Third-line antiepileptic therapy and outcome in status epilepticus: the impact of vasopressor use and prolonged mechanical ventilation

Features affecting treatment decisions and outcome in refractory status epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is associated with worse outcomes than responsive established status epilepticus (SE). Guidelines recommend that refractory convulsive SE should be treated with continuous intravenous anesthetic drugs (CIVADs). Many cases of nonconvulsive SE are not reated with CIVADs, and the use of anesthesia might be associated with increased mortality. The factors leading to the decision to use anesthesia and how these might affect outcome are still largely unknown. Our goal was to identify features of refractory SE associated with treatment choices and outcome.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective study was conducted of all consecutive patients with RSE admitted to a tertiary center between January 2015 and December 2020. We collected demographic and clinical variables at SE onset and at time of third-line treatment, including ictal burden during the hour preceding the administration of the third-line treatment. The primary outcome measure was the decision to use CIVADs as third-line treatment. Secondary outcome measures were in-hospital mortality and functional outcome at discharge.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-one RSE episodes were included. Of these, 29 (18%) received CIVADs as third-line treatment and 61 (38%) died. The type of third-line treatment was not associated with mortality. CIVADs were more likely to be used with higher ictal burden, fewer comorbidities, a lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at time of third-line administration, and in the absence of history of epilepsy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.03, .76, .66, and .25, respectively). Multivariable analyses also identified comorbidities, an acute etiology, and lower GCS score at time of third-line administration as risk factors of mortality (OR = 1.43, .09-.28, and .80, respectively). Ictal burden was not associated with outcome.

SIGNIFICANCE

Ictal burden, semiology, and consciousness at time of third-line treatment are associated with the decision to use CIVADs in SE. Semiology and consciousness at time of third-line treatment are also associated with mortality.

Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus: Therapeutic Options and Prognosis

In patients with status epilepticus (SE), the underlying biologic background represents the main prognostic variable. A swift application of a treatment protocol is recommended, including adequate doses of a benzodiazepine followed by an intravenous anti-seizure medicine. If refractory SE arises, general anesthetics should be used in generalized convulsive and non-convulsive SE in coma, while further non-sedating anti-seizure medications attempts are warranted in patients with focal forms. Ketogenic diet and/or ketamine in patients with super-refractory SE, and immunologic treatments for those with new-onset refractory SE/febrile-induced refractory epilepsy syndrome should be considered early. Pharmacologic treatment of SE after cardiac arrest should be oriented by the results of multimodal prognostication.

Treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in Brazil: a review

Status epilepticus (SE) is the most severe presentation of epilepsy. Currently, SE is defined according to 2 sequential time frames: time 1, after which it is unlikely that the seizure will resolve spontaneously, therefore requiring the initiation of therapy; and time 2, when long-term consequences become more likely. For convulsive SE, these time frames are well defined: 5 minutes for time 1 and 30 minutes for time 2. "Time is brain" in the treatment of SE, as delays in diagnosis and treatment are associated with worse outcomes. After clinical stabilization, the first step is the administration of intravenous (IV) benzodiazepines. Rapid initiation of treatment and use of appropriate dosing are more important than the selection of a specific benzodiazepine. Following this, treatment continues with the use of an IV antiseizure medication (ASM). In Brazil, the recommended options available are phenytoin and levetiracetam. Status epilepticus is considered refractory to treatment if seizures persist after the administration of benzodiazepines and IV ASM. The cornerstone of this stage is the induction of therapeutic coma using IV anesthetic drugs (IVADs), although evidence is limited regarding the choice among midazolam, propofol, or barbiturates. Super-refractory SE is defined when seizures persist despite continuous infusion of IVADs or recur after these drugs are tapered. There is very limited data regarding the treatment of super-refractory SE. In the absence of randomized controlled trials, treatment should be guided by the physician's experience, clinical judgment, and established therapeutic options from previous reports.

Ketamine to Prevent Endotracheal Intubation in Adults with Refractory Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is defined as status epilepticus (SE) with no obvious motor phenomenon and is diagnosed based on electroencephalogram (EEG). Refractory SE (RSE) is the persistence of seizures despite treatment with an adequately dosed first-line and second-line agents. Although guidelines for convulsive RSE include third-line agents such as intravenous anesthetic drugs (midazolam, propofol, or barbiturates), the therapeutic approach to NCSE is not well outlined. Treatment with traditional anesthetics invariably includes endotracheal intubation, which is associated with significant adverse events. Comparatively, ketamine, a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist is not associated with significant cardiorespiratory depression and may help in avoiding intubation.

OBJECTIVE

In this case series, we describe our experience with the early use of intravenous ketamine as the first anesthetic agent in patients with refractory NCSE to avoid endotracheal intubation.

METHODS

We present a case series of nine patients managed in the Neurointensive Care Unit at a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. The study was approved by the hospital and university institutional review boards and the requirement for informed consent was waived for retrospective analysis of existing data, per institutional policy. All cases of SE were identified from a prospective database, and a subsequent retrospective chart review identified all patients with a diagnosis of refractory NCSE in whom ketamine was used as the first anesthetic agent. The primary endpoint was the avoidance of endotracheal intubation while on ketamine infusion. The secondary endpoint was defined as cessation of both clinical and electrographic seizures recorded on continuous EEG within 24 h of ketamine administration.

RESULTS

A total of nine patients experiencing refractory NCSE were included in this case series, with a median age of 61 (range 26-72) years and seven patients were male. The primary endpoint, avoiding intubation, was achieved in five out of nine (55%) cases. Six patients experienced resolution of refractory NCSE with ketamine administration as the sole anesthetic agent. Four patients required endotracheal intubation and three patients had a failure of seizure cessation with ketamine. Hypersalivation and pneumonia were the most common ketamine associated adverse events. In non-intubated patients, no deaths occurred. One patient was discharged home, four to subacute rehabilitation, one to a long term acute care hospital, and one patient to hospice.

CONCLUSION

The use of ketamine as the primary anesthetic agent may be a reasonable option to avoid endotracheal intubation in a subset of patients with refractory NCSE. This study is limited by its small sample size, retrospective design, and reliance on information obtained from chart review.

Treatment of Refractory Status Epilepticus With Continuous Intravenous Anesthetic Drugs: A Systematic Review

Importance

Multiple continuous intravenous anesthetic drugs (CIVADs) are available for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus (RSE). There is a paucity of data comparing the different types of CIVADs used for RSE.

Objective

To systematically review and compare outcome measures associated with the initial CIVAD choice in RSE in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Evidence Review

Data sources included English and non-English articles using Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science (January 1994-June 2023) as well as manual search. Study selection included peer-reviewed studies of 5 or more patients and at least 1 patient older than 12 years with status epilepticus refractory to a benzodiazepine and at least 1 standard antiseizure medication, treated with continuously infused midazolam, ketamine, propofol, pentobarbital, or thiopental. Independent extraction of articles was performed using prespecified data items. The association between outcome variables and CIVAD was examined with an analysis of variance or χ2 test where appropriate. Binary logistic regressions were used to examine the association between outcome variables and CIVAD with etiology, change in mortality over time, electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring (continuous vs intermittent), and treatment goal (seizure vs burst suppression) included as covariates. Risk of bias was addressed by listing the population and type of each study.

Findings

A total of 66 studies with 1637 patients were included. Significant differences among CIVAD groups in short-term failure, hypotension, and CIVAD substitution during treatment were observed. Non-epilepsy-related RSE (vs epilepsy-related RSE) was associated with a higher rate of CIVAD substitution (60 of 120 [50.0%] vs 11 of 43 [25.6%]; odds ratio [OR], 3.11; 95% CI, 1.44-7.11; P = .006) and mortality (98 of 227 [43.2%] vs 7 of 63 [11.1%]; OR, 17.0; 95% CI, 4.71-109.35; P < .001). Seizure suppression was associated with mortality (OR, 7.72; 95% CI, 1.77-39.23; P = .005), but only a small subgroup was available for analysis (seizure suppression: 17 of 22 [77.3%] from 3 publications vs burst suppression: 25 of 98 [25.5%] from 12 publications). CIVAD choice and EEG type were not predictors of mortality. Earlier publication year was associated with mortality, although the observation was no longer statistically significant after adjusting SEs for clustering.

Conclusions and Relevance

Epilepsy-related RSE was associated with lower mortality compared with other RSE etiologies. A trend of decreasing mortality over time was observed, which may suggest an effect of advances in neurocritical care. The overall data are heterogeneous, which limits definitive conclusions on the choice of optimal initial CIVAD in RSE treatment.

Association Between Dose Escalation of Anesthetics and Outcomes in Patients With Refractory Status Epilepticus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between dose escalation of continuously administered IV anesthetics and its duration with short-term outcomes in adult patients treated for refractory status epilepticus (RSE).

METHODS

Clinical and electroencephalographic data of patients with RSE without hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy who were treated with anesthetics at a Swiss academic medical center from 2011 to 2019 were assessed. The frequency of anesthetic dose escalation (i.e., dose increase) and its associations with in-hospital death or return to premorbid neurologic function were primary endpoints. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify associations with endpoints.

RESULTS

Among 111 patients with RSE, doses of anesthetics were escalated in 57%. Despite patients with dose escalation having a higher morbidity (lower Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score at status epilepticus [SE] onset, more presumably fatal etiologies, longer duration of SE and intensive care, more infections, and arterial hypotension) as compared with patients without, the primary endpoints did not differ between these groups in univariable analyses. Multivariable analyses revealed decreased odds for death with dose escalation (odds ratio 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.86), independent of initial GCS score, presumably fatal etiology, SE severity score, SE duration, and nonconvulsive SE with coma, with similar functional outcome among survivors compared with patients without dose escalation.

DISCUSSION

Our study reveals that anesthetic dose escalation in adult patients with RSE is associated with decreased odds for death without increasing the proportion of surviving patients with worse neurofunctional state than before RSE.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that anesthetic dose escalation decreases the odds of death in patients with RSE.

Status epilepticus in the ICU

Status epilepticus (SE) is a common medical emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Management that follows published guidelines is best suited to improve outcomes, with the most severe cases frequently being managed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Diagnosis of convulsive SE can be made without electroencephalography (EEG), but EEG is required to reliably diagnose nonconvulsive SE. Rapidly narrowing down underlying causes for SE is crucial, as this may guide additional management steps. Causes may range from underlying epilepsy to acute brain injuries such as trauma, cardiac arrest, stroke, and infections. Initial management consists of rapid administration of benzodiazepines and one of the following non-sedating intravenous antiseizure medications (ASM): (fos-)phenytoin, levetiracetam, or valproate; other ASM are increasingly used, such as lacosamide or brivaracetam. SE that continues despite these medications is called refractory, and most commonly treated with continuous infusions of midazolam or propofol. Alternatives include further non-sedating ASM and non-pharmacologic approaches. SE that reemerges after weaning or continues despite management with propofol or midazolam is labeled super-refractory SE. At this step, management may include non-sedating or sedating compounds including ketamine and barbiturates. Continuous video EEG is necessary for the management of refractory and super-refractory SE, as these are almost always nonconvulsive. If possible, management of the underlying cause of seizures is crucial particularly for patients with autoimmune encephalitis. Short-term mortality ranges from 10 to 15% after SE and is primarily related to increasing age, underlying etiology, and medical comorbidities. Refractoriness of treatment is clearly related to outcome with mortality rising from 10% in responsive cases, to 25% in refractory, and nearly 40% in super-refractory SE.

ACVIM Consensus Statement on the management of status epilepticus and cluster seizures in dogs and cats

BACKGROUND

Seizure emergencies (ie, status epilepticus [SE] and cluster seizures [CS]), are common challenging disorders with complex pathophysiology, rapidly progressive drug-resistant and self-sustaining character, and high morbidity and mortality. Current treatment approaches are characterized by considerable variations, but official guidelines are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To establish evidence-based guidelines and an agreement among board-certified specialists for the appropriate management of SE and CS in dogs and cats.

ANIMALS

None.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A panel of 5 specialists was formed to assess and summarize evidence in the peer-reviewed literature with the aim to establish consensus clinical recommendations. Evidence from veterinary pharmacokinetic studies, basic research, and human medicine also was used to support the panel's recommendations, especially for the interventions where veterinary clinical evidence was lacking.

RESULTS

The majority of the evidence was on the first-line management (ie, benzodiazepines and their various administration routes) in both species. Overall, there was less evidence available on the management of emergency seizure disorders in cats in contrast to dogs. Most recommendations made by the panel were supported by a combination of a moderate level of veterinary clinical evidence and pharmacokinetic data as well as studies in humans and basic research studies.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Successful management of seizure emergencies should include an early, rapid, and stage-based treatment approach consisting of interventions with moderate to preferably high ACVIM recommendations; management of complications and underlying causes related to seizure emergencies should accompany antiseizure medications.

How much refractory is 'refractory status epilepticus'? A retrospective study of treatment strategies and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate whether differences in clinical outcomes exist according to treatments received and seizure activity resolution in patients with refractory status epilepticus (RSE).

METHODS

Consecutive episodes of non-hypoxic status epilepticus (SE) in patients ≥ 14 years old were included. Episodes of RSE were stratified in: (i) SE persistent despite treatment with first-line therapy with benzodiazepines and one second-line treatment with antiseizure medications (ASMs), but responsive to successive treatments with ASMs (RSE-rASMs); (ii) SE persistent despite treatment with first-line therapy with benzodiazepines and successive treatment with one or more second-line ASMs, but responsive to anesthetic drugs [RSE-rGA (general anesthesia)]. Study endpoints were mortality during hospitalization and worsening of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge.

RESULTS

Status epilepticus was responsive in 298 (54.1%), RSE-rASMs in 152 (27.6%), RSE-rGA in 46 (8.3%), and super-refractory (SRSE) in 55 (10.0%) out of 551 included cases. Death during hospitalization occurred in 98 (17.8%) and worsening of mRS at discharge in 287 (52.1%) cases. Multivariable analyses revealed increased odds of in-hospital mortality with RSE-rGA (odds ratio [OR] 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-7.35) and SRSE (OR 3.83, 95%. CI 1.73-8.47), and increased odds of worsening of mRS with RSE-rASMs (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.28-3.31), RSE-rGA (OR 4.44, 95% CI 1.97-10.00), and SRSE (OR 13.81, 95% CI 5.34-35.67).

CONCLUSIONS

In RSE, varying degrees of refractoriness may be defined and suit better the continuum spectrum of disease severity and the heterogeneity of SE burden and prognosis.

Evaluating salvage electroconvulsive therapy for the treatment of prolonged super refractory status epilepticus: A case series

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Clinicians have treated super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT); however, data supporting the practice are scant and lack rigorous evaluation of continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) changes related to therapy. This study aims to describe a series of patients with SRSE treated at our institution with ECT and characterize cEEG changes using a blinded review process.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients admitted for SRSE and treated with ECT from January 2014 to December 2022. Our primary outcome was the resolution of SRSE. Secondary outcomes included changes in ictal-interictal EEG patterns, anesthetic burden, treatment-associated adverse events, and changes in clinical examination. cEEG was reviewed pre- and post-ECT by blinded epileptologists.

RESULTS

Ten patients underwent treatment with ECT across 11 admissions (8 female, median age 57 years). At the time of ECT initiation, nine patients had ongoing SRSE while two had highly ictal patterns and persistent encephalopathy following anesthetic wean, consistent with late-stage SRSE. Super-refractory status epilepticus resolution occurred with a median time to cessation of 4 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 3-9 days) following ECT initiation. Background continuity improved in five patients and periodic discharge frequency decreased in six. There was a decrease in anesthetic use following the completion of ECT and an improvement in neurological exams. There were no associated adverse events.

DISCUSSION

In our cohort, ECT was associated with improvement of ictal-interictal patterns on EEG, and resolution of SRSE, and was not associated with serious adverse events. Further controlled studies are needed.

Early timing of anesthesia in status epilepticus is associated with complete recovery: A 7-year retrospective two-center study

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy, tolerability, and outcome of different timing of anesthesia in adult patients with status epilepticus (SE).

METHODS

Patients with anesthesia for SE from 2015 to 2021 at two Swiss academic medical centers were categorized as anesthetized as recommended third-line treatment, earlier (as first- or second-line treatment), and delayed (later as third-line treatment). Associations between timing of anesthesia and in-hospital outcomes were estimated by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 762 patients, 246 received anesthesia; 21% were anesthetized as recommended, 55% earlier, and 24% delayed. Propofol was preferably used for earlier (86% vs. 55.5% for recommended/delayed anesthesia) and midazolam for later anesthesia (17.2% vs. 15.9% for earlier anesthesia). Earlier anesthesia was statistically significantly associated with fewer infections (17% vs. 32.7%), shorter median SE duration (.5 vs. 1.5 days), and more returns to premorbid neurologic function (52.9% vs. 35.5%). Multivariable analyses revealed decreasing odds for return to premorbid function with every additional nonanesthetic antiseizure medication given prior to anesthesia (odds ratio [OR] = .71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .53-.94) independent of confounders. Subgroup analyses revealed decreased odds for return to premorbid function with increasing delay of anesthesia independent of the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS; STESS = 1-2: OR = .45, 95% CI = .27-.74; STESS > 2: OR = .53, 95% CI = .34-.85), especially in patients without potentially fatal etiology (OR = .5, 95% CI = .35-.73) and in patients experiencing motor symptoms (OR = .67, 95% CI = .48-.93).

SIGNIFICANCE

In this SE cohort, anesthetics were administered as recommended third-line therapy in only every fifth patient and earlier in every second. Increasing delay of anesthesia was associated with decreased odds for return to premorbid function, especially in patients with motor symptoms and no potentially fatal etiology.

Association Between Induced Burst Suppression and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Refractory Status Epilepticus: A 9-Year Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the frequency of induced EEG burst suppression pattern during continuous IV anesthesia (IVAD) and associated outcomes in adult patients treated for refractory status epilepticus (RSE).

METHODS

Patients with RSE treated with anesthetics at a Swiss academic care center from 2011 to 2019 were included. Clinical data and semiquantitative EEG analyses were assessed. Burst suppression was categorized as incomplete burst suppression (with ≥20% and <50% suppression proportion) or complete burst suppression (with ≥50% suppression proportion). The frequency of induced burst suppression and association of burst suppression with outcomes (persistent seizure termination, in-hospital survival, and return to premorbid neurologic function) were the endpoints.

RESULTS

We identified 147 patients with RSE treated with IVAD. Among 102 patients without cerebral anoxia, incomplete burst suppression was achieved in 14 (14%) with a median of 23 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 1-29) and complete burst suppression was achieved in 21 (21%) with a median of 51 hours (IQR 16-104). Age, Charlson comorbidity index, RSE with motor symptoms, the Status Epilepticus Severity Score and arterial hypotension requiring vasopressors were identified as potential confounders in univariable comparisons between patients with and without any burst suppression. Multivariable analyses revealed no associations between any burst suppression and the predefined endpoints. However, among 45 patients with cerebral anoxia, induced burst suppression was associated with persistent seizure termination (72% without vs 29% with burst suppression, p = 0.004) and survival (50% vs 14% p = 0.005).

DISCUSSION

In adult patients with RSE treated with IVAD, burst suppression with ≥50% suppression proportion was achieved in every fifth patient and not associated with persistent seizure termination, in-hospital survival, or return to premorbid neurologic function.

Comparing Patients With Isolated Seizures and Status Epilepticus in Intensive Care Units: An Observational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the frequency of status epilepticus (SE) among seizing critically ill adult patients and to determine clinical differences between patients with isolated seizures and patients with SE in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

From 2015 to 2020, all consecutive adult ICU patients at a Swiss tertiary care center with isolated seizures or SE as reported by intensivists and/or consulting neurologists were identified by screening of all digital medical, ICU, and EEG records. Patients aged <18 years and patients with myoclonus due to hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy but without seizures on EEG were excluded. The frequency of isolated seizures, SE, and clinical characteristics at seizure onset associated with SE were the primary outcomes. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify associations with the emergence of SE.

RESULTS

Among 404 patients with seizures, 51% had SE. Compared with patients with isolated seizures, patients with SE had a lower median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (3 vs 5, p < 0.001), fewer fatal etiologies (43.6% vs 80.5%, p < 0.001), higher median Glasgow coma scores (7 vs 5, p < 0.001), fever more frequently (27.5% vs 7.5%, p < 0.001), shorter median ICU and hospital stay (ICU: 4 vs 5 days, p = 0.039; hospital stay: 13 vs 15 days, p = 0.045), and recovered to premorbid function more often (36.8% vs 17%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analyses revealed decreased odds ratios (ORs) for SE with increasing CCI (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99), fatal etiology (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.08-0.29), and epilepsy (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.63). Systemic inflammation was an additional association with SE after excluding patients with seizures as the reason for ICU admission (ORfor CRP 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.01; ORfor fever 7.35, 95% CI 2.84-19.0). Although fatal etiologies and increasing CCI remained associated with low odds for SE after excluding anesthetized patients and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, inflammation remained associated in all subgroups except patients with epilepsy.

DISCUSSION

Among all ICU patients with seizures, SE emerged frequently and seen in every second patient. Besides the unexpected low odds for SE with higher CCI, fatal etiology, and epilepsy, the association of inflammation with SE in the critically ill without epilepsy represents a potential treatment target and deserves further attention.

Status Epilepticus in Older Adults: Diagnostic and Treatment Considerations

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the leading life-threatening neurological emergencies in the elderly population, with significant morbidity and mortality. SE presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the older population given overlap with other causes of encephalopathy, complicating diagnosis, and the common occurrence of multiple comorbid diseases complicates treatment. First-line therapy involves the use of rescue benzodiazepine in the form of intravenous lorazepam or diazepam, intramuscular or intranasal midazolam and rectal diazepam. Second-line therapies include parenteral levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, valproate and lacosamide, and underlying comorbidities guide the choice of appropriate medication, while third-line therapies may be influenced by the patient's code status as well as the cause and type of SE. The standard of care for convulsive SE is treatment with an intravenous anesthetic, including midazolam, propofol, ketamine and pentobarbital. There is currently limited evidence guiding appropriate therapy in patients failing third-line therapies. Adjunctive strategies may include immunomodulatory treatments, non-pharmacological strategies such as ketogenic diet, neuromodulation therapies and surgery in select cases. Surrogate decision makers should be updated early and often in refractory episodes of SE and informed of the high morbidity and mortality associated with the disease as well as the high probability of subsequent epilepsy among survivors.

Balancing the risks and benefits of anesthetics in status epilepticus

PURPOSE

According to international guidelines, status epilepticus refractory to first- and second-line antiseizure medication should be treated with anesthetics. Therefore, continuously delivered intravenous midazolam, propofol, or barbiturates are recommended as third-line therapy. While electroencephalographically (EEG)-controlled titration of anesthetics to seizure termination or to the emergence of an EEG burst-suppression pattern makes sense, evidence of the efficacy and tolerability of such third-line treatment is limited and concerns regarding the risks of anesthesia remain. The lack of treatment alternatives and persistent international discord reflecting contradictory results from some studies leave clinicians on their own when deciding to escalate treatment. In this conference-accompanying narrative review, we highlight the challenges of EEG-monitored third-line treatment and discuss recent studies that examined earlier administration of anesthetics.

RESULTS

Based on the literature, maintaining continuous burst suppression is difficult despite the constant administration of anesthetics, and the evidence for burst suppression as an adequate surrogate target is limited by methodological shortcomings as acknowledged by international guidelines. In our Swiss cohort including 102 patients with refractory status epilepticus, burst suppression as defined by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Critical Care EEG Terminology 2021 was established in only 21%. Besides case reports suggesting that rapid but short-termed anesthesia can be sufficient to permanently stop seizures, a study including 205 patients revealed that anesthesia as second-line treatment was associated with a shorter median duration of status epilepticus (0.5 versus 12.5 days, p < 0.001), median ICU (2 versus 5.5 days, p < 0.001) and hospital stay (8 versus 17 days, p < 0.001) with equal rates of complications when compared to anesthesia as third-line treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent investigations have led to important findings and new insights regarding the use of anesthetics in refractory status epilepticus. However, numerous methodological limitations and remaining questions need to be considered when it comes to the translation into clinical practice, and, in consequence, call for prospective randomized studies. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.

Constant rate infusion of diazepam or propofol for the management of canine cluster seizures or status epilepticus

INTRODUCTION

Cluster seizures (CS) and status epilepticus (SE) in dogs are severe neurological emergencies that require immediate treatment. Practical guidelines call for constant rate infusion (CRI) of benzodiazepines or propofol (PPF) in patients with seizures not responding to first-line treatment, but to date only few studies have investigated the use of CRI in dogs with epilepsy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

METHODS

Dogs that received CRI of diazepam (DZP) or PPF for antiepileptic treatment during hospitalization at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of the University of Turin for CS or SE between September 2016 and December 2019 were eligible for inclusion. Favorable outcome was defined as cessation of clinically visible seizure activity within few minutes from the initiation of the CRI, no seizure recurrence within 24 h after discontinuation of CRI through to hospital discharge, and clinical recovery. Poor outcome was defined as recurrence of seizure activity despite treatment or death in hospital because of recurrent seizures, catastrophic consequences of prolonged seizures or no return to an acceptable neurological and clinical baseline, despite apparent control of seizure activity. Comparisons between the number of patients with favorable outcome and those with poor outcome in relation to type of CRI, seizure etiology, reason for presentation (CS or SE), sex, previous AED therapy and dose of PPF CRI were carried out.

RESULTS

A total of 37 dogs, with 50 instances of hospitalization and CRI administered for CS or SE were included in the study. CRI of diazepam (DZP) or PPF was administered in 29/50 (58%) and in 21/50 (42%) instances of hospitalization, respectively. Idiopathic epilepsy was diagnosed in 21/37 (57%), (13/21 tier I and 8/21 tier II); structural epilepsy was diagnosed in 6/37 (16%) of which 4/6 confirmed and 2/6 suspected. A metabolic or toxic cause of seizure activity was recorded in 7/37 (19%). A total of 38/50 (76%) hospitalizations were noted for CS and 12/50 (24%) for SE. In 30/50 (60%) instances of hospitalization, the patient responded well to CRI with cessation of seizure activity, no recurrence in the 24 h after discontinuation of CRI through to hospital discharge, whereas a poor outcome was recorded for 20/50 (40%) cases (DZP CRI in 12/50 and PPF CRI in 8/50). Comparison between the number of patients with favorable outcome and those with poor outcome in relation to type of CRI, seizure etiology, reason for presentation (CS or SE), sex and previous AED therapy was carried out but no statistically significant differences were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study is the first to document administration of CRI of DZP or PPF in a large sample of dogs with epilepsy. The medications appeared to be tolerated without major side effects and helped control seizure activity in most patients regardless of seizure etiology. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effects of CRI duration on outcome and complications.

Therapeutically induced EEG burst-suppression pattern to treat refractory status epilepticus—what is the evidence?

Current guidelines advocate to treat refractory status epilepticus (RSE) with continuously administered anesthetics to induce an artificial coma if first- and second-line antiseizure drugs have failed to stop seizure activity. A common surrogate for monitoring the depth of the artificial coma is the appearance of a burst-suppression pattern (BS) in the EEG. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the origin and neurophysiology of the BS phenomenon as well as the evidence from the literature for the presumed benefit of BS as therapy in adult patients with RSE.

Intravenous ganaxolone for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus: Results from an open-label, dose-finding, phase 2 trial

OBJECTIVE

Patients with refractory status epilepticus (RSE) have failed treatment with benzodiazepines and ≥1 second-line intravenous (IV) antiseizure medication (ASM). Guidelines recommend IV anesthesia when second-line ASMs have failed, but potential harms can outweigh the benefits. Novel treatments are needed to stop and durably control RSE without escalation to IV anesthetics. Ganaxolone is an investigational neuroactive steroid in development for RSE treatment. This study's objective was to determine the appropriate dosing for IV ganaxolone in RSE and obtain a preliminary assessment of efficacy and safety.

METHODS

This was an open-label, phase 2 trial conducted from February 19, 2018 to September 18, 2019, at three sites in the United States. Patients were aged ≥12 years, had convulsive or nonconvulsive SE, and failed to respond to ≥1 second-line IV ASM. Twenty-one patients were screened; 17 were enrolled. Patients received IV ganaxolone added to standard-of-care ASMs. Ganaxolone infusion was initiated as an IV bolus (over 3 min) with continuous infusion of decreasing infusion rates for 48-96 h followed by an 18-h taper. There were three ganaxolone dosing cohorts: low, 500 mg/day; medium, 650 mg/day; and high, 713 mg/day. The primary end point was the number of patients not requiring escalation to IV anesthetic treatment within 24 h of ganaxolone initiation.

RESULTS

Most of the 17 enrolled patients (65%) had nonconvulsive SE, and had failed a median of three prior ASMs, including first-line benzodiazepine and second-line IV ASM therapy. Median time to SE cessation following ganaxolone initiation was 5 min. No patient required escalation to third-line IV anesthetics during the 24-h period following ganaxolone initiation. Two treatment-related serious adverse events (sedation) were reported. Of the three deaths, none was considered related to ganaxolone; all occurred 9-22 days after completing ganaxolone.

SIGNIFICANCE

IV ganaxolone achieved rapid and durable seizure control in patients with RSE, and showed acceptable safety and tolerability.

Determinants of mortality and long-term outcome in children with refractory and super refractory status epilepticus

AIM

To evaluate factors associated with progression of convulsive refractory status epilepticus(RSE) to super refractory status epilepticus(SRSE) and long term outcome in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this open cohort study, data of children admitted with convulsive RSE from 2010 to 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. The outcome at two years was graded according to the Glasgow outcome scale(GOS).

RESULTS

Fifty six children formed study population, 24 progressed to SRSE. The mean age of the study population was 9.38 ± 4.28(2-16) years. There was no significant difference for age between SRSE and RSE children (9.53 ± 4.50 years vs. 9.17 ± 4.06 years; p = 0.756). Acute symptomatic aetiology was the most common aetiology for RSE (57.1%) and SRSE (54.2%). There were no differences for aetiology between children who progressed to SRSE and those who did not. Mean length of stay in the NICU was 13.54 ± 17.53 days and children who progressed to SRSE had a longer length of stay in NICU (4.78 ± 3.03 days vs. 25.21 ± 21.77 days; p < 0.001). The mortality was 14.2%. Acidosis was more common in children who died (27.1% vs. 87.5%;p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the mortality between RSE and SRSE (9.4% vs. 20.8%; p = 0.268). At latest follow up 34 (60.7%) children had good outcome. Poor outcome was more common in children who progressed to SRSE(29.4% vs. 63.6%;p < 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Acute symptomatic etiology is more frequent in children with RSE and SRSE. Progression to SRSE did not significantly increase mortality but associated with poor GOS outcome. Encouragingly, 60% of children had good outcome.

Frequency and Types of Complications Encountered in Patients With Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus in the Neurological ICU: Impact on Outcome

Objectives. The frequency and types of complications in patients with nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) who are followed up in the intensive care unit (ICU), and the impact of these complications on outcome are not well-known. We investigated the complications and their effects on prognosis in NCSE patients. Methods. After reviewing the video-EEG monitoring (VEEGM) reports of all the consecutive patients who were followed up in our ICU between 2009 and 2019, we identified two groups of patients: 1-patients with NCSE (study group) and 2-patients who underwent VEEGM for possible NCSE but did not have ictal recordings (no-NCSE group). Electronic health records were reviewed to identify demographic and clinical data, duration of ICU care, medical and surgical complications, pharmacologic treatment, and outcome. These parameters were compared statistically between the groups. We also investigated the parameters affecting prognosis at discharge. Results. Thirty-two patients with NCSE comprised the study group. Infection developed in 84%. More than half were intubated, had tracheostomy or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy application. Refractory NCSE was associated with significantly more frequent complications and worse outcome. There was a higher tendency of infections in the study group (P = .059). Higher organ failure scores and prolonged stay in ICU predicted worse outcome (P < .05). Conclusion. The frequency of complications in patients with NCSE who are cared for in the ICU is considerable. Most of the complications are similar to the other patients in ICU, except for the higher frequency of infections. Increased physician awareness about modifiable parameters and timely interventions might help improve prognosis.

[S2k guidelines: status epilepticus in adulthood : Guidelines of the German Society for Neurology]

This S2k guideline on diagnosis and treatment of status epilepticus (SE) in adults is based on the last published version from 2021. New definitions and evidence were included in the guideline and the clinical pathway. A seizures lasting longer than 5 minutes (or ≥ 2 seizures over more than 5 mins without intermittend recovery to the preictal neurological state. Initial diagnosis should include a cCT or, if possible, an MRI. The EEG is highly relevant for diagnosis and treatment-monitoring of non-convulsive SE and for the exclusion or diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures. As the increasing evidence supports the relevance of inflammatory comorbidities (e.g. pneumonia) related clinical chemistry should be obtained and repeated over the course of a SE treatment, and antibiotic therapy initiated if indicated.Treatment is applied on four levels: 1. Initial SE: An adequate dose of benzodiazepine is given i.v., i.m., or i.n.; 2. Benzodiazepine-refractory SE: I.v. drugs of 1st choice are levetiracetam or valproate; 3. Refractory SE (RSE) or 4. Super-refractory SE (SRSE): I.v. propofol or midazolam alone or in combination or thiopental in anaesthetic doses are given. In focal non-convulsive RSE the induction of a therapeutic coma depends on the circumstances and is not mandatory. In SRSE the ketogenic diet should be given. I.v. ketamine or inhalative isoflorane can be considered. In selected cased electroconvulsive therapy or, if a resectable epileptogenic zone can be defined epilepsy surgery can be applied. I.v. allopregnanolone or systemic hypothermia should not be used.

Parental perception of FIRES outcomes, emotional states, and social media usage

Objective

To investigate parental perception of FIRES outcomes, assess emotional states and related social media usage.

Methods

A survey‐based study of parents of children with FIRES participating in a FIRES‐specific Facebook group was performed. The survey collected information on medical aspects of their child's course in the acute, subacute, and chronic periods, emotional states, and social media usage. Child outcome was assessed utilizing the pediatric extended Glasgow outcome scale (GOS‐E). Parental emotional states were assessed utilizing the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS). Descriptive statistics were performed. Associations were described using the Spearman rank correlation. Open‐ended questions were included. Thematic analysis was performed.

Results

Twenty‐nine surveys were analyzed. All children were in the chronic phase at time of survey response, except for two who died. Mothers answered 22 surveys, and fathers answered seven. Median age at FIRES presentation was 5.6 years [IQR 4.2‐8.95], with a median number of 3 seizures per week [IQR 0‐10, range 0‐50], 4 daily anti‐seizure medicines [IQR 3‐5], and chronic GOS‐E of 6 [IQR 2‐8 range 2‐8]. Most parents reported none to mild levels of depression, anxiety, and stress. Higher seizure burden positively correlated with parental depression symptoms (r = .41 (95% CI 0.01, 0.70), P = .045). Most parents found social media helpful with coping and 96% desired FIRES research advertised. Twenty‐five parents shared their recommendations to fellow parents and the medical team in an open‐ended format. Themes included support, expertise, and medical advice.

Significance

Despite their children's significantly impaired functional outcome after FIRES and high rates of medically refractory epilepsy, the cohort demonstrated remarkable emotional resilience. They perceive social media as beneficial, are interested in social media‐advertised research, and share valuable advice. Social media may serve as an introductory platform to enhance the physician‐scientist‐parent/patient relationship.

Safety and Efficacy of Coma Induction Following First-Line Treatment in Status Epilepticus: A 2-Center Study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the safety and efficacy of artificial coma induction to treat status epilepticus (SE) immediately after first-line antiseizure treatment instead of following the recommended approach of first using second-line drugs.

METHODS

Clinical and electrophysiologic data of all adult patients treated for SE from 2017 to 2018 in the Swiss academic medical care centers from Basel and Geneva were retrospectively assessed. Primary outcomes were return to premorbid neurologic function and in-hospital death. Secondary outcomes were the emergence of complications during SE, duration of SE, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays.

RESULTS

Of 230 patients, 205 received treatment escalation after first-line medication. Of those, 27.3% were directly treated with artificial coma and 72.7% with second-line nonanesthetic antiseizure drugs. Of the latter, 16.6% were subsequently put on artificial coma after failure of second-line treatment. Multivariable analyses revealed increasing odds for coma induction after first-line treatment with younger age, the presence of convulsions, and an increased SE severity as quantified by the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS). While outcomes and complications did not differ compared to patients with treatment escalation according to the guidelines, coma induction after first-line treatment was associated with shorter SE duration and ICU and hospital stays.

CONCLUSIONS

Early induction of artificial coma is performed in more than every fourth patient and especially in younger patients presenting with convulsions and more severe SE. Our data demonstrate that this aggressive treatment escalation was not associated with an increase in complications but with shorter duration of SE and ICU and hospital stays.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that early induction of artificial coma after unsuccessful first-line treatment for SE is associated with shorter duration of SE and ICU and hospital stays compared to the use of a second-line nonanesthetic antiseizure drug instead of or before anesthetics, without an associated increase in complications.

Early Neurologic Recovery, Practice Pattern Variation, and the Risk of Endotracheal Intubation Following Established Status Epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the association between early neurologic recovery, practice pattern variation, and endotracheal intubation during established status epilepticus, we performed a secondary analysis within the cohort of patients enrolled in the Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT).

METHODS

We evaluated factors associated with the endpoint of endotracheal intubation occurring within 120 minutes of ESETT study drug initiation. We defined a blocked, stepwise multivariate regression, examining 4 phases during status epilepticus management: (1) baseline characteristics, (2) acute treatment, (3) 20-minute neurologic recovery, and (4) 60-minute recovery, including seizure cessation and improving responsiveness.

RESULTS

Of 478 patients, 117 (24.5%) were intubated within 120 minutes. Among high-enrolling sites, intubation rates ranged from 4% to 32% at pediatric sites and 19% to 39% at adult sites. Baseline characteristics, including seizure precipitant, benzodiazepine dosing, and admission vital signs, provided limited discrimination for predicting intubation (area under the curve [AUC] 0.63). However, treatment at sites with an intubation rate in the highest (vs lowest) quartile strongly predicted endotracheal intubation independently of other treatment variables (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.08-21.4, model AUC 0.70). Site-specific variation was the factor most strongly associated with endotracheal intubation after adjustment for 20-minute (aOR 23.4, 95% CI 6.99-78.3, model AUC 0.88) and 60-minute (aOR 14.7, 95% CI 3.20-67.5, model AUC 0.98) neurologic recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Endotracheal intubation after established status epilepticus is strongly associated with site-specific practice pattern variation, independently of baseline characteristics, and early neurologic recovery and should not alone serve as a clinical trial endpoint in established status epilepticus.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01960075.

Update on the management of status epilepticus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Randomized controlled trials investigating the initial pharmacological treatment of status epilepticus have been recently published. Furthermore, status epilepticus arising in comatose survivors after cardiac arrest has received increasing attention in the last years. This review offers an updated assessment of status epilepticus treatment in these different scenarios.

RECENT FINDINGS

Initial benzodiazepines underdosing is common and correlates with development of status epilepticus refractoriness. The recently published ESETT trial provides high-level evidence regarding the equivalence of fosphenytoin, valproate, and levetiracetam as a second-line option. Myoclonus or epileptiform transients on electroencephalography occur in up to 1/3 of patients surviving a cardiac arrest. Contrary to previous assumptions regarding an almost invariable association with death, at least 1/10 of them may awaken with reasonably good prognosis, if treated. Multimodal prognostication including clinical examination, EEG, somatosensory evoked potentials, biochemical markers, and neuroimaging help identifying patients with a chance to recover consciousness, in whom a trial with antimyoclonic compounds and at times general anesthetics is indicated.

SUMMARY

There is a continuous, albeit relatively slow progress in knowledge regarding different aspect of status epilepticus; recent findings refine some treatment strategies and help improving patients' outcomes. Further high-quality studies are clearly needed to further improve the management of these patients, especially those with severe, refractory status epilepticus forms.

Antiepileptic Drug Therapy for Status Epilepticus

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most serious neurologic emergencies. SE is a condition that encompasses a broad range of semiologic subtypes and heterogeneous etiologies. The treatment of SE primarily involves the management of the underlying etiology and the use of antiepileptic drug therapy to rapidly terminate seizure activities. The Drug Committee of the Korean Epilepsy Society performed a review of existing guidelines and literature with the aim of providing practical recommendations for antiepileptic drug therapy. This article is one of a series of review articles by the Drug Committee and it summarizes staged antiepileptic drug therapy for SE. While evidence of good quality supports the use of benzodiazepines as the first-line treatment of SE, such evidence informing the administration of second- or third-line treatments is lacking; hence, the recommendations presented herein concerning the treatment of established and refractory SE are based on case series and expert opinions. The choice of antiepileptic drugs in each stage should consider the characteristics and circumstances of each patient, as well as their estimated benefit and risk to them. In tandem with the antiepileptic drug therapy, careful searching for and treatment of the underlying etiology are required.

Would people living with epilepsy benefit from palliative care?

Palliative care (PC) is an approach to the care of persons living with serious illness and their families that focuses on improving quality of life and reducing suffering by addressing complex medical symptoms, psychosocial needs, spiritual well-being, and advance care planning. While PC has traditionally been associated with hospice care for persons with cancer, there is now recognition that PC is relevant to many noncancer diagnoses, including neurologic illness, and at multiple points along the illness journey, not just end of life. Despite the recent growth of the field of neuropalliative care there has been scant attention paid to the relevance of PC principles in epilepsy or the potential for PC approaches to improve outcomes for persons living with epilepsy and their families. We believe this has been a significant oversight and that PC may provide a useful framework for addressing the many sources of suffering facing persons living with epilepsy, for engaging patients and families in challenging conversations, and to focus efforts to improve models of care for this population. In this manuscript we review areas of significant unmet needs where a PC approach may improve patient and family-centered outcomes, including complex symptom management, goals of care, advance care planning, psychosocial support for patient and family and spiritual well-being. When relevant we highlight areas where epilepsy patients may have unique PC needs compared to other patient populations and conclude with suggestions for future research, clinical, and educational efforts.

A Theoretical Paradigm for Evaluating Risk-Benefit of Status Epilepticus Treatment

Aggressive treatment of status epilepticus with anesthetic drugs can provide rapid seizure control, but it might lead to serious medical complications and worse outcomes. Using a decision analysis approach, this concise review provides a framework for individualized decision making about aggressive and nonaggressive treatment in status epilepticus. The authors propose and review the most relevant parameters guiding the risk-benefit analysis of treatment aggressiveness in status epilepticus and present real-world-based case examples to illustrate how these tools could be used at the bedside and serve to guide future research in refractory status epilepticus treatment.

Acute Provoked Seizures-Work-Up and Management in Adults

Acute provoked seizures, also known as acute symptomatic seizures, occur secondary to a neurological or systemic precipitant, commonly presenting as a first-time seizure. In this article, we will discuss etiology, emergent protocols, medical work-up, initial treatment, and management of these seizures. The definitions, classifications, and management of convulsive status epilepticus and nonconvulsive status epilepticus in an acute setting will also be reviewed.

Validation of the Status epilepticus severity score (STESS) at high-complexity hospitals in Medellín, Colombia

PURPOSE

The Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) is one of the most well-known clinical scoring systems to predict mortality in status epilepticus (SE). The objective of this study was to validate STESS in a Colombian population.

METHOD

We evaluated historical data of adult patients (age ≥16 years) with a clinical or electroencephalographic diagnosis of SE admitted between 2014 and 2017. Prospectively, we included patients admitted from January to June of 2018. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-analysis, determination of best cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were performed.

RESULTS

The sample was 395 patients, with in-hospital mortality of 16.8 %. The area under the ROC curve for STESS was 0.84. A cutoff point of ≥3 produced the highest sensitivity of 84.9 % (95 % CI 73.9 %-92.5 %) and a specificity of 65.7 % (95 % CI 60.2 %-70.8 %), with a positive likelihood ratio of 2.5 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.2.

CONCLUSIONS

STESS is a useful tool to predict mortality in patients with SE. In Medellin, Colombia, a STESS < 3 allows the identification of the patients who survive reliably. Those patients with a score <3 may have a better prognosis, and treatment with fewer side effects than anaesthetics could be suggested, always remembering the importance of the treating physician's clinical judgement.

Treatment of Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Comprehensive Review by the American Epilepsy Society Treatments Committee

Purpose:

Established tonic–clonic status epilepticus (SE) does not stop in one-third of patients when treated with an intravenous (IV) benzodiazepine bolus followed by a loading dose of a second antiseizure medication (ASM). These patients have refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and a high risk of morbidity and death. For patients with convulsive refractory status epilepticus (CRSE), we sought to determine the strength of evidence for 8 parenteral ASMs used as third-line treatment in stopping clinical CRSE.

Methods:

A structured literature search (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL) was performed to identify original studies on the treatment of CRSE in children and adults using IV brivaracetam, ketamine, lacosamide, levetiracetam (LEV), midazolam (MDZ), pentobarbital (PTB; and thiopental), propofol (PRO), and valproic acid (VPA). Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), magnesium sulfate, and pyridoxine were added to determine the effectiveness in treating hard-to-control seizures in special circumstances. Studies were evaluated by predefined criteria and were classified by strength of evidence in stopping clinical CRSE (either as the last ASM added or compared to another ASM) according to the 2017 American Academy of Neurology process.

Results:

No studies exist on the use of ACTH, corticosteroids, or IVIg for the treatment of CRSE. Small series and case reports exist on the use of these agents in the treatment of RSE of suspected immune etiology, severe epileptic encephalopathies, and rare epilepsy syndromes. For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists on the effectiveness of brivaracetam (level U; 4 class IV studies). For children and adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists on the effectiveness of ketamine (level U; 25 class IV studies). For children and adults with CRSE, it is possible that lacosamide is effective at stopping RSE (level C; 2 class III, 14 class IV studies). For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists that LEV and VPA are equally effective (level U, 1 class III study). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support the effectiveness of LEV (level U; 2 class IV studies). Magnesium sulfate may be effective in the treatment of eclampsia, but there are only case reports of its use for CRSE. For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support either that MDZ and diazepam infusions are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study) or that MDZ infusion and PTB are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support either that MDZ infusion and PRO are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study) or that low-dose and high-dose MDZ infusions are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For children and adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that MDZ is effective as the last drug added (level U; 29 class IV studies). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PTB and PRO are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For adults and children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PTB is effective as the last ASM added (level U; 42 class IV studies). For CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PRO is effective as the last ASM used (level U; 26 class IV studies). No pediatric-only studies exist on the use of PRO for CRSE, and many guidelines do not recommend its use in children aged <16 years. Pyridoxine-dependent and pyridoxine-responsive epilepsies should be considered in children presenting between birth and age 3 years with refractory seizures and no imaging lesion or other acquired cause of seizures. For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists that VPA and diazepam infusion are equally effective (level U, 1 class III study). No class I to III studies have been reported in adults treated with VPA for CRSE. In comparison, for children and adults with established convulsive SE (ie, not RSE), after an initial benzodiazepine, it is likely that loading doses of LEV 60 mg/kg, VPA 40 mg/kg, and fosphenytoin 20 mg PE/kg are equally effective at stopping SE (level B, 1 class I study).

Conclusions:

Mostly insufficient evidence exists on the efficacy of stopping clinical CRSE using brivaracetam, lacosamide, LEV, valproate, ketamine, MDZ, PTB, and PRO either as the last ASM or compared to others of these drugs. Adrenocorticotropic hormone, IVIg, corticosteroids, magnesium sulfate, and pyridoxine have been used in special situations but have not been studied for CRSE. For the treatment of established convulsive SE (ie, not RSE), LEV, VPA, and fosphenytoin are likely equally effective, but whether this is also true for CRSE is unknown. Triple-masked, randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of parenteral anesthetizing and nonanesthetizing ASMs in the treatment of CRSE.

Therapeutic Options for Patients with Refractory Status Epilepticus in Palliative Settings or with a Limitation of Life-Sustaining Therapies: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) represents a serious medical condition requiring early and targeted therapy. Given the increasing number of elderly or multimorbid patients with a limitation of life-sustaining therapy (LOT) or within a palliative care setting (PCS), guidelines-oriented therapy escalation options for RSE have to be omitted frequently.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review sought to summarize the evidence for fourth-line antiseizure drugs (ASDs) and other minimally or non-invasive therapeutic options beyond guideline recommendations in patients with RSE to elaborate on possible treatment options for patients undergoing LOT or in a PCS.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, focusing on fourth-line ASDs or other minimally or non-invasive therapeutic options was performed in February and June 2020 using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. The search terminology was constructed using the name of the specific ASD or therapy option and the term 'status epilepticus' with the use of Boolean operators, e.g. "(brivaracetam) AND (status epilepticus)". The respective Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Emtree terms were used, if available.

RESULTS

There is currently no level 1, grade A evidence for the use of ASDs in RSE. The best evidence was found for the use of lacosamide and topiramate (level 3, grade C), followed by brivaracetam, perampanel (each level 4, grade D) and stiripentol, oxcarbazepine and zonisamide (each level 5, grade D). Regarding non-medicinal options, there is little evidence for the use of the ketogenic diet (level 4, grade D) and magnesium sulfate (level 5, grade D) in RSE. The broad use of immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatment options in the absence of a presumed autoimmune etiology cannot be recommended; however, if an autoimmune etiology is assumed, steroid pulse, intravenous immunoglobulins and plasma exchange/plasmapheresis should be considered (level 4, grade D). Even if several studies suggested that the use of neurosteroids (level 5, grade D) is beneficial in RSE, the current data situation indicates that there is formal evidence against it.

CONCLUSIONS

RSE in patients undergoing LOT or in a PCS represents a challenge for modern clinicians and epileptologists. The evidence for the use of ASDs in RSE beyond that in current guidelines is low, but several effective and well-tolerated options are available that should be considered in this patient population. More so than in any other population, advance care planning, advance directives, and medical ethical aspects have to be considered carefully before and during therapy.

Dexamethasone as Abortive Treatment for Refractory Seizures or Status Epilepticus in the Inpatient Setting

Refractory seizures or status epilepticus (RS/SE) continues to be a challenge in the inpatient setting. Failure to abort a seizure with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may lead to intubation and treatment with general anesthesia exposing patients to complications, extending hospitalization, and increasing the cost of care. Studies have shown a key role of inflammatory mediators in seizure generation and termination. We describe 4 patients with RS/SE that was aborted when dexamethasone was added to conventional AEDs: a 61-year-old female with temporal lobe epilepsy who presented with delirium, nonconvulsive status epilepticus, and oculomyoclonic status; a 56-year-old female with history of traumatic left frontal lobe hemorrhage who developed right face and hand epilepsia partialis continua followed by refractory focal clonic seizures; a 51-year-old male with history of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage who exhibited left-sided epilepsia partialis continua; and a 75-year-old female with history of breast cancer who manifested nonconvulsive status epilepticus and refractory focal clonic seizures. All patients continued experiencing RS/SE despite first- and second-line therapy, and one patient continued to experience RS/SE despite third-line therapy. Failure to abort RS/SE with conventional therapy motivated us to administer intravenous dexamethasone. A 10-mg load was given (except in one patient) followed by 4.0- 5.2 mg q6h. All clinical and electrographic seizures stopped 3-4 days after starting dexamethasone. When dexamethasone was discontinued 1-3 days after seizures stopped, all patients remained seizure-free on 2-3 AEDs. The cessation of RS/SE when dexamethasone was added to conventional antiseizure therapy suggests that inflammatory processes are involved in the pathogenesis of RS/SE.

Causes of Death in Status Epilepticus

OBJECTIVES

To determine the causes of death in patients with status epilepticus. To analyze the relative contributions of seizure etiology, seizure refractoriness, use of mechanical ventilation, anesthetic drugs for seizure control, and medical complications to in-hospital and 90-day mortality, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Single-center neuroscience ICU.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with status epilepticus were identified by retrospective search of electronic database from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

Review of electronic medical records.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were collected. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to determine whether the use of anesthetic drugs, mechanical ventilation, Status Epilepticus Severity Score, refractoriness of seizures, etiology of seizures, or medical complications were associated with in-hospital, 90-day mortality or discharge disposition. Among 244 patients with status epilepticus (mean age was 64 yr [interquartile range, 42-76], 55% male, median Status Epilepticus Severity Score 3 [interquartile range, 2-4]), 24 received anesthetic drug infusions for seizure control. In-hospital and 90-day mortality rates were 9.2% and 19.2%, respectively. Death was preceded by withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in 19 patients (86.3%) and cardiac arrest in three (13.7%). Only Status Epilepticus Severity Score was associated with in-hospital and 90-day mortality, whereas the use of anesthetic drugs for seizure control, mechanical ventilation, medical complications, etiology, and refractoriness of seizures were not. Hospital length of stay was longer in patients with medical complications (p = 0.0091), refractory seizures (p = 0.0077), and in those who required anesthetic drugs for seizure control (p = 0.0035). Patients who had refractory seizures were less likely to be discharged home (odds ratio, 0.295; CI, 0.143-0.608; p = 0.0009).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, death primarily resulted from the underlying neurologic disease and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and not from our treatment choices. Use of anesthetic drugs, medical complications, and mechanical ventilation were not associated with in-hospital and 90-day mortality.

Electrographic predictors of successful weaning from anaesthetics in refractory status epilepticus

Intravenous third-line anaesthetic agents are typically titrated in refractory status epilepticus to achieve either seizure suppression or burst suppression on continuous EEG. However, the optimum treatment paradigm is unknown and little data exist to guide the withdrawal of anaesthetics in refractory status epilepticus. Premature withdrawal of anaesthetics risks the recurrence of seizures, whereas the prolonged use of anaesthetics increases the risk of treatment-associated adverse effects. This study sought to measure the accuracy of features of EEG activity during anaesthetic weaning in refractory status epilepticus as predictors of successful weaning from intravenous anaesthetics. We prespecified a successful anaesthetic wean as the discontinuation of intravenous anaesthesia without developing recurrent status epilepticus, and a wean failure as either recurrent status epilepticus or the resumption of anaesthesia for the purpose of treating an EEG pattern concerning for incipient status epilepticus. We evaluated two types of features as predictors of successful weaning: spectral components of the EEG signal, and spatial-correlation-based measures of functional connectivity. The results of these analyses were used to train a classifier to predict wean outcome. Forty-seven consecutive anaesthetic weans (23 successes, 24 failures) were identified from a single-centre cohort of patients admitted with refractory status epilepticus from 2016 to 2019. Spectral components of the EEG revealed no significant differences between successful and unsuccessful weans. Analysis of functional connectivity measures revealed that successful anaesthetic weans were characterized by the emergence of larger, more densely connected, and more highly clustered spatial functional networks, yielding 75.5% (95% confidence interval: 73.1-77.8%) testing accuracy in a bootstrap analysis using a hold-out sample of 20% of data for testing and 74.6% (95% confidence interval 73.2-75.9%) testing accuracy in a secondary external validation cohort, with an area under the curve of 83.3%. Distinct signatures in the spatial networks of functional connectivity emerge during successful anaesthetic liberation in status epilepticus; these findings are absent in patients with anaesthetic wean failure. Identifying features that emerge during successful anaesthetic weaning may allow faster and more successful anaesthetic liberation after refractory status epilepticus.

Factors affecting mortality of refractory status epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the factors affecting the mortality of refractory status epilepticus (RSE) in comparison with non-refractory status epilepticus (non-RSE).

MATERIAL-METHOD

Included in this retrospective study were 109 status epilepticus cases who were hospitalized in the neurological intensive care unit Katip Celebi University. Fifty-two were RSE and 57 were non-RSE. All clinical data were gathered from the hospital archives. Factors which may cause mortality were categorized for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

While elderly age, continuous clinical seizure activity, absence of former seizure, infection, prolonged stay of ICU, anesthesia, and cardiac comorbidity were significantly related to mortality in the RSE subgroup, potentially fatal accompanying diseases were significantly related to mortality in the non-RSE subgroup. No significant relationship was found between mortality and refractoriness. Multivariate analysis revealed that a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) at presentation of 8 or lower was the independent predictor of mortality both in the general SE population (P = .017) and in the RSE subgroup (P = .007). Intubation (P = .011) and hypotension (P = .011) were the other independent predictors of mortality in the general SE population. No independent predictor of mortality was detected in the non-RSE subgroup.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Intubation, hypotension, and a low GCS at presentation could be the main factors which could alert clinicians of an increased risk of mortality in SE patients. Although non-RSE and RSE had similar rates of mortality in the ICU, the mortality-related factors of SE vary in the RSE and the non-RSE subgroups.

Bedside interpretation of simplified continuous EEG after cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Continuous EEG-monitoring (cEEG) in the ICU is recommended to assess prognosis and detect seizures after cardiac arrest but implementation is often limited by the lack of EEG-technicians and experts. The aim of the study was to assess ICU physicians ability to perform preliminary interpretations of a simplified cEEG in the post cardiac arrest setting.

METHODS

Five ICU physicians received training in interpretation of simplified cEEG - total training duration 1 day. The ICU physicians then interpreted 71 simplified cEEG recordings from 37 comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. The cEEG included amplitude-integrated EEG trends and two channels with original EEG-signals. Basic EEG background patterns and presence of epileptiform discharges or seizure activity were assessed on 5-grade rank-ordered scales based on standardized EEG terminology. An EEG-expert was used as reference.

RESULTS

There was substantial agreement (κ 0.69) for EEG background patterns and moderate agreement (κ 0.43) for epileptiform discharges between ICU physicians and the EEG-expert. Sensitivity for detecting seizure activity by ICU physicians was limited (50%), but with high specificity (87%).

CONCLUSIONS

After cardiac arrest, preliminary bedside interpretations of simplified cEEGs by trained ICU physicians may allow earlier detection of clinically relevant cEEG changes, prompting changes in patient management as well as additional evaluation by an EEG-expert. This strategy requires awareness of limitations of both the simplified electrode montage and the cEEG interpretations performed by ICU physicians. cEEG evaluation by an expert should not be delayed.

Predictors of mortality at one year after generalized convulsive status epilepticus

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening neurologic emergency, which requires prompt medical treatment. Little is known of the long-term survival of SE. The aim of this study was to investigate which factors influence 90 days and 1-year mortality after SE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study includes all consecutive adult (>16 years) patients (N = 70) diagnosed with generalized convulsive SE (GCSE) in Helsinki University Central Hospital (HUCH) emergency department (ED) over 2 years. We defined specific factors including patient demographics, GCSE characteristics, treatment, complications, delays in treatment, and outcome at hospital discharge and determined their relation to 90 days and 1-year mortality after GCSE by using logistic regression models. Survival analyses at 1 year after GCSE were performed with Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was 7.1%. Mortality rate was 14.3% at 90 days and 24.3% at 1 year after GCSE. In the univariate logistic regression analysis, Status Epilepticus Severity Score > 4 (STESS) (ODDS = 7.30, p = 0.012), worse-than-baseline condition at hospital discharge (ODDS = 3.5, p = 0.006), long delays in attaining seizure freedom (ODDS = 2.2, p = 0.041), and consciousness (ODDS = 3.4, p = 0.014) were risk factors for mortality at 90 days whereas epilepsy (ODDS = 0.2, p = 0.014) and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) >3 at hospital discharge (ODDS = 0.05, p = 0.006) were protective factors. Risk factors for mortality at 1 year were STESS >4 (ODDS = 5.1, p = 0.028), use of vasopressors (ODDS = 8.2, p = 0.049), and worse-than-baseline condition at discharge (ODDS = 7.8, p = 0.010) while GOS >3 (ODDS = 0.2, p = 0.005) was protective. The univariate survival analysis at 1 year confirmed the significant findings regarding parameters STESS >4 (Hazard ratio (HR) = 4.1, p = 0.009), worse-than-baseline condition (HR = 6.2, p = 0.015), GOS >3 (HR = 0.2, p = 0.004) at hospital discharge and epilepsy (HR = 0.4, p = 0.044). Additionally, diagnostic delay over 6 h (HR = 3.8, p = 0.022) and Complication Burden Index (CBI) as an ordinal variable (0-2, 3-6, >6) (HR = 2.7, p = 0.027) were predictive for mortality. In the multivariate survival analysis, STESS > 4 (HR = 5.1, p = 0.007), CBI (HR = 3.2, p = 0.025, ordinal variable), diagnostic delay over 6 h (HR = 7.2, p = 0.003), and worse-than-baseline condition at hospital discharge (HR = 5.8, p = 0.027) were all independent risk factors for mortality at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe form of SE, delayed recognition of GCSE, high number of complications during treatment period, and poor condition at hospital discharge are all independent predictors of long-term mortality. Most of these factors are also associated with mortality at 90 days, though at that point, delays in treatment seem to have a greater impact on prognosis than at 1 year. This article is part of the Special Issue "Proceedings of the 7th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures.

Why do patients die after status epilepticus?

The epidemiology of status epilepticus (SE) and predictors of outcome in particular have been well described with consistent findings around the world. Understanding of the actual causes of death in patients hospitalized with SE is limited. The following is a summary of published information about causes of death in patients hospitalized with SE and a reconciling of conflicting studies examining the influence of continuous intravenous anesthetic drugs on the mortality of SE. A recently published paper was presented at the Colloquium and is summarized here, along with new data addressing an audience question about withdrawal of care in SE. In the spirit of the conference, we end with a call to arms and invitation for collaborators. Proceedings of the 7th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures.

Association of Time to Treatment With Short-term Outcomes for Pediatric Patients With Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus

Importance

Treatment delay for seizures can lead to longer seizure duration. Whether treatment delay is associated with major adverse outcomes, such as death, remains unknown.

Objective

To evaluate whether untimely first-line benzodiazepine treatment is associated with unfavorable short-term outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study included 218 pediatric patients admitted between June 1, 2011, and July 7, 2016, into the 11 tertiary hospitals in the United States within the Pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group. Patients, ranging in age from 1 month to 21 years, with refractory convulsive status epilepticus (RCSE) that did not stop after the administration of at least 2 antiseizure medications were included. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: those who received the first-line benzodiazepine treatment in less than 10 minutes and those who received it 10 or more minutes after seizure onset (untimely). Data were collected and analyzed from June 1, 2011, to July 7, 2016.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was death during the related hospital admission. The secondary outcome was the need for continuous infusion for seizure termination. Multivariate analysis of mortality controlled for structural cause, febrile RCSE, age, and previous neurological history (including previous RCSE events). Use of continuous infusions was additionally adjusted for generalized RCSE, continuous RCSE, and 5 or more administrations of antiseizure medication.

Results

A total of 218 patients were included, among whom 116 (53.2%) were male and the median (interquartile range) age was 4.0 (1.2-9.6) years. The RCSE started in the prehospital setting for 139 patients (63.8%). Seventy-four patients (33.9%) received their first-line benzodiazepine treatment in less than 10 minutes, and 144 (66.1%) received untimely first-line benzodiazepine treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that patients who received untimely first-line benzodiazepine treatment had higher odds of death (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 11.0; 95% CI, 1.43 to ∞; P = .02), had greater odds of receiving continuous infusion (AOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.01-3.36; P = .047), had longer convulsive seizure duration (AOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.38-4.88; P = .003), and had more frequent hypotension (AOR 2.3; 95% CI, 1.16-4.63; P = .02). In addition, the timing of the first-line benzodiazepine treatment was correlated with the timing of the second-line (95% CI, 0.64-0.95; P < .001) and third-line antiseizure medications (95% CI, 0.25-0.78; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

Among pediatric patients with RCSE, an untimely first-line benzodiazepine treatment is independently associated with a higher frequency of death, use of continuous infusions, longer convulsion duration, and more frequent hypotension. Results of this study raise the question as to whether poor outcomes could, in part, be prevented by earlier administration of treatment.

Change in Mortality of Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus in High-Income Countries Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Status epilepticus (SE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Since the late 1990s, a more aggressive management of prolonged convulsive seizures lasting longer than 5 minutes has been advocated.

Objective

To determine if convulsive SE mortality has decreased during a time of increasing advocacy for out-of-hospital treatment and escalating and earlier treatment protocols for prolonged seizures and SE.

Data Source

This systemic review and meta-analysis on studies focused on the mortality of convulsive status epilepticus was conducted by searching MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL Plus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews between January 1, 1990, and June 30, 2017.

Study Selection

Studies were excluded if they had fewer than 30 participants (<20 for refractory SE), were limited to SE of single specific etiology or an evaluation of a single treatment modality, or were studies of nonconvulsive SE.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data were abstracted and their quality was assessed via a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale independently by 2 reviewers (A.N. and T.D.G.) using the Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality or 30-day case fatality expressed as proportional mortality.

Results

Sixty-one studies were included in the analysis. The pooled mortality ratios were 15.9% (95% CI, 12.7-19.2) for adult studies, 13.0% (95% CI, 7.2-19.0) for all-age population studies, 3.6% (95% CI, 2.0%-5.2%) for pediatric studies, and 17.3% (95% CI, 9.8-24.7) for refractory SE studies, with very high between-study heterogeneity. We found no evidence of a change in prognosis over time nor by the definition of SE used.

Conclusions and Relevance

The mortality of convulsive SE is higher in adults than in children and there was no evidence for improved survival over time. Although there are many explanations for these findings, they can be explained by aetiology of SE being the major determinant of mortality. However, there are potential confounders, including differences in case ascertainment and study heterogeneity. This meta-analysis highlights the need for strict international guidelines for the study of this condition.

Duration of therapeutic coma and outcome of refractory status epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

Examine the association of duration of therapeutic coma (TC) with seizure recurrence, morbidity, and mortality in refractory status epilepticus (RSE). Define an optimal window for TC that provides sustained seizure control and minimizes complications.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational cohort study involving patients who presented with RSE to the University of Alabama at Birmingham or the University of California at San Francisco from 2010 to 2016. Relationship of duration of TC with primary and secondary outcomes was evaluated using two-sample t tests, simple linear regression, and chi-square tests. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors. Predictive ability of TC for seizure recurrence was quantified using a receiver-operating characteristic curve. Youden index was used to determine an optimal cutoff value.

RESULTS

Multivariable analysis of clinical and treatment characteristics of 182 patients who were treated predominantly with propofol as anesthetic agent showed that longer duration of the first trial of TC (27.2 vs 15.6 hours) was independently associated with a higher chance of seizure recurrence following the first weaning attempt (P = 0.038) but not with poor functional neurologic outcome upon discharge, in-hospital complications, or mortality. Furthermore, higher doses of anesthetic utilized during the first trial of TC were independently associated with fewer in-hospital complications (P = 0.003) and associated with a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and total length of stay. Duration of TC was identified as an independent predictor of seizure recurrence with an optimal cutoff point at 35 hours.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study suggests that a shorter duration yet deeper TC as treatment for RSE may be more effective and safer than the currently recommended TC duration of 24-48 hours. Prospective and randomized trials should be conducted to validate these assertions.

Factors predicting cessation of status epilepticus in clinical practice: Data from a prospective observational registry (SENSE)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the initial termination rate of status epilepticus (SE) in a large observational study and explore associated variables.

METHODS

Data of adults treated for SE were collected prospectively in centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, during 4.5 years. Incident episodes of 1,049 patients were analyzed using uni- and multivariate statistics to determine factors predicting cessation of SE within 1 hour (for generalized convulsive SE [GCSE]) and 12 hours (for non-GCSE) of initiating treatment.

RESULTS

Median age at SE onset was 70 years; most frequent etiologies were remote (32%) and acute (31%). GCSE was documented in 43%. Median latency between SE onset and first treatment was 30 minutes in GCSE and 150 minutes in non-GCSE. The first intravenous compound was a benzodiazepine in 86% in GCSE and 73% in non-GCSE. Bolus doses of the first treatment step were lower than recommended by current guidelines in 76% of GCSE patients and 78% of non-GCSE patients. In 319 GCSE patients (70%), SE was ongoing 1 hour after initiating treatment and in 342 non-GCSE patients (58%) 12 hours after initiating treatment. Multivariate Cox regression demonstrated that use of benzodiazepines as first treatment step and a higher cumulative dose of anticonvulsants within the first period of treatment were associated with shorter time to cessation of SE for both groups.

INTERPRETATION

In clinical practice, treatment guidelines were not followed in a substantial proportion of patients. This underdosing correlated with lack of cessation of SE. Our data suggest that sufficiently dosed benzodiazepines should be used as a first treatment step. ANN NEUROL 2019;85:421-432.

Impact of timing of continuous intravenous anesthetic drug treatment on outcome in refractory status epilepticus

Background

Patients in refractory status epilepticus (RSE) may require treatment with continuous intravenous anesthetic drugs (cIVADs) for seizure control. The use of cIVADs, however, was recently associated with poor outcome in status epilepticus (SE), raising the question of whether cIVAD therapy should be delayed for attempts to halt seizures with repeated non-anesthetic antiepileptic drugs. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of differences in therapeutic approaches on RSE outcome using timing of cIVAD therapy as a surrogate for treatment aggressiveness.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study over 14 years (n = 77) comparing patients with RSE treated with cIVADs within and after 48 h after RSE onset, and functional status at last follow-up was the primary outcome (good = return to premorbid baseline or modified Rankin Scale score of less than 3). Secondary outcomes included discharge functional status, in-hospital mortality, RSE termination, induction of burst suppression, use of thiopental, duration of RSE after initiation of cIVADs, duration of mechanical ventilation, and occurrence of super-refractory SE. Analysis was performed on the total cohort and on subgroups defined by RSE severity according to the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) and by the variables contained therein.

Results

Fifty-three (68.8%) patients received cIVADs within the first 48 h. Early cIVAD treatment was independently associated with good outcome (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 3.175, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.273–7.918; P = 0.013) as well as lower chance of both induction of burst suppression (aRR 0.661, 95% CI 0.507–0.861; P = 0.002) and use of thiopental (aRR 0.446, 95% CI 0.205–0.874; P = 0.043). RSE duration after cIVAD initiation was shorter in the early cIVAD cohort (hazard ratio 1.796, 95% CI 1.047–3.081; P = 0.033). Timing of cIVAD use did not impact the remaining secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis revealed early cIVAD impact on the primary outcome to be driven by patients with STESS of less than 3.

Conclusions

Patients with RSE treated with cIVADs may benefit from early initiation of such therapy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2235-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Long-term outcomes of status epilepticus: A critical assessment

We reviewed 37 studies reporting long-term outcomes after a status epilepticus (SE) episode in pediatric and adult populations. Study design, length of follow-up, outcome measures, domains investigated (mortality, SE recurrence, subsequent epilepsy, cognitive outcome, functional outcome, or quality of life), and predictors of long-term outcomes are summarized. Despite heterogeneity in the design of prior studies, overall risk of poor long-term outcome after SE is high in both children and adults. Etiology is the main determinant of outcome, and the effect of age or SE duration is often difficult to distinguish from the underlying cause. The effect of the treatment on long-term outcome after SE is still unknown.