Epstein-Barr virus-negative lymphoproliferate disorders in long-term survivors after heart, kidney, and liver transplant

Incidence, screening, and management of de novo malignancies in liver transplant patients: A review

Liver transplantation (LT) is the definitive treatment for end-stage liver disease, acute liver failure, and liver cancer. Although advancements in surgical techniques, postoperative care, and immunosuppressive therapies have significantly improved outcomes, the long-term use of immunosuppression has increased the risk of complications, including infections, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Among these, de novo malignancies (DNMs) are a major concern, accounting for 20%-25% of deaths in LT recipients surviving beyond the early post-transplant period. Non-melanoma skin cancers, particularly squamous cell carcinoma are the most prevalent DNMs. Other significant malignancies include Kaposi's sarcoma, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, and various solid organ cancers, including head and neck cancers. Compared to the general population, LT patients face a twofold increase in solid organ malignancies and a 30-fold increase in lymphoproliferative disorders. Risk factors for DNM include chronic immunosuppression, alcohol or tobacco use, viral infections, and underlying liver disease. Emerging evidence emphasizes the importance of tailored cancer screening and prevention strategies, including regular dermatological examinations, targeted screenings for high-risk cancers, and patient education on lifestyle modifications. Early detection through enhanced surveillance protocols has been shown to improve outcomes. Management of DNMs involves a combination of standard oncological therapies and adjustments to immunosuppressive regimens, with promising results from the use of mTOR inhibitors in select patients. The review highlights the critical need for ongoing research to refine risk stratification, optimize screening protocols, and improve treatment approaches to mitigate the burden of DNMs in LT recipients. By implementing personalized preventive and therapeutic strategies, we can enhance long-term outcomes and quality of life for this vulnerable population.

Cutaneous Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) involve T- or B-cell proliferation in an immunosuppressed transplant recipient. It usually presents at extra-nodal sites and can affect several organs. Cutaneous manifestations of PTLD are relatively rare and can be very heterogeneous. We report a case of a 36-year-old male cardiac transplant recipient on long-term immunosuppression (ciclosporin, azathioprine, and prednisolone) who presented with a three-month history of a painless ulcer on the right lower leg. A skin biopsy showed a dermal atypical lymphoid infiltrate positive for PAX5, CD20 and MUM1 on immunohistochemistry and EBV with in-situ hybridisation and a 70% Ki-67 cell proliferation index. A whole body fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scan showed increased tracer uptake corresponding to the site of the cutaneous ulcer, the anterior cortex of the right lower tibia, an area adjacent to the right superficial femoral artery and the right inguinal node. These findings were in keeping with monomorphic B-cell post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) consistent with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, non-germinal centre subtype. Cessation of azathioprine and treatment with an anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, led to clinical resolution of the ulcer and a negative FDG-PET scan, with no disease recurrence to date. We present a rare case of monomorphic PTLD with cutaneous involvement, presenting with a solitary, painless ulcer, which was successfully treated with a reduction in immunosuppression and additional rituximab monotherapy, given the aggressive subtype. PTLD can arise many years post-transplant and is a serious, potentially life-threatening complication. Therefore, early recognition and prompt treatment are of paramount importance.

Recent Advances in Adult Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder

PTLD is a rare but severe complication of hematopoietic or solid organ transplant recipients, with variable incidence and timing of occurrence depending on different patient-, therapy-, and transplant-related factors. The pathogenesis of PTLD is complex, with most cases of early PLTD having a strong association with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and the iatrogenic, immunosuppression-related decrease in T-cell immune surveillance. Without appropriate T-cell response, EBV-infected B cells persist and proliferate, resulting in malignant transformation. Classification is based on the histologic subtype and ranges from nondestructive hyperplasias to monoclonal aggressive lymphomas, with the most common subtype being diffuse large B-cell lymphoma-like PTLD. Management focuses on prevention of PTLD development, as well as therapy for active disease. Treatment is largely based on the histologic subtype. However, given lack of clinical trials providing evidence-based data on PLTD therapy-related outcomes, there are no specific management guidelines. In this review, we discuss the pathogenesis, histologic classification, and risk factors of PTLD. We further focus on common preventive and frontline treatment modalities, as well as describe the application of novel therapies for PLTD and elaborate on potential challenges in therapy.

Gastrointestinal manifestations, risk factors, and management in patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Patients with a history of solid organ transplantation (SOT) or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are at an increased risk of developing post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is commonly affected as it has an abundance of B and T cells.

AIM

To determine typical GI-manifestations, risk factors for developing PTLD, and management.

METHODS

Major databases were searched until November 2021.

RESULTS

Non-case report studies that described GI manifestations of PTLD, risk factors for developing PTLD, and management of PTLD were included. Nine articles written within the last 20 years were included in the review. All articles found that patients with a history of SOT, regardless of transplanted organ, have a propensity to develop GI-PTLD.

CONCLUSION

GI tract manifestations may be nonspecific; therefore, consideration of risk factors is crucial for identifying GI-PTLD. Like other lymphoma variants, PTLD is very aggressive making early diagnosis key to prognosis. Initial treatment is reduction of immunosuppression which is effective in more than 50% of cases; however, additional therapy including rituximab, chemotherapy, and surgery may also be required.

Safety and Efficacy of Anti-CD19-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Combined With Programmed Cell Death 1 Inhibitor Therapy in a Patient With Refractory Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease: Case Report and Literature Review

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) often exhibits poor prognosis and high mortality, and there are no uniform guidelines for the treatment of this disease. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells show significant efficacy in treatment of relapse/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Treatment using anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy in PTLD has been limited by immunosuppressants and has not been widely employed. In this study, a refractory post kidney transplant DLBCL patient with a high tumor burden was enrolled in a clinical trial of anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy. The tacrolimus dose was not decreased during combination chemotherapy, as the creatinine level of the patient increased. To improve the function of autologous T cells, combination therapy with anti-CD19-CAR T cells and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors was selected. After treatment with the combination therapy, the patient was diagnosed with grade 1 cytokine release syndrome and grade 3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. The amplification peak of anti-CD19-CAR T cells reached 9.01% on day 7. With PD-1 inhibitor maintenance therapy, his disease was maintained in partial remission for 18 weeks. However, his tumor suddenly increased in size, and he discontinued the treatment, including radiation therapy. The anti-CD19-CAR T cell and PD-1 inhibitors have a combined effect on PTLD, and this combination therapy needs to be further explored.

Heterogeneous Manifestations of Posttransplant Lymphoma in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Case Series

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurs in 1% to 3% of adult renal transplant recipients (RTRs). PTLD has a heterogeneous presentation and is often associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and immunosuppression. We present a descriptive case series of 16 RTRs who demonstrate a variety of PTLD manifestations. Fifty-six percent received rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction, and 37.5% received basiliximab. Maintenance immunosuppression included glucocorticoids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Median time from transplantation to PTLD diagnosis was 96.5 months. PTLD involved a single site in 44% of RTRs and multiple sites in 56%. PTLD was localized to the gastrointestinal tract in 9 RTRs, in lymph nodes in 9, central nervous system in 4, bone marrow in 3, skin in 3, lungs in 2, perinephric space in 2, mediastinum in 1, and native kidney in 1. PTLD was EBV positive in 8 RTRs, monomorphic/monoclonal in 14, and of B-cell lineage in 13. Three RTRs had T-cell PTLD. Immunosuppressive agents, except glucocorticoids, were discontinued at diagnosis. Treatment was chemotherapy either alone (in 14 RTRs) or in combination with radiation. Complete remission was achieved in 62.5% of RTRs. Renal dysfunction developed in 62.5% of RTRs, and 4 received dialysis. The overall mortality rate was 62.5%, with median time of death 6.5 months after diagnosis. PTLD that was EBV negative and had T-cell involvement presented with aggressive disease and a higher mortality. Clinicians should be aware of the various PTLD manifestations. Early diagnosis and a multidisciplinary approach to treatment is crucial for improved patient outcomes.

Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Recipient's Reconstructed Middle Hepatic Vein After Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplant: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is known as one of the most frequent post-transplant neoplastic diseases, which may lead to recipient and graft morbidity after liver transplant.

PATIENT

A 14-year-old boy received pediatric living donor liver transplant (right living graft) 29 months ago, with etiology of biliary atresia. During 22-month follow-up after transplant, computed tomography and positron emission tomography with computed tomography scan showed a single progressive mass locating in the graft cutting surface with occlusive reconstructed middle hepatic vein (MHV). Serology was negative for Epstein-Barr virus serology. Mild fever and pneumonia did not improve after 1-week intravenous antibiotics. PTLD was considered.

RESULTS

A surgical resection was scheduled and performed in compliance with the Helsinki Congress and the Istanbul Declaration. During laparotomy, a single mass located in the reconstructed MHV from segment V to the inferior vena cava was confirmed. Postoperative immunohistochemical result showed CD 3(+), CD 20(+), CD 38(+), CD 10(-), CD 56(-), Ki-67(+, 20%-30%), Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA(-), and Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2(-). Polymorphic PTLD was eventually diagnosed. No recurrence or new set lesions were detected after 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first case describing PTLD may originate from reconstructed MHV after pediatric living donor liver transplant. As a life-threatening complication of liver transplant, surgical resection should be considered as a safe and feasible treatment for the single resectable mass.

Survival outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants with EBV-positive or EBV-negative post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, A CIBMTR study

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT). Although most PTLD is EBV-positive (EBV^pos ), EBV-negative (EBV^neg ) PTLD is reported, yet its incidence and clinical impact remain largely undefined. Furthermore, factors at the time of transplant impacting survival following PTLD are not well described.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2014, 432 cases of PTLD following alloHCT were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). After exclusions, 267 cases (EBV^pos  = 222, 83%; EBV^neg  = 45, 17%) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eight patients (78%) received in vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) with either anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab. Incidence of PTLD was highest using umbilical cord donors (UCB, 1.60%) and lowest using matched related donors (MRD, 0.40%). Clinical features and histology did not significantly differ among EBV^pos or EBV^neg PTLD cases except that absolute lymphocyte count recovery was slower, and CMV reactivation was later in EBV^neg PTLD [EBV^pos 32 (5-95) days versus EBV^neg 47 (10-70) days, P = .016]. There was no impact on survival by EBV status in multivariable analysis [EBV^neg RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.94-2.15, P = .097].

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in survival outcomes for patients with EBV^pos or EBV^neg PTLD occurring following alloHCT and 1-year survival is poor. Features of conditioning and use of serotherapy remain important.

A review of adenotonsillar hypertrophy and adenotonsillectomy in children after solid organ transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Paediatric solid organ transplantation is an increasingly successful treatment. Improved survival is paralleled by increased secondary complications of immunosuppression, including post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). PTLD frequently presents in Waldeyer's lymphatic ring. Adenotonsillar hypertrophy (ATH) is common in children, however in children after transplant, ATH may indicate PTLD. We review the literature on ATH and the role of adenotonsillectomy in children after transplantation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed on the 26 th September 2017 of Ovid Medline (1996-September 2017), Embase (1996-2017) and EBM reviews (Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2005-September 20 th 2017). Results were limited to English language publications within the last 20 years. Abstracts were screened for relevance to PTLD and ATH in the paediatric solid organ transplantation population. Screening of the bibliographies identified further articles.

RESULTS

85 unique articles were screened to yield 18 relevant publications. 10 were retrospective studies and 8 were prospective studies.

CONCLUSION

In children, we report a PTLD incidence of up to 15%, with up to 63% of cases presenting in the head and neck. Histological examination of adenotonsillectomy specimens found PTLD in a mean 5.7% (range 0-39%). We found a lack of prospective studies into this topic and further high quality research is needed. Clinical assessment of ATH in children after transplantation and when to perform a diagnostic adenotonsillectomy remains challenging. Children with ATH warrant prompt further investigation and support from colleagues in transplantation and oncology is required. .

The changing face of adult posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: Changes in histology between 1999 and 2013

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) typically presents with either polymorphic or monomorphic histology. While both are the end result of immunosuppressive therapies, their origins are felt to be different with different prognoses and responsiveness to therapy, resulting in 2 different malignancies. We attempted to confirm reports suggesting that the relative frequency of these 2 histologies is shifting over time. We analyzed 3040 adult PTLD cases in the UNOS OPTN database from 1999 to 2013. Changes in PTLD cases over time were analyzed for histology, time from transplant to diagnosis, and patient EBV serostatus. We found that the relative proportion of polymorphic versus monomorphic histology has changed with an increase in the proportion of monomorphic cases with time (1999-2003, 54.9% vs. 45.1%; 2004-2008, 58.3% vs. 41.7%; 2009-2013, 69.7% vs. 30.3%; P = <.001). The change is driven by a gradual increase in the number of monomorphic PTLD with a steady number of polymorphic PTLD. The change is most strongly seen in transplant recipients who were EBV serostatus positive at the time of transplant. Potential causes are changes in immunosuppressive regimens with increased tacrolimus use (P = .009) and increased survival among transplant patients leading to later occurrence of PTLD (P = .001) that have occurred during the time frame analyzed. As organ transplantation has evolved over time, PTLD has coevolved. These changes in histology have important implications regarding the origin and clinical management of PTLD.

Post-transplant malignancies in pediatric liver transplant recipients: Experience of two centers in Turkey

BACKGROUND/AIMS

A liver transplant is the preferred treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease, as it usually results in longterm survival. However, due to the use of chronic immunosuppressive therapy, which is necessary to prevent rejection, de novo cancer is a major risk after transplantation. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of post-transplant malignancies in children after liver transplantations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study group consisted of 206 liver transplant recipients, with no history of cancer, including hepatocellular carcinoma, in two liver transplantation centers in Turkey between 1997 and 2015. Data were obtained from patient's data chart.

RESULTS

In the study group, de novo cancer was diagnosed in 13 of the 206 patients. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) occurred in seven (53.8%) patients and other malignancies in six of the 13 patients. The types of PTLD were as follows: B-cell origin (n=2), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-related (n=2), T-cell origin (n=1), and Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=2). EBV DNA was isolated from seven patients, three of whom developed PTLD. The others developed Kaposi's sarcomas, Burkitt's lymphomas, cutaneous large-cell lymphomas, Hodgkin's lymphomas, and liver sarcomas.

CONCLUSION

After transplantation, immunosuppressive treatment is unavoidable, increasing the risk of malignancies. However, a close follow-up and periodic screening can reduce cancer-related mortality and morbidity.

EBV-Negative Monomorphic B-Cell Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder with Marked Morphologic Pleomorphism and Pathogenic Mutations in ASXL1, BCOR, CDKN2A, NF1, and TP53

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are a diverse group of lymphoid or plasmacytic proliferations frequently driven by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). EBV-negative PTLDs appear to represent a distinct entity. This report describes an unusual case of a 33-year-old woman that developed a monomorphic EBV-negative PTLD consistent with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) 13 years after heart-lung transplant. Histological examination revealed marked pleomorphism of the malignant cells including nodular areas reminiscent of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) with abundant large, bizarre Hodgkin-like cells. By immunostaining, the malignant cells were immunoreactive for CD45, CD20, CD79a, PAX5, BCL6, MUM1, and p53 and negative for CD15, CD30, latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), and EBV-encoded RNA (EBER). Flow cytometry demonstrated lambda light chain restricted CD5 and CD10 negative B-cells. Fluorescence in situ hybridization studies (FISH) were negative for cMYC, BCL2, and BCL6 rearrangements but showed deletion of TP53 and monosomy of chromosome 17. Next-generation sequencing studies (NGS) revealed numerous genetic alterations including 6 pathogenic mutations in ASXL1, BCOR, CDKN2A, NF1, and TP53(x2) genes and 30 variants of unknown significance (VOUS) in ABL1, ASXL1, ATM, BCOR, BCORL1, BRNIP3, CDH2, CDKN2A, DNMT3A, ETV6, EZH2, FBXW7, KIT, NF1, RUNX1, SETPB1, SF1, SMC1A, STAG2, TET2, TP53, and U2AF2.

Role of Chemotherapy and Rituximab for Treatment of Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Solid Organ Transplantation

Objective:

To evaluate the role of chemotherapy and/or rituximab for treatment of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in solid organ transplantation.

Data Sources:

A MEDLINE search (1966–May 2007) was conducted using the key words posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, solid organ transplantation, chemotherapy, and rituximab. References of relevant articles and abstracts from recent hematology, oncology, and transplantation scientific meetings (2004–May 2007) were also reviewed.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Prospective and retrospective studies identified from the data sources were evaluated, and all information deemed relevant was included for this review.

Data Synthesis:

Overall response rates ranged from 53% to 68%, 25% to 83%, and 74% to 100% for rituximab monotherapy, chemotherapy, and chemotherapy plus rituximab, respectively. Positive response to treatment was influenced by prognostic factors, including presence of Epstein-Barr virus in tumor cells, normal lactate dehydrogenase levels, good performance status, early disease onset after transplantation, and early disease stages. These factors in study patients likely contribute to the variability in response rates seen between treatment options. Severe adverse effects, ranging from grade 3 neutropenia to infection resulting in death, occurred more frequently in patients receiving chemotherapy than in patients receiving only rituximab.

Conclusions:

Although reduction in immunosuppressive medications remains the first-line therapy for PTLD treatment, many cases do not respond to this treatment alone, especially monomorphic or more aggressive cases of lymphoma. Therefore, it is reasonable to begin active treatment including rituximab and/or chemotherapy initially, along with reduction in immunosuppression in many cases. Further prospective, comparative studies are urgently needed to confirm the efficacy of these treatment strategies as well as to clarify which subset of patients may benefit most from them.

Risk-adapted Treatment for Severe B-Lineage Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disease After Solid Organ Transplantation in Children

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) remains to be defined due to heterogeneity of this condition and lack of predictors of the outcome. Here we report our experience with pediatric PTLD nonresponsive to immunosuppression (IS) withdrawal, managed after stratification into high and low risk according to the presenting features.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective review of prospectively enrolled patients. From 2001 to 2011, 17 children were diagnosed with severe B-lineage, CD20+, PTLD after a median of 37 months (range, 5-93) from liver (12), heart (4), or multiorgan (1) transplantation. Treatment was tailored on 2 risk groups: (1) standard-risk (SR) patients received IS reduction and rituximab; (2) high-risk (HR) patients received IS discontinuation, rituximab and polychemotherapy.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of rejection at 1 and 5 years after the diagnosis of PTLD was 35% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 18-69%) and 53% (33-85%), respectively, whereas the disease-free survival at 1 and 5 years was 94% (95% CI, 65-99%) and 75% (45-90%), respectively. Three children died, PTLD-free, from different transplant-related complications: primary nonfunction after retransplantation (liver), cytomegalovirus disease 21 months after PTLD treatment (liver), graft dysfunction 25 months after PTLD (heart).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe B-lineage PTLD after solid organ transplantation may be classified as SR or HR and treated accordingly with a tailored protocol obtaining a satisfactory long-term outcome. This approach accomplishes the control of lymphoproliferation in severe forms as well as the minimization of toxicity in milder PTLDs.

Incidence, risk factors and outcomes of de novo malignancies post liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is associated with a 2 to 7 fold higher, age and gender adjusted, risk of de novo malignancy. The overall incidence of de novo malignancy post LT ranges from 2.2% to 26%, and 5 and 10 years incidence rates are estimated at 10% to 14.6% and 20% to 32%, respectively. The main risk factors for de novo malignancy include immunosuppression with impaired immunosurveillance, and a number of patient factors which include; age, latent oncogenic viral infections, tobacco and alcohol use history, and underlying liver disease. The most common cancers after LT are non-melanoma skin cancers, accounting for approximately 37% of de novo malignancies, with a noted increase in the ratio of squamous to basal cell cancers. While these types of skin cancer do not impact patient survival, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders and solid organ cancer, accounting for 25% and 48% of malignancies, are associated with increased mortality. Patients developing these types of cancer are diagnosed at more advanced stages, and their cancers behave more aggressively compared with the general population. Patients undergoing LT for primary sclerosing cholangitis (particularly with inflammatory bowel disease) and alcoholic liver disease have high rates of malignancies compared with patients undergoing LT for other indications. These populations are at particular risk for gastrointestinal and aerodigestive cancers respectively. Counseling smoking cessation, skin protection from sun exposure and routine clinical follow-up are the current approach in practice. There are no standardized surveillance protocol, but available data suggests that regimented surveillance strategies are needed and capable of yielding cancer diagnosis at earlier stages with better resulting survival. Evidence-based strategies are needed to guide optimal surveillance and safe minimization of immunosuppression.

Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disease After Solid Organ Transplantation: Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Management

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a potentially fatal complication after (solid organ) transplantation, which is highly associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). The EBV-specific cytotoxic T cell response that is essential in controlling the virus in healthy individuals is suppressed in transplant recipients using immunosuppressive drugs. A primary EBV infection in EBV-seronegative patients receiving an EBV-seropositive donor organ or a reactivation in those who are already latently infected pretransplantation can lead to uninhibited growth of EBV-infected B cells and subsequently to PTLD. Effective preventive strategies, such as vaccines and antiviral agents, are lacking. Because not every transplant recipient with increasing EBV viral load develops PTLD, it is hard to decide how intensively these patients should be monitored and how and when a preemptive intervention should take place. There is a need for other tools to help predict the development of PTLD in patients at risk to make timing and strategy of preemptive intervention easier and more reliable.

The cornerstone of the treatment of patients with PTLD is restoring the host's immunity by reduction of immunosuppressive drug therapy. American and British guidelines recommend to add rituximab monotherapy or rituximab in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone, depending on histology and clinical characteristics. Although response to these therapies is good, toxicity is a problem, and PTLD still has a relatively high mortality rate. An evolving therapy, especially in PTLD occurring in allogeneic stem cell transplantation, is restoring the host's immune response with infusion of EBV-specific cytotoxic T cells. This may also play a role in the future in both prevention and treatment of PTLD in SOT.

Epstein- Barr Virus: Clinical and Epidemiological Revisits and Genetic Basis of Oncogenesis

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is classified as a member in the order herpesvirales, family herpesviridae, subfamily gammaherpesvirinae and the genus lymphocytovirus. The virus is an exclusively human pathogen and thus also termed as human herpesvirus 4 (HHV4). It was the first oncogenic virus recognized and has been incriminated in the causation of tumors of both lymphatic and epithelial nature. It was reported in some previous studies that 95% of the population worldwide are serologically positive to the virus. Clinically, EBV primary infection is almost silent, persisting as a life-long asymptomatic latent infection in B cells although it may be responsible for a transient clinical syndrome called infectious mononucleosis. Following reactivation of the virus from latency due to immunocompromised status, EBV was found to be associated with several tumors. EBV linked to oncogenesis as detected in lymphoid tumors such as Burkitt's lymphoma (BL), Hodgkin's disease (HD), post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) and T-cell lymphomas (e.g. Peripheral T-cell lymphomas; PTCL and Anaplastic large cell lymphomas; ALCL). It is also linked to epithelial tumors such as nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), gastric carcinomas and oral hairy leukoplakia (OHL). In vitro, EBV many studies have demonstrated its ability to transform B cells into lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs). Despite these malignancies showing different clinical and epidemiological patterns when studied, genetic studies have suggested that these EBV- associated transformations were characterized generally by low level of virus gene expression with only the latent virus proteins (LVPs) upregulated in both tumors and LCLs. In this review, we summarize some clinical and epidemiological features of EBV- associated tumors. We also discuss how EBV latent genes may lead to oncogenesis in the different clinical malignancies

Lymphoproliferative Disorders after Lung Transplantation: Clinicopathological Characterization of 16 Cases with Identification of Very-Late-Onset Forms

BACKGROUND

The incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) has recently declined, but late cases are increasingly reported in lung transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVES

We present our experience with PTLD after lung transplantation, attempting to examine the distinguishing characteristics of early versus late cases.

METHODS

We have reviewed clinical and pathological data of all cases occurring in our institution between 2001 and 2014.

RESULTS

Patients, aged 15-63 years, were mostly (12/16) Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) seropositive at the time of transplantation. Eleven early cases, occurring 9.4 ± 5.2 months after transplantation and mostly (9/11) prior to 2010, had EBV+ diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Lungs and/or thoracic lymph nodes were often involved (n = 8). Treatments included reduction of immune suppression (n = 11), rituximab (n = 8) and chemotherapy (n = 7). Two patients are in complete remission at 26 and 216 months. Nine patients died 8.0 ± 6.5 months after PTLD diagnosis. Of the 5 cases with late PTLD occurring 4-23 years (mean ± SD: 10.4 ± 7.7) after transplantation (and 3/5 after 2009), 1 had pulmonary lymphomatoid granulomatosis (only endothoracic case), 1 cutaneous large T-cell lymphoma, 2 had anaplastic large cell lymphomas, and 1 Hodgkin's disease. Two of the 5 cases were EBV-, including one followed by a second EBV+ PTLD after 8 years of complete remission. Two patients were alive and well (follow-up: 44 and 151 months), one having suffered from EBV-related cholestatic hepatitis 6 years after the PTLD.

CONCLUSION

Our small experience shows a trend toward (very) late occurrence, associated with more unusual clinicopathologic features, but not with a worse prognosis.

The Impact of EBV Status on Characteristics and Outcomes of Posttransplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorder

We examined the associations of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status with characteristics and outcomes of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) by studying 176 adult solid organ transplant recipients diagnosed with PTLD between 1990 and 2013 (58 [33%] EBV-negative; 118 [67%] EBV-positive). The proportion of EBV-negative cases increased over time from 10% (1990-1995) to 48% (2008-2013) (p < 0.001). EBV-negative PTLD had distinct characteristics (monomorphic histology, longer latency) though high-risk features (advanced stage, older age, high lactate dehydrogenase, central nervous system involvement) were not more common compared to EBV-positive PTLD. In multivariable analysis, EBV negativity was not significantly associated with worse response to initial therapy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.84; p = 0.75). The likelihood of achieving a complete remission (CR) was not significantly different for EBV-negative versus EBV-positive PTLD including when therapy was reduction of immunosuppression alone (35% vs. 43%, respectively, p = 0.60) or rituximab (43% vs. 47%, p = 1.0). EBV negativity was also not associated with worse overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.91; p = 0.71). Our findings indicate that EBV status is not prognostic or predictive of treatment response in adults with PTLD. The high proportion of EBV-negative disease diagnosed in recent years highlights the need for new strategies for prevention and management of EBV-negative PTLD.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are a serious complication after solid organ or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and include a range of diseases from benign proliferations to malignant lymphomas. Risk factors for developing PTLD include Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, recipient age, transplanted organ, type of immunosuppression, and genetics. Uncontrolled proliferation of EBV-infected B cells is implicated in EBV-positive PTLD, whereas the pathogenesis of EBV-negative PTLD may be similar to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the general population. The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies PTLD into four categories: early lesions, polymorphic PTLD, monomorphic PTLD, and classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL). Treatment is aimed at cure of PTLD, while maintaining transplanted organ function. However, there are no established guidelines for the treatment of PTLD. Immune suppression reduction (ISR) is the first line of treatment in most cases, with more recent data suggesting early use of rituximab. In more aggressive forms of PTLD, upfront chemotherapy may offer a better and more durable response. Sequential therapy using rituximab followed by chemotherapy has demonstrated promising results and may establish a standard of care. Novel therapies including anti-viral agents, adoptive immunotherapy, and monoclonal antibodies targeting cytokines require further study in the prevention and treatment of PTLD.

Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease: proposed imaging classification

Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is the second most common tumor in adult transplant recipients. Most cases of PTLD are attributed to Epstein-Barr virus. Decreased levels of immunosurveillance against this tumor virus as a result of immunosuppressive regimens are thought to account for most cases of PTLD. Histologically, PTLD ranges from relatively benign lymphoid hyperplasia to poorly differentiated lymphoma, and tissue sampling is required to establish the subtype. The frequency of PTLD varies depending on the type of allograft and immunosuppressive regimen. PTLD has a bimodal manifestation, with most cases occurring within the first year after transplantation and a second peak occurring 4-5 years after transplantation. Patients are often asymptomatic or present with nonspecific symptoms, and a mass visible at imaging may be the first clue to the diagnosis. Imaging plays an important role in identifying the presence of disease, guiding tissue sampling, and evaluating response to treatment. The appearance of PTLD at imaging can vary. It may be nodal or extranodal. Extranodal disease may involve the gastrointestinal tract, solid organs, or central nervous system. Solid organ lesions may be solitary or multiple, infiltrate beyond the organ margins, and obstruct organ outflow. Suggestive imaging findings should prompt tissue sampling, because knowledge of the PTLD subtype is imperative for appropriate treatment. Treatment options include reducing immunosuppression, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgical resection of isolated lesions.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders are not associated with IgG4 sclerosing disease

BACKGROUND

Although the majority of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) cases are associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), 20-42% of cases are EBV negative (EBV-N). The antigenic stimulus that drives EBV-N PTLD is unknown, but is likely heterogeneous. A common feature of PTLD, regardless of EBV status, is an abnormal polytypic lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate. Immunglobulin-G4 (IgG4) syndrome is also characterized by a polytypic lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate with a predominance of IgG4-positive (IgG4-P) plasma cells.

METHODS

We investigated the possibility of an association between EBV-N PTLD and IgG4 syndrome. Of 33 evaluated PTLD cases, 9 (27%) were EBV-N. EBV-N PTLD cases showed longer transplantation-to-diagnosis times than EBV-positive cases.

RESULTS

A single patient had a preceding benign duodenal biopsy with focally prominent IgG4-P plasma cells; however, no clinical data supported IgG4 syndrome, precluding an association between IgG4 syndrome and subsequent EBV-N PTLD in this patient.

CONCLUSION

As none of 29 evaluable cases of PTLD (including all 9 EBV-N cases) were associated with an increase in IgG4-P plasma cells, IgG4 syndrome does not appear to play a role in the etiology of EBV-N PTLD. The significance of these findings and the current understanding of the etiology of EBV-N PTLD are discussed.

Long-term complete remission of multiple extranodal natural killer/T-cell-type posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after surgical resection: a case report

BACKGROUND

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a life-threatening complication of organ transplantation that results from immunosuppression therapy. Most cases of PTLD derive from the B-cell lineage. T-cell PTLD, particularly natural killer (NK)/T-cell PTLD, is quite rare; only a few cases have been described.

CASE REPORT

A 42-year-old woman received a living-related renal allograft from her father. Sixteen years after transplantation, the patient presented with a 1-week history of low-grade fever and epigastralgia. Computed tomography revealed intestinal masses and a right upper lung lobe mass. Gallium scintigraphy showed uptake in the abdominal mass. Epstein-Barr virus-related antibody was not detected in the patient's serum sample. We performed extirpation of the jejunum and ileum tumors. The pathologic findings showed that these 2 tumors were NK/T-cell lymphoma. After the operation, the lung mass rapidly enlarged, and right upper lobectomy was performed. The right upper lung lobe tumor showed the same histopathologic findings as the small bowel tumor. The final histologic diagnosis was established as multiple extranodal NK/T cell type PTLD of the small bowel and right upper lung lobe.

CONCLUSIONS

After reduction of the immunosuppressive agent, no recurrence of PTLD has been observed for the past 9 years.

Risk of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after solid organ transplantation in the United States

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma arising in the context of immunosuppression is an important adverse outcome after solid organ transplantation. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most commonly diagnosed subtype of post-transplantation non-Hodgkin lymphoma, but few studies of transplant recipients have examined subtype-specific risks. Therefore, we examined DLBCL risk in the Transplant Cancer Match Study, including registry-based cancer ascertainment among 96,615 solid organ transplants performed from 2000 to 2008. We determined standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals comparing DLBCL risk in transplant recipients with that in the general population, and used multivariable Poisson regression models to assess the impact of potential risk factors. We identified 321 incident cases of DLBCL, over 12 times more than expected based on general population rates (SIR = 12.6, 95% confidence interval = 11.2-14.0). SIRs were highest in young recipients and those receiving a lung or pancreas/kidney-pancreas transplant, and were greatly elevated for extranodal DLBCLs at the site of the transplantation compared with other sites. DLBCL risk was highest in the first year following transplantation, and SIRs for early-onset DLBCL risk were elevated in association with Epstein-Barr virus-negative serostatus and use of polyclonal antibody induction therapy. In conclusion, associations between recipient and transplant factors and post-transplantation DLBCL risk suggest a complicated interrelationship among multiple risk factors and timing of disease.

Epstein-barr virus-negative post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases: three distinct cases from a single center

Three cases of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-negative post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease that occurred 6 to 8 years after renal transplantation are reported. The patients respectively had gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and atypical Burkitt lymphoma. Absence of EBV in the tissue samples was demonstrated by both in situ hybridization for EBV early RNA and polymerase chain reaction for EBV DNA. Patients were treated with reduction in immunosuppression and combined chemotherapy plus an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab. Despite the reduction in immunosuppression, patients had stable renal functions without loss of graft functions. The patient with atypical Burkitt lymphoma had an abnormal karyotype, did not respond to treatment completely, and died due to disease progression. The other patients are still alive and in remission 5 and 3 years after diagnosis, respectively. EBV-negative post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases are usually late-onset and are reported to have poor prognosis. Thus, reduction in immunosuppression is usually not sufficient for treatment and more aggressive approaches like rituximab with combined chemotherapy are required.

Ocular adnexal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a review of epidemiology and risk factors

Ocular adnexal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), the most common form of ophthalmic NHL, has a unique incidence pattern showing a steady and rapid increase in the past few decades, nearly equal rates among both genders, and predominance among Asians/Pacific Islanders. No major cause for ocular adnexal NHL has been identified, although infectious agents, immune disorders and genetic/epigenetic factors have all been implicated in its etiology. Identifying putative risk factors and biologic mechanisms leading to carcinogenesis in ocular adnexal NHL may enable implementation of effective preventive and/or therapeutic approaches for this malignancy. This article summarizes current knowledge on epidemiology of ocular adnexal NHL and the role of various potential risk factors in its etiology.

Spectrum of lymphoproliferative disorders following renal transplantation in North India

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a well-recognized, but uncommon complication of organ transplantation. This study was a retrospective analysis of 2000 patients who underwent renal transplantation over a period of 30 years (1980-2010). Forty malignancies were diagnosed in 36 patients. Of these, 29 patients (1.45%) had PTLD (7 females, 22 males) accounting for 72.5% of all malignancies after transplantation. Twenty-two (75.8%) developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma and seven patients (24.2%) had myeloma. Diagnosis was made by biopsy of the involved organ in 21 patients (72.4%) and aspiration cytology in five patients (17.2%). In three patients, the diagnosis was made only at autopsy. Mean age at the time of diagnosis of PTLD was 41.9 years (range 21-69 years). Time interval from transplantation to the diagnosis of PTLD ranged from 3 months to 144 months with a median of 48 months. Only five patients (17.2%) developed PTLD within a year of transplantation. Twelve patients developed PTLD 1-5 years and 12 patients 5-10 years after transplantation. Organ involvement was extra nodal in 18 patients (82%). Thirteen (59%) patients had disseminated disease and nine (41%) had localized involvement of a single organ (brain-3, liver-1, allograft-1, perigraft node-1, retroperitoneal lymph nodes-3). Infiltration of the graft was noted in two patients. Patients with myeloma presented with backache, pathological fracture, unexplained anemia or graft dysfunction. PTLD was of B cell origin in 20 cases (70%). CD 20 staining was performed in 10 recent cases, of which 8 stained positive. Of the 26 patients diagnosed during life, 20 (69%) died within 1 year of diagnosis despite therapy. In conclusion, PTLD is encountered late after renal transplantation in the majority of our patients and is associated with a dismal outcome. The late onset in the majority of patients suggests that it is unlikely to be Epstein Barr virus related.

Current status of immunosuppression in liver transplantation

With advancements in immunosuppressive strategies and availability of better immunosuppressive agents, survival rate following liver transplantation has improved significantly in the recent times. Besides improvements in surgical techniques, the most important factor that has contributed to this better outcome is the progress made in the field of immunosuppression. Over the last several years, the trend has changed to tailored immunosuppression with the aim of achieving optimal graft function while avoiding its undesirable side effects. Induction agents are no longer used routinely and the aim is to provide minimal immunosuppression in the maintenance phase. The present review discusses the various types of immunosuppressive agents, their mechanism of action, clinical utility, advantages and disadvantages, and their side effects in short and long-term. It also discusses about tailoring immunosuppression in presence of various situations such as renal dysfunction, metabolic syndrome, hepatitis C recurrence, cytomegalovirus infections and so on. The issue of chronic kidney disease and the available renal sparing immunosuppressive strategies has been particularly stressed upon. Finally, it discusses about the practical aspects of various immunosuppression regimens including drug monitoring.

Early onset, EBV− PTLD in pediatric liver-small bowel transplantation recipients: a spectrum of plasma cell neoplasms with favorable prognosis

Five cases of EBV− PTLD in pediatric recipients of combined liver and small bowel allografts are reported. The lesions were plasma cell neoplasms that resolved completely after minimal treatment.

Burden of de novo malignancy in the liver transplant recipient

Recipients of liver transplantation (LT) have a higher overall risk (2-3 times on average) of developing de novo malignancies than the general population, with standardized incidence ratios ranging from 1.0 for breast and prostate cancers to 3-4 for colon cancer and up to 12 for esophageal and oropharyngeal cancers. Aside from immunosuppression, other identified risk factors for de novo malignancies include the patient's age, a history of alcoholic liver disease or primary sclerosing cholangitis, smoking, and viral infections with oncogenic potential. Despite outcome studies showing that de novo malignancies are major causes of mortality and morbidity after LT, there are no guidelines for cancer surveillance protocols or immunosuppression protocols to lower the incidence of de novo cancers. Patient education, particularly for smoking cessation and excess sun avoidance, and regular clinical follow-up remain the standard of care. Further research in epidemiology, risk factors, and the effectiveness of screening and management protocols is needed to develop evidence-based guidelines for the prevention and treatment of de novo malignancies.

T-cell therapy in the treatment of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases (PTLD) associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection often develop after organ and haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. These lymphoproliferative diseases are tumours that usually express all latent EBV viral proteins, and are therefore amenable to T-cell-based immune therapies, such as donor lymphocyte infusions and the adoptive transfer of EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. In this Review, we describe current approaches of T-cell-based therapies to treat PTLD, and describe strategies that improve the feasibility of such treatment.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder after lung transplantation: a review of 35 cases

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a complication of organ transplantation. The risk of developing PTLD varies depending on a number of factors, including the organ transplanted and the degree of immunosuppression used.

METHODS

We report a retrospective analysis of 35 patients with PTLD treated at our center after lung transplantation. Of 705 patients who received allografts, 34 (4.8%) developed PTLD. One patient underwent transplantation elsewhere and was treated at our center.

RESULTS

PTLD involved the allograft in 49% of our patients and the gastrointestinal (GI) tract lumen in 23%. Histologically, 39% of tumors were monomorphic and 48% polymorphic. The time to presentation defined the location and histology of disease. Of 17 patients diagnosed within 11 months of transplantation, PTLD involved the allograft in 12 (71%) and the GI tract in 1 (p = 0.01). This "early" PTLD was 85% polymorphic (p = 0.006). Conversely, of the 18 patients diagnosed more than 11 months after transplant, the lung was involved in 5 (28%) and the GI tract in 7 (39%; p = 0.01). "Late" PTLD was 71% monomorphic (p = 0.006). Median overall survival after diagnosis was 18.57 months. Overall survival did not differ between all lung transplant recipients and those who developed PTLD.

CONCLUSIONS

PTLD is an uncommon complication after lung transplantation, and its incidence declined remarkably in the era of modern immunosuppression. We report several factors that are important for predisposition toward, progression of, and treatment of PTLD after lung transplantation.

Time trends in risk and risk determinants of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in solid organ transplant recipients

Organ transplantation increases risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), but long-term risk and time trends have seldom been evaluated. Immunosuppressive drug load is an important risk determinant, but the details are unclear. We studied NHL risk in a nationwide Swedish cohort of 11 081 graft recipients transplanted 1970-2008. Relative risks (RRs) were estimated within the cohort and versus the general population by age, sex, follow-up time and calendar period. NHL risk was also assessed by cumulative and average doses of immunosuppressive treatments in a nested case-control design throughout 1997 using conditional logistic regression. We observed 153 NHL cases during 97 853 years of follow-up. Compared with the general population, NHL risk was eightfold increased (RR 7.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.6-9.4), and increased risks persisted after ≥15 years of follow-up among kidney (6.1; 95% CI 3.5-10) and nonkidney recipients (44; 14-103). Among nonkidney recipients, NHL risk was lower in the 2000s compared with the 1990s (0.5; 95% CI 0.3-1.0; p = 0.04). A high average dose of antithymocyte immunoglobulin (ATG) conferred an eightfold increased risk of NHL (OR 8.5; 95% CI 1.9-38). To conclude, posttransplant NHL risk decreased during the last decade among nonkidney recipients, possibly because of a more careful use of ATG, the introduction of new drugs, or both.

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease following liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite contemporary immunosuppressive regimens, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) remains a major complication after liver transplantation. This review highlights advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of PTLD in liver transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The spectrum of PTLD after liver transplant ranges from polymorphic lymphoproliferation to high-grade monoclonal lymphoma and is usually related to outgrowth of lymphocytes infected with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Risk factors for PTLD include EBV-seronegativity of the recipient, young age, intensity of immunosuppression, and the first year posttransplant. Measurement of EBV load by quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays is an important aid in the surveillance and diagnosis of PTLD although the specificity for PTLD is only about 50% (specificity for EBV is ∼100%). In patients diagnosed with PTLD, management options include reduction of immunosuppression, rituximab, combination chemotherapy, and adoptive immunotherapy. Outcomes have improved because rituximab has been incorporated into treatment regimens, and immunotherapy approaches show promise.

SUMMARY

PTLD is a significant complication after liver transplantation, particularly in children. Advances in early detection approaches have aided in the diagnosis and management of PTLD, but further research to identify better predictive biomarkers is needed to improve risk-based treatment strategies.

Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (FCD), and rituximab: a remission induction therapy for aggressive pediatric post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD)

Management of aggressive, usually late-occurring, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs), a life-threatening complication after solid organ transplants, remains controversial. Four children affected by aggressive CD20+ PTLDs received a chemo-immunotherapy regimen for remission induction based on fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab, associated with a rapid discontinuation of immunosuppression (IS). Subsequent consolidation chemotherapy consisted of Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster-modified blocks. All patients achieved a complete remission, which persisted for 25, 68+, 80+, and 103+ months after diagnosis. Therapy was well tolerated. No patients developed allograft rejection during PTLD treatment. Our experience suggests that this chemo-immunotherapeutic approach may be an effective treatment strategy while allowing for a concomitant discontinuation of IS.

[Hematologic malignant complications after transplantation]

Post-transplant hemopathies are a serious complication of organ transplantation. They include several entities: non-hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin disease and myeloma. The pathophysiology, clinical and histological features, treatment and evolution of these diseases are different, but share some similarities. Among factors involved in lymphomagenesis, the role of Epstein Barr virus and immunosuppression are central. EBV primo-infection or reactivation together with a deep depression of T-cell immunity is at particular risk of lymphoma development. The clinical expression and outcome of lymphomas are varied. Assays for EBV replication quantification have been developed leading to immunosuppression decreasing and antiviral therapy when the replication increases. Treatment of post-transplant lymphoproliferations consists mainly in immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Hodgkin disease and myeloma are rare after transplantation; their management is close to the one of immunocompetent patients. The recurrence of myeloma, amyloidosis or light chain deposition disease seems frequent after transplantation and only patients with disappearance of monoclonal component should be proposed for transplantation. On the opposite, the risk of recurrence appears lower for Hodgkin disease; therefore the transplantation of patients with a history of Hodgkin disease looks possible.

Management of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders following solid organ transplant: an update

Development of secondary malignancies is a well-known complication of solid organ transplant, with skin cancer and lymphoproliferative disorders being most frequently observed. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders, caused by diminished immune surveillance, represent a broad spectrum of pathological and clinical disorders, ranging from benign conditions to very aggressive lymphomas. Here we review treatment options for adult patients experiencing posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders following solid organ transplant.

Using Epstein-Barr viral load assays to diagnose, monitor, and prevent posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA measurement is being incorporated into routine medical practice to help diagnose, monitor, and predict posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in immunocompromised graft recipients. PTLD is an aggressive neoplasm that almost always harbors EBV DNA within the neoplastic lymphocytes, and it is often fatal if not recognized and treated promptly. Validated protocols, commercial reagents, and automated instruments facilitate implementation of EBV load assays by real-time PCR. When applied to either whole blood or plasma, EBV DNA levels reflect clinical status with respect to EBV-related neoplasia. While many healthy transplant recipients have low viral loads, high EBV loads are strongly associated with current or impending PTLD. Complementary laboratory assays as well as histopathologic examination of lesional tissue help in interpreting modest elevations in viral load. Circulating EBV levels in serial samples reflect changes in tumor burden and represent an effective, noninvasive tool for monitoring the efficacy of therapy. In high-risk patients, serial testing permits early clinical intervention to prevent progression toward frank PTLD. Restoring T cell immunity against EBV is a major strategy for overcoming PTLD, and novel EBV-directed therapies are being explored to thwart virus-driven neoplasia.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder following renal transplantation: a single-center experience over 40 years

OBJECTIVES

To investigate post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) following renal transplantation at our institution.

METHODS

Medical records of 631 patients who underwent renal transplantation at Osaka University Hospital between March 1965 and December 2008 were reviewed.

RESULTS

PTLD following renal transplantation was detected in 10 patients (five men, five women; mean age at transplantation, 38.5 years). Mean duration from renal transplantation to the onset of PTLD was 7.1 years (range, 5 months to 18 years, 9 months). Mean duration of observation was 3.9 years from the onset of PTLD. Immunosuppressant therapy comprised multidrug combination therapy, including cyclosporine in six patients and tacrolimus in four patients. In addition to a reduction in the immunosuppressant dose, which was performed in all patients, PTLD was treated with surgery in seven patients, radiotherapy in two patients, rituximab in five patients, and cytotoxic chemotherapy in four patients. A complete remission in eight patients and progressive disease in two were observed. At last follow up, seven patients were alive and five patients had functioning grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of PTLD following renal transplantation at our institution is 1.6% with onset occurring more than 5 years after transplantation in five patients. Consequently, with long-term renal graft survival now feasible, attention must be paid to detecting late-onset PTLD.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder localized in the colon after liver transplantation: report of a case

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a life-threatening complication of any organ transplantation. It is more common in children than in adults, and the risk factors include Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and immunosuppression. We report a case of colonic marginal zone B-cell lymphoma occurring 4 years after liver transplantation in a 52-year-old man who had been taking immunosuppressive agents, namely, cyclosporin, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisolone. A routine follow-up colonoscopy showed a 2.0-cm diffuse nodular transverse colon polyp covered with erosive mucosa. Snare polypectomy was done without any complications. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for CD3 and CD20 in the interstitially scattered small lymphocytes and negative for Bcl-2, revealing marginal zone B-cell lymphoma. EBV quantitative polymerase chain reaction was less than the detection limit (<10 copies/5 microl whole blood). Extraintestinal whole-body screening was negative. The patient underwent right hemicolectomy after colonoscopic tattooing for positive resection margins on snare polypectomy. Surgical pathology revealed no evidence of residual lymphoma. Treatment consisted of colonic resection and reduction of the doses of immunosuppressants. The patient is currently under close surveillance without any signs of recurrence.

Malignancy after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence and type of malignancies after heart transplantation at a medical institute in Taiwan.

METHODS

From January 1987 to December 2008, a total of 66 patients who survived more than 30 days after transplantation were enrolled in this study.

RESULTS

Of the 66 heart transplant recipients, 8 (12.1%) post-transplant malignancies were diagnosed: 5 posttransplant lymphoproliferative diseases (PTLD), 1 prostate cancer, 1 lung cancer, and 1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cheek. The clinical presentations were diverse, and the diagnoses were confirmed by biopsy. Only 1 patient died of PTLD and subsequent multiple organ failure.

CONCLUSION

Cancer is a limiting factor for long-term survival after heart transplantation. The most common type in this study was PTLD. Early detection and aggressive treatment results in good response and preserves the allograft.

Cancer incidence and risk factors after solid organ transplantation

Iatrogenic immunosuppression is a unique setting for investigating immune-related mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Solid organ transplant recipients have a 3-fold excess risk of cancer relative to the age- and sex-matched general population. Population-based studies utilizing cancer registry records indicate that a wide range of cancers, mostly those with a viral etiology, occur at excess rates. To date, cancer risk has predominantly been examined in adult kidney transplant recipients in Western countries. It is yet to be established whether a similar incidence profile exists in the long-term for other solid organ, pediatric and non-Western transplant recipients. The cancer incidence profile before and after kidney transplantation strongly suggests a relatively minor contribution by both preexisting cancer risk factors and the conditions underlying end-stage kidney disease, and points to a causal role for immunosuppression. Within-cohort risk factor analyses have largely been performed on cohorts with voluntary cancer notification, and very few have incorporated biomarkers of the level of immunosuppression, the current receipt of immunosuppressive agents, or genetic risk factors. Because of their markedly high risk of certain cancers, findings from comprehensive studies in transplant recipients have the potential to raise new avenues for investigation into causal mechanisms and preventive measures against immune-related and infectious causes of cancer.