Use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole to prevent bacterial infections in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Reduction of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and bloodstream infections by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis in patients with rheumatic diseases

Objective: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is routinely administered to patients with rheumatic diseases in Japan. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of TMP/SMX prophylaxis on PJP and non-central line-associated bloodstream infections (BSIs) in patients receiving high-dose glucocorticoids for the treatment of rheumatic diseases.Method: This study enrolled patients who were admitted between 1 October 2003 and 31 March 2018 and began high-dose glucocorticoid therapy for rheumatic diseases during hospitalization. The observation period was 4 months from the commencement of high-dose glucocorticoid therapy. The effect of TMP/SMX prophylaxis on PJP and non-central line-associated BSI was analysed.Results: Of the 437 patients included in the study, 376 received TMP/SMX prophylaxis and 61 patients did not. During the observation period, TMP/SMX prophylaxis was discontinued in 76 patients (20.2%). Three PJP cases (0.7%) occurred. Among the 399 patients included in our analysis of non-central line-associated BSI, eight experienced non-central line-associated BSI (2.0%). Among the covariates, TMP/SMX prophylaxis was associated with reduced PJP and non-central line-associated BSI incidence [odds ratio (OR) 0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00-0.38, and OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.42, respectively].Conclusion: Routine TMP/SMX prophylaxis reduced the incidence of both PJP and BSI in patients with rheumatic diseases undergoing high-dose glucocorticoid therapy.

Guideline for Antibacterial Prophylaxis Administration in Pediatric Cancer and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Background

Bacteremia and other invasive bacterial infections are common among children with cancer receiving intensive chemotherapy and in pediatric recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Systemic antibacterial prophylaxis is one approach that can be used to reduce the risk of these infections. Our purpose was to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for systemic antibacterial prophylaxis administration in pediatric patients with cancer and those undergoing HSCT.

Methods

An international and multidisciplinary panel was convened with representation from pediatric hematology/oncology and HSCT, pediatric infectious diseases (including antibiotic stewardship), nursing, pharmacy, a patient advocate, and a CPG methodologist. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to generate recommendations based on the results of a systematic review of the literature.

Results

The systematic review identified 114 eligible randomized trials of antibiotic prophylaxis. The panel made a weak recommendation for systemic antibacterial prophylaxis for children receiving intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia and relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Weak recommendations against the routine use of systemic antibacterial prophylaxis were made for children undergoing induction chemotherapy for ALL, autologous HSCT and allogeneic HSCT. A strong recommendation against its routine use was made for children whose therapy is not expected to result in prolonged severe neutropenia. If used, prophylaxis with levofloxacin was recommended during severe neutropenia.

Conclusions

We present a CPG for systemic antibacterial prophylaxis administration in pediatric cancer and HSCT patients. Future research should evaluate the long-term effectiveness and adverse effects of prophylaxis.

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Modifications of the Gut Microbiota in Children with Cancer

In children with cancer, chemotherapy can produce cytotoxic effects, resulting in immunosuppression and an augmented risk of febrile neutropenia and bloodstream infections. This has led to widespread use of antibiotic prophylaxis which, combined with intensive chemotherapy treatment, could have a long-term effect on the gastrointestinal microbiome. In this review, we aimed to analyze the current literature about the widespread use of antibiotic prophylaxis in children experiencing infectious complications induced by chemotherapy and its effects on the gut microbiome. Our review of the literature shows that antimicrobial prophylaxis in children with cancer is still a trending topic and, at the moment, there are not enough data to define universal guidelines. Children with cancer experience long and painful medical treatments and side effects, which are associated with great economic and social burdens, important psychological consequences, and dysbiosis induced by antibiotics and also by chemotherapy. Considering the importance of a healthy gut microbiota, studies are needed to understand the impact of dysbiosis in response to therapy in these children and to define how to modulate the microbiome to favor a positive therapeutic outcome.

Prophylaxis for Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) in non-HIV immunocompromised patients

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is a disease affecting immunocompromised patients. PCP among these patients is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of PCP prophylaxis among non-HIV immunocompromised patients; and to define the type of immunocompromised patient for whom evidence suggests a benefit for PCP prophylaxis.

SEARCH METHODS

Electronic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 1), MEDLINE and EMBASE (to March 2014), LILACS (to March 2014), relevant conference proceedings; and references of identified trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing prophylaxis with an antibiotic effective against PCP versus placebo, no intervention, or antibiotic(s) with no activity against PCP; and trials comparing different antibiotics effective against PCP among immunocompromised non-HIV patients. We only included trials in which Pneumocystis infections were available as an outcome.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias in each trial and extracted data from the included trials. We contacted authors of the included trials to obtain missing data. The primary outcome was documented PCP infections. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated and pooled using the random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen trials performed between the years 1974 and 2008 were included, involving 1412 patients. Four trials included 520 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and the remaining trials included adults with acute leukemia, solid organ transplantation or autologous bone marrow transplantation. Compared to no treatment or treatment with fluoroquinolones (inactive against Pneumocystis), there was an 85% reduction in the occurrence of PCP in patients receiving prophylaxis with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, RR of 0.15 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.62; 10 trials, 1000 patients). The evidence was graded as moderate due to possible risk of bias. PCP-related mortality was also significantly reduced, RR of 0.17 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.94; nine trials, 886 patients) (low quality of evidence due to possible risk of bias and imprecision), but in trials comparing PCP prophylaxis against placebo or no treatment there was no significant effect on all-cause mortality (low quality of evidence due to imprecision). Occurrence of leukopenia or neutropenia and their duration were not reported consistently. No significant differences in overall adverse events or events requiring discontinuation were seen comparing trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole to no treatment or placebo (four trials, 470 patients, moderate quality evidence). No differences between once daily versus thrice weekly trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were seen (two trials, 207 patients).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Given an event rate of 6.2% in the control groups of the included trials, prophylaxis for PCP using trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole is highly effective among non-HIV immunocompromised patients, with a number needed to treat to prevent PCP of 19 patients (95% CI 17 to 42). Prophylaxis should be considered for patients with a similar baseline risk of PCP.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in children with cancer or who have undergone hematopoietic cell transplantation

Bacterial infections are common in children with cancer and can lead to life-threatening complications. Infections in these patients mainly occur during neutropenic periods, and may be caused by Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria. The patients at highest risk of serious infections include those with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and those undergoing myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). This is a review with the main aim of making a critical appraisal of the literature, and summarising what is currently known and can be recommended. The most significant studies support the use of floroquinolones (mainly ciprofloxacin) as the most rational approach to treat pediatric patients with probably long-lasting neutropenia, although trimetoprim-sulphametoxazole and amoxicillin/clavulanate may theoretically be valid alternatives. No prophylaxis seems to be needed for children with cancer without severe neutropenia. However, a global evaluation of the studies of antibiotic prophylaxis in children with cancer indicates that there are not enough data to prepare definite guidelines for its use or avoidance in pediatric oncology, and so further studies are needed. It is not only important to define the best antibiotic regimens for the children in whom such prophylaxis is useful, but also to identify precisely those who do not need it. This would avoid the antibiotic misuse that probably occurs at the moment because many low-risk children with cancer are treated. As prophylaxis against infections requires long-term adherence to an antibiotic regimen, the attitudes and beliefs of stakeholders need to be fully considered.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients following chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Bacterial infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who are neutropenic following chemotherapy for malignancy. Trials have shown the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing the incidence of bacterial infections but not in reducing mortality rates. Our systematic review from 2006 also showed a reduction in mortality.

OBJECTIVES

This updated review aimed to evaluate whether there is still a benefit of reduction in mortality when compared to placebo or no intervention.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cancer Network Register of Trials (2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2011), EMBASE (1980 to March 2011), abstracts of conference proceedings and the references of identified studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing different types of antibiotic prophylaxis with placebo or no intervention, or another antibiotic, to prevent bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently appraised the quality of each trial and extracted data from the included trials. Analyses were performed using RevMan 5.1 software.

MAIN RESULTS

One-hundred and nine trials (involving 13,579 patients) that were conducted between the years 1973 to 2010 met the inclusion criteria. When compared with placebo or no intervention, antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduced the risk of death from all causes (46 trials, 5635 participants; risk ratio (RR) 0.66, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.79) and the risk of infection-related death (43 trials, 5777 participants; RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77). The estimated number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one death was 34 (all-cause mortality) and 48 (infection-related mortality).Prophylaxis also significantly reduced the occurrence of fever (54 trials, 6658 participants; RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.87), clinically documented infection (48 trials, 5758 participants; RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.76), microbiologically documented infection (53 trials, 6383 participants; RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.62) and other indicators of infection.There were no significant differences between quinolone prophylaxis and TMP-SMZ prophylaxis with regard to death from all causes or infection, however, quinolone prophylaxis was associated with fewer side effects leading to discontinuation (seven trials, 850 participants; RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.87) and less resistance to the drugs thereafter (six trials, 366 participants; RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.74).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic prophylaxis in afebrile neutropenic patients significantly reduced all-cause mortality. In our review, the most significant reduction in mortality was observed in trials assessing prophylaxis with quinolones. The benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis outweighed the harm such as adverse effects and the development of resistance since all-cause mortality was reduced. As most trials in our review were of patients with haematologic cancer, we strongly recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for these patients, preferably with a quinolone. Prophylaxis may also be considered for patients with solid tumours or lymphoma.

Risk factors for treatment related mortality in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

BACKGROUND

In spite of major improvements in the cure rate of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), 2-4% of patients still die from treatment related complications.

PROCEDURE

We investigated the pattern of treatment related deaths (TRDs) and possible risk factors in the NOPHO ALL-92 and ALL-2000 protocols. Fifty-five TRDs were identified among the 1,645 ALL-92 patients and 33 among the 1,090 ALL-2000 patients.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the incidence of TRDs between the two protocols (3.4% vs. 3.2%). Five patients died before initiation of therapy (0.2%), and the overall subsequent risk of induction death and death in first complete remission (CR1) was 1.2% and 1.8%, respectively. Infections were the major cause of death comprising 72% of all cases including 9 deaths from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 11 deaths from fungal infections. Other causes of death included bleeding or thrombosis (eight patients), tumour burden related toxicities (seven patients) and organ toxicity (seven patients). Female gender (hazard ratio (HR): 2.2, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.4-3.4), high white blood cell count (≥ 200 × 10(9) /L) at diagnosis (HR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.7-7.1), T-cell disease (HR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.01-3.7), Down syndrome (HR: 7.3, 95% CI: 3.6-14.9) and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in CR1 (HR: 8.0, 95% CI: 3.3-19.5) were identified as independent risk factors for TRD.

CONCLUSION

Several TRDs were potentially preventable and future efforts should be directed towards patients at risk.

Infections during induction therapy for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. the role of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP) prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Bacteremias are frequent during induction therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children. Antibacterial prophylaxis therapy may thus be warranted. The purpose of this study was to analyze the rate of infections during induction therapy in two cohorts of children with ALL where one cohort received prophylactic sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP).

PROCEDURE

All infections were registered through a retrospective non-randomized review of medical records of 171 consecutive children newly diagnosed with ALL below 15 years of age at diagnosis. A total of 85 children treated from 1992 to 2000 did not receive SMX-TMP, whereas 86 children treated from 2000 to 2008 received SMX-TMP 20 mg/kg in one daily oral dose during induction therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 26% of all children had no febrile episodes during induction. Infections were more frequent in children below 5 years of age. Significantly fewer children receiving SMX-TMP developed fever (17% vs. 34%, P = 0.02) and bacteremia (20% vs. 45%, P = 0.0003). Especially children with non-high risk criteria had fewer infections when receiving prophylaxis. When adjusting for age, type of catheter, and SMX-TMP prophylaxis on the risk of bacteremia by a multiple Cox regression analysis, we found that age and prophylaxis, but not the type of catheter, were associated with a significantly reduced risk of bacteremia.

CONCLUSION

Children with ALL receiving SMX-TMP prophylaxis during induction therapy experienced fewer febrile episodes, fewer days with fever demanding intravenous antibiotic treatment, and fewer episodes of bacteremia. Both SMX-TMP prophylaxis and age played significant independent roles for the occurrence of bacteremia.

Prophylaxis of Pneumocystis pneumonia in immunocompromised non-HIV-infected patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of prophylaxis for Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP), caused by Pneumocystis jirovecii (formerly Pneumocystis carinii), for immunocompromised non-HIV-infected patients by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials that compared prophylaxis using antibiotics effective against P jirovecii, given orally or intravenously, vs placebo, no intervention, or antibiotics with no activity against P jirovecii. In addition, we included trials that compared different PCP prophylactic regimens or administration schedules. The search included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, and conference proceedings. No language, year, or publication restrictions were applied. Two reviewers (H.G. and M.P.) independently searched, selected trials, extracted data, and performed methodological quality assessment. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twelve randomized trials were identified, including 1245 patients (50% children) who had undergone autologous bone marrow or solid organ transplant or who had hematologic cancer. When trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was administered, a 91% reduction was observed in the occurrence of PCP (RR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02-0.32); the number needed to treat was 15 (95% CI, 13-20) patients, with no heterogeneity. Pneumocystis pneumonia-related mortality was significantly reduced (RR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.94), whereas all-cause mortality did not differ significantly (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.18-3.46). Adverse events that required discontinuation occurred in 3.1% of adults and none of the children, and all were reversible. No differences between once-daily and thrice-weekly administration schedules were found.

CONCLUSION

Balanced against severe adverse events, PCP prophylaxis is warranted when the risk for PCP is higher than 3.5% for adults. Adverse events are less frequent in children, for whom prophylaxis might be warranted at lower PCP incidence rates.

Prophylaxis for Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) in non-HIV immunocompromised patients

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is a disease affecting immunocompromised patients. PCP among these patients is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of PCP prophylaxis among non-HIV immunocompromised patients. To define the type of immunocompromised patients for whom evidence suggests a benefit for PCP prophylaxis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2007), PubMed (March 2007), LILACS (March 2007), relevant conference proceedings; references of identified trials; the first author of each included trial was contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs or quasi- RCTs comparing prophylaxis with an antibiotic effective against Pneumocystis versus placebo, no intervention, an antibiotic/s with no activity against Pneumocystis or another antibiotic effective against Pneumocystis for immune-compromised non-HIV patients. Only trials pre-defining Pneumocystis infections as an outcome were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently appraised the quality of each trial and extracted data from included trials. Relative risks (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated and pooled using the random effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven trials including 1155 patients (520 children), performed between the years 1974 and 1997, were included. Compared to no treatment or treatment with fluoroquinolones (inactive against Pneumocystis), there was a 91% reduction in the occurrence of PCP in patients receiving prophylaxis with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, RR 0.09 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.32), eight trials, 821 patients. No significant difference was encountered in all cause mortality, RR 0.81 (95% CI 0.27 to 2.37), five trials, 509 patients, while PCP-related mortality was significantly reduced, RR 0.17 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.94), seven trials, 701 patients. Occurrence of leukopenia, neutropenia and their duration were not reported consistently. No significant difference in any adverse event was seen comparing trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole to no treatment/ placebo (four trials, 470 patients). No differences between once daily versus thrice weekly trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were seen (two trials, 207 patients).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Given an event rate of 7.5% as in included trials' control group, prophylaxis for PCP using TMP/SMX is highly effective among non-HIV patients, with a number needed to treat of 15 patients (95% CI 13 to 20). Prophylaxis should be considered for the types of patients with hematological malignancies, bone marrow transplantation and solid organ transplantation included in these trials.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients following chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Bacterial infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in neutropenic patients following chemotherapy for malignancy. Trials have shown the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in decreasing the incidence of bacterial infections, but not in reducing mortality rates.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to evaluate whether antibiotic prophylaxis in afebrile neutropenic patients reduced mortality when compared to placebo or no intervention.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches on The Cochrane Cancer Network Register of Trials (2004), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to 2004) and EMBASE (1980 to 2004) and abstracts of conference proceedings; references of identified studies; the first author of each included trial was contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs or quasi-RCTs comparing different types of antibiotic prophylaxis with placebo or no intervention, or another antibiotic to prevent bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently appraised the quality of each trial and extracted data from the included trials. Relative risks (RR) or average differences, with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred trials (10,274 patients) performed between the years 1973 to 2004 met inclusion criteria. Antibiotic prophylaxis significantly decreased the risk for death when compared with placebo or no intervention (RR, 0.66 [95% CI 0.54 to 0.81]). The authors estimated the number needed to treat (NNT) in order to prevent 1 death from all causes as 60 (95% CI 34 to 268). Prophylaxis resulted in a significant decrease in the risk of infection-related death, RR 0.58 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.74) and in the occurrence of fever, RR 0.78 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.82). A reduction in mortality was also evident when the more recently conducted quinolone trials were analysed separately. Quinolone prophylaxis reduced the risk for all-cause mortality, RR 0.52 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.84).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our review demonstrated that prophylaxis significantly reduced all-cause mortality. The most significant reduction in mortality was observed in trials assessing prophylaxis with quinolones. The benefit demonstrated in our review outweighs harm, such as adverse effects, and development of resistance, since all-cause mortality is reduced. Since most trials in our review were of patients with haematologic cancer, prophylaxis, preferably with a quinolone, should be considered for these patients.

Fever and neutropenia in children with cancer: diagnostic parameters at presentation

We evaluated 91 episodes of fever in 46 profoundly neutropenic children with cancer, in a search for any symptom, sign or laboratory test that would serve to identify patients with septicemia and differentiate them from those in no immediate need of prompt antimicrobial therapy. Seventeen episodes (19%) were bacteremias, 59 (64%) were suspected septic infections, 9 (10%) were focal bacterial infections and 6 (7%) proved not to be bacterial infections. We were unable to detect any parameter, either on admission or after two days of antimicrobial therapy (except for blood culture findings), that would be helpful in differentiating bacteremia from an episode not of bacterial origin. We focused on serum levels of C reactive protein and found them unreliable on an individual level. Prompt institution of antimicrobial therapy at the occurrence of fever results in low mortality, but does not allow assignment of cases to different categories.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

The antimicrobial combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole is active in vitro against various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Clinically, it is useful for prophylaxis and treatment of selected infections of the genitourinary, respiratory, and gastrointestinal tracts. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole by itself or in combination with other antimicrobial agents is indicated for most Nocardia asteroides infections and is the antimicrobial agent of choice for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. The drug is relatively nontoxic in patients who do not have the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and is available in both oral and intravenous forms. The native compounds and the metabolites of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole are excreted primarily in the urine. When the creatinine clearance is less than 30 ml/min, the dosage of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole should be adjusted.

Protecting neutropenic patients from bowel-derived organisms

Prevention of infection from bowel-derived organisms in neutropenic patients requires both the appropriate use of chemoprophylaxis and close attention to the prevention of cross-colonization or cross-infection with resistant Enterobacteriaceae and pseudomonads. Control of common-source infection and control of Gram-positive infection are also important. The objectives of chemoprophylaxis should be considered and their efficacy regularly assessed. Non-absorbable antibiotics may have an important place in minimizing selection of resistant strains, but absorbed agents such as cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole) and 4-quinolones offer advantages over these and nalidixic acid as prophylactic agents. Ciprofloxacin prophylaxis is probably more effective at reducing Gram-negative bacteraemia than co-trimoxazole but overall mortality may be higher. Further confirmation and investigation of the reasons for this are needed. Protocols of rational antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment involving these agents can be modified to cover only the Gram-negative superinfections that are likely.

A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for prophylaxis of infection in renal transplantation: clinical efficacy, absorption of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, effects on the microflora, and the cost-benefit of prophylaxis

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy of long-term prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) for prevention of bacterial infection following renal transplantation, the absorption of TMP-SMZ in transplant patients, the effects of prophylaxis on the microflora, and the cost-benefit of prophylaxis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-two adult patients selected to undergo renal transplantation participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

RESULTS

Patients randomized to receive TMP-SMZ experienced fewer hospital days with fever (3.3% versus 7.7%, p less than 0.001) and significantly fewer bacterial infections during the transplant hospitalization after removal of a urethral catheter (0.76 versus 1.88 per 100 days, p less than 0.005) and following discharge from the hospital (0.08 versus 0.30 per 100 days, p less than 0.001). During the transplant hospitalization, a daily dose of 320/1,600 mg was highly effective for prophylaxis whereas 160/800 mg daily gave unexpectedly low blood levels and was effective only for prevention of urinary tract infections after catheter removal. Prophylaxis was most effective in prevention of infections of the urinary tract (24 versus 54, p less than 0.005) and bloodstream (one versus nine, p less than 0.01) and infections caused by enteric gram-negative bacilli (four versus 46, p less than 0.001), enterococci (six versus 22, p = 0.006), or Staphylococcus aureus (one versus nine, p = 0.01). Prophylaxis did not prevent urinary tract infection associated with urethral catheters in the early posttransplant period, but after catheter removal, reduced the risk of urinary tract infection threefold (p less than 0.001). No significant differences in colonization by TMP-SMZ-resistant gram-negative bacilli were identified between the two groups; patients given TMP-SMZ were, paradoxically, less likely to become colonized by candida, probably because of less exposure to antibiotics for treatment of infection. Recipients of prophylaxis did not have a higher rate of infection caused by TMP-SMZ-resistant bacteria or Candida; however, their infections were more likely to be caused by resistant bacteria than infections in patients in the placebo group (62% versus 18%, p less than 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis with TMP-SMZ, which is well tolerated, significantly reduces the incidence of bacterial infection following renal transplantation, especially infection of the urinary tract and bloodstream, can provide protection against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, and is cost-beneficial. Subnormal absorption of TMP-SMZ in the early posttransplant period mandates 320/1,600 mg daily for optimal benefit. Prophylaxis has little discernible effect on the microflora.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

The antimicrobial combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole is active in vitro against a variety of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Clinically, it is useful for treatment and prophylaxis of various infections of the genitourinary tract and certain infections of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole by itself or in combination with other antimicrobial agents is indicated for most Nocardia asteroides infections. It is the antimicrobial agent of choice for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. The drug is relatively nontoxic in patients who do not have acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), and it is available in oral and intravenous forms. The native compounds and the metabolites of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole are excreted primarily in the urine. When the creatinine clearance decreases to less than 30 ml/min, the dosage of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole should be adjusted.

Successful intermittent chemoprophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonitis

We conducted a prospective, randomized clinical trial over a two-year period in patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia to assess the effectiveness of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole given on three consecutive days each week as compared with daily in the prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonitis. P. carinii pneumonitis did not develop in any of 92 patients receiving the drug daily (30,602 patient-days) or in any of 74 who received it three consecutive days a week (27,329 patient-days), whereas the incidence of the infection expected without prophylaxis is 21 percent. One patient, excluded from both groups because of an adverse reaction to sulfonamides in the past, acquired P. carinii pneumonitis. Especially noteworthy was a difference in the occurrence of systemic mycoses, with 10 cases in the daily-treatment group and only 1 case in the three-days-a-week group (P = 0.024). No differences were observed in the rates of other infections or adverse effects associated with the drug. We conclude that trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is as effective given three days a week as it is given daily in the prevention of P. carinii pneumonitis and that the intermittent schedule has the advantages of less frequent fungal infections and lower cost. Intermittent chemoprophylaxis may be especially beneficial to certain patients who are unable to tolerate the daily doses.

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: trimethoprim resistant organisms during treatment

A cross sectional study was carried out in children receiving treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia to determine the prevalence of trimethoprim resistant organisms in their gut flora and to compare this with a control population. There was a significantly higher prevalence of trimethoprim resistant bacteria in the study group (61%) compared with controls (14%). A longitudinal study showed that emergence of these organisms was intermittent during treatment.

Problems of intensive therapy in childhood cancer

Tremendous progress has been made in the treatment of childhood cancers. Certain hematologic malignancies have an impressive cure rate with the current intensive antineoplastic treatment regimens. There is optimism that the treatment of children who have advanced stage solid tumors with intensive, multimodality therapy may improve their chances for long-term survival. These treatment programs, though potentially curative, are highly toxic, with severe myelosuppression and damage to other organ systems. An awareness of these potential toxicities, an understanding of how to prevent or minimize certain problems, and the ability to treat those complications which do arise are all essential to the successful management of childhood cancer.