Effects of risperidone on affective symptoms in patients with schizophrenia

The contribution of the cingulate cortex: treating depressive symptoms in first-episode drug naïve schizophrenia

Background

Our previous study has shown the cingulate cortex abnormalities in first-episode drug naïve (FEDN) schizophrenia patients with comorbid depressive symptoms. However, it remains largely unknown whether antipsychotics may induce morphometric change in cingulate cortex and its relationship with depressive symptoms. The purpose of this study was to further clarify the important role of cingulate cortex in the treatment on depressive symptoms in FEDN schizophrenia patients.

Method

In this study, 42 FEDN schizophrenia patients were assigned into depressed patients group (DP, n = 24) and non-depressed patients group (NDP, n = 18) measured by the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD). Clinical assessments and anatomical images were obtained from all patients before and after 12-week treatment with risperidone.

Results

Although risperidone alleviated psychotic symptoms in all patients, depressive symptoms were decreased only in DP. Significant group by time interaction effects were found in the right rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) and other subcortical regions in the left hemisphere. After risperidone treatment, the right rACC were increased in DP. Further, the increasing volume of right rACC was negatively associated with improvement in depressive symptoms.

Conclusion

These findings suggested that the abnormality of the rACC is the typical characteristics in schizophrenia with depressive symptoms. It's likely key region contributing to the neural mechanisms underlying the effects of risperidone treatment on depressive symptoms in schizophrenia.

A double-blind randomised comparative trial of amisulpride versus olanzapine for 2 months in the treatment of subjects with schizophrenia and comorbid depression

Purpose

To compare the efficacy and safety of amisulpride and olanzapine in subjects with schizophrenia and comorbid depression in a randomised double-blind trial.

Patients

Eighty-five adult patients fulfilling DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia and presenting a depressive episode were randomised to amisulpride (200–600 mg/day) or olanzapine (5–15 mg/day) for 8 weeks. Primary efficacy variables were change in Calgary Depression Scale (CDS) score and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Change. Safety was monitored by adverse event reporting and determination of extrapyramidal function and metabolic variables.

Results

The mean change from baseline of CDS score was –6.84 in the amisulpride group and –7.36 in the olanzapine group. 65.9% and 61.5% of subjects, respectively, were considered “much” or “very much” improved. No significant inter-group difference in effect size was observed. The frequency of adverse events was low and emergence of extrapyramidal symptoms was not seen. Four patients in the olanzapine group developed abnormal triglyceride levels. Mean weight gain was 1.45 and 0.5 kg, respectively, in the olanzapine and amisulpride groups.

Conclusion

Amisulpride and olanzapine are effective in patients with schizophrenia and comorbid depression. Tolerance of both drugs was acceptable, although use of olanzapine was associated with a trend toward greater metabolic side-effects [19].

The effects of donepezil on phencyclidine-induced cognitive deficits in a mouse model of schizophrenia

Donepezil is the first-line of treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD), which improves cognitive impairment effectively, but whether it has an impact on cognitive impairment in schizophrenia remains unknown. In this study, we evaluated the effects and mechanisms of donepezil on schizophrenia-like cognitive deficits induced by phencyclidine (PCP). The cognitive deficits model of schizophrenia was established by injecting PCP into mice. Risperidone, an atypical antipsychotic drug, served as positive control drug. Three behavioral tests including novel object recognition (NOR) test, Morris Water Maze (MWM) and passive avoidance (PA) test were performed to evaluate the effect of donepezil on PCP-induced cognitive deficits. Furthermore, the content of BDNF and NGF in the hippocampus and cortex of mice was determined using ELISA. Expressions of p-GSK-3β/GSK-3β, p-Akt/Akt, Bcl-2/Bax and Caspase-3 in the hippocampus and cortex were detected by Western blot. Results revealed that donepezil has a protective effect on PCP-induced cognitive dysfunction. Moreover, donepezil can also improve PCP-induced schizophrenia-like cognitive deficits by inhibiting neuronal apoptosis and regulating synaptic plasticity, which was possible through the up-regulation of p-Akt, p-GSK-3β, Bcl-2 and the down-regulation of Bax, Caspase-3. The results indicated that donepezil might exhibit a beneficial effect on the treatment of cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia.

A composite scale applied to evaluate anxiety in schizophrenic patients (SAES)

Anxiety in schizophrenia possesses specific features and is difficult to assess because no specific evaluating tool is currently available. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a hetero-assessment-based scale to specifically measure anxiety in schizophrenia. A literature review and a survey among psychiatrists allowed the selection of 29 items from 4 previous scales evaluating anxiety. Factor analysis allowed building up a final 22-item composite scale of anxiety evaluation in schizophrenia (SAES), which was then validated in 147 schizophrenic patients. One hundred and forty-seven (147) schizophrenic patients (70.8 % male, mean age = 36.9 years) were included in the study. Principal component analysis of the SAES revealed three factors, namely "expressed and perceived anxiety," "somatic anxiety," and "anxiety and environment". All total and factor scores of the SAES were significantly correlated (p < .001) with total and factor scores of the original scales. Finally, the SAES showed good inter-rater reliability [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = .82]. In conclusion, a specific tool for evaluating anxiety in schizophrenia (SAES) was developed and validated in a sample of schizophrenic patients. The SAES can be useful to investigate clinical, psychopathological, and therapeutic aspects of anxiety in schizophrenia.

Benefits of switching women schizophrenic patients to aripiprazole: a case study and brief review of the literature

Hyperprolactinemia, an adverse side-effect of the use of typical and some atypical antipsychotics, has both acute and chronic clinical consequences. When observed in schizophrenic patients, it may be treated by switching the patient to an antipsychotic agent with a lower liability for the induction of hyperprolactinemia. The effects of substituting aripiprazole for other antipsychotic agents on schizophrenic patients with antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia have been previously reported in several studies. Many studies have also noted that aripiprazole can sometimes lead to increases in psychotic symptoms, especially in the period immediately following the switch or when aripiprazole is combined with a dopamine antagonist. Here, we report observations on five female patients who were experiencing symptomatic hyperprolactinemia and psychotic exacerbation while on antipsychotic treatment, yet improved in both conditions after being switched to aripiprazole monotherapy. We also provide a brief review of the existing studies that report the results of switching patients from other antipsychotics to aripiprazole.

Population pharmacokinetics of oral risperidone in children, adolescents and adults with psychiatric disorders

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Oral risperidone is licensed globally for the treatment of several psychiatric disorders in children, adolescents and adults. The pharmacokinetic profile of risperidone is well documented in adults. In this study, the pharmacokinetics of oral risperidone in children and adolescents were investigated along with population pharmacokinetics in paediatric and adult subjects.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetics of oral risperidone in children and adolescents were investigated through non-compartmental analysis (paediatric phase I study; n = 24) and population pharmacokinetic analysis using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling software (NONMEM) on a pooled database including both paediatric (n = 304) and adult (n = 476) data. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the relevance of the effects of covariates on the plasma exposure of the active antipsychotic fraction.

RESULTS

Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis showed that, after correcting doses for bodyweight, plasma exposure was comparable between children and adolescents and in line with historical adult data. Pooled population pharmacokinetic analysis, using a priori allometric scaling of the clearance and volume of distribution, showed that apparent renal clearance of the active antipsychotic fraction was 0.96 L/h and apparent metabolic clearance was 4.26 L/h for a typical patient weighing 62 kg, aged 18.1 years, with a median creatinine clearance of 117.6 mL/min. For a typical child (11 years, 39 kg), adolescent (15 years, 60 kg) and adult (33 years, 70 kg), the apparent total oral clearance values were 4.35, 5.30 and 5.04 L/h, respectively. None of the tested demographic or biochemical characteristics were found to have a relevant effect on any of the pharmacokinetic parameters of risperidone and the active antipsychotic fraction.

CONCLUSION

Population pharmacokinetics and Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated similar pharmacokinetics of risperidone in children, adolescents and adults.

Management of patients presenting with acute psychotic episodes of schizophrenia

The initial management of patients with schizophrenia presenting to psychiatric emergency departments with an acute psychotic episode requires rapid decisions to be made by physicians concerning the treatment of individuals who are likely to be relatively uncooperative, agitated and lacking insight. The treatment decision must be adapted to the individual characteristics and needs of each patient. This article reviews the issues from the perspective of the initial management of acute psychosis as it is currently practised in Europe, and discusses the pragmatic implications for initial treatment decisions and the elaboration of a long-term treatment plan. Initially, administration of antipsychotics to control psychotic symptoms and benzodiazepines to control agitation represents the cornerstone of treatment. Oral medication is preferable to injectable forms wherever possible, and atypical antipsychotics are to be preferred over conventional agents because of their lower risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects, which are a major determinant of poor adherence to treatment. Whatever antipsychotic is chosen by the physician during the initial period, it is likely that it will need to be continued for many years, and it is thus important to take into account the long-term safety profile of the drug chosen, particularly in relation to extrapyramidal adverse effects, metabolic complications and quality of life. Building a therapeutic alliance with the patient and his/her family or carers is an important element that should be included in the initial management of psychosis. The long-term goal should be to minimize the risk of psychotic relapse through adequate treatment adherence.

A comparison of low-dose risperidone to paroxetine in the treatment of panic attacks: a randomized, single-blind study

BACKGROUND

Because a large proportion of patients with panic attacks receiving approved pharmacotherapy do not respond or respond poorly to medication, it is important to identify additional therapeutic strategies for the management of panic symptoms. This article describes a randomized, rater-blind study comparing low-dose risperidone to standard-of-care paroxetine for the treatment of panic attacks.

METHODS

Fifty six subjects with a history of panic attacks were randomized to receive either risperidone or paroxetine. The subjects were then followed for eight weeks. Outcome measures included the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS), the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (Ham-A), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D), the Sheehan Panic Anxiety Scale-Patient (SPAS-P), and the Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI).

RESULTS

All subjects demonstrated a reduction in both the frequency and severity of panic attacks regardless of treatment received. Statistically significant improvements in rating scale scores for both groups were identified for the PDSS, the Ham-A, the Ham-D, and the CGI. There was no difference between treatment groups in the improvement in scores on the measures PDSS, Ham-A, Ham-D, and CGI. Post hoc tests suggest that subjects receiving risperidone may have a quicker clinical response than subjects receiving paroxetine.

CONCLUSION

We can identify no difference in the efficacy of paroxetine and low-dose risperidone in the treatment of panic attacks. Low-dose risperidone appears to be tolerated equally well as paroxetine. Low-dose risperidone may be an effective treatment for anxiety disorders in which panic attacks are a significant component.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT100457106.

Amisulpride versus risperidone in the treatment of depression in patients with schizophrenia: a randomized, open-label, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of amisulpride on depression in patients with schizophrenia, in comparison to risperidone.

METHOD

In this open-label, 12-week study, patients with stable schizophrenia and a comorbid major or minor depressive episode (DSM-IV) taking risperidone were randomized into a risperidone-continuation group (N = 45) or an amisulpride-switch group (N = 42). The main outcome measures were changes from baseline on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Secondary efficacy measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and the Global Assessment of Functioning. Safety measures included treatment-emergent adverse events and extrapyramidal symptoms.

RESULTS

The mean dose at endpoint was 4.2 mg/day for risperidone and 458.3 mg/day for amisulpride. Improvements in the CDSS and BDI scores were significantly greater in the amisulpride-switch group than in the risperidone-continuation group at weeks 8 and 12, and at the endpoint. The amisulpride-switch group also showed a significantly greater reduction in the score for the PANSS depression/anxiety factor, and the total score from baseline to endpoint. No significant difference was observed between the two groups for treatment-emergent adverse events or change from baseline for extrapyramidal symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Switching from risperidone to amisulpride in patients with stable schizophrenia with comorbid depression improved depressive symptoms significantly compared to continuing with risperidone.

Efficacy of flupentixol and risperidone in chronic schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms

The study investigated the non-inferiority of flupentixol compared to risperidone in the treatment of negative symptoms. In addition, the effects of flupentixol on mood and cognitive symptoms were explored. In a randomized, double-blind multicenter study, 144 non-acute schizophrenia patients with predominant negative symptoms were treated with a flexible dose of either flupentixol (4-12 mg/d) or risperidone (2-6 mg/d) for up to 25 weeks. In addition to a non-inferiority analysis, a principal component analysis (PCA) of the PANSS was performed post hoc. Regarding negative symptoms, flupentixol proved to be non-inferior to risperidone. Both drugs improved depressed mood with effect sizes favoring flupentixol. PCA suggested a five-factor structure. Effect sizes for the cognitive factor were up to 0.74 for flupentixol and up to 0.80 for risperidone. EPS scores were rather low and Parkinsonism improved in both groups, but anticholinergic drugs were prescribed significantly more frequently in the flupentixol group, which generally showed significantly more adverse events. Results indicate that the 1st generation antipsychotic flupentixol improves negative, affective and cognitive symptoms in chronic schizophrenia comparable to risperidone. Further studies should confirm the latter using neuropsychological performance tests and should investigate whether tolerability improves with a markedly lower dose range.

Creating more effective antidepressants: clues from the clinic

Antidepressant medications have eased the suffering of millions of people. In addition to treating depression, antidepressant drugs also treat several anxiety disorders. Unfortunately, there are problematic limitations with antidepressant agents, including a delayed therapeutic response and insufficient efficacy. Emerging evidence shows that atypical antipsychotic agents can be used as augmentation therapy in patients with poor responses to antidepressants. Future drugs combining key features of antidepressant and atypical antipsychotic agents could offer new promise for patients suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and depression.

Delivering the choice agenda as a framework to manage adverse effects: a mental health nurse perspective on prescribing psychiatric medication

The article describes the clinical management of a patient referred, with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, who experienced adverse effects associated with an elevated prolactin level. A reflective model was adopted to inform the new learning which emerged from the clinical scenario. It highlights that Mental Health Nurse Supplementary Prescribers need to develop a prescribing value base underpinned by choice in addition to advanced technical skills to manage unhelpful effects of medication.

Long-acting risperidone injection: efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of the first long-acting atypical antipsychotic

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of long-acting risperidone.

METHODS

Studies published between January 2000 and October 2006 evaluating the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of long-acting risperidone were reviewed, as identified from literature searches using Medline and EMBASE. Abstracts and posters on long-acting risperidone presented at key psychiatry congresses and available in the public domain during this time period were also reviewed.

RESULTS

The unique pharmacokinetic profile of long-acting risperidone is derived from the encapsulation of risperidone in a glycolide/lactide matrix in the form of microspheres such that after a single intramuscular injection, significant plasma levels of the drug are achieved after week 3. Steady state, after repeated administration at 2-week intervals, is achieved after 3 injection cycles. Short- and long-term studies have demonstrated that long-acting risperidone (25, 37.5, or 50 mg) is both efficacious and well tolerated in a wide variety of patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses. Most patients can be switched from other oral and long-acting antipsychotic agents without compromising efficacy and safety. Long-acting risperidone may also reduce overall healthcare costs by decreasing rates of relapse and hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

The assured delivery of an atypical antipsychotic medication with long-acting risperidone has important implications for patient compliance, maintenance of stability, consistency of treatment, and improving patient outcomes including the achievement of remission.

The relationship between patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes in schizophrenia

In recent years, the goals of treatment in schizophrenia have evolved from objective improvements in psychotic symptoms to encompass patient-related factors such as subjective response and quality of life. In order to examine factors that influence patient satisfaction with treatment, subjective quality of life and subjective response to treatment, two literature searches were performed using PubMed. The first searched for articles of any kind with no time limits using the search parameters 'schizophrenia AND satisfaction', 'antipsychotic AND satisfaction', 'schizophrenia AND subjective response', 'schizophrenia AND therapeutic alliance', 'schizophrenia AND psychosocial OR psychoeducation'. Secondly, PubMed was searched between January 1990 and December 2005 using the key words 'satisfaction', 'subjective response' and 'quality of life' in combination with an array of atypical agents. Results demonstrated that patient satisfaction with antipsychotic therapy is influenced by multiple factors. The most frequently reported reasons for dissatisfaction include drug side effects, lack of involvement in treatment planning or decision-making and lack of involvement of family members in the care plan. The majority of studies have demonstrated that the atypical antipsychotics are associated with significant improvements in quality of life, functional status and patient satisfaction compared with conventional agents. The therapeutic alliance is key to achieving optimal outcomes, by providing information and education to meet patients' needs, while facilitating compliance with drug therapy to ensure better clinical outcomes. A long-acting atypical antipsychotic that can ensure medication delivery will provide a platform for psychosocial interventions, and thus may further increase patient satisfaction and, ultimately, improve long-term outcomes in schizophrenia.

Symptom domains of schizophrenia: the role of atypical antipsychotic agents

Given their more obvious presentation, the reduction of positive symptoms and their associated behavioural problems have been considered the most important treatment outcome parameter in patients with schizophrenia. However, the development of the atypical antipsychotic agents in the early 1990s resulted in the adoption of more wide-reaching measures of therapeutic outcome. The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy of currently available atypical agents across multiple symptom domains of schizophrenia with a specific focus on negative symptoms, neurocognition, social functioning, quality of life and insight. As such, studies published between January 1990 and December 2005 that evaluated the clinical efficacy and tolerability of atypical antipsychotics in different symptom domains of schizophrenia were reviewed as identified from literature researches using MEDLINE and Embase. Abstracts and posters presented at key psychiatry and schizophrenia congresses during this period were also reviewed where available in the public domain. Results from the studies identified have consistently demonstrated that atypical antipsychotics have substantial advantages over conventional antipsychotics with a broader spectrum of efficacy across symptomatic domains of schizophrenia as proven by greater improvements in negative symptoms and cognitive function and a beneficial effect on affective symptoms and quality of life. However, their clinical advantages have often been limited by patients' partial compliance with therapy. As such, the development of a long-acting atypical antipsychotic agent may provide a new and valuable treatment option for patients with schizophrenia.

Optimisation of long-term treatment in schizophrenia: treating the true spectrum of symptoms

Treatment dissatisfaction and discontinuation continue to limit the long-term treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia comprises a wide spectrum of symptoms, including hallucinations, delusions, hostility, cognitive deficits, and depression and anxiety symptoms. Medication is often effective in the treatment of the positive and hostility symptoms of schizophrenia, but less effective on other symptoms of the disease i.e. negative, affective and cognitive symptoms. However, each one of these symptoms can impinge on the functionality of the patient and decrease their quality of life. For example, negative and affective symptoms may lead to low self-esteem and depression, while cognitive deficits are a major impediment to social and vocational rehabilitation. Even when therapy does address the spectrum of symptoms, often the side effects are severe and may contribute to patient non-compliance or withdrawal of therapy, as patients prefer to experience their disease symptoms rather than drug-induced adverse effects. Optimisation of long-term therapy to overcome these issues is now the challenge for antipsychotic therapy. Recent advances in the development of newer atypical antipsychotics bring us closer to achieving the correct balance between long-term efficacy, tolerability and patient function. Atypical antipsychotics have been shown to be effective for the treatment of positive, negative, affective and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. In addition, their advancing mechanisms of action provide advantages over the older agents in terms of long-term tolerability. The use of atypical agents to address the full range of psychotic symptoms with minimal adverse effects should ensure improved functionality and an improved patient quality of life in patients with schizophrenia: both can be regarded as positive reinforcers for long-term compliance.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, part 2: long-term treatment of schizophrenia

These guidelines for the biological treatment of schizophrenia were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). The goal during the development of these guidelines was to review systematically all available evidence pertaining to the treatment of schizophrenia, and to reach a consensus on a series of practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful based on the available evidence. These guidelines are intended for use by all physicians seeing and treating people with schizophrenia. The data used for developing these guidelines have been extracted primarily from various national treatment guidelines and panels for schizophrenia, as well as from meta-analyses, reviews and randomised clinical trials on the efficacy of pharmacological and other biological treatment interventions identified by a search of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into four levels of evidence (A-D). This second part of the guidelines covers the long-term treatment as well as the management of relevant side effects. These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antipsychotic medication, other pharmacological treatment options, electroconvulsive therapy, adjunctive and novel therapeutic strategies) of adults suffering from schizophrenia.

Suicidal behavior in schizophrenia

There is a high prevalence of suicidal behavior in individuals suffering from schizophrenia and recent investigations substantially elucidate this problem and provide useful insights about clinical risk factors, neurobiologic underpinnings and the impact of various treatments on reducing such behavior. The risk of suicide is greatest early in the course of schizophrenic illness but continues throughout life; risk factors for suicidal behavior include psychosis, depression and substance abuse. Effectively treating positive symptoms and depression, reducing substance abuse, avoiding akathisia, addressing demoralization and instilling hope are important elements in this treatment approach. The newer generation of atypical antipsychotics (particularly clozapine) and new psychologic approaches (particularly cognitive behavioral therapy) appear to be useful in reducing suicidality in schizophrenia. The significant advances in defining the neurobiologic basis of suicidality may enable the development of more effective treatments. The renewed emphasis on resilience and recovery as desired outcomes in schizophrenia and the accompanying sense of hope encourage optimism about effectively reducing suicidality in schizophrenia. Over the past 10 years, much has been learnt and hopefully this momentum will be translated into increasingly better outcomes.

Risperidone: a review

When the risk of agranulocytosis associated with clozapine, the prototype of the second-generation neuroleptics, became apparent, its prescription was restricted to patients refractory to classical neuroleptics such as chlorpromazine and haloperidol. This stimulated the development of several novel second-generation antipsychotics with a clinical profile similar to that of clozapine. These novel antipsychotics, which include risperidone, olanzapine and others, are characterised by different pharmacological structures, and also to a certain degree by different pharmacological mechanisms. Following the increased research on the novel second-generation antipsychotics, it became apparent that they not only have the advantage of better extrapyramidal tolerability than the classical neuroleptics, but also have a broader efficacy spectrum (i.e., advantages in the treatment of negative and depressive symptoms and cognitive disturbances in the context of schizophrenia). Risperidone was specifically designed by Paul Janssen as a combined 5-HT2A and D2 receptor antagonist, thus following the pharmacological mechanism thought to be responsible for the antipsychotic effects of clozapine. After its advent in the 1990s as the first novel second-generation antipsychotic, risperidone achieved worldwide acceptance. The following review gives an overview of the huge clinical database available for risperidone in the field of schizophrenia.

Occurrence and treatment of depressive comorbidity/cosyndromality in schizophrenic psychoses: conceptual and treatment issues

Depressive symptoms are a common feature of schizophrenic disorders, a fact that has become increasingly apparent over the last two decades. Apparently the introduction of standardized rating scales in cross-sectional and longitudinal investigations played an important role in the recognition of the relevance of depressive symptoms. They can be interpreted as being cosyndromal or comorbid, depending on the conceptual perspective applied. This is not simply a difference in terminology but is of great aetiopathogenetic relevance. Of particular clinical relevance is the observation that schizophrenic patients with concomitant depressive symptoms have a greater risk of suicidality or an unfavourable disease course. For this reason it is important that sufficient attention is paid to the diagnosis and treatment of depressive symptoms occurring during schizophrenic psychoses. Besides treatment with antidepressants, modern neuroleptics are of great importance in this context as they are more efficacious than classical neuroleptics in treating depressive symptoms.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, Part 1: acute treatment of schizophrenia

These guide lines for the biological treatment of schizophrenia were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBO). The goal during the development of these guidelines was to review systematically all available evidence pertaining to the treatment of schizophrenia, and to reach a consensus on a series of practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful based on the available evidence. These guidelines are intended for use by all physicians seeing and treating people with schizophrenia. The data used for developing these guidelines have been extracted primarily from various national treatment guidelines and panels for schizophrenia, as well as from meta-analyses, reviews and randomised clinical trials on the efficacy of pharmacological and other biological treatment interventions identified by a search of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into four levels of evidence (A-D). This first part of the guidelines covers disease definition, classification, epidemiology and course of schizophrenia, as well as the management of the acute phase treatment. These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antipsychotic medication, other pharmacological treatment options, electroconvulsive therapy, adjunctive and novel therapeutic strategies) of adults suffering from schizophrenia.

Antidepressive effects of traditional and second generation antipsychotics: a review of the clinical data

For a long time,in the context of depressive symptoms in schizophrenia traditional neuroleptics were mostly discussed with respect to possible depressiogenic side effects, although some studies argued that they may also have certain antidepressive effects. However, this was not proven at that time in placebo-controlled studies. Placebo-controlled studies performed in recent years have shown that second generation antipsychotics have antidepressive effects which are significantly stronger than those of the traditional neuroleptics. In addition, it was demonstrated that this antidepressive effect can only partially be explained as being secondary to the improvement of positive and negative symptoms, and is apparently predominantly due to a direct (primary) effect on depressive symptoms. It is of special relevance in this context that the antidepressive effect of second generation antipsychotics was recently demonstrated in depression. The positive results from some studies in bipolar depression are especially impressive and underline the antidepressive potencies of novel antipsychotics beyond the spectrum of schizophrenia.

Acute and continuation risperidone monotherapy in bipolar mania: a 3-week placebo-controlled trial followed by a 9-week double-blind trial of risperidone and haloperidol

In a randomized, double-blind trial, patients with acute bipolar mania received 1-6 mg/day of risperidone, 2-12 mg/day of haloperidol, or placebo for 3 weeks, followed by double-blind risperidone or haloperidol for 9 weeks. Of 438 patients, 154 were randomized to risperidone, 144 to haloperidol, and 140 to placebo. The mean+/-S.D. modal doses were 4.2+/-1.7 mg/day of risperidone and 8.0+/-3.6 mg/day of haloperidol during the initial 3-week phase and 4.1+/-1.8 and 7.4+/-3.7 mg/day during the 12-week period. At week 3, mean Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score reductions from baseline were significantly greater in patients receiving risperidone than placebo (p<0.001). Differences between risperidone and haloperidol on this efficacy measure were not significant. Further reductions in YMRS scores were seen in patients receiving risperidone or haloperidol during the subsequent 9 weeks. No unexpected adverse events were reported. Extrapyramidal disorder and hyperkinesias, the most commonly reported adverse events with antipsychotic use, occurred less frequently with risperidone than haloperidol. We conclude that risperidone monotherapy was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for bipolar mania and that efficacy was maintained over the long term.

Efficacy and safety of long-acting risperidone in stable patients with schizoaffective disorder

BACKGROUND

The treatment of schizoaffective disorder is often complicated by the variety of symptoms that contribute to its pathology. Data from a large study (n=725), which included schizoaffective patients to assess the effect of long-acting risperidone, are presented.

METHOD

A multicenter, open-label study enrolled non-acute, clinically stable patients with schizoaffective disorder (n=110). Patients on a stable dose of antipsychotic for at least 4 weeks at study entry were switched to long-acting risperidone every 2 weeks for 50 weeks.

RESULTS

Mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores (+/-S.E.) improved significantly (p<0.001) at each measured time point, including endpoint (-9.0+/-1.6), compared with baseline. Significant reductions were observed on mean PANSS cluster scores for both anxiety/depression (-1.3+/-0.4, p<0.001) and uncontrolled hostility/excitement (-0.7+/-0.3, p<0.05). In addition, scores improved significantly for positive symptoms (-2.2+/-0.5, p<0.001), negative symptoms (-3.1+/-0.5, p<0.001), and disorganized thoughts (-1.7+/-0.4, p<0.001). The overall subjective score of movement disorders was low at baseline (3.6+/-4.1) and had significantly decreased at endpoint (2.75; p<0.05). Patients were previously treated with antipsychotics for 398+/-790 days before being switched to long-acting risperidone.

LIMITATIONS

Although this was a 50-week study, which included over 100 patients with schizoaffective disorder, limitations include the open-label design and that it was not designed specifically to assess patients with this disorder. PANSS symptom domains previously defined by factor analytic methods were used for mood symptom measures. No specific mood symptom scales were administered in this study.

CONCLUSION

Patients with schizoaffective disorder, considered stable on their antipsychotic medication at study entry, experienced additional significant clinical improvements and minimal side effects with injections of long-acting risperidone over a 50-week study period.

Suicidality and second generation antipsychotics in schizophrenia patients: a case-controlled retrospective study during a 5-year period

RATIONALE

Rates of attempted suicide for individuals with schizophrenia are approaching 30%. Attempted suicide is among the most potent predictors of subsequent suicide. Several studies suggest that suicide is more likely to occur in patients who are not being adequately treated or not being treated at all. An effort was made in the last decade to evaluate the antisuicide effects of pharmacological treatment in schizophrenia with emphasis on the role of the newer second-generation antipsychotics (SGA).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to assess in a large cohort of schizophrenia patients the effects of exposure to SGA on suicidality of patients suffering from schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The study is a retrospective case-controlled evaluation over a 5-year period undertaken in a large university affiliated tertiary care psychiatric hospital.

METHODS

Between January 1998 and December 2002, all records of admissions of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder patients (ICD-10) were assessed. Data as to age, gender, diagnosis, suicide attempt prior to admission, treatment with antipsychotic medication, dose and duration of treatment (mg daily, duration) with SGA was extracted from patients' files. All patients who had attempted suicide prior to admission were defined as the index group. The case-controlled group was comprised of the next admission of a patient suffering from schizophrenia (or schizoaffective disorder), matched for gender and age, who did not attempt suicide.

RESULTS

Records of 756 patients (4486 admissions for said period) were analyzed (56.6% male, mean age 39.1+/-13.5 years). Amongst 378 patients who attempted suicide (index group), 16.1% were exposed to SGA while 37% were exposed in the control group (P=0.0001). The protective effect (odds ratio) of treatment by SGA was 3.54 (95%CI: 2.4-5.3). Risperidone was more frequently prescribed in the control group (54.3%) and had a larger effect-size than olanzapine (3.16 versus 1.76), although not statistically significant. Clozapine was prescribed only to a few patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Schizophrenia patients exposed to both risperidone and olanzapine may gain protection from suicidality. The antisuicide effects seem to differ between SGAs. The long duration and large sample size support this finding, despite the retrospective nature of this study.

The role of atypical antipsychotics in bipolar depression and anxiety disorders

Bipolar disorder is a complex condition that includes symptoms of mania, depression, and often anxiety. Diagnosing and treating bipolar depression is challenging, with the disorder often being diagnosed as unipolar depression. In addition, comorbid anxiety can be a significant detractor to successful outcomes, increasing symptom severity, frequency of episodes and suicide rates, and decreasing response to antidepressant therapy. Anxiety often precedes and hastens the onset of bipolar disorder, and a shared genetic etiology has been suggested. Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of atypical antipsychotics for the acute and maintenance treatment of mania. Evidence from studies in patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder and bipolar depression indicate that these agents may also have antidepressant effects. In open trials in patients with bipolar mania, risperidone therapy has led to significant reductions in depression scores compared with baseline. Reductions in depression scores in patients with bipolar mania have been significantly greater with olanzapine compared with placebo. In patients with bipolar depression, the combination of olanzapine and fluoxetine resulted in significant improvement in depression compared with olanzapine alone or placebo. Although little data are available on the effects of these agents on comorbid anxiety in patients with bipolar disorder, some atypical antipsychotics have demonstrated efficacy in patients with anxiety disorders, including obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Thus, atypical antipsychotics represent an important therapeutic option for the treatment of bipolar disorder, providing improvements in manic, depressive, and anxiety symptoms.

Risperidone in acute and long-term therapy of schizophrenia--a clinical profile

Data from a range of well-controlled clinical trials, observational studies, and clinical use support the efficacy of risperidone for both acute and long-term therapy of schizophrenic psychoses. With regard to positive symptoms, the efficacy of risperidone was shown to be at least comparable with that of haloperidol. However, risperidone differs from conventional antipsychotics because it is more effective against the negative symptoms, has beneficial effects on affective and cognitive symptoms, and carries less risk of extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). To date, risperidone is the only atypical antipsychotic to have shown a significantly lower relapse rate compared with haloperidol in a long-term double-blind trial. This review describes comprehensive trial data and therapeutic observations gained with risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia since its approval.

New developments in the pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia

This review summarizes current key research strategies and the most prominently pursued new potential treatments for schizophrenia. First, new routes of administration for second generation antipsychotics are presented. These include rapidly dissolving tablets, drops and sirups as well as new intramuscular formulations. Newly available short acting and long acting (depot) antipsychotics complement oral antipsychotics so that the full spectrum of routes of administration is now available for second generation antipsychotics. Next to antipsychotic polypharmacy, in which two or more antipsychotics are combined, pharmacological add-on treatments, mainly with benzodiazepines, antidepressants and mood stabilizers enjoy increasing popularity. Most of this practice is driven by personal preferences, clinical experience and marketing rather than evidence based medicine. New pharmacological mechanisms currently utilized in advanced states of development include partial dopamine D2-receptor agonism, supplementation with glutamatergic agents, estrogen and omega-3-fatty acids. While the concept of partial D1-agonism has already led to the successful launch of a new antipsychotic, aripiprazole, the other attempts to improve therapeutic response in schizophrenia patients have so far provided equivocal results. It is argued that they may be helpful for certain subgroups or specific symptoms of schizophrenia patients. In conclusion, many exciting new pharmacological leads are currently pursued and this will very likely augment the options for treating patients with schizophrenia.

Pharmacokinetic comparison of fast-disintegrating and conventional tablet formulations of risperidone in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Difficulties with and resistance to tablet-taking are common in all patient groups and can exacerbate compliance problems and undermine treatment efficacy. In recent years, rapidly dissolving oral drug formulations have been developed to overcome problems related to swallowing difficulties.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of a fast-disintegrating oral tablet of risperidone and the conventional oral tablet.

METHODS

This was a randomized, open-label, 2-way crossover trial in which healthy volunteers received two 0.5-mg tablets of a fast-disintegrating oral risperidone formulation and two 0.5-mg tablets of conventional oral risperidone, each in a single administration. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis of the active moiety (risperidone + 9-hydroxy-risperidone), risperidone, and its active metabolite 9-hydroxy-risperidone were obtained during a 96-hour period after dosing. Safety assessments included monitoring of adverse events, hematology and biochemistry tests of the sampled blood, urinalysis, blood pressure measurements, and electrocardiography.

RESULTS

The bioequivalence assessment was based on pharmacokinetic and statistical analysis of data from 37 subjects who completed both treatment periods. The plasma concentration-time profiles of the active moiety, risperidone, and 9-hydroxy-risperidone were similar after intake of the 2 formulations. The fast-disintegrating tablet and the conventional tablet showed bioequivalence with respect to the active moiety, risperidone, and 9-hydroxy-risperidone. The 90% CIs for the mean treatment ratios of the log-transformed peak plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) to the last quantifiable time point, and AUC extrapolated to infinity were all within the predefined equivalence range from 80% to 125%. Twenty-eight of 50 (56%) subjects originally randomized reported adverse events, with a similar incidence for both treatments. All adverse events were mild, with somnolence and headache being the most frequently reported. No clinically relevant changes were observed in physical, biochemical, hematologic, or urinalysis variables during the study.

CONCLUSION

In this study in healthy subjects, a single administration of two 0.5-mg fast-disintegrating risperidone tablets was bioequivalent to a single administration of two 0.5-mg conventional risperidone tablets.

Switching patients to aripiprazole from other antipsychotic agents: a multicenter randomized study

RATIONALE

Switching patients from one antipsychotic to another can lead to tolerability problems or transient symptom exacerbations. It is important to compare switching strategies to determine which methods produce the best possible patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of three dosing strategies for switching chronic, stable patients with schizophrenia from current oral antipsychotic monotherapy to once-daily oral aripiprazole monotherapy.

METHOD

Patients in this 8-week, open-label, outpatient study were randomized to: 1). immediate initiation of 30 mg/day aripiprazole with simultaneous immediate discontinuation of current antipsychotic; 2). immediate initiation of 30 mg/day aripiprazole while tapering off current antipsychotic over 2 weeks; or 3). up-titrating aripiprazole to 30 mg/day over 2 weeks, while simultaneously tapering off current antipsychotic. Efficacy assessments included PANSS, CGI-S, and CGI-I scores. Safety assessments included: adverse events (AEs) recording, evaluation of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), vital signs, ECG, and clinical laboratory tests.

RESULTS

Efficacy with aripiprazole was maintained during the study with numerical improvements compared with baseline in all three groups. The overall incidence of AEs was broadly comparable across all groups, and AEs were generally mild to moderate in severity and time-limited. Discontinuations due to AEs were comparable across the groups. No deterioration in EPS occurred in any group. The reduction in body weight and plasma prolactin levels following switch to aripiprazole were comparable across the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Any of the three strategies evaluated can be used safely for switching patients to aripiprazole from antipsychotic monotherapy. Furthermore, patients' symptoms may continue to improve after switching to aripiprazole.

The new and evolving pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia

Based on the evidence presented here, the following tentative conclusions can be drawn. Atypical antipsychotics (except amisulpride) have shown superiority over placebo in acute schizophrenia. Compared with conventional antipsychotics, they are at least as effective. Generally, analyses employing conservative criteria (e.g., Cochrane reviews) report few efficacy differences between atypical and conventional agents. There are now many well-controlled studies indicating modest advantages for the atypical antipsychotics, however, particularly in specific symptom domains. For the treatment of negative symptoms, olanzapine and to a lesser extent amisulpride seem most promising. Risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine display advantages in improving cognitive and depressive symptoms. There are indications that the atypical antipsychotics are associated with decreased likelihood of rehospitalization and improved quality of life. In head-to-head comparisons of atypical antipsychotics, none have shown consistent efficacy advantages. In severely refractory samples, no atypical antipsychotics have consistently been shown to be as effective as clozapine or superior to conventional agents. There are indications, however, that risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine have advantages over conventional agents in less severely refractory patients. Few maintenance RCTs have been published, and efficacy advantages for atypical antipsychotics in prospective RCTs in first-episode schizophrenia have not been reported.

The European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study: rationale, methods and recruitment

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study is to understand the comparative costs and outcomes of antipsychotic drug treatment, with specific focus on olanzapine. The study will also provide a large database for research into the treatment and outcome of schizophrenia. The role of observational studies in the assessment of the effectiveness of antipsychotic agents is reviewed, and the rationale, design and recruitment issues surrounding the SOHO study are presented.

METHOD

SOHO is a 3-year, prospective, observational study of the health outcomes associated with antipsychotic treatment in Europe.

RESULTS

Over 10 000 patients have been recruited from 10 countries. Baseline evaluation included measures of clinical status, social functioning, quality of life, service use and pharmacological treatment. Patients will be followed for 3 years.

CONCLUSION

The SOHO study will complement randomized controlled trial findings on the treatment of schizophrenia and will address relevant clinical and policy research questions.

Gene expression profiling with DNA microarrays: advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders

DNA microarray transcriptome profiling of the postmortem brain opens novel horizons in understanding molecular changes associated with complex psychiatric disorders. With careful analysis and interpretation of microarray data we are uncovering previously unknown, expression patterns that maybe subject-specific and pivotal in understanding the disease process. In our recent studies, analyses of the prefrontal cortex of subjects with schizophrenia and matched controls uncovered complex changes in the expression of genes related to presynaptic secretory release, GABAergic and glutamatergic transmission, metabolic pathways, myelination, as well as cAMP and phosphoinositol second messenger systems. Our goal will be to integrate this expression data within the context of the relevant anatomical, biochemical, molecular, imaging and clinical findings.

Treatment of the symptoms of schizophrenia: a combined analysis of double-blind studies comparing risperidone with haloperidol and other antipsychotic agents

Combined data on efficacy were available from 12 double-blind short-term (maximum 8 weeks) trials comparing risperidone and other antipsychotics in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Patients received risperidone (n = 1056) or other antipsychotics (n = 703). Haloperidol (n = 473) was the most frequently prescribed other antipsychotic. Efficacy assessments include the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total, subscale (positive symptoms, negative symptoms and general psychopathology), cluster (cognitive and affective symptoms) and item (anxiety and hostility) scores. At endpoint, the mean decrease from baseline in PANSS total scores was significantly greater for patients receiving risperidone (-20.9) than other antipsychotics (-16.2; P < 0.001), or the subset receiving haloperidol (-14.3; P < 0.001). Risperidone-treated patients showed a significantly greater decrease in the positive (P < 0.01), negative (P < 0.05) and general psychopathology (P < 0.001) scores than patients receiving other antipsychotics or haloperidol. Scores for cognition, affective symptoms, anxiety and hostility each improved significantly (P < 0.05) more for patients receiving risperidone than those receiving other antipsychotics or haloperidol. Efficacy data on patients with an acute exacerbation were available from seven trials (risperidone n = 372, other antipsychotics n = 285, including haloperidol n = 120). At endpoint, the mean decrease from baseline in PANSS total scores was significantly greater for patients receiving risperidone (-24.7) than other antipsychotics (-19.8, P < 0.01) including haloperidol (-19.8, P < 0.05). Risperidone-treated patients also showed a greater decrease in positive symptom scores (-7.8) than those receiving other antipsychotics (-6.3; P < 0.01) or haloperidol (-7.1). A > or = 20% reduction in PANSS total score with risperidone, haloperidol and other antipsychotics was achieved by 65.9%, 54.3% and 54.9%, respectively; a > or = 30% PANSS reduction by 54.0%, 46.6% and 46.5% of patients, respectively; and a > or = 40% reduction by 43.8%, 33.7% and 34.4% of patients, respectively. These findings are consistent with earlier findings that show risperidone is more efficacious than haloperidol for reducing the symptoms of schizophrenia.