JC virus infection in allograft kidneys: analysis by polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry

Longitudinal study of human polyomaviruses viruria in kidney transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Immunosuppression after kidney transplantation (KTx) exposes recipients to Human Polyomaviruses (HPyVs) infections, whose natural history is still misunderstood.

METHODS

Allograft biopsies, and urine from 58 donor-recipient pairs were collected before KTx (T0) and 1 (T1), 15 (T2), 30 (T3), 60 (T4), 90 (T5), 180 (T6), 270 (T7), 360 (T8), and 540 (T9) days after transplant. Specimens were tested for JC (JCPyV) and BK (BKPyV), by quantitative Real-Time PCR. The course of post-KTx HPyVs viruria, and the association between JCPyV viruria in recipients and donors, were evaluated.

RESULTS

HPyVs were detected in 3/58 (5.2%) allograft biopsies. HPyVs viruria was present in 29/58 (50%) donors and 41/58 (70.7%) recipients. JCPyV DNA was detected in 26/58 (44.8%) donors and 25/58 recipients (43.1%), 19 of whom received kidney from JCPyV positive donor, whereas BKPyV genome was detected in 3 (5.2%) donors and 22 (37.9%) recipients. The median time of JCPyV, and BKPyV first episode of replication was 1, and 171 days post KTx, respectively. At T0, JCPyV viruria of donors was associated with increased risk of JCPyV replication post-KTx; recipients with JCPyV positive donors showed lower risk of BKPyV replication post-KTx.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested that JCPyV may be transmitted by allograft, and that its replication post KTx might prevent BKPyV reactivation. Future investigation regarding correlation between chronic exposure to immunosuppressive agents and HPyVs urinary replication are warranted.

Virus-Associated Nephropathies: A Narrative Review

While most viral infections cause mild symptoms and a spontaneous favorable resolution, some can lead to severe or protracted manifestations, specifically in immunocompromised hosts. Kidney injuries related to viral infections may have multiple causes related to the infection severity, drug toxicity or direct or indirect viral-associated nephropathy. We review here the described virus-associated nephropathies in order to guide diagnosis strategies and treatments in cases of acute kidney injury (AKI) occurring concomitantly with a viral infection. The occurrence of virus-associated nephropathy depends on multiple factors: the local epidemiology of the virus, its ability to infect renal cells and the patient's underlying immune response, which varies with the state of immunosuppression. Clear comprehension of pathophysiological mechanisms associated with a summary of described direct and indirect injuries should help physicians to diagnose and treat viral associated nephropathies.

Determining host factors contributing to the reactivation of JC virus in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The John Cunningham virus (JCV) is the established etiological agent of the polyomavirus-associated nephropathy among renal transplant recipients. In the present study, we aimed to determine the probable predictive factors leading to JCV replication in renal transplant patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Urine and plasma samples were collected from a total of 120 consecutive renal-transplanted patients without preliminary screening from Jan 2018 to Mar 2019. After DNA extraction, the simultaneous detection and quantification of JCV and BK polyomavirus (BKV) were conducted using a Real-time quantitative PCR method. Moreover, statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software packages, SPSS version 21.

RESULTS

The prevalence of JCV viruria and viremia among renal transplant recipients were 26 (21.67%) and 20 (16.67%), respectively. A significant association was observed between the JCV and two risk factors, diabetes mellitus (P = 0.002) and renal stones (P = 0.015). The prevalence of JCV viremia among recipients who were grafted near time to sampling was significantly higher (P = 0.02). There was a statistically significant coexistence between BK and JC viruses among our patients (P = 0.029). The frequency of JCV viruria in males was reported almost three times more than in females (P = 0.005). The JCV shedding in urine was significantly associated with the tropical steroids like prednisolone acetate, which have been the standard regimen (P = 0.039). Multivariable analysis revealed duration of post-transplantation (OR, 0.89; P = 0.038), diabetes mellitus (OR, 1.85; P = 0.034), and renal stone (OR 1.10; P = 0.04) as independent risk factors associated with JCV viremia post-renal transplantation.

CONCLUSION

It seems that the discovery of potential risk factors, including immunological and non-immunological elements, may offer a possible preventive or therapeutic approach in the JCV disease episodes. The results of this study may also help clarify the probable clinical risk factors involving in progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy development.

Archetype JC Polyomavirus (JCPyV) Prevails in a Rare Case of JCPyV Nephropathy and in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients With JCPyV Viruria

Background

JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) is reactivated in approximately 20% of renal transplant recipients, and it may rarely cause JCPyV-associated nephropathy (JCPyVAN). Whereas progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy of the brain is caused by rearranged neurotropic JCPyV, little is known about viral sequence variation in JCPyVAN owing to the rarity of this condition.

Methods

Using single-molecule real-time sequencing, characterization of full-length JCPyV genomes in urine and plasma samples from 1 patient with JCPyVAN and 20 stable renal transplant recipients with JCPyV viruria was attempted. Sequence analysis of JCPyV strains was performed, with emphasis on the noncoding control region, the major capsid protein gene VP1, and the large T antigen gene.

Results

Exclusively archetype strains were identified in urine from the patient with JCPyVAN. Full-length JCPyV sequences were not retrieved from plasma. Archetype strains were found in urine samples from 19 stable renal transplant recipients, with JCPyV quasispecies detected in 5 samples. In a patient with minor graft dysfunction, a strain with an archetype-like noncoding cont rol region was discovered. Individual point mutations were detected in both VP1 and large T antigen genes.

Conclusions

Archetype JCPyV was dominant in the patient with JCPyVAN and in stable renal transplant recipients. Archetype rather than rearranged JCPyV seems to drive the pathogenesis of JCPyVAN.

A Difficult Decision: Atypical JC Polyomavirus Encephalopathy in a Kidney Transplant Recipient

BACKGROUND

A number of cerebral manifestations are associated with JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) which are diagnosed by detection of JCPyV in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), often with the support of cerebral imaging. Here we present an unusual case of a kidney transplant patient presenting with progressive neurological deterioration attributed to JCPyV encephalopathy.

METHODS

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction JCPyV was used prospectively and retrospectively to track the viral load within the patient blood, urine, CSF, and kidney sections. A JCPyV VP1 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure patient and donor antibody titers. Immunohistochemical staining was used to identify active JCPyV infection within the kidney allograft.

RESULTS

JC polyomavirus was detected in the CSF at the time of presentation. JC polyomavirus was not detected in pretransplant serum, however viral loads increased with time, peaking during the height of the neurological symptoms (1.5E copies/mL). No parenchymal brain lesions were evident on imaging, but transient cerebral venous sinus thrombosis was present. Progressive decline in neurological function necessitated immunotherapy cessation and allograft removal, which led to decreasing serum viral loads and resolution of neurological symptoms. JC polyomavirus was detected within the graft's collecting duct cells using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical staining. The patient was JCPyV naive pretransplant, but showed high antibody titers during the neurological symptoms, with the IgM decrease paralleling the viral load after graft removal.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a case of atypical JCPyV encephalopathy associated with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and disseminated primary JCPyV infection originating from the kidney allograft. Clinical improvement followed removal of the allograft and cessation of immunosuppression.

Alloimmunity But Not Viral Immunity Promotes Allograft Loss in a Mouse Model of Polyomavirus-Associated Allograft Injury

Background

The interplay between viral infection and alloimmunity is known to influence the fate of transplanted organs. Clarifying how local virus-associated inflammation/injury and antiviral immunity can alter host alloimmune responses in transplantation remains a critical question.

Methods

We used a mouse model of polyomavirus (PyV) infection and kidney transplantation to investigate the roles of direct viral pathology, the antiviral immune response, and alloimmunity in the pathogenesis of PyV-associated allograft injury. We have previously shown that an effective primary T cell response is required in PyV-associated graft injury.

Results

Here we show that the transfer of primed antidonor, but not antiviral, T cells results in PyV-associated allograft injury. In further studies, we use a surrogate minor antigen model (ovalbumin) and show that only antidonor specific T cells and not antiviral specific T cells are sufficient to mediate injury. Lastly, we demonstrate that local but not systemic virus-mediated inflammation and injury within the graft itself are required.

Conclusions

These data suggest that in this mouse model, the predominant mechanism of allograft injury in PyV-associated injury is due to an augmented alloimmune T cell response driven by virus-induced inflammation/injury within the graft. These studies highlight the important interplay between viral infection and alloimmunity in a model system.

Polyomavirus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation

Polyomavirus nephropathy has become an important complication in kidney transplantation, with a prevalence of 1% to 8%. Unfortunately, the risk factors for polyomavirus nephropathy and renal allograft loss are not well defined. The definitive diagnosis is made through assessment of a kidney transplant biopsy. Recently, noninvasive urine and serum markers have been used to assist in polyomavirus nephropathy diagnosis and monitoring. Primary treatment is immunosuppression reduction, but must be balanced with the risks of rejection. No antiviral treatments for polyomavirus nephropathy have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Although cidofovir has shown in vitro activity against murine polyomaviruses, and has been effective in some patients, it is associated with significant nephrotoxicity. Graft loss due to polyomavirus nephropathy should not be a contraindication to retransplantation; however, experience is limited. This review presents potential risk factors, screening, diagnostic and monitoring methods, therapeutic management, and retransplantation experience for polyomavirus nephropathy.

Prevalence, reactivation and genotyping of John Cunningham virus among end-stage renal disease and kidney transplant patients

Aim: Infection of John Cunningham virus (JCV) usually occurs in early childhood and can lead to progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in immunosuppressed individuals. In this study, prevalence, reactivation and genotypes of JCV were evaluated. Materials & methods: Overall, 128 sex-matched individuals, including 64 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and 64 kidney transplant (KT) patients were evaluated using PCR and reverse transcriptase-PCR. Results: JCV DNA was detected in the urine samples of 17.2% of KT recipients and 1.6% of ESRD patients. Reactivation of JCV was determined in 12.5% of KT patients. All JCV-DNA-positive samples belonged to Af2 genotype (subtype b). Conclusion: Rare excretion of JCV in the ESRD urine samples can be associated with kidney function. JCV shedding and reactivation occur more frequently in the first 2 years following kidney transplantation. The genotype of Af2-b is circulating among the population of Iran.

BK Polyomavirus Tubulointerstitial Nephritis With Urothelial Hyperplasia in a Kidney Transplant

Polyomavirus nephropathy is characterized histopathologically by evidence of viral replication and acute tubular injury with interstitial inflammation, tubulitis, and intranuclear inclusions. Polyomavirus nephropathy typically develops in the kidney transplant as a combination of the unique nature of the transplanted tissue and the immunomodulated status of the patient. We present a case in which a patient had lingering BK viremia and declining kidney function following receipt of lung and kidney transplants. A kidney biopsy was performed, which demonstrated BK polyomavirus tubulointerstitial nephritis, resultant cytopathic changes and tubular/ductal injury, associated urothelial hyperplasia with foci of squamous metaplasia, suspected membranous glomerulopathy, and moderate arterial/arteriolar sclerosis. There was also evidence of more proximal nephron viral involvement, with glomerular parietal epithelium infection and injury present. This case shows impressive BK polyomavirus-associated urothelial hyperplasia in the kidney, which to our knowledge has not been previously illustrated in the literature. There have been numerous studies attempting to show the association of polyomaviruses with the development of carcinoma, and this case report is significant because it is an example of viral-induced changes that are concerning and hold potential for malignant transformation.

A prospective study of renal transplant recipients reveals an absence of primary JC polyomavirus infections

BACKGROUND

Both JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) and BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) are acquired at an early age. JCPyV causes progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and has been described in association with nephropathy.

OBJECTIVES

Urine and plasma samples from renal transplant recipients (RTRs) were examined for JCPyV to determine its involvement in causing infection and disease.

STUDY DESIGN

JCPyV testing was performed on 112 RTRs included in a randomised controlled study of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive regimens [1]. Urine and EDTA blood samples were collected pre- and post-transplantation and analysed for JCPyV using real-time PCR and sequencing to determine genotype and viral variation. Donor and recipient IgG antibody status to JCPyV was also determined.

RESULTS

Overall, 13.3% of RTRs were positive for JCPyV of which one patient developed viraemia without viruria. JCPyV DNA was detected early following transplantation (defined as five days post transplantation) from recipients with donors that were positive for JCPyV IgG antibodies. No dual cases of JCPyV and BKPyV were observed. One patient sample had sequence duplication in the non-coding control region.

CONCLUSIONS

Like BKPyV, JCPyV tends to occur early post transplantation but did not result in sustained viraemia. There was no deterioration of renal function in patients positive for JCPyV. As with other viruses, JCPyV donor serostatus was a risk factor for detection of JCPyV DNA. JCPyV appears to protect individuals from BKPyV infection, as recipients were twice as likely to develop BKPyV with a negative JCPyV donor.

Practical Applications in Immunohistochemistry: Evaluation of Rejection and Infection in Organ Transplantation

CONTEXT

-Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue biopsy specimens is a crucial tool in diagnosis of both rejection and infection in patients with solid organ transplants. In the past 15 years, the concept of antibody-mediated rejection has been refined, and diagnostic criteria have been codified in renal, heart, pancreas, and lung allografts (with studies ongoing in liver, small intestine, and composite grafts), all of which include immunoanalysis for the complement split product C4d.

OBJECTIVES

-To review the general concepts of C4d biology and immunoanalysis, followed by organ-allograft-specific data, and interpretative nuances for kidney, pancreas, and heart, with discussion of early literature for lung and liver biopsies. Additionally, practical applications and limitations of immunostains for infectious organisms (Polyomavirus, Adenoviridae [adenovirus], and the herpes virus family, including Herpes simplex virus, Cytomegalovirus, Human herpes virus 8, and Epstein-Barr virus) are reviewed in the context of transplant recipients.

DATA SOURCES

-Our experience and published primary and review literature.

CONCLUSIONS

-Immunohistochemistry continues to have an important role in transplant pathology, most notably C4d staining in assessment of antibody-mediated rejection and assessment of viral pathogens in tissue. In all facets of transplant pathology, correlation of morphology with special studies and clinical data is critical, as is close communication with the transplant team.

Human polyomavirus receptor distribution in brain parenchyma contrasts with receptor distribution in kidney and choroid plexus

The human polyomavirus, JCPyV, is the causative agent of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, a rare demyelinating disease that occurs in the setting of prolonged immunosuppression. After initial asymptomatic infection, the virus establishes lifelong persistence in the kidney and possibly other extraneural sites. In rare instances, the virus traffics to the central nervous system, where oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, and glial precursors are susceptible to lytic infection, resulting in progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. The mechanisms by which the virus traffics to the central nervous system from peripheral sites remain unknown. Lactoseries tetrasaccharide c (LSTc), a pentasaccharide containing a terminal α2,6-linked sialic acid, is the major attachment receptor for polyomavirus. In addition to LSTc, type 2 serotonin receptors are required for facilitating virus entry into susceptible cells. We studied the distribution of virus receptors in kidney and brain using lectins, antibodies, and labeled virus. The distribution of LSTc, serotonin receptors, and virus binding sites overlapped in kidney and in the choroid plexus. In brain parenchyma, serotonin receptors were expressed on oligodendrocytes and astrocytes, but these cells were negative for LSTc and did not bind virus. LSTc was instead found on microglia and vascular endothelium, to which virus bound abundantly. Receptor distribution was not changed in the brains of patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Virus infection of oligodendrocytes and astrocytes during disease progression is LSTc independent.

A case of primary JC polyomavirus infection-associated nephropathy

A 15-year-old boy with a posterior urethral valve received a deceased donor kidney transplant (KT) in March 2011. Basiliximab induction followed by tacrolimus-based triple medication was used as immunosuppression. Eleven months after KT, the graft function deteriorated and the biopsy demonstrated interstitial nephritis suggestive of acute rejection. BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) surveillance in urine and plasma was negative. The patient received methylprednisolone pulses and anti-thymocyte globulin. Immunohistochemistry was positive for simian virus 40 (SV40) large T-antigen (LTag) in the biopsies, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction for JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) indicated high viral loads in urine and borderline levels in plasma. Immunosuppression was reduced and follow-up biopsies showed tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis. Two years after KT, antibody-mediated rejection resulted in graft loss and return to hemodialysis. Retrospective serologic work-up indicated a primary JCPyV infection with seroconversion first for IgM, followed by IgG, but no indication of BKPyV infection. In the SV40 LTag positive biopsies, JCPyV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) with archetype noncoding control region was detected, while BKPyV DNA was undetectable. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of primary JCPyV infection as the cause of PyV-associated nephropathy in KT.

Asymptomatic hematuria associated with urinary polyomavirus infection in immunocompetent patients

Unlike the case for immunodeficient patients, little is known about polyomavirus (PV) infection in immunocompetent patients. PV infection in immunocompetent individuals has been reported sporadically, but little is known about asymptomatic hematuria. To determine the clinical significance and prevalence of urinary PV infection in immunocompetent patients, a total of 95 individuals admitted to Seoul St. Mary's hospital were investigated. Sixty-four patients were enrolled for evaluation of asymptomatic hematuria, and 31 healthy individuals served as controls. Clinical screening for PV infection was performed by urine cytology analysis by liquid-based preparation and urine RT-PCR for BK virus (BKV) and JC virus (JCV), respectively. The average age of the patients in the PV(+) - and PV(-) -groups with asymptomatic hematuria were 60 years and 46 years, respectively. Urine cytology analysis revealed decoy cells in 37/64 hematuria patients (38.9%), but not in healthy controls. They were more prevalent in male patients. Eighty-two patients (86.3%) had PV viruria, viz., 54/64 patients in the hematuria group and 28/31 in the control group. Interestingly, 28/31 (90.3%) cases in the healthy control group were positive for PV viruria, which exceeded the number in the hematuria group (84.4%). PV viruria was associated primarily with JCV, rather than BKV. PV viruria, including JCV viruria, correlated with urine decoy cells and increased age. In conclusion, urinary PV infection is common in immunocompetent patients with asymptomatic hematuria and is age-related. These data may provide an insight into the pathogenesis and future treatment of asymptomatic hematuria associated with urinary PV infection in immunocompetent patients.

Human Polyomavirus JC monitoring and noncoding control region analysis in dynamic cohorts of individuals affected by immune-mediated diseases under treatment with biologics: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) onset, caused by Polyomavirus JC (JCPyV) in patients affected by immune-mediated diseases during biological treatment, raised concerns about the safety profile of these agents. Therefore, the aims of this study were the JCPyV reactivation monitoring and the noncoding control region (NCCR) and viral protein 1 (VP1) analysis in patients affected by different immune-mediated diseases and treated with biologics.

METHODS

We performed JCPyV-specific quantitative PCR of biological samples collected at moment of recruitment (t0) and every 4 months (t1, t2, t3, t4). Subsequently, rearrangements' analysis of NCCR and VP1 was carried out. Data were analyzed using χ2 test.

RESULTS

Results showed that at t0 patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases presented a JCPyV load in the urine significantly higher (p≤0.05) than in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and Crohn's disease (CD). It can also be observed a significant association between JC viruria and JCPyV antibodies after 1 year of natalizumab (p=0.04) in MS patients. Finally, NCCR analysis showed the presence of an archetype-like sequence in all urine samples, whereas a rearranged NCCR Type IR was found in colon-rectal biopsies collected from 2 CD patients after 16 months of infliximab. Furthermore, sequences isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of 2 MS patients with JCPyV antibody at t0 and t3, showed a NCCR Type IIR with a duplication of a 98 bp unit and a 66 bp insert, resulting in a boxB deletion and 37 T to G transversion into the Spi-B binding site. In all patients, a prevalence of genotypes 1A and 1B, the predominant JCPyV genotypes in Europe, was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

It has been important to understand whether the specific inflammatory scenario in different immune-mediated diseases could affect JCPyV reactivation from latency, in particular from kidneys. Moreover, for a more accurate PML risk stratification, testing JC viruria seems to be useful to identify patients who harbor JCPyV but with an undetectable JCPyV-specific humoral immune response. In these patients, it may also be important to study the JCPyV NCCR rearrangement: in particular, Spi-B expression in PBMCs could play a crucial role in JCPyV replication and NCCR rearrangement.

The human JC polyomavirus (JCPyV): virological background and clinical implications

JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) was the first of now 12 PyVs detected in humans, when in 1964, PyV particles were revealed by electron microscopy in progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) tissues. JCPyV infection is common in 35-70% of the general population, and the virus thereafter persists in the renourinary tract. One third of healthy adults asymptomatically shed JCPyV at approximately 50,000 copies/mL urine. PML is rare having an incidence of <0.3 per 100,000 person years in the general population. This increased to 2.4 per 1000 person years in HIV-AIDS patients without combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Recently, PML emerged in multiple sclerosis patients treated with natalizumab to 2.13 cases per 1000 patients. Natalizumab blocks α4-integrin-dependent lymphocyte homing to the brain suggesting that not the overall cellular immunodeficiency but local failure of brain immune surveillance is a pivotal factor for PML. Recovering JCPyV-specific immune control, e.g., by starting cART or discontinuing natalizumab, significantly improves PML survival, but is challenged by the immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Important steps of PML pathogenesis are undefined, and antiviral therapies are lacking. New clues might come from molecular and functional profiling of JCPyV and PML pathology and comparison with other replicative pathologies such as granule cell neuronopathy and (meningo-)encephalitis, and non-replicative JCPyV pathology possibly contributing to some malignancies. Given the increasing number of immunologically vulnerable patients, a critical reappraisal of JCPyV infection, replication and disease seems warranted.

A review on JC virus infection in kidney transplant recipients

The polyomavirus (PyV), JC virus (JCV), is a small nonenveloped DNA virus that asymptomatically infects about 80% of healthy adults and establishes latency in the kidney tissue. In case of immunodeficient hosts, JCV can lytically infect the oligodendrocytes, causing a fatal demyelinating disease, known as progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Although the reactivation of another human PyV, BK virus (BKV), is relatively common and its association with the polyomavirus associated nephropathy (PyVAN) following renal transplantation is proven, JCV replication and its impact on graft function and survival are less well studied. Here we describe the biology of JCV and its pathological features and we review the literature regarding the JCV infection analyzed in the setting of transplantations.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) development is associated with mutations in JC virus capsid protein VP1 that change its receptor specificity

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a fatal demyelinating disease caused by JC virus (JCV) infection of oligodendrocytes, may develop in patients with immune disorders following reactivation of chronic benign infection. Mutations of JCV capsid viral protein 1 (VP1), the capsid protein involved in binding to sialic acid cell receptors, might favor PML onset. Cerebrospinal fluid sequences from 37/40 PML patients contained one of several JCV VP1 amino acid mutations, which were also present in paired plasma but not urine sequences despite the same viral genetic background. VP1-derived virus-like particles (VLPs) carrying these mutations lost hemagglutination ability, showed different ganglioside specificity, and abolished binding to different peripheral cell types compared with wild-type VLPs. However, mutants still bound brain-derived cells, and binding was not affected by sialic acid removal by neuraminidase. JCV VP1 substitutions are acquired intrapatient and might favor JCV brain invasion through abrogation of sialic acid binding with peripheral cells, while maintaining sialic acid-independent binding with brain cells.

Does JC polyomavirus cause nephropathy in renal transplant patients?

INTRODUCTION

BK polyomavirus (BKV) reactivation characterized by active viruria occurs in 23%-57% of renal allograft recipients and BKV-associated nephropathy in as many as 8% of renal allograft recipients. Only a few cases of nephritis have been attributed to JC polyomavirus (JCV) with limited information about JCV replication and its impact on graft function and survival of kidney transplant patients. We sought to determine the prevalence of BKV and JCV replication, the risk factors associated with viral reactivation, and their implications for the development of polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) among renal transplant patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 186 kidney transplant recipients who were transplanted between 2005 and 2009 with a 1-year follow-up. If the urine polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive, we performed a PCR on blood. If this was positive or renal dysfunction was present, we performed a renal biopsy.

RESULTS

Viruria was positive in 72 cases (39%) and viremia in 12 (6.5%); including, 3 patients (1.6%) who developed PVN. In the patients with viruria, BKV was detected in 47% and JCV in 46%; both were detected in 7%, although the combination of viremia and nephropathy were caused by BKV in all cases.

CONCLUSION

In renal transplant patients, the incidence of BKV and JCV viruria was similar, although in our series the JCV serotype did not cause viremia or PVN. Our experience suggested that JCV did not have the ability to cause PVN.

Different patterns of BK and JC polyomavirus reactivation following renal transplantation

AIM

Reactivation of latent BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection is relatively common following renal transplantation and BKV-associated nephropathy has emerged as a significant complication. JC polyomavirus (JCV) reactivation is less well studied. The aim of the study was to determine reactivation patterns for these polyomaviruses in renal transplant recipients using an in-house quantitative real-time multiplex PCR assay and IgG serological assays using recombinant BK and JC virus-like particles.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of urine and plasma samples collected from 30 renal transplant patients from February 2004 to May 2005 at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. Samples were collected at 5 days and thereafter at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-transplantation.

RESULTS

Eight patients (26.7%) were positive for BK viruria; three of these patients submitted plasma samples and two had BK viraemia. Five patients (16.7%) were positive for JC viruria. A corresponding rise in BKV and JCV antibody titres was seen in association with high levels of viruria.

CONCLUSIONS

Different patterns of reactivation were observed: BK viruria was detected after 3-6 months, and JC viruria was observed as early as 5 days post-transplantation. One patient had biopsy-proven BKV nephropathy. No dual infections were seen. In order to ensure better graft survival, early diagnosis of these polyomaviruses is desirable.

A correlation between polyomavirus JC virus quantification and genotypes in renal transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the John Cunningham virus (JCV) viral load and the multigenotypes in viruria are correlated with transplant patients.

METHODS

The urine of 60 renal transplant patients and 60 healthy controls were screened. We used quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and capillary electrophoresis to assess viral load and genotype respectively.

RESULTS

The incidence of viruria and viral load were higher in transplant patients with P = .0092 and P = .0094, respectively. The incidence of different genotype in transplant patients versus controls was 8.3% versus 13.3% for single genotype, 26.7% versus 5% for 2 genotypes, and 5% versus 0% for multigenotypes (P = .0004). The incidence of more than 2 genotypes was high in people with a high viral load and closely related with the transplant patients (P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

Not only viral load but also genotypes are important as a screening parameter to understand the immune milieu of the patients to prevent subsequent complications like polyomavirus nephropathy, infection, and malignancy.

Polyomavirus infection and its impact on renal function and long-term outcomes after lung transplantation. Transplantation. 2009;88:360-366. [PMID: 19667938 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3181ae5ff9]

BACKGROUND

Polyomavirus infection causes nephropathy after kidney transplantation but has not been thoroughly investigated in nonrenal organ transplantation.

METHODS

Ninety lung transplant recipients were enrolled, and they provided urine samples for over 4.5 years. Samples were analyzed for BK virus (BKV), JC virus (JCV), and simian virus 40 (SV40) by conventional and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine (66%) patients had polyomavirus detected at least once, including 38 patients (42%) for BKV, 25 patients (28%) for JCV, and six patients (7%) for SV40. Frequency of virus shedding in serial urine samples by patients positive at least once varied significantly among viruses: JCV, 64%; BKV, 48%; and SV40, 14%. Urinary viral loads for BKV (10 copies/mL) and JCV (10 copies/mL) were higher than for SV40 (10 copies/mL; P=0.001 and 0.0003, respectively). Polyomavirus infection was associated with a pretransplant diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio 6.0; P=0.016) but was less common in patients with a history of acute rejection (odds ratio 0.28; P=0.016). SV40 infection was associated with sirolimus-based immunosuppression (P=0.037). Reduced survival was noted for patients with BKV infection (P=0.03). Patients with polyomavirus infection did not have worse renal function than those without infection, but in patients with BKV infection, creatinine clearances were lower at times when viral shedding was detected (P=0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

BKV and JCV were commonly detected in the urine of lung transplant recipients; SV40 was found at low frequency. No definite impact of polyomavirus infection on renal function was documented. BKV infection was associated with poorer survival.

Polyomavirus nephropathy: a current perspective and clinical considerations

During the last decade, the human polyomaviruses (BK virus and, much less commonly, JC virus) have entered the realm of routine clinical decision making for providers caring for kidney transplant recipients. The emergence of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) as an important clinical entity coincided with the development and use of more potent immunosuppression agents, currently the only clear risk factor for reactivation of the virus. Ongoing efforts to define the pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and appropriate management of PVAN have led to a greater ability to prevent and control viral-induced interstitial nephritis despite continued deficiencies in our understanding of risk factors for disease and lack of published prospective polyomavirus-specific antiviral trials. The purpose of this review is to summarize advances made during the last decade and highlight emerging data that address common clinical considerations the clinician currently faces in the understanding and management of PVAN.

Identification and characterization of mefloquine efficacy against JC virus in vitro

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare but frequently fatal disease caused by the uncontrolled replication of JC virus (JCV), a polyomavirus, in the brains of some immunocompromised individuals. Currently, no effective antiviral treatment for this disease has been identified. As a first step in the identification of such therapy, we screened the Spectrum collection of 2,000 approved drugs and biologically active molecules for their anti-JCV activities in an in vitro infection assay. We identified a number of different drugs and compounds that had significant anti-JCV activities at micromolar concentrations and lacked cellular toxicity. Of the compounds with anti-JCV activities, only mefloquine, an antimalarial agent, has been reported to show sufficiently high penetration into the central nervous system such that it would be predicted to achieve efficacious concentrations in the brain. Additional in vitro experiments demonstrated that mefloquine inhibits the viral infection rates of three different JCV isolates, JCV(Mad1), JCV(Mad4), and JCV(M1/SVEDelta), and does so in three different cell types, transformed human glial (SVG-A) cells, primary human fetal glial cells, and primary human astrocytes. Using quantitative PCR to quantify the number of viral copies in cultured cells, we have also shown that mefloquine inhibits viral DNA replication. Finally, we demonstrated that mefloquine does not block viral cell entry; rather, it inhibits viral replication in cells after viral entry. Although no suitable animal model of PML or JCV infection is available for the testing of mefloquine in vivo, our in vitro results, combined with biodistribution data published in the literature, suggest that mefloquine could be an effective therapy for PML.

Viral infection after renal transplantation: surveillance and management

Viral infections remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality following renal transplantation. Although cytomegalovirus is the most common opportunistic pathogen seen in transplant recipients, numerous other viruses have also affected outcomes. In some cases, preventive measures such as pretransplant screening, prophylactic antiviral therapy, or post transplant viral monitoring may limit the impact of these infections. Recent advances in laboratory monitoring and antiviral therapy have improved outcomes. This review will summarize the major viral infections seen following transplant and discuss strategies for prevention and management of these potential pathogens.

Polyomavirus BK versus JC replication and nephropathy in renal transplant recipients: a prospective evaluation

BACKGROUND

JC virus (JCV) viruria is more common than BK virus (BKV) viruria in healthy individuals but in kidney transplants (KT), polyomavirus nephropathy (PVAN) is primarily caused by BKV. Few cases of PVAN have been attributed to JCV. Systematic studies on JCV replication in KT are lacking.

METHODS

Out of a cohort of KT patients screened with urine cytology, patients shedding decoy cells were studied (n=103). Molecular studies demonstrated BKV, JCV, or BKV+JCV shedding in 58 (56.3%), 28 (27.2%), and 17 (16.5%), respectively. Biopsy was performed when decoy cells persisted 2 months or serum creatinine increased >20%.

RESULTS

BKV viruria was strongly associated with BKV viremia (93%), PVAN (48%, P=0.01) and graft loss (P=0.03). Higher BKV viremia correlated with graft dysfunction (P=0.01), more advanced histological pattern of PVAN (P<0.0001), and more infected cells in biopsy (P=0.0001). BKV viremia of > or =10,000 copies/mL was significantly associated with histologically confirmed PVAN (P=0.0001). Reduction of immunosuppression lead to disappearance of decoy cells in patients shedding BK (>93%). JCV viruria, was more often asymptomatic (P=0.002) and affected older patients (P=0.02). JCV PVAN was less common (21.4%) and was characterized by sparse cytopathic changes but significant inflammation and fibrosis. JCV viremia was rare (14.2%), transient, and low (mean 2.0E+03/mL). After reduction of immunosuppression decoy cells persisted in >50% of patients with JCV (P=0.0001), but no graft loss occurred. During the period of the current study, the incidence of BKV-PVAN was 5.5% and the incidence of JCV-PVAN was 0.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The data point to significant differences of BKV and JCV biology regarding replication and disease in KT patients, with important implications for screening and management.

Polyomaviruses and human diseases

Polyomaviruses are small, nonenveloped DNA viruses, which are widespread in nature. In immunocompetent hosts, the viruses remain latent after primary infection. With few exceptions, illnesses associated with these viruses occur in times of immune compromise, especially in conditions that bring about T cell deficiency. The human polyomaviruses BKV and JCV are known to cause, respectively, hemorrhagic cystitis in recipients of bone marrow transplantation and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in immunocompromised patients, for example, by HIV infection. Recently, transplant nephropathy due to BKV infection has been increasingly recognized as the cause for renal allograft failure. Quantitation of polyomavirus DNA in the blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine, identification of virus laden "decoy cells" in urine, and histopathologic demonstration of viral inclusions in the brain parenchyma and renal tubules are the applicable diagnostic methods. Genomic sequences of polyomaviruses have been reported to be associated with various neoplastic disorders and autoimmune conditions. While various antiviral agents have been tried to treat polyomavirus-related illnesses, current management aims at the modification and/or improvement in the hosts' immune status. In this chapter, we provide an overview of polyomaviruses and briefly introduce its association with human diseases, which will be covered extensively in other chapters by experts in the field.

Latent and Productive Polyomavirus Infections of Renal Allografts

Polyomavirus allograft nephropathy, also termed BK virus nephropathy (BKN) after the main causative agent, the polyoma-BK-virus strain, is a major complication following kidney transplantation. BKN is the most common viral infection affecting the renal allograft with a reported prevalence of 1% up to 10%. It often leads to chronic allograft dysfunction and graft loss. BKN is most likely caused by the reactivation of latent BK viruses which, under sustained and intensive immunosuppression, enter a replicative/productive cycle. Viral disease, i.e., BKN, is typically limited to the kidney transplant. It is histologically defined by the presence of intranuclear viral inclusion bodies in epithelial cells and severe tubular injury. Virally induced tubular damage is the morphological correlate for allograft dysfunction. In this chapter, different variants of polyomavirus intranuclear inclusion bodies [types 1 through 4] and adjunct techniques [immunohistochemistry, in-situ hybridization, electron microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)] that are used for proper characterization of disease are described. Special emphasis is placed on the clinical and pathophysiological significance of different histological stages of BKN.

Presence, quantitation and characterization of JC virus in the urine of Italian immunocompetent subjects

Human polyomavirus JC (JCV) infects the worldwide population, remains latent in the kidney, and is excreted in the urine. A longitudinal study was performed in order to evaluate JCV excretion, to characterize molecularly the virus and to determine if its presence in urine is a consequence of viral reactivation or merely of epithelial squamous cell shedding. The presence of cellular sediment and the JCV genome were examined in 333 urine samples collected periodically for 3 months from 17 healthy subjects; molecular characterization, and quantitation of the virus were also undertaken. JCV DNA was detected in 40.2% of the samples, with a significant difference (P<0.001) observed between males and females. JCV shedding was independent of the presence of cellular sediment in every individual. JCV genotype 1 was the genome detected most frequently, while all of the amplified strains showed archetypal organization of the transcriptional control region (TCR). No clinical symptoms have been associated with JCV excretion and no microbial load was detected in the urine samples. The lack of correlation between JCV DNA detection and the presence of squamous cells in urine sediment indicates that viruria is regulated by the life cycle of JCV. Thus, the virus is eliminated as consequence of its reactivation.

Management of infections by the human polyomavirus JC: past, present and future

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy is a fatal demyelinating disease caused by infection of oligodendrocytes by the human polyomavirus known as JC virus. Over the past 10 years, the disease has been documented almost exclusively in AIDS patients, who constitute a rapidly growing population of immunosuppressed individuals. More recently, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy has also been described in patients undergoing solid organ or cell transplant, as a result of immunosuppressive therapy to avoid graft rejection. Although there are several reports of successful treatment of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, large-scale prospective trials have been few, and with mixed results. As more is discovered about the biology of JC virus infection and advances are made in targeted parenchymal delivery of therapeutic agents, there is hope for the development of an effective therapy for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

Molecular epidemiology characterization of the urinary excretion of polyomavirus in healthy individuals from portugal—a Southern European population

The human polyomaviruses--BKV and JCV--are members of Polyomaviridae family and after primary infections they persist as latent infection especially in the kidneys. BKV reactivation is mainly related to urinary tract diseases and JCV reactivation can induce the disease progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. The aim of our study was to characterize the excretion of polyomaviruses in urine samples of healthy individuals from a Portuguese population. We analyzed 498 DNA samples using PCR-RFLP, the sequence amplified consisted in 176 or 173 bp within the antigen T region. Our results indicate that 23.9% of the samples were positive for JCV, 1.8% positive for BKV and 74.3% of the individuals were negative for both viruses. We observed an increased prevalence of JCV shedding in male individuals in comparison to female (P = 0.026). Furthermore, the shedding of both polyomaviruses was influenced by the age of individuals with a significant increase in individuals with more than 56 years old (P = 0.005). Our results show that the shedding of polyomavirus in urine of healthy individuals is highly variable between genders, is influenced by age and differs from region to region. Further studies are needed to evaluate the prevalence of polyomaviruses in healthy individuals, in order to understand the biological behaviour of these viruses.

New commercially available PCR and microplate hybridization assay for detection and differentiation of human polyomaviruses JC and BK in cerebrospinal fluid, serum, and urine samples

JC and BK human polyomaviruses (family Polyomaviridae) may cause severe neurological or urinary tract pathologies in immunocompromised hosts. In the present study, we evaluated a new commercially available PCR and microplate colorimetric hybridization assay for the standardized differential detection of JC virus (JCV) and BK virus (BKV) genomes in clinical samples. This JC/BK Consensus test was first evaluated by testing serial dilutions of JCV or BKV plasmid DNA standards and was then compared with an in-house reference PCR assay for the detection of JC and BK virus genomes in 70 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples of patients with neurological disorders and in 75 serum or plasma samples and 125 urine samples of renal graft recipients. This new test allowed a limit of detection of 10 copies and 1 copy of JC and BK virus genomes, respectively, and was able to differentiate various levels of JCV, BKV, and mixed JCV and BKV DNA genomes in a single reaction tube. Our results showed 100% specificity and sensitivity for the JC/BK Consensus test with CSF samples. With serum or plasma samples, this test had a sensitivity and a specificity of 100% for both JCV and mixed JCV and BKV DNA detection and a sensitivity and a specificity of 100 and 97.8% for BKV DNA detection, respectively. With urine samples, the sensitivity and specificity were 100 and 96.6%, respectively, for JCV DNA detection; 100 and 89.4%, respectively, for BKV DNA detection; and 44.4 and 100%, respectively, for mixed JCV and BKV DNA detection. In conclusion, our data indicate that this new test, the JC/BK Consensus test, is valuable for the sensitive and specific differential detection of single JCV and BKV infections in CSF, serum or plasma, and urine samples. The use of this reliable PCR assay would improve the routine virological diagnosis as well as the clinical care of immunocompromised patients with polyomavirus-related pathologies.

Polyoma virus in pediatric renal transplantation

Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for children with end-stage renal disease. Patient survival and allograft survival have improved with better immunosuppressant regimes to reduce acute allograft rejection but post-transplant infections have been exacerbated. An emerging problematic virus in the past decade is the polyoma virus BKV. The features of BKV including the clinical features in the general and immune compromised population are reviewed and correlated with pediatric studies in the post-transplant population. These features are placed in context with lessons learned about BKV in relevant adult studies.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for the management of human polyomaviruses

Polyomaviruses [BK virus (BKV), JC virus (JCV) and simian virus 40 (SV40)] have been known to be associated with diseases in humans for over thirty years. BKV-associated nephropathy and JCV-induced progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) were for many years rare diseases occurring only in patients with underlying severe impaired immunity. Over the past decade, the use of more potent immunosuppression (IS) in transplantation, and the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) epidemic, have coincided with a significant increase in the prevalence of these viral complications. Prophylactic and therapeutic interventions for human polyomavirus diseases are limited by our current understanding of polyomaviral pathogenesis. Clinical trials are limited by small numbers of patients affected with clinically significant diseases, lack of defined risk factors and disease definitions, no proven effective treatment and the overall significant morbidity and mortality associated with these diseases. This chapter will focus on a review of the current and future research related to therapeutic targets and interventions for polyomavirus-associated diseases.

Molecular genetics of the BK virus

The BK Virus (BKV) genome is a double-stranded, circular DNA molecule with genetic organization similar to other polyomaviruses, and high homology to JC Virus (JCV) and SV40. The archetypal form of BKV noncoding regulatory region (NCRR) is the infectious form of BKV that replicates in the urothelium and is excreted in the urine. Rearranged forms of the NCRR are found in kidney and other tissues often in association with disease. BKV strains can be assigned to genotype/serotype groups based on sequence variation in the VP1 gene. Sequencing of the complete genomes from patient samples will enhance BKV phylogenetic studies and identify genotypic differences and naturally occurring mutations in BKV that may correlate with incidence and/or severity of a disease. This chapter is a review of the molecular genetics of the BK virus in respect to BKV disease.

Quantitative real-time PCR assay for detection of human polyomavirus infection

The human polyomaviruses BK (BKV) and JC (JCV) affect immunosuppressed patients and are associated with urogenital tract (BKV) and CNS disorders (JCV) and in humans, the pathogenic role of the rhesus monkey virus, Simian virus 40 (SV40), is uncertain. These three viruses have somewhat overlapping tissue pathogenicity and detection of all three polyomaviruses is desirable. A broadly targeted, simple, single tube real-time degenerated quantitative PCR (QPCR) technique for detection of JCV, BKV and SV40 DNA was developed. To avoid false positive results, due to contamination with commonly used SV40 T-antigen plasmids, a conserved region of the VP2 gene was targeted. Down to 1-10 copies of target DNA per PCR reaction were detected. The QPCR was compared with a nested PCR on 41 clinical samples (urine, serum and plasma): 24 (58.5%) tested positive by nested PCR, whereas 31 (75.6%) were positive with QPCR. One CSF sample, from a patient with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, was negative with the nested PCR but determined as positive by QPCR. Sera from 24 blood donors were negative with QPCR. The QPCR described had a high sensitivity. Its specificity was confirmed sequencing. The QPCR is simple to perform and is valuable for diagnosis of polyomavirus infection.

A comparative study of BK and JC virus infections in organ transplant recipients

JC virus (JCV) rarely causes kidney disease, whereas BK virus (BKV) is a known cause of viral nephropathy. Existing studies on prevalence of JCV in healthy and transplanted subjects have reported only qualitative detection of viral DNA. We used quantitative PCR (qPCR) to assess JC viral load in transplant recipients and non-immunosuppressed controls, and compared JCV loads to BKV loads. JC viruria was seen in 8/23 (34.7%) controls, 23/103 (22.3%) renal, and 10/44 (22.7%) liver transplant patients. No patient developed JC viremia. BK viruria was seen in 2/23 (8.7%) controls, 36/103 (34.9%) renal, and 7/44 (15.9%) liver transplant patients. BK viremia was seen only in the kidney (8/103 = 7.7%) patients. The mean BKV urinary load was higher in kidney compared to liver patients and controls (4.22E + 07 vs. 2.88E + 05 vs. 4.39E + 02 copies/ml), whereas JC viral load was similar for all three patient groups (1.55E + 06 vs. 2.66E + 06 vs. 2.13E + 06 copies/ml). JCV viral loads were surprisingly high in all patient categories studied, but did not result in viremia or viral nephropathy. Although both BKV and JCV are widely latent in patients accepted for transplantation, concurrent reactivation of both viruses was infrequent. BKV viremia was seen in kidney but not liver recipients. The mechanisms underlying these notable phenomena remain to be investigated.

Detection of polyomavirus BK and JC in children with kidney diseases and renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Reactivation of polyomavirus is a known reason for severe renal dysfunction in adult renal transplant recipients. Testing for polyomavirus DNA in plasma has been described as a sensitive and specific method to discover viral nephropathy in adult patients. We were now interested in polyomavirus status in a pediatric patient setting.

METHODS

Plasma and urine samples were obtained from 80 children including 38 children after renal transplantation (group 1), 7 children with different kidney diseases receiving immunosuppressive treatment (group 2) and 35 children with different kidney diseases not receiving immunosuppressive treatment (group 3). A nested polymerase chain reaction method was used for amplification of polyomavirus DNA fragments. Differentiation between JC and BK virus was done by digestion with restriction endonucleases.

RESULTS

Polyomavirus DNA was detected in the urine sample of 19 of 38 (50%) renal transplant recipients (group 1), of 1 of 7 (14%) patients from group 2 and in none of the 35 patients of group 3. Plasma samples from 3 (8%) of group 1 patients and from 1 child each of group 2 (14%) and group 3 (3%) were tested positive for polyomavirus DNA.

CONCLUSION

Urinary polyomavirus excretion seems to be more frequent in pediatric patients with kidney diseases receiving immunosuppressive treatment and after renal transplantation than in children with various kidney diseases without immunosuppressive treatment.

Co-infection of Polyomavirus-BK and Cytomegalovirus in Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Polyomavirus-BK (BK) is a significant cause of allograft dysfunction in renal transplant recipients. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK infection are thought to be possible risk factors for one another, but no supporting data are yet available.

METHODS

The authors monitored BK and CMV infection by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 69 renal transplant recipients with serum creatinine elevation to determine the prevalence of co-infection. In addition, 150 adult renal transplant recipients were also retrospectively analyzed for both infections.

RESULTS

Of 69 recipients, 12 were plasma BK-PCR-positive. Eight of the 12 showed high BK levels (>10 copies) and BK nephropathy. Six of the 12 were also CMV-PCR-positive compared with only 3 of 57 plasma BK-negative patients (50% vs. 5.3%, P=0.001). Comparatively, the incidence of Epstein-Barr virus infection was similar in both groups (1 of 12 [8.3%] vs. 2 of 57 [3.5%], P =not significant). In addition, retrospective analysis of CMV-PCR-positivity in 150 adult renal transplant recipients showed similar results (5 of 6 in BK-PCR-positive [83%] vs. 8 of 144 in BK-PCR-negative [5.6%], P=0.00001). More plasma BK-PCR-positive patients had concomitant CMV infection than CMV-PCR-positive patients with BK infection (5 of 6 [83%] vs. 4 of 13 [31%], P=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, high plasma BK-positivity (>10) is significantly associated with BK nephropathy. Plasma BK-positivity is highly associated with co-infection of CMV, suggesting possible risk factors for one another. Therefore, detection of either infection strongly suggests the need to monitor for the other. This strategy may lead to the prevention of virus-induced complications by preemptive antiviral therapy in renal allografts.

Viral infection in the renal transplant recipient

Viruses are among the most common causes of opportunistic infection after transplantation and the most important. The risk for viral infection is a function of the specific virus encountered, the intensity of immune suppression used to prevent graft rejection, and other host factors governing susceptibility. Viral infection, both symptomatic and asymptomatic, causes the "direct effects" of invasive disease and "indirect effects," including immune suppression predisposing to other opportunistic infections and oncogenesis. Rapid and sensitive microbiologic assays for many of the common viruses after transplantation have replaced, for the most part, serologic testing and in vitro cultures for the diagnosis of infection. Furthermore, quantitative molecular tests allow the individualization of antiviral therapies for prevention and treatment of infection. This advance is most prominent in the management of cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C viruses. Diagnostic advances have not been accompanied by the development of specific and nontoxic anti-viral agents or effective antiviral vaccines. Vaccines, where available, should be given to patients as early as possible and well in advance of transplantation to optimize the immune response. Studies of viral latency, reactivation, and the cellular effects of viral infection will provide clues for future strategies in prevention and treatment of viral infections.

Polyomavirus nephropathy: morphology, pathophysiology, and clinical management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Viral nephropathies, particularly those caused by polyomaviruses of the BK-virus strain, are serious complications following renal transplantation. The review will highlight the morphological, pathophysiological and clinical aspects of BK-virus nephropathy. New patient management strategies are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate-mofetil promotes the activation of latent BK-virus in the urinary tract and increases the odds ratio for developing BK-virus nephropathy significantly. A productive infection with BK-viruses shows viral replication in tubular epithelial cells and acute tubular injury. BK-virus nephropathy can be further complicated by concurrent acute rejection episodes contributing to graft demise. Risk assessment after transplantation and patient management during ongoing viral nephropathy have undergone revision by the introduction of real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction techniques measuring BK-virus genome load fluctuations in the serum. Treatment strategies for BK-virus nephropathy include not only low-dose immunosuppression but also drugs with antiviral effects: cidofovir and leflunomide. Transient anti-rejection therapy, including anti-lymphocytic preparations, is a therapeutic option in cases of BK-virus nephropathy and concurrent acute rejection. Recent advances in patient management strategies have resulted in markedly improved graft survival. In cases of graft loss due to BK-virus nephropathy, re-transplantation should be considered.

SUMMARY

BK-virus nephropathy is a significant complication following renal transplantation. Recent advances have improved our understanding of the morphological changes, potential risk factors and patient management strategies would be optimized. The availability of quantitative viral load measurements now offers the opportunity for a more accurate and timely clinical intervention.

Polyomavirus nephropathy in kidney transplantation

Polyomavirus nephropathy has become an important complication in kidney transplantation, with a prevalence of 1% to 8%. Unfortunately, the risk factors for polyomavirus nephropathy and renal allograft loss are not well defined. The definitive diagnosis is made through assessment of a kidney transplant biopsy. Recently, noninvasive urine and serum markers have been used to assist in polyomavirus nephropathy diagnosis and monitoring. Primary treatment is immunosuppression reduction, but must be balanced with the risks of rejection. No antiviral treatments for polyomavirus nephropathy have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Although cidofovir has shown in vitro activity against murine polyomaviruses, and has been effective in some patients, it is associated with significant nephrotoxicity. Graft loss due to polyomavirus nephropathy should not be a contraindication to retransplantation; however, experience is limited. This review presents potential risk factors, screening, diagnostic and monitoring methods, therapeutic management, and retransplantation experience for polyomavirus nephropathy.

Polyomavirus infection in pediatric renal transplant recipients: evaluation using a quantitative real-time PCR technique

Polyomavirus infection and related nephropathy is being increasingly recognized as an important cause of allograft dysfunction in adult renal transplant recipients. We prospectively monitored pediatric renal transplant recipients for the presence of BK and JC polyomavirus in urine and blood using a quantitative PCR assay to evaluate the prevalence and clinical relevance of polyomavirus infection in the pediatric renal transplant population. Of 46 pediatric renal recipients who were evaluated, nine (20%) demonstrated isolated BKV viruria, while five (11%) had concomitant BKV viremia and viruria. JCV viruria was found in eight (17%) patients. BKV viremia was associated with a significantly higher urinary BKV viral load: median urinary viral load 1.9 x 10(9) copies/mL (range 6.7 x 10(2)-1.8 x 10(11)) for the group with concomitant viremia and viruria vs. 1.8 x 10(3) copies/mL (range 2.5 x 10(2)-4.5 x 10(6)) for the group with isolated viruria (p < 0.0001). In children that were followed prospectively since their transplantation, the BKV urinary viral load increased markedly before viremia became detectable a few weeks later. None of the patients with JCV viruria or isolated BKV viruria had renal dysfunction. Among the five patients with BKV in both urine and blood, two developed biopsy-proven BKV nephropathy associated with deterioration of the renal function. Management of the BKV nephropathy consisted of reduction of immunosuppression alone or in combination with antiviral treatment with cidofovir. This study shows that polyomavirus infection and related interstitial nephritis is a relevant clinical issue in the pediatric renal transplant population. Monitoring the polyomaviral load in the urine and the blood of the patients using a quantitative PCR technique is a useful tool in the diagnosis and subsequent management of this infection. Even before viremia is present, an important rise in the urinary viral load should draw the attention of the transplant clinician and raise the issue of adapting the immunosuppression.