BASELINE STAGING OF NEWLY DIAGNOSED PROSTATE CANCER: A SUMMARY OF THE LITERATURE

Fluorescence-guided lymphadenectomy in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the role of interventional radiology

Background

Bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLNR) is used in high-risk prostate cancer for assessing metastatic involvement and lymph node staging. Nevertheless, in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer, loco-regional lymph nodes are not always metastatic. Based on this assumption, the aim of this study is to evaluate the potential of ePLND performed under fluorescence guidance after administration of the Indocyanine green (ICG)-Lipiodol mixture via embolization of the prostate arteries in order to identify metastatic lymph nodes, that are then confirmed by histopathology analysis.

Materials and methods

All participants underwent selective embolization of the prostatic arteries 24-48 h before the scheduled surgery. The embolization procedure involved the injection of 25 mg/ml ICG, distilled water, and Lipiodol adequately mixed. During ePLND, the "Firefly" mode integrated into the Da Vinci robotic system was used to assess fluorescence in loco-regional lymph nodes. The lymph nodes were harvested and sent for histopathological examination. Intraoperative fluorescence results, histopathological findings, and short-term postoperative complications were recorded and classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. For statistical analysis, the Phi coefficient was used to assess the correlation between categorical variables.

Results

Ten patients diagnosed with high-risk or unfavorable intermediate-risk PCa were included. All patients underwent radical robot assisted prostatectomy with ePLND within 48 h of prostate embolization using ICG-Lipiodol. Intraoperative fluorescence results, final histopathological findings and postoperative complications were recorded. The lymph nodes with positive fluorescence, after being analyzed separately, were confirmed to be as metastatic upon dedicated histopathological examination, while non-fluorescent lymph nodes were found to be negative for metastatic involvement. The phi coefficient was calculated to establish the degree of correlation between detection of green fluorescence by Firefly system and the positivity of lymph nodes for metastatic invasion at the histopathological analysis. The concordance assessed by phi correlation coefficient was 0.76, with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval).

Conclusion

Although preliminary, the results of this study demonstrate the potential of fluorescence-guided ePLND after ICG-Lipiodol administration for improving the identification of metastatic lymph nodes during Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy RARP. Further studies are required to validate our findings with a larger group of patients.

Evolving Paradigms in Prostate Cancer: The Integral Role of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Primary Staging and Therapeutic Decision-Making

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography or computed tomography (PET/CT) has emerged as a superior imaging option to conventional imaging for prostate cancer. The majority of early evidence and prospective trials evaluated PSMA PET/CT in the biochemical recurrence or metastatic setting. However, there has been an increasing number of prospective trials in the primary setting. The purpose of this narrative review was to describe the role of PSMA PET/CT in localized primary prostate cancer. This narrative review focuses on the prospective evidence available in this setting. We detail the current practice and future potential for PSMA PET/CT to be used in multiple stages of localized primary prostate cancer. The most common practice currently for PSMA PET/CT is in the primary nodal and metastatic staging of high-risk prostate cancer. We describe other roles of PSMA PET/CT, including in intermediate-risk prostate cancer as well as local staging and the impact on radiation therapy and surgical management. We also discuss the potential future roles of PSMA PET/CT in prediagnosis such as risk stratification for biopsy, prognosis, and specific surgical roles. Potential pitfalls of PSMA PET/CT are also addressed. PSMA PET/CT has already had a significant influence on prostate cancer, and there will continue to be a greater role for this imaging modality in localized primary prostate cancer.

Whole-body MRI for staging prostate cancer: a narrative review

OBJECTIVE

To present a narrative review regarding the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) in staging patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa) and compare it to established imaging modalities.

METHODS

A narrative review was carried out using PubMed using the following keywords: 'whole body', 'magnetic resonance imaging', 'MRI', 'prostate cancer', 'risk stratification', and 'staging'. Articles that evaluated WBMRI as the imaging modality to stage patients with HRPCa were included, while studies that solely assessed for biochemical recurrence or metastatic disease progression were excluded.

RESULTS

In the evaluation of lymphatic metastases, WBMRI has demonstrated a comparable, if not improved, sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional imaging of computed tomography (CT). Furthermore, WBMRI demonstrates improved sensitivity and specificity in detecting bone metastases compared to bone scintigraphy (BS). However, with advent of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligands for positron emission tomography (PET), the diagnostic performance of WBMRI to detect metastatic disease appears inferior.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic capabilities of WBMRI exceed that of conventional imaging of CT and BS in detecting metastatic disease in patients with HRPCa. However, WBMRI does not perform as well as PSMA PET/CT. Further study on cost comparisons between WBMRI and PSMA PET/CT are needed, as well as evaluations of combined PSMA PET/MRI are needed.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Prostate cancer - Diagnosis and management of localised disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the Oncology Committee of the French Urology Association is to propose updated recommendations for the diagnosis and management of localized prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature from 2022 to 2024 was conducted by the CCAFU on the elements of diagnosis and therapeutic management of localized PCa, evaluating references with their level of evidence.

RESULTS

The recommendations set out the genetics, epidemiology and diagnostic methods of PCa, as well as the concepts of screening and early detection. MRI, the reference imaging test for localized cancer, is recommended before prostate biopsies are performed. Molecular imaging is an option for disease staging. Performing biopsies via the transperineal route reduces the risk of infection. Active surveillance is the standard treatment for tumours with a low risk of progression. Therapeutic methods are described in detail, and recommended according to the clinical situation.

CONCLUSION

This update of French recommendations should help to improve the management of localized PCa.

Case report: Pancreatic metastasis from small-cell lung cancer appears as primary G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor on combined contrast PET imaging with three probes

Pancreatic metastasis is a rare malignant tumor; when it comes to multiple cancers, it may be a challenge to identify the primary lesion of new pancreatic metastases. With the continuous advancement of imaging technology, the PET/computed tomography (CT) has been widely used because of its high diagnostic accuracy and non-invasiveness. However, in the present case, the patient had history of limited small-cell lung carcinoma and prostatic cancer; the combined application of the three kinds of PET/CT was used to identify the new metastases of pancreatic and bone metastases, which suggested a high probability of primary G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with bone metastases. After the needle biopsy, samples were confirmed by diagnostic pathology as small-cell lung cancer metastasizing to the pancreas and bone. The results of our case suggests the irreplaceability of pathology and possibility of misdiagnosis by PET/CT; moreover, it also supplements clinical data for second primary cancers after small-cell lung cancer.

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for staging patients with high-risk prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Staging patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa) with conventional imaging of computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy (BS) is suboptimal. Therefore, we aimed to compare the accuracy of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) with conventional imaging to stage patients with HRPCa.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with newly diagnosed HRPCa (prostate-specific antigen ≥20 ng/ml and/or Grade Group ≥4). Patients underwent BS, CT of the abdomen and pelvis, and WBMRI within 30 days of evaluation. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic performances of detecting metastatic disease to the lymph nodes and bone for WBMRI and conventional imaging. The reference standard was defined by histopathology or by all available clinical information at 6 months of follow-up. To compare diagnostic tests, Exact McNemar's test and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics curves were utilized.

RESULTS

Among 92 patients enrolled, 15 (16.3%) and 8 (8.7%) patients were found to have lymphatic and bone metastases, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of WBMRI in detecting lymphatic metastases were 0.60 (95% confidence interval 0.32-0.84), 0.84 (0.74-0.92), and 0.80 (0.71-0.88), respectively, while CT were 0.20 (0.04-0.48), 0.92 (0.84-0.97), and 0.80 (0.71-0.88). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of WBMRI to detect bone metastases were 0.25 (0.03-0.65), 0.94 (0.87-0.98), and 0.88 (0.80-0.94), respectively, while CT and BS were 0.12 (0-0.53), 0.94 (0.87-0.98), and 0.87 (0.78-0.93). For evaluating lymphatic metastases, WBMRI demonstrated a higher sensitivity (p = 0.031) and discrimination compared to CT (0.72 versus 0.56, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

For staging patients with HRPCa, WBMRI outperforms CT in the detection of lymphatic metastases and performs as well as CT and BS in the detection of bone metastases. Further studies are needed to assess the cost effectiveness of WBMRI and the utility of combined PSMA PET and WBMRI.

Incidence and risk factors for bone metastases at presentation in solid tumors

Introduction

Bone metastases are associated with increased morbidity and decreased quality of life in patients with solid tumors. Identifying patients at increased risk of bone metastases at diagnosis could lead to earlier interventions. We sought to retrospectively identify the incidence and predictive factors for bone metastases at initial diagnosis in a large population-based dataset.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify patients 18 years-old or older diagnosed with solid cancers from 2010 to 2019. Patients with hematologic malignancies and primary tumors of the bone were excluded. We calculated the incidence and predictive factors for bone metastases according to demographic and tumor characteristics.

Results

Among 1,132,154 patients identified, 1,075,070 (95.0%) had known bone metastasis status and were eligible for the study. Bone metastases were detected in 55,903 patients (5.2% of those with known bone metastases status). Among patients with bone metastases, the most common primary tumors arose from lung (44.4%), prostate (19.3%), breast (12.3%), kidney (4.0%), and colon (2.2%). Bone metastases at presentation were most common in small cell lung cancer (25.2%), non-small cell lung cancer (18.0%), and esophageal adenocarcinoma (9.4%). In addition to stage classification, predictors for bone metastases included Gleason score (OR 95.7 (95% CI 73.1 - 125.4) for Grade Group 5 vs 1 and OR 42.6 (95% CI 32.3 - 55.9) for Group 4 vs 1) and PSA (OR 14.2 (95% CI 12.6 - 16.0) for PSA > 97 vs 0 - 9.9) for prostate cancer, HER2 and hormonal receptor (HR) status (OR 2.2 (95% CI 1.9 - 2.6) for HR+/HER2+ vs HR-/HER2-) for breast cancer, histology (OR 2.5 (95% CI 2.3 - 2.6) for adenocarcinoma vs squamous) for lung cancer, and rectal primary (OR 1.2 (95% 1.1 - 1.4) vs colon primary) and liver metastases (OR 8.6 (95% CI 7.3 - 10.0) vs no liver metastases) for colorectal tumors.

Conclusions

Bone metastases at presentation are commonly seen in solid tumors, particularly lung, prostate, breast, and kidney cancers. Clinical and pathologic factors are associated with a significantly increased risk for bone metastases.

PSMA PET for Detection of Recurrence

Prostate cancer (PC) is a significant health concern worldwide, with high incidence and mortality rates. Early and accurate detection and localization of recurrent disease at biochemical recurrence (BCR) is critical for guiding subsequent therapeutic decisions and improving patient outcomes. At BCR, conventional imaging consisting of CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy are recommended by US and European guidelines, however, these modalities all bear certain limitations in detecting metastatic disease, particularly in low-volume relapse at low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Molecular imaging with PET/CT or PET/MRI using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting radiopharmaceuticals has revolutionized imaging of PC. Particularly at BCR PC, PSMA PET has shown better diagnostic performance compared to conventional imaging in detecting local relapse and metastases, even at very low PSA levels. The most recent version of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline has included PSMA-targeted PET/CT or PET/MRI for the localization of BCR PC. There are several different PSMA-targeting radiopharmaceuticals labeled with different radioisotopes, each with slightly different characteristics, but overall similar high sensitivity and specificity for PC. PSMA-targeted PET has the potential to significantly impact patient care by guiding personalized treatment decisions and thus improving outcomes in BCR PC patients.

Advances in high-risk localized prostate cancer: Staging and management

Nearly 15% of individuals with localized prostate cancer are identified as high risk for recurrence and progression of the disease, which is why the correct staging is vital for the definition of correct treatment-also developing novel therapeutic strategies to find a balance between getting better outcomes without sacrificing the quality of life (QoL). In this narrative review, we introduced the current standards of staging and primary treatment of high-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa), based on international guidelines and arguments in the debate, under the light of the most recent literature. It brings essential tools such as PSMA PET/CT and different nomograms (Briganti. MSKCC, Gandaglia) for accurate staging and selecting wisely the definitive therapy. Even though there is a broad discussion over the best local treatment in curative-intent treatment, it looks more important to define which patient profile would adapt correctly to every different treatment, highlighting the benefits and superior outcomes with multimodal treatment.

Nanotechnology-Aided Advancement in Combating the Cancer Metastasis

Modern medicine has been working to find a cure for cancer for almost a century, but thus far, they have not been very successful. Although cancer treatment has come a long way, more work has to be carried out to boost specificity and reduce systemic toxicity. The diagnostic industry is on the cusp of a technological revolution, and early diagnosis is essential for improving prognostic outlook and patient quality of life. In recent years, nanotechnology's use has expanded, demonstrating its efficacy in enhancing fields such as cancer treatment, radiation therapy, diagnostics, and imaging. Applications for nanomaterials are diverse, ranging from enhanced radiation adjuvants to more sensitive early detection instruments. Cancer, particularly when it has spread beyond the original site of cancer, is notoriously tough to combat. Many people die from metastatic cancer, which is why it remains a huge issue. Cancer cells go through a sequence of events known as the "metastatic cascade" throughout metastasis, which may be used to build anti-metastatic therapeutic techniques. Conventional treatments and diagnostics for metastasis have their drawbacks and hurdles that must be overcome. In this contribution, we explore in-depth the potential benefits that nanotechnology-aided methods might offer to the detection and treatment of metastatic illness, either alone or in conjunction with currently available conventional procedures. Anti-metastatic drugs, which can prevent or slow the spread of cancer throughout the body, can be more precisely targeted and developed with the help of nanotechnology. Furthermore, we talk about how nanotechnology is being applied to the treatment of patients with cancer metastases.

Management of bone metastasis in prostate cancer

Progression of bone metastases is the primary cause of death in prostate cancer, and skeletal-related events (SREs), including pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, radiation, or surgery to bone can impair patients' quality of life. Over the past decade, the development of cytotoxic agents, androgen-receptor-axis-targeted therapies (ARATs), and radioligand therapies has prolonged overall survival of prostate cancer patients with bone metastases and reduced the risk of SREs. The use of bone-modifying agents has also contributed to the reduced risk of SREs. Initial use of a cytotoxic agent, docetaxel, or an ARAT agent with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the current approach to metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. However, there is no consensus on the optimal medication for upfront use in combination with ADT, or on specific patient selection. Recently, next-generation imaging modalities, such as whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography have been utilized to detect bone metastases at an early stage. In addition, metastasis-directed therapy, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy, has been attempted. In the future, patients with bone metastatic prostate cancer will be divided into subgroups and their treatment options will be tailored to their specific characteristics.

Circulating biomarkers for diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring in bone metastasis

Bone is a frequent site of metastasis for multiple types of solid tumors in organs such as prostate, breast, lung, etc., accounting for significant morbidities and mortalities of afflicted patients. One of the major problems of bone metastasis is lack of biomarkers for early diagnosis and for monitoring therapeutic responses. Medical imaging modalities such as computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and radioactive isotope-based bone scans are currently standard clinical practices, yet these imaging techniques are limited to detect early lesions or to accurately monitor the metastatic disease progression during standard and/or experimental therapies. Accordingly, development of novel blood biomarkers rationalizes extensive basic research and clinical development. This review article covers the up-to-date information on protein- and cell-based biomarkers of bone metastasis that are currently used in the clinical practices and also are under development.

Diagnostic and cost‐effectiveness of axial skeleton MRI in staging high‐risk prostate cancer

Introduction

Current literature suggests that axial skeleton magnetic resonance imaging (AS-MRI) is more sensitive than Tc 99m bone scintigraphy (BS) for detecting bone metastases (BM) in high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). However, BS is still widely performed. Its diagnostic accuracy has been studied; however, its feasibility and cost implications are yet to be examined.

Methods

We reviewed all patients with high risk PCa undergoing AS-MRI over a 5-year period. AS-MRI was performed on patients with histologically confirmed PCa and either PSA > 20 ng/ml, Gleason ≥8, or TNM Stage ≥T3 or N1 disease. All AS-MRI studies were obtained using a 1.5-T AchievaPhilips™MRI scanner. We compared the AS-MRI positivity and equivocal rate with that of BS. Data were analysed according to Gleason score, T-stage and PSA. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to quantify the strength of association between positive scans and clinical variables. Feasibility and burden of expenditure was also evaluated.

Results

Five hundred three patients with a median age of 72 and a mean PSA of 34.8 ng/ml were analysed. Eighty-eight patients (17.5%) were positive for BM on AS-MRI (mean PSA 99 [95% CI 69.1-129.9]). Comparatively 409 patients (81.3%) were negative for BM on AS-MRI (mean PSA 24.7 (95% CI [21.7-27.7]) (p = 0.007); 1.2% (n = 6) of patients had equivocal results (mean PSA 33.4 [95% CI 10.5-56.3]). There was no significant difference in age (p = 0.122) between this group and patients with a positive scan, but there was a significant difference in PSA (p = 0.028), T stage (p = 0.006) and Gleason score (p = 0.023). In comparison with BS, AS-MRI detection rate was equivalent or higher compared with the literature. Based on NHS tariff calculations, there would be a minimum cost saving of £8406.89. All patients underwent AS-MRI within 14 days.

Conclusion

The use of AS-MRI to stage BM in high-risk PCa is both feasible and results in a reduced burden of expenditure.

PSMA Receptor-Based PET-CT: The Basics and Current Status in Clinical and Research Applications

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a 100 kD, 750 amino acid (AA) long type II transmembrane glycoprotein that has a short N-terminal intracellular domain with 19 AA, 24 AA transmembrane proteins and a large C-terminal extracellular domain with 707 AA. PSMA has been mapped to chromosome 11p 11-12 in the region of the folate hydrolase gene (FOLH1) and has no known natural ligand. The protein possesses enzymatic activity-glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCP-II)-and is thought to have role in folate uptake (FOLH1 gene). 'PSMA' expression, although significantly up-regulated in prostate carcinoma (more in high-risk and aggressive variants), is not exclusive for it and is noted in various other benign and malignant conditions, especially in the neovasculature. Currently, PSMA PET-CT is approved for high-risk and biochemically recurrent prostate carcinoma (PCa), and in patient selection for PSMA based theranostics. This review aims to highlight the clinical evolution of the PSMA molecule and PSMA PET-CT as a diagnostic modality, various indications of PSMA PET-CT, the appropriateness criteria for its use, pitfalls and artefacts, and other uses of PSMA PET apart from prostate carcinoma.

Quantitative [99mTc]Tc-MDP SPECT/CT correlated with [18F]NaF PET/CT for bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the correlation between standardized uptake value (SUV) and volume-based parameters measured by quantitative [^99mTc]Tc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and [¹⁸F]-sodium fluoride ([¹⁸F]NaF) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in the assessment of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer.

METHODS

The study included 26 male prostate cancer patients with confirmed or suspected bone metastases who underwent both [^99mTc]Tc-MDP SPECT/CT and [¹⁸F]NaF PET/CT studies. Skeletal lesions visible on both SPECT/CT and PET/CT were classified as benign or metastases. The maximum SUV (SUVmax), peak SUV (SUVpeak), mean SUV (SUVmean), metabolic bone volume (MBV), and total bone uptake (TBU) were calculated for every lesion showing abnormal uptake.

RESULTS

A total of 202 skeletal lesions (147 benign and 55 metastases) were detected in the 26 patients. Strong significant correlations were noted between SPECT/CT and PET/CT for the SUV- and volume-based parameters (all P < 0.001). The SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmean, and TBU values obtained with SPECT/CT were significantly lower than the corresponding values obtained with PET/CT (all P < 0.001). The MBV in SPECT/CT was significantly higher than that in PET/CT (P < 0.001). All SUV- and volume-based parameters obtained with both SPECT/CT and PET/CT for metastatic lesions were significantly higher than the corresponding parameters for benign lesions (P values from 0.036 to < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results demonstrate that the SUV- and volume-based parameters for bone uptake obtained with quantitative SPECT/CT and PET/CT are strongly correlated in patients with prostate cancer. The SUV parameters obtained with SPECT/CT were significantly lower than those obtained with PET/CT, whereas the uptake volume obtained with SPECT/CT was significantly higher than that obtained with PET/CT.

Calibrated Regression Models Based on the Risk of Clinical Nodal Metastasis Should be Used as Decision Aids for Prostate Cancer Staging to Reduce Unnecessary Imaging

INTRODUCTION

Radionuclide imaging will change the role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) for prostate cancer (CaP) staging. Current guidelines recommend abdominopelvic imaging for new cases of CaP categorized as unfavorable intermediate risk (UIR) or higher. We assessed the performance characteristics of CT/MRI based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and developed a model that predicts cN1 disease using conventional imaging.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We selected patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with CaP from 2010 to 2016 with available age, prostate specific antigen, clinical locoregional staging, biopsy Gleason grading, and core information. Multivariate logistic regression (MLR) was used on a undersampled training dataset using cN1 as the outcome. Performance characteristics were compared to those of the three most recent versions of the NCCN guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 443,640 men were included, and 2.5% had cN1 disease. Using CT/MRI only, the current NCCN guidelines have a sensitivity of 99%, and the number needed to image (NNI) is 24. At the same sensitivity, the cN1 risk was 1.6% using the MLR. The NNI for UIR alone is 341. Using the MLR model and a threshold of 10%, the PPV is 10.3% and 64% of CTs/MRIs could be saved at a cost of missing 6% of cN1 patients (or 0.15% of all patients).

CONCLUSION

The NCCN guidelines are sensitive for detecting cN1 with CT/MRI, however, the number needed to image is 24. Obtaining CT/MRI for nodal staging when patients have a cN1 risk of 10% would reduce total imaging while still remaining sensitive. As novel PET tracers becomes increasingly used for initial CaP staging, well calibrated prediction models trained on the outcome of interest should be developed as decision aids for obtaining imaging.

Using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for Therapy Response Assessment in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Application of EAU/EANM Recommendations in Clinical Practice

For patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), no reliable biomarkers for predicting therapeutic response or assisting in treatment selection and sequencing are currently available. Using the recent European Association of Urology and European Association of Nuclear Medicine recommendations, we aimed to compare response assessment between prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT and conventional imaging in mCRPC patients starting first-line treatment with a novel hormonal agent (NHA) and to perform a sequential comparative analysis of PSMA PET/CT-derived parameters after 4 and 12 wk of therapy. Methods: Data from 18 mCRPC patients who started NHA treatment and underwent ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT before therapy initiation (baseline), at week 4 (W4), and at week 12 (W12) in addition to conventional imaging (bone scintigraphy, CT) at baseline and W12 were retrospectively included. PET/CT images were quantitatively analyzed for maximum and mean SUV and total PSMA ligand-positive lesions. Comparative analysis of PET/CT-derived parameters was performed, and patients were classified as having nonprogressive disease or progressive disease (PD) according to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, prostate-specific antigen, and conventional imaging criteria. Results: Treatment response was evaluable by ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in 16 of 18 patients (89%) and by conventional imaging in 11 of 18 patients (61%). Five of 16 patients classified as having PD by ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT at W12 had already met progression criteria at W4, and substantial agreement was observed between W4 and W12 (κ, 0.74) ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT results. Nonetheless, 2 of 16 patients (13%) were incorrectly classified as having PD because of a flare phenomenon on PSMA PET/CT that disappeared at W12. Conclusion: Volumetric assessments of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging can improve response evaluation in NHA-treated patients with mCRPC. Although early response assessments at W4 need to be approached with caution because of flare, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging at W4 and W12 revealed substantial agreement in therapy response assessments; these findings warrant further investigation to distinguish PD from flare at W4 and help improve the understanding of resistance to therapy.

Are staging bone scans necessary in patients with T3a prostate cancer? A multicentre study

Objective:

Studies reporting increased risk of metastases in T3a disease are based on clinical staging (Digital rectal examination) in the pre-multiparametric–magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (mp-MRI) era. The aim of our study was to assess the rate of positive bone scans in patients ascribed with T3a prostate cancer on a pre-biopsy mp-MRI.

Methods:

We performed a multicentre, retrospective analysis of all patients with T3a prostate cancer staged by mp-MRI who had a bone scan between January 2017 and April 2020.

Results:

A total of 586 patients were diagnosed with T3a prostate cancer on mp-MRI, with a median age of 71 years (range: 47–87). The median presenting PSA was 11 ng/mL (range: 1–537); 125 patients (21.3%) had a PSA ⩽ 20 and either grade group (GG) 1 or 2 in their prostate biopsy; none of these patients had bone metastases. Eighteen patients (3.1%) were found to have bone metastases: 11 patients had GG ⩾ 3 disease on biopsy and nodal disease, 6 had GG ⩾ 3 without evidence of nodal disease and 1 had a PSA of 103.

Conclusion:

The use of bone scans in patients with T3a prostate cancer staged on mp-MRI but without other evidence of high-risk disease (GG ⩾ 3 and PSA > 20 ng/mL) appears to be unnecessary and could be safely avoided.

Level of evidence:

2b

The Performance of FDA-Approved PET Imaging Agents in the Detection of Prostate Cancer

Positron emission tomography (PET) incorporated with X-ray computed tomography (PET/CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is increasingly being used as a diagnostic tool for prostate cancer (PCa). In this review, we describe and evaluate the clinical performance of some Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agents used for visualizing PCa: [¹⁸F]FDG, [¹¹C]choline, [¹⁸F]FACBC, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, [¹⁸F]DCFPyL, and [¹⁸F]-NaF. We carried out a comprehensive literature search based on articles published from 1 January 2010 to 1 March 2022. We selected English language articles associated with the discovery, preclinical study, clinical study, and diagnostic performance of the imaging agents for the evaluation. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted imaging agents demonstrated superior diagnostic performance in both primary and recurrent PCa, compared with [¹¹C]choline and [¹⁸F]FACBC, both of which target dividing cells and are used especially in patients with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values. When compared to [¹⁸F]-NaF (which is suitable for the detection of bone metastases), PSMA-targeted agents were also capable of detecting lesions in the lymph nodes, soft tissues, and bone. However, a limitation of PSMA-targeted imaging was the heterogeneity of PSMA expression in PCa, and consequently, a combination of two PET tracers was proposed to overcome this obstacle. The preliminary studies indicated that the use of PSMA-targeted scanning is more cost efficient than conventional imaging modalities for high-risk PCa patients. Furthering the development of imaging agents that target PCa-associated receptors and molecules could improve PET-based diagnosis of PCa.

Advancements in the radiooncological treatment of high-risk prostate cancer: a quarter century of achievements

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the development of treatment of primary high-risk prostate cancer in regards to biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED), acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) side effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Primary high-risk prostate cancer patients treated between 1994 and 2016 were included. Applied doses ranged from 60 to 80 Gy, with a dose of 1.8 or 2 Gy per fraction. Techniques were either 3D conformal or intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric intensity modulated arc therapy.

RESULTS

142 patients were treated with doses up to 70 Gy (median dose 66 Gy; 66 Gy group), 282 with doses between 70 and 76 Gy (median dose 74 Gy; 74 Gy group), and 141 with doses >76 Gy (median dose 78 Gy; 78 Gy group). The median follow-up was 48 months. The bNED rates were 50% after 5 years and 44% after 9 years in the 66 Gy group; 65% and 54%, respectively, in the 74 Gy group; and 83% and 66%, respectively, in the 78 Gy group (p = 0.03 vs. 74 Gy and p < 0.0001 vs. 66 Gy). We found a higher rate of acute GI side effects in the 78 Gy group compared to the other groups, but not in maximum acute GU side effects and late maximum GI and GU effects.

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk prostate cancer patients treated with doses of 78 Gy had significantly better bNED rates. Compared to the historical 66 Gy group, 50% more patients achieved bNED after a follow-up of 9 years.

Validating the screening criteria for bone metastases in treatment-naïve unfavorable intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer - the prevalence and location of bone- and lymph node metastases

OBJECTIVE

The European Association of Urology (EAU) recommends a bone scan for newly diagnosed unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. We aimed to validate the screening criteria for bone metastases in patients with treatment-naïve prostate cancer.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included all patients with treatment-naïve unfavorable intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. All underwent MRI of the lumbar column (T2Dixon) and pelvis (3DT2w, DWI, and T2 Dixon). The presence and location of lymph node and bone metastases were registered according to risk groups and radiological (rad) T-stage. The risk of lymph node metastases was assessed by odds ratio (OR).

RESULTS

We included 390 patients, of which 68% were high-risk and 32% were unfavorable intermediate-risk. In the high-risk group, the rate of regional- and non-regional lymph node metastases was 11% and 6%, respectively, and the rate of bone metastases was 10%. In the unfavorable intermediate-risk group, the rate of regional- and non-regional lymph node metastases was 4% and 0.8%, respectively, and the rate of bone metastases was 0.8%. Metastases occurred exclusively in the lumbar column in 0.5% of all patients, in the pelvis in 4%, and the pelvis and lumbar column in 3%. All patients with bone metastases had radT3-4, and patients with radT3-4 showed a four-fold increased risk of lymph node metastases (OR 4.48, 95% CI: 2.1-9.5).

CONCLUSION

Bone metastases were found in 10% with high-risk prostate cancer and 0.8% with unfavorable intermediate-risk. Therefore, we question the recommendation to screen the unfavorable intermediate-risk group for bone metastases.

KEY POINTS

• The rate of bone metastases was 10% in high-risk patients and 0.8% in the unfavorable intermediate-risk group. • The rate of lymph-node metastases was 17% in high-risk patients and 5% in the unfavorable intermediate-risk group. • No bone metastases were seen in radiologically localized disease.

Application of SPECT and PET / CT with computer-aided diagnosis in bone metastasis of prostate cancer: a review

Bone metastasis has a significant influence on the prognosis of prostate cancer(PCa) patients. In this review, we discussed the current application of PCa bone metastasis diagnosis with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) computer-aided diagnosis(CAD) systems. A literature search identified articles concentrated on PCa bone metastasis and PET/CT or SPECT CAD systems using the PubMed database. We summarized the previous studies focused on CAD systems and manual quantitative markers calculation, and the coincidence rate was acceptable. We also analyzed the quantification methods, advantages, and disadvantages of CAD systems. CAD systems can detect abnormal lesions of PCa patients' 99mTc-MDP-SPECT, 18F-FDG-PET/CT, 18F-NaF-PET/CT, and 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT images automated or semi-automated. CAD systems can also calculate the quantitative markers, which can quantify PCa patients' whole-body bone metastasis tumor burden accurately and quickly and give a standardized and objective result. SPECT and PET/CT CAD systems are potential tools to monitor and quantify bone metastasis lesions of PCa patients simply and accurately, the future clinical application of CAD systems in diagnosing PCa bone metastasis lesions is necessary and feasible.

Utility of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 positron emission tomography for imaging of primary prostate cancer and pre-operative efficacy in N-staging of unfavorable intermediate to very high-risk patients validated by histopathology

¹⁸F-rhPSMA-7.3, the lead compound of a new class of radiohybrid prostate-specific membrane antigen (rhPSMA) ligands, is currently in phase III trials for prostate cancer (PCa) imaging. Here, we describe our experience in primary PCa staging. Methods: We retrospectively identified 279 patients with primary PCa who underwent ¹⁸F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET/CT (staging cohort). A subset of patients (83/279) subsequently underwent prostatectomy with lymph node (LN) dissection without prior treatment (efficacy cohort). Distribution of tumor lesions was determined for the staging cohort and stratified by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk score. Involvement of pelvic LN was assessed retrospectively by 3 blinded independent central readers, and a majority rule was used for analysis. Standard surgical fields were rated on a five-point scale independently for PET and for morphological imaging. Results were compared to histopathological findings on a patient-, right vs. -left, and template-basis. Results: For the staging cohort ¹⁸F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET was positive in 275/279 (98.6%), 106/279 (38.0%), 46/279 (16.5%), 65/279 (23.3%) and 5/279 (1.8%) patients for local, pelvic nodal, extrapelvic nodal, metastatic bone, and visceral metastatic disease. In the efficacy cohort, LN metastases were present in 24/83 patients (29%), located in 48/420 (11%) resected templates and in 33/166 (19.9%) hemi-pelvic templates in histopathology. Based on majority vote results, the patient-level sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for pelvic nodal metastases were 66.7% (95%CI, 44.7-83.6%), 96.6% (95%CI, 87.3-99.4%) and 88.0% (95%CI, 78.5-93.8%) for ¹⁸F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET and 37.5% (95%CI, 19.6-59.2%), 91.5% (95%CI, 80.6-96.8%) and 75.9% (95%CI, 65.0-84.3%) for morphological imaging, respectively. ¹⁸F-rhPSMA-7.3 showed higher interobserver agreement than morphological imaging (patient-level Fleiss' κ=0.54; 95%CI, 0.47-0.62 vs. 0.24; 95%CI, 0.17-0.31). A mean standardized uptake value ratio of 6.6 (95%CI, 5.2-8.1) documented a high image contrast between local tumors and adjacent low urinary tracer retention. Conclusion: ¹⁸F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET offers superior diagnostic performance to morphological imaging for primary N-staging of newly diagnosed PCa, shows lower inter-reader variation, and offers good distinction between primary tumor and bladder background activity. With increasing NCCN risk group an increasing frequency of extra-prostatic tumor lesions was observed.

The role of MRI in the management of a prostate cancer patient with bone and lymph nodes metastases. A case report

The use of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is recommended, in the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines, for local staging of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Systemic staging is recommended only for patients with unfavourable intermediate and high-risk disease; with bone and lymph node assessments usually being performed using bone scan (BS) and computed tomography (CT), respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging technique with the highest sensitivity for the detection of bone metastases and has shown promising results also for lymph node assessments. In this report we illustrate how MRI provided a comprehensive assessment of local disease as well as bone and lymph node metastases in a patient with PCa. (www.actabiomedica.it).

dSPIC: a deep SPECT image classification network for automated multi-disease, multi-lesion diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Functional imaging especially the SPECT bone scintigraphy has been accepted as the effective clinical tool for diagnosis, treatment, evaluation, and prevention of various diseases including metastasis. However, SPECT imaging is brightly characterized by poor resolution, low signal-to-noise ratio, as well as the high sensitivity and low specificity because of the visually similar characteristics of lesions between diseases on imaging findings.

METHODS

Focusing on the automated diagnosis of diseases with whole-body SPECT scintigraphic images, in this work, a self-defined convolutional neural network is developed to survey the presence or absence of diseases of concern. The data preprocessing mainly including data augmentation is first conducted to cope with the problem of limited samples of SPECT images by applying the geometric transformation operations and generative adversarial network techniques on the original SPECT imaging data. An end-to-end deep SPECT image classification network named dSPIC is developed to extract the optimal features from images and then to classify these images into classes, including metastasis, arthritis, and normal, where there may be multiple diseases existing in a single image.

RESULTS

A group of real-world data of whole-body SPECT images is used to evaluate the self-defined network, obtaining a best (worst) value of 0.7747 (0.6910), 0.7883 (0.7407), 0.7863 (0.6956), 0.8820 (0.8273) and 0.7860 (0.7230) for accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F-1 score, respectively, on the testing samples from the original and augmented datasets.

CONCLUSIONS

The prominent classification performance in contrast to other related deep classifiers including the classical AlexNet network demonstrates that the built deep network dSPIC is workable and promising for the multi-disease, multi-lesion classification task of whole-body SPECT bone scintigraphy images.

aPROMISE: A Novel Automated-PROMISE platform to Standardize Evaluation of Tumor Burden in 18F-DCFPyL (PSMA) images of Veterans with Prostate Cancer

Rationale: Standardized staging and quantitative reporting is necessary to demonstrate the association of ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT (PSMA) imaging with clinical outcome. This work introduces an automated platform to implement and extend the Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE) criteria - aPROMISE. The objective is to validate the performance of aPROMISE in staging and quantifying disease burden in patients with prostate cancer who undergo PSMA Imaging. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 109 Veterans with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer, who underwent PSMA imaging. To validate the performance of aPROMISE, two independent nuclear-medicine physicians conducted aPROMISE-assisted reads, resulting in standardized reports that quantify individual lesions and stage the patients. Patients were staged as having local only disease (miN0M0); regional lymph node only (miN1M0), metastatic disease only (miN0M1), and with both regional and distant metastatic disease (miN1M1). The staging obtained from aPROMISE-assisted reads was compared with the staging by conventional imaging. Cohen's pairwise kappa agreement was used to evaluate the inter-reader variability. Correlation coefficient and ICC was used to evaluate the inter-reader variability of the quantitative assessment (miPSMA-index) in each stage. Kendall Tau and t-test was used to evaluate the association of miPSMA-index with PSA and Gleason Score. Results: All PSMA images of 109 veterans met the DICOM conformity and the requirements for the aPROMISE analysis. Both independent aPROMISE-assisted analyses demonstrated significant upstaging in patients with localized (23%; N = 20/87) and regional tumor burden (25%; N = 2/8). However, a significant number of patients with bone metastases identified on conventional imaging (NaF PET/CT) were downstaged (29%; N = 4/14). The comparison of the two independent aPROMISE-assisted reads demonstrated a high kappa agreement - 0.82 (miN0M0), 0.90 (miN1M0), and 0.77 (miN0M1). The Spearman correlation of quantitative miPSMA-index was 0.93, 0.96 and 0.97, respectively. As a continuous variable, miPSMA index in the prostate (miT) was associated with risk groups defined by the PSA and Gleason.. Conclusion: Here we demonstrate consistency of the aPROMISE platform between readers and observed substantial upstaging in PSMA imaging compared to the conventional imaging. aPROMISE may contribute to the broader standardization of PSMA imaging assessment and to its clinical utility in management of prostate cancer patients.

Oligometastatic prostatic cancer recurrence: role of salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) and radiation therapy-stereotactic body radiation therapy (RT-SBRT)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Metastases directed therapy (MDT) is an increasingly utilized modality in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) recurrence. The purpose of our review is to discuss the recent literature on the safety and oncologic outcomes of this treatment approach.

RECENT FINDINGS

Metastases directed therapy, in particular, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and salvage lymph node dissection (sLND), has shown promising efficacy in patients with OMPC. Many case series report favorable outcomes with MDT as compared to hormonal deprivation therapy alone or surveillance. Of the few case series investigating the use of MDT as part of a multimodality approach in castrate-resistant OMPC, more favorable outcomes in comparison to the use of systemic treatment alone are reported.

SUMMARY

With the recent advances in imaging techniques, particularly molecular imaging, management of OMPC has progressed rapidly in the last few years. The feasibility and benefits of MDT in OMPC have been demonstrated in prospective and retrospective series. Further prospective studies investigating the role of MDT to define optimal patient subgroups and management strategies are warranted.

Nuclear Imaging for Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer: The Emergence of Modern Techniques Using Novel Radiotracers

Accurate staging of prostate cancer (PCa) at initial diagnosis and at biochemical recurrence is important to determine prognosis and the optimal treatment strategy. To date, treatment of metastatic PCa has mostly been based on the results of conventional imaging with abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy. However, these investigations have limited sensitivity and specificity which impairs their ability to accurately identify and quantify the true extent of active disease. Modern imaging modalities, such as those based on the detection of radioactively labeled tracers with combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scanning have been developed specifically for the detection of PCa. Novel radiotracers include ¹⁸F-sodium fluoride (NaF), ¹¹C-/¹⁸F-fluorocholine (FCH), ¹⁸F-fluordihydrotestosterone (FDHT), ⁶⁸Gallium and ¹⁸F-radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (e.g., ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11, ¹⁸F-DCFPyL). PET/CT with these tracers outperforms conventional imaging. As a result of this, although their impact on outcome needs to be better defined in appropriate clinical trials, techniques like prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT have been rapidly adopted into clinical practice for (re)staging PCa. This review focuses on nuclear imaging for PCa bone metastases, summarizing the literature on conventional imaging (focusing on CT and bone scintigraphy—magnetic resonance imaging is not addressed in this review), highlighting the prognostic importance of high and low volume metastatic disease which serves as a driver for the development of better imaging techniques, and finally discussing modern nuclear imaging with novel radiotracers.

Comparison of irregular flux viewer system with BONENAVI version for identification of Tc-99m MDP whole body bone scan metastasis images

The Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate (MDP) whole body bone scan (WBBS) has been widely accepted as a method of choice for the initial diagnosis of bone and joint changes in patients with oncologic diseases. The WBBS has shown high sensitivity but relatively low specificity due to bone variation. This study aims to use the self-developing irregular flux viewer (IFV) system to predict possible bone lesions in planar WBBS. The study uses gradient vector flow (GVF) and self-organizing map (SOM) methods to analyze the blood fluid-dynamics and evaluate hot points. The evaluation includes a selection of 368 patients with bone metastasis from prostate cancer, lung cancer and breast cancer. Finally, we compare IFV values with BONENAVI version data. BONENAVI is a computer-assisted diagnosis system that analyzes bone scintigraphy automatically. The analysis shows that the IFV system achieves sensitivities of 93% for prostate cancer, 91% for breast cancer, and 83% for lung cancer, respectively. On the other hand, our proposed approach achieves a higher sensitivity than the results of BONEVAVI version 2.0.5 for prostate cancer (88%), breast cancer (86%) and lung cancer (82%), respectively. The study results demonstrate that the high sensitivity and specificity of the IFV system can provide assistance for image interpretation and generate prediction values for WBBS.

Evaluating determinants of receipt of molecular imaging in biochemical recurrent prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Molecular imaging with novel radiotracers is changing the treatment landscape in prostate cancer (PCa). Currently, standard of care includes either conventional and molecular imaging at time of biochemical recurrence (BCR). This study evaluated the determinants of and cost associated with utilization of molecular imaging for BCR PCa.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational cohort study among men with BCR PCa from June 2018 to May 2019. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to analyze the primary outcome: receipt of molecular imaging (e.g. Fluciclovine PET and Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen PET) as part of diagnostic work-up for BCR PCa. Multivariate linear regression models were used to analyze the secondary outcome: overall healthcare cost within a 1-year time frame.

RESULTS

The study sample included 234 patients; 79.1% White, 2.1% Black, 8.5% Asian/Pacific Islander, and 10.3% Other. The majority were 55 years or older (97.9%) and publicly insured (74.8%). Analysis indicated a one-unit reduction in PSA is associated with 1.3 times higher likelihood of receiving molecular imaging (p < 0.01). Analysis found that privately insured patients were associated with approximately $500,000 more in hospital reimbursement (p < 0.01) as compared to the publicly insured. Additionally, a one-unit increase in PSA is associated with $6254 increase in hospital reimbursement or an increase in total payments by 2.1% (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher PSA was associated with lower likelihood for molecular imaging and higher cost in a one-year time frame. Higher cost was also associated with private insurance, but there was no clear relationship between insurance type and imaging type.

Development of Mobile Application for Dynamically Monitoring the Risk of Prostate Cancer and Clinicopathology

OBJECTIVE

To develop an application dynamically monitoring the prostate cancer (PCa) risk for patients to assess their own progression of PCa risk at home.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2019, all of the 1697 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy at the cancer center, which is one of the Chinese Prostate Cancer Consortium. Patients' clinical parameters from January 2010 to May 2018 were used to establish models that consisted of several risk factors with P value <0.1 in univariate analysis and with P value <0.05 in multivariate analysis (n=1113), including model 1 (predicting PCa), model 2 (predicting PCa with high Gleason scores (7 or higher)) and model 3 (predicting PCa with the high clinical stage (T2b or higher)). Other patients from June 2018 to December 2019 were used to validate models (n=440). Patients with a lack of sufficient data were eventually excluded (n=144).

RESULTS

A total of 1553 patients were involved in this study, and an application was used to perform the models. The predictive cut-off value and area under the curves (AUCs) of model 1, 2 and 3 were, respectively, calculated (cut-off: 0.53, 0.38 and 0.40, AUCs: 0.88, 0.89 and 0.89). Using a cut-off value of 10%, three models obtained a high sensitivity (>95%). Besides, more patients can be correctly reclassified via our models (42.9 to 55.5%). Decision curve analyses revealed a decent net benefit in any probability for models. These results were well verified in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

This application showed decent performance in predicting the risk of PCa and clinicopathology, which was available and convenient for patients to self-assess the progress of PCa risks so that being better to participate in disease management.

Surgical management of high-risk, localized prostate cancer

High-risk prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease that lacks clear consensus on its ideal management. Historically, non-surgical treatment was the preferred strategy, and several studies demonstrated improved survival among men with high-risk disease managed with the combination of radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared with ADT alone. However, practice trends in the past 10-15 years have shown increased use of radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection for primary management of high-risk, localized disease. Radical prostatectomy, as a primary monotherapy, offers the potential benefits of avoiding ADT, reducing rates of symptomatic local recurrence, enabling full pathological tumour staging and potentially reducing late adverse effects such as secondary malignancy compared with radiation therapy. Retrospective studies have reported wide variability in short-term (pathological) and long-term (oncological) outcomes of radical prostatectomy. Surgical monotherapy continues to be appropriate for selected patients, whereas in others the best treatment strategy probably involves a multimodal approach. Appropriate risk stratification utilizing clinical, pathological and potentially also genomic risk data is imperative in the initial management of men with prostate cancer. However, data from ongoing and planned prospective trials are needed to identify the optimal management strategy for men with high-risk, localized prostate cancer.

Salvage Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection and Current State of Imaging for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Does a Standard Exist?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We aim to evaluate the efficacy of salvage lymph node dissection (SLND) for nodal recurrent prostate cancer after primary treatment. We also provide a review of the diagnostic performance of next-generation sequencing (next-generation imaging (NGI)) radiotracers in the salvage setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most studies evaluating SLND include a heterogeneous population with a small sample size and are retrospective in design. The 5-year clinical recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival following SLND are 26-52% and 57-89%, respectively, among prospective studies. NGI improves accuracy in detecting nodal recurrence compared to conventional CT, with PMSA PET-CT showing the most promise. However, limited studies exist comparing imaging modalities and performance is variable at low PSA values. SLND is a promising treatment option, but more prospective data are needed to determine the ideal surgical candidate and long-term oncologic outcomes. More studies comparing different NGI are needed to determine the best imaging modality in patients who may be candidates for salvage treatment.

The prevalence and locations of bone metastases using whole-body MRI in treatment-naïve intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and distribution of bone metastases in treatment-naïve prostate cancer patients eligible for a metastatic workup using whole-body MRI, and to evaluate the results in light of current guidelines.

Methods

This single-institution, retrospective study included all patients with treatment-naïve prostate cancer referred to whole-body MRI during 2016 and 2017. All were eligible for a metastatic workup according to the guidelines: PSA > 20 ng/ml and/or Gleason grade group ≥ 3 and/or cT ≥ 2c and/or bone symptoms. The definition of a metastasis was descriptive and based on the original MRI reports. The anatomical location of metastases was registered.

Results

We included 161 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer of which 36 (22%) were intermediate-risk and 125 (78%) were high-risk. The median age and PSA were 71 years (IQR 64–76) and 13 ng/ml (IQR 8–28), respectively. Bone metastases were found in 12 patients (7%, 95% CI: 4–13), and all were high-risk with Gleason grade group ≥ 4. The pelvis was affected in 4 patients, and the spine + pelvis in the remaining 8. No patients demonstrated metastases to the spine without concomitant metastases in the pelvis. Limitations are the small number of metastases and retrospective design.

Conclusion

This study suggests that the overall prevalence of bone metastases using the current guidelines for screening is quite low. No metastases were seen in the case of Gleason grade group ≤ 3, and further studies should investigate if it necessary to screen non-high-risk patients.

Key Points

• The overall prevalence of bone metastases was 7% in the case of newly diagnosed intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.

• The prevalence in high-risk patients was 10%, and no metastases were seen in patients with Gleason grade group ≤ 3.

• The pelvic skeleton is the main site, and no metastases occurred in the spine without concomitant pelvic metastases.

Differences in survival of prostate cancer Gleason 8-10 disease and the establishment of a new Gleason survival grading system

Background

Although the latest Gleason grading system in 2014 has distinguished between Gleason 3 + 4 and 4 + 3, Gleason 8 and Gleason 9–10 are remained systemically classified.

Methods

A total of 261,125 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) were selected between 2005 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We used propensity score matching to balance clinical variables and then compared overall survival (OS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) between Gleason score subgroups. We further establish a new Gleason survival grading system based on the hazard ratio (HR) values of each Gleason subgroup. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan–Meier curves were used to compare patient survival.

Results

Among PCa patients with Gleason score 8 disease, patients with Gleason 5 + 3 had significantly worse OS and CSS than those with Gleason 3 + 5 (OS: HR = 1.26, p = 0.042; CSS: HR = 1.42, p = 0.005) and 4 + 4 (HR = 1.50 for OS and HR = 1.69 for CSS, p < 0.001 for all). PCa patients with Gleason 5 + 3 and Gleason 4 + 5 may have the similar OS and CSS (reference Gleason score <=6, 5 + 3: OS HR = 2.44, CSS HR = 7.63; 4 + 5: OS HR = 2.40, CSS HR = 8.92; p < 0.001 for all). The new Gleason survival grading system reclassified the grades 4 and 5 of the 2014 updated Gleason grading system into three hierarchical grades, which makes the classification of grades more detailed and accurate.

Conclusion

PCa patients with Gleason 8–10 may have three different survival subgroups, Gleason 3 + 5 and 4 + 4, Gleason 5 + 3 and 4 + 5, and Gleason 5 + 4 and 5 + 5. Our results maximize risk stratification for PCa patients, provide guidance for clinicians to assess their survival and clinical management, and make a recommendation for the next Gleason grading system update.

Personal Medicine and Bone Metastases: Biomarkers, Micro-RNAs and Bone Metastases

Bone metastasis is a major cause of morbidity within solid tumours of the breast, prostate, lung and kidney. Metastasis to the skeleton is associated with a wide range of complications including bone fractures, spinal cord compression, hypercalcaemia and increased bone pain. Improved treatments for bone metastasis, such as the use of anti-bone resorptive bisphosphonate agents, within post-menopausal women have improved disease-free survival; however, these treatments are not without side effects. There is thus a need for biomarkers, which will predict the risk of developing the spread to bone within these cancers. The application of molecular profiling techniques, together with animal model systems and engineered cell-lines has enabled the identification of a series of potential bone-metastasis biomarker molecules predictive of bone metastasis risk. Some of these biomarker candidates have been validated within patient-derived samples providing a step towards clinical utility. Recent developments in multiplex biomarker quantification now enable the simultaneous measurement of up to 96 micro-RNA/protein molecules in a spatially defined manner with single-cell resolution, thus enabling the characterisation of the key molecules active at the sites of pre-metastatic niche formation as well as tumour-stroma signalling. These technologies have considerable potential to inform biomarker discovery. Additionally, a potential future extension of these discoveries could also be the identification of novel drug targets within cancer spread to bone. This chapter summarises recent findings in biomarker discovery within the key bone metastatic cancers (breast, prostate, lung and renal cell carcinoma). Tissue-based and circulating blood-based biomarkers are discussed from the fields of genomics, epigenetic regulation (micro-RNAs) and protein/cell-signalling together with a discussion of the potential future development of these markers towards clinical development.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Conventional imaging using CT and bone scan has insufficient sensitivity when staging men with high-risk localised prostate cancer. We aimed to investigate whether novel imaging using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET-CT might improve accuracy and affect management.

METHODS

In this multicentre, two-arm, randomised study, we recruited men with biopsy-proven prostate cancer and high-risk features at ten hospitals in Australia. Patients were randomly assigned to conventional imaging with CT and bone scanning or gallium-68 PSMA-11 PET-CT. First-line imaging was done within 21 days following randomisation. Patients crossed over unless three or more distant metastases were identified. The primary outcome was accuracy of first-line imaging for identifying either pelvic nodal or distant-metastatic disease defined by the receiver-operating curve using a predefined reference-standard including histopathology, imaging, and biochemistry at 6-month follow-up. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ANZCTR12617000005358.

FINDINGS

From March 22, 2017 to Nov 02, 2018, 339 men were assessed for eligibility and 302 men were randomly assigned. 152 (50%) men were randomly assigned to conventional imaging and 150 (50%) to PSMA PET-CT. Of 295 (98%) men with follow-up, 87 (30%) had pelvic nodal or distant metastatic disease. PSMA PET-CT had a 27% (95% CI 23-31) greater accuracy than that of conventional imaging (92% [88-95] vs 65% [60-69]; p<0·0001). We found a lower sensitivity (38% [24-52] vs 85% [74-96]) and specificity (91% [85-97] vs 98% [95-100]) for conventional imaging compared with PSMA PET-CT. Subgroup analyses also showed the superiority of PSMA PET-CT (area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve 91% vs 59% [32% absolute difference; 28-35] for patients with pelvic nodal metastases, and 95% vs 74% [22% absolute difference; 18-26] for patients with distant metastases). First-line conventional imaging conferred management change less frequently (23 [15%] men [10-22] vs 41 [28%] men [21-36]; p=0·008) and had more equivocal findings (23% [17-31] vs 7% [4-13]) than PSMA PET-CT did. Radiation exposure was 10·9 mSv (95% CI 9·8-12·0) higher for conventional imaging than for PSMA PET-CT (19·2 mSv vs 8·4 mSv; p<0·001). We found high reporter agreement for PSMA PET-CT (κ=0·87 for nodal and κ=0·88 for distant metastases). In patients who underwent second-line image, management change occurred in seven (5%) of 136 patients following conventional imaging, and in 39 (27%) of 146 following PSMA PET-CT.

INTERPRETATION

PSMA PET-CT is a suitable replacement for conventional imaging, providing superior accuracy, to the combined findings of CT and bone scanning.

FUNDING

Movember and Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Imaging and Management of Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common noncutaneous malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer related death in the United States. Men with clinical suspicion of PCa undergo tissue sampling and based on features including the Gleason score, Prostate Specific antigen (PSA) levels and clinical tumor (T) stage, patients are risk stratified into 6 major groups based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. This forms the basis for deciding imaging and management. Active surveillance is the preferred approach for less aggressive tumors. Surgery or radiation +/- androgen deprivation therapy continue to be the primary treatment options for localized disease. Imaging plays a critical role in the diagnosis, staging and management of PCa. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is currently the imaging modality of choice for locoregional staging. MRI, computed tomography and bone scan remain the preferred modalities for evaluation of nodal, soft tissue, and bone metastases, respectively. Advanced positron emission tomography imaging using novel radiotracers are being developed but are not yet integrated in the diagnostic guidelines for initial staging. In this review, we will discuss the imaging and treatment algorithms based on the NCCN risk groups, describe the utility of individual modalities, review Prosate Imaging and Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) version 2.1 for the reporting of mpMRI of the prostate.

Imaging for Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Literature

Background: Initial staging and assessment of treatment activity in metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) patients is controversial. Indications for the various available imaging modalities are not well-established due to rapid advancements in imaging and treatment.

Methods: We conducted a critical literature review of the main imaging abnormalities that suggest a diagnosis of metastasis in localized and locally advanced PCa or in cases of biological relapse. We also assessed the role of the various imaging modalities available in routine clinical practice for the detection of metastases and response to treatment in metastatic PCa patients.

Results: In published clinical trials, the most commonly used imaging modalities for the detection and evaluation of therapeutic response are bone scan, abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT), and pelvic and bone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For the detection and follow-up of metastases during treatment, modern imaging techniques i.e., choline-positron emission tomography (PET), fluciclovine-PET, or Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET provide better sensitivity and specificity. This is particularly the case of fluciclovine-PET and PSMA-PET in cases of biochemical recurrence with low values of prostate specific antigen.

Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, conventional imaging still have a role, and communication between imagers and clinicians should be encouraged. Present and future clinical trials should use modern imaging methods to clarify their usage.

Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET staging on clinical decision-making in patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Accurate staging is of major importance to determine the optimal treatment modality for patients with prostate cancer. Positron emission tomography (PET) with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising technique that outperformed conventional imaging in the detection of nodal and distant metastases in previous studies. However, it is still unclear whether the superior sensitivity and specificity also translate into improved patient management. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET for staging of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer and its potential impact on disease management.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 116 patients who underwent ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT or MRI scans for staging of their intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer between April 2016 and May 2018 were included. The potential impact of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET staging on patient management was assessed within a simulated multidisciplinary tumour board where hypothetical treatment decisions based on clinical information and conventional imaging alone was determined. This treatment decision was compared with the treatment recommendation based on clinical information and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging.

RESULTS

The primary tumour was positive on ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET in 113 patients (97%). Nodal metastases were detected in 28 patients (24%) and bone metastases in 14 patients (12%). Compared with clinical staging and conventional imaging, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET resulted in new information in 42 of 116 patients (36%). In 32 of 116 patients (27%), this information would most likely have changed the management into a different therapy modality (15 patients, 13%) or adjusted treatment details (e.g. modification of radiotherapy field or lymph node dissection template; 17 patients, 14%).

CONCLUSION

Information from ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET staging has the potential to change the management in more than a fourth of the patients who underwent PET staging for their intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer. Whether these more personalized ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET-based treatment decisions will improve patient outcome needs further investigation.

Localising occult prostate cancer metastasis with advanced imaging techniques (LOCATE trial): a prospective cohort, observational diagnostic accuracy trial investigating whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in radio-recurrent prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Accurate whole-body staging following biochemical relapse in prostate cancer is vital in determining the optimum disease management. Current imaging guidelines recommend various imaging platforms such as computed tomography (CT), Technetium 99 m (99mTc) bone scan and 18F-choline and recently 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) for the evaluation of the extent of disease. Such approach requires multiple hospital attendances and can be time and resource intensive. Recently, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) has been used in a single visit scanning session for several malignancies, including prostate cancer, with promising results, providing similar accuracy compared to the combined conventional imaging techniques. The LOCATE trial aims to investigate the application of WB-MRI for re-staging of patients with biochemical relapse (BCR) following external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy in patients with prostate cancer.

METHODS/DESIGN

The LOCATE trial is a prospective cohort, multi-centre, non-randomised, diagnostic accuracy study comparing WB-MRI and conventional imaging. Eligible patients will undergo WB-MRI in addition to conventional imaging investigations at the time of BCR and will be asked to attend a second WB-MRI exam, 12-months following the initial scan. WB-MRI results will be compared to an enhanced reference standard comprising all the initial, follow-up imaging and non-imaging investigations. The diagnostic performance (sensitivity and specificity analysis) of WB-MRI for re-staging of BCR will be investigated against the enhanced reference standard on a per-patient basis. An economic analysis of WB-MRI compared to conventional imaging pathways will be performed to inform the cost-effectiveness of the WB-MRI imaging pathway. Additionally, an exploratory sub-study will be performed on blood samples and exosome-derived human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) dimer measurements will be taken to investigate its significance in this cohort.

DISCUSSION

The LOCATE trial will compare WB-MRI versus the conventional imaging pathway including its cost-effectiveness, therefore informing the most accurate and efficient imaging pathway.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

LOCATE trial was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov on 18th of October 2016 with registration reference number NCT02935816.

Total-Body 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for Bone Metastasis Detection in Prostate Cancer Patients: Potential Impact on Bone Scan Guidelines

Our purpose was to determine the relationship between serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level categories (<5, 5-10, 10-20, and >20 ng/mL) and the incidence of bone metastases detected by total-body ⁶⁸Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 PET/CT and to assess if expanding the ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging field to include the vertex and lower extremities (total-body acquisition) affects bone metastasis detection rates and patient management. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 388 prostate cancer patients enrolled in 5 prospective studies (NCT02940262, NCT03368547, NCT03042312, NCT04050215, and NCT03515577). All underwent ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans acquired from vertex to toes for primary staging (n = 93/388, 24%), biochemical recurrence (BCR) localization (n = 225/388, 58%), or restaging metastatic disease (M1) before or during systemic therapy (n = 70/388, 18%) between September 2017 and May 2018. Results: In total, 321 of 388 patients (83%) had a positive ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 study. PSMA-positive bone lesions were found in 105 of 388 (27%) patients, with an incidence that was positively associated with serum PSA level (<10 ng/mL, 21%; 10-20 ng/mL, 41%; ≥20 ng/mL, 41%; P < 0.001). This association was maintained for all 3 indications: initial staging, BCR, and restaging M1. Bone metastases occurred most frequently in restaging M1, followed by BCR and initial staging. Bone metastasis incidence was not significantly associated with National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk score (P = 0.22). The average number of PSMA-positive regions also increased with serum PSA level (P < 0.001). Eighteen of 388 (5%) and 18 of 388 (5%) had lesions above the superior orbital ridge and below the proximal third of the femur, respectively. There was only 1 of 388 patients (0.26%) in whom the total-body PET acquisition had an impact on management. Conclusion: Bone metastases as assessed with ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT are prevalent even in patients with low serum PSA levels. Therefore, current guidelines for bone assessments in prostate cancer patients should be revisited because ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT may provide additional information for accurate bone staging at low serum PSA levels. Including the total body (from vertex to toes) in ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging revealed additional bone lesions in 6% of patients, but without significantly affecting patient management.

68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT for primary staging of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The present study is based on a retrospective analysis of Gallium-68 (⁶⁸Ga)-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA I&T) PET/CT performed in newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve prostate cancer (PCa) patients prior to definitive treatment.

METHODS

A total of 82 men were included in the study and were imaged with ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT to assess the distribution of PSMA-avid disease for staging purposes (11 with low-risk, 32 with intermediate-risk, and 39 with high-risk PCa). Forty patients (20 with intermediate- and 20 with high-risk disease) underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection which allowed for correlation of imaging findings with histopathologic data.

RESULTS

PSMA-positive disease was detected in 83% of patients with 66/82 (80.5%) primary tumours being visualized. PSMA-avid lymph nodes were recorded in 17/82 patients (20.7%, 3 with intermediate-risk and 14 with high-risk PCa); distant disease was found in 14/82 subjects (17.1%, 2 with intermediate-risk and 12 with high-risk PCa). No extraprostatic disease was found in low-risk PCa. SUV_max of primary tumours showed a weak but significant correlation with serum PSA values (r = 0.51, p < 0.001) and Gleason scores (GSC; r = 0.35, p = 0.001), respectively. In correlation with histopathology, calculated per-region sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for detection of lymph node metastases were 35.0%, 98.4%, 63.6%, 95.0%, and 93.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with initial diagnosis of intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT emerges as a relevant staging procedure by identifying nodal and/or distant metastases. Due to the low prevalence of extraprostatic disease, its value seems to be limited in low-risk disease.