Postoperative pain, analgesia, and recovery-bedfellows that cannot be ignored

Veterinary Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (Vet-ERAS) Program in Dogs Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a veterinary enhanced recovery after surgery (Vet-ERAS) protocol in dogs undergoing emergency laparotomy (EL). The protocol, adapted from human medicine, encompassed a multidisciplinary approach and interventions such as early goal-directed fluid resuscitation, antibiotic prophylaxis, anti-emetic therapy, multimodal analgesia, and early enteral nutrition. A prospective observational study compared outcomes between dogs managed with the Vet-ERAS protocol (n = 59) and historical controls (n = 82). Implementation of the Vet-ERAS protocol resulted in a significant reduction in perioperative complication rates (p = 0.003) and 15-day mortality (5% vs. 20.7%). Intraoperative complications, including tachycardia and hypothermia, were significantly lower in the Vet-ERAS group. Compliance with the protocol improved over time (p = 0.01). These findings suggest that integrating the Vet-ERAS protocol into perioperative management can improve outcomes in dogs undergoing EL.

An injectable in situ gel formed by ropivacaine with small lipid molecules to achieve long-term postoperative analgesia

Although local anesthetics (LA) are non-addictive and effective in managing postoperative pain, their short-term effects limit their clinical utility. In this study, we constructed an in situ gel injection formulation with stearic acid-ropivacaine hydrophobic ion-pair (HIP) and glycerol monoglyceride (SA-ROP-GMS) for multiday postoperative pain management. As an in situ gel, SA-ROP-GMS avoids the burst release effect common to water-soluble small molecule drugs in liposomes and hydrogels. Meanwhile, the hydrophobic ion-pair formed by ropivacaine and stearic acid contributes to the gel's stabilization and slow-release properties. In vivo evaluation of mouse models of pain demonstrated that the formulation provided multiday analgesia. And the absence of systemic toxicity of SA-ROP-GMS was verified by histological and blood biochemical studies. This study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of an injectable ropivacaine formulation based on in situ gel. The materials used in SA-ROP-GMS are safe and easy to obtain, and the preparation process is simple and fast, providing a convenient and effective strategy for the development of single-dose long-acting local anesthetic products, which is of great significance for postoperative pain management. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: More than 80% of patients experience severe postoperative pain, and poor pain control reduces recovery satisfaction while increasing the risk of chronic pain. In this study, we constructed an injectable in situ gel using all-small-molecule excipients for slow-release drug delivery for the first time. We designed a method to form a lipid drug coupling between ropivacaine and stearic acid (SA-ROP HIP), which was then combined with glyceryl monostearate (SA-ROP-GMS). SA-ROP-GMS maintained analgesia for nearly 10 days in a single dose, significantly improving ease of administration and patient compliance. In addition, the auxiliary ingredients used in this study are biocompatible and inexpensive. This formulation follows the trend of regional anesthesia and provides a new solution for postoperative pain management.

Effect of virtual reality intervention on hospitalized patients with acute pain after thoracoscopic surgery: a pilot randomized clinical trial

The study investigates the effectiveness of immersive virtual reality (VR) as a nonpharmaceutical approach to manage postoperative pain in patients following thoracoscopic surgery. In this single-center, triple-arm pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), 61 postsurgical patients with a postoperative pain numerical rating scale (NRS) score ≥4 after receiving standard analgesia were included and assigned to either a quantum clinics-VR (QTC-VR) group, a Placebo-VR group, or a control group. The QTC-VR group engaged in a daily 10-minute interactive pain relief 3D-VR program, while the Placebo-VR group watched a daily 10-minute relaxation-based 2D film through VR headsets for three days following surgery. 61 postsurgical patients were randomized and allocated (21 in the QTC-VR group, 20 in the Placebo-VR group, and 20 in the control group) in the final intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses. Compared with patients receiving Placebo-VR intervention, patients reported significantly lower pain scores following the daily QTC-VR intervention on postoperative days 1 (mean difference, -0.889; 95% CI, -1.464 to -0.314; P < 0.001), 2 (mean difference, -0.631; 95% CI, -1.211 to -0.051; P = 0.014), and 3 (mean difference, -0.798; 95% CI, -1.345 to -0.251; P < 0.001), respectively. Additionally, patients receiving QTC-VR intervention also reported high satisfaction and tolerable adverse events with their treatment. In conclusion, this pilot RCT demonstrates that QTC-VR might be a promising intervention for pain management post-thoracoscopic surgery, warranting further validation in ongoing phase III trials.

Prospective Survey of Postoperative Pain in Japan: A Multicenter, Observational Study

Background/Objectives: Postoperative analgesia is important for reducing biologically invasive reactions to surgery. In Japan, postoperative analgesia, including indices of analgesia, has not been adequately addressed. This study aimed to determine the relationship between postoperative pain and postoperative course and the importance of analgesia for early recovery. Methods: Patients who underwent any of seven surgical procedures in gastrointestinal, thoracic, and cardiac surgery were enrolled. The primary endpoint was a median Prince Henry Pain Scale score from postoperative days 1 to 3. Secondary endpoints were the quality of recovery on postoperative day 7 (Quality of Recovery-15 [QoR-15]) and the length of postoperative hospital stay. Results: Median postoperative pain levels among surgeries were 3 on day 1, 2 on days 2 and 3, 1 on day 7, and 1 at discharge. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, the use of postoperative epidural analgesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) were significant predictors of early postoperative pain. Only early postoperative pain was a significant predictor of QoR-15 score. Regular use of acetaminophen, early postoperative pain, no appetite, and postoperative complications were significant in affecting the length of postoperative hospital stay. In the comparison of early postoperative pain according to whether epidural analgesia and IV-PCA were used, the group that used both methods had the least pain. Conclusions: In Japan, early postoperative pain persists after major surgical procedures and affects postoperative quality of recovery and length of hospital stay. The use of epidural analgesia, IV-PCA, or both appeared to be effective in overcoming early postoperative pain, thereby enhancing early postoperative recovery.

IoC2 monitoring versus standard practice in reducing opioid consumption in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Nociception monitoring has recently gained recognition as a valuable tool for guiding intraoperative opioid administration. Several nociception monitors, including the Surgical Pleth Index, the Index of Consciousness (IoC) and the Nociception Level, have been introduced for managing intraoperative analgesia. While these technologies show promise in initial applications, the effectiveness of IoC2 in guiding pain management during anaesthesia, particularly in elderly patients who require precise opioid use, remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of IoC2 in guiding intraoperative opioid use in elderly patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a prospective, randomised, controlled, single-blind, single-centre study with recruitment carried out from 1 February to 30 November 2025. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the IoC2 group or the control group. In the IoC2 group, sufentanil dosing will be guided by intraoperative IoC2 measurements, while in the control group, it will be guided by haemodynamic parameters. The primary outcome will be to compare intraoperative sufentanil consumption between the two groups to assess the potential role of IoC2 in optimising perioperative analgesia in elderly patients.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the ethics committee of China-Japan Friendship Hospital (2024-KY-148-3) and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400089115). The findings will be disseminated through academic presentations and peer-reviewed journal publications, providing valuable data and insights into the role of IoC2 in guiding intraoperative pain management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2400089115.

Surgical fear and sleep quality effect the postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing brain tumor surgery: cross sectional study

BACKGROUND

Patients with a brain tumor experience high levels of anxiety because of the fear of remaining functional and neuropsychological sequelae. This situation affects the postoperative quality of recovery. This study was conducted to determine the effect of surgical fear and sleep quality on the postoperative quality of recovery and pain.

METHOD

This cross-sectional study was completed with 101 patients who met the inclusion criteria and underwent craniotomy under general anesthesia for a brain tumor between October 2020 and August 2021 in a university hospital. The data were collected using the Patient Information Form, Surgical Fear Scale, Richard Champell Sleep Scale, Quality of Recovery Questionnaire, and Patient Follow-up Form. Hierarchical regression analysis was used to reveal the determinants of postoperative quality of recovery.

RESULTS

The mean fear of surgery score of women was higher than men, and sleep quality and postoperative quality of recovery were lower than men (p = 0.045). A moderate negative correlation between fear of surgery and sleep quality was found (r = -0.377; p = 0.000). There was a weak negative correlation between fear of surgery and postoperative recovery quality (r = -0.252; p = 0.011), and a weak positive correlation between preoperative sleep quality and recovery quality (r = 0.297; p = 0.003). The variables of fear, sleep, duration of hospital stay, pain, and age were found to be statistically the best predictors of postoperative quality of recovery (R2 = 0.295; p = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

As a result, surgical fear, sleep deprivation, and pain during the perioperative period negatively impact recovery quality and prolong the healing process. Psychological preparation by starting from the pre-operative period, providing sleep and rest, evaluation, and management of postoperative pain would contribute to the early recovery and discharge of patients.

Epidural analgesia versus systemic opioids for postoperative pain management after VATS: Protocol for a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) remains a significant challenge. While epidural analgesia is still the gold standard, other types of regional analgesia are gaining popularity because of perceived less risk of complications. The efficacy of systemic opioids as an alternative to epidural analgesia has not been thoroughly explored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of systemic opioids versus epidural analgesia in managing postoperative pain after VATS.

METHODS

We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist. A comprehensive search will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library supplemented with Scopus citation searches, search for gray literature using Google Scholar and a search for ongoing studies. We will include studies based on the PICO methodology without restrictions regarding study type. Two independent reviewers will screen studies, extract data, and assess study quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools. The primary outcomes will be postoperative pain intensity at rest and during activity at 24, 48, and 72 h. Secondary outcomes will include use of "rescue" opioids, hospital length of stay, and adverse events. If feasible, a meta-analysis will be done, otherwise we will perform a descriptive analysis.

RESULTS

The results will provide a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of systemic opioids versus epidural analgesia in managing postoperative pain in VATS patients. Data synthesis will include pooled estimates for pain scores, opioid consumption, and adverse events, possibly with subgroup and sensitivity analyses conducted to explore heterogeneity across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review will offer valuable insights into the optimal pain management strategy for patients undergoing VATS. The findings may guide clinical practice in selecting the most effective and safe analgesic approach, improving postoperative recovery, and patient outcomes.

BDNF-VGF Pathway Aggravates Incision Induced Acute Postoperative Pain via Upregulating the Neuroinflammation in Dorsal Root Ganglia

Approximately one-third of postoperative patients are troubled by postoperative pain. Effective treatments are still lacking. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-VGF (non-acronymic) in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) in postoperative pain. Pain behaviors were assessed through measurements of paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) and paw withdrawal latency (PWL). Transcriptome analysis was conducted to identify potential targets associated with postoperative pain. Western blotting, immunofluorescence, and ELISA were employed to further detect macrophage activation as well as the expression of BDNF, VGF, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. Results showed that plantar incision induced both mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia. Transcriptome analysis suggested that plantar incision caused upregulation of BDNF and VGF. The expressions of BDNF and VGF were upregulated in isolectin B4-positive (IB4+) and calcitonin gene-related peptide-positive (CGRP+) neurons, rather than neurofilament 200-positive (NF200+) neurons. The activation of BDNF-VGF pathway upregulated expression of IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β and promoted the activation of macrophages. In conclusion, BDNF-VGF pathway aggravates acute postoperative pain by promoting macrophage activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine production, which may provide a new target for the treatment of postoperative pain.

Efficacy of Preemptive Topical Lidocaine 5% Plaster in the Prevention of Post-Craniotomy Pain, a Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective

The current landscape is characterized by a dearth of effective, safe, simple, and noninvasive methods for preventing pain following craniotomy. This clinical trial seeks to evaluate the efficacy profile of preemptive application of a topical 5% lidocaine patch in alleviating post-craniotomy pain.

Methods

This was a multi-centric, prospective randomized placebo-controlled triple-blind clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to either the masked intervention group, who received lidocaine 5% white hydrogel plasters (N = 90), or the placebo control group who received plain hydrogel plasters of the same pattern, size, appearance and material as L5Ps, but free of lidocaine (N = 90). Primary outcome was the pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale at 24 h) after craniotomy. Secondary outcomes included: intra-operative analgesics consumption, pain intensity, cumulative rescue analgesics consumption, sleeping scores, adverse effects such as skin reactions, etc. The intention-to-treat analyses and the per-protocol analyses were used.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in the VAS scores at 24 h after craniotomy (P = 0.539). However, subgroup analysis for female and male patients showed that statistically significant differences were found in VAS scores in male patients (0 [0, 3] in the masked intervention group at 24 h after craniotomy and 3 [1, 4.5] in the placebo control group, P = 0.017). There were no obvious side effects directly associated with preemptive L5P.

Conclusion

Preemptive lidocaine 5% plaster as a safe technique was not found to be effective in reducing post-craniotomy pain, but potential gender disparities in the outcomes of this method warrant further investigation.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT04169854).

Postoperative analgesic effect of intravenous coinjection of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine in gynaecological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Hysterectomy or myomectomy is a common gynaecological procedure that results in moderate to severe acute postoperative pain, which can cause many adverse effects. This study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy, opioid consumption, quality of postoperative recovery (QOR) and adverse reactions of intravenous coinjection of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine versus lidocaine or dexmedetomidine alone in gynaecological surgery.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis was performed.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were used to access the articles. Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies published before 1 May 2024.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the final analysis in which the intraoperative intervention group received intravenous coinjection of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine, and the control group received intravenous injection of lidocaine or dexmedetomidine alone in gynaecologic procedures.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Study retrieval, literature screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. The quality of included studies was assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias (ROB V.2.0). Data were expressed as standardised mean difference, weighted mean difference or relative risk with 95% CI. Review Manager V.5.4 was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of five RCTs were included, involving 672 patients, of which 224 patients received coinjection of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine. The results revealed that coinjection of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine was superior to individual lidocaine in the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 1 hour (MD=-0.90, 95% CI (-1.11 to -0.69), p<0.001), 2 hours (MD=-0.99, 95% CI (-1.19 to -0.80), p<0.001), 4 hours (MD=-1.20, 95% CI (-1.75 to -0.66), p<0.001), 6 hours (MD=-1.09, 95% CI (-1.48 to -0.70), p<0.001), 8 hours (MD=-1.22, 95% CI (-1.61 to -0.83), p<0.001) and 12 hours (MD=-0.76, 95% CI (-1.35 to -0.17), p=0.o1) after surgery. Compared with the dexmedetomidine group, the lidocaine+dexmedetomidine group had low VAS scores at 1 hour (MD=-0.60, 95% CI (-0.83 to -0.37), p<0.001), 2 hours (MD=-0.70, 95% CI (-0.87 to -0.53), p<0.001), 6 hours (MD=-0.79, 95% CI (-0.98 to -0.59), p<0.001), 8 hours (MD=-0.77, 95% CI (-1.25 to -0.28), p=0.002) and 12 hours (MD=-0.56, 95% CI (-1.00 to -0.11), p=0.01) after surgery. Coinjection of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine resulted in significantly lower postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting and bradycardia than lidocaine alone (all p<0.05). Compared with the dexmedetomidine group, the lidocaine+dexmedetomidine group shortened the time to intestinal transit resumption (p=0.003). Coinjection of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine reduced intraoperative opioid consumption and increased QOR scores compared with lidocaine and dexmedetomidine alone (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Lidocaine combined with dexmedetomidine had superior analgesic efficacy and safety. However, due to the limitation in the number of available studies, more large-scale, prospective RCTs are needed for further investigation.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42023384018.

Efficacy and safety of 4-hydroxy 2-methyl-N-(5-methyl-2-thiazolyl)-2H-1, 2-benzothiazin-3-carboxamide 1,1-dioxide, a fast-acting meloxicam formulation, on moderate-to-severe pain following abdominal surgery: A phase III randomized controlled trial

4-hydroxy 2-methyl-N-(5-methyl-2-thiazolyl)-2H-1, 2-benzothiazin-3-carboxamide 1,1-dioxide (QP001), a novel long-lasting meloxicam formulation, may provide adequate postoperative pain relief with a good safety profile. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QP001 for moderate-to-severe pain following abdominal surgery. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial recruited patients undergoing abdominal surgery at 23 centers between October 30, 2022, and July 10, 2023. Patients were randomized to a QP001 or placebo group in a 2:1 ratio. Postoperative pain intensity was evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale. The primary efficacy outcome was the area under curve (AUC) of pain intensity-time 0-24 h after awakening from anesthesia (AUC0-24). Adverse events and drug reactions were recorded to evaluate safety. A total of 258 patients underwent randomization, and 255 patients received at least one trial drug, including 170 in the QP001 group and 85 in the placebo group. Among these patients, 250 completed the study. The AUC0-24 was significantly lower in the QP001 group than in the placebo group (50.5 vs. 85.19, difference of 34.69 [40.7%], p < 0.0001). This was accompanied by a decrease in morphine use and an increase in patient satisfaction. Moreover, the overall adverse events or adverse drug reaction rates were similar between the QP001 and placebo groups. Among patients undergoing abdominal surgery, postoperative pain was significantly lower in the QP001 group than in the placebo group. QP001 has a great analgesic effect of up to 24 h and satisfactory safety in patients with moderate-to-severe abdominal pain.

Efficacy and safety of 4-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(5-methyl-2-thiazolyl)-2H-1, 2-benzothiazin-3-carboxamide 1,1-dioxide, a rapid-acting meloxicam formulation, for analgesia after orthopaedic surgery under general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain management is one of the most challenging treatments after orthopaedic surgery, and improved medical treatment options are urgently needed. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(5-methyl-2-thiazolyl)-2H-1, 2-benzothiazin-3-carboxamide 1,1-dioxide (QP001) for moderate to severe pain following orthopaedic surgery.

METHODS

This randomized clinical trial enlisted patients experiencing moderate to severe pain following orthopaedic surgery in 20 hospitals in China. We allocated randomly 132 participants to receive 30 mg QP001 and 66 participants to receive 0.9% saline pre-surgery. The primary efficacy outcome was the total morphine consumption within 24 h.

RESULTS

The total morphine consumption in the QP001 group, versus placebo group, was significantly lower over the following 24 h [12.53 (10.51) vs. 26.13 (13.98), P < 0.001]. The total morphine consumption in the QP001 group, versus placebo group, was also significantly decreased over the following 48 h (P < 0.001). The QP001 group, versus placebo, showed a significant decrease in the effective pressing times of the analgesic pump, morphine relief analgesia ratio over the 24 h and 48 h periods and the area under the curve for pain intensity-time as well as a significant prolonged in the time of first pressing the analgesic pump and the time of first morphine rescue analgesia (P < 0.001). The QP001 groups, versus placebo, show no significant difference in adverse events, but the incidence of adverse drug reactions decreased (59.4% vs. 75.8%, P = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

QP001 provides analgesia and reduces opioid consumption in patients with moderate to severe pain after orthopaedic surgery, with a favorable safety profile.

Incidence and risk factors of pain following breast cancer surgery: a retrospective national inpatient sample database study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain (PP) is a dynamic process that reflects the complex interplay between symptoms, treatment, and patient experiences, and its intensity is reportedly primarily related to the severity of surgical trauma. However, no large-scale national database-based study has hitherto been conducted to assess the occurrence and features related to PP following breast cancer (BC) surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we screened BC surgery cases between 2015 and 2019 within the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database, utilizing the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10th edition clinical modification codes. The researchers identified patients who developed PP and compared them to those who did not. Factors associated with PP were then screened: patient demographics (age and race), hospital characteristics (type of insurance, bed size, teaching status, type of admission, location, and hospital area), length of stay (LOS), total cost during hospitalization, inpatient mortality, comorbidities, and perioperative complications. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent risk factors for postoperative pain in BC surgery.

RESULTS

39,870 BC surgery cases were identified over a five-year period from 2015 to 2019. The overall occurrence of PP following breast cancer surgery was 6.15% (2,387 cases), with a slight upward trend every year. Significant racial disparities were observed, Whites associated with a higher incidence of PP (P < 0.001). In addition, the incidence of elective admission was 11.96% lower (67.491% vs. 79.451%) than that of patients without PP following breast cancer surgery (P < 0.001). Besides, PP was related to prolonged hospitalization duration (3 vs. 2 days; P < 0.001), and higher total cost ($68,283 vs. $60,036; P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression identified breast cancer surgery-independent risk factors for PP, including younger age, non-elective hospital admission, rural hospitals, depression, drug abuse, metastatic cancer, psychoses, weight loss, and chronic pulmonary disease. In addition, postoperative pain for BC was associated with urinary retention, gastrointestinal complications, continuous invasive ventilation, deep vein thrombosis, urinary tract infection, blood transfusion, arrhythmia, and chest pain.

CONCLUSION

Despite the low incidence of postoperative pain in BC surgery cases, it is essential to investigate factors predisposing to PP to allow optimal care management and improve the outcomes of this patient population.

A new long-acting analgesic formulation for postoperative pain management

Local anesthetics (LA), as part of multimodal analgesia, have garnered significant interest for their role in delaying the initiation of opioid therapy, reducing postoperative opioid usage, and mitigating both hospitalization duration and related expenses. Despite numerous endeavors to extend the duration of local anesthetic effects, achieving truly satisfactory long-acting analgesia remains elusive. Drawing upon prior investigations, vesicular phospholipid gels (VPGs) emerge as promising candidates for extended-release modalities in small-molecule drug delivery systems. Therefore, we tried to use the amphiphilicity of phospholipids to co-encapsulate levobupivacaine hydrochloride and meloxicam, two drugs with different hydrophilicity, to obtain a long-term synergistic analgesic effect. Initially, the physicochemical attributes of the formulation were characterized, followed by an examination of its in vitro release kinetics, substantiating the viability of extending the release duration of the dual drugs. Sequentially, in vivo investigations encompassing pharmacokinetic profiling and assessment of analgesic efficacy were undertaken, revealing a prolonged release duration of up to 120 h and attainment of optimal postoperative analgesia. Subsequently, inquiries into the mechanism underlying synergistic analgesic effects and safety evaluations pertinent to the delivery strategy were pursued. In summation, we successfully developed a promising formulation to achieve long-acting analgesia.

Intravenous Lidocaine Compared with Quadratus Lumborum Block on Postoperative Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Renal Surgery: Protocol for a Randomized Noninferiority Trial

Background

Patients undergoing laparoscopic renal surgery often experience significant postoperative pain. Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) provides effective postoperative pain control after laparoscopic procedures, while lidocaine administered intravenously also exerts analgesic effects for surgical patients. We design this trial to compare the effects of i.v. lidocaine infusion with QLB on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic renal surgery.

Methods

In this randomized noninferiority trial, a total of 120 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic renal surgery will be randomized to receive either i.v. lidocaine or unilateral QLB for postoperative pain management. Lidocaine will be i.v. administered at 1.5 mg/kg (ideal body weight) over 10 min during anesthesia induction, followed by an infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/h intraoperatively and in a post-anesthesia care unit. Ultrasound-guided anterior QLB with 0.375% ropivacaine 30 mL will be conducted before the start of surgery. Patient-controlled i.v. sufentanil will be used for pain relief during the first 48 h after surgery. The primary outcome is the cumulative sufentanil consumption during 0-24 h postoperatively, with a noninferiority margin of 5 μg. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity at rest and on coughing at 1, 6, 24, and 48 h postoperatively; sufentanil consumption within 24-48 h after surgery; rescue analgesic use within 0-48 h after surgery; nausea and vomiting within 0-48 h postoperatively; and quality of recovery at 24 and 48 h after surgery.

Discussion

The results of this trial will add to the clinical evidence for improving postoperative pain management in patients who undergo laparoscopic renal surgery.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400082974).

Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia in instrumented lumbar spinal surgeries

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and wound infiltration (WI) for postoperative analgesia in patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery with instrumentation.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, 80 patients were divided into two groups: ESPB (n = 40) and WI (n = 40). Postoperative pain intensity was assessed via the visual analog scale (VAS) at multiple time points within 24 h. Additionally, opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and patient satisfaction were evaluated.

RESULTS

Both ESPB and WI provided effective postoperative pain management, with no significant differences in VAS scores. However, the ESPB group demonstrated a significantly longer duration of analgesia, a shorter time to first rescue analgesia, and lower total tramadol consumption (50 ± 60 mg vs. 100 ± 75 mg; p = 0.010) than did the WI group. Furthermore, a trend toward reduced PONV incidence was observed in the ESPB group, likely due to its opioid-sparing effect.

CONCLUSION

While both ESPB and WI provided effective postoperative pain management, ESPB demonstrated a distinct advantage by offering a longer duration of analgesia and significantly reducing opioid consumption. These findings suggest that ESPB is more effective than WI for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spinal surgeries, providing prolonged pain relief and improving patient outcomes. Further studies are warranted to explore its long-term benefits and cost-effectiveness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.govPRS: NCT06567964 Date: 08/21/2024 Retrospectively registered.

Comparison of the effect of use of preoperative mexiletine tablets and control on reducing postoperative pain in patients undergoing abdominal surgery

Objective

Postoperative pain is a major concern for patients and healthcare providers following abdominal surgery. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of mexiletine in reducing postoperative pain in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Methods

In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, 34 patients were divided into two groups. One group received 600 mg of mexiletine tablets, while the other group received vitamin C tablets (control) two hours before surgery. Postoperative pain levels were assessed at 6, 12, and 24 h by using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Additionally, the amount of narcotics received within the first 24 h after surgery was recorded.

Results

The results showed that the average postoperative pain score in patients who received mexiletine was significantly lower than in those who received vitamin C tablets (P<0.001). Furthermore, the average amount of narcotics received after surgery was significantly lower in the mexiletine group compared to the control group (P=0.03). Pain scores at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery were also significantly lower in the mexiletine group (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Mexiletine was effective in reducing postoperative pain and the need for narcotics in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. This study highlights the potential of mexiletine as a valuable preoperative intervention for postoperative pain management.

Effect of Topical Application of an NSAID Lateral to the Incision on Postoperative Pain Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

How to minimize postoperative pain following knee replacement surgery has been a great challenge. This study was performed to evaluate the effect of applying a topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) lateral to the incision for postoperative pain following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

The randomized controlled trial enrolled 100 patients from August 2023 to January 2024. One hundred patients who underwent UKA were randomized into two groups. The intervention group received a topical NSAID lateral to the incision postoperatively, and the control group received a placebo lateral to the incision postoperatively. The primary outcome measures were the amount of opioid consumption and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score (12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h after operation) for pain. The secondary outcome measures were the American Knee Society Score (AKSS, preoperation and 1-month follow-up after operation), the time of first analgesic demand, side effects of opioids, operation time, postoperative stay, surgery-related complications, and postoperative incision healing grade. Independent sample t test and paired sample t test were used to compare continuous data. Chi-square test and Fisher's precision probability tests were used to analyze the categorical data.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients (intervention group, 48 patients; control group, 50 patients) were analyzed. Opioid consumption was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group during the first 12 h, 12 to 24 h, and 24 to 48 h postoperatively (p < 0.05). The VAS score for pain within 72 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the AKSS, operation time, postoperative stay, complications, or postoperative incision healing grade between the two groups. The time of first analgesic demand for patient-controlled analgesia was significantly later in the intervention group than in the control group (p < 0.05). There were fewer side effects of opioids in the intervention group (8.3%) than in the control group (18.0%).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative application of topical NSAIDs lateral to the incision is an effective and safe method for pain management after UKA, helping to decrease the pain score and reduce opioid consumption postoperatively with no increase in side effects.

Comparison of supraclavicular block with infraclavicular block for distal arm surgeries: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

BACKGROUND

Supraclavicular and infraclavicular nerve block are commonly used for the analgesia of distal arm surgeries, and this meta-analysis aims to compare their analgesic efficacy for distal arm surgeries.

METHODS

We searched several databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases, and selected the randomized controlled trials exploring the analgesic efficacy of supraclavicular block versus infraclavicular block for distal arm surgeries. This meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effect or fixed-effect model based on the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with infraclavicular nerve block for distal arm surgeries, supraclavicular nerve block was associated with substantially reduced complete sensory block (odds ratio [OR] = 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.19-0.88; P = .02) and block performance time (standard mean difference [SMD] = -3.06; 95% CI = -5.82--0.31; P = .03), but had no effect on duration of analgesia (SMD = -0.15; 95% CI = -0.49-0.18; P = .36), time to sensory block (SMD = -0.41; 95% CI = -2.28-1.47; P = .67), vascular puncture (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.11-10.05; P = .98) or adverse events (OR = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.12-4.04; P = .69).

CONCLUSIONS

Infraclavicular nerve block may be superior to supraclavicular nerve block for the analgesia of distal arm surgeries but needs increased block performance time.

Opioid requirement and pain intensity after mandibular surgeries with dexmedetomidine administration in two ways: intraoperative infusion versus bolus injection

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the opioid requirement and pain intensity after surgeries of mandibular fractures with administration of dexmedetomidine by two approaches of infusion and single bolus.

METHODS

In this double-blind clinical trial, the participants were randomized and matched in terms of age and gender in two groups (infusion and bolus). In both groups, the amount of narcotic used, hemodynamic indices, oxygen saturation, and pain intensity were collected based on the ten-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 7 time points for 24 h. SPSS version 24 software was used for data analysis. A significance level of less than 5% was considered.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, ASA class, and duration of surgery (P>0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of nausea and vomiting and subsequently receiving anti-nausea medication (P>0.05). The need for opioid consumption after surgery was not different in two groups (P>0.05). Infusion of dexmedetomidine reduced postoperative pain more rapidly than its single bolus dose (P<0.05). However, over time, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of changes in oxygen saturation variables (P>0.05). Homodynamic indices including heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure in the bolus group were significantly lower than the infusion group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Administration of dexmedetomidine in the form of infusion can reduce postoperative pain better than bolus injection, with less probability of hypotension and bradycardia.

Local Magnesium Sulfate Administration Ameliorates Nociception, Peripheral Inflammation, and Spinal Sensitization in a Rat Model of Incisional Pain

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative pain remains one of the most common complaints after surgery, and appropriate treatments are limited.

METHODS

We therefore investigated the effect of the anti-nociceptive properties of magnesium sulfate (MgSO4), an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, on incision-induced postoperative pain and peripheral and central nervous system inflammation.

RESULTS

We found that local MgSO4 administration dose-dependently increases paw withdrawal latency, indicating reduced peripheral postoperative pain. Furthermore, MgSO4 inhibited the expression of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and phosphorylation of the NMDA receptor NR1 subunit in injured paw tissue and significantly attenuated microglial and astrocytic activation in the ipsilateral lumbar spinal cord dorsal horn.

CONCLUSION

Locally administered MgSO4 has potential for development as an adjunctive therapy for preventing central nociceptive sensitization.

Pain Scores after Open Fetal Spina Bifida Repair and Caesarean Section: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

In fetal surgery, successful pain management is crucial for postoperative mobilization, prophylaxis of contractions, and fast recovery. This study analyzed patient's pain experience after open fetal spina bifida (fSB) repair in comparison to pain scores after the subsequent Caesarean section (C-section).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected with a questionnaire given to 91 women, who had fSB repair and then C-section at our center between 2019 and 2022. It comprised 12 questions covering different aspects of pain experience and satisfaction with pain therapy and was answered by 67 women after fSB repair and 53 after C-section. Postoperative pain was rated on a Likert scale from 0 (slight/rarely) to 100 (strongest/always). Outcomes after fSB repair were compared to those after C-section. Additionally, subgroup analysis compared outcomes of women with different pain levels (group 1-5) after fSB repair.

RESULTS

Compared to women after C-section women after fSB repair reported significantly higher maximum pain scores (MPS) (p = 0.03), higher sleep disturbance due to pain (p = 0.03), and sedation rates (p = 0.001) as side effect from pain therapy. No differences were found regarding feelings of insecurity (p = 0.20) or helplessness (p = 0.40), as well as involvement in (p = 0.3) and satisfaction with pain therapy (p = 0.5). Subgroup analysis revealed that women with higher MPS after fSB repair were significantly more often non-Caucasians (p = 0.003) and more often affected by pain while lying in bed (p = 0.007) and during mobilization (p = 0.005). Additionally, they reported higher rates of dizziness (p = 0.02) and lower satisfaction rates with pain therapy (p = 0.03). Postoperative complication rate did not differ among groups.

CONCLUSION

Although women after fSB repair reported higher MPS compared to after C-section, the current pain management was generally perceived as satisfactory.

Movement-evoked Pain versus Pain at Rest in Postsurgical Clinical Trials and in Meta-analyses: An Updated Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Given the widespread recognition that postsurgical movement-evoked pain is generally more intense, and more functionally relevant, than pain at rest, the authors conducted an update to a previous 2011 review to re-evaluate the assessment of pain at rest and movement-evoked pain in more recent postsurgical analgesic clinical trials.

METHODS

The authors searched MEDLINE and Embase for postsurgical pain randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses published between 2014 and 2023 in the setting of thoracotomy, knee arthroplasty, and hysterectomy using methods consistent with the original 2011 review. Included trials and meta-analyses were characterized according to whether they acknowledged the distinction between pain at rest and movement-evoked pain and whether they included pain at rest and/or movement-evoked pain as a pain outcome. For trials measuring movement-evoked pain, pain-evoking maneuvers used to assess movement-evoked pain were tabulated.

RESULTS

Among the 944 included trials, 504 (53%) did not measure movement-evoked pain (vs. 61% in 2011), and 428 (45%) did not distinguish between pain at rest and movement-evoked pain when defining the pain outcome (vs. 52% in 2011). Among the 439 trials that measured movement-evoked pain, selection of pain-evoking maneuver was highly variable and, notably, was not even described in 139 (32%) trials (vs. 38% in 2011). Among the 186 included meta-analyses, 94 (51%) did not distinguish between pain at rest and movement-evoked pain (vs. 71% in 2011).

CONCLUSIONS

This updated review demonstrates a persistent limited proportion of trials including movement-evoked pain as a pain outcome, a substantial proportion of trials failing to distinguish between pain at rest and movement-evoked pain, and a lack of consistency in the use of pain-evoking maneuvers for movement-evoked pain assessment. Future postsurgical trials need to (1) use common terminology surrounding pain at rest and movement-evoked pain, (2) assess movement-evoked pain in virtually every trial if not contraindicated, and (3) standardize movement-evoked pain assessment with common, procedure-specific pain-evoking maneuvers. More widespread knowledge translation and mobilization are required in order to disseminate this message to current and future investigators.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Open Fetal Spina Bifida Repair

INTRODUCTION

For open fetal spina bifida (fSB) repair, a maternal laparotomy is required. Hence, enhanced maternal recovery after surgery (ERAS) is paramount. A revision of our ERAS protocol was made, including changes in operative techniques and postoperative pain management. This study investigates eventual benefits.

METHODS

Our study included 111 women with open fSB repair at our center. The old protocol group (group 1) either received a transverse incision of the fascia with transection of the rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) or a longitudinal incision of the fascia without RAM transection, depending on placental location. The new protocol required longitudinal incisions in all patients (group 2). Postoperative pain management was changed from tramadol to oxycodone/naloxone. Outcomes of the two different protocol groups were analyzed and compared regarding the primary endpoint, the length of hospital stay (LOS) after fetal surgery, as well as regarding the following secondary endpoints: postoperative pain scores, day of first mobilization, removal of urinary catheter, bowel movement, and the occurrence of maternal and fetal complications.

RESULTS

Out of 111 women, 82 (73.9%) were in group 1 and 29 (26.1%) were in group 2. Women in group 2 showed a significantly shorter LOS (18 [14-23] days vs. 27 [18-39] days, p = 0.002), duration until mobilization (3 [2-3] days vs. 3 [3-4] days, p = 0.03), and removal of urinary catheter (day 3 [3-3] vs. day 4 [3-4], p = 0.004). Group 2 less often received morphine subcutaneously (0% vs. 35.4%, p < 0.001) or intravenously (0% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.02) but more often oxycodone (69.0% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were seen regarding pain scores, bowel movement, and maternal and/or fetal complications.

CONCLUSION

The new ERAS protocol that combined changes in surgical technique and pain medication led to better outcomes while reducing LOS. Continuous revisions of current ERAS protocols are essential to improve patient care continuously.

Effect of noise isolation using noise-cancelling headphones during laparoscopic surgery for postoperative pain reduction: A randomized clinical trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Most laparoscopic surgeries under general anesthesia are performed in noisy environments, although the effect of intraoperative noise reduction on postoperative pain remains uncertain. This study aimed to explore whether postoperative pain could be reduced through the intraoperative use of noise-cancelling headphones.

DESIGN

This study was conducted as a prospective parallel-group randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Operating room and surgery room.

PATIENTS

Ninety patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

In the intervention group, noise-cancelling headphones were used to reduce noise intensity during laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the maximum movement-evoked pain intensity within 24 h post-surgery, measured using a 10-point numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes included the maximum resting pain score and total opioid consumption during the 24-h period post-surgery. Mean intraoperative noise and the proportion of intraoperative time with noise intensity ≥70 dB were recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

The maximum movement-evoked pain score was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (mean score [SD], 2.7 [1.0] and 4.0[1.0], respectively; P < 0.001). The intervention group required significantly fewer opioids than the control group (mean [SD], 44.2 [12.8] and 51.3[17.5] mg, respectively; P = 0.032). In the control group, but not the intervention group, all postoperative pain scores were significantly associated with the proportion of intraoperative time with noise intensity ≥70 dB, which was an independent risk factor for postoperative pain.

CONCLUSION

During laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia, intraoperative noise isolation using noise-cancelling headphones is a safe and effective strategy for relieving postoperative pain and decreasing total opioid analgesic consumption.

Efficacy and safety of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after APS team standardized postoperative pain management: A 6-year experience of an acute pain service in 107802 Chinese patients

There are few studies on the impact of postoperative pain management (such as Acute Pain Service, APS) on the prognosis of patients, especially the research on large samples, even less data on Chinese patients. It is reported that only 25.12 % of hospitals in China have established APS or similar teams, and less than 10 % of them are responsible for the whole process of postoperative analgesia services. Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology has established a professional APS team led by anesthesiologists (TJ-APS), and has a standardized workflow and management system. Based on the TJ-APS standardized postoperative pain management, the incidence and adverse effects of postoperative pain in different types of surgical patients were analyzed. In total, 107,802 patients receiving intravenous PCA from the Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology were selected between January 2016 and December 2021, which were under TJ-APS standardized postoperative analgesia process, postoperative analgesia strategy based on the principle of "low opioid, multimodal, specialization and individualization", as well as regular ward rounds and 24-h on call on-duty system. We assessed the incidence and adverse effects of postoperative pain in different types of surgical patients. Based on the TJ-APS standardized postoperative pain management, the incidence of poor postoperative analgesia in patients with intravenous PCA is significantly lower than that reported in the current literature (20 %), and mainly occurs in biliary-pancreatic surgery, extrahepatic surgery and gastrointestinal surgery. The overall incidence of adverse effects was 5.52 %, of which nausea and vomiting was the highest, especially among gynecological tumors and gynecological patients, which were 10.75 % and 8.68 % respectively, but both were lower than the level reported in the current literature (20 %). This APS multimodal management and analgesia process can provide reference and guidance for PCA management of postoperative acute pain.

The Role of Ketamine as a Component of Multimodal Analgesia in Burns: A Retrospective Observational Study

Background: Burn wound dressing and debridement are excruciatingly painful procedures that call for appropriate analgesia-typically multimodal. Better post-procedural pain management, less opioid use, and consequently fewer side effects, which could prolong recovery and increase morbidity, are all benefits of this type of analgesia. Intravenously administered ketamine can be effective as monotherapy or in combination with opioids, especially with procedural sedation such as in burn wound dressing. Methods: This observational study investigated the effect of ketamine administered in subanesthetic doses combined with opioids during burn wound dressing. The study was conducted from October 2018 to October 2021. A total of 165 patients met the inclusion criteria. A total of 82 patients were in the ketamine group, while 83 patients were dressed without ketamine. The main outcome was the effect of ketamine on intraprocedural opioid consumption. The secondary outcome included the effect of ketamine on postprocedural pain control. Results: Patients dressed with ketamine were significantly older (p = 0.001), while the mean doses of intraoperatively administered propofol and fentanyl were significantly lower than in patients dressed without ketamine (150 vs. 220 mg, p < 0.001; and 0.075 vs. 0.150 mg, p < 0.001; respectively). Conclusions: Ketamine was an independent predictor of lower intraoperative fentanyl consumption, according to the multivariate regression analysis (p = 0.015). Contrarily, both groups of patients required postoperative tramadol treatment, while intraoperative ketamine administration had no beneficial effects on postoperative pain management.

A Continuous Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Decreases Hospital Length of Stay Compared to Thoracic Epidural Analgesia After Open Radical Cystectomy Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Background: Poorly managed postoperative pain can prolong hospital stays and increase the risk of complications in patients undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC). Despite strong support from the clinical guidelines for using surgical site-specific peripheral regional anesthetic techniques and neuraxial analgesia, their effects on postoperative outcomes are unclear. Objectives: This study aims to fill the above knowledge gap by comparing thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and continuous transversus abdominis plane (CTAP) blocks in ORC patients. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we conducted chart reviews at a quaternary care academic hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, between March 2015 and September 2017. Patients undergoing ORC and receiving either CTAP or TEA were included. The primary outcome was the hospital length of stay (HLOS), and secondary outcomes included time until ambulation, postoperative narcotic usage, and renal function as measured by the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Results: We studied 146 patients, 124 of whom met our inclusion criteria. Patients receiving CTAP had a 17.4% reduction in HLOS (95% CI: 3.2, 29.4; P = 0.02) and a 13.9% reduction in time until ambulation (95% CI: 3.4, 23.3; P = 0.01) compared to those receiving TEA. This was equivalent to a relative decrease in HLOS of approximately 2.1 days in the CTAP group as compared to the TEA group. No significant differences were observed in narcotic usage or GFR between the two groups. Our sensitivity analyses using instrumental variables analysis yielded similar results. Conclusions: Continuous transversus abdominis plane was associated with a shorter HLOS and quicker time to ambulate compared to TEA, without affecting narcotic usage or renal function. These findings suggest that CTAP may be a viable alternative to TEA for perioperative analgesia in ORC patients. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Postpartum Depression in Women With Prenatal Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Postpartum depression (PPD) is emerging as a major public health problem worldwide. Although the particular period and context in which PPD occurs provides an opportunity for preventive interventions, there is still a lack of pharmacologic prevention strategies for PPD.

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine for prevention of PPD among women with prenatal depression undergoing cesarean delivery.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized clinical trial enrolled 338 women who screened positive for prenatal depression at 2 hospitals in Hunan, China from March 28, 2022, to April 16, 2023. Women with an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score of more than 9 who were 18 years of age or older and were scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were eligible.

Interventions

Eligible participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the dexmedetomidine group or the control group via centrally computer-generated group randomization. Dexmedetomidine, 0.5 μg/kg and 0.9% saline were intravenously infused for 10 minutes after delivery in the dexmedetomidine and control groups, respectively. After infusion, sufentanil or dexmedetomidine plus sufentanil was administered via patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for 48 hours in the control group and dexmedetomidine group, respectively.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was positive PPD screening results at 7 and 42 days post partum, defined as a postpartum Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score of more than 9. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis.

Results

All 338 participants were female, with a mean (SD) age of 31.5 (4.1) years. Positive PPD screening incidence at 7 and 42 days post partum in the dexmedetomidine group vs the control group was significantly decreased (day 7, 21 of 167 [12.6%] vs 53 of 165 [32.1%]; risk ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.25-0.62]; P < .001; day 42, 19 of 167 [11.4%] vs 50 of 165 [30.3%]; risk ratio, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.23-0.61]; P < .001). The dexmedetomidine group showed no significant difference in adverse events vs the control group (46 of 169 [27.2%] vs 33 of 169 [19.5%]; P = .10), but the incidence of hypotension increased (31 of 169 [18.3%] vs 16 of 169 [9.5%]; risk ratio, 2.15 [95% CI, 1.13-4.10]; P = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance

Dexmedetomidine administration in the early postpartum period significantly reduced the incidence of a positive PPD screening and maintained a favorable safety profile.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2200057213.

Application of Butorphanol versus Sufentanil in Multimode Analgesia via Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Hepatobiliary Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

We investigate the efficacy and safety of butorphanol in multimodal analgesia combined with dexmedetomidine and ketorolac via patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after hepatobiliary surgery, as compared with sufentanil.

Patients and Methods

Postoperative follow-up data of hepatobiliary surgery patients in Henan Provincial People's Hospital from March 2018 to June 2021 were collected retrospectively and divided into butorphanol group (group B) or sufentanil group (group S) according to the postoperative intravenous controlled analgesia scheme. The baseline characteristics and surgical information of the two groups were matched through propensity score matching (PSM).

Results

A total of 3437 patients were screened, and PSM yielded 1816 patients after matching, including 908 in the butorphanol group and 908 in the sufentanil group. Compared with group S, the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain on the first postoperative day and the second postoperative day was lower in group B during rest (3.2% vs 10.9%, P<0.001; 1.2% vs 4.6%, P<0.001), and during movement (7.0% vs 18.9%, P<0.001; 2.6% vs 8.7%, P<0.001). Patients receiving butorphanol had a lower morphine consumption (50mg vs 120mg, P<0.001). The bolus attempts of an analgesic pump in group B were significantly lower than in group S (1 vs 2, P<0.001). Postoperative hospital length of stay was shortened in group B (11d vs 12d, P=0.017). The occurrence of postoperative vomiting was lower in group B (1.4% vs 3.0%, P=0.025) than in group S. However, more patients in group B experienced dizziness (0.9% vs 0.1%, P=0.019).

Conclusion

Compared with sufentanil, the application of butorphanol in multimodal analgesia combined with dexmedetomidine and ketorolac via PCIA ameliorated postoperative pain after hepatobiliary surgery, with reduced opioid consumption and shorter postoperative hospital length of stay.

Artificial intelligent patient-controlled intravenous analgesia improves the outcomes of older patients with laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer from July 2019 to May 2021 were selected. The patients were assigned to Ai-PCIA group and control group. Ai-PCIA group received postoperative analgesia management and effect evaluation through intelligent wireless analgesia system + postoperative follow-up twice a day, while control group received analgesia management and effect evaluation through ward physician feedback + postoperative follow-up twice a day. The pain numerical score (NRS), Richards-Campbell Sleep Scale (RCSQ), and adverse outcomes were collected and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients (20 females and 40 males with average (78.26 ± 6.42) years old) were included. The NRS scores at rest and during activity of the Ai-PCA group at 8, 12, and 24 h after the operation were significantly lower than that of the control group (all P < 0.05). The RCSQ score of Ai-PCA group was significantly higher than that of control group on the 1st and 2nd days after operation (all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of dizziness and nausea, vomiting, and myocardial ischemia (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ai-PCIA can improve the analgesic effect and sleep quality of older patients after laparoscopic radical resection, which may be promoted in clinical analgesia practice.

Fifty years of pain research and clinical advances: highlights and key trends

ABSTRACT

This article highlights advances in basic science preclinical pain research, clinical research, and psychological research occurring over the 50 years since the International Association for the Study of Pain was founded. It presents important findings and key trends in these 3 areas of pain science: basic science preclinical research, clinical research, and psychological research.

Effects of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine or ropivacaine alone on duration of postoperative analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Ropivacaine is a long-acting local anesthetic that is used to treat postoperative pain. Adjuvant use of dexmedetomidine in regional anesthesia may prolong the duration of analgesia. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the duration and effect of ropivacaine alone vs. ropivacaine in combination with dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ropivacaine alone or ropivacaine in combination with dexmedetomidine for regional anesthesia. The primary outcome was duration of analgesia, defined as the time from onset of the block to the time of the first analgesic request or initial pain report. Secondary outcomes were duration of sensory block, duration of motor block, consumption of sufentanil for analgesia, length of hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies with 1148 patients were included. Overall quality of the RCTs, as assessed by the Jadad scale, was high. The meta-analysis demonstrated that ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine significantly prolonged the duration of postoperative analgesia from local anesthetics compared to ropivacaine alone (WMD: 4.14h; 95%CI: 3.29~5.0h; P<0.00001; I2 = 99%). There was evidence of high heterogeneity between studies. The duration of sensory and motor block was significantly increased, and consumption of sufentanil for analgesia and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were significantly reduced in patients who received ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine compared to ropivacaine alone. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to ropivacaine alone, ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine significantly prolonged the duration of postoperative analgesia and sensory and motor block, and reduced consumption of sufentanil for analgesia and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, across an array of surgeries.

Correlation Between Pain Intensity and Quality of Recovery After Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer Resection

Purpose

The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire provides a multifaceted assessment of postoperative recovery, and the resulting score is recommended as an endpoint in clinical studies focused on postoperative pain. We aimed to investigate the correlation between the QoR-15 score and postoperative pain intensity in surgical patients.

Patients and Methods

Adult patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung cancer resection and were enrolled in a prospective registry or in a previous prospective study were included in this study. Baseline and perioperative data, including the results of assessment using the Korean version of the QoR-15 (QoR-15K) questionnaire at 48 hours postoperatively, were collected from the database. Correlations between the QoR-15K total score, questionnaire dimensions, and postoperative pain intensity at 48 hours postoperatively were determined using the Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ).

Results

We analyzed a total of 137 eligible patients. Significant negative correlations were noted between the QoR-15K total score and pain intensity at rest (ρ = -0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.57 - -0.31, P < 0.001) and during coughing (ρ = -0.55, 95% CI: -0.65 - -0.42, P < 0.001) at 48 hours postoperatively. The pain dimension and pain intensity at 48 hours postoperatively showed significant correlations with physical comfort, emotional state, and physical independence dimensions. Multivariable logistic regression revealed a significant negative association between the pain score at 24 hours postoperatively and good or excellent postoperative recovery.

Conclusion

The results support the impact of postoperative pain on the overall postoperative quality of recovery in patients who underwent VATS for lung cancer resection. Moreover, the QoR-15K score may be considered as a primary endpoint in clinical studies on postoperative pain control.

Evaluating patient outcomes in postoperative pain management according to the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R)

BACKGROUND

In the first 24 h after surgery, it is necessary to evaluate the patient responses to pain, analgesia and patient satisfaction to prevent complications related to the pain management process.

AIM

To evaluate patients' outcomes (pain qualities, side effects of the pain management, pain treatment satisfaction, non-pharmacological pain treatment methods, predictors of pain management satisfaction and percentage of pain relief) according to the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) in the first 24 h.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

The study sample was comprised of 700 patients, who were surgically treated at the surgical clinics of a university hospital and completed the first postoperative 24 h. The data was collected through the "Patient Information Form" and the "Turkish version of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R)".

RESULTS

The medians of the lowest and the worst postoperative pain severity level were 3.0 and 7.0, respectively. Patients experienced severe pain in 60 % of the first postoperative 24 h and reported that 70 % of their pain eventually decreased. A positive and significant correlation was found between pain interference, pain-affected mood/emotions, the severity of pain-related side effects, the least and worst pain severity levels and severe pain, and the percentage of time experienced with severe pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the patients experienced severe pain, which restricted their daily life activities and led to negative emotions. Acute postoperative pain may negatively affect patient outcomes and delay postoperative recovery during the early period. Therefore, pain should be managed in the early period to prevent physical and psychological side effects.

Preemptive QP001, a fast-acting meloxicam formulation, provides analgesia and reduces opioid consumption following abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

QP001, a novel meloxicam formulation, has been developed to manage moderate to severe postoperative pain. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QP001 injections for moderate to severe pain following abdominal surgery.

METHOD

This prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial enlisted patients experiencing moderate to severe pain following abdominal surgery. These patients were randomized to receive either QP001 injections (30 mg or 60 mg) or a placebo pre-surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint was the total morphine consumption within 24 h after the first administration.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients were enrolled, and 106 patients completed the study. The total morphine consumption in the QP001 30 mg group and 60 mg group, versus placebo group, were significantly lower over the following 24 h (5.11[5.46] vs 8.86[7.67], P = 0.011; 3.11[3.08] vs 8.86[7.67], P < 0.001), respectively. The total morphine consumption in the QP001 30 mg and 60 mg groups, versus placebo group, was also significantly decreased over the following 48 h, including the 24-48 h period (P ≤ 0.001). The QP001 30 mg and 60 mg groups, versus placebo, showed a significant decrease in the area under the curve for pain intensity-time as well as a significant decrease in the effective pressing times of the analgesic pump over the 24 h and 48 h periods (P < 0.05). The QP001 groups, versus placebo, show no significant different in Adverse Events or Adverse Drug Reactions (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative/preemptive QP001 provides analgesia and reduces opioid consumption in patients with moderate to severe pain following abdominal surgery, while maintaining a favorable safety profile.

Analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine with or without magnesium adjunct in bilateral ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve blocks following cesarean section under subarachnoid block: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Pain relief is a basic aspect of anesthesia care. Optimal post-cesarean section analgesia should minimize postoperative complications, facilitate infant care, and prevent postoperative morbidity. Bilateral ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric (IIIH) nerve block has been considered as a part of the multimodal approach. This study was designed to explore the efficacy of adding magnesium sulfate as an adjunct to bupivacaine to provide analgesia following cesarean delivery, using bilateral IIIH nerve block.

Materials And Methods

Seventy-two parturients who were scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomized into two groups of 36 patients each. Group MB patients were given bilateral IIIH nerve block with 250 mg of magnesium sulfate and 95 mg of 0.25% plain bupivacaine. Group B patients were given bilateral IIIH nerve block with 0.9% normal saline and 95 mg of 0.25% plain bupivacaine. Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h, both at rest and with activity were measured. Rescue doses of opioid (intravenous [IV] tramadol 50 mg) at each time point of assessment, total tramadol consumption, time to patients' first request for rescue analgesic agent, and patients' satisfaction score were recorded.

Results

The demographic and social parameters of patients in both the groups were comparable. The mean postoperative VAS pain score in group MB was significantly lesser both at rest and with movement than in group B at 12 and 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). Total postoperative tramadol consumed over 24 h was significantly lesser in the magnesium group than in the control group (125.55 ± 20.76 vs. 160.24 ± 25.82 mg), with a P value of 0.026. The time to patient's first analgesic request was significantly prolonged in group MB compared to group B (505.2 ± 41.4 vs. 372.6 ± 88.8 min, respectively), with a P value of 0.040. However, patients in both groups expressed good satisfaction scores.

Conclusion

Magnesium sulfate as an adjunct to bupivacaine in bilateral IIIH nerve block reduced VAS pain scores, total tramadol consumption, and prolonged post-cesarean section analgesia.

Kinins' Contribution to Postoperative Pain in an Experimental Animal Model and Its Implications

Postoperative pain causes discomfort and disability, besides high medical costs. The search for better treatments for this pain is essential to improve recovery and reduce morbidity and risk of chronic postoperative pain. Kinins and their receptors contribute to different painful conditions and are among the main painful inflammatory mediators. We investigated the kinin's role in a postoperative pain model in mice and reviewed data associating kinins with this painful condition. The postoperative pain model was induced by an incision in the mice's paw's skin and fascia with the underlying muscle's elevation. Kinin levels were evaluated by enzyme immunoassays in sham or operated animals. Kinin's role in surgical procedure-associated mechanical allodynia was investigated using systemic or local administration of antagonists of the kinin B₁ receptor (DALBk or SSR240612) or B₂ receptor (Icatibant or FR173657) and a kallikrein inhibitor (aprotinin). Kinin levels increased in mice's serum and plantar tissue after the surgical procedure. All kinin B₁ or B₂ receptor antagonists and aprotinin reduced incision-induced mechanical allodynia. Although controversial, kinins contribute mainly to the initial phase of postoperative pain. The kallikrein-kinin system can be targeted to relieve this pain, but more investigations are necessary, especially associations with other pharmacologic targets.

Postoperative effects and complications of intrathecal morphine compared to epidural analgesia in patients undergoing intracorporeal robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Analgesia after robot assisted radical cystectomy aims to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption, while facilitating early mobilization and enteral nutrition and minimizing complications. Epidural analgesia is currently recommended for an open radical cystectomy, but it is unclear if intrathecal morphine is a suiting, less-invasive alternative for a robot-assisted radical cystectomy.

METHODS

The analgesic method of choice changed from epidural anesthesia to intrathecal anesthesia for patients undergoing a robot-assisted radical cystectomy. This single-center retrospective study aims to investigate if there is a difference between epidural and intrathecal analgesia in postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, length of hospital stays and postoperative complications. An Propensity Matched Analysis was added to conventional analysis to consolidate the findings.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 153 patients of whom 114 received an epidural catheter with bupivacaine/sufentanil and 39 received a single shot of intrathecal bupivacaine/morphine. Mean pain scores on the first two postoperative days (POD) were slightly higher in the intrathecal analgesia group (epidural versus intrathecal analgesia, NRS POD0: 0(0-2)[0-8] versus 1(0-3)[0-5], p = 0.050; POD1: 2(1-3)[0-8] versus 3(1-4)[0-7], p = 0.058; POD2: 2(0-3)[0-8] versus 3(2-4)[0-7], p = 0.010). Total postoperative morphine consumption was similar over the first seven days: 15 mg (5-35)[0-148] in the epidural group versus 11 mg (0-35)[0-148] in the intrathecal morphine group, p = 0.167. Length of hospital stay and time until fit for discharge where slightly higher in the epidural group (respectively 7 days (5-9)[4-42] versus 6 days (5-7)[4-38], p = 0.006, and 5 days (4-8)[3-30]) versus 5 days (4-6)[3-34], p = 0.018). There was no further difference in postoperative course.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the effects of epidural analgesia and intrathecal morphine are comparable and that intrathecal morphine may be a suiting alternative for epidural analgesia.

Risk factors and protective factors of acute postoperative pain: an observational study at a German university hospital with cross-sectional and longitudinal inpatient data

OBJECTIVES

Surgical fear is one of the most important psychological risk factors for postoperative pain, but less is known about the contribution of protective factors. This study investigated somatic and psychological risk and resilience factors of postoperative pain and validated the German version of the Surgical Fear Questionnaire (SFQ).

SETTING

University Hospital of Marburg, Germany.

DESIGN

Single-centre observational study and cross-sectional validation study.

PARTICIPANTS

Data for validating the SFQ were obtained from a cross-sectional observational study (N=198, mean age 43.6 years, 58.8% female) with persons undergoing different kinds of elective surgery. A sample of N=196 (mean age 43.0 years, 45.4% female) undergoing elective (orthopaedic) surgery was analysed to investigate somatic and psychological predictors of relevant acute postsurgical pain (APSP).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants completed preoperative and postoperative assessments at postoperative days 1, 2 and 7. Presurgical pain, age, gender, pain expectation, surgical setting, physical status, anaesthesia, surgical fear, pain catastrophising, depression, optimism and self-efficacy were examined as predictors.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the original two-factor structure of the SFQ. Correlation analyses indicated good convergent and divergent validity. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α) was between 0.85 and 0.89. Blockwise logistic regression analyses for the risk of APSP revealed outpatient setting, higher preoperative pain, younger age, more surgical fear and low dispositional optimism as significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

The German SFQ is a valid, reliable and economical instrument with which the important psychological predictor surgical fear can be assessed. Modifiable factors that increase the risk of postoperative pain were higher pain intensity before surgery and being fearful about negative consequences of the surgery whereas positive expectations seem to buffer against postsurgical pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

DRKS00021764 and DRKS00021766.

Duloxetine for rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of duloxetine for postoperative recovery after total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

The following electronic databases were searched for eligible trials: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, VIP, Wanfang Data, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The search was performed from the inception dates to 10 August 2022. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Standard mean differences or mean differences with 95% CIs for pooled data were calculated. The primary outcomes were pain, physical function, and analgesic consumption. Secondary outcomes included range of motion (ROM) of the knee, depression, and mental health.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 11 studies, reporting on a total of 1019 patients. Results of analyses indicated that duloxetine showed a statistically significant reduction in pain at rest at 3 days, 1 week, 2, and 6 weeks and pain on movement at 5 days, 1 week, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks. However, there was no statistical significance in pain at rest and on movement at 24 h, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. Additionally, duloxetine had a significant improvement in physical function, ROM of the knee at 6 weeks, and emotional function (depression and mental health). Moreover, the cumulative opioid consumption at 24 h in the duloxetine groups was lower than in the control groups. But there was no statistical significance for the cumulative opioid consumption over 7 days between the duloxetine groups and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, duloxetine might reduce pain mainly over a time span of 3 days-8 weeks and lower cumulative opioid consumption within 24 h. In addition, it improved physical function, ROM of the knee with a time span of 1-6 weeks and emotional function (depression and mental health).

No association of postoperative opioid usage with long-term surgery outcomes in patients with liver cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study

ABSTRACT

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a fatal cancer worldwide, and surgical resection remains the standard treatment. Postoperative opioid prescription has been believed to affect cancer recurrence through complex biological pathways. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database of Taiwan to evaluate the relationship between postoperative opioid use and long-term surgical outcomes of patients with HCC. This study had a retrospective cohort design. In total, 812 patients older than 20 years who underwent hepatectomy because of HCC were included. The exposure group comprised patients who used opioids during hospitalization postoperatively. The comparison group included those who never used opioids during hospitalization postoperatively. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the overall survival or recurrence-free survival rate between the opioid group and the nonopioid group. A total of 530 patients received opioids postoperatively and 282 patients did not. The hazard ratios of overall survival and recurrence-free survival were 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.41) and 1.15 (95% CI, 0.91-1.46), respectively. Total postoperative opioids were converted into oral morphine milligram equivalents and then divided into 3 equal subgroups: low dose, <40 mg; medium dose, 40 to 144 mg; and high dose, ≥145 mg. The hazard ratios of overall survival were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.63-1.24) for the low-dose group, 1.27 (95% CI, 0.92-1.74) for the medium-dose group, and 1.14 (95% CI, 0.83-1.58) for the high-dose group. Postoperative opioids do not affect overall and recurrence-free survival in patients undergoing hepatectomy or liver transplantation because of HCC. Cancer recurrence should not be a clinical concern regarding postoperative opioid prescription.

A multi-disciplinary program for opioid sparse arthroplasty results in reduced long-term opioid consumption: a four year prospective study

INTRODUCTION

The current opioid epidemic poses patient safety and economic burdens to healthcare systems worldwide. Postoperative prescriptions of opioids contribute, with reported opioid prescription rates following arthroplasty as high as 89%. In this multi-centre prospective study, an opioid sparing protocol was implemented for patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty. The primary outcome is to report our patient outcomes in the context of this protocol, and to examine the rate of opioid prescription on discharge from our hospitals following joint arthroplasty surgery. This is possibly associated with the efficacy of the newly implemented Arthroplasty Patient Care Protocol.

METHODS

Over three years, patients underwent perioperative education with the expectation to be opioid-free after surgery. Intraoperative regional analgesia, early postoperative mobilisation and multimodal analgesia were mandatory. Long-term opioid medication use was monitored and PROMs (Oxford Knee/Hip Score (OKS/OHS), EQ-5D-5 L) were evaluated pre-operatively, and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Primary and secondary outcomes were opiate use and PROMs at different time points.

RESULTS

A total of 1,444 patients participated. Two (0.2%) knee patients used opioids to one year. Zero hip patients used opioids postoperatively at any time point after six weeks (p < 0.0001). The OKS and EQ-5D-5 L both improved for knee patients from 16 (12-22) pre-operatively to 35 (27-43) at 1 year postoperatively, and 70 (60-80) preoperatively to 80 (70-90) at 1 year postoperatively (p < 0.0001). The OHS and EQ-5D-5 L both improved for hip patients from 12 (8-19) preoperatively to 44 (36-47) at 1 year postoperatively, and 65 (50-75) preoperatively to 85 (75-90) at 1 year postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Satisfaction improved between all pre- and postoperative time points for both knee and hip patients (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Knee and hip arthroplasty patients receiving a peri-operative education program can effectively and satisfactorily be managed without long-term opioids when coupled with multimodal perioperative management, making this a valuable approach to reduce chronic opioid use.

Pain management in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Pain after transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) can seriously affect the prognosis of patients and the insertion of additional medical resources.

AIM

To develop an early warning model for predicting pain after TACE to enable the implementation of preventive analgesic measures.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 857 patients (from January 2016 to January 2020) and prospectively enrolled 368 patients (from February 2020 to October 2022; as verification cohort) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received TACE in the Hepatic Surgery Center of Tongji Hospital. Five predictive models were established using machine learning algorithms, namely, random forest model (RFM), support vector machine model, artificial neural network model, naive Bayes model and decision tree model. The efficacy of these models in predicting postoperative pain was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, decision curve analysis and clinical impact curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 24 candidate variables were included in the predictive models using the iterative algorithms. Age, preoperative pain, number of embolised tumours, distance from the liver capsule, dosage of iodised oil and preoperative prothrombin activity were closely associated with postoperative pain. The accuracy of the predictive model was compared between the training [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.798; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.745-0.851] and verification (AUC = 0.871; 95%CI: 0.818-0.924) cohorts, with RFM having the best predictive efficiency (training cohort: AUC = 0.869, 95%CI: 0.816-0.922; internal verification cohort: AUC = 0.871; 95%CI: 0.818-0.924).

CONCLUSION

The five predictive models based on advanced machine learning algorithms, especially RFM, can accurately predict the risk of pain after TACE in patients with HCC. RFM can be used to assess the risk of pain for facilitating preventive treatment and improving the prognosis.

Effect on music therapy on quality of recovery and postoperative pain after gynecological laparoscopy

BACKGROUND

Music therapy is safe, inexpensive, simple, and has relaxing properties for mental and physical capacities, as well as few side effects. Moreover, it improves patient satisfaction and reduces postoperative pain. Thus, we intended to evaluate the effect of music intervention on the quality of comprehensive recovery using quality of recovery 40 (QoR-40) survey in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to music intervention group or control group: 41 patients each. After anesthetic induction, headphones were placed on the patients, and then classical music selected by an investigator was started in the music group with individual comfortable volume during surgery, while the player was not started in the control group. On postoperatively 1 day, the QoR-40 (5 categories: emotions, pain, physical comfort, support, and independence) survey was evaluated, while postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting were assessed at 30 minutes and 3, 24, and 36 hours postoperatively.

RESULTS

Total QoR-40 score was statistically better in the music group, and among the 5 categories, the music group had a higher pain category score than the control group. The postoperative pain score was significantly lower in the music group at 36 hours postoperatively, although the requirement for rescue analgesics was similar in both groups. The incidence of postoperative nausea did not differ at any time point.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative music intervention enhanced postoperative functional recovery and reduced postoperative pain in patients who underwent laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

Oral pregabalin is effective as preemptive analgesia in abdominal hysterectomy-A randomized controlled trial

Postoperative pain is one of the main negative symptoms resulting from surgery and the use of new methods to control this symptom is of ever-increasing relevance. Opioid-sparing strategies, such as multimodal analgesia, are trends in this scenario. Pregabalin is a well-established treatment for neuropathic pain; however, it is still controversial in the surgical context for postoperative analgesia. This study investigated the effect of pregabalin on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. It is a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Female patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy were randomised to use pregabalin (group P1), 300 mg orally 2 h before surgery, or identical placebo pills (group P0). The main outcome includes the postoperative pain index by visual analogue scale (VAS) and McGill's pain questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include opioid consumption and the presence of adverse effects. A value of p < 0.05 was used to reject type I error. Fifty-five patients were randomised amongst the groups. Patients in group P1 had lower pain rates by VAS scale, both at rest and in active motion, than group P0. In McGill's questionnaire, patients from group P1 also had lower pain rates (12 × 28.5). There was approximately twice as much opioid consumption amongst patients in group P0. Regarding side effects, there was a difference between the two groups only for dizziness, being more incident in group P1. This study suggests that pregabalin is an important adjuvant drug in treating postoperative pain in patients with abdominal hysterectomy.

Blood flow restriction training promotes functional recovery of knee joint in patients after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: A randomized clinical trial

Purpose: To explore the effect of blood flow restriction training (BFRT) on the recovery of knee function in patients after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM). Methods: Forty patients undergoing APM surgery were included in this parallel group, two-arm, single-assessor blinded, randomized clinical trial. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: routine rehabilitation group (RR Group, n = 20) and routine rehabilitation + blood flow restriction training group (RR + BFRT Group, n = 20). One subject in each group dropped out during the experiment. All patients received 8 weeks of routine rehabilitation starting from the second day after APM. In addition, patients in the RR + BFRT group required additional BFRT twice a week. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score, range of motion (ROM), one-leg standing test (OLST) score, Lysholm knee score, quadriceps muscle strength, quadriceps thickness, and thigh circumference were evaluated at preoperative, postoperative, 4 and 8 weeks after surgery. SPSS 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the data. Repeated measures ANOVA was used if the data were normally distributed and had homogeneity of variance. Generalized estimating equations were chosen if the data were not normally distributed or had homogeneity of variance. Results: There were no significant differences in VAS score, ROM, OLST score, Lysholm knee score, quadriceps muscle strength, quadriceps thickness, and thigh circumference between the two groups before surgery (p > 0.05). Compared with postoperative, VAS score, ROM, OLST score, Lysholm knee score, and thigh circumference were significantly improved in the RR group (p < 0.05), while quadriceps muscle strength and quadriceps thickness were not significantly enhanced at 8 weeks postoperatively (p > 0.05). However, VAS score, ROM, OLST score, Lysholm knee score, quadriceps muscle strength, quadriceps thickness, and thigh circumference were all significantly improved in the RR + BFRT group at 8 weeks postoperatively (p < 0.05). Furthermore, compared with the RR group, VAS score (50% vs. 86%), ROM (7.9% vs. 16.0%), OLST score (57.3% vs. 130.1%), Lysholm knee score (38.4% vs. 55.7%), relative peak torque (11.0% vs. 84.7%), mean power (20.6% vs. 88.1%), rectus femoris thickness (0.40% vs. 13.0%), vastus medialis (0.29% vs. 5.32%), vastus lateralis (0% vs. 6.2%), vastus internus (0% vs. 5.8%), and thigh circumference (2.7% vs. 5.8%) in the RR + BFRT group were significantly improved at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively (p < 0.05). Conclusion: BFRT combined with routine rehabilitation training can better promote the recovery of knee joint function in patients after APM, especially the improvement of quadriceps muscle strength and thickness.

Nociceptive Profile and Analgesic use of Patients Submitted to Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery: A Prospective Cohort

Objective  This study aimed to evaluate the nociceptive profile and the intake of analgesic drugs of patients submitted to rotator cuff repair surgery. Also, to evaluate the nociceptive thresholds and the integrity of the descending inhibitory system, pain catastrophism and prevalence of nociceptive or neuropathic pain. Methods  Approved by the Ethics Committee of La Salle University (1.325.433/2015). 40 patients (>18 years old) who underwent rotator cuff repair surgery (divided in small and large injuries) were recruited. The used instruments were: Sociodemographic Questionnaire, Functional Pain Scale, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Quantitative Sensory Test (QST) and Conditioned Pain Modulation Task (CPM). Results  Patients had a significant difference in pain thresholds QST heat (independent samples t test) and quality of sleep, mood and anxiety (paired t test) in groups preoperative. There was a significant correlation between preoperative CPM and postoperative VAS (Pearson Correlation). It was observed that, in preoperative, 38 patients used analgesics continuously. Besides that, in postoperative, use of opioid drugs was higher in patients with small injury (13 patients) than in those with large injury (9 patients). Conclusion  Therefore, patients with rotator cuff injuries did not present alterations in the descending inhibitory system, but showed alterations in pain thresholds, which may interfere in the postoperative period and still be related to the consumption of analgesics.