Withdrawal of steroid immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients

Immunosuppression of HLA identical living-donor kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant (KT) recipients of HLA identical siblings (HLAid) have lower immunological risk, but there are no specific recommendations for immunosuppression. Our aim was to analyze evidence about results from HLAid living-donor recipients under different immunosuppression in the current era of immunological risk assessment.

METHODS

Systematic review of studies describing associations between outcomes of HLAid living-donor KT recipients according to their immunological risk and applied immunosuppression.

RESULTS

From 1351 studies, 16 (5636 KT recipients) were included in the analysis. All studies were retrospective, ten comparing immunosuppression strategies, and six immunological risk strata. Of those ten, six studies were published in 1990 or earlier and only three included tacrolimus. The evidence is poor, and the inclusion of calcineurin inhibitors does not demonstrate better results. Furthermore, only few studies describe different immunosuppression regimens according to the patient immunological risk and, in general, they do not include the assessment with new solid phase assays.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no studies analyzing the association of outcomes of HLAid KT recipients with current immunological risk tools. In the absence of evidence, no decision or proposal of immunosuppression adapted to modern immunological risk assessment can be made currently by the Descartes Working Group.

Complete steroid avoidance is effective and safe in children with renal transplants: a multicenter randomized trial with three-year follow-up

To determine whether steroid avoidance in pediatric kidney transplantation is safe and efficacious, a randomized, multicenter trial was performed in 12 pediatric kidney transplant centers. One hundred thirty children receiving primary kidney transplants were randomized to steroid-free (SF) or steroid-based (SB) immunosuppression, with concomitant tacrolimus, mycophenolate and standard dose daclizumab (SB group) or extended dose daclizumab (SF group). Follow-up was 3 years posttransplant. Standardized height Z-score change after 3 years follow-up was -0.99 ± 2.20 in SF versus -0.93 ± 1.11 in SB; p = 0.825. In subgroup analysis, recipients under 5 years of age showed improved linear growth with SF compared to SB treatment (change in standardized height Z-score at 3 years -0.43 ± 1.15 vs. -1.07 ± 1.14; p = 0.019). There were no differences in the rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 3 years after transplantation (16.7% in SF vs. 17.1% in SB; p = 0.94). Patient survival was 100% in both arms; graft survival was 95% in the SF and 90% in the SB arms (p = 0.30) at 3 years follow-up. Over the 3 year follow-up period, the SF group showed lower systolic BP (p = 0.017) and lower cholesterol levels (p = 0.034). In conclusion, complete steroid avoidance is safe and effective in unsensitized children receiving primary kidney transplants.

Effect of long-term steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort study

Background. Steroids are largely effective for the immunosuppressive treatment in renal transplant patients, but cause severe side effects. Whether steroid withdrawal confers long-term beneficial effects remains unclear.

Methods. Data on 4481 cadaveric kidney transplant recipients were collected to estimate the impact of steroid withdrawal on kidney function and graft and patient survival using multivariate Cox regression models.

Results. A total of 923 patients (20.6%) had steroid treatment withdrawn. This was more common in recipients from younger donors and in older recipients, and in recipients with a first transplant, those who had pre-transplant or de novo diabetes mellitus and those with fewer episodes of acute rejection (AR) (22.4% vs. 29.2%, P < 0.001). Cox multivariate analysis stratifying by propensity scores showed that long-term steroid therapy was associated with a 70% increase in the risk of patient death. The repeated measures linear model showed that, although the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (aMDRD) values changed over time (P = 0.002), this was independent of steroid withdrawal (P = 0.08). In addition, of the 772 (17.2%) recipients who developed de novo diabetes mellitus, 204 (26.4%) ceased antidiabetic therapy, with more of these among those who ceased steroids (23% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.003). Blood pressure, cholesterol and triglyceride values were all significantly lower in the patients who ceased steroids.

Conclusions. Steroid withdrawal in selected patients had no negative effect over time on renal function and graft survival, and it was associated with reduced mortality.

Kidney transplantation with corticosteroid-free maintenance immunosuppression: a single center analysis of graft and patient survivals

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a corticosteroid-free maintenance immunosuppression on graft survival in kidney transplantation. We analyzed 79 patients who were transplanted between June 1, 2006 and May 31, 2007. We excluded hyperimmunized patients, second transplantations, living donors, and black recipients. Patients underwent induction with thymoglobulin or basiliximab, followed by treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus, and methylprednisolone. On the 5th day, the patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (n = 45) discontinued steroid therapy; group B (n = 34) continued prednisone therapy. We performed a comparative analysis of incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection episodes (ARE), renal function at 6 and 12 months, graft and patient survivals, causes of graft loss, and mortality. The 2 groups were similar for donor, recipient, and graft characteristics. The incidences of DGF were 8.9% in group A and 14.7% in group B; those for ARE were 2.3% in group A and 13.8% in group B (P = .077). The mean serum creatinine levels at 6 and 12 months were similar. There were 8 graft losses: 3 in group A (3 deaths with functioning grafts) and 5 in group B (1 death, 3 vascular causes, 1 kidney nonfunction). The 4 deaths were due to infection (n = 3) or neoplasia (n = 1). Graft survivals at 1 year were 98% in group A and 85% in group B, and patient survivals were 98% and 97%, respectively. An immunosuppressive regimen using antibody induction and steroid-free treatment proved to be effective in low-risk patients.

A prospective trial of a steroid-free/calcineurin inhibitor minimization regimen in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical live donor renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Few prospective trials in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) identical living donor (LD) renal transplantation exist. This prospective study evaluated a corticosteroid (CS)-free, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) minimization immunosuppressive regimen in HLA-identical LD renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

Twenty HLA-identical LD recipients were prospectively enrolled. Immunosuppression included mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (2 g/day), tacrolimus (target trough 4-8 ng/mL), sirolimus (target trough 6-10 ng/mL), and no pre- or postoperative steroids. In the absence of prior rejection, tacrolimus was discontinued at posttransplant day 120 and sirolimus at 1 year, leaving patients on MMF monotherapy.

RESULTS

Tacrolimus was successfully withdrawn in 94% of patients (16/17). One hundred percent (15/15) of patients who reached 1-year posttransplant had sirolimus discontinued. Ninety-four percent (17/18) of patients remain off CSs. Mean serum creatinine at 6, 12, and 24 months were 1.38+/-0.32, 1.35+/-0.37, and 1.25+/-0.29 mg/dL; corresponding mean calculated creatinine clearance estimates were 70+/-18, 73+/-17, and 72+/-15 mL/min. Acute cellular rejection, chronic allograft nephropathy, and CNI toxicity were not observed. Death-censored graft survival was 100% at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A CS-free, CNI minimization immunosuppressive regimen with weaning to MMF monotherapy provides excellent renal function, graft survival, and patient survival in HLA-identical LD renal transplant recipients.

Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Steroid-sparing strategies have been attempted during the last two decades in order to avoid morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. Previous systematic reviews of steroid withdrawal after kidney transplantation have shown significant increases in acute rejection and an increase in graft failure rates. Steroid avoidance in kidney transplantation is increasingly attempted and the possible benefits or harms have never been a subject of a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of steroid withdrawal or avoidance in patients receiving a kidney transplant.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE, references lists and abstracts from international transplantation society scientific meetings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies (RCTs) of steroid avoidance or withdrawal were included providing that one treatment arm consisted in steroid avoidance or withdrawal and intention-to-treat rates of acute rejection and graft failure were clearly established after steroid avoidance or use or withdrawal or continuation. Observational studies were tabulated.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 30 RCTs (5949 participants). Steroid-sparing strategies showed no effect on mortality or graft loss including death. Patients on any steroid-sparing strategy showed a higher risk of graft loss excluding death than those with conventional steroid use (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.52), especially in those not receiving MMF/Myf or everolimus (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.90). Acute rejection was more frequent with a steroid-sparing strategy (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.40) and more frequent after steroid withdrawal or avoidance when compared with standard steroid treatment when cyclosporin (CsA) was used. Steroid-sparing and withdrawal strategies showed benefits in reducing antihypertensive drug need, serum cholesterol, antihyperlipidaemic drug need, new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) requiring any treatment and cataracts. Steroid avoidance did not alter serum cholesterol, but was associated with less frequent NODAT requiring any treatment. Cardiovascular events were reduced with steroid avoidance. Reduced antihypertensive drug need and serum cholesterol were similar with CsA or tacrolimus (TAC). Reduced antihyperlipidaemic drug need was only evident with TAC, whereas the reduction in NODAT requiring any treatment was only evident with CsA. Infection was lower in steroid-sparing patients using CsA (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.00). NODAT requiring any treatment was less frequent with steroid avoidance than with steroid withdrawal.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review confirms that steroid avoidance and steroid withdrawal strategies in kidney transplantation are not associated with increased mortality or graft loss despite an increase in acute rejection. These immunosuppression strategies may allow safe steroid avoidance or elimination a few days after kidney transplantation if antibody induction treatment is prescribed or after three to six months if such induction is not used.

Minimizing immunosuppression, an alternative approach to reducing side effects: objectives and interim result

Exceptionally low acute rejection rates and excellent graft survival can be achieved with cyclosporine and tacrolimus (CNI)-based immunosuppressive protocols that incorporate antiproliferative immunosuppressants and corticosteroids. However, despite short-term success, long-term attrition of graft function and side effects of immunosuppressive agents continue to be significant problems, leaving clinicians looking for possible interventions. CNI nephrotoxicity is but one of numerous factors that may contribute to long-term damage in transplant kidneys. Metabolic, cosmetic, and neuropsychiatric complications of steroids affect quality of life after transplantation. Newer immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus (Rapa) have raised the possibility of withdrawing or avoiding CNIs or steroids altogether. In this report we review studies that address either CNI or steroid minimization strategies and discuss their risks versus benefits. Given the accumulated experience to date, in our opinion the use of CNIs and steroids as part of immunosuppressive regimens remains the proven standard of care for renal transplant patients. The long-term safety and efficacy of CNI and steroid minimization strategies needs to be further validated in controlled clinical trials with adequate long-term follow-up.

Steroid- and calcineurin inhibitor free immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: state of the art and future developments

Owing to the increasing disparity of organ demand and organ supply the search for optimal immunosuppressive strategies has become a central issue in kidney transplantation (KTX). In the focus today are modifications of the use of calcineurin-inhibitors (CNIs, Cyclosporine A/Tacrolimus) and steroids, as they are nephrotoxic and promote cardiovascular risk factors like arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus. These modifications can either be withdrawal or avoidance of these substances in combination with new and/or established immunosuppressants. Because about half of all KTXs are performed by or with the help of urologists' knowledge of modern immunosuppressive regimens is crucial also for urologists. We performed a literature research (PubMed, DIMDI, medline) for CNI- and steroid-sparing protocols and studies to elucidate their influence on graft-function and graft- and patient-survival. New substances and actual studies were also evaluated. Several published reports on CNI- and steroid-sparing protocols after KTX exist, including withdrawal, reduction or avoidance. The time of reduction seems to be crucial: an initially increased immune response should be counterbalanced by an initially intensified immunosuppression. Therefore, late steroid withdrawal seems to be safer than early withdrawal especially in Cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Steroid avoidance also seems feasible on a CNI based regimen, especially in context with induction therapy. Withdrawal or avoidance of CNIs seems feasible with mycophenolate acid and/or induction therapy with IL 2-receptor antibodies as co-immunosuppressants. This is of interest in grafts with deteriorating function or from donors with extended criteria. Also, CNI- and steroid-free immunosuppression can be successfully performed with new immunosuppressants but results are yet premature. CNI- and/or steroid reduction, withdrawal or even avoidance is feasible. As long-term graft function is the goal of KTX and as more kidneys from donors with extended criteria are transplanted "tailored immunosuppression" will replace standards in the future.

Corticosteroid-sparing strategies in renal transplantation: are we still balancing rejection risk with improved tolerability?

Chronic allograft nephropathy and death with a functioning graft (mainly due to cardiovascular causes) are the most common causes of graft loss after the first year of renal transplantation. Immunosuppressants, and corticosteroids among them, contribute to an increase in cardiovascular risk because of their significant adverse effects, including hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and hyperglycaemia. Thus, corticosteroid discontinuation or avoidance has become a priority among the transplant community in order to enhance long-term graft and patient survival. Nevertheless, corticosteroid-sparing strategies may increase the risk of acute and chronic rejection and, thus, worsen the prognosis of transplant recipients. Initial attempts during the azathioprine epoch did not provide satisfactory results, as they were associated with high acute rejection rates, emphasising the risk of under-immunosuppression. The advent of new immunosuppressants, such as mycophenolate mofetil, mTOR inhibitors and anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies, have renewed the interest in corticosteroid-sparing protocols, and the results of new trials suggest that these corticosteroid-sparing strategies, even at an early stage after transplantation, are safe enough in view of the stable renal function and low rates of acute rejection reported. However, immunological risk factors, such as African American ethnicity, the presence of panel-reactive anti-HLA antibodies (even at low rates), and a history of previous acute rejection episodes should be taken into account and corticosteroid withdrawal strategies should be undertaken with caution. Long-term follow-up studies must be performed to confirm the encouraging short-term data.

Steroid Sparing in Kidney Transplantation: Changing Paradigms, Improving Outcomes, and Remaining Questions

The widely known adverse effects of long-term therapy with corticosteroids have motivated increasing interest in steroid-free immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients. Results from recent trials that used newer immunosuppressants to facilitate elimination of steroids suggest better short-term results than were achieved in an earlier era. However, the best results have been reported in uncontrolled trials of low-risk patients or in randomized trials with relatively short periods of follow-up. Increasingly, the therapeutic paradigm has shifted from late withdrawal of steroids to very early withdrawal after transplantation or even complete avoidance. Induction antibody therapy has been used routinely in the most successful trials that involved early steroid withdrawal or avoidance. Although the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients who are treated with steroid-free immunosuppression are improving steadily, there still is room for concern in recommending this strategy as a standard of practice.

Corticosteroid avoidance in pediatric renal transplantation

Corticosteroids have played a central role in the evolution of renal transplant as the modality of choice for renal replacement in end stage kidney disease. Their use is associated with significant, dose related morbidity including osseous, cardiovascular, metabolic complications, body disfigurement and growth retardation in children. The strategies that have been employed to minimize these side effects include reduction in the daily administered dose of steroids, use of alternate day dosing regimens, steroid withdrawal post-transplantation and complete steroid avoidance. Steroid dose minimization has been associated with increased rates of acute rejection, though introduction of newer and more potent immunosuppressives has helped reduce the incidence of this complication. Steroid minimization will benefit patient morbidity due to cataracts, cardiovascular and osseous complications, but may offer little benefit towards improving linear growth. Alternate day steroid therapy may have a greater impact on growth improvement, but may be troubled by regimen non-adherence. Steroid withdrawal post-transplant, the ultimate target, is successful in a cohort of patients, but overall, has been historically associated with unacceptably high rates of clinical acute rejection, and has thus been used sparingly in adults and even less so in children. Complete corticosteroid avoidance, using newer induction and immunosuppressive agents, has been associated with an 8-23% incidence of acute rejection in pediatric renal transplant patients, significant catch-up growth post-transplant, improvements in post-transplant hypertension and hyperlipidemia, and a high safety profile at current follow-up. Newer induction protocols may allow complete steroid-free immunosuppression thus offering significant advantages in preventing the above-mentioned steroid related morbidity, which could also possibly be applicable to other areas of solid organ transplantation in all age groups.

Corticosteroid avoidance in pediatric renal transplantation: can it be achieved?

Corticosteroids have been a cornerstone therapy in renal transplantation, which is the treatment modality of choice for adult and pediatric end-stage renal disease. Their use is associated with significant morbidity, notably cardiovascular, endocrine, and bone complications, body disfiguration, and almost universal growth retardation in children. While newer immunosuppressants have reduced the incidence of these adverse effects, they continue to pose significant post-transplant challenges. There are various strategies that can be used to avoid these adverse effects including the use of an alternative corticosteroid such as deflazacort, minimization of corticosteroid dosage, corticosteroid withdrawal after a period of early use, and more recently complete corticosteroid avoidance. Recent randomized studies have demonstrated significant improvement in growth parameters, lipid profile, and in the amount of bone loss in patients treated with deflazacort, an oxazoline analog of prednisone, compared with methylprednisone.Corticosteroid minimization has been associated with an increased rate of acute rejection. While augmentation with newer immunosuppressants has helped reduce the incidence of acute rejection, significant improvements in growth have not been demonstrated. Alternate-day corticosteroid therapy has been shown to have a beneficial effect on growth but regimen compliance has limited its widespread applicability. Studies of corticosteroid withdrawal have met with varied success. Early corticosteroid withdrawal has been associated with rejection rates ranging from 10% to 81% and late corticosteroid withdrawal, from 13% to 68.8%, with acute rejection episodes occurring as late as 4 years after corticosteroid withdrawal. The rates of clinical acute rejection have been unacceptably high, and corticosteroid withdrawal is thus used very sparingly in adults and even less so in children. Complete corticosteroid avoidance as reported by an initial study has been associated with a 23% incidence of acute rejection and 'catch-up' growth post-transplantation in 14 pediatric recipients, as measured by the change in height standard deviation scores post-transplantation. A second renal transplant study, in adults, demonstrated similar rejection rates of 25% with improvement in post-transplant hypertension and lipid profiles. A more recent pediatric study using a novel extended daclizumab induction protocol demonstrated an 8% incidence of clinical acute rejection with significant improvements in graft function, hypertension, and growth, without an increased incidence of infectious complications. Renal transplantation with a corticosteroid-free protocol may offer significant advantages in the incidence of acute rejection, graft function, growth, blood pressure, lipidemia, and body appearance and appears to be well tolerated when used with a variety of current induction protocols to replace early corticosteroid use. This protocol may also be applicable to other areas of solid organ transplantation in all age groups.

African-American renal transplant recipients benefit from early corticosteroid withdrawal under modern immunosuppression

African-Americans (AAs) have historically been considered high-risk renal transplant recipients due to increased rejection rates and reduced long-term graft survival. As a result, AAs are often excluded from corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD) protocols. Modern immunosuppression has reduced rejections and improved graft survival in AAs and may allow successful CSWD. Outcomes in 56 AAs were compared to 56 non-AAs. All patients were enrolled in one of four early CSWD protocols. Results are reported as AA versus non-AA. Acute rejection at 1-year was 23% and 18%; (p = NS); creatinine clearance at 1-year was 75 versus 80 mL/min (p = NS); patient and graft survival was 96% versus 98% and 91% versus 91%; (p = NS). AAs benefit from early CSWD with significantly improved blood pressure, LDL < 130 mg/dL and HDL > 45 mg/dL at 1-year, post-transplant diabetes of 8.7%, and mean weight change at 1-year of 4.8 +/- 7.2 kg. In conclusion, early CSWD in AAs is associated with acceptable rejection rates, excellent patient and graft survival, and improved cardiovascular risk, indicating that the risks and benefits of early CSWD are similar between AAs and non-AAs. Additional follow-up is needed to determine long-term renal function, graft survival, and cardiovascular risk in AAs with early CSWD.

Conversion to sirolimus in solid organ transplantation: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors are associated with adverse events, including nephrotoxicity and diabetes that might reduce the benefits of long-term graft survival. We report our experience in converting kidney (K), kidney-pancreas (KP), pancreas (P), and (L) recipients from a calcineurin inhibitor/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/prednisone dose-induced nephrotoxicity (K = 9, KP = 5, P = 1, L = 5), hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) (K = 7, KP = 5), chronic allograft nephropathy (K = 12, L = 1), and glucose intolerance (K = 9, KP = 6, P = 2, L = 2).

METHODS

The conversion protocol consisted of an abrupt discontinuation of the calcineurin inhibitor with sirolimus (8-12 mg, PO loading dose) initiated 24-72 hours after stopping the calcineurin inhibitor. Sirolimus was titrated to target trough levels of 12-16 ng/mL. Daclizumab 2 mg/kg IV was given to all KP and P recipients on days 0 and 14 postconversion.

RESULTS

Resolution of HUS occurred in 12 of 12 patients (100%) with a drop in serum creatinine from 3.3 +/- 1.5 to 1.8 +/- 0.9 mg/dL (P =.04). Sirolimus conversion due to nephrotoxicity, HUS, and chronic allograft nephropathy improved serum creatinine from 2.9 +/- 1.4 to 2.2 +/- 0.9 mg/dL (P =.01). Eleven of 19 patients (58%) resolved glucose intolerance. Two patients suffered rejection due to noncompliance. Increases in cholesterol (208 +/- 70 to 243 +/- 77 mg/dL, P <.05) and triglycerides (232 +/- 145 to 265 +/- 148 mg/dL, P = NS), and minimal reduction in platelet values (243 +/- 85 to 237 +/- 85, P = NS) occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that a calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppressive regimen with sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids preserves graft function in patients with clinical indications warranting calcineurin inhibitor discontinuation.

Urinary tract infections after renal transplantation

Up to now one of the major problems for successful organ transplantation has been the reaction of the immune system of the recipient against the donor organ. This could lead to acute and chronic rejection, and in cases of unsuccessful treatment to the loss of the transplant. In organ graft recipients, immunosuppressive agents are used to prevent or treat rejection episodes and to maintain graft function. Although there is an increasing number of immunosuppressive substances, the immunosuppressive therapy currently in use is relatively unspecific and targets many immunological functions. The net state of immunosuppression is a complex function determined by the interaction of a number of factors, the most important of these are the dose, duration and temporal sequence in which immunosuppressive drugs are employed. Any kind of immunosuppressive protocol is thus associated with an increased infection rate. This has an important socioecological impact, because frequent hospitalizations resulting from infectious complications are necessary, having an overall mortality rate of 3.5% within 2 weeks of admission. The most common cause of septicaemia is urinary tract infection. Frequent urinary tract infections are associated with the early onset of chronic rejection, suggesting a pathogenetic relationship between these two features. The occurrence of chronic rejection has led to reduced transplant survival. The prevention of urinary tract infections, or the early diagnosis and accurate treatment of urinary tract infections is important in renal transplant recipients.

A prospective randomized trial on azathioprine addition to cyclosporine versus cyclosporine monotherapy at steroid withdrawal, 6 months after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Many attempts have been made to withdraw steroid therapy in renal transplant patients in order to avoid its many side effects. Results have been, so far, controversial. In this randomized prospective study, we compare the efficacy of azathioprine adjuncts to cyclosporine at the time of steroid withdrawal, 6 months after transplantation, versus Cyclosporine monotherapy, in preventing acute rejection.

METHODS

One hundred and sixteen kidney transplant patients with good and stable renal function (creatininemia <2 mg/dl) received, in the first 6 months, cyclosporine + steroid. They were then randomized into two groups (A and B), and steroid therapy was withdrawn over 2 months. Group A (58 patients) continued on cyclosporine monotherapy, whereas group B (58 patients) added azathioprine (1 mg/kg/day) at the beginning of randomization and continued on cyclosporine + azathioprine. In both groups, patients resumed steroid therapy at the first episode of acute rejection. Follow-up after randomization was 5.3+/-1.6 years.

RESULTS

After 5 years, the incidence of steroid resumption was 57% in group A and 29% in group B (P<0.02); of those, 68% and 88% of them were within 6 months from randomization. Anti-rejection therapy was always successful. Five-year patient and graft survival rates were 90% and 88% in group A and 100% and 91% in group B. Creatininemia did not differ, at follow-up. Side effects differed only for mild and reversible leukopenia caused by azathioprine in group B.

CONCLUSION

Cyclosporine plus azathioprine is more effective than cyclosporine monotherapy in reducing the incidence of acute rejection after steroid withdrawal. Graft loss as a result of chronic rejection, mild in both groups, did not differ. Steroid withdrawal is feasible and advantageous, and the addition of azathioprine allowed 71% of our selected patients to remain steroid-free.

Results of pancreas transplantation after steroid withdrawal under tacrolimus immunosuppression

PURPOSE

The results of steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients under tacrolimus immunosuppression were analyzed.

METHODS

From July 4, 1994 until April 30, 1998, 147 pancreas transplantations were performed in 141 patients, including 126 simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations, 13 pancreas after kidney transplantation, and 8 pancreas transplantations alone. Baseline immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus and steroids without antilymphocyte induction. Twenty-three patients were excluded from analysis because of early graft loss in 17 cases, retransplantation in 5 cases, and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation after heart transplantation in 1 patient.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up of 2.8+/-1.1 years (range 1.0 to 4.8 years), complete steroid withdrawal was achieved in 58 (47%) patients with a mean time to steroid withdrawal of 15.2+/-8 months (range 4 to 40 months after transplantation). Of the entire cohort of 141 patients, overall 1-, 2-, and 4-year patient survival rates were 98%, 95.5%, and 86%, respectively. Overall 1-, 2-, and 4-year graft survival rates were 83%, 80%, and 71% (pancreas) and 95%, 91%, and 84% (kidney), respectively. Of the 124 patients analyzed for steroid withdrawal, 1-, 2-, and 4-year patient survival rates were 98%, 97%, and 92%, respectively. Overall 1-, 2-, and 4-year graft survival rates were 98%, 91.5%, 83% (pancreas) and 97%, 95%, and 91% (kidney). Patient, pancreas, and kidney survival rates at 1 year were 100%, 100%, and 98% (off steroids) versus 97%, 91%, and 96% (on steroids, all NS) and at 4 years were 100%, 94%, and 95% (off steroids) versus 78%, 68%, and 85% (on steroids, P = 0.01, 0.002, and NS, respectively). The cumulative risk of rejection at the time of follow-up was 76% for patients on steroids versus 74% for patients off steroids (P = NS). Seven patients originally tapered off steroids were treated for subsequent rejection episodes, which were all steroid sensitive, and two of these seven patients are currently off steroids. Thirteen patients received antilymphocyte therapy for steroid-resistant rejection, five of whom are now off steroids. Tacrolimus trough levels were 9.3+/-2.4 ng/ml (off steroids) and 9.7+/-4.3 (on steroids, P = NS). Mean fasting glucose levels were 98+/-34 mg/dl (off steroids) and 110+/-41 mg/dl (on steroids, P = NS). Mean glycosylated hemoglobin levels were 5.2+/-0.9% (off steroids) and 6.2+/-2.1% (on steroids, P = 0.02), and mean serum creatinine levels were 1.4+/-0.8 mg/dl (off steroids) and 1.7+/-1.0 mg/dl (on steroids, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

These data show for the first time that steroid withdrawal can be safely accomplished in pancreas transplant recipients maintained on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Steroid withdrawal is associated with excellent patient and graft survival with no increase in the cumulative risk of rejection.

Prednisone withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients on cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil--a prospective randomized study. Steroid Withdrawal Study Group

BACKGROUND

Prospective randomized trials have shown a reduced rate of acute rejection (AR) in mycophenolate mofetil-treated kidney transplant recipients. We hypothesized that this increased protection from AR could allow successful prednisone (P) withdrawal in cyclosporine/mycophenolate mofetil/P-treated recipients.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of P withdrawal at 3 months post-transplant was initiated. Entry criteria were: primary transplant, adult, no AR by 90 days, mycophenolate mofetil dose > or =2 g/day, cyclosporine dose = 5-15 mg/kg/ day, P dose = 10-15 mg/day. Study participants were randomized to have P tapered over 8 weeks (beginning at 3 months posttransplant) to 0 vs. 10 mg/day. Prestudy power analysis determined 500 recipients should be randomized for 80% statistical power to test equivalence of the primary endpoint, AR, or treatment failure at 1 year posttransplant. By design, the study was to be stopped if interim data precluded reaching equivalence. An established data safety monitoring board monitored the study.

RESULTS

After 266 patients were enrolled, the patient enrollment was stopped (after safety monitoring board review) because of excess rejection in the P withdrawal group. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative incidence of rejection or treatment failure within 1 year posttransplant (+/-95% confidence interval) for the maintenance group was 9.8% (4.4%; treatment failure, 14.9%); for the withdrawal group, 30.8% (21.0%; 39.3%). Treatment differences in the distribution of time to event were highly significant (P = 0.0007). Of note, risk was higher in blacks (39.6%) versus nonblacks (16.0%) (P<0.001). At 1 year post-transplant, there was no difference between groups in patient or graft survival. For the patients with functioning grafts at 6 months posttransplant, withdrawal patients had lower cholesterol (P = 0.0005), had higher creatinine (P = 0.03), and were less likely to use antihypertensives (P = 0.001). These differences persist to 1 yr posttransplant.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that for recipients on cyclosporine/mycophenolate mofetil/P with no AR at 90 days, the chance of developing subsequent AR is small; if P is tapered and withdrawn, the risk increases (but the majority remain free of acute and chronic rejection). After withdrawal, the risk of AR is different for blacks versus nonblacks. Withdrawal patients had a lower cholesterol level and less need for antihypertensives.

Pretreatment with glucocorticoids enhances T-cell effector function: possible implication for immune rebound accompanying glucocorticoid withdrawal

Glucocorticoids (GCs) exert their immunosuppressive/antiproliferative effects largely through inhibition of cytokine expression, and paradoxically upregulate the expression of (proinflammatory) cytokine receptors on select nonlymphoid cells. Clinically, withdrawal of GCs was frequently associated with worsening of the outcome of heightened immunity disorders, thereby implicating enhanced cytokine and cytokine receptor expression as a possible consequence of acute/short-term GCs withdrawal. In view of the significance of this complication of GC therapy, we addressed the effect of GC withdrawal on cytokine receptor expression and subsequent T-cell effector function, using the proliferation of human T cells as biological readout. To mimic GC withdrawal, T cells were treated with GCs or controls, stimulated, and incubated for 16-20 h at 37 degrees C, washed, and reactivated for a further 4-48 h. Surface marker expression was assessed by FACS analysis, and proliferation was determined by measuring the cellular uptake of tritiated thymidine. Dexamethasone (DEX) and prednisolone (PRED), in a concentration-dependent manner, inhibited T-cell proliferation induced by anti-CD28 Ab + PMA. However, pretreatment of T cells activated with mitogens, cross-linking antibodies, or PMA + ionomycin ("CD3-bypass" stimulation regimen), but not resting T cells, with DEX or PRED resulted in a marked increase in IL-IR, IL-2R alpha, and IL-6R expression, which was accompanied by a significant enhancement in T-cell proliferation. This effect of GCs was neither stimulus specific nor did it result from alteration in cell viability, and was paralleled by augmentation in cytokine (rIL-2) effects on DEX-pretreated and preactivated T cells. Taken together, our results underline the dual effects of GCs in regulating T-cell activation and cytokine expression. In essence, GCs directly inhibited T-cell proliferation by suppressing cytokine production, and, by enhancing cytokine receptor expression, pretreatment with GCs augmented T-cell proliferation.

A pilot study on the safety and effectiveness of immunosuppression without prednisone after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids are commonly used in the immunosuppression therapy after liver transplantation, yet are associated with considerable side effects. Retrospective studies have shown that corticosteroids can be safely withdrawn from months to years after transplant. We prospectively investigated the effects of early immunosuppression without the use of corticosteroids on graft outcome and transplant complications.

METHODS

Forty-five patients undergoing liver transplantation were randomized to receive immunosuppression composed of cyclosporine microemulsion and azathioprine with (n=22) or without prednisone (n=23), in conventional doses. In those patients who received prednisone, this was withdrawn within 3 months after transplant. The median follow-up of survivors was 14 months (range: 6-24). The study end points were to determine graft survival and function, infectious complications, including hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA levels in HCV-infected recipients, acute rejection, kidney function, and metabolic complications.

RESULTS

Eleven deaths occurred, 6 of which were in the prednisone group. Two-year survival did not differ between patients treated with or without prednisone (70.2% vs. 78.3%, P=0.83), nor did the causes of death. No differences were observed with regard to graft function, renal function, and infectious complications. In the subset of patients who received transplants for HCV-related cirrhosis, the dynamics of virus replication HCV-RNA was faster among those treated with prednisone. The incidence and severity of acute rejection was similar in the two groups. More than 80% of acute rejections in both groups were classified as mild or moderate and underwent spontaneous resolution. Only two patients in each group had severe acute rejection requiring additional treatment with high-dose steroids. Patients receiving prednisone tended to have greater biochemical signs of cholestasis, higher serum cholesterol and glucose levels, and more frequent insulin requirement than those treated without corticosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplantation can be performed safely without using corticosteroids in the early postoperative course, and there is no need for routine aggressive steroid treatment of established acute rejections.

Diltiazem retards the metabolism of oral prednisone with effects on T-cell markers

The area under the time-plasma concentration curve (AUC) was measured for prednisolone (the major active metabolite of prednisone) after ingestion of 15 mg of prednisone (phase 1) and again after 3 d of oral diltiazem (180 mg/d) followed by the same dose of oral prednisone (phase 2) in eight normal adult patients. Diltiazem increased the prednisolone AUC by 21% (range 3-38%), from 1297 +/- 157 ng/h/mL to 1560 +/- 169 ng/h/mL (p = 0.001). This effect was associated with a greater decrease from baseline in CD3+ lymphocyte number at 4 h after prednisone ingestion (596 +/- 175 vs. 516 +/- 140, p = 0.05), a larger percentage decrease of circulating CD3+ lymphocytes at 8 h (43 +/- 19% vs. 53 +/- 19%, p = 0.04), and a decrease in the number of CD3+ CD8+ T cells at 4 h post-prednisone ingestion (279 +/- 81 vs. 236 +/- 51, p = 0.04). Diltiazem retards prednisolone metabolism and when used chronically with prednisone could conceivably, in some patients, enhance its immunologic and other clinical effects. Potentiation of prednisone side-effects by diltiazem may be of special interest in pediatric patients, and possible diltiazem-prednisone interactions merit study in this population.

Withdrawal of immunosuppression: implications for composite tissue allograft transplantation

Complete or partial withdrawal of immunosuppression is a desirable goal for physicians managing solid organ transplant recipients and has particular appeal for the management of composite tissue allograft recipients. Experience to date with steroid withdrawal or cyclosporine withdrawal in organ transplant recipients suggests that the risks of acute rejection are minimized with slow tapering of the drugs and when drug withdrawal is attempted many months or years after transplantation. Unfortunately, the full benefits of withdrawing any component of a multidrug immunosuppression regimen can probably be achieved only when the drug is withdrawn relatively early after transplantation. Thus, there is a need for improved immunologic monitoring to facilitate withdrawal of immunosuppression in any setting. Because steroid withdrawal might be particularly advantageous to the recipient of a composite tissue allograft, further experience is needed to determine the safety of steroid withdrawal with newer immunosuppressants such as tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and sirolimus.

Specific immune tolerance during pregnancy after renal transplantation

Pregnancy is associated with specific immunological tolerance to fetal antigens suggesting that immunoregulatory processes during pregnancy can induce specific immunological unresponsiveness. We report a case of a female renal transplant recipient who stopped immunosuppressive therapy during first pregnancy. Despite histologically proven acute renal allograft rejection during the early course of transplantation, no immunological response was observed for 9 years after withdrawal of immunosuppression. Two further pregnancies within that time period did not evoke any renal complications, but were complicated by premature rupture of the amnion and by the development of preeclampsia. To our knowledge, there are no reports of such a long-term specific unresponsiveness to a renal allograft without immunosuppressive therapy. Natural and active immunoregulatory mechanism can be related for the development of specific immune tolerance to renal allograft in this case.

Randomised controlled trial of steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients receiving triple immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

The combination of cyclosporin, azathioprine, and prednisolone (triple immunosuppression) is the most commonly used immunosuppressive regimen early after renal transplantation, but the risks and benefits of maintaining the steroid component of this regimen in the long term are uncertain.

METHODS

A randomised controlled trial of steroid withdrawal was conducted among renal transplant patients receiving triple immunosuppression. Between one and six years after transplantation, 100 such patients were randomised either to reduce prednisolone treatment to zero over about four months or to maintain their triple immunosuppression unchanged. Outcome was analysed according to "Intention-to-treat".

FINDINGS

In 42 (86%) of 49 patients allocated to steroid withdrawal, complete steroid withdrawal was achieved. Although these patients did not experience defined acute rejection episodes, insidious increases in plasma creatinine were observed more frequently in this group than in the controls. In 97 patients surviving one year after trial entry, plasma creatinine exceeded the baseline by more than 25% at some time in the first year in 25 (53%) of 47 in the steroid withdrawal group compared with 9 (18%) of 50 in the control group (p < 0.001, chi-square test). In some cases these increases were transient. However, when corrected for the baseline (entry) value significant differences between groups were apparent in both mean plasma creatinine and mean creatinine clearance; mean (SD) plasma creatinine values at entry, immediately after withdrawal, and at one year were 138 (27), 151 (36), and 150 (36) mumol/L in the steroid withdrawal group versus 138 (34), 140 (51), and 139 (47) mumol/L in the control group (p = 0.017, analysis of covariance). Steroid withdrawal patients showed a further rise in mean plasma creatinine to 160 (44) and 161 (65) mumol/L at two and three years from trial entry. Changes in several clinical and metabolic indices were also observed in association with steroid withdrawal. Blood pressure declined but the reduction was incompletely sustained, being more evident immediately after steroid withdrawal than at one year. Total cholesterol declined about 1 mmol/L in the steroid withdrawal group. Other changes associated with steroid withdrawal were reductions in white cell count and haemoglobin and increases in plasma phosphate and alkaline phosphatase.

INTERPRETATION

Late steroid withdrawal is feasible in most patients with stable graft function on triple immunosuppression and has potentially beneficial metabolic effects. However, a substantial proportion of patients show a reduction in graft function, indicating a need for caution in considering the long term outcome.

Radiation therapy for renal transplant rejection refractory to pulse steroids and OKT3

PURPOSE

To determine the response rate and kidney graft survival following local irradiation to the transplanted renal graft undergoing persistent rejection after medical management including pulse steroids and OKT3. The role of radiation for renal transplant rejection after failure of OKT3 has not been previously reported.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From July 1, 1988 to July 1, 1994, 72 consecutive patients with kidney graft rejection were treated with local irradiation to the transplanted renal graft following failure of medical management. All patients received pulse steroids and OKT3, an anti-CD3 immunosuppressant. Patients who failed to respond to methylprednisolone and OKT3 therapy were referred for radiation therapy. The median time from the diagnosis of rejection to irradiation was 8 days. All kidney grafts received local graft irradiation to a total of 8 Gy delivered in four daily fractions.

RESULTS

Sixty (83%) patients initially responded to radiotherapy at 7 days after completion of radiotherapy, as defined by a decrease in serum creatinine. Thirty-five responding patients have not experienced a second episode of graft rejection. Overall, 43 (60%) patients have renal graft survival, with a median follow-up of 16 months (range of 6-73 months)>

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that there is a subgroup of kidney graft patients undergoing graft rejection who are refractory to pulse steroids and OKT3 therapy where irradiation may be an effective modality with high rates of response and a moderate rate of graft survival. However, a prospective, randomized trial in these medically refractory patients is needed to ascertain whether these results are clinically significant.

Living related and unrelated donors for kidney transplantation. A 28-year experience

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze a single center's 28-year experience with 1000 living donor transplants.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The number of potential renal transplant recipients far exceeds the number of cadaveric donors. For this reason, living related donors (LRDs) and, more recently, living unrelated donors (LURDs) have been used to decrease the cadaveric donor shortage.

METHODS

From November 15, 1966, until August 5, 1994, 1000 living donor transplants were performed; 906 were living related and 94 were living unrelated transplants. Results were divided into precyclosporine (1966-1986, era I) and cyclosporine (1986-1994, era II) eras. Patient and graft survivals were compared between diabetic and nondiabetic recipients, between LRDs and LURDs, and according to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching. Donor mortality, morbidity, and postoperative renal function were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The 5-, 10-, and 20-year graft survivals were 78.8%, 64.8%, and 43.4%, respectively. Patient and graft survival improved in era II (patient = 87.0% vs. 81.7%, p = 0.03; graft = 72.9% vs. 67.7%, p = 0.04). Nondiabetic patient and graft survivals were better than diabetic patient survivals in both eras. However, diabetic patient survival improved in era II (78.0% vs. 66.9%, p = 0.04). In era II, HLA-identical recipients had better graft survival than haploidentical or mismatched recipients (91.7% vs. 67.3% and 66.1%, p = 0.01). No difference between haploidentical LRDs and LURDs was seen. One donor death occurred in 1970, and 17% of donors developed postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Living related and unrelated renal donation continues to be an important source of kidneys for patients with end-stage renal disease.

Successful steroid withdrawal half a year after kidney transplantation

We report two kidney transplant recipients with successful steroid withdrawal. They are living related donor transplant recipients. The first patient, a 37-year-old female, received the kidney from her HLA identical father. The second patient, a 44-year-old man, received the kidney from his HLA 1 haploidentical brother. Both patients were maintained on triple immunosuppressive drug therapy prior to withdrawal of steroid and subsequently were maintained on cyclosporine and azathioprine or mizoribine. Acute rejection occurred within the first 1 month and was treated with steroid bolus therapy successfully in both cases. The time of steroid withdrawal after transplantation was 6.5 months in the first patient and 5 months in the second patient. After steroid withdrawal their graft function remained stable and the graft specimens obtained by biopsy 8 months after withdrawal showed no signs of rejection; no side effects of steroid appeared. These results suggest that steroid withdrawal half a year after transplantation can be accomplished without jeopardizing graft function in selected living related donor transplant recipients.

Living-unrelated renal transplantation: results in 40 patients

Kidney transplantation for the treatment of end-stage renal disease has been limited by an inadequate number of donor organs. Because of the enormous impact kidney transplantation can have for patients, the authors have performed 40 living-unrelated donor renal transplantations using a donor-specific transfusion protocol since 1981. Ten additional patients were entered but became sensitized. Donors included 23 wives, seven husbands, six friends, and four individuals related by marriage. Type I diabetes was the most common indication for transplantation (45%). Despite 36 rejections in 24 patients (27 of 36 [75%] in the early postoperative period), only two grafts failed because of rejection. Twenty-one of these rejections responded to high-dose prednisone alone; the remainder required antilymphocyte globulin therapy or plasmapheresis. Sixteen patients had no acute rejections. Three other grafts were lost, including two deaths: one myocardial infarction (with a functioning graft), and one death secondary to a postoperative cecal perforation. One graft was lost from infarction after percutaneous nephrostomy placement. Of 40 grafts, 34 were functioning with a mean serum creatinine of 1.7 mg/dL (at a mean follow-up time of 27 months). Actuarial patient and graft survival were 94% and 89%, respectively, at 3 years. Living-unrelated renal transplants are an acceptable alternative to cadaver transplants, with excellent graft and patient survival.

A rapid assay for measuring both colony size and cytolytic activity of limiting dilution microcultures

A combined 51Cr-release/MTT dye method is described for accurately measuring cytolytic activity and colony size in the same set of culture microwells. The method was applied to the study of cell-mediated lympholysis (CML) in limiting dilution analysis (LDA) cultures of human PBL from a renal transplant recipient and a healthy control. The results showed that the combined CML/MTT method could detect differences in lytic activity per cell in LDA cultures, and thus is a useful adjunct to standard precursor frequency analysis.