Steady-state dopamine clearance in critically ill infants and children

Clinical Trials in Hemodynamic Support: Past, Present, and Future

Managing low blood flow states in the preterm population remains a challenge in neonatal clinical care. The heterogeneity of the trials to date and the relatively low number of infants enrolled, in addition to a desire to oversimplify the underlying pathophysiology, have contributed to an inability to draw meaningful conclusions to direct clinical care. This article reviews the current literature on this topic in the preterm population and outlines the challenges that have been encountered in performing such trials. Alternative studies are proposed, based on the lessons learned over the past number of years.

Dopamine plasma clearance is increased in piglets compared to neonates during continuous dopamine infusion

AIM

Piglets models have often been used to study the effects of dopamine infusion on hypotension in neonates. However, piglets need higher doses of dopamine than neonates to increase blood pressure. We investigated whether this difference was due to interspecific difference in dopamine pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

Arterial blood samples were drawn from six neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of Copenhagen University Hospital and 20 newborn piglets during continuous dopamine infusion. Furthermore, to estimate the piglet plasma dopamine half-life, blood samples were drawn at 2.5-minute intervals after the dopamine infusion was discontinued. The plasma dopamine content was analysed by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection.

RESULTS

The dopamine displayed first-order kinetics in piglets and had a half-life of 2.5 minutes, while the median plasma clearance was 627.9 mL/kg/minute (interquartile range 452.6-1914.4). Both piglets and neonates showed large interindividual variations in plasma clearance, but the median tended to be lower in neonates (384.9, interquartile range 114.2-480.2 mL/kg/minute).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that pharmacokinetic differences may explain the interspecific difference in required doses of dopamine infusion to increase blood pressure. This is important when translating the results obtained in piglet models to treating neonatal hypotension with dopamine.

A meta-analysis of low-dose dopamine in heart failure

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is a major health problem worldwide with no proven therapy. Low-dose dopamine (LDD) has been applied to patients with HF to enhance diuresis and preserve renal function since the last century. However, the efficacy of LDD in HF has been questioned by several studies recently. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to appraise the effects of the LDD to HF.

METHODS

Relative trials were identified in the PubMed, The Web of Science, OVID EBM Reviews and Cochrane databases, and the relevant papers were examined. Pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated by random effects models. The primary endpoints in our meta-analysis were renal function, determined by blood urea, creatinine levels, eGFR and urine output. Secondary endpoints were rates of all-cause mortality and readmission after treatment.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one retrospective study involving 587 patients were included in this analysis. LDD enhanced eGFR (MD, 7.44; 95% CI, 1.92-12.95; P=0.008), urine output (SMD, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.15-1.01; P=0.008) and decrease creatinine levels (MD, -0.36; 95% CI, -0.64/-0.08; P=0.004), blood urea (MD, -6.97; 95% CI, -13.12/-0.81; P=0.03). No statistically significant differences in the rates of mortality (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.62-1.20, P=0.37) and readmission (RR: 0.86; 95% CI 0.47-1.56, P=0.62) were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

LDD indeed brought benefits in terms of promoting diuresis and preserving renal function for HF patients. It did not demonstrate statistical significance in rates of readmission nor mortality. The efficacy of LDD to HF patients should be confirmed by further large, high quality clinical trials.

Renal-Dose Dopamine: From Hypothesis to Paradigm to Dogma to Myth and, Finally, Superstition?

Acute renal failure (ARF) is common in the critically ill and is associated with a high mortality rate. Its pathogenesis is not understood. Because animal models use ischemia to induce experimental ARF, there is the widespread belief that lack of blood flow is responsible for ARF. Low-dose dopamine (LDD) has been shown to increase renal blood flow in animal and in human volunteers. Thus, it has been administered to humans for almost 3 decades in the belief that it would lead to renal arterial vasodilation and increase renal blood flow (RBF). However, the etiology of ARF in critical illness is likely multifactorial, and the contribution of hypovolemia and reduced renal perfusion is unknown. Furthermore, interindividual variation in the pharmacokinetics of dopamine typically results in poor correlation between blood levels and administered dose, making accurate and reliable delivery of LDD difficult. Finally, dopamine is a proximal tubular diuretic that increases Na+ delivery to tubular cells, thus increasing their oxygen demands. Accordingly, even if LDD were able to preferentially increase RBF, there is no guarantee that it would restore renal parenchymal oxygen homeostasis. More important, 2 meta-analyses and a large double-blind, prospective, multiple-center, randomized controlled trial have failed to demonstrate that dopamine protects the kidney in critically ill patients with ARF. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of renal-dose dopamine in the intensive care unit.

Diagnosis and management of hypotension in neonates

The diagnosis and management of hypotension in neonates is a frequently encountered issue in the intensive care setting. There is an ongoing debate as to the appropriateness of blood pressure monitoring as an indicator of organ perfusion and tissue hypoxia. These ultimately determine morbidity and mortality in the sick newborn. This article explores the methods available for the assessment of organ perfusion and speculates on other means that may become available in the future. Different modalities of treatment currently in use are discussed, with the aim of using information gained from perfusion monitoring techniques to determine the optimal choice of therapy.

Low-dose aminophylline for the treatment of neonatal non-oliguric renal failure-case series and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Aminophylline is a methylxanthine with multiple physiologic actions. At low doses, aminophylline can antagonize adenosine and improve renal function via increased glomerular filtration rate. Despite its clinical use, little data exists in neonates for this indication. Therefore, the objective of this report is to describe the impact of aminophylline on renal function indices in a series of neonates with acute renal failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of 13 neonates with acute renal failure who received aminophylline during a 15-month study period. Aminophylline was administered at 1 mg/kg intravenously or orally every twelve hours. Forty-six percent (n = 6) of the patients received a 5 mg/kg loading dose before initiation of maintenance therapy. Most patients had already received other treatments for renal failure, including diuretics and dopamine.

RESULTS

Resolution of acute renal failure (with normalization of serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen) was documented in 10 patients (77%). Four of the thirteen patients died from complications due to their prematurity. Failure of low-dose aminophylline was observed in 3 of the 4 patients who died.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose aminophylline in neonates with acute renal failure is associated with an improvement in renal function indices.

What is the right dose of epinephrine?

OBJECTIVE

To review the findings and discuss implications of studies on high-dose epinephrine (0.1 mg/kg) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in children.

DESIGN

A critical appraisal of "A Comparison of High-Dose and Standard-Dose Epinephrine in Children with Cardiac Arrest" by Perondi et al. (N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1722-1730), with literature review.

FINDINGS

Retrospective studies investigating the use of high-dose epinephrine during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation demonstrate conflicting results with respect to return of spontaneous circulation and survival. The randomized controlled trial by Perondi et al. demonstrates decreased survival with the use of high-dose epinephrine and no difference in return of spontaneous circulation when compared with the standard dose.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no benefit from the use of high-dose epinephrine in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation. There is potential harm from such dosing. The cumulative evidence against the use of high-dose epinephrine during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation is strong.

The case against renal dose dopamine in the pediatric intensive care unit

The use of dopamine for the treatment of renal insufficiency has become a controversial issue. Dopamine exerts its effects on the kidneys through activity on the catecholamine receptors and by its diuretic and natriuretic properties. Utilization of renal dose dopamine to increase renal blood flow has been considered beneficial for preservation of renal function for over 30 years. The hypothesis proposed was that increasing urine volume must indicate improving renal function, particularly in oliguric patients. However, recent clinical trials in adult and pediatric patients have not only failed to demonstrate any benefit, but have also suggested that this therapy may actually have detrimental effects. This article reviews basic pharmacology and physiologic effects and the potential adverse effects of "renal dose dopamine." It also examines the results of clinical trials, in both pediatric and adult patients, that evaluated its usefulness for the treatment of renal insufficiency.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dopamine and norepinephrine in critically ill head-injured patients

OBJECTIVE

To explore the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dopamine and norepinephrine.

DESIGN

Prospective, controlled, trial.

SETTING

Neurosciences critical care unit.

PATIENTS

Eight patients with a head injury, requiring dopamine or norepinephrine infusions to support cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP).

INTERVENTION

Patients received in randomised order, either dopamine or norepinephrine to achieve and maintain a CPP of 70 mmHg, and then, following a 30-min period of stable haemodynamics, a CPP of 90 mmHg. Data were then acquired using the second agent. Haemodynamic measurements were made during each period and a blood sample was obtained at the end of each study period for analysis of plasma catecholamine concentrations

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Plasma levels of norepinephrine and dopamine were significantly related to infusion rates but did not have a simple linear relationship to haemodynamic parameters. However, there was a significant quadratic relationship between the infusion rate of dopamine and cardiac index (r2=0.431), and systemic vascular resistance index (r2=0.605), with a breakpoint (at which cardiac index reduced and SVRI increased) at a dopamine plasma level of approximately 50 nM/l (corresponding to an infusion rate of approximately 15 microg.kg(-1).min(-1)).

CONCLUSIONS

Norepinephrine and dopamine have predictable pharmacokinetics; however, those of dopamine do not fit a simple first-order kinetic model. The pharmacodynamic effects of dopamine and norepinephrine show much inter-individual variability and unpredictability. Plasma levels of dopamine appear to relate to variations in adrenergic receptor effects with break points that reflect expectations from infusion-rate related pharmacodynamics.

Treatment of hypotension in newborns

Systemic hypotension is a common complication of preterm birth affecting approximately one-third of very low-birthweight infants. There is considerable variation between neonatal units in the reported prevalence of hypotension, the threshold for therapeutic intervention and the nature of any cardiovascular support offered. Systemic hypotension is associated with adverse long-term neurodevelopmental outcome. The majority of preterm infants with hypotension have a normal or high left ventricular output, with low systemic vascular resistance often associated with a haemodynamically significant ductal shunt. Historically, volume expansion, dopamine and dobutamine have been the agents most commonly used to treat hypotension. Some hypotensive preterm infants have low cortisol levels, and corticosteroids are being used increasingly to prevent or treat hypotension in these babies.

Bad medicine: low-dose dopamine in the ICU

Low-dose dopamine administration (ie, doses < 5 microg/kg/min) has been advocated for 30 years as therapy in oliguric patients on the basis of its action on dopaminergic renal receptors. Recently, a large, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial has demonstrated that low-dose dopamine administered to critically ill patients who are at risk of renal failure does not confer clinically significant protection from renal dysfunction. In this review, we present the best evidence and summarize the effects of low-dose dopamine infusion in critically ill patients. We review the history and physiology of low-dose dopamine administration and discuss the reasons why dopamine is not clinically effective in the critically ill. In addition to the lack of renal efficacy, we present evidence that low-dose dopamine administration worsens splanchnic oxygenation, impairs GI function, impairs the endocrine and immunologic systems, and blunts ventilatory drive. We conclude that there is no justification for the use of low-dose dopamine administration in the critically ill.

Kinetic interactions of dopamine and dobutamine with human catechol-O-methyltransferase and monoamine oxidase in vitro

Dopamine and dobutamine are often infused together into acutely ill patients requiring temporary support of cardiac and renal function, but whether these catecholamines affect the metabolic clearance of each other is not established. We determined the kinetics of dopamine and dobutamine as substrates and inhibitors of each other, i.e., apparent V(max), K(m), and K(i), with crude preparations of human blood mononuclear cell catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and platelet monoamine oxidase (MAO) at pH 7.4 and 37 degrees C. Values of V(max) for dopamine and dobutamine as substrates for COMT were 0.45 and 0.59 nmol of 3-O-methyl product formed per milligram of protein per minute, whereas those for K(m) were 0.44 and 0.05 mM, respectively. Dopamine and dobutamine were competitive inhibitors of each other in this reaction. The K(i) for dopamine as an inhibitor of dobutamine methylation was 1.5 mM, whereas that for dobutamine as an inhibitor of dopamine methylation was 0.015 mM. Dopamine but not dobutamine was a substrate for MAO. The V(max) for dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde formation from dopamine was 0.29 nmol/mg protein/min and the K(m) for dopamine was 0.38 mM. Dobutamine was a noncompetitive inhibitor of dopamine oxidation in this reaction (K(i) congruent with 1.19 mM). The high apparent K(m) and K(i) values derived for dopamine and dobutamine when tested with these two human enzymes in vitro suggest that these catecholamines do not interfere with the metabolism of each other when both are infused together at therapeutic concentrations.

Low-dose "renal" dopamine

Low dose renal dopamine continues to be infused in patients at risk for renal dysfunction or as a therapy after acute renal failure has been established. This article reviews the impact of acute renal failure on patients and reviews the history and use of dopamine therapy for patients. A discussion of the rationale, positive and equivocal evidence, side effects, and possible clinical indications for low-dose renal dopamine therapy is included.

Diuretic therapy of heart failure in infants and children

Diuretics are the mainstay of traditional therapy for congestive heart failure. The syndrome of heart failure is now understood to involve complex interactions of neurohumoral substances released in response to poor cardiac function. Developmental changes during infancy and childhood will affect both the activation of systemic neurohumoral responses and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic actions of diuretics. Few human studies directly evaluate the efficacy of diuretic therapy in heart failure in adults. The pharmacodevelopmental aspects of diuretic therapy in infants and children are also incompletely studied. This review will describe the kidney's role in the pathogenesis of sodium and water retention in heart failure and the developmental changes in the kidney related to fluid retention. Known principles of diuretic therapy in congestive heart failure will be described. All these factors can then be used by the reader to evaluate the role of diuretic therapy in the complex syndrome of heart failure in infants and children.

Effects of drugs on glucose measurements with handheld glucose meters and a portable glucose analyzer

Thirty drugs used primarily in critical care and hospital settings were tested in vitro to observe interference on glucose measurements with 6 hand-held glucose meters and a portable glucose analyzer. Paired differences of glucose measurements between drug-spiked samples and unspiked control samples were calculated to determine bias. A criterion of +/- 6 mg/dL was used as the cutoff for interference. Ascorbic acid interfered with the measurements on all glucose devices evaluated. Acetaminophen, dopamine, and mannitol interfered with glucose measurements on some devices. Dose-response relationships help assessment of drug interference in clinical use. High dosages of these drugs may be given to critically ill patients or self-administered by patients without medical supervision. Package inserts for the glucose devices may not provide adequate warning information. Hence, we recommend that clinicians choose glucose devices carefully and interpret results cautiously when glucose measurements are performed during or after drug interventions.

Dopamine versus dobutamine for hypotensive preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Inotropes are widely used in preterm infants to treat systemic hypotension. The most commonly used drugs are dopamine and dobutamine. These agents have different modes of action which may result in different haemodynamic effects.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness and safety of dopamine and dobutamine in the treatment of systemic hypotension in preterm infants.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The standard search method of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used. Searches of electronic and other databases were performed. Previous reviews were searched for references to relevant trials and leading authors in the field were contacted for information about other published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials where short and/or long term effects of treatment with dopamine and dobutamine for the treatment of systemic arterial hypotension were compared were selected for this review. Trials studying newborn infants born before 37 completed weeks gestation and less than 28 days of age were eligible for inclusion. Systemic arterial hypotension was not defined specifically, but accepted as defined in individual studies. Studies were not limited by birthweight, lower gestational age threshold or by route or duration of administration of inotropic agents. Study quality and eligibility were assessed independently by each reviewer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The standard method of the Cochrane Collaboration described in the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook was used to perform this systematic review. Data extraction was performed independently by each reviewer, with differences being resolved by discussion. The following outcomes were determined: mortality in the neonatal period, long term neurodevelopmental outcome, radiological evidence of severe neurological injury, short term haemodynamic changes and incidence of adverse effects. The effect of interventions is expressed either as Relative Risk (RR), Risk Difference (RD) or as Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) with their 95% Confidence Interval (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials met the pre-defined criteria for inclusion in this review. There was no evidence of a significant difference between dopamine and dobutamine in terms of neonatal mortality (RD 0.02 95% CI -0.12 to 0.16), incidence of periventricular leukomalacia (RD -0.08, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.04), or severe periventricular haemorrhage (RD -0.02, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.09). Dopamine was more successful than dobutamine in treating systemic hypotension, with fewer infants having treatment failure (RD -0.29, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.17; NNT = 3.5, 95% CI 2.4 to 5.9). There was no evidence of a significant difference in change in left ventricular output when dopamine was compared with dobutamine (WMD -83 ml/kg/min, 95% CI -174 to 8 ml/kg/min). There was no evidence of a significant difference between the two agents with respect to the incidence of tachycardia (RD -0.06, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.14). None of the studies reported the incidence of adverse long term neurodevelopmental outcome.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Dopamine is more effective than dobutamine in the short term treatment of systemic hypotension in preterm infants. There was no evidence of an effect on the incidence of adverse neuroradiological sequelae (severe periventricular haemorrhage and/or periventricular leucomalacia), or on the incidence of tachycardia. However, in the absence of data confirming long term benefit and safety of dopamine compared to dobutamine, no firm recommendations can be made regarding the choice of drug to treat hypotension.

Can the use of low-dose dopamine for treatment of acute renal failure be justified?

The use of dopamine for the prevention and treatment of acute renal failure is widespread. Its use is based on physiology suggesting selective renal vasodilation when it is infused at low dose. This article reviews the available data on the clinical use of dopamine. When used to prevent acute renal failure in high-risk treatments there is no evidence of benefit of dopamine but, given the low incidence of significant renal failure, the studies are underpowered. In treatment of acute renal failure, the quality of the data is poor. Only in one small randomised trial of moderate acute renal failure in patients with malaria was a clinically significant benefit of dopamine shown. The rest of the data, in the form of case series, showed either no benefit of dopamine or small benefits of little clinical significance. Again, these studies are of insufficient power for conclusions to be drawn as to the overall benefits and risks. We conclude that benefits of dopamine use cannot be ruled out by currently available data but its use cannot be advised until trials examining clinically important endpoints in large numbers of patients have been performed.

Pharmacokinetics of Catecholamines During Hemofiltration in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND: Continuous hemofiltration is used in pediatric patients with acute renal failure. Many of these patients are treated with catecholamines for hemodynamic instability. The authors studied the pharmacokinetics of dopamine and dobutamine on patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three critically ill pediatric patients with acute renal failure and cardiovascular instability treated with hemofiltration and intravenous infusion of dopamine and/or dobutamine were entered into the study. Blood samples were drawn at steady-state levels from the arterial port (inflow) of the hemofilter, from the venous port (outflow) of the hemofilter, and from the ultrafilter. Sixteen (n = 16) pharmacokinetic measurements were made, six (n = 6) for dopamine and 10 (n = 10) for dobutamine. The clearance of dopamine by the hemofilter was 0.078 +/- 0.011 mL/kg/min, and for dobutamine it was 0.036 +/- 0.008 mL/kg/min. On the average, 0.56% of the dopamine dose and 0.13% of the dobutamine dose was removed by the hemofilter. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of dopamine and dobutamine at the dosage range of 5-25 µg/kg/min are not altered by continuous hemofiltration. Relative to total plasma clearance, negligible amounts of the drug were removed. The dosage of these catecholamines need not be adjusted during continuous hemofiltration.

The effects of low-dose dopamine infusions on haemodynamic and renal parameters in patients with septic shock requiring treatment with noradrenaline

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether low-dose dopamine (LDD) has a significant effect on systemic haemodynamic variables and renal function when used in conjunction with high-dose noradrenaline in optimally volume-resuscitated patients with septic shock.

DESIGN

A prospective clinical study in which each patient acted as his/her own control.

SETTING

Teaching hospital Intensive Care Unit.

PATIENTS

Twenty-one patients with septic shock treated with high-dose noradrenaline were studied, 17 patients completed the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Fluid loading to an optimal left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) whilst on more noradrenaline than 10 mcg/min and dopamine of 2.5 mcg/kg per min. Three study periods each of 2 h with LDD present, withdrawn and restarted. During each period a complete haemodynamic profile and measurement of urine flow rate, creatinine clearance and sodium excretion was performed.

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

Removing and restarting LDD caused marked changes in cardiac index (CI, 17% fall, p < 0.01: 23% rise, p < 0.01), stroke volume (SV, 11% fall, p < 0.05: 14% rise, p < 0.05) and systolic blood pressure (SBP, 11% fall, p < 0.05: 14% rise, p < 0.05). Urine volume fell by 40% (p < 0.05) when dopamine was withdrawn. Significant reductions in sodium excretion (p < 0.05) and fractional sodium excretion (p < 0.05) also occurred on stopping LLD. Changes in creatinine clearance were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose dopamine causes significant increases in SBP SV, cardiac output and urine flow during treatment with noradrenaline.

Pharmacokinetics of drugs used in critically ill adults

Critically ill patients exhibit a range of organ dysfunctions and often require treatment with a variety of drugs including sedatives, analgesics, neuromuscular blockers, antimicrobials, inotropes and gastric acid suppressants. Understanding how organ dysfunction can alter the pharmacokinetics of drugs is a vital aspect of therapy in this patient group. Many drugs will need to be given intravenously because of gastrointestinal failure. For those occasions on which the oral route is possible, bioavailability may be altered by hypomotility, changes in gastrointestinal pH and enteral feeding. Hepatic and renal dysfunction are the primary determinants of drug clearance, and hence of steady-state drug concentrations, and of efficacy and toxicity in the individual patient. Oxidative metabolism is the main clearance mechanism for many drugs and there is increasing recognition of the importance of decreased activity of the hepatic cytochrome P450 system in critically ill patients. Renal failure is equally important with both filtration and secretion clearance mechanisms being required for the removal of parent drugs and their active metabolites. Changes in the steady-state volume of distribution are often secondary to renal failure and may lower the effective drug concentrations in the body. Failure of the central nervous system, muscle, the endothelial system and endocrine system may also affect the pharmacokinetics of specific drugs. Time-dependency of alterations in pharmacokinetic parameters is well documented for some drugs. Understanding the underlying pathophysiology in the critically ill and applying pharmacokinetic principles in selection of drug and dose regimen is, therefore, crucial to optimising the pharmacodynamic response and outcome.

Sulfoconjugation and renal excretion contribute to the interpatient variation of exogenous catecholamine clearance in critically ill children

OBJECTIVE

To delineate the contributions of sulfoconjugation, renal excretion, and patient age to the wide interpatient variability in exogenous dobutamine and dopamine plasma clearance.

DESIGN

Simultaneous plasma free and sulfoconjugated dobutamine and/or dopamine, respective urine free catecholamine, and serum creatinine were determined on stable critically ill children receiving unchanged continuous infusions of dobutamine and/or dopamine for at least 1 hr. Free dobutamine and dopamine clearance rates were calculated.

SETTING

Pediatric and neonatal intensive care units in university settings.

PATIENTS

Forty-seven stable critically ill neonates and children.

INTERVENTIONS

Continuous infusions of dobutamine and/or dopamine: nine patients received dopamine only, 27 patients received dobutamine only, and 11 patients received both simultaneously.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Fractions of plasma dobutamine and dopamine sulfoconjugated were 0.73 +/- 0.05 and 0.76 +/- 0.05, respectively. Free plasma dobutamine and dopamine clearances were 102 +/- 15 mL/kg/min and 250 +/- 38 mL/kg/min, respectively. Linear regression analyses demonstrated relationships of the fraction of plasma dobutamine and dopamine sulfoconjugated to the respective free plasma clearances (r2 = .30, p < .01, and r2 = 0.29, p < .01, respectively), and, more impressively, to the natural logarithm of the respective free plasma clearances (r2 = 0.58, p < .001, and r2 = 0.39, p < .01). Patients with serum creatinine concentrations >2 mg/dL had lower free plasma dobutamine and dopamine clearance rates than those patients with serum creatinine of <2 mg/dL (6 +/- 1 vs. 107 +/- 15 mL/kg/min for dobutamine and 40 +/- 38 vs. 270 +/- 39 mL/kg/min for dopamine, respectively, p < .05 for both by Mann-Whitney U test). No relationship was noted between free catecholamine clearance and age.

CONCLUSION

Sulfoconjugation and renal excretion are important determinants of the wide interpatient variability in plasma free dobutamine and dopamine clearance rates.

Pharmacology of pediatric resuscitation

The resuscitation of children from cardiac arrest and shock remains a challenging goal. The pharmacologic principles underlying current recommendations for intervention in pediatric cardiac arrest have been reviewed. Current research efforts, points of controversy, and accepted practices that may not be most efficacious have been described. Epinephrine remains the most effective resuscitation adjunct. High-dose epinephrine is tolerated better in children than in adults, but its efficacy has not received full analysis. The preponderance of data continues to point toward the ineffectiveness and possible deleterious effects of overzealous sodium bicarbonate use. Calcium chloride is useful in the treatment of ionized hypocalcemia but may harm cells that have experienced asphyxial damage. Atropine is an effective agent for alleviating bradycardia induced by increased vagal tone, but because most bradycardia in children is caused by hypoxia, improved oxygenation is the intervention of choice. Adenosine is an effective and generally well-tolerated agent for the treatment of supraventricular tachycardia. Lidocaine is the drug of choice for ventricular dysrhythmias, and bretylium, still relatively unexplored, is in reserve. Many pediatricians use dopamine for shock in the postresuscitative period, but epinephrine is superior. Most animal research on cardiac arrest is based on models with ventricular fibrillation that probably are not reflective of cardiac arrest situations most often seen in pediatrics.

Alterations in dopamine clearance and catechol-O-methyltransferase activity by dopamine infusions in children

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) in the biodisposition of pharmacologic concentrations of dopamine.

DESIGN

The study was an open-label dose escalation trial in which dopamine was employed as the sole exogenous catecholamine. The dosage was adjusted to achieve improvements in cardiac output or to augment renal function.

SETTING

A 16-bed pediatric intensive care unit serving both medical and surgical patients.

PATIENTS

The study was performed using 14 dopamine-treated and five untreated control patients. Children ranged in age from 16 days to 12 yrs; five of the treated patients and two of the untreated controls were female. All but one of the study patients were enrolled within 24 hrs of palliative or corrective surgery for congenital heart disease. Control patients had noncardiac surgical procedures. Both treated and control groups were similar with respect to severity of illness, as judged by Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System score.

INTERVENTIONS

All treated patients received dopamine as a continuous intravenous infusion. Infusion rates were determined by caregivers and ranged from 3.0 to 20 micrograms/kg/min.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Serial, timed blood samples were obtained from patients and control subjects for the determination of plasma dopamine concentrations and for the determination of mononuclear cell COMT activity. Measured rates of dopamine infusion (3.0 to 18.3 micrograms/kg/min) were consistently less than the nominal rates (3.0 to 20.0 micrograms/kg/min) of infusion (p < .0001) due in part to calculations based on the hydrochloride salt rather than dopamine base. At similar steady-state infusion rates, plasma dopamine concentrations varied over a four-fold range, with steady-state concentrations at even the lowest infusion rate exceeding endogenous concentrations by at least ten-fold. Variations in steady-state plasma dopamine concentration reflected large age-associated variations in dopamine clearance, which was found to be saturable at concentrations of > 200 ng/mL. Mononuclear cell COMT activity was assessed simultaneously in these patients. Baseline COMT activity varied over a six-fold range and was unrelated to dopamine clearance or patient age. COMT activity increased two- to six-fold in dopamine-treated patients with plasma steady-state dopamine concentrations of > 100 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate marked age and concentration-dependent differences in dopamine clearance that account for large interindividual differences in the steady-state plasma dopamine concentrations in patients receiving similar infusion rates. While concomitant variability in COMT activity is observed, the lack of correlation between dopamine clearance and COMT activity suggests that COMT is not rate-limiting for the clearance of exogenously administered dopamine.

A randomized, blinded trial of high-dose epinephrine versus standard-dose epinephrine in a swine model of pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether high-dose epinephrine administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a swine pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest model improves outcome (i.e., resuscitation rate, survival rate, and neurologic function) compared with standard-dose epinephrine.

DESIGN

A randomized, blinded study.

SETTING

A large animal cardiovascular laboratory at a university.

SUBJECTS

Thirty domestic piglets (3 to 4 months of age) were randomized to receive standard-dose epinephrine (0.02 mg/kg) or high-dose epinephrine (0.2 mg/kg) during CPR after 10 mins of cardiac standstill with loss of aortic pulsation after endotracheal tube clamping.

INTERVENTIONS

Two minutes of CPR were provided, followed by advanced pediatric life support. Successfully resuscitated animals were supported in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting for 2 hrs and then observed for 24 hrs.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Electrocardiogram, thoracic aortic blood pressure, and right atrial blood pressure were monitored continuously until the intensive care period ended. Survival rate and neurologic outcome were determined. Return of spontaneous circulation was obtained in 13 of 15 high-dose epinephrine piglets vs. ten of 15 standard-dose epinephrine piglets (p < .20). Four of 13 high-dose piglets died in the ICU period after initial resuscitation vs. 0 of ten standard-dose piglets (p < or = .05). Nine high-dose piglets survived 2 hrs vs. ten standard-dose piglets. Three piglets in each group survived for 24 hrs, but all were severely neurologically impaired. Two minutes after resuscitation, piglets treated with high-dose epinephrine had higher heart rates (210 +/- 24 vs. 189 +/- 40 beats/min, p < .05) and higher aortic diastolic pressures (121 +/- 39 vs. 74 +/- 40 mm Hg, p < .01). Within 10 mins of return of spontaneous circulation, severe tachycardia (> 240 beats/min) was more frequently noted in the high-dose group than in the standard-dose group (p < .05). All four high-dose piglets that died in the ICU period experienced ventricular fibrillation within 10 mins of return of spontaneous circulation.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose epinephrine did not improve 2-hr survival rate, 24-hr survival rate, or neurologic outcome. High-dose epinephrine resulted in severe tachycardia and hypertension immediately after resuscitation and in a higher mortality rate immediately after resuscitation.

Pharmacokinetics of cardiovascular drugs in children. Inotropes and vasopressors

Infants and children with congenital or acquired heart disease and children with systemic disease often require pharmacological support of their failing circulation. Catecholamines may serve as inotropic (enhance myocardial contractility) or vasopressor (elevate systemic vascular resistance) agents. Noncatecholamine inotropic agents, such as the cardiac glycosides or the bipyridines, may be used in place of, or in addition to, catecholamines. Developmental changes in neonates, infants and children will affect the response to inotropic or pressor therapy. Maturation of the gastrointestinal tract, liver and kidneys alters absorption, metabolism and elimination of drugs, although there are few clear examples of this among the vasoactive drugs considered in this review. Changes in body composition affect the volume of distribution (Vd) and clearance (CL) of drugs. Developmentally based pharmacodynamic differences also affect the responses to both therapeutic and toxic effects of inotropes. These pharmacodynamic differences are based in part upon developmental changes in myocardial structure, cardiac innervation and adrenergic receptor function. For example, the immature myocardium has fewer contractile elements and therefore a decreased ability to increase contractility; it also responds poorly to standard techniques of manipulating preload. Available data suggest that dopamine and dobutamine pharmacokinetics are similar to those in adults. Wide interindividual variability has been noted. A consistent relationship between CL and age has not been demonstrated, although one investigator demonstrated an almost 2-fold increase in the CL of dopamine in children under the age of 2 years. The CL of dopamine appears to be reduced in children with renal and hepatic failure. Fewer data are available regarding the pharmacokinetics of epinephrine (adrenaline), norepinephrine (noradrenaline) and isoprenaline (isoproterenol). Digoxin pharmacokinetics have been extensively evaluated in infants and children. The Vd for digoxin is increased in infants and children. Children beyond the neonatal period display increased CL of digoxin, approaching adult values during puberty. Although it was previously thought that children both needed and tolerated higher serum concentrations of digoxin than adults, more recent studies indicate that adequate clinical response can be achieved with serum concentrations similar to those aimed for in adults, with decreased toxicity. Evaluation of studies of digoxin pharmacokinetics is complicated by the presence of an endogenous substance with digoxin-like activity on radioimmunoassay. Limited studies of amrinone pharmacokinetics in infants and children indicate a dramatically larger Vd, and a decreased elimination half-life in older infants and children, compared with values observed in adults.

Dopamine and renal salvage in the critically ill patient

Dopamine is a catecholamine used widely in critically ill patients and those undergoing major surgery, often as a 'renal protective' agent. Direct renal vasodilatation with 'low-dose' dopamine is the widely accepted basis for its use--hence the term 'renal dose' dopamine. However, recent evidence has revealed that the renal effects of this agent are far more complex. Moreover, some of these effects may be undesirable in the 'at-risk' kidney. The increased renal blood flow (RBF) of dopamine may be largely attributable to its inotropic (myocardial) action, even with low doses (i.e. less than 5 micrograms/kg/min). Similar increases in RBF can also be demonstrated with other (non-dopaminergic) inotropes. The early evidence for direct renal vasodilatation in response to dopamine has been brought into question by more recent research. The diuresis and natriuresis commonly seen following dopamine administration is now known to be due to a direct renal tubular (or 'diuretic') action. Furthermore, increasing knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of acute (ischaemic) renal failure, including RBF and the concept of 'oxygen supply and demand' in relation to tubular function, suggests that dopamine may mask important signs of renal ischaemia. Whether or not dopamine is truly beneficial to renal function currently remains unanswered. As it stands however, there is sufficient evidence to question its routine use in the setting of renal dysfunction in the critically ill patient.

Dopamine pharmacokinetics in critically ill newborn infants

Dopamine is frequently used in critically ill newborn infants for treatment of shock and cardiac failure, but its pharmacokinetics has not been evaluated using a specific analytical method. Steady-state arterial plasma concentrations of dopamine were measured in 11 seriously ill infants receiving dopamine infusion, 5-20 micrograms.kg-1.min-1, for presumed or proven sepsis and hypotensive shock. Steady-state concentrations of dopamine ranged from 0.013-0.3 microgram/ml. Total body clearance averaged 115 ml.kg-1.min-1. The apparent volume of distribution and elimination half life averaged 1.8 l.kg-1 and 6.9 min, respectively. No relationship was observed between dopamine pharmacokinetics and gestational age, postnatal age or birthweight. Substantial interindividual variation was seen in dopamine pharmacokinetics in seriously ill infants, and plasma concentrations could not be predicted accurately from its infusion rate. Marked variation in clearance explains in part, the wide dose requirements of dopamine needed to elicit clinical response in critically ill newborn infants.

Pharmacokinetics of dopamine in critically ill newborn infants

Dopamine pharmacokinetics was investigated in 14 critically ill newborn infants ranging from 27 to 43 weeks of gestational age and from 0.9 to greater than 4 kg birth weight. Plasma clearance rate was determined from dopamine levels during controlled infusions under actual clinical conditions. Dopamine was administered in stepwise increasing doses up to 8 micrograms/kg/min. Dopamine concentration and dopamine clearance rate were determined from duplicate samples drawn during each infusion in each patient. Steady-state plasma dopamine concentrations and plasma clearance rates were observed within 20 minutes at each infusion. Plasma dopamine concentration ranged from 0.5 ng/ml before infusion to almost 70 ng/ml at an infusion rate of 4 to 8 micrograms/kg/min. There was a linear correlation between infusion rate and plasma dopamine concentration (r = 0.68, p less than 0.001). Neither plasma dopamine concentration nor infusion rate had a significant effect on clearance rate. These data are consistent with first-order kinetics for administered dopamine in critically ill neonates over the range of concentrations studied.

Dopamine and dobutamine in pediatric therapy

Dopamine hydrochloride is widely used to increase blood pressure, cardiac output, urine output, and peripheral perfusion in neonates, infants, and older children with shock and cardiac failure. Its pharmacologic effects are dose dependent, and at low, intermediate, and high dosages include dilation of renal, mesenteric, and cerebral vasculature; inotropic response in the myocardium; and increases in peripheral and renal vascular resistance, respectively. The inotropic response is diminished in neonates compared with older children and adults due to maturational differences in norepinephrine stores. The clearance of dopamine varies widely in the pediatric population, depending on age. Its elimination half-life is approximately 2 minutes in full-term neonates and older children, and may be as long as 4-5 minutes in preterm infants. Due to immaturity of the autonomic nervous system, the drug may produce some adverse respiratory responses at high dose in neonates, the most common being tachycardia and cardiac arrhythmias. Dobutamine resembles dopamine chemically and is an analog of isoproterenol. It is relatively cardioselective at dosages used in clinical practice, with its main action being on beta 1-adrenergic receptors. Unlike dopamine, it does not have any effect on specific dopaminergic receptors. Dobutamine is used to increase cardiac output in infants and children with circulatory failure. Its elimination half-life is about 2 minutes in adults and older children. No information is available about its pharmacokinetics in neonates and infants. Adverse effects such as an increase in heart rate usually occur at high dosages.