Sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma of the head and neck

Nodal Metastases in Stage 3 Head and Neck Melanoma: Patterns of Metastases and Patterns of Failure

OBJECTIVE

Stage 3 patients with clinically positive nodal metastasis are treated with therapeutic neck dissection and adjuvant systemic therapy. The aim of our study was to examined the predictability of pre-operative CT as a nodal drainage assessment tool.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all patients with clinically positive head and neck cutaneous melanoma between 2010 and 2019. Clinical disease was diagnosed as radiological suspicious, biopsy-proven node. A pre-operative CT evaluation for nodal metastasis was compared to pathology report.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients were included. Forty patients (75.5%) were males with a mean age of 59 (SD 15.52). The majority of patients (26.4%) had an unknown primary site. The most common sites for primary were the cheek in eight patients (15.1%) followed by forehead (9.4%) and lateral neck (9.4%). Preoperative CT predicted nodal disease in 84.6% of cases. The primary region that mainly failed from the previously described clinical prediction was the upper anterior neck with 83.3% parotid involvement. A total of 10 patients (18.9%) were diagnosis with non-clinical nodes on pathology with a median non-clinical node of 1 (range 1-2). Of them, 9 (90%) were in the same clinical levels detected by CT. Pre-operative CT was associated with a neck level accuracy of 98.1%.

CONCLUSION

Stage 3 head and neck melanoma with clinically positive nodal metastasis that are eligible for an adjuvant systemic treatment, may benefit from a highly selective neck dissection according to their pre-operative imaging studies. This should be further evaluated in a large-scale clinical trial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Sentinel Lymph Node Procedure in Pediatric Patients with Melanoma, Squamous Cell Carcinoma, or Sarcoma Using Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging with Indocyanine Green: A Feasibility Trial

BACKGROUND

Standard sentinel lymph node procedure (SNP) in pediatric cancer consists of a preoperative injection with ^99mtechnetium nanocolloid in combination with an optional intraoperative injection with blue dye. However, blue dye has disadvantages, and the detection rate is low, with only 60% of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) staining blue. In adult oncology, fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) has been shown to be a safe and accurate method for visual detection of SLNs, with a higher sensitivity (up to 97%) compared with blue dye. Therefore, our aim is to determine the feasibility of the addition of ICG to ^99mtechnetium nanocolloid (ICG-TC) for visual detection of SLN in pediatric patients.

METHODS

A total of 15 pediatric patients with melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and sarcoma were prospectively included. Preoperatively, patients were injected with ICG-TC and imaging with lymphoscintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography- computed tomography was performed. Intraoperatively, SLN was detected with fluorescence and the gamma probe. Postoperatively, fluorescence was quantified by tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) and surgeons evaluated the use of ICG using a standardized questionnaire.

RESULTS

In 10/15 (67%) patients, SLNs were visible transcutaneously. Of all intraoperatively detected SLNs, 35/37 (95%) were fluorescent and 37/37 (100%) were radioactive. Furthermore, ICG-TC led to the identification of six additional SLNs as compared with preoperative imaging. The median TBR in vivo was 6.5 (IQR 5.3). The surgical evaluation showed that ICG assisted in SLN detection and was easy to use.

CONCLUSIONS

ICG-TC for the SNP is a feasible procedure in pediatric patients. It showed an accurate detection rate, was helpful for visual guidance, and no adverse events occurred.

Technologic (R)Evolution Leads to Detection of More Sentinel Nodes in Patients with Melanoma in the Head and Neck Region

Sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy (SNB) has proven to be a valuable tool for staging melanoma patients. Since its introduction in the early 1990s, this procedure has undergone several technologic refinements, including the introduction of SPECT/CT, as well as radioguidance and fluorescence guidance. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effect of this technologic evolution on SNB in the head and neck region. The primary endpoint was the false-negative (FN) rate. Secondary endpoints were number of harvested SNs, overall operation time, operation time per harvested SN, and postoperative complications. Methods: A retrospective database was queried for cutaneous head and neck melanoma patients who underwent SNB at The Netherlands Cancer Institute between 1993 and 2016. The implementation of new detection techniques was divided into 4 groups: 1993-2005, with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative use of both a γ-ray detection probe and patent blue (n = 30); 2006-2007, with addition of preoperative road maps based on SPECT/CT (n = 15); 2008-2009, with intraoperative use of a portable γ-camera (n = 40); and 2010-2016, with addition of near-infrared fluorescence guidance (n = 192). Results: In total, 277 patients were included. At least 1 SN was identified in all patients. A tumor-positive SN was found in 59 patients (21.3%): 10 in group 1 (33.3%), 3 in group 2 (20.0%), 6 in group 3 (15.0%), and 40 in group 4 (20.8%). Regional recurrences in patients with tumor-negative SNs resulted in an overall FN rate of 11.9% (group 1, 16.7%; group 2, 0%; group 3, 14.3%; group 4, 11.1%). The number of harvested nodes increased with advancing technologies (P = 0.003), whereas Breslow thickness and operation time per harvested SN decreased (P = 0.003 and P = 0.017, respectively). There was no significant difference in percentage of tumor-positive SNs, overall operation time, and complication rate between the different groups. Conclusion: The use of advanced detection technologies led to a higher number of identified SNs without an increase in overall operation time, possibly indicating an improved surgical efficiency. Operation time per harvested SN decreased; the average FN rate remained 11.9% and was unchanged over 23 y. There was no significant change in postoperative complication rate.

Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging with Lymphoscintigraphy Improves the Accuracy of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in melanoma management, there remains room for improvement in the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy. The authors analyzed a prospective cohort of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy with lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green fluorescence to evaluate the quality and accuracy of this technique.

METHODS

Consecutive primary cutaneous melanoma patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy with radioisotope lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green fluorescence from 2012 to 2018 were prospectively enrolled. Analysis was performed of melanoma characteristics, means of identifying sentinel lymph nodes, sentinel lymph node status, and recurrence.

RESULTS

Five hundred ninety-four melanomas and 1827 nodes were analyzed; 1556 nodes (85.2 percent) were identified by radioactivity/fluorescence, 255 (14 percent) by radioactivity only, and 16 (0.9 percent) with indocyanine green only. There were 163 positive sentinel nodes. One hundred forty-seven (90.2 percent) were identified by radioactivity/fluorescence, 13 (8 percent) by radioactivity only, and three (0.6 percent) with fluorescence only. Of the 128 patients with a positive biopsy, eight patients' (6.3 percent) nodes were identified by radioactivity only and four (3.4 percent) with fluorescence only. There were 128 patients with a positive biopsy, 454 with a negative biopsy, and 12 patients who had a negative biopsy with subsequent nodal recurrence. Mean follow-up was 2.8 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In the study of the largest cohort of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent a sentinel lymph node biopsy with radioisotope lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green-based technology, the quality and accuracy of this technique are demonstrated. This has important implications for melanoma patients, as the adoption of this approach with subsequent accurate staging, adjuvant workup, and treatment may improve survival outcomes. .

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, II.

Patterns of failure in patients with cutaneous head and neck melanoma

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of head and neck melanoma is increasing. Various factors influence prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the subgroup of patients with head and neck melanoma who fail primary treatment and to define the patterns of failure.

METHODS

The database of a tertiary medical center was reviewed for patients diagnosed and surgically treated for cutaneous head and neck melanoma in 1995-2014. Regional disease failure was defined as disease confirmed in positive SLNB at first assessment or at recurrence.

RESULTS

The cohort included 141 patients followed for a median duration of 6.8 years (range 1-20 years). Median tumor thickness was 2.1 mm (range 0.5-12 mm). Ulceration was documented in 38 patients (26.9%). Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was positive in 18 patients (12.8%). Total disease failure rate was 32.6% with similar rates of regional (n = 26, 18.4%) and distal (n = 22, 15.6%) failure. Most patients (86.3%) with systemic recurrence had a negative SNLB as did 6/26 patients (23%) with regional failure. Forty-three patients (30.4%) died during follow-up, half of them (23 patients, 16.3%) of melanoma. On multivariate analysis, Breslow thickness was the only significant predictor of outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The pattern of treatment failure in patients with head and neck melanoma relate predominantly to Breslow thickness. The high false-negative rate of SNLB and the relatively high rate of systemic failures in patients with negative SNLB indicate a low predictive value of this procedure. Efforts to detect systemic disease during follow-up need to be intensified.

Primary Melanoma: from History to Actual Debates

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes the long scientific background followed to design guidelines and everyday clinical practice applied to melanoma patients. Surgery is the first option to cure melanoma patients (PTS) at initial diagnosis, since primary cutaneous lesions are usually easily resectable. An excisional biopsy of the lesion, with minimal clear margins, can be obtained in the vast majority of cases. Punch biopsies may be proposed only in case of large lesions located on specific cosmetic or functional areas like the face, extremities, or genitals where a mutilating complete resection would not be performed without prior histological diagnosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

After the histologic confirmation of melanoma, definite surgical excision of the scar and surrounding tissue is planned, to obtain microsatellite free margins. The width of these margins has been identified following the results of several clinical trials and it is either 1 or 2 cm, depending on the Breslow thickness of the primary tumor. Following the latest staging system proposed by the American Joint Cancer commission (AJCC), a sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is usually performed in case of a primary lesion > 0.8 mm thickness or for high-risk thinner lesions, if no evidence of nodal involvement has been identified clinically or radiographically. Surgical management of primary melanoma is well established. There is debate on the optimal surgical margins for 1-2 mm melanomas. There are specific considerations for special primaries (bulky, extremity, mucosal). Sentinel node (SN) evaluation does not improve survival, but is routinely used as staging.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous head and neck melanoma

PURPOSE

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is now a standard of care for cutaneous melanoma, but it is still controversial for cutaneous head and neck melanoma (CHNM). This study aims to confirm the feasibility, accuracy and low morbidity of SLNB in CHNM and evaluate its prognostic value.

METHODS

A monocentric and retrospective study on patients with CHNM treated in our tertiary care center (Gustave Roussy) between January 2008 and December 2012 was performed. The feasibility, morbidity and prognostic value of this technique were analysed.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-four consecutive patients were included. SLNB was realized in 97.6% of the cases. No significant post-operative morbidity was observed. Nineteen percents of patients had a positive SN while only 14.3% of complete lymph node dissections (CLND) had additional nodal metastasis. The risk of recurrence after positive SN was significantly higher (69.2 vs 30.8%, p = 0.043). The false omission rate was low with 7.1%. Overall survival and disease-free survival were better in the negative SN group (82 vs 49%, p < 0.001 and 69.3 vs 41.8%, p = 0.0131). The risk of recurrence was significantly higher in the positive SN group (p = 0.043) and when primary tumour was ulcerated (p = 0.031). Only the mitotic rate of the primary tumour was associated with SN positivity (p = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

As in other sites, SLNB status is a strong prognostic factor with comparable false omission rate and no superior morbidity.

Sentinel Node Biopsy for Malignant Melanoma: Analysis of a Four-Year Experience

Aims and background

Sentinel node (SN) biopsy has been introduced to solve the controversy concerning the effectiveness of prophylactic lymphadenectomy in intermediate thickness melanoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of metastases, the technical details of the procedure, and the main reasons of failure.

Methods

235 patients affected by intermediate thickness melanoma (tumor thickness >0.75 mm and <4 mm) without clinical signs of systemic spread (N0M0) were submitted to sentinel node biopsy between 1996 and 2000. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was routinely performed in the last 184 patients. Intraoperative mapping with gamma probe was combined with the use of vital dye for identification of sentinel nodes in the last 113 patients.

Results

The SN detection rate was 95.6%, with significant differences depending on the site of dissection and the use of a gamma probe. The overall rate of micrometastases was 14.7%, but relevant differences were recorded between different subgroups of patients (T2, 5.1%; T3a, 19.6%; T3b, 29%).

Conclusions

Sentinel node biopsy requires a multidisciplinary approach (surgery, pathology and nuclear medicine) for reliable results. The association of vital dye and intraoperative gamma probe for sentinel node harvesting has made the procedure more effective, less time-consuming and less invasive. Failures may be due not only to surgical mistakes, but also to improper nuclear medicine procedures or inaccurate histological evaluation of SNs. Methods for histological examination of the SN are still debated and not standardized but promising results have recently been obtained with molecular oncology techniques (RT-PCR).

Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma of the Head and Neck

Biopsy of head and neck sentinel nodes (SNs) can be technically problematic due to the unpredictable and variable drainage patterns of this anatomic region. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of SN biopsy for cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck. We performed SN biopsy in 17 patients affected by stage I cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck on the basis of lymphoscintigraphy, blue dye and gamma probe. A total of 24 procedures were performed. Drainage to more than one lymphatic basin was observed in five patients (two basins in three cases and three basins in two cases) and in all cases SN biopsy was performed in all basins. The biopsy distribution by site was: six cervical nodes, five parotid nodes, four supraclavicular and submandibular nodes, three auricular and axillary nodes. The SN identification rate was 87.5% (21/24); metastases were discovered in four cases, with a positivity rate of 23.6%. At the time of writing, 1 patient is alive with local disease, 3 patients are dead and 13 are alive and free of disease with a follow-up ranging from 1 to 40 months (median, 21 months) following SN biopsy. In our opinion preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and the intraoperative use of a gamma probe are useful for the identification of lymphatic drainage of cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck.

Amelanotic Lentigo Maligna Melanoma: Mohs Surgery as the Definitive Treatment of an Invisible Tumour

Amelanotic lentigo maligna melanoma represents <2% of melanomas. Diagnosis is delayed owing to the lack of lesion pigmentation and advanced disease at presentation. Excision with appropriate margins is the treatment standard, but the starting point for such margins is often unclear. We describe 2 patients with amelanotic melanoma treated by Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) that would not have been cleared by wide local excision alone and provide an extensive review of the literature. Both patients presented with histologic diagnoses of malignant melanoma, one with a barely perceptible biopsy site scar on the left infraorbital cheek/lower eyelid (Breslow 1.8 mm) and the second with an amelanotic tumour on the right helix (Breslow 10 mm). Due to location, aggressive histology, amelanotic appearance, and no apparent surrounding skin surface changes, MMS was elected to maximise margin control. For patient 1, invasive and in situ tumour was found at the American Joint Committee on Cancer–recommended margin of 1.5 cm, and the final defect measured 8.5 × 4.8 cm. Patient 2 had a significant invasive and amelanotic lentigo maligna component, resulting in a 9.0 × 6.5-cm defect. MMS allows for immediate histologic feedback on tumour margins of a clinically invisible tumour and thus offers the most definitive treatment.

Evaluation of a radioactive and fluorescent hybrid tracer for sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck malignancies: prospective randomized clinical trial to compare ICG-(99m)Tc-nanocolloid hybrid tracer versus (99m)Tc-nanocolloid

PURPOSE

There is some controversy about the value of sentinel lymph node excision (SLNE) in patients with head and neck malignancies. The gold standard for detection and targeted extirpation of the SLN is lymphoscintigraphy with (99m)Tc-nanocolloid. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to analyse the feasibility and clinical benefit of a hybrid tracer comprising the near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent indocyanine green (ICG) and (99m)Tc-nanocolloid (ICG-(99m)Tc-nanocolloid) in direct comparison with standard (99m)Tc-nanocolloid for guiding SLNE in patients with head and neck cutaneous malignancies.

METHODS

We analysed the data from 40 clinically lymph node-negative patients with melanoma, high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma or sweat gland carcinoma who underwent SLNE with ICG-(99m)Tc-nanocolloid (cohort A) or with the standard (99m)Tc-nanocolloid (cohort B).

RESULTS

Overall SLNs were identified preoperatively in all 20 patients (100%) in cohort A and in 18 of 20 patients (90%) in cohort B. The SLN basin was detected preoperatively in 18 patients (90%) in cohort A and also in 18 patients (90%) in cohort B. SLNs were identified intraoperatively in all 20 patients (100%) in cohort A and in 19 patients (95%) in cohort B (p = 0.487). Metastatic SLNs were detected in 9 patients (22.5%), 3 (15.0%) in cohort A and 6 (30.0%) in cohort B (p = 0.228).

CONCLUSION

The hybrid tracer ICG-(99m)Tc-nanocolloid is an innovative imaging tracer, reliably and readily providing additional information for the detection and excision of SLN in the head and neck region. Therefore, SLNE with combined radioactive and NIR fluorescence guidance is an attractive option for improving the SLN detection rate in patients with cutaneous head and neck malignancies.

Is complete lymph node dissection after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma always necessary? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The current recommendation for patients with cutaneous melanoma and a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a complete lymph node dissection (CLND). However, metastatic melanoma is not present in approximately 80% of CLND specimens. A meta-analysis was performed to identify the clinicopathological variables most predictive of non-sentinel node (NSN) metastases when the sentinel node is positive in patients with melanoma.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Current Contents Connect, Cochrane library, Google scholar, Science Direct, and Web of Science. The search identified 54 relevant articles reporting the frequency of NSN metastases in melanoma. Original data was abstracted from each study and used to calculate a pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

FINDINGS

The pooled estimates that were found to be significantly associated with the high likelihood of NSN metastases were: ulceration (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.53-2.31), satellitosis (OR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.86-5.66), neurotropism (OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.39-4.53), >1 positive SLN (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.2-2.62), Starz 3 (old) (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 0.89-3.76), Angiolymphatic invasion (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.34-4.54), extensive location (OR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.74-2.81), macrometastases >2 mm (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.61-2.35), extranodal extension (OR: 3.38, 95% CI: 1.79-6.40) and capsular involvement (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.37-7.27). There were 3 characteristics not associated with NSN metastases: subcapsular location (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.38-0.67), Rotterdam Criteria <0.1 mm (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.17-0.50) and Starz I (new) (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22-0.91). Other variables including gender, Breslow thickness 2-4 mm and extremity as primary site were found to be equivocal.

INTERPRETATION

This meta-analysis provides evidence that patients with low SLN tumor burden could probably be spared the morbidity associated with CLND. We identified 9 factors predictive of non-SLN metastases that should be recorded and evaluated routinely in SLN databases. However, further studies are needed to confirm the standard criteria for not performing CLND.

Skin cancer of the head and neck

The majority of skin cancers of the head and neck are nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC). Basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma are the most frequent types of NMSC. Malignant melanoma is an aggressive neoplasm of skin, and the ideal adjuvant therapy has not yet been found, although various options for treatment of skin cancer are available to the patient and physician, allowing high cure rate and excellent functional and cosmetic outcomes. Sunscreen protection and early evaluation of suspicious areas remain the first line of defense against skin cancers.

Assessment of second tier lymph nodes in melanoma and implications for extent of elective neck dissection in metastatic cutaneous malignancy of the parotid

BACKGROUND

The parotid is the commonest site of cutaneous metastases in the head and neck. The role and extent of neck dissection in patients with parotid metastatic cutaneous malignancy remains controversial.

METHODS

We reviewed the lymphoscintigraphy and single photon emission CT (SPECT) of patients with melanoma who had a sentinel node in the parotid to determine the second tier cervical lymph nodes.

RESULTS

Levels II and III cervical nodes make up 82% of second tier lymph nodes for the parotid, and levels IV and V, 12% and 4%, respectively. Second tier lymph nodes isolated to levels I, IV, or V, bypassing levels II and III, occurred in only 2% of cases.

CONCLUSION

The risk of harboring occult metastasis in levels I, IV, and V when levels II and III are negative is low. Levels II and III neck dissection is likely to be an effective staging procedure in patients with isolated parotid metastases.

Role of selective sentinel lymph node dissection in head and neck melanoma

Selective sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plays an important role in the staging of the regional nodal basins for head and neck (H&N) melanoma. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is mandatory to identify the regional nodal basin(s) accurately for a newly diagnosed H&N primary melanoma of at least 1mm or greater. A wide local excision should be delayed if SLN mapping is indicated, to minimize watershed effect and maximize accuracy in identifying the "true" SLN because of the complex lymphatic network in the H&N region. An experienced multidisciplinary team is required for optimal identification of H&N SLNs. In general, selective SLND can replace ELND to minimize the complications of a neck dissection. Completion lymph node dissection is only indicated when the SLN is positive. A nerve stimulator should be used during selective SLND in the parotid and posterior triangle to minimize the injury to the facial and spinal accessory nerve.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is accurate and prognostic in head and neck melanoma

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has emerged as a widely used staging procedure for cutaneous melanoma. However, debate remains around the accuracy and prognostic implications of SLNB for cutaneous melanoma arising in the head and neck, as previous reports have demonstrated inferior results to those in nonhead and neck regions. Through the largest single-institution series of head and neck melanoma patients, the authors set out to demonstrate that SLNB accuracy and prognostic value in the head and neck region are comparable to other sites.

METHODS

A prospectively collected database was queried for cutaneous head and neck melanoma patients who underwent SLNB at the University of Michigan between 1997 and 2007. Primary endpoints included SLNB result, time to recurrence, site of recurrence, and date and cause of death. Multivariate models were constructed for analyses.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty-three patients were identified. A sentinel lymph node was identified in 352 of 353 patients (99.7%). Sixty-nine of the 353 (19.6%) patients had a positive SLNB. Seventeen of 68 patients (25%) undergoing completion lymphadenectomy after a positive SLNB result had at least 1 additional positive nonsentinel lymph node. Patients with local control and a negative SLNB failed regionally in 4.2% of cases. Multivariate analysis revealed positive SLNB status to be the most prognostic clinicopathologic predictor of poor outcome; hazard ratio was 4.23 for SLNB status and recurrence-free survival (P < .0001) and 3.33 for overall survival (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB is accurate and its results are of prognostic importance for head and neck melanoma patients.

Sentinel Node Biopsy for Head and Neck Melanoma

Objective. This systematic review was conducted to examine the test performance of sentinel node biopsy in head and neck melanoma, including the identification rate and false-negative rate.

Data Sources. PubMed, EMBASE, ASCO, and SSO database searches were conducted to identify studies fulfilling the following inclusion criteria: sentinel node biopsy was performed, lesions were located on the head and neck, and recurrence data for both metastatic and nonmetastatic patients were reported.

Review Methods. Dual-blind data extraction was conducted. Primary outcomes included identification rate and test performance based on completion neck dissection or nodal recurrence.

Results. A total of 3442 patients from 32 studies published between 1990 and 2009 were reviewed. Seventy-eight percent of studies were retrospective and 22% were prospective. Trials varied from 9 to 755 patients (median 55). Mean Breslow depth was 2.53 mm. Median sentinel node biopsy identification rate was 95.2%. More than 1 basin was reported in 33.1% of patients. A median of 2.56 sentinel nodes per patient were excised. Sentinel node biopsy was positive in 15% of patients. Subsequent completion neck dissection was performed in almost all of these patients and revealed additional positive nodes in 13.67%. Median follow-up was 31 months. Across all studies, predictive value positive for nodal recurrence was 13.1% and posttest probability negative was 5%. Median false-negative rate for nodal recurrence was 20.4%.

Conclusion. Sentinel node biopsy of head and neck melanoma is associated with an increased false-negative rate compared with studies of non–head and neck lesions. Positive sentinel node status is highly predictive of recurrence.

Radio-guided surgery: advantages of a new portable γ-camera (Sentinella) for intraoperative real time imaging and detection of sentinel lymph nodes in cutaneous malignancies

BACKGROUND

The histological status of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is one of the most relevant prognostic factors for the overall survival of patients with cutaneous malignancies, independent of tumour depth of the primary tumour.

OBJECTIVES

Our study seeks to evaluate the reliability and medical benefit of SLN excision (SLNE) performed with a portable γ-camera for intraoperative real time imaging of SLN.

METHODS

Therefore our study compares the visualization of SLN performed with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and preoperative SPECT/CT with the intraoperative real time imaging of SLN performed with a new portable γ-camera (Sentinella) in 60 patients who were treated with a SLNE for early stage melanoma (n = 38), high risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (n = 16), Merkel cell carcinoma (n = 4), sebaceous gland carcinoma (n = 1), and sweat glands carcinoma or porocarcinoma (n = 1).

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled in this study. The portable γ-camera visualized all 126 preoperatively identified SLN. 23 additional SLN (15.4%) in 15 patients were only identified using the portable γ-camera. Two of these additional SLN showed metastatic involvement.

CONCLUSION

The portable γ-camera is an innovative imaging technique, reliable and providing additional information in the detection of SLN. Therefore SLNE with intraoperative γ-camera use is an attractive option to improve the detection of SLN in cutaneous malignancies and could help to reduce false negative SLN results.

Advantages of preoperative ultrasound in conjunction with lymphoscintigraphy in detecting malignant melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective analysis in 221 patients with malignant melanoma AJCC Stages I and II

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node excision (SLNE) for the detection of regional nodal metastases and staging of malignant melanoma has resulted in some controversies in international discussions as it is a surgical intervention with potential morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

The present retrospective study seeks to clarify the reliability of preoperative ultrasonography (US) in direct comparison to the result of SLNE and seeks to identify potential advantages of preoperative ultrasound if performed in conjunction with lymphoscintigraphy in detecting malignant melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph node (SLN).

PATIENTS

We retrospectively analysed data from 221 patients with primary malignant melanoma with a Breslow index of ≥ 1.0 mm.

RESULTS

Of the 221 patients, 77.4% (n = 171) had a negative SLN. In 50 patients (22.6%), the histopathological investigation of 71 excised lymph nodes resulted in a positive SLN. The US examination demonstrated a sensitivity of 13.6%, a specificity of 96.9%, a positive predictive value of 97.2% and a negative predictive value of 12.6%. SLNE alone shows a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 98.6%, a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 98.3%. Preoperative US in conjunction with dynamic lymphoscintigraphy, followed by SLNE, demonstrated a detecting ratio of 100% (n = 28) for micrometastases and 98.6% (n = 42/43) for macrometastases.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study confirms that preoperative US alone cannot replace the vital information obtained during dynamic lymphoscintigraphy. But preoperative US is an important component of the staging procedure in melanoma patients and has clear advantages when performed in conjunction with dynamic lymphoscintigraphy. Therefore, we recommend preoperative US before every SLNE.

Tumor location predicts survival in cutaneous head and neck melanoma

BACKGROUND

Prior studies documented poorer outcomes in patients with cutaneous head and neck melanoma (CHNM) relative to those with melanoma at other sites. We evaluated survival differences attributable to tumor location in patients with CHNM.

METHODS

We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for patients undergoing surgery for CHNM from 1988 to 2006, excluding patients without biopsy-proven diagnoses, those diagnosed at autopsy, and patients with distant metastases. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, we assessed patient, tumor, and treatment-specific factors on overall survival (OS) and melanoma specific survival (MSS). Cox proportional hazards models assessed the role of tumor location (ear, eyelid, face, lip, scalp/neck) on OS and MSS, while controlling for patient age, gender, race, tumor thickness, tumor ulceration, lymph node status, histologic subtype, type of surgery, and use of radiation. Risks of overall and melanoma-specific mortality were reported as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Among 27,097 patients, 10-y rates of OS and MSS were 56.1% and 84.7%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, scalp/neck primary site was associated with an increased risk of overall (HR 1.20, CI 1.14-1.26; P < 0.001) and melanoma-specific mortality (HR 1.64, CI 1.49-1.80, P < 0.001) relative to melanomas of the face. Tumors of the lip had poorer MSS (HR 1.55; CI 1.05-2.28, P = 0.03) but not OS (HR 1.03, CI 0.80-1.34; P = 0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with melanomas of the scalp/neck have poorer OS and MSS and those with lip melanomas have poorer MSS. These anatomic areas should not be overlooked when performing skin examinations.

Cutaneous melanoma in the elderly

The aim of this review was to analyze the difficulties in diagnosing and treating elderly patients with cutaneous melanoma. It focused on the main causes for late diagnosis and relatively poor prognosis in these patients. Early detection of melanoma is vital to reduce mortality in these patients and surgery is often curative. Adequate treatment of elderly patients with melanoma requires knowledge of the clinical features and histopathology of the disease, and the therapeutic options. This review also examined the main surgical procedures for primary melanoma and regional lymph node staging, and the curative and palliative procedures indicated for those elderly patients with advanced disease. It is expected that several molecular genetic factors will soon provide further prognostic information of possible benefit for elderly patients with melanoma.

Head and neck cutaneous melanoma: a retrospective observational study on 146 patients

BACKGROUND

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is a novel staging technique in cutaneous melanoma, but it is more challenging in the head and neck (H&N) than in the trunk and extremities. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of SNB in patients with clinical stage I-II H&N cutaneous melanoma, with emphasis on disease outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty five patients with H&N melanoma of >1.0 mm in Breslow depth underwent SNB and were compared to 121 historic H&N melanoma patients, who had either undergone routine prophylactic neck dissection or had been observed without any invasive nodal staging.

RESULTS

Sixteen percent of the SNB patients were sentinel-positive and there have been no false-negative cases. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, there were no significant differences between the study groups in melanoma-specific overall survival. Among the entire cohort, melanoma-specific overall survival rate was 67.1% at 5 years and 61.9% at 10 years. Predictive factors for worsen survival were nodal micrometastases, male sex, scalp location, thick primary lesion and ulceration.

DISCUSSION

SNB is a reliable and mini-invasive approach for the nodal staging of H&N cutaneous melanoma. Traditional neck dissection is recommended only for therapeutic purposes in clinically node-positive or sentinel-positive patients.

Regional recurrence after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma

OBJECTIVE

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has shown great utility in the management of melanoma. An analysis of regional recurrence in previously mapped negative SLN basins as the first site of relapse is performed.

METHODS

A retrospective query of a prospective melanoma database from 1994 to 2006 identified 1287 patients who underwent successful SLN biopsy. One thousand sixty patients (82.4%) were SLN negative and 227 (17.6%) patients SLN positive. Clinical variables were examined for the impact on regional recurrence by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 44.3 months (range 3-155 months). Thirty-five patients (3.3%) presented with false-negative (FN) SLN biopsy. Pathologic review of the SLNs harvested from these basins found 7 (20.0%) samples positive for metastatic melanoma. Multivariate analysis found head and neck site [hazard ratio 3.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.77-7.60, P < 0.001] and tumor thickness (hazard ratio 1.16; 95% CI, 1.04-1.30, P = 0.01) to be predictive of FN SLN biopsy. The 5-year melanoma specific survival calculated from the date of the SLN biopsy was 57.6% (95%CI, 35.7-41.9) in the FN group, which was not statistically different than the SLN positive group 60.0% (95% CI, 29.6-40.1; P = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Head and neck tumor site and tumor thickness are predictors of a FN SLN biopsy. Mechanisms other than pathologic SLN sampling error may contribute to the failure of the SLN biopsy in some patients. Patients with regional recurrence after negative SLN biopsy have a similar 5-year survival compared with patients with positive SLNs.

Contemporary parathyroidectomy: exploiting technology

BACKGROUND

Conventional parathyroidectomy, as practiced only 10 years ago, has given way to considerable change, largely as a result of the evolution of technology. Several of these important technologies include radio-guided surgery, ultrasound imaging, high-resolution endoscopy, and rapid intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) monitoring. Modern parathyroid surgeons should maintain familiarity with the appropriate role of these approaches.

STUDY DESIGN

Evidence-based analysis of state-of-the-art approaches to the diagnosis and management of primary hyperparathyroidism.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Four distinct technologies are analyzed in detail, with particular attention to their impact on the practice of parathyroid surgery. These include radio-guided surgery, ultrasound imaging, high-resolution endoscopy, and IOPTH.

RESULTS

Each of the technologies examined has substantial value in the current practice of parathyroidectomy. Judicious implementation of these technologies will vary from practice to practice. Radio-guided surgery may obviate the need for IOPTH monitoring, therefore resulting in the fastest procedural times. Ultrasound imaging is useful as an adjunct to sestamibi scanning to localize adenomatous parathyroid glands. Endoscopic techniques facilitate visualization through small openings and may help surgeons achieve minimal access incisions. Finally, the use of IOPTH is a useful adjunct to directed explorations, and it imparts confidence that all hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue has been removed.

CONCLUSIONS

The practice of parathyroid surgery has undergone tremendous change in the past decade, and this change has largely been a technology-driven phenomenon. Acquisition of familiarity and skill with these new technologies will be necessary for the endocrine head and neck surgeon wishing to stay abreast of modern surgical techniques and provide quality care.

The single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography: a new procedure to perform the sentinel node biopsy in patients with head and neck melanoma

The aim of this study was to define and validate a new technique to detect the sentinel node (SN) in patients treated for head and neck melanoma. In a small series of 23 head and neck melanoma patients, lymphatic mapping was followed by SN biopsy, using in 12 patients a new diagnostic imaging technique, single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. The procedure is described and the major problems encountered are discussed. The preliminary data show that identification of SN using single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography never failed in 12 patients, and biopsies performed, compared with those in a standard group, took significantly less time (Mann-Whitney test P=0.006). In conclusion, the authors underline the possibility of a wide use for this technique.

Use of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma of the Head and Neck

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) is a well-accepted procedure for truncal and extremity melanoma (T&E). However, its role in melanoma of the head and neck (H&N) remains controversial. Complex lymphatic and vascular drainage make SLN more challenging in this region. This study was done to evaluate the results of SLN for H&N versus T&E melanoma. Three hundred sixteen patients who underwent SLN for melanoma using a double indicator technique were identified from a prospective database. Records were analyzed retrospectively. Statistical analysis was performed using χ2, t test, or Mann-Whitney U test to evaluate the results, as appropriate. H&N was found in 87 cases (27.5%). The mean age was 63.2 and 53.2 years for H&N and T&E melanoma (P < 0.001), respectively. 99Technetium positivity (89.7% H&N versus 99.6% T&E, P < 0.001) and isosulfan blue positivity (85.1% H&N versus 91.7% T&E, P = 0.08) were more likely in T&E melanoma. There was a significant difference between H&N and T&E melanoma with respect to the incidence of failed SLN, defined as no sentinel nodes identified intraoperatively (8.0% versus 0%, P < 0.001). Both groups had similar rates of positive intraoperative imprint cytologic examination (4.6% H&N versus 6.1% T&E, P > 0.5). There was a trend suggesting a higher mean number of sentinel lymph nodes found (3.1 versus 2.7, P = 0.1) in H&N melanoma. The total number of lymph nodes found in dissection specimens (20.9 versus 21.9, P = 0.45), the total number of positive lymph nodes (3.5 versus 1.6, P = 0.32), the incidence of any recurrence (19.5% versus 12.7%, P = 0.2), and time to recurrence (14.2 versus 20.6 months, P = 0.18) were similar between H&N and T&E melanoma. SLN mapping of H&N lesions is more difficult than at other sites. However, rates of nodal positivity are similar to melanoma of the trunk and extremities. Therefore, despite being more demanding, SLN is useful in diagnosis and treatment of melanomas of the head and neck.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of the English Literature

BACKGROUND

Although most cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is curable by a variety of treatment modalities, a small subset of tumors recur, metastasize, and result in death. Although risk factors for metastasis have been described, there are little data available on appropriate workup and staging of patients with high-risk SCC.

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed reported cases and case series of SCC in which sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was performed to determine whether further research is warranted in developing SLNB as a staging tool for patients with high-risk SCC.

METHODS

The English medical literature was reviewed for reports of SLNB in patients with cutaneous SCC. Data from anogenital and nonanogenital cases were collected and analyzed separately. The percentage of cases with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) was calculated. False negative and nondetection rates were tabulated. Rates of local recurrence, nodal and distant metastasis, and disease-specific death were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 607 patients with anogenital SCC and 85 patients with nonanogenital SCC were included in the analysis. A SLN could not be identified in 3% of anogenital and 4% of nonanogenital cases. SLNB was positive in 24% of anogenital and 21% of nonanogenital patients. False-negative rates as determined by completion lymphadenectomy were 4% (8/213) and 5% (1/20), respectively. Most false-negative results were reported in studies from 2000 or earlier in which the combination of radioisotope and blue dye was not used in the SLN localization process. Complications were reported rarely and were limited to hematoma, seroma, cutaneous lymphatic fistula, wound infection, and dehiscence.

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to the lack of controlled studies, it is premature to draw conclusions regarding the utility of SLNB in SCC. The available data, however, suggest that SLNB accurately diagnoses subclinical lymph node metastasis with few false-negative results and low morbidity. Controlled studies are needed to demonstrate whether early detection of subclinical nodal metastasis will lead to improved disease-free or overall survival for patients with high-risk SCC.

Management of sentinel lymph nodes in malignant skin tumors using dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and the single-photon-emission computed tomography/computed tomography combined system

BACKGROUND

The differentiation of true sentinel lymph nodes from nonsentinel lymph nodes is difficult in cases of multiple radiolabeled or dyed lymph nodes.

METHODS

We examined the locations of sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma and other malignant skin tumors by using dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and the single-photon-emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) combined system.

RESULTS

Sentinel lymph nodes were detected in 45 of the 53 patients examined using only the ordinary blue dye method (85%), and were detected in all 35 patients examined using the SPECT/CT method (100%). Twenty of the 35 patients mentioned above had one sentinel lymph node. Multiple sentinel lymph nodes were demonstrated in the head and neck areas using the SPECT/CT method. Significant differences (P=0.0015) in the numbers of sentinel lymph nodes were found between the blue dye method only and the SPECT/CT method in the neck area. Popliteal sentinel lymph nodes were recognized in three patients, and cubital sentinel lymph nodes were recognized in two patients. Two patients had plural regional lymph nodes: one had popliteal and groin sentinel lymph nodes, while the other had cubital and axillary sentinel lymph nodes. The probe counts of the popliteus and cubitus were significantly lower (P=0.0241) than the counts in the groin, axilla, and neck areas. Micrometastatic sentinel lymph nodes were recognized in four patients, and two patients had metastases in both sentinel and nonsentinel lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic lymphoscintigraphy was useful when we were concerned about cubital and popliteal lymph nodes. The SPECT/CT combined system was useful in recognizing the anatomical location of sentinel lymph nodes before biopsy. The detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes using the SPECT/CT method was always better than that with the blue dye method (P=0.0197).

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Cutaneous Head and Neck Melanoma: Mapping the Parotid Gland

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for primary cutaneous head and neck melanoma (CHNM) has been shown to be successful and is the current standard of care for intermediate-thickness melanoma. We evaluated our experience with CHNM associated with SLNB mapping to the region of the parotid gland.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospectively collected melanoma database identified 1014 CHNMs. Two-hundred twenty-three patients underwent SLNB, and 72 (32%) had mapping in the region of the parotid gland between May 1995 and June 2003.

RESULTS

The mean number of SLNs per patient was 2.5. A sentinel lymph node (SLN) was successfully identified in 94% of patients, and in 12%, the SLN was positive for metastatic disease. Biopsy of intraparotid SLNs was performed in 51.4% and of periparotid SLNs in 26.4%, and a superficial parotidectomy was performed in 22.2%. Ten patients were found to have lymph nodes in the parotid region with metastatic disease (eight identified by SLNB), and two (20%) patients developed intraparotid lymph node recurrence in the setting of a negative SLNB. Same-basin recurrence in SLN-negative patients was 3.3% with a median follow-up of 26 months. Facial nerve dysfunction was identified in seven (10%) patients. Facial nerve function returned to preoperative status in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB for patients with primary CHNM mapping to the parotid gland can be performed with a high degree of accuracy and a low morbidity consisting of temporary facial nerve paresis.

Surgical reconstruction after subtotal ear resection in malignant melanoma of the ear

Surgery in malignant melanoma of the external ear often leads to substantial defects where reconstruction poses a difficult challenge. We describe an option of a one-step ear reconstruction after subtotal ear resection in malignant melanoma surgery. In a patient with a high-risk melanoma of the helical rim, a wide local excision was performed. Because of a metastasis-suspect lymph node in the parotid gland, surgery included asservation of the sentinel lymph node, neck dissection and parotidectomy. A complete reconstruction of the ear was achieved using a bilobed flap from the retroauricular and neck region with acceptable cosmetic and functional results by one-step surgery. One micrometastasis was detected in the nuchal region but not in the marked sentinel lymph node. An adequate one-step ear reconstruction as described may also be performed to the benefit of patients with high-risk melanomas, allowing early adjuvant therapy.

Does sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous head and neck melanoma alter disease outcome?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In the head and neck region, value, reliability, and safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) have not yet been determined conclusively. The aim of study was to assess impact of SLNB on disease outcome in cutaneous head and neck melanoma.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with a clinically node-negative head and neck melanoma, > or =1.0 mm Breslow thickness, participated in a prospective study from 1995 to 2005. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) tumor-positive patients underwent completion lymphadenectomy. SLN tumor-negative patients underwent clinical monitoring. Median follow-up was 54 (range 10-114) months. Recurrence-free and overall survival curves were constructed by Kaplan-Meier.

RESULTS

SLNs could be identified in 33 patients (92%). In 7 patients (21%) the SLN was tumor-positive. In 1 patient (13%) the SLNB was false-negative. In 17 patients (47%) SLNs could be identified in the parotid region (success rate parotid region 100%). This study showed no significant difference in recurrence-free and overall survival between patients with tumor-positive and tumor-negative SLN.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and accuracy of SLNB in the neck and parotid nodal basins were similar to those in non-head and neck sites. However, the technique is technically demanding in this region. In this small series SLNB did not alter disease outcome.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of cutaneous head and neck melanoma

Sentinel lymph node biopsy has revolutionized the surgical management of primary malignant melanoma. Most series on sentinel lymph node mapping have concentrated on extremity and truncal melanomas. The head and neck region has a rich and unpredictable lymphatic system. The use of sentinel lymph node mapping in the management of head and neck melanoma is evaluated. The authors conducted a retrospective review of patients treated for clinical stage I and stage II malignant melanoma of the head and neck with dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy. One hundred thirty-two patients (99 male patients and 33 female patients) were identified. The primary melanoma sites were the scalp (n = 54), ear (n = 14), face (n = 37), and neck (n = 27). Primary tumor staging was as follows: T1, 11; T2, 38; T3, 39; and T4, 44. Dynamic lymphoscintigraphy visualized sentinel lymph nodes in 128 patients (97 percent). In 71 cases (55 percent), a single draining nodal basin was identified, and in 57 cases there were multiple draining nodal basins (two basins, 55; three basins, two). Sentinel lymph nodes were successfully identified in 176 of 186 nodal basins (95 percent). Positive sentinel lymph nodes were identified in 22 patients (17.6 percent). Sentinel lymph node positivity by tumor staging was as follows: T2, 10.8 percent; T3, 19.4 percent; and T4, 26.8 percent. Completion lymphadenectomy revealed residual disease in seven patients (33.3 percent). Sentinel lymph node mapping for head and neck melanoma can be performed with results comparable to those of other anatomical sites.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor for patients with cutaneous melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is now the standard of care for staging clinically node-negative patients. It is accurate with low morbidity, yet SLNB for head and neck melanoma is challenging because of unpredictable lymphatic drainage and risk of complications.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data identified patients with cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck > or =.76 mm. Sentinel lymph nodes were identified by using a standardized protocol of preoperative lymphoscintigrams, intraoperative blue dye injections, and handheld gamma probes. Clinical, surgical, and pathologic data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A sentinel lymph node was removed in 41 (94%) of 44 patients. Seven (17%) of 41 had at least 1 positive sentinel lymph node. Three of seven had primary tumors <1 mm (two of the three were not ulcerated). The sites of lymphatic drainage of the primary lesion were discordant, with historical anatomically predicted sites in 24.4% of cases. None of the 34 patients with negative SLNB has had a nodal recurrence (false-negative rate, 0%; sensitivity and negative predictive value, 100%). The mean follow-up is 22.4 months (range, <1-69 months). Seven (17%) of 41 patients had minor complications.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB in the head and neck area is challenging; however, combined preoperative, intraoperative, and histological techniques produce a sensitive procedure with a high negative predictive value. The lack of false-negative results obviates the need for prophylactic neck dissections.