A qualitative study of the experience and impact of neuropathic pain in people living with HIV

The multi-dimensional stigma of chronic pain: A narrative review

Accumulating evidence suggests that stigma is a pervasive and pernicious psychosocial phenomenon that affects people living with chronic pain. In this narrative review, we describe the nature of stigma experienced by people with chronic pain and discuss its multifaceted determinants. These determinants include features of pain itself and intersectional factors, including comorbid conditions and social marginalization. We review the current state of the evidence on the association between stigma and chronic pain-related functioning, highlighting avenues for future research. Building on evidence from other health conditions, we identify multifaceted approaches to intervention that address all levels of the socio-ecological system which contribute to stigma and its negative impacts on people with pain.

Provoked cytokine response is not associated with distress or induced secondary hyperalgesia in people with suppressed HIV

Psychological distress predicts the onset and worsening of persistent pain, but the mechanisms that underpin this influence are poorly understood. Pro-inflammatory signalling is a plausible mechanistic link, given its known connections to distress, pain, and neural upregulation. Sustained distress may prime the inflammatory system to respond more strongly to a phasic noxious challenge, supporting neuroimmune upregulation of central nociceptive signalling and persistent pain. This cross-sectional study tested the hypotheses that in vitro endotoxin-provoked expression of typically pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL1β, IL6) is a partial mediator between distress and persistent pain, and that it is associated with the secondary hyperalgesia response to an experimental noxious challenge, in people with suppressed HIV. Study participants were 99 adults (mean (range) age: 43(28-64y/o; 72 females) with either no pain (n=54) or persistent pain (n=45), mostly of black South African ethnicity, low socio-economic status, and with high social support. The results replicated previous reports that distress is associated with persistent pain status and pain severity, and also showed an association between distress and the anatomical extent of pain. However, distress was not associated with provoked cytokine expression, nor was provoked cytokine expression associated with secondary hyperalgesia. The conflict between our findings and the evidence on which our hypotheses were based could reflect masking of an effect by differentially trained immune systems or a more complex relationship arising from diverse psychoneuroimmunological interactions in this sample. Our sample's combination of HIV status, African genetic ancestry, financial impoverishment, and rich social interconnectedness is poorly represented in current research and represents an opportunity to deepen insight into psychoneuroimmunological interactions related to distress and persistent pain.

Regional and interregional functional and structural brain abnormalities in neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain is a severe form of chronic pain due to a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. Here we provide an overview of the neuroimaging approaches that can be used to assess brain abnormalities in a chronic pain condition, with particular focus on people with neuropathic pain and then summarize the findings of studies that applied these methodologies to study neuropathic pain. First, we review the most commonly used approaches to examine grey and white matter abnormalities using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and then review functional neuroimaging techniques to measure regional activity and inter-regional communication using functional MRI, electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG). In neuropathic pain the most prominent structural abnormalities have been found to be in the primary somatosensory cortex, insula, anterior cingulate cortex and thalamus, with differences in volume directionality linked to neuropathic pain symptomology. Functional connectivity findings related to treatment outcome point to a potential clinical utility. Some prominent abnormalities in neuropathic pain identified with EEG and MEG throughout the dynamic pain connectome are slowing of alpha activity and higher regional oscillatory activity in the theta and alpha band, lower low beta and higher high beta band power. Finally, connectivity and coupling findings placed into context how regional abnormalities impact the networks and pathways of the dynamic pain connectome. Overall, functional and structural neuroimaging have the potential to identify predictive biomarkers that can be used to guide development of personalized pain management of neuropathic pain.

Psychological, physical and complementary therapies for the management of neuropathic pain

This chapter aims to explain and evaluate the evidence for psychological, physical and complementary therapies as part of a holistic plan for managing neuropathic pain. Psychological therapies refer to interventions targeting mental health, while physical therapies refer to interventions designed to target movement and functional ability, and complementary therapies are those that attempt to target key mechanisms of change to alter brain and body functioning, or thought processes related to the experience of pain. Each therapeutic modality is discussed to narratively report on the evidence and provide implications for clinicians. Where evidence was unavailable for neuropathic pain populations, evidence from chronic pain populations more broadly was considered. Although promising, there is a lack of high-quality evidence investigating the benefits and safety of psychological, physical and complementary therapies for the management of neuropathic pain. The low certainty evidence and lack of evidence across different neuropathic pain conditions impacts the ability to make recommendations for clinical practice. However, there are several potential areas for future research. Psychological therapies that focus on the underlying mechanisms related to emotion regulation may improve mood and pain, while cognitive and behavioural based approaches may improve psychological comorbidities such as anxiety and depression. Physical therapies involving physical activity and exercise, education, and graded motor imagery may improve functioning and reduce pain. Finally, complementary therapies including electroencephalography neurofeedback, acupuncture, virtual reality, hypnosis and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation may provide promising reductions in pain. There is a clear need for further high-quality trials to evaluate the benefits and safety of psychological, physical and complementary therapies to guide the management of neuropathic pain.

Pain catastrophizing levels differentiate between common diseases with pain: HIV, fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome, and breast cancer survivors

OBJECTIVES

Pain catastrophizing is a core psychological factor determining pain experience. We addressed the question of whether patients with different pain syndromes group into different pain catastrophizing phenotypes.

METHODS

A total of 727 patients with chronic pain associated with four primary syndromes: Breast cancer (BC) survivors (n = 400), fibromyalgia (FM, n = 52), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS, n = 155), and HIV (n = 120) were first studied for differences in levels of pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, PCS) and pain intensity by analysis of variance. Subsequently, individual scores of the PCS subscales "rumination", "magnification," and "helplessness" from the pooled cohorts were submitted to multivariate k-means clustering to explore subgroups.

RESULTS

Three clusters defined by the level of catastrophizing were identified. The "low catastrophizing" cluster (n = 377) included most of the BC patients (71.0%) and the "moderate catastrophizing" cluster (n = 256) most of the FM patients (61.5%). HIV (31.9%) and CRPS (44.7%) patients were over-represented in the "high catastrophizing" cluster (n = 94) with the highest catastrophizing tendencies in all dimensions. These patients reported more helplessness than the patients in the two other clusters.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary syndrome causing the pain has an impact on self-reported pain-related catastrophizing. Helplessness is a predominant feature in HIV and CRPS patients and therefore an important target in pain rehabilitation.

Ongoing Healthcare Disparities in neuroHIV: Addressing Gaps in the Care Continuum

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We aim to review the neurological complications of HIV and the social, cultural, and economic inequalities that contribute to disparities in neuroHIV care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Disparities in diagnostics and care of patients with neurological infections and non-infectious conditions associated with HIV in both high-income and low-to-middle-income countries (LMIC) are common. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these disparities. Factors, such as HIV-related stigma, may deter people from accessing HIV treatment. First-line recommended treatments for neurological infections are not available in many LMICs, leading to inadequate treatment and exposure to agents with more harmful side effect profiles. Access-related factors, such as lack of transportation, lack of health insurance, and inadequate telehealth access, may increase the risk of HIV-related neurological complications. Further research is needed to increase awareness of neurological complications among providers and PWH, and regional guidelines should be considered to better address these complications.

Chronic pain is no more prevalent in people living with HIV than in their uninfected counterparts in South Africa

BACKGROUND

There are few studies on chronic pain prevalence in people living with HIV, and there are no studies comparing chronic pain prevalence in an HIV-infected group (HIV+) to that found in an uninfected group (HIV-) in the same population. This study was undertaken to (1) estimate the chronic pain prevalence in HIV+ individuals and (2) compare chronic pain prevalence between HIV+ and HIV- groups in a population.

METHODS

Individuals ≥15 years old were recruited using multi-stage probability sampling in the 2016 South African Demographic and Health Survey. In an interview, participants were asked whether they currently had pain or discomfort, and if so, whether that pain or discomfort had persisted for at least 3 months (operational definition of chronic pain). Blood samples were taken from a volunteering sub-sample for HIV testing.

RESULTS

A total of 6584 of 12,717 eligible individuals answered the questionnaire and were tested for HIV. Mean age: 39.1 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.3-39.9), per cent female: 55% (95% CI: 52-56) and tested HIV+: 19% (95% CI: 17-20). The prevalence of chronic pain was 19% (95% CI: 16-23) in the HIV+ group, which was similar to that found in the HIV- group (20% [95% CI: 18-22]; odds ratio [adjusted for age, sex, socio-economic status] = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.74-1.17], p-value = 0.549).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of chronic pain in South Africans living with HIV was approximately 20%, and having HIV was not associated with an increased risk of chronic pain.

SIGNIFICANCE

Using data from a large, national, population-based study in South Africa, I show for the first time that the prevalence of chronic pain in that population did not differ materially between the part of the population that was living with HIV compared with their uninfected counterparts (both approximately 20%). These findings run counter to the dogma that there is a greater risk of having pain in people living with HIV.

Pain management in people with severe mental illness: an agenda for progress

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Feasibility randomized-controlled trial of online acceptance and commitment therapy for painful peripheral neuropathy in people living with HIV: The OPEN study

BACKGROUND

Neuropathic pain negatively affects quality of life among people living with HIV (PLWH). This study examined the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomized-controlled trial of online acceptance and commitment therapy ("ACT OPEN") for neuropathic pain in PLWH.

METHODS

Using a parallel-groups design, thirty-eight participants were randomized to ACT OPEN or a waitlist control (2:1). Participants completed standard self-report outcome measures at baseline, and two- and five-months post-randomization. Participants were aware of their allocation, but assessment was blinded.

RESULTS

Twenty-five participants were randomized to ACT OPEN and 13 to the control (of 133 referrals). ACT OPEN completion was 69% and two-month trial retention was 82%. Treatment credibility and satisfaction scores for ACT OPEN were comparable to scores reported in previous trials of cognitive-behavioural treatments for pain. Four adverse events were reported during the study, including one serious adverse event; all of these were unrelated to the research procedures. Small to moderate effects and 95% confidence intervals suggest that the true effect may favour ACT OPEN for improvements in pain intensity/interference and depression.

CONCLUSIONS

A full-scale RCT of online ACT for pain management in PLWH may be feasible with refinements to trial design to facilitate recruitment.

SIGNIFICANCE

Research on pain management in people living with HIV has primarily focused on pharmacological treatments with limited success. This is the first study to show the potential feasibility of a psychological treatment based on acceptance and commitment therapy delivered online and tailored for pain management in people with HIV ("ACT OPEN"). ACT OPEN may be a promising treatment in this population and further evaluation in a full-scale randomized-controlled trial appears warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered (clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03584412).

Acceptability of psychologically-based pain management and online delivery for people living with HIV and chronic neuropathic pain: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

Chronic neuropathic pain is common in people living with HIV. Psychological treatments can improve quality of life for people with chronic pain in general, and online delivery can increase access to these treatments. However, the acceptability of psychological treatment and online delivery have not been investigated in-depth in people living with HIV and chronic neuropathic pain. Therefore, a qualitative study was undertaken to explore views about a psychological treatment for pain management in this population and to investigate the acceptability of online treatment delivery.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted and analysed using inductive thematic analysis, adopting a critical realist perspective. Twenty-six people living with HIV and chronic neuropathic pain completed semi-structured interviews. Their views about a psychological treatment for pain management and online delivery were explored in-depth.

RESULTS

Three themes and 12 subthemes were identified. Theme one represents a desire for a broader approach to pain management, including not wanting to take more pills and having multidimensional goals that were not just focussed on pain relief. Theme two includes barriers to online psychologically-based pain management, including concerns about using the Internet and confidentiality. Theme three describes treatment facilitators, including accessibility, therapist support, social connection, and experiencing success.

CONCLUSIONS

A psychological treatment for chronic neuropathic pain management appears acceptable for people living with HIV. Therapist-supported online delivery of cognitive-behavioural pain management may be acceptable for people living with HIV given appropriate development of the treatment to address identified barriers to engagement. These data can inform developments to enhance engagement in online psychologically-informed pain management in people living with HIV and more broadly in remote delivery of psychological treatments.