Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Guidelines on the Management of Critically Ill Adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Noninvasive ventilation for respiratory failure: When does it work and when it does not?

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV) is a positive pressure ventilation method employed across various disease processes, utilizing noninvasive interfaces such as helmets and facemasks rather than invasive methods such as endotracheal intubation. The benefits of NIV are significant in both the acute care setting, such as improving work of breathing and avoiding the need for endotracheal intubation, as well as in the chronic care setting, improving quality of life and mortality. While new guidelines broaden the application of NIV across various disease areas and introduce emerging modalities, uncertainty persists regarding the appropriate timing and circumstances for NIV utilization. We present a detailed review of the literature with up-to-date studies assessing the indications and limitations of NIV in a variety of conditions associated with acute and chronic respiratory failure. The review also summarizes the current guidelines on the use of NIV in the acute care setting. Although primarily targeted towards the acute indications of NIV, we believe this review will aid in better understanding and managing noninvasive ventilation for clinicians across both the inpatient and outpatient settings.

Worldwide application and valuation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support during the COVID-19 pandemic (WAVES)

ObjectiveThe outcomes of COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) varied. We aim to investigate the variability concerning location and timeframe. We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 351 institutions in 53 countries. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge or death up to 90 days from ECMO start. The associations between calendar time (month and year) of ECMO initiation and the primary outcome were examined by Cox regression modeling. Multivariable survival analyses were adjusted for the time of ECMO start, age, body mass index, APACHE II, SOFA, and the duration of mechanical ventilation before ECMO.Results1060 adult COVID-19 patients enrolled in the COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium (COVID Critical) international registry and required VV-ECMO support. The study period is from January 2020 to December 2021. The median age was 51 years old, and 70% were male patients. Most patients were from Europe (39.3%) and North America (37.4%). The in-hospital mortality of the entire cohort was 47.12%. In North America and Europe, there was an increased probability of death from May 2020 through February 2021. Latin America showed a steady rate of survival until late in the study. South Asia, the Middle East, and Africa showed an increased chance of mortality around May 2020. In the Asian-Pacific region, after February 2021, there was an increased probability of death. The time of ECMO initiation and advanced patient age were associated with increased mortality.ConclusionVariability in the outcomes of COVID-19 patients on VV-ECMO existed within different regions. This variability reflects the differences in resources, policies, patient selection, management, and possibly COVID-19 virus subtypes. Our findings might help guide global response in the future by early adoption of patient selection protocols, worldwide policies, and delivery of resources.

Prognostic value of multivariate logistic regression analysis and amyloid A lactate monitoring in patients with severe pneumonia-associated sepsis

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe pneumonia-associated sepsis often face high mortality rates, highlighting the need for simple and effective prognostic biomarkers. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of serum amyloid A (SAA) and blood lactate (Lac) levels using multivariate logistic regression.

METHOD

This was a retrospective study conducted from January 2021 to December 2023, which included 156 patients diagnosed with severe pneumonia. Of these, 54 developed sepsis (septic group) while 102 did not (non-septic group). Clinical data, SAA, and Lac levels were compared between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify factors influencing the onset of severe pneumonia-associated sepsis and to assess the prognostic significance of SAA and Lac.

RESULT

Significant differences were found in APACHE II score, SOFA score, age, mechanical ventilation, SAA, and Lac levels between the septic and non-septic groups (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified age, SOFA score, APACHE II score, mechanical ventilation, SAA, and Lac as influencing factors for severe pneumonia-associated sepsis (P < 0.05). Patients with poor prognosis (PP) had significantly elevated SAA and Lac levels compared to those with good prognosis (GP) (P < 0.05). Among septic patients, those with PP had significantly higher SAA and Lac levels compared to those with GP (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that advanced age, septic shock, elevated SAA levels, and increased Lac levels were predictors of PP (P < 0.05). The prognostic value of SAA and Lac was demonstrated by AUCs of 0.764 and 0.771, respectively. When combined, the AUC increased to 0.903 with a specificity of 95.00% and sensitivity of 80.25%.

CONCLUSION

Severe pneumonia-associated sepsis is influenced by age, SOFA score, APACHE II score, mechanical ventilation, SAA, and Lac levels. Elevated SAA and Lac levels are associated with PP and can provide prognostic information for adverse outcomes. While SAA and Lac show potential as biomarkers for predicting the prognosis of severe pneumonia-associated sepsis, their clinical utility should be considered in conjunction with other diagnostic and clinical factors for effective patient management and risk stratification.

[Efficiency and safety of the integrated use of medical gases thermal heliox, nitric oxide and molecular hydrogen in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated by hypoxemic, hypercapnic respiratory failure and secondary pulmonary arterial hypertension in the post-COVID period]

AIM

To study the efficacy and safety of the combined use of thermal heliox (t-He/O2), nitric oxide (NO) and molecular hydrogen (H2) in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) complicated by hypoxemic, hypercapnic respiratory failure (RF) and secondary pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in the post-COVID period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The randomized, comparative, controlled, parallel study included patients (n=100, 52 men and 48 women) with exacerbation of COPD levels of evidence C and D (GOLD 2021-2023) with hypoxemic, hypercapnic respiratory failure and secondary PAH, who had pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2 before hospitalization. Patients with similar demographic, clinical, and functional parameters, who received non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and oxygen (O2) along with standard drug therapy, were divided into 5 groups: Group 1 (main): (n=22: 12 men, 10 women, who received t-He/O2, NO, and H2 sequentially); Group 2 (n=20: 10 men, 10 women, who received t-He/O2 and NO); Group 3 (n=20: 11 men, 9 women, who received t-He/O2 and H2); Group 4 (n=18: 10 men, 8 women, who received NO and H2); Group 5 (control) (n=20: 9 men, 11 women). The dynamics of the clinical condition of patients, gas exchange in the lungs, acid-base balance, left-to-right discharge fraction, hemodynamic parameters, and exercise tolerance were assessed.

RESULTS

A positive effect of the complex use of medical gases on the clinical condition of patients, gas exchange parameters in the lungs, metabolism, hemodynamic parameters and exercise tolerance was found in comparison with these parameters in patients who received medical gases separately and with the control group.

CONCLUSION

The combination of t-He/O2, NO and H2 with simultaneous pathogenetic therapy and NIV in patients with exacerbation of COPD complicated by hypoxemic, hypercapnic RF and secondary PAH in the post-COVID period is safe and more effective compared to groups receiving each medical gas separately. Complex therapy improves the clinical condition of patients, reduces signs of hypoxemia and hypercapnia, vascular endothelial dysfunction, metabolic disorders and increases tolerance to physical activity by normalizing gas exchange in the lungs, increasing oxygen delivery to tissues, reducing the shunt fraction, and restoring metabolism.

High-velocity nasal insufflation versus noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for moderate acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the emergency department: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the emergency department (ED) involve dyspnea, cough, and chest discomfort; frequent exacerbations are associated with increased mortality and reduced quality of life. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NiPPV) is commonly used to help relieve symptoms but is limited due to patient intolerance. We aimed to determine whether high-velocity nasal insufflation (HVNI) is noninferior to NiPPV in relieving dyspnea within 4 h in ED patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.

METHODS

This randomized control trial was conducted in seven EDs in the United States. Symptomatic patients with suspected COPD, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) ≥ 60 mm Hg, and venous pH 7.0-7.35 were randomized to receive HVNI (n = 36) or NiPPV (n = 32). The primary outcome was dyspnea severity 4 h after the initiation of study intervention, as measured by the Borg score. Secondary outcomes included vital signs, oxygen saturation, venous pCO2, venous pH, patient discomfort level, and need for endotracheal intubation.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were randomized between November 5, 2020, and May 10, 2023 (mean age 65.6 years; 47% women). The initial pCO2 was 77.7 ± 13.6 mm Hg versus 76.5 ± 13.6 mm Hg and the initial venous pH was 7.27 ± 0.063 versus 7.27 ± 0.043 in the HVNI and NiPPV groups, respectively. Dyspnea was similar in the HVNI and NiPPV groups at baseline (dyspnea scale score 5.4 ± 2.93 and 5.6 ± 2.41) and HVNI was noninferior to NiPPV at the following time points: 30 min (3.97 ± 2.82 and 4.54 ± 1.65, p = 0.006), 60 min (3.09 ± 2.70 and 4.07 ± 1.77, p < 0.001), and 4 h (3.17 ± 2.59 and 3.34 ± 2.04, p = 0.03). At 4 h, there was no difference between the groups in the pCO2 mm Hg (68.76 and 67.29, p = 0.63). Patients reported better overall comfort levels in the HVNI group at 30 min, 60 min, and 4 h (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

In participants with symptomatic COPD, HVNI was noninferior to NiPPV in relieving dyspnea 4 h after therapy initiation. HVNI may be a reasonable treatment option for some patients experiencing moderate acute exacerbations of COPD in the ED.

The extent of carbapenem-resistant encoding genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae from COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients in a tertiary care center, Saudi Arabia

Rapid dissemination of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) is a leading cause of treatment failure, significantly increasing morbidity and mortality rates among inpatients, particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to detect the occurrence of carbapenemase- and carbapenem-resistant-encoding genes in K. pneumoniae isolates from COVID-19 positive and negative patients, and to assess their impact on patient outcomes. A prospective analysis was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia, collecting 97 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) isolates from patients with COVID-19 during 2020-2021. Isolates were obtained from various clinical specimens. Antimicrobial susceptibility assays were performed using the Automated Vitek-2 system, and data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics. The predominant carbapenemases identified were Oxacillinase-48 (OXA-48), followed by KPC and New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), with Imipenemase (IMP) and Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM) being the least prevalent. COVID-19 did not significantly affect the distribution of these genes (P>0.05); however, COVID-19 status and age over 60 years significantly impacted the outcomes of CRKP patients. Other factors such as gender, total ICU or ward stay, and comorbidities did not significantly affect CRKP infection outcomes. The most common carbapenem-resistant genes identified were blaKPC, blaNDM, and blaOXA-48; however, they were not significantly associated with increased mortality.

Outcomes of Prone Positioning in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients

Background: Prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with severe ARDS is associated with reduced mortality. COVID-19 causes variable pulmonary involvement in some patients suffering from severe respiratory failure and ARDS. Although proning in the COVID-19 patient population is increasingly common, more data are needed to fully understand its utility in those with ARDS due to COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study, inclusive of 100 consecutive subjects intubated for ARDS from COVID-19, admitted to the ICU from September 2020 to December 2020. Data were collected daily from time of intubation for 7 d along with 30-d outcomes. Results: The study included a total of 53 subjects proned and 47 nonproned during their hospitalization. Proned subjects had a mean age of 61.8 years and 56.6% were male, compared with a mean age of 66.3 years and 57.4% male in the nonproned group. Age, sex, other baseline characteristics, and treatments were similar between groups, except that proned subjects had a higher body mass index than nonproned subjects (34.1 ± 7.5 vs 30.5 ± 7.4, kg/m2 P = .02) and lower initial P/F ratios (119.1 ± 54.5 vs 154.0 ± 92.7 mm Hg, P = .047). Proned subjects received more neuromuscular blockade (OR 6.63, 95% CI 3.25-13.12, P < .001) and higher sedation levels (two sedatives: OR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.77-5.08; ≥3 sedatives: OR = 7.13, 95% CI 3.96-12.81) with similar ICU stays, ventilator days, newly initiated renal replacement therapy, and 30-d outcomes including being alive, out of the ICU, or discharged from the hospital when compared with nonproned subjects. There were a total of 15 (28.3%) complications related to proning. Proned subjects were reintubated significantly less than the nonproned group (1.9% vs 19.1%, P = .006). Conclusions: Proning mechanically ventilated COVID-19 subjects was associated with more frequent use of neuromuscular blockade and sedation, and lower rates of re-intubation, for respiratory failure when compared with nonproned subjects.

A tidal volume of 7 mL/kg PBW or higher may be safe for COVID-19 patients

PURPOSE

The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has revived the debate on the optimal tidal volume during acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Some experts recommend 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight (PBW) for all patients, while others suggest 7-9 mL/kg PBW for those with compliance >50 mL/cmH2O. We investigated whether a tidal volume ≥ 7 ml/kg PBW may be safe in COVID-19 patients, particularly those with compliance >50 mL/cmH2O.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This secondary analysis of a multicenter study compares the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) mortality among 600 patients ventilated with <7 or ≥ 7 mL/kg PBW. Compliance was categorized as <40, 40-50, or > 50 mL/cmH2O.

RESULTS

346 patients were ventilated with <7 (6.2 ± 0.5) mL/kg PBW and 254 with ≥7 (7.9 ± 0.9) mL/kg PBW. ICU mortality was 33 % and 29 % in the two groups (p = 0.272). At multivariable regression analysis, tidal volume ≥ 7 mL/kg PBW was associated with lower ICU mortality in the overall population (odds ratio: 0.62 [95 %-confidence interval: 0.40-0.95]) and in each compliance category.

CONCLUSIONS

A tidal volume ≥ 7 (up to 9) mL/kg PBW was associated with lower ICU mortality in these COVID-19 patients, including those with compliance <40 mL/cmH2O. This finding should be interpreted cautiously due to the retrospective study design.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrails.govNCT04388670.

Empirical antibiotic therapy improves outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: An emulated targeted trial within a prospective, multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Bacterial pulmonary superinfections develop in a substantial proportion of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients and are associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation requirements and increased mortality. Albeit recommended, evidence supporting the use of empirical antibiotics at intubation is weak and of low quality. The aim of this study was to elucidate the effect of empirical antibiotics, administered within 24 h of endotracheal intubation, on superinfections, duration of mechanical ventilation, and mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

Emulated targeted trial by means of a propensity score-matched analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study of consecutive mechanically ventilated patients admitted to 62 Spanish intensive care units suffering from COVID-19 between March 2020 and February 2021.

RESULTS

Overall, 8532 critically ill COVID-19 patients were included, of which 2580 mechanically ventilated patients remained after matching. Empirical antibiotics were prescribed to 1665 (64%) at intubation. Pulmonary superinfections developed in 39% and 47% of patients treated with and without empirical antibiotics, respectively (p<0.01). Patients treated with empirical antibiotics had a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (incidence risk ratio: 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.78 - 0.94], p<0.01) and a reduced stay in the intensive care unit (incidence risk ratio: 0.89 [95% CI, 0.82 - 0.97] days, p<0.01). Mortality 28 days after endotracheal intubation was 28% in patients treated with empirical antibiotics as opposed to 32% in patients treated without (odds ratio: 0.76 [95% CI, 0.61 - 0.94], p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The administration of empirical antibiotics at intubation in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients was associated with a reduced incidence of pulmonary superinfections, a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit stay, and a lower mortality rate. Notwithstanding these benefits, the applicability of these findings to other viral pneumonias and beyond the pandemic context remains uncertain.

REGISTRATION

www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (NCT04457505).

Research Progress on the Measurement Methods and Clinical Significance of Capillary Refill Time

The monitoring of peripheral circulation, as indicated by the capillary refill time, is a sensitive and accurate method of assessing the microcirculatory status of the body. It is a widely used tool for the evaluation of critically ill patients, the guidance of therapeutic interventions, and the assessment of prognosis. In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on microcirculation monitoring which has led to an increased focus on capillary refill time. The International Sepsis Guidelines, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the World Health Organization, and the American Heart Association all recommend its inclusion in the evaluation of the system in question. Furthermore, the methodology for its measurement has evolved from a traditional manual approach to semiautomatic and fully automatic techniques. This article presents a comprehensive overview of the current research on the measurement of capillary refill time, with a particular focus on its clinical significance. The aim is to provide a valuable reference for clinicians and researchers and further advance the development and application of microcirculation monitoring technology.

Recent nanoengineered therapeutic advancements in sepsis management

Sepsis (defined as sepsis 3.0) is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to a variety of pathogenic microorganisms. Characterized by high morbidity and mortality, sepsis has become a global public health problem. However, there is a lack of appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for sepsis and current management rely on the limited treatment strategies. Recently, nanomedicines targeting and controlling the release of bio-active agents have shown excellent potency in sepsis management, with improved therapeutic efficacy and reduced adverse effects. In this review, we have summarized the advantages of nanomaterials. Also, the preparation and efficacy of the main categories of anti-sepsis nanomedicines applied in sepsis management are described in detail, including antibiotic-coated nanomaterials, antimicrobial peptides-coated nanomaterials, biomimetic nanomaterials, nanomaterials targeting macrophages and natural products loaded nanomaterials. These advances in nanomedicines establish the huge potential for nanomaterials-based sepsis management, especially in the improved pharmaceutical and pharmacological properties, enhanced therapeutic efficacy, controllable drug-targeting and reduced side effects. To further facilitate clinical translation of anti-sepsis nanomedicines, we propose that the issues involving safety, regulatory laws and cost-effectiveness should receive much more attention in the future.

The impact of dexamethasone on short- and long-term mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Dexamethasone has been widely used in treating severe COVID-19 patients due to its anti-inflammatory properties. However, its long-term impact on mortality remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of dexamethasone on short-term (28-day) and long-term (1-year) mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and to explore its efficacy across different respiratory support.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the MIMIC-IV (v3.0) database. A total of 576 confirmed COVID-19 patients were included, with 288 patients receiving dexamethasone and 288 not receiving it, matched by propensity scores. Survival analyses assessed the impact of dexamethasone on mortality, and subgroup analyses were performed based on the type of respiratory support received.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, dexamethasone treatment was associated with reduced mortality at both 28 days (adjusted HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.99, P = 0.045) and 1 year (adjusted HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.92, P = 0.014). Subgroup analysis revealed differential treatment effects by respiratory support type (P for interaction = 0.001 at 28 days and 0.004 at 1 year). The survival benefit was most pronounced in patients receiving NIV (28-day adjusted HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.42, P < 0.001) and significant in those receiving IMV (28-day adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.99, P = 0.045), while no significant benefit was observed in patients receiving oxygen therapy alone.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study suggests that dexamethasone treatment was associated with reduced mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, particularly in those receiving NIV or IMV. These findings add to the evidence supporting dexamethasone use in severe COVID-19 patients requiring respiratory support.

Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Ventilatory Factors Influencing COVID-19 Mortality in the ICU of a Hospital in Colombia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The COVID-19 pandemic posed significant challenges to healthcare systems worldwide, and mortality rates were driven by a complex interaction of patient-specific factors, one of the most important being those related to the scheduling of invasive mechanical ventilation. This study examined the sociodemographic, clinical, and ventilatory factors associated with mortality in COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU of a hospital in Colombia.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, involving 116 patients over the age of 18 who were admitted to the ICU with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 between March 2020 and May 2021. Data were collected from the patients' medical records. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 24®. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to identify factors associated with COVID-19 mortality, followed by adjustment through binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

It was found that 65.5% of the patients were male, with a mean age of 64 ± 14 years, and the overall mortality rate was 49%. Factors significantly associated with higher mortality included male sex (OR: 6.9, 95% CI: 1.5-31.7), low oxygen saturation on admission (OR: 7.6, 95% CI: 1.1-55), and PEEP settings at 96 h (OR: 8, 95% CI: 1.4-45). Mortality was not influenced by socioeconomic status or health system affiliation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified male sex, age over 65 years, PEEP greater than 10 cmH2O at 96 h of mechanical ventilation, and low oxygen saturation as significant factors associated with higher mortality in COVID-19 patients, while no significant associations were found with socioeconomic status or health system affiliation. These findings highlight the importance of focusing on clinical management and ventilatory strategies in reducing mortality, particularly for high-risk groups, rather than relying on socioeconomic factors as predictors of outcomes.

Stroke in critically ill patients with respiratory failure due to COVID-19: Disparities between low-middle and high-income countries

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the incidence of stroke in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) versus high-income countries (HICs) in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and its impact on in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

International observational study conducted in 43 countries. Stroke and mortality incidence rates and rate ratios (IRR) were calculated per admitted days using Poisson regression. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to address the HICs vs. LMICs imbalance for confounders.

RESULTS

23,738 patients [20,511(86.4 %) HICs vs. 3,227(13.6 %) LMICs] were included. The incidence stroke/1000 admitted-days was 35.7 (95 %CI = 28.4-44.9) LMICs and 17.6 (95 %CI = 15.8-19.7) HICs; ischemic 9.47 (95 %CI = 6.57-13.7) LMICs, 1.97 (95 %CI = 1.53, 2.55) HICs; hemorrhagic, 7.18 (95 %CI = 4.73-10.9) LMICs, and 2.52 (95 %CI = 2.00-3.16) HICs; unspecified stroke type 11.6 (95 %CI = 7.75-17.3) LMICs, 8.99 (95 %CI = 7.70-10.5) HICs. In regression with IPW, LMICs vs. HICs had IRR = 1.78 (95 %CI = 1.31-2.42, p < 0.001). Patients from LMICs were more likely to die than those from HICs [43.6% vs 29.2 %; Relative Risk (RR) = 2.59 (95 %CI = 2.29-2.93), p < 0.001)]. Patients with stroke were more likely to die than those without stroke [RR = 1.43 (95 %CI = 1.19-1.72), p < 0.001)].

CONCLUSIONS

Stroke incidence was low in HICs and LMICs although the stroke risk was higher in LMICs. Both LMIC status and stroke increased the risk of death. Improving early diagnosis of stroke and redistribution of healthcare resources should be a priority.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12620000421932 registered on 30/03/2020.

Risk factors for converting traditional wards to temporary intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from nurses' perspectives

BACKGROUND

The surge in critically ill COVID-19 patients caused a shortage of intensive care unit (ICU) beds. Some hospitals temporarily transformed general wards into ICUs to meet this pressing health care demand.

AIM

This study aims to evaluate and analyse the risk factors in temporary ICU from the perspective of nurses. By identifying these factors, the goal is to provide actionable insights and recommendations for effectively establishing and managing temporary ICUs in similar crisis scenarios in the future.

STUDY DESIGN

The study was conducted in China within a public hospital. Specifically, it focused on examining 62 nurses working in a temporary ICU that was converted from an infectious disease ward. The research utilized the Hazard Vulnerability Analysis (HVA) scoring method to identify potential threats, evaluate their probability, estimate their impact on specific organizations or regions and calculate the relative risk associated with such occurrences.

RESULTS

Staff demonstrated the highest risk percentage (32.74%), with Stuff (16.11%), Space (15.19%) and System (11.30%) following suit. The most critical risk factors included insufficient knowledge and decision-making competence in critical care (56.14%), lacking decision-making abilities and skills in renal replacement therapy care (55.37%), inadequate decision-making capacity and relevant skills in respiratory support care (50.64%), limited decision-making capability in circulatory support care (45.73%) and unfamiliarity with work procedures or systems (42.09%).

CONCLUSIONS

Urgent implementation of tailored training and support for temporary ICU nurses is paramount. Addressing capability and skill-related issues among these nurses supersedes resource availability, infrastructure, equipment and system considerations. Essential interventions must target challenges encompassing nurses' inability to perform critical treatment techniques autonomously and ensure standardized care. These measures are designed to heighten patient safety and elevate care quality during emergencies. These findings offer a viable avenue to mitigate potential moral distress, anxiety and depression among nurses, particularly those transitioning from non-critical care backgrounds. These nurses swiftly assimilate into temporary ICUs, and the study's insights offer practical guidance to alleviate their specific challenges.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The study on risk factors for converting traditional wards into temporary ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially from the perspective of nurses, provides crucial insights into the challenges and requirements for effectively establishing and managing these emergency settings. The findings highlight several key areas of concern and opportunities for improvement directly related to clinical practice, particularly in situations where there is a rapid need to adapt to increased demands for critical care. By addressing the identified risk factors through enhanced training, support systems, resource management, process improvements and cultivating a culture of adaptability, not only can the quality of care in temporary ICUs be improved, but also can the health care system be better prepared for future emergencies. These actions will help mitigate the risks associated with such conversions, ultimately benefiting patient safety, staff well-being and the overall effectiveness of health care services in crises.

Impact of Inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) on the Outcome of COVID-19 Associated ARDS

Background: Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) can improve oxygenation in acute respiratory syndrome (ARDS), has anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic effects, and can inhibit coronavirus- replication. The study aim was to investigate the impact of iNO in COVID-19 associated ARDS (CARDS) on oxygenation, the length of mechanical ventilation (MV), the level of inflammatory markers and the rate of thrombotic events during ICU stay. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational, monocentric study analyzing the effect of INO (15 parts per million) vs. non-iNO in adult ventilated CARDS patients on oxygenation, the level of inflammatory markers, and the rate of thrombotic events during ICU stay. Within the iNO group, the impact on gas exchange was assessed by comparing arterial blood gas results obtained at different time points. Results: Overall, 19/56 patients were treated with iNO, with no difference regarding sex, age, body mass index, and SOFA-/APACHE II- score between the iNO and non-iNO groups. iNO improved oxygenation in iNO-responders (7/19) and had no impact on inflammatory markers or the rate of thrombotic events but was associated with an increased MV length. Conclusions: iNO was able to improve oxygenation in CARDS in iNO-responders but did not show an impact on inflammatory markers or the rate of thrombotic events, while it was associated with an increased MV length.

Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine in the Prone Position in Elderly Patients with Pneumonia: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify a safe and effective method to assist older adults with pneumonia in tolerating the prone position for a longer duration.

METHODS

This was a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study performed at the Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital. Eighty patients with pneumonia aged ≥ 65 years were included. The patients were able to spontaneous breath in the prone position and were administered intravenous dexmedetomidine or an isotonic sodium chloride solution. The cumulative daily durations of prone positioning for all patients in the two groups were recorded. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who completed ≥ 9 h/day in the prone position. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of complications in the prone position and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were included (average age: 79.6 ± 8.9 years). The percentage of patients who completed ≥ 9 h/day in the prone position was significantly higher in the dexmedetomidine group than in the placebo group (P = 0.011). The percentage of patients who completed ≥ 12 h/day in the prone position was also significantly greater in the dexmedetomidine group than in the placebo group (P = 0.008). There were no significant differences in other variables between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that intravenous dexmedetomidine injection can significantly prolong the duration of spontaneous breathing in the prone position in elderly pneumonia patients without obvious adverse events. We provide a safe and effective method to help patients with pneumonia, especially those with delirium or cognitive impairment, who cannot tolerate the length of time needed for spontaneous breathing in the prone position to be effective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Center (registration number: ChiCRT2300067383) on 2023-01-05.

Helmet Ventilation in a Child with COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Background

In pediatric patients with severe COVID-19, if the respiratory support provided using high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) becomes insufficient, no definitive evidence exists to support the escalation to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or mechanical ventilation (MV). Case Presentation. A 9-year-old boy being treated with face mask-delivered biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation developed fever, tachypnea, and frequent desaturation. The COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction test and urine antigen test for Streptococcus pneumoniae were both positive, and sputum culture yielded Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The do-not-resuscitate order precluded the use of endotracheal intubation. After 2 h of HFNC support, the respiratory rate oxygenation (ROX) index declined from 7.86 to 3.71, indicating impending HFNC failure. A helmet was used to deliver NIV, and SpO2 was maintained at >90%. Dyspnea and desaturation gradually improved, and the patient was switched to HFNC 6 days later and discharged 10 days later.

Conclusion

In some cases, acute respiratory distress syndrome severity cannot be measured using the oxygenation index or oxygenation saturation index, and the SpO2/FiO2 ratio and ROX index may serve as useful alternatives. Although NIV delivered through a facemask or HFNC is more popular than helmet-delivered NIV, in certain circumstances, it can help escalate respiratory support while providing adequate protection to healthcare professionals.

The usage of immunosuppressant agents and secondary infections in patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study

Although COVID-19 infection is an immunosuppressant disease, many immunosuppressant agents, such as pulse methylprednisolone (PMP), dexamethasone (DXM), and tocilizumab (TCZ), were used during the pandemic. Secondary infections in patients with COVID-19 have been reported recently. This study investigated these agents' effects on secondary infections and outcomes in patients with COVID-19 in intensive care units (ICUs). This study was designed retrospectively, and all data were collected from the tertiary intensive care units of six hospitals between March 2020 and October 2021. All patients were divided into three groups: Group I [GI, PMP (-), DXM (-) and TCZ (-)], Group II [GII, PMP (+), DXM (+)], and Group III [GIII, PMP (+), DXM (+), TCZ (+)]. Demographic data, PaO/FiO2 ratio, laboratory parameters, culture results, and outcomes were recorded. To compare GI-GII and GI-GIII, propensity score matching (PSM) was used by matching 14 parameters. Four hundred twelve patients with COVID-19 in the ICU were included in the study. The number of patients with microorganisms ≥ 2 was 279 (67.7%). After PSM, in GII and GIII, the number of (+) tracheal cultures and (+) bloodstream cultures detected different microorganisms ≥ 2 during the ICU period, neuropathy, tracheotomized patients, duration of IMV, and length of ICU stay were significantly higher than GI. The mortality rate was similar in GI and GII, whereas it was significantly higher in GIII than in GI. The use of immunosuppressant agents in COVID-19 patients may lead to an increase in secondary infections. In addition, increased secondary infections may lead to prolonged ICU stay, prolonged IMV duration, and increased mortality.

Lessons Learned From Ventilated and Proned Patients With COVID-19: A Multisite Retrospective Study to Identify Predictive Factors for Facial Pressure Injuries

BACKGROUND

Many patients critically ill with COVID-19 develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) necessitating mechanical ventilation and proning. Although proning is lifesaving, it has been linked to the occurrence of facial pressure injuries (PIs).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the incidence and use of prevention strategies and identify predictors of facial PIs in patients who received ventilator and proning treatments in COVID-designated intensive care units at 2 large quaternary medical centers in the Midwest.

METHOD

This was a retrospective cohort study using data extracted from an electronic health record between October 2020 and February 2022. Demographics, clinical and care variables, and PI outcomes were analyzed to identify predictors of PI using logistic and Cox regression.

RESULTS

The cohort (N = 150) included patients from 2 units, unit a (n = 97) and unit b (n = 53) with a mean age of 60 years, with 68% identifying as male. Patients were vented for an average of 18 (SD, 16.2) days and proned for an average of 3 (SD, 2.5) days. Many (71%) died. Over half (56%) developed facial PI with a proning-exposure-adjusted incidence rate of 18.5%. Patients with PI were significantly different in several factors. Logistic regression showed predictors of PIs were duration of mechanical ventilation (in days; P = .02) and head turned (P = .01). Cox regression also identified head turn as predictive (P < .01), with Black/African American race as protective (P = .03).

DISCUSSION

Critically ill patients with COVID-19 receiving ventilator and proning therapy developed facial PIs despite the use of recommended prevention practices. Further research on effective PI prevention strategies is needed.

Difference in the impact of coinfections and secondary infections on antibiotic use in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between the Omicron-dominant period and the pre-Omicron period

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the effect of coinfections and/or secondary infections on antibiotic use in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

METHOD

Days of therapy per 100 bed days (DOT) in a COVID-19 ward were compared between 2022 (Omicron period) and 2021 (pre-Omicron period). Antibiotics were categorized as antibiotics predominantly used for community-acquired infections (CAIs) and antibiotics predominantly used for health care-associated infections (HAIs). Bacterial and/or fungal infections which were proved or assumed on admission were defined as coinfections. Secondary infections were defined as infections that occurred following COVID-19.

RESULTS

Patients with COVID-19 during the Omicron period were older and had more comorbidities. Coinfections were more common in the Omicron period than in the pre-Omicron period (44.4% [100/225] versus 0.8% [2/257], respectively, p < 0.001), and the mean DOT of antibiotics for CAIs was significantly increased in the Omicron period (from 3.60 to 17.84, p < 0.001). Secondary infection rate tended to be higher in the Omicron period (p = 0.097). Mean DOT of antibiotics for HAIs were appeared to be lower in the COVID-19 ward than in the general ward (pre-Omicron, 3.33 versus 6.37, respectively; Omicron, 3.84 versus 5.22, respectively). No multidrug-resistant gram-negative organisms were isolated in the COVID-19 ward.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic use for CAIs was limited in the pre-Omicron period but increased in the Omicron period because of a high coinfection rate on admission. With the antimicrobial stewardship, excessive use of antibiotics for HAIs was avoided in the COVID-19 ward during both periods.

The Global Burden of Sepsis and Septic Shock

A dysregulated host response to infection causes organ dysfunction in sepsis and septic shock, two potentially fatal diseases. They continue to be major worldwide health burdens with high rates of morbidity and mortality despite advancements in medical care. The goal of this thorough review was to present a thorough summary of the current body of knowledge about the prevalence of sepsis and septic shock worldwide. Using widely used computerized databases, a comprehensive search of the literature was carried out, and relevant studies were chosen in accordance with predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A narrative technique was used to synthesize the data that were retrieved. The review's conclusions show how widely different locations and nations differ in terms of sepsis and septic shock's incidence, prevalence, and fatality rates. Compared to high-income countries (HICs), low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are disproportionately burdened more heavily. We talk about risk factors, comorbidities, and difficulties in clinical management and diagnosis in a range of healthcare settings. The review highlights the need for more research, enhanced awareness, and context-specific interventions in order to successfully address the global burden of sepsis and septic shock.

A Simulated Tracheostomy Tube Change Educational Intervention to Promote Competency Among Novice Healthcare Professionals: A Repeated Measures Study

Objective

To evaluate an educational intervention to promote confidence, knowledge, and skills in tracheostomy tube change among nursing students.

Methods

The study, conducted at the at the Johns Hopkins Center for Immersive Learning and Digital Innovation, enrolled nursing students without prior experience in tracheostomy tube change. The intervention included a pre-recorded presentation, faculty demonstrations with a Tracheostomy Care Training Simulation Model, and participant practice demonstrating skills. Primary outcomes included confidence, knowledge, and competency with tracheostomy tube changes. Secondary outcomes included number of attempts required to achieve competency and time required per attempt. The study followed STROBE guidelines with repeated measure design.

Results

Participants in the study (n=50) had a mean age of 30 years, were predominantly female (83%) with a bachelor's degree (76%), most often in the third semester of nursing school (45%). Participants showed a mean improvement of 3.58 points out of five (SD: 0.56, P<0.001) across 11 pre- and post-test items. Every confidence assessment improved, with the largest increase in assessing tube placement. Knowledge assessments improved across all eight test items in the first test-retest interval, showing an improvement of 1.14 points out of five (SD: 0.89, P<0.001). Competency assessment improved in the first test-retest interval of 1.01 points out of five (SD: 0.65, P<0.001). On serial assessments, time to complete tracheostomy tube change decreased from 2.39 to 0.60 minutes. Faculty deemed 95% of participants competent after only one skill testing iteration.

Conclusion

An educational intervention, combining digital presentations with interactive faculty-led simulations and practical skill assessments, successfully elevated nursing students' confidence, knowledge, and competency in tracheostomy tube changes.

Intubation Decision Based on Illness Severity and Mortality in COVID-19: An International Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of intubation timing, guided by severity criteria, on mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients, amidst existing uncertainties regarding optimal intubation practices.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted from February 1, 2020, to November 1, 2022.

SETTING

Ten academic institutions in the United States and Europe.

PATIENTS

Adults (≥ 18 yr old) confirmed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and hospitalized specifically for COVID-19, requiring intubation postadmission. Exclusion criteria included patients hospitalized for non-COVID-19 reasons despite a positive SARS-CoV-2 test.

INTERVENTIONS

Early invasive mechanical ventilation (EIMV) was defined as intubation in patients with less severe organ dysfunction (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] < 7 or Pa o2 /F io2 ratio > 250), whereas late invasive mechanical ventilation (LIMV) was defined as intubation in patients with SOFA greater than or equal to 7 and Pa o2 /F io2 ratio less than or equal to 250.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was mortality within 30 days of hospital admission. Among 4464 patients, 854 (19.1%) required mechanical ventilation (mean age 60 yr, 61.7% male, 19.3% Black). Of those, 621 (72.7%) were categorized in the EIMV group and 233 (27.3%) in the LIMV group. Death within 30 days after admission occurred in 278 patients (42.2%) in the EIMV and 88 patients (46.6%) in the LIMV group ( p = 0.28). An inverse probability-of-treatment weighting analysis revealed a statistically significant association with mortality, with patients in the EIMV group being 32% less likely to die either within 30 days of admission (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.90; p = 0.008) or within 30 days after intubation irrespective of its timing from admission (adjusted HR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.90; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

In severe COVID-19 cases, an early intubation strategy, guided by specific severity criteria, is associated with a reduced risk of death. These findings underscore the importance of timely intervention based on objective severity assessments.

Risk prediction of major cardiac adverse events and all-cause death following covid-19 hospitalization at one year follow-up: The HOPE-2 score

BACKGROUND

Long-term consequences of COVID-19 are still partly known.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To derive a clinical score for risk prediction of long-term major cardiac adverse events (MACE) and all cause death in COVID-19 hospitalized patients.

METHODS

2573 consecutive patients were enrolled in a multicenter, international registry (HOPE-2) from January 2020 to April 2021 and identified as the derivation cohort. Five hundred and twenty-six patients from the Cardio-Covid-Italy registry were considered as external validation cohort. A long-term prognostic risk score for MACE and all cause death was derived from a multivariable regression model.

RESULTS

Out of 2573 patients enrolled in the HOPE-2 registry, 1481 (58 %) were male, with mean age of 60±16 years. At long-term follow-up, the overall rate of patients affected by MACE and/or all cause death was 7.8 %. After multivariable regression analysis, independent predictors of MACE and all cause death were identified. The HOPE-2 prognostic score was therefore calculated by giving: 1-4 points for age class (<65 years, 65-74, 75-84, ≥85), 3 points for history of cardiovascular disease, 1 point for hypertension, 3 points for increased troponin serum levels at admission and 2 points for acute renal failure during hospitalization. Score accuracy at ROC curve analysis was 0.79 (0.74 at external validation). Stratification into 3 risk groups (<3, 3-6, >6 points) classified patients into low, intermediate and high risk. The observed MACE and all-cause death rates were 1.9 %, 9.4 % and 26.3 % for low- intermediate and high-risk patients, respectively (Log-rank test p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The HOPE-2 prognostic score may be useful for long-term risk stratification in patients with previous COVID-19 hospitalization. High-risk patients may require a strict follow-up.

Efficacy and Safety of High PEEP NIV in COVID-19 Patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with high PEEP levels application in patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study with data collected from 95 patients who were administered NIV as part of their treatment in the COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) at University Hospital Centre Zagreb between October 2021 and February 2022. The definite outcome was NIV failure.

RESULTS

High PEEP NIV was applied in all 95 patients; 54 (56.84%) patients could be kept solely on NIV, while 41 (43.16%) patients required intubation. ICU mortality of patients solely on NIV was 3.70%, while total ICU mortality was 35.79%. The most significant difference in the dynamic of respiratory parameters between 2 patient groups was visible on Day 3 of ICU stay: By that day, patients kept solely on NIV required significantly lower PEEP levels and had better improvement in PaO2, P/F ratio, and HACOR score.

CONCLUSION

High PEEP applied by NIV was a safe option for the initial respiratory treatment of all patients, despite the severity of ARDS. For some patients, it was also shown to be the only necessary form of oxygen supplementation.

Along with PaO2/FiO2 ratio and lymphopenia, low HLA-DR monocytes are the only additional parameter that independently predicts the clinical course of undifferentiated SARS-CoV-2 patients in emergency departments

Because one-third of patients deteriorate after their admission to the emergency department, assessing the prognosis of COVID-19 patients is of great importance. However, to date, only lymphopenia and the partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio have been reported as partly predictive of COVID-19-related further deterioration, and their association has not been evaluated. We asked whether other key biomarkers of SARS-CoV-2 immunologic defects-increase in circulating immature granulocytes, loss of monocyte HLA-DR (mHLA-DR) expression, and monocyte differentiation blockade-could also predict further COVID-19 deterioration. A series of 284 consecutive COVID-19 patients, with the sole inclusion criterion of being an adult, were prospectively enrolled at emergency department admission (day 0) of 2 different hospitals: 1 for the exploratory cohort (180 patients) and 1 for the confirmatory cohort (104 patients). Deterioration was assessed over the next 7 days. Neither increased immature granulocyte levels nor monocyte differentiation blockade predicted patient worsening. Among more than 30 clinical, biological, and radiological parameters, the value of decreased P/F ratio and lymphopenia for prediction of further COVID-19 deterioration was strongly confirmed, and the loss of mHLA-DR was the only additional independent marker. Combined together in a simple OxyLymphoMono score, the 3 variables perfectly predicted patients who did not worsen and correctly predicted worsening in 59% of cases. By highlighting lymphocyte and monocyte defects as preceding COVID-19 deterioration, these results point on early immunosuppression in COVID-19 deterioration. Combining P/F ratio, lymphopenia, and loss of mHLA-DR together in a simple and robust score could offer a pragmatic method for COVID-19 patient stratification.

Utility of NICaS Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19

(1) Background: COVID-19 presented many challenges to effective treatments, such as managing cardiovascular insufficiency while mitigating risks to healthcare providers. This study utilized NICaS, a non-invasive hemodynamic monitor that provides advanced data via whole-body impedance analysis. We investigated the associated trends in hemodynamic parameters obtained by the NICaS device and their correlation with in-hospital all-cause mortality during COVID-19 hospitalization in the intensive care unit. (2) Methods: Data from 29 patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit and monitored with NICaS between April 2020 and February 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. (3) Results: Decreasing cardiac output and cardiac power were significantly associated with death. Total peripheral resistance was significantly increasing in non-survivors as was total body water percentage. Those admitted with a heart rate above 90 beats per minute had a significantly reduced survival. (4) Conclusions: Non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring via the NICaS device is simple and effective in evaluating critically ill patients with COVID-19 and may help guide clinical management via remote monitoring. Controlling tachycardia may help ensure adequate oxygen supply-demand ratio. A hint toward a beneficiary effect of a restrictive fluid balance may be observed.

The evolution of sepsis publications and global productivity: A bibliometric analysis between 1980 and 2020

The literature study was conducted by using the Web of Science (WoS) database, employing bibliometric analysis to examine all papers released from 1980 to 2020. The search was performed using the terms "sepsis, septicemia, septic shock" specifically within the titles of the publications. The findings of the literature research revealed a total of 51,725 articles. Out of the total number of publications, 26,896 articles were identified, accounting for 51.9% of the total. The bibliometric study revealed that the United States had the largest number of papers (8693), followed by China (2807), Germany (2299), France (1606), and the United Kingdom (1932). The writers that exhibited the most prolific output in terms of article production on the topic of sepsis were Vincent, with a total of 217 articles, followed by Wang P with 154 articles, and Chaudry IH with 126 articles. The University of Pittsburgh, Brown University, and the University of Michigan were identified as the most productive universities, in that order. The findings from the prediction model revealed that the projected number of articles to be published in 2021 is estimated to be 2086, while the projected number for 2030 is estimated to be 2637. The literature has predominantly focused on disease markers and diagnostic methods, severity and effects of the disease, immunity and inflammation, effects of the disease in neonates and the neonatal period, and treatment and care. According to trend analysis results, recent focus in sepsis research includes a broad spectrum of investigations such as mortality rates, prognostic determinants, diagnostic methods, biomarkers, epidemiological insights, critical care strategies, infections, treatment outcomes, emergency department scenarios, pediatric assessments, and antibiotic interventions.

Lung ultrasound score predicts outcomes in patients with acute respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 treated with non-invasive respiratory support: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Lung ultrasound has demonstrated its usefulness in several respiratory diseases management. One derived score, the Lung Ultrasound (LUS) score, is considered a good outcome predictor in patients with Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF). Nevertheless, it has not been tested in patients undergoing non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS). Taking this into account, the aim of this study is to evaluate LUS score as a predictor of 90-day mortality, ETI (Endotracheal intubation) and HFNC (High Flow Nasal Cannula) failure in patients with ARF due to COVID-19 admitted to a Respiratory Intermediate Care Unit (RICU) for NIRS management.

RESULTS

One hundred one patients were admitted to the RICU during the study period. Among these 76% were males and the median age was 55 (45-64) years. Initial ARF management started with HFNC, the next step was the use of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) devices and the last intervention was ETI and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. Of the total study population, CPAP was required in 40%, ETI in 26%, while 15% died. By means of a ROC analysis, a LUS ≥ 25 points was identified as the cut-off point for mortality(AUC 0.81, OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.71; p < 0.001), ETI (AUC 0.83, OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.70; p < 0.001) and HFNC failure (AUC 0.75, OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.41; p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival curves also identified LUS ≥ 25 as a predictor of 90-days mortality (HR 4.16, 95% CI 1.27-13.6) and 30 days ETI as well.

CONCLUSION

In our study, a ≥ 25 point cut-off of the Lung Ultrasound Score was identified as a good outcome prediction factor for 90-days mortality, ETI and HFNC failure in a COVID-19 ARF patients cohort treated in a RICU. Considering that LUS score is easy to calculate, a multicenter study to confirm our findings should be performed.

Acute Respiratory Failure From Early Pandemic COVID-19: Noninvasive Respiratory Support vs Mechanical Ventilation

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy for initial respiratory support in patients with respiratory failure associated with COVID-19 is unclear, and the initial strategy may affect outcomes.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Which initial respiratory support strategy is associated with improved outcomes in patients with COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

All patients with COVID-19 requiring respiratory support and admitted to a large health care network were eligible for inclusion. We compared patients treated initially with noninvasive respiratory support (NIRS; noninvasive positive pressure ventilation by facemask or high-flow nasal oxygen) with patients treated initially with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The primary outcome was time to in-hospital death analyzed using an inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox model adjusted for potential confounders. Secondary outcomes included unweighted and weighted assessments of mortality, lengths of stay (ICU and hospital), and time to intubation.

RESULTS

Nearly one-half of the 2,354 patients (47%) who met inclusion criteria received IMV first, and 53% received initial NIRS. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 38% (37% for IMV and 39% for NIRS). Initial NIRS was associated with an increased hazard of death compared with initial IMV (hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.03-1.94), but also an increased hazard of leaving the hospital sooner that waned with time (noninvasive support by time interaction: hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.98).

INTERPRETATION

Patients with COVID-19 with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure initially treated with NIRS showed an increased hazard of in-hospital death.

Is 1 Day of Focused Training in Echocardiographic Assessment Using Subxiphoid-Only (EASy) Examination Enough? A Tertiary Hospital Response to the COVID-19 Crisis and the Use of the EASy Examination to Support Unit-Wide Image Acquisition

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the efficacy of 1-day training in echocardiography assessment using subxiphoid-only (EASy) followed by supervised image interpretation and decision-making during patient rounds as a novel approach to scaling up the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in critically ill patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of medical records and EASy examination images.

SETTING

Tertiary care academic hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 14 adults (> 18 yr old) with COVID-19-associated respiratory failure under the care of Albany Medical Center's surge response team from April 6-17, 2020 who received at least one EASy examination.

INTERVENTIONS

Residents (previously novice sonographers) were trained in EASy examination using 1 day of didactic and hands-on training, followed by independent image acquisition and supervised image interpretation, identification of hemodynamic patterns, and clinical decision-making facilitated by an echocardiography-certified physician during daily rounds.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We recorded the quality of resident-obtained EASy images, scanning time, and frequency with which the supervising physician had to repeat the examination or obtain additional images. A total of 63 EASy examinations were performed; average scanning time was 4.3 minutes. Resident-obtained images were sufficient for clinical decision-making on 55 occasions (87%), in the remaining 8 (13%) the supervising physician obtained further images.

CONCLUSIONS

EASy examination is an efficient, valuable tool under conditions of scarce resources. The educational model of 1-day training followed by supervised image interpretation and decision-making allows rapid expansion of the pool of sonographers and implementation of bedside echocardiography into routine ICU patient management.

Epidemiology and outcomes of previously healthy critically ill patients with COVID-19: A population-based cohort

Comorbid conditions represent a major risk for severe illness among persons with COVID-19. Previously healthy people with COVID-19 can also develop severe illness, but are expected to have better outcomes than those with comorbid conditions. Nevertheless, recent data suggest that the former may have, counterintuitively, higher risk of death among those with non-COVID sepsis. However, the epidemiology and outcomes of previously healthy people among critically ill patients with COVID-19 are unknown. We used statewide data to identify intensive care unit (ICU) admissions aged ≥18 years in Texas with COVID-19 in 2020. Multilevel logistic regression was used to estimate the association of comorbid state with short-term mortality (defined as in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice) overall and with higher illness severity among ICU admissions. Among 52,776 ICU admissions with COVID-19, 6373 (12.1%) were previously healthy. Short-term mortality among previously healthy ICU admissions and those with comorbidities was 16.9% versus 34.6%. On adjusted analyses, the odds of short-term mortality were lower among the previously healthy compared to those with comorbidities overall (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73-0.98)), but did not differ among those with ≥3 organ dysfunctions (aOR 1.11 (95% CI: 0.84-1.46)) and the mechanically ventilated (aOR 0.87 (95% CI: 0.68-1.12)), while being higher among those with do-not-resuscitate status (aOR 1.40 (95% CI: 1.04-1.89)). Over one in eight ICU admissions with COVID-19 were previously healthy. Although being previously healthy was associated with lower risk of death compared to those with comorbidities overall, it had no prognostic advantage among the more severely ill.

Pharmacokinetics of recombinant human annexin A5 (SY-005) in patients with severe COVID-19

Objective: Annexin A5 is a phosphatidylserine binding protein with anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant and anti-apoptotic properties. Preclinical studies have shown that annexin A5 inhibits pro-inflammatory responses and improves organ function and survival in rodent models of sepsis. This clinical trial aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of the recombinant human annexin A5 (SY-005) in severe COVID-19. Methods: This was a pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Severe COVID-19 patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous 50 μg/kg (low dose, n = 3), 100 μg/kg (high dose, n = 5) of SY-005 or placebo (n = 5) every 12 h for 7 days. Plasma SY-005 levels were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the PK parameters were determined using non-compartmental analysis. Results: All patients treated with SY-005 had a normal baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, 104-125 mL/min/1.73 m2). Both low and high doses of SY-005 were cleared within 6 h after intravenous administration. Plasma maximum concentrations (Cmax), half-life, clearance and volume distribution of low and high doses of SY-005 were 402.4 and 848.9 ng/mL, 0.92 and 0.96 h, 7.52 and 15.19 L/h, and 9.98 and 20.79 L, respectively. Daily pre-dose circulating annexin A5 levels were not significantly different when SY-005 was administered at the low or the high dose 12-h intervals. There was no significant effect on activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or INR (international normalized ratio of prothrombin time) during 7 days of SY-005 treatment. Conclusion: SY-005 doses of 50 and 100 μg/kg were detectable and subsequently cleared from the plasma in severe COVID-19 patients with normal baseline renal function. There was no significant plasma SY-005 accumulation 6 h after drug administration and coagulation was not altered during 7 days of treatment. Clinical trials Registration: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04748757, first posted on 10 February 2021).

Effects of traditional Chinese medicine on treatment outcomes in severe COVID-19 patients: a single-centre study

As the search for effective treatments for COVID-19 continues, the high mortality rate among critically ill patients in Intensive Care Units (ICU) presents a profound challenge. This study explores the potential benefits of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) as a supplementary treatment for severe COVID-19. A total of 110 critically ill COVID-19 patients at the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Vulcan Hill Hospital between Feb., 2020, and April, 2020 (Wuhan, China) participated in this observational study. All patients received standard supportive care protocols, with a subset of 81 also receiving TCM as an adjunct treatment. Clinical characteristics during the treatment period and the clinical outcome of each patient were closely monitored and analysed. Our findings indicated that the TCM group exhibited a significantly lower mortality rate compared with the non-TCM group (16 of 81 vs 24 of 29; 0.3 vs 2.3 person/month). In the adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, TCM treatment was associated with improved survival odds (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the analysis also revealed that TCM treatment could partially mitigate inflammatory responses, as evidenced by the reduced levels of proinflammatory cytokines, and contribute to the recovery of multiple organic functions, thereby potentially increasing the survival rate of critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Qualitative study of COVID-19 patient experiences with non-invasive ventilation and pronation: strategies to enhance treatment adherence

INTRODUCTION

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) treatment combined with pronation in patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure has been shown to be effective in improving respiratory function and better patient outcomes. These patients may experience discomfort or anxiety that may reduce adherence to treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore and describe the subjective experiences of patients undergoing helmet NIV and pronation during hospitalisation for COVID-19 respiratory failure, with a focus on the elements of care and strategies adopted by patients that enabled good adaptation to treatments.

METHOD

A qualitative descriptive study, using face-to-face interviews, was carried out with a purposeful sample of 20 participants discharged from a pulmonary intensive care unit who underwent helmet continuous positive airway pressure and pronation during hospitalisation for COVID-19.

RESULTS

Content analysis of the transcripts revealed feelings and experiences related to illness and treatments, strategies for managing one's own negative thoughts, and practical strategies of one's own and healthcare workers to facilitate adaptation to pronation and helmet. Experience was reflected in five major topics related to specific time points and settings: feelings and experiences, helmet and pronation: heavy but beneficial, positive thinking strategies, patients' practical strategies, support of healthcare professionals (HCPs).

CONCLUSIONS

This study may be useful to HCPs to improve the quality and appropriateness of care they provide.

Two-year multidisciplinary follow-up of COVID-19 patients requiring invasive and noninvasive respiratory support

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 patients frequently develop respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. Data on long-term survival of patients who had severe COVID-19 are insufficient. We assessed and compared two-year survival, CT imaging, quality of life, and functional recovery of COVID-19 ARDS patients requiring respiratory support with invasive (IMV) versus noninvasive ventilation (NIV).

METHODS

Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted up to May 28th, 2020, who required IMV or NIV, and survived to hospital discharge were enrolled. Patients were contacted two years after discharge to assess vital status, functional, psychological, and cognitive outcomes using validated scales. Patients with persistent respiratory symptoms or high burden of residual lung damage at previous CT scan received a two-year chest CT scan.

RESULTS

Out of 61 IMV survivors, 98% were alive at two-year follow-up, and 52 completed the questionnaire. Out of 82 survivors receiving NIV only, 94% were alive at two years, and 47 completed the questionnaire. We found no major differences between invasively and noninvasively ventilated patients, with overall acceptable functional recovery. Among the 99 patients completing the questionnaire, 23 have more than moderate exertional dyspnea. Chest CT scans showed that 4 patients (all received IMV) had fibrotic-like changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received mechanical ventilation due to COVID-19 and were discharged from hospital had a 96% survival rate at the two-year follow-up. There was no difference in overall recovery and quality of life between patients who did and did not require IMV, although respiratory morbidity remains high.

Probiotics and prebiotics: potential prevention and therapeutic target for nutritional management of COVID-19?

Scientists are working to identify prevention/treatment methods and clinical outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Nutritional status and diet have a major impact on the COVID-19 disease process, mainly because of the bidirectional interaction between gut microbiota and lung, that is, the gut-lung axis. Individuals with inadequate nutritional status have a pre-existing imbalance in the gut microbiota and immunity as seen in obesity, diabetes, hypertension and other chronic diseases. Communication between the gut microbiota and lungs or other organs and systems may trigger worse clinical outcomes in viral respiratory infections. Thus, this review addresses new insights into the use of probiotics and prebiotics as a preventive nutritional strategy in managing respiratory infections such as COVID-19 and highlighting their anti-inflammatory effects against the main signs and symptoms associated with COVID-19. Literature search was performed through PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science databases; relevant clinical articles were included. Significant randomised clinical trials suggest that specific probiotics and/or prebiotics reduce diarrhoea, abdominal pain, vomiting, headache, cough, sore throat, fever, and viral infection complications such as acute respiratory distress syndrome. These beneficial effects are linked with modulation of the microbiota, products of microbial metabolism with antiviral activity, and immune-regulatory properties of specific probiotics and prebiotics through Treg cell production and function. There is a need to conduct clinical and pre-clinical trials to assess the combined effect of consuming these components and undergoing current therapies for COVID-19.

[Ventilatory management of SARS-CoV-2 acute respiratory failure]

COVID-19 pneumonia presents several particularities in its clinical presentation (cytokine storm, silent hypoxemia, thrombo-embolic risk) and may lead to a number of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) phenotypes. While the optimal oxygenation strategy in cases of hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) is still under debate, ventilatory management of COVID-19-related ARF has confirmed the efficacy of high-flow oxygen therapy and restored interest in other ventilatory approaches such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and noninvasive ventilation involving a helmet, which due to patient overflow are sometimes implemented outside of critical care units. However, further studies are still needed to determine which patients should be given which oxygenation technique, and under which conditions they require invasive mechanical ventilation, given that delayed initiation potentially burdens prognosis. During invasive mechanical ventilation, ventral decubitus and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have become increasingly prevalent. While innovative therapies such as awake prone position or lung transplantation have likewise been developed, their indications, modalities and efficacy remain to be determined.

What are the current anti-COVID-19 drugs? From traditional to smart molecular mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, a highly infectious member of the coronavirus family, which emerged in December 2019 in "Wuhan, China". It induces respiratory illness ranging from mild symptoms to severe disease. It was declared a "pandemic" by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2020. Since then, a vast number of clinical and experimental studies have been conducted to identify effective approaches for its prevention and treatment.

MAIN BODY

The pathophysiology of COVID-19 represents an unprecedented challenge; it triggers a strong immune response, which may be exacerbated by "a cytokine storm syndrome". It also induces thrombogenesis and may trigger multi-organ injury. Therefore, different drug classes have been proposed for its treatment and prevention, such as antivirals, anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody agents (monoclonal antibodies, convalescent plasma, and immunoglobulins), anti-inflammatory drugs, immunomodulators, and anticoagulant drugs. To the best of our knowledge, this review is the first to present, discuss, and summarize the current knowledge about the different drug classes used for the treatment of COVID-19, with special emphasis on their targets, mechanisms of action, and important adverse effects and drug interactions. Additionally, we spotlight the latest "October 2023" important guidelines (NIH, IDSA, and NICE) and FDA approval or authorization regarding the use of these agents in the management of COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

Despite the wide array of therapeutic strategies introduced for the treatment of COVID-19, one of the most prominent therapeutic challenges is SARS-CoV-2 mutations and emerging new variants and subvariants. Currently, the anti-COVID-19 drug pipeline is continuously affording novel treatments to face this growing challenge.

Association between number of vasopressors and mortality in COVID-19 patients

Study objective

Study the clinical outcomes associated with the number of concomitant vasopressors used in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Design

A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients admitted with COVID-19 to the intensive care unit (ICU) between March and October 2020.

Setting

Rush University Medical Center, United States.

Participants

Adult patients at least 18 years old with COVID-19 with continuous infusion of any vasopressors were included.

Main outcome measures

60-day mortality in COVID-19 patients by the number of concurrent vasopressors received.

Results

A total of 637 patients met our inclusion criteria, of whom 338 (53.1 %) required the support of at least one vasopressor. When compared to patients with no vasopressor requirement, those who required 1 vasopressor (V1) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.27, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.86-5.79, p < 0.01) (n = 137), 2 vasopressors (V2) (aOR 4.71, 95 % CI 2.54-8.77, p < 0.01) (n = 86), 3 vasopressors (V3) (aOR 26.2, 95 % CI 13.35-53.74 p < 0.01) (n = 74), and 4 or 5 vasopressors(V4-5) (aOR 106.38, 95 % CI 39.17-349.93, p < 0.01) (n = 41) were at increased risk of 60-day mortality. In-hospital mortality for patients who received no vasopressors was 6.7 %, 22.6 % for V1, 27.9 % for V2, 62.2 % for V3, and 78 % for V4-V5.

Conclusion

Critically ill patients with COVID-19 requiring vasopressors were associated with significantly higher 60-day mortality.

Potential role of IgM-enriched immunoglobulin as adjuvant treatment in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection

BACKGROUND

Severe COVID-19 patients are characterized by a dysregulated host response to an infection, with uncontrolled pro- and anti- inflammatory pathway activation. Consistent proportion of patients require admission in intensive care units and are at risk of progression to severe forms of disease. These patients are generally admitted during later stages of the disease, when effective antiviral and monoclonal antibody are not indicated. We aimed to assess the potential role of IgM-enriched intra venous immunoglobulins (IGAM) preparations in this setting.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational case-controlled study was conducted at a single-center University Hospital of Udine in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region of Italy. Patients referring to the center between March 2020 and April 2021 was included. During the study period, patient who received Pentaglobin® IGAM treatment (N.=56), administered as compassionate use, was compared with a control group (N.=169) to assess, by propensity score analysis, clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Untreated controls required, respect to patient treated with IGAM therapy, longer time to hospitalization with no significant differences in death and orotracheal intubation requirement. Significant differences in the two cohort were in: SOFA was higher in treated, while D-dimer and P/F ratio was better in the treatment cohort. Multivariate logistic regression analysis performed on the "matched sample," obtained by a weighting propensity score approach, identify, as significant protective factor for death outcome, the Pentaglobin® treatment (0.820 [0.698-0.963], P=0.016) and low C-reactive protein (1.001 [1.000-1.002], P=0.031) value while the delay of onset hospitalization is associate with a worst outcome (0.983 [0.967-0.999], P=0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study offers a significant insight concerning the use of IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparations in patients with SARS-CoV-2 severe infection and also could identifying the specific immunological and biochemical profile of the patient who can more benefit from this therapeutic option.

[The current sepsis guidelines-What do you need to know?]

The current international sepsis guidelines from 2021 are based on the work of a panel of 60 international experts from various fields. They include a total of 93 recommendations, some of which include new aspects compared to the 2016 version of the guidelines. This article provides a subjective compilation by two internal medicine intensivists who highlight some aspects, especially of changes within the guidelines compared to the previous version. The focus is on the fields of screening, sepsis bundles, fluid and vasopressor treatment and adjuvant treatment. In addition, for the first time these guidelines address the important issue of long-term sequelae for sepsis survivors and their environment.

Intracranial hemorrhage in patients treated for SARS-CoV-2 with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is routinely used in patients with severe respiratory failure and has been increasingly needed during the COVID-19 pandemic. In patients treated with ECMO, significant intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) risk exists due to circuit characteristics, anticoagulation, and disease characteristics. ICH risk may be substantially higher in COVID-19 patients than patients treated with ECMO for other indications.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed current literature regarding ICH during ECMO treatment of COVID-19. We utilized Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases. Meta-analysis was performed for included comparative studies. Quality assessment was performed using MINORS criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 54 studies with 4000 ECMO patients were included, all retrospective. Risk of bias was increased via MINORS score primarily due to retrospective designs. ICH was more likely in COVID-19 patients (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.23, 2.42). Mortality among COVID patients on ECMO with ICH was 64.0%, compared with 41% in patients without ICH (RR1.9, 95% 1.44, 2.51).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests increased hemorrhage rates in COVID-19 patients on ECMO compared to similar controls. Hemorrhage reduction strategies may include atypical anticoagulants, conservative anticoagulation strategies, or biotechnology advances in circuit design and surface coatings.

Effect of different infusion approaches on safety and efficacy of terlipressin: Current controversies

Terlipressin, a synthetic analog of vasopressin, has been widely used to treat acute variceal bleeding, hepatorenal syndrome, and other complications of cirrhosis. However, among different infusion approaches of terlipressin, its safety and efficacy are also heterogeneous. Previous studies have demonstrated that continuous infusion of terlipressin is more effective with a lower incidence of adverse events than intermittent intravenous infusion. This paper aims to review the relevant literature and summarize the data regarding the safety and effectiveness of different infusion approaches of terlipressin to guide clinical practice.

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for coronavirus disease 2019 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Although the application of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is accumulating, the feasibility and safety of this therapy remain controversial. We aimed to evaluate the effect of VV-ECMO in the treatment of these patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases through November 2021. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the included studies were screened, and meta-analysis was performed by R software (version 4.0.2).

RESULTS

Forty-two studies including 2037 COVID-19 patients supported with VV-ECMO due to ARDS were identified. The pooled analysis revealed that 30-, 60-, and 90-day mortality among patients were respectively 46% (95% CI 37%-57%, I2 = 66%), 46% (95% CI 30%-70%, I2 = 93%), and 49% (95% CI 43%-58%, I2 = 52%), and the pooled incidence rate of in-hospital mortality, major bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, and renal replacement therapy were respectively 35%, 39%, 11%, 40%, 15%, 21%, and 44%.

CONCLUSION

Although COVID-19 patients may have a higher risk of bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, and acute kidney injury during ECMO therapy, the survival rate was more than half of the cases. Our data may support the application of VV-ECMO in COVID-19 patients.

The impact of leadership styles on employee safety behaviour among Chinese healthcare workers: The moderating role of cooperation facilitation

With the support of social exchange theory and social impact theory, this study aimed to examine the impact of transactional and transformational leadership on safety behaviour with the moderating role of cooperation facilitation in Chinese healthcare workers. This study used a simple random sampling method and data were collected from healthcare workers in Zhenjiang city, Jiangsu province, China. A total of 376 questionnaires were utilised and partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) technique was used for data analysis. The result showed that transactional and transformational leadership positively impact safety behaviour of health care workers. The findings also indicated that cooperation facilitation positively moderates the relationship between transactional and transformational leadership on safety behaviour. This study provides an insightful contribution that leadership must encourage the workers to cooperate in safety-related activities to make the work environment healthier and safer. Lastly, this study also discussed some theoretical and practical implications for researchers and policymakers.

How Did COVID-19 Impact the Antimicrobial Consumption and Bacterial Resistance Profiles in Brazil?

The indiscriminate use of antibiotics has favored the selective pressure of multidrug resistance among microorganisms. This research evaluated the pattern of antibiotic prescriptions among the Brazilian population between January 2018 and December 2021. Additionally, the study sought to analyze the incidence rates of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and examine the profiles of antibiotic resistance. We assessed the hospital and community antimicrobial consumption from the National Health Surveillance Agency Database and correlated it to microorganisms. The consumption of antimicrobials in the hospital environment increased by 26% in 2021, highlighting polymyxin B, which increased by 204%. In 2021, 244,266 cases of CLABSI were reported, indicating a nosocomial infection rate of 7.9%. The rate of resistance to polymyxin B was higher in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1400%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (514%). Azithromycin emerged as the predominant antibiotic utilized within the community setting, accounting for 24% of the overall consumption. Pearson's correlation analysis revealed a significant and positive correlation (r = 0.71) between the elevated usage of azithromycin and the incidence of COVID-19. Our results indicate an increase in antimicrobial consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic and reinforce the fact that the misuse of antimicrobials may lead to an expansion in antimicrobial resistance.