Adult procedural sedation: an update

Immediate effects of propofol on mood: a randomized comparison of two doses in a cohort with depression

RATIONALE

The intravenous anesthetic propofol is known to induce positive mood effects during routine clinical use, suggesting it might be repurposed as an antidepressant, but also raising concerns about abuse potential. How propofol's acute effects vary by dose and with repeated infusions is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This exploratory analysis aimed to (1) compare the immediate mood effects of propofol administered at two different doses, (2) describe how those mood effects change with repeated infusions, and (3) evaluate whether acute mood improvement predicts later antidepressant response.

METHODS

Twenty-four adults with moderate-to-severe treatment-resistant depression were randomized into two dosing groups. Six low- or high-dose propofol infusions were administered under blinded conditions over a two-week period. Self-reported mood states were recorded before and after each infusion using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS-X). Abuse potential was evaluated with the Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ-5).

RESULTS

At the first infusion, propofol induced acute improvements in PANAS-X Sadness, Fear, Joviality, and Serenity scales (p < 0.002), independent of dose. Over the series of six infusions, acute changes in Sadness, Fear, and Joviality, but not Serenity, diminished with infusion number (p < 0.002). The DEQ-5 "want more" rating decreased across infusions (p = 0.002). Changes in PANAS-X scales with the first infusion did not predict later improvement in depression severity (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Cumulative changes in mood states observed with repeated infusions suggest that propofol engages adaptive mechanisms in mood circuitry. Subjective responses with repeated infusions do not indicate increasing potential for abuse in this patient population.

Effect of intravenous lidocaine on Ciprofol dose in patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Ciprofol (CIP) for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy (GE) can cause respiratory or cardiovascular complications. The literature suggests that intravenous (IV) lidocaine infusion can alleviate visceral pain and enhance humans' ventilator response to CO2. Therefore, it was hypothesized that IV lidocaine could reduce the CIP dose for painless GE and improve recovery time.

METHODS

This randomized placebo-controlled trial included 40 patients undergoing GE. After CIP titration for unconsciousness, patients in group L were given IV lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg bolus dose, then a 2 mg/kg/h continuous infusion); the same volume saline as placebo was given for N group patients. The primary endpoint was the required CIP dose. Secondary endpoints were: endoscopic examination time, awakening time, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge time, pain and fatigue after awakening, adverse events, and endoscopist's and patient's satisfaction.

RESULTS

Both cohorts had comparable demographic characteristics. Group L's CIP consumption was decreased by 23.0% than the N group (47.38 ± 7.45 mg vs. 61.50 ± 9.44 mg, respectively, p < 0.001). Awakening time (P=0.002), PACU discharge time (P < 0.001), pain (P = 0.008), and fatigue (P = 0.004) after awakening were also reduced in group L. Furthermore, group L had higher satisfaction scores than group N (P = 0.017). No marked difference was identified in the incidence of unfavorable effects (P > 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Lidocaine IV infusion caused a 23.0% reduction in CIP requirements during GE. Furthermore, post-endoscopic pain and fatigue were also improved, thus suggesting that lidocaine is an efficient therapeutic option.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial has been submitted to the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2300069868, registration date: 28/03/2023).

Comparison of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for the induction of deep sedation during gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures: A multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial

Ciprofol is a propofol analogue with improved pharmacokinetic properties. A multi‐centre, non‐inferiority trial was conducted to compare the deep sedation properties of ciprofol and propofol with a non‐inferiority margin of 8% in patients undergoing gastroscopy and colonoscopy. In total, 289 patients were randomly allocated for surgery (259 colonoscopy and 30 gastroscopy) at a 1:1 ratio to be given intravenous injections of ciprofol (0.4 mg/kg) or propofol (1.5 mg/kg). The primary outcome was the success rate of colonoscopy defined as colonoscopy completion with no need for an alternative sedative or >5 ciprofol or propofol top up doses within any 15‐min time period. The success rate of colonoscopy was 100% in the ciprofol group vs. 99.2% in the propofol group (mean difference 0.8%, 95% CI: −2.2% to 4.2%). Except for the gastrointestinal lesions found during the gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures, the occurrence rates of adverse drug reactions in the ciprofol and propofol groups were 31.3% and 62.8%, respectively (P < 0.001). Pain on injection was less common in the ciprofol group (4.9% vs. 52.4%, P < 0.001). The outcomes demonstrated that ciprofol was non‐inferior to propofol with regard to successful sedation for gastroscopy or colonoscopy procedures and no obvious important adverse events occurred.

Prospective evaluation of remifentanil-propofol mixture for total intravenous anesthesia: A randomized controlled study

Application of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) may be considered as unpractical when compared with inhalational anesthesia. Although it is mostly not recommended, mixing intravenous agents is popular in clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to investigate the suitability of using remifentanil-propofol mixture (MIXTIVA) for TIVA. Adult patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade of I-II scheduled for elective thyroidectomy were randomly allocated to 3 groups (n=32 for each) to receive TIVA with remifentanil and propofol infusions separately (control group, Group I) or with MIXTIVA infusion that contained remifentanil/propofol at a proportion of 2/1,000 or 3/1,000 (remifentanil concentration, 20 or 30 µg/ml in 1% propofol in Group II or Group III, respectively). The extubation time (the primary outcome of the study), the orientation time and number of patients in whom intraoperative hypotension, hypertension or bradycardia episodes were encountered during anesthesia were comparable among the groups. The mean remifentanil infusion rate in Group III was significantly higher than that in the other groups. The mean propofol infusion rates and mean bispectral index (BIS) scores during anesthesia were comparable among groups. Hypotension accompanied with a high BIS was encountered in one patient in Group III. In conclusion, compared to the standard TIVA technique using separate drug infusions, MIXTIVA infusion used for thyroidectomies did not result in any statistically significant difference in recovery and clinical outcomes. This technique may be considered as a practical implementation for busy ambulatory centers performing general anesthesia. The present study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (trial registration no. NCT04394897).

The Influence of Age on Propofol Dosing Requirements During Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department

Propofol is a frequently used agent for procedural sedation in the emergency department (ED). Some have suggested that propofol dosing in this setting should be adjusted in elderly patients; however, limited data exist supporting this recommendation. Additional factors that may contribute to altered propofol dose requirements in this setting have not been thoroughly explored. The objective of this analysis was to ascertain the effect age may have on the propofol dose required during procedural sedation in the ED. This retrospective study was conducted at a Level 1 academic medical center ED and included patients 18 years or older who received propofol for procedural sedation from 2015 to 2017. Those patients who were 18-64 years of age were compared with those 65 years or older. Between the two groups, total and weight-based propofol requirements for sedation, opioid doses, and adverse events were compared. This analysis included 101 procedural sedations. The median induction dose and opioid requirements before or during the procedure were not significantly different between the two groups. Compared with patients 18-64 years of age, those 65 years or older had significantly less total weight-based propofol requirements (p = 0.024) and required less total propofol for sedation (p = 0.007). In addition, patients 65 years or older required fewer repeat doses of propofol during the procedure than younger patients (p = 0.043). The incidence of adverse effects, including respiratory suppression, was not significantly different between the two groups. Patients 65 years or older may have lower weight-based propofol dosing requirements than younger patients. Utilizing a reduced total dose and repeat dosing strategy for propofol in this setting may be indicated. Further investigations are recommended to clarify factors that signal the need for more tailored dosing.

Clinical Knowledge and Practice of "Ketofol" at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital

Background: Ketamine and propofol in a single syringe are reported to create an admixture used for balancing cardiorespiratory effects during induction of general anesthesia. This study aimed to assess the clinical practice and knowledge of “ketofol” among anesthesia providers.

Methods: A cross-sectional institutional-based study was conducted among anesthesia providers. Data abstracted format was prepared and distributed to senior anesthetists, junior anesthetist postgraduate students, and undergraduate students. The study was conducted from January 1, 2019, to January 30, 2019. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were performed for frequency distribution and to determine the association, respectively.

Result: From a total of 133 participants included in the study, the majority, 88 (66.2%), were men and 75 (56.9%) had 0–2 years of experience. More than two-thirds of participants, 105 (78.9%), have never had a seminar or educational session about combined use. Lack of experience among 11 participants (8.3%) was one of the reasons for not using “ketofol” followed by lack of knowledge among three (2.3%) participants. The majority of participants, 112 (84.2%), prefer ketamine and propofol to be administered one right after the other with separate syringes and the ratio to be 1:2, 64 (48.2). There was no significant association observed between sociodemographic and other characteristics and the practice of “ketofol.”

Conclusion: In this study, nearly half of the participants rated their knowledge at the average level, and the study identifies that there is clinical knowledge and practice gap among anesthesia providers working in the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (UOGCSH). Preparing educational sessions regarding “ketofol” for addressing identified barriers is among the recommendations forwarded to UOGCSH.

Difference between remimazolam toluenesulfonic acid and propofol in waking quality and conscious state after general anesthesia

Objective

To explore the difference of anesthesia recovery and postoperative conscious state between remimazolam toluenesulfonic acid and propofol after induction and maintenance of general anesthesia.

Methods

104 patients undergoing elective tracheal intubation general anesthesia in our hospital were randomly divided into 2 groups: Remimazolam Toluenesulfonic acid group (Group R) and Propofol group (Group P). MOAA/S score, the modified Aldrete score, recovery index, time point, a state of consciousness, interpretative vital signs and adverse events were monitored at different time.

Results

Compared with the Group P, the extubation time and orientation recovery time of the Group R were significantly shorter. When the operation time was less than 1 hour, the MOAA/S score of the Group R was shorter than that of Group P at 5 min and 15 min after the operation. To compare with the Group P, the score of MOAA/S in the Group R increased at 5 min, 20 min and 30 min after the operation. When the operation time was less than or equal to 1 h, the modified Aldrete score in the Group R was slightly higher than that in the Group P at 30 min after extubation. There was no injection pain in the the Group R, and the incidence of hypotension was lower than that of propofol.

Conclusion

Compared with Propofol, when the operation time of general anesthesia is more than 1 hour, recovery time of Remimazolam Toluenesulfonic acid is shorter, with more complete and higher-quality recovery.

Induction and maintenance of procedural sedation in adults: focus on remimazolam injection

Introduction: Procedural sedation (PS) is a humane way to help patients get through painful medical procedures by the administration of sedative drugs combined with analgesics. However, each of the currently used medications has certain shortcomings, urging the search for a new drug. Remimazolam, a novel benzodiazepine, is an ultra-short-acting hypnotic agent invented out of the 'soft drug' development.Areas covered: This presented review provides an overview of the drugs used in clinical practice for the induction and maintenance of procedural sedation in adults, focusing on the newly investigated benzodiazepine remimazolam. Literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE and ClinicalTrial.gov databases from January 2007 to December 2020.Expert opinion: Based on the reported clinical trials so far, remimazolam has demonstrated its effectiveness and safety with promising properties including rapid onset, short duration of action, predictable and consistent recovery profile, metabolism almost unaffected by liver or renal function, with non or minimal cardiorespiratory depression, and availability with a reversal drug. With marketing approval received recently, remimazolam is expected to have a place in the practice for procedural sedation in the near future if its efficacy and safety are further confirmed by more clinical trials and post-market analyses.

Procedural sedation in Belgium : guideline for safe patient care

Guideline produced by the Society for Anesthesia and Resuscitation of Belgium Working Group on Procedural Sedation (SARB-WG-PS).

[Drugs for intravenous induction of anesthesia: propofol]

In a series of articles dealing with hypnotics for induction of anesthesia, this article describes the development and current value of propofol. Its significance far exceeds that of a pure induction hypnotic (sedation in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and on the intensive care unit). Propofol is also used for sedation in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and on the intensive care unit. In the field of induction of anesthesia, the alternatives are barely used. Some contraindications are still controversial whereas others are no longer sufficiently anchored in the users' awareness (widespread off-label use). Adverse effects, such as injection pain, infection risk and propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS) could be significantly reduced by pharmacovigilance. With appropriate caution nearly the whole spectrum of anesthesiology patients can be treated using propofol. The hemodynamic side effects and the rare but potentially fatal PRIS are limitations. Further developments address the water solubility and the solubilizing agents of propofol.

Guidelines for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults: Joint Indian Chest Society/National College of chest physicians (I)/Indian association for bronchology recommendations

Flexible bronchoscopy (FB) is commonly performed by respiratory physicians for diagnostic as well as therapeutic purposes. However, bronchoscopy practices vary widely across India and worldwide. The three major respiratory organizations of the country supported a national-level expert group that formulated a comprehensive guideline document for FB based on a detailed appraisal of available evidence. These guidelines are an attempt to provide the bronchoscopist with the most scientifically sound as well as practical approach of bronchoscopy. It involved framing appropriate questions, review and critical appraisal of the relevant literature and reaching a recommendation by the expert groups. The guidelines cover major areas in basic bronchoscopy including (but not limited to), indications for procedure, patient preparation, various sampling procedures, bronchoscopy in the ICU setting, equipment care, and training issues. The target audience is respiratory physicians working in India and well as other parts of the world. It is hoped that this document would serve as a complete reference guide for all pulmonary physicians performing or desiring to learn the technique of flexible bronchoscopy.

Feasibility of measuring memory response to increasing dexmedetomidine sedation in children

BACKGROUND

The memory effect of dexmedetomidine has not been prospectively evaluated in children. We evaluated the feasibility of measuring memory and sedation responses in children during dexmedetomidine sedation for non-painful radiological imaging studies. Secondarily, we quantified changes in memory in relation to the onset of sedation.

METHODS

A 10 min bolus of dexmedetomidine (2 mcg kg^-1) was given to children as they named simple line drawings every five s. The absence of sedation was identified as any verbal response, regardless of correctness. After recovery, recognition memory was tested with correct Yes/No recognitions (50% novel pictures) and was matched to sedation responses during the bolus period (subsequent memory paradigm).

RESULTS

Of 64 accruals, 30 children (mean [SD]6.1 (1.2) yr, eight male) received dexmedetomidine and completed all study tasks. Individual responses were able to be modelled successfully in the 30 children completing all the study tasks, demonstrating feasibility of this approach. Children had 50% probability of verbal response at five min 40 s after infusion start, whereas 50% probability of subsequent recognition memory occurred sooner at four min five s.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantifying memory and sedation effects during dexmedetomidine infusion in verbal children was possible and demonstrated that memory function was present until shortly before verbal unresponsiveness occurred. This is the first study to investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on memory in children.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT 02354378.

Propofol for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that propofol, a unique general anesthetic that engages N-methyl-D-aspartate and gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors, has antidepressant properties. This open-label trial was designed to collect preliminary data regarding the feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of deep propofol anesthesia for treatment-resistant depression.

METHODS

Ten participants with moderate-to-severe medication-resistant depression (age 18-45 years and otherwise healthy) each received a series of 10 propofol infusions. Propofol was dosed to strongly suppress electroencephalographic activity for 15 minutes. The primary depression outcome was the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Self-rated depression scores were compared with a group of 20 patients who received electroconvulsive therapy.

RESULTS

Propofol treatments were well tolerated by all subjects. No serious adverse events occurred. Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores remained stable. Hamilton scores decreased by a mean of 20 points (range 0-45 points), corresponding to a mean 58% improvement from baseline (range 0-100%). Six of the 10 subjects met the criteria for response (>50% improvement). Self-rated depression improved similarly in the propofol group and electroconvulsive therapy group. Five of the 6 propofol responders remained well for at least 3 months. In posthoc analyses, electroencephalographic measures predicted clinical response to propofol.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that high-dose propofol treatment is feasible and well tolerated by individuals with treatment-resistant depression who are otherwise healthy. Propofol may trigger rapid, durable antidepressant effects similar to electroconvulsive therapy but with fewer side effects. Controlled studies are warranted to further evaluate propofol's antidepressant efficacy and mechanisms of action. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02935647.

Different effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine sedation on electroencephalogram patterns: Wakefulness, moderate sedation, deep sedation and recovery

Sedation induces changes in electroencephalography (EEG) dynamics. However, the distinct EEG dynamic characteristics at comparable sedation levels have not been well studied, resulting in potential interpretation errors in EEG monitoring during sedation. We aimed to analyze the EEG dynamics of dexmedetomidine and propofol at comparable sedation levels and to explore EEG changes with increased sedation levels for each agent. We measured the Bispectral Index (BIS) and 20-channel EEG under dexmedetomidine and propofol sedation from wakefulness, moderate sedation, and deep sedation to recovery in healthy volunteers (n = 10) in a randomized, 2-day, crossover study. Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (OAA/S) score was used to assess sedation levels. Despite similar changes in increased delta oscillations, multiple differences in the EEG spatiotemporal dynamics were observed between these two agents. During moderate sedation, both dexmedetomidine and propofol induced increased spindle power; however, dexmedetomidine decreased the global alpha/beta/gamma power, whereas propofol decreased the alpha power in the occipital area and increased the global spindle/beta/gamma power. During deep sedation, dexmedetomidine was associated with increased fronto-central spindle power and decreased global alpha/beta/gamma power, but propofol was associated with increased theta/alpha/spindle/beta power, which was maximized in the frontal area. The transition of topographic alpha/spindle/beta power distribution from moderate sedation to deep sedation completely differed between these two agents. Our study demonstrated that there was a distinct hierarchy of EEG changes with increased sedation depths by propofol and dexmedetomidine. Differences in EEG dynamics at the same sedation level might account for differences in the BIS value and reflect the different sedation mechanisms. EEG-based clinical sedation monitoring should consider the effect of drug types on EEG dynamics.

Sedation for advanced procedures in the bronchoscopy suite: proceduralist or anesthesiologist?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article focuses on the issue of sedation provided either by proceduralists or anesthesiologists for advanced bronchoscopy procedures. The relative merits of both approaches are presented. Current evidence from the literature and guideline recommendations relevant to this topic are reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

In general, patient and proceduralist satisfaction as well as patient safety are increased when intravenous sedation is provided for advanced bronchoscopic procedures. However, guidelines by various societies remain vague on defining the appropriate level of care required when providing sedation for these procedures. In addition, targeted depth of sedation varies considerably among practitioners. While in some settings, nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol sedation has been proven safe; nevertheless, its use is controversial, especially in the bronchoscopy suite.

SUMMARY

The role of the anesthesiologist in sedation for advanced bronchoscopy remains undefined. When deep sedation for prolonged interventional procedures is needed or when dealing with patients who have multiple comorbidities, an anesthesiologist should be involved.

Ketamine procedural sedation in the emergency department of an urban tertiary hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We describe ketamine procedural sedations and associated adverse events in low-acuity and high-acuity patients in a resource-limited ED.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of ketamine procedural sedations at the Emergency Medical Department at the Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. We observed consecutive procedural sedations and recorded patient demographics, medications, vital signs, pulse oximetry, capnography and a priori defined adverse events (using standard definitions in emergency medicine sedation guidelines). All treatment decisions were at the discretion of the treating providers who were blinded to study measurements to simulate usual care. Data collection was unblinded if predefined safety parameters were met. For all significant adverse and unblinding events, ketamine causality was determined via review protocol. Additionally, providers and patients were assessed for sedation satisfaction.

RESULTS

We observed 54 children (median 3 years, range 11 days-15 years) and 45 adults (median 33 years, range 18-79 years). The most common indications for ketamine were burn management in children (55.6%) and orthopaedic procedures in adults (68.9%). Minor adverse events included nausea/vomiting (12%), recovery excitation (11%) and one case of transient hypertension. There were nine (9%) patients who had decreased saturation readings (SpO₂ ≤92%). There were three deaths, all in severely injured patients. After review protocol, none of the desaturations or patient deaths were thought to be caused by ketamine. No patient experienced ketamine-related laryngospasm, apnoea or permanent complications. Overall, ketamine was well tolerated and resulted in high patient and provider satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

In this series of ketamine sedations in an urban, resource-limited ED, there were no serious adverse events attributable to ketamine.

On the Horizon: The Future of Procedural Sedation

Sedation plays an integral part in endoscopy. By achieving patient comfort, it allows for a better examination and enhances patient satisfaction. Various medications have been used, propofol being the current favorite. With emphasis on patient safety and quality of endoscopy, various new medications in different combinations are being used to achieve adequate sedation and not escalate the cost of the procedure. With the advent of newer medications and newer modalities to administer these medications, there is need for more specialized training for the endoscopist to feel comfortable while using these medications.

Efficacy and Safety of FospropofolFD Compared to Propofol When Given During the Induction of General Anaesthesia: A Phase II, Multi-centre, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Active-Controlled, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study

The present phase II study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of fospropofol disodium for injection (FospropofolFD ) and propofol when given during the induction of general anaesthesia in patients scheduled for elective surgery. FospropofolFD is a water-soluble prodrug of propofol. Approved by the Ethical Committee, 240 participants aged 18-65 years were equally randomly allocated to receive an intravenous bolus of FospropofolFD 20 mg/kg or propofol 2 mg/kg without any anaesthetic pre-treatment. The primary efficacy end-point was the sedation success rate within 5 min. after administering investigational drugs (the sedation success is defined as obtaining Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale score of 1). All the participants completed the induction and intubation within 25 min. after administration. The sedation success rates within 5 min. after administration of FospropofolFD 20 mg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg were 94.50% versus 100% in the intention-to-treat population and 95.10% versus 100% in the per-protocol population, respectively. The non-inferiority test obtained a p-value less than 0.025, and the lower limits of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval were more than -0.09. This meant that FospropofolFD 20 mg/kg was considered non-inferior to propofol 2 mg/kg for the primary efficacy end-point. Compared with propofol 2 mg/kg, FospropofolFD 20 mg/kg had a slower sedation efficacy. No serious adverse events were observed in the two groups. The sedation success rate within 5 min. after administration of FospropofolFD 20 mg/kg was non-inferior to propofol 2 mg/kg, and FospropofolFD 20 mg/kg can be used for the induction of general anaesthesia safely.