Impact of a neuroscience intensive care unit on neurosurgical patient outcomes and cost of care: evidence-based support for an intensivist-directed specialty ICU model of care

In-hospital Mortality is Lower in Brain-Injured Patients After Admission to a Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit: A Multi-Center Cohort Study

ObjectiveTo study the impact of dedicated Neuroscience Intensive Care Units (NSU) on clinical outcomes in patients with acute brain injury.DesignRetrospective, multicenter cohort study.Setting172 intensive care units within the United States.PatientsProspectively compiled and maintained a registry of a total of 32,047 brain-injured patients (stroke = AIS, aneurysmal-bleed = SAH, intra-cerebral-hemorrhage = ICH, and traumatic brain injury = TBI) from 2008-2013.MeasurementsExposure of interest was the type of intensive care unit (ICU), divided into NSU and non-NSU (medical = MICU, non-neurosurgical = SICU, trauma = TICU, cardiac = CCU, or mixed). Outcomes of interest were the actual and predicted in-hospital mortality, ICU mortality, ICU length of stay, and ventilator-free days. We calculated the actual and predicted in-hospital mortality using the Cerner Corporation Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV (APACHE Clinical Information System, CIS). We then compared the actual in-hospital mortality against the mortality prediction of the APACHE-IV model based on ICU designation (NSU v. non-NSU). The multivariable model was adjusted for within-hospital effects and known predictors of poor outcomes after brain injury.Main ResultsNational APACHE-IV predicted that in-hospital mortality was higher for NSU admissions than non-NSU admissions (21% v. 19%, p < .0001). However, the actual ICU mortality (10% vs 11%, p < 0.01) and in-hospital mortality (15% vs 16%, p = 0.06) were lower in patients admitted to a NSU as compared to non-NSU. We observed lower ventilator-free days (22 vs 24, p < 0.001) in NSU v. non-NSU. In the multivariable regression analysis adjusted for within-hospital effects, known variables of poor outcome, and the severity of illness APACHE-III score, the in-hospital mortality was lower for NSU admissions (OR, 0.8; 95%CI, 0.7-0.9, p = 0.02) as compared to non-NSU.ConclusionAdmission of critically ill brain-injured patients to dedicated NSUs is associated with lower actual in-hospital mortality. Future iterations of APACHE-IV modeling may need to incorporate NSU designations for calculations of expected mortality among brain-injured patients.

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Reduce Neuroscience ICU Length of Stay

GOAL

Efficient patient flow is critical at Tampa General Hospital (TGH), a large academic tertiary care center and safety net hospital with more than 50,000 discharges and 30,000 surgical procedures per year. TGH collaborated with GE HealthCare Command Center to build a command center (called CareComm) with real-time artificial intelligence (AI) applications, known as tiles, to dynamically streamline patient care operations and throughput. To facilitate patient flow for our neuroscience service line, we partnered with the GE HealthCare Command Center team to configure a Downgrade Readiness Tile (DRT) to expedite patient transfers out of the neuroscience intensive care unit (NSICU) and reduce their length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

As part of an integrated NSICU performance improvement project, our LOS reduction workgroup identified the admission/discharge and transfer process as key metrics. Based on a 90%-plus average capacity, early identification of patients eligible for a downgrade to lower acuity units is critical to maintain flow from the operating rooms and emergency department. Our group identified clinical factors consistent with downgrade readiness as well as barriers preventing transition to the next phase of care. Configuration of an AI-powered model was identified as a mechanism to drive earlier downgrade and reduce LOS in the NSICU. A multidisciplinary ICU LOS reduction steering committee met to determine the criteria, design, and implementation of the AI-powered DRT. As opposed to identifying traditional clinical factors associated with stability for transfer, our working group asked, "What are clinical barriers preventing downgrade?" We identified more than 76 clinical elements from the electronic medical records that are programmed and displayed in real-time with a desired accuracy of over 95%. If no criteria are present, and no bed is requested or assigned, the DRT will report potential readiness for transfer. If three or more criteria are present, the DRT will suggest that the patient is not eligible for transfer.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The DRT was implemented in January 2022 and is used during multidisciplinary rounds (MDRs) and displayed on monitors positioned throughout the NSICU. During MDRs, the bedside nurses present each patient's key information in a standardized manner, after which the DRT is used to recommend or oppose patient transfer. Six months postimplementation period of the DRT and MDRs, the NSICU has seen a 7% or roughly eight-hour reduction in the ICU length of stay (4.15-3.88 days) with a more than three-hour earlier placement of a transfer order. Unplanned returns to the ICU (or bouncebacks) have remained low with no change in the preimplementation rate of 3% within 24 hours. As a result of this success, DRTs are being implemented in the medical ICUs.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

This work is uniquely innovative as it shows AI can be integrated into traditional interdisciplinary rounds and enable accelerated decision-making, continuous monitoring, and real-time alerts. ICU throughput has traditionally relied on direct review of a patient's clinical course executed during clinical rounds. Our methodology adds a dynamic and technologically augmented touchpoint that is available in real time and can prompt a transfer request at any time throughout the day.

Current Challenges in Neurocritical Care: A Narrative Review

Neurocritical care as a field aims to treat patients who are neurologically critically ill due to a variety of pathologies. As a recently developed subspecialty, the field faces challenges, several of which are outlined in this review. The authors discuss aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, status epilepticus, and traumatic brain injury as specific disease processes with opportunities for growth in diagnosis, management, and treatment, as well as disorders of consciousness that can arise as a result of many neurological injuries. They also address logistical challenges, such as the need for specialized resources needed to successfully run a neurosciences intensive care unit (neuro-ICU), the variations in training of those who staff neuro-ICUs, and different interdisciplinary team structures. Although an immense amount of data is collected in the neuro-ICU, leveraging the data for clinical research is an area with room for further innovation. Additionally, developing accurate basic science models for these disease processes is an ongoing area of exploration. Finally, the authors explore psychosocial challenges present in the care of neurologically critically ill patients, including limitations in prognostication and religious and cultural perceptions of brain death.

Incidence and Current Status of Acute Management of Traumatic Brain Injuries in Korea: A National Population-Based Study of 2016-2018

Objective

This study aimed to describe the incidence and status of acute management of traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) in Korea.

Methods

We utilized nationwide administrative data from the National Emergency Department Information System (2016-2018), focusing on patients with TBIs who visited emergency medical centers within 7 days of injury and were treated in neurosurgery.

Results

The study included 117,830 patients, indicating an annual crude incidence of 79.4 TBIs per 100,000 persons. The highest incidence was in the age groups 0-4 and 75-79 years, with men experiencing TBIs more often than women (79.3 vs. 60.4). Traffic accidents were the most common cause (34.2%). Ambulance transport accounted for 65.4% of cases, with a median hospital arrival time of 62 minutes. Only 7.6% of patients were admitted to trauma care units, showing significant regional variations. Craniotomy or craniectomy was performed in 4.8% of cases. Normal discharge occurred in 69.3% of patients, and the overall in-hospital mortality rate was 5.3%, higher in men (3.9% vs. 1.5%).

Conclusion

In Korea, the incidence of TBIs vary by age, sex, and regions. Current status of management of TBIs also differs by regions, especially between metropolitan city and province. Tailored strategies for TBI management are needed based on these differences.

Predictors of mortality at 3 months in patients with skull base tumor resections in a low-income setting

Objective

Globally, skull base tumors are among the most challenging tumors to treat and are known for their significant morbidity and mortality. Hence, this study aimed to identify robust associated factors that contribute to mortality of patients following surgical resection for a variety of skull base tumors at the 3-month follow-up period. This in turn helps devise an evidence-based meticulous treatment strategy and baseline input for quality improvement work.

Methodology

A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing skull base tumor resection was conducted at two large-volume neurosurgery centers in Ethiopia. The categorical variables were expressed in frequencies and percentages. Normal distribution of continuous data was checked by histogram and the Shapiro-Wilk test. Median with interquartile range (IQR) was calculated for skewed data, while mean with standard deviation (SD) was used for normally distributed data. Odds ratio and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) were used to express the result of univariate and multivariate binary logistic analyses, respectively. A p-value <0.005 was considered statistically significant at 95% confidence interval (CI).

Result

The study involved 266 patients. Of this, women accounted for 63.5% of patients. The median age of patients was 37 (±IQR = 17) years while the median size of the tumor in this study was 4.9 (±IQR 1.5) cm. The mean duration of symptoms at time of presentation was 17.3 (±SD = 11.1) months. Meningioma, pituitary adenoma, and craniopharyngioma contributed to 68.4%, 19.2%, and 9% of the skull-based tumors, respectively. Mortality following skull base tumor resection was 21.1%. On multivariable binary logistic regression analysis, intraoperative iatrogenic vascular insult (AOR = 28.76, 95% CI: 6.12-135.08, p = 0.000), intraventricular hemorrhage (AOR = 6.32, 95% CI: 1.19-33.63, p = 0.031), hospital-associated infection (AOR = 6.96, 95% CI: 2.04-23.67, p = 0.002), and extubation time exceeding 24 h (AOR = 12.89, 95% CI: 4.89-40.34, p = 0.000) were statistically significant with 3-month mortality.

Conclusion

Mortality from skull base tumor resection remains high in our setting. Holistic pre-operative surgical planning, meticulous intraoperative execution of procedures, and post-operative dedicated follow-up of patients in a neurointensive care unit alongside quality improvement works on identified risks of mortality are strongly recommended to improve patient outcomes. The urgent need for setup improvement and further training of neurosurgeons is also underscored.

A Narrative Review of Interhospital Transfers for Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Of the 750,000 strokes in the United States every year, 15% patients suffer from hemorrhagic stroke. Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a subtype of hemorrhagic stroke. Despite advances in acute management, patients with hemorrhagic stroke continue to suffer from high mortality and survivors suffer from multidomain impairments in the physical, cognitive, and mental health domains which could last for months to years from their index stroke. Long-term prognosis after ICH is critically dependent on the quality and efficacy of care a patient receives during the acute phase of care. With ongoing care consolidation in stroke systems of care, the number of ICH patients who need to undergo interhospital transfers (IHTs) is increasing. However, the associations between IHT and ICH outcomes have not been well described in literature. In this review, we describe the epidemiology of IHT for ICH, the relationship between IHT and ICH patient outcomes, and proposed improvements to the IHT process to ensure better long-term patient outcomes. Our review indicates that evidence regarding the safety and benefit of IHT for ICH patients is conflicting, with some studies reporting poorer outcomes for transferred patients compared to direct admissions via emergency rooms and other studies showing no effect on outcomes. The American Heart Association guidelines for ICH provide recommendations for timely blood pressure control and anticoagulation reversal to improve patient outcomes. The American Heart Association stroke systems of care guidelines provide recommendations for transfer agreements and but do not provide details on how patients should be managed while undergoing IHT. Large, prospective, and multicenter studies comparing outcomes of IHT patients to direct admissions are necessary to provide more definitive guidance to optimize IHT protocols and aid clinical decision-making.

A quality improvement study on how a simulation model can help decision making on organization of ICU wards

BACKGROUND

Intensive Care Unit (ICU) capacity management is essential to provide high-quality healthcare for critically ill patients. Yet, consensus on the most favorable ICU design is lacking, especially whether ICUs should deliver dedicated or non-dedicated care. The decision for dedicated or non-dedicated ICU design considers a trade-off in the degree of specialization for individual patient care and efficient use of resources for society. We aim to share insights of a model simulating capacity effects for different ICU designs. Upon request, this simulation model is available for other ICUs.

METHODS

A discrete event simulation model was developed and used, to study the hypothetical performance of a large University Hospital ICU on occupancy, rejection, and rescheduling rates for a dedicated and non-dedicated ICU design in four different scenarios. These scenarios either simulate the base-case situation of the local ICU, varying bed capacity levels, potential effects of reduced length of stay for a dedicated design and unexpected increased inflow of unplanned patients.

RESULTS

The simulation model provided insights to foresee effects of capacity choices that should be made. The non-dedicated ICU design outperformed the dedicated ICU design in terms of efficient use of scarce resources.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice to use dedicated ICUs does not only affect the clinical outcome, but also rejection- rescheduling and occupancy rates. Our analysis of a large university hospital demonstrates how such a model can support decision making on ICU design, in conjunction with other operation characteristics such as staffing and quality management.

Prognostic Factors Affecting Postsurgical Outcomes of Adult Patients with Intracranial Meningioma: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To identify the prognostic factors of surgical resection for meningioma and their relationship with patient outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 53 patients (≥16 years), who underwent surgical resection for intracranial meningioma at the King Abdulaziz University Hospital from 2012 to 2022. Data regarding tumor location and size, histopathological type, chief complaint, chief complaint duration, admission date, diagnosis, operation, and discharge date were collected. These data were subjected to univariate and bivariate analyses to investigate the relationship between the postsurgical outcomes of the patients with meningioma and the variables of age at surgery, sex, length of hospitalization, chief complaint, Glasgow outcome score, World Health Organization histopathological classification, body mass index, tumor size, and nature of surgical resection.

RESULTS

The mean age of our study cohort was 49.09 ± 12.64 years, with a female preponderance (75.5%) and mean body mass index of 29.31 ± 5.52 kg/m2. length of hospitalization (mean: 26.92 ± 54.88 days) demonstrated a significant (P = 0.012) impact on prognosis after surgery. In addition, convexity meningiomas (21.2%), which were observed in the maximum number of cases, and mean tumor volume (28.67 ± 48.85 mm) were significantly (P = 0.049) associated with the outcome. Most patients (78.8%) underwent total surgical resection, and histopathological examinations revealed a higher frequency of grade 1 than grade 2 tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Short duration of hospitalization and superficial location of the tumor are associated with optimal outcomes after surgical resection for patients with meningioma.

Demonstration of High Diagnostic Accuracy for Cerebral Ischemia in a Large Academic Hub-and -Spoke Telestroke Network

Objective

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the initial telestroke consultation in a large academic hub-and-spoke telemedicine network.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study includes all patients evaluated for cerebral ischemia through video telestroke consultation in a large academic hub-and-spoke telemedicine network from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020. A detailed chart review was conducted to identify the initial suspected diagnosis and final diagnosis. Cerebral ischemia was defined as acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. All other diagnoses were defined as stroke mimics. Data were organized into continuous and categorical variables. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), and likelihood ratio (LR+) for the telestroke-consultation diagnosis were calculated while using the final diagnosis as the gold standard diagnosis.

Results

A total of 1043 patients met the inclusion criteria. The final diagnosis of cerebral ischemia was made in 63.5% of all patients (539 of the 1043 with acute ischemic stroke,123 of the 1043 with transient ischemic attack). Stroke mimic was diagnosed in 36.5% patients (381 of the 1043). The sensitivity and specificity of telestroke evaluation for diagnosis of cerebral ischemia were 97.1% and 81.4%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 90.1%, and negative predictive value was 94.2%. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 91.4%, with an LR+ of 5.21 and AUC of 0.89.

Conclusion

This study highlights the high diagnostic accuracy of telestroke providers in diagnosing cerebral ischemia. Further research exploring the application of teleneurology in the nonstroke setting and other medical subspecialties is warranted.

A Comparison of Surgery Wait Times and Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay Among Patients with Brain Tumors by Country-Level Income and Healthcare System: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The current study highlights the differences in surgery wait times and postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) for brain tumor patients between high income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and across countries with different payer health systems.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Outcomes of interest were surgery wait time and postoperative LOS.

RESULTS

Fifty-three articles were included totaling 456,432 patients. Five studies discussed surgery wait times and 27 discussed LOS. Three HIC studies reported mean surgery wait time of 4 days (SD not reported), 33 ± 13 days, and 34 ± 39 days, and 2 LMIC studies reported median surgery wait time of 4.6 (1-15) and 50 (13-703) days. Mean LOS was 5.1 days (95% CI: 4.2-6.1 days) from 24 HIC studies and 10.0 days (95% CI: 4.6-15.6 days) from 8 LMIC studies respectively. Mean LOS was 5.0 days (95% CI: 3.9-6.0 days) from countries with mixed payer system, and 7.7 days (95% CI: 4.8-10.5 days) from countries with single payer systems.

CONCLUSIONS

There are limited data on surgery wait-times yet slightly more data on postoperative LOS. Despite a wide range of wait times, mean LOS in brain tumor patients tended to be longer in LMICs than HICs and longer for countries with single payer health systems than mixed payer health systems. Further studies are needed to evaluate surgery wait times and LOS for brain tumor patients more accurately.

Mortality Following Diagnosis of Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage Within an Integrated "Hub-and-Spoke" Neuroscience Care Model: Is Spoke Presentation Noninferior to Hub Presentation?

BACKGROUND

Practice guidelines recommend that patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) be treated in units with acute neuroscience care experience. However, most hospitals in the United States lack this degree of specialization. We sought to examine outcome differences for patients with nontraumatic ICH presenting to centers with and without advanced neuroscience care specialization.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adult patients presenting with nontraumatic ICH between 1/1/2011 and 9/30/2020 across 21 medical centers within Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated care system that employs a "hub-and-spoke" model of neuroscience care in which two centers service as neuroscience "hubs" and the remaining 19 centers service as referral "spokes." Patients presenting to spokes can receive remote consultation (including image review) by neurosurgical or neurointensive care specialists located at hubs. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. We used hierarchical logistic regression, adjusting for ICH score components, comorbidities, and demographics, to test a hypothesis that initial presentation to a spoke medical center was noninferior to hub presentation [defined as an odds ratio (OR) with an upper 95% confidence interval (CI) limit of 1.24 or less].

RESULTS

A total of 6978 patients were included, with 6170 (88%) initially presenting to spoke medical centers. The unadjusted 90-day mortality for patients initially presenting to spoke versus hub medical centers was 32.2% and 32.7%, respectively. In adjusted analysis, presentation to a spoke medical center was neither noninferior nor inferior for 90-day mortality risk (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.84-1.74). Sensitivity analysis excluding patients admitted to general wards or lacking continuous health plan insurance during the follow-up period trended closer to a noninferior result (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.69-1.44).

CONCLUSIONS

Within an integrated "hub-and-spoke" neuroscience care model, the risk of 90-day mortality following initial presentation with nontraumatic ICH to a spoke medical center was not conclusively noninferior compared with initial presentation to a hub medical center. However, there was also no indication that care for selected patients with nontraumatic ICH within medical centers lacking advanced neuroscience specialization resulted in significantly inferior outcomes. This finding may support the safety and efficiency of a "hub-and-spoke" care model for patients with nontraumatic ICH, although additional investigations are warranted.

Intracerebral haemorrhage

Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is a dramatic condition caused by the rupture of a cerebral vessel and the entry of blood into the brain parenchyma. ICH is a major contributor to stroke-related mortality and dependency: only half of patients survive for 1 year after ICH, and patients who survive have sequelae that affect their quality of life. The incidence of ICH has increased in the past few decades with shifts in the underlying vessel disease over time as vascular prevention has improved and use of antithrombotic agents has increased. The pathophysiology of ICH is complex and encompasses mechanical mass effect, haematoma expansion and secondary injury. Identifying the causes of ICH and predicting the vital and functional outcome of patients and their long-term vascular risk have improved in the past decade; however, no specific treatment is available for ICH. ICH remains a medical emergency, with prevention of haematoma expansion as the key therapeutic target. After discharge, secondary prevention and management of vascular risk factors in patients remains challenging and is based on an individual benefit-risk balance evaluation.

Impact of dedicated neuro-anesthesia management on clinical outcomes in glioblastoma patients: A single-institution cohort study

BACKGROUND

Glioblastomas are mostly resected under general anesthesia under the supervision of a general anesthesiologist. Currently, it is largely unkown if clinical outcomes of GBM patients can be improved by appointing a neuro-anesthesiologist for their cases. We aimed to evaluate whether the assignment of dedicated neuro-anesthesiologists improves the outcomes of these patients. We also investigated the value of dedicated neuro-oncological surgical teams as an independent variable in both groups.

METHODS

A cohort consisting of 401 GBM patients who had undergone resection was retrospectively investigated. Primary outcomes were postoperative neurological complications, fluid balance, length-of-stay and overall survival. Secondary outcomes were blood loss, anesthesia modality, extent of resection, total admission costs, and duration of surgery.

RESULTS

320 versus 81 patients were operated under the anesthesiological supervision of a general anesthesiologist and a dedicated neuro-anesthesiologist, respectively. Dedicated neuro-anesthesiologists yielded significant superior outcomes in 1) postoperative neurological complications (early: p = 0.002, OR = 2.54; late: p = 0.003, OR = 2.24); 2) fluid balance (p<0.0001); 3) length-of-stay (p = 0.0006) and 4) total admission costs (p = 0.0006). In a subanalysis of the GBM resections performed by an oncological neurosurgeon (n = 231), the assignment of a dedicated neuro-anesthesiologist independently improved postoperative neurological complications (early minor: p = 0.0162; early major: p = 0.00780; late minor: p = 0.00250; late major: p = 0.0364). The assignment of a dedicated neuro-oncological team improved extent of resection additionally (p = 0.0416).

CONCLUSION

GBM resections with anesthesiological supervision of a dedicated neuro-anesthesiologists are associated with improved patient outcomes. Prospective evidence is needed to further investigate the usefulness of the dedicated neuro-anesthesiologist in different settings.

Clinical impact of physician staffing transition in intensive care units: a retrospective observational study

Background

Intensivists play an essential role in improving the outcomes of critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). The transition of ICU physician staffing from low-intensity ICUs (elective intensivist or no intensivist consultation) to high-intensity ICUs (mandatory intensivist consultation or a closed ICU) improves clinical outcomes. However, whether a transition from high-intensity to low-intensity ICU staffing affects ICU outcomes and quality of care remains unknown.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted to examine the impact of high- versus low-intensity staffing models on all-cause mortality in a suburban secondary community hospital with 400 general beds and 8 ICU beds. The ICU was switched from a high-intensity staffing model (high-former period) to low-intensity staffing in July 2019 (low-mid period) and then back to high-intensity staffing in March 2020 (high-latter period). Patients admitted from the emergency department, general ward, or operating room after emergency surgery were enrolled in these three periods and compared, balancing the predicted mortality and covariates of the patients. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality analyzed using hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazards regression. An interrupted time-series analysis (ITSA) was also conducted to evaluate the effects of events (level change) and time.

Results

There were 962 eligible admissions, of which 251, 213, and 498 occurred in the high-former, low-mid, and high-latter periods, respectively. In the matched group (n = 600), the all-cause mortality rate comparing the high-former period with the low-mid period showed an HR of 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.56, 1.39; p = 0.58] and that comparing the high-latter period with the low-mid period showed an HR of 0.84 [95% CI, 0.54, 1.30; p = 0.43]. The result for comparison between the three periods was p = 0.80. ITSA showed level changes of 4.05% [95% CI, -13.1, 21.2; p = 0.63] when ICU staffing changed from the high-former to the low-mid period and 1.35% [95% CI, -13.8, 16.5; p = 0.86] when ICU staffing changed from the low-mid to the high-latter period.

Conclusion

There was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality among the three ICU staffing periods. This study suggests that low-intensity ICU staffing might not worsen clinical outcomes in the ICU in a medium-sized community hospital. Multiple factors, including the presence of an intensivist, other medical staff, and practical guidelines, influence the prognosis of critically ill patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01905-0.

The necessity for routine intensive care unit admission following elective craniotomy for epilepsy surgery: a retrospective single-center observational study

OBJECTIVE

Traditionally, patients who underwent elective craniotomy for epilepsy surgery are monitored postoperatively in an intensive care unit (ICU) overnight in order to sufficiently respond to potential early postoperative complications. In the present study, the authors investigated the frequency of early postoperative events that entailed ICU monitoring in patients who had undergone elective craniotomy for epilepsy surgery. In a second step, they aimed at identifying pre- and intraoperative risk factors for the development of unfavorable events to distinguish those patients with the need for postoperative ICU monitoring at the earliest possible stage.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective observational cohort study assessing patients with medically intractable epilepsy (n = 266) who had undergone elective craniotomy for epilepsy surgery between 2012 and 2019 at a tertiary care epilepsy center, excluding those patients who had undergone invasive diagnostic approaches and functional hemispherectomy. Postoperative complications were defined as any unfavorable postoperative surgical and/or anesthesiological event that required further ICU therapy within 48 hours following surgery. A multivariate analysis was performed to reveal preoperatively identifiable risk factors for postoperative adverse events requiring an ICU setting.

RESULTS

Thirteen (4.9%) of 266 patients developed early postoperative adverse events that required further postoperative ICU care. The most prevalent event was a return to the operating room because of relevant postoperative intracranial hematoma (5 of 266 patients). Multivariate analysis revealed intraoperative blood loss ≥ 325 ml (OR 6.2, p = 0.012) and diabetes mellitus (OR 9.2, p = 0.029) as risk factors for unfavorable postoperative events requiring ICU therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study revealed routinely collectable risk factors that would allow the identification of patients with an elevated risk of postsurgical complications requiring a postoperative ICU stay following epilepsy surgery. These findings may offer guidance for a stepdown unit admission policy following epilepsy surgical interventions after an external validation of the results.

Implementation of neurocritical care in Thailand

Dedicated neurointensive care units and neurointensivists are rarely available in Thailand, a developing country, despite the high burden of life-threatening neurologic illness, including strokes, post-cardiac arrest brain injury, status epilepticus, and cerebral edema from various etiologies. Therefore, the implementation of neurocritical care is essential to improve patient outcomes. With the resource-limited circumstances, the integration of neurocritical care service by collaboration between intensivists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, and other multidisciplinary care teams into the current institutional practice to take care of critically-ill neurologic patients is more suitable than building a new neurointensive care unit since this approach can promptly be made without reorganization of the hospital system. Providing neurocritical care knowledge to internal medicine and neurology residents and critical care fellows and developing a research system will lead to sustainable quality improvement in patient care. This review article will describe our current situation and strategies to implement neurocritical care in Thailand.

Association of Neurocritical Care Services With Mortality and Functional Outcomes for Adults With Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Neurocritical care (NCC) aims to improve the outcomes of critically ill patients with brain injury, although the benefits of such subspecialized care are yet to be determined.

Objective

To evaluate the association of NCC with patient-centered outcomes in adults with acute brain injury who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). The protocol was preregistered on PROSPERO (CRD42020177190).

Data Sources

Three electronic databases were searched (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from inception through December 15, 2021, and by citation chaining.

Study Selection

Studies were included for interventions of neurocritical care units (NCCUs), neurointensivists, or NCC consulting services compared with general care in populations of neurologically ill adults or adults with acute brain injury in ICUs.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data extraction was performed in keeping with PRISMA guidelines and risk of bias assessed through the ROBINS-I Cochrane tool by 2 independent reviewers. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at longest follow-up until 6 months. Secondary outcomes were ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and functional outcomes. Data were measured as risk ratio (RR) if dichotomous or standardized mean difference if continuous. Subgroup analyses were performed for disease and models of NCC delivery.

Results

After 5659 nonduplicated published records were screened, 26 nonrandomized observational studies fulfilled eligibility criteria. A meta-analysis of mortality outcomes for 55 792 patients demonstrated a 17% relative risk reduction (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75-0.92; P = .001) in those receiving subspecialized care (n = 27 061) compared with general care (n = 27 694). Subgroup analyses did not identify subgroup differences. Eight studies including 4667 patients demonstrated a 17% relative risk reduction (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70-0.97; P = .03) for an unfavorable functional outcome with subspecialized care compared with general care. There were no differences in LOS outcomes. Heterogeneity was substantial in all analyses.

Conclusions and Relevance

Subspecialized NCC is associated with improved survival and functional outcomes for critically ill adults with brain injury. However, confidence in the evidence is limited by substantial heterogeneity. Further investigations are necessary to determine the specific aspects of NCC that contribute to these improved outcomes and its cost-effectiveness.

Quality Improvement in Neurocritical Care: a Review of the Current Landscape and Best Practices

Purpose of Review

The field of neurocritical care (NCC) has grown such that there is now a substantial body of literature on quality improvement specific to NCC. This review will discuss the development of this literature over time and highlight current best practices with practical tips for providers.

Recent Findings

There is tremendous variability in patient care models for NCC patients, despite evidence showing that certain structural elements are associated with better outcomes. There now also exist evidence-based recommendations for neurocritical care unit (NCCU) structure and processes, as well as NCC-specific performance measure (PM) sets; however, awareness of these is variable among care providers. The evidence-based literature on NCC structure, staffing, training, standardized order sets and bundles, transitions of care including handoff, prevention of bounce backs, bed flow optimization, and inter-hospital transfers is growing and offers many examples of successful performance improvement initiatives in NCCUs.

Summary

NCC providers care for patients with life-threatening conditions like intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhages, ischemic stroke, and traumatic brain injury, which are associated with high morbidity, complexity of treatment, and cost. Quality improvement initiatives have been successful in improving many aspects of NCC patient care, and NCC providers should continue to update and standardize their practices with consideration of this data. More research is needed to continue to identify high-risk and high-cost NCCU structures and processes and strategies to optimize them, validate current NCC PMs, and encourage clinical adoption of those that prove to be associated with improved outcomes.

Variability in intensive care utilization for intracerebral hemorrhage in the United States: Retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

There are urban-rural geographic health disparities in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) outcomes. However, there is limited data regarding the relationship between intensive care (ICU) availability and ICH outcomes. We examined whether ICU availability was a significant contributor to ICH outcomes by US geographic region.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used de-identified Medicare inpatient datasets from January 2016 to December 2019 and identified all index ICH admissions, stratifying by ICU care received during the hospitalization. Distributions of teaching hospital status, quartile of ICH volume, hospital urban-rural designation, and ICU availability were obtained using chi-square test. Propensity-score matching was utilized to compare outcomes of more favorable outcome, inpatient mortality, and 30-day all-cause readmissions by ICU availability at each hospital.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 119,891 hospitalizations for ICH, 66,306 (55.3%) received ICU-level care. Of hospitals that treated at least one ICH, 42.6% did not provide ICU level care for any ICH admission during the study period. Teaching hospitals (48.0% vs 7.0%; p<0.0001), hospitals with higher ICH case volumes (p<0.0001) and in larger metropolitan areas (p<0.0001) were more likely to have an ICU available. Propensity score-matched models showed that hospital ICU availability was associated with a lower likelihood of inpatient mortality (29.4% vs 33.7%; p=0.0016) CONCLUSIONS: Rural-urban disparities in ICH outcomes are likely multifactorial, but ICU availability likely contributes to the disparity. Additional studies are necessary to elucidate other contributing mechanisms.

Primary versus early secondary referral to a specialized neurotrauma center in patients with moderate/severe traumatic brain injury: a CENTER TBI study

Background

Prehospital care for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) varies with some emergency medical systems recommending direct transport of patients with moderate to severe TBI to hospitals with specialist neurotrauma care (SNCs). The aim of this study is to assess variation in levels of early secondary referral within European SNCs and to compare the outcomes of directly admitted and secondarily transferred patients.

Methods

Patients with moderate and severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale < 13) from the prospective European CENTER-TBI study were included in this study. All participating hospitals were specialist neuroscience centers. First, adjusted between-country differences were analysed using random effects logistic regression where early secondary referral was the dependent variable, and a random intercept for country was included. Second, the adjusted effect of early secondary referral on survival to hospital discharge and functional outcome [6 months Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE)] was estimated using logistic and ordinal mixed effects models, respectively.

Results

A total of 1347 moderate/severe TBI patients from 53 SNCs in 18 European countries were included. Of these 1347 patients, 195 (14.5%) were admitted after early secondary referral. Secondarily referred moderate/severe TBI patients presented more often with a CT abnormality: mass lesion (52% vs. 34%), midline shift (54% vs. 36%) and acute subdural hematoma (77% vs. 65%). After adjusting for case-mix, there was a large European variation in early secondary referral, with a median OR of 1.69 between countries. Early secondary referral was not associated with functional outcome (adjusted OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.78–1.69), nor with survival at discharge (1.05, 0.58–1.90).

Conclusions

Across Europe, substantial practice variation exists in the proportion of secondarily referred TBI patients at SNCs that is not explained by case mix. Within SNCs early secondary referral does not seem to impact functional outcome and survival after stabilisation in a non-specialised hospital. Future research should identify which patients with TBI truly benefit from direct transportation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-021-00930-1.

Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Review of the Pathophysiology and Management Strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage remains a devastating disease process despite medical advances made over the past 3 decades. Much of the focus was on prevention and treatment of vasospasm to reduce delayed cerebral ischemia and improve outcome. In recent years, there has been a shift of focus onto early brain injury as the precursor to delayed cerebral ischemia. This review will focus on the most recent data surrounding the pathophysiology of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and current management strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a paucity of successful trials in the management of subarachnoid hemorrhage likely related to the targeting of vasospasm. Pathophysiological changes occurring at the time of aneurysmal rupture lead to early brain injury including cerebral edema, inflammation, and spreading depolarization. These events result in microvascular collapse, vasospasm, and ultimately delayed cerebral ischemia. Management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage has remained the same over the past few decades. No recent trials have resulted in new treatments. However, our understanding of the pathophysiology is rapidly expanding and will advise future therapeutic targets.

Iatrogenic hand trauma in institutionalized brain-injured patients: About 2 cases

The objective of this work was to draw the attention of caretakers for institutionalized brain-injured patients to the risk of iatrogenic trauma associated with improper manipulation of the fingers during hand opening for grooming. Two clinical cases of chronic open dislocation of the thumb and the fifth finger in institutionalized brain-injured patients were reviewed. Interrogation of the patients and their relatives did not reveal either the date or the mechanism of the injury. In the light of these two cases, it appears that better training of caretakers should make it possible to avoid iatrogenic trauma during hygiene care of institutionalized brain-injured patients.

Postoperative Admission of Adult Craniotomy Patients to the Neuroscience Ward Reduces Length of Stay and Cost

BACKGROUND

The neurointensive care unit (NICU) has traditionally been the default recovery unit after elective craniotomies.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether admitting adult patients without significant comorbidities to the neuroscience ward (NW) instead of NICU for recovery resulted in similar clinical outcome while reducing length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization cost.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and cost data of adult patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy at a university hospital within a 5-yr period who had a LOS less than 7 d. We compared those admitted to the NICU for 1 night of recovery versus those directly admitted to the NW.

RESULTS

The NICU and NW groups included 340 and 209 patients, respectively, and were comparable in terms of age, ethnicity, overall health, and expected LOS. NW admissions had shorter LOS (3.046 vs 3.586 d, P < .001), and independently predicted shorter LOS in multivariate analysis. While the NICU group had longer surgeries (6.8 vs 6.4 h), there was no statistically significant difference in the cost of surgery. The NW group was associated with reduced hospitalization cost by $3193 per admission on average (P < .001). Clinically, there were no statistically significant differences in the rate of return to Operating Room, Emergency Department readmission, or hospital readmission within 30 d.

CONCLUSION

Admitting adult craniotomy patients without significant comorbidities, who are expected to have short LOS, to NW was associated with reduced LOS and total cost of admission, without significant differences in postoperative clinical outcome.

Triage of Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage to Comprehensive Versus Primary Stroke Centers

OBJECTIVES

The management of patients admitted with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) mostly occurs in an ICU. While guidelines recommend initial treatment of these patients in a neurocritical care or stroke unit, there is limited data on which patients would benefit most from transfer to a comprehensive stroke center where on-site neurosurgical coverage is available 24/7. As neurocritical units become more common in primary stroke centers, it is important to determine which patients are most likely to require neurosurgical intervention and transfer to comprehensive stroke centers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective observational cohort study conducted at an academic comprehensive stroke center in the United States. Four-hundred-fifty-nine consecutive patients transferred or directly admitted to the neurocritical care unit from 2016-2018 with the primary diagnosis of ICH were included. Univariate statistics and multivariate regression were used to identify clinical characteristics associated with neurosurgical intervention, defined as undergoing craniotomy, ventriculostomy, or endovascular embolization of an arteriovenous malformation (AVM).

RESULTS

The following variables were associated with neurosurgical intervention in multivariate analysis: age (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.27-0.55), admission Glasgow Coma Scale (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.18-0.48), the presence of intraventricular hemorrhage (OR 2.82, CI 1.71-4.65), infratentorial location of ICH (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.20-4.31), previous antiplatelet use (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.24-3.34), and an AVM indicated on CT Angiogram (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.19-5.63) were independently associated with the need for neurosurgical intervention. This was translated into a scoring system to help make quick triage decisions, with high sensitivity (99%, 95% CI 97-99%) and negative predictive value (98%, 95% CI 89-99%).

CONCLUSIONS

Using previously well described predictors of severity in ICH patients, we were able to develop a scoring system to predict the need for neurosurgical intervention with high sensitivity and negative predictive value.

A Perspective from the Neurocritical Care Society and the Society of Critical Care Medicine: Team-Based Care for Neurological Critical Illness

The Neurocritical Care Society and the Society of Critical Care Medicine have worked together to create a perspective regarding the Standards of Neurologic Critical Care Units (Moheet et al. in Neurocrit Care 29:145-160, 2018). The most neurologically ill or injured patients warrant the highest standard of care available; this supports the need for defining and establishing specialized neurological critical care units. Rather than interpreting the Standards as being exclusionary, it is most appropriate to embrace them in the setting of team-based care. Since there are many more patients than there are highly specialized beds, collaborative care and appropriate transfer agreements are essential in promoting excellent patient outcomes. This viewpoint addresses areas of clarification and emphasizes the need for collegiality and partnership in delivering the best specialty critical care to our patients.

Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Distribution, Service Delivery, and Staffing in the United States in 2018

OBJECTIVES

To assess the distribution, service delivery, and staffing of pediatric cardiac intensive care in the United States.

DESIGN

Based on a 2016 national PICU survey, and verified through online searching and clinician networking, medical centers were identified with a separate cardiac ICU or mixed ICU. These centers were sent a structured web-based survey up to four times, with follow-up by mail and phone for nonresponders.

SETTING

Cardiac ICUs were defined as specialized units, specifically for the treatment of children with life-threatening primary cardiac conditions. Mixed ICUs were defined as separate units, specifically for the treatment of children with life-threatening conditions, including primary cardiac disease.

PARTICIPANTS

Cardiac ICU or mixed ICU physician medical directors or designees.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

One-hundred twenty ICUs were identified: 61 (51%) were mixed ICUs and 59 (49%) were cardiac ICUs. Seventy five percent of institutions at least sometimes used a neonatal ICU prior to surgery. The most common temporary cardiac support beyond extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was a centrifugal pump such as Centrimag. Durable cardiac support devices were far more common in separate cardiac ICUs (84% vs 20%; p < 0.0001). Significantly less availability of electrophysiology, heart failure, and cardiac anesthesia consultation was available in mixed ICUs (p = 0.0003, p < 0.0001, p = 0.042 respectively). ICU attending physicians were in-house day and night 98% of the time in mixed ICUs and 87% of the time in cardiac ICUs. Nurse practitioners were consistent front-line providers in the ICUs caring for children with primary cardiac disease staffing 88% of cardiac ICUs and 56% of mixed ICUs. Mixed ICUs were more commonly staffed with pediatric residents, and critical care fellows were found in more cardiac ICUs (83% vs 77%; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Mixed ICUs and cardiac ICUs have statistically different staffing models and available services. More evaluation is needed to understand how this may impact patient outcomes and training programs of physicians and nurses.

Impact on Patient Outcomes of Pharmacist Participation in Multidisciplinary Critical Care Teams: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effects of including critical care pharmacists in multidisciplinary ICU teams on clinical outcomes including mortality, ICU length of stay, and adverse drug events.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, and references from previous relevant systematic studies.

STUDY SELECTION

We included randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies that reported clinical outcomes such as mortality, ICU length of stay, and adverse drug events in groups with and without critical care pharmacist interventions.

DATA EXTRACTION

We extracted study details, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

From the 4,725 articles identified as potentially eligible, 14 were included in the analysis. Intervention of critical care pharmacists as part of the multidisciplinary ICU team care was significantly associated with the reduced likelihood of mortality (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.83; p < 0.00001) compared with no intervention. The mean difference in ICU length of stay was -1.33 days (95% CI, -1.75 to -0.90 d; p < 0.00001) for mixed ICUs. The reduction of adverse drug event prevalence was also significantly associated with multidisciplinary team care involving pharmacist intervention (odds ratio for preventable and nonpreventable adverse drug events, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15-0.44; p < 0.00001 and odds ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28-0.77; p = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Including critical care pharmacists in the multidisciplinary ICU team improved patient outcomes including mortality, ICU length of stay in mixed ICUs, and preventable/nonpreventable adverse drug events.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of methamphetamine-associated versus non-methamphetamine intracerebral hemorrhage

Methamphetamine use has emerged as a risk factor for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We aim to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of methamphetamine-associated ICH (Meth-ICH) versus Non-Meth-ICH. Patients with ICH between January 2011 and December 2017 were studied. Meth-ICH and Non-Meth-ICH were defined by history of abuse and urine drug screen (UDS). The clinical features of the 2 groups were explored. Among the 677 consecutive patients, 61 (9.0%) were identified as Meth-ICH and 350 as Non-Meth ICH. Meth-ICH was more common in Hispanics (14.6%) and Whites (10.1%) as compared to Asians (1.2%). Patients with Meth-ICH were more often younger (51.2 vs. 62.2 years, p < 0.001), male (77.0% vs. 61.4.0%, p < 0.05), and smokers (44.3% vs. 13.4%, p < 0.001). Non-Meth-ICH was more likely to have history of hypertension (72.61% v. 59%, p < 0.05) or antithrombotic use (10.9% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in clinical severity, hospital length of stay (LOS), rate of functional independence (29.5% vs. 25.7%, p = 0.534), or mortality (18.0% vs. 24.6%, p = 0.267) between the 2 groups. Methamphetamine use was not an independent predictor of poor outcome. Despite difference in demographics, Meth-ICH is similar to Non-Meth ICH in hospital course and outcome.

Management of severe thermal burns in the acute phase in adults and children

OBJECTIVES

To provide recommendations to facilitate the management of severe thermal burns during the acute phase in adults and children.

DESIGN

A committee of 20 experts was asked to produce recommendations in six fields of burn management, namely, (1) assessment, admission to specialised burns centres, and telemedicine; (2) haemodynamic management; (3) airway management and smoke inhalation; (4) anaesthesia and analgesia; (5) burn wound treatments; and (6) other treatments. At the start of the recommendation-formulation process, a formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed and enforced throughout the process. The entire process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The experts drew up a list of questions that were formulated according to the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes). Two bibliography experts per field analysed the literature published from January 2000 onwards using predefined keywords according to PRISMA recommendations. The quality of data from the selected literature was assessed using GRADE® methodology. Due to the current paucity of sufficiently powered studies regarding hard outcomes (i.e. mortality), the recommendations are based on expert opinion.

RESULTS

The SFAR guidelines panel generated 24 statements regarding the management of acute burn injuries in adults and children. After two scoring rounds and one amendment, strong agreement was reached for all recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Substantial agreement was reached among a large cohort of experts regarding numerous strong recommendations to optimise the management of acute burn injuries in adults and children.

Neurocritical Care Outcomes, Research, and Technology: A Review

Importance

Neurocritical care has grown into an organized specialty that may have consequences for patient care, outcomes, research, and neurointensive care (neuroICU) technology.

Observations

Neurocritical care improves care and outcomes of the patients who are neurocritically ill, and neuroICUs positively affect the financial state of health care systems. The development of neurocritical care as a recognized subspecialty has fostered multidisciplinary research, neuromonitoring, and neurocritical care information technology, with advances and innovations in practice and progress.

Conclusions and Relevance

Neurocritical care has become an important part of health systems and an established subspecialty of neurology. Understanding its structure, scope of practice, consequences for care, and research are important.

Impact of Neurointensivist Co-Management in a Semiclosed Neurocritical-Care Unit

Background and Purpose

The importance of the specialized management of neurocritical patients is being increasingly recognized. We evaluated the impact of neurointensivist comanagement on the clinical outcomes (particularly the mortality rate) of neurocritical patients admitted to a semiclosed neurocritical-care unit (NCU).

Methods

We retrospectively included neurocritical patients admitted to the NCU between March 2015 and February 2018. We analyzed the clinical data and compared the outcomes between patients admitted before and after the initiation of neurointensivist co-management in March 2016.

Results

There were 1,785 patients admitted to the NCU during the study period. Patients younger than 18 years (n=28) or discharged within 48 hours (n=200) were excluded. The 1,557 remaining patients comprised 590 and 967 who were admitted to the NCU before and after the initiation of co-management, respectively. Patients admitted under neurointensivist co-management were older and had higher Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores. The 30-day mortality rate was significantly lower after neurointensivist co-management (p=0.042). A multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that neurointensivist co-management significantly reduced mortality rates in the NCU and in the hospital overall [odds ratio=0.590 (p=0.002) and 0.585 (p=0.001), respectively].

Conclusions

Despite the higher severity of the condition during neurointensivist co-management, co-management significantly improved clinical outcomes (including the mortality rate) in neurocritical patients.

Socioeconomic restraints and brain tumor surgery in low-income countries

Healthcare spending has become a grave concern to national budgets worldwide, and to a greater extent in low-income countries. Brain tumors are a serious disease that affects a significant percentage of the population, and thus proper allocation of healthcare provisions for these patients to achieve acceptable outcomes is a must. The authors reviewed patients undergoing craniotomy for tumor resection at their institution for the preceding 3 months. All the methods used for preoperative planning, intraoperative management, and postoperative care of these patients were documented. Compromises to limit spending were made at each stage to limit expenditure, including low-resolution MRI, sparse use of intraoperative monitoring and image guidance, and lack of dedicated postoperative neurocritical ICU. This study included a cohort of 193 patients. The average cost from diagnosis to discharge was $1795 per patient (costs are expressed in USD). On average, there was a mortality rate of 10.5% and a neurological morbidity rate of 14%, of whom only 82.2% improved on discharge or at follow-up. The average length of stay at the hospital for these patients was 9.09 days, with a surgical site infection rate of only 3.5%. The authors believe that despite the great number of financial limitations facing neurosurgical practice in low-income countries, surgery can still be performed with reasonable outcomes.

Racial/ethnic disparities in hospital utilization in intracerebral hemorrhage

Background and purpose

There is evidence that racial and ethnic differences among intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients exist. We sought to establish the occurrence of disparities in hospital utilization in the United States.

Methods

We identified ICH patients from United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample database for years 2006–2014 using codes (DX1 = 431, 432.0) from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition. We compared five race/ethnic categories: White, Black, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, and Others ( Native American and other) with regard to demographics, comorbidities, disease severity, in-hospital complications, in-hospital procedures, length of stay (LOS), total hospital charges, in-hospital mortality, palliative care, (PC) and do not resuscitate (DNR). We categorized procedures as lifesaving (i.e. ventriculostomy, craniotomy, craniectomy, and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt), life sustaining (i.e. mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, transfusions, and gastrostomy). White race/ethnicity was set as the reference group.

Results

Out of 710,293 hospitalized patients with ICH 470,539 (66.2%), 114,821 (16.2%), 66,451 (9.3%), 30,297 (4.3%) and 28,185 (3.9%) were White, Black, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, and Others, respectively. Minorities (Black, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, and Others) had a higher rate of in-hospital complications, in-hospital procedures, mean LOS, and hospital charges compared to Whites. In contrast, Whites had a higher rate of in-hospital mortality, PC, and DNR. In multivariable analysis, all minorities had higher rate of MV, tracheostomy, transfusions, and gastrostomy compared to Whites, while Hispanics had higher rate of craniectomy and VP shunt; and Asian or Pacific Islander and Others had higher rate of craniectomy. Whites had a higher rate of in-hospital mortality, palliative care, and DNR compared to minorities. In mediation analysis, in-hospital mortality for whites remained high after adjusting with PC and DNR.

Conclusion

Minorities had greater utilization of lifesaving and life sustaining procedures, and longer LOS. Whites had greater utilization of palliative care, hospice, and higher in-hospital mortality. These results may reflect differences in culture or access to care and deserve further study.

ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY AND CHRONIC HEALTH EVALUATION (APACHE) II SCORE - THE CLINICAL PREDICTOR IN NEUROSURGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

The APACHE II scoring system is approved for its benchmarking and mortality predictions, but there are only a few articles published to demonstrate it in neurosurgical patients. Therefore, this study was performed to acknowledge this score and its predictive performance to hospital mortality in a tertiary referral neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU). All patients admitted to the Neurosurgical ICU from February 1 to July 31, 2011 were recruited. The parameters indicated in APACHE II score were collected. The adjusted predicted risk of death was calculated and compared with the death rate observed. Descriptive statistics including the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was performed. The results showed that 276 patients were admitted during the mentioned period. The APACHE II score was 16.56 (95% CI, 15.84-17.29) and 19.08 (95% CI, 15.40-22.76) in survivors and non-survivors, while the adjusted predicted death rates were 13.39% (95% CI, 11.83-14.95) and 17.49% (95% CI, 9.81-25.17), respectively. The observed mortality was only 4.35%. The area under the ROC of APACHE II score to the hospital mortality was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.44-0.79). In conclusion, not only the APACHE II score in neurosurgical patients indicated low severity, but its performance to predict hospital mortality was also inferior. Additional studies of predicting mortality among these critical patients should be undertaken.

Can trauma surgeons keep up? A prospective cohort study comparing outcomes between patients with traumatic brain injury cared for in a trauma versus neuroscience intensive care unit

Background

Although many patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are admitted to trauma intensive care units (ICUs), some question whether outcomes would improve if their care was provided in neurocritical care units. We sought to compare characteristics and outcomes of patients with TBI admitted to and cared for in a trauma versus neuroscience ICU.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study of adult (≥18 years of age) blunt trauma patients with TBI admitted to a trauma versus neuroscience ICU between May 2015 and December 2016. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate an adjusted odds ratio (OR) comparing 30-day mortality between cohorts.

Results

In total, 548 patients were included in the study, including 207 (38%) who were admitted to the trauma ICU and 341 (62%) to the neuroscience ICU. When compared with neuroscience ICU admissions, patients admitted to the trauma ICU were more likely to have sustained their injuries from a high-speed mechanism (71% vs. 34%) and had a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) (median 25 vs. 16) despite a similar head Abbreviated Injury Scale score (3 vs. 3, p=0.47) (all p<0.05). Trauma ICU patients also had a lower initial Glasgow Coma Scale score (5 vs. 15) and systolic blood pressure (128 mm Hg vs. 136 mm Hg) and were more likely to have fixed or unequal pupils at admission (13% vs. 8%) (all p<0.05). After adjusting for age, ISS, a high-speed mechanism of injury, fixed or unequal pupils at admission, and field intubation, the odds of 30-day mortality was 70% lower among patients admitted to the trauma versus neuroscience ICU (adjusted OR=0.30, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.82).

Conclusions

Despite a higher injury burden and worse neurological examination and hemodynamics at presentation, patients admitted to the trauma ICU had a lower adjusted 30-day mortality. This finding may relate to improved care of associated injuries in trauma versus neuroscience ICUs.

Level of evidence

Prospective comparative study, level II.

Immunosenescence in neurocritical care

BACKGROUND

Several advanced and developing countries are now entering a superaged society, in which the percentage of elderly people exceeds 20% of the total population. In such an aging society, the number of age-related diseases such as malignant tumors, diabetes, and severe infections including sepsis is increasing, and patients with such disorders often find themselves in the ICU.

MAIN BODY

Age-related diseases are closely related to age-induced immune dysfunction, by which reductions in the efficiency and specificity of the immune system are collectively termed "immunosenescence." The most noticeable is a decline in the antigen-specific acquired immune response. The exhaustion of T cells in elderly sepsis is related to an increase in nosocomial infections after septicemia, and even death over subacute periods. Another characteristic is that senescent cells that accumulate in body tissues over time cause chronic inflammation through the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, termed senescence-associated secretory phenotype. Chronic inflammation associated with aging has been called "inflammaging," and similar age-related diseases are becoming an urgent social problem.

CONCLUSION

In neuro ICUs, several neuro-related diseases including stroke and sepsis-associated encephalopathy are related to immunosenescence and neuroinflammation in the elderly. Several advanced countries with superaged societies face the new challenge of improving the long-term prognosis of neurocritical patients.

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Systems of Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

The American Heart Association previously recommended implementation of cardiac resuscitation systems of care that consist of interconnected community, emergency medical services, and hospital efforts to measure and improve the process of care and outcome for patients with cardiac arrest. In addition, the American Heart Association proposed a national process to develop and implement evidence-based guidelines for cardiac resuscitation systems of care. Significant experience has been gained with implementing these systems, and new evidence has accumulated. This update describes recent advances in the science of cardiac resuscitation systems and evidence of their effectiveness, as well as recent progress in dissemination and implementation throughout the United States. Emphasis is placed on evidence published since the original recommendations (ie, including and since 2010).

Intensive Care Unit Admission for Patients in the INTERACT2 ICH Blood Pressure Treatment Trial: Characteristics, Predictors, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Wide variation exists in criteria for accessing intensive care unit (ICU) facilities for managing patients with critical illnesses such as acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We aimed to determine the predictors of admission, length of stay, and outcome for ICU among participants of the main Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Trial (INTERACT2).

METHODS

INTERACT2 was an international, open, blinded endpoint, randomized controlled trial of 2839 ICH patients (<6 h) and elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) allocated to receive intensive (target SBP <140 mmHg within 1 h) or guideline-recommended (target SBP <180 mmHg) BP-lowering treatment. The primary outcome was death or major disability, defined by modified Rankin scale scores 3-6 at 90 days. Logistic regression and propensity score analyses were used to determine independent associations.

MAIN RESULTS

Predictors of ICU admission included younger age, recruitment in China, prior ischemic/undetermined stroke, high SBP, severe stroke [National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score ≥15], large ICH volume (≥15 mL), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) extension, early neurological deterioration, intubation and surgery. Determinants of prolonged ICU stay (≥5 days) were prior antihypertensive use, NIHSS ≥15, large ICH volume, lobar ICH location, IVH, early neurological deterioration, intubation and surgery. ICU admission was associated with higher-risk major disability at 90-day assessment compared to those without ICU admission.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents prognostic variables for ICU management and outcome of ICH patients included in a large international cohort. These data may assist in the selection and counseling of patients and families concerning ICU admission.

Interhospital Transfer of Neurosurgical Patients: Implications of Timing on Hospital Course and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Interhospital transfer of neurosurgical patients is common; however, little is known about the impact of transfer parameters on clinical outcomes. Lower survival rates have been reported for patients admitted at night and on weekends in other specialties. Whether time or day of admission affects neurosurgical patient outcomes, specifically those transferred from other facilities, is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of the timing of interhospital transfer on the hospital course and clinical outcomes of neurosurgical patients.

METHODS

All consecutive admissions of patients transferred to our adult neurosurgical service were retrospectively analyzed for a 1-year study period using data from a central transfer database and the electronic health record.

RESULTS

Patients arrived more often at night (70.8%) despite an even distribution of transfer requests. The lack of transfer imaging did not affect length of stay, intervention times, or patient outcomes. Daytime arrivals had shorter total transfer time, but longer intenstive care unit and overall length of stay (8.7 and 11.6 days, respectively), worse modified Rankin Scale scores, lower rates of functional independence, and almost twice the mortality rate. Weekend admissions had significantly worse modified Rankin Scale scores and lower rates of functional independence.

CONCLUSIONS

The timing of transfer arrivals, both by hour or day of the week, is correlated with the time to intervention, hospital course, and overall patient outcomes. Patients admitted during the weekend suffered worse functional outcomes and a trend towards increased mortality. While transfer logistics clearly impact patient outcomes, further work is needed to understand these complex relationships.