Reproducibility of the circadian blood pressure pattern in 24-h versus 48-h recordings: the Spanish Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry

Pregnancy-onset obstructive sleep apnea and ambulatory blood pressure

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Elevated nocturnal blood pressure (BP) increases the risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). Though obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) increases the risk for HDP, data on OSA, and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in pregnancy are scarce. We aim to examine the BP profile of women with pregnancy-onset OSA.

METHODS

Pregnant women with overweight/obesity and snoring were recruited at <13 weeks gestation and underwent level III home sleep apnea testing and 24-hour ABPM at enrollment and at 31-34 weeks' gestation. Women with OSA at enrollment were excluded. Mean differences in nocturnal BP and 24-hour BP measurements, between women with pregnancy-onset OSA and women without OSA, were computed by multivariable linear regression.

RESULTS

Participants (40/101) had pregnancy-onset OSA (respiratory event index (REI) ≥5 events per hour) in the third trimester. Despite no significant differences in baseline BP, nocturnal systolic and diastolic BP were significantly higher in women with pregnancy-onset OSA compared to women without OSA, after adjusting for multiple covariates (mean difference 5.49 (1.45-9.52) and 3.89 (0.19-7.60), respectively). Differences in systolic BP persisted into the daytime in the OSA group. Lack of nocturnal dipping was highly prevalent in both groups, but the difference was not significant in the adjusted model.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy-onset OSA in the 3rd trimester is associated with elevated nocturnal BP and daytime systolic BP. The lack of nocturnal dipping irrespective of REI cut-off in pregnant women at risk for SDB further demonstrates the limitations of REI in defining pathology in pregnancy.

Comparison of nocturnal blood pressure dipping status detected by home vs. ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: analysis of J-HOP Nocturnal BP Study data

Nocturnal blood pressure (BP) dipping is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, independent of nighttime BP levels. We compared nocturnal BP dipping detected by conventional ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) with that detected by nocturnal home BP monitoring (HBPM), which can measure BP during sleep with a timer function. We analyzed data of 927 subjects in the nationwide practice-based J-HOP Nocturnal BP Study and observed that the prevalences of nocturnal BP dipping status for HBPM and ABPM respectively were: extreme dipper, 6.9% and 14.8%; dipper, 36.1% and 42.4%; non-dipper, 42.8% and 33.2%; riser pattern, 14.1%, and 9.6%. The agreement between nocturnal dipping classification by HBPM and ABPM was 41.0%, and when we used ≥3 days of HBPM data, the agreement rate increased to 42.8%. Obtaining an increased number of nighttime BP measurements at home for multiple days may increase the reliability of assessments of nocturnal BP dipping status detected by HBPM.

Effects of a maintenance period on ambulatory blood pressure and morning blood pressure surge in young normotensives post isometric training

Isometric resistance training (IRT) has emerged as an efficacious therapeutic intervention to reduce ambulatory blood pressure (BP), and BP diurnal variability. However, once the required decreases in BP have been achieved the efficacy of implementing a reduced maintenance dose is not understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effects of an 8-week maintenance period (8-week) following the cessation of the prescribed 8-week IRT in young normotensives. Twenty-two recreationally active, not resistance trained, normotensive (24-h ambulatory SBP, ≥130 mmHg) young adults were randomly assigned to a training-maintenance [TG-MT; n = 13 (female = 5); age 21 ± 2 years] or a non-training control [CON; n = 9 (female = 4); age 23 ± 3 years] group. Ambulatory BP, morning BP surge (MBPS) and average real variability (ARV) were measured prior to, after 8 weeks of bilateral leg IRT (4x2-minute contractions at 20% MVC with 2-min rest periods, 3 days/week) and following an 8-week (once per week) maintenance period. On completion of the maintenance period the significant reductions seen following the IRT were maintained within the TG-MT group in 24-h ambulatory SBP (6 ± 4 mmHg, p < 0.001), daytime (5 ± 5 mmHg, p = 0.002), MBPS (7 ± 10 mmHg, p = 0.019) and 24-h SBP ARV (2.03 ± 1.44 mmHg, p = 0.001), daytime SBP ARV (2.04 ± 1.78 mmHg, p = 0.003). These results show that reductions in ambulatory BP (24-h SBP and daytime SBP), in addition to BP diurnal variations (MBPS, 24-h SBP ARV and daytime SBP AVR) are maintained following an 8-week maintenance dose in young adults and add further weight to the growing body of evidence promoting IRT as an efficacious therapeutic exercise intervention to prevent or reduce BP.

A blunted nocturnal blood pressure decline is associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality

OBJECTIVE

It has been suggested that a blunted nocturnal blood pressure (BP) decline is associated with a poor prognosis. Nevertheless, it remains unclear if an abnormal dipping is deleterious per se or it merely reflects an elevated BP during sleep. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of nocturnal BP decline, with or without concomitant elevated nocturnal BP.

METHODS

Vital status and cause of death were obtained from death certificates in 59 124 patients, enrolled in the Spanish ABPM Registry between 2004 and 2014 (median follow-up: 10 years). The association between night-to-day ratio (NDR) and dipping patterns (extreme dippers, dippers, reduced dippers, and risers) with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were evaluated by Cox-proportional models adjusted for clinical confounders and 24 h blood pressure.

RESULTS

NDR was associated with all-cause mortality [hazard ratio for 1SD change: 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-1.17]. Reduced dippers (1.13; 1.06-1.20) and risers (1.41; 1.32-1.51) were associated with an increased risk of all-cause death, whereas extreme dippers (0.90; 0.79-1.02) were not. Elevated NDR (≥0.9) in the absence of elevated night SBP (<120 mmHg) was associated with an increased risk of death (1.13; 1.04-1.22), as well as elevated night SBP but normal NDR (1.38; 1.26-1.50), and the combination of both abnormalities (1.56; 1.46-1.66). Similar results were obtained for cardiovascular mortality.

CONCLUSION

Abnormalities in the circadian pattern are associated with an increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. This is maintained even in the absence of nocturnal BP elevation.

[Circadian rhythm and blood pressure in patients with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and its relationship with the risk of cardiovascular events]

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular diseases are the group of diseases that cause most deaths worldwide, being arterial hypertension the modifiable risk factor that mostly predisposes to other cardiovascular diseases development. In this regard, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) lets to detect the different changes in blood pressure throughout 24h, known as circadian patterns (dipper, non-dipper, riser or extreme dipper). There may be an association between these patterns and cardiovascular risk, so this study aims to compare cardiovascular risk using the 2 validated scales REGICOR and SCORE in patients with different circadian patterns using ABMP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of hypertensive patients with ABMP registered between 2015 and 2021 in Alcázar de San Juan and Madridejos. Data were collected from clinical history (arterial hypertension, BMI, comorbidities, and smoking habits) and ABPM records, as well as sociodemographic and analytical variables, cardiovascular risk scales (REGICOR and SCORE) and circadian rhythm variables (dipper, extreme dipper, non-dipper and rise pattern).

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-nine patients (46.5% female, 64.3±12.6 years old) were included. There were 38.3% with dipper pattern, 10% extreme dipper, 33.1% non-dipper and 18.6% riser. Patients with riser pattern showed higher score on the REGICOR and SCORE scales (34 and 68%, respectively). A significant correlation was established between both scales (Spearman rho: 0.589; p<0.001), but with poor concordance (kappa=0.348 [95% CI 0.271-0.425]).

CONCLUSION

ABMP has turned into a very useful tool in the diagnosis and treatment of arterial hypertension. In addition, the circadian patterns of these patients may correlate to the choice of an adequate treatment and correct follow-up.

Clinical Significance of Nocturnal Hypertension and Nighttime Blood Pressure Dipping in Hypertension

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This narrative review article aims to discuss more recent evidence, current challenges, and future perspectives regarding the clinical importance of nocturnal hypertension and nighttime blood pressure dipping, with particular reference to diagnosis, prognostic value, and therapeutic approach.

RECENT FINDINGS

The importance of nighttime blood pressure and nighttime blood pressure dipping has been demonstrated in decades. Increased nighttime blood pressure has been acknowledged as an unfavorable clinical trait. However, more recent evidence suggests that the abolishment of normal circadian blood pressure rhythm is not always a solid predictor of adverse cardiovascular events and needs to be interpreted in the light of each patients' individual characteristics. Physicians treating hypertensive patients with adverse nighttime blood pressure profiles often face the dilemma of chronotherapy. This has been a blurred field for years, yet very recent evidence from appropriately designed studies attempts to shed light on this puzzling question. As 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is being increasingly recommended and applied in real-world practice for the diagnosis and monitoring of hypertension, information on nighttime blood pressure and nocturnal dipping profile is collected but is not always easy to interpret.

Sleep characteristics associated with nocturnal blood pressure nondipping in healthy individuals: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The current literature investigating nocturnal blood pressure (BP) nondipping has largely focused on clinical populations, however, conditions such as hypertension, obstructive sleep apnoea and insomnia are recognized confounding factors for BP dipping. The exact mechanisms responsible for BP nondipping remain unclear, therefore, there is a need to investigate BP nondipping in healthy individuals to better understand the underlying mechanisms. This review identifies sleep characteristics that may contribute to BP nondipping in healthy individuals. It is anticipated that an understanding of the sleep characteristics that contribute to BP nondipping may inform future sleep-related behavioral interventions to ultimately reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

The PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant, English language, peer-reviewed publications (from inception to March 2022). The search identified 550 studies. After duplicates were removed, the titles and abstracts of the remaining 306 studies were screened. Of these, 250 studies were excluded leaving 56 studies to test for eligibility. Thirty-nine studies were excluded such that 17 studies fully met the inclusion criteria for the review.

RESULTS

Findings from this review indicate that short sleep duration, more sleep fragmentation, less sleep depth and increased variability in sleep timing may be associated with BP nondipping in healthy individuals.

CONCLUSION

While there is no evidence-based approach for the treatment of nocturnal BP nondipping, it seems promising that addressing one's sleep health may be an important starting point to reduce the prevalence of BP nondipping and perhaps the progression to cardiovascular disease.

Effects of isometric resistance training and detraining on ambulatory blood pressure and morning blood pressure surge in young normotensives

Isometric resistance training (IRT) has been shown to reduce resting and ambulatory blood pressure (BP), as well as BP variability and morning BP surge (MBPS). However, there are no data available regarding how long after cessation of IRT these effects are maintained. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effects of 8 weeks of detraining on resting BP, ambulatory BP and MBPS following 8 weeks of IRT in a population of young normotensive individuals and to further substantiate previously reported reductions in MBPS following IRT. Twenty-five apparently healthy participants with resting BP within the normal range (16 men, age = 23 ± 6 years; 9 women, age = 22 ± 4 years, resting BP: 123 ± 5/69 ± 7 mmHg) were randomly assigned to a training-detraining (TRA-DT, n = 13) or control (CON, n = 12) group. Resting BP, ambulatory BP and MBPS were measured prior to, after 8 weeks of bilateral leg IRT using an isokinetic dynamometer (4 × 2-min contractions at 20% MVC with 2-min rest periods, 3 days/week) and following an 8-week detraining period. There were significant reductions in 24-h ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) and calculated SBP average real variability (ARV) following IRT that were maintained after detraining (pre-to-post detraining, −6 ± 4 mmHg, p = 0.008, −2 ± 1.5 mmHg, p = 0.001). Similarly, the training-induced decreases in daytime SBP and daytime SBP ARV (pre-to-post detraining, −5 ± 6 mmHg, p = 0.001; −2 ± 1.2 mmHg, p = 0.001, respectively), MBPS (pre-to-post detraining, −6 ± 9 mmHg, p = 0.046) and resting SBP (pre-to-post detraining, −4 ± 6 mmHg, p = 0.044) were preserved. There were no changes in night-time or night-time SBP ARV across all time points (pre-to-post detraining, −1 ± 8 mmHg, p = 1.00, −0.7 ± 2.9 mmHg, p = 1.00). These results confirm that IRT causes significant reductions in resting BP, ambulatory BP, ambulatory ARV and MBPS. Importantly, the changes remained significantly lower than baseline for 8 weeks after cessation of training, suggesting a sustained effect of IRT.

Effects of isometric leg training on ambulatory blood pressure and morning blood pressure surge in young normotensive men and women

Despite the reported association between diurnal variations in ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and elevated cardiovascular disease risk, little is known regarding the effects of isometric resistance training (IRT), a practical BP-lowering intervention, on ambulatory BP and morning BP surge (MBPS). Thus, we investigated whether (i) IRT causes reductions in ambulatory BP and MBPS, in young normotensives, and (ii) if there are any sex differences in these changes. Twenty normotensive individuals (mean 24-h SBP = 121 ± 7, DBP = 67 ± 6 mmHg) undertook 10-weeks of bilateral-leg IRT (4 × 2-min/2-min rest, at 20% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) 3 days/week). Ambulatory BP and MBPS (mean systolic BP (SBP) 2 h after waking minus the lowest sleeping 1 h mean SBP) was measures pre- and post-training. There were significant reductions in 24-h ambulatory SBP in men (− 4 ± 2 mmHg, P = 0.0001) and women (− 4 ± 2 mmHg, P = 0.0001) following IRT. Significant reductions were also observed in MBPS (− 6 ± 8 mmHg, p = 0.044; − 6 ± 7 mmHg, P = 0.019), yet there were no significant differences between men and women in these changes, and 24-h ambulatory diastolic BP remained unchanged. Furthermore, a significant correlation was identified between the magnitude of the change in MBPS and the magnitude of changes in the mean 2-h SBP after waking for both men and women (men, r = 0.89, P = 0.001; women, r = 0.74, P = 0.014). These findings add further support to the idea that IRT, as practical lifestyle intervention, is effective in significantly lowering ambulatory SBP and MBPS and might reduce the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events that often occur in the morning.

[Use of 48-hour ABPM in specialist care. Experience in our centre]

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a basic tool in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension (HT). Validity is based on the number of readings taken and their duration. Our aim was to study in our 48-hour ABPM series whether extending the duration of ABPM to 48 hours is justified.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a case series comprising 81 patients with 48-hour ABPM over a 5-year period (2013 to 2018). We analysed the differences between the first and second day.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients, 44 men, mean age of 52 years (± 18). The mean blood pressure (BP) was higher on the first day (132/77 mmHg vs. 130/76 mmHg, p ≤ .01) and there was also a greater proportion of patients with HT on the first day (59 vs. 50%; p ≤ .05). The patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n = 33) had higher systolic BP (SBP) on the second night (p ≤ .05), a circadian rhythm of higher risk on the second day (dipper 13.6 vs. 86.4%, non-dipper 60.7 vs. 41.7%, and riser 30.3 vs. 18.8%; p ≤ .05), more diabetes (39%, p ≤ .01) and more left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (74%, p ≤ .05).

CONCLUSIONS

48-hour ABPM could determine BP readings and circadian rhythm better than 24-hour ABPM, especially in patients with CKD and diabetes, both diseases carrying high cardiovascular risk.

Reproducibility study of nocturnal blood pressure dipping in patients with high cardiovascular risk

It has been shown that in most people there is a physiological reduction in blood pressure during nighttime sleep, it falling by approximately 10% compared to daytime values (dippers). On the other hand, in some people, there is no nighttime reduction (non‐dippers). Various studies have found an association between being a non‐dipper and a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, but few have assessed whether the nocturnal pattern is maintained over time. From the database of the TAHPS study, data were available on 225 patients, each of whom underwent 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) on four occasions over a period of 5 months. We studied the reproducibility of the nocturnal BP dipping pattern with mixed linear analysis and also calculated the concordance in the classification of patients as dippers or non‐dippers. The intraclass correlation coefficients between the different ABPM recordings were 0.482 and 0.467 for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. Two‐thirds (67%) and 70% of the patients classified, respectively, as dippers or non‐dippers based on systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings in the first ABPM recording were found to have the same classification based on the subsequent recordings. We conclude that the reproducibility of nocturnal dipping patterns and concordance of dipper vs non‐dipper status in individual patients is modest and therefore that we should be cautious about recommending treatments or interventions based on these patterns.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring to Diagnose and Manage Hypertension

This review portrays how ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring was established and recommended as the method of choice for the assessment of BP and for the rational use of antihypertensive drugs. To establish much-needed diagnostic ambulatory BP thresholds, initial statistical approaches evolved into longitudinal studies of patients and populations, which demonstrated that cardiovascular complications are more closely associated with 24-hour and nighttime BP than with office BP. Studies cross-classifying individuals based on ambulatory and office BP thresholds identified white-coat hypertension, an elevated office BP in the presence of ambulatory normotension as a low-risk condition, whereas its counterpart, masked hypertension, carries a hazard almost as high as ambulatory combined with office hypertension. What clinically matters most is the level of the 24-hour and the nighttime BP, while other BP indexes derived from 24-hour ambulatory BP recordings, on top of the 24-hour and nighttime BP level, add little to risk stratification or hypertension management. Ambulatory BP monitoring is cost-effective. Ambulatory and home BP monitoring are complimentary approaches. Their interchangeability provides great versatility in the clinical implementation of out-of-office BP measurement. We are still waiting for evidence from randomized clinical trials to prove that out-of-office BP monitoring is superior to office BP in adjusting antihypertensive drug treatment and in the prevention of cardiovascular complications. A starting research line, the development of a standardized validation protocol for wearable BP monitoring devices, might facilitate the clinical applicability of ambulatory BP monitoring.

Guidelines for the design and conduct of human clinical trials on ingestion-time differences - chronopharmacology and chronotherapy - of hypertension medications

Current hypertension guidelines fail to provide a recommendation on when-to-treat, thus disregarding relevant circadian rhythms that regulate blood pressure (BP) level and 24 h patterning and medication pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The ideal purpose of ingestion-time (chronopharmacology, i.e. biological rhythm-dependent effects on the kinetics and dynamics of medications, and chronotherapy, i.e. the timing of pharmaceutical and other treatments to optimize efficacy and safety) trials should be to explore the potential impact of endogenous circadian rhythms on the effects of medications. Such investigations and outcome trials mandate adherence to the basic standards of human chronobiology research. In-depth review of the more than 150 human hypertension pharmacology and therapeutic trials published since 1974 that address the differential impact of upon-waking/morning versus at-bedtime/evening schedule of treatment reveals diverse protocols of sometimes suboptimal or defective design and conduct. Many have been "time-of-day," i.e. morning versus evening, rather than circadian-time-based, and some relied on wake-time office BP rather than around-the-clock ambulatory BP measurements (ABPM). Additionally, most past studies have been of too small sample size and thus statistically underpowered. As of yet, there has been no consensual agreement on the proper design, methods and conduct of such trials. This Position Statement recommends ingestion-time hypertension trials to follow minimum guidelines: (i) Recruitment of participants should be restricted to hypertensive individuals diagnosed according to ABPM diagnostic thresholds and of a comparable activity/sleep routine. (ii) Tested treatment-times should be selected according to internal biological time, expressed by the awakening and bed times of the sleep/wake cycle. (iii) ABPM should be the primary or sole method of BP assessment. (iv) The minimum-required features for analysis of the ABPM-determined 24 h BP pattern ought to be the asleep (not "nighttime") BP mean and sleep-time relative BP decline, calculated in reference to the activity/rest cycle per individual. (v) ABPM-obtained BP means should be derived by the so-called adjusted calculation procedure, not by inaccurate arithmetic averages. (vi) ABPM should be performed with validated and calibrated devices at least hourly throughout two or more consecutive 24 h periods (48 h in total) to achieve the highest reproducibility of mean wake-time, sleep-time and 48 h BP values plus the reliable classification of dipping status. (vii) Calculation of minimum required sample size in adherence with proper statistical methods must be provided. (viii) Hypertension chronopharmacology and chronotherapy trials should preferably be randomized double-blind, randomized open-label with blinded-endpoint, or crossover in design, the latter with sufficient washout period between tested treatment-time regimens.

Nondipping Blood Pressure: Predictive or Reactive Failure of Renal Sodium Handling?

Blood pressure follows a daily rhythm, dipping during nocturnal sleep in humans. Attenuation of this dip (nondipping) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Renal control of sodium homeostasis is essential for long-term blood pressure control. Sodium reabsorption and excretion have rhythms that rely on predictive/circadian as well as reactive adaptations. We explore how these rhythms might contribute to blood pressure rhythm in health and disease.

Short-term reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure measurements: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 35 observational studies

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review on the reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) has not yet been conducted. This meta-analysis compared 24-h/daytime/night-time SBP and DBP mean values and SBP/DBP nocturnal dipping status from ABPMs in participants with or without hypertension.

METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL Complete databases were searched for articles published before 3 May 2019. Eligible studies reporting a 24-h ABPM repeated at least once within 1 month were included. The mean daytime/night-time/24-h BP values, percentage of nocturnal dipping, and proportion of nondippers were compared between the first and second day of measurements, and the proportion of participants with inconsistent dipping status were estimated using a random effect model.

RESULTS

Population-based analysis found a 0-1.1 mmHg difference between the first and second ABPM for 24-h/daytime/night-time SBP and DBP and 0-0.5% for percentage of SBP/DBP nocturnal dipping. The proportion of non-dippers was not different between the first and second ABPM. Intra-individual analysis found that the 95% limit of agreements (LOA) for SBP/DBP were wide and the 95% LOA for daytime SBP, common reference to diagnose hypertension, ranged -16.7 to 18.4 mmHg. Similarly, 32% of participants had inconsistent nocturnal dipping status.

CONCLUSION

ABPM had excellent reproducibility at the population level, favouring its application for research purposes; but reproducibility of intra-individual BP values and dipping status from a 24-h ABPM was limited. The available evidence was limited by the lack of high-quality studies and lack of studies in non-Western populations.

Two-Year Responses of Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure to First Occupational Lead Exposure

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Lead exposure causing hypertension is the mechanism commonly assumed to set off premature death and cardiovascular complications. However, at current exposure levels in the developed world, the link between hypertension and lead remains unproven. In the Study for Promotion of Health in Recycling Lead (URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02243904), we recorded the 2-year responses of office blood pressure (average of 5 consecutive readings) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure to first occupational lead exposure in workers newly employed at lead recycling plants. Blood lead (BL) was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (detection limit 0.5 µg/dL). Hypertension was defined according to the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline. Statistical methods included multivariable-adjusted mixed models with participants modeled as a random effect and interval-censored Cox regression. Office blood pressure was measured in 267 participants (11.6% women, mean age at enrollment, 28.6 years) and ambulatory blood pressure in 137 at 2 follow-up visits. Geometric means were 4.09 µg/dL for baseline BL and 3.30 for the last-follow-up-to-baseline BL ratio. Fully adjusted changes in systolic/diastolic blood pressure associated with a doubling of the BL ratio were 0.36/0.28 mm Hg (95% CI, −0.55 to 1.27/−0.48 to 1.04 mm Hg) for office blood pressure and −0.18/0.11 mm Hg (−2.09 to 1.74/−1.05 to 1.27 mm Hg) for 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure. The adjusted hazard ratios of moving up across hypertension categories for a doubling in BL were 1.13 (0.93–1.38) and 0.84 (0.57–1.22) for office blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure, respectively. In conclusion, the 2-year blood pressure responses and incident hypertension were not associated with the BL increase on first occupational exposure.

Repeated ambulatory monitoring reveals an evening rise in blood pressure in a Japanese population

Recent studies have revealed 2 peaks in the onset of cardiovascular events, 1 in the morning and another in the evening. We evaluated whether blood pressure (BP) also rises in the morning/evening and identified the determinants of evening BP rise using 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring for 7 consecutive days. We identified 2 BP peaks, 1 in the morning (0-3 hours after waking) and 1 in the evening (9-12 hours after waking). Subjects were subclassified according to the extent of evening BP rise: those in the top quartile (≥6.45 mm Hg, n = 34; ER group) vs all others. After adjustment for age, sex, and 24-hour systolic BP, evening BP rise was associated with the use of antihypertensive medications [odds ratio (OR), 3.57; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.46-8.74; P = .01] and estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99; P = .04), confirming its association with antihypertensive medication use and renal dysfunction.

Association of Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure With Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes

Importance

Blood pressure (BP) is a known risk factor for overall mortality and cardiovascular (CV)-specific fatal and nonfatal outcomes. It is uncertain which BP index is most strongly associated with these outcomes.

Objective

To evaluate the association of BP indexes with death and a composite CV event.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Longitudinal population-based cohort study of 11 135 adults from Europe, Asia, and South America with baseline observations collected from May 1988 to May 2010 (last follow-ups, August 2006-October 2016).

Exposures

Blood pressure measured by an observer or an automated office machine; measured for 24 hours, during the day or the night; and the dipping ratio (nighttime divided by daytime readings).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) expressed the risk of death or a CV event associated with BP increments of 20/10 mm Hg. Cardiovascular events included CV mortality combined with nonfatal coronary events, heart failure, and stroke. Improvement in model performance was assessed by the change in the area under the curve (AUC).

Results

Among 11 135 participants (median age, 54.7 years, 49.3% women), 2836 participants died (18.5 per 1000 person-years) and 2049 (13.4 per 1000 person-years) experienced a CV event over a median of 13.8 years of follow-up. Both end points were significantly associated with all single systolic BP indexes (P < .001). For nighttime systolic BP level, the HR for total mortality was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.17-1.28) and for CV events, 1.36 (95% CI, 1.30-1.43). For the 24-hour systolic BP level, the HR for total mortality was 1.22 (95% CI, 1.16-1.28) and for CV events, 1.45 (95% CI, 1.37-1.54). With adjustment for any of the other systolic BP indexes, the associations of nighttime and 24-hour systolic BP with the primary outcomes remained statistically significant (HRs ranging from 1.17 [95% CI, 1.10-1.25] to 1.87 [95% CI, 1.62-2.16]). Base models that included single systolic BP indexes yielded an AUC of 0.83 for mortality and 0.84 for the CV outcomes. Adding 24-hour or nighttime systolic BP to base models that included other BP indexes resulted in incremental improvements in the AUC of 0.0013 to 0.0027 for mortality and 0.0031 to 0.0075 for the composite CV outcome. Adding any systolic BP index to models already including nighttime or 24-hour systolic BP did not significantly improve model performance. These findings were consistent for diastolic BP.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this population-based cohort study, higher 24-hour and nighttime blood pressure measurements were significantly associated with greater risks of death and a composite CV outcome, even after adjusting for other office-based or ambulatory blood pressure measurements. Thus, 24-hour and nighttime blood pressure may be considered optimal measurements for estimating CV risk, although statistically, model improvement compared with other blood pressure indexes was small.

Reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure values and circadian blood pressure patterns in untreated subjects in a 1-11 month interval

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate in untreated subjects the reproducibility of mean values and four circadian patterns between two ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) recordings separated by 1-11 months.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 481 individuals (59% women) evaluated by ABPM on two occasions, visit 1 (V1) and 2 (V2), separated by 5.5+0.2 months. Four circadian patterns were defined by night/day systolic blood pressure (SBP) ratios: reverse dippers (RD), ratio >1.0; non-dippers (ND), ratio 0.9-1.0; dippers (D), ratio 0.8-<0.9; and extreme dippers (ED), ratio <0.8. Coefficients of correlation and concordance between the ABPM values at V1 and V2 and the reproducibility of the RD, ND, D and ED patterns were calculated by the percentage of the same profile from V1 to V2.

RESULTS

Mean 24-h blood pressure (BP) at V1 and V2 was 126.8/75.9±0.5/0.5 vs. 126.5/75.7±0.5/0.4 mmHg (NS). Nighttime SBP fall was 9.8±0.4 (V1) and 9.6±0.3% (V2) (NS). The correlation coefficient of ABPM data at V1 vs. at V2 was 0.41-0.69 (p<0.001) and the concordance coefficient was 0.34-0.57 (p<0.01). At V1, 38 subjects were classified as ED (7.9%); D, n=216 (44.9%), 187 as ND (38.9%) and 40 as RD (8.3%). At V2 only 26.3% of ED, 44.9% of D, 54.5% of ND and 40% of RD maintained the same profile as at V1.

CONCLUSION

In untreated subjects ABPM has high reproducibility for mean values but only modest reproducibility for circadian profiles, thereby challenging the prognostic value of BP dipping patterns.

Reproducibility of blood pressure dipping: relation to day-to-day variability in sleep quality

Previous studies of the reproducibility of blood pressure (BP) dipping have yielded inconsistent results. Few have examined factors that may influence day-to-day differences in dipping. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed on three occasions, approximately 1 week apart, in 115 untreated adult subjects with elevated clinic BPs. The mean ± standard deviation BP dip was 18 ± 7/15 ± 5 mm Hg (sleep/awake BP ratio = 0.87 ± 0.05/0.82 ± 0.06), with a median (interquartile range) day-to-day variation of 5.2 (3.1-8.1)/4.3 (2.8-5.6) mm Hg. There was no decrease in variability with successive measurements. The reproducibility coefficient (5.6 [95% confidence interval, 5.1-6.1] mm Hg) was greater and the intraclass correlation coefficient (0.53 [95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.63]) was smaller for the systolic dip than for 24-hour or awake systolic BPs, suggesting greater day-to-day variability in dipping. Variability in systolic dipping was greater in subjects with higher awake BP, but was not related to age, gender, race, or body mass index. Within individuals, day-to-day variations in dipping were related to variations in the fragmentation index (P < .001), a measure of sleep quality. Although mean 24-hour and awake BPs were relatively stable over repeated monitoring days, our study confirms substantial variability in BP dipping. Day-to-day differences in dipping are related to sleep quality.

Short-term reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Nondipping, defined as a less than 10% decline in Night:Day (N:D) ratio of blood pressure using 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, is associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes. However, its reproducibility has been questioned in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five of 29 recruited hypertensive or prehypertensive patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease completed ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on two occasions, 7-15 days apart, on a stable antihypertensive regimen. Daytime and night-time were defined as 6:00-21:59 h and 22:00-5:59 h, respectively. Correlation and concordance coefficients for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate were determined based on N:D and Asleep:Awake (A:A) ratios. Consistency of dipping was assessed by using Cohen's Kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Mean (±standard deviation) for age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, differences in daytime and night-time SBP and DBP were 43.12 years (8.55 years), 63.1 ml/min (20.5 ml/min), 11.74 mmHg (8.2 mmHg), and 10.82 mmHg (6.4 mmHg), respectively. Seventeen of 25 (68%) and 18 of 25 (72%) participants maintained the same dipping category based on D:N or A:A separation. Cohen's Kappa was 0.34 for D:N ratio and 0.38 for A:A ratio. Correlation and concordance coefficients were 0.89 and 0.88 for daytime SBP, 0.91 and 0.91 for daytime DBP, 0.79 and 0.78 for night-time SBP, 0.81 and 0.80 for night-time DBP, 0.58 and 0.56 for N:D ratio of SBP, and 0.56 and 0.53 for N:D ratio of DBP. Coefficients for A:A ratio were almost identical to N:D values except for A:A ratios of SBP (0.69 and 0.67) and DBP (0.48 and 0.45).

CONCLUSION

Repeated measures of SBP and DBP, 7-15 days apart, are highly correlative and concordant in the studied population, but nondipping, even though predominant, was found to be modestly reproducible.

Nocturnal blood pressure in untreated essential hypertensives

AIM. Prevalence, correlates and reproducibility of nocturnal hypertension (NH) as defined by fixed cut-off limits in uncomplicated essential hypertension are poorly defined. Therefore, we assessed such issue in a cohort of 658 untreated hypertensives. METHODS. All subjects underwent procedures including cardiac and carotid ultrasonography, 24-h urine collection for microalbuminuria, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), over two 24-h periods within 4 weeks. NH was defined according to current guidelines (i.e. night-time blood pressure, BP ? 120/70 mmHg) and non-dipping status as a reduction in average systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) at night lower than 10% compared with daytime values. RESULTS. A total of 477 subjects showed NH during the first and second ABPM period; 62 subjects had normal nocturnal BP (NN) in both ABPM sessions. Finally, 119 subjects changed their pattern from one ABPM session to the other. Overall, 72.5% of subjects had reproducible NH, 18% variable pattern (VP) and 9.5% reproducible NN. In the same group, figures of reproducible non-dipping, variable dipping and reproducible dipping pattern were 24%, 24% and 52%, respectively. Among NH patients, 56% of whom were dippers, subclinical cardiac organ damage was more pronounced than in their NN counterparts. CONCLUSIONS. In uncomplicated essential hypertensives, NH is a more frequent pattern than non-dipping; NH is associated with organ damage, independently of dipping/non-dipping status. This suggests that options aimed at restoring a blunted nocturnal BP fall may be insufficient to prevent cardiovascular complications unless night-time BP values are fully normalized.

The reproducibility of ethnic differences in the proportional awake-sleep blood pressure decline among women

A growing body of evidence indicates that African Americans (AA), on average, have a smaller proportional decline in blood pressure (BP) from waking to sleep than European Americans (EA), but this difference is largely based on correlational data from a single assessment day. The persistence of this difference over repeated sampling is not well established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether ethnic differences in the awake-sleep BP decline between AA and EA persisted over three monthly assessments. The subjects were 47 AA (age = 39.7 +/- 8.7) and 92 EA (age = 37.4 +/- 9.2) normotensive women. Subjects had 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring done on midweek workdays at 1-month intervals for three consecutive months. The proportional decline in BP was calculated as follows: (average awake - average sleep)/average sleep. The persistence of ethnic differences was evaluated using repeated-measures ANCOVA and by examining Bland-Altman plots. The ANCOVA results revealed that overall, the proportional decline of AA women was less than that of EA women for both SBP (P < 0.038) and DBP (P < 0.083), consistent with previous research, and that there were also no significant ethnic differences by monthly assessment. Bland-Altman plots revealed that overall and by ethnicity, the proportional decline in BP among individual subjects over the 3 months was also reproducible. These results suggest that the ethnic difference in awake-sleep BP between AA and EA women persists over time and that the awake-sleep decline in BP among individuals, whether AA or EA, is also reproducible.

Role of ambulatory and home blood pressure recording in clinical practice

Because of shortcomings of the office blood pressure (BP) measurement in individuals with hypertension (eg, white coat and masked hypertension effects, terminal digit bias, and large variability in BP among a small number of readings), use of out-of-office blood pressure measurements has become more common in clinical practice. The presence of the syndromes of white-coat and masked hypertension creates the concern that the office BP measurements are not reflective of an individual patient's true BP values. Home (or self) and ambulatory BP assessments have been used in numerous types of clinical trials and have demonstrated their usefulness as reliable research and clinical tools. In this article, we review the recent literature on the benefits and limitations of home (self) and ambulatory monitoring of the BP in clinical practice. In particular, how it relates to the diagnosis of patients with various presentations of hypertension and to cardio-vascular outcomes with long-term follow-ups of population cohorts.

Reproducibility of the ambulatory arterial stiffness index in hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND

We studied the repeatability of the ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI), which can be computed from 24-h blood pressure (BP) recordings as unity minus the regression slope of diastolic on systolic BP.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-two hypertensive outpatients recruited in Nijmegen (mean age = 46.2 years; 76.3% with systolic and diastolic hypertension) and 145 patients enrolled in the Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial (71.0 years) underwent 24-h BP monitoring at a median interval of 8 and 31 days, respectively. We used the repeatability coefficient, which is twice the SD of the within-participant differences between repeat recordings, and expressed it as a percentage of four times the SD of the mean of the paired measurements.

RESULTS

Mean AASI (crude or derived by time-weighted or robust regression) and 24-h pulse pressure (PP) were similar on repeat recordings in both cohorts. In Nijmegen patients, repeatability coefficients of AASI and PP were approximately 50%. In Syst-Eur trial patients, repeatability coefficient was approximately 60% for AASI and approximately 40% for PP. For comparison, repeatability coefficients for 24-h systolic and diastolic BP were approximately 30%. Differences in AASI between paired recordings were correlated with differences in the goodness of fit (r2) of the AASI regression line as well as with differences in the night-to-day BP ratio. However, in sensitivity analyses stratified for type of hypertension, r2, or dipping status, repeatability coefficients for AASI did not widely depart from 50 to 60% range.

CONCLUSION

Estimates of mean AASI were not different between repeat recordings, and repeatability coefficients were within the 50-60% range.