More questions than answers: a call for a moratorium on the use of intravitreal infliximab outside of a well-designed trial. Retina. 2010;30:1-5. [PMID: 20061905 DOI: 10.1097/iae.0b013e3181cde727]

Challenges for further successful development of tumor necrosis factor targeting therapies for uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Uveitis is a heterogeneous group of ocular conditions characterized by inflammation of the uveal tract and is one of the leading causes of vision impairment. In developed countries, noninfectious uveitis (NIU) represents most cases and is challenging to treat due to its severity, chronicity, and high recurrence rates. The advent of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) agents have dramatically improved outcomes and changed treatment paradigms in NIU.

AREAS COVERED

The index article summarizes the present experience of anti-TNF-α agents in NIU pharmacotherapy and highlights the barriers to further research and development of anti-TNF-α agents for uveitis. Common challenges faced in NIU clinical drugs trials, specific difficulties in anti-TNF-α drug development, and promising competitor drug candidates are discussed and evaluated.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-TNF-α agents have revolutionized NIU pharmacotherapy and greatly improved outcomes with good safety profiles. The great success of systemic infliximab and adalimumab in NIU treatment has resulted in little impetus for further development of this class of medication. Attempts have been made to deliver anti-TNF-α agents intravitreally but that has not been successful thus far. With expiring patents, competition from biosimilars and newer, novel molecules, it may not be viable to continue pursuing anti-TNF-α drug development.

T cells in ocular autoimmune uveitis: Pathways and therapeutic approaches

Autoimmune uveitis is a non-infectious intraocular condition that affects the uveal tract of the eye and threatens vision if not treated properly. Increasing evidence suggests that activated CD4⁺ T cells are associated with progressive and permanent destruction of photoreceptors in ocular autoimmune diseases. As such, the purpose of this review is to offer an overview of the role of CD4⁺ T cells in autoimmune uveitis as well as a justification for the current development and assessment of innovative autoimmune uveitis medications targeting CD4⁺ T cells. With an emphasis on T helper (Th)17, Th1, and Th2 cells, follicular helper CD4⁺ T cells, and regulatory T cells, this review presents a summary of recent research related to the pathways and signaling that encourage CD4⁺ T cells to develop into specialized effector cells. We also describe immunotherapeutic approaches based on CD4⁺ T cell subsets and their potential as therapeutic agents for autoimmune disorders.

RP1-associated recessive retinitis pigmentosa caused by paternal uniparental disomy

BACKGROUND

We report on a patient with a juvenile-onset inherited retinal degeneration (IRD) associated with homozygous RP1 mutations inherited by uniparental disomy (UPD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 6-year-old healthy girl failed school vision screening and was diagnosed with a bull's eye maculopathy. She underwent complete ophthalmic examination, full-field electroretinograms (ERG), kinetic fields, full-field sensitivity testing (FST), and retinal imaging with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and near-infrared (NIR) and short wavelength (SW) fundus autofluorescence (FAF).

RESULTS

Visual acuities were relatively preserved (20/30+). There was subtle foveal depigmentation but an otherwise normal fundus examination. SD-OCT revealed a relatively preserved fovea with thinning of the photoreceptor outer nuclear layer with increasing distance from the foveal center coinciding with marked attenuation of the NIR and less marked loss of the SW-FAF signal. ERGs were non-detectable. Kinetic visual fields were generally full to large (V-4e) target but constricted to ~10°of eccentricity to I-4e stimuli. Dark-adapted thresholds by FST were rod-mediated and elevated by ~2 log units. Homozygous pathogenic mutations in RP1 (c.1720_1721del; p.Ser574Asnfs*8) were identified. Family member testing revealed father and siblings to be unaffected carriers; the mother carried wild-type alleles. Further testing suggested UPD of chromosome 8.

CONCLUSION

This report adds support to UPD as a mechanism of inheritance in IRDs and stresses the importance of familial testing for genetic diagnosis and counseling. Consistent with earlier descriptions of autosomal recessive RP1-IRDs our patient showed an early rod and cone photoreceptor degeneration.

Biologic Drugs for the Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitis

ABSTRACT

The management of noninfectious uveitis is constantly evolving. A new "biologic era" in treatment began after the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocking drugs was demonstrated in rheumatologic inflammatory diseases. The goal of specific immunomodulation with a biologic drug is to target inflammation at the molecular level with a low rate of serious adverse events. The purpose of this review is to summarize current knowledge of biologic drugs in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis by describing clinical studies and recent pharmacological developments.

The efficacy of systemic and intravitreal infliximab treatments in an endotoxin-induced uveitis model

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of systemic and intravitreal infliximab treatments in an experimental endotoxin-induced uveitis (EIU) model. Methods: Twenty-eight white New Zealand rabbits were equally divided into 4 groups. Group 1 received an intravitreal injection of 0.1 cc saline, group 2 received an intravitreal injection of 2 µg/0.1 cc lipopolysaccharide (LPS), group 3 received an intravitreal injection of 2 µg/0.1 cc LPS and 2 mg/0.1 cc infliximab, and group 4 received intravitreal injection of 2 µg/0.1 cc LPS and intravenous injection of 5 mg/kg infliximab. Clinical, biochemical (aqueous and vitreous humour protein levels and TNF-α concentrations), and histopathological evaluations were performed. Results: The clinical examination score was lower in group 4 than in group 2 (p = 0.006); but there was no significant difference between groups 2 and 3 (Bonferroni correction, p = 0.016). No statistically significant difference was found among groups 2, 3, and 4 for aqueous humour protein levels (p > 0.05). Significantly higher aqueous humour concentrations of TNF-α was measured in group 3 comparing to both group 1 and 4 (p = 0.003 and p = 0.002, respectively). No significant difference was found in vitreous protein levels or TNF-α concentrations among all study groups (Bonferroni correction, p = 0.026 and p = 0.101, respectively). Histopathological evaluation of the uveal tissue and anterior chamber reaction revealed the highest inflammation in group 3 (p < 0.001). In group 4, histopathological evaluation of uveal tissue was lower than in groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively); whereas there was no difference in anterior chamber inflammation between groups 2 and 4 (p = 1.00). Conclusion: Intravitreal 2 mg/0.1 cc infliximab injection exacerbated inflammation in an EIU model; whereas systemic infliximab treatment at a dose of 5 mg/kg suppressed inflammation effectively and rapidly.

Efficacy and safety of intravitreal anti-tumour necrosis factor drugs in adults with non-infectious uveitis - a systematic review

Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs have been extensively used in non-infectious uveitis (NIU), when corticosteroids or conventional immunosuppressive drugs cannot adequately control inflammation or intolerable side-effects occur. However, systemic anti-TNF therapies are also associated with a myriad of side-effects. Therefore, intravitreal administration of anti-TNF biologics has been employed to minimize patient morbidity and systemic adverse effects, while maintaining therapeutic effectivity. We undertook a systematic review to determine evidence of efficacy and safety of intravitreal administration of anti-TNF drugs in adults with NIU. We conducted this systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016041946). We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE, from inception to April 2017, as well as clinical trial registries and grey literature. The qualitative analysis included all studies of adult patients with a diagnosis of NIU and who received intravitreal anti-TNF drugs with a 4-week minimum follow-up. A total of 4840 references were considered for title and abstract screening. Seven full texts were screened, and five studies were considered for analysis. All studies were open-label, single-centre, prospective, non-randomized, interventional case series with a follow-up between 4 and 26 weeks, employing either adalimumab in two studies and infliximab in three. Three studies showed a treatment effect of anti-TNF intravitreal injections, while one study revealed short-term improvement and one study revealed no efficacy of anti-TNF intravitreal therapy. None of the studies reported ocular adverse effects but only two studies included electrophysiological assessment in the safety analysis and no study assessed systemic human anti-drug antibodies. The available evidence is not sufficiently robust to conclude about the clinical effectivity of intravitreal anti-TNF in NIU and so no recommendation can be made. In conclusion, intravitreal injection of anti-TNF antibodies remains a possible treatment option to be explored through robust clinical investigation.

INTRAVITREAL INFLIXIMAB IN REFRACTORY UVEITIS IN BEHCET'S DISEASE: A Safety and Efficacy Clinical Study

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of intravitreal infliximab (1 mg/0.05 mL) in patients with refractory posterior uveitis in Behcet's disease.

METHODS

Twenty patients were included in this study. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), vitreous haze (graded 0-4), vasculitis, retinitis, and papillopathy (presence or absence) were assessed at baseline, Day 1 and Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 18. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) central foveal thickness, fluorescein angiography, and flash electroretinogram were done at baseline and 4, 12, and 18 weeks.

RESULTS

Mean baseline logMAR BCVA was 0.94 (20/160), had improved significantly by Week 2 to 0.6 (20/80) (P < 0.0001), and reached 0.36 (20/40) by Weeks 18 with three injections (P < 0.0001). Mean central foveal thickness OCT decreased significantly from baseline 361 μm to 180 μm at the end of follow-up (P < 0.0001). Profound decrease in mean vitreous haze gradings from two to 0.2 by the end follow-up (P < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in the number of patients with vasculitis (15 at baseline to 1 weeks at 18 weeks), retinitis (nine at baseline to none at 4 weeks), and papillitis (two at baseline to none at 4 weeks) (P < 0.05). No significant electrophysiological changes or ocular adverse inflammatory reactions were observed during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal infliximab appeared to be safe and effective in treating uveitis in Behcet's disease and should be considered as an alternative to systemic therapies.

Intravitreal drug administration for treatment of noninfectious uveitis

Intravitreal treatment became popular with the discovery of the blood ocular barriers, which significantly limit drug penetration in systemic or topical administration. As the mainstay of treatment in noninfectious uveitis (NOIU) is still corticosteroids, triamcinolone acetonide (TA) was the first intravitreally used agent in this subset of patients. Although it was very effective in controlling inflammation and improving the inflammation related complications, TA was found to have a high rate of intraocular complications and a relatively short half-life necessitating frequent reinjections. Other systemically used therapeutic options such as methotrexate and anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents were also tried intravitreally. Additionally anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents that are widely used intravitreally in the management of diabetic retinopathy and age related macular degeneration have become an option to control the uveitis related complications like macular edema, retinal and choroidal neovascularizations. Advances in biotechnology led to the slow release biodegradable implant era. These implants have a longer duration of action, which may help in decreasing the number of reinjections. Today two forms of implants have been approved for use in NOIU, Retisert (0.59 mg flucinolone acetonide, surgical intervention) and Ozurdex (0.7 mg dexamethasone, office based intervention). Studies dealing with newer agents (cyclosporine, LFG31, sirolimus) in the management of chronic NOIU are on the way. The search for ideal effective, safe and biocompatible intravitreal agents in the management of NOIU has not ended yet.

Birdshot chorioretinopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Birdshot chorioretinopathy remains incompletely understood, but new insights into its pathogenesis have been reported recently, and treatment and monitoring options have also expanded. Central visual acuity may remain good until the late stages of the disease, but loss of visual field and peripheral retinal function is common.

RECENT FINDINGS

The underlying pathogenesis of the disease has long been believed to be T-cell driven, but examination of the IL-17 pathway has now further refined the potential underlying mechanism. New imaging techniques, including extended depth imaging of the choroid with optical coherence tomography, have demonstrated promise in detecting disease activity earlier, enabling targeted treatment to be given. Treatment options have expanded with the advent of the biological agents, and these may yet improve outcomes, particularly in refractory patients.

SUMMARY

Laboratory research continues to investigate the underlying mechanisms of disease, but our understanding remains frustratingly incomplete for a disease with such a clear HLA association. Clinical research is increasingly being driven to improve the phenotyping of affected patients so that those at risk of visual loss can be identified early and treated more aggressively with individually targeted therapies such as the newer biological agents, but how successful this approach will ultimately prove to be remains to be seen.

Update on intravitreal anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapies for ocular disorders

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-?) is an important pro-inflammatory cytokine associated with a variety of ocular diseases. The currently available TNF-? inhibitors are etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, and certolizumab. Experimental and clinical studies on the intravitreal use of these agents have been reported with etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab: etanercept has shown limited efficacy in scarce reports; infliximab has been associated with local safety concerns but appears to benefit certain cases; adalimumab has shown no efficacy in cases of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or diabetic macular edema (DME), but the combination with bevacizumab may be effective in refractory cases of macular diseases. Further preclinical and clinical studies are warranted in order to be able to obtain a more robust conclusion on the use of intravitreal TNF-? inhibitors.

Multiplex bead array assay of plasma cytokines in type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic retinopathy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the roles of plasma cytokines in diabetic retinopathy (DR) and their relationship with the severity of DR.

METHODS

This study included 59 diabetic patients and 19 non-diabetic controls. The plasma concentrations of endothelial growth factor (EGF), eotaxin, fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2), Flt-3 ligand (Flt-3L), fractalkine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), growth-related oncogene (GRO), interferon (IFN)-α2, IFN-γ, interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12 (p40), IL-12 (p70), IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, IFN-inducible protein-10 (IP-10), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, MCP-3, macrophage-derived cytokine (MDC), macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, MIP-1β, sCD40L, sIL-2Rα, transforming growth factor (TGF)-α, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- α, TNF-β, and VEGF were measured with Luminex multiplex bead immunoassay. The levels of these cytokines were investigated according to the DR stage.

RESULTS

The plasma level of ten cytokines-MCP-1, IL-6, IL-7, IL-9, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, sCD40L, sIL-2Rα and TNF-β-increased significantly in the diabetic group compared to the controls. The Flt-3L, IL-1Ra, IL-3, IL-5, and IL-12 (p40) levels were lower in the diabetic group than in the control group. The TNF-α plasma level was significantly elevated in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) compared with the levels in patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and patients with no apparent diabetic retinopathy (NDR).

CONCLUSIONS

TNF-α might be involved in the progression of DR, especially in the pathogenesis of PDR. TNF-α is a potential cytokine for the prognosis of DR and might act as a therapeutic target in DR.

Intravitreal infliximab for choroidal neovascularization in patients refractory to conventional treatments

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal infliximab in the course of compassionate use in patients affected by choroidal neovascularization. This prospective interventional case series includes four eligible patients, affected by exudative age-related macular degeneration (2/4), retinal angiomatous proliferation (1/4) and central retinal vein occlusion (1/4), who were refractory to conventional treatments. The patients received a single intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml of reconstituted infliximab solution (20mg/ml). The main outcomes measure were changes in best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness. Patients were evaluated at baseline, every week for the first month, then every two weeks, and on demand. Morphologic parameters improved after a single infliximab intravitreal injection. However, all patients developed acute uveitis in a period ranging from 4 to 7 weeks after treatment. Control of the intraocular inflammation was achieved with topical and systemic steroids in 3 patients, whereas in one case pars plana vitrectomy was needed. A single intravitreal injection of infliximab does not seem to improve the natural history of CNV from different aetiologies. However, all patients in our series developed a serious inflammatory response that required surgical management in one case. The intravitreal administration of infliximab is hence not safe and not recommended in clinical practice.

Birdshot uveitis: current and emerging treatment options

Birdshot chorioretinopathy is a relatively uncommon subtype of idiopathic posterior uveitis with distinct clinical characteristics and a strong genetic association with the Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-A29 allele. The diagnosis remains clinical and is based on the presence of typical clinical features, including multiple, distinctive, hypopigmented choroidal lesions throughout the fundus. The long-term visual prognosis of this disorder, however, remains guarded – central visual acuity can be preserved until late in the disease and it is not uncommon for patients to receive inadequate immunosuppressive treatment, leading to a poor long-term outcome in which peripheral retinal damage eventually leads to visual deterioration. Birdshot chorioretinopathy has proven a particularly attractive area of study within the field of uveitis, as it is a relatively easily defined disease with an associated human leukocyte antigen haplotype. Despite this, however, the immune mechanisms involved in its pathogenesis remain unclear, and some patients continue to lose retinal function despite therapy with corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive agents. Laboratory research continues to investigate the underlying mechanisms of disease, and clinical research is now being driven to improve the phenotyping and monitoring of this condition as, in the era of so-called personalized medicine, it is becoming increasingly important to identify patients at risk of visual loss early so that they can be treated more aggressively with targeted therapies such as the newer biological agents. This approach requires the formation of collaborative groups, as the relative rarity of the condition makes it difficult for one center to accumulate enough patients for worthwhile studies. Nevertheless, results obtained with newer therapies, such as biological agents directed against particular cytokines or cell-surface receptors, demonstrate ever improving control of the inflammation in refractory cases, providing hope that the outlook for visual function in this condition can only improve.

Diabetic retinopathy: current concepts and emerging therapy

More Americans become blind each year from microvascular complications of diabetes than from any other cause. Several studies have indicated that tight glucose control and lifestyle modification can dramatically reduce the incidence and prevalence of diabetic retinopathy. Research over the past several years has yielded a tremendous increase in our knowledge of the pathogenesis of the damage to the retina that occurs in diabetes and has facilitated our ability to intervene and control the damage. New intravitreal medical therapies supported by government- and industry-supported research are gradually replacing standard laser photocoagulation for the treatment of all forms of retinopathy.

New options for uveitis treatment

Uveitis is one of the most important causes of blindness worldwide. Its etiology and pathogenesis are complicated and have not been well understood. The treatment for uveitis is predominantly based on steroids and immunosuppressants. However, systemic side effects limit their clinical application. With the advancement of molecular biology, some intravitreal implants and biologic agents have been used for the treatment of uveitis. Additionally, novel techniques such as gene therapy and RNA interference are being studied for using as uveitis therapy. This paper reviews recent advances in uveitis treatment.

Local therapies for inflammatory eye disease in translation: past, present and future

Despite their side-effects and the advent of systemic immunosuppressives and biologics, the use of corticosteroids remains in the management of patients with uveitis, particularly when inflammation is associated with systemic disease or when bilateral ocular disease is present. The use of topical corticosteroids as local therapy for anterior uveitis is well-established, but periocular injections of corticosteroid can also be used to control mild or moderate intraocular inflammation. More recently, intraocular corticosteroids such as triamcinolone and steroid-loaded vitreal inserts and implants have been found to be effective, including in refractory cases. Additional benefits are noted when ocular inflammation is unilateral or asymmetric, when local therapy may preclude the need to increase the systemic medication.

Implants in particular have gained prominence with evidence of efficacy including both dexamethasone and fluocinolone loaded devices. However, an appealing avenue of research lies in the development of non-corticosteroid drugs in order to avoid the side-effects that limit the appeal of injected corticosteroids. Several existing drugs are being assessed, including anti-VEGF compounds such as ranibizumab and bevacizumab, anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha antibodies such as infliximab, as well as older cytotoxic medications such as methotrexate and cyclosporine, with varying degrees of success. Intravitreal sirolimus is currently undergoing phase 3 trials in uveitis and other inflammatory pathways have also been proposed as suitable therapeutic targets. Furthermore, the advent of biotechnology is seeing advances in generation of new therapeutic molecules such as high affinity binding peptides or modified high affinity or bivalent single chain Fab fragments, offering higher specificity and possibility of topical delivery.

Novel Intraocular Therapy in Non-infectious Uveitis of the Posterior Segment of the Eye

This article reviews the new clinically relevant data regarding the intraocular treatment of non-infectious uveitis. Triamcinolone acetonide is the most commonly used intravitreal corticosteroid for treatment of uveitis and uveitic macular oedema. The drug is available at low cost but it is associated with a high risk of raised intraocular pressure (IOP) and cataract and is not licensed for intraocular use. Dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®) appears to have a better safety profile, and a slightly long-lasting effect than triamcinolone acetonide. Fluocinolone acetonide implant (Retisert®) implant allows the release of corticosteroids at a constant rate over a 3-year period, but it requires surgical placement and its use is associated with a very high risk of cataracts and raised intraocular pressure. Iluvien® is another fluocinolone acetonide implant that could represent a more convenient treatment option for such cases in the future as it can be inserted into the vitreous cavity through 25-gauge injector system in an outpatient setting. To circumvent the risks associated with corticosteroids use, non-corticosteroids related therapeutics including intravitreal methotrexate; anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatments and intravitreal sirolimus have been recently developed.

Intravitreal tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors for neovascular age-related macular degeneration suboptimally responsive to antivascular endothelial growth factor agents: a pilot study from the Pan American Collaborative Retina Study Group

PURPOSE

To compare the short-term visual and anatomic outcomes after intravitreal injections of 2 different tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors to continued antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in eyes with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration that responded suboptimally to anti-VEGF agents.

METHODS

Retrospective comparative case series of 26 eyes. Eyes were injected intravitreally with 1 mg infliximab, 2 mg infliximab, 2 mg adalimumab, or 1.25 mg bevacizumab. The main outcomes measured were the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the central macular thickness (CMT) at 3 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean log minimal angle of resolution BCVA changed from 1.04±0.23 at baseline to 1.06±0.51 at 3 months (P=0.9455) in the 1-mg infliximab group; 0.94±0.48 at baseline to 0.85±0.43 in the 2-mg infliximab group (P=0.2802); 1.58±0.50 at baseline to 1.38±0.43 in the adalimumab group (P=0.1116); and 1.08±0.1 at baseline to 1.03±0.16 in the bevacizumab group (P=0.9928). The mean CMT changed from 387±54 μm at baseline to 342±108 μm (P=0.1053) in the 1-mg infliximab group; 301±42 μm at baseline to 284±73 μm (P=0.4854) in the 2-mg infliximab group; remained unchanged at 348±106 μm (P=0.308) in the adalimumab group; and 362±66 μm to 340±27 μm in the bevacizumab group (P=0.4622). Adverse events included uveitis in 37.5% (6/16) of eyes injected with infliximab.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal infliximab and adalimumab do not appear to benefit eyes with CNV that responded suboptimally to anti-VEGF agents. Intravitreal injections of infliximab may elicit a severe intraocular inflammatory reaction.

Intravitreal infliximab for sight-threatening relapsing uveitis in Behçet disease: a pilot study in 15 patients

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and to conduct a preliminary assessment of efficacy of intravitreal infliximab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody, for sight-threatening relapsing uveitis in Behçet disease.

DESIGN

Prospective, noncomparative, interventional pilot study.

METHODS

A single intravitreal injection of infliximab (1 mg/0.05 mL) was given to 15 patients with relapsing posterior uveitis at the onset of a unilateral attack. Best-corrected visual acuity, anterior chamber cells, vitreous haze, and posterior eye segment inflammation were assessed at baseline and at 1, 7, 14, and 30 days after treatment.

RESULTS

Ocular or extra-ocular side effects were not observed. Baseline best-corrected visual acuity (mean logarithm of minimal angle of resolution, 0.74; range, 0.15 to 1.7) improved significantly by day 7 and continued to improve through day 30 after infliximab (mean, 0.30; P < .0001). Profound decreases in anterior chamber cells and vitreous haze (both P < .0001), as well as beneficial effects in retinal vasculitis (P = .0001) and retinitis (P = .001) were evident through day 30. Cystoid macular edema persisted in 9 of 11 eyes affected, but central macular thickness decreased from a baseline mean of 434 to 309 mm at the end of follow-up (P < .0001). Lack of systemic treatment at baseline in 4 patients or background immunosuppressive medications, which remained unchanged during follow-up, did not influence significantly these responses; additional treatment was not required.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that intraocularly produced or acting tumor necrosis factor, or both, is crucial in Behçet disease-associated relapsing uveitis and that intravitreal infliximab should be considered when systemic administration is not feasible or contraindicated. Further studies may identify patients for whom intravitreal infliximab is preferable to systemic treatment.

Uveitis, the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT), and intravitreal biologics for ocular inflammation

PURPOSE

To provide perspective on the implications of the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT) on intravitreal biologic agents in uveitis and retinal diseases in which ocular inflammatory pathways are central to their pathogenesis.

DESIGN

Interpretative essay.

METHODS

Literature review and interpretation.

RESULTS

Besides the clear importance of CATT from a patient treatment perspective in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), these data highlight the critical relevance of highly specific protein immunotherapies offered with biologic agents. The CATT trial also provides a reminder regarding the importance of rigorous efficacy and safety monitoring required when administering intravitreal biologic therapy. Within the field of uveitis, systemic and local biologics have been used to effectively treat uveitis, targeting pathways implicated in both angiogenesis and inflammation (eg, tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α] and interleukin-2 pathways), and research on intravitreal biologic therapy for uveitis and AMD will continue to expand. With over 25 ongoing clinical trials on intravitreal biologic therapy for AMD, enthusiasm for vanguard biologic therapies should be tempered by judicious monitoring for adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The importance of the CATT trial encompasses day-to-day treatment decisions for AMD, as well as lessons on how biologics for ocular disease should be implemented into clinical practice. Specifically, the introduction of intravitreal biologic therapies into clinical practice for uveitis, AMD, and other ocular diseases in which inflammation is involved should be guided by a clear understanding of the immunotherapeutic agent and its molecular target and with rigorous monitoring for both patient benefit and patient safety.

Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha for retinal diseases: current knowledge and future concepts

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine produced by macrophages and T-cells. It plays an important role both in inflammation and apoptosis. In the eye, TNF-α appears to have a role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory, edematous, neovascular and neurodegenerative disorders. Several TNF-blocking drugs have been developed and approved, and are in clinical use for inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and ankylosing spondylitis. TNF-α blockers are widely used in ophthalmology as an off-label alternative to "traditional" immunosuppressive and immune-modulatory treatments in noninfectious uveitis. Preliminary studies suggest a positive effect of intravenously administered TNF-α blockers, mainly infliximab, for treating refractory diabetic macular edema and neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Unfortunately, much of the current data raises considerable safety concerns for intravitreal use of TNF-α inhibitors, in particular, intraocular inflammatory responses have been reported after intravitreal injection of infliximab. Results of dose-finding studies and humanized antibody or antibody fragments (e.g. adalimumab) are anticipated in the coming years; these will shed light on potential benefits and risks of local and systemic TNF-α blockers used for treatment of diseases of the retina and choroid.

Review and update of intraocular therapy in noninfectious uveitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review new clinically relevant data regarding the intraocular treatment of noninfectious uveitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Triamcinolone acetonide, the most commonly used intravitreal corticosteroid for treatment of uveitis and uveitic macular oedema has a limited duration of action and is associated with a high risk of corticosteroid-induced intraocular pressure (IOP) rise and cataract. Recent advances have led to the development of sustained-release corticosteroid devices using different corticosteroids such as dexamethasone and fluocinolone acetonide. Treatment options for patients who have previously exhibited corticosteroid hypertensive response have also expanded through the use of new noncorticosteroid intravitreal therapeutics such as methotrexate and antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents.

SUMMARY

Ozurdex dexamethasone implant appears to have a better safety profile, and a slightly long-lasting effect than triamcinolone acetonide. The Retisert implant allows the release of corticosteroids at a constant rate for 2.5 years, but it requires surgical placement and its use is associated with a very high risk of cataract and requirement for IOP-lowering surgery. For patients who are steroid responders, methotrexate may offer a better alternative to corticosteroid treatment than anti-VEGF agents, but controlled trials are required to confirm this.

intravitreal tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in the treatment of refractory diabetic macular edema: a pilot study from the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to report the short-term visual and anatomical outcomes after intravitreal injections of two different tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors in eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema.

METHODS

An interventional, retrospective, multicenter study of 39 eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema that were injected with adalimumab (n = 5 for 2 mg) or infliximab (n = 15 for 1 mg; n = 19 for 2 mg). The main outcome measures were the best-corrected visual acuity and the central macular thickness at 3 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

In the 1-mg infliximab group, the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity improved from 1.49 ± 0.58 at baseline to 1.38 ± 0.56 at 3 months (P = 0.6991). In the 2-mg infliximab group, the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity worsened from 0.76 ± 0.54 to 1.03 ± 0.69 at 3 months (P = 0.5995). In the adalimumab group, the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity improved from 1.44 ± 0.77 to 1.08 ± 0.85 at 3 months (P = 0.2500). The central macular thickness in the 1-mg infliximab group decreased from 459 ± 125 μm at baseline to 388 ± 131 μm at 3 months (P = 0.1178). In the 2-mg infliximab group, the central macular thickness remained unchanged from 378 ± 97 μm at baseline to 349 ± 118 μm at 3 months (P = 0.2162). In the adalimumab group, the central macular thickness remained unchanged from 521 ± 163 μm at baseline to 526 ± 390 μm at 3 months (P = 0.1250). There were no systemic side effects reported in any of the patients. However, laboratory markers for autoimmunity were not done. None of the eyes injected with either adalimumab or 1 mg of infliximab had adverse ocular events. In the 2-mg infliximab group, 42% (8 of 19) of eyes developed severe uveitis. Three of these eyes (37.5%) required pars plana vitrectomy. The uveitis in the remaining five eyes resolved with topical steroid therapy.

CONCLUSION

Both intravitreal adalimumab and infliximab do not appear to benefit eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema. Intravitreal injections of infliximab may elicit a severe intraocular inflammatory reaction.

Protein delivery for retinal diseases: from basic considerations to clinical applications

Because the eye is protected by ocular barriers but is also easily accessible, direct intravitreous injections of therapeutic proteins allow for specific and targeted treatment of retinal diseases. Low doses of proteins are required in this confined environment and a long time of residency in the vitreous is expected, making the eye the ideal organ for local proteic therapies. Monthly intravitreous injection of Ranibizumab, an anti-VEGF Fab has become the standard of care for patients presenting wet AMD. It has brought the proof of concept that administering proteins into the physiologically low proteic concentration vitreous can be performed safely. Other antibodies, Fab, peptides and growth factors have been shown to exert beneficial effects on animal models when administered within the therapeutic and safe window. To extend the use of such biomolecules in the ophthalmology practice, optimization of treatment regimens and efficacy is required. Basic knowledge remains to be increased on how different proteins/peptides penetrate into the eye and the ocular tissues, distribute in the vitreous, penetrate into the retinal layers and/or cells, are eliminated from the eye or metabolized. This should serve as a basis for designing novel drug delivery systems. The later should be non-or minimally invasive and should allow for a controlled, scalable and sustained release of the therapeutic proteins in the ocular media. This paper reviews the actual knowledge regarding protein delivery for eye diseases and describes novel non-viral gene therapy technologies particularly adapted for this purpose.