Reactive metabolites and their role in drug reactions

Genomic Risk Factors Driving Immune-Mediated Delayed Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) remain associated with significant mortality. Delayed hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) that occur greater than 6 h following drug administration are T-cell mediated with many severe DHRs now associated with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) risk alleles, opening pathways for clinical prediction and prevention. However, incomplete negative predictive value (NPV), low positive predictive value (PPV), and a large number needed to test (NNT) to prevent one case have practically prevented large-scale and cost-effective screening implementation. Additional factors outside of HLA contributing to risk of severe T-cell-mediated DHRs include variation in drug metabolism, T-cell receptor (TCR) specificity, and, most recently, HLA-presented immunopeptidome-processing efficiencies via endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase (ERAP). Active research continues toward identification of other highly polymorphic factors likely to impose risk. These include those previously associated with T-cell-mediated HLA-associated infectious or auto-immune disease such as Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR), epistatically linked with HLA class I to regulate NK- and T-cell-mediated cytotoxic degranulation, and co-inhibitory signaling pathways for which therapeutic blockade in cancer immunotherapy is now associated with an increased incidence of DHRs. As such, the field now recognizes that susceptibility is not simply a static product of genetics but that individuals may experience dynamic risk, skewed toward immune activation through therapeutic interventions and epigenetic modifications driven by ecological exposures. This review provides an updated overview of current and proposed genetic factors thought to predispose risk for severe T-cell-mediated DHRs.

In-Vitro Approaches to Predict and Study T-Cell Mediated Hypersensitivity to Drugs

Mitigating the risk of drug hypersensitivity reactions is an important facet of a given pharmaceutical, with poor performance in this area of safety often leading to warnings, restrictions and withdrawals. In the last 50 years, efforts to diagnose, manage, and circumvent these obscure, iatrogenic diseases have resulted in the development of assays at all stages of a drugs lifespan. Indeed, this begins with intelligent lead compound selection/design to minimize the existence of deleterious chemical reactivity through exclusion of ominous structural moieties. Preclinical studies then investigate how compounds interact with biological systems, with emphasis placed on modeling immunological/toxicological liabilities. During clinical use, competent and accurate diagnoses are sought to effectively manage patients with such ailments, and pharmacovigilance datasets can be used for stratification of patient populations in order to optimise safety profiles. Herein, an overview of some of the in-vitro approaches to predict intrinsic immunogenicity of drugs and diagnose culprit drugs in allergic patients after exposure is detailed, with current perspectives and opportunities provided.

In vitro testing for diagnosis of idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions: Implications for pathophysiology

Idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) represent a major health problem, as they are unpredictable, often severe and can be life threatening. The low incidence of IDRs makes their detection during drug development stages very difficult causing many post-marketing drug withdrawals and black box warnings. The fact that IDRs are always not predictable based on the drug's known pharmacology and have no clear dose-effect relationship with the culprit drug renders diagnosis of IDRs very challenging, if not impossible, without the aid of a reliable diagnostic test. The drug provocation test (DPT) is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of IDRs but it is not always safe to perform on patients. In vitro tests have the advantage of bearing no potential harm to patients. However, available in vitro tests are not commonly used clinically because of lack of validation and their complex and expensive procedures. This review discusses the current role of in vitro diagnostic testing for diagnosis of IDRs and gives a brief account of their technical and mechanistic aspects. Advantages, disadvantages and major challenges that prevent these tests from becoming mainstream diagnostic tools are also discussed here.

Cytochrome P450 2E1 gene polymorphisms/haplotypes and anti-tuberculosis drug-induced hepatitis in a Chinese cohort

Objective

The pathogenic mechanism of anti-tuberculosis (anti-TB) drug-induced hepatitis is associated with drug metabolizing enzymes. No tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms (tSNPs) of cytochrome P450 2E1(CYP2E1) in the risk of anti-TB drug-induced hepatitis have been reported. The present study was aimed at exploring the role of tSNPs in CYP2E1 gene in a population-based anti-TB treatment cohort.

Methods and Design

A nested case-control study was designed. Each hepatitis case was 14 matched with controls by age, gender, treatment history, disease severity and drug dosage. The tSNPs were selected by using Haploview 4.2 based on the HapMap database of Han Chinese in Beijing, and detected by using TaqMan allelic discrimination technology.

Results

Eighty-nine anti-TB drug-induced hepatitis cases and 356 controls were included in this study. 6 tSNPs (rs2031920, rs2070672, rs915908, rs8192775, rs2515641, rs2515644) were genotyped and minor allele frequencies of these tSNPs were 21.9%, 23.0%, 19.1%, 23.6%, 20.8% and 44.4% in the cases and 20.9%, 22.7%, 18.9%, 23.2%, 18.2% and 43.2% in the controls, respectively. No significant difference was observed in genotypes or allele frequencies of the 6 tSNPs between case group and control group, and neither of haplotypes in block 1 nor in block 2 was significantly associated with the development of hepatitis.

Conclusion

Based on the Chinese anti-TB treatment cohort, we did not find a statistically significant association between genetic polymorphisms of CYP2E1 and the risk of anti-TB drug-induced hepatitis. None of the haplotypes showed a significant association with the development of hepatitis in Chinese TB population.

GSTM1 and GSTT1 genetic polymorphisms and risk of anti-tuberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity: an updated meta-analysis

The results of studies investigating the associations between GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms and anti-tuberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity (ADIH) risk exhibit much controversy. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed in order to examine the associations between GST variants and ADIH risk. A total of 451 relevant studies were identified through the digital medical databases Medline, Embase, and CBM published up to October 2012. Thirteen individual case-control studies were eventually recruited for GSTM1 null polymorphism (including 951 ADIH cases, 1,922 controls) and 12 studies for GSTT1 null polymorphism (847 cases, 1,811 controls). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were appropriately calculated from fixed-effects or random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were stratified by ethnicity and different treatment combinations. The overall ORs of relevant studies that exhibited elevated ADIH risk was significantly associated with GSTM1 null genotypes (OR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.04-1.79), but for the GSTT1 polymorphism, no difference was found (OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.82-1.18). In the subgroup analyses, the pooled results showed that GSTM1 null allele carriers had a significant association with ADIH risk in East Asians and the patients who used isoniazid (INH) + rifampicin (RMP) + pyrazinamide (PZA) + ethambutol (EMB), or + streptomycin (SM) (HRZES), but the opposite result was observed for patients using HR. Moreover, the GSTT1 null genotype evaluated the susceptibility to ADIH for tuberculosis using HRZ. This meta-analysis provides evidence that there may be an increased risk of ADIH in individuals with null genotypes of GSTM1 in the total population, especially East Asians and patients receiving HRZE or HRZES. However, polymorphisms of the GSTT1 null genotype seem to have no association with susceptibility to ADIH, except for patients receiving HRZ.

Pharmacogenetic study of drug-metabolising enzyme polymorphisms on the risk of anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury: a meta-analysis

Background

Three first-line antituberculosis drugs, isoniazid, rifampicin and pyrazinamide, may induce liver injury, especially isoniazid. This antituberculosis drug-induced liver injury (ATLI) ranges from a mild to severe form, and the associated mortality cases are not rare. In the past decade, many investigations have focused the association between drug-metabolising enzyme (DME) gene polymorphisms and risk for ATLI; however, these studies have yielded contradictory results.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, ISI web of science and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis was performed to examine the association between polymorphisms from 4 DME genes (NAT2, CYP2E1, GSTM1 and GSTT1) and susceptibility to ATLI. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Heterogeneity among articles and their publication bias were also tested.

Results

38 studies involving 2,225 patients and 4,906 controls were included. Overall, significantly increased ATLI risk was associated with slow NAT2 genotype and GSTM1 null genotype when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. Significantly increased risk was also found for CYP2E1*1A in East Asians when stratified by ethnicity. However, no significant results were observed for GSTT1.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated that slow NAT2 genotype, CYP2E1*1A and GSTM1 null have a modest effect on genetic susceptibility to ATLI.

Clinical outcomes and management of mechanism-based inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4

Mechanism-based inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 is characterized by NADPH-, time-, and concentration-dependent enzyme inactivation, occurring when some drugs are converted by CYPs to reactive metabolites. Such inhibition of CYP3A4 can be due to the chemical modification of the heme, the protein, or both as a result of covalent binding of modified heme to the protein. The inactivation of CYP3A4 by drugs has important clinical significance as it metabolizes approximately 60% of therapeutic drugs, and its inhibition frequently causes unfavorable drug–drug interactions and toxicity. The clinical outcomes due to CYP3A4 inactivation depend on many factors associated with the enzyme, drugs, and patients. Clinical professionals should adopt proper approaches when using drugs that are mechanism-based CYP3A4 inhibitors. These include early identification of drugs behaving as CYP3A4 inactivators, rational use of such drugs (eg, safe drug combination regimen, dose adjustment, or discontinuation of therapy when toxic drug interactions occur), therapeutic drug monitoring, and predicting the risks for potential drug–drug interactions. A good understanding of CYP3A4 inactivation and proper clinical management are needed by clinical professionals when these drugs are used.

An in silico approach to map the binding site of doxorubicin on hemoglobin

Binding modalities of doxorubicin (DOX), a widely used antineoplastic anthracyline antibiotic with hemoglobin (Hb) have been studied. The protein and the ligand were prepared using CORINA and protonated with insight II. The best conformation was sought by employing GOLDV. Molecular modeling calculations showed that DOX binds Hb to a non-classical drug binding site. The alpha subunit of Hb has been assigned to posses the binding site for DOX with a binding affinity (Ka) = 16.98 x10(3) mol(-1). The interaction was found to be thermodynamically favorable (DeltaG degrees = -66.23 KJmol(-1)). The analysis of DOX binding site to Hb suggested that the types of interactions that contribute in this binding are hydrophobic contacts, hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions.

Immunotoxicology: role in the safety assessment of drugs

The immunotoxic effects of drugs are divided into immunosuppression, immunostimulation, hypersensitivity and autoimmunity. The major adverse consequences of immunosuppression are infectious complications and virus-induced malignancies. Flu-like reactions, more frequent autoimmune diseases and hypersensitivity reactions to unrelated allergens, and inhibition of drug-metabolising enzymes are the adverse effects related to immunostimulation. Hypersensitivity reactions are the most frequent immunotoxic effects of drugs. They include immune-mediated ('allergic') and non immune-mediated ('pseudoallergic') reactions. Drug-induced autoimmune reactions, either systemic or organ-specific, are seemingly rare. A review of drug-induced immunotoxic effects demonstrates that immunotoxicity is a significant cause of morbidity and even mortality. As immunotoxicologists have long focused on immunosuppression, the nonclinical immunotoxicity safety assessment of unexpected immunosuppression is based on a number of relatively well standardised and validated animal models and assays. However, there is no general consensus regarding the minimal requirement for this assessment. Many different assays can be used to extend the assessment case by case. Few animal models and assays have been validated for use in the nonclinical safety assessment of unexpected immunostimulation. The situation is worse regarding the prediction of hypersensitivity and autoimmune reactions. Our limited understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of immunotoxicity accounts, at least partly, for this situation. Recent guidelines for the immunotoxicity safety assessment of drugs, even though conflicting on several points, will serve as an impetus not only to refine current animal models and assays, but also to search for better alternatives. The new data generated will have to be interpreted and extended to animal species other than just rodents. Likewise, animal results will have to be compared with findings in humans. The search for immunological endpoints that can be used in several animal species and in humans will therefore become essential. Specific endpoints and clinical criteria that can be included in clinical trials to further investigate the potential for immunotoxicity of new drugs will have to be defined. Because immunotoxicity plays a key role in drug-induced adverse effects, the role of immunotoxicology in drug safety assessment is indisputable and the systematic nonclinical as well as clinical immunotoxicity assessment of every new drug is deemed essential.

Immunopharmacology of hypersensitivity reactions to drugs

Drug hypersensitivity reactions are characterized by their unpredictability, lack of simple dose-dependency, host sensitivity, and potentially serious clinical outcome. They occur in a small proportion of patients, and usually the predisposing factors are unknown, although there is increasing evidence for genetic predisposition and disease being significant risk factors. The current understanding of the chemical basis of immune-mediated reactions is based on the hapten hypothesis, which requires drug bioactivation, covalent binding to proteins, followed by uptake, antigen processing, and a polyclonal immune response. The recently proposed "danger hypothesis" can be considered to be an essential addition to the hapten hypothesis. According to the danger hypothesis, the immune response to a drug-derived antigen requires the presence of co-stimulatory signals and cytokines, which propagate and determine the type of immune response. The "danger signal" might result from chemical, physical, or viral stress.