The clinical and pathological course of hepatitis B liver disease in renal transplant recipients

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in kidney transplant patients with resolved hepatitis B virus infection: Risk factors and the safety and efficacy of preemptive therapy

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is associated with complications and adverse outcomes in patients with clinically resolved HBV infection who are seronegative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag), and seropositive for hepatitis B core antibody (HBc Ab) and/or hepatitis B surface antibody (HBs Ab) before kidney transplantation (KT).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 52 patients with resolved HBV infection who were HBV-DNA negative. HBV-DNA after KT was evaluated, and the occurrence of HBV reactivation and outcomes were monitored. We defined HBV reactivation as seropositivity for HBV-DNA at or above the minimal detection level of 1.0 log IU/mL and treated preemptively (using entecavir) when the HBV-DNA level was at or above 1.3 log IU/mL, in accordance with the Japanese Guidelines for HBV treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 52 patients, the mean age was 57.2 ± 10.8 years. The median HBc Ab titer was 12.8 (interquartile range, 4.6-42.6) cutoff index, and five (9.6%) cases of HBV reactivation occurred. No patients developed graft loss and died due to HBV reactivation. Statistical analysis showed that age and HBc Ab titer were significant risk factors for HBV reactivation (P = .037 and P = .042, respectively). No significant differences were found between graft survival and the presence or absence of HBV reactivation.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that HBc Ab titer and age could be significant risk factors for HBV reactivation. Resolution of HBV infection did not appear to be associated with patient or graft survival, regardless of whether HBV reactivation occurred, when following our preemptive strategy.

Long-term data on entecavir treatment for treatment-naive or lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B infection in kidney transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Entecavir (ETV) showed short-term efficacy and safety in HBsAg-positive kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), but long-term data are lacking.

METHODOLOGY

We retrospectively reviewed 30 HBsAg-positive KTRs who received ETV during 2007-2017.

RESULTS

Eighteen treatment-naïve (Group I) and 12 lamivudine-resistant (Group II) patients received ETV for 48.4 ± 35.2 and 66.0 ± 26.0 months, respectively. Both groups show significant HBV DNA decline, but Group I achieved earlier undetectability after 11.9 ± 9.6 months (compared with 28.8 ± 24.2 months in Group II, P = .033). Group I showed higher rates of undetectable HBV DNA (89%, 94%, 94%, 100%, and 100% at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, respectively, compared with 25%, 50%, 50%, 91%, and 91% in Group II, P = .003). ALT normalized after 6.0 ± 1.9 and 6.8 ± 2.1 months in Group I and Group II, respectively. Four patients (33.3%) in Group II developed drug resistance (2 had persistent viraemia and 2 had virological breakthrough, at 40.3 ± 15.0 months). Group II showed higher liver stiffness after 5 years (7.7 ± 4.1 kPa, compared with 5.0 ± 1.6 kPa in Group I, P = .046) and incidence of cirrhosis (4 patients [33.3%], compared with 1 [5.6%] patient in Group I, P = .049). Two patients (one in each group) developed hepatocellular carcinoma. Renal allograft function remained stable during follow-up of 63.2 ± 33.4 months for both groups. There was no difference in patient and graft survival between two groups at 5 years (P = .62 and .36, respectively).

CONCLUSION

ETV showed favorable long-term efficacy and tolerability in treatment-naïve KTRs. One-third of lamivudine-resistant subjects showed non-response or viral breakthrough after ETV treatment.

Challenges of kidney transplantation in HIV positive recipients

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has long been a contraindication to kidney transplantation due to transplant immunosuppression, HIV-associated renal dysfunction, and nephrotoxicity associated with antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, advances in antiretroviral therapies and transplant immunosuppression regimens have allowed patients to successfully undergo kidney transplantation. Emerging data has shown that kidney transplantation may be a viable option for appropriately selected HIV patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In this review, we discuss the indications, immunosuppression protocols, and outcomes of kidney transplantation in HIV patients.

Safety of Monitoring Viral and Liver Function Markers in Patients With Prior Resolved Hepatitis B Infection After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a risk factor of mortality in kidney transplant recipients. However, information on the risk of HBV reactivation in kidney recipients with prior resolved HBV infection is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of simply monitoring viral and liver markers in living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) recipients with prior resolved HBV infection.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the clinical records of LDKT recipients. Changes in the levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag), surface antibody, core antibody, and HBV-DNA after transplantation were evaluated, and the occurrence of de novo HBV-related hepatitis and allograft function were monitored.

RESULTS

Of 61 consecutive LDKT patients, seven had prior resolved HBV infection. Four patients underwent ABO-compatible LDKT, whereas two underwent ABO-incompatible LDKT. The median age was 64 years (range, 61-69 years), and two patients were women. The causes of end-stage kidney disease were diabetic nephropathy, hypertensive nephrosclerosis, and chronic glomerulonephritis. Five patients were referred to hepatologists. The history of HBV vaccination was not confirmed in all patients. Prophylaxis with entecavir was administered to two patients with ABO-incompatible LDKT before transplantation. All patients tested negative for HBs Ag and HBV-DNA throughout observation, and none developed de novo HBV-related hepatitis or graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HBV infection without HBV DNA positivity are eligible for kidney transplants without antiviral therapy, even those on rituximab therapy. Monitoring viral and liver markers combined with hepatologist consultations may ensure safe follow-up in LDKT recipients with prior resolved HBV infection.

Entecavir treatment in kidney transplant recipients infected with hepatitis B

Although nucleotide/side analogs improve the clinical outcome of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive (HBsAg+) kidney transplant recipients (KTR), a significant proportion of subjects have developed resistance to lamivudine (LAM). We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and tolerability of entecavir (ETV) in HBsAg+ KTR at Queen Mary Hospital during 2005-2013. Twenty-one patients (10 treatment-naïve, 11 with LAM resistance) were included (duration of ETV treatment 34.7 ± 22.9 months, range 6-75 months). ETV treatment led to a decline of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA titer compared to baseline and is more significant in the treatment-naïve group (treatment-naïve: p = 0.028, <0.001 and <0.001; LAM-resistant p = 0.273, 0.180, and 0.109 after 12, 24, and 36 months). The cumulative rate of HBV DNA undetectability at 12, 24, and 36 months was 60%, 100%, and 100% for treatment-naïve group, and 27%, 45%, and 45% for LAM-resistant group, respectively. Time-to-HBV DNA undetectability and time-to-alanine transaminase (ALT) normalization were 15.7 ± 4.6 and 12.6 ± 3.7 months for treatment-naïve patients, and 24.5 ± 4.2 and 28.2 ± 3.5 months for those with LAM resistance. Genotypic resistance to ETV emerged after 20.0 ± 3.5 months with increase in ALT and HBV DNA in two patients with LAM resistance, but was not observed in the treatment-naïve group. Allograft dysfunction, de novo cirrhosis, or hepatocellular carcinoma did not occur during follow-up.

High pretransplant HBV level predicts HBV reactivation after kidney transplantation in HBV infected recipients

Purpose

HBsAg-positive kidney recipients are at increased risk for mortality and graft failure. The aims of this study were to identify the outcomes of HBsAg-positive recipients who received preemptive antiviral agents after successful kidney transplantation and to analyze risk factors for HBV reactivation.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 944 patients performed kidney transplantation between 1999 and 2010.

Results

HBsAg-negative recipients were 902 patients and HBsAg-positive recipients, 42. Among HBsAg-positive recipients, HBV reactivation was detected in 7 patients and well controlled by switch or combination therapy. Graft failure developed in only one patient due to chronic rejection regardless of HBV reactivation but no deaths occurred. All patients were alive at the end of follow-up and none developed end-stage liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma. There was statistically significant difference in graft survival between HBsAg-positive recipients and HBsAg-negative. Multivariate analysis identified increased HBV DNA levels (>5 × 10⁴ IU/mL) in the HBsAg-positive kidney transplant recipients as a risk factor for HBV reactivation (P = 0.007).

Conclusion

Effective viral suppression with antiviral agents in HBsAg-positive renal transplant recipients improves patient outcome and allograft survival. Antiviral therapy may be especially beneficial in patients with high HBV DNA levels prior to transplantation.

Impact of pre-existing hepatitis B infection on the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients in the United States

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pre-existing hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has been associated in inferior renal transplant outcomes. We examined outcomes of HBV+ renal recipients in a more recent era with availability of oral anti-viral agents.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Using the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database, we selected adult primary kidney recipients transplanted in the United States (2001 to 2007). The cohort was divided into HBV+ (surface antigen positive, n = 1346) and HBV- patients (surface antigen negative; n = 74,335). Five-year graft survival, patient survival, hepatic failure incidence, and associated adjusted risks were compared.

RESULTS

HBV+ recipients were more frequently Asian, had a lower body mass index, and glomerulonephritis was more prevalent as the etiology of ESRD. HBV+ recipients had less pretransplant diabetes and cardiovascular disease, were less likely a living donor recipient, and were less likely to receive steroids at discharge. Five-year patient survival was 85.3% and 85.6% and graft survival was 74.9% and 75.1% for HBV+ and HBV-, respectively. HBV infection was not a risk factor for death or kidney failure, although 5-year cumulative incidence of hepatic failure was higher in HBV+ recipients (1.3% versus 0.2%; P < 0.001), and HBV+ was associated with 5.5- and 5.2-fold increased risk for hepatic failure in living and deceased donors, respectively, compared with HBV-.

CONCLUSIONS

In a recent era (2001 to 2007), HBV-infected renal recipients were not at higher risk for kidney failure or death; however, they remain at higher risk of liver failure compared with HBV- recipients.

Long-term outcome of renal transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis B infection-impact of antiviral treatments

BACKGROUND

Antiviral treatment has improved the short-term outcome of kidney transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis B infection, but its long-term impact, especially in patients who have developed drug resistance, remains uncertain.

METHODS

Sixty-three hepatitis B surface antigen positive (HBsAg+) and 63 HBsAg- patients who have undergone kidney transplantation from 1985 to 2008 were retrospectively reviewed and their clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

With lamivudine as initial treatment, 62% of patients developed drug resistance after 4 years. Lamivudine resistance was associated with a higher incidence of chronic hepatitis but had no significant impact on liver stiffness score or patient survival during follow-up. Salvage treatment with adefovir or entecavir was well tolerated, and resulted in a three-log decrease in hepatitis B deoxynucleic acid after 6 months and normalization of alanine aminotransferase in 75% of patients. The survival rate of HBsAg+ patients transplanted in the recent era of antiviral treatment was 81% at 10 years. Treatment of hepatitis B with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues resulted in significantly improved patient survival (83% vs. 34% at 20 years, P=0.006). Although antiviral treatment was associated with reduced mortality because of liver complications (P=0.036), liver-related deaths still accounted for 40% of mortalities in HBsAg+ patients in the era of antiviral therapies and 22.2% of all deaths that occurred in patients who had received antiviral treatment.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of HBsAg+ renal transplant recipients with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues confers long-term survival benefit, and that rescue therapy with adefovir or entecavir is effective and well tolerated in patients who had developed resistance to lamivudine.

[Chronic viral hepatitis and kidney failure]

Chronic viral hepatitis remains a major problem among patients with chronic renal failure. Hepatitis B and C viruses are frequent among dialysis patients and after renal transplantation and may significantly diminish the survival of both the patient and the graft. Hepatitis B and C viral infection in these patients is often characterized by normal transaminase levels despite viremia and progressive liver lesions. Liver biopsy remains essential for assessing the extent of liver disease. Cirrhosis is a contraindication to transplantation of only a kidney, because of elevated morbidity and mortality. A combined as liver-kidney transplantation may be considered. The best treatment of hepatitis infections is preventive: vaccination against the hepatitis B virus and attentive hygiene, especially to prevent nosocomial transmission. Among patients not awaiting transplant, antiviral treatment should be reserved for patients with active or even fibrotic liver disease. For hemodialysis patients awaiting kidney transplant: Alpha interferon is ineffective and poorly tolerated by dialysis patients. Lamivudine is effective and well tolerated, but its long-term efficacy and its optimal effective dose in dialysis patients remain unknown.

Reactivation of hepatitis and lamivudine therapy in 11 HBsAg-positive renal allograft recipients: a single centre experience

BACKGROUND

In hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) (+) renal allograft recipients, the mortality associated with liver disease reaches 37-78%. An antiviral agent, lamivudine, has recently been reported to be safe and effective for preventing hepatic damage in these patients, although either resurgence of HBV-DNA levels after discontinuation or emerging resistant HBV mutants caused by long-term administration are still unsettled.

METHODS

Between July 1976 and December 2003, 555 renal transplantations were performed in our centre. Of these, 11 patients who were HBsAg (+) at the time of transplantation (2.0%) were selected for this study. We investigated the incidence of hepatitis reactivation for three yr after transplantation and their clinical courses, including the efficacy of lamivudine therapy in seven of the 11 patients.

RESULTS

Six episodes of hepatitis reactivation developed in five of the 11 patients (45.5%) within three yr after transplantation. Five episodes of six occurred within four months after transplantation. The patient who underwent the most severe reactivation needed intensive care including lamivudine administration and plasma exchange. Lamivudine caused no severe adverse effects and HBV-DNA levels dropped to under measurable levels within four months after lamivudine administration in all patients. Resistant HBV mutant emerged in only one patient, who had the longest lamivudine administration of 49 months.

CONCLUSIONS

For HBsAg (+) renal allograft recipients, careful monitoring of HBV-DNA levels and timely administration of lamivudine could prevent hepatic damage caused by reactivation of hepatitis.

Prospective study on lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B in renal allograft recipients

The natural history of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in renal transplant recipients (RTx) is unclear, despite its increasing incidence. Twenty-nine HBsAg-positive RTx with rising HBV DNA received lamivudine therapy. The course of lamivudine-resistant HBV infection was studied prospectively. During 68.7 +/- 12.5 months of follow-up, 14 (48.3%) patients developed lamivudine resistance, at 10-35 months (mean 16.9 +/- 7.0). All showed mutant sequences at codons 552 and 528 of the YMDD motif, while 13 patients demonstrated wild-type sequence at codon 555. Lamivudine resistance was unrelated to patient demographics, HBeAg status/sero-conversion, or genotype. Following resistance, HBV DNA and alanine aminotransferase showed an initial increase followed by spontaneous gradual reduction. The subsequent peak HBV DNA was lower (1.26 +/- 1.09 x 10(9) vs. 6.26 +/- 12.23 x 10(9) copies/mL, p = 0.011), while that of alanine aminotransferase was higher (196 +/- 117 vs. 77 +/- 47 imicro/l, p = 0.005), compared with pretreatment levels. Post-resistance hepatitic flare occurred in 11 (78.6%) patients. This was transient in four (36.4%), but became chronic in six (54.5%) patients. Decompensation was noted in one patient during this flare, but all survived. We conclude that drug resistance is prevalent in lamivudine-treated RTx. Despite a lower ensuing peak viremia compared with baseline, hepatitic flare is common. While most patients have spontaneous resolution, a minority may develop potentially fatal decompensation during the preceding exacerbation.

PREEMPTIVE LIVING-DONOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION: CLINICAL COURSE AND OUTCOME

BACKGROUND

Dialysis is not only associated with morbidity, it is also expensive. In developing countries, preemptive renal transplantation (Tx) may be a cost-effective option, offering an additional benefit to conventional renal Tx.

MATERIALS

Between March 1976 and March 2001, 1,279 first living-donor Txs were performed in our center. The 82 patients (6.4%) who underwent Tx without prior dialysis were compared with 1,197 patients who had been dialyzed before Tx.

RESULTS

The dialysis-dependent group received more blood transfusions (65% vs. 30%) before Tx. Actuarial graft and patient survival at 5 years was comparable in both groups (P =0.2 and P =0.8, respectively). The incidence of acute and chronic rejection was not different between the two groups. Mortality rate was also similar in the two groups. The main cause of death with a functioning graft was cardiovascular in the preemptive Tx group and chronic liver disease and infection in the control group.

CONCLUSION

In the context of a developing country, preemptive Tx offers comparable patient and graft survival to conventional renal Tx and eliminates the complications, inconvenience, and cost of dialysis.

Preemptive lamivudine therapy based on HBV DNA level in HBsAg-positive kidney allograft recipients

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive kidney transplant recipients have increased liver-related mortality. The impact of lamivudine treatment on patient survival, the optimal time to start treatment, and the feasibility of discontinuing treatment have not been determined. This study examined these issues with a novel management protocol. Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were measured serially in HBsAg-positive kidney transplant recipients, and lamivudine was administered preemptively to patients with increasing HBV DNA levels with or without elevation of aminotransferase levels. Outcomes of patients who underwent transplantation before or after institution of this preemptive management strategy (in January 1996) were compared. Eleven de novo patients (91.7%) who underwent transplantation between 1996 and 2000 and 15 existing patients (39.5%) who underwent transplantation between 1983 and 1995 received preemptive lamivudine therapy for 32.6 +/- 13.3 months. The treatment criteria were met by de novo patients at 8.4 +/- 6.2 months (range, 1-18 months) after transplantation. Suppression of HBV DNA and normalization of aminotransferase levels were achieved in all treated patients, and 21.4% had hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion. The survival of preemptively managed de novo transplant patients was similar to that of HBsAg-negative controls, whereas HBsAg-positive patients who underwent transplantation before January 1996 had inferior survival (relative risk of death, 9.7 [P <.001]; relative risk of liver-related mortality, 68.0 [P <.0001]). Eleven patients (40.7%) developed lamivudine resistance. Discontinuation of lamivudine was attempted in 12 low-risk patients after stabilization and was successful in 5 (41.7%). In conclusion, preemptive lamivudine therapy based on serial HBV DNA levels and clinical monitoring improved the survival of HBsAg-positive renal allograft recipients. Treatment can be discontinued safely in selected patients after stabilization to minimize the selection of drug-resistant HBV mutants.

A role for chronic parvovirus B19 infection in liver dysfunction in renal transplant recipients?

BACKGROUND

Clinically, liver dysfunction in renal transplant recipients is related to hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The contribution of parvovirus B19 (B19) to liver disease in renal transplant recipients has not been studied. Here we present the association of liver dysfunction with or without the coinfection of B19, HBV, and HCV after renal transplantation.

METHODS

We used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to identify B19, HBV, and HCV infections in serum samples taken from 144 renal transplant recipients before transplantation and at 12 and 24 months after transplantation. After each patient had fasted for 12 hr, blood was taken for measurement of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase monthly for at least 6 months.

RESULTS

Liver dysfunction developed at the significantly higher incidence of 47% in the anti-HCV(+) patients compared with 6% in the noninfected group (P<0.0001). HBV infection had no impact on the incidence of liver dysfunction in renal transplant recipients. A higher incidence of liver dysfunction was found in 42% of B19 IgG(+)IgM(-) group patients compared with 13% of the B19 IgG(+)IgM(+) group (P=0.0051) and 9.5% of the B19 IgG(-)IgM(-) group (P=0.0003). A B19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay revealed significantly higher liver dysfunction in 29% of B19 PCR(+) group patients compared with 13.6% of B19 PCR(-) patients (P=0.0419). Patients who were anti-HCV(+) and B19 PCR(+) had a significantly higher incidence of liver dysfunction than B19 PCR(-) patients (P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic B19 infection and HCV infection, both separately and in combination, increase the incidence of liver dysfunction in renal transplant recipients. HBV infection does not seem to be independently or synergistically associated with liver dysfunction.

Lamivudine therapy for hepatitis B in renal transplantation

Antiviral therapies are associated with an increased risk of acute rejection in transplant patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lamivudine therapy for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in renal transplant patients. Six patients were included in this study. They received 150 mg/day of lamivudine during a follow-up period of 24 months. The laboratory tests monitored were HBV DNA, HBsAg, HBeAg, ALT, gamma-GT, serum creatinine and blood cyclosporine levels. The HBV DNA became undetectable in four patients as early as in the third month of treatment. After six months, the viral load was also negative in the other two patients, and remained so until 18 months of follow-up. The medication was well tolerated with no major side effects. Lamivudine was safe and effective in blocking HBV replication in renal transplant patients without any apparent increase in the risk of graft failure for the 24-month period of study.

Recommendations for the outpatient surveillance of renal transplant recipients. American Society of Transplantation

Many complications after renal transplantation can be prevented if they are detected early. Guidelines have been developed for the prevention of diseases in the general population, but there are no comprehensive guidelines for the prevention of diseases and complications after renal transplantation. Therefore, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Transplantation developed these guidelines to help physicians and other health care workers provide optimal care for renal transplant recipients. The guidelines are also intended to indirectly help patients receive the access to care that they need to ensure long-term allograft survival, by attempting to systematically define what that care encompasses. The guidelines are applicable to all adult and pediatric renal transplant recipients, and they cover the outpatient screening for and prevention of diseases and complications that commonly occur after renal transplantation. They do not cover the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and complications after they become manifest, and they do not cover the pretransplant evaluation of renal transplant candidates. The guidelines are comprehensive, but they do not pretend to cover every aspect of care. As much as possible, the guidelines are evidence-based, and each recommendation has been given a subjective grade to indicate the strength of evidence that supports the recommendation. It is hoped that these guidelines will provide a framework for additional discussion and research that will improve the care of renal transplant recipients.

Results on preemptive or prophylactic treatment of lamivudine in HBsAg (+) renal allograft recipients: comparison with salvage treatment after hepatic dysfunction with HBV recurrence

BACKGROUND

Lamivudine has been reported to be able to stabilize liver enzyme and hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication with recurrent hepatitis that has been regarded as a frequent and major risk factor for hepatic dysfunction and chronic liver disease in renal transplant recipients. Because large number of hepatitis antigenemia patients among renal transplant patients experience recurrent hepatic dysfunction with HBV recurrence and permanent histological deterioration, preemptive or primary prophylactic use of lamivudine before transplantation may be more beneficial than a trial for the treatment of advanced hepatic dysfunction.

METHODS

We conducted a double arm study to compare the efficacy of lamivudine between the preemptive (HBV DNA positive) or prophylactic (HBV DNA negative) trial for the maintenance of stable liver function (n=10) and the trial for the salvage of advanced hepatic dysfunction developed after renal transplantation (n=6) in hepatitis B viremia carrier renal transplant recipients.

RESULTS

Hepatic dysfunction with recurrent HBV antigenemia developed in 11 of 36 (30.6%) hepatitis antigenemia patients with a mean duration of 8.4 months (range 5-19.4 months). In six patients treated with lamivudine after hepatic dysfunction from recurrent hepatitis B viremia, serum AST and ALT level normalized within 1 month and HBV-DNA disappeared in all cases. HBV-DNA, however, reappeared in three (50%) without any discontinuation of lamivudine. Liver biopsy revealed recurrent chronic active hepatitis with severe activity of fibrosis in four cases, cholestatic fibrosing hepatitis in one, and permanent cirrhotic change in one. In seven patients who had preemptive lamivudine treatment at 9, 6, 2, 2, 1, 0, 0 month before the transplantation, HBV-DNA had converted to negative with a mean follow up of 1.2 months (range 1-2 month) in all case. Three patients who had prophylactic trials with lamivudine have all remained HBV-DNA negative. The recurrence rate of HBV viremia in the preemptive or prophylactic lamivudine treated group is 10.0% (1/10), which is significantly lower than that (42.3%, 11/25) in the nonlamivudine-treated group. The re-recurrence rate of HBV viremia was significantly higher (3/6, 50.0%) in the reactive lamivudine treated group than in prophylactic or preemptive group (1/10, 10%).

CONCLUSION

Although lamivudine treatment after hepatic dysfunction can be a sound conventional treatment modality, this preliminary study may suggest that preemptive or prophylactic trial of lamivudine before hepatic dysfunction might be a more effective strategy for prevention of permanent histological deterioration and recurrence of hepatitis B viremia.

HBV genotypic resistance to lamivudine in kidney recipients and hemodialyzed patients

BACKGROUND

Lamivudine is a potent inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA polymerase. Its overall efficiency is clearly hampered by relapse at discontinuation and by risk of genotypic resistance. We describe herein the first cases of HBV resistance to lamivudine in kidney recipients and hemodialyzed patients.

METHODS

We analyzed 26 HBV-infected kidney recipients and five hemodialyzed patients treated with lamivudine who became serum HBV DNA-negative (by Digene test). The biological and virological follow-up identified breakthrough as defined by the reappearance of serum HBV DNA. In two cases of breakthrough, HBV DNA was amplified and sequenced through the polymerase domain, including the YMDD motif, before the beginning of treatment and at time of breakthrough to determine genotypic mutations.

RESULTS

Ten breakthroughs (reappearance of serum HBV DNA) were observed after a median follow-up of 11 months in eight kidney recipients and two hemodialyzed patients after a median duration of treatment of 16.5 (from 4 to 31) months of treatment. Previous HBe/anti-HBe seroconversion was not observed in the patients who escaped. In two kidney recipients, the comparison of HBV-DNA sequences before the treatment and after the breakthrough identified in one case a mutation of the highly conserved YMDD motif (YVDD), whereas in the second case, no genotypic mutation was observed in the sequenced region.

CONCLUSION

We report the first cases of HBV genotypic resistance to lamivudine in kidney recipients and hemodialysis patients. Genotypic resistance is observed after 4-31 months of therapy. The YMDD mutation does not account for all cases of virological escape.

Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis-B-positive renal transplant recipients

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of malignancy after renal transplantation in Asia, where hepatitis B virus infection is endemic. Early detection and resection are the key to successful treatment because the mortality rate for HCC is high. The value of alpha-fetoprotein monitoring in the early detection of HCC in renal transplant recipients has not been reported before. We describe 2 patients who had successful resection of HCC following early diagnosis by alpha-fetoprotein monitoring. The epidemiology of post-transplant HCC in various parts of the world and its pathogenesis are discussed.

Liver transplantation and HBsAg-positive postnecrotic cirrhosis: adequate immunoprophylaxis and delta virus co-infection as the significant determinants of long-term prognosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The place of liver transplantation in hepatitis B viral (HBV)-related diseases remains controversial because of the high rate of reinfection. The aim of this study was to define the determinants of long-term prognosis after transplantation.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients were transplanted during the period February 1984-September 1996. Six patients died during the early (< 3 months) posttransplant period from causes unrelated to HBV infection. All 52 long-term (> 3 months) survivors were evaluated in relation to the mode of presentation, viral replication at time of transplantation, absence of hepatocellular cancer at time of transplantation and use of adequate immunoprophylaxis (IP). Adequate immunoprophylaxis, defined as maintenance of anti-HBs levels over 100 mUI/ml, was introduced in December 1989. Intention-to-treat IP analysis compared patients transplanted before and after this date. The median follow-up was 74 months (range 4 to 131). Forty-seven patients (90%) had a minimal follow-up of 3 years.

RESULTS

Five-year actuarial survival rates of 58 patients and of 52 long-term survivors were 72 +/- 6% and 80 +/- 6%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that delta co-infection (n = 25) significantly improved survival (p < 0.001) [96 +/- 4% vs 63 +/- 10% in HBV patients (n = 27) at 5 years] as did absence of hepatocellular cancer (n = 36) (p = 0.020) [89 +/- 5% vs 61 +/- 12% in 16 non-cancer patients]. IP, however, significantly influenced 5-year survival in the HBV-patient group (n = 17) (p = 0.001) [85 +/- 10% vs 30 +/- 14% in 10 patients without IP). Multivariate analysis selected delta co-infection (p = 0.002) and IP (p = 0.01) as the significant determinants of prognosis independently influencing survival. Uni- and multivariate analyses showed that survival without reinfection was significantly influenced by IP (p = 0.002) [73 +/- 8% (n = 31) versus 33 +/- 12% in 15 non-treated patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Delta virus co-infection and immunoprophylaxis are the most important prognostic factors after transplantation for postnecrotic HBsAg-positive cirrhosis. Transplantation can be proposed as a therapeutic tool only if life-long adequate adjuvant therapy can be achieved. Under this condition good results can even be obtained if there is viral replication at the time of transplantation.

Impact of hepatitis B and C virus on kidney transplantation outcome

The impact of hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) on patient survival after kidney transplantation is controversial. The aims of this study were (1) to assess the independent prognostic values of HBsAg and anti-HCV in a large renal transplant population, (2) to compare infected patients with noninfected patients matched for factors possibly associated with graft and patient survival, and (3) to assess the prognostic value of biopsy-proven cirrhosis. Eight hundred thirty-four transplanted patients were included: 128 with positive HBsAg (group I), 216 with positive anti-HCV (group II), and 490 without serological markers of HBV and HCV (group III). Fifteen percent and 29% of patients were HBsAg-positive and anti-HCV-positive, respectively. Ten-year survivals of group I (55 +/- 6%) and group II (65 +/- 5%) were significantly lower than survival of group III (80 +/- 3%, P <.001). At 10 years, among overall patients with HCV screening (n = 834), four variables had independent prognostic values in patient survival: age at transplantation (P <.0001), year of transplantation (P =.02), biopsy-proven cirrhosis (P =.03), and presence of HCV antibodies (P =.02). In the case control study, comparison of infected patients with their matched control patients showed that age at transplantation (P <.05), HBsAg (P =.005), and anti-HCV (P =.005) were independent prognostic factors. HCV, biopsy-proven cirrhosis, and age are independent prognostic factors of 10-year survival in patients with kidney grafts. The case-control study showed that anti-HCV and HBsAg were independently associated with patient and graft survivals. In infected patients, a routine liver histological analysis would improve selection of patients for renal transplantation.

Preemptive live-related renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Preemptive transplantation (PTX) utilizes transplantation as the primary renal replacement therapy in the absence of any preceding dialysis. In developing countries, PTX may be a cost-effective option, offering additional benefits to conventional transplantation.

METHODS

Between 1989 and 1996, 43 patients who underwent live-related PTX were compared with 86 matched controls who underwent transplantation after hemodialysis. Pre- and posttransplant morbidity, and graft and patient survival rates were compared.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 15 months in the preemptive group and 20.5 months in the control group. Controls received more transfusions (4.6+/-2.6 vs. 2.4+/-2.3), had higher hepatitis B surface antigen positivity [12 (14.6%) vs. 1 (2.4%)], and more commonly had hepatic dysfunction [5 (5.8%) vs. nil)] in the pretransplant period compared with the preemptive group. Similarly, at 6 months after transplant, the incidence of hepatitis B surface antigen positivity (13 vs. 2) and hepatic dysfunction (18 vs. 3) were higher in the control group compared with the preemptive group. The 1- and 2-year graft (preemptive: 82.8% and 77.3%; controls: 82% and 78%, respectively) and patient (preemptive: 92% and 89.5%; controls: 91% and 89.5%, respectively) survival rates were similar.

CONCLUSION

PTX offers comparable patient and graft survival to conventional transplantation. It eliminates the complications and inconvenience of dialysis. Transfusion requirements, and therefore associated morbidity, are lower. PTX is more cost effective, therefore, it should be a recommended practice in a developing country.

Risks of transplanting kidneys from hepatitis B surface antigen-negative, hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors

BACKGROUND

As the number of patients on the United States kidney transplant list increases, investigation into the utility of transplanting organs formerly considered marginal or undesirable has intensified. Using kidneys from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive donors is thought to place recipients at excessive risk of graft failure, morbidity, and mortality. However, the risks of using kidneys from HBsAg-negative but hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive donors have not been defined.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 1994, our group transplanted 1067 cadaveric kidneys, including 38 from HBsAg(-)/HBcAb(+) donors. Of these 38 kidneys, 27 were transplanted into HBcAb(-) recipients (group 1) and 11 were transplanted into HBcAb(+) recipients (group 2). Group 1 and 2 patients received no hepatitis immunoglobulin therapy after transplantation and received the same immunosuppression and rejection therapies as recipients of kidneys from HBcAb(-) donors.

RESULTS

After transplantation, none of the group 1 patients became HBsAg(+), three became hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb)-positive, and two became HBcAb(+). Of the group 2 patients, none became newly HBsAg(+) or HBsAb(+). No patient receiving a kidney from an HBsAg(-)/HBcAb(+) donor developed signs or symptoms of clinical hepatitis B. Graft and patient survival rates were similar in both groups and similar to the rates of the 1029 recipients of kidneys from HBcAb(-) donors.

CONCLUSIONS

Recipients of kidneys from HBsAg(-)/HBcAb(+) donors are at a small risk of hepatitis B seroconversion but are at no excess risk of graft failure or short-term morbidity or mortality.

Histopathological impacts of hepatitis virus infection in hemodialysis patients: should liver biopsy be performed before renal transplantation?

To evaluate the histologic changes in the livers of renal transplant candidates who were infected with hepatitis viruses, we performed a percutaneous liver biopsy in each of 74 regular hemodialysis patients. Forty percent of them were seropositive for the antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) whereas 29.7% had anti-HCV and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) concomitantly. Seven (9.5%) were seropositive for only hepatitis B surface antigen HBsAg. Histopathological examination revealed that 30% of patients had chronic active hepatitis (CAH), 11% had chronic persistent hepatitis (CPH), and 3% displayed histopathological evidence of cirrhosis. Eleven of 22 patients with CAH were positive for only anti-HCV, and 2 of 22 were positive for only HBsAg. One patient had HBsAg and anti-HCV together, and 8 of 22 had anti-HBs and anti-HCV concomitantly. None of the anti-HBs positive patients exhibited abnormal histopathological changes. We found no statistically significant difference in histopathological findings between the HBsAg positive and anti-HCV positive patients. As 32 of 74 patients (43%) had some degree of chronic liver disease, we concluded that it is prudent to evaluate liver histology in HBsAg and anti-HCV seropositive renal transplant candidates before transplantation.

The long-term virologic and pathologic impact of renal transplantation on chronic hepatitis B virus infection

In an attempt to evaluate the long-term reciprocal impact of renal transplantation on hepatitis B virus infection, we analyzed the clinical, virologic, and pathologic features of 151 HBsAg-positive kidney transplant recipients. The spontaneous disappearance rates of HBsAg, HBeAg, and HBV DNA during a median follow-up of 125 months (range 1 to 320) were 3, 30.6, and 3%, respectively, figures lower than in the general population. A high rate of persistent viral replication (50%) and reactivation (30%) was noted. Noteworthy was the high frequency of histologic deterioration (85.3%), accompanied by cirrhosis in 28% and by hepatocellular carcinoma in 23% of the patients with cirrhosis. Co-infection by hepatitis C and B viruses was significantly associated with histologic worsening. Liver disease was the leading cause of death (36.6%), especially in patients with cirrhosis. Despite persistent viral replication, histopathologic deterioration, and liver-related overmortality, there were paradoxically no significant differences in the survival of these 151 HBsAg-positive compared with 1247 HBsAg-negative kidney recipients--however, allograft actuarial survival was better in the former than in the latter group (P=0.0006). Chronic hepatitis B infection is not a contraindication to renal transplantation in the absence of cirrhosis. The presence of cirrhosis should lead either to dialysis continuation or to a combined liver/kidney transplantation, in the absence of viral replication.

Interferon-alpha facilitates renal transplantation in hemodialysis patients with chronic viral hepatitis

Interferon-alpha has not been used previously in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis B and C. This uncontrolled report evaluates the biochemical and/or histologic profile resulting from the administration of interferon-alpha in seven hemodialysis patients, two with chronic hepatitis B and five with hepatitis C. Biochemical improvement was noted in all patients. Histologic progression did not occur in the two cases in which such assessment was made, and five of them were subsequently transplanted without recurrence of disease.

Kidney transplantation in hepatitis B surface antigen carriers

Chronic hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers run a high risk of developing chronic liver disease after renal transplantation. To determine the impact of liver disease on long-term morbidity and mortality of HBsAg carriers following kidney transplantation we analyzed 1977 patients, including 76 HBsAg carriers, who underwent renal transplantation during the period 1968-1992. Although the HBsAg carriers had a better 5-year patient and graft survival rate (94% and 83%) than HBsAg-negative patients (87% and 61%), the prognosis was poor after the tenth year of transplantation. Transplant loss is more frequently caused by death of the HBsAg carriers, in contrast to the total population (34% vs 17% for HBsAg-negative patients). Death occurs in 73% of cases due to complications of hepatitis B. In the HBsAg-negative patients, the predominant cause of death is cardiovascular failure (51% vs 11% in HBsAg carriers), whereas only 2% died of liver disease. Kidney transplantation in HBsAg carriers with normal liver function appears to be justified because of rare graft loss due to acute rejection, low early morbidity and mortality, and late onset of fatal hepatic deterioration.

Clinicopathologic course of hepatitis B infection in surface antigen carriers following living-related renal transplantation

We present the clinical course, serology, and histopathology of 17 living-related renal allograft recipients who were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive at the time of transplantation. Although 14 patients were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive, none had clinical hepatitis at the time of transplantation. All patients were receiving moderate doses of prednisolone and azathioprine only. At the mean short-term follow-up of 70 months (range, 6 to 132 months), none of the patients had seroconversion to antibody to HBsAg. Four patients died due to extrahepatic complications between 16 and 50 months following transplantation. Of these, three had normal liver function at the time of death and one had portal tract infiltration by chronic inflammatory cells. One patient died due to fulminant hepatitis at 6 months after transplantation. Of the remaining 12 patients, although 11 were HBeAg positive, only two developed chronic active hepatitis. Our short-term follow-up data suggest that chronic liver disease is not a frequent complication following living-related renal transplantation in HBsAg carriers. In addition, the presence of HBeAg at the time of transplantation does not predict a bad prognosis. Thus, in a living-related renal transplant program, asymptomatic carriers of HBsAg with positive HBeAg are not a contraindication for renal transplantation.

The impact of hepatitis C virus infection on renal allograft recipients

A second generation hepatitis C virus recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) was used to screen stored perioperative serum from 641 renal allograft recipients. One hundred and nine (17%) were anti-HCV positive at the time of transplant. RIBA positivity was found to be an independent predictor of post-transplant liver disease in a logistic regression model (P < 0.05). Moreover, RIBA positive patients were at greater risk for infectious events (P = 0.03) and rejection episodes (P = 0.002). The cumulative dose of antilymphoblast globulin administered as induction therapy was an independent predictor of post-transplant liver disease in a dose response relationship. Qualitative PCR showed that 74% of the perioperative RIBA positive patients had detectable HCV RNA in a current serum sample. Further, quantitative HCV RNA analysis with a competitive template PCR and HCV strain identification by restriction fragment length polymorphism demonstrated a large range of HCV RNA copies/ml of serum and three different HCV strains (BK, Hutch and HCV-1). Neither quantity of HCV RNA nor strain type correlated with abnormal transaminases post-transplant. As yet, there has not been an effect of anti-HCV status on actuarial patient and graft survival. This study suggests that anti-HCV is not a contraindication to renal transplantation; however, we would recommend that the pre-transplant evaluation of the anti-HCV positive patient include a liver biopsy to properly stage the disease. Close post-transplant follow-up is required in view of the increased risk for infection and rejection.

Course of hepatitis B and D virus infection in auxiliary liver grafts in hepatitis B-positive patients. A light-microscopic and immunohistochemical study

Four patients who received an auxiliary partial liver graft for decompensated liver cirrhosis due to hepatitis B (HBV), associated in two cases with hepatitis D virus (HDV) superinfection, were studied. The sequential appearance of hepatitis B and D antigens in the grafts was investigated in serial liver biopsies by immuno-histochemical methods and compared with the viral antigenic profiles of the host livers. The histological changes in the liver grafts were studied in relation to the viral expression patterns. One week after transplantation, expression of HBsAg was already apparent in two grafts. HBcAg was found in the graft of the only patient with HBcAg in the host liver. HDAg was expressed in the grafts of both patients with HDV superinfection; in one of these cases HDAg was present without HBsAg. At 3 months, viral antigen expression was maximal. Expression of HBsAg and HBcAg in the grafts of the two HDV-positive patients was, however, less extensive than in the two HBV-positive patients. All patients developed a mild lobular hepatitis, histologically demonstrated between the 47th and 107th posttransplantation day. In the two HBV-positive, HDV-negative patients, cirrhotic transformation of the graft occurred within 1 year. In the HDV-positive patients only a mild chronic active hepatitis with slight or moderate fibrosis was observed after 1 year. We conclude that recurrence of HBV and HDV infection in auxiliary liver grafts is demonstrable within 1-3 weeks. HBV infection in liver grafts may be a rapidly progressive disease. Coinfection with HDV does not aggravate the acute hepatitis and may even suppress the progression of chronic HBV.

Microsomal liver function declines steadily after kidney grafting: a three to five year follow-up

We have previously shown that the functioning hepatocyte mass (galactose elimination capacity, GEC) and microsomal liver functions (non-renal clearances of unbound prednisolone and cyclosporin A) are impaired in renal allograft recipients (N = 28) one month and one year after successful transplantation. To assess the natural history of these hepatic functional derangements, we reinvestigated 21 patients with stable renal function three to five years following grafting. GEC remained with 6.07 +/- 0.86 mg/min x kg significantly (P less than 0.001) below that in healthy controls (7.52 +/- 0.78 mg/min x kg), but did not significantly change during follow-up (5.93 +/- 0.96 and 6.26 +/- 0.94 mg/min x kg at 1 year and 1 month, respectively). In contrast, the non-renal clearance of unbound prednisolone declined steadily during follow-up averaging 4.98 +/- 0.71 ml/min x kg at three to five (compared to 5.83 +/- 1.51 and 6.80 +/- 1.73 ml/min x kg at one year and one month, respectively). These values were lower (P less than 0.01) than those observed in healthy control subjects (7.56 +/- 1.59 ml/min x kg). The total body clearance of cyclosporin A decreased similarly with time averaging 4.5 +/- 1.2 ml/min x kg at three to five years (compared to 4.9 +/- 1.2 and 5.9 +/- 2.1 ml/min x kg at 1 year and 1 month, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hepatitis C virus infection among kidney transplant recipients

The extent of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among kidney recipients was investigated in 67 patients by testing for anti-HCV paired serum samples, collected at time of transplantation and during follow-up (average 32 +/- 20 months). Prevalence of anti-HCV at transplant time was 48%, and was related to the time on dialysis and to the amount of blood transfusions. Following transplantation, nine (28%) seropositive patients lost anti-HCV and five (14%), previously seronegative, seroconverted. Anti-HCV was found to be positive in 92% of the patients with chronic liver disease who were on hemodialysis, but in 56% in kidney recipients with chronic hepatitis. Anti-HCV was positive in 50% of patients with resolving hepatitis before transplantation, but only in 21% of those with acute hepatitis following transplantation. This study confirms the high risk of HCV infection among hemodialysis and kidney recipient populations, and also that HCV is closely related with the length of time the patient is on hemodialysis as well as the number of blood units transfused. HCV is the main cause of acute and chronic liver disease in hemodialysis patients and of chronic liver disease in kidney recipients, but does not clearly influence the survival of the allograft nor that of patients.

Liver transplantation in HBs antigen (HBsAg) carriers. Prevention of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence by passive immunization

Liver transplantation in HBs-antigen (HBsAg) positive allograft recipients is associated with a high risk of HBV recurrence some time after surgery. So far, results of measures to prevent recurrent HBV-infection by means of treatment with interferon, hepatitis B vaccination and short-term passive immunization with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) or monoclonal antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) have been disappointing. In the present study the results of long-term, anti-HBs monitored passive immunization with HBIg is reported. In 23 HBsAg-positive liver transplant recipients an anti-HBs level of greater than or equal to 100 IU/l was maintained for 6 or 12 months, respectively. The rate of recurrent infection was found to be less than 20% under HBIg substitution, whereas 11 graft recipients with no or only short-term HBIg prophylaxis were reinfected by month 15 after transplantation. HBV recurrence was associated with chronic liver disease and recurrent cirrhosis in the allograft.

Hepatitis B virus core antigen (HBc Ag) accumulation in an HBV nonproducer clone of HepG2-transfected cells is associated with cytopathic effect

Two clones of the hepatoblastoma HepG2 cell line transfected with complete hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV DNA) were studied. The kinetics and cytopathic effect of HBV Ag production in these two clones (one of which was an HBV producer) were compared to those of the parent HepG2 cell line. The presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBe Ag) was determined by commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A hepatitis B core antigen (HBc Ag)-specific ELISA assay was developed, using monoclonal anti-HBc to detect HBc Ag. Amounts of HBs, HBe, and HBC Ags were partially quantified in both intracellular and extracellular compartments. The HBV producer clone excreted high levels of HBc, HBe, and HBs Ags from the beginning of the growth phase, and no cytopathic effect was observed. The HBV nonproducer clone produced high levels of HBs and HBe Ags, but there was no detectable HBc Ag in the supernatant; instead, HBc Ag accumulated in the intracellular compartment. In this clone, significant cell death was observed 4 days after cell confluency, corresponding with notable HBc Ag release into the supernatant. These results suggest a cytopathic effect associated with HBc Ag accumulation in the HBV nonproducer clone, but no cytopathic effect in the HBV producer clone. This suggests that virological factors as well as the host's immune response may be considered in explaining liver injury occurring in hepatitis B.

Immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine (HEVAC B) in children with advanced renal failure

The immune response after hepatitis B (HB) vaccine HEVAC B was studied in 33 children (mean age 10 +/- 4 years) with advanced renal failure. Responders and protected patients were defined by antibody titres to HB surface antigen (anti-HBs) of greater than 10 and 50 mIU/ml, respectively. All received the initial recommended three injections at monthly intervals, and 23 received a booster injection (IB) 11 +/- 1 months after the third injection (I3). Loss of protection after I3 led to additional injections in 8 patients (25%). Vaccine was well tolerated and no HB infection occurred during the follow-up period (19 +/- 10 months). The percentage of responders was 91% 2 +/- 1 months after I3, and 100% 1 month, 13 +/- 1 months and 26 +/- 2 months after IB. The percentages of protected patients at these dates were 91%, 95%, 100% and 100%. Anti-HBs titres 1-3 months after I3 were useful for indicating those patients likely to have a rapid decline in anti-HBs titres, thus requiring serial anti-HBs determinations and additional injections to prevent a loss of protection. We conclude that at the expense of a reinforced vaccination schedule in 25% of patients, HEV AC B vaccine can safely achieve a sustained protection in more than 90% of uraemic children.

Chronic hepatitis in kidney allograft recipients

98 HBsAg-positive and 31 HBsAg-negative kidney recipients were compared to assess the effect of renal transplantation on chronic liver disease and vice versa. Diagnosis was based on analysis of liver biopsy specimens including semiquantitative evaluation of histological features of chronic hepatitis. Serial specimens were examined: chronic liver disease occurred in 88% of HBsAg-positive patients and 4% of HBsAg-negative patients with normal liver at the time of transplantation. Liver abnormalities in the former were chronic persistent hepatitis (32%), chronic active hepatitis (51%), and cirrhosis (17%). Actuarial patient survival was similar in HBsAg-positive (78%) and HBsAg-negative (87%) patients, as was allograft survival (64% and 71%, respectively). In both HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative patients chronic alcohol consumption was more frequent in those with chronic liver disease than those without. These data suggest that renal transplantation may be appropriate for haemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis whatever their HBV status.