Increased infections associated with the use of OKT3 for treatment of steroid-resistant rejection in renal transplantation

Review article: latent tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases receiving immunosuppression-risks, screening, diagnosis and management

BACKGROUND

One quarter of the world's population has latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Systemic immunosuppression is a risk factor for LTBI reactivation and the development of active tuberculosis. Such reactivation carries a risk of significant morbidity and mortality. Despite the increasing global incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the use of immune-based therapies, current guidelines on the testing and treatment of LTBI in patients with IBD are haphazard with a paucity of evidence.

AIM

To review the screening, diagnostic practices and medical management of LTBI in patients with IBD.

METHODS

Published literature was reviewed, and recommendations for testing and treatment were synthesised by experts in both infectious diseases and IBD.

RESULTS

Screening for LTBI should be performed proactively and includes assessment of risk factors, an interferon-gamma releasing assay or tuberculin skin test and chest X-ray. LTBI treatment in patients with IBD is scenario-dependent, related to geographical endemicity, travel and other factors. Ideally, LTBI therapy should be used prior to immune suppression but can be applied concurrently where urgent IBD medical treatment is required. Management is best directed by a multidisciplinary team involving gastroenterologists, infectious diseases specialists and pharmacists. Ongoing surveillance is recommended during therapy. Newer LTBI therapies show promise, but medication interactions need to be considered. There are major gaps in evidence, particularly with specific newer therapeutic approaches to IBD.

CONCLUSIONS

Proactive screening for LTBI is essential in patients with IBD undergoing immune-suppressing therapy and several therapeutic strategies are available. Reporting of real-world experience is essential to refining current management recommendations.

Nocardia Infection in Nephrotic Syndrome Patients: Three Case Studies and A Systematic Literature Review

Objective

The multicenter literature review and case studies of 3 patients were undertaken to provide an updated understanding of nocardiosis, an opportunistic bacterial infection affecting immunosuppressed nephrotic syndrome (NS) patients receiving long-term glucocorticoid and immunosuppressant treatment. The results provided clinical and microbiological data to assist physicians in managing nocardiosis patients.

Methods

Three cases between 2017 and 2018 from a single center were reported. Additionally, a systematic review of multicenter cases described in the NCBI PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase in English between January 1, 2001 and May 10, 2021 was conducted.

Results

This study described three cases of Nocardia infection in NS patients. The systematic literature review identified 24 cases with sufficient individual patient data. A total of 27 cases extracted from the literature review showed that most patients were > 50 years of age and 70.4% were male. Furthermore, the glucocorticoid or corticosteroid mean dose was 30.9 ± 13.7 mg per day. The average time between hormone therapy and Nocardia infection was 8.5 ± 9.7 months. Pulmonary (85.2%) and skin (44.4%) infections were the most common manifestations in NS patients, with disseminated infections in 77.8% of patients. Nodule/masses and consolidations were the major radiological manifestations. Most patients showed elevated inflammatory biomarkers levels, including white blood cell counts, neutrophils percentage, and C-reactive protein. Twenty-five patients received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole monotherapy (18.5%) or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-based multidrug therapy (74.1%), and the remaining two patients (7.4%) received biapenem monotherapy. All patients, except the two who were lost to follow-up, survived without relapse after antibiotic therapy.

Conclusions

Nephrotic syndrome patients are at high risk of Nocardia infection even if receiving low-dose glucocorticoid during the maintenance therapy. The most common manifestations of nocardiosis in NS patients include abnormal lungs revealing nodules and consolidations, skin and subcutaneous abscesses. The NS patients have a high rate of disseminated and cutaneous infections but a low mortality rate. Accurate and prompt microbiological diagnosis is critical for early treatment, besides the combination of appropriate antibiotic therapy and surgical drainage when needed for an improved prognosis.

Isolated Nocardiosis, an Unrecognized Primary Immunodeficiency?

Nocardiosis is an infectious disease caused by the gram-positive bacterium Nocardia spp. Although it is commonly accepted that exposure to Nocardia is almost universal, only a small fraction of exposed individuals develop the disease, while the vast majority remain healthy. Nocardiosis has been described as an "opportunistic" disease of immunocompromised patients, suggesting that exposure to the pathogen is necessary, but a host predisposition is also required. Interestingly, increasing numbers of nocardiosis cases in individuals without any detected risk factors, i.e., without overt immunodeficiency, are being reported. Furthermore, a growing body of evidence have shown that selective susceptibility to a specific pathogen can be caused by a primary immunodeficiency (PID). This raises the question of whether an undiagnosed PID may cause nocardiosis affecting otherwise healthy individuals. This review summarizes the specific clinical and microbiological characteristics of patients with isolated nocardiosis published during the past 30 years. Furthermore, it gives an overview of the known human immune mechanisms to fend off Nocardia spp. obtained from the study of PIDs and patients under immunomodulatory therapies.

Ten Years of Orthoclone OKT3 (Muromonab-CD3): A Review

Many important advances in transplantation have been made during the last decade. The introduction of Orthoclone OKT3 into clinical trials and its subsequent approval by the Food and Drug Administration in 1985 for use as an antirejection agent for renal transplantation were landmarks in the field of clinical transplantation of solid organs. In the decade since the approval of OKT3 for clinical use, much has been learned and written about OKT3. OKT3 now is considered a safe and effective agent for prophylaxis and first-line treatment of acute rejection of solid organ allografts. In this article, the development and use of OKT3 over the last 10 years, as well as the present status and future implications of immune therapy with OKT3, are reviewed.

Immunosuppressive monoclonal antibodies: current and next generation

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are well-established therapeutics, as evidenced by the large number of Food and Drug Administration-approved mAbs for the treatment of cancers, and inflammatory or autoimmune diseases, and for the prevention and treatment of solid organ transplant rejection. Although, in many cases, mAbs have improved patient survival, they are also associated with an increased incidence of opportunistic infections. We review here the current and next generation of mAbs and the risks that infectious disease specialists should be aware of.

Antibody immunosuppressive therapy in solid-organ transplant: Part I

Currently, a wide variety of both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies are being routinely utilized to prevent and treat solid organ rejection. More commonly, these agents are also administered in order to delay introduction of calcineurin inhibitors, especially in patients with already compromised renal function. While these antibody therapies dramatically reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes and improved both short and long-term graft survival, they are also associated with an increased incidence of opportunistic infections and neoplastic complications. Therefore, effective patient management must necessarily balance these risks against the potential benefits of the therapy.

Defining the risks for cytomegalovirus infection and disease after solid organ transplantation

Cytomegalovirus continues to be one of the most clinically significant infections after solid organ transplantation. Classic definitions of patients at high risk for infection and tissue-invasive disease are focused on recipient-donor serostatus, type of organ transplanted, and overall level of immunosuppression. However, recent trends in clinical practice call for a reevaluation of cytomegalovirus infection risks after solid organ transplantation. Indeed, whereas early-onset cytomegalovirus infection is usually controlled by antiviral prophylaxis with ganciclovir and derivatives, delayed- and late-onset cytomegalovirus infection can develop after the completion of a course of preventive therapy. In addition, indirect effects of cytomegalovirus infection may occur as a result of persistent low-level viremia. Suboptimal dosing of antiviral drugs due to specific drug toxicities may result in the development of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus disease. The relationship between organ allograft rejection and cytomegalovirus infection and disease has been recognized for some time. Transplantation of increasing numbers of extended-criteria donor organs increases the risk of delayed graft function and acute rejection, prompting the use of more intensive immunosuppression. In addition, the trend to spare long-term exposure to calcineurin inhibitors has contributed to a resurgence in the use of polyclonal T-cell induction immunosuppressive agents, which may reduce host anticytomegalovirus immunity. We discuss the current trends in solid organ transplantation that provide a foundation for defining risks for cytomegalovirus infection and disease, including identification of patients who would benefit from more aggressive cytomegalovirus monitoring and prevention strategies.

The use of sirolimus in ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus infections in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The widespread use of prophylactic ganciclovir and anti-lymphocyte/thymocyte therapies are associated with increased induction of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) strains. The use of sirolimus has been associated with a lower incidence of CMV infection in transplant recipients. We questioned whether it could also be effective as a therapeutic treatment of resistant CMV infection.

METHODS

Patients with ganciclovir-resistant CMV infections determined clinically and by DNA sequencing analysis were enrolled. Antigenaemia and DNA sequencing were used to diagnosis and follow the mutations.

RESULTS

Nine transplant patients were given sirolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (n = 4) or a calcineurin inhibitor (n = 5). Seven out of nine recipients were CMV IgG negative before transplantation. We observed a rapid decrease in antigenaemia levels, reaching zero in eight out of nine (88.9%) patients within a median of 20.3 +/- 10.1 d. Graft function remained stable and no patient presented acute rejection or recurrence of the CMV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

This suggests that the use of sirolimus plus ganciclovir therapy could be useful in ganciclovir-resistant CMV infections.

The onset of rapidly progressive neurologic deterioration after a brief gastrointestinal illness in a renal allograft recipient

Renal transplant recipients are at increased risk for life-threatening complications, most commonly infections. Because of their impaired cell-mediated immunity, these patients are particularly susceptible to organisms that rely on intracellular survival and spread, such as Listeria monocytogenes. Despite being a food-borne pathogen, L. monocytogenes is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Here we report the case of a renal transplant recipient who developed rapidly progressive neurological symptoms after a brief gastrointestinal illness. Magnetic resonance imaging scan of the brain showed a large mass that was identified as an abscess due to L. monocytogenes. Timely aspiration and antibiotic treatment resulted in complete recovery, as opposed to worse outcomes in the available case reports. We further review the epidemiology, microbiology, clinical presentation, and therapeutic options for listerial brain abscess.

Muronomab-CD3 for pediatric acute myocarditis

The treatment of pediatric acute myocarditis that is hemodynamically significant often includes immune modulation with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and steroids, and supportive measures. In this population, published outcomes include recovery of ventricular function from 6 months to years, transplantation, or death. We studied the effect of the immunosuppressive agent muronomab-CD3 (OKT3) on recovery of heart failure in the treatment of pediatric myocarditis. A retrospective chart review was performed identifying 15 pediatric patients diagnosed with acute myocarditis and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or arrhythmias to which OKT3 was added to the immunosuppressive regimen. All patients were treated with supportive care, intravenous immunoglobulin, and steroids. LVEF by echocardiogram was plotted for each patient versus time. Outcomes included recovery of left ventricular function (as defined by an LVEF > or = 45%), death, or listing for transplant. The diagnosis of acute myocarditis was made by a positive endomyocardial biopsy in 8 patients. Nine patients required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or LV assist device. After treatment with OKT3, 9 patients made a significant recovery of LVEF within 17 days, and 1 recovered by 60 days. Six of the patients requiring mechanical assistance recovered within this time period. There were 4 deaths--3 due to ECMO complications and 1 due to underlying gastrointestinal illness. One patient diagnosed with chronic myocarditis on biopsy underwent transplantation. No significant side effects attributable to OKT3 occurred. By decreasing the autoimmune inflammatory response, OKT3 may hasten recovery of ventricular function and be a useful adjunct therapy for hemodynamically significant acute pediatric myocarditis.

Rituximab, anti-CD20, induces in vivo cytokine release but does not impair ex vivo T-cell responses

Pre-formed HLA antibodies (Ab), reported as panel-reactive antibody (PRA), prolong transplant waiting time. We hypothesized that rituximab (RIT) could reduce PRA via B-cell depletion. As part of a Phase I study of single RIT dose, we studied in vivo and ex vivo effects on T-cell immune responses. Nine subjects (n = 3) were treated at 50, 150, and 375 mg/m(2). Serum interleukin-1alpha (IL-1alpha), IL-6, IL-12, tumor necrosis factor beta (TNF-beta), and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). T-cell function was monitored with T-cell proliferation assays. IL-6 levels rose in eight patients (7.15 +/- 4.38 pg/mL to 86.22 +/- 77.08, p = 0.021). The high-dose group had detectable TNF-betapost rituximab infusion (874.7 +/- 1466.5 pg/mL). There was no decline in T-cell proliferation in response to phytohemagglutinin or allogeneic lymphocyte stimuli. Stimulation indices in the presence of both concentrations of tetanus toxoid rose significantly at 4 weeks.

Sequential cytomegalovirus antigenemia monitoring in kidney transplant patients treated with antilymphocyte antibodies

BACKGROUND

Antilymphocyte antibodies (ALA) use is related to disseminated cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after kidney transplantation. Strict surveillance of CMV infection, preemptive antiviral treatment or concomitant ganciclovir and ALA use are proposed as an attempt to prevent related clinical complications. Our objective was to describe the pattern of CMV infection, based on sequential antigenemia detection, after ALA treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty renal transplant patients were prospectively screened for CMV infection after ALA treatment. CMV antigenemia (pp65 antigen detection) was monitored twice a week in the first month and weekly until 60 days after the beginning of ALA therapy. Any positive value of antigenemia was considered CMV infection.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight (93.3%) patients were CMV positive (IgG) before transplantation. The mean duration of ALA treatment was 12.1+/-2.4 days. Positive antigenemia was detected in 24 (80%) patients, a mean of 52.5+/-15 days after transplant and 44.7+/-14 days after the beginning of ALA treatment. The median antigenemia count was 7 positive cells/300,000 neutrophils (range: 1-227). Antigenemia preceded clinical symptoms by 5.8 days (0-28 days). Eighteen (75%) of 24 positive patients received ganciclovir treatment: 8 patients (26.7%) for viral syndrome, 2 patients (33.3%) for invasive disease, and 8 patients (26.7%) as part of preemptive therapy, asymptomatic with high antigenemia values. Six pp65-positive patients with low counts were followed up until a negative result and remained asymptomatic without any specific treatment.

CONCLUSION

CMV infection was frequent after ALA treatment in this group and generally occurred late after completion of treatment. Antigenemia was a reliable tool to guide preemptive treatment in these patients, and such strategy is an alternative option compared to the prophylactic use of ganciclovir with ALA treatment.

The use of daclizumab as induction therapy in combination with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in recipients with previous transplants

Clinical trials using daclizumab as induction therapy in combination with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes in solid organ transplantation. In an attempt to obtain a low rejection rate we proceeded with the use of daclizumab as induction therapy, in combination with TAC and MMF for recipients with previous transplants. In this study, we analyzed patients who received previous transplants, treated with the above immunosuppressive regimen. Group A consisted of four patients with previous liver transplants, group B consisted of 16 recipients with previous kidney transplants and group C consisted of three patients with previous simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants. All patients underwent cadaveric kidney transplants except one patient in group B, who underwent a pancreas transplant. At 12 months, patient and graft survival for all groups was 100 and 100%, respectively. Acute rejection rate was 0% for group A, 12.5% for group B, and 0% for group C. Daclizumab induction therapy is effective for patients with previous transplants and does not appear to increase the risk of acute rejection.

Pneumonia in kidney allograft recipients

Infectious complications, including pneumonia, remain one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in kidney allograft recipients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between pneumonia occurrence and treatment duration and recipient age, cause of native kidney insufficiency, dialysis duration, time between transplantation and onset, HLA matching, PRA immunosuppressive protocol, acute rejection incidence and treatment, kidney function at the pneumonia onset, as well as presence of comorbid conditions. One hundred and twenty pneumonia cases occurred in kidney allograft recipients transplanted between 1991 and 2000 with 12 to 120 months follow-up. Twenty five percentage of pneumonia episodes were diagnosed during the first posttransplant month, 25% between 2 and 6 months, and 25% at 0.5 to 3 years. Treatment duration measured from pneumonia onset to the study endpoint of recovery, which was defined as antibiotic withdrawal, show 50% of patient we cured after 15 days and 75% after 24 days of treatment. The risk of prolonged pneumonia treatment was associated with: second versus first kidney transplantation with RR = 2.3 (P <.02) and medians of treated time 28 versus 15 days; as well as serum creatinine level above 2 mg/dL (RR = 1.4; P <.098). Exposure to enhanced-potency immunosuppressive protocols including induction therapy with mono- or polyclonal antibodies increased the RR = 1.65 (P <.02), and lengthened the time to 18 versus 14 days. Maintenance immunosuppression with agents other than cyclosporine also enhanced the risk. (RR = 2.18; P <.068).

CD4-dependent generation of dominant transplantation tolerance induced by simultaneous perturbation of CD154 and LFA-1 pathways

CD154 and LFA-1 (CD11a) represent conceptually distinct pathways of receptor/ligand interactions (costimulation and adhesion/homing, respectively) that have been effectively targeted to induce long-term allograft acceptance and tolerance. In the current study, we determined the relative efficacy and nature of tolerance induced by mAbs specific for these pathways. In vitro analysis indicated that simultaneous targeting of CD154 and LFA-1 resulted in profound inhibition of alloreactivity, suggesting that combined anti-CD154/anti-LFA-1 therapy could be highly effective in vivo. Thus, we evaluated combining mAb therapies targeting CD154 and LFA-1 for inducing transplantation tolerance to pancreatic islet allografts. Monotherapy with either anti-CD154 or anti-LFA-1 was partially effective for inducing long-term allograft survival, whereas the combination resulted in uniform allograft acceptance in high-responder C57BL/6 recipients. This combined therapy was not lymphocyte depleting and did not require the long-term deletion of donor-reactive T lymphocytes to maintain allograft survival. Importantly, combined anti-CD154/anti-LFA therapy uniquely resulted in "dominant" transplantation tolerance. Therefore, simultaneous perturbation of CD154 and LFA-1 molecules can result in profound tolerance induction not accomplished through individual monotherapy approaches. Furthermore, results show that such regulatory tolerance can coexist with the presence of robust anti-donor reactivity, suggesting that active tolerance does not require a corresponding deletion of donor-reactive T cells. Interestingly, although the induction of this regulatory state was highly CD4 dependent, the adoptive transfer of tolerance was less CD4 dependent in vivo.

Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of daclizumab (Zenapax) in a two-dose regimen in liver transplant recipients

A major thrust of transplantation research is to find more effective and less broadly toxic immunosuppressive agents. One potential way is the use of monoclonal antibodies directed to IL-2R alpha. Immunoprophylaxis with daclizumab, a humanized anti-IL-2R alpha monoclonal antibody, has been shown to be effective in the prevention of acute rejection in kidney transplant patients. These results encouraged us to initiate a pilot study in 28 liver transplant patients in 1997. Daclizumab was administered intravenously approximately 6 h after reperfusion (1 mg/kg) and on day 4 post-transplant (0.5 mg/kg). Additional immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine A as well as of corticosteroids. Administration of daclizumab was not associated with any side-effects. We only experienced one acute rejection in a patient on day 17 post-transplant. It resolved immediately under therapy with prednisolone. The rate of opportunistic infections did not differ from results with conventional immunosuppressive regimens. At 4 years post-transplant no lymphoproliferative disease was observed. Patient survival at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months post-transplant was 88.5, 84.6, 80.8 and 73.1%, respectively. Immunoprophylaxis with a two-dose daclizumab regimen is safe, effective and well tolerated, and does not lead to increased opportunistic infections.

Contemporary immunosuppression in renal transplantation

Over the past 3 decades, renal allograft survival has improved significantly as a result of the development of powerful immunosuppressive agents. Nevertheless, the overall half-life of renal allografts has increased marginally during that time period, owing to drug-related nephrotoxicity and chronic rejection. New immunosuppressive agents are being evaluated because of the need for a reduction in the dose of nephrotoxic calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids. Additional agents have demonstrated the ability to retard the onset of chronic rejection in preclinical transplant models. In concert with these efforts, approaches are in development to alleviate the ever increasing shortage of donor organs, including the as yet unrealized goals of successful and practical xenotransplantation and the bioartificial kidney. Further identification and development of novel agents that target the specific components of the allograft response will provide the key to the achievement of donor-specific tolerance, the "Holy Grail" of solid organ transplantation.

Polyoma viral infection in renal transplantation: the role of immunosuppressive therapy

BACKGROUND

Polyoma virus infection in renal transplant recipients has been observed with increasing frequency in recent years. Renal allograft involvement in this condition may occur as a result of primary infection or secondary to reactivation of the latent virus. Interstitial nephritis, ureteric stenosis, rise in serum creatinine and allograft function loss have been attributed to this viral infection.

METHODS

In this study we reviewed our experience with 8 patients who developed polyoma viral infection confirmed by allograft biopsy. All patients were receiving mycophenolate mofetil as part of the immunosuppression and 7 of the 8 patients were on tacrolimus. All patients have biopsy proven polyoma viral infection. The following therapeutic maneuvers were carried out following the diagnosis of polyoma viral infection: 1) stopping mycophenolate and 2) switching tacrolimus to cyclosporine or reducing the tacrolimus dose to adjust it at a lower therapeutic trough level. The clinical course and outcome of our patients were reviewed in relation to manipulation of immunosuppressive medications.

RESULTS

The incidence of this infection in our transplant program in the last 3 yr was 5.3%. Seventy-five percent of the patients had at least one rejection episode and 63% had more than one rejection episode. The main risk factor for the development of polyoma viral infection was related to the intensity of immunosuppression. The use of antirejection therapy after histological diagnosis of polyoma virus infection was not associated with improvement of renal function despite the histological appearance of acute rejection. Thus, the interstitial nephritis associated with polyoma viral infection appears to be an inflammatory response to the virus rather than acute rejection. Six out of the 8 patients stabilized renal function with reduction in immunosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduction in immunosuppression was associated with the stabilization of renal function when instituted early. However, these patients were left with a degree of allograft dysfunction and their outcome may be significantly compromised. The lack of effective antiviral therapy for polyoma virus may limit the use of newer and more potent immunosuppressive medications.

The use of intravenous tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as induction and maintenance immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas--kidney recipients with previous transplants

Clinical trials using quadruple immunosuppression that include the combination of tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. In attempting to obtain a low rejection rate without antibody induction therapy, we proceeded with the combination of TAC intravenous (i.v.), MMF, and steroids as induction therapy and as primary immunosuppression for recipients with previous transplants. In this study, we analyzed 10 patients who received previous transplants, treated with low-dose TAC i.v. as induction therapy. Group A consisted of 6 patients with previous transplants that underwent SPK and group B consisted of four recipients with previous SPK that underwent cadaveric kidney transplants. For group A, the previous transplants were: living related kidney (LRK) followed by islet cell (IC) transplant (n=2), LRK transplant (n=1), cadaver kidney (CAD) and IC transplant (n=1), SPK (n=1), and three previous CAD kidney transplants (n=1). In group A, all six kidneys were lost due to recurrent diabetic nephropathy, IC possibly to rejection, and the pancreas due to thrombosis. In group B with previous SPK transplants, three recipients lost their kidney to chronic rejection and one to long-term use of a nephrotoxic antibiotic. Currently, in all group A and B patients, the kidney and the pancreas are functioning, although 1 patient in group A developed type 2 diabetes (normal fasting C-peptide). Two patients in group A developed three rejection episodes that responded to steroid treatment. The results indicate the TAC i.v. in combination with oral TAC, MMF, and steroids offer effective induction therapy in patients with previous transplants.

Quadruple tacrolimus-based induction therapy including azathioprine and ALG does not significantly improve outcome after liver transplantation when compared with standard induction with tacrolimus and steroids: results of a prospective, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus in combination with prednisolone has been proven to be a safe and effective immunosuppressive induction therapy in solid organ transplantation. However, it remains unclear whether a tacrolimus-based quadruple induction regimen with azathioprine and an antilymphocytic preparation could further improve the results after orthotopic liver transplantation. Therefore, we designed a prospective, randomized study to compare the immunosuppressive efficacy of dual (tacrolimus and prednisolone) and quadruple (tacrolimus, azathioprine, ALG Merieux and prednisolone) induction after liver transplantation.

METHODS

After randomization, 120 consecutive patients of primary liver transplants were divided into the dual group (n=59) and the quadruple group (n=61) and followed for a minimum of 3 years.

RESULTS

Patient survival at 3 years was 88.2% in the dual versus 94.9% in the quadruple group. Overall 25 patients in each group (41 and 42%, respectively) developed acute rejection. There was no difference in the number and severity of rejections. In each group only four patients required OKT3-therapy, however, although three of four patients in the quadruple group responded to OKT3 and cleared rejection, none of the four patients in the dual group were treated successfully with OKT3 (P<0.02). Rejection in these patients resolved only after additional treatment with mycophenolate mofetil. Adverse events and infections were equally distributed in both groups. Asymptomatic Cytomegalovirus infections were more common in the quadruple group (P<0.02). As of today, only one patient developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (dual group).

CONCLUSIONS

The data from our single-center study indicate that both tacrolimus-based dual and quadruple immunosuppressive induction regimens yield similar safety and effectiveness after liver transplantation.

Reactivation of tuberculosis after conversion from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil 16 years after renal transplantation

The incidence of tuberculosis among transplant recipients is greater than in the general population. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a potent immunosuppressive agent that has become part of most standard immunosuppressive protocols after renal transplantation. We have recently shown that conversion from azathioprine (AZA) to MMF in patients with chronic allograft dysfunction may be beneficial. Here, we report a patient with a history of pulmonary tuberculosis during his childhood. This patient was converted from AZA to MMF therapy 16 years after allogenic renal transplantation because of chronic allograft dysfunction. Two months later, he developed axillary lymph node tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Because he denied contact with infectious persons, we diagnosed reactivation of old dormant tuberculosis. After surgical extirpation, quadruple antituberculous therapy was administered for 3 months (isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide), followed by dual therapy for 3 months (isoniazid and rifampicin), and monotherapy for another 3 months (isoniazid). In the follow-up period, he remained asymptomatic with stable graft function. We conclude that MMF therapy in renal allograft recipients may cause reactivation of old dormant tuberculosis, even in the very late posttransplantation period. In these patients, close monitoring and isoniazid prophylaxis may be useful.

Influence of anti-rejection therapy on the timing of cytomegalovirus disease and other infections in renal transplant recipients

Infections are an important cause of mortality and morbidity in renal transplant recipients. To study the impact of anti-rejection therapy on the timing of infections, the records of 599 consecutive renal transplants, performed prior to 31 December 1996 at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, were reviewed. Patients were grouped according to acute rejection (AR) episode and treatment during the first 6 months after transplantation. Group 1 [n = 168 (35%)] patients did not experience any episode of AR. Group 2 [n = 169 (35%)] patients had one or more episodes of AR and received high doses of steroids. Group 3 [n = 141 (30%)] patients had more than one episode of AR and received anti-lymphocyte antibodies in addition to high doses of steroids. Infections were more common in Groups 2 and 3 but only cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease occurred earlier in patients treated with lympholytics. Given the high incidence and early onset of CMV disease in patients receiving lympholytics and considering that an effective prophylactic protocol remains undetermined, pre-emptive treatment with ganciclovir in this high risk group appears justified.

Impact of acute rejection therapy on infections and malignancies in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Infections and malignancies are important causes of mortality and morbidity in renal allograft recipients. Their risk increases with increasing immunosuppression.

METHODS

In an attempt to quantitate the increase in the risk of these complications in association with antirejection therapy, we reviewed the records of all renal allograft recipients of our center transplanted during the cyclosporin era. We sub-divided the patients into three groups based on acute rejection episodes during the first 6 months posttransplant, and the treatment for acute rejection: those who did not develop AR--group 1 (n=168); those who had one or more episodes of acute rejection and were treated with high dose corticosteroids --group 2 (n=169); those who in addition to corticosteroids required cytolytics (OKT3) and/or other drugs--group 3 (n=141).

RESULTS

52% patients in group 1, 71% patients in group 2 and 86% patients in group 3 had one or more episodes of infection during the first 6 months posttransplantation. Relative risk for group 2 and 3 were 1.56 (P=0.0002) and 2.98 (P<0.00001), respectively. Infection/patient rates at 6 months were 0.67, 1.23, and 2.79 in groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Groups 1 and 2 had a similar number of cases with squamous and basal cell carcinoma, however, there were few cases with these malignancies in group 3. No case of lymphoma was seen in group 1; there were four cases in group 2 and nine in group 3. There was no significant difference in patient survival in group 1 and 2, however, patients in group 3 had a reduced patient survival (1 vs. 3 P<0.001, 2 vs. 3 P=0.067). Graft survival was best in group 1 and worst in group 3 (1 vs. 2 P<0.05; 1 vs. 3 P<0.00001; 2 vs. 3 P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In renal transplant recipients the risk of infections and lymphoma increases with increasing immunosuppression and hence mortality and morbidity associated with it. When adding a potent immunosuppressive agent to rescue a kidney one needs to consider the serious and at times fatal side effects given the modest beneficial effect on long-term outcome.

Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin for immunosuppression in renal transplantation: meta-analysis of randomised trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare tacrolimus with cyclosporin for immunosuppression in renal transplantation.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of randomised trials of two treatments after kidney transplantation.

IDENTIFICATION

Four studies involving 1037 patients. Trials were included if they were randomised, the intervention group received tacrolimus, the control group received cyclosporin, the patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months, and patient survival, graft survival, incidence of acute rejection, need for antilymphocyte treatment, or the prevalence of diabetes mellitus after transplant was reported.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pooled estimates of patient mortality, allograft loss, and episodes of acute rejection 1 year after transplantation.

RESULTS

The odds ratio for loss of allograft with tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin was 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.65 to 1.40). The odds ratio for mortality with tacrolimus was 1.07 (0.47 to 2.48). Treatment with tacrolimus was associated with a reduction in episodes of acute rejection (0.52; 0.36 to 0.75), a reduction in the use of antilymphocyte antibodies to treat rejection (0.37; 0.25 to 0. 56), and an increased prevalence of diabetes mellitus after transplantation (5.03; 2.04 to 12.36) compared with treatment with cyclosporin.

CONCLUSIONS

After renal transplantation, immunosuppression with tacrolimus results in a significant reduction in acute rejection compared with cyclosporin. Follow up studies of high methodological quality are needed to determine whether tacrolimus improves long term renal graft survival.

Central nervous system infection with Listeria monocytogenes. 33 years' experience at a general hospital and review of 776 episodes from the literature

We reviewed 776 previously reported and 44 new cases of CNS listeriosis outside of pregnancy and the neonatal period, and evaluated the epidemiologic, diagnostic, and therapeutic characteristics of this infection. Among patients with Listeria meningitis/meningoencephalitis, hematologic malignancy and kidney transplantation were the leading predisposing factors, but 36% of patients had no underlying diseases recognized. The infection occurred throughout life, with a higher incidence before the age of 3 and after the age of 45-50 years. Fever, altered sensorium, and headache were the most common symptoms, but 42% of patients had no meningeal signs on admission. Compared with patients with acute meningitis due to other bacterial pathogens, patients with Listeria infection had a significantly lower incidence of meningeal signs, and the CSF profile was significantly less likely to have a high WBC count or a high protein concentration. Gram stain of CSF was negative in two-thirds of cases of CNS listeriosis. One-third of patients had focal neurologic findings, and approximately one-fourth developed seizures over their course. Mortality was 26% overall, and was higher among patients with seizures and those older than 65 years of age. Relapse occurred in 7% of episodes. Ampicillin for a minimum of 15-21 days (with an aminoglycoside for at least the first 7-10 days) remains the treatment of choice. Cerebritis/abscess due to L. monocytogenes, without meningeal involvement, is less common but may be diagnosed by blood cultures and CNS imaging, or by stereotactic biopsy. Longer antibiotic therapy (at least 5-6 weeks) is needed in the presence of localized CNS involvement.

Listeriosis in pediatric oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Adult cancer patients are considered to be at an increased risk for Listeria monocytogenes infections, but, to the authors' knowledge, little information regarding this infection in the pediatric oncology population has been published.

METHODS

The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center microbiology laboratory's database was searched for cases of Listeria monocytogenes infection during the period from January 1981 to December 1996, and thorough chart reviews of the cases identified in patients age < 21 years were performed.

RESULTS

Listerial infections occurred in 5 children (3 with leukemia, 1 with lymphoma, and 1 with a brain tumor) among 20,612 admissions to the pediatric department during this period. All five children were actively receiving therapy for their malignancy, and two also were receiving other potentially immunosuppressive therapies. None was receiving co-trimoxazole prophylaxis. All were treated successfully for the Listeria monocytogenes infection with ampicillin and gentamicin (four patients) or ampicillin alone (one patient). At last follow-up two patients were long term, event-free survivors, two had died of their underlying malignancy, and one patient had died of cytomegalovirus pneumonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Listeria monocytogenes infections in pediatric oncology patients can be treated successfully with ampicillin-containing antibiotic regimens.

A prospective randomized trial comparing interleukin-2 receptor antibody versus antithymocyte globulin as part of a quadruple immunosuppressive induction therapy following orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Quadruple immunosuppressive induction therapy has been shown to markedly reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes without increasing the incidence of infectious complications after liver transplantation. However, the use of polyclonal antibody preparations (e.g. antithymocyte globulin [ATG]) is associated with side effects such as fever and tachycardia. To evaluate the efficacy and the safety of a monoclonal antibody directed against the interleukin-2 receptor (BT563) in comparison with ATG as part of a quadruple induction regimen, a prospective, randomized study was conducted.

METHODS

Eighty consecutive adult recipients of primary orthotopic liver transplants were randomized to receive either BT563 (10 mg/day; days 0-12; n=39) or ATG (5 mg/kg/day; days 0-6; n=41) in addition to the standard immunosuppressive protocol consisting of cyclosporine, and prednisolone, and azathioprine.

RESULTS

Patients treated with BT563 had a significantly lower incidence of steroid-sensitive rejection episodes (3 vs. 11; P<0.025) and also significantly fewer drug-related side effects (4 vs. 18, P<0.038) when compared with patients treated with ATG. The incidence of infectious complications was not different between the two groups. Patient survival did not differ significantly between the two groups (84.6% at 1, 2, and 3 years in the BT563 group and 90.2% at 1 year and 87.8% at 2 and 3 years for the ATG group). Analysis of graft function showed an advantage for the BT563 group in terms of postoperative bilirubin levels. However, no differences were observed in long-term follow-up between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that treatment with anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody as part of quadruple induction therapy after orthotopic liver transplantation is safe and effective and shows fewer steroid-sensitive rejection episodes as well as fewer side effects when compared with quadruple induction therapy including ATG.

Ten-year results of the Oregon program with 295 consecutive heart transplants in the Pacific Northwest

BACKGROUND

The Oregon Cardiac Transplant Program provides a regional service. Since December 4, 1985, 284 patients, including 14 children, from Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Alaska, and Hawaii, underwent 295 orthotopic heart transplantation procedures at the Oregon Health Sciences University. Eleven patients underwent transplantations twice.

METHODS

Detailed, up-to-date follow-up data were available on all patients. All patients have been followed up prospectively for transplant-related complications.

RESULTS

The most common recipient diagnoses were coronary artery disease (50%) or idiopathic cardiomyopathy (33%). The mean age of the recipients was 48 +/- 15 years (range, 3 months to 68 years). Donor hearts were retrieved from a procurement area of a 1,500-mile radius that involved Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Nevada, Utah, California, and Canada. The mean donor age was 28 +/- 11 years and the donor heart ischemia time was 180 +/- 56 minutes. The median recipient waiting time was 75 days. Operative mortality was 6%. One-year, 5-year, and 10-year actuarial patient survival rates are 86 +/- 2%, 74 +/- 3%, and 59 +/- 5%, respectively. The majority of survivors are in very good functional status.

CONCLUSIONS

Now, more than 10 years into its existence, the Oregon Heart Transplant Program has fulfilled its goal of providing a most effective treatment option for patients with end-stage heart disease in the region.

Ten years of Orthoclone OKT3 (muromonab-CD3): a review

Many important advances in transplantation have been made during the last decade. The introduction of Orthoclone OKT3 into clinical trials and its subsequent approval by the Food and Drug Administration in 1985 for use as an antirejection agent for renal transplantation were landmarks in the field of clinical transplantation of solid organs. In the decade since the approval of OKT3 for clinical use, much has been learned and written about OKT3. OKT3 now is considered a safe and effective agent for prophylaxis and first-line treatment of acute rejection of solid organ allografts. In this article, the development and use of OKT3 over the last 10 years, as well as the present status and future implications of immune therapy with OKT3, are reviewed.

Immunoprophylaxis with a monoclonal anti-IL-2 receptor antibody in liver transplant patients

The immunosuppressive effect of a monoclonal antibody (moAb), BT563, directed to the alpha-chain of the IL-2R (CD25), was analyzed in a prospective nonrandomized trial and a prospective randomized trial. Primary objectives were evaluation of the incidence of acute rejections and infections; secondary objectives were safety and tolerability of the moAb. A total of 28 patients were enrolled (phase II) to receive 10 mg/day of BT563 (12 days) as immunoprophylaxis in combination with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and low-dose steroids. Subsequently 32 patients were randomly assigned (phase III) to receive BT563 (10 mg/day) for 12 days or ATG (5 mg/kg/day) for 7 days in addition to cyclosporine and low-dose steroids. No side effects of the BT563 treatment were noted. The actuarial survival was 82% at 12 months in the phase II trial and 92% at 12 months in both arms of the phase III trial. There was one acute rejection in the phase II trial. No acute rejections were noted in the BT arm of the phase III trial and 5 acute rejections were treated in the ATG arm. In the phase II trial 7 infectious episodes were observed, while one infection was seen in the BT arm and 7 in the ATG arm of the triple immunosuppression phase III trial. In all patients circulation of coated CD25+ lymphocytes was observed during BT563 treatment; there was no evidence of depletion or modulation of CD25+ cells. Mean serum levels of BT563 ranged from 1.6 to 7.6 microgram/ml throughout the therapy. An antimurine response was seen in 82% (phase II) and 100% (phase III) of the patients. Antirabbit antibodies were found in 56% of the patients treated with ATG. Analysis of the antimurine response specificity revealed in 56% blocking anti-isotypic antibodies and only in 3% of the patients an anti-idiotypic response. The data of the study presented suggest that therapy with an anti IL-2R moAb is at least equal to ATG application according to the incidence of acute rejections and infections.

Rescue therapy with tacrolimus in simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplantation

Tacrolimus has been effective both in primary and rescue therapy following steroid and OKT3-resistant acute rejection in liver and kidney transplantation. Due to the effects of tacrolimus on glucose metabolism, there has been concern about its use in simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplantation. We report on the results of six patients (three female, three male, age 35.2 +/- 7.3 years) converted from cyclosporin A to tacrolimus following simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplantation in steroid-resistant acute rejection. Tacrolimus was induced 2.8 +/- 1.7 months (range 1-4.8 months) after transplantation; follow-up was 3-18 months. Following conversion, creatinine levels declined in all patients [3.5 +/- 1.2 mg/dl before conversion, 3.0 +/- 1.9 mg/dl (n = 6) at three months, 1.4 +/- 0.1 mg/ dl at 1 year (n = 3)]. Before conversion, fasting blood glucose levels averaged 154 +/- 33 mg/dl, with three patients receiving insulin. Three months later no patient required insulin, the mean glucose level being 107 +/- 23 mg/dl (n = 6); at 1 year it was 92 +/- 9 mg/dl (n = 3). One patient lost his pancreatic graft after 4 months due to a mycotic aneurysm. We conclude that conversion to tacrolimus is a safe and effective treatment in cases of steroid-resistant rejections following pancreas/ kidney transplantation.

High-dose acyclovir and intravenous immune globulin reduce the incidence of CMV disease after liver transplantation

We attempted to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in liver transplant (LTx) recipients by means of a combined prophylaxis regimen consisting of high-dose acyclovir (HDA) and immune globulin (IVIG). In 259 consecutive patients, HDA was given for 3 months post-LTx; recipients seronegative for CMV also received IVIG. The previous 94 patients comprised our control group; in this group, low dose acyclovir was given to prevent herpes, and prophylaxis of CMV consisted of IVIG given only to seronegative recipients of seropositive donors. The overall incidence of CMV disease was lower in the HDA group (10.8%) than in the control group (27.6%); (P < 0.001). The CMV disease rate associated with primary exposure was 26.3% in the HDA group and 83.3% in the control group (P < 0.001). The incidence of CMV disease occurring after acute rejection was 9.5% in HDA patients and 24.6% in controls (P < 0.005) The HDA protocol was associated with a trend toward a lower incidence of CMV in patients requiring OKT3 therapy (16.7% vs 29%). High-dose acyclovir/IVIG thus reduces the incidence of CMV disease in seronegative recipients after LTx and lowers the risk of CMV disease associated with therapy for rejection.