High-dose/activation-associated tolerance model for allografts: lessons from spontaneous tolerance of transplanted livers:

Transfer of Allograft Specific Tolerance Requires CD4+CD25+T Cells but Not Interleukin-4 or Transforming Growth Factor–β and Cannot Induce Tolerance to Linked Antigens

BACKGROUND

The mechanisms by which CD4+T cells, especially CD4+ CD25+T cells, transfer allograft specific tolerance are poorly defined. The role of cytokines and the effect on antigen-presenting cells is not resolved.

METHODS

Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy induced tolerance to PVG heterotopic cardiac transplantation in DA rats. Peripheral CD4+T cells or CD4+ CD25+ and CD4+ CD25-T cell subsets were adoptively transferred to irradiated DA hosts grafted with PVG heart grafts. For specificity studies, tolerant CD4+T cells were transferred to hosts with Lewis or (PVGxLewis)F1 heart grafts. Cytokine mRNA induction and the requirement for interleukin (IL)-4 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta in the transfer of tolerance was assessed.

RESULTS

CD4+T cells transferred specific tolerance and suppressed naïve CD4+T cells capacity to effect rejection of PVG but not Lewis grafts. (PVGxLewis)F1 grafts had a major rejection episode but recovered. Later these hosts accepted PVG but not Lewis skin grafts. Adoptive hosts restored with tolerant or naïve cells had similar levels of mRNA expression for all Th1 and Th2 cytokines and effector molecules assayed. Transfer of tolerance by CD4+T cells was not blocked by mAb to IL-4 or TGF-beta. CD4+ CD25-T cells from either naïve or tolerant hosts effected rejection. In contrast neither tolerant nor naïve CD4+ CD25+T cells restored rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific tolerance transfer required CD4+ containing CD4+ CD25+T cells. An inflammatory response with induction of mRNA for Th1 and Th2 cytokines plus cytotoxic effector molecules occurred, but IL-4 and TGF-beta were not essential. Inhibition of antigen presenting cells was not the sole mechanism as there was no linked tolerance.

Transplant Tolerance Associated With a Th1 Response and Not Broken by IL-4, IL-5, and TGF-β Blockade or Th1 Cytokine Administration

BACKGROUND

Specific transplant tolerance is mediated by CD4 T cells that die unless supported by T-cell derived cytokines and donor antigen. This study examined the role of Th1 and Th2 cytokines in the maintenance of tolerance.

METHODS

Tolerance to fully allogeneic PVG cardiac allografts in DA rats was induced by short-term anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody therapy. Responses of tolerant cells to donor and third party antigen were assessed in vivo by examination of the infiltrate in the heart and application of skin grafts, and in vitro in mixed lymphocyte culture. Cell subsets were stained, induction of cytokine mRNA assayed by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and the role of cytokines determined by treating with blocking monoclonal antibody to cytokines or cytokine administration.

RESULTS

Tolerated grafts had a T cell and macrophage infiltrate with increased mRNA for Th1 cytokines, interleukin (IL)-2, and interferon (IFN)-gamma but not Th2 cytokines. Peripheral lymphocytes proliferated in mixed lymphocyte culture and expressed Th1 cytokine mRNA. Tolerant hosts accepted PVG and rejected Lewis skin allografts and the lymph nodes draining both these grafts had similar induction of Th1 and Th2 cytokine mRNA. Treatment of tolerant rats with Th1 cytokines IL-2, IFN-gamma, and IL-12p70 or monoclonal antibody that blocked IL-4, IL-5, and transforming growth factor-beta did not prevent acceptance of PVG skin grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies in a model of tolerance regulated by CD4CD25 T cells demonstrated there was no defect in Th1 responses. Tolerance was due to regulation that was not solely dependent on IL-4, IL-5, or transforming growth factor-beta and was not inactivated or overwhelmed by administration of Th1 cytokines, IL-2, IFN-gamma or IL-12p70.

Interleukin-12p70 Prolongs Allograft Survival by Induction of Interferon Gamma and Nitric Oxide Production

BACKGROUND

Interleukin (IL)-12p70, a heterodimeric cytokine has been considered central to induction of Th1 responses with the assistance of IL-18 and IL-27. It was predicted IL-12p70 treatment would promote allograft rejection. In these studies, IL-12p70 delayed rejection.

METHODS

We compared Piebald Virol Glaxo (PVG) neonatal heart graft survival in fully allogeneic Dark Agoutti (DA) rats treated with IL-12p70 alone or in combination with other cytokines. The mechanism by which IL-12p70 induced delayed rejection was examined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction of cytokine mRNA and studying the role of interferon (IFN)-gamma and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) that were induced by IL-12.

RESULTS

IL-12p70 treatment significantly delayed PVG neonatal heart graft rejection compared to normal rejection control and other control groups treated with supernatant from Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cells transfected with IL-12p35, IL-12p40, or no cytokine gene. IL-12p70 had no effect on alloantibody response. IFN-gamma and iNOS mRNA expression was increased in heart graft and regional lymph node compared to normal rejection and other treatment groups, consistent with Th1 response induction. IL-12p35 mRNA expression decreased in IL-12p70 treated rats but there was no difference in IL-12p40, Th2, or Tr1 cytokine mRNA expression. Coadministration of an iNOS inhibitor, L-NIL, or a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that blocks IFN-gamma, inhibited IL-12p70's ability to prolong allograft survival; as did co-treatment with IL-4 but not IL-13.

CONCLUSIONS

IL-12p70 treatment may inhibit rejection by hyperinduction of Th1 responses, especially production of IFN-gamma and nitric oxide. These effects may be by enhancing regulatory T-cell responses or by the activation of iNOS in macrophages to produce excessive nitric oxide that in turn inhibits alloimmune responses.

Irreversible intestinal failure

Intestinal failure (IF) can be defined as the reduction of functional gut mass below the minimal amount necessary for digestion and absorption adequate to satisfy the nutrient and fluid requirements for maintenance in adults or growth in children. In developed countries, IF mainly includes individuals with the congenital or early onset of conditions requiring protracted or indefinite parenteral nutrition (PN). Short bowel syndrome was the first commonly recognized cause of protracted IF. The normal physiologic process of intestinal adaptation after extensive resection usually allows for recovery of sufficient intestinal function within weeks to months. During this time, patients can be sustained on parenteral nutrition. Only a few children have permanent intestinal insufficiency and life-long dependency on PN. Non-transplant surgery including small bowel tapering and lengthening may allow weaning from PN in some cases. Hormonal therapy with recombinant human growth hormone has produced poor results while therapy with glucagon-like peptide-2 holds promise. Congenital diseases of enterocyte development such as microvillus inclusion disease or intestinal epithelial dysplasia cause permanent IF for which no curative medical treatment is currently available. Severe and extensive motility disorders such as total or subtotal intestinal aganglionosis (long segment Hirschsprung disease) or chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction syndrome may also cause permanent IF. PN and home-PN remain are the mainstays of therapy regardless of the cause of IF. Some patients develop complications while receiving long-term PN for IF especially catheter related complications (thrombosis, sepsis) and liver disease. These patients may be candidates for intestinal transplantation. This review discusses the causes of irreversible IF and emphasizes the specific medico-surgical strategies for prevention and treatment of these conditions at several stages of IF.

Spontaneous acceptance of liver transplants in rodents: evidence that liver leucocytes induce recipient T-cell death by neglect

In many animal models transplanted livers are not rejected, even when there is a complete MHC mismatch between the donor and recipient and the recipient is not immunosuppressed. This distinguishes liver transplants from other organs, such as kidneys and hearts, which are rapidly rejected in mismatched individuals. Acceptance of transplanted livers in a rat model is not due to the absence of an immune response to the liver and there is a rapid, abortive response that is ultimately exhausted. Donor leucocytes transferred with the liver appear to be responsible for both liver acceptance and the abortive activation of the recipient's T cells. The immune mechanism of liver transplant acceptance appears to be due to 'death by neglect' in which T cells are activated to express IL-2 and IFN-gamma mRNA in the recipient lymphoid tissues, but not at adequate levels within the graft. Subsequently the activated T cells die leading to specific clonal deletion of liver donor-reactive T cells. These findings have important implications for liver transplant patients as immunosuppressive drugs that are given to prevent rejection can also interfere with this form of tolerance. In addition, it might be possible to modify the immunosuppressive drug treatment of transplant patients to promote the process of death by neglect of recipient alloreactive T cells.

Immune activation is required for the induction of liver allograft tolerance: implications for immunosuppressive therapy

Liver transplants in many animal models are unusual because often they are not rejected even when transplanted across complete major histocompatibility complex barriers without immunosuppression. Their paradoxical behavior is even more obvious when the immune mechanism of acceptance is examined. Instead of acceptance resulting from a lack of immune response to the graft, the opposite occurs, and there is an unusual extensive increase in immune activation in acceptance compared with rejection. This abnormal extensive immune activation is driven by donor leukocytes transferred with the liver and results in death of the recipient cells that would normally reject the transplant. Some forms of immunosuppression inhibit this activation-associated liver transplant tolerance. The significance of these findings and possible means to design future treatment protocols for clinical transplantation that optimize management of liver transplant recipients are discussed.

Intestinal transplantation: indications, results and strategy

The term 'intestinal failure' is now often used to describe gastrointestinal function insufficient to satisfy body nutrient and fluid requirements. The first recognized condition of intestinal failure was short bowel syndrome. Severe motility disorders such as chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction syndrome in children as well as congenital intractable intestinal mucosa disorders are also forms of intestinal failure, because no curative treatment for these diseases is yet available. Parenteral nutrition and home parenteral nutrition remain the mainstay of therapy for intestinal failure, whether it is partial or total, provisional or permanent. However, some patients develop complications while receiving standard therapy for intestinal failure and are considered for intestinal transplantation. Indeed, recent advances in immunosuppressive treatment and the better monitoring and control of acute rejection have brought intestinal transplantation into the realm of standard treatment for intestinal failure. Although it has been used in humans for the past two decades, this procedure has had a slow learning curve. According to the current results, this challenging procedure may be performed in children or adults, only under certain conditions.

Immunosuppressive drugs: the first 50 years and a glance forward

During the past 50 years, many immunosuppressive drugs have been described. Often their mechanisms of action were established long after their discovery. Eventually these mechanisms were found to fall into five groups: (i) regulators of gene expression; (ii) alkylating agents; (iii) inhibitors of de novo purine synthesis; (iv) inhibitors of de novo pyrimidine synthesis; and (v) inhibitors of kinases and phosphatases. Glucocorticoids exert immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory activity mainly by inhibiting the expression of genes for interleukin-2 and other mediators. Cyclophosphamide metabolites alkylate DNA bases and preferentially suppress immune responses mediated by B-lymphocytes. Methotrexate and its polyglutamate derivatives suppress inflammatory responses through release of adenosine; they suppress immune responses by inducing the apoptosis of activated T-lymphocytes and inhibiting the synthesis of both purines and pyrimidines. Azathioprine metabolites inhibit several enzymes of purine synthesis. Mycophenolic acid and mizoribine inhibit inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, thereby depleting guanosine nucleotides. Mycophenolic acid induces apoptosis of activated T-lymphocytes. A leflunomide metabolite and Brequinar inhibit dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, thereby suppressing pyrimidine nucleotide synthesis. Cyclosporine and FK-506 (Tacrolimus) inhibit the phosphatase activity of calcineurin, thereby suppressing the production of IL-2 and other cytokines. In addition, these compounds have recently been found to block the JNK and p38 signaling pathways triggered by antigen recognition in T-cells. In contrast, rapamycin inhibits kinases required for cell cycling and responses to IL-2. Rapamycin also induces apoptosis of activated T-lymphocytes. Immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory compounds in development include inhibitors of p38 kinase and of the type IV isoform of cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase which is expressed in lymphocytes and monocytes.A promising future application of immunosuppressive drugs is their use in a regime to induce tolerance to allografts. The role of leukocytes in grafts, and the induction of apoptosis of clones of responding T-lymphocytes, is discussed.

Evidence that apoptosis of activated T cells occurs in spontaneous tolerance of liver allografts and is blocked by manipulations which break tolerance

BACKGROUND

Fully allogeneic liver grafts from piebald virol glaxo to dark agouti rats are spontaneously tolerated, whereas kidney transplants between these strains are rejected. Liver tolerance is broken by donor irradiation or peritransplant corticosteroid treatment of recipient rats, both of which interfere with the activation of recipient cells.

METHODS

In this study we used a combination of immunohistochemical staining, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling and Annexin-V apoptosis assays to compare donor cell migration, cytokine profiles, and leukocyte apoptosis in grafts and lymphoid organs from tolerant liver and rejecting kidney recipients. We then examined the effect on apoptosis of treatments which abrogate liver tolerance.

RESULTS

Liver transplantation in this tolerant strain combination is accompanied by rapid migration of many passenger leukocytes to the recipient spleen and lymph node, concurrent with a marked but transient increase in the amount of mRNA for the cytokines interleukin-2 and interferon-gamma. Apoptotic cells appear promptly in the spleen, their numbers reaching a peak 2 days earlier than has been previously shown for the graft infiltrate. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells undergo apoptosis and apoptotic cells are most concentrated among CD25+ T cells. In contrast, renal transplant rejection is associated with limited donor cell migration to lymphoid tissues and significantly less up-regulation of interleukin-2 and interferon-gamma in the spleen. Few apoptotic cells are detected in spleen or graft infiltrate during rejection, whereas apoptotic renal tubular and glomerular cells are found from day 5. Either recipient steroid treatment or donor irradiation significantly reduced the number of apoptotic cells in liver graft infiltrates and recipient spleen.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these findings suggest that a mechanism akin to activation-induced cell death, with apoptosis of alloreactive recipient cells may be responsible for the induction of spontaneous liver transplant tolerance.