Pharmacokinetic properties and antihypertensive efficacy of once-daily diltiazem

Peripheral edema associated with calcium channel blockers: incidence and withdrawal rate--a meta-analysis of randomized trials

OBJECTIVE

Peripheral edema is considered to be a common and annoying adverse effect of calcium channel blockers (CCBs). It has been thought to occur secondary to arteriolar dilatation causing intracapillary hypertension and fluid extravasation. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and withdrawal rate of peripheral edema with CCBs.

METHODS

A systematic search was made in PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL from 1980 to January 2011 for randomized clinical trials reporting peripheral edema with CCBs in patients with hypertension. Trials enrolling at least 100 patients in the CCB arm and lasting at least 4 weeks were included in the analysis. Both the incidence and withdrawal rate due to edema were pooled by weighing each trial by the inverse of the variance. Head-to-head comparison was done to evaluate the risk of edema between newer lipophilic dihydropyridine (DHP) CCBs and older DHPs.

RESULTS

One hundred and six studies with 99 469 participants, mean age 56 ± 6 years, satisfied our inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. The weighted incidence of peripheral edema was significantly higher in the CCBs group when compared with controls/placebo (10.7 vs. 3.2%, P < 0.0001). Similarly, the withdrawal rate due to edema was higher in patients on CCBs compared with control/placebo (2.1 vs. 0.5%, P < 0.0001). Both the incidence of edema and patient withdrawal rate due to edema increased with the duration of therapy with CCBs reaching 24 and 5%, respectively, after 6 months. The risk of peripheral edema with lipophilic DHPs was 57% lower than with traditional DHPs (relative risk 0.43; 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.53; P < 0.0001). Incidence of peripheral edema in patients on DHPs was 12.3% compared with 3.1% with non-DHPs (P < 0.0001). Edema with high-dose CCBs (defined as more than half the usual maximal dose) was 2.8 times higher than that with low-dose CCBs (16.1 vs. 5.7%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of peripheral edema progressively increased with duration of CCB therapy up to 6 months. Over the long term, more than 5% of patients discontinued CCBs because of this adverse effect. Edema rates were lower with both non-DHPs and lipophilic DHPs.

Administration-time-dependent effects of diltiazem on the 24-hour blood pressure profile of essential hypertension patients

The aim of this study was to identify differences in the patterns of efficacy and duration of effect by diltiazem given in different dosage forms and schedules. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were monitored before and after treatment by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for 48 h every 30 min. Patients were divided for treatment assignment into 4 groups -nocturnal BP dippers and nondippers. In dipper hypertension, diltiazem-retard at 08:00 (n = 7) had the most marked antihypertensive effects during nighttime rest (SBP; 136 +/- 14/118 +/- 9 mmHg, p < 0.01 before vs. after treatment). Diltiazem-retard at 19:00 (n = 6) exerted greatest effect during daytime activity (152 +/- 7/139 +/- 6, p < 0.01) with inhibition of the morning BP rise. Diltiazem (t.i.d., n = 5) had the best effect during daytime activity (151 +/- 16/136 +/- 9, p < 0.05). However, in nondipper hypertensive patients, diltiazem (t.i.d., n = 8) had the most pronounced antihypertensive effects during nightly rest (144 +/- 12/127 +/- 12, p < 0.05). Evening medication with diltiazem retard appears to be more efficacious than the other dosage schedules.

Diltiazem: ten years of clinical experience in the treatment of hypertension

Diltiazem hydrochloride is a benzothiazepine derivative calcium-channel blocker with proven antianginal and antihypertensive capabilities. Its primary mechanism of action is vasodilatation, which results in diminished vascular resistance and improved perfusion to various vascular beds and target organs. The antihypertensive efficacy of diltiazem in various demographic groups has been studied and compared with diuretics, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and other calcium-channel blockers. These studies have shown that the antihypertensive effect of diltiazem is similar to that of the other therapies. Diltiazem does not adversely affect electrolytes or carbohydrate or lipid metabolism, and it may have beneficial effects on the heart and kidneys. Diltiazem reduces myocardial hypertrophy and exerts antianginal effects on the heart through coronary vasodilation and reduction in the blood pressure double product. Diltiazem improves renal perfusion and attenuates proteinuria. These effects may be helpful in limiting the progression of renal injury. Overall, the efficacy and tolerability of diltiazem, as well as its salutary effects on the heart and kidneys, make it an important therapeutic consideration for patients with hypertensive disease.

Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two marketed bid formulations of diltiazem in healthy volunteers

Cardizem SR and Bi-Tildiem were both approved in their respective countries on the basis of clinical trials demonstrating efficacy and safety in the treatment of angina pectoris. In this cross-over randomized study, we assessed whether these two sustained-release formulations of diltiazem have equivalent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. Twenty-four young healthy male volunteers were hooked to Holters and ambulatory blood pressure monitors for 24 h to establish baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), sinus rate and PR intervals. They then received a single dose of 120 mg of diltiazem from one formulation. The pharmacodynamic measurements were recorded for a further 24 h and blood samples were collected over 36 h for evaluation of diltiazem in plasma by a high-performance liquid chromatogrpahic (HPLC) method. The procedures were repeated with the alternate formulation after a 7 d wash-out. Pharmacokinetics showed statistically significant (p < 0.01) differences in AUC0-12 with means (+/- SD) of 519.2(+/- 172.8) and 429.6(+/- 147.2) ng h ml-1, AUC0-36 of 835.6(+/- 281.6) and 730.9 (+/- 271.5) ng h ml-1 and Cmax of 89.1(+/- 30.3) and 61.1(+/- 21.2) ng ml-1 for Cardizem SR and Bi-Tildiem, respectively. The only pharmacodynamic parameter showing a statistically significant difference in change from baseline between the two formulations was DBP with mean (+/- SD) change in AUC0-12 of -13.6(+/- 20.8) and +8.4(+/- 31.7) mm Hg h (p = 0.0135) and in AUC0-24 of -33.0(+/- 43.7) and -0.3(+/- 59.2) mm Hg h (p = 0.0463) for Cardizem SR and Bi-Tildiem, respectively. These findings suggest that assessment of efficacy of sustained-release formulations of diltiazem by bioequivalence could be misleading. They also confirm that a single dose of diltiazem does not elicit a significant pharmacodynamic response in healthy volunteers. Equivalence for such formulations should therefore be demonstrated by pharmacodynamic evaluation or clinical studies in a patient population.

Novel drug-delivery systems for hypertension

Although novel controlled-release drug-delivery systems have been used in other areas of medicine, their application in the treatment of hypertension has been relatively recent. Biotechnical use of chemical-dispensing systems has been applied to propranolol, clonidine (the transdermal therapeutic system), nifedipine (the gastrointestinal therapeutic system), verapamil (the sodium alginate and spheroidal oral-delivery absorption system), felodipine (the hydrophilic gel principle), metoprolol succinate (the multiple-unit pellet system), and diltiazem (one system comprising sustained-release beads and the other utilizing the patented Geomatrix extended-release system). Oral drug-delivery systems allow antihypertensive agents that previously had to be administered two to four times daily to be administered once each day. Potential disadvantages of the oral controlled-release products include delayed attainment of pharmacodynamic effect, unpredictable or reduced bioavailability, enhanced first-pass hepatic metabolism, dose dumping, sustained toxicity, dosing inflexibility, and increased cost. Potential advantages include reduced dosing frequency, enhanced compliance and convenience, reduced toxicity, stable drug levels, uniform drug effect, and decreased total dose. Although skin reactions are common, the transdermal drug delivery of clonidine provides another innovative approach to supplying transcutaneous, controlled, continuous delivery of drug for 7 days. It is possible that future research will prove that the agents that provide complete 24-hour control may reduce the cardiovascular events associated with the early-morning blood pressure surge. This evolution in antihypertensive therapy to achieve once-daily dosing may prove to be of great value to both physicians and patients in the 1990s.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of calcium antagonists. An update

The calcium antagonists are valuable and widely used agents in the management of essential hypertension and angina. There is an increasing number of new agents to add to the 3 prototype substances nifedipine, diltiazem and verapamil. These new agents are dihydropyridines structurally related to nifedipine. However, they tend to have longer elimination half-lives (t 1/2 beta) and may be suitable for twice-daily administration. Amlodipine is an exception with a t 1/2 beta in excess of 30h. Apart from elimination rates, however, the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the newer agents have a notable tendency to resemble those of the established agents. They are highly cleared drugs, are relatively highly protein bound. As they are subject to significant first-pass metabolism, old age and hepatic impairment will increase their plasma concentrations due to a reduced first-pass effect. Renal impairment does little to their pharmacokinetics since the fraction eliminated unchanged by the kidney is small. For most agents, plasma concentration-response relationships have been described. Interesting areas for further research include chronopharmacokinetics, stereoselective pharmacokinetics and lipid solubility. Drugs affecting hepatic blood flow and drug metabolising capacity have predictable interaction potential. Some of the newer calcium antagonists will, like verapamil, increase plasma digoxin concentrations. Verapamil and diltiazem decrease phenazone (antipyrine) metabolism and therefore tend to decrease the metabolism of other drugs.