Positioning of a double-lumen endobronchial tube without the aid of any instruments: an implication for emergency management

Comparison of lung ultrasound technique <em>versus</em> clinical method to evaluate the accuracy of size and placement of left endobronchial double lumen tube in patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery: a prospective observational study

Anthropometric measurements like height and gender have been frequently found to be inaccurate in prediction of size of double lumen tube (DLT). A tracheal ultrasonography (TUS) is a technique that can be used to predict the size of DLT and its correct placement for lung isolation. We aim to check the accuracy of ultrasound over clinical methods. This prospective study included 68 patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation (OLV) with DLT. The groups were assessed for the size of DLT by either anthropometric measurement using height and gender (Group C) or ultrasound method (Group U). Further, the accuracy of placement of DLT was assessed through, either lung auscultation in group C or various ultrasonographic and ventilatory parameters such as lung isolation in the first attempt (lung sliding and lung pulse sign), oxygenation status and peak airway pressure, in group U. Surgeon satisfaction score was also compared in both the groups. The accuracy of predicted DLT size between Group C and Group U was statistically significant (p=0.044). In Group C, 56% of patients showed a mismatch between the predicted DLT size and the actual size required, while in Group U, the mismatch was only 32.4%. The accuracy of DLT placement through group C was 41% as compared to 79% in Group U. Surgeon satisfaction score was also significantly higher in Group U as compared to Group C (p=0.0028). Thus, our study suggests that tracheal and chest ultrasonography for DLT size selection and placement for lung isolation is superior to clinical methods.

Right displacement of trachea to reduce right bronchial misplacement of left double lumen tube: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study

Background

Misplacement of double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs) during bronchial intubation, especially when bronchoscopy guidance is not applicable, threatens effective lung isolation and brings about airway injury during reposition. We aimed to examine whether a novel maneuver called right tracheal displacement (RTD) can reduce left-sided DLT misplacement during first-attempt intubation without bronchoscopy guidance.

Methods

Patients that underwent thoracic surgeries requiring one-lung ventilation during November 2020 to January 2021 were recruited and randomized into control and RTD group, with 54 cases in each group. The primary outcomes included the incidence of DLT misplacement and the time to complete desired bronchial intubation. The secondary outcomes included mucosal injury, sore throat and hoarseness upon emergence and at 24 h post-operatively.

Result

The incidence of DLT misplacement in RTD group was significantly lower compared to control group (0% vs. 16.7%) The time to complete bronchial intubation was also significantly shortened in RTD group compared to control (52.88 ± 9.36 s vs. 63.04 ± 20.02 s). The incidence of mucosal injury, sore throat and hoarseness were comparable between two groups.

Conclusion

RTD maneuver can effectively improve the success rate of first-attempt proper DLT positioning and shorten the time required by bronchial intubation.

Trial registration

This prospective, double-blind, randomized study has completed the registration of the Chinese Clinical Trial Center at 2/11/2020 with the registration number ChiCTR2000040212. It was conducted from 26/11/2020 to 31/7/2021 in third affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen university.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01850-y.

Lung ultrasound is non-inferior to bronchoscopy for confirmation of double-lumen endotracheal tube positioning: a randomized controlled noninferiority study

BACKGROUND

Appropriate placement of left-sided double-lumen endotracheal tubes (LDLTs) is paramount for optimal visualization of the operative field during thoracic surgeries that require single lung ventilation. Appropriate placement of LDLTs is therefore confirmed with fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) rather than clinical assessment alone. Recent studies have demonstrated lung ultrasound (US) is superior to clinical assessment alone for confirming placement of LDLT, but no large trials have compared US to the gold standard of FOB. This noninferiority trial was devised to compare lung US with FOB for LDLT positioning and achievement of lung collapse for operative exposure.

METHODS

This randomized, controlled, double-blind, noninferiority trial was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand from October 2017 to July 2019. The study enrolled 200 ASA classification 1-3 patients that were scheduled for elective thoracic surgery requiring placement of LDLT. Study patients were randomized into either the FOB group or the lung US group after initial blind placement of LDLT. Five patients were excluded due to protocol deviation. In the FOB group (n = 98), fiberoptic bronchoscopy was used to confirm lung collapse due to proper positioning of the LDLT, and to adjust the tube if necessary. In the US group (n = 97), lung ultrasonography of four pre-specified zones (upper and lower posterior and mid-axillary) was used to assess lung collapse and guide adjustment of the tube if necessary. The primary outcome was presence of adequate lung collapse as determined by visual grading by the attending surgeon on scale from 1 to 4. Secondary outcomes included the time needed to adjust and confirm lung collapse, the time from finishing LDLT positioning to the grading of lung collapse, and intraoperative parameters such has hypotension or hypertension, hypoxia, and hypercarbia. The patient, attending anesthesiologist, and attending thoracic surgeon were all blinded to the intervention arm.

RESULTS

The primary outcome of lung collapse by visual grading was similar between the intervention and the control groups, with 89 patients (91.8%) in the US group compared to 83 patients (84.1%) in the FOB group (p = 0.18) experiencing adequate collapse. This met criteria for noninferiority per protocol analysis. The median time needed to confirm and adjust LDLT position in the US group was 3 min (IQR 2-5), which was significantly shorter than the median time needed to perform the task in the FOB group (6 min, IQR 4-10) (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients undergoing thoracic surgery requiring LDLT, lung ultrasonography was noninferior to fiberoptic bronchoscopy in achieving adequate lung collapse and reaches the desired outcome in less time.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03314519 , Principal investigator: Kasana Raksamani, Date of registration: 19/10/2017.

Lung sonography can improve the specificity of determination of left-sided double-lumen tracheal tube position in both novices and experts: a randomised prospective study

Objective

Lung sonography can be helpful to determine the position of a left-sided double-lumen tube (DLT). However, clinical experience is required for correct assessment. We investigated whether lung sonography can improve the diagnostic efficacy of determining the DLT position in novices and experts.

Methods

In this randomised prospective clinical study, 88 patients were allocated to two groups using auscultation or lung sonography for initial assessment of the DLT position. In each group, two repeated assessments were performed; the first was performed by a novice, and the second was performed by an expert. The final DLT position was confirmed by fibre-optic bronchoscopy. The primary outcome was the diagnostic efficacy (including overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity) in confirming the DLT position.

Results

In both the novices and experts, the specificity of determining the DLT position was significantly higher with lung sonography than auscultation (60.0% vs. 21.7% and 66.7% vs. 37.5%, respectively). Additionally, the predictability of an incorrect position was similar between the novices and experts using lung sonography (area under the curve of 0.665 and 0.690, respectively).

Conclusions

Lung sonography can improve the diagnostic efficacy of detecting an incorrect DLT position in both novices and experts.

A New Technique to Determine the Size of Double-lumen Endobronchial Tubes by the Two Perpendicularly Measured Bronchial Diameters

The cross-section of the mainstem bronchi is not completely round. For preoperative selection of a double-lumen endobronchial tube size, it may be necessary to measure the mediolateral and the anteroposterior bronchial diameters, which can be measured respectively on chest radiograph and computed tomography. With Internal Review Board approval and patients’ informed consent, 105 elective thoracic surgical patients who needed left-sided double-lumen tubes were enrolled. Double-lumen tube size was selected depending on the arithmetic mean of the mediolateral and anteroposterior bronchial diameters. Moreover, the outer diameters of the bronchial tube should be smaller than both mediolateral and anteroposterior diameters. The recommended bronchial diameter for each double-lumen tube size was chosen so that the mean of the two bronchial diameters was 0 to 2.0 mm larger than the upper limit of 95% confidence interval of the averaged outer diameter of the bronchial tube of the selected double-lumen tube. In no case was the predicted double-lumen tube size inappropriate. Generally, anteroposterior bronchial diameters appeared to be different from mediolateral diameters (P=0.001). The double-lumen tube size to be selected based on only one bronchial diameter was different from the one selected based on two perpendicularly measured bronchial diameters in 54.3% of patients (57/105). Preoperative selection of the double-lumen tube size based on the anteroposterior, mediolateral and mean bronchial diameters seems to be useful in that this may obviate the need to change an inappropriately sized double-lumen tube and may be helpful in reducing the related complications.

Point-of-care ultrasound versus auscultation in determining the position of double-lumen tube

This study was designed to assess the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound in determining the position of double-lumen tubes (DLTs).A total of 103 patients who required DLT intubation were enrolled into the study. After DLTs were tracheal intubated in the supine position, an auscultation researcher and ultrasound researcher were sequentially invited in the operating room to conduct their evaluation of the DLT. After the end of their evaluation, fiberscope researchers (FRs) were invited in the operating room to evaluate the position of DLT using a fiberscope. After the patients were changed to the lateral position, the same evaluation process was repeated. These 3 researchers were blind to each other when they made their conclusions. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were obtained by statistical analysis.When left DLTs (LDLTs) were used, the accuracy of ultrasound (84.2% [72.1%, 92.5%]) was higher than the accuracy of auscultation (59.7% [45.8%, 72.4%]) (P < .01). When right DLTs (RDLTs) were used, the accuracy of ultrasound (89.1% [76.4%, 96.4%]) was higher than the accuracy of auscultation (67.4% [52.0%, 80.5%]) (P < .01). When LDLTs were used in the lateral position, the accuracy of ultrasound (75.4% [62.2%, 85.9%]) was higher than the accuracy of auscultation (54.4% [40.7%, 67.6%]) (P < .05). When RDLT were used, the accuracy of ultrasound (73.9% [58.9%, 85.7%]) was higher than the accuracy of auscultation (47.8% [32.9%, 63.1%]) (P < .05).Assessment via point-of-care ultrasound is superior to auscultation in determining the position of DLTs.

Effect-site concentration of remifentanil required to blunt haemodynamic responses during tracheal intubation: A randomized comparison between single- and double-lumen tubes

Objective

To investigate the effect-site concentration of remifentanil required to blunt haemodynamic responses during tracheal intubation with a single-lumen tube (SLT) or a double-lumen tube (DLT).

Methods

Patients scheduled for thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation were randomly allocated to either the SLT or DLT group. All patients received a target-controlled infusion of propofol and a predetermined concentration of remifentanil. Haemodynamic parameters during intubation were recorded. The effect-site concentration of remifentanil was determined using a delayed up-and-down sequential allocation method.

Results

A total of 92 patients were enrolled in the study. The effective effect-site concentrations of remifentanil required to blunt haemodynamic responses in 50% of patients (EC₅₀) estimated by isotonic regression with bootstrapping was higher in the DLT than the SLT group (8.5 ng/ml [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.0–9.5 ng/ml] versus 6.5 ng/ml [95% CI 5.6–6.7 ng/ml], respectively). Similarly, the effective effect-site concentrations of remifentanil in 95% of patients in the DLT group was higher than the SLT group (9.9 ng/ml [95% CI 9.8–10.0 ng/ml] versus 7.0 ng/ml [95% CI 6.9–7.0 ng/ml], respectively).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that a DLT requires a 30% higher EC₅₀ of remifentanil than does an SLT to blunt haemodynamic responses during tracheal intubation when combined with a target-controlled infusion of propofol.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01542099.

Endobronchial intubation in thoracic surgery: Which side should be preferred?

AIM

This study was undertaken to compare the clinical performance of right versus left double-lumen endotracheal tubes placed without using fiberoptic bronchoscopy in thoracic surgery operations.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients who were operated on in our institution between January 2013 and February 2014. We analyzed clinical performance in terms of hypoxia, hypercapnia, and adequate deflation of the lungs with both left- and right-sided double-lumen endotracheal tubes.

RESULTS

There were 80 patients with a mean age of 53.74 ± 15.59 years. Right-sided double-lumen tubes were used in 33 patients, and left-sided double-lumen tubes were used in 47. Perioperative hypoxi (p < 0.05), hypercapnia (p < 0.01), and inadequate deflation of the lung (p < 0.001) were found more frequently with the use of right-sided double-lumen endotracheal tubes. Arterial blood gas analyses in the post-anesthesia care unit showed that high pCO2 (>45 mm Hg), low pH (<7.36), and high lactate levels (>4 mmol L(-1)) were more frequent with right-sided double-lumen endotracheal tubes (p < 0.001). The incidence of atelectasis was greater (p < 0.001) and the duration of hospital stay was longer (p = 0.02) with the use of right-sided double-lumen endotracheal tubes.

CONCLUSION

Right-sided double-lumen endotracheal tubes resulted in poorer clinical performance. Therefore, a left-sided double-lumen endotracheal tube should be preferred in thoracic surgery operations when an appropriate size of fiberoptic bronchoscope is not available.

Can ultrasound be useful for predicting the size of a left double-lumen bronchial tube? Tracheal width as measured by ultrasonography versus computed tomography

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To correlate tracheal width as measured by ultrasound with width measured by computed tomography (CT), and to evaluate the possible role of ultrasound in the selection of the proper size of left-sided double-lumen endotracheal tubes (LDLTs).

DESIGN

Two independent, prospective, observational clinical studies (Study 1 and Study 2).

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

Study 1 included 25 patients and Study 2 included 20 adult thoracic surgery patients who required a LDLT during anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS

In Study 1, CT measurements of tracheal width were made at the coronary plane 0.5 cm above the sternoclavicular joint; CT measurements of the left main bronchus diameter were made 1 cm below the carina. Ultrasound measurement of tracheal width was performed just above the sternoclavicular joint in the transversal section. In Study 2, patients' tracheas were intubated with a LDLT based on ultrasound measurements. The frequencies of incorrect selections of LDLT and unsatisfactory lung collapse were analyzed.

MAIN RESULTS

There was a strong correlation between tracheal width as measured by ultrasound and tracheal width (r=0.882, P<0.001) and left main bronchus width (r=0.832, P<0.001) as measured by CT. In 5 cases (25%), the incorrect LDLT by ultrasound was selected; and one (5%) was found to have an unsatisfactory lung collapse.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of the outer tracheal width by ultrasound can be a useful method for predicting the diameter of left main bronchus and for selecting a LDLT.

[Correct placement of left-sided double lumen endotracheal tubes: a simple verification technique]

OBJECTIVE

Double lumen endotracheal tubes (DLTs) are used in thoracic surgery for selective bronchial intubation, which is required for single lung ventilation. Correct placement of the tube is checked by means of fiberoptic bronchoscopy. We present a simple alternative method to help confirm the correct placement of left-sided DLTs. The method consists of passing a suction catheter through the tracheal lumen of the tube. Our hypothesis was that if the catheter can be inserted without difficulty, the tube is correctly placed. The objective was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of that criterion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We studied patients scheduled for elective left pneumonectomy or lobectomy. After passing the catheter through the left-sided DLT, placement was checked by means of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (gold standard) and the results were compared with the placement assessment based on ease of insertion.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included. The DLT was judged to be correctly placed in 88% of patients in whom the catheter was inserted without resistance. Bronchoscopy corroborated this finding in 84% of cases; the tube was found to be incorrectly placed in the remaining 4% of cases and had to be reinserted. Resistance was noted in 12% of cases and bronchoscopy confirmed that the tube was incorrectly placed in those patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique can be very useful in placing left-sided DLTs in situations where fiberoptic bronchoscopy is not available and if the anesthesiologist has a thorough command of the method. Our results support the routine use of this criterion as it is simple and easy to learn. It should be remembered, however, that confirmation of placement by means of fiberoptic bronchoscopy is currently the gold standard technique.

[Emergency treatment of thoracic trauma]

Thoracic trauma, most often associated with other serious injuries, is the main cause of death in the first 45 years of life. The percentage of chest injuries in multiple trauma, mainly from blunt impact, has remained relatively constant at 80% during the last 30 years. Isolated thoracic injuries comprise only 25% of all trauma cases, 90% of chest injuries are due to blunt impact, while penetrating injuries make up 5-10%. Since 25% of deaths from trauma are attributable to chest injuries, they determine the survival rate in multiple trauma to a significant extent. The pattern of chest injuries is variable, frequently in different combinations comprising rib cage and diaphragm, lung parenchyma, airway and mediastinal organs. This article details the immediate simultaneous diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the prehospital phase, management in the emergency room, the relative importance of computed tomography, ultrasound examination and endoscopy in the primary diagnostic evaluation and the principles of anaesthetic management of thoracic trauma.

Atemwegsmanagement bei der Ein-Lungen-Ventilation

The progress in sophisticated and complex operating methods for intrathoracic procedures demands reliable lung separation with the possibility of one-lung ventilation. Patients with thoracic traumas and pulmonary emergencies can confront any anaesthesiologist with the need for lung separating procedures. This review describes the contemporary procedures for lung separation. The special aspects of difficult airway management during one-lung ventilation and the indications for one-lung ventilation are described in detail. The pathophysiological changes during one-lung ventilation and strategies to avoid hypoxemia and to preserve adequate oxygenation are discussed.