External Corroboration That Corticosteroids May Be Harmful to Septic Shock Endotype A Patients

Glucocorticoid therapy for sepsis in the AI era: a survey on current and future approaches

Sepsis, a life-threatening medical condition, manifests as new or worsening organ failures due to a dysregulated host response to infection. Many patients with sepsis have manifested a hyperinflammatory phenotype leading to the identification of inflammatory modulation by corticosteroids as a key treatment modality. However, the optimal use of corticosteroids in sepsis treatment remains a contentious subject, necessitating a deeper understanding of their physiological and pharmacological effects. Our study conducts a comprehensive review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on traditional corticosteroid treatment in sepsis, alongside an analysis of evolving clinical guidelines. Additionally, we explore the emerging role of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine, particularly in diagnosing, prognosticating, and treating sepsis. AI's advanced data processing capabilities reveal new avenues for enhancing corticosteroid therapeutic strategies in sepsis. The integration of AI in sepsis treatment has the potential to address existing gaps in knowledge, especially in the application of corticosteroids. Our findings suggest that combining corticosteroid therapy with AI-driven insights could lead to more personalized and effective sepsis treatments. This approach holds promise for improving clinical outcomes and presents a significant advancement in the management of this complex and often fatal condition.

Towards personalized medicine: a scoping review of immunotherapy in sepsis

Despite significant progress in our understanding of the pathophysiology of sepsis and extensive clinical research, there are few proven therapies addressing the underlying immune dysregulation of this life-threatening condition. The aim of this scoping review is to describe the literature evaluating immunotherapy in adult patients with sepsis, emphasizing on methods providing a "personalized immunotherapy" approach, which was defined as the classification of patients into a distinct subgroup or subphenotype, in which a patient's immune profile is used to guide treatment. Subgroups are subsets of sepsis patients, based on any cut-off in a variable. Subphenotypes are subgroups that can be reliably discriminated from other subgroup based on data-driven assessments. Included studies were randomized controlled trials and cohort studies investigating immunomodulatory therapies in adults with sepsis. Studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov, from the first paper available until January 29th, 2024. The search resulted in 15,853 studies. Title and abstract screening resulted in 1409 studies (9%), assessed for eligibility; 771 studies were included, of which 282 (37%) were observational and 489 (63%) interventional. Treatment groups included were treatments targeting the innate immune response, the complement system, coagulation and endothelial dysfunction, non-pharmalogical treatment, pleiotropic drugs, immunonutrition, concomitant treatments, Traditional Chinese Medicine, immunostimulatory cytokines and growth factors, intravenous immunoglobulins, mesenchymal stem cells and immune-checkpoint inhibitors. A personalized approach was incorporated in 70 studies (9%). Enrichment was applied using cut-offs in temperature, laboratory, biomarker or genetic variables. Trials often showed conflicting results, possibly due to the lack of patient stratification or the potential influence of severity and timing on immunomodulatory therapy results. When a personalized approach was applied, trends of clinical benefit for several interventions emerged, which hold promise for future clinical trials using personalized immunotherapy.

Recent Data about the Use of Corticosteroids in Sepsis-Review of Recent Literature

Sepsis, characterized by life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a maladaptive host response to infection, and its more severe form, septic shock, pose significant global health challenges. The incidence of these conditions is increasing, highlighting the need for effective treatment strategies. This review explores the complex pathophysiology of sepsis, emphasizing the role of the endothelium and the therapeutic potential of corticosteroids. The endothelial glycocalyx, critical in maintaining vascular integrity, is compromised in sepsis, leading to increased vascular permeability and organ dysfunction. Corticosteroids have been used for over fifty years to treat severe infections, despite ongoing debate about their efficacy. Their immunosuppressive effects and the risk of exacerbating infections are significant concerns. The rationale for corticosteroid use in sepsis is based on their ability to modulate the immune response, promote cardiovascular stability, and potentially facilitate organ restoration. However, the evidence is mixed, with some studies suggesting benefits in terms of microcirculation and shock reversal, while others report no significant impact on mortality or organ dysfunction. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign provides cautious recommendations for their use. Emerging research highlights the importance of genomic and transcriptomic analyses in identifying patient subgroups that may benefit from corticosteroid therapy, suggesting a move toward personalized medicine in sepsis management. Despite potential benefits, the use of corticosteroids in sepsis requires careful consideration of individual patient risk profiles, and further research is needed to optimize their use and integrate genomic insights into clinical practice. This review underscores the complexity of sepsis treatment and the ongoing need for evidence-based approaches to improve patient outcomes.

Glucocorticoid use in acute respiratory failure from pulmonary causes and association with early changes in the systemic host immune response

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoids are commonly used in patients with or at-risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but optimal use remains unclear despite well-conducted clinical trials. We performed a secondary analysis in patients previously enrolled in the Acute Lung Injury and Biospecimen Repository at the University of Pittsburgh. The primary aim of our study was to investigate early changes in host response biomarkers in response to real-world use of glucocorticoids in patients with acute respiratory failure due to ARDS or at-risk due to a pulmonary insult. Participants had baseline plasma samples obtained on study enrollment and on follow-up 3 to 5 days later to measure markers of innate immunity (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNFr1, ST2, fractalkine), epithelial injury (sRAGE), endothelial injury (angiopoietin-2), and host response to bacterial infections (procalcitonin, pentraxin-3). In our primary analyses, we investigated the effect of receiving glucocorticoids between baseline and follow-up samples on host response biomarkers measured at follow-up by doubly robust inverse probability weighting analysis. In exploratory analyses, we examined associations between glucocorticoid use and previously characterized host response subphenotypes (hyperinflammatory and hypoinflammatory).

RESULTS

67 of 148 participants (45%) received glucocorticoids between baseline and follow-up samples. Dose and type of glucocorticoids varied. Regimens that used hydrocortisone alone were most common (37%), and median daily dose was equivalent to 40 mg methylprednisolone (interquartile range: 21, 67). Participants who received glucocorticoids were more likely to be female, to be on immunosuppressive therapy at baseline, and to have higher baseline levels of ST-2, fractalkine, IL-10, pentraxin-3, sRAGE, and TNFr1. Glucocorticoid use was associated with decreases in IL-6 and increases in fractalkine. In exploratory analyses, glucocorticoid use was more frequent in participants in the hyperinflammatory subphenotype (58% vs 40%, p = 0.05), and was not associated with subphenotype classification at the follow-up time point (p = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Glucocorticoid use varied in a cohort of patients with or at-risk for ARDS and was associated with early changes in the systemic host immune response.

Pediatric Sepsis Diagnosis, Management, and Sub-phenotypes

Sepsis and septic shock are major causes of morbidity, mortality, and health care costs for children worldwide, including >3 million deaths annually and, among survivors, risk for new or worsening functional impairments, including reduced quality of life, new respiratory, nutritional, or technological assistance, and recurrent severe infections. Advances in understanding sepsis pathophysiology highlight a need to update the definition and diagnostic criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock, whereas new data support an increasing role for automated screening algorithms and biomarker combinations to assist earlier recognition. Once sepsis or septic shock is suspected, attention to prompt initiation of broad-spectrum empiric antimicrobial therapy, fluid resuscitation, and vasoactive medications remain key components to initial management with several new and ongoing studies offering new insights into how to optimize this approach. Ultimately, a key goal is for screening to encompass as many children as possible at risk for sepsis and trigger early treatment without increasing unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotics and preventable hospitalizations. Although the role for adjunctive treatment with corticosteroids and other metabolic therapies remains incompletely defined, ongoing studies will soon offer updated guidance for optimal use. Finally, we are increasingly moving toward an era in which precision therapeutics will bring novel strategies to improve outcomes, especially for the subset of children with sepsis-induced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and sepsis subphenotypes for whom antibiotics, fluid, vasoactive medications, and supportive care remain insufficient.

Temporal Changes in Innate and Adaptive Immunity During Sepsis as Determined by ELISpot

Background

The inability to evaluate host immunity in a rapid quantitative manner in patients with sepsis has severely hampered development of novel immune therapies. The ELISpot assay is a functional bioassay that measures the number of cytokine-secreting cells and the relative amount of cytokine produced at the single-cell level. A key advantage of ELISpot is its excellent dynamic range enabling a more precise quantifiable assessment of host immunity. Herein, we tested the hypothesis on whether the ELISpot assay can detect dynamic changes in both innate and adaptive immunity as they often occur during sepsis. We also tested whether ELISpot could detect the effect of immune drug therapies to modulate innate and adaptive immunity.

Methods

Mice were made septic using sublethal cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Blood and spleens were harvested serially and ex vivo IFN-γ and TNF-α production were compared by ELISpot and ELISA. The capability of ELISpot to detect changes in innate and adaptive immunity due to in vivo immune therapy with dexamethasone, IL-7, and arginine was also evaluated.

Results

ELISpot confirmed a decreased innate and adaptive immunity responsiveness during sepsis progression. More importantly, ELISpot was also able to detect changes in adaptive and innate immunity in response to immune-modulatory reagents, for example dexamethasone, arginine, and IL-7 in a readily quantifiable manner, as predicted by the reagents known mechanisms of action. ELISpot and ELISA results tended to parallel one another although some differences were noted.

Conclusion

ELISpot offers a unique capability to assess the functional status of both adaptive and innate immunity over time. The results presented herein demonstrate that ELISpot can also be used to detect and follow the in vivo effects of drugs to ameliorate sepsis-induced immune dysfunction. This capability would be a major advance in guiding new immune therapies in sepsis.

Extending the 'host response' paradigm from sepsis to cardiogenic shock: evidence, limitations and opportunities

Recent clinical and research efforts in cardiogenic shock (CS) have largely focussed on the restoration of the low cardiac output state that is the conditio sine qua non of the clinical syndrome. This approach has failed to translate into improved outcomes, and mortality has remained static at 30-50%. There is an unmet need to better delineate the pathobiology of CS to understand the observed heterogeneity of presentation and treatment effect and to identify novel therapeutic targets. Despite data in other critical illness syndromes, specifically sepsis, the role of dysregulated inflammation and immunity is hitherto poorly described in CS. High-dimensional molecular profiling, particularly through leukocyte transcriptomics, may afford opportunity to better characterise subgroups of patients with shared mechanisms of immune dysregulation. In this state-of-the-art review, we outline the rationale for considering molecular subtypes of CS. We describe how high-dimensional molecular technologies can be used to identify these subtypes, and whether they share biological features with sepsis and other critical illness states. Finally, we propose how the identification of molecular subtypes of patients may enrich future clinical trial design and identification of novel therapies for CS.

Leveraging Data Science and Novel Technologies to Develop and Implement Precision Medicine Strategies in Critical Care

Precision medicine aims to identify treatments that are most likely to result in favorable outcomes for subgroups of patients with similar clinical and biological characteristics. The gaps for the development and implementation of precision medicine strategies in the critical care setting are many, but the advent of data science and multi-omics approaches, combined with the rich data ecosystem in the intensive care unit, offer unprecedented opportunities to realize the promise of precision critical care. In this article, the authors review the data-driven and technology-based approaches being leveraged to discover and implement precision medicine strategies in the critical care setting.

Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Low-Dose Hydrocortisone in Adults with Septic Shock

Low-Dose Hydrocortisone and Septic ShockCorticosteroids have been evaluated as a therapy for septic shock for more than 50 years. However, uncertainty persists about their effects on mortality. Pirracchio and colleagues undertake a patient-level meta-analysis to answer this important question.

The ultimate tradeoff: how red cell adaptations to malaria alter the host response during critical illness

The human immune system evolved in response to pathogens. Among these pathogens, malaria has proven to be one of the deadliest and has exerted the most potent selective pressures on its target cell, the red blood cell. Red blood cells have recently gained recognition for their immunomodulatory properties, yet how red cell adaptations contribute to the host response during critical illness remains understudied. This review will discuss how adaptations that may have been advantageous for host survival might influence immune responses in modern critical illness. We will highlight the current evidence for divergent host resilience arising from the adaptations to malaria and summarize how understanding evolutionary red cell adaptations to malaria may provide insight into the heterogeneity of the host response to critical illness, perhaps driving future precision medicine approaches to syndromes affecting the critically ill such as sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Current sepsis therapeutics

Management of the patient with sepsis comprises three key branches: control of the underlying infection, haemodynamic stabilization, and modulation of the host response. Each aspect should be considered in all patients and, when relevant, managed at the same time. Infection control is applicable to all patients with sepsis and will include antibiotic therapy and often surgical intervention to remove an infectious source. Haemodynamic support involves fluid administration in all patients and vasoactive agents in patients with associated circulatory shock. Noradrenaline is the first choice vasopressor agent; inotropic agents, usually dobutamine, may be added in case of myocardial depression. No interventions directed at individual components of the host response to sepsis have yet been shown to improve outcomes, but glucocorticoids and vasopressin have a global impact on the response and can thus be considered in this category. A move toward more personalized treatment is needed across all three arms of sepsis management.

Redefining critical illness

Research and practice in critical care medicine have long been defined by syndromes, which, despite being clinically recognizable entities, are, in fact, loose amalgams of heterogeneous states that may respond differently to therapy. Mounting translational evidence-supported by research on respiratory failure due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection-suggests that the current syndrome-based framework of critical illness should be reconsidered. Here we discuss recent findings from basic science and clinical research in critical care and explore how these might inform a new conceptual model of critical illness. De-emphasizing syndromes, we focus on the underlying biological changes that underpin critical illness states and that may be amenable to treatment. We hypothesize that such an approach will accelerate critical care research, leading to a richer understanding of the pathobiology of critical illness and of the key determinants of patient outcomes. This, in turn, will support the design of more effective clinical trials and inform a more precise and more effective practice at the bedside.

Gene Expression Scoring of Immune Activity Levels for Precision Use of Hydrocortisone in Vasodilatory Shock

PURPOSE

Among patients with vasodilatory shock, gene expression scores may identify different immune states. We aimed to test whether such scores are robust in identifying patients' immune state and predicting response to hydrocortisone treatment in vasodilatory shock.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We selected genes to generate continuous scores to define previously established subclasses of sepsis. We used these scores to identify a patient's immune state. We evaluated the potential for these states to assess the differential effect of hydrocortisone in two randomized clinical trials of hydrocortisone versus placebo in vasodilatory shock.

RESULTS

We initially identified genes associated with immune-adaptive, immune-innate, immune-coagulant functions. From these genes, 15 were most relevant to generate expression scores related to each of the functions. These scores were used to identify patients as immune-adaptive prevalent (IA-P) and immune-innate prevalent (IN-P). In IA-P patients, hydrocortisone therapy increased 28-day mortality in both trials (43.3% vs 14.7%, P = 0.028) and (57.1% vs 0.0%, P = 0.99). In IN-P patients, this effect was numerically reversed.

CONCLUSIONS

Gene expression scores identified the immune state of vasodilatory shock patients, one of which (IA-P) identified those who may be harmed by hydrocortisone. Gene expression scores may help advance the field of personalized medicine.

Managing sepsis in the era of precision medicine: challenges and opportunities

INTRODUCTION

Precision medicine is a medical model in which decisions, practices, interventions and therapies are tailored to the individual patient based on their predicted response or risk of disease. Sepsis is a life-threatening condition characterized by immune system dysregulation whose pathophysiology remains incompletely understood. There is much hope that precision medicine can lead to better outcomes in patients with sepsis.

AREAS COVERED

In this review from a comprehensive literature search in PubMed for English-language studies conducted in adults, we highlight recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of sepsis of bacterial origin in adults using precision medicine approaches including rapid diagnostic tests, predictive biomarkers, genomic methods, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and monitoring cell mediated immunity. Challenges and directions for future research are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Current diagnostic testing in sepsis relies primarily on conventional cultures (e.g. blood cultures), which are time-consuming and may delay critical therapeutic decisions. Nonculture-based techniques including nucleic acid amplification technologies (NAAT), other molecular methods (biomarkers), and genomic sequencing offer promise to overcome some of the inherent limitations seen with culture-based techniques.

Using RNA-Seq to Investigate Immune-Metabolism Features in Immunocompromised Patients With Sepsis

Objective: Sepsis is life threatening and leads to complex inflammation in patients with immunocompromised conditions, such as cancer, and receiving immunosuppressants for autoimmune diseases and organ transplant recipients. Increasing evidence has shown that RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) can be used to define subendotype in patients with sepsis; therefore, we aim to use RNA-Seq to identify transcriptomic features among immunocompromised patients with sepsis.

Methods: We enrolled patients who were admitted to medical intensive care units (ICUs) for sepsis at a tertiary referral centre in central Taiwan. Whole blood on day-1 and day-8 was obtained for RNA-Seq. We used Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to identify the enriched pathway of day-8/day-1 differentially expressed genes and MiXCR to determine the diversity of T cell repertoire.

Results: A total of 18 immunocompromised subjects with sepsis and 18 sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score-matched immunocompetent control subjects were enrolled. The ventilator-day, ICU-stay, and hospital-day were similar between the two groups, whereas the hospital mortality was higher in immunocompromised patients than those in immunocompetent patients (50.0 vs. 5.6%, p < 0.01). We found that the top day-8/day-1 upregulated genes in the immunocompetent group were mainly innate immunity and inflammation relevant genes, namely, PRSS33, HDC, ALOX15, FCER1A, and OLR1, whereas a blunted day-8/day-1 dynamic transcriptome was found among immunocompromised patients with septic. Functional pathway analyses of day-8/day-1 differentially expressed genes identified the upregulated functional biogenesis and T cell-associated pathways in immunocompetent patients recovered from sepsis, whereas merely downregulated metabolism-associated pathways were found in immunocompromised patients with septic. Moreover, we used MiXCR to identify a higher diversity of T cell receptor (TCR) in immunocompetent patients both on day-1 and on day-8 than those in immunocompromised patients.

Conclusions: Using RNA-Seq, we found compromised T cell function, altered metabolic signalling, and decreased T cell diversity among immunocompromised patients with septic, and more mechanistic studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanism.

Pediatric sepsis biomarkers for prognostic and predictive enrichment

Sepsis is a major public health problem in children throughout the world. Given that the treatment guidelines emphasize early recognition, there is interest in developing biomarkers of sepsis, and most attention is focused on diagnostic biomarkers. While there is a need for ongoing discovery and development of diagnostic biomarkers for sepsis, this review will focus on less well-known applications of sepsis biomarkers. Among patients with sepsis, the biomarkers can give information regarding the risk of poor outcome from sepsis, risk of sepsis-related organ dysfunction, and subgroups of patients with sepsis who share underlying biological features potentially amenable to targeted therapeutics. These types of biomarkers, beyond the traditional concept of diagnosis, address the important concepts of prognostic and predictive enrichment, which are key components of bringing the promise of precision medicine to the bedside of children with sepsis.

The immunology of sepsis

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to an infection. This recently implemented definition does not capture the heterogeneity or the underlying pathophysiology of the syndrome, which is characterized by concurrent unbalanced hyperinflammation and immune suppression. Here, we review current knowledge of aberrant immune responses during sepsis and recent initiatives to stratify patients with sepsis into subgroups that are more alike from a clinical and/or pathobiological perspective, which could be key for identification of patients who are more likely to benefit from specific immune interventions.

A Precision Medicine Approach to Biomarker Utilization in Pediatric Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury

Sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill children, and acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication that confers an increased risk for poor outcomes. Despite the documented consequences of sepsis-associated AKI (SA-AKI), no effective disease-modifying therapies have been identified to date. As such, the only treatment options for these patients remain prevention and supportive care, both of which rely on the ability to promptly and accurately identify at risk and affected individuals. To achieve these goals, a variety of biomarkers have been investigated to help augment our currently limited predictive and diagnostic strategies for SA-AKI, however, these have had variable success in pediatric sepsis. In this mini-review, we will briefly outline the current use of biomarkers for SA-AKI, and propose a new framework for biomarker discovery and utilization that considers the individual patient's sepsis inflammatory response. Now recognized to be a key driver in the complex pathophysiology of SA-AKI, understanding the dysregulated host immune response to sepsis is a growing area of research that can and should be leveraged to improve the prediction and diagnosis of SA-AKI, while also potentially identifying novel therapeutic targets. Reframing SA-AKI in this manner - as a direct consequence of the individual patient's sepsis inflammatory response - will facilitate a precision medicine approach to its management, something that is required to move the care of this consequential disorder forward.