• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4806042)   Today's Articles (4832)
For: Zhou N, Pfingst BE. Effects of site-specific level adjustments on speech recognition with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2014;35:30-40. [PMID: 24225651 DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829d15cc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
James CJ, Laborde ML, Algans C, Tartayre M, Marx M. Channel crosstalk detected using ECAP measurements is associated with poorer speech perception in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2025;458:109206. [PMID: 39933408 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2025.109206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2024] [Revised: 01/16/2025] [Accepted: 02/01/2025] [Indexed: 02/13/2025]
2
Adenis V, Partouche E, Stahl P, Gnansia D, Huetz C, Edeline JM. Asymmetric pulses delivered by a cochlear implant allow a reduction in evoked firing rate and in spatial activation in the guinea pig auditory cortex. Hear Res 2024;447:109027. [PMID: 38723386 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
3
Aldag N, Nogueira W. Psychoacoustic and electroencephalographic responses to changes in amplitude modulation depth and frequency in relation to speech recognition in cochlear implantees. Sci Rep 2024;14:8181. [PMID: 38589483 PMCID: PMC11002021 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58225-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]  Open
4
Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Colesa DJ, Swiderski DL, Raphael Y, Pfingst BE. Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2023;24:5-29. [PMID: 36600147 PMCID: PMC9971430 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-022-00882-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]  Open
5
Effects of number of maxima and electrical dynamic range on speech-in-noise perception with an “n-of-m” cochlear-implant strategy. Biomed Signal Process Control 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
6
Chang CJ, Sun CH, Hsu CJ, Chiu T, Yu SH, Wu HP. Cochlear implant mapping strategy to solve difficulty in speech recognition. J Chin Med Assoc 2022;85:874-879. [PMID: 35666612 DOI: 10.1097/jcma.0000000000000748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]  Open
7
Gransier R, Wouters J. Neural auditory processing of parameterized speech envelopes. Hear Res 2021;412:108374. [PMID: 34800800 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
8
Relationship Between Speech Recognition in Quiet and Noise and Fitting Parameters, Impedances and ECAP Thresholds in Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Ear Hear 2021;41:935-947. [PMID: 31702597 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
9
Imsiecke M, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Nogueira W. Amplitude Growth Functions of Auditory Nerve Responses to Electric Pulse Stimulation With Varied Interphase Gaps in Cochlear Implant Users With Ipsilateral Residual Hearing. Trends Hear 2021;25:23312165211014137. [PMID: 34181493 PMCID: PMC8243142 DOI: 10.1177/23312165211014137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]  Open
10
Neural Modulation Transmission Is a Marker for Speech Perception in Noise in Cochlear Implant Users. Ear Hear 2021;41:591-602. [PMID: 31567565 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
11
Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Zwolan TA, Pfingst BE. Using the electrically-evoked compound action potential (ECAP) interphase gap effect to select electrode stimulation sites in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2021;406:108257. [PMID: 34020316 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
12
Zhou N, Dixon S, Zhu Z, Dong L, Weiner M. Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners: Is the Performance Driven by Temporal or Spectral Modulation Sensitivity? Trends Hear 2020;24:2331216520948385. [PMID: 32895024 PMCID: PMC7482033 DOI: 10.1177/2331216520948385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]  Open
13
Gransier R, Carlyon RP, Wouters J. Electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users. Sci Rep 2020;10:15406. [PMID: 32958791 PMCID: PMC7506023 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72235-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]  Open
14
Falcón González JC, Borkoski Barreiro S, Ramos De Miguel A, Ramos Macías A. Improvement of speech perception in noise and quiet using a customised Frequency-Allocation Programming (FAP) method. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019;39:178-185. [PMID: 31131837 PMCID: PMC6536028 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100x-2013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2017] [Accepted: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
15
Nunn TB, Jiang D, Green T, Boyle PJ, Vickers DA. A systematic review of the impact of adjusting input dynamic range (IDR), electrical threshold (T) level and rate of stimulation on speech perception ability in cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol 2019;58:317-325. [DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1564844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
16
Assessing the Relationship Between the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and Speech Recognition Abilities in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients. Ear Hear 2019;39:344-358. [PMID: 28885234 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
17
Zhou N, Cadmus M, Dong L, Mathews J. Temporal Modulation Detection Depends on Sharpness of Spatial Tuning. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2018;19:317-330. [PMID: 29696448 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-018-0663-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]  Open
18
Brochier T, McKay C, McDermott H. Rate modulation detection thresholds for cochlear implant users. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2018;143:1214. [PMID: 29495682 DOI: 10.1121/1.5025048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
19
Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients. Ear Hear 2018;37:303-11. [PMID: 26671316 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
20
Mathew R, Undurraga J, Li G, Meerton L, Boyle P, Shaida A, Selvadurai D, Jiang D, Vickers D. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2017;354:86-101. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2017] [Revised: 05/16/2017] [Accepted: 07/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
21
Marsella P, Scorpecci A, Cartocci G, Giannantonio S, Maglione AG, Venuti I, Brizi A, Babiloni F. EEG activity as an objective measure of cognitive load during effortful listening: A study on pediatric subjects with bilateral, asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2017;99:1-7. [PMID: 28688548 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2017] [Revised: 05/12/2017] [Accepted: 05/13/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
22
Brochier T, McDermott HJ, McKay CM. The effect of presentation level and stimulation rate on speech perception and modulation detection for cochlear implant users. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2017;141:4097. [PMID: 28618807 PMCID: PMC5457292 DOI: 10.1121/1.4983658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Revised: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
23
Scheperle RA. Suprathreshold compound action potential amplitude as a measure of auditory function in cochlear implant users. J Otol 2017;12:18-28. [PMID: 29937833 PMCID: PMC6011805 DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2017.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2016] [Revised: 01/02/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2017] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]  Open
24
The Change in Electrical Stimulation Levels During 24 Months Postimplantation for a Large Cohort of Adults Using the Nucleus® Cochlear Implant. Ear Hear 2017;38:357-367. [DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
25
Bosen AK, Chatterjee M. Band importance functions of listeners with cochlear implants using clinical maps. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2016;140:3718. [PMID: 27908046 PMCID: PMC5392084 DOI: 10.1121/1.4967298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
26
Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Pfingst BE. Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap. Hear Res 2016;341:50-65. [PMID: 27521841 PMCID: PMC5131540 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Revised: 08/01/2016] [Accepted: 08/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
27
Theelen–van den Hoek FL, Boymans M, van Dijk B, Dreschler WA. Adjustments of the amplitude mapping function: Sensitivity of cochlear implant users and effects on subjective preference and speech recognition. Int J Audiol 2016;55:674-87. [DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1202454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
28
Scheperle RA, Abbas PJ. Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users. Ear Hear 2015;36:441-53. [PMID: 25658746 PMCID: PMC4478147 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
29
Assessing temporal modulation sensitivity using electrically evoked auditory steady state responses. Hear Res 2015;324:37-45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2014] [Revised: 02/19/2015] [Accepted: 02/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
30
Zhou N, Kraft CT, Colesa DJ, Pfingst BE. Integration of Pulse Trains in Humans and Guinea Pigs with Cochlear Implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2015;16:523-34. [PMID: 25990549 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-015-0521-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2014] [Accepted: 04/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]  Open
31
Pfingst BE, Zhou N, Colesa DJ, Watts MM, Strahl SB, Garadat SN, Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Budenz CL, Raphael Y, Zwolan TA. Importance of cochlear health for implant function. Hear Res 2015;322:77-88. [PMID: 25261772 PMCID: PMC4377117 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2014] [Revised: 08/14/2014] [Accepted: 09/16/2014] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA