1
|
Krishna LKR, Ravindran N, Kwok HYF, Tan XY, Soh J, Leong EYM, Wan DWJ, Low TY, Chan AWJ, Lim NCJ, Ng YK, Thenpandiyan AA, Leong JR, Lim AYD, Quah ELY, Tse LN, Pl S, Rajanala SP, Lua JK, Rajalingam V, Fam VJE, Govindasamy R, AbdulHamid NAB, Lim C, Ong EK, Sim SW, Mason S, Ong SYK. The impact of mentoring relationships on professional identity formation in medical education: a systematic review. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2025; 25:576. [PMID: 40253352 PMCID: PMC12008893 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-025-07158-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2025] [Indexed: 04/21/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The promise that enduring and personalised mentoring relationships shape how mentees think, feel and act as professionals, or their professional identity formation (PIF), and thus how they interact, care and support patients and families has garnered significant interest. However, efforts to marshall these elements have been limited due to a lack of effective understanding. To address this lacunae, a systematic scoping review was carried out to map current knowledge on mentoring relationships and its impact on PIF. METHODS Guided by PRISMA guidelines and the Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) to ensure a consistent and reproducible review, independent searches and appraisals of relevant articles published between 1st January 2000 and 4th December 2024 on PubMed, Embase, ERIC and Scopus databases were performed. Data from included articles were content and thematically analysed. Related themes and categories were combined using the SEBA methodology. RESULTS 248 articles were identified across four databases and snowballing of key articles. A total of 27 articles were included. The domains identified were: (1) the mentoring ecosystem; (2) mentoring dynamics; (3) shifts in belief systems and professional identity; and (4) complex adaptive systems. CONCLUSIONS The mentoring programme can be seen as a mentoring ecosystem, functioning as a community of practice and supporting the socialisation process within its boundaries and along the mentoring trajectory. The culture and structure of the mentoring ecosystem help inculcate the shared belief systems and programme identity. It also nurtures stakeholder investment and commitment, as well as their internal compass which is key to contending with the complex array of influences upon their development. Through the lens of a complex adaptive system, it is also possible to appreciate transitions between roles and responsibilities and the notion of being and becoming. These findings underline the evolving nature of practice and the need for personalised and longitudinal mentoring support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore, 308207, Singapore.
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
- Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, The Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK.
- The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC, Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308436, Singapore.
- SingHealth Internal Medicine Residency, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
| | - Nila Ravindran
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Hannah Yi Fang Kwok
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore, 308207, Singapore
| | - Xuan Yu Tan
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Jasper Soh
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Elizabeth Yong Mei Leong
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore, 308207, Singapore
| | - Darius Wei Jun Wan
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Tiat Yan Low
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Aiden Wei-Jun Chan
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Chong Jin Lim
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Yen Kit Ng
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Arthena Anushka Thenpandiyan
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Jun Rey Leong
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Adele Yi Dawn Lim
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Elaine Li Ying Quah
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Leia Ning Tse
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Sriram Pl
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Sri Priyanka Rajanala
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Jun Kiat Lua
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Varsha Rajalingam
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Victoria Jia En Fam
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Psychosocial Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Ranitha Govindasamy
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02- 03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Nur Amira Binte AbdulHamid
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Crystal Lim
- Medical Social Services, Singapore General Hospital, Block 3, Singapore, 169854, Singapore
| | - Eng Koon Ong
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Shin Wei Sim
- Geylang Polyclinic (National Healthcare Group Polyclinics), 21 Geylang East Central, Singapore, 389707, Singapore
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
| | - Simon Yew Kuang Ong
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cooley J, Kennie-Kaulbach N, Crespo K, Anksorus H, Riley B, Williams C, O'Sullivan TA. Professional identity, pivotal moments, and influences: Implications for preceptor development. CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING & LEARNING 2025; 17:102345. [PMID: 40120503 DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2024] [Revised: 02/26/2025] [Accepted: 03/11/2025] [Indexed: 03/25/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Preceptors are critical in training learners and supporting learner professional identity formation (PIF). This manuscript describes pharmacist preceptors' professional identities (PI), pivotal moments and influences that shaped those PIs, and how this impacts their precepting to inform future preceptor development. METHODS Semi-structured interviews with experienced preceptors from five experiential education programs were transcribed and analyzed. An abductive approach was used for coding, followed by thematic analysis. RESULTS Twenty-two participants from various settings described their PI as a medication specialist, care provider, safeguard, educator, and/or manager. Six themes were recognized across the interview question data as critical to forming professional identity. These included: common elements among pharmacists' PIs such as being a medication-related problem solver (theme 1) and helping/serving others (theme 2); a connection between preceptor identity and participant precepting practices (theme 3); and the importance of role models (theme 4), practicing autonomy (theme 5) and being treated as a pharmacist (theme 6) in developing the participants' PI. DISCUSSION These findings suggest that preceptor development could focus on introducing the concept of PIF, build an understanding of the importance of role models and pivotal moments in supporting PIF, and support the development of preceptor identity as a clinician, educator, or teacher. CONCLUSION Critically, the findings from this analysis suggest that a preceptor's PI can influence how they precept, the types of experiences they facilitate for learners, and the norms and values they model. These findings will inform future preceptor development programs about their learner's PIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Cooley
- University of Arizona, R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Natalie Kennie-Kaulbach
- Practice Experience Program, College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
| | - Katie Crespo
- College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Canada.
| | - Heidi Anksorus
- University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Brittany Riley
- Marshall University School of Pharmacy, Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.
| | - Charlene Williams
- University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brouwer HJ, Barry M, Kluijtmans M, Damoiseaux RAMJ, de Groot E. Fostering the clinician as teacher: A realist review. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2025; 59:151-163. [PMID: 39034500 PMCID: PMC11708814 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinician-teachers, physicians with educational responsibilities in either classroom or clinical setting, are assumed to add value by virtue of their dual role. The clinical responsibilities are often prioritised over the educational tasks. How and under which circumstances clinician-teachers are able to perform their educational role and create added value for different stakeholders is currently unclear. OBJECTIVES To identify for whom, how and under which circumstances educational activities executed by CTs by virtue of their dual role add value to others. SCOPE CTs activities linking the system of education and clinical practice beyond direct patient interactions and purposefully executed. METHODS A realist review was conducted. Databases were searched in two stages: a narrow conventional search, followed by a comprehensive artificial intelligence-aided search. Studies concerning clinician-teachers' dual role were included. Realist analysis was applied to identify in which contexts resource mechanisms triggered reasoning mechanisms, which led to specific outcomes for different stakeholders. RESULTS Sixty-six studies were included. In contexts where clinician-teachers' dual role was formally recognised and valued, clinician-teachers benefitted from the credibility and legitimacy bestowed on them, making the transfer of domain-specific knowledge more impactful. In contexts where sociocultural differences between both systems existed, CTs were able to mediate and adjust recommendations aligned with stakeholders' perceived relevance. Also, contexts organised to support both roles made resource mechanisms more impactful. Clinician-teachers added value to students' clinical competency and learning environment, and to educational organisations' curricular innovation. In their clinical workspace, clinician-teachers added value by enhancing colleague physicians' teaching expertise, implementing educational innovations and recruiting students for scarce specialisms. CONCLUSION Clinician-teachers add value to students, colleague physicians and the clinical and educational contexts at large. Domain-specific knowledge of both systems was important to gain credibility and achieve added value. Openness, formal recognition and allocated time for both roles in educational and clinical contexts towards the dual role are important to strengthen the impact of the dual role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiske Joanna Brouwer
- Department of General Practice & Nursing Science, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Margot Barry
- Department of General Practice & Nursing Science, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Manon Kluijtmans
- Education Center, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Roger Anna Maria Joseph Damoiseaux
- Department of General Practice & Nursing Science, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Esther de Groot
- Department of General Practice & Nursing Science, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Al-Sabiry M, Slootweg I, Numans ME, van Mook WNKA, Barnhoorn P. Exploring residents' perspectives on their professional identity in general practice residency in the Netherlands: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e088097. [PMID: 39732495 PMCID: PMC11683983 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 11/25/2024] [Indexed: 12/30/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Educational initiatives in residency may lack alignment with residents' learning objectives. Furthermore, they may overlook residents' struggle to find fulfilment in their work. Professional identity formation (PIF) is a conceptual lens through which to explore the alignment of educational initiatives with residents' learning objectives. Few empirical studies have examined PIF in residency in general. PIF outcomes in general practice (GP) residency, from the perspective of residents, are poorly represented in the current literature. This study aimed to explore residents' perspectives on their professional identity to inform PIF learning objectives in GP residency. DESIGN A qualitative descriptive study using a list of predetermined questions to guide focus group interviews. SETTING Data collection took place between winter and autumn 2019 at four GP training institutes across the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS 92 third (final) year GP residents participated in focus group interviews. RESULTS Residents' overall perspectives hinged on how to negotiate the endlessness of the profession. This endlessness was reported to manifest in four areas, namely, the GP: as an accessible healthcare provider, as a spider in the care-web, providing personalised care and maintaining a work-life balance. CONCLUSIONS GP residents' narratives highlighted an increasingly challenging profession and posited the importance of guided negotiation for their PIF. Deploying the concept of subjectification in residents' guided negotiation of the profession's endlessness possibly improves the supervisor-resident educational alliance. Furthermore, awareness of issues related to work-life balance and fostering residents' sense of belonging and collegiality may contribute to improving their well-being and sense of fulfilment in their work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miami Al-Sabiry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Irene Slootweg
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Mattijs E Numans
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Walther NKA van Mook
- Intensive care, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
| | - Pieter Barnhoorn
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zaccagnini M, Bussières A, Nugus P, West A, Thomas A. Measuring Scholarly Practice in Respiratory Therapists: The Development and Initial Validation of a Scholarly Practice Tool. THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2024:00005141-990000000-00140. [PMID: 39692544 DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Respiratory therapists (RTs) must apply competencies to address the health care needs of the public. Although all competencies are deemed essential, scholarly practice requires that professionals critically assess their practices, integrate evidence-based literature, and enhance the care they deliver to patients. Though scholarly practice is also associated with professional empowerment, role satisfaction, and improved patient care, it is rarely measured. The purpose of this study was to develop, pilot, and generate preliminary validity evidence of a tool designed to measure scholarly practice among RTs. METHODS We used DeVellis' nine-step scale development process and exploratory factor analysis to develop the tool. The results of a scoping review and qualitative study were used to generate an item pool and pilot test it with 81 RTs across Canada. The refined tool was tested on a larger sample (n = 832) and analyzed using exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS Using principal axis factoring with Promax rotation, we retained 18 items across 4 factors, explaining 56.7% of the variance in the data (31.7%, 10.2%, 8.6%, 6.2%): (Factor 1) professional development and credibility, (Factor 2) elements supporting scholarly practice, (Factor 3) the perceived impact of scholarly activities on practice, and (Factor 4) scholarly practitioner identity and ability. Internal consistency of the final 18-item scale was suitable overall (Cronbach alpha = 0.879) and for each factor (F1 = 0.888; F2 = 0.774; F3 = 0.842; F4 = 0.746). DISCUSSION Our results provide preliminary evidence for a scholarly practice tool that can encourage self-reflection and/or foster peer-based reflection. Using the tool with other health care professionals and conducting confirmatory factor analysis could generate additional validity evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Zaccagnini
- Dr. Zaccagnini: Graduated doctoral student, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Québec. Canada, and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. Dr. Bussières: Professor, Département chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, and School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Québec. Canada, and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. Dr. Nugus: Associate Professor, Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada, and Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada. Dr. West: Chief Executive Officer, The Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada. Dr. Thomas: Associate Professor, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Québec. Canada, and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada, and Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University, Montréal, Québec. Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Krishna LKR, Kwok HYF, Ravindran N, Tan XY, Soh J, Wan DWJ, Rajalingam V, Lua JK, Leong EYM, Low TY, Chan AWJ, Lim CJN, Ng YK, Thenpandiyan AA, Lim AYD, Tse LN, Pl S, Rajanala SP, Leong JR, Quah ELY, Fam VJE, Govindasamy R, Abdul Hamid NAB, Lim C, Sim DSW, Ong EK, Mason S, Somasundaram N, Ong SYK. A systematic scoping review of mentoring support on professional identity formation. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:1380. [PMID: 39605048 PMCID: PMC11600620 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06357-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 11/14/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mentoring's success in nurturing professional identity formation (PIF) has been attributed to its ability to build personalised and enduring mentoring relationships. However, beyond functioning as communities of practice (CoPs) supporting socialisation processes, how mentoring integrates programme values and instils a shared identity amongst mentees remains unclear. The need for personalised guidance and timely attention to a mentee's unique needs in evolving mentoring relationships point to the critical role of support mechanisms ('mentoring support'). We conducted a systematic scoping review (SSR) studying "What is known about mentoring support's role in nurturing PIF?". METHODS Adopting PRISMA-ScR guidelines, this SSR was guided by the Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA). Independent searches were carried out on publications featured between 1st January 2000 and 30th June 2023 in PubMed, Embase, ERIC and Scopus databases. The Split Approach saw concurrent, independent thematic and content analyses of the included articles. The Jigsaw Perspective combined complementary themes and categories, creating broader themes/categories. The subsequent Funnelling Process formed key domains that platformed the synthesis of the discussion. RESULTS Two thousand three hundred forty-one abstracts were reviewed, 323 full-text articles were appraised and 151 articles were included and analysed. The key domains identified were (1) definitions and roles; (2) personalisation; (3) shepherding; and (4) PIF. CONCLUSION The success of mentoring in PIF lies in its ability to blend role modelling, supervision, mentoring, coaching and teaching, with self-care, guided reflection, apprenticeship and assessment to meet the individual needs of the mentee and their changing circumstances. Blending the contents of the mentoring umbrella emphasises the critical role of the mentor and host organisation in supporting mentor training, communications, support and assessment mechanisms. Mentee engagement and its active role in support measures complement the CoP-like mentoring programme's use of blending mentoring support to advance the socialisation process. These insights reflect a complex interactive process scaffolding the development of mentoring relationships and PIF. The effect of the mentoring umbrella on clinical practice requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02-03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
- Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, The Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK.
- The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC, Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308436, Singapore.
| | - Hannah Yi Fang Kwok
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore, 308207, Singapore
| | - Nila Ravindran
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Xuan Yu Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Jasper Soh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Darius Wei Jun Wan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Varsha Rajalingam
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Jun Kiat Lua
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Elizabeth Yong Mei Leong
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore, 308207, Singapore
| | - Tiat Yan Low
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Aiden Wei-Jun Chan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Chong Jin Nicholas Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Yen Kit Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Arthena Anushka Thenpandiyan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Adele Yi Dawn Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Leia Ning Tse
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Sriram Pl
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Sri Priyanka Rajanala
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Jun Rey Leong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Elaine Li Ying Quah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Victoria Jia En Fam
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Psychosocial Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Ranitha Govindasamy
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02-03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
| | - Nur Amira Binte Abdul Hamid
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Crystal Lim
- Medical Social Services, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
| | - Dorsett Shin Wei Sim
- Geylang Polyclinic, National Healthcare Group Polyclinics, 21 Geylang East Central, Singapore, 389707, Singapore
| | - Eng Koon Ong
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Assisi Hospice, 832 Thomson Road, Singapore, 574627, Singapore
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
| | - Nagavalli Somasundaram
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Simon Yew Kuang Ong
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McMains KC, Konopasky A, Durning SJ, Meyer HS. Do All Roads Lead to Full Participation? Examining Trajectories of Clinical Educators in Graduate Medical Education through Situated Learning Theory. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE 2024; 36:613-623. [PMID: 37547996 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2023.2230188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
Phenomenon: As new faculty members begin their careers in Graduate Medical Education, each begins a journey of Professional Identity Formation from the periphery of their educational communities. The trajectories traveled vary widely, and full participation in a given educational community is not assured. While some medical school and post-graduate training programs may nurture Professional Identity Formation, there is scant support for faculty. To date, the trajectories that Graduate Medical Education faculty travel, what may derail inbound trajectories, and what tools Graduate Medical Education faculty use to navigate these trajectories have not been explicitly described. We explore these three questions here. Approach: Communities of Practice, a component of Situated Learning Theory, serves as a helpful framework to explore trajectories of educator identity development among Graduate Medical Educators. We used a inductive and deductive approach to Thematic Analysis, with Situated Learning Theory as our interpretive frame. Semi-structured interviews of faculty members of GME programs matriculating into a Health Professions Education Program were conducted, focusing on participants' lived experiences in medical education and how these experiences shaped their Professional Identity Formation. Findings: Participants noted peripheral, inbound, boundary, and outbound trajectories, but not an insider trajectory. Trajectory derailment was attributed to competing demands, imposter syndrome and gendered marginality. Modes of belonging were critical tools participants used to shape PIF, not only engagement with educator roles but disengagement with other roles; imagination of future roles with the support of mentors; and fluid alignment with multiple mutually reinforcing identities. Participants identified boundary objects like resumes and formal roles that helped them negotiate across Community of Practice boundaries. Insights: Despite a desire for full participation, some clinical educators remain marginal, struggling along a peripheral trajectory. Further research exploring this struggle and potential interventions to strengthen modes of belonging and boundary objects is critical to create equitable access to the inbound trajectory for all of our colleagues, leaving the choice of trajectories up to them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin C McMains
- Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Abigail Konopasky
- Department of Medical Education, Dartmouth School of Medicine, Hannover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Steven J Durning
- Department of Medical Education, Dartmouth School of Medicine, Hannover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Holly S Meyer
- Center for Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sarraf-Yazdi S, Pisupati A, Goh CK, Ong YT, Toh YR, Goh SPL, Krishna LKR. A scoping review and theory-informed conceptual model of professional identity formation in medical education. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 58:1151-1165. [PMID: 38597258 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Professional identity formation (PIF) is a central tenet of effective medical education. However, efforts to support, assess and study PIF are hindered by unclear definitions and conceptualisations of what it means to 'think, act, and feel like a physician'. Gaps in understanding PIF, and by extension, its support mechanisms, can predispose individuals towards disengaged or unprofessional conduct and institutions towards short-sighted or reactionary responses to systemic issues. METHODS A Systematic Evidence-Based Approach-guided systematic scoping review of PIF theories was conducted related to medical students, trainees and practising doctors, published between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2021 in PubMed, Embase, ERIC and Scopus databases. RESULTS A total of 2441 abstracts were reviewed, 607 full-text articles evaluated and 204 articles included. The domains identified were understanding PIF through the lens of pivotal theories and characterising PIF by delineating the underlying factors that influence it and processes that define it. CONCLUSIONS Based on regnant theories and frameworks related to self-concepts of identity and personhood, the relationships between key PIF influences, processes and outcomes were examined. A theory-backed integrated conceptual model was proposed to delineate the interconnected relationships among these, aiming to untangle some of the complexities inherent to PIF, to shed light on existing practices and to identify shortcomings in our understanding so as to develop mechanisms in support of its multifaceted, interlinked components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anushka Pisupati
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chloe Keyi Goh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yun Ting Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - You Ru Toh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Suzanne Pei Lin Goh
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- KK Women's and Children Hospital, Singapore
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative and End of Life Care Centre, United Kingdom Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kennie-Kaulbach N, Cooley J, Williams C, Riley B, Anksorus H, O'Sullivan TA. How Preceptors Support Pharmacy Learner Professional Identity Formation. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION 2024; 88:100740. [PMID: 38908435 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.100740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pharmacy preceptors play a role in helping learners form professional identities during experiential education. However, it is not clear what specific roles and precepting strategies best foster professional identity formation (PIF). The objective of this study was to explore how preceptors support pharmacy learner PIF. METHODS This qualitative study used an interpretative descriptive approach. Preceptors from 5 experiential education programs were recruited using purposive sampling for individual semistructured interviews. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed by thematic analysis. Team members used a reflective and iterative approach for data analysis and generation of themes. RESULTS A total of 22 participants were interviewed from various pharmacy practice settings and precept a range of learners, including introductory pharmacy practice experiences, advanced pharmacy practice experiences, and residents. Four main themes were identified to support pharmacy leaner PIF: making learners part of the practice and team, preparing learners to assume the role of a pharmacist, helping learners navigate emotions during practice experiences, and supporting learners in finding the right fit within the profession. Specific precepting strategies associated with each theme were identified. CONCLUSION Preceptors play an important role in supporting learners in thinking and acting as professionals while also helping navigate emotional experiences that may impact PIF and having conversations to help define learner's future aspirations of the pharmacist they want to become. Strategies identified can inform curricular approaches and preceptor development that intentionally supports PIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Janet Cooley
- University of Arizona, R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Charlene Williams
- University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Brittany Riley
- Marshall University, Marshall University School of Pharmacy, Huntington, WV, USA
| | - Heidi Anksorus
- University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Al-Sabiry M, Barnhoorn P, Slootweg I, van Mook W, Numans M. Which 'end' do you have in mind? Clinical supervisors' perceptions of Professional Identity Formation outcomes in GP residency. MEDICAL TEACHER 2024; 46:1236-1242. [PMID: 38295758 DOI: 10.1080/0142159x.2024.2308070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Professional Identity Formation (PIF) is crucial for high-quality patient care and physician well-being. Few empirical studies examined PIF in residency from the perspective of supervisors. In GP residency, residents are supervised with an 'end in mind' that remains unexplored. To encourage supervisors to reflect on their teaching behaviours, this study investigated GP clinical supervisors' perceptions of PIF outcomes in GP residency. METHODS Applying qualitative description, focus group interviews were conducted between spring and autumn 2019. Using a semi-structured interview guide, supervisors' perceptions of PIF outcomes were explored. In an iterative coding process applying constant comparison, a thematic analysis was performed of focus group transcripts. RESULTS We conducted eight focus groups with 55 supervisors at four training institutes across the Netherlands. Half of the supervisors were female. GP supervisors tend to address the 'poor GP' when prompted to address the 'good GP'. PIF outcomes in GP residency should revolve around taking ownership in patient care, self-care and the persistence of GP as a profession. CONCLUSION PIF can be challenged by a lack of positive language. Supervisors' strong beliefs regarding ideals of the profession potentially compromise PIF when they do not resonate with residents' beliefs, resulting in poor educational alliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miami Al-Sabiry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter Barnhoorn
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Irene Slootweg
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Walther van Mook
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
- School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| | - Mattijs Numans
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sternszus R, Steinert Y, Razack S, Boudreau JD, Snell L, Cruess RL. Being, becoming, and belonging: reconceptualizing professional identity formation in medicine. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1438082. [PMID: 39257893 PMCID: PMC11383779 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1438082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the last decade, there has been a drive to emphasize professional identity formation in medical education. This shift has had important and positive implications for the education of physicians. However, the increasing recognition of longstanding structural inequalities within society and the profession has highlighted how conceptualizations of professional identity formation have also had unintended harmful consequences. These include experiences of identity threat and exclusion, and the promotion of norms and values that over-emphasize the preferences of culturally dominant groups. In this paper, the authors put forth a reconceptualization of the process of professional identity formation in medicine through the elaboration of 3 schematic representations. Evolutions in the understandings of professional identity formation, as described in this paper, include re-defining socialization as an active process involving critical engagement with professional norms, emphasizing the role of agency, and recognizing the importance of belonging or exclusion on one's sense of professional self. The authors have framed their analysis as an evidence-informed educational guide with the aim of supporting the development of identities which embrace diverse ways of being, becoming, and belonging within the profession, while simultaneously upholding the standards required for the profession to meet its obligations to patients and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Sternszus
- Department of Pediatrics and Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Yvonne Steinert
- Department of Family Medicine and Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Saleem Razack
- Department of Pediatrics and Scholar in the Centre for Health Education Scholarship, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - J Donald Boudreau
- Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Montreal, QC, Canada
- University of Notre Dame, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Linda Snell
- Department of Medicine and Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Richard L Cruess
- Department of Surgery and Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Prasad S, O’Malley CB, Levy AS, Mauger M, Chase AJ. Medical Educator Perceptions of Faculty Effort and Intent to Stay in Academic Medicine. MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR 2024; 34:795-806. [PMID: 39099858 PMCID: PMC11296991 DOI: 10.1007/s40670-024-02071-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
Purpose Core roles of medical school faculty are increasingly diverse, substantial, and evolving. In alignment with this dynamic nature of medical education, faculty effort should be accurately appraised, constantly evaluated, and rewarded to ensure faculty satisfaction and promote a culture of belonging. The study goal was to examine the imbalance in official assignments and perceptions of medical school faculty effort in various educator domains. Materials and Methods An 80-item survey was designed to collect quantitative and qualitative measures of faculty perceptions of effort. Survey questions collected data on faculty demographics, intent to stay, and perceptions of effort in the following educator domains: teaching, educational leadership and administration, research and scholarship, and service. A mixed methods approach was utilized in data analysis. Results Eighty-eight complete survey responses were collected between February and May of 2022 from respondents from 27 states. There was a significant disparity between assigned and perceived effort in the educator domains of teaching, research, and service (P < 0.01). Faculty satisfaction with percent effort dedicated to teaching significantly correlated with intent to stay (P < 0.05). Satisfaction with workload assignments was higher with advanced academic rank and male gender. Qualitative analysis identified many key themes in the categories of promotion, workload, resources, and retention. Conclusions Our study revealed that satisfaction with workload directly correlates with intent to stay, and principles of equitable workload distribution are violated from the perspective of the medical educator. This data provides critical information that can be used to assist medical schools in developing metrics to evaluate faculty performance in medical education and improve retention in academic medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samiksha Prasad
- Department of Medical Education, Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Terry Building 1523-D, 3200 South University Drive, Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
| | - Chasity B. O’Malley
- Department of Medical Education, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH USA
| | - Arkene S. Levy
- Department of Medical Education, Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Terry Building 1523-D, 3200 South University Drive, Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
| | - McHenry Mauger
- Department of Medical Education, Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Terry Building 1523-D, 3200 South University Drive, Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
| | - Amanda J. Chase
- Department of Medical Education, Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Terry Building 1523-D, 3200 South University Drive, Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Teo MYK, Ibrahim H, Lin CKR, Hamid NABA, Govindasamy R, Somasundaram N, Lim C, Goh JL, Zhou Y, Tay KT, Ong RRS, Tan V, Toh Y, Pisupati A, Raveendran V, Chua KZY, Quah ELY, Sivakumar J, Senthilkumar SD, Suresh K, Loo WTW, Wong RSM, Pei Y, Sng JH, Quek SQM, Owyong JLJ, Yeoh TT, Ong EK, Phua GLG, Mason S, Hill R, Chowdhury AR, Ong SYK, Krishna LKR. Mentoring as a complex adaptive system - a systematic scoping review of prevailing mentoring theories in medical education. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:726. [PMID: 38970020 PMCID: PMC11225364 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05707-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective mentorship is an important component of medical education with benefits to all stakeholders. In recent years, conceptualization of mentorship has gone beyond the traditional dyadic experienced mentor-novice mentee relationship to include group and peer mentoring. Existing theories of mentorship do not recognize mentoring's personalized, evolving, goal-driven, and context-specific nature. Evidencing the limitations of traditional cause-and-effect concepts, the purpose of this review was to systematically search the literature to determine if mentoring can be viewed as a complex adaptive system (CAS). METHODS A systematic scoping review using Krishna's Systematic Evidence-Based Approach was employed to study medical student and resident accounts of mentoring and CAS in general internal medicine and related subspecialties in articles published between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2023 in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases. The included articles underwent thematic and content analysis, with the themes identified and combined to create domains, which framed the discussion. RESULTS Of 5,704 abstracts reviewed, 134 full-text articles were evaluated, and 216 articles were included. The domains described how mentoring relationships and mentoring approaches embody characteristics of CAS and that mentorship often behaves as a community of practice (CoP). Mentoring's CAS-like features are displayed through CoPs, with distinct boundaries, a spiral mentoring trajectory, and longitudinal mentoring support and assessment processes. CONCLUSION Recognizing mentorship as a CAS demands the rethinking of the design, support, assessment, and oversight of mentorship and the role of mentors. Further study is required to better assess the mentoring process and to provide optimal training and support to mentors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mac Yu Kai Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Halah Ibrahim
- Department of Medical Sciences, Khalifa University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Casper Keegan Ronggui Lin
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Blk MD11, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, #02-03, 117597, Singapore
| | - Nur Amira Binte Abdul Hamid
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Ranitha Govindasamy
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Blk MD11, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, #02-03, 117597, Singapore
| | - Nagavalli Somasundaram
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Crystal Lim
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Medical Social Services, Singapore General Hospital, Block 3, Singapore, 169854, Singapore
| | - Jia Ling Goh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Yi Zhou
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Kuang Teck Tay
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Ryan Rui Song Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Vanessa Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Youru Toh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Anushka Pisupati
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Vijayprasanth Raveendran
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Keith Zi Yuan Chua
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Elaine Li Ying Quah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Jeevasuba Sivakumar
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Samyuktha Dhanalakshmi Senthilkumar
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Keerthana Suresh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Wesley Teck Wee Loo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Ruth Si Man Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Yiying Pei
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Julia Huina Sng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Simone Qian Min Quek
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Jasmine Lerk Juan Owyong
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Ting Ting Yeoh
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Eng Koon Ong
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Assisi Hospice, 832 Thomson Road, Singapore, 574627, Singapore
| | - Gillian Li Gek Phua
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
| | - Ruaraidh Hill
- Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building The Quadrangle, Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK
| | - Anupama Roy Chowdhury
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Level 3, College Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
| | - Simon Yew Kuang Ong
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 11 NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Blk MD11, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, #02-03, 117597, Singapore.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
- Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building The Quadrangle, Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK.
- PalC, The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308436, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ryan A, Moran CN, Byrne D, Hickey A, Boland F, Harkin DW, Guraya SS, Bensaaud A, Doyle F. Do professionalism, leadership, and resilience combine for professional identity formation? Evidence from confirmatory factor analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1385489. [PMID: 38938377 PMCID: PMC11208471 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1385489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Professional identity formation (PIF) is an ongoing, self-reflective process involving habits of thinking, feeling and acting like a physician and is an integral component of medical education. While qualitative work has suggested that PIF is informed by professionalism, resilience, and leadership, there is a dearth of quantitative work in this area. Multiple methods build rigor and the present study aimed to quantitatively assess the relative psychometric contributions of professionalism, resilience, and leadership constructs to informing PIF, using a latent factor analysis approach. Methods We analyzed data from the PILLAR study, which is an online cross-sectional assessment of a pre-clinical cohort of medical students in the RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, using established and validated quantitative measures in each area of interest: PIF, professionalism, leadership and resilience. A total of 76 items, combining four validated scales, along with a selection of demographic questions, were used. The hypothesis that PIF is informed by, and correlates with, professionalism, resilience and leadership was examined by conducting a confirmatory factor analysis of a proposed three-factor higher-order model. Model estimation used Maximum Likelihood Method (MLM) with geomin rotation. The hypothesized (measurement) model was examined against an alternative (saturated) model, as well as a three-factor model. Results Latent variable analysis from 1,311 students demonstrated that a three-factor higher-order model best fit the data; suggesting PIF is informed by professionalism, resilience, and leadership, and that these constructs are statistically distinct and account for differential aspects of PIF. This higher-order model of PIF outperformed both the saturated model and the three-factor model. The analysis of which component may be the most or least influential was inconclusive, and the overall model was not influenced by year of training. Discussion Building upon existing conceptual contentions, our study is the first to quantitatively support the contribution of professionalism, resilience, and leadership to the development of professional identity, and to delineate the inter-relationships between PIF and these constructs. This information can be used by medical educators when designing curricula and educational strategies intended to enhance PIF. Future work should seek to assess the influence of these constructs longitudinally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aine Ryan
- Centre for Professionalism in Medicine and Health Sciences at Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Catherine N. Moran
- Department of Health Psychology, School of Population Health, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - David Byrne
- Department of Health Psychology, School of Population Health, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Anne Hickey
- Department of Health Psychology, School of Population Health, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fiona Boland
- Data Science Centre, School of Population Health, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Denis W. Harkin
- Centre for Professionalism in Medicine and Health Sciences at Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Shaista S. Guraya
- Institute of Learning, Mohammad Bin Rashid University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Abdelsalam Bensaaud
- Centre for Professionalism in Medicine and Health Sciences at Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Frank Doyle
- Department of Health Psychology, School of Population Health, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Valestrand EA, Whelan B, Eliassen KER, Schei E. Alienation in the Teaching Hospital: How Physician Non-Greeting Behaviour Impacts Medical Students' Learning and Professional Identity Formation. PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 13:239-249. [PMID: 38638636 PMCID: PMC11025575 DOI: 10.5334/pme.1185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Clinical workplaces offer unrivalled learning opportunities if students get pedagogic and affective support that enables them to confidently participate and learn from clinical activities. If physicians do not greet new students, the learners are deprived of signals of social respect and inclusion. This study explored how physicians' non-greeting behaviour may impact medical students' participation, learning, and professional identity formation in clinical placements. Methods We analysed 16 senior Norwegian medical students' accounts of non-greeting behaviours among their physician supervisors in a reflexive thematic analysis of focus group interview data. Results The main themes were: A) Descriptions of non-greeting. Not being met with conduct signalling rapport, such as eye contact, saying hello, using names, or introducing students at the workplace, was perceived as non-greeting, and occurred across clinical learning contexts. B) Effects on workplace integration. Non-greeting was experienced as a rejection that hurt students' social confidence, created distance from the physician group, and could cause avoidance of certain workplace activities or specific medical specialties. C) Impact on learning. Non-greeting triggered avoidance and passivity, reluctance to ask questions or seek help or feedback, and doubts about their suitability for a medical career. Conclusion Medical students' accounts of being ignored or treated with disdain by physician superiors upon entering the workplace suggest that unintended depersonalising behaviour is ingrained in medical culture. Interaction rituals like brief eye contact, a nod, a "hello", or use of the student's name, can provide essential affective support that helps medical students thrive and learn in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eivind Alexander Valestrand
- Center for Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Beth Whelan
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
- Student Health and Wellness Center, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | | | - Edvin Schei
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Phua GLG, Owyong JLJ, Leong ITY, Goh S, Somasundaram N, Poon EYL, Chowdhury AR, Ong SYK, Lim C, Murugam V, Ong EK, Mason S, Hill R, Krishna LKR. A systematic scoping review of group reflection in medical education. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:398. [PMID: 38600515 PMCID: PMC11007913 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05203-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reviewing experiences and recognizing the impact of personal and professional views and emotions upon conduct shapes a physician's professional and personal development, molding their professional identity formation (PIF). Poor appreciation on the role of reflection, shortages in trained tutors and inadequate 'protected time' for reflections in packed medical curricula has hindered its integration into medical education. Group reflection could be a viable alternative to individual reflections; however, this nascent practice requires further study. METHODS A Systematic Evidence Based Approach guided Systematic Scoping Review (SSR in SEBA) was adopted to guide and structure a review of group reflections in medical education. Independent searches of articles published between 1st January 2000 and 30th June 2022 in bibliographic and grey literature databases were carried out. Included articles were analysed separately using thematic and content analysis, and combined into categories and themes. The themes/categories created were compared with the tabulated summaries of included articles to create domains that framed the synthesis of the discussion. RESULTS 1141 abstracts were reviewed, 193 full-text articles were appraised and 66 articles were included and the domains identified were theories; indications; types; structure; and benefits and challenges of group reflections. CONCLUSIONS Scaffolded by current approaches to individual reflections and theories and inculcated with nuanced adaptations from other medical practices, this SSR in SEBA suggests that structured group reflections may fill current gaps in training. However, design and assessment of the evidence-based structuring of group reflections proposed here must be the focus of future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Li Gek Phua
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Jasmine Lerk Juan Owyong
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- School of Humanities and Behavioural Sciences, Singapore University of Social Sciences, 463 Clementi Road, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ian Tze Yong Leong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Suzanne Goh
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- KK Women's and Children Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Rd, Singapore, 169854, Singapore
| | - Nagavalli Somasundaram
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eileen Yi Ling Poon
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Simon Yew Kuang Ong
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Crystal Lim
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Medical Social Services, Singapore General Hospital, 16 College Road, Block 3 Level 1, Singapore, 169854, Singapore
| | - Vengadasalam Murugam
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Eng Koon Ong
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Assisi Hospice, 832 Thomson Rd, Singapore, Singapore
- Office of Medical Humanities, SingHealth Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, 31 Third Hospital Ave, Singapore, 168753, Singapore
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
| | - Ruaridh Hill
- Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, The Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, Singapore.
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
- PalC, The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, Singapore, Singapore.
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Larson S, Cooley JH. Reflections on an evolving pharmacist professional identity from two pharmacy educators. CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING & LEARNING 2024; 16:207-211. [PMID: 38184485 DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2023.12.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this article is to describe the Professional Identity Formation (PIF) journeys of two Experiential Education (EE) Directors in a reflective narrative. DESCRIPTION Using the "What? So What? Now What?" model of reflection, this manuscript will describe the experiences of two EE administrators as they reflect upon the various pivotal moments of their career and professional transitions. ANALYSIS/INTERPRETATION As pharmacy educators seek to be purposeful and intentional about guiding their students' journeys to form their own professional identities, they must first be willing to engage in their own self-reflection to explore their own journeys. Then, pharmacy educators will be better equipped to assist learners as their own professional identity is developed. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS In this article, the authors have modeled candid self-reflection and have described their own PIF journeys to serve as a guide for other pharmacy educators seeking to do the same.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Larson
- Director of Experiential Education, Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Glendale AZ Campus 19555 North 59th Avenue, Glendale, AZ 85308, United States.
| | - Janet Heather Cooley
- Associate Professor, Director of Experiential Education Pharmacy Practice and Science, The University of Arizona, Roy P. Drachman Hall, B306J, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Liang JZ, Ng DKW, Raveendran V, Teo MYK, Quah ELY, Chua KZY, Lua JK, Owyong JLJ, Vijayan AV, Abdul Hamid NAB, Yeoh TT, Ong EK, Phua GLG, Mason S, Fong W, Lim C, Woong N, Ong SYK, Krishna LKR. The impact of online education during the Covid-19 pandemic on the professional identity formation of medical students: A systematic scoping review. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0296367. [PMID: 38181035 PMCID: PMC10769105 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Evolving individual, contextual, organizational, interactional and sociocultural factors have complicated efforts to shape the professional identity formation (PIF) of medical students or how they feel, act and think as professionals. However, an almost exclusive reliance on online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic offers a unique opportunity to study the elemental structures that shape PIF and the environmental factors nurturing it. We propose two independent Systematic Evidence-Based Approach guided systematic scoping reviews (SSR in SEBA)s to map accounts of online learning environment and netiquette that structure online programs. The data accrued was analysed using the clinically evidenced Krishna-Pisupati Model of Professional Identity Formation (KPM) to study the evolving concepts of professional identity. The results of each SSR in SEBA were evaluated separately with the themes and categories identified in the Split Approach combined to create richer and deeper 'themes/categories' using the Jigsaw Perspective. The 'themes/categories' from each review were combined using the Funnelling Process to create domains that guide the discussion. The 'themes/categories' identified from the 141 included full-text articles in the SSR in SEBA of online programs were the content and effects of online programs. The themes/categories identified from the 26 included articles in the SSR in SEBA of netiquette were guidelines, contributing factors, and implications. The Funnelling Process identified online programs (encapsulating the content, approach, structures and the support mechanisms); their effects; and PIF development that framed the domains guiding the discussion. This SSR in SEBA identifies the fundamental elements behind developing PIF including a structured program within a nurturing environment confined with netiquette-guided boundaries akin to a Community of Practice and the elemental aspect of a socialisation process within online programs. These findings ought to be applicable beyond online training and guide the design, support and assessment of efforts to nurture PIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Zhen Liang
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Donovan Kai Wei Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vijayprasanth Raveendran
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mac Yu Kai Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Elaine Li Ying Quah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Keith Zi Yuan Chua
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jun Kiat Lua
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Andrew Vimal Vijayan
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Ting Ting Yeoh
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eng Koon Ong
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Assisi Hospice, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gillian Li Gek Phua
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Warren Fong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Crystal Lim
- Medical Social Services, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Natalie Woong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Simon Yew Kuang Ong
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- PalC, The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wurth S, Maisonneuve H, Moussa MA, Campion B, Caire Fon N, Peltier C, Audétat MC. Development of complex pedagogical competencies and reflexivity in clinical teachers via distance learning: a mixed methods study. MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE 2023; 28:2265163. [PMID: 37818594 PMCID: PMC10569352 DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2265163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
Clinical reasoning is the cornerstone to healthcare practice and teaching it appropriately is of utmost importance. Yet there is little formal training for clinical supervisors in supervising this reasoning process. Distance education provides interesting opportunities for continuous professional development of healthcare professionals. This mixed methods study aimed at gaining in-depth understanding about whether and how clinical teachers can develop complex pedagogical competencies through participation in a Massive Open Online Course on the supervision of clinical reasoning (MOOC SCR). Participants self-assed their clinical supervision skills before and after partaking in the MOOC SCR through the Maastricht Clinical Teachers Questionnaire. Item scores and the distribution of response proportions before and after participation were compared using paired t-tests and McNemar's tests respectively. In parallel, the evolution of a subset of MOOC participants' pedagogical practice and posture was explored via semi-structured interviews throughout and beyond their MOOC participation using simulated and personal situational recalls. The verbatim were analysed with standard thematic analysis. Quantitative and qualitative findings converged and their integration demonstrated that partaking in the MOOC SCR promoted the development of complex pedagogical competencies and reflexivity with the participants. This was quantitatively evidenced by significantly higher self-assessed supervision skills and corresponding attitudes after completing the MOOC. The qualitative data provided rich descriptions of how this progression in pedagogical practice and posture occurred in the field and how it was shaped by participants' interaction with the MOOC's content and their motivations to progress. Our findings provide evidence for the development of pedagogical skills and corresponding attitudes for the supervision of clinical reasoning through participation in the MOOC SCR and contribute to the literature body on the opportunities that distance learning provides for the development of pedagogical competencies. The extent to which the pedagogical underpinnings of the MOOC contributed to these developments remains to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Wurth
- Unit for Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Hubert Maisonneuve
- University Institute for Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Amir Moussa
- University Institute for Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Baptiste Campion
- Institute of Higher Studies in Social Communications, Brussels School of Journalism and Communication, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nathalie Caire Fon
- Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine Department, Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Claire Peltier
- Unit for Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Educational Sciences, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Marie-Claude Audétat
- Unit for Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- University Institute for Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sternszus R, Slattery NK, Cruess RL, Cate OT, Hamstra SJ, Steinert Y. Contradictions and Opportunities: Reconciling Professional Identity Formation and Competency-Based Medical Education. PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION 2023; 12:507-516. [PMID: 37954041 PMCID: PMC10637293 DOI: 10.5334/pme.1027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
The widespread adoption of Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) has resulted in a more explicit focus on learners' abilities to effectively demonstrate achievement of the competencies required for safe and unsupervised practice. While CBME implementation has yielded many benefits, by focusing explicitly on what learners are doing, curricula may be unintentionally overlooking who learners are becoming (i.e., the formation of their professional identities). Integrating professional identity formation (PIF) into curricula has the potential to positively influence professionalism, well-being, and inclusivity; however, issues related to the definition, assessment, and operationalization of PIF have made it difficult to embed this curricular imperative into CBME. This paper aims to outline a path towards the reconciliation of PIF and CBME to better support the development of physicians that are best suited to meet the needs of society. To begin to reconcile CBME and PIF, this paper defines three contradictions that must and can be resolved, namely: (1) CBME attends to behavioral outcomes whereas PIF attends to developmental processes; (2) CBME emphasizes standardization whereas PIF emphasizes individualization; (3) CBME organizes assessment around observed competence whereas the assessment of PIF is inherently more holistic. Subsequently, the authors identify curricular opportunities to address these contradictions, such as incorporating process-based outcomes into curricula, recognizing the individualized and contextualized nature of competence, and incorporating guided self-assessment into coaching and mentorship programs. In addition, the authors highlight future research directions related to each contradiction with the goal of reconciling 'doing' and 'being' in medical education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Sternszus
- Department of Pediatrics & Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CA
| | | | - Richard L. Cruess
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery & Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CA
| | - Olle ten Cate
- Utrecht Center for Research and Development of Health Professions Education, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, NL
| | - Stanley J. Hamstra
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Holland Bone and Joint Program, Toronto, Canada
- ACGME, Chicago, IL, US
- Department of Medical Education, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, US
| | - Yvonne Steinert
- Department of Family Medicine & Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Valestrand EA, Hokstad LM, Schei E, Ofstad EH, Stenfors T, Kvernenes M. The liminal landscape of mentoring-Stories of physicians becoming mentors. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2023; 57:1020-1027. [PMID: 37183266 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study explores narratives of physicians negotiating liminality while becoming and being mentors for medical students. Liminality is the unstable phase of a learning trajectory in which one leaves behind one understanding but has yet to reach a new insight or position. METHODS In this study, we analysed semi-structural interviews of 22 physician mentors from group-based mentoring programmes at two Norwegian and one Canadian medical school. In a dialogical narrative analysis, we applied liminality as a sensitising lens, focusing on informants' stories of becoming a mentor. RESULTS Liminality is an unavoidable aspect of developing as a mentor. Which strategies mentors resort to when facing liminality are influenced by their narrative coherence. Some mentors thrive in liminality, enjoying the possibility of learning and developing as mentors. Others deem mentoring and the medical humanities peripheral to medicine and thus struggle with integrating mentor and physician identities. They may contradict themselves as they shift between their multiple identities, resulting in rejection of the learning potentials that liminality affords. CONCLUSION Mentors with integrated physician and mentor identities can embrace liminality and develop as mentors. Those mentors with contradicting dialogues between their identities may avoid liminality if it challenges their understanding of who they are and make them experience discomfort, confusion and insufficiency while becoming a mentor. Support of the mentoring role from the clinical culture may help these physicians develop internal dialogues that reconcile their clinician and mentor identities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eivind A Valestrand
- Center for Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Leif Martin Hokstad
- Educational Development Unit, Department of Education and Lifelong Learning, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Medical Simulation Centre, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Edvin Schei
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Eirik H Ofstad
- Department of Community Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- The Medical Clinic, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway
| | - Terese Stenfors
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Division for learning, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| | - Monika Kvernenes
- Center for Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Brooks JV, Dickinson BL, Quesnelle KM, Bonaminio GA, Chalk-Wilayto J, Dahlman KB, Fulton TB, Hyland KM, Kruidering M, Osheroff N, Tuan RL, Ho MJ. Professional Identity Formation of Basic Science Medical Educators: A Qualitative Study of Identity Supports and Threats. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2023; 98:S14-S23. [PMID: 37556802 PMCID: PMC10657385 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000005354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Basic science medical educators (BSME) play a vital role in the training of medical students, yet little is known about the factors that shape their professional identities. This multi-institutional qualitative study investigated factors that support and threaten the professional identity formation (PIF) of these medical educators. METHOD A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with a purposive sample of 58 BSME from 7 allopathic medical schools in the U.S. In-depth semi-structured interviews of individual BSME were conducted between December 2020 and February 2021 to explore the facilitators and barriers shaping the PIF of BSME. Thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS Factors shaping PIF were grouped into 3 broad domains: personal, social, and structural. Interrelated themes described a combination of factors that pushed BSME into teaching (early or positive teaching experiences) and kept them there (satisfaction and rewards of teaching, communities of like-minded people), as well as factors that challenged their PIF (misunderstanding from medical students, clinical, and research faculty, lack of formal training programs, and lack of tenure-track educator positions). The structural environment was reported to be crucial for PIF and determined whether BSME felt that they belonged and were valued. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that although most BSME derive a sense of fulfillment and meaning from their role as medical educators, they face considerable obstacles during their PIF. Structural change and support are needed to increase recognition, value, promotion, and belonging for BSME to improve the satisfaction and retention of this important group of faculty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Veazey Brooks
- J.V. Brooks is associate professor, Department of Population Health & Division of Palliative Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Bonny L Dickinson
- B.L. Dickinson is senior associate dean for faculty affairs, director of medical education research, and professor, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, Georgia
| | - Kelly M Quesnelle
- K.M. Quesnelle is clinical professor and chair, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, South Carolina
| | - Giulia A Bonaminio
- G.A. Bonaminio is professor, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Janine Chalk-Wilayto
- J. Chalk-Wilayto is associate professor of anatomy, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, Georgia
| | - Kimberly Brown Dahlman
- K.B. Dahlman is associate professor of medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Tracy B Fulton
- T.B. Fulton is professor, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Katherine M Hyland
- K.M. Hyland is professor, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Institute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Marieke Kruidering
- M. Kruidering is professor, Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Neil Osheroff
- N. Osheroff is professor, Departments of Biochemistry and Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, and has an appointment at VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Rupa Lalchandani Tuan
- R.L. Tuan is associate professor, Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ming-Jung Ho
- M.-J. Ho is professor of family medicine and associate director, Center for Innovation and Leadership in Education, Georgetown University Medical Center, and director of education research, MedStar Health, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Krishna LKR, Pisupati A, Teo KJH, Teo MYK, Quek CWN, Chua KZY, Venktaramana V, Raveendran V, Singh H, Hui SLWC, Ng VWW, Ting OY, Loh EKY, Yeoh TT, Owyong JLJ, Ong EK, Phua GLG, Hill R, Mason S, Ong SYK. Professional identity formation amongst peer-mentors in a research-based mentoring programme. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2023; 23:787. [PMID: 37875886 PMCID: PMC10598986 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04718-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mentoring plays a pivotal yet poorly understood role in shaping a physician's professional identity formation (PIF) or how they see, feel and act as professionals. New theories posit that mentoring nurtures PIF by functioning as a community of practice through its structured approach and its support of a socialisation process made possible by its assessment-directed personalized support. To test this theory and reshape the design, employ and support of mentoring programs, we evaluate peer-mentor experiences within the Palliative Medicine Initiative's structured research mentoring program. METHODS Semi-structured interviews with peer mentors under the Palliative Medicine Initiative (PMI) at National Cancer Centre Singapore were conducted and triangulated against mentoring diaries to capture longitudinal data of their PMI experiences. The Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) was adopted to enhance the trustworthiness of the data. SEBA employed concurrent content and thematic analysis of the data to ensure a comprehensive review. The Jigsaw Perspective merged complementary themes and categories identified to create themes/categories. The themes/categories were compared with prevailing studies on mentoring in the Funnelling Process to reaffirm their accuracy. RESULTS Twelve peer-mentors participated in the interviews and eight peer-mentors completed the mentoring diaries. The domains identified were community of practice and identity work. CONCLUSIONS The PMI's structured mentoring program functions as a community of practice supporting the socialisation process which shapes the peer-mentor's belief system. Guided by a structured mentoring approach, stage-based assessments, and longitudinal mentoring and peer support, peer-mentors enhance their detection and evaluation of threats to their regnant belief system and adapt their self-concepts of identity and personhood to suit their context. These insights will help structure and support mentoring programs as they nurture PIF beyond Palliative Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
- Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK.
- Palliative Care Institute, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
- The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education (PalC), Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jln Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308436, Singapore.
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
| | - Anushka Pisupati
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Kelly Jia Hui Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Mac Yu Kai Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Chrystie Wan Ning Quek
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Keith Zi Yuan Chua
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Vaishnavi Venktaramana
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Vijayprasanth Raveendran
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Harpreet Singh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Sabine Lauren Wong Chyi Hui
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Victoria Wen Wei Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Ong Yun Ting
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Eleanor Kei Ying Loh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Ting Ting Yeoh
- Division of Oncology Pharmacy, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Jasmine Lerk Juan Owyong
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Eng Koon Ong
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Assisi Hospice, 832 Thomson Rd, Singapore, 574627, Singapore
- Office of Medical Humanities, SingHealth Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gillian Li Gek Phua
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Ruaraidh Hill
- Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
| | - Simon Yew Kuang Ong
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
McMains KC, Durning SJ, Norton C, Meyer HS. The Making of an Educator: Professional Identity Formation Among Graduate Medical Education Faculty Through Situated Learning Theory. THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2023; 43:254-260. [PMID: 37201556 DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Professional identity formation (PIF) is a foundational element to professional medical education and training. Given the impact of faculty role models and mentors to student and trainee learning, mapping the landscape of PIF among faculty takes on increased importance. We conducted a scoping review of PIF through the lens of situated learning theory. Our scoping review question was: How is situated learning theory used to understand the process of PIF among graduate medical educators? METHODS The scoping review methodology described by Levac et al served as the architecture for this review. Medline, Embase, PubMed, ERIC, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched (from inception) using a combination of terms that describe PIF among graduate medical educators. RESULTS Of the 1434 unique abstracts screened, 129 articles underwent full-text review, with 14 meeting criteria for inclusion and full coding. Significant results organized into three main themes: importance of using common definitions; evolution of theory over time with untapped explanatory power; identity as a dynamic construct. DISCUSSION The current body of knowledge leaves many gaps. These include lack of common definitions, need to apply ongoing theoretical insights to research, and exploration of professional identity as an evolving construct. As we come to understand PIF among medical faculty more fully, twin benefits accrue: (1) Community of practices can be designed deliberately to encourage full participation of all graduate medical education faculty who desire it, and (2) Faculty can more effectively lead trainees in negotiating the ongoing process of PIF across the landscape of professional identities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin C McMains
- Dr. McMains : Professor, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD. Dr. Durning : Director, Center for Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, and Professor, Department of Medicine. Norton : Instruction Librarian, Division of Library Services, National Institutes of Health Library, Bethesda, MD. Dr. Meyer : Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Center for Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Su Q, Wu Y, Yun B, Zhang H, She D, Han L. The mediating effect of clinical teaching behavior on transition shock and career identity among new nurses: A cross-sectional study. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY 2023; 125:105780. [PMID: 36963229 DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND New nurse attrition is a worldwide problem. Because of the gap between theory and practice in their work, new nurses may experience transition shock, which can have a negative impact on their career identity. Clinical teaching behavior is an important component in reducing the impact of new nurse transition, stabilizing the hospital nursing workforce, and cultivating high-quality nursing talents. OBJECTIVES Based on the New Nurse Transition Model, to explore the mediating role of clinical teaching behavior in the relationship between transition shock and career identity in the new nurse population of Gansu Province. DESIGN A cross-sectional study. SETTING Seventeen hospitals in Gansu province of China. PARTICIPANTS A total of 1684 new nurses (1590 female and 94 male) were recruited from seventeen hospitals in Gansu province. METHODS Three questionnaires include: The Clinical Teaching Behavior Inventory (CTBI-23), the Transition shock of Newly Graduated Nurses Scale (TSNGNS), and the Nurse's Career Identity Scale (NCIS). Structural equation modeling was used to deal with the relationships among clinical teaching behavior, transition shock, and career identity. RESULTS Transition shock was found to be negatively related to both career identity and clinical teaching behavior, with clinical teaching behavior mediates the relationship between transition shock and career identity. CONCLUSIONS The clinical teaching behavior of the teaching staff plays a role in mediating the relationship between new nurses' sense of career identity and transition shock. Accordingly, the teaching behavior of clinical teaching should be improved and the quality of clinical teaching behavior should be improved to increase the career identity of new nurses and reduce the turnover rate of new nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Su
- The First Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China; Nursing Department, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China; School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Yuhan Wu
- School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Bei Yun
- School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Hongyan Zhang
- Nursing Department, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Dongli She
- Nursing Department, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Lin Han
- The First Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China; Nursing Department, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China; School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Barnhoorn PC, Nierkens V, Numans ME, Steinert Y, van Mook WNKA. "What kind of doctor do you want to become?": Clinical supervisors' perceptions of their roles in the professional identity formation of General Practice residents. MEDICAL TEACHER 2023; 45:485-491. [PMID: 36288745 DOI: 10.1080/0142159x.2022.2137395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Supporting the development of a professional identity is a primary objective in postgraduate education. Few empirical studies have explored professional identity formation (PIF) in residency, and little is known about supervisors' perceptions of their roles in residents' PIF. In this study, we sought to understand how supervisors perceive their roles in the PIF of General Practice (GP) residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS Guided by principles of qualitative description, we conducted eight focus groups with 55 supervisors at four General Practice training institutes across the Netherlands. Informed by a conceptual framework of PIF, we performed a thematic analysis of focus group transcripts. RESULTS Three themes related to how GP supervisors described their roles in supporting residents' PIF: supervising with the desired goal of GP training in mind; role modeling and mentoring as key strategies to achieve that goal; and the value of developing bonds of trust to support the process. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this study is the first to explore PIF in GP training from the perspective of clinical supervisors. The identified themes mirror the components of the therapeutic alliance between doctors and patients from a supervisor's perspective and highlight the pivotal roles of the supervisor in a resident's PIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter C Barnhoorn
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Vera Nierkens
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mattijs E Numans
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Steinert
- Department of Family Medicine and Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Walther N K A van Mook
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, and Maastricht UMC + Academy, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Stelwagen M, Westmaas A, Van Kempen A, Scheele F. In-hospital education of parents of newborns may benefit from competency-based education: A qualitative focus group and interview study among health professionals. J Clin Nurs 2023; 32:1076-1088. [PMID: 35460132 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS/OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to appraise health professionals' self-reported practices in educating parents of hospitalised newborns from the perspective of competency-based education and to identify areas for improvement of parental learning. BACKGROUND Patient education is essential to achieve autonomy in parents of hospitalised newborns. The literature provides descriptions of the use of various components of competency-based education in patient education. This suggests that competency-based education is a valuable concept for patient education. DESIGN A case-based qualitative study. METHODS Three focus group discussions were conducted and 28 semi-structured interviews with 45 health professionals who practice in a hospital setting that is designed to empower parents. The data were analysed with a framework analysis approach, using a framework of competency-based education themes for a combined inductive and deductive content data analysis. The recommendations of the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist were followed. FINDINGS Two themes of competency-based education emerged as evidently operationalised: (1) 'Learning climate' and (2) 'Role modeling'. Five themes emerged as incompletely operationalised: (1) 'Parent curriculum based on inter-professional consensus'; (2) 'Transparency about the competencies needed'; (3) 'Access to teaching'; (4) 'Assessing and reporting results'; and (5) 'Proficiency statements based on autonomy expectations'. Two themes did not emerge: (1) 'Empowering parents to be active learners' and (2) 'Evaluation and improvement of the education program'. CONCLUSIONS Parent education is at risk of being merely on a master-apprentice model and may be more effective if it is designed on competency-based education principles. Identified areas for improvement are empowering parents to be 'active learners' and by involving them in the evaluation and improvement of the educational program. Parent education in neonatal health care may benefit from an appraisal based on competency-based education themes. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Appraising parent education based on competency-based education principles is feasible for improving the learning process towards parent autonomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mireille Stelwagen
- Department of Teaching and Department of Pediatrics at OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alvin Westmaas
- Department of Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Health, University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Van Kempen
- Department of Pediatrics at OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fedde Scheele
- Department of Gynecology and Department Teaching at OLVG Hospital, Health systems innovation and education at the VU University Amsterdam and Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Linsenmeyer M, Long G. Goal-Oriented and Habit-Oriented Reflective Models to Support Professional Identity Formation and Metacognitive Thinking. MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR 2023; 33:569-575. [PMID: 37261017 PMCID: PMC10226929 DOI: 10.1007/s40670-023-01752-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Professional identity formation (PIF) is a multi-year, complex, social, and intellectual process that culminates in trainees "thinking, acting, and feeling like a doctor." Some of the processes of PIF, particularly the Hidden Curriculum, may result in suboptimal outcomes in student's cognition, including implicit bias and poor clinical decision-making. Many have recognized the importance of reflective writing, particularly metacognition, in undergraduate medical education. However, there are few concrete examples and explanations for fully integrating reflective writing exercises across multiple situations, experiences, and levels of growth. The authors provide conceptual frameworks, concrete curricular structures, and reflective tools used at two medical schools. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01752-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Machelle Linsenmeyer
- Office of Assessment and Educational Development, West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lewisburg, WV 24901 USA
| | - Goldberry Long
- Department of Creative Writing, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Selling SK, Rooholamini SN, Grow HM, McPhillips H, Hoang K, Blankenburg R, Rassbach C. The Effects of Coaching Pediatric Residents on Faculty Coaches' Relationships, Learning, and Professional Identity Formation. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2023; 98:376-383. [PMID: 36205486 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000005011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Coaching programs have been implemented in medical education to improve skill development and feedback for trainees. As more faculty take on coaching roles, it is critical to understand how being a coach affects faculty as well as trainees. This study examined the effects of coaching residents on faculty members' relationships, learning, and professional identity formation (PIF), as they move through intersecting communities across landscapes of practice. METHOD From July 2020 to January 2021, the authors conducted a mixed-methods study of current and former coaches at 2 institutions with longitudinal pediatric resident coaching programs. They used a concurrent triangulation design in which qualitative and quantitative data were collected simultaneously and integrated during data analysis. A survey explored the impact of coaching on faculty members' learning, relationships, and PIF, and semistructured interviews further examined coaches' experiences. The interview transcripts were analyzed inductively guided by the sensitizing principles of PIF and landscapes of practice. RESULTS Of 43 eligible coaches, 32 (74%) completed the survey, and 18 completed interviews. Four themes emerged from the interviews. (1) Coaches' relationships supported belonging in multiple communities. (2) Coaching enabled multidimensional learning. (3) Relationships served as mechanisms of learning for coaches. (4) Coaches' relationships and learning catalyzed PIF. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the effects of coaching on career growth by faculty rank ( P = .02). Coaches' strengthened PIF increased a sense of purpose, meaning, and professional fulfillment, and inspired new career directions. Survey data further supported these findings. CONCLUSIONS Being a coach deepened faculty members' professional identities through their varied relationships, multidimensional learning, and sense of belonging in intersecting communities. This study introduces a framework to understand the factors mediating coaches' PIF and highlights how investing in coaching leads to important benefits for coaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Kate Selling
- S.K. Selling is a medical student, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Sahar N Rooholamini
- S.N. Rooholamini is assistant professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - H Mollie Grow
- H.M. Grow is associate professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Heather McPhillips
- H. McPhillips is professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kim Hoang
- K. Hoang is clinical assistant professor, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Rebecca Blankenburg
- R. Blankenburg is clinical professor, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Caroline Rassbach
- C. Rassbach is clinical professor, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kirkness KB, Bazira PJ, Finn GM, Nizza IE. "Preparing them for the profession": An interpretative phenomenological analysis of anatomy educators coping with complexity in the United Kingdom curriculum. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION 2023; 16:237-251. [PMID: 36120944 DOI: 10.1002/ase.2225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Efforts to integrate the basic sciences into the ever-changing curriculum are a trending area of research in health professions education. Low-stakes, high-frequency assessment methods such as the progress test are now widely implemented in the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland as a means of furthering curricular integration toward contemporary goals of competency and professional identity formation. The anatomy educator's experience vis-à-vis these curricular changes is not well understood. This study aimed to explore how anatomy educators make sense of the shifting demands of their role. The interviews were semi-structured, particularly concerned with the phenomenon of teachers adapting to the complexity of their learning environment. The study used interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to focus on the lived experiences of participants coping with the phenomena in question: how do anatomy educators make sense of the learning environment in the United Kingdom? Interviews were transcribed verbatim and interpreted inductively, identifying four key themes: confidence through connectedness, variations in appraisals of curricular integration, managing expectations to perform in paradoxical situations, and the emergence of innovative teaching. Results point to the learning environment as a complex system and highlight the importance of feeling support from and connection to colleagues, enabling individual educators to develop confidence, meet the top-down demands of changing curricula, and experience personal identity development and uncertainty tolerance within their role. This IPA study offers insight into the lived experiences of anatomy educators whose experiential interpretations of a complex and changing curriculum can uniquely inform stakeholders in health professions education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen B Kirkness
- Health Professions Education Unit (HPEU), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Peter J Bazira
- Centre for Anatomical and Human Sciences, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Gabrielle M Finn
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Isabella E Nizza
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Barnhoorn PC, Nierkens V, Numans ME, Steinert Y, Kramer AWM, van Mook WNKA. General practice residents’ perspectives on their professional identity formation: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2022. [PMCID: PMC9301807 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To move beyond professionalism as a measurable competency, medical educators have highlighted the importance of forming a professional identity, in which learners come to ‘think, act, and feel like physicians’. This socialisation process is known as professional identity formation (PIF). Few empirical studies on PIF in residency have been undertaken. None of these studies focused on PIF during the full length of GP training as well as the interplay of concurrent socialising factors. Understanding the socialisation process involved in the development of a resident’s professional identity and the roles of influencing factors and their change over time could add to a more purposeful approach to PIF. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the process of PIF during the full length of General Practice (GP) training and which factors residents perceive as influential. Design A qualitative descriptive study employing focus group interviews. Setting Four GP training institutes across the Netherlands. Participants Ninety-two GP residents in their final training year participated in 12 focus group interviews. Results Study findings indicated that identity formation occurs primarily in the workplace, as residents move from doing to becoming and negotiate perceived norms. A tapestry of interrelated influencing factors—most prominently clinical experiences, clinical supervisors and self-assessments—changed over time and were felt to exert their influence predominantly in the workplace. Conclusions This study provides deeper empirical insights into PIF during GP residency. Doing the work of a GP exerted a pivotal influence on residents’ shift from doing as a GP to thinking, acting and feeling like a GP, that is, becoming a GP. Clinical supervisors are of utmost importance as role models and coaches in creating an environment that supports residents’ PIF. Implications for practice include faculty development initiatives to help supervisors be aware of how they can perform their various roles across different PIF stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter C Barnhoorn
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Vera Nierkens
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mattijs E Numans
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Steinert
- Department of Family Medicine and Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anneke WM Kramer
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Walther NKA van Mook
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Yu C, Liu Q, Wang W, Xie A, Liu J. Professional Identity of 0.24 Million Medical Students in China Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Three Waves of National Cross-Sectional Studies. Front Public Health 2022; 10:868914. [PMID: 35400047 PMCID: PMC8989960 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.868914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Professional identity (PI) influences the doctor's thoughts and behaviors. Thus, PI formation (PIF) plays an important role in medical students' education. Major changes to the learning environment could impact PIF, but the influence of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on medical students' PI had confusing conclusions in previous studies. We aimed to compare PI of medical students by using the data from three waves of national cross-sectional surveys conducted in China in 2019, 2020, and 2021, and to examine factors that influence PIF. METHOD We used data from the China Medical Student Survey (CMSS) which has conducted three national cross-sectional surveys. From 2019 to 2021, CMCC retrieved data on PI from a nationally representative sample of medical students from 33, 121, and 123 colleges, respectively. We analyzed the data using Chi-square test, analysis of variance, and multivariable logistic regression according to sociodemographic characteristics, pre-university experience, college characteristics, and college experience. RESULTS A total of 244,040 medical students in China participated in the surveys. The overall score of PI increased from 3.80 in 2019 to 3.85 in 2021. Medical students with family medical background, high intrinsic and extrinsic motivation of major selection, teachers' positive role model, and high personal comprehensive quality ranking were more likely to have higher PI (all p < 0.05). The more attention students paid to the COVID-19 pandemic, the higher PI they would have (aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.67-2.24 for more attention; aOR 2.31, 95% CI 2.00-2.68 for the most attention). However, parents' participation on the front lines of COVID-19 pandemic negatively influenced the PI of medical students (aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57-0.93). CONCLUSIONS PI of medical students increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of the pandemic on PI was complex. To improve the PI of medical students, the education sector, health sector and the society need to make concerted efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Yu
- National Center for Health Professions Education Development, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Department of Medical Education, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Qiao Liu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Weimin Wang
- National Center for Health Professions Education Development, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Department of Medical Education, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| | - Ana Xie
- National Center for Health Professions Education Development, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Department of Medical Education, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jue Liu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Department of Global Health and Development, Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mei XX, Wang HY, Wu XN, Wu JY, Lu YZ, Ye ZJ. Self-Efficacy and Professional Identity Among Freshmen Nursing Students: A Latent Profile and Moderated Mediation Analysis. Front Psychol 2022; 13:779986. [PMID: 35310284 PMCID: PMC8927723 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This study was designed to estimate the associations between self-efficacy and professional identity. A total of 1,051 freshmen nursing students (FNSs) from the Be Resilient to Nursing Career (BRNC) program were recruited from four universities between September and November 2020. A latent profile and moderated meditation analysis were performed. Four profiles of self-efficacy were identified and named as Lowest (15.6%), Med-low (45.0%), Med-high (32.7%), and Highest (6.7%). The mediating role of resilience and the moderating effect of role models were also identified. Therefore, self-efficacy, resilience, and role models may be three important factors to professional identity in FNSs and these relationships should be further validated in longitudinal or interventional studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Zeng Jie Ye
- School of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Santivasi WL, Nordhues HC, Hafferty FW, Vaa Stelling BE, Ratelle JT, Beckman TJ, Sawatsky AP. Reframing professional identity through navigating tensions during residency: A qualitative study. PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 11:93-100. [PMID: 35301685 PMCID: PMC8941044 DOI: 10.1007/s40037-022-00709-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Professional identity formation (PIF) is the internalization of characteristics, values, and norms of the medical profession. An individual's identity formation has both psychological and sociological influences. Social psychology may be useful to explore the interactions between the psychological and sociological aspects of PIF. In this study, we explored how resident physicians navigated tensions between professional ideals and the reality of medical practice to characterize PIF during residency training. METHODS Using constructivist grounded theory, the authors conducted 23 semi-structured interviews with internal medicine residents. Interview transcripts were processed through open coding and analytic memo writing. During data gathering and analysis, the authors utilized Social Cognitive Theory, specifically the bidirectional influence between person, behavior, and context, to analyze relationships among themes. Theoretical insights were refined through group discussion and constant comparison with newly collected data. RESULTS Residents described tensions experienced during residency between pre-existing ideals of "a good doctor" and the realities of medical practice, often challenging residents to reframe their ideals. The authors provide evidence for the presence of dynamic, bidirectional influences between identity (person), behavior, and environment (context), and demonstrate how PIF is informed by a complex interplay between these elements. The authors present two examples to demonstrate how residents reframed their ideals during residency training. DISCUSSION The complex bidirectional influences between person, behavior, and context, informed by SCT, helps illuminate the process of PIF in residency training. This study highlights the effects of the context of residency training on the development of residents' professional identities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wil L Santivasi
- Center for Palliative Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Hannah C Nordhues
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - John T Ratelle
- Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Thomas J Beckman
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Adam P Sawatsky
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sawatsky AP, O'Brien BC, Hafferty FW. Autonomy and developing physicians: Reimagining supervision using self-determination theory. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 56:56-63. [PMID: 34091940 DOI: 10.1111/medu.14580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
In this article, we address the question, 'What is the role of autonomy in physician development?' Medical education is a developmental process, and autonomy plays a motivational role in physician development. Calls for increased supervision of residents have raised concerns that the resulting decreased autonomy might interfere with resident development, leading the authors to explore the relationship between supervision and autonomy. The medical education literature posits a simple inverse relationship between supervision and autonomy. Within competency frameworks, autonomy is operationalised as independence and viewed as the end goal of training. Alternatively, there is emerging empirical literature describing autonomy and supervision as dynamic and developmental constructs and point towards more complex relationship between supervision and autonomy. Self-determination theory (SDT) presents a framework for understanding this dynamic relationship and the role of autonomy in physician development. Within SDT, autonomy is a fundamental psychological need, associated with motivation for learning, self-regulation and an internal locus of control. Supporting learner autonomy can afford learners the opportunity to internalise the values and norms of the profession, leading to an integrated regulation of their behaviours and actions. Conceptualising autonomy through the lens of SDT provides an avenue for education interventions and future research on supervision and autonomy. Educators can integrate supervision and autonomy support in the clinical setting, seeking to motivate learner development by balancing optimal challenge and support and integrating autonomy support with 'hands-on' approaches to supervision. SDT also provides a theoretical framework relevant to current discussions regarding feedback conversations and coaching in medical education. Lastly, conceptualising autonomy using SDT opens new avenues for investigation, exploring the complex relationship between supervision and autonomy and developing efforts to integrate autonomy support with clinical supervision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam P Sawatsky
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bridget C O'Brien
- Department of Medicine and Center for Faculty Educators, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Snook AG, Schram AB, Arnadottir SA. “I am a teacher” – exploring how to support teacher identity formation in physical therapists. PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2021.2000809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Asta B. Schram
- School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kvernenes M, Valestrand EA, Schei E, Boudreau JD, Ofstad EH, Hokstad LM. Threshold concepts in group-based mentoring and implications for faculty development: A qualitative analysis. MEDICAL TEACHER 2021; 43:879-883. [PMID: 34097839 DOI: 10.1080/0142159x.2021.1931077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The literature on faculty development programs for mentors is scarce. This study examines mentors' experiences and challenges, with the aim of identifying threshold concepts in mentoring. It also discusses the implications for the faculty development of mentors. METHODS Semi-structured interviews solicited personal narratives and reflections on mentors' lived experiences. Data analysis was guided by the threshold concepts framework allowing for the identification of significant and transformative shifts in perspectives. RESULTS We interviewed 22 mentors from two Norwegian and one Canadian medical school with group-based mentoring programs. The mentoring experience involved four significant threshold concepts: focusing on students' needs; the importance of creating a trusting learning space; seeing oneself through the eyes of students; and aligning mentor and physician identities. CONCLUSION Taking on a mentor role can provoke personal and professional dilemmas while also sparking growth. The trajectories of developing as a mentor and as a professional physician may be seen to mutually validate, mirror and reinforce each other. Faculty development programs designed specifically for mentors should aim to stimulate reflection on previous learning experiences and strive for a successful alignment of the distinct pedagogical and clinical content knowledge required to fulfill various professional roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Kvernenes
- Center for Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Edvin Schei
- Center for Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - J Donald Boudreau
- Institute of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, Australia
| | - Eirik Hugaas Ofstad
- Department of Community Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
- The Medical Clinic, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway
| | - Leif Martin Hokstad
- Educational Development Unit, Department of Education and Lifelong Learning, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Medical Simulation Centre, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kuilanoff E. Burnout and Our Professional Identity Crisis as Clinical Educators. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2021; 96:616-617. [PMID: 33885409 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000003994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Kuilanoff
- Clinical assistant professor of general pediatrics (clinician-educator), Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California;
| |
Collapse
|