Effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in proteinuric kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Treatment of patients with IgA nephropathy: a call for a new paradigm

IgA nephropathy (IgAN), the world's most common primary glomerular disease, carries a significant lifetime risk for kidney failure as well as an enormous socioeconomic burden. In the past, studies in patients with IgAN largely focused on optimizing so-called supportive care, that is, blockade of the renin-angiotensin system, blood pressure control, and lifestyle modifications. The effectiveness of immunosuppressive measures, particularly high-dose corticosteroid therapy, has been reported variably, but there is considerable evidence for an increase in serious adverse effects with such therapies. This disappointing situation has changed dramatically with a better understanding of the pathogenesis of IgAN, and with regulatory agencies accepting changes in proteinuria and the estimated glomerular filtration rate loss or slope over 2 to 3 years as surrogate outcome markers. A multitude of new therapies are now being evaluated in IgAN, and several drugs, such as sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitors, sparsentan (a dual endothelin-1 and angiotensin II receptor blocker), nefecon (a targeted release formulation of budesonide), and iptacopan (a complement factor B inhibitor), have been approved, with more to come in the next few years. In this review, we propose a new treatment paradigm that combines therapies with different mechanisms of action to target the immune components and the chronic kidney disease components of IgAN in parallel to preserve long-term kidney survival.

Benefits of aldosterone receptor antagonism in chronic kidney disease: the BARACK-D RCT

Background

Chronic kidney disease affects around 10% of the global population and is associated with significant risk of progression to end-stage renal disease and vascular events. Aldosterone receptor antagonists such as spironolactone have shown prognostic benefits in patients with heart failure, but effects on patients with chronic kidney disease are uncertain.

Objectives

To determine the effect of low-dose spironolactone on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in people with chronic kidney disease stage 3b.

Design

Prospective randomised open blinded end-point trial.

Settings

Three hundred and twenty-nine general practitioner practices throughout the United Kingdom.

Participants

Patients meeting the criteria for chronic kidney disease stage 3b (estimated glomerular filtration rate 30-44 ml/minute/1.73 m2) according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines were recruited. Due to the higher than anticipated measurement error/fluctuations, the eligible range was extended to 30-50 ml/minute/1.73 m2 following the initial recruitment period.

Intervention

Participants were randomised 1 : 1 to receive either spironolactone 25 mg once daily in addition to standard care, or standard care only.

Outcome measures

Primary outcome was the first occurring of all-cause mortality, first hospitalisation for heart disease (coronary heart disease, arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation, sudden death, failed sudden death), stroke, heart failure, transient ischaemic attack or peripheral arterial disease, or first occurrence of any condition not listed at baseline. Secondary outcome measures included changes in blood pressure, renal function, B-type natriuretic peptide, incidence of hyperkalaemia and treatment costs and benefits.

Results

One thousand four hundred and thirty-four participants were randomised of the 3022 planned. We found no evidence of differences between the intervention and control groups in terms of effectiveness with the primary combined vascular end points, nor with the secondary clinical outcomes, including progression in renal decline. These results were similar for the total treatment periods or a 3-year follow-up period as originally planned. More adverse events were experienced and more participants discontinued treatment in the intervention group. Two-thirds of participants randomised to spironolactone stopped treatment within six months because they met pre-specified safety stop criteria. The addition of low-dose spironolactone was estimated to have a cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained value above the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's threshold of £30,000.

Limitations

Main limitations were difficulties in recruiting eligible participants resulting in an underpowered trial with poor ethnic diversity taking twice as long as planned to complete. We have explored the data in secondary analyses that indicate that, despite these difficulties, the findings were reliable.

Conclusions

The benefits of aldosterone receptor antagonism in chronic kidney disease trial found no evidence to support adding low-dose spironolactone (25 mg daily) in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3b: there were no changes to cardiovascular events during the trial follow-up, either for the combined primary or individual components. There was also no evidence of benefit observed in rates of renal function decline over the trial, but much higher initial creatinine rise and estimated glomerular filtration rate decline, and to a higher percentage rate, in the intervention arm in the first few weeks of spironolactone treatment, which resulted in a high proportion of participants discontinuing spironolactone treatment at an early stage. These higher rates of negative renal change reduced in scale over the study but did not equalise between arms. The addition of 25 mg of spironolactone therefore provided no reno- or cardio-protection and was associated with an increase in adverse events.

Future work

These findings might not be applicable to different mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists.

Study registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN44522369.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 12/01/52) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 29, No. 5. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Preserving renal function: gliflozins, GLP1 agonists, and antialdosterones

For a long time, a prognostic and therapeutic fatalism accompanied even the most motivated clinicians when they had to deal with a progressive decline in renal function; the modest successes were nullified by an increasingly aggressive syndrome whose therapy had remained the same for more than 30 years. In the meantime, the increased understanding of the physiopathological mechanisms connected to it had not been accompanied by an equal development of drugs capable of counteracting it, and this, also due to the progressive aging of the population, had rapidly made 'chronic kidney disease' (CKD) a problem of World Public Health due to its incidence, prevalence, and exponentially increasing costs in every part of the world. The progressive reduction of glomerular filtration rate, as has been known for some time, is accompanied by an increase in cardiovascular risk, understood as fatal and non-fatal heart attack, stroke, heart failure, and mortality. Therefore, every effort must be aimed at preventing or slowing the decline of renal function to reduce not only critical renal events (the need for dialysis or transplant among the most feared) but also the incidence of cardiovascular events. Since the disease is asymptomatic for a long time (it is often detected occasionally and with culpable delay), it is essential to make a correct and early assessment of renal function with appropriate methods. Once CKD was identified, clinicians, to slow its progression, could rely for a long time only on strict control of those risk factors most responsible for worsening it, such as diabetes and its complications, on the optimization of high blood pressure values and the mandatory use of drugs blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, particularly in the presence of albuminuria. This strategy has proven to be only partially effective over time, and most patients still showed a progressive worsening of renal function. Only in the last few years have we had access to two classes of innovative drugs, such as gliflozins and incretins, that have imposed themselves on the therapeutic scene because they have shown that they can slow the progression of CKD, first in patients with Type 2 diabetes and subsequently in patients with CKD regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes. Unexpectedly and convincingly, they have also shown a significant impact on cardiovascular prognosis. Initially antidiabetic drugs, their efficacy has forced the reviewers of both cardiology and nephrology guidelines to indicate them among the drugs to use. Lately, the class of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist drugs has been enriched by finerenone. This molecule has favourable pharmacokinetic characteristics compared with previous medications of the same class and tested in Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD) which has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular and renal disease in diabetic patients compared with placebo.

Can we slow down the decline in renal function?

The 'chronic kidney disease' (CKD) definition that best outlines the complex syndrome commonly called 'kidney failure' has become a problem of World Public Health due to its incidence and prevalence and due to exponentially increasing costs in every part of the world. The progressive reduction in the glomerular filtration rate, as known, goes hand in hand with an increase in cardiovascular risk understood as fatal and non-fatal heart attack, stroke, heart failure, and mortality. Therefore, every effort must aim at preventing or slowing down the decline in renal function in order to reduce not only critical renal events (the need for dialysis or transplantation among the most dreadful) but also the incidence of cardiovascular events. Since the disease is asymptomatic for a long time (often its detection is occasional and done with guilty delay), it is clearly important to make a correct and early evaluation of renal function with appropriate methods. Furthermore, it is crucial to make an aetiological diagnosis, when it is possible, of CKD because this will allow for the most targeted therapy possible. For a long time, an effective approach for the majority of people with CKD could only count on strict control of the diabetic disease and its complications, optimization of high blood pressure values, and the mandatory use of drugs blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, particularly in the presence of albuminuria. Over time, this strategy proved to be only partially effective and the majority of patients nonetheless showed a progressive worsening of renal function. Only recently have we had access to two classes of innovative drugs such as glyphozines and incretins which have established themselves on the therapeutic scene because they have shown to be able to slow down the progression of CKD, first in patients with type 2 diabetes and subsequently in patients with CKD whether or not they have diabetes. Unexpectedly and convincingly, they have also been shown to significantly impact cardiovascular prognosis. From initially antidiabetic drugs, their effectiveness has forced the medical iconography to enrich itself with a new therapeutic niche by rightly speaking of 'cardio-nephro-metabolic' drugs.

Efficacy of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists on Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: An Umbrella Review

Rationale & Objective

To comprehensively summarize the efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) to improve kidney and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Study Design

Relevant studies were identified from Medline and Scopus databases from their inception up to August 2023.

Setting & Study Populations

Patients with nondialysis or dialysis CKD.

Selection Criteria for Studies

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR-MAs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the efficacy of MRAs on kidney and CV outcomes in patients with nondialysis or dialysis CKD were included in this study.

Data Extraction

Characteristics of studies and participants, and treatment effects were extracted.

Analytic Approach

Efficacy of MRAs was qualitatively summarized according to types of patients and MRAs.

Results

Forty SR-MAs were included. When compared with placebo/usual care, steroidal MRAs (sMRAs) provided significant benefit in decreasing all-cause (pooled RRs of 0.38 [0.22-0.65] to 0.87 [0.77-0.98]) and CV mortality (pooled RRs of 0.34 [0.15-0.75] to 0.46 [0.28-0.76]) only in patients treated with dialysis, when compared with placebo. Nonsteroidal MRAs (nsMRAs) significantly lowered composite CV events in both nondialysis CKD (pooled RRs of 0.86 [0.79-0.94] to 0.92 [0.85-0.99]) and patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) (pooled RRs of 0.86 [0.78-0.95] to 0.88 [0.81-0.96]). In addition, nsMRAs showed significant benefit in reducing composite kidney outcomes in patients with either nondialysis CKD or DKD when compared with placebo. However, this efficacy was lower than sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with DKD. Moreover, both sMRAs and nsMRAs significantly increased the risk of hyperkalemia in patients with nondialysis CKD and DKD.

Limitations

The comparison between nsMRAs and SGLT2i is based on network meta-analyses. Consequently, additional head-to-head RCTs are necessary to confirm the advantages of SGLT2i over nsMRAs.

Conclusions

sMRAs offer benefits in reducing all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and composite CV events in patients treated with dialysis. nsMRAs improve kidney outcomes in patients with nondialysis CKD and DKD but increase hyperkalemia risk.

A Narrative Review of Signaling Pathway and Treatment Options for Diabetic Nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Diabetic nephropathy is a progressive kidney disease that frequently results in end-stage renal disorders and is characterized by proteinuria, albuminuria, decreased filtration, and renal fibrosis. Despite the fact that there are a number of therapeutic alternatives available, DN continues to be the main contributor to end-stage renal disease. Therefore, significant innovation is required to enhance outcomes in DN patients.

METHODS

Information was collected from online search engines like, Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Sci-Hub databases using keywords like diabetes, nephropathy, kidney disease, autophagy, etc. Results: Natural compounds have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties and impact various signaling pathways. They ameliorate kidney damage by decreasing oxidative stress, inflammatory process, and fibrosis and enhance the antioxidant system, most likely by activating and deactivating several signaling pathways. This review focuses on the role of metabolic memory and various signaling pathways involved in the pathogenesis of DN and therapeutic approaches available for the management of DN. Special attention is given to the various pathways modulated by the phytoconstituents.

Potential Role of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Nondiabetic Chronic Kidney Disease and Glomerular Disease

Glomerular disease is a leading cause of CKD and ESKD. Although diabetic kidney disease is the most common cause of glomerular disease, nondiabetic causes include malignancy, systemic autoimmune conditions, drug effects, or genetic conditions. Nondiabetic glomerular diseases are rare diseases, with a paucity of high-quality clinical trials in this area. Furthermore, late referral can result in poor patient outcomes. This article reviews the current management of nondiabetic glomerular disease and explores the latest developments in drug treatment in this area. Current treatment of nondiabetic glomerular disease aims to manage complications (edema, hypertension, proteinuria, hyperlipidemia, hypercoagulability, and thrombosis) as well as target the underlying cause of glomerular disease. Treatment options include renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, statins/nonstatin alternatives, loop diuretics, anticoagulation agents, immunosuppressives, and lifestyle and dietary modifications. Effective treatment of nondiabetic glomerular disease is limited by heterogeneity and a lack of understanding of the disease pathogenesis. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (ns-MRAs, such as finerenone), with their broad anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects, have emerged as valuable therapeutic options for a range of cardiorenal conditions, including CKD. ns-MRAs are an evolving drug class of particular interest for the future treatment of nondiabetic glomerular disease, and there is evidence that these agents may improve kidney prognosis in various subgroups of patients with CKD. The benefits offered by ns-MRAs may present an opportunity to reduce the progression of CKD from a spectrum of glomerular disease. Several novel ns-MRA are in clinical development for both diabetic and nondiabetic CKD.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Clinical Evidence and Potential Adverse Events

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) globally and is associated with an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). DKD management requires a multipronged approach to decrease the progression of CKD and CVD. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) added to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor therapy reduce the incidence of cardiovascular outcomes and progression of CKD. This review examines the cardiorenal benefits of MRAs and summarizes evidence on potential risks for acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, and sexual dysfunction for steroidal and nonsteroidal MRAs.

Early reduction in albuminuria is associated with a steeper 'dip' in initial estimated glomerular filtration rate but favourable long-term kidney outcomes in people with diabetes receiving sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors

AIM

To assess if early change in albuminuria was linked to an initial change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and long-term kidney outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) receiving sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors.

METHODS

Using a medical database from a multicentre healthcare institute in Taiwan, we retrospectively enrolled 8310 people receiving SGLT2 inhibitors from 1 June 2016 to 31 December 2021. We compared the risks of initial eGFR decline, major adverse renal events (MARE; >50% eGFR reduction or development of end-stage kidney disease), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) using a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

In all, 36.8% (n = 3062) experienced a >30% decrease, 21.0% (n = 1743) experienced a 0%-30% decrease, 14.4% (n = 1199) experienced a 0%-30% increase, and 27.7% (n = 2306) experienced a >30% increase in urine albumin-to-creatine ratio (UACR) after 3 months of SGLT2 inhibitor treatment. Greater acute eGFR decline at 3 months correlated with greater UACR reduction: -3.6 ± 10.9, -2.0 ± 9.5, -1.1 ± 8.6, and -0.3 ± 9.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 for the respective UACR change groups (p < 0.001). Over a median of 29.0 months, >30% UACR decline was associated with a higher risk of >30% initial eGFR decline (hazard ratio [HR] 2.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61-4.47]), a lower risk of MARE (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.89), and a comparable risk of MACE or HHF after multivariate adjustment (p < 0.05). The nonlinear analysis showed early UACR decline was linked to a lower risk of MARE but a higher risk of initial steep eGFR decline of >30%.

CONCLUSION

Physicians should be vigilant for the potential adverse effects of abrupt eGFR dipping associated with a profound reduction in UACR, despite the favourable long-term kidney outcomes in the population with T2D receiving SGLT2 inhibitor treatment.

Combination therapy for kidney disease in people with diabetes mellitus

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD), defined as co-existing diabetes and chronic kidney disease in the absence of other clear causes of kidney injury, occurs in approximately 20-40% of patients with diabetes mellitus. As the global prevalence of diabetes has increased, DKD has become highly prevalent and a leading cause of kidney failure, accelerated cardiovascular disease, premature mortality and global health care expenditure. Multiple pathophysiological mechanisms contribute to DKD, and single lifestyle or pharmacological interventions have shown limited efficacy at preserving kidney function. For nearly two decades, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors were the only available kidney-protective drugs. However, several new drug classes, including sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, a non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist and a selective endothelin receptor antagonist, have now been demonstrated to improve kidney outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In addition, emerging preclinical and clinical evidence of the kidney-protective effects of glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists has led to the prospective testing of these agents for DKD. Research and clinical efforts are geared towards using therapies with potentially complementary efficacy in combination to safely halt kidney disease progression. As more kidney-protective drugs become available, the outlook for people living with DKD should improve in the next few decades.

A European Renal Association (ERA) synopsis for nephrology practice of the 2023 European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension

In June 2023, the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) presented and published the new 2023 ESH Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension, a document that was endorsed by the European Renal Association (ERA). Following the evolution of evidence in recent years, several novel recommendations relevant to the management of hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) appeared in these Guidelines. These include recommendations for target office blood pressure (BP) <130/80 mmHg in most and against target office BP <120/70 mmHg in all patients with CKD; recommendations for use of spironolactone or chlorthalidone for patients with resistant hypertension with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) higher or lower than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively; use of a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor for patients with CKD and estimated eGFR ≥20 mL/min/1.73 m2; use of finerenone for patients with CKD, type 2 diabetes mellitus, albuminuria, eGFR ≥25 mL/min/1.73 m2 and serum potassium <5.0 mmol/L; and revascularization in patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease and secondary hypertension or high-risk phenotypes if stenosis ≥70% is present. The present report is a synopsis of sections of the ESH Guidelines that are relevant to the daily clinical practice of nephrologists, prepared by experts from ESH and ERA. The sections summarized are those referring to the role of CKD in hypertension staging and cardiovascular risk stratification, the evaluation of hypertension-mediated kidney damage and the overall management of hypertension in patients with CKD.

Biomarkers to Guide Medical Therapy in Primary Aldosteronism

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is an endocrinopathy characterized by dysregulated aldosterone production that occurs despite suppression of renin and angiotensin II, and that is non-suppressible by volume and sodium loading. The effectiveness of surgical adrenalectomy for patients with lateralizing PA is characterized by the attenuation of excess aldosterone production leading to blood pressure reduction, correction of hypokalemia, and increases in renin-biomarkers that collectively indicate a reversal of PA pathophysiology and restoration of normal physiology. Even though the vast majority of patients with PA will ultimately be treated medically rather than surgically, there is a lack of guidance on how to optimize medical therapy and on key metrics of success. Herein, we review the evidence justifying approaches to medical management of PA and biomarkers that reflect endocrine principles of restoring normal physiology. We review the current arsenal of medical therapies, including dietary sodium restriction, steroidal and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, epithelial sodium channel inhibitors, and aldosterone synthase inhibitors. It is crucial that clinicians recognize that multimodal medical treatment for PA can be highly effective at reducing the risk for adverse cardiovascular and kidney outcomes when titrated with intention. The key biomarkers reflective of optimized medical therapy are unsurprisingly similar to the physiologic expectations following surgical adrenalectomy: control of blood pressure with the fewest number of antihypertensive agents, normalization of serum potassium without supplementation, and a rise in renin. Pragmatic approaches to achieve these objectives while mitigating adverse effects are reviewed.

Controversies in Hypertension V: Resistant and Refractory Hypertension

Apparent resistant hypertension, defined as uncontrolled office blood pressure despite ≥ 3 antihypertensive medications including a diuretic or use of ≥ 4 medications regardless of blood pressure, occurs in ≤ 15% of treated hypertensives. Apparent refractory hypertension, defined as uncontrolled office pressure despite use of 5 or more medications including a diuretic, occurs in ≤ 10% of resistant cases. Both are associated with increased comorbidity and enhanced cardiovascular risk. To rule out pseudo-resistant or pseudo-refractory hypertension, employ guideline-based methodology for obtaining pressure, maximize the regimen, rule out white-coat effect, and assess adherence. True resistant hypertension is characterized by volume overload and aldosterone excess, refractory by enhanced sympathetic tone. Spironolactone is the preferred agent for resistance, with lower doses. Spironolactone, potassium binders, or both, are preferred if the estimated glomerular filtration rate is below 45. If significant albuminuria, finerenone is indicated. The optimal treatment of refractory hypertension is unclear, but sympathetic inhibition (α-β blockade, centrally acting sympathoinhibitors, or both) seems reasonable. Renal denervation has shown minimal benefit for resistance, but its role in refractory hypertension remains to be defined.

Additive effects of dapagliflozin and finerenone on albuminuria in non-diabetic CKD: an open-label randomized clinical trial

Background

Dapagliflozin and finerenone reduce albuminuria and slow CKD progression, but additive effects remain unstudied. We compared their individual and combined efficacy and safety in patients with non-diabetic CKD.

Methods

In an open-label, randomized clinical trial, we included patients aged 18-80 on maximal tolerated ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker with eGFR 25-45 mL/min/1,73 m2 and albuminuria 150-2000 mg/g. Participants received either finerenone 20 mg/day or dapagliflozin 10 mg/day for four weeks, followed by combination therapy for four weeks. Data were collected at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks.

Results

Twenty patients (10 per group) with a mean mGFR of 34 mL/min/1,73 m2 and a mean urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) of 469 mg/g were included. Finerenone alone or in addition to dapagliflozin resulted in -24% (95% CI, -36% to -11%) and -34% (95% CI, -47% to -18%) change in UACR, respectively. Dapagliflozin alone or in addition to finerenone resulted in -8% (95% CI, -22 to 9%) and -10% (95% CI, -28% to 12%) change in UACR, respectively. Overall, UACR change after 8 weeks was -36% (95% CI, -46% to -24%). After 8 weeks, systolic blood pressure and mGFR were reduced by 10 mmHg (95% CI, 6-13 mmHg) and 7 mL/min/1,73 m2 (95% CI, 5-8 mL/min/1,73 m2). Adverse effects were minimal.

Conclusions

The combination of finerenone and dapagliflozin was safe and significantly reduced albuminuria. The effect of combination therapy was at least equal to the calculated, combined effect of each of the drugs, suggesting an additive effect on albuminuria. Larger studies assessing long-term effects and safety are warranted.

Kidney function monitoring and trajectories in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequently co-exist. The frequency of kidney monitoring and range of kidney function in patients with AF in clinical practice are uncertain.

METHODS

All adult Albertans with AF between 2008 and 2017 were identified using ICD-9 and -10 codes 427.3 and I48. Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) risk categories were defined using eGFR by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaborative equation and albuminuria results within 6 months of eGFR measurement. eGFR trajectories were compared from baseline to maximum value within the following year.

RESULTS

Among 105,946 patients with AF, 16.0% were KDIGO category G1 (eGFR ≥ 90), 49.0% G2 (60-89.9), 19.8% G3a (45-59.9), 11.4% G3b (30-44.9), and G4 3.8% (15-29.9). Albuminuria was normal/mild 83.4%, moderate 11.7%, and severe 4.9%. Kidney monitoring was more common among people with lower eGFR and worse albuminuria, from approximately twice annually for G1-2/A1-2 to 8 times annually in stage G4A3. Approximately 60-80% of patients received guideline-recommended monitoring, consistent across KDIGO stages. With lower baseline eGFR, annual change in eGFR decreased while the relative proportion of patients who worsened compared to improved increased: for baseline eGFR 60-89.9, 16.7% worsened vs 6.7% improved, but for eGFR 30-44.9, 8.8% worsened but only 1.0% improved.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of kidney function monitoring in patients with AF increased with worsening KDIGO risk category and adhered to KDIGO guidelines in approximately three quarters of patients. A minority of patients had moderate to severe eGFR impairment, of whom most remained stable over 1 year.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use in chronic kidney disease with type 2 diabetes: a clinical practice document by the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) board of the European Renal Association (ERA)

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) represents a major public health issue; it develops in about 30%-40% of patients with diabetes mellitus and is the most common cause of CKD worldwide. Patients with CKD and T2D are at high risk of both developing kidney failure and of cardiovascular events. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers were considered the cornerstone of treatment of albuminuric CKD in T2D for more than 20 years. However, the residual risk of progression to more advanced CKD stages under RAS blockade remains high, while in major studies with these agents in patients with CKD and T2D no significant reductions in cardiovascular events and mortality were evident. Steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are known to reduce albuminuria in individuals on RAS monotherapy, but their wide clinical use has been curtailed by the significant risk of hyperkalemia and absence of trials with hard renal outcomes. In recent years, non-steroidal MRAs have received increasing interest due to their better pharmacologic profile. Finerenone, the first compound of this class, was shown to effectively reduce the progression of kidney disease and of cardiovascular outcomes in participants with T2D in phase 3 trials. This clinical practice document prepared from a task force of the European Renal Best Practice board summarizes current knowledge on the role of MRAs in the treatment of CKD in T2D aiming to support clinicians in decision-making and everyday management of patients with this condition.

[Diabetes and chronic kidney disease]

Chronic kidney disease is one of the most serious complications of diabetes. One of the challenges in the follow-up of patients with diabetes is to discover signs of kidney disease. Recent research shows that several drugs have renal protective effects. In this clinical review article we present markers used in the follow-up of patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease, and new treatment options.

Novel therapeutic approaches in the management of chronic kidney disease: a narrative review

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a pathologic entity with constantly rising incidence and high rates of morbidity and mortality, which are associated with serious cardiovascular complications. Moreover, the incidence of end-stage renal disease tends to increase. The epidemiological trends of CKD warrant the development of novel therapeutic approaches aiming to prevent its development or retard its progression through the control of major risk factors: type 2 diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Contemporary therapeutics such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and second-generation mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are utilized in this direction. Additionally, experimental and clinical studies present novel drug categories that could be employed in managing CKD, such as aldosterone synthesis inhibitors or activators guanylate cyclase, while the role of melatonin should be further tested in the clinical setting. Finally, in this patient population, the use of hypolipidemic agents may provide incremental benefits.

Using Renin Activity to Guide Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Therapy in Patients with Low Renin and Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are often empirically used for patients with low-renin hypertension (LRH) or probable primary aldosteronism (PA) who decline surgery. However, the optimal approach to MRA therapy is unknown. Studies have shown that a rise in renin is an effective biomarker of prevention of cardiovascular complications of PA. This study aimed to determine whether empiric MRA therapy in patients with LRH or probable PA targeting unsuppressed renin is associated with a decrease in blood pressure and/or proteinuria.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center cohort study from 2005 to 2021 included adults with LRH or probable PA (renin activity <1.0 ng/ml/h and detectable aldosterone levels). All patients were empirically treated with an MRA, targeting renin ≥1.0 ng/ml/h.

RESULTS

Out of 39 patients studied, 32 (82.1%) achieved unsuppressed renin. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased from 148.0 and 81.2 to 125.8 and 71.6 mm Hg, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). Similar blood pressure reductions were seen whether patients had high (>10 ng/dl) or low (<10 ng/dl) aldosterone levels. The majority (24/39; 61.5%) of patients had at least one baseline anti-hypertensive medication stopped. Among the six patients who had detectable proteinuria and albumin-to-creatinine (ACR) measurements post-treatment, the mean ACR decreased from 179.0 to 36.1 mg/g (P = 0.03). None of the patients studied had to completely stop treatment due to adverse reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Empiric MRA therapy in patients with LRH or probable PA targeting unsuppressed renin can safely and effectively improve blood pressure control and reduce proteinuria.

Finerenone: Questions and Answers-The Four Fundamental Arguments on the New-Born Promising Non-Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the most common complications of diabetes mellitus and an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Despite guideline-directed therapy of CKD in patients with type 2 diabetes, the risk of renal failure and cardiovascular events still remains high, and diabetes remains the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease in affected patients. To date, current medications for CKD and type 2 diabetes mellitus have not reset residual risk in patients due to a high grade of inflammation and fibrosis contributing to kidney and heart disease. This question-and-answer-based review will discuss the pharmacological and clinical differences between finerenone and other mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and then move on to the main evidence in the cardiovascular and renal fields, closing, finally, on the potential role of therapeutic combination with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is).

Effects of Finerenone on Cardiovascular and Chronic Kidney Diseases: A New Weapon against Cardiorenal Morbidity and Mortality-A Comprehensive Review

Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) show high rates of cardiorenal outcomes. In addition, the progression towards renal failure and cardiovascular events rises as CKD worsens. Several studies suggest that the activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) induces cardiac and renal injury, including inflammation and fibrosis. Finerenone is a novel, nonsteroidal, selective MR antagonist (MRA) which has demonstrated anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects in pre-clinical studies. Moreover, two large trials (FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD) investigated the renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with mild to severe CKD in type 2 diabetes which received finerenone. On these bases, this comprehensive review aims to summarize the current knowledge regarding finerenone and its effects on CKD and the cardiovascular system, emphasizing its role in modifying cardiorenal outcomes.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists for Preventing Chronic Kidney Disease Progression: Current Evidence and Future Challenges

Regulation and action of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) have been the focus of intensive research over the past 80 years. Genetic and physiological/biochemical analysis revealed how MR and the steroid hormone aldosterone integrate the responses of distinct tubular cells in the face of environmental perturbations and how their dysregulation compromises fluid homeostasis. In addition to these roles, the accumulation of data also provided unequivocal evidence that MR is involved in the pathophysiology of kidney diseases. Experimental studies delineated the diverse pathological consequences of MR overactivity and uncovered the multiple mechanisms that result in enhanced MR signaling. In parallel, clinical studies consistently demonstrated that MR blockade reduces albuminuria in patients with chronic kidney disease. Moreover, recent large-scale clinical studies using finerenone have provided evidence that the non-steroidal MR antagonist can retard the kidney disease progression in diabetic patients. In this article, we review experimental data demonstrating the critical importance of MR in mediating renal injury as well as clinical studies providing evidence on the renoprotective effects of MR blockade. We also discuss areas of future investigation, which include the benefit of non-steroidal MR antagonists in non-diabetic kidney disease patients, the identification of surrogate markers for MR signaling in the kidney, and the search for key downstream mediators whereby MR blockade confers renoprotection. Insights into these questions would help maximize the benefit of MR blockade in subjects with kidney diseases.

Treating chronic kidney disease to reduce cardiovascular risk

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a complex syndrome and a relevant problem of public health due to its large incidence and prevalence and to the high costs for its management. The hallmark of CKD, the progressive reduction in the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), is strongly associated with an increase in cardiovascular events, such as fatal and non-fatal heart attack, stroke and heart failure, and mortality. Therefore, clinicians should pay any effort for preventing or slowing down the decline of renal function in order to reduce not only the occurrence of critical renal events (the need for dialysis or renal transplantation, among the most dreadful) but also the incidence of cardiovascular events. Accordingly, an early diagnosis and a targeted treatment in patients with kidney disease are crucial to reduce the evolution towards more advanced stages of the disease and the occurrence of complications. For a long time, the therapeutic approach to the majority of CKD patients was based on the strict control of risk factors, such as the diabetic disease and hypertension, together with the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, particularly in the presence of albuminuria. Over time, this strategy proved to be only partially effective, since most CKD patients showed a progressive worsening of renal function. Gliflozins and incretins are novel anti-diabetic drugs that have been demonstrated to slow down the slope of eGFR reduction in patients with CKD, irrespective of diabetic status. Concurrently, these drugs showed to significantly impact cardiovascular prognosis reducing the incidence of clinical events. For their ability to act on a wide spectrum of disease, gliflozins and incretins are also called 'cardio-nephro-metabolic' drugs.

Effectiveness of nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with diabetic kidney disease

Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are a new class of drugs developed to address the medical need for effective and safer treatment to protect the kidney and the heart in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). There are several drugs within this class at varying stages of clinical development. Finerenone is the first nonsteroidal MRA approved in the US for treating patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D). In clinical studies, finerenone slowed CKD progression without inducing marked antihypertensive effects. Esaxerenone is a nonsteroidal MRA with proven blood pressure-lowering efficacy that is currently licensed in Japan for treating hypertension. There are also three other nonsteroidal MRAs in mid-to-late stages of clinical development. Here we overview evidence addressing pharmacological and clinical differences between the nonsteroidal MRAs and the steroidal MRAs spironolactone and eplerenone. First, we describe a framework that highlights the role of aldosterone-mediated pathological overactivation of the mineralocorticoid receptor and inflammation as important drivers of CKD progression. Second, we discuss the benefits and adverse events profile of steroidal MRAs, the latter of which are often a limiting factor to their use in routine clinical practice. Finally, we show that nonsteroidal MRAs differ from steroidal MRAs based on pharmacology and clinical effects, giving the potential to expand the therapeutic options for patients with DKD. In the recently completed DKD outcome program comprising two randomized clinical trials - FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD - and the FIDELITY analysis of both trials evaluating more than 13,000 patients, the nonsteroidal MRA finerenone demonstrated beneficial effects on the kidney and the heart across a broad spectrum of patients with CKD and T2D. The long-term efficacy of finerenone on cardiac and renal morbidity and mortality endpoints, along with the anti-hypertensive efficacy of esaxerenone, widens the scope of available therapies for patients with DKD.

Change in albuminuria as a surrogate endpoint for cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with diabetes

For the purpose of predicting clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease, change in albuminuria is a good candidate to be a surrogate marker for future cardiovascular events and progression of kidney disease. Spot urine albumin/creatinine ratio is convenient and recognized as a viable alternative to 24-h albumin, with some limitations. Although there is sufficient evidence to validate its use in clinical trials as a surrogate endpoint for renal outcomes, this is not yet the case for cardiovascular outcomes. While change in albuminuria as a primary or secondary endpoint is trial-specific, its use should be encouraged, nonetheless.

Novel Therapies on the Horizon of Hypertension Management

BACKGROUND

The rates of uncontrolled hypertension, along with downstream cardiovascular outcomes, has been worsening in this country. Despite the plethora of antihypertensive medications on the market, the prevalence of resistant hypertension (RH) is estimated to be 13.7%. Therefore in addition to increased clinical education and focus on lifestyle management of hypertension and medication compliance, new therapies are needed to address this rise in hypertension.

METHODS

A systematic review of the available medical literature was performed to identify emerging treatment options for RH.

RESULTS

Six different pharmacologic classes and 2 procedural interventions were identified as being appropriate for review in this paper. The pharmacologic classes to be explored are non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, aminopeptidase A inhibitors, dual endothelin antagonists, aldosterone synthetase inhibitors, atrial natriuretic peptide inhibitors, and attenuators of hepatic angiotensinogen. Discussion of procedural interventions to lower blood pressure will focus on renal denervation and devices that increase carotid baroreceptor activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Promising medication and procedural interventions are being developed and studied to expand our treatment arsenal for patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension and RH.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone pathway modulators in chronic kidney disease: A comparative review

Chronic kidney disease presents a health challenge that has a complex underlying pathophysiology, both acquired and inherited. The pharmacotherapeutic treatment options available today lower the progression of the disease and improve the quality of life but cannot completely cure it. This poses a challenge to the healthcare provider to choose, from the available options, the best way to manage the disease as per the presentation of the patient. As of now, the recommended first line of treatment to control the blood pressure in chronic kidney disease is the administration of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system modulators. These are represented mainly by the direct renin inhibitor, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor blockers. These modulators are varied in their structure and mechanisms of action, hence showing varying treatment outcomes. The choice of administration of these modulators is determined by the presentation and the co-morbidities of the patient, the availability and affordability of the treatment option, and the expertise of the healthcare provider. A direct head-to-head comparison between these significant renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system modulators is lacking, which can benefit healthcare providers and researchers. In this review, a comparison has been drawn between the direct renin inhibitor (aliskiren), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor blockers. This can be of significance for healthcare providers and researchers to find the particular loci of interest, either in structure or mechanism, and to intervene as per the case presentation to obtain the best possible treatment option.

Management of Type 2 Diabetic Kidney Disease in 2022: A Narrative Review for Specialists and Primary Care

Purpose of review

Kidney disease is present in almost half of Canadian patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), and it is also the most common first cardiorenal manifestation of T2D. Despite clear guidelines for testing, opportunities are being missed to identify kidney diseases, and many Canadians are therefore not receiving the best available treatments. This has become even more important given recent clinical trials demonstrating improvements in both kidney and cardiovascular (CV) endpoints with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, finerenone. The goal of this document is to provide a narrative review of the current evidence for the treatment of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) that supports this new standard of care and to provide practice points.

Sources of information

An expert panel of Canadian clinicians was assembled, including 9 nephrologists, an endocrinologist, and a primary care practitioner. The information the authors used for this review consisted of published clinical trials and guidelines, selected by the authors based on their assessment of their relevance to the questions being answered.

Methods

Panelists met virtually to discuss potential questions to be answered in the review and agreed on 10 key questions. Two panel members volunteered as co-leads to write the summaries and practice points for each of the identified questions. Summaries and practice points were distributed to the entire author list by email. Through 2 rounds of online voting, a second virtual meeting, and subsequent email correspondence, the authors reached consensus on the contents of the review, including all the practice points.

Key findings

It is critical that DKD be identified as early as possible in the course of the disease to optimally prevent disease progression and associated complications. Patients with diabetes should be routinely screened for DKD with assessments of both urinary albumin and kidney function. Treatment decisions should be individualized based on the risks and benefits, patients' needs and preferences, medication access and cost, and the degree of glucose lowering needed. Patients with DKD should be treated to achieve targets for A1C and blood pressure. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade and treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors are also key components of the standard of care to reduce the risk of kidney and CV events for these patients. Finerenone should also be considered to further reduce the risk of CV events and chronic kidney disease progression. Education of patients with diabetes prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors and/or finerenone is an important component of treatment.

Limitations

No formal guideline process was used. The practice points are not graded and are not intended to be viewed as having the weight of a clinical practice guideline or formal consensus statement. However, most practice points are well aligned with current clinical practice guidelines.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for nephroprotection and cardioprotection in patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) develops in ∼40% of patients with diabetes and is the most common cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) worldwide. Patients with CKD, especially those with diabetes mellitus, are at high risk of both developing kidney failure and cardiovascular (CV) death. The use of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers to reduce the incidence of kidney failure in patients with DKD dates back to studies that are now ≥20 years old. During the last few years, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have shown beneficial renal effects in randomized trials. However, even in response to combined treatment with RAS blockers and SGLT2is, the renal residual risk remains high with kidney failure only deferred, but not avoided. The risk of CV death also remains high even with optimal current treatment. Steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduce albuminuria and surrogate markers of CV disease in patients already on optimal therapy. However, their use has been curtailed by the significant risk of hyperkalaemia. In the FInerenone in reducing kiDnEy faiLure and dIsease prOgression in DKD (FIDELIO-DKD) study comparing the actions of the non-steroidal MRA finerenone with placebo, finerenone reduced the progression of DKD and the incidence of CV events, with a relatively safe adverse event profile. This document presents in detail the available evidence on the cardioprotective and nephroprotective effects of MRAs, analyses the potential mechanisms involved and discusses their potential future place in the treatment of patients with diabetic CKD.

Dyskalemia in people at increased risk for heart failure: findings from the heart 'OMics' in AGEing (HOMAGE) trial

AIMS

In people at risk of heart failure (HF) enrolled in the Heart 'OMics' in AGEing (HOMAGE) trial, spironolactone reduced circulating markers of collagen synthesis, natriuretic peptides, and blood pressure and improved cardiac structure and function. In the present report, we explored factors associated with dyskalaemia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The HOMAGE trial was an open-label study comparing spironolactone (up to 50 mg/day) versus standard care in people at risk for HF. After randomization, serum potassium was assessed at 1 and 9 months and was defined as low when ≤3.5 mmol/L (hypokalaemia) and high when ≥5.5 mmol/L (hyperkalaemia). Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to identify clinical predictors of dyskalaemia. A total of 513 participants (median age 74 years, 75% men, median estimated glomerular filtration rate 71 mL/min/1.73 m² ) had serum potassium available and were included in this analysis. At randomization, 88 had potassium < 4.0 mmol/L, 367 had potassium 4.0-5.0 mmol/L, and 58 had potassium > 5.0 mmol/L. During follow-up, on at least one occasion, a serum potassium < 3.5 mmol/L was observed in 6 (1.2%) and <4.0 mmol/L in 46 (9%) participants, while a potassium > 5.0 mmol/L was observed in 38 (8%) and >5.5 mmol/L in 5 (1.0%) participants. The median (percentile_25-75 ) increase in serum potassium with spironolactone during the study was 0.23 (0.16; 0.29) mmol/L. Because of the low incidence of dyskalaemia, for regression analysis, hypokalaemia and hyperkalaemia thresholds were set at <4.0 and >5.0 mmol/L, respectively. The occurrence of a serum potassium > 5.0 mmol/L during follow-up was positively associated with the presence of diabetes mellitus {odds ratio [OR]: 1.21 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.14; 3.79]} and randomization to spironolactone (OR: 2.83 [95% CI 1.49; 5.37]). Conversely, the occurrence of a potassium concentration < 4.0 mmol/L was positively associated with the use of thiazides (OR: 2.39 [95% CI 1.32; 4.34]), blood urea concentration (OR: 2.15 [95% CI 1.34; 3.39] per 10 mg/dL), and history of hypertension (OR: 2.32 [95% CI 1.02; 5.29]) and negatively associated with randomization to spironolactone (OR: 0.30 [95% CI 0.18; 0.52]).

CONCLUSIONS

In people at risk for developing HF and with relatively normal renal function, spironolactone reduced the risk of hypokalaemia and, at the doses used, was not associated with the occurrence of clinically meaningful hyperkalaemia.

Hypertension mediated kidney and cardiovascular damage and risk stratification: Redefining concepts

Hypertension mediated organ damage (HMOD) refers to structural or functional changes in arteries or target organs that can be present in long-standing hypertension, but it can be also found in naïve never treated patients. Traditionally, cardiovascular risk is stratified with charts or calculators that tend to underestimate the real cardiovascular risk. The diagnosis of HMOD automatically reclassifies patients to the highest level of cardiovascular risk. Subclinical HMOD can be present already at the diagnosis of hypertension and more than 25% of hypertensives are misclassified with the routine tests recommended by hypertension guidelines. Whether HMOD regression improves cardiovascular outcomes has never been investigated in randomized clinical trials and remains controversial. However, different drugs have been probed with promising results in high cardiovascular risk patients, such as the new antidiabetic or the novel non-steroid mineralocorticoid antagonists. Accordingly, trials have shown that lowering blood pressure reduces cardiovascular events. In this narrative review, we will discuss the role of HMOD in cardiovascular risk stratification, the different types of organ damage, and the evidence available to define whether HMOD can be used as a therapeutic target.

Progress in the management of patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diabetic kidney disease is the most common cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease in the world. Risk factor modification, glucose control, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade have remained the standard of care for 2 decades. New therapeutic agents have emerged in recent years, demonstrating kidney and cardiovascular benefits, and herein we review recent clinical trials on this topic.

RECENT FINDINGS

After the publication of several cardiovascular outcome trials for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i), new trials have focused ON primary kidney-specific outcomes demonstrating safety and benefits among patients with proteinuric CKD; patients with or without diabetes, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) respectively. Similarly, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (ns-MRAs) and glucagon-like-peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have improved cardiovascular and kidney outcomes. Recently, clinical practice guidelines have also been updated to reflect this new evidence.

SUMMARY

In summary, SGLT-2i, GLP-1 RAs, and ns-MRAs have demonstrated cardiovascular and kidney benefits, including all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, progression to end-stage kidney disease, and hospitalizations for heart failure exacerbation among diverse patient population.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for cardioprotection in chronic kidney disease: a step into the future

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) share major risk factors and mechanistic pathways for progression. Furthermore, either decreased glomerular filtration rate or increased albuminuria are major risk factors for cardiovascular events. Evidence from previous renal outcome trials in patients with proteinuric CKD showed that angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) effectively slow CKD progression, establishing these agents as fundamental CKD pharmacologic treatments. However, in all these trials and subsequent meta-analyses, ACEIs and ARBs did not significantly reduce cardiovascular events or mortality, indicating a high residual risk for CVD progression in individuals with CKD. In contrast to the above, several outcome trials with old and novel mineralocorticoid receptor-antagonists (MRAs) clearly suggest that these agents, apart from nephroprotection, offer important cardioprotection in this population. This article is an overview of previous and recent evidence on the effects of MRAs on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CKD attempting to highlight a pathway able to improve both cardiovascular and renal prognosis in this population.

Effects of Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists on Acute and Chronic Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Slopes in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

AIMS

Steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) form a cornerstone of the management of heart failure (HF), but little is known about the long-term effects of MRA therapy on kidney function. We evaluated acute and chronic estimated glomerular function (eGFR) slopes in the 2 largest completed trials testing steroidal MRAs in chronic HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted parallel post hoc eGFR slope analyses in 2 multinational, double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled trials of steroidal MRAs in chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction (EMPHASIS-HF) and preserved ejection fraction (TOPCAT Americas region). GFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation. Annual slopes of eGFR were assessed by generalized random coefficient models. Least square mean differences of eGFR slopes between steroidal MRA and placebo arms. Median follow-up was 1.8 years (EMPHASIS-HF) and 3.3 years (TOPCAT Americas). From baseline to month 4-6 ("acute eGFR slope"), compared to placebo, MRA treatment led to an acute decline in eGFR of -2.4 mL/min/1.73m² (95% CI -3.4 to -1.4; P <0.001) and -2.0 mL/min/1.73m² (95% CI -3.0 to -1.8; P <0.001) in EMPHASIS-HF and TOPCAT Americas, respectively. From month 4-6 to end of study, there was no difference in "chronic eGFR slope" between MRA and placebo arms (-0.3 mL/min/1.73m² /year [95% CI -1.3 to 0.7; P =0.53] and 0.1 mL/min/1.73m² /year [95% CI -1.4 to 1.7; P =0.86]) in EMPHASIS-HF and TOPCAT Americas, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroidal MRAs result in acute declines in eGFR but do not modify long-term kidney disease trajectories in chronic HF with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The 2021-2022 position of Brazilian Diabetes Society on diabetic kidney disease (DKD) management: an evidence-based guideline to clinical practice. Screening and treatment of hyperglycemia, arterial hypertension, and dyslipidemia in the patient with DKD

BACKGROUND

Diabetic kidney disease is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This review is an authorized literal translation of part of the Brazilian Diabetes Society (SBD) Guidelines 2021-2022. This evidence-based guideline provides guidance on the correct management of Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD) in clinical practice.

METHODS

The methodology was published elsewhere in previous SBD guidelines and was approved by the internal institutional Steering Committee for publication. Briefly, the Brazilian Diabetes Society indicated 14 experts to constitute the Central Committee, designed to regulate methodology, review the manuscripts, and make judgments on degrees of recommendations and levels of evidence. SBD Renal Disease Department drafted the manuscript selecting key clinical questions to make a narrative review using MEDLINE via PubMed, with the best evidence available including high-quality clinical trials, metanalysis, and large observational studies related to DKD diagnosis and treatment, by using the MeSH terms [diabetes], [type 2 diabetes], [type 1 diabetes] and [chronic kidney disease].

RESULTS

The extensive review of the literature made by the 14 members of the Central Committee defined 24 recommendations. Three levels of evidence were considered: A. Data from more than 1 randomized clinical trial or 1 metanalysis of randomized clinical trials with low heterogeneity (I2 < 40%). B. Data from metanalysis, including large observational studies, a single randomized clinical trial, or a pre-specified subgroup analysis. C: Data from small or non-randomized studies, exploratory analyses, or consensus of expert opinion. The degree of recommendation was obtained based on a poll sent to the panelists, using the following criteria: Grade I: when more than 90% of agreement; Grade IIa 75-89% of agreement; IIb 50-74% of agreement, and III, when most of the panelist recommends against a defined treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

To prevent or at least postpone the advanced stages of DKD with the associated cardiovascular complications, intensive glycemic and blood pressure control are required, as well as the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blocker agents such as ARB, ACEI, and MRA. Recently, SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor agonists have been added to the therapeutic arsenal, with well-proven benefits regarding kidney protection and patients' survival.

RNA-binding proteins and their role in kidney disease

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are of fundamental importance for post-transcriptional gene regulation and protein synthesis. They are required for pre-mRNA processing and for RNA transport, degradation and translation into protein, and can regulate every step in the life cycle of their RNA targets. In addition, RBP function can be modulated by RNA binding. RBPs also participate in the formation of ribonucleoprotein complexes that build up macromolecular machineries such as the ribosome and spliceosome. Although most research has focused on mRNA-binding proteins, non-coding RNAs are also regulated and sequestered by RBPs. Functional defects and changes in the expression levels of RBPs have been implicated in numerous diseases, including neurological disorders, muscular atrophy and cancers. RBPs also contribute to a wide spectrum of kidney disorders. For example, human antigen R has been reported to have a renoprotective function in acute kidney injury (AKI) but might also contribute to the development of glomerulosclerosis, tubulointerstitial fibrosis and diabetic kidney disease (DKD), loss of bicaudal C is associated with cystic kidney diseases and Y-box binding protein 1 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of AKI, DKD and glomerular disorders. Increasing data suggest that the modulation of RBPs and their interactions with RNA targets could be promising therapeutic strategies for kidney diseases.

Can patiromer allow for intensified renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade with losartan and spironolactone leading to decreased albuminuria in patients with chronic kidney disease, albuminuria and hyperkalaemia? An open-label randomised controlled trial: MorphCKD

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality. No specific treatment of the underlying condition is available for the majority of patients, but ACE-inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARB) slows progression in albuminuric CKD. Adding a mineralocorticoid receptor-antagonist (MRA) like spironolactone has an additive effect. However, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS)-blockade increases the risk of hyperkalaemia which is exacerbated by the presence of CKD. Thus, hyperkalaemia may prevent optimal use of RAAS-blockade in some patients.This project hypothesises that adding a potassium binder (patiromer) allows for improved RAAS-blockade including the use of MRA, thereby reducing albuminuria in patients with albuminuric CKD where full treatment is limited by hyperkalaemia.If successful, the study may lead to improved treatment of this subgroup of patients with CKD. Furthermore, the study will examine the feasibility of potassium binders in patients with CKD.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

An open-label, randomised controlled trial including 140 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 25-60 mL/min/1.73 m², a urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) >500 mg/g (or 200 mg/g if diabetes mellitus) and a current or two previous plasma-potassium >4.5 mmol/L. Patients who develop hyperkaliaemia >5.5 mmol/L during a run-in phase, in which RAAS-blockade is intesified with the possible addition of spironolactone, are randomised to 12-month treatment with maximal tolerated ACE-I/ARB and spironolactone with or without patiromer.The primary endpoint is the difference in UACR measured at randomisation and 12 months compared between the two groups. Secondary endpoints include CKD progression, episodes of hyperkalaemia, blood pressure, eGFR, markers of cardiovascular disease, diet and quality of life.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study is approved by The Central Denmark Region Committees on Health Research Ethics (REFNO 1-10-72-110-20) and is registered in the EudraCT database (REFNO 2020-001595-15). Results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals, at meetings and at international conferences.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Use and Hard Renal Outcomes in Real-World Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Real-world evidence about mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use has been limited in chronic kidney disease, particularly regarding its association with hard renal outcomes.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, adult chronic kidney disease outpatients referred to the department of nephrology at an academic hospital between January 2005 and December 2018 were analyzed. The main inclusion criteria were estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥10 and <60 mL/min per 1.73 m² and follow-up ≥90 days. The exposure of interest was MRA use, defined as the administration of spironolactone, eplerenone, or potassium canrenoate. The primary outcome was renal replacement therapy initiation, defined as the initiation of chronic hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or kidney transplantation. A marginal structural model using inverse probability of weighting was applied to account for potential time-varying confounders.

RESULTS

Among a total of 3195 patients, the median age and estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline were 66 years and 38.4 mL/min per 1.73 m², respectively. During follow-up (median, 5.9 years), 770 patients received MRAs, 211 died, and 478 started renal replacement therapy. In an inverse probability of weighting-weighted pooled logistic regression model, MRA use was significantly associated with a 28%-lower rate of renal replacement therapy initiation (hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.53-0.98]). The association between MRA use and renal replacement therapy initiation was dose-dependent (P for trend <0.01) and consistent across patient subgroups. The incidence of hyperkalemia (>5.5 mEq/L) was somewhat higher in MRA users but not significant (hazard ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.88-1.48]).

CONCLUSIONS

MRA users showed a better renal prognosis across various chronic kidney disease subgroups in a real-world chronic kidney disease population.

Therapeutic Advances in Diabetic Nephropathy

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the most common cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in the United States. Risk factor modification, such as tight control of blood glucose, management of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, and the use of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade have been proven to help delay the progression of DKD. In recent years, new therapeutics including sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, endothelin antagonists, glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), have provided additional treatment options for patients with DKD. This review discusses the various treatment options available to treat patients with diabetic kidney disease.

New Aspects in the Management of Hypertension in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease not on Renal Replacement Therapy

With chronic kidney disease (CKD) being a global arising health problem, strategies for delaying kidney disease progression and reducing the high cardiovascular risk inherent to CKD, are the main objectives of the actual management of patients with kidney diseases. In these patients, the control of arterial hypertension is essential, as high blood pressure (BP) is a strong determinant of worst cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Achieving target blood pressures recommended by international guidelines is mandatory and often demands a multiple levels management, including several pharmacological and lifestyle measures. Even in the presence of adequate BP control, the residual cardiovascular risk remains high. In this respect, the recent demonstration that novel agents such as sodium glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors or the new non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist finerenone can retard the progression of kidney diseases and reduce cardiovascular mortality on top of standard of care treatment with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors represent enormous progresses. These studies also demonstrate that cardiovascular and renal protection can be obtained beyond blood pressure control. Other promising novelties are still to come such as renal denervation and endothelin receptor antagonists in the setting of diabetic and non-diabetic kidney diseases. In the present review, we shall discuss the classic and the new aspects for the management of hypertension in CKD, integrating the new data from recent clinical studies.

Differentiation between emerging non-steroidal and established steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: head-to-head comparisons of pharmacological and clinical characteristics

INTRODUCTION

Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists (MRAs) provide cardiorenal protection. However steroidal MRAs might induce hyperkalemia and sex hormone-related adverse effects. Several novel non-steroidal MRAs are being developed that are highly selective for the MR and may have an improved safety profile.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review summarizes data from head-to-head comparisons of emerging non-steroidal MRAs with older steroidal MRAs, including pharmacological characteristics, pharmacokinetic properties, clinical outcomes, and safety, and highlights similarities and differences between emerging agents and established steroidal MRAs.

EXPERT OPINION

Head-to-head comparisons in phase 2 trials suggest that the new non-steroidal MRAs exhibit at least equivalent efficacy to steroidal MRAs but may have a better safety profile in patients with heart failure and/or kidney disease. When also taking into account data from recent phase 3 placebo-controlled trials, these novel non-steroidal MRAs have the potential to provide a cardiorenal benefit above that of current optimized standard-of-care treatment in a high-risk population with reduced renal function, and with a lower risk of hyperkalemia. To optimize therapy, further research is needed to clarify the molecular differences in the mode of action of non-steroidal MRAs versus steroidal MRAs, and biomarkers that are predictive of MRA response need to be identified and validated.

Novel Non-Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Cardiorenal Disease

Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists (MRAs) are key agents in guideline-oriented drug therapy for cardiovascular (CV) diseases such as chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and resistant hypertension. Currently available steroidal MRAs are efficacious in reducing morbidity and mortality, however, they can be associated with intolerable side effects including hyperkalemia in everyday clinical practice. Recently, a new class of non-steroidal MRAs including esaxerenone, AZD9977, apararenone, KBP-5074, and finerenone have been developed with an improved benefit-risk profile and a novel indication for finerenone for diabetic kidney disease. To better understand the non-steroidal MRAs, this review provides information on the molecular pharmacology as well as relevant current preclinical and clinical data on cardiorenal outcomes. A comparative review of all compounds in the class is discussed with regard to clinical efficacy and safety as well as a perspective outlining their future use in clinical practice.

The mineralocorticoid receptor in chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health concern, affecting approximately 10% of the population worldwide. CKD of glomerular or tubular origin leads to the activation of stress mechanisms, including the renin angiotensin aldosterone system and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation. Over the last two decades, blockade of the MR has arisen as a potential therapeutic approach against various forms of kidney disease. In this review, we summarize the experimental studies that have shown a protective effect of MR antagonists (MRAs) in non-diabetic and diabetic CKD animal models. Moreover, we review the main clinical trials that have shown the clinical application of MRAs to reduce albuminuria and, importantly, to slow CKD progression. Recent evidence from the FIDELIO trial showed that the MRA finerenone can reduce hard kidney outcomes when added to the standard of care in CKD associated with type 2 diabetes. Finally, we discuss the effects of MRAs relative to those of SGLT2 inhibitors, as well as the potential benefit of combination therapy to maximize organ protection.

A renaissance in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease, hypertension in chronic kidney disease, and beyond

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects approximately 15% of the US population and is associated with significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The two leading causes of end stage kidney disease are hypertension and diabetes mellitus, both of which are modifiable risk factors. The cornerstones of CKD care include early detection, management of associated risk factors, modification of cardiovascular disease risk, slowing progression of disease, and management of complications including anemia, acid base disturbance, and mineral and bone disorders. For the last 20 years, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors were the mainstay treatment for proteinuric diabetic and nondiabetic kidney disease. Recently, new therapies such as sodium-glucose linked transporter 2 inhibitors, have emerged as powerful tools in the treatment of CKD with indications in both diabetic and nondiabetic kidney disease. In this article, we define CKD staging, review new hypertension and diabetic guidelines for CKD patients, and discuss major trials for new potential therapies in CKD, particularly diabetic kidney disease. We will provide practical guidance for primary care physicians to diagnose CKD and implement these agents early in the disease course to prevent the progression of disease and reduce the morbidity and mortality of this vulnerable population.

Chronic Kidney Disease: Strategies to Retard Progression

Chronic kidney disease (CKD), defined as the presence of irreversible structural or functional kidney damages, increases the risk of poor outcomes due to its association with multiple complications, including altered mineral metabolism, anemia, metabolic acidosis, and increased cardiovascular events. The mainstay of treatments for CKD lies in the prevention of the development and progression of CKD as well as its complications. Due to the heterogeneous origins and the uncertainty in the pathogenesis of CKD, efficacious therapies for CKD remain challenging. In this review, we focus on the following four themes: first, a summary of the known factors that contribute to CKD development and progression, with an emphasis on avoiding acute kidney injury (AKI); second, an etiology-based treatment strategy for retarding CKD, including the approaches for the common and under-recognized ones; and third, the recommended approaches for ameliorating CKD complications, and the final section discusses the novel agents for counteracting CKD progression.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists-Use in Chronic Kidney Disease

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) are drugs with a potentially broad spectrum of action. They have been reported to have healing effects in many diseases, such as chronic heart failure, hypertension, or nephrotic syndrome. Numerous studies suggest that mineralocorticoid receptor activation is pathogenic and a progression factor of chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, results of studies on the use of MRA in the treatment of CKD are inconclusive. Current guidelines recommend against the use of MRA in patients with advanced CKD. Although, there is growing interest on their use in this population due to treatment benefits. In this review, we summarize studies which were purposed to evaluate the impact of MRA therapy on CKD patients. Despite many benefits of this treatment e.g., reducing cardiovascular mortality or alleviating proteinuria, steroidal MRA (such as spironolactone or eplerenone) have a low safety profile. They often lead to hyperkalemia complications which are dangerous in patients with CKD, and diabetic nephropathy, especially in hemodialysis patients. Studies on recently developed nonsteroidal MRA showed that they have fewer side effects. In our review, we discuss steroidal and nonsteroidal MRA treatment effects on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), proteinuria, the cardiovascular system, and hyperkalemia in CKD patients. We present new content and recent publications in this field.

Hyperkalemia in Chronic Kidney Disease in the New Era of Kidney Protection Therapies

Despite recent therapeutic advances, chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the fastest growing global causes of death. This illustrates limitations of current therapeutic approaches and, potentially, unidentified knowledge gaps. For decades, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers have been the mainstay of therapy for CKD. However, they favor the development of hyperkalemia, which is already common in CKD patients due to the CKD-associated decrease in urinary potassium (K⁺) excretion and metabolic acidosis. Hyperkalemia may itself be life-threatening as it may trigger potentially lethal arrhythmia, and additionally may limit the prescription of RAAS blockers and lead to low-K⁺ diets associated to low dietary fiber intake. Indeed, hyperkalemia is associated with adverse kidney, cardiovascular, and survival outcomes. Recently, novel kidney protective therapies, ranging from sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors to new mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have shown efficacy in clinical trials. Herein, we review K⁺ pathophysiology and the clinical impact and management of hyperkalemia considering these developments and the availability of the novel K⁺ binders patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, recent results from clinical trials targeting metabolic acidosis (sodium bicarbonate, veverimer), and an increasing understanding of the role of the gut microbiota in health and disease.