Treatment of renal allograft rejection with T10B9.1A31 or OKT3: final analysis of a phase II clinical trial

Use of human splenocytes in an innovative humanised mouse model for prediction of immunotherapy-induced cytokine release syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Humanised mice have emerged as valuable models for pre-clinical testing of the safety and efficacy of immunotherapies. Given the variety of models available, selection of the most appropriate humanised mouse model is critical in study design. Here, we aimed to develop a model for predicting cytokine release syndrome (CRS) while minimising graft-versus-host disease (GvHD).

METHODS

To overcome donor-induced variation, we directly compared the in vitro and in vivo immune phenotype of immunodeficient NSG mice reconstituted with human bone marrow (BM) CD34+ haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or spleen mononuclear cells (SPMCs) from the same human donors. SPMC engraftment in NSG-dKO mice, which lack MHC class I and II, was also evaluated as a strategy to limit GvHD. Another group of mice was engrafted with umbilical cord blood (UCB) CD34+ HSCs. Induction of CRS in vivo was investigated upon administration of the anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody OKT3.

RESULTS

PBMC- and SPMC-reconstituted NSG mice showed short-term survival, with engrafted human T cells exhibiting mostly an effector memory phenotype. Survival in SPMC-reconstituted NSG-dKO mice was significantly longer. Conversely, both BM and UCB-HSC models showed longer survival, without demonstrable GvHD and a more naïve T-cell phenotype. PBMC- and SPMC-reconstituted mice, but not BM-HSC or UCB-HSC mice, experienced severe clinical signs of CRS upon administration of OKT3.

CONCLUSION

PBMC- and SPMC-reconstituted NSG mice better predict OKT3-mediated CRS. The SPMC model allows generation of large experimental groups, and the use of NSG-dKO mice mitigates the limitation of early GvHD.

Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for treating acute rejection episodes in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Registry data shows that the incidence of acute rejection has been steadily falling. Approximately 10% to 35% of kidney recipients will undergo treatment for at least one episode of acute rejection within the first post-transplant year. Treatment options include pulsed steroid therapy, the use of an antibody preparation, the alteration of background immunosuppression, or combinations of these options. Over recent years, new treatment strategies have evolved, and in many parts of the world there has been an increase in use of tacrolimus and mycophenolate and a reduction in the use of cyclosporin and azathioprine use as baseline immunosuppression to prevent acute rejection. There are also global variations in use of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies to treat acute rejection. This is an update of a review published in 2006.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to: (1) to evaluate the relative and absolute effects of different classes of antibody preparation in preventing graft loss and resolving cellular or humoral rejection episodes when used as a treatment for first episode of rejection in kidney transplant recipients; (2) evaluate the relative and absolute effects of different classes of antibody preparation in preventing graft loss and resolving cellular or humoral rejection episodes when used as a treatment for steroid-resistant rejection in kidney transplant recipients; (3) determine how the benefits and adverse events vary for each type of antibody preparation; and (4) determine how the benefits and harms vary for different formulations of antibody within each type.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register to 18 April 2017 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in all languages comparing all mono- and polyclonal antibody preparations, given in combination with any other immunosuppressive agents, for the treatment of cellular or humoral graft rejection, when compared to any other treatment for acute rejection were eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias of the included studies and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 new studies (18 reports, 346 participants) in this update, bring the total number of included studies to 31 (76 reports, 1680 participants). Studies were generally small, incompletely reported, especially for potential harms, and did not define outcome measures adequately. The risk of bias was inadequate or unclear risk for random sequence generation (81%), allocation concealment (87%) and other bias (87%). There were, however, a predominance of low risk of bias for blinding (75%) and incomplete outcome data (80%) across all the studies. Selective reporting had a mixture of low (58%), high (29%), and unclear (13%) risk of bias.Seventeen studies (1005 participants) compared therapies for first acute cellular rejection episodes. Antibody therapy was probably better than steroid in reversing acute cellular rejection (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.82; moderate certainty) and preventing subsequent rejection (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.99; moderate certainty), may be better for preventing graft loss (death censored: (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.12; low certainty) but there was little or no difference in death at one year. Adverse effects of treatment (including fever, chills and malaise following drug administration) were probably reduced with steroid therapy (RR 23.88, 95% CI 5.10 to 111.86; I2 = 16%; moderate certainty).Twelve studies (576 patients) investigated antibody treatment for steroid-resistant rejection. There was little or no benefit of muromonab-CD3 over ATG or ALG in reversing rejection, preventing subsequent rejection, or preventing graft loss or death. Two studies compared the use of rituximab for treatment of acute humoral rejection (58 patients). Muromonab-CD3 treated patients suffered three times more than those receiving either ATG or T10B9, from a syndrome of fever, chills and malaise following drug administration (RR 3.12, 95% CI 1.87 to 5.21; I2 = 31%), and experienced more neurological side effects (RR 13.10 95% CI 1.43 to 120.05; I2 = 36%) (low certainty evidence).There was no evidence of additional benefit from rituximab in terms of either reversal of rejection (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.64), or graft loss or death 12 months (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.23 to 4.35). Rituximab plus steroids probably increases the risk of urinary tract infection/pyelonephritis (RR 5.73, 95% CI 1.80 to 18.21).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In reversing first acute cellular rejection and preventing graft loss, any antibody is probably better than steroid, but there is little or no difference in subsequent rejection and patient survival. In reversing steroid-resistant rejection there was little or no difference between different antibodies over a period of 12 months, with limited data beyond that time frame. In treating acute humoral rejection, there was no evidence that the use of antibody therapy conferred additional benefit in terms of reversal of rejection, or death or graft loss.Although this is an updated review, the majority of newer included studies provide additional evidence from the cyclosporin/azathioprine era of kidney transplantation and therefore conclusions cannot necessarily be extrapolated to patients treated with more contemporary immunosuppressive regimens which include tacrolimus/mycophenolate or sirolimus. However, many kidney transplant centres around the world continue to use older immunosuppressive regimes and the findings of this review remain strongly relevant to their clinical practice.Larger studies with standardised reproducible outcome criteria are needed to investigate the outcomes and risks of antibody treatments for acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients receiving contemporary immunosuppressive regimes.

TGN1412 Induces Lymphopenia and Human Cytokine Release in a Humanized Mouse Model

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) such as the superagonistic, CD28-specific antibody TGN1412, or OKT3, an anti-CD3 mAb, can cause severe adverse events including cytokine release syndrome. A predictive model for mAb-mediated adverse effects, for which no previous knowledge on severe adverse events to be expected or on molecular mechanisms underlying is prerequisite, is not available yet. We used a humanized mouse model of human peripheral blood mononuclear cell-reconstituted NOD-RAG1^-/-Aβ^-/-HLADQ^{(tg+ or tg-)}IL-2Rγc^-/- mice to evaluate its predictive value for preclinical testing of mAbs. 2–6 hours after TGN1412 treatment, mice showed a loss of human CD45⁺ cells from the peripheral blood and loss of only human T cells after OKT3 injection, reminiscent of effects observed in mAb-treated humans. Moreover, upon OKT3 injection we detected selective CD3 downmodulation on T cells, a typical effect of OKT3. Importantly, we detected release of human cytokines in humanized mice upon both OKT3 and TGN1412 application. Finally, humanized mice showed severe signs of illness, a rapid drop of body temperature, and succumbed to antibody application 2–6 hours after administration. Hence, the humanized mouse model used here reproduces several effects and adverse events induced in humans upon application of the therapeutic mAbs OKT3 and TGN1412.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of TOL101, a murine IgM anti-human αβ T cell receptor antibody, in renal transplant patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

TOL101 is a highly selective murine anti-αβ T cell receptor (TCR) IgM antibody and has recently completed phase II testing in primary renal transplant patients. This study was undertaken to determine the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and immunogenic profile of TOL101.

METHODS

Nine cohorts of two to six patients received at least five daily doses (of, or combination of, 0.28, 1.4, 7, 14, 28, or 42 mg) of TOL-101 administered at successively higher doses. Semi-logarithmic graphs of serum TOL101 concentration versus time supported the use of a one-compartment intravenous infusion pharmacokinetic model. The model was parameterized in terms of serum clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V d).

RESULTS

There was a trend toward a decrease in serum CL as the dose increased from 1.4 to 28 mg. However, the mean values for CL and V d were consistent across the cohorts that received 28, 32, and 42 mg. The mean ± standard deviation half-lives for these five cohorts ranged from 15.1 ± 7.35 to 28.6 ± 8.46 h, with an overall mean of 23.8 h, supporting both daily as well as fixed (i.e., not based on weight) dosing. Using CD3+ ≤25 cells/mm(3) as the primary pharmacodynamic marker, all non-responders were in the 0.28, 1.4, or 7 mg cohorts, suggesting that starting doses above 14 mg are required. Finally, one patient out of 36 was found to have anti-drug antibody.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, the data show that while TOL101 is a highly potent anti-TCR antibody, its pharmacological profile is somewhat versatile, allowing for daily dosing without immunogenicity concerns.

PD-1-dependent restoration of self-tolerance in the NOD mouse model of diabetes after transient anti-TCRβ mAb therapy

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

T cells play a major role in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes, and there is great interest in developing curative immunotherapies targeting these cells. In this study, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the T cell receptor β-chain (TCRβ) was investigated for its ability to prevent and reverse disease in mouse models of diabetes.

METHODS

RIP-OVA(hi) (C57BL/6-Tg(Ins2-OVA)59Wehi/WehiJ) mice adoptively transferred with ovalbumin-specific T cells (an induced model of diabetes) and NOD mice (a spontaneous model of diabetes) were used to test anti-TCRβ mAb therapy as a means of preventing and reversing type 1 diabetes.

RESULTS

A single dose of anti-TCRβ completely prevented disease in RIP-OVA(hi) mice without inducing the release of inflammatory cytokines. Transient anti-TCRβ therapy prevented diabetes in 90% of NOD mice and reversed the disease after its onset in 73% of NOD mice. Long after the remission of type 1 diabetes, the anti-TCRβ treated mice were able to reject BALB/c skin allografts with normal kinetics while maintaining normoglycaemia. Treatment did not cause significant reductions in lymphocyte numbers in the spleen or pancreatic lymph nodes, but did result in a decreased percentage of chemokine receptor 9 (CCR9) positive, CD8(+) T cells. Notably, anti-TCRβ therapy increased the expression of programmed death 1 (PD-1) on the surface of the T cells; PD-1 expression is important for maintaining anti-TCRβ-induced self-tolerance, as type 1 diabetes recurs in mice following a blockade of PD-1 signalling.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Anti-TCRβ mAb is a safe and effective immunotherapy that results in reduced numbers of CCR9(+) T cells, an increased expression of PD-1 on T cells and the restoration of self-tolerance in NOD mice.

Anti-TCR mAb induces peripheral tolerance to alloantigens and delays islet allograft rejection in autoimmune diabetic NOD mice

BACKGROUND

Clinical application of islet transplantation to treat type 1 diabetes has been limited by islet allograft destruction by both allogeneic and autoimmune diabetogenic T-cell responses. The current study aims at determining whether an anti-T-cell receptor (TCR) monoclonal antibody (mAb) has potential as a novel and potent induction immunotherapy for islet transplantation.

METHODS

We have investigated the therapeutic efficacy and mechanisms of action of anti-TCR therapy in four different murine models, which comprise either allo- or autoimmune responses alone or both together.

RESULTS

T-cell response to islet allografts was potently abrogated by a brief treatment with an anti-TCRβ mAb (clone H57-597), resulting in long-term survival of BALB/c islet allografts in streptozotocin-induced diabetic B6 mice. Moreover, transient anti-TCR treatment permanently prevented BALB/c skin allograft rejection on Rag1 B6 recipients that were reconstituted with Foxp3 cell-depleted B6 splenocytes, but did not impair the reconstituted cells' ability to reject the later transplanted C3H skin allografts (transplanted at 120 days after BALB/c skin grafting). Transient anti-TCR treatment was also able to completely prevent diabetes onset in NOD.SCID.γc mice that were transferred with lymphocytes from diabetic NOD mice. Next, transient anti-TCR treatment significantly prolonged the survival of transplanted BALB/c islets in overtly diabetic NOD mice, which comprise both allogeneic and autoimmune diabetogenic T-cell responses to the transplanted islets.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, anti-TCR mAb induced peripheral tolerance to specific alloantigens even in the absence of Foxp3-expressing natural regulatory T cells. These findings reveal the potential for using TCR-targeting mAbs as induction immunotherapy for islet transplantation.

First-in-human study of the safety and efficacy of TOL101 induction to prevent kidney transplant rejection

TOL101 is a murine IgM mAb targeting the αβ TCR. Unlike other T cell targets, the αβ TCR has no known intracellular signaling domains and may provide a nonmitogenic target for T cell inactivation. We report the 6-month Phase 2 trial data testing TOL101 in kidney transplantation. The study was designed to identify a dose that resulted in significant CD3 T cell modulation (<25 T cell/mm(3) ), to examine the safety and tolerability of TOL101 and to obtain preliminary efficacy information. Thirty-six patients were enrolled and given 5-10 daily doses of TOL101; 33 patients completed dosing, while three discontinued after two doses due to a self-limiting urticarial rash. Infusion adjustments, antihistamines, steroids and dose escalation of TOL101 reduced the incidence of the rash. Doses of TOL101 above 28 mg resulted in prolonged CD3 modulation, with rapid recovery observed 7 days after therapy cessation. There were no cases of patient or graft loss. Few significant adverse events were reported, with one nosocomial pneumonia. There were five biopsy-confirmed acute cellular rejections (13.9%); however, no donor-specific antibodies were detected. Overall TOL101 was well-tolerated, supporting continued clinical development using the dose escalating 21-28-42-42-42 mg regimen.

A humanised mouse model of cytokine release: comparison of CD3-specific antibody fragments

CD3-specific antibodies have shown clinical efficacy in both transplantation and autoimmunity. However, targeting CD3 in this way can lead to T-cell activation and a serious cytokine release syndrome mediated by Fcγ receptor binding. An in vivo mouse model has been developed using severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice to detect human T-cell depletion and cytokine release into the circulation after administration of OKT3. This system has been used to evaluate OKT3 antibody fragments lacking the entire Fc region alongside whole antibody constructs. These data clearly show that cytokine release is detected with all OKT3 antibody constructs and fragments tested and these can be ranked from highest to lowest as follows: mIgG2a>hIgG1 (Ala-Ala)>hIgG1 diFab' maleimide (DFM)>hIgG1 F(ab')₂>mIgG2a F(ab')₂>hIgG1 Fab'. Furthermore, the monovalent hIgG1 Fab' fragment gives the least cytokine release but it does not deplete human T-cells in this assay format. This suggests that T-cell activation may be playing a role in the mechanism of action of anti-CD3 antibodies and consequently the unwanted cytokine release is potentially unavoidable for this class of molecules. This model system provides a useful tool to aid in understanding and reducing the potential risks of cytokine release following antibody therapy.

Anti-TCRβ mAb induces long-term allograft survival by reducing antigen-reactive T cells and sparing regulatory T cells

TCR specific antibodies may modulate the TCR engagement with antigen-MHC complexes, and in turn regulate in vivo T cell responses to alloantigens. Herein, we found that in vivo administration of mAbs specific for mouse TCRβ (H57-597), TCRα or CD3 promptly reduced the number of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in normal mice, but H57-597 mAb most potently increased the frequency of CD4(+) Foxp3(+) Treg cells. When mice were injected with staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) superantigen and H57-597 mAb, the expansion of SEB-reactive Vβ8(+) T cells was completely abrogated while SEB-nonreactive Vβ2(+) T cells remained unaffected. More importantly, transient H57-597 mAb treatment exerted long-lasting effect in preventing T cell responses to alloantigens, and produced long-term cardiac allograft survival (>100 days) in 10 out of 11 recipients. While Treg cells were involved in maintaining donor-specific long-term graft survival, T cell homeostasis recovered over time and immunity was retained against third party allografts. Moreover, transient H57-597 mAb treatment significantly prolonged survival of skin allografts in naïve recipients as well as heart allografts in skin-sensitized recipients. Thus, transient modulation of the TCRβ chain by H57-597 mAb exhibits potent, long-lasting therapeutic effects to control alloimmune responses.

Future prospects in immunosuppression for liver transplantation

1. Our increasing understanding of signaling pathways and cellular interactions in transplant immunobiology and the availability of novel immunosuppressive agents have facilitated targeted strategies. 2. The driving forces behind the development of new immunosuppressive regimens are the long-term complications of current immunosuppressive regimens (particularly renal dysfunction and metabolic disturbances). 3. By regulatory mandate, the requirement for the primary endpoint to be a composite of death, graft loss, and rejection remains intact; however, current and future clinical trials could incorporate key secondary endpoints that address renal and metabolic derangements.

Have we overestimated the benefit of human(ized) antibodies?

The infusion of animal-derived antibodies has been known for some time to trigger the generation of antibodies directed at the foreign protein as well as adverse events including cytokine release syndrome. These immunological phenomena drove the development of humanized and fully human monoclonal antibodies. The ability to generate human(ized) antibodies has been both a blessing and a curse. While incremental gains in the clinical efficacy and safety for some agents have been realized, a positive effect has not been observed for all human(ized) antibodies. Many human(ized) antibodies trigger the development of anti-drug antibody responses and infusion reactions. The current belief that antibodies need to be human(ized) to have enhanced therapeutic utility may slow the development of novel animal-derived monoclonal antibody therapeutics for use in clinical indications. In the case of murine antibodies, greater than 20% induce tolerable/negligible immunogenicity, suggesting that in these cases humanization may not offer significant gains in therapeutic utility. Furthermore, humanization of some murine antibodies may reduce their clinical effectiveness. The available data suggest that the utility of human(ized) antibodies needs to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, taking a cost-benefit approach, taking both biochemical characteristics and the targeted therapeutic indication into account.

Monoclonal antibody-induced cytokine-release syndrome

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are widely used in anti-inflammatory and tumor therapy. Although effective, mAbs can cause a variety of adverse effects. An important toxicity seen with a few mAbs is cytokine-release syndrome (CRS). These mAbs include: alemtuzumab, muromonab-CD3, rituximab, tosituzumab, CP-870,893, LO-CD2a/BTI-322 and TGN1412. By contrast, over 30 mAbs used clinically are not associated with CRS. In this review, the clinical aspects of CRS, the mAbs associated with CRS, the cytokines involved and putative mechanisms mediating cytokine release will be discussed. This will be followed by a discussion of the poor predictive value of studies in animals and the prospects for creating in vitro screens. Finally, approaches to decreasing the probability of CRS, decreasing the severity or treating CRS, should it occur, will be described.

T10B9 monoclonal antibody: a short-acting nonstimulating monoclonal antibody that spares gammadelta T-cells and treats and prevents cellular rejection

T10B9.1A-31/MEDI-500 is a nonmitogenic immunoglobulin M kappa murine monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against the alpha-beta (αβ) heterodimer of the T-lymphocyte receptor complex. The hybridoma was first produced by fusing spleen cells from BALB/C mice immunized with human peripheral blood T-lymphocytes with SP2/O-Ag14 mutant myeloma cells. The mAb is produced and purified using multistep ion exchange and molecular sieve chromatography protocols. T10B9 has been used successfully to treat acute cellular rejection in renal transplantation and as an immunosuppression induction agent in heart and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. Because T10B9 is nonmitogenic and causes minimal cytokine release, both treatment of rejection and induction of immunosuppression were accomplished with significantly fewer and milder untoward effects (cytokine release syndrome) than its comparator OKT3. Since T10B9 is directed against the αβ heterodimer of the CD3 epitope, it spares the gamma delta (γδ) region. These gamma delta (γδ) T cells have a unique role in the immune response controlling many serious human diseases and perhaps facilitating the development of immunologic tolerance. T10B9 has a relatively short duration of action, depleting T cells for only 10 to 14 days, unlike the protracted depletion seen with thymoglobulin and Campath-1H. There is no B-lymphocyte depletion with T10B9 as there is with both of the aforementioned reagents. The lack of prolonged lymphocyte depletion may account for less infection observed with T10B9 treatment.

Biologics in the prevention and treatment of graft rejection

Biologics are used in solid organ allografting and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for the induction and maintenance of immunosuppression. In solid organ transplantation, antibodies targeting T cells are part of induction protocols administered for initiation of immunosuppression during organ transfer and during sustained post transplant periods for prevention of graft rejection. Several clinical trials in renal allografting provide data for the efficacy and safety of biologics in this clinical setting. Application of biologics also allows the reduction of calcineurin inhibitors, thereby reducing toxicity and improving long-term graft function. In acute rejection periods, anti T cell antibodies are established in steroid-resistant cases. Strategies interfering with the activity of soluble cytokines are less frequently applied for solid organ transplantation. In HSCT, T cell directed antibodies as part of conditioning protocols improve engraftment and reduce the incidence of detrimental graft vs host disease (GvHD). In acute GvHD, both antibodies targeting T cells and cytokines like TNF-alpha are established therapeutics for remission induction.

Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for treating acute rejection episodes in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Registry data shows that between 15-35% kidney recipients will undergo treatment for at least one episode of acute rejection within the first post transplant year. Treatment options include pulsed steroid therapy, the use of an antibody preparation, the alteration of background immunosuppression, or combinations of these options. In 2002, in the US, 61.4% patients with an acute rejection episode received steroids, 20.4% received an antibody preparation and 18.2% received both.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and harms of mono- or polyclonal antibodies (Ab) used to treat acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (in The Cochrane Library, issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (1966-June 2005), EMBASE (1980-June 2005), and the specialised register of the Cochrane Renal Group (June 2005).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in all languages comparing all mono- and polyclonal antibody preparations, given in combination with any other immunosuppressive agents, for the treatment of acute graft rejection, when compared to any other treatment for acute rejection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trials for eligibility and quality, and extracted data. Results are expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty one trials (49 reports, 1387 patients) were identified. Trials were generally small, incompletely reported, especially for potential harms, and did not define outcome measures adequately. Fourteen trials (965 patients) compared therapies for first rejection episodes. Ab was better than steroid in reversing rejection (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.87) and preventing graft loss (death censored RR 0.74, CI 0.58 to 0.95) but there was no difference in preventing subsequent rejection or death at one year. Seven trials (422 patients) investigated Ab treatment of steroid-resistant rejection. There was no benefit of muromonab-CD3 over ATG or ALG in either reversing rejection, preventing subsequent rejection, preventing graft loss or death.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In reversing first rejection, any antibody is better than steroid and also prevents graft loss, but subsequent rejection and patient survival are not significantly different. In reversing steroid-resistant rejection the effects of different antibodies are also not significantly different. Given the clinical problem caused by acute rejection, data are very sparse, and clinically important differences in outcomes between widely used interventions have not been excluded. Standardised reproducible outcome criteria are needed.

Use of a T cell-specific monoclonal antibody, T10B9, in a novel allogeneic stem cell transplantation protocol for hematologic malignancy high-risk patients

To reduce the toxicity of traditional conditioning regimens for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), we used single-agent chemotherapy conditioning with either busulfan (total cumulative dose, 16 mg/kg) or melphalan (200 to 240 mg/m 2 ), followed by the anti-T cell-specific monoclonal antibody T10B9 (MEDI-500) daily for 3 days. T cell-replete SCT was performed from HLA-identical sibling donors. Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis consisted of 7 additional days of T10B9 and delayed onset of cyclosporine (ie, on day +4 or +5). Twenty-six high-risk hematologic malignancy patients were entered onto this study. All 24 patients who survived longer than 8 days engrafted, although 1 patient experienced late graft failure. Deaths occurred in 21 of 26 patients because of infection (n = 7), progression/recurrence of primary disease (n = 6), aGVHD (n = 4), regimen-related toxicity (n = 1), and other causes (n = 3). Five of these patients are enjoying disease-free survival with a median survival of 1193 days after allo-SCT. The conditioning regimen induced modulation of surface expression of CD3 (but not CD4 or CD8) and was associated with decreasing tumor necrosis factor-alpha (but not interleukin-6) serum levels. In conclusion, single-agent chemotherapy conditioning with T10B9 produced durable engraftment and long-term survival in some patients who would not have qualified for a traditional allo-SCT.

Treatment of acute kidney allograft rejection with a non-mitogenic CD3 antibody

T3/4.A is a non-mitogenic murine IgA mAb to human CD3 that was selected for clinical studies to provide an alternative for the mitogenic, T cell-activating, therapeutic mAb OKT3. Previously, we reported that T3/4.A is better tolerated in humans than the IgG2a-CD3 mAb T3/4.2a. Here we report the results of a phase II clinical trial to assess the immunosuppressive potential of T3/4.A. Eighteen first kidney transplant recipients with a first rejection episode were included. Baseline immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporin and prednisolone. Rejection treatment consisted of 5 mg mAb per day during 10 days. Fourteen patients responded, of whom four experienced a second rejection within 2 weeks, one experienced chronic rejection after 2.5 years, whereas the others remained rejection-free after treatment (median duration of follow-up 42 months). Four patients did not respond and eventually lost their graft. These results are similar to treatment results with OKT3, as reported in the literature. Following the first dose of T3/4.A, side effects were limited, and reduced compared to OKT3-treated controls. On the second day, 15 patients developed transient vomiting and/or diarrhoea, which coincided with elevated serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines. Minimal or even no side effects occurred during the remaining days, which is in sharp contrast to that seen generally during OKT3 treatment. Both T cell numbers and TCR expression were reduced during the therapy. We conclude that T3/4.A is a good alternative for OKT3 to treat rejection episodes in renal transplant recipients.

Non FcR-binding murine antihuman CD3 monoclonal antibody is capable of productive TCR signalling and induces proliferation in the presence of costimulation

CLB T3/4.A is a non FcR-binding CD3 mAb of the murine IgA isotype, which may be used as an alternative for the mitogenic OKT3 mAb in the treatment of acute cellular rejection after organ transplantation. We studied TCR signalling and T cell activation in response to T3/4.A in normal human PBMC in vitro. T3/4.A induced a rapid rise in free cytoplasmic Ca(2+), not different from the response to mitogenic CD3 mAb. However, protein tyrosine phosphorylation and, particularly, MAPK activation, were reduced as compared to mitogenic CD3 mAb. T3/4.A enhanced expression of both CD69 and CD25, but proliferation and detectable cytokine production did not occur. Addition of either CD28 mAb or IL-2 induced a strong proliferative response, which was accompanied by cytokine production. At higher mAb concentrations, T cell activation decreased, which correlated with TCR downmodulation. To exclude the possibility that activation by T3/4.A depends on interaction of murine IgA Fc with as yet unknown FcR, we showed that also with CD3 mAb F(ab')2 fragments upregulation of activation molecules occurred, as well as proliferation in the presence of costimulation. We conclude that the non FcR-binding murine IgA mAb T3/4.A acts as a partial agonist and leads to proliferation and cytokine production only in the presence of appropriate costimuli. These findings may explain the mitigated cytokine release syndrome observed in vivo with some nonmitogenic CD3 mAbs.

Removal of amphipathic epitopes from genetically engineered antibodies: production of modified immunoglobulins with reduced immunogenicity

Several approaches have been developed to reduce the human immune response to nonhuman antibodies. However, chimeric antibodies and humanized antibodies often have decreased binding affinity. We described a new approach for reducing the immunogenicity of chimeric antibodies while maintaining the affinity. This approach seeks to prevent the recognition of murine immunogenic peptides from the antibody variable region by human lymphocytes. Putative immunogenic epitopes in the variable region are identified and subjected to site directed mutagenesis to make them human and/or to break the amphipathic motifs. The R3 antibody, which blocks the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor, was used as a model system to test this approach. Four segments containing possible amphipathic epitopes were found in the heavy variable domain using the program AMPHI. Six amino acids within two of these segments were substituted by the corresponding residues from a homologous human sequence. No mutations were made in the murine light variable domain. Experiments in monkeys suggested that the "detope" R3 antibody was less immunogenic than its chimeric analogue. A search for possible amphipathic epitopes in the Kabat database revealed the presence of conserved patterns in the different families of variable region sequences, suggesting that the proposed method may be of general applicability.