An open trial of clozapine in 11 adolescents with childhood-onset schizophrenia

Low Dose Clozapine in Early Onset Resistant Schizophrenia: Case Report and Two Year Follow-up

Childhood-onset schizophrenia (COS) is considered a rare and severe form of schizophrenia, with onset before age 13 and only half of affected patients responding to nonclozapine antipsychotics.¹ These patients with resistant COS show favorable responses to clozapine, but with higher adverse effects than seen in adults. Some resistant cases respond at a lower dose with minimal adverse effects.² However, it is unclear which patients will respond to a low dose and how long one should wait before increasing the dose of clozapine. We report a patient with resistant COS who showed a favorable but delayed-onset response to low-dose clozapine.

Thirty years of research on negative symptoms of schizophrenia: A scientometric analysis of hotspots, bursts, and research trends

Research on negative symptoms of schizophrenia has received renewed interest since the 1980s. A scientometric analysis that objectively maps scientific knowledge, with changes in recent trends, is currently lacking. We searched the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) on December 17, 2021 using relevant keywords. R-bibliometrix and CiteSpace were used to perform the analysis. We retrieved 27,568 references published between 1966 and 2022. An exponential rise in scientific interest was observed, with an average annual growth rate in publications of 16.56% from 1990 to 2010. The co-cited reference network that was retrieved presented 24 different clusters with a well-structured network (Q=0.7921; S=0.9016). Two distinct major research trends were identified: research on the conceptualization and treatment of negative symptoms. The latest trends in research on negative symptoms include evidence synthesis, nonpharmacological treatments, and computational psychiatry. Scientometric analyses provide a useful summary of changes in negative symptom research across time by identifying intellectual turning point papers and emerging trends. These results will be informative for systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and generating novel hypotheses.

Clozapine for Management of Childhood and Adolescent-Onset Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Schizophrenia at a young age deserves investigation because of the greater severity and burden of illness on individuals and health care than its adult onset. For this study, we included both childhood-onset schizophrenia and early-onset schizophrenia. We used the common term "childhood and adolescent-onset schizophrenia (CAOS)" for either type. This systematic review provides an overview of the clinical use, efficacy, and safety of clozapine treatment in managing CAOS. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO databases. We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), open-label studies (OLSs), review articles, meta-analytic and observational studies. Our literature search resulted in 1242 search results. After the title, abstract, and full article review, 18 studies qualified (double-blind RCTs n = 4; OLS n = 4; observational studies n = 7; case reports n = 3). Results: Clozapine use in CAOS was generally well tolerated and not associated with any fatalities. Clozapine use in the short term (6 weeks) and long term (2-9 years) was superior in efficacy than other antipsychotics in CAOS management. Improvement in overall symptoms was maintained during long-term follow-up over the years in OLSs. Clozapine appeared to have a favorable clinical response and shorter hospital stays. Sedation and hypersalivation were commonly reported (90%), constipation was next in frequency (13%-50%). Neutropenia was seen in 6%-15% of cases and agranulocytosis (<0.1%). Although weight gain was common (up to 64%), followed by metabolic changes (8%-22%), treatment-onset diabetes was less frequent (<6%). Akathisia, tachycardia, and blood pressure changes were less commonly seen. Conclusions: Limited studies indicate that clozapine is a safe and efficacious option for CAOS management. We need large-scale and well-designed long-term RCTs for the use of clozapine in the management of CAOS.

The side effect profile of Clozapine in real world data of three large mental health hospitals

OBJECTIVE

Mining the data contained within Electronic Health Records (EHRs) can potentially generate a greater understanding of medication effects in the real world, complementing what we know from Randomised control trials (RCTs). We Propose a text mining approach to detect adverse events and medication episodes from the clinical text to enhance our understanding of adverse effects related to Clozapine, the most effective antipsychotic drug for the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but underutilised due to concerns over its side effects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We used data from de-identified EHRs of three mental health trusts in the UK (>50 million documents, over 500,000 patients, 2835 of which were prescribed Clozapine). We explored the prevalence of 33 adverse effects by age, gender, ethnicity, smoking status and admission type three months before and after the patients started Clozapine treatment. Where possible, we compared the prevalence of adverse effects with those reported in the Side Effects Resource (SIDER).

RESULTS

Sedation, fatigue, agitation, dizziness, hypersalivation, weight gain, tachycardia, headache, constipation and confusion were amongst the highest recorded Clozapine adverse effect in the three months following the start of treatment. Higher percentages of all adverse effects were found in the first month of Clozapine therapy. Using a significance level of (p< 0.05) our chi-square tests show a significant association between most of the ADRs and smoking status and hospital admission, and some in gender, ethnicity and age groups in all trusts hospitals. Later we combined the data from the three trusts hospitals to estimate the average effect of ADRs in each monthly interval. In gender and ethnicity, the results show significant association in 7 out of 33 ADRs, smoking status shows significant association in 21 out of 33 ADRs and hospital admission shows the significant association in 30 out of 33 ADRs.

CONCLUSION

A better understanding of how drugs work in the real world can complement clinical trials.

A Retrospective Investigation of Clozapine Treatment in Autistic and Nonautistic Children and Adolescents in an Inpatient Clinic in Turkey

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective study is to examine the clinical outcomes and safety of clozapine in children and adolescents with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders/autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or affective disorders.

METHODS

The inpatient and outpatient files of all children and adolescents treated with clozapine over a period of 34 months (from October 2011 to July 2014) were reviewed. Demographic and clinical data were examined to describe clinical and metabolic findings, dosing, and tolerability of clozapine treatment in youth with schizophrenia, other psychotic disorders, ASD, or bipolar disorder.

RESULTS

The 37 pediatric patients included 26 patients with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders, 7 patients with ASD complicated by schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders or affective disorders, and 4 patients with ASD only. In all groups (n = 37) there was a significant reduction (p < 0.001) in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) points after clozapine treatment during the inpatient period (38.78 ± 27.75 days). In patients with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders co-occurring with ASD or not (n = 31), there was a significant improvement in psychotic symptoms according to Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores and subscores (p < 0.001). Of the 26 patients with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders, 8 (30.8%) showed a positive response (>30% symptom reduction on BPRS). In patients with ASD complicated by schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders or bipolar disorders (n = 7), there was a significant reduction (p = 0.017) in BPRS scores after clozapine treatment. The discontinuation rate for clozapine was 10.8%, and the most frequently observed side effect was hypersalivation (54.1%). Neutropenia associated with clozapine was observed in only one patient (2.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine seems to be effective and safe in children and adolescents with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders co-occuring with ASD or not. There is a need for further studies for determining the efficacy of clozapine in children and adolescents with bipolar affective disorder or ASD.

Relationship between clozapine dose, serum concentration, and clinical outcome in children and adolescents in clinical practice

Information on dose- and concentration-related clinical effects of clozapine treatment in children and adolescents is scarce. This study aimed to examine the relationship between dose, serum concentration, and clinical outcome as well as the influencing factors thereof in paediatric patients treated with clozapine. Data from a routine Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) service between 2004 and 2014 were studied in 68 patients, aged 11-18 years. Severity of illness, therapeutic effectiveness and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were assessed by standardized means. A relationship between the daily dose (mean 319 mg, 4.9 mg/kg) and serum concentration (mean 387 ng/ml) of clozapine was found with the variation in dose explaining 30 % of the variability in clozapine serum concentrations. Also gender contributed to the variability, however, no influence of age or concomitant medications was detected. Furthermore, a significant association was found between clozapine serum concentration and the occurrence of ADRs. Patients without ADRs had a lower mean serum concentration than those with mild (261.4 vs 407.3 ng/ml, P = 0.018) and moderate ADRs (261.4 vs 416.3 ng/ml, P = 0.028). As clozapine was estimated to be effective in lower blood concentrations, guidance on a possibly lower therapeutic range of clozapine serum levels in paediatric patients is provided. With ADRs increasing under higher concentrations, TDM is strongly recommended in paediatric clozapine therapy for individualized dosing. Dose adjustment in females also might be reasonable according to gender-related differences in serum concentrations. However, regarding the limitations of this study results should be validated in larger studies with more standardized designs.

Antipsychotics use in children and adolescents: An on-going challenge in clinical practice

Antipsychotic medications (APs) are a well-established pharmacological treatment in adults with serious mental health problems. However, many adult mental health disorders have their origins and onset in childhood or adolescence. The understanding that neuropsychiatric conditions of childhood are in part biologically determined, led to an increase in the number of clinical trials supporting evidence on the efficacy of antipsychotic agents as first-line treatment for childhood psychotic disorders and therapeutic augmentation of nonpsychotic conditions. In recent years the use of antipsychotics in children and adolescents for neurodevelopmental, behavioural and psychiatric disorders has significantly increased while the age of prescription has decreased. These trends have not been matched by advances in the understanding of APs' safety profile in this group of patients. It is therefore crucial that current and future practice is informed by up-to-date synthesis of the evidence and clinical guidelines about the use and monitoring of these treatments in paediatric populations, since the effectiveness of early therapeutic interventions in children can affect positively the long-term outcome.

Antipsychotics in children and adolescents with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective:

To systematically review the efficacy and tolerability data of antipsychotics in children and adolescents with schizophrenia.

Materials and Methods:

Pubmed, Google scholar and Psych Info were searched to identify studies published in peer-reviewed English language journals. All studies evaluating the efficacy of antipsychotics in children and adolescents with schizophrenia and having 3 or more participants were included. Of the studies identified, only randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Data was analysed using effect size calculation as per Cohen's d. Fifty published studies were identified which reported use of antipsychotics in children and adolescents with schizophrenia. Of these, 15 randomized controlled studies were included in meta-analysis.

Results:

Evidence suggests that both first generation antipsychotics (FGA) and second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are better than placebo (effect size [ES] 2.948, confidence interval [CI] 1.368 to 4.528, sample size 31; and ES 0.454, CI 0.414 to 0.542, sample size 1308 respectively). However, FGAs seemed to be inferior to SGAs (ES -0.363, CI -0.562 to -0.163, sample size of 243) and clozapine is superior to all other antipsychotics (ES 0.848, CI 0.748 to 0.948, and sample size 85) in treatment of schizophrenia in children and adolescents. The extrapyramidal side effects are more common with FGAs while metabolic adverse effects are more common with SGAs.

Conclusion:

FGAs and SGAs are effective in the treatment of children and adolescents with schizophrenia. Clozapine apparently is the most effective antipsychotic in this condition.

Atypical antipsychotics for psychosis in adolescents

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia often presents in adolescence, but current treatment guidelines are based largely on studies of adults with psychosis. Over the past decade, the number of studies on treatment of adolescent-onset psychosis has increased. The current systematic review collates and critiques evidence obtained on the use of various atypical antipsychotic medications for adolescents with psychosis.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of atypical antipsychotic medications in adolescents with psychosis. We reviewed in separate analyses various comparisons of atypical antipsychotic medications with placebo or a typical antipsychotic medication or another atypical antipsychotic medication or the same atypical antipsychotic medication but at a lower dose.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Register (October 2011), which is based on regular searches of BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. We inspected references of all identified studies and contacted study authors and relevant pharmaceutical companies to ask for more information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared atypical antipsychotic medication with placebo or another pharmacological intervention or with psychosocial interventions, standard psychiatric treatment or no intervention in children and young people aged 13 to 18 years with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, acute and transient psychoses or unspecified psychosis. We included studies published in English and in other languages that were available in standardised databases.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Review authors AK and SSD selected the studies, rated the quality of the studies and performed data extraction. For dichotomous data, we estimated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a fixed-effect model. When possible, for binary data presented in the 'Summary of findings' table, we calculated illustrative comparative risks. We summated continuous data using the mean difference (MD). Risk of bias was assessed for included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 13 RCTs, with a total of 1112 participants. We found no data on service utilisation, economic outcomes, behaviour or cognitive response. Trials were classified into the following groups. 1. Atypical antipsychotics versus placebo: Only two studies compared one atypical antipsychotic medication with placebo. In one study, the number of non-responders treated with olanzapine was not different from the number treated with placebo (1 RCT, n = 107, RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.10); however, significantly more (57% vs 32%) people left the study early (1 RCT, n = 107, RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.87) from the placebo group compared with the olanzapine group. With regard to adverse effects, young people treated with aripiprazole had significantly lower serum cholesterol compared with those given placebo (1 RCT, n = 302, RR 3.77, 95% CI 1.88 to 7.58). 2. Atypical antipsychotics versus typical antipsychotics: When the findings of all five trials comparing atypical antipsychotic medications with a typical antipsychotic medication were collated, no difference in the mean end point Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) score was noted between the two arms (5 RCTs, n = 236, MD -1.08, 95% CI -3.08 to 0.93). With regard to adverse effects, the mean end point serum prolactin concentration was much higher than the reference range for treatment with risperidone, olanzapine and molindone in one of the studies. However, fewer adolescents who were receiving atypical antipsychotic medications left the study because of adverse effects (3 RCTs, n = 187, RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.15) or for any reason (3 RCTs, n = 187, RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.97).3. One atypical antipsychotic versus another atypical antipsychotic: The mean end point BPRS score was not significantly different for people who received risperidone compared with those who received olanzapine; however, the above data were highly skewed. Overall no difference was noted in the number of people leaving the studies early because of any adverse effects between each study arm in the three studies comparing olanzapine and risperidone (3 RCTs, n = 130, RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.44 to 3.04). Specific adverse events were not reported uniformly across the six different studies included in this section of the review; therefore it was difficult to do a head-to-head comparison of adverse events for different atypical antipsychotic medications.4. Lower-dose atypical antipsychotic versus standard/higher-dose atypical antipsychotic: Three studies reported comparisons of lower doses of the atypical antipsychotic medication with standard/higher doses of the same medication. One study reported better symptom reduction with a standard dose of risperidone as compared with a low dose (1 RCT, n = 257, RR -8.00, 95% CI -13.75 to -2.25). In another study, no difference was reported in the number of participants not achieving remission between the group receiving 10 mg/d and those who received 30 mg/d of aripiprazole (1 RCT, n = 196, RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.48). Similarly in the other study, authors reported no statistically significant difference in clinical response between the two groups receiving lower-dose (80 mg/d) and higher-dose (160 mg/d) ziprasidone, as reflected by the mean end point BPRS score (1 RCT, n = 17, MD -4.40, 95% CI -19.20 to 10.40).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No convincing evidence suggests that atypical antipsychotic medications are superior to typical medications for the treatment of adolescents with psychosis. However, atypical antipsychotic medications may be more acceptable to young people because fewer symptomatic adverse effects are seen in the short term. Little evidence is available to support the superiority of one atypical antipsychotic medication over another, but side effect profiles are different for different medications. Treatment with olanzapine, risperidone and clozapine is often associated with weight gain. Aripiprazole is not associated with increased prolactin or with dyslipidaemia. Adolescents may respond better to standard-dose as opposed to lower-dose risperidone, but for aripiprazole and ziprasidone, lower doses may be equally effective. Future trials should ensure uniform ways of reporting.

Systematic review of the efficacy and tolerability of clozapine in the treatment of youth with early onset schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

The use of clozapine (CLZ) for treatment-resistant schizophrenia is well established in adults. However, it is seldom used in youth with early onset schizophrenia (EOS) largely because of lack of clarity about its risk benefit ratio. This review synthesises and evaluates available evidence regarding the efficacy and tolerability of CLZ in EOS with the aim to assist clinical decision-making.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the primary literature on the clinical efficacy and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) observed during CLZ treatment in EOS. We also identified relevant practice guidelines and summarised current guidance.

RESULTS

CLZ showed superior efficacy than other antipsychotics in treating refractory EOS patients; short-term clinical trials suggest an average improvement of 69% on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale that was sustained during long-term follow-up (up to 9 years). No fatalities linked to CLZ treatment were reported. Sedation and hypersalivation were the most common complaints, reported by over 90% of patients. Other common ADRs (reported in 10-60% of patients) were enuresis, constipation, weight gain, and non-specific EEG changes. Less common ADRs (reported in 10-30% of patients) were akathisia, tachycardia and changes in blood pressure. Neutropenia was reported in 6-15% of cases but was usually transient while agranulocytosis was rare (<0.1%). Seizures were also uncommon (<3%). Metabolic changes were relatively common (8-22%) but emergent diabetes was not frequently observed (<6%). Overall the rate of discontinuation was low (3-6%). Current guidelines recommend the use of CLZ in EOS patients who have failed to respond to two adequate trials with different antipsychotics and provide detailed schedules of assessments to evaluate and assess potential ADRs both prior to initiation and throughout CLZ treatment.

CONCLUSION

Available data although limited in terms of number of studies are consistent in demonstrating that CLZ is effective and generally safe in the treatment of refractory EOS provided patients are regularly monitored.

Hematological and cardiometabolic safety of clozapine in the treatment of very early onset schizophrenia: a retrospective chart review

OBJECTIVE

There are very few studies in the literature regarding clozapine use in children <13 years of age. In this retrospective chart review, we compared the safety of clozapine--as determined by hematological and cardiometabolic changes - to that of non-clozapine antipsychotics used in the treatment of childhood-onset schizophrenia (COS).

METHODS

The clozapine treatment group (CTG) consisted of 17 COS patients (mean age 10.4 ± 2 years) who were hospitalized in a psychiatric ward between the years 2005 and 2012. The control group consisted of 19 COS patients (mean age 10.1 ± 1.4 years) who were hospitalized in the same ward during the same time period, and were treated with non-clozapine antipsychotics. A retrospective chart review was conducted. Hematological (white blood cells, absolute neutrophil count [ANC], red blood cells, platelets), metabolic (aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, triglycerides, total cholesterol, bilirubin) and cardiac (heart rate) values were extracted from the medical charts.

RESULTS

The average follow-up periods for the CTG and the control group were 332.9 ± 200.5 days and 291.7 ± 157 days, respectively. In the CTG, moderate neutropenia (ANC<1500/mm(3)) and mild neutropenia (1500/mm(3)<ANC<2000/mm(3)) were observed in two children (12%) and one child (6%), respectively. The neutropenia was transient in all cases. Treatment with clozapine was permanently discontinued only in one child (6%). There were no cases of agranulocytosis or severe infection in the CTG. In the control group, two children (11%) showed hematological abnormalities. Hyperlipidemia was observed in one child (6%) in the CTG at release from the hospital. Significantly more children (47%) in the CTG had tachycardia (heart rate>100 beats per minute) at release from the hospital, compared with only one child (5%) in the control group (p=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that clozapine use in very early onset schizophrenia is safe. Although hematological adverse effects did occur in our study, the rates were not much higher than those seen in the control group. We found that the hematological abnormalities in the CTG were mostly transient, and that treatment with clozapine can be safely continued or renewed.

Twenty-four months of antipsychotic treatment in children and adolescents with first psychotic episode: discontinuation and tolerability

OBJECTIVE

The Child and Adolescent First-Episode Psychosis Study is a longitudinal study of early-onset first psychotic episodes. This report describes the naturalistic psychopharmacological treatment administered during a 24-month follow-up period, as well as discontinuation rates, reasons for discontinuation, and adverse effects.

METHODS

The sample comprised 110 patients, aged 9 to 17 years, with a first psychotic episode. Pharmacological treatment, changes, reasons for discontinuation, and the UKU (Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser) Side Effect Rating Scale were registered at 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Second-generation antipsychotics, especially risperidone, quetiapine, and olanzapine, were the most commonly used. The discontinuation rate was 44.5% at 6 months, 59.1% at 12 months, and 70.9% at 24 months. Discontinuation rates or reasons for discontinuation (adverse reaction, insufficient response, and other) did not differ significantly between antipsychotics. At 6 months, significant differences were found in body mass index increase and body mass index z score increase, which were higher with olanzapine, and in neurological effects, which were higher with risperidone; at 12 and 24 months, these differences were no longer significant. High maintenance rates were found in the clozapine group, although they had higher scores on the autonomic subscale of the UKU.

CONCLUSIONS

A long follow-up period reveals high discontinuation rates similar to those observed in adults, particularly during the first year. No differences were found between antipsychotics. Differences in adverse effects were found at 6 months but not subsequently after changes in treatment. Clozapine had a high maintenance rate, and its tolerability was comparable to that of other antipsychotics.

Empirical evidence for psychopharmacologic treatment in early-onset psychosis and schizophrenia

Psychotic symptoms presenting in youth can be clinically complex and require that a child and adolescent psychiatrist use significant skill in making a diagnosis and initiating treatment. There are a number of illnesses to rule out before making a diagnosis of early-onset schizophrenia in particular. Psychosis in youth has significant associated morbidity and places high demands not only on families but also on the medical and educational systems. More effective pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments for psychosis are needed. Nonpharmacologic therapies targeting relatively treatment-resistant domains of dysfunction such as neurocognition are also necessary as adjunctive treatments to our extant pharmacologic agents.

Clozapine versus typical neuroleptic medication for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Long-term drug treatment of schizophrenia with typical antipsychotics has limitations: 25 to 33% of patients have illnesses that are treatment-resistant. Clozapine is an antipsychotic drug, which is claimed to have superior efficacy and to cause fewer motor adverse effects than typical drugs for people with treatment-resistant illnesses. Clozapine carries a significant risk of serious blood disorders, which necessitates mandatory weekly blood monitoring at least during the first months of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of clozapine compared with typical antipsychotic drugs in people with schizophrenia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

For the current update of this review (March 2006) we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All relevant randomised clinical trials (RCTs).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis, based on a fixed-effect model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) again based on a fixed-effect model.

MAIN RESULTS

We have included 42 trials (3950 participants) in this review. Twenty-eight of the included studies are less than 13 weeks in duration, and, overall, trials were at significant risk of bias. We found no significant difference in the effects of clozapine and typical neuroleptic drugs for broad outcomes such as mortality, ability to work or suitability for discharge at the end of the study. Clinical improvements were seen more frequently in those taking clozapine (n=1119, 14 RCTs, RR 0.72 CI 0.7 to 0.8, NNT 6 CI 5 to 8). Also, participants given clozapine had fewer relapses than those on typical antipsychotic drugs (n=1303, RR 0.62 CI 0.5 to 0.8, NNT 21 CI 15 to 49). BPRS scores showed a greater reduction of symptoms in clozapine-treated patients, (n=1145, 16 RCTs, WMD -4.22 CI -5.4 to -3.1), although the data were heterogeneous (Chi(2) 0.0001, I(2) 66%). Short-term data from the SANS negative symptom scores favoured clozapine (n=196, 5 RCTs, WMD -5.92 CI -7.8 to -4.1). We found clozapine to be more acceptable in long-term treatment than conventional antipsychotic drugs (n=982, 16 RCTs, RR 0.60 CI 0.5 to 0.7, NNT 15 CI 12 to 20). Blood problems occurred more frequently in participants receiving clozapine (3.2%) compared with those given typical antipsychotics (0%) (n=1031, 13 RCTs, RR 7.09 CI 2.0 to 25.6). Clozapine participants experienced more drowsiness, hypersalivation, or temperature increase, than those given conventional neuroleptics. However, clozapine patients experienced fewer motor adverse effects (n=1433, 18 RCTs, RR 0.58 CI 0.5 to 0.7, NNT 5 CI 4 to 6).The clinical effects of clozapine were more pronounced in participants resistant to typical neuroleptics in terms of clinical improvement (n=370, 4 RCTs, RR 0.71 CI 0.6 to 0.8, NNT 4 CI 3 to 6) and symptom reduction. Thirty-four per cent of treatment-resistant participants had a clinical improvement with clozapine treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine may be more effective in reducing symptoms of schizophrenia, producing clinically meaningful improvements and postponing relapse, than typical antipsychotic drugs - but data are weak and prone to bias. Participants were more satisfied with clozapine treatment than with typical neuroleptic treatment. The clinical effect of clozapine, however, is, at least in the short term, not reflected in measures of global functioning such as ability to leave the hospital and maintain an occupation. The short-term benefits of clozapine have to be weighed against the risk of adverse effects. Within the context of trials, the potentially dangerous white blood cell decline seems to be more frequent in children and adolescents and in the elderly than in young adults or people of middle-age.The existing trials have largely neglected to assess the views of participants and their families on clozapine. More community-based long-term randomised trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of clozapine on global and social functioning as trials in special groups such as people with learning disabilities.

Long-term sustained benefits of clozapine treatment in refractory early onset schizophrenia: a retrospective study in Korean children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

Treatment resistance in early onset schizophrenia (EOS) is one of the most challenging problems in child and adolescent psychiatry. We retrospectively examined the therapeutic dosage, clinical response, and side effect profiles of long-term clozapine treatment in Korean children and adolescents with refractory EOS or very early onset schizophrenia (VEOS).

METHOD

26 refractory patients treated with clozapine for more than 1 year were analyzed. Efficacy was determined by comparing hospitalization rate and duration, before and after clozapine treatment. Tolerability was assessed through review of documented adverse events.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in hospital days per year was observed in 25 (96.2%) patients after clozapine treatment compared to before clozapine. Long-term benefit of the treatment was supported by a further reduction of the hospitalization rate in 14 patients treated with clozapine for more than 3 years. Neutropenia developed in 26.9% patients at 1 year and there was no agranulocytosis. Overall, eight male patients (8/12, 66.7%) and one female patient (1/14, 7%) developed neutropenia and out of the nine patients, seven patients were maintained and two patients were successfully rechallenged on clozapine.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that long-term clozapine treatment may effectively reduce the amount of time Asian patients with refractory EOS or VEOS spend in the hospital. However careful monitoring of adverse events is required.

Weight gain in children and adolescents during 45 weeks treatment with clozapine, olanzapine and risperidone

The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term weight gain associated with clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone treatment and its clinical risk factors in children and adolescents. At four child and adolescent psychiatric departments, the weight and body mass index of initially hospitalized patients (aged 9.0-21.3 years) treated with clozapine (n = 15), olanzapine (n = 8), and risperidone (n = 10) were prospectively monitored for 45 weeks. Clinical risk factors (age, gender, baseline weight, dosage, drug-naivety) were tested for their association with weight gain in the three groups. All three groups experienced significant weight gain between baseline and endpoint. The absolute and percentage average weight gains were significantly higher for the olanzapine group (16.2 +/- 8.8 kg; 30.1 +/- 18.9%) than for the clozapine (9.5 +/- 10.4 kg; 14.8 +/- 15.8%) and the risperidone (7.2 +/- 5.3 kg; 11.5 +/- 6.0%) groups. Olanzapine is associated with extreme long-term weight gain in children and adolescents that, in addition, is much higher than that expected in adults. Clozapine and risperidone are associated with a less marked weight gain in children and adolescents but also much higher than that expected in adults. These differences may affect compliance with medication and health risk.

Antipsychotic treatment in child and adolescent first-episode psychosis: a longitudinal naturalistic approach

OBJECTIVE

The Child and Adolescent First-Episode Psychosis Study (CAFEPS) is a naturalistic longitudinal study of early-onset first psychotic episodes. This report describes the antipsychotic treatment during the first year and compares the most frequently used agents after 6 months.

METHODS

Participants were 110 patients, aged 9-17 years, with a first psychotic episode attended consecutively at six different centers. The Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), Disability Assessment Schedule (DAS), and Global Assessment of Function (GAF) scales were administered at baseline and at 6 months and the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser (UKU) Side Effects Rating Scale only at 6 months.

RESULTS

Diagnoses at baseline were 38.2% psychotic disorder not otherwise specified, 39.1% schizophrenia-type disorder, 11.8% depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, and 10.9% bipolar disorder, manic episode with psychotic symptoms. The most frequently used antipsychotic agents were risperidone (n = 50), quetiapine (n = 18), and olanzapine (n = 16). Patients who were prescribed olanzapine or quetiapine had more negative and general symptoms. Using the baseline score as covariate, no significant differences were found in the reductions on any scale in patients treated with risperidone, quetiapine, or olanzapine for 6 months. Weight increase was greater with olanzapine than with risperidone (p = 0.020) or quetiapine (p = 0.040). More neurological side effects appeared with risperidone than with olanzapine (p = 0.022). All side effects were mild or moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Second-generation antipsychotics, especially risperidone, quetiapine, and olanzapine, are the most used in our context in first psychotic episodes in children and adolescents. These three obtain similar clinical improvement, but differ in their side effects.

Glycopyrrolate for treatment of clozapine-induced sialorrhea in three adolescents

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this case study was to report preliminary data on the effectiveness and tolerability of glycopyrrolate for the treatment of clozapine-induced sialorrhea, or excessive flow of saliva, in an adolescent population.

METHOD

Three adolescent females (age 13-16), who developed sialorrhea secondary to clozapine treatment, received an open-label trial of glycopyrrolate (4-8 mg) during inpatient hospitalization for treatment-resistant psychotic illness.

RESULTS

The target symptom of sialorrhea was improved in all three cases, with patient self-reports of decreased production of saliva confirmed by staff observation. Glycopyrrolate was generally well tolerated by the patients. One patient reported constipation, which improved with symptomatic treatment. A second patient reported dry mouth, which improved with a reduction in dose of glycopyrrolate.

CONCLUSIONS

These three cases provide support for the potential effectiveness and tolerability of glycopyrrolate for clozapine-induced sialorrhea in adolescents. Further controlled studies are required to determine the safety, efficacy and tolerability of glycopyrrolate in this age group and in adults for clozapine-induced sialorrhea.

Efficacy and tolerability of second-generation antipsychotics in children and adolescents with schizophrenia

Early-onset schizophrenia-spectrum (EOSS) disorders (onset of psychotic symptoms before 18 years of age) represent a severe variant associated with significant chronic functional impairment and poor response to antipsychotic treatment. All drugs with proven antipsychotic effects block dopamine D(2) receptors to some degree. The ongoing development of the dopamine and other neurotransmitter receptor systems during childhood and adolescence may affect clinical response and susceptibility to side effects in youth. A literature search was conducted of clinical trials of antipsychotics in children and adolescents with EOSS disorders between 1980 and 2007 from the Medline database, reference lists, and conference proceedings. Trials were limited to double-blind studies of duration of 4 or more weeks that included 15 or more patients. Ten clinical trials were identified. Antipsychotic medications were consistently found to reduce the severity of psychotic symptoms in children and adolescents when compared with placebo. The superiority of clozapine has been now demonstrated relative to haloperidol, standard-dose olanzapine, and "high-dose" olanzapine for EOSS disorders. However, limited comparative data are available regarding whether there are differences among the remaining second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in clinical effectiveness. The available data from short-term studies suggest that youth might be more sensitive than adults to developing antipsychotic-related adverse side effects (eg, extrapyramidal side effects, sedation, prolactin elevation, weight gain). In addition, preliminary data suggest that SGA use can lead to the development of diabetes in some youth, a disease which itself carries with it significant morbidity and mortality. Such a substantial risk points to the urgent need to develop therapeutic strategies to prevent and/or mitigate weight gain and diabetes early in the course of treatment in this population.

Clozapine treatment of childhood-onset schizophrenia: evaluation of effectiveness, adverse effects, and long-term outcome

OBJECTIVE

Clozapine is a unique atypical antipsychotic with superior efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Plasma concentration of clozapine and its major metabolite N-desmethylclozapine (NDMC) as well as the ratio of NDMC to clozapine have been reported to be predictors of clozapine response. Here we evaluate these as well as other measures in an effort to find predictors of response to clozapine in our early-onset treatment-refractory population.

METHOD

Fifty-four children and adolescents participated in double-blind (n = 22) or open-label (n = 32) clozapine trials. Clinical evaluations took place at baseline, week 6 on clozapine, and at 2- to 6-year follow-up. The data were analyzed in relation to demographics, age at onset, IQ, clozapine dose, and plasma concentrations of prolactin, clozapine, NDMC, and NDMC/clozapine ratio. Stepwise regression and correlation analyses were performed to find predictors of treatment response.

RESULTS

Clinical improvement after 6 weeks of clozapine treatment, as measured by the percentage of improvement on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, was strongly associated with the NDMC/clozapine ratio at the 6-week time point (Pearson correlation coefficient: r = 0.41; p < .01 for Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and r = 0.43; p < .01 for Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms). Although the rate of side effects was higher than that typically found in the adult population, it did not appear to be related to clozapine dose, clozapine or NDMC plasma concentrations, or NDMC/clozapine ratio. Outcome at long-term follow-up, as measured by Children's Global Assessment Scale, was associated with lesser illness severity at baseline and with greater improvement during the initial 6 weeks of clozapine treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The NDMC/clozapine ratio may be a valuable predictor of response to clozapine and may suggest new approaches to clozapine treatment.

Antipsychotic medication for childhood-onset schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Childhood-onset schizophrenia is schizophrenia with onset prior to the age of 13 years. Although it is rare, people who suffer from schizophrenia at an early age appear to have a clinically severe form of the illness with poor long-term prognosis. Antipsychotic medication is one way of managing this rare but serious mental illness.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of antipsychotic medication for childhood-onset schizophrenia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (November 2006 and February 2007), inspected references of all identified studies for further trials and contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies and authors of trials for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised clinical trials involving children and young people with a diagnosis of childhood onset schizophrenia (i.e. with a diagnosis of schizophrenia before the age of 13) comparing any antipsychotic drug with another antipsychotic or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We reliably selected, quality assessed and extracted data from trials. We excluded data where more than 50% of participants in any group were lost to follow up. For homogenous dichotomous data we calculated random effects, relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) and, where appropriate, number needed to treat (NNT) on an intention-to-treat basis. For normal continuous data we calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD).

MAIN RESULTS

From a total of 2062 citations, we identified six relevant trials. We categorised trials into three comparisons: atypical versus typical, atypical versus atypical and typical versus typical antipsychotic drugs. The only comparison to find any differences between treatment groups was atypical versus typical antipsychotic drugs. A few results from one study favoured the atypical antipsychotic clozapine over haloperidol in treating treatment resistant childhood-onset schizophrenia (n=21, WMD CGAS 17.00 CI 7.74 to 26.26; n=21, WMD Bunney-Hamburg Psychosis Rating Scale -3.60 CI -6.64 to -0.56). Participants on clozapine, however, were three times more likely to have drowsiness (1 RCT, n=21, RR 3.30 CI 1.23 to 8.85, NNH 2 CI 2 to 17) and half of the children receiving clozapine had neutropenia (1 RCT, n=21, RR 12, CI 0.75 to 192.86).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are few relevant trials and, presently, there is little conclusive evidence regarding the effects of antipsychotic medication for those with early onset schizophrenia. Some benefits were identified in using the atypical antipsychotic clozapine compared with haloperidol but the benefits were offset by an increased risk of serious adverse effects. Larger, more robust, trials are required.

Risperidone in adolescent schizophrenic psychoses: A retrospective study

Objective. The aim of the study was to assess the therapeutic effect and tolerability of risperidone in patients with early-onset schizophrenia and other related psychotic disorders. Methods. Our retrospective study included 47 schizophrenic patients (27 boys, 20 girls) with an average age of 16.5±1.3 years. The patients were evaluated based on their medical records prior to being started on risperidone, and then after 1, 3 and 6 weeks of risperidone administration. Efficacy of treatment was evaluated using the first item on the CGI scale. Survivors analysis was used. Results. After week 6, the average dose of risperidone was 3.8±1.4 mg. Eighty-two percent of the patients were evaluated as responders, 64% as full responders and 18% as partial responders. There were eight patients who dropped out of the study during treatment. The initial inclusion score on the CGI was 5.8±0.7. This score showed a steady decrease at each evaluation point during the treatment. At week 1 the score was 4.5±1.1 (P<0.001), at week 3, 3.4±1.2 (P<0.001), and at week 6 it was 2.6±1.2 (P<0.001). The medication was well tolerated. Less than half of the patients (46%) reported any side effects, according to their medical records. Parkinsonism (19%), sedation (8.5%) and hypersalivation (8.5%) were the most commonly reported side effects. The mean weight of the participants increased from 61.2±10.0 kg to 64.7±10.0 kg between baseline and week 6 (P=0.002). Conclusion. Our experience supports the use of risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenic disorders in adolescence.

Weight gain associated with clozapine, olanzapine and risperidone in children and adolescents

The study was aimed at the evaluation of weight gain associated with atypical antipsychotics and its clinical risk factors in children and adolescents. Weight and body mass index (BMI) of initially hospitalised patients treated with clozapine (n = 15), olanzapine (n = 15), and risperidone (n = 15) were prospectively monitored on a weekly basis for the first 6 weeks. Different clinical risk factors were tested for their association with weight gain in the three groups. All three groups experienced significant weight gain between baseline and endpoint (p < 0.0001). For all weight measures, planned comparisons were all significant between olanzapine vs. clozapine and risperidone, respectively. Average weight gain was significantly higher for the olanzapine group (mean = 4.6 kg, SD = 1.9) than for the risperidone (mean = 2.8 kg, SD = 1.3) and clozapine (mean = 2.5 kg, SD = 2.9) groups. Olanzapine and risperidone, but not clozapine, caused a disproportionately higher weight gain in children and adolescents in comparison to adults.

Clinical drug monitoring in child and adolescent psychiatry: side effects of atypical neuroleptics

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to improve and evaluate the practibility of a method for the assessment of drug-associated side effects, and we implemented a clinical drug monitoring for atypical neuroleptics.

METHODS

Side effects of initially hospitalized patients treated with clozapine (n = 16), olanzapine (n = 16), and risperidone (n = 19) were prospectively monitored on a weekly basis for the first 3 weeks. In the case of stable medication, measurements of all variables were made every 4 weeks or upon discharge. We used the Dosage Record Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (DOTES) in a supplemented version to measure the presence and severity of side effects.

RESULTS

Drowsiness and decreased motor activity were common, especially in the first 2 weeks. Orthostatic hypotension, increased salivation, constipation, and nasal congestion were seen in more than 30% to 60% of patients treated with clozapine and were less common in adolescents treated with olanzapine and risperidone. Rigidity, tremor, and dystonia were seen in 5% to 15% of patients treated with risperidone and olanzapine. The average weight gain after 6 weeks of treatment with the atypical neuroleptics was significantly higher for the olanzapine group (4.6 +/- 1.9 kg) than for the risperidone (2.8 +/- 1.3 kg) and clozapine (2.5 +/- 2.9 kg) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' supplemented DOTES version is generally applicable to clinical use in mental health centers. The differences among the side effects of these three agents may affect compliance with medication and medical risks of metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. More research on the short- and long-term safety of psychotropic drugs in children and adolescents, using standardized methods, should be considered.

Antipsychotics in early onset Schizophrenia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To develop an evidence base for using antipsychotic medications for schizophrenia in children and adolescents.

METHOD

Data sources were identified in PsychINFO (1872-2003), MEDLINE (1966-2003), and articles in reference lists. Study selection criteria: (1) treatment with antipsychotics; (2) ages were between 5 and 18 years; (3) sample diagnosed with schizophrenia; (4) prospective design; (5) rating instruments used. Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria and were rated. Study quality was independently rated.

RESULTS

Average response rate among 8 studies employing atypicals was 55.7% compared to 72.3% among 13 studies employing typicals. The difference was statistically different at the trend level (z = 1.65, P < 0.10). The effect size on a continuous measure was 0.36 in favor of typicals. When study quality was included in the model, the effect of medication type remained unchanged. Average weight gain in patients treated with typicals was 1.4 Kg. compared to 4.5 Kg for those treated with atypicals. Sedation was more common among those on atypicals. The rate of extrapyramidal side effects was similar among the two groups

CONCLUSIONS

Antipsychotic medications seem effective for schizophrenia treatment in children and adolescents. Typicals appear to be more effective and cause less weight gain than atypicals. However, more rigorous clinical trials are necessary.

Case Reports With A Child Psychiatric Exploration of Catatonia, Autism, and Delirium

This chapter starts with some remarks on the conceptual history of catatonia, which begins with Kahlbaum and continues with Kraeplin, Bleuler, and Leonhard. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 4th ed., Text Revision, criteria for catatonia and the multicausal origin of the disorder are discussed. So, not only schizophrenia and mood disorders associated with catatonia, which is the primary form, are introduced but also an extensive list of somatic disorders-resulting in secondary catatonia-along with the work of Gelenberg and Wing. Next, two very difficult cases, of boys with autism, catatonia, and one of them with mental retardation as well, are presented. Major textbooks, PubMed, and Medline were used for a select literature search. The results show the main and really relevant but scarce data concerning primary and secondary catatonia. In the discussion the topics are this dearth in knowledge, the concept of catatonia and its similarities with delirium, and the relation catatonia-autism, and where to find the data. The conclusions summarize the main points and end with a gentle reminder, or is it an appeal?

Second-generation antipsychotic medications in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed available pediatric literature on second-generation antipsychotic medications to assess current evidence of efficacy and safety.

METHOD

An English language MEDLINE search (1974-2003) was conducted using key words-atypical antipsychotics, children and adolescents, toxicity, clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole. Additional efficacy and safety data were obtained from drug manufacturers.

RESULTS

We identified 176 reports, including 15 double-blind, controlled trials, 58 openlabel studies, 18 retrospective chart reviews, and 85 case series/reports. The majority of these studies (43%) were of risperidone. Evidence suggests that second-generation antipsychotics are efficacious in the treatment of psychosis, bipolar disorders, pervasive developmental disorders, and Tourette's Disorder, and are potentially useful in mental retardation, conduct disorder, and severe attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The most frequently reported side effects included cardiovascular effects, weight gain, sedation, sialorrhea, extrapyramidal signs, and hyperprolactinemia, although the relative frequencies of these untoward effects vary among medications.

CONCLUSION

Although the evidence base for pediatric use of second-generation antipsychotics is expanding, the majority of available studies are anecdotal, or short-term, openlabel trials. Reports suggest that these compounds are effective for a variety of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents, but additional double-blind, controlled studies are required to establish definitive efficacy. Although these medications appear to be well tolerated in short-term studies, long-term follow-up investigations and ongoing clinical monitoring are necessary to confirm their safety in this age group.

Global assessment of psychosocial functioning in child and adolescent psychiatry. A review of three unidimensional scales (CGAS, GAF, GAPD)

Global assessment of functioning represents an important aspect of assessment in clinical practice and research. It can help identify persons in need of psychiatric treatment, have predictive value and measure change over time, including treatment effects. This review examines publications concerning development, psychometric properties and usefulness of three scales for children: Axis-VI in ICD-10 Global Assessment of Psychosocial Disability (GAPD), Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) and Axis-V in DSM-IV Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF). It is based on literature searches in PubMed and PsycInfo (1977-2003), and screening of Scandinavian and English textbooks on child psychiatry. The three scales differ in theoretical guidelines, descriptions of codes/anchor points and psychometric aspects. CGAS has been evaluated in 69 papers and 33 have been published on GAF used for children. The one paper comparing GAPD and CGAS found both scales sufficiently reliable for clinical practice. Reliability of CGAS and GAF has been found to vary from fair to substantial, depending on raters, training and diagnostic groups. International consensus for the use of one scale for global assessment of functioning for children 4-18 years would improve reliability in clinical practice and ease comparisons of studies across countries. A training programme would assist in this.

Atypical antipsychotic use in a state hospital inpatient adolescent population

Atypical antipsychotics are now the most commonly prescribed antipsychotics in young patients. These drugs are increasingly being used because of better tolerance and safety as seen in the adult populations. Youth with more severe psychopathology who are treated in the inpatient setting have been overlooked in much of the published research, and the extent of use and rationale in this population is unknown. This naturalistic retrospective study examined a population of adolescents in an inpatient state hospital setting with regard to their use of atypical antipsychotics. All patients who received an inpatient prescription for atypical antipsychotics between January 1, 1997 and June 1, 2000 and were ages 18 or younger at the time of medication initiation were included in the study. Twenty-three percent (88/380) of patients received an atypical antipsychotic: 68% (60/88) risperidone, 27% (24/88) olanzapine, and 5% (4/88) quetiapine. Psychotic disorders were considered as the primary diagnosis in only 17% of patients treated with atypical antipsychotics, and no particular diagnosis was predictive of monotherapy with an atypical antipsychotic. In the adolescent populations, atypical antipsychotics are being used for a wide variety of diagnoses and are commonly used adjunctively (more than 80%) with many concomitant psychotropic medications. More research is needed to develop useful and specific practice guidelines in children and adolescents for these commonly used medications.

Weight gain associated with atypical antipsychotic use in children and adolescents: prevalence, clinical relevance, and management

Atypical antipsychotics are increasingly prescribed to children and adolescents with neuropsychiatric disorders. Although their profile of potent antagonism at specific serotonin and dopamine receptors offers certain advantages compared with typical antipsychotics, their use has been associated with various adverse effects, including significant weight gain. This adverse effect is of particular concern in children and adolescents, secondary to the immediate and long-term health risks associated with weight gain, including obesity, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia. Indeed, from 1963 to 1991, the prevalence of obesity has approximately doubled in youth. Prior to selecting an atypical antipsychotic, a detailed review of the predictors of weight gain is necessary for every child and adolescent. Published data suggest that clozapine and olanzapine are associated with considerable weight gain, whereas risperidone and quetiapine have a moderate risk. Alternatively, ziprasidone and aripiprazole may exhibit a low risk for this adverse effect. Whereas behavioral and pharmacologic measures are available to manage weight gain associated with atypical antipsychotics, research is needed to establish more effective and safe interventions for this adverse effect in children and adolescents.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Atypical Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Schizophrenia and Comorbid Disorders in Children and Adolescents

Evidence on the efficacy and safety of atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents with schizophrenia is limited. The purpose of this review is to assess the published data on the use of atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents with schizophrenia alone and with comorbid disorders, and to establish benefit-risk guidelines for clinicians.Risperidone, olanzapine and clozapine were found to be effective in the treatment of aggression and mania. Risperidone, and possibly also olanzapine, may be the drugs of choice in children with comorbid tic disorders. Ziprasidone has some monoamine reuptake inhibition properties and may be administered as an augmenting agent in children and adolescents with schizophrenia and comorbid anxiety and mood disorders. Compared with the typical antipsychotics, the atypical drugs seem to be more effective, better tolerated and lead to better patient adherence. Importantly, the atypical antipsychotics have a lower propensity to induce extrapyramidal symptoms and a potential (shown so far only in adults) to improve cognitive function and inhibit suicidal behaviour (especially clozapine). Yet, the adverse effects associated with these agents, especially weight gain, which may also have long-term effects, can lead to non-compliance in the young population. In children and adolescents receiving clozapine, olanzapine and quetiapine (but not ziprasidone, which does not have a pro-appetite effect), particularly those with obesity or a family history of diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose and lipid levels must be monitored frequently. Weight gain might be better controlled when the children and their parents are properly informed about this adverse effect and diet is regulated. Another major disadvantage of the atypical antipsychotics, especially risperidone, is their association with hyperprolactinaemia, which can lead to hypogonadism-induced osteoporosis, galactorrhoea, gynaecomastia, irregular menstruation and sexual dysfunction, all seen also with typical antipsychotics. Other atypical antipsychotics, namely olanzapine and ziprasidone, have been reported to be prolactin sparing in adults, but may not be completely devoid of hyperprolactinaemic effects in children and adolescents. Thus, prolactin levels should be assessed routinely in young patients treated with atypical antipsychotics. Further, children and adolescents with hyperprolactinaemia-related effects should be switched to a prolactin-sparing agent, such as quetiapine. All atypical antipsychotics may induce sedation and they are not devoid of extrapyramidal symptoms (especially risperidone). The use of typical antipsychotics has been limited to patients who are resistant to atypical antipsychotics, intolerant to their adverse effects, or require injections or depot preparations. Further double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and long-term safety assessments are needed before definitive conclusions can be reached about the place of atypical antipsychotics in the therapeutic armamentarium of childhood-onset schizophrenia.

Olanzapine treatment in chronic drug-resistant childhood-onset schizophrenia: an open-label study

The use of typical antipsychotics is limited in children with schizophrenia, owing to the high rate of response failure and early appearance of extrapyramidal syndromes as well as tardive and withdrawal dyskinesia. The aim of the present study was to examine the effectiveness of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine in the treatment of childhood-onset schizophrenia. The study sample included nine children hospitalized for schizophrenia who had proven refractory to treatment with at least two antipsychotic drugs. Olanzapine was administered after a 2-week washout period in gradually increasing doses to a maximum of 5 mg/day on day 5 and 10 mg/day in week 3; six patients received up to 20 mg/day as of week 5. The duration of the study was 12 weeks. Patient psychiatric status was measured with three scales at onset of therapy and thereafter once weekly. Patients also underwent regular blood, laboratory, and liver function tests, and we also monitored their blood pressure and weight and performed electrocardiography and electroencephalography. A reduction in all psychopathology scores was obtained at 12 weeks from baseline. All extrapyramidal symptoms of previous medications resolved, and there were no new incidents. Side effects were mild. There were no adverse changes in blood chemistry, hematological tests, or electrocardiography parameters, but the treatment was associated with a significant weight gain (6.10 +/- 3.25 kg). At 1-year follow-up, the improvement in psychiatric symptoms was sustained in eight children. We conclude that olanzapine may have potential as a first-line drug in the treatment of drug-resistant childhood-onset schizophrenia. Large-scale, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative studies are needed to clarify the role of the various atypical antipsychotics in both treatment-resistant and treatment-naïve populations with psychotic symptoms/disorders.

Clozapine pharmacokinetics in children and adolescents with childhood-onset schizophrenia

Clozapine (CLZ) dose-related adverse effects may be more common in children than adults, perhaps reflecting developmental pharmacokinetic (PK) differences. However, no pediatric CLZ PK data are available. Accordingly, we studied CLZ and its metabolites, norclozapine (NOR), and clozapine-N-oxide (NOX) in six youth, ages 9-16 years, with childhood onset schizophrenia (COS). At the time of the PK study, mean CLZ dose was 200 mg (3.4 mg/kg). Serum was collected during week 6 on CLZ before and 0.5-8 h after a morning dose. Serum concentrations were assayed by liquid chromatography/UV-detection. Mean concentration, area-under-the-curve (AUC), and clearance were calculated. CLZ clearance averaged 1.7 L/kg-h. NOR concentrations (410) exceeded CLZ (289) and NOX (63 ng/ml) and AUC(0-8h) of NOR (3,356) > CLZ (2,359) > NOX (559 ng/ml-h) [53, 38, and 9% of total analytes, respectively]. In adults, NOR serum concentrations on average are 10-25% < CLZ, differing significantly from our sample. Dose normalized concentrations of CLZ (mg/kg-d) did not vary with age and were similar to reported adult values. Clinical improvement seen in 5/6 patients correlated with serum CLZ concentrations. In addition, clinical response and total number of side effects correlated with NOR concentrations. NOR (a neuropharmacologically active metabolite) and free CLZ may contribute to the effectiveness and adverse effects in youth.

Treatment recommendations for the use of antipsychotics for aggressive youth (TRAAY). Part I: a review

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence for the safety and efficacy of nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments for aggression in children and adolescents.

METHOD

and searches (1990-present) were conducted for double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of atypical antipsychotics for aggression and for literature on the use of other pharmacological agents and psychosocial interventions for aggression. Case reports and adult literature regarding the safety of atypical antipsychotics were used where controlled data for youth were lacking.

RESULTS

Controlled data on the treatment of aggression in youth is scarce. Psychosocial interventions may be effective alone or in combination with pharmacological treatments. Psychotropic agents (e.g., stimulants, mood stabilizers, beta-blockers) have also been shown to have limited efficacy in reducing aggression. Antipsychotics, particularly the atypical antipsychotics, show substantial efficacy in the treatment of aggression in selected pediatric populations. Atypical antipsychotics are generally associated with fewer extrapyramidal symptoms than are typical antipsychotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychosocial interventions and atypical antipsychotics are promising treatments for aggression in youth. Double-blind studies should examine the safety and efficacy of atypical antipsychotics compared to each other and to medications from other classes, the efficacy of specific medications for different subtypes of aggression, combining various psychotropic medications, optimal dosages, and long-term safety.

Correlation of antipsychotic and prolactin concentrations in children and adolescents acutely treated with haloperidol, clozapine, or olanzapine

Patients with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (third edition, revised) diagnosis of schizophrenia or psychotic disorder not otherwise specified with onset of psychosis before the age of 13 participated in 6- to 8-week open or double-blind trials of haloperidol (n = 15, mean dose 15.4 +/- 8.1 mg/day [0.27 +/- 0.15 mg/kg/day]), clozapine (n = 30, mean dose 269.9 +/- 173.3 mg/day [4.4 +/- 2.6 mg/kg/day]), or olanzapine (n = 12, mean dose 17.5 +/- 2.8 mg/day [0.30 +/- 0.13 mg/kg/day]). Blood samples were obtained at 6 weeks for evaluation of haloperidol, reduced haloperidol, clozapine, desmethylclozapine, and olanzapine plasma concentrations and serum prolactin concentrations. No gender differences were noted for antipsychotic dose or concentration within each treatment group. Correlations between antipsychotic plasma concentration and serum prolactin concentration were significant only for the olanzapine treatment group (r = 0.80, p = 0.002). Separate correlations for gender were significant only for females receiving olanzapine (r = 0.91, p = 0.03); the patient with the highest serum prolactin experienced galactorrhea. Further studies evaluating the prolactin-elevating properties of antipsychotics are warranted in this population.

Tolerability profile of atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents

Antipsychotics are frequently used in the treatment of a variety of neuropsychiatric conditions in children and adolescents. Atypical antipsychotics have come to the forefront in child psychiatry due largely to their tolerability profiles as well as their efficacy. Potential treatment options include clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine and ziprasidone. A number of studies investigating the use of clozapine have been published in children; however, owing to the frequent monitoring required for agranulocytosis, the use of clozapine may be restricted to patients with treatment-refractory disease. With accumulating data on the development of glucose intolerance in adults receiving clozapine, closer monitoring of bodyweight and fasting blood glucose is imperative. Clozapine also has an increased seizure risk, therefore a baseline electroencephalogram should be performed, as well as continued vigilance for this adverse effect. Risperidone is an atypical antipsychotic that is generally well tolerated and numerous studies have been published investigating this drug in children. Unlike clozapine, its receptor interaction profile lends itself toward increased risk of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and hyperprolactinaemia. Bodyweight gain is a common adverse effect, although somewhat less than that reported with olanzapine. Baseline liver function studies prior to initiation of this medication are recommended. Risperidone-induced mania has been reported in adults and, therefore, increased caution should be used when deciding to treat children and adolescents with risperidone, particularly in those with a predisposition toward mania. Olanzapine, like risperidone, has also been associated with onset of mania in adults. Olanzapine has a receptor profile that results in significant risk for bodyweight gain and sedation. Furthermore, this drug has been linked to the development of glucose intolerance; thus, it is important to monitor bodyweight and fasting blood glucose on a frequent basis. Less information is known about quetiapine in children and adolescents. Reports about its efficacy and tolerability vary. Quetiapine appears to have increased risk for sedation and bodyweight gain, albeit less than that of olanzapine. The compound appears to be less likely to induce EPS. Finally, ziprasidone has recently been approved for use in the adult population. This compound, in terms of its receptor profile, has more in common with risperidone. This suggests a potential for increased risk of EPS and hyperprolactinaemia. It also has an increased risk of QTc prolongation; thus, a baseline electrocardiogram is suggested, particularly in those patients with a history of cardiovascular illness. Lack of evidence for bodyweight gain with ziprasidone is a considerable advantage.

Treatment of the special patient with schizophrenia

Special patient populations with schizophrenia have received little attention. These populations include adolescents, the elderly, substance abusers, and patients who are considered treatment-resistant. Interest in these populations is rapidly growing, especially with regard to their treatment with second-generation antipsychotics. This article describes the treatment of special patient populations and summarizes the research that has been done in this field.

Longitudinal study of brain morphology in first episode schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Beginning with Kraepelin, schizophrenia has been viewed as a progressive disorder. Although numerous studies of the longitudinal course of schizophrenia have demonstrated the clinical deterioration that occurs predominantly in the early stages of the illness, the pathophysiology of this clinical phenomenon has not been established. This aspect of the illness may be of critical importance to understanding the pathogenesis of schizophrenia and determining preventive therapeutic strategies. Abnormalities in brain morphology have been consistently described in schizophrenia, but it is not known when in the natural history of the illness they arise and whether they are progressive. Previous studies of brain morphology have been inconclusive, in part because of the variability of methods for image acquisition and analysis, assessment of patients already at chronic stages of their illness with extensive prior treatment exposure, and inadequate periods of follow-up.

METHODS

To address these questions we examined 107 patients in their first episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and 20 healthy volunteers using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical assessments of psychopathology and treatment outcome for periods of up to 6 years. Fifty-one patients and 13 control subjects had MRIs after at least 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Results confirm the findings of ventricular enlargement and anterior hippocampal volume reductions in first episode schizophrenia patients that have been previously reported. In addition, we found changes in selected structures over time in relation to treatment outcome, including increases in ventricular volume that were associated with poor outcome patients. Contrary to our hypothesis, there were no significant reductions in cortical and hippocampal volumes over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding of progressive ventricular enlargement in patients with poor outcome schizophrenia is consistent with the hypothesis that persistent positive and negative symptoms result in progressive brain changes in the form of ventricular enlargement, possibly due to neurodegeneration rather than the confounding effects of treatment. Future studies of first episodes of schizophrenia should utilize higher resolution imaging techniques that compare clinically well characterized patients with and without poor outcome and recurrent symptoms to control subjects who are well matched to patients for age and gender. There is also a need to control for treatment effects of typical antipsychotic medication on brain structure.

Typical neuroleptics in child and adolescent psychiatry

This paper reviews the use of typical ("old") neuroleptics in the treatment of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders. Very few methodologically sound papers have been published in the field. It is concluded that typical neuroleptics should be used sparingly and only in severe and incapacitating disorders such as some psychotic conditions and handicaping tic disorders. Side effects have to be very carefully monitored.

Atypical neuroleptics in child and adolescent psychiatry

Atypical neuroleptics have enriched our treatment programmes, especially in childhood and adolescent schizophrenia. This article reviews the use of atypical neuroleptics in children and adolescents with schizophrenic disorder. It considers the receptor binding profile and pharmacological properties, indications, side effects, clinical applications and trials of atypical neuroleptics in comparison to the classical neuroleptic haloperidol in adolescent schizophrenia. Special emphasis is placed on the most common atypical neuroleptics clozapine, olanzapine and risperidone since most studies are carried out with these compounds, especially with clozapine. More clinically controlled trials have to be conducted since only one was performed so far. The place of the atypical neuroleptics is discussed and further studies are necessary in order to differentiate the indications tested so far and to find out if the spectrum of indications can be broadened.

Paediatric uses of atypical antipsychotics

Antipsychotics are commonly prescribed to children and adolescents. With the relatively recent availability of the atypical antipsychotics, physicians have begun prescribing these agents to young people in the hope of finding safe, effective alternatives to the typical antipsychotics. This report reviews what is currently known about the use of the atypical antipsychotics in young people. Most of the currently available data are based on case reports and case series. The results of only a handful of prospective trials pertaining to the use of the atypical antipsychotics in youths have been reported. Based on the available information, it appears that clozapine has a role in juvenile treatment resistant schizophrenia. When considered as a group, the 'first-line' atypical antipsychotics risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine appear to have promise as treatments for several neuropsychiatric disorders in young people. These conditions include psychotic, mood, disruptive, movement and pervasive developmental disorders. Unfortunately, as has historically been the case, the demand to address the clinical needs of young patients with neuropsychiatric disorders has outpaced empirically based information. This is particularly important because significant side effects can occur when children or adolescents are treated with atypical antipsychotics. Since there is a paucity of short-term and almost no long-term safety data pertaining to these agents in young people, careful consideration must be made prior to initiating atypical antipsychotic treatment for a child or teenager. Based upon what is known about these agents, a rational approach to the use of these drugs in juveniles is offered.

Management of schizophrenia in children and adolescents. The role of clozapine

Clozapine is a dibenzodiazepine derivative with established antipsychotic efficacy in adult patients with schizophrenic psychoses. There are more than 15 studies that have also demonstrated the antipsychotic efficacy of clozapine in childhood and adolescent schizophrenia. The main advantages of clozapine treatment in this age group in comparison with typical antipsychotics are: (i) high antipsychotic efficacy during an acute schizophrenic episode; (ii) better improvement in chronic cases with a high load of negative symptoms; and (iii) markedly fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects and, therefore, fairly good tolerability. However, because of its possible adverse effects on the haemopoetic system (granulocytopenia, agranulocytosis), clozapine should not be used as first-line antipsychotic medication. Other adverse effects are related to the cardiovascular system (hypotonia, tachycardia or arrhythmia), the central nervous system (epileptic seizures, fever) and liver function (transient increases in levels of hepatic transaminases). Two other frequent adverse effects are hypersalivation and body-weight gain, which may present a particular problem in adolescents and young adults. Careful monitoring of haematological parameters and other adverse effects are preconditions for a successful treatment programme.

Olanzapine pharmacokinetics in pediatric and adolescent inpatients with childhood-onset schizophrenia

Well-designed studies investigating how pediatric or adolescent patients with mental disorders respond to and metabolize the newer antipsychotic drugs are practically nonexistent. Without such data, clinicians have difficulty designing appropriate dosage regimens for patients in these age groups. The results from a study of olanzapine pharmacokinetics in children and adolescents are described. Eight inpatients (ages 10-18 years) with treatment-resistant childhood-onset schizophrenia received olanzapine (2.5-20 mg/day) over 8 weeks. Blood samples, collected during dose titration and at a steady state provided pharmacokinetic data. The final evaluation (week 8) included extensive sampling for 36 hours after a 20-mg dose. Olanzapine concentrations in these eight pediatric patients were of the same magnitude as those for nonsmoking adult patients with schizophrenia but may be as much as twice the typical olanzapine concentrations in patients with schizophrenia who smoke. Olanzapine pharmacokinetic evaluation gave an apparent mean oral clearance of 9.6 +/- 2.4 L/hr and a mean elimination half-life of 37.2 +/- 5.1 hours in these young patients. The determination of the initial olanzapine dose for adolescent patients should take into consideration factors such as the patient's size. In general, however, the usual dose recommendation of 5 to 10 mg once daily with a target dose of 10 mg/day is likely a good clinical guideline for most adolescent patients on the basis of our pharmacokinetics results.

Atypische Neuroleptika in der Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie

Zusammenfassung: Atypische Neuroleptika haben unsere Therapiemöglichkeiten in der Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie verbessert. Dieser Artikel faßt die Anwendung der atypischen Neuroleptika bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit schizophrenen Psychosen zusammen. Es werden das Rezeptor-Bindungsprofil, pharmakologische Eigenschaften, Indikationen, Nebenwirkungen, klinische Anwendungen und Studien der atypischen Neuroleptika, im Vergleich zu dem klassischen Neuroleptikum Haloperidol, berücksichtigt. Besondere Betonung wurde auf die am häufigsten verwendeten atypischen Neuroleptika Clozapin, Olanzapin und Risperidon gelegt, da weltweit die meisten Studien mit diesen Medikamenten durchgeführt worden sind. Der Stellenwert der atypischen Neuroleptika wird diskutiert und es werden weitere Studien gefordert, um die Indikationen zu differenzieren, und um zu sehen, ob das Indikationsspektrum erweitert werden kann.

Clozapine versus typical neuroleptic medication for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Long-term drug treatment of schizophrenia with conventional antipsychotics has limitations: 25-33% of patients have illnesses that are treatment-resistant. Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug, which is claimed to have superior efficacy and to cause fewer motor adverse effects than typical drugs for people with treatment-resistant illnesses. Clozapine carries a significant risk of serious blood disorders, which necessitates mandatory weekly blood monitoring at least during the first months of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of clozapine for schizophrenia in comparison to typical antipsychotic drugs.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Publications in all languages were searched from the following databases: Biological Abstracts (1982-1999), The Cochrane Library CENTRAL (Issue 2, 1999), Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Specialised Register (1999), EMbase (1980-1999), ISI Citation Index, LILACS (1982-1999), MEDLINE (1966-1999), and PsycLIT (1974-1999). Reference list screening of included papers was performed. Authors of recent trials and the manufacturer of clozapine contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials comparing clozapine with typical antipsychotic drugs were included by independent assessment by at least two reviewers.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by at least two reviewers. Authors of trials published since 1980 were contacted for additional and missing data. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of homogeneous dichotomous data were calculated with the Peto method. A random effects model was used for heterogeneous dichotomous data. Where possible the numbers needed to treat (NNT) or needed to harm (NNH) were also calculated. Weighted or standardised means were calculated for continuous data.

MAIN RESULTS

Currently the review includes 31 studies, 26 of which are less than 13 weeks in duration. These studies include 2589 participants, most of whom were men (74%). The average age was 38 years. There was no difference in the effects of clozapine and typical neuroleptic drugs for broad outcomes such as mortality, ability to work or suitability for discharge at end of the study. Clinical improvement was seen more frequently in those taking clozapine (random effects OR 0.4 CI 0.2-0.6, NNT 6) both in the short and the long term. Also, in the short term, participants on clozapine had fewer relapses than those on typical antipsychotic drugs (OR 0.6 CI 0.4-0.8, NNT 20 CI 17-38), and this may be true for long-term treatment as well. Symptom assessment scales showed a greater reduction of symptoms in clozapine-treated patients. Clozapine treatment was more acceptable than low-potency antipsychotics such as chlorpromazine (OR 0.6 CI 0.4-0.9) but did not differ from acceptability of high-potency neuroleptics such as haloperidol (random effects OR 0.8 CI 0.4-1.5). Clozapine was more acceptable in long-term treatment than conventional antipsychotic drugs (random effects OR 0.4 CI 0.2-0.7, NNT 6 CI 3-111). Patients were more satisfied with clozapine treatment (OR 0.5 CI 0.3-0.8, NNT 12 CI 7-37), but they experienced more hypersalivation, temperature increase, and drowsiness than those given conventional neuroleptics. However, clozapine patients experience fewer motor side effects and less dry mouth. The clinical efficacy of clozapine was more pronounced in participants resistant to typical neuroleptics in terms of clinical improvement (random effects OR 0.2 CI 0.1-0.5, NNT 5 CI 4-7) and symptom reduction. Thirty-two percent of treatment resistant people had a clinical improvement with clozapine treatment.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review confirms that clozapine is convincingly more effective than typical antipsychotic drugs in reducing symptoms of schizophrenia, producing clinically meaningful improvements and postponing relapse. Patients were more satisfied with clozapine treatment than with typical neuroleptic treatment. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED

Effective treatment for mental disorders in children and adolescents

As pressure increases for the demonstration of effective treatment for children with mental disorders, it is essential that the field has an understanding of the evidence base. To address this aim, the authors searched the published literature for effective interventions for children and adolescents and organized this review as follows: (1) prevention; (2) traditional forms of treatment, namely outpatient therapy, partial hospitalization, inpatient treatment, and psychopharmacology; (3) intensive comprehensive community-based interventions including case management, home-based treatment, therapeutic foster care, and therapeutic group homes; (4) crisis and support services; and (5) treatment for two prevalent disorders, major depressive disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Strong evidence was found for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, depression, anxiety, and disruptive behavior disorders. Guidance from the field relevant to moving the evidence-based interventions into real-world clinical practice and further strengthening the research base will also need to address change in policy and clinical training.