Aerosolized pentamidine as primary prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: efficacy, mortality and morbidity

Comparative efficacy and safety of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis regimens for people living with HIV: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is a common opportunistic infection among people living with HIV (PWH), particularly among new and untreated cases. Several regimens are available for the prophylaxis of PCP, including trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), dapsone-based regimens (DBRs), aerosolized pentamidine (AP), and atovaquone.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of PCP prophylaxis regimens in PWH by network meta-analysis.

METHODS

DATA SOURCES: Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL from inception to June 21, 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Comparative randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

PARTICIPANTS

PWH.

INTERVENTIONS

Regimens for PCP prophylaxis either compared head-to-head or versus no treatment/placebo.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs 2.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Title or abstract and full-text screening and data extraction were performed in duplicate by two independent reviewers. Data on PCP incidence, all-cause mortality, and discontinuation due to toxicity were pooled and ranked by network meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses of primary versus secondary prophylaxis, by year, and by dosage were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 26 RCTs, comprising 55 treatment arms involving 7516 PWH were included. For the prevention of PCP, TMP-SMX was ranked the most favourable agent and was superior to DBRs (risk ratio [RR] = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36-0.83) and AP (RR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0.77). TMP-SMX was also the only agent with a mortality benefit compared with no treatment/placebo (RR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98). However, TMP-SMX was also ranked as the most toxic agent with a greater risk of discontinuation than DBRs (RR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.54) and AP (7.20; 95% CI, 5.37-9.66). No significant differences in PCP prevention or mortality were detected among the other regimens. The findings remained consistent within subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

TMP-SMX is the most effective agent for PCP prophylaxis in PWH and the only agent to confer a mortality benefit; consequently, it should continue to be recommended as the first-line agent. Further studies are necessary to determine the optimal dosing of TMP-SMX to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity.

Colorectal cancer screening in human immunodeficiency virus population: Are they at average risk?

AIM: To evaluate if human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) population is getting adequate screening for colon cancer in the highly active anti-retroviral treatment (HAART) era with improved longevity, and the prevalence of polyps and adenomas in this population, when compared with the general population.

METHODS: We conducted retrospective chart review of average-risk HIV population for colon cancer attending our infectious disease clinic. Individuals who underwent diagnostic colonoscopy were excluded. We extracted various demographic, HIV disease-specific and colonoscopy data including histo-pathological reports in the last 10 years. Total population was divided into a study group, who underwent screening colonoscopy and a control group who did not. We analyzed data using standard statistical methods and software.

RESULTS: We found that 25% of average-risk HIV-infected population was screened for colon cancer using colonoscopy. There was no difference in gender and ethnic distribution between the groups. We found wider distribution of age (50-84 years with mean 56 years) in the control group when compared to (50-73 years with mean 58 years) the study group. However, there were 89% of subjects with well-controlled HIV disease measured by HIV RNA copies of < 75 in the study group when compared with 70% in the control group (P < 0.0001). We noticed polyp detection rate of 55% and adenoma detection rate of 32% in HIV population.

CONCLUSION: It is unclear whether HIV or HAART medications play a role in increased prevalence of adenomas. We suggest that when estimating the risk for colonic neoplasms, HIV population should be considered as a high-risk group and screened accordingly.

Quantifying the risks and benefits of efavirenz use in HIV-infected women of childbearing age in the USA

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to quantify the benefits (life expectancy gains) and risks (efavirenz-related teratogenicity) associated with using efavirenz in HIV-infected women of childbearing age in the USA.

METHODS

We used data from the Women's Interagency HIV Study in an HIV disease simulation model to estimate life expectancy in women who receive an efavirenz-based initial antiretroviral regimen compared with those who delay efavirenz use and receive a boosted protease inhibitor-based initial regimen. To estimate excess risk of teratogenic events with and without efavirenz exposure per 100,000 women, we incorporated literature-based rates of pregnancy, live births, and teratogenic events into a decision analytic model. We assumed a teratogenicity risk of 2.90 events/100 live births in women exposed to efavirenz during pregnancy and 2.68/100 live births in unexposed women.

RESULTS

Survival for HIV-infected women who received an efavirenz-based initial antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen was 0.89 years greater than for women receiving non-efavirenz-based initial therapy (28.91 vs. 28.02 years). The rate of teratogenic events was 77.26/100,000 exposed women, compared with 72.46/100,000 unexposed women. Survival estimates were sensitive to variations in treatment efficacy and AIDS-related mortality. Estimates of excess teratogenic events were most sensitive to pregnancy rates and number of teratogenic events/100 live births in efavirenz-exposed women.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of non-efavirenz-based initial ART in HIV-infected women of childbearing age may reduce life expectancy gains from antiretroviral treatment, but may also prevent teratogenic events. Decision-making regarding efavirenz use presents a trade-off between these two risks; this study can inform discussions between patients and health care providers.

Pharmaceuticals and worker productivity loss: a critical review of the literature

Many chronic illnesses that affect the working population can cause losses in productivity. The extent to which these productivity losses can be reduced by pharmacological treatment is of particular interest to employers, who bear the productivity costs and subsidize the cost of employees' health care. In the past several years, the effects of pharmaceuticals on productivity losses have been tested in numerous studies, including randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. In this article, we summarize and critically review these studies and, where appropriate, provide quantitative overviews. The evidence is very good for about a dozen drug classes that pharmaceuticals reduce productivity losses caused by respiratory illnesses (ie, asthma, allergic disorders, bronchitis, upper respiratory infections, and influenza) diabetes, depression, dysmenorrhea, and migraine. We also discuss the calculation of productivity costs, reductions in which may partially or completely offset the costs of treatment. This information should be helpful to occupational physicians who are increasingly providing recommendations on employer benefit plan designs and pharmaceutical benefits.

Prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: who are we missing?

OBJECTIVE

To obtain population-based information on the characteristics of persons who were not receiving chemoprophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) by examining the use of primary and secondary PCP prophylaxis among San Francisco residents whose AIDS-defining opportunistic illness was PCP in 1993.

DESIGN

Retrospective medical record review.

SETTING

Medical charts were obtained from San Francisco hospitals and outpatient facilities at which AIDS patients received their initial AIDS diagnosis.

PARTICIPANTS

San Francisco residents whose AIDS-defining opportunistic illness was PCP in 1993.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Use of primary and secondary PCP prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Of the 326 eligible patients, 35% received primary PCP prophylaxis. Non-whites were significantly less likely to have received primary PCP prophylaxis than white patients [22 versus 40%, respectively; odds ratio (OR), 0.49; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.28-0.87]. Uninsured individuals-were also less likely to have received primary PCP prophylaxis than those with insurance (18 versus 41%; OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.73). The sociodemographic characteristics of patients who did and did not receive secondary PCP prophylaxis did not differ significantly. The most frequently cited reasons for not receiving primary PCP prophylaxis were that patients were unaware of their infection with HIV or were not receiving regular medical care.

CONCLUSIONS

Barriers to receipt of PCP prophylaxis exist and are resulting in cases of preventable disease and unnecessary medical costs. Interventions to increase counseling, testing, and referral to medical care for persons at high risk for HIV infection are needed.

Primary care of the HIV patient: standard practice and new developments in the era of managed care

It is easy when taking care of the patient with AIDS to lose sight of the whole person and become focused on the details of micromanagement, distracted by the array of new therapies, and overwhelmed by the financial risks of the disease. It is therefore critical that a healing and respectful relationship is developed with patients and they are engaged in the decisions regarding their care. Physicians must also continue the search for new therapies and struggle to ensure that patients have access to state-of-the-art treatment. In this, the primary care physician plays a critical role, through identifying study centers, becoming an investigator in expanded access programs, and using referrals to clinical trials to provide new therapies to patients and improve understanding of HIV treatment. Finally, quality of life must be at the forefront of physicians' medical conscience. Ultimately, the physician must know when the best treatment he of she can offer is the assurance of a dignified and comfortable death.

A rapid and simple nested PCR assay for the detection of Pneumocystis carinii in sputum samples

Detection of Pneumocystis carinii by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), based on the thymidylate synthase (TS) gene of rat P. carinii, is a specific and sensitive method for the detection of the parasite in respiratory samples. However, the use of the method is limited by a laborious phenol-chloroform DNA extraction method and an expensive and time-consuming hybridization procedure. For routine clinical samples, DNA preparation can be simplified and hybridization substituted by a nested PCR technique. Such a modified PCR procedure, based on the TS gene of P. carinii, was evaluated on 190 induced sputum samples from 50 immunosuppressed patients, infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), with and without symptoms of P. carinii pneumonia (PCP). The PCR assay, preceded by a rapid DNA preparation (Wizard DNA Clean-up), detected P. carinii-DNA in 13/15 sputa containing parasites as seen by microscopy using immunocytochemical (IFL) staining, and in 10 additional sputum samples lacking demonstrable parasites by microscopy. These samples are to be considered as 'true' positives, since all but 2 were from patients, who developed a PCP within 1 year. We conclude that the nested PCR assay is more sensitive than IFL for the detection of P. carinii in AIDS patients, prior to the debut of PCP symptoms.