Perioperative Opioid Administration

Knowledge, attitudes and practices of pain management among Taiwanese physicians in a reformed 2-year postgraduate training programme: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey

BACKGROUND

Taiwan implemented a reformed 6-year medical education in 2013, with a subsequent 2-year postgraduate training programme starting in August 2019. This study investigated the perceptions of acute and chronic pain management in postgraduate physicians.

METHODS

In late July 2023, a cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted of Taiwanese physicians who had almost completed their postgraduate 2-year or 1-year training and those who were starting a postgraduate programme in early August 2023. This survey evaluated their knowledge, attitude and clinical experience related to opioid-based pain management and their perceptions of the opioid crisis in the United States and Taiwan.

RESULTS

Of the 197 postgraduate physicians, 169 (85.8%) responded to the survey. Physicians who had received postgraduate 2-year (n = 48) and 1-year (n = 51) training had a deeper understanding of opioids (p < 0.001) and exhibited greater confidence in acute and chronic pain management (both p < 0.001) compared with those who were just starting a postgraduate programme (n = 70). Of the included physicians, 92 (54.4%) were aware of the ongoing opioid crisis in the United States, but only 28 (16.6%) disagreed with the notion of a current opioid problem in Taiwan. Approximately 27.8% had never heard of multimodal analgesia, and 86.4% expressed a need for further pain management education.

CONCLUSIONS

The postgraduate training programme in Taiwan provides enhanced knowledge of opioids and improves physicians' levels of confidence in acute and chronic pain management. However, only one-sixth of postgraduate physicians are aware that Taiwan does not have an opioid problem.

Predicting postoperative complications after pneumonectomy using machine learning: a 10-year study

BACKGROUND

Reducing postoperative cardiovascular and neurological complications (PCNC) during thoracic surgery is the key to improving postoperative survival.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate independent predictors of PCNC, develop machine learning models, and construct a predictive nomogram for PCNC in patients undergoing thoracic surgery for lung cancer.

METHODS

This study used data from a previous retrospective study of 16,368 patients with lung cancer (training set: 11,458; validation set: 4,910) with American Standards Association physical statuses I-IV who underwent surgery. Postoperative information was collected from electronic medical records to help build models based on cause-and-effect and statistical data, potentially revealing hidden dependencies between factors and diseases in a big data environment. The optimal model was analyzed and filtered using multiple machine-learning models (Logistic regression, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Random forest, Light Gradient Boosting Machine and Naïve Bayes). A predictive nomogram was built and receiver operating characteristics were used to assess the validity of the model. The discriminative power and clinical validity were assessed using calibration and decision-making curve analyses.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, surgery duration, intraoperative intercostal nerve block, postoperative patient-controlled analgesia, bronchial blocker use and sufentanil use were independent predictors of PCNC. Random forest was identified as the optimal model with an area under the curve of 0.898 in the training set and 0.752 in the validation set, confirming the excellent prediction accuracy of the nomogram. All the net benefits of the five machine-learning models in the training and validation sets demonstrated excellent clinical applicability, and the calibration curves showed good agreement between the predicted and observed risks.

CONCLUSION

The combination of machine-learning models and nomograms may contribute to the early prediction and reduction in the incidence of PCNC.

Can intraoperative opioid use in hip and knee arthroplasty be reduced further without negatively affecting pain control: A case controlled study

Background

Whilst forming the backbone of perioperative analgesic regimes in joint replacement surgery, the negative side effect profile of opioids is well known. Common impediments to a smooth running Enhanced Rapid Recovery model of care are often altered cognitive function and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), both related to opioid use.This study focuses on evaluating whether further reductions in intraoperative opioid use during joint arthroplasty can be safely achieved with minimal impact of such reductions on pain control and postoperative outcomes including opioid requirements and the incidence of PONV and ability to mobilise.

Method

Case controlled review of prospectively collected data assessing intraoperative opioid use, postoperative analgesic requirement, incidence of PONV and cognitive status as well as day 0 mobility postoperatively. 50 patients were randomized in the study and control groups.

Results

The study group received statistically significant lower dose of intraoperative opioids equivalent to 24.18 mg of Morphine compared to control group with equivalent to 69.58 mg of Morphine (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant increase in analgesia requirement postoperatively and no negative influence on PONV or ability to follow immediate postoperative rehabilitative protocols.

Conclusion

Opioid use intraoperatively can be reduced even further without any compromise of postoperative pain control and PONV and may further reduce impediments to efficiency in rapid recovery models of care.

Efficacy of quadratus lumborum block type 3 on postoperative cell-mediated immunity and analgesia for laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Various methods have been formulated to reduce pain and relieve immunosuppression in order to improve prognosis. The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) on the postoperative analgesia and perioperative cell-mediated immunity in patients underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 54 patients scheduled for laparoscopic radical gastrectomy were randomly evenly assigned into both groups. The participants in Group Q received US-guided QLB 3 bilaterally with ropivacaine (0.25%, 30 mL on each side) before surgery along with GA, and those in Group C received GA without any special treatment. Both groups were given patient-controlled intravenous analgesia postoperatively. The primary outcomes were the T-cell subsets and Natural killer (NK) cell level at 30 min before surgery (T0) and at 0, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively (T1, T2, T3, and T4) were measured. The secondary outcomes were as fellows: the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (rest and movement) at T1, T2, T3, and T4. In addition, the opioid consumption, and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions.

RESULTS

The level of CD3 + , CD4 + T, and natural killer (NK) cells, besides the CD4 + /CD8 + ratio showed less reduction at T1, T2, T3, and T4 in Group Q (P < 0.05). The VAS pain scores (at rest and on movement) were significantly lower in Group Q at T1-T4 (P < 0.05). Opioid consumption and the incidence of adverse reactions were lower in Group Q (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For patients undergoing LRG, the ultrasound-guided QLB 3 could alleviate perioperative cell-mediated immunity suppression, improve postoperative analgesia, decrease opioid consumption, and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000034592).

Global research frontiers and thematic trends in opioid-free anesthesia over the past 20 years: a bibliometric analysis

Objective

Opioids have constituted an essential element of general anesthesia for a considerable length of time. However, with the increase in opioid misuse and associated postoperative adverse effects, studies related to opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) have emerged, which pose a challenge in identifying key research directions. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to provide a review of the relevant literature in the field of OFA over the past 2 decades, with the goal of identifying the prevailing trends and research Frontiers.

Methods

A systematic review of the publications on OFA was conducted using the Web of Science Core Collection database, with the objective of identifying relevant publications between the years 2005 and 2024. The bibliometric analysis was conducted using CiteSpace (version 6.1. R6), VOSviewer (version 1.6.19), and R (version4.4.2).

Results

In conclusion, 477 publications were included in this study. The number of annual publications in this field has exhibited a steady increase over the past 2 decades. The United States and its institutions were found to be the most central. Forget, Patrice, and BELOEIL H were identified as the most prolific and highly cited authors, respectively. The journal with the highest number of publications was BMC Anesthesiology. The most frequently cited journal was Anesthesia and Analgesia, followed by Anesthesiology. In addition, keyword burst, keywords co-occurrence, and analysis of cited references indicate that recent studies have focused on: opioid consumption, pain, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Meanwhile, analysis of keyword clusters and keywords timeline view showed that the main research frontiers are sevoflurane anesthesia, plane block, multimodal anesthesia, opioid-sparing anesthesia.

Conclusion

Our results show that the current trends and directions of research focus on opioid consumption, pain, and PONV. Frontiers for future research are expected to include research areas related to sevoflurane anesthesia, plane block, multimodal anesthesia, opioid-sparing anesthesia.

Intravenous Ibuprofen Versus Ketorolac for Perioperative Pain Control in Patients with Morbid Obesity Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the perioperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous ibuprofen versus ketorolac in patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial included adult patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery. Participants were randomized to receive either ibuprofen or ketorolac intravenously every 8 h. All patients received paracetamol intravenously 1 gm/6 h. Inadequate intraoperative analgesia was managed by fentanyl boluses, while inadequate postoperative analgesia was managed by nalbuphine boluses. The primary outcome was static visual analogue scale (VAS) 0.5 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were postoperative static and dynamic VAS, intra- and postoperative opioids consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patients' satisfaction.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were analyzed in each group. The median VAS (quartiles) at 0.5 h postoperatively was lower in the ketorolac group (3 [3, 6]) than in the ibuprofen group (7 [4, 8]), P-value < 0.001. The static and dynamic VAS were lower in the ketorolac group than in the ibuprofen group up to 6 h postoperatively. The intra- and postoperative opioid consumption was lower in the ketorolac group than in the ibuprofen group. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was also lower in the ketorolac group than in the ibuprofen group. Patients in the ketorolac group had higher level of satisfaction than patients in the ibuprofen group.

CONCLUSION

In patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery, perioperative administration of ketorolac provided improved pain control, reduced opioid consumption, and lowered the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting, compared to ibuprofen. Additionally, patients reported higher satisfaction with ketorolac.

Impacts of opioid stewardship in surgical settings: a scoping review

ABSTRACT

Opioid stewardship programs have been implemented in many countries to reduce harms related to prescription opioid use. Yet, there is an evidence gap on the impact of these programs in surgical settings. This systematic scoping review aimed to examine the impact of opioid stewardship on opioid use and clinical outcomes, alongside assessing adherence, and barriers to its implementation in surgical settings. A systematic search strategy was developed and applied among 7 electronic databases for published literature. In total, 100 eligible articles were included in the review. Most studies showed that opioid stewardship reduced the quantity of opioid use (in 83/88 studies; 94%) and the number of days of opioid supplied (15/18; 83%). No effect was seen on the rate of opioid refills (34/44; 78%), postoperative pain scores (22/23; 96%), and length of hospital stay (12/15; 80%). The adherence rates ranged from 32% to 100%, with considerable heterogeneity in the indicators used to measure the quality use of opioids. Logistical issues, patients' demand for analgesics, clinicians' uncertainty regarding the efficacy of nonopioid analgesics, and a lack of role allocation were reported as major barriers to implementation. Opioid stewardship can improve the quality use of opioids without adversely affecting clinical outcomes. The variety of opioid stewardship types, measurement metrics, study designs, and different surgeries pose challenges in determining causal relationships. Future prospective studies using standardized approaches are needed to develop more robust evidence.

Comparison of surgical pleth index-guided analgesia versus conventional analgesia technique in general anesthesia surgeries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to investigate whether the use of surgical pleth index (SPI)-guided intraoperative analgesia can result in a reduction in opioid consumption, intraoperative circulatory fluctuations, and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions when compared to conventional analgesia techniques.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from the inception of these databases to November 2024. The objective was to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the use of SPI-guided analgesia with conventional analgesia practices in adult patients who underwent general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the intraoperative consumption of opioids, while intraoperative circulatory fluctuations, postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores, and adverse events served as secondary outcomes. Standardized mean differences (SMDs), weighted mean differences (WMDs) or pooled risk ratios (RRs) along with the corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were employed for analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated no significant difference in intraoperative opioid consumption between the SPI-guided analgesia group and the control group (SMD = 0.16, 95 % CI: -0.15 to 0.47, p = 0.33). However, SPI-guided analgesia was found to reduce intraoperative propofol dosage (SMD = -0.31, 95 % CI: -0.54 to -0.08, p = 0.008), prevent intraoperative tachycardia (RR = 0.50, 95 % CI: 0.30 to 0.85, p = 0.011), and significantly shorten the eye-opening time (WMD = -1.89, 95 % CI: -2.47 to -1.31, p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed in extubation time, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pain scores, or postoperative opioid consumption.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the conventional analgesia group, SPI-guided analgesia does not reduce intraoperative opioid consumption in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol for this meta-analysis has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024611690).

Effectiveness and Safety of Opioid-Free Anaesthesia and Analgesia in pain control and postoperative recovery of patients undergoing gynaecologic oncologic surgery: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Opioids have been essential for the anesthesiologic management of patients undergoing surgical procedures such as gynecologic oncology, but incorrect dosage can lead to unwanted hemodynamic effects. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) and multimodal postoperative analgesia techniques can solve this problem as they can restrict the excessive use of opioids.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted by reviewing the medical records of patients at the Hernando Moncaleano Perdomo University Hospital. Female patients who underwent gynecologic oncology surgery at the MPUHN and who received OFA, or opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) were identified. Two cohorts were created in which one have all patients (unadjusted cohort) and one with randomly selected patients (adjust cohort). Data on pain were collected using a visual analog pain scale (VAPS), along with hemodynamic variables and adverse events at 7 different times from admission to the operating room until discharge from the hospital. A bivariate analysis was performed between OFA and OBA, comparing frequencies of VAPS and adverse events with chi2, while mean difference for hemodynamic variables with t student. A multivariate analysis was performed with multiple logistic regression to evaluate differences in frequency of VAPS between OFA and OBA.

RESULTS

For unadjusted cohort, difference was identified for greater pain in OFA than in OBA (p < 0.001) for the times before surgery, recovery room, and 24 h after surgery, while differences were only identified at recovery room in the adjusted cohort. The heart rate has significant differences only at pre-surgery, 30 min of induction and admission to the recovery room. Respiratory rate has significant differences at admission to the operating room, 30 min of induction. Mean arterial pressure was significant only in the recovery room and for oxygen saturation at admission to the operating room and discharge from recovery. Higher frequency of requiring antiemetics was only identified in patients with OFA than OBA on the fifth day of surgery. Significance was identified in multivariate analysis between OBA and OFA for at discharge from recovery room.

CONCLUSIONS

The OFA technique for gynecologic oncologic surgery patients has a similar impact on pain control compared to OBA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Does not apply.

Effects of balanced opioid-free anesthesia on post-operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is common after video-assisted thoracic surgery, which may be associated with the use of intraoperative opioids. We tested the hypothesis that balanced opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) might reduce the incidence of PONV after video-assisted thoracic surgery.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-eight adults undergoing video-assisted thoracic assisted surgery were randomly assigned to receive balanced opioid-free anesthesia or balanced opioid-based anesthesia (OBA). The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV, which was assessed with the Myles's simplified PONV impact scale during the initial 24 h after surgery.

RESULTS

Compared with OBA group, the overall incidence of PONV in OFA group was significant reduced (14.6% vs. 30.1%, P = 0.017), and OFA reduced the risk of PONV events within 24 h of surgery (HR, 0.44; 95%CI: 0.22-0.87, P = 0.018). The incidence of other postoperative complications in OFA group was lower than that in OBA group (19.5% vs. 33.7%, P = 0.039). The quality of recovery, distance of 6-minute walk test, pain scores, and 36-item short form survey were comparable at each time points.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery, the use of balanced OFA anesthesia can help reduce the incidence of PONV events. This anesthetic regimen has shown good feasibility without significantly increasing the patient's pain score and complications.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT05411159. First posted date: 9 Jun, 2022.

Influence of Intraoperative Pain Management on Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative analgesia and sedation are closely related to postoperative delirium. Depth of sedation based on bispectral index (BIS) guidance has been shown to reduce the occurrence of postoperative delirium (POD). However, the correlation between intraoperative analgesia levels and POD is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of intraoperative analgesic management guided by the nociceptive stimulus index (NOX) on postoperative delirium.

METHODS

In this prospective single-center randomized controlled study, elderly patients aged 65 and above, who are scheduled to undergo unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA), were allocated into two groups: the routine monitoring group (group R), which solely monitored patient sedation levels using BIS; and the NOX monitoring group (group N), which monitored patient analgesic levels using NOX based on BIS-monitored sedation levels. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative delirium within 3 days after surgery, using the confusion assessment method (CAM).

RESULTS

From May 2022 to December 2022, a total of 240 patients were randomized; 12 were excluded because of failure to meet experimental conditions or were lost to follow-up. Patients in group N had a lower incidence rate (%) of POD on the first day compared to those in group R (8 (7%) vs 18 (16%), P = 0.041). The dosage of remifentanil administered in group N was significantly higher than that in group R (927.07 ± 268.09 vs 882.32 ± 187.91 mg, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate intraoperative analgesia guided by NOX is associated with POD. When sedation levels were consistent, the incidence of POD was significantly reduced in older patients with NOX-guided analgesic management during unilateral TKA surgery.

IoC2 monitoring versus standard practice in reducing opioid consumption in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Nociception monitoring has recently gained recognition as a valuable tool for guiding intraoperative opioid administration. Several nociception monitors, including the Surgical Pleth Index, the Index of Consciousness (IoC) and the Nociception Level, have been introduced for managing intraoperative analgesia. While these technologies show promise in initial applications, the effectiveness of IoC2 in guiding pain management during anaesthesia, particularly in elderly patients who require precise opioid use, remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of IoC2 in guiding intraoperative opioid use in elderly patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a prospective, randomised, controlled, single-blind, single-centre study with recruitment carried out from 1 February to 30 November 2025. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the IoC2 group or the control group. In the IoC2 group, sufentanil dosing will be guided by intraoperative IoC2 measurements, while in the control group, it will be guided by haemodynamic parameters. The primary outcome will be to compare intraoperative sufentanil consumption between the two groups to assess the potential role of IoC2 in optimising perioperative analgesia in elderly patients.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the ethics committee of China-Japan Friendship Hospital (2024-KY-148-3) and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400089115). The findings will be disseminated through academic presentations and peer-reviewed journal publications, providing valuable data and insights into the role of IoC2 in guiding intraoperative pain management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2400089115.

Discrepancy in opioid prescription patterns for Black or African American patients following lower extremity bypass surgery for chronic limb-threatening ischemia

BACKGROUND

Disparity in the allocation of medical services and resources based on race is present within the health care industry today, including the prescription of postoperative analgesics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the presence of race-based disparity in the prescription of postdischarge opioids after lower extremity bypass (LEB) surgery for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was conducted on adult CLTI patients who underwent LEB from 2000 to 2023 in the TrinetX database. Patients were stratified into two groups based on race: White (group I) and black or African American (AA) (group II). Primary outcomes were defined as oral opioid prescriptions at 7 days and 30 days after discharge, and mortality at 1 year postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and 30-day postoperative outcomes, including myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, cerebral vascular accident, deep vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury, major amputation, minor amputation, major adverse cardiac events, and major adverse limb events. Stratified analysis was conducted based on disease stage (rest pain vs lower extremity ulcer vs gangrene). Univariate analysis was performed via two-sample t test and χ2 test. Logistic regression was performed to estimate the association of Black or AA (vs White) race while controlling for pertinent preoperative potential confounders.

RESULTS

There were 3345 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Group I included 2661 White patients and group II included 684 Black or AA patients. Group II patients were more likely to be younger, female, present with gangrene, and have a history of hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or diabetic neuropathy. At both 7 and 30 days after discharge, the Black or AA cohort had significantly lower rates of opioid prescriptions (33.2% vs 42.5% and 35.8% vs 47.2%, respectively) (all P < .05). Stratification by indication showed that opioid prescription disparity persisted despite black or AA patients presenting at worse stages of disease both at 7 and 30 days after discharge (7 days: rest pain 43.4% vs 33.7% [P = .013], ulcer 41.4% vs 31.7% [P = .027], gangrene, 42.7% vs 33.6% [P = .006] and 30 days: rest pain 47.8% vs 37.1% [P = .007], ulcer 45.4% vs 33.5% [P = .007], gangrene, 48.2% vs 36.1% [P < .001]). Adjusted analysis confirmed that Black or AA race was associated with lower rates of 7- (adjusted odds ratio, 0.607; P = .001) and 30-day (adjusted odds ratio, 0.56; P = .001) postdischarge opioid prescriptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Black or AA patients were less likely to receive postdischarge opioid prescriptions compared with their White counterparts at 7 and 30 days after LEB for CLTI.

Photobiomodulation as part of multimodal analgesia to improve pain relief and wound healing after elective caesarean section: A protocol for randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Caesarean section (CS) is the most common inpatient surgical procedure performed in Canada. CS is known to cause moderate-to-severe pain, which is suggested to be associated with postpartum depression and persistent pain. Existing limitations in multimodal analgesia and conscious attempts to avoid opioids highlight the need for non-pharmacological strategies. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) uses light-emitting diode (LED) and laser and has suggested potential for improving pain control and wound healing. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of PBMT as part of existing multimodal analgesia after elective CSs.

METHODS

This placebo-controlled, two-arm, multi-centre, parallel-design randomized controlled trial includes women aged ≥16 years with planned CS under spinal anesthesia (Clinical Trials Registration: NCT05738239). Patients will be randomized post-CS to intervention (n = 90) or placebo (n = 90). Study interventions will be carried out using equipment supported by Meditech International Incorporated (approved by Health Canada for pain relief). Patients will receive a maximum of 5 post-surgical treatment sessions of active PBMT (intervention: LED therapy: DUO 240 [red at 660nm and near-infrared at 840nm] applied parallel to the abdominal incision scar, followed by BIOFLEX LDR-100 laser probe (660nm red light) and the LD1-200 laser probe (825nm near-infrared light), applied at the incision wound edges) or non-effective doses of LED array and laser therapy (placebo), 4-6 hrs post-CS, and at 8am and 7pm of postoperative days 1 and 2. Patients, research assistants involved in patient recruitment and follow-up, health care providers, and data analysts will be blinded. All patients will have access to routine multimodal analgesia. Patients will be followed up in hospital on the evening of surgery and on postoperative days 1 and 2 (morning, noon, and evening); at 6 weeks; and at 3 months by telephone. Primary outcome is pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain).

SIGNIFICANCE

The results of this study may result in improved pain control, maternal satisfaction and wound healing; decrease the use of perioperative opioids; potentially decrease the incidence of postpartum depression and persistent pain; and overall lead to better postoperative outcomes thereby decreasing healthcare costs.

Opioid consumption in the first 30 days after surgery was independently associated with new persistent opioid use

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies suggest that new persistent opioid use (NPOU) after surgery was associated with larger perioperative opioid prescriptions, but the association between NPOU and postoperative opioid consumption is unknown.

METHODS

This retrospective study included opioid naïve individuals aged 18-64 who underwent surgical procedures across 70 Michigan hospitals between July 1, 2018 and November 15, 2021 and were prescribed opioids at discharge. We used clinical and patient-reported opioid consumption data from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, a statewide surgical registry, linked with the state Prescription Drug Monitoring Program. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to assess the association between patient-reported opioid consumption during the 30 days after discharge and NPOU, defined as having an opioid fill during both 31-120 days and 121-210 days after discharge.

RESULTS

Among 36,271 patients included, 482 (1.3%) developed NPOU. These patients consumed more opioid pills in the first 30 days postoperatively than those without NPOU (mean (SD): 7.3 (8.4) 5 mg oxycodone equivalent pills vs 4.1 (5.5), SMD=-0.41). In adjusted analyses, each additional opioid pill consumed in the 30-day postoperative period was associated with a 0.05 percentage-point increase in the predicted probability of NPOU (95% CI 0.04 to 0.07 percentage points). Thus, holding all other variables constant, a 10-pill increase in consumption would be associated with a 0.5 percentage-point increase in the probability of NPOU, or a 38.4% increase relative to the baseline rate of 1.3%.

CONCLUSION

Demonstrating that opioid consumption in the first 30 days after surgery was independently associated with NPOU underscores the importance of perioperative opioid prescribing on long-term outcomes.

Mitigating and preventing perioperative opioid-related harm

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although necessary for treatment of acute pain, opioids are associated with significant harm in the perioperative period and further intervention is necessary perioperatively to mitigate opioid-related harm.

RECENT FINDINGS

Opioid-naive patients are often first exposed to opioids when undergoing surgery, which can result in significant harm. Despite their benefits in reducing acute postsurgical pain, they are also associated with risks ranging from mild (e.g., pruritis, constipation, nausea) to potentially catastrophic (e.g. opioid-induced ventilatory impairment, respiratory depression, death). Overprescribing of opioids can lead to opioid diversion and drug driving. In this review, we will discuss opioid-related harm and what strategies can be used perioperatively to mitigate this harm. Interventions such as optimizing nonopioid analgesia, implementing Enhanced Recovery after Surgery programs, effective respiratory monitoring, patient education and opioid stewardship programs will be discussed.

SUMMARY

We will review policy and guidelines regarding perioperative opioid management and identify challenges and future directions to mitigate opioid-related harm.

Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Upper Limb Surgery in Obese Patients as a Day Case Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study

Background

Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is a relatively new approach, and many studies are still needed to assess its effectiveness and compare it to opioid-based anesthesia (OBA).

Objectives

This study investigated the use of OFA in obese patients undergoing upper limb surgery and compares its outcomes with those of OBA.Methods:This prospective randomized clinical study included 76 obese patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m² who were scheduled for upper limb surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either OFA (group A, n = 38) or OBA (group B, n = 38). The OBA group was administered propofol, fentanyl, and atracurium, while the OFA group received lidocaine, propofol, atracurium, and dexmedetomidine. All patients were mechanically ventilated, and anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane and atracurium. Primary outcomes monitored included postoperative pain [Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ≥ 4] and the number of rescue doses of tramadol. Secondary outcomes included extubation time, any cardiac events, hypoxia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, and duration of hospital stay.

Results

The OFA group had significantly lower extubation time, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) compared to the OBA group. Additionally, VAS scores were significantly lower at the 30-minute and 2-hour marks after extubation (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively) in patients receiving OFA. The OFA group also experienced fewer adverse effects, required fewer rescue doses of tramadol, and had shorter hospital stays.

Conclusions

Opioid-free anesthesia may result in better and safer outcomes for obese patients undergoing upper limb surgeries, with fewer postoperative complications and shorter hospital stays. However, further research is needed to fully understand the potential benefits of OFA compared to OBA.

Use of opioids and opioid alternatives during general anesthesia: a pan-Canadian survey among anesthesiologists

PURPOSE

While there is limited patient-centred evidence (i.e., evidence that is important for patients and end-users) to inform the use of pharmacologic opioid minimization strategies (i.e., the use of opioid alternatives) for adult surgical patients requiring general anesthesia, such strategies are increasingly being adopted into practice. Our objectives were to describe anesthesiologists' beliefs regarding intraoperative opioid minimizing strategies use and utility, and to explore important clinical decision-making factors.

METHODS

We conducted a pan-Canadian web-based survey of anesthesiologists that was distributed using a modified Dillman technique. Our multidisciplinary team, including a patient partners panel, participated in the process of domains and items generation, items reduction, formatting, and composition. Our sampling frames were members of the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society and members of the Association des Anesthésiologistes du Québec. We used the newsletters of each organization to distribute our survey, which was available in English and French and housed on the LimeSurvey (LimeSurvey GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) platform.

RESULTS

From our eligible sampling frame, 18% completed the survey (356 respondents out of 2,008 eligible participants). Most of the respondents believed that using opioid minimization strategies during general anesthesia could improve postoperative clinical outcomes, including pain control (84% agree or strongly agree, n = 344/409). Reported use of pharmacologic opioid minimization strategies was variable; however, most respondents believed that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists (ketamine), α2-adrenoceptor agonists (dexmedetomidine), corticosteroids, and intravenous lidocaine improve prostoperative clinical outcomes. The primary factors guiding decision-making regarding the use of opioid minimization strategies were postoperative acute pain intensity, the impact of acute pain on functioning, patient well-being (i.e., quality of recovery) and patient satisfaction with care. A lack of evidence was the most important barrier limiting the use of opioid minimization strategies.

CONCLUSION

In our survey of Canadian anesthesiologists, several opioid minimization strategies were believed to be effective complements to general anesthesia, although there was substantial variation in their reported use. Future randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews evaluating the effectiveness of opioid minimization strategies should prioritize patient-centred outcome measures assessment such as the quality of recovery or the impact of acute pain on functioning.

Opioid free versus opioid sparing strategies for multimodal antinociception during laparoscopic colectomy: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), when compared to opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA), reduces postoperative opioid consumption while still providing adequate pain control. We thus tested the hypothesis that patients having an OFA strategy during laparoscopic colectomy would require less postoperative opioids when compared to an OSA strategy.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective randomized controlled superiority trial, randomly allocated consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy to receive either sevoflurane-dexmedetomidine anesthesia with a continuous infusion of lidocaine and ketamine (OFA group) or sevoflurane-sufentanil boluses anesthesia with a continuous infusion of lidocaine (OSA group). Both groups received multimodal antinociception with boluses of dexamethasone, lidocaine, and ketamine during anesthesia induction, as well as acetaminophen, ketoprofen, and nefopam before the end of the surgery. OFA patients also received a dose of magnesium sulfate during induction. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption at 48 h after surgery, expressed in oral morphine equivalents (OME). Secondary exploratory outcomes were pain scores, opioid-related adverse events, and patient quality of life (WHODAS score).

RESULTS

Of the 160 randomized patients, 155 were included in a modified intention-to-treat analysis. Median [Q1-Q3] OME consumption at 48 h after surgery did not differ between groups (9 [0-30] mg for OFA vs. 14 [0-30] mg for OSA; p = 0.861). Key secondary outcomes were not different between groups except a three time higher incidence of bradycardia in the OFA group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy with a multimodal antinociception protocol, OFA, when compared to OSA, did not decrease postoperative opioid consumption.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY AND NUMBER

NCT05031234.

Effects of opioid-sparing general anesthesia on postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic gynecological surgery

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to investigate whether opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery were randomly assigned to either the opioid-using anesthesia (OUA) or the OSA groups. In the OUA group, remifentanil was administered as an opioid during general anesthesia. In the OSA group, apart from a single dose of 5 μg/kg of alfentanil for tracheal intubation, no other opioids were used. In both groups, a multimodal intravenous non-opioid analgesic regimen was used preferentially in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV, assessed by symptoms until the postoperative day 1.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients were included in this study. The incidence of nausea in the PACU was significantly lower in the OSA group compared to in the OUA group (31.7% in the OSA group vs. 51.7% in the OUA group, P = 0.026). Pain scores and the incidence of opioid analgesic administration were lower in the OSA group during PACU stay, resulting in a significantly lower number of patients requiring rescue opioid analgesics (3.3% vs. 18.3%, P = 0.008). There were no significant differences in intraoperative vital signs, hemodynamic interventions, or duration of PACU and hospital stay between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

OSA significantly reduced postoperative nausea, pain scores, and the need for rescue analgesics in the PACU without increasing hemodynamic instability in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial Evaluating Opioid-Free versus Opioid-Sparing Analgesia for Orbital Fracture Reconstruction Under General Anesthesia

Background and Objectives

Opioid-minimizing strategies are making their appearance in enhanced recovery after surgery. This study is aimed to explore the potential advantages of opioid-free analgesia (OFA) compared to opioid-sparing analgesia (OSA) in patients undergoing orbital fracture reconstruction.

Methods

In this prospective, single-center, randomized controlled study, we randomly recruited 122 patients undergoing orbital fracture reconstruction under general anesthesia. Patients received total intravenous anesthesia with a flexible laryngeal mask airway, and multimodal analgesia with either OSA or OFA methods. The OSA group (n = 61) received low doses of fentanyl and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and the OFA group (n = 61) received medial canthus peribulbar block (MCPB) combined with NSAIDs. The primary outcomes consisted of area-under-the-curve (AUC) of the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) through the first 24h.

Results

Compared to the OSA group, the OFA group demonstrated non-inferiority in postoperative analgesia through the first 24 postoperative hours (difference of the medians, -6; 95% confidence interval [CI], -12 to 6), but failed to meet the non-inferiority criterion in the incidence of PONV (difference ratio, 3%; 95% CI, -7% to 14%). The Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire (QoR-40) scores on postoperative day 1 was significantly higher in group OFA compared to group OSA (188 [178 to 196] vs 181 [169 to 191], respectively; P = 0.005).

Conclusion

In orbital fracture reconstruction, both OFA and OSA strategies provide effective postoperative pain relief, but OFA using MCPB combined NSAIDs enhances the quality of early postoperative recovery.

Registered

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900028088.

No Difference in Postoperative Recovery Outcomes Between Opioid-Free and Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia Under Multimodal Analgesic Protocol for Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study

Background: With growing concerns about opioid-related risks, efforts to reduce opioid use throughout the perioperative period have increased. This study aimed to compare postoperative recovery outcomes between opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) and opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) under a multimodal analgesic protocol in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 196 patients undergoing VATS from August 2019 to December 2021. Patients received either dexmedetomidine-based OFA or remifentanil-based OSA. Postoperative recovery was assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score, opioid consumption, and pain intensity. Additionally, opioid-related complications and intraoperative hemodynamic changes were evaluated. Results: Both groups showed similar QoR-15 scores 24 h postoperatively (124.2 ± 7.0 vs. 123.0 ± 6.9, p = 0.227). Opioid consumption and pain intensity were comparable, and the incidence of opioid-related adverse events did not significantly differ between the groups. Intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia were more frequent in the OFA group, but the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: The study concluded that both OFA and OSA, when used under a multimodal analgesic protocol, provided effective postoperative recovery in patients undergoing VATS with no significant differences in outcomes.

The effect of preemptive retrolaminar block on lumbar spinal decompression surgery

PURPOSE

Spinal decompression surgery causes severe pain. Retrolaminar block (RLB) is block, which is done by infiltration of local anesthetic to block spinal nerves between the lamina and superior costotransversospinalis muscle. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of RLB on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Secondary aims are effects on additional anesthetic and analgesic consumption.

METHODS

The sixty (60) patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery between May 2020 and May 2021 under general anesthesia with or without applied preemptive RLB for postoperative analgesia were included in this prospective observational study. Group I received ultrasound-guided preemptive RLB. In Group II, no intervention was performed. Postoperative VAS scores were compared in groups as primary outcome, perioperative additional anesthetic and analgesic needs were compared as secondary outcome.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the groups in favor of the RLB group in terms of postoperative VAS scores at rest [1.33 (0.33-3.509)] and movement [2.40 (1.20-4.00)] (p < 0.001). Perioperative sevoflurane consumption was significantly low in block group (p < 0.001). Postoperative tramadol consumption was lower in Group I compared with Group II [Group 1: 200 (100-300); Group 2: 37.5 (0-200); p < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Preemptive RLB may be used to reduce patients' pain in lumbar decompression surgery as well as to be part of a multimodal analgesia and anesthesia regimen to reduce anesthetic and analgesic drug consumption. Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT04209907).

Multimodal analgesic strategies in polytraumatized patients

In recent years, the resuscitation of trauma patients has improved; however, pain related to trauma remains associated with systemic complications. In trauma patients, pain should be considered a vital sign, and its control is crucial for reducing complications, improving patient satisfaction, and enhancing the quality of life. The multimodal analgesia approach is the mainstay in pain control, and growing evidence in the literature supports a greater role of regional anesthesia in the management of trauma casualties. In this review, we offer the reader an updated general framework of the various approaches available for pain treatment in polytraumatized patients, with a focus on the opportunities presented by regional anesthesia. We will examine different types of locoregional anesthesia blocks and describe ultrasonographic execution techniques.

Comparison of a single intravenous infusion of alfentanil or sufentanil combined with target-controlled infusion of propofol for daytime hysteroscopy: a randomized clinical trial

Background

The administration of either alfentanil or sufentanil as a single injection, combined with target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol, represents a frequently employed anesthetic regimen for daytime hysteroscopy.

Objectives

This study was designed to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of alfentanil and sufentanil in the context of daytime hysteroscopy.

Design

A total of 160 patients, scheduled for daytime hysteroscopy, were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A and Group S respectively received alfentanil 10 μg/kg or sufentanil 0.15 μg/kg as a single intravenous injection. Both groups were given propofol with TCI for sedation.

Methods

Monitoring of vital signs was conducted from pre-anesthesia through to 2 h postoperatively. The primary outcome measured was hypoxemia, defined as SpO2 levels below 92% for a duration of 30 s, which necessitated manual positive pressure ventilation. Secondary outcomes included various perioperative complications, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) occurring 2 h after surgery, as well as hemodynamic indicators, NRS scores for pain, and other anesthesia-related data. This comprehensive dataset was meticulously documented and subsequently analyzed for comparative purposes.

Results

The analyses revealed that Group A had a significantly lower incidence of hypoxemia (p = 0.002) and PONV (p = 0.021). Additionally, group A demonstrated overall more stable blood pressure and heart rate, as well as higher SpO2 levels.

Conclusion

For daytime hysteroscopy, alfentanil at a dose of 10 μg/kg is safer than sufentanil at a dose of 0.15 μg/kg when combined with propofol TCI.

Trial registration

This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (The URL of registration is https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=177784; registration number: ChiCTR2200063939). The date of first registration was September 21, 2022.

Assessing the relative efficacy of components of opioid-free anaesthesia in adult surgical patients: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The rise of opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA) aims to reduce postoperative pain while reducing opioid-related side effects during surgery. However, the various adjuvant agents used in OFA complicate the evaluation of their effectiveness and risks. Recent reviews question the clinical benefits of OFA, highlighting the need for thorough evaluation. This protocol describes a network meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of OFA with opioid-based anaesthesia and will identify key components for optimal postoperative outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will perform a systematic search of literature published in English without time restriction in Embase, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (via PubMed) and CINAHL, along with Google Scholar for grey literature. The final search will be performed on 1 October 2024. We will include randomised controlled trials with adult patients undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia, excluding preclinical, observational, regional anaesthesia-only and prolonged anaesthesia outside the operating room studies. The primary outcome is postsurgical pain scores, with secondary outcomes including quality of recovery, opioid consumption, adverse effects and long-term events. We will assess bias using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool and conduct Bayesian network meta-analyses for pooled estimates. We will report effect estimates as ORs and standardised mean differences with 95% credible intervals and assess certainty using GRADE methodology.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international anaesthesia and pain management conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024505853.

Variations in Current Practice and Protocols of Intraoperative Multimodal Analgesia: A Cross-Sectional Study Within a Six-Hospital US Health Care System

BACKGROUND

Multimodal analgesia (MMA) aims to reduce surgery-related opioid needs by adding nonopioid pain medications in postoperative pain management. In light of the opioid epidemic, MMA use has increased rapidly over the past decade. We hypothesize that the rapid adoption of MMA has resulted in variation in practice. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine how MMA practices have changed over the past 6 years and whether there is variation in use by patient, provider, and facility characteristics.

METHODS

Our study population includes all patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia at 1 of 6 geographically similar hospitals in the United States between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022. Intraoperative pain medications were obtained from the hospital's perioperative information management system. MMA was defined as an opioid plus at least 2 other nonopioid analgesics. Frequencies, χ2 tests (χ2), range, and interquartile range (IQR) were used to describe variation in MMA practice over time, by patient and procedure characteristics, across hospitals, and across anesthesiologists. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to understand the independent contributions of patient and procedural factors to MMA use.

RESULTS

We identified 25,386 procedures among 21,227 patients. Overall, 46.9% of cases met our definition of MMA. Patients who received MMA were more likely to be younger females with a lower comorbidity burden undergoing longer and more complex procedures that included an inpatient admission. MMA use has increased steadily by an average of 3.0% each year since 2017 (95% confidence interval =2.6%-3.3%). There was significant variation in use across hospitals (n = 6, range =25.9%-68.6%, χ2 = 3774.9, P < .001) and anesthesiologists (n = 190, IQR =29.8%-65.8%, χ2 = 1938.5, P < .001), as well as by procedure characteristics. The most common MMA protocols contained acetaminophen plus regional anesthesia (13.0% of protocols) or acetaminophen plus dexamethasone (12.2% of protocols). During the study period, the use of opioids during the preoperative or intraoperative period decreased from 91.4% to 86.0% of cases; acetaminophen use increased (41.9%-70.5%, P < .001); dexamethasone use increased (24.0%-36.1%, P < .001) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) increased (6.9%-17.3%, P < .001). Gabapentinoids and IV lidocaine were less frequently used but also increased (0.8%-1.6% and 3.4%-5.3%, respectively, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large integrated US health care system, approximately 50% of noncardiac surgery patients received MMA. Still, there was wide variation in MMA use by patient and procedure characteristics and across hospitals and anesthesiologists. Our findings highlight a need for further research to understand the reasons for these variations and guide the safe and effective adoption of MMA into routine practice.

Perioperative Regional Anesthesia on Persistent Opioid Use and Chronic Pain after Noncardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Whether regional anesthesia impacts the development of chronic postsurgical pain is currently debateable, and few studies have evaluated an effect on prolonged opioid use. We sought to systematically review the effect of regional anesthesia for adults undergoing noncardiac elective surgery on these outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINHAL for randomized controlled trials (from inception to April 2022) of adult patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgeries that evaluated any regional technique and included one of our primary outcomes: (1) prolonged opioid use after surgery (continued opioid use ≥2 months postsurgery) and (2) chronic postsurgical pain (pain ≥3 months postsurgery). We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis on the specified outcomes and used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach to rate the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies were included in the review. Pooled estimates indicated that regional anesthesia had a significant effect on reducing prolonged opioid use (relative risk [RR] 0.48, 95% CI, 0.24-0.96, P = .04, I 2 0%, 5 trials, n = 348 patients, GRADE low quality). Pooled estimates for chronic pain also indicated a significant effect favoring regional anesthesia at 3 (RR, 0.74, 95% CI, 0.59-0.93, P = .01, I 2 77%, 15 trials, n = 1489 patients, GRADE moderate quality) and 6 months (RR, 0.72, 95% CI, 0.61-0.85, P < .001, I 2 54%, 19 trials, n = 3457 patients, GRADE moderate quality) after surgery. No effect was found in the pooled analysis at 12 months postsurgery (RR, 0.44, 95% CI, 0.16-1.17, P = .10).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that regional anesthesia potentially reduces chronic postsurgical pain up to 6 months after surgery. Our findings also suggest a potential decrease in the development of persistent opioid use.

Comparison of opioid-free and opioid-inclusive propofol anaesthesia for thyroid and parathyroid surgery: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting occur frequently following thyroid and parathyroid surgery and are associated with worse patient outcomes. We hypothesised that opioid-free propofol anaesthesia would reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting compared with opioid-inclusive propofol anaesthesia in patients undergoing these procedures.

METHODS

We conducted a randomised, double-blinded controlled trial in adult patients scheduled to undergo thyroid and parathyroid surgery at two medical centres in mainland China. Patients were allocated randomly (1:1, stratified by sex and trial site) to an opioid-free anaesthesia group (esketamine, lidocaine, dexmedetomidine and propofol) or an opioid-inclusive group (sufentanil and propofol). Propofol infusions were titrated to bispectral index 45-55. Patients received prophylaxis for nausea and vomiting using dexamethasone and ondansetron and multimodal analgesia with paracetamol and flurbiprofen axetil. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the first 48 h after surgery.

RESULTS

We assessed 557 patients for eligibility and 394 completed this trial. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the first postoperative 48 h was lower in the opioid-free anaesthesia group (10/197, 5%) compared with opioid-inclusive group (47/197, 24%) (OR (95%CI) 0.17 (0.08-0.35), p < 0.001), yielding a number needed to treat of 5.3. Additionally, opioid-free propofol anaesthesia was associated with a reduced need for rescue anti-emetics, lower rates of hypotension and desaturation after tracheal extubation, and higher patient satisfaction. Time to tracheal extubation was prolonged slightly in the opioid-free group. The two groups had similar postoperative pain scores and 30-day outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Opioid-free propofol anaesthesia reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing thyroid and parathyroid surgery. An opioid-free anaesthetic regimen can optimise anaesthetic care during thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

The impact of opioids on the hallmarks of ageing

Opioids rank among the most hazardous substances of abuse, leading to opioid use disorders (which greatly diminish life quality) and contributing to the highest drug-related mortality rates. Nonetheless, both the therapeutic and recreational use of opioids is escalating globally. Interestingly, chronic opioid users often exhibit signs consistent with accelerated ageing, suggesting that they likely interfere with well-characterized ageing mechanisms (e.g., telomere shortening, epigenetic changes, mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular senescence). Here, we review the most recent advances regarding the impact of opioids on well-characterized hallmarks of ageing, to ascertain a potential association between opioid use and accelerated ageing. Our findings indicate that there is accumulating evidence supporting a close association between the use of opioids and the early onset of some ageing hallmarks, namely mitochondrial dysfunction, genomic instability, or telomere shortening. However, there is still limited data available regarding how opioids specifically impact other ageing hallmarks, like nutrient sensing, cellular senescence, or loss of proteostasis. Taking into consideration the high prevalence of opioid use, strengthening the understanding of the mechanisms underlying opioids' impact on ageing assumes utmost relevance, both in terms of improving risk assessment, as well as to help researchers and clinicians prevent or mitigate these effects in clinical settings.

Multimodal Analgesia and Outcomes in Hysterectomy Surgery-A Population-Based Analysis

Objective: We aimed to investigate the impact of multimodal analgesia on postoperative complications and opioid prescription on a national level. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included n = 1,307,923 hysterectomies (01/2006-12/2022, Premier Healthcare claims data). Multimodal analgesia was defined as opioid use with the addition of non-opioid analgesic modes, grouped into four categories: opioid-only and 1, 2, or 3 or more additional non-opioid analgesics. Multivariable regression models measured associations between multimodal categories and outcomes (composite/respiratory/cardiac/gastrointestinal/genitourinary, and CNS complications, oral morphine milligram equivalents [MME], and length of hospital stay [LOS]). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. Results: Overall, 84.3% (1,102,812/1,307,923) received multimodal analgesia, of which 58.9%, 28.0%, and 13.1% received 1, 2, or 3 or more additional non-opioid analgesics, respectively. The odds of any composite complication (any ≥1 complication) decreased with the addition of 1, 2, 3, or more analgesic modalities (versus opioid-only): OR 0.66 (CI 0.64; 0.68), OR 0.63 (CI 0.61; 0.66), OR 0.65 (CI 0.62; 0.67), respectively. Similar patterns existed for respiratory, cardiac, and genitourinary complications. Opioid prescription decreased incrementally with 1,2, 3, or more non-opioid analgesic modalities by 9.51 mg (CI 11.16; 7.86) and 15.29 mg (CI 17.21; 13.37) and 29.35 mg (CI 31.79; 26.91) cumulative MME. LOS was reduced by 0.52 days (CI 0.54; 0.51), 0.49 days (CI 0.51; 0.47), and 0.40 days (CI 0.43; 0.38), respectively. Costs were reduced by $765 (CI 817; 714) or $479 (CI 539; 419) with 1 or 2 multimodal modes. Conclusions: These findings suggest substantial benefits of multimodal analgesia, including significant decreases in serious complications (especially respiratory, cardiac, and genitourinary), opioid consumption, and hospitalizations. Multimodal analgesia may facilitate safe and efficient pain management with optimized opioid consumption.

Evaluation of the effect of fluid management on intracranial pressure in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgery based on the ratio of the optic nerve sheath diameter to the eyeball transverse diameter as measured by ultrasound: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

During gynecological laparoscopic surgery, pneumoperitoneum and the Trendelenburg position (TP) can lead to increased intracranial pressure (ICP). However, it remains unclear whether perioperative fluid therapy impacts ICP. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the impact of restrictive fluid (RF) therapy versus conventional fluid (CF) therapy on ICP in gynecological laparoscopic surgery patients by measuring the ratio of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) to the eyeball transverse diameter (ETD) using ultrasound.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients who were scheduled for laparoscopic gynecological surgery were randomly assigned to the CF group or the RF group. The main outcomes were differences in the ONSD/ETD ratios between the groups at predetermined time points. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative circulatory parameters (including mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and urine volume changes) and postoperative recovery indicators (including extubation time, length of post-anaesthesia care unit stay, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay).

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the ONSD/ETD ratio and the ONSD over time between the two groups (all p > 0.05). From T2 to T4, the ONSD/ETD ratio and the ONSD in both groups were higher than T1 (all p < 0.001). From T1 to T2, the ONSD/ETD ratio in both groups increased by 14.3%. However, the extubation time in the RF group was shorter than in the CF group [median difference (95% CI) -11(-21 to -2) min, p = 0.027]. There were no differences in the other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery, RF did not significantly lower the ONSD/ETD ratio but did shorten the tracheal extubation time, when compared to CF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2300079284. Registered on December 29, 2023.

Nudging strategies to influence prescribers' behavior toward reducing opioid prescriptions: a systematic scoping review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic scoping review aimed to map the literature on the use of various nudging strategies to influence prescriber behavior toward reducing opioid prescriptions across diverse healthcare settings.

METHODS

A systematic database search was conducted using seven electronic databases. Only articles published in English were included. A total of 2234 articles were identified, 35 of which met the inclusion criteria. Two independent dimensions were used to describe nudging strategies according to user action and the timing of their implementation.

RESULTS

Six nudging strategies were identified. The most common strategy was default choices, followed by increasing salience of information or incentives and providing feedback. Moreover, 32 studies used the electronic health record as an implementation method, and 29 reported significant results. Most of the effective interventions were multicomponent interventions (i.e., combining nudge strategies and non-nudge components).

CONCLUSIONS

Most nudging strategies used a passive approach, such as defaulting prescriptions to generics and requiring no action from the prescriber. Although reported as effective, this approach often operates under the prescriber's radar. Future research should explore the ethical implications of nudging strategies.INPLASY registration number: 202420082.

Opioid-Free Using Ketamine versus Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia during the Intraoperative Period in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Opioids effectively manage perioperative pain but have numerous adverse effects. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) eliminates intraoperative opioid use; however, evidence for its use in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is limited. This study assessed the effect of OFA using ketamine in VATS patients compared to opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA). A total of 91 patients undergoing VATS lobectomy or segmentectomy were randomized to either the OFA group (ketamine) or the OSA group (remifentanil). The primary outcome was the quality of recovery (QoR) on postoperative day (POD) 1, measured with the QoR-40 questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores and adverse events. Both groups had comparable baseline and surgical characteristics. On POD 1, the QoR-40 score was higher in the OFA group than in the OSA group (164.3 ± 10.8 vs. 158.7 ± 10.6; mean difference: 5.6, 95% CI: 1.1, 10.0; p = 0.015), though this did not meet the pre-specified minimal clinically important difference of 6.3. The visual analog scale score was lower in the OFA group as compared to the OSA group at 0-1 h (4.2 ± 2.3 vs. 6.2 ± 2.1; p < 0.001) and 1-4 h after surgery (3.4 ± 1.8 vs. 4.6 ± 1.9; p = 0.003). The OFA group had a lower incidence of PONV (2 [4.4%] vs. 9 [19.6%]; p = 0.049) and postoperative shivering (4 [8.9%] vs. 13 [28.3%]; p = 0.030) than the OSA group at 0-1 h after surgery. Using OFA with ketamine proved feasible, as indicated by the stable intraoperative hemodynamics and absence of intraoperative awareness. Patients undergoing VATS with OFA using ketamine showed a statistically significant, but clinically insignificant, QoR improvement compared to those receiving OSA with remifentanil.

Is General Anesthesia for Peripheral Vascular Surgery Correlated with Impaired Outcome in Patients with Cardiac Comorbidity? A Closer Look into the Nationwide Danish Cohort

OBJECTIVE

General anesthesia (GA) may impair outcome after vascular surgery. The use of anticoagulant medication is often used in patients with cardiac comorbidity. Regional anesthesia (RA) requires planning of discontinuation before neuraxial blockade(s) in this subgroup. This study aimed to describe the effect of anesthesia choice on outcome after vascular surgery in patients with known cardiac comorbidity.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Danish hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

6302 patients with known cardiac comorbidity, defined as ischemic heart disease, valve disease, pulmonary vascular disease, heart failure, and cardiac arrhythmias, undergoing lower extremity vascular surgery between 2005 and 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

GA versus RA.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data were extracted from national registries. GA was defined as anesthesia with mechanical ventilation. Multivariable regression models were used to describe the incidence of postoperative complications as well as 30-day mortality, hypothesizing that better outcomes would be seen after RA. The rate of RA decreased from 48% in 2005 to 20% in 2017. The number of patients with 1 or more complications was 9.7% vs 6.2% (p < 0.001), and 30-day mortality was 6.0% vs 3.4% (p < 0.001) after GA. After adjusting for baseline differences, the odds ratio (OR) was significantly lower for medical complications (cardiac, pulmonary, renal, new dialysis, intensive care unit and other medical complications; OR, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-0.98) and 30-day mortality (OR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99) after RA.

CONCLUSIONS

RA may be associated with a better outcome than GA after lower extremity vascular surgery in patients with a cardiac comorbidity. Prioritizing RA, despite the inconvenience of discontinuing anticoagulants, may be recommended.

Opioid-free general anesthesia: considerations, techniques, and limitations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the role of opioids during general anesthesia and examine their advantages and risks in the context of clinical practice. We define opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) as the absolute avoidance of intraoperative opioids.

RECENT FINDINGS

In most minimally invasive and short-duration procedures, nonopioid analgesics, analgesic adjuvants, and local/regional analgesia can significantly spare the amount of intraoperative opioid needed. OFA should be considered in the context of tailoring to a specific patient and procedure, not as a universal approach. Strategies considered for OFA involve several adjuncts with low therapeutic range, requiring continuous infusions and resources, with potential for delayed recovery or other side effects, including increased short-term and long-term pain. No evidence indicates that OFA leads to decreased long-term opioid-related harms.

SUMMARY

Complete avoidance of intraoperative opioids remains questionable, as it does not necessarily ensure avoidance of postoperative opioids. Multimodal analgesia including local/regional anesthesia may allow OFA for selected, minimally invasive surgeries, but further research is necessary in surgeries with high postoperative opioid requirements. Until there is definitive evidence regarding procedure and patient-specific combinations as well as the dose and duration of administration of adjunct agents, it is imperative to practice opioid-sparing approach in the intraoperative period.

Effect of modified opioid sparing anaesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery: protocol for a monocentre, double-blind randomised controlled trial - the MOSA study

INTRODUCTION

Obesity patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS) are frequently encountered perioperative adverse events related to opioids-based anaesthesia (OBA) or opioids-free anaesthesia (OFA). While modified opioid-sparing anaesthesia (MOSA) has been shown to lower the occurrence of adverse events related to OBA and OFA. This study is to assess the efficacy of MOSA in enhancing the recovery quality among individuals undergoing LBS.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A single-centre, prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled trial is conducted at a tertiary hospital. A total of 74 eligible participants undergoing elective LBS will be recruited and randomly allocated. Patients in the MOSA group will receive a combination of low-dose opioids, minimal dexmedetomidine, esketamine and lidocaine, while in the OBA group will receive standard general anaesthesia with opioids. Patients in both groups will receive standard perioperative care. The primary outcome is the quality of recovery-15 score assessed at 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include pain levels, anxiety and depression assessments, gastrointestinal function recovery, perioperative complication rates, opioid consumption and length of hospital stay.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been provided by the Ethical Committee of Yan'an Hospital of Kunming City (approval No. 2023-240-01). Eligible patients will provide written informed consent to the investigator. The outcomes of this trial will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed scholarly journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The study protocol is registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn/ on 19 December 2023. (identifier: ChiCTR2300078806). The trial was conducted using V.1.0.

Meditation for perioperative pain and anxiety: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Effective pain and anxiety management during the perioperative phase remains a challenge for patients undergoing surgeries and other invasive procedures. The current standard of care involves prescribing analgesics to treat these conditions; however, there has been recent interest in applying multimodal strategies that limit the use of these medications. One such modality is meditation, which has been shown to be effective in alleviating various physical and psychological symptoms in other settings. This systematic review aims to assess how current meditative practices affect perioperative pain and anxiety.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, APA PsycINFO, EBM Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science for all available dates. Our primary outcomes of interest were patient-reported pain and anxiety scores using the Visual Analog Scale, the Brief Pain Inventory, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). For the HADS and STAI scales, only the anxiety and anxiety-state subgroups were reported, respectively.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 1746 articles. A total of 286 full-text articles were screened, and 16 studies were included in this systematic review. A total of eight studies assessed pain scores after invasive procedures; five reported improvements in pain scores, and three reported no change after meditative practices. Ten studies assessed anxiety outcomes after invasive procedures: nine reported a decrease in overall anxiety levels as a result of meditation practices while one study reported no change in anxiety scores.

CONCLUSION

Data from this limited literature suggests that different meditation practices could be effective in alleviating pain and anxiety within the perioperative phase for patients undergoing various types of invasive procedures. Future prospective studies are needed to determine whether routine meditation in the perioperative setting is effective in mitigating perioperative pain and anxiety.

Intravenous ibuprofen versus ketorolac for perioperative pain control in open abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the analgesic effects of intravenous ibuprofen to ketorolac after open abdominal hysterectomy.

METHODS

This randomized double-blinded controlled trial included adult women scheduled for elective open abdominal hysterectomy. Participants were randomized to receive either 30 mg ketorolac (n = 50) or 800 mg ibuprofen (n = 50) preoperatively, then every 8 h postoperatively for 24 h. All participants received paracetamol 1 gm/6 h. Rescue analgesic was given if the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain assessment was > 3. The primary outcome was the mean postoperative dynamic VAS during the first 24 h. Secondary outcomes were static VAS, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, postoperative morphine consumption, time to independent movement, and patient's satisfaction.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients in the ibuprofen group and fifty patients in the ketorolac group were analyzed. The 24-h dynamic and static VAS were similar in the two groups. The median (quartiles) dynamic VAS was 1.1 (0.9, 1.9) in the ibuprofen group versus 1.0 (0.7, 1.3) in the ketorolac group, P-value = 0.116; and the median (quartiles) static VAS was 0.9 (0.6, 1.3) in the ibuprofen group versus 0.7 (0.4, 1.1) in the ketorolac group, P-value = 0.113. The intra- and postoperative analgesic requirements were also similar in the two groups. However, patient satisfaction was slightly higher in the ketorolac group than that in the ibuprofen group (median [quartiles]: 6 [5, 7] versus 5 [4, 7], respectively), P-value: 0.009.

CONCLUSION

The two drugs, intravenous ibuprofen and ketorolac produced similar analgesic profile in patients undergoing open abdominal hysterectomy receiving multimodal analgesic regimen. NCT05610384, Date of registration: 09/11/2022 CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05610384. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05610384.

Strong opioids-induced cardiac, neurologic, and respiratory disorders: a real-world study from 2004 to 2023 based on FAERS

Opioids are mainly used as adjuncts to the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia, postoperative analgesia, and treating moderate to severe cancer pain and chronic pain. However, the hazards of these drugs to various organ organs still need to be further explored. This study used the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to determine whether commonly receiving opioids was higher than the baseline risk for all other medications. FAERS was asked about adverse events (AEs) for the opioids "morphine," "fentanyl," "oxycodone," "hydromorphone," "sufentanil," and "remifentanil" from the first quarter of 2004 (2004Q1) through the second quarter of 2023 (2023Q2). Disproportionality signaling analysis was performed by calculating reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM). AEs with system organ classes (SOCs) of "cardiac disease," "neurologic disease," and "respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disease" were then screened. The statistical analysis included 12,819,518 reports in the FAERS database from 2004Q1 to 2023Q2, of which 236,619 AEs were reported as "primary suspect" for the six drugs mentioned above, which were selected as "cardiac disorders," "nervous system disorders," and "respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders." Some AEs identified in this study are consistent with the drug labeling, such as bradycardia, respiratory depression, and somnolence. In addition, some unexpected and significant acute adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as toxic leukoencephalopathy and coma, may occur. This study identified potential new and unexpected ADRs for opioids, providing valuable evidence for safety studies of opioids.

The Development and Implementation of the Fast-Pace Assessment Framework and Tiered Analgesic Orders for Opioid Optimization

BACKGROUND

Within the context of the opioid epidemic, changes needed to be made in the prescription and administration of analgesics. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and implementation of a project that utilized a holistic pain assessment framework and introduced new order sets to guide the integration of nonopioid, opioid, and co-analgesics in a quaternary care medical center.

METHODS

An interdisciplinary team updated policies and procedures for pain assessment and opioid administration and created new analgesic order sets for both adult and pediatric patients. Following requisite approvals, these order sets were integrated into the electronic health record. Education of clinicians, patients, and caregivers was provided to facilitate implementation of these new clinical practices.

RESULTS

Prescribers' levels of adherence with the use of the pain order sets ranged from 80% to 90% and no adverse effects were reported. Education of nursing staff was incorporated into hospital orientation. Ongoing evaluations are providing insights into how the new policies and procedures can be optimized to ensure reliable, safe, and effective pain management.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the implementation of the opioid optimization project, adherence with the tiered, multimodal approach to analgesic prescribing is high. Next steps include both qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the benefits and challenges associated with this practice change. For example, systems will be developed to monitor nurses' adherence with the implementation of the pain order sets and the use of both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic pain management interventions.

Balanced opioid-free anesthesia with lidocaine and esketamine versus balanced anesthesia with sufentanil for gynecological endoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

In this randomized controlled trial, 74 patients scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic surgery (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I/II) were enrolled and randomly divided into two study groups: (i) Group C (control), received sufentanil (0.3 μg/kg) and saline, followed by sufentanil (0.1 μg/kg∙h) and saline; and (ii) Group F (OFA), received esketamine (0.15 mg/kg) and lidocaine (2 mg/kg), followed by esketamine (0.1 mg/kg∙h) and lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg∙h). The primary outcome was the 48-h time-weighted average (TWA) of postoperative pain scores. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation, adverse effects, and postoperative sedation score, pain scores at different time points, analgesic consumption at 48 h, and gastrointestinal functional recovery. The 48-h TWAs of pain scores were 1.32 (0.78) (95% CI 1.06-1.58) and 1.09 (0.70) (95% CI 0.87-1.33) for Groups F and C, respectively. The estimated difference between Groups F and C was - 0.23 (95% CI - 0.58 - 0.12; P = 0.195). No differences were found in any of the secondary outcomes and no severe adverse effects were observed in either group. Balanced OFA with lidocaine and esketamine achieved similar effects to balanced anesthesia with sufentanil in patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery, without severe adverse effects.Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR2300067951, www.chictr.org.cn 01 February, 2023.

Impact of fluid balance and opioid-sparing anesthesia within enchanced recovery pathway on postoperative morbidity after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer

Background

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for esophagectomy may reduce the high incidence of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of properly conducted ERAS protocol with specific emphasis on fluid balance and opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) on postoperative major morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy.

Methods

Patients undergoing elective esophagectomy for esophageal cancer at the Hospital for Digestive Surgery, University Clinical Center of Serbia, from December 2017 to March 2021, were included in this retrospective observational study. Patients were divided into two groups: the ERAS group (OSA, intraoperative goal-directed therapy, and postoperative “near-zero” fluid balance) and the control group (opioid-based anesthesia, maintenance mean blood pressure ≥ 65 mmHg, and liberal postoperative fluid management). The primary outcome was major morbidity within 30 days from surgery and 30-day and 90-day mortality. Multivariable analysis was used to examine the effect of the ERAS protocol.

Results

A total of 121 patients were divided into the ERAS group (69 patients) and the control group (52 patients). Patients in the ERAS group was received less fentanyl, median 300 (interquartile range (IQR), 200–1,550) mcg than in control group, median 1,100 (IQR, 650–1750) mcg, p &lt; 0.001. Median intraoperative total infusion was lower in the ERAS group, 2000 (IQR, 1000–3,750) mL compared to control group, 3,500 (IQR, 2000–5,500) mL, p &lt; 0.001. However, intraoperative norepinephrine infusion was more administered in the ERAS group (52.2% vs. 7.7%, p &lt; 0.001). On postoperative day 1, median cumulative fluid balance was 2,215 (IQR, −150-5880) mL in the ERAS group vs. 4692.5 (IQR, 1770–10,060) mL in the control group, p = 0.002. After the implementation of the ERAS protocol, major morbidity was less frequent in the ERAS group than in the control group (18.8% vs. 75%, p &lt; 0.001). There was no statistical significant difference in 30-day and 90-day mortality (p = 0.07 and p = 0.119, respectively). The probability of postoperative major morbidity and interstitial pulmonary edema were higher in control group (OR 5.637; CI95%:1.178–10.98; p = 0.030 and OR 5.955; CI95% 1.702–9.084; p &lt; 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

A major morbidity and interstitial pulmonary edema after esophagectomy were decreased after the implementation of the ERAS protocol, without impact on overall mortality.

Noninferiority trials in acute pain research: a valid approach or a slippery slope?

The conduct and reporting of studies with a noninferiority hypothesis is challenging because of the complexity involved in their design and interpretation. However, studies with a noninferiority design have increased in popularity. A recently published trial reported on the noninferiority of lidocaine infusion to epidural analgesia in major abdominal surgeries. Apart from needing a critical appraisal, this draws attention to improve our understanding of noninferiority study framework and its unique features. Given the increasing focus on using various analgesic adjuncts and multiple approaches to fascial plane blocks to avoid more definitive and standard approaches, it is imperative that particular attention is paid to appropriate execution and reporting of noninferiority studies.