Telehealth Interventions to Improve Obstetric and Gynecologic Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Improving Maternal Postpartum Access to Care through Telemedicine (IMPACT): A multi-center randomized controlled trial of postpartum interventions to improve access and outcome

BACKGROUND

Postpartum care is essential for maternal health and significantly impacts long-term health outcomes, yet it remains inadequately addressed, particularly among Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic individuals. The primary objective of the Improving Maternal Postpartum Access to Care through Telemedicine (IMPACT) study is to compare the effectiveness of two postpartum care models on early postpartum complication detection, hospital readmission prevention, postpartum health knowledge, quality of life, and chronic medical condition management among medically underserved individuals.

METHOD

The IMPACT study is a multi-center, randomized controlled trial conducted at Parkland Hospital in Dallas, Texas, and Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, Georgia. It aims to compare two postpartum care models (intensive education vs. enhanced virtual care) among 3500 Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic postpartum individuals of lower socioeconomic status. Phase I (year 1) involves collecting baseline data and refining the study based on patient feedback. Phase II (year 2-4) continues recruiting participants and assigns them to each model randomly. Data collection spans a one-year follow-up period (1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after enrollment), including maternal health outcomes, mental health assessments, laboratory tests, and patient-reported measures.

CONCLUSION

The IMPACT study provides an innovative approach to postpartum care, utilizing telemedicine to enhance access and education for underserved populations. The study findings will have significant implications for healthcare providers and policymakers, offering evidence-based guidance for optimizing postpartum care delivery and informing clinical guidelines that can help reduce maternal health disparities.

Examining digital care relationships of medicaid participants in the pre/postnatal care period: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Underserved populations in the United States are at higher risk for poor maternal health outcomes. New models of care, such as telehealth, can offer additional support, including access to care 24/7/365 days a year; however, little is known about their impact on nurse-patient relationships. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of patients and nurses (registered and advanced practice registered nurses) on the relationships established through a telehealth program for pregnant and postpartum women.

METHODS

A qualitative, descriptive, longitudinal study was conducted between December 2022 and December 2023. Semi-structured interviews were completed with 28 individuals in the first year after the program's launch. Among the participants, 23 were pregnant or postpartum women enrolled in a pregnancy and postpartum support program, and five were nurses involved in delivering the program. The semi-structured interviews were conducted remotely using a phone or an online platform. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Two major themes, Therapeutic Nurse-Patient Relationships and Programmatic Aspects that Support Virtual Relationships, along with twelve subthemes, were identified. Participants felt that the programmatic aspects allowed them to create meaningful relationships with their care providers. In addition, the digital services offered a nonjudgmental and supportive method for women to receive care and education when and where they need it. From the nurses' standpoint, they felt that they could personalize the care for women without the time limitations typical in an in-person clinical encounter.

CONCLUSIONS

Supporting women through digital models of care can influence their engagement and relationships with their nurses. Findings show that both the women and the nurses reported being able to establish positive relationships, although they described them differently. As a result, women reported feeling comfortable accessing care and asking pregnancy-related questions, suggesting that telehealth programs can foster the development of therapeutic nurse-patient relationships.

Perinatal Outcomes Among Patients Using OB Teleflex, A Hybrid Prenatal Telemedicine Program

OBJECTIVES

To assess obstetric outcomes among participants of the OB Teleflex program, in which roughly half of prenatal care was virtual, compared to those who were eligible, but elected traditional prenatal care.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study of patients who delivered between October 1, 2021, and September 30, 2022, compared OB Teleflex participation to routine prenatal care. Low-risk patients with a singleton, viable, non-anomalous fetus, and without hypertension requiring medication, were eligible for OB Teleflex and included in the study. Inverse probability weighting was used to obtain unbiased estimates of program effect on a composite of adverse outcomes that included primary caesarean delivery, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, preterm birth, insufficient gestational weight gain, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

RESULTS

Out of 674 patients that delivered at our center during the study period, 347 were eligible for OB Teleflex and met study criteria. Of the 347 patients eligible for OB Teleflex, 63 (18%) chose to participate in the program. Those who elected OB Teleflex compared to those who did not, differed by race, parity, and history of caesarean deliveries. In both adjusted and unadjusted analysis of the composite of adverse outcomes, there was no difference between OB Teleflex participants and those receiving standard care.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid prenatal telemedicine did not differ from standard prenatal care in the rate of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Programs like OB Teleflex may help to remove barriers from care without worsening birth outcomes. Larger studies are needed to investigate whether hybrid prenatal care can improve outcomes.

Patient and provider perspectives on telemedicine use in an outpatient gynecologic clinic serving a diverse, low-income population

ObjectiveTo evaluate patient and provider experiences using telemedicine for gynecologic visits among a diverse, low-income population.MethodsPatients attending telemedicine visits at a resident-run gynecology clinic completed a modified Telemedicine Usability Questionnaire and providers completed a survey addressing satisfaction and barriers for each visit. The Telemedicine Usability Questionnaire included six subscales to assess telemedicine usability with 1-5 Likert-scale responses. Statistical analyses included Chi-square, Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon rank sum, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and two-sample t-test.ResultsOf 192 patients enrolled, 157 (82%) completed the surveys (87% video visits, 13% telephone visits). Most patients were ethnic minorities (non-Hispanic White-16%, Hispanic-32%, Black-28%, Asian-10%), median age was 40 years (range 18-69), and 63% reported income under $40,000. The total mean Telemedicine Usability Questionnaire score was 4.3/5. The reliability subscale score (3.72/5) was lower compared to all other subscales (p < 0.001). Older respondents were more likely to find telemedicine unreliable (mean age >44 vs <39, p = 0.02). Without telemedicine, 54% would have traveled ≥1 h to appointments, with 46% spending over $35 on travel, and 27% missing ≥ 1 workday. Patients preferred telemedicine for follow-up rather than initial visits (81% vs 33%, p < 0.01). Among providers, residents felt less adequately trained in telemedicine compared to nurse practitioners and fellows (54% vs 46%, p = 0.039).ConclusionLow-income women utilizing telemedicine for outpatient gynecologic care report positive experiences with improved access to healthcare, cost, and time savings compared to in-person visits. Provider experiences were also positive; however, teaching hospitals must evaluate whether trainee providers feel adequately trained to deliver telemedicine visits.

Informatics Interventions for Maternal Morbidity: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Women have been entering pregnancy less healthy than previous generations, placing them at increased risk for pregnancy complications. One approach to ensuring effective monitoring and treatment of at-risk women is designing technology-based interventions that prevent maternal morbidities and treat perinatal conditions.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review evaluates what informatics interventions have been designed and tested to prevent and treat maternal morbidity.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant studies. The inclusion criteria were studies that tested a medical or clinical informatics intervention; enrolled adult women; and addressed preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preterm birth, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-defined severe maternal morbidity, or perinatal mental health conditions. Demographic, population, and intervention data were extracted to characterize the technologies, conditions, and populations addressed.

RESULTS

A total of 80 studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Many of the studies tested for multiple conditions. Of these, 73% (60/82) of the technologies were tested for either GDM or perinatal mental health conditions, and 15% (12/82) were tested for preeclampsia. For technologies, 32% (28/87) of the technologies tested were smartphone or tablet applications, 26% (23/87) were telehealth interventions, and 14% (12/87) were remote monitoring technologies. Of the many outcomes measured by the studies, almost half (69/140, 49%) were patient physical or mental health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Per this scoping review, most informatics interventions address three conditions: GDM, preeclampsia, and mental health. There may be opportunities to treat other potentially lethal conditions like postpartum hemorrhage using proven technologies such as mobile apps. Ample gaps in the literature exist concerning the use of informatics technologies aimed at maternal morbidity. There may be opportunities to use informatics for lesser-targeted conditions and populations.

The effectiveness of a community-based online low-glycaemic index diet and lifestyle recommendations intervention for people with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The community health workers (CHWs)-led model is an important strategy for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in China. However, existing community-based dietary and health education interventions in diabetes management are insufficient. Meanwhile, emerging mobile health (mHealth) has emerged as a promising tool for improving disease management. Current evidence on the combined efficacy of mHealth technologies and CHWs strategies remains limited.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the effectiveness of an online dietary and health education intervention delivered through a tertiary hospital's WeChat official account (WOA) for T2DM patients, examining its influence on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, body mass index (BMI), serum lipid profiles, and diabetes-specific quality of life (DSQL).

METHODS

This randomized clinical trial was conducted in two community health centers in China, enrolling adults diagnosed with T2DM. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups over 3 months. The control group received standard care, while the intervention group accessed online low glycaemic index (GI) dietary and lifestyle recommendations via the WOA. This group was instructed to monitor blood glucose levels, upload daily dietary photos, review health education notifications, and participate in real-time communication with the diabetes management team via the WOA.

RESULTS

A total of 178 participants were randomized to the control group (mean [SD] age, 57.07 [10.96] years, n = 89) and the intervention group (mean [SD] age, 57.18 [10.61] years, n = 89). After 3 months, significant improvements were observed in the intervention group compared to the control group, with lower HbA1c levels (mean 7.82%, SD 0.43%; p = 0.001), BMI (mean 24.35, SD 1.25 kg/m2; p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mean 2.38, SD 0.21 mmol/L; p < 0.001), and DSQL scores (mean 43.24, SD 7.23; P < 0.001), whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mean 1.35, SD 0.37 mmol/L; p = 0.001) was significantly higher. Subgroup analysis at 3 months showed that age, education, disease duration, comorbidity, and BMI influenced the effectiveness of HbA1c reduction.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the WOA-based intervention effectively engages patients in community diabetes management, leading to improved glycemic control, weight reduction, lipid metabolism optimization, and better quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2400081045.

A scoping review of digital technologies in antenatal care: recent progress and applications of digital technologies

INTRODUCTION

Digital health technologies have vastly improved monitoring, diagnosis, and care during pregnancy. As expectant mothers increasingly engage with social media, online platforms, and mobile applications, these innovations present valuable opportunities to enhance the quality of maternal healthcare services.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to assess the applicability, outcomes, and recent advancement of digital health modalities in antenatal care.

METHOD

We conducted a scoping review by searching four electronic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, EBSCOhost), performing manual searches of Google Scholar, and examining the references of relevant studies. Eligible studies included original research published in English between 2010 and 2024 involving the use of digital health technologies for antenatal care, complying with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping review guidelines.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-six eligible articles were identified, with the majority (61.11%) conducted in high-income countries, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. Digital health studies have increased over time, driven by telehealth adoption in affluent nations. Interventions predominantly focused on patient-provider consultations, remote monitoring, and health education, complementing in-person visits or as a substitute when necessary. High levels of acceptance and satisfaction were reported among users. These interventions primarily targeted general maternal care (28.57%), gestational diabetes mellitus (15.07%), and mental health (13.49%) while also addressing gestational weight management, hypertensive disorders, high-risk pregnancies and maternal education. The findings demonstrated positive outcomes in managing clinical conditions, enhancing knowledge, promoting birth preparedness, and improving antenatal care access and utilisation. Additionally, the findings revealed the cost-effectiveness of these approaches in alleviating financial burdens for patients and healthcare systems.

CONCLUSION

Digital health is emerging as a pivotal tool in maternal and child care, fostering positive outcomes and high acceptance among patients and healthcare providers. Its integration into antenatal care ensures the maintenance of standard care quality, with no adverse effects reported despite limited discussions on safety and privacy concerns. As these technologies continue to evolve, they are set to redefine antenatal care by offering more accessible, efficient, and patient-centred solutions, ultimately shaping the future of maternal healthcare delivery.

Continuous remote home monitoring solutions for mother and fetus: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Continuous remote monitoring holds the potential to improve obstetric healthcare through early detection of abnormal parameters along with associated complications. Rapid advancements in mobile technologies make this field promising for a new approach to improving the health of pregnant women and their unborn children.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping literature review aims to present the current research stand of existing literature addressing wearables for continuous remote monitoring of pregnant women and their unborn children at home.

METHODS

"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews" (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines were followed. The literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase databases. Additionally, the reference lists of existing studies were examined for relevant literature.

RESULTS

A total of 37 papers were analyzed, addressing continuous remote home monitoring of pregnant women or their fetuses. These papers showcased a diverse array of technologies with different capabilities. Continuous remote home monitoring was found to be feasible. However, several challenges were identified, including issues related to user compliance, data reliability, and the lack of addressing data security.

CONCLUSION

Continuous remote home monitoring through wearables emerges as a promising approach in obstetric healthcare. However, further investigation and research are needed, particularly focusing on larger sample sizes and more heterogeneous patient populations and addressing user compliance, data reliability, and data security.

The early COVID-19 pandemic period and associated gestational weight gain

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate if gestational weight gain was altered during the early COVID-19 pandemic period.

METHODS

This a retrospective cohort study evaluating gestational weight gain among individuals delivering during the early COVID-19 pandemic epoch (March 10-December 31, 2020) compared to temporally matched pre-pandemic (matched months in 2018 and 2019) controls using electronic medical record data from a large tertiary care hospital. The primary outcome was gestational weight gain defined as a categorical measure representing below, meeting, or above Institute of Medicine (IOM) criteria with further adjustment for gestational age at delivery. The early-pandemic exposure group was also categorized by gestational age at the start period (<14 weeks' and 14-20 weeks') to assess if duration of exposure affected gestational weight gain risks with the use of multinominal logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 5,377 individuals 3,619 (67.3 %) and 1,758 (32.7 %) were in the pre and early pandemic epochs respectively. Overall, 934 (17.4 %) individuals gained below recommended, 1,280 (23.8 %) met recommendations, and 3,163 (58.8 %) gained above IOM recommended gestational weight gain. Compared to the pre-pandemic epoch, the early pandemic period was not associated with weight gain below (OR 1.06, 95 % Cl 0.89-1.27) or above (OR 1.03, 95 % Cl 0.89-1.19) IOM recommendations. This was also true when the early pandemic group was stratified based on gestational age at the start of the early pandemic period (<14 weeks' and 14-20 weeks').

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated no significant difference in maternal weight gain between pre and early COVID-19 pandemic periods.

Hybrid remote and in-clinic maternal-fetal surveillance for women with gestational diabetes: A prospective pilot study

OBJECTIVE

This study explores a hybrid approach to maternal-fetal care for gestational diabetes (GD), integrating virtual visits seamlessly with in-clinic assessments. We assessed the feasibility, time efficiency, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes to facilitate wider adoption of maternal-fetal telemedicine.

METHODS

We conducted a 4-week prospective study involving 20 women with GD at ≥32 weeks of pregnancy, alternating between remote and in-clinic weekly visits. Remote assessments began with women self-measuring vital signs and using a digital urine dipstick. The remote encounter started with a midwife performing anamnesis and remotely connecting women to the fetal nonstress test. A physician concluded the meeting with remote sonographic assessment of amniotic fluid maximal vertical pocket that together with the nonstress test provided the modified biophysical assessment as well as a video encounter and ongoing glycemic control assessment. We assessed the feasibility of remote visits, compared visit durations, evaluated women's satisfaction using the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire, examined glucose documentation adherence during hybrid care compared with the following period until birth, and assessed GD-related clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Remote visits had a success rate of 97.4% (38 of 39), with significantly shorter durations compared with in-clinic visits (median 59.0 min vs. 159.0 min, P < 0.001). Women expressed high satisfaction (6.6 of 7), and adherence with recording fasting glucose values during the study period was significantly higher than the following period until birth (92.2% vs. 61.8%, P = 0.001). Notably, none required induction of labor for glycemic control imbalance, and there were no cases of macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, or neonatal hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSION

The hybrid approach to maternal-fetal care for GD demonstrated feasibility, safety, time efficiency, improved patient satisfaction, and enhanced glycemic control adherence.

Beyond COVID-19: Reported clinical practices in maternity care in Victoria during the COVID-19 pandemic and implications for the future - A statewide review

BACKGROUND

In Australia, during the COVID-19 pandemic many routine pregnancy visits were replaced by telehealth, along with changes to routine screening and visitor policies. Many providers plan to continue these changes.

AIMS

Describe changes to maternity care provision across the state of Victoria during the COVID-19 pandemic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A population-based cross-sectional design was used. Managers of maternity services (public and private) were invited to complete a questionnaire by telephone or online exploring changes to care delivery, telehealth practices, perceived impact of changes and future telehealth implementation.

RESULTS

Fifty per cent of maternity service managers (34/68; 27 public, six private) responded (March-April 2021). Around 50% of all pregnancy visits became telehealth, with multiple combinations of face-to-face and telehealth visits; 92% conducted the first (booking) appointment via telehealth. No specific gestational visit was conducted face-to-face by all services. Visits most likely to be face-to-face were at 39 and 40 weeks gestation (65%). For telehealth appointments, there was an ad hoc approach to routine screening, eg, measuring blood pressure (11% did not advise at all), fetal growth (26%-no specific strategy) and fetal heart rate (15%-no specific strategy). Over half (52%) would consider maintaining telehealth post-pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in a single state, there was great variation in what constitutes telehealth, when pregnant women should have face-to-face visits, and what routine screening in pregnancy should be maintained. This is concerning given over half the services are planning to continue telehealth post-pandemic, despite the lack of evidence of safety, efficacy and input from women and clinicians.

Patient-Centric Approach to Personalized Electronic Medical Records via QR Code in Japan

Government policies in the United States and the European Union promote standardization and value creation in the use of FAIR (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability) data, which can enhance trust in digital health systems and is crucial for their success. Trust is built through elements such as FAIR data access, interoperability, and improved communication, which are essential for fostering innovation in digital health technologies. This Viewpoint aims to report on exploratory research demonstrating the feasibility of testing a patient-centric data flow model facilitating semantic interoperability on precision medical information. In this global trend, the interoperable interface called Sync for Science-J (S4S-J) for linking electronic medical records (EMRs) and personal health records was launched as part of the Basic Policy for Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform in Japan. S4S-J controls data distribution consisting of EMR and patient-generated health data and converts this information into QR codes that can be scanned by mobile apps. This system facilitates data sharing based on personal information beliefs and unlocks siloed Internet of Things systems with a privacy preference manager. In line with Japanese information handling practices, the development of a mobile cloud network will lower barriers to entry and enable accelerated data sharing. To ensure cross-compatibility and compliance with future international data standardization, S4S-J conforms to the Health Level 7 Fast Health Care Interoperability Resources standard and uses the international standardized logical observation identifiers names and codes (LOINC) to redefine medical terms used in different terminology standards in different medical fields. It is developed as an applied standard in medical information intended for industry, health care services, and research through secondary use of data. A multicenter collaborative study was initiated to investigate the effectiveness of this system; this was a registered, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial, the EMBRACE study of the mobile health app M♡Link for hyperglycemic disorders in pregnancy, which implements an EMR-personal health record interoperable interface via S4S-J. Nevertheless, the aforementioned new challenges, the pivotal Health Level 7 Fast Health Care Interoperability Resources system, and LOINC data mapping were successfully implemented. Moreover, the preliminary input of EMR-integrated patient-generated health data was successfully shared between authorized medical facilities and health care providers in accordance with the patients' preferences. The patient-centric data flow of the S4S-J in Japan is expected to guarantee the right to data portability, which promotes the maximum benefit of use by patients themselves, which in turn contributes to the promotion of open science.

Perception of Telemedicine and Remote Learning Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Health Education England Survey of London Obstetrics and Gynaecology Trainees

Purpose

To determine the level of uptake of telemedicine among postgraduate obstetrics and gynaecology (O&G) trainees in London, and how they perceive its impact on their training.

Methods

A mixed-methods survey aimed at exploring trainee perspectives of telemedicine use in clinical practice and its implications for training. Study participants were O&G specialist doctors on the London (UK) training programme. The survey was distributed to the 2022 cohort via Email communication facilitated by Health Education England.

Results

The response rate was 46.3% (118/255). Of respondents, 96% (113/118) had experience of telemedicine, in a range of clinical environments; 91% (106/117) felt telemedicine should become embedded in O&G practice (the most frequent reported advantage was time-saving and a barrier was language translation); 43% of trainees (50/116) stated that they were unable to attain effective clinical training during telemedicine appointments; and 70% (81/116) indicated a preference for remote online teaching. The majority of trainees (75%) had some level of experience in the use of technology in clinical training, encompassing various modalities including surgical and ultrasound simulation, remote real-time training and virtual reality patient consultations. Trainee responses, on the whole, reflected a lack of confidence in their ultrasound skills; 79.5% (74/93) of trainees responsible for acute gynaecology admissions reported that at least 25% of admissions were for deferred ultrasound scanning investigation. Most trainees anticipated that real-time remote supervision for both USS and laparoscopy would enhance training opportunities and expedite time to patient diagnosis and management. Anticipated barriers included concerns regarding the uptake of technology and connectivity issues.

Conclusion

Telemedicine for clinical care has been demonstrated to be well-received by most O&G trainees. However, it is necessary to consider effective O&G training when delivering telemedicine. Technology gives rise to a number of training opportunities, with the development of online teaching, telementoring and simulation. Trainees report both advantages and disadvantages which should be carefully considered to optimise postgraduate O&G training.

Telehealth use and receipt of recommended services within one-year postpartum

INTRODUCTION

In obstetrics, telehealth is widely used in the provision of prenatal and postpartum care. The objective was to compare the utilization of commonly recommended services after delivery among individuals receiving telehealth versus in-person postpartum care.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort study of individuals receiving postpartum care at a single institution between 1 July 2020 and 30 June 2023. The primary exposure was the exclusive use of telehealth versus an in-person visit for postpartum care. Two primary outcomes were assessed between 0 and 365 days after the delivery: 1) long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method use and 2) pap smear screening. Secondary outcomes occurring between 0 and 365 days after delivery included: clinic-based weight assessment, clinic-based blood pressure assessment, any prescription contraception use, primary care visit, and pregnancy within 1 year.

RESULTS

Among the 9953 individuals, 9058 (91.0%) had a postpartum visit. 1811 (19.9%) utilized telehealth exclusively, which peaked during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exclusive telehealth users were less likely to have a pap smear (21.6 vs. 40.1%, p < 0.001) or use LARCs (8.6 vs. 19.4%, p < 0.001) than those receiving in-person care. In the adjusted analysis, the odds ratio for receiving a pap smear was 0.38 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.47) and for using a LARC was 0.38 (95% CI 0.31-0.47) when comparing telehealth to in-person care. Reduced odds of all secondary outcomes were seen in the exclusive telehealth use compared to the in-person cohort, with the exception of subsequent pregnancy within 1 year, which was not significantly different.

DISCUSSION

Acknowledging that telehealth now has become an important means for patients to access medical care, these findings should prompt clinicians to consider when an in-person postpartum visit should be offered or recommended over telehealth, especially when a patient may not have a preference or reported barriers to accessing an in-person visit.

Telehealth to Address Preventable Maternal Deaths: A Call to Action

Over 80% of maternal deaths are preventable. Telehealth approaches can help address disparities by increasing access to quality maternal health care. In this position statement, we advocate for the utility of telehealth to address maternal mortality disparities, focusing specifically on the postpartum period, where most maternal deaths occur. Specifically, we describe how telehealth visits, mobile health applications, and wearable devices for remote patient monitoring can be used to promote the uptake of postpartum care and adherence to evidence-based treatment for the most common causes of maternal death (i.e., cardiovascular conditions and mental health-related conditions). We discuss challenges that must be overcome to ensure the broad and equitable reach of telehealth and identify specific action steps to address this pressing public health issue.

A Comparison of Delivery Modalities for Pregnancy Clinical Care Management: Telephonic Versus Video

OBJECTIVE

Given the high prevalence of maternal morbidity and mortality, it is imperative that maternal health interventions are comprehensively evaluated, so they can be scaled with fidelity. Community-based care management models focused on perinatal health care are a priority for health care systems and payers. Alternative care management delivery modalities, such as video visits, are needed to expand program reach amidst growing system-level challenges. This evaluation explores the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of video versus telephonic care in perinatal care management.

METHODS

Using a mixed methods approach, we implemented a quality improvement project to learn about the integration and impact of video-enabled care into the UPMC Health Plan "Pregnancy Clinical Support" (PCS) care management delivery model. Focus groups were conducted with PCS care managers (CMs) to explore their perspectives on video-visit integration. Video-only members were propensity scores matched to telephonic-only members; statistical comparisons were conducted to assess between-group differences in engagement.

RESULTS

PCS CMs discussed ways to structure effective video-visit onboarding, strengths, and drawbacks of video-enabled care, workflow integration challenges, and best practices for introducing video visits to members. Video-only members had significantly (P < 0.0001) more clinical sessions (2.56 ± 1.57 vs 2.05 ± 1.52) and longer case duration measured in calendar days (209 ± 80 vs 169 ± 94) during the 17-month project period than telephonic-only members.

CONCLUSION

Evidence generated provides direct guidance on successfully integrating video visits into workflows of community-based CMs while improving engagement in care across diverse member populations.

Mothers prefer a hybrid model of postpartum care: a pilot mixed method study

BACKGROUND

Telehealth, including video consultation (VC), has become prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the experience and concern of women using VC for postpartum care has yet to be adequately studied but is crucial for their adoption. The study aimed to assess the experience and attitude of postpartum mothers (PPM) towards using VC as a novel model of care delivery and the factors that could potentially affect their adoption.

METHOD

Data were gathered from PPM participating in VC using Zoom platform for postpartum care using mixed method. In-depth interviews (IDI) of twenty-five PPM were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and audited for accuracy. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify themes relating to perceived threat, usefulness, ease of use, and attitudes toward using VC in postpartum care. The themes are reported based on the "Health Information Technology Acceptance Model" framework. Preliminary quantitative data on the acceptability of VC were collected using structured surveys.

RESULTS

PPMs valued convenience, accessibility, and personalised care VC offered to address their immediate postpartum concerns. They perceived VC as suitable for seeking medical opinions, improving confidence in parent crafting, and providing better care access. They recognised the lack of physical examination as a major limitation in VC and proposed a hybrid postpartum care model, combining VC and in-person consultation to cater to individual needs and preferences. PPMs alluded to trust in the care providers, flexibility in VC appointment timings and enhanced interface of remote platforms as enablers for VC adoption. Preliminary quantitative data shows that PPMs found VC saved time (100%), energy (98%), and money (90%) and was appropriate (94%), easy to use (96%), acceptable (96%) for postpartum care.

CONCLUSION

PPMs favoured combining VC and in-person consultation to mitigate their concerns and personalise their care needs.

Telemedicine Follow-up After Medication Management of Early Pregnancy Loss

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of a new protocol for telemedicine follow-up after medication management of early pregnancy loss. Study Design: The study was designed to assess the feasibility of planned telemedicine follow-up after medication management of early pregnancy loss. We compared these follow-up rates with those after planned in-person follow-up of medication management of early pregnancy loss and planned telemedicine follow-up after medication abortion. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, including patients initiating medication management of early pregnancy loss <13w0d gestation and medication abortion ≤10w0d with a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol between April 1, 2020, and March 28, 2021. As part of a new clinical protocol, patients could opt for telemedicine follow-up one week after treatment and a home urine pregnancy test 4 weeks after treatment. Our primary outcome was completed follow-up as per clinical protocol. We also examined outcomes related to complications across telemedicine and in-person follow-up groups. Results: Of patients reviewed, 181 were eligible for inclusion; 75 had medication management of early pregnancy loss, and 106 had medication abortion. Thirty-six out of 75 patients elected for telemedicine follow-up after early pregnancy loss. Of patients scheduled for telemedicine follow-up, 29/36 (81%, 95% CI: 64-92) with early pregnancy loss and 64/69 (93%, 95% CI: 84-98) undergoing medication abortion completed follow-up as per protocol (p = 0.06). Completed follow-up was also similar among patients undergoing medication management of early pregnancy loss who planned for in-person follow-up (p = 0.135). Complications were rare and did not differ across early pregnancy loss and medication abortion groups. Conclusions: Telemedicine follow-up is a feasible alternative to in-person assessment after medication management of early pregnancy loss.

A cost-minimisation population-based analysis of telehealth-integrated antenatal care

Background

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Victoria's largest maternity service provider implemented a telehealth-integrated antenatal care (ANC) schedule for high- and low-risk pregnancies. The program has been maintained since March 2020. Given ever-increasing healthcare costs, economic evaluation is crucial to ensure value and guide ongoing use.

Methods

The aim of the study was to perform a cost-minimisation analysis of telehealth integrated ANC compared to conventional in-person ANC, from the hospital and patient perspectives. We hypothesised that the costs associated with telehealth integrated ANC would be less than in-person ANC. We generated propensity score matched pre- and post-telehealth cohorts from women with a singleton pregnancy who received ANC and birthed at Monash Health from 1 Jan 2018-22 Mar 2020 (pre-telehealth), and 20 Apr 2020-31 Dec 2021 (post-telehealth). Data were extracted from electronic medical and finance records. We assigned costs for all Monash Health outpatient, inpatient, and emergency department episodes to calculate mean cost per birth. Patient travel costs were estimated based on distance residing from hospital.

Findings

Matched pre- and post-telehealth cohorts of n = 13,534 each were created. There were no significant differences in stillbirth, pre-eclampsia, severe maternal morbidity, or death. There was a AU$133 (0.98%, 95% CI [-0.17%, 2.16%]) increase in cost per birth in the post-telehealth cohort. This was driven by increased hospital costs (AU$340 or 2.64% increase, [1.44%, 3.86%]), due to a 4.78% increase in antenatal inpatient episodes and 3.51% increase in outpatient appointments post-telehealth. Increased care complexity was noted in the post-telehealth period with increased rates of gestational diabetes, caesarean birth, and specialty-led care (p-values all <0.0001). In contrast, patient costs of accessing healthcare fell significantly from AU$562 pre-telehealth to AU$355 post-telehealth (difference -AU$207 (-36.81%, [-37.46%, -36.16%]).

Interpretation

Telehealth supported the provision of a greater volume of antenatal care to more complex pregnancies, while maintaining safety and quality of care, for only a minimal cost increase to health funders and substantial cost savings to patients. This finding provides reassurance regarding the financial viability of telehealth-integrated antenatal care.

Funding

None.

The Impact of Telehealth on Obstetrical Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic

OBJECTIVE

 Nationwide, obstetric clinics modified prenatal care to include telehealth visits in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, enabling the opportunity to investigate its impact on patient outcomes. We hypothesized that use of prenatal telehealth visits would increase the number of prenatal visits, decrease the frequency of urgent triage/emergency department (ED) visits, and improve perinatal outcomes. This study aimed to determine the impact of telehealth on number of obstetric prenatal visits and urgent triage/ED visits amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.

STUDY DESIGN

 This is a retrospective cohort of patients from a federally qualified health center in central Texas. Patients with a singleton gestation who delivered after 32 weeks were included. Comparison groups were made between those patients who delivered between May 2020 and December 2020 (presumed modified prenatal visit schedule with in-person and telehealth) and those patients delivering between June 2019 and February 2020 (the traditional care model with in-person visits only). Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to estimate differences in the number of prenatal visits and unscheduled triage/ED visits.

RESULTS

 A total of 1,654 patients were identified with 801 (48.4%) patients undergoing modified prenatal care and 853 (51.6%) patients receiving traditional care during the study period. No significant differences were seen in overall prenatal attendance or triage/ED presentations. However, when stratified by parity, multiparous patients undergoing modified prenatal care were less likely to experience an urgent triage/ED presentation (8.7 vs. 12.7%; odds ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.61).

CONCLUSION

 When compared with a traditional prenatal visitation cohort prepandemic, patients who received modified telehealth prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic had similar prenatal attendance and unscheduled emergency presentations. However, multiparous patients experienced a decreased rate of unscheduled emergency presentations. Supplementing prenatal care with telehealth may provide overall comparable prenatal care delivery.

KEY POINTS

· Use of telehealth has the potential to improve prenatal care.. · The COVID-19 pandemic allowed for comparison to traditional prenatal care.. · Multiparous patients had a decreased frequency of ED visits.. · Similar prenatal attendance was seen between both prenatal models..

Optimising digital clinical consultations in maternity care: a realist review and implementation principles

OBJECTIVES

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to increased use of digital clinical consultations (phone or video calls) within UK maternity services. This project aimed to review the evidence on digital clinical consultations in maternity systems to illuminate how, for whom and in what contexts, they can be used to support safe, personalised and equitable care.

DESIGN

A realist synthesis, drawing on diverse sources of evidence (2010-present) from OECD countries, alongside insights from knowledge user groups (representing healthcare providers and service users).

METHODS

The review used three analytical processes (induction, abduction and retroduction) within three iterative stages (development of initial programme theories; evidence retrieval and synthesis; validation and refinement of the programme theories).

RESULTS

Ninety-three evidence sources were included in the final synthesis. Fifteen programme theories were developed showing that digital clinical consultations involve different mechanisms operating across five key contexts: the organisation, healthcare providers, the clinical relationship, the reason for consultation and women. The review suggests that digital clinical consultations can be effective and acceptable to stakeholders if there is access to appropriate infrastructure/digital resources and if implementation is able to ensure personalisation, informed choice, professional autonomy and relationship-focused connections. The review found relatively less evidence in relation to safety and equity.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the complexity of maternity systems, there can be 'no one-size fits all' approach to digital clinical consultations. Nonetheless, the review distills four 'CORE' implementation principles: C-creating the right environment, infrastructure and support for staff; O-optimising consultations to be responsive, flexible and personalised to different needs and preferences; R-recognising the importance of access and inclusion; and E-enabling quality and safety through relationship-focused connections. Service innovation and research are needed to operationalise, explore and evaluate these principles, particularly in relation to safety and equity.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021288702.

An analysis of virtual triage utilization by pregnant women prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Objective

This analysis describes the use patterns of web-based virtual triage (VT) by pregnant patients before and during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic, and how the pandemic influenced frequency of VT use, nature of symptoms reported, and the associated implications for maternal healthcare delivery.

Methods

An online survey of 36,910 patients who reported pregnancy was completed between January 1, 2019 and June 30, 2022. The data were segmented into six month periods to allow comparative analyses of usage frequency and changes in initial complaints over the study period, with particular emphasis on the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Descriptive statistics and trend analyses were used to identify significant shifts in symptom reporting and user demographics.

Results

A marked increase in the utilization of VT by pregnant women during the pandemic occurred. The percentage of pregnant users grew from 0.32% in the first half of 2019 to 0.85% in late 2021, with the greatest rise (213%) in the first six months of 2020. The most common symptoms reported were abdominal pain, headache, nausea, back pain, fatigue and cough. Pre-pandemic, VT use focused on prospective mothers learning about the potential causes of typical symptoms occurring during pregnancy, but during the pandemic there was a substantial increase in reporting symptoms associated with acute respiratory infections such as cough, nasal congestion, and dyspnea.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly influenced the use of VT by pregnant women, with a shift towards addressing concerns related to respiratory symptoms and potential COVID-19 exposure. These findings underline the significant role of digital health tools in maintaining access to health information during times of crisis and highlight the evolving needs of pregnant patients in such settings.

Does telemedicine hold the key for reproductive health care? A quantitative examination of women's intentions toward use and accurate information disclosure

OBJECTIVE

To investigate women's perceptions of telemedicine for reproductive health care services, focusing on how perceived benefits and privacy risks influence their intentions to adopt telemedicine and their willingness to disclose personal health information.

STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey was conducted. The study applied the privacy calculus theory to the context of telemedicine for reproductive health, using adapted, validated variables to develop the survey. Outcome variables included intentions to adopt telemedicine and willingness to disclose accurate personal health information.

DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE

Data were collected in May and June 2023 using Qualtrics online panel services, targeting women across the United States who had not used telemedicine for reproductive health. The sample comprised 847 women aged 18 and older. Structural equation modeling was employed using AMOS v28.0 to test the hypothesized relationships between perceived benefits, perceived risks, and adoption intentions. The analysis controlled for age, household income, political affiliation, religious views, and prior births.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Perceived benefits were positively related to intention to adopt telemedicine for reproductive care (β: 0.600, p < 0.001), and willingness to disclose accurate personal health information (β: 0.453, p < 0.001). Unexpectedly, perceived privacy risks were positively related to adoption intentions (β: 0.128, p < 0.001), but negatively related to willingness to disclose (β: -0.282, p < 0.001). Intentions to adopt were positively associated with willingness to disclose (β: 0.089, p < 0.05). Lastly, older women and women located in states with abortion restrictions expressed lower intentions to adopt. The model explained 40.2% of variance in intention to adopt and 38.3% of variance in willingness to disclose.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates the importance of perceived benefits and privacy risks in driving telemedicine adoption and disclosure intentions among women in the reproductive health context. These findings suggest the need for targeted strategies to address privacy concerns and support telemedicine adoption, particularly in restrictive regulatory environments.

Examining use of telehealth in jails: linking women to community OUD services

BACKGROUND

Opioid use disorder (OUD) remains a significant health care need for women, particularly those involved in the criminal legal system (CLS). There are no studies to date that focus on the utilization of telehealth as a platform for assessment and linkage to medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) at community re-entry for women, despite the fact that women have unique risk factors that may contribute to opioid relapse in the community. The purpose of this mixed-methods study is to provide an overview of the innovative use of telehealth for linking incarcerated women to community MOUD treatment in the Kentucky-hub of the Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN).

METHODS

This study incorporates qualitative and quantitative data collection with MOUD providers, recovery staff involved in peer navigation services, and women who are incarcerated to understand perceptions of the use of telehealth prior to jail release as a linkage to community services.

RESULTS

Findings from this study suggest overall support for the use of telehealth between community MOUD treatment providers and women who are incarcerated using videoconferencing technology. On average, there was very little variation in provider favorable feedback related to clinical engagement or in face-to-face comparability, as well as how telehealth allowed the participant to discuss personal and sensitive issues during the clinical assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings suggest benefits associated with the use of telehealth in increasing access to treatment for women with OUD. Jails are critical venues for telehealth interventions because they provide the opportunity to reach women who have been actively using illicit substances, often have advanced-stage substance use disorders which have compromised their health and mental health, and often have not been previously identified as needing treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was originally registered on 8/23/19, ClinicalTrials.gov, #NCT04069624.

Impact of telehealth on patient-provider communication in prenatal care for pregnant women from underserved settings

INTRODUCTION

Telehealth has emerged as a promising supplementary modality in prenatal care. However, its impact on patient-provider communication (PPC), especially among pregnant women from underserved settings, requires comprehensive evaluation. This study examined the factors associated with the quality of patient-provider communication during the COVID-19 pandemic among pregnant telehealth users and non-users.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional study design, 242 women were surveyed (response rate = 23%) regarding their experience with telehealth, quality of PPC, and experiences of discrimination during prenatal care. Multiple regression models were used to identify the factors associated with the quality of PPC during the COVID-19 pandemic. A sub-group analysis explored the factors associated with the quality of PPC separately among telehealth users and non-users.

RESULTS

The majority of the participants were on Medicaid (95%) and self-identified as Black/African American (57.3%). Regression analyses revealed a negative relationship between telehealth use during pregnancy and the quality of PPC (β = -1.13, P = 0.002). Irrespective of the telehealth use, the experience of discrimination was associated with poor quality of PPC among users (β = -3.47, P = .02) and non-users (β = -.78, P = .03), while adjusting for sociodemographic factors and social support during pregnancy.

DISCUSSION

While telehealth offers advantages like convenience, increased accessibility, and continuity of care, challenges in establishing effective PPC in virtual settings have emerged that emphasize the necessity for comprehensive provider training extending beyond technical competencies. The persistent issue of perceived discrimination, impacting PPC across both groups, underscores the necessity to rethink existing strategies of mandatory training to increase providers' knowledge.

Virtual Compared With In-Office Postoperative Visits After Urogynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare patient satisfaction, health care resource utilization, and adverse events among patients receiving a virtual video compared with in-office postoperative visit after urogynecologic surgery. We hypothesized that virtual video visits would be noninferior to in-office visits.

METHODS

This was a randomized noninferiority clinical trial of patients undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence at a single academic tertiary referral center. Participants were randomized to receive either a virtual video postoperative visit or a standard in-office postoperative visit. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction measured by the validated PSQ-18 (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18) (noninferiority margin 5 points) at the 6-week postoperative visit. Secondary outcomes included PSQ-18 domain scores (noninferiority margin 0.5 points) and composite health care resource utilization and adverse events after the 6-week postoperative visit up to 12 weeks after surgery (noninferiority margin 10%). A sample size of 100 participants (50 per group) would allow 80% power to assess a 5-point noninferiority margin on the total PSQ-18 with an SD of 10 and α=0.05.

RESULTS

From January 2023 to September 2023, 265 patients were screened for eligibility, and 104 were randomized. A total of 100 participants (50 per arm) completed the study and were included in the analysis. The mean±SD age of all participants was 57.0±13.2 years. The mean±SD PSQ-18 total score was 75.18±8.15 in the virtual group and 75.14±8.7 in the in-office group. The mean PSQ-18 total score was 0.04 points higher (ie, greater degree of satisfaction) in the virtual group, with a 95% CI of -2.75 to 2.83, which met the criterion for noninferiority. Between-group differences for all PSQ-18 domain scores likewise met criterion for noninferiority. Composite health care resource utilization was 14.0% lower in the virtual group than in the in-office group (20.0% vs 34.0%, 95% CI, -28.0% to 1.0%). For composite adverse events, the between-group difference was 2.0% (2.0% in virtual group vs 0.0% in in-office group, 95% CI,-3.0% to 8.0%).

CONCLUSION

Virtual video postoperative visits were noninferior to in-office visits with regard to patient satisfaction, health care resource utilization, and adverse events and can be offered as an alternative to in-office visits for postoperative follow-up after urogynecologic surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05641077.

A multi-faceted exploration of unmet needs in the continuing improvement and development of fertility care amidst a pandemic

PURPOSE

The continuous improvement and development of fertility care, internationally, requires ongoing monitoring of current delivery processes and outcomes in clinical practice. This descriptive and exploratory mixed-methods study was conducted in eight countries (Brazil, China, France, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Spain and the United Kingdom) to assess the unmet needs of fertility patients (male and female), and existing challenges, barriers and educational gaps of physicians and laboratory specialists involved in human fertility care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was deployed sequentially in two phases: 1) in-depth 45-minute semi-structured interviews (n=76), transcribed, coded and thematically analysed using an inductive reasoning approach, 2) an online survey (n=303) informed by the findings of the qualitative interviews, face validated by experts in reproductive medicine, and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods.

RESULTS

The integrated results of both phases indicated numerous areas of challenges, including: 1) investigating male-related infertility; 2) deciding appropriate treatment for men and selective use of assisted reproductive technology; and 3) maintaining access to high-quality fertility care during a pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

The paper presents a reflective piece on knowledge and skills that warrant ongoing monitoring and improvement amongst reproductive medicine healthcare professionals amidst future pandemics and unanticipated health system disruptions. Moreover, these findings suggest that there is an additional need to better understand the required changes in policies and organizational processes that would facilitate access to andrology services for male infertility and specialized care, as needed.

Telemedicine utilization and perceived quality of virtual care among pregnant and postpartum women during the COVID-19 pandemic

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this research was to examine the association between perceived quality of care during the COVID-19 pandemic and the modality of maternity care visits, virtual or in-person.

METHODS

This study utilized an online nationwide survey about experiences in prenatal and postpartum care between 18 April and 6 August 2020. Perceived quality of care was categorized into worse care, better, or the same care as compared to before the pandemic. Barriers were categorized into five groups: (1) concern for the privacy of health information, (2) not having a private or quiet place, (3) lack of physical exam or measurements, (4) quality of care, and (5) technology issues. Data analyses included bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

The majority (75.3%) of modified visits utilized telemedicine. Over half of the women took at-home measurements and the majority were successful. Barriers to care included a lack of a quiet or private space to conduct their visit. Women expressed concerns about a lack of measurements and a lower quality of care. Women who received telemedicine visits perceived worse care as compared to women who received in-person care visits (OR = 5.62; 95% CI 5.01-6.31).

DISCUSSION

Previous studies have shown that pregnant patients are generally satisfied with virtual care during the pandemic. This study provides insight from a large nationwide sample of women and geographic variation in satisfaction and perceived quality. These findings highlight barriers and potential solutions to improving patients' perceived quality of virtual maternity care, and thus future uptake of high-quality, virtual care.

Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Clinical Protocol #19: Breastfeeding Promotion in the Prenatal Period (Revised 2024)

Background: The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine revised the 2015 version of this clinical protocol to review the evidence and provide recommendations related to breastfeeding promotion in the prenatal period. Key Information: Promoting and normalizing breastfeeding in the prenatal period can improve breastfeeding outcomes including initiation and duration of breastfeeding. Ideally, prenatal interventions should be a part of a comprehensive longitudinal breastfeeding support program. Recommendations: Clinicians or other health workers should discuss breastfeeding at each prenatal visit. Counseling topics should include the health benefits of breastfeeding versus not breastfeeding, the basics of breastfeeding (e.g., physiology, positioning), what to expect of hospital-based and immediate postpartum breastfeeding support (i.e., Baby-Friendly Ten Steps), and the risks of unnecessary supplementation. Medical, anatomical, and other risk factors for breastfeeding challenges should be identified, and targeted anticipatory guidance should be given. Prenatal counseling should include distribution of structured breastfeeding education at low literacy levels and in the parent's preferred language. Counseling should be culturally sensitive and patient-centered, including family members when appropriate. Prenatal support may integrate various health workers (e.g., medical doctors, midwives, community health workers, lactation consultants, among others) and include various modalities including telecommunication. Enhancing breastfeeding education for prenatal care providers is also imperative. Additional themes related to implementation of recommendations for specific populations are also reviewed.

Quality of Blood Pressure Monitoring During Telehealth Visits for Pregnant Patients at Risk of Preeclampsia

Introduction: Preeclampsia is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The United States Preventative Services Task Force released 2023 recommendations encouraging more research on telehealth's role in facilitating blood pressure monitoring for patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including preeclampsia. This study evaluates the integration of self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) into telehealth obstetric visits during the COVID-19 pandemic for pregnant patients at risk of preeclampsia. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients with one or more preeclampsia risk factors who delivered at a tertiary hospital from January to March 2021. Information pertaining to patients' number of antepartum, postpartum, and telehealth visits, blood pressure cuff access, and documentation of SMBP readings was recorded. Analyses were conducted in RStudio version 2022.12.0 + 353 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Results: Of 721 eligible patients, 244 (33.8%) had 2 or more ante- or postpartum telehealth visits. Of these 244 patients, 142 (58.2%) had chart documentation of owning a home blood pressure cuff. Only 106 (43.4%) had 1 or more SMBP documented in their telehealth visit notes, and they were more likely to have received care at federally qualified health centers than maternal fetal medicine clinics (p = 0.018) or private clinics (p < 0.001). Charts revealed no explanation for lack of blood pressure documentation during telehealth visits for most cases (n = 129, 93.5%). Conclusions: Opportunities exist to standardize blood pressure recording and documentation during telehealth visits, especially for patients with risk factors for preeclampsia, and to advocate for greater access to home blood pressure cuffs for all pregnant patients.

Telemedicine for Routine Prenatal Care: Use and Satisfaction During the COVID-19 Pandemic

INTRODUCTION

Telemedicine use in prenatal care has greatly expanded without substantial research. Optimizing user experiences can increase telemedicine's utilization to support care access. The purpose of this study was to explore patient and provider experiences using telemedicine for routine prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic, identifying factors affecting its utilization and satisfaction.

METHODS

In this mixed methods study, online surveys and semi-structured interviews with pregnant and postpartum patients and perinatal providers across the United States were used to explore experiences with telemedicine and prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were collected from July to December 2021. Survey findings were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and interviews were thematically coded and analyzed, followed by mixed methods analysis.

RESULTS

Results of 946 surveys (750 patients and 196 providers) and 30 interviews (15 patients and 15 providers) met inclusion for analysis. Telemedicine was utilized by 42% of patients and 72% of perinatal provider participants. The primary reason patients did not use telemedicine was because it was not offered. Patients and providers who did not use telemedicine expressed the following main concerns with virtual care: uncertainty about care quality, particularly when blood pressure and the fetal heart rate were not assessed, and potential challenges with developing trusting patient-provider relationships. Patients and providers who used telemedicine rated their experience as mild to moderate satisfaction across the 6 Telehealth Usability Questionnaire domains. Satisfaction scores were not dependent on whether physical examination components were included in virtual visits.

DISCUSSION

Providing patients with the choice to use telemedicine as needed or combined with in-person visits for routine prenatal care may increase care utilization. Although not directly linked with satisfaction, interest in using telemedicine would likely increase for patients and providers concerned with care quality if blood pressure and fetal heart rate are assessed during virtual visits.

Centering Equity and Fostering Stakeholder Collaboration and Trust-Pillars of the Maternal Health Innovation Program in Maryland

Objective

To describe two main pillars of the Maryland Maternal Health Innovation Program (MDMOM): (1) centering equity and (2) fostering broad stakeholder collaboration and trust.

Methods

We summarized MDMOM's key activities and used severe maternal morbidity (SMM) surveillance and program monitoring data to quantify MDMOM's work on the two pillars. We developed measures of hospital engagement with MDMOM (participation in quality improvement [QI] activities, participation in check-in meetings, staff involvement) and with other partners (participation in QI activities, representation in state-level groups). We examined Bonferroni-adjusted correlations between these hospital engagement measures and with key hospital characteristics: level of maternity care, annual delivery volume, and SMM rate.

Results

Over 100 national and state organizations and individual stakeholders contributed to our building the MDMOM program and implementing key activities centering equity: hospital-based SMM surveillance in 20 of Maryland's 32 hospitals; almost 5,000 trainings offered to perinatal health care providers; two telemedicine/telehealth interventions; training of home visitors and community-based organization staff. Birthing hospitals represent MDMOM's main implementation partners. The strength of their participation in MDMOM QI activities is positively correlated to their participation in check-in meetings and with the degree of involvement by physicians in such activities. Higher engagement in MDMOM QI activities is also positively correlated to hospitals' participation in other state-level maternal health initiatives or groups.

Conclusion

Our experience with the MDMOM program demonstrates that an equity focus and broad stakeholder collaboration building strong relationships and providing implementation support can lead to high levels of engagement in innovative maternal health interventions.

Promoting childbirth in a rural health facility: A quasi-experimental study in western Kenya

BACKGROUND

The high maternal and neonatal mortality rate in sub-Saharan Africa could be reduced by using navigation by means of mobile devices to increase the number of women who choose to give birth in a health center (HC) with a skilled healthcare practitioner.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental design was used to test a midwife-delivered navigation by means of mobile phone. A total of 208 women were randomized to two groups (intervention and control). Women in the intervention group received up to three navigation calls from midwives. Women in the control group received usual antenatal education during prenatal visits. Data were collected using semistructured questionnaires. Childbirth location was determined through medical records.

RESULTS

Overall, 180 (87%) women gave birth in a HC with a 3% advantage for the intervention group. A total of 86% (88/102) of the control group gave birth in a HC versus 89% (92/103) for the intervention group (Χ2 = 0.44, p-value = 0.51), with an unadjusted odds ratio of 1.33 (95% CI: 0.57, 3.09). Among those with personal phones, 91% (138/152) had a birth in a HC versus 79% (42/53) in those without a personal phone (Χ2 = 4.89, p-value = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that it is feasible to deliver phone-based navigation to support birth in a HC; personal phone ownership may be a factor in the success of this strategy.

California provider and advocate perspectives about opportunities to optimize nutrition services and resources in the first 1000 days

Background

Nutrition in the first 1000 days of life, from conception to age 2 years, plays a critical role in shaping offspring's physical and mental development, yet many families from underserved backgrounds suffer from nutrition inequity during this important stage of development. The objective of this study is to assess nutrition services and resources provided to families during the first 1000 days across diverse settings in California.

Methods

A semistructured survey was disseminated to healthcare and educational providers who offer services to pregnant and/or postpartum women and children up to age 2 years. Perspectives about five domains of early-life nutrition services and resources were assessed: (1) accessibility, (2) mode of content delivery, (3) content of messages, (4) breastfeeding support, and (5) professional development on early-life nutrition. Mixed methodology was used to conduct descriptive and thematic analyses for closed and open-ended survey questions, respectively.

Results

Survey respondents (n = 148) worked in healthcare (37%), governmental (20%), community (20%), and childcare settings (23%). Over 60% primarily served low-income families. Less than 9% reported that their organizations provide prenatal nutrition messaging about critical micronutrients required to support foetal neurodevelopment, highlighting an opportunity for professional development training in nutrition. Need for equitable access to nutrition education and resources by addressing Language, Income, Food resources, Time and Transportation (LIFTT) was a cross-cutting theme that emerged.

Conclusion

Providers perceive a need to enhance LIFTT accessibility and improve delivery of early-life nutrition-related services for families in the first 1000 days by providing topic-specific education and culturally responsive resources with consistent, evidence-based messages.

Health care use and health consequences of geographic lack of access to abortion and maternity care

BACKGROUND

Recent years have brought substantial declines in geographic access to abortion facilities and maternity care across the US. The purpose of this study was to identify the reproductive health consequences of living in a county without access to comprehensive reproductive health care services.

METHODS

We analyzed National Center for Health Statistics data on all live births occurring in the US in 2020. We used data on locations of abortion facilities and availability of maternity care in order to classify counties by level of access to comprehensive reproductive health care services and defined comprehensive reproductive health care deserts as counties that did not have an abortion facility in the county or in any neighboring county and did not have any maternity care practitioners. We fit modified Poisson regression models with generalized estimating equations to estimate the degree to which living in a comprehensive reproductive health care desert was associated with receipt of timely and adequate prenatal care and risk of preterm birth, controlling for individual-level and county-level characteristics.

RESULTS

In 2020, one third of counties in the US were comprehensive reproductive health care deserts (n = 1082), and 136,272 births occurred in these counties. In adjusted models, there was no difference in prenatal health care use (timeliness or adequacy of care) between persons in comprehensive reproductive health care deserts and those with full access to care, but the risk of preterm birth was significantly elevated (aRR =1.09, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of access to comprehensive reproductive health care services may increase the incidence of preterm birth.

Virtual Obstetric Hospitalist Support for Obstetric Emergencies and Deliveries: The Mayo Clinic Experience

Objective: To implement use of obstetric (OB) hospitalist telemedicine services (TeleOB) to support clinicians facing OB emergencies in low-resource hospital settings. Methods: TeleOB was staffed by OB hospitalists working at a tertiary maternity center. The service was available via real-time high-definition audio/video technology for providers at 17 outlying hospitals across a health system spanning two states. The initial 25 service activations are described. Results: TeleOB supported 17 deliveries, two postpartum emergency department (ED) consultations, and four antenatal ED consultations. In 10 of 17 (59%) deliveries, teleneonatology was jointly activated to support neonatal resuscitation. Sixteen (94%) deliveries occurred in multiparas, and five (29%) resulted from spontaneous preterm labor. Eighty percent (20/25) of activations occurred in facilities without maternity services. Conclusions: A TeleOB service staffed by OB hospitalists successfully supports hospitals in an integrated health care system. TeleOB is feasible for support of hospitals with no delivery facilities or with limited maternity care resources.

Effectiveness of mHealth Apps for Maternal Health Care Delivery: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

BACKGROUND

Globally, the use of mobile health (mHealth) apps or interventions has increased. Robust synthesis of existing systematic reviews on mHealth apps may offer useful insights to guide maternal health clinicians and policy makers.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness or impact of mHealth apps on maternal health care delivery globally.

METHODS

We systematically searched Scopus, Web of Science (Core Collection), MEDLINE or PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews using a predeveloped search strategy. The quality of the reviews was independently assessed by 3 reviewers, while study selection was done by 2 independent raters. We presented a narrative synthesis of the findings, highlighting the specific mHealth apps, where they are implemented, and their effectiveness or outcomes toward various maternal conditions.

RESULTS

A total of 2527 documents were retrieved, out of which 16 documents were included in the review. Most mHealth apps were implemented by sending SMS text messages with mobile phones. mHealth interventions were most effective in 5 areas: maternal anxiety and depression, diabetes in pregnancy, gestational weight management, maternal health care use, behavioral modification toward smoking cessation, and controlling substance use during pregnancy. We noted that mHealth interventions for maternal health care are skewed toward high-income countries (13/16, 81%).

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of mHealth apps for maternity health care has drawn attention in research and practice recently. The study showed that research on mHealth apps and their use dominate in high-income countries. As a result, it is imperative that low- and middle-income countries intensify their commitment to these apps for maternal health care, in terms of use and research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022365179; https://tinyurl.com/e5yxyx77.

[Evidence synthesis and recommendations: clinical practice guidelines on drug treatment for hypertension in pregnancySíntese de evidências e recomendações: diretrizes de prática clínica para o tratamento farmacológico da hipertensão arterial na gravidez]

Introduction

Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy are a major cause of severe morbidity, long-term disability, and death. Appropriate pharmacological treatment is essential in the management of these disorders.

Objectives

Synthesize the recommendations developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) to improve the quality of care and health outcomes of adults with high blood pressure, and address aspects of how to implement these recommendations.

Methods

A synthesis was conducted of WHO recommendations: drug treatment for severe hypertension in pregnancy and WHO recommendations: drug treatment for non-severe hypertension in pregnancy. The WHO recommendations follow the GRADE methodology (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) for the preparation of guidelines, as described in the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development. In addition, a systematic search for studies carried out in the Region of the Americas was conducted in PubMed, Lilacs, Health Systems Evidence, Epistemonikos, and gray literature to identify barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies.

Results

Four recommendations were formulated for women with hypertensive disorders. Implementation barriers and facilitators were identified, and indicators were created to assess adherence and outcomes.

Conclusions

The formulated recommendations provide guidance on how to approach drug treatment of hypertension in pregnancy, with considerations for implementation in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Defining practices suitable for care via teleconsultation in gynaecological and obstetrical care: a French Delphi survey

OBJECTIVE

Delineate the scope of teleconsultation services that can be effectively performed to provide women with comprehensive gynaecological and obstetrical care.

DESIGN

Based on the literature and experts' insights, we identified a list of gynaecological and obstetrical care practices suitable for teleconsultation. A three-round Delphi consensus survey was then conducted online among a panel of French experts. Experts using a 9-point Likert scale assessed the relevance of each teleconsultation practice in four key domains: prevention, gynaecology and antenatal and postnatal care. Consensus was determined by applying a dual-criteria approach: the median score on a 9-point Likert scale and the percentage of votes either below 5 or 5 and higher.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a national level in France and involved multiple healthcare centres and professionals from various geographical locations.

PARTICIPANTS

The panel comprised 22 French experts with 19 healthcare professionals, including 12 midwives, 3 obstetricians-gynaecologists, 4 general practitioners and 3 healthcare system users. Participants were selected to include diverse practice settings encompassing hospital and private practices in both rural and urban areas.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The study's primary outcome was the identification of gynaecological and obstetrical care practices suitable for teleconsultation. Secondary outcomes included the level of professional consensus on these practices.

RESULTS

In total, 71 practices were included in the Delphi survey. The practices approved for teleconsultation were distributed as follows: 92% in prevention (n=12/13), 55% in gynaecology (n=18/33), 31% in prenatal care (n=5/16) and 12% in postnatal care (n=1/9). Lastly, 10 practices remained under discussion: 7 in gynaecology, 2 in prenatal care and 1 in postnatal care.

CONCLUSIONS

Our consensus survey highlights both the advantages and limitations of teleconsultations for women's gynaecological and obstetrical care, emphasising the need for careful consideration and tailored implementation.

Urgent Follow-up after Outpatient Nonstress Tests and the Potential for Fetal Monitoring at Home

OBJECTIVE

 This study aimed to measure the proportion of patients needing urgent clinical follow-up after an abnormal outpatient nonstress test (NST). We further sought to capture the patient perspective on the acceptability of performing NSTs at home.

STUDY DESIGN

 A retrospective cohort study was performed over a 2-year period to determine the frequency of abnormal NSTs in a hospital-based, antepartum testing unit in patients greater than or equal to 32 weeks' gestation. The proportion of patients who delivered within 24 hours of an abnormal NST was also determined. A cross-sectional, web-based patient survey was conducted to obtain insight into the patient's comfort level with potentially performing NSTs at home.

RESULTS

 The chart review yielded 665 patients who underwent 2,122 NSTs at greater than or equal to 32 weeks. Of the 2,122 NSTs, 111 were categorized as abnormal and required urgent clinical follow-up, or 5.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.3, 6.3%). Of the 665 patients, 13 delivered within 24 hours of an abnormal NST, or 2.0% (95% CI 1.0, 3.3%). In the web-based survey, the proportion of respondents who would feel comfortable or very comfortable conducting NSTs at home was 87/125, or 69.6% (95% CI 60.9, 77.1%).

CONCLUSION

 This study revealed that 5.2% of NSTs performed in a hospital-based antepartum testing unit were abnormal and required urgent clinical follow-up. Of the patients being followed in the antepartum testing unit, 2.0% delivered within 24 hours of an abnormal NST. The majority of the survey respondents indicated they would feel comfortable performing NSTs at home. The present study adds important information regarding the risks and benefits of NSTs at home.

KEY POINTS

· Telehealth for NSTs offers advantages over in-person NSTs.. · The proportion of NSTs that need urgent follow-up was 5.2%.. · A majority of patients are interested in telehealth for NSTs.. · Guidelines are needed before adoption of telehealth for NSTs..

The impact of telehealth applications on pregnancy outcomes and costs in high-risk pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Telehealth is an applicable, acceptable, cost-effective, easily accessible, and speedy method for pregnant women. This study aimed to examine the impact of telehealth applications on pregnancy outcomes and costs in high-risk pregnancies.

METHODS

Studies were selected from PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, EBSCO, Scopus, and Clinical Key databases according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria from January to February 2021. Cochrane risk-of-bias tools were used in the quality assessment of the studies.

RESULTS

Four observational and eight randomized controlled studies were included in this meta-analysis (telehealth: 135,875, control: 94,275). It was seen that the number of ultrasound (p < 0.01) and face-to-face visits (p < 0.01), fasting insulin (p < 0.01), hemoglobin A1C before delivery (p < 0.01), and emergency cesarean section rates (p = 0.05) were lower in the telehealth group. In the telehealth group, the women's use of antenatal corticosteroids (p = 0.03) and hypoglycemic medication at delivery (p = 0.03), the total of nursing interventions (p < 0.01), compliance with actual blood glucose measurements (p < 0.01), induction intervention at delivery (p = 0.003), and maternal mortality (p < 0.001) rates were higher. Two groups were similar in terms of the use of medical therapy, total gestational weight gain, health problems related to pregnancy, mode and complications of delivery, maternal intensive care unit admission, fetal-neonatal growth and development, neonatal health problems and mortality, follow-up, and care costs.

DISCUSSION

Telehealth and routine care yielded similar maternal/neonatal health and cost outcomes. It can be said that telehealth is a safe technique to work with in the management of high-risk pregnancies.

Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement

Background

The COVID pandemic prompted an increase in the use of digital clinical consultations (telephone or video calls) within midwifery and nursing care. This paper reports on a realist review project related to maternity care that seeks to illuminate for whom such consultations can safely and acceptably be used, how, for what purposes and in what contexts.

Aims

This paper addresses the first phase of a realist enquiry - initial programme theory development - focusing particularly on the role of stakeholder involvement (including digital transformation leaders, midwives, obstetricians, service users and community organisations).

Methods

Three sub-stages of initial programme theory development are described highlighting the contribution of stakeholder groups to each stage: (i) consultation to focus the review question, (ii) focused searching and (iii) further consultation.

Results

Realist literature searching strategies yielded limited theory-rich evidence on digital consultations. Stakeholders provided essential additional contributions resulting in the development of 13 initial programme theories and a conceptual framework.

Conclusions

More research on the implementation of virtual midwifery/nursing consultations is needed. Nursing/midwifery digital researchers should involve stakeholders to help shape research priorities, deepen contextual understanding and sense-check emerging findings.

Telehealth use in maternity care during a pandemic: A lot of bad, some good and possibility

BACKGROUND

To reduce transmission risk during the COVID-19 pandemic, 'telehealth' (health care delivered via telephone/video-conferencing) was implemented into Australian maternity services. Whilst some reports on telehealth implementation ensued, there was scant evidence on women and midwives' perspectives regarding telehealth use.

METHODS

A qualitative study was conducted in Australia during 2020-2021 using two data sources from the Birth in the Time of COVID-19 (BITTOC) study: i) interviews and ii) surveys (open-text responses). Content analysis was utilised to analyse the data and explore telehealth from the perspective of midwives and women accessing maternity care services. In-depth interviews were conducted with 20 women and 16 midwives. Survey responses were provided from 687 midwives and 2525 women who were pregnant or gave birth in 2021, generating 212 and 812 comments respectively.

FINDINGS

Telehealth delivery was variable nationally and undertaken primarily by telephone/videoconferencing. Perceived benefits included: reduced COVID-19 transmission risk, increased flexibility, convenience and cost efficiency. However, women described inadequate assessment, and negative impacts on communication and rapport development. Midwives had similar concerns and also reported technological challenges.

CONCLUSION

During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth offered flexibility, convenience and cost efficiency whilst reducing COVID-19 transmission, yet benefits came at a cost. Telehealth may particularly suit women in rural and remote areas, however, it also has the potential to further reduce equitable, and appropriate care delivery for those at greatest risk of poor outcomes. Telehealth may play an adjunct role in post-pandemic maternity services, but is not a suitable replacement to traditional face-to-face maternity care.

Use of Digital Health and Digital Therapeutics to Treat SUD in Criminal Justice Settings: a Review

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to investigate the use of digital health technologies and/or digital therapeutics (DTx) products in the treatment of substance use disorders (SUDs) in the general population and among criminal justice-involved individuals.

Recent Findings

Despite an expanding evidence base, only three SUD DTxs have received federal regulatory approval. Across studies, DTx products have proven successful in engaging patients in SUD treatment and reducing healthcare costs and resource utilizations. Findings for emerging SUD DTx products show similar results. Still, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the use of digital health technologies and/or DTx among criminal justice populations.

Summary

DTxs have proven effective for treating multiple SUD types (e.g., nicotine and opioids) among the general population. DTx shows similar promise among justice-involved populations, but additional efficacy and implementation research is needed to address barriers such as cost, cultural resistance, and infrastructure.

Evaluating Standard of Care and Obstetrical Outcomes in a Reduced Contact Prenatal Care Model in the COVID-19 Pandemic

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to investigate the impact of reduced contact prenatal care necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic on meeting standards of care and perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study of patients in low-risk obstetrics clinic at a tertiary care county facility serving solely publicly insured patients comparing reduced in-person prenatal care (R) over 12 weeks with a control group (C) receiving traditional prenatal care who delivered prior.

RESULTS

Total 90 patients in reduced contact (R) cohort were matched with controls (C). There were similar rates of standard prenatal care metrics between groups. Gestational age (GA) of anatomy ultrasound was later in R (p = 0.017). Triage visits and missed appointments were similar, though total number of visits (in-person and telehealth) was higher in R (p = 0.043). R group had higher GA at delivery (p = 0.001). Composite neonatal morbidity and length of stay were lower in R (p = 0.017, p = 0.048). Maternal and neonatal outcomes did not otherwise differ between groups. Using Kotelchuck Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization index, R had higher rates of adequate prenatal care (45.6% R vs. 24.4% C, p = 0.005).

DISCUSSION

Our study demonstrates the non-inferiority of a hybrid, reduced schedule prenatal schedule to traditional prenatal scheduling. In a reduced contact prenatal care model, more patients met criteria for adequate prenatal care, likely due to higher attendance of telehealth visits. These findings raise the question of revising the prenatal care model to mitigate disparities in disadvantaged populations.

Telehealth as an Effective Care Delivery Method During the COVID-19 Pandemic for the Rhode Island Behavioral Health Population

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Rhode Island implemented a telehealth waiver allowing telehealth parity. This study investigated (1) if telehealth allowed for patients who seek mental health services to maintain visit frequency and (2) if subpopulations were less likely to utilize telehealth. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the change in total number of visits, in-person visits from pre-waiver to post-waiver, and a multivariate linear regression to identify relationships between demographics and telehealth utilization. Participants were able to maintain the frequency of visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Race/ethnicity, age, gender, employment status, and housing status were all statistically significant predictors of telehealth utilization. Telehealth aids in the continuing of care when in-person visits are not a viable option. Access to telehealth is crucial during public health emergencies and aids in maintaining visit frequency. Further research should be done to evaluate subgroups who are less likely to utilize telehealth.

Effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions among pregnant women: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To carry out a systematic review of systematic reviews with an update of the existing evidence relating to a broad range of smoking cessation interventions, including psycho-social, digital and pharmacologic interventions, for pregnant women.

DATA-SOURCES

Search was conducted in March 2022 in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane in two stages: 1) a search of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, published from January 2012 through January 2022; 2) an update of those that fulfilled eligibility criteria reproducing the primary search strategy.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We selected randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacological, digital, and psychosocial interventions in aged 18 years and over who were daily smokers, and compared these with routine care, less intense interventions or placebo.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Data from eligible studies were manually extracted by two authors and reviewed by a third. The quality of the reviews was evaluated using the AMSTAR scale, and risk of bias was measured with the Rob-2 tool and GRADE level of evidence.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 63 RCTs (n = 19849 women). The interventions found to be effective were: financial incentives (RR:1.77; 95%CI:1.21-2.58), counseling (RR:1.27; 95%CI:1.13-1.43) and long-term nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) (RR:1.53; 95%CI:1.16-2.01). Short-term NRT, bupropion, digital interventions, feedback, social support, and exercise showed no effectiveness. The GRADE level of evidence was moderate-to-high for all interventions, with the exception of long-term NRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation are the most effective for pregnant women. The moderator analysis suggests that pregnant women of low socioeconomic status might benefit less from smoking cessation interventions than women of a high socioeconomic status. These women are usually heavier smokers that live in pro-smoking environments and could require more intensive and targeted interventions.

Assessment of Pregnancy-Related Telehealth Interventions in the United States: A 10-Year Scoping Review

Introduction: Telehealth use in obstetrics has been demonstrated to improve efficiency, access to care, and pregnancy outcomes. Despite reported successful implementation of these programs, information regarding the program variations and its impact on health care costs and outcomes are scarce. Methods: This is a scoping review of pregnancy-related telehealth studies to understand the current landscape of pregnancy-related telehealth interventions as well as to subset those that are used in high-risk pregnancies. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework to guide this review. Results: A total of 70 articles were included in this scoping review. Of those, 53 (75.7%) studies included a pregnant population and 17 (24.3%) studies focused on a rural and/or urban population. Most studies (n = 56; 80%) included some form of synchronous interaction between provider and participant. Patient outcomes included maternal/infant health outcomes (n = 41; 44.1%), patient satisfaction (n = 9; 9.7%), and attendance/compliance (n = 5; 5.4%). Provider-level outcomes included knowledge change (n = 11; 11.8%) and self-efficacy (n = 3; 3.2%). Other outcomes included assessment of costs and patient/provider feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. Overall, there has been a growing trend in articles published on pregnancy-related telehealth studies since 2011, with 2018 having the most publications in a single year. Conclusion: This review suggests a steadily growing body of literature on pregnancy-related telehealth interventions; however, more research is needed to better understand outcomes of telehealth for pregnancy-related care, especially related to patient satisfaction, health disparities, and cost-benefit.