TACE-HAIC combined with targeted therapy and immunotherapy versus TACE alone for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumour thrombus: a propensity score matching study

Comparative efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors versus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors alone in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and advanced-stage disease presents significant therapeutic challenges. Combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance treatment efficacy. This meta-analysis evaluates efficacy and safety of TACE + TKIs + ICIs compared to TKIs + ICIs alone in patients with HCC.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across "PubMed", "Web of Science", "Cochrane Library", "Scopus", "Google Scholar", and "Embase" to screen studies up to November 2024. Studies comparing TACE + TKIs + ICIs with TKIs + ICIs alone in advanced HCC were included. Outcomes of interest included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events. Results were reported as relative risk (RR) or hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Funnel plots was used to assess publication bias.

RESULTS

Ten studies comprising 1999 patients were included. The combination of TACE + TKIs + ICIs marked improved ORR (RR = 1.81, 95%CI:1.57-2.09, P < 0.00001) and DCR (RR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.19-1.46, P < 0.00001) comparing with TKIs + ICIs alone. OS and PFS were also significantly prolonged in combination group, with HR of 0.55 (95%CI:0.48-0.63, P < 0.00001) and 0.73 (95%CI:0.65-0.82, P < 0.00001), respectively. Adverse events such as pain (RR = 3.94, 95%CI:2.40-6.47, P < 0.001) and nausea/vomiting (RR = 2.28, 95% CI:1.56-3.33, P < 0.001) were more frequent in the TACE + TKIs + ICIs group, though rates of hypertension, diarrhea, and rash were similar between groups. Funnel plots indicated minimal publication bias for primary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of TACE, TKIs, and ICIs significantly improves ORR, DCR, OS, and PFS compared to TKIs and ICIs alone, demonstrating superior efficacy with an acceptable safety profile. These findings provide evidence for the integration of TACE with systemic therapies in the management of HCC.

Multiparametric MRI-based Machine Learning Radiomics for Predicting Treatment Response to Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Targeted and Immunotherapy in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate multiple machine learning predictive models incorporating clinical features and pretreatment multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic features for predicting treatment response to transarterial chemoembolization combined with molecular targeted therapy plus immunotherapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study involved 276 patients with unresectable HCC who received combination therapy from 4 medical centers. Patients were divided into one training cohort and two independent external validation cohorts. 16 radiomic features from six multiparametric MRI sequences and 2 clinical features were used to build six machine learning models. The models were evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), decision curve analysis, and incremental predictive value.

RESULTS

Alpha-fetoprotein and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are clinical independent predictors of treatment response. In the training cohort and two external validation cohorts, the AUCs and 95% confidence intervals for predicting treatment response were respectively 0.782 (0.698-0.857) 0.695 (0.566-0.823), and 0.679 (0.542-0.810) for the clinical model; 0.942 (0.903-0.974), 0.869 (0.761-0.949), and 0.868 (0.769-0.942) for the radiomics model; and 0.956 (0.920-0.984), 0.895 (0.810-0.967), and 0.892 (0.804-0.957) for the combined clinical-radiomics model. In the three cohorts, the incremental predictive value of the radiomics model over the clinical model was 49.2% (P < 0.001), 28.8% (P < 0.001), and 31.5% (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The combined clinical-radiomics model may provide a reliable and non-invasive tool to predict individual treatment responses and guide and improve clinical decision-making in combination therapy of HCC patients.

Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy followed by transarterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy followed by transarterial embolization (HAIC+TAE) to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical data of patients who received HAIC+TAE or TACE between April 2020 and April 2022 was collected. Propensity score-matching was used to balance the baseline characteristics of the two groups. Tumor response according to mRECIST, median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were investigated. ALBI score was applied to evaluate the changes of liver function and other relative adverse reactions were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients with uHCC were enrolled in the study, including 71 in the TACE group and 27 in the HAIC+TAE group. After propensity score matching, 23 pairs of patients were investigated. The HAIC+TAE group showed a longer median TTP and OS than TACE group (mTTP 316 vs. 235 days, P=0.023; mOS 580 vs. 493 days, P=0.020). Objective response rates in HAIC+TAE group and TACE group were 65.2% and 47.8% (P=0.234). Disease-control rates were 87.0% and 82.6% (P=1.000). No significant difference was found in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination treatment strategy of HAIC+TAE in patients with uHCC appears to be a safe regimen, with the potential to prolong mTTP and mOS relative to TACE. The sequential application of this therapy merits consideration as an innovative treatment strategy for individuals with uHCC.

Two treatment methods for hepatocellular carcinoma: Lenvatinib or bevacizumab combined with sintilimab and interventional therapy

In their study, Han et al compared the efficacy of bevacizumab plus sindilizumab plus interventional therapy with that of lenvatinib plus sindilizumab plus interventional therapy for patients with intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The triple therapy, which integrates interventional therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, has emerged as a promising research focus in the treatment of liver cancer. Consequently, it is of utmost significance to select an appropriate combination of interventional therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy for patients suffering from intermediate and advanced liver cancer.

Comparative analysis of hepatectomy for HCC with PVTT: Insights from a 30-year single-center experience: Hepatectomy for HCC with PVTT

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is frequent in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although hepatectomy is the primary treatment for HCC, no consensus exists on its role in PVTT between Eastern and Western clinicians. This study aims to assess the efficacy of hepatectomy in HCC patients with PVTT by analyzing perioperative outcomes and prognosis.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study reviewed HCC patient data from Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong (1989-2020). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to match patients with and without PVTT undergoing hepatectomy, comparing perioperative and survival outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

Among 3981 HCC patients, 1842 had PVTT and were not operated (not-operated group), while 2139 underwent hepatectomy. Of the operated patients, 156 had PVTT (PVTT group) and 1983 did not (no-PVTT group). Median overall survival (mOS) in the not-operated group was 2.7 months, compared to 13.0 months in the PVTT group. After 1:3 PSM, the no-PVTT group (n = 468) had longer mOS (47.0 vs. 13.0 months, p < 0.001) and disease-free survival (10.6 vs. 4.2 months, p < 0.001). The PVTT group had longer operative times (449 vs. 390 min, p < 0.001), higher complication rates (37.8 % vs. 28.2 %, p = 0.024), and closer surgical margins (0.6 vs. 1.0 cm, p = 0.036), but similar hospital mortality (p = 0.898). mOS for low-AFP (<17400 ng/ml) and high-AFP (≥17400 ng/ml) patients was 16.2 vs. 8.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Aggressive treatment of PVTT is necessary. For certain PVTT patients, hepatectomy may be potentially effective, with acceptable perioperative safety and seemingly no technical barriers.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of combined surgery with intraoperative radiotherapy and postoperative PVC for hepatocellular carcinoma with mPVTT

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accompanied by main portal vein tumor thrombosis (mPVTT) is associated with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel triple therapy approach combining surgery, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), and postoperative portal vein infusion chemotherapy (PVC) for HCC with mPVTT.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 56 patients diagnosed with HCC and mPVTT. Patients were divided into two groups: the surgery-IORT-PVC group (n = 21) and the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) group (n = 35). Baseline characteristics, treatment procedures, postoperative complications, and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The surgery-IORT-PVC group (n = 21) demonstrated superior median overall survival (OS) (not reached vs. 7 months, P < 0.05 4.99(2.543-9.792)) and median progression-free survival (PFS) (not reached vs. 4 months, P < 0.05 5.268(2.765-10.03)) compared to the TACE-HAIC group (n = 35). Additional, the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS (75.6 %, 60.5 %, 60.5 % vs 28.8 %, 8.2 %, 8.2 %) and PFS (73.3 %, 64.1 %, 64.1 % vs 9.5 %, 9.5 %, 9.5 %) of the surgery-IORT-PVC group significantly superior to that of the TACE-HAIC group. Multivariate analysis identified the treatment modality as an independent factor influencing both OS and PFS. Postoperative complications in the surgery-IORT-PVC group were manageable. No severe adverse events were reported in either group.

CONCLUSION

Overall, this novel treatment modality offers a potential effective therapy modality for patients with HCC and mPVTT who previously had limited therapeutic options.

Phase II study with sorafenib plus radiotherapy for advanced HCC with portal and/or hepatic vein tumor thrombosis

Background & Aims

Portal and hepatic vein tumor thrombosis is associated with inferior outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and systemic treatment alone is often insufficient. This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of combining sorafenib with radiotherapy in advanced HCC with thrombosis.

Methods

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03535259), this phase II single-arm prospective trial targeted patients with HCC with portal or hepatic vein tumor thrombosis, liver minus gross tumor volume >700 ml, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scores of 0 or 1. Participants underwent 40-66 Gy radiotherapy for the hepatic primary tumor and vein tumor thrombosis, with concurrent oral sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) until disease progression or unacceptable adverse events. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS) and the secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), median progression-free survival (mPFS), time to tumor progression (TTP), tumor thrombosis control, and grade ≥3 adverse events.

Results

Between May 2018 and January 2020, 86 patients were enrolled with a median radiotherapy dose of 54 Gy (40-65 Gy). At a median follow-up of 17.2 months, mOS, mPFS, and TTP stood at 16.5, 6.1, and 6.8 months, respectively. ORR reached 47.7% and 52.3% per RECIST and mRECIST, respectively. For the tumor thrombosis, 2-year control rates per mRECIST were 93.1%. No grade 5 adverse events were noted, whereas thrombocytopenia (22.1%) and leukopenia (14.0%) were the main grade 3 adverse events.

Conclusions

Concurrent sorafenib and radiotherapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with HCC with portal or hepatic vein tumor thrombosis.

Impact and implications

Treatment options for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and vascular tumor thrombus are limited. The efficacy and safety of concurrent sorafenib and radiation for HCC with portal or hepatic vein tumor thrombosis has not been elucidated. This phase II trial shows that concurrent sorafenib and radiotherapy is effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of advanced HCC with portal vein or hepatic vein tumor thrombosis.

Clinical trials registration

This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03535259).

Conversion resection of initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma associated with steatohepatitis through hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy-transarterial chemoembolization and systemic therapy: a case report

Background

For advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), effective treatment options remain scarce. The risks of surgery and the likelihood of tumor residue restrict the use of liver resection. However, the combination of systemic therapy with locoregional treatments has recently demonstrated promising anti-tumor efficacy, offering new avenues for advanced HCC.

Case Description

We detail the case of a 61-year-old male who is free of viral hepatitis and alcohol consumption, but overweight with a body mass index (BMI) of 25.2 kg/m2. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, and blood tests were conducted, leading to a diagnosis of HCC associated with steatohepatitis, along with a combined portal vein tumor thrombus. Following four rounds of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolization (HAIC-TACE), 7 cycles of sintilimab treatment, and lenvatinib, there was marked tumor reduction and thrombus retraction to a peripheral branch. The patient subsequently underwent curative liver resection. Pathology revealed extensive necrosis within the tumor region and chronic hepatitis with steatosis in the adjacent liver tissue. No viable tumor tissue was identified. Now about 6 months after the operation, the patient is still in a tumor-free state.

Conclusions

In this instance, we detail the effective transition of an HCC patient, with underlying steatohepatitis, to a treatment regimen that included HAIC-TACE along with sintilimab and lenvatinib. This approach yielded potent antitumor activity and was notably devoid of severe side effects. The outcome of this case expands the therapeutic horizon for managing HCC in the context of steatohepatitis.

Efficacy and safety of arterial FOLFOX chemotherapy plus anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

Background

Given the limited efficacy of current first-line therapies, there is an urgent need to develop novel treatment strategies to improve the prognosis of patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uICC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimens (HAIC-FO) plus anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 immunotherapy [αPD-(L)1] antibody [HAIC+αPD-(L)1] compared to systemic chemotherapy (SYS) plus αPD-(L)1 antibody [SYS+αPD-(L)1] as a first-line treatment for patients with uICC.

Methods

In this retrospective study, treatment-naive uICC patients who were treated with HAIC+αPD-(L)1 or SYS+αPD-(L)1 were included. The clinical characteristics, therapeutic outcomes, and adverse events (AEs) of the patients in the two groups were compared. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize biases between groups.

Results

From January 2019 to January 2023, a total of 182 patients were enrolled; 147 patients were included in the HAIC+αPD-(L)1 group and 35 patients were included in the SYS+αPD-(L)1 group. After PSM, 61 and 26 patients were included in the HAIC+αPD-(L)1 and SYS+αPD-(L)1 groups, respectively. The HAIC+αPD-(L)1 group had longer median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median intrahepatic PFS (mIPFS) than did the SYS+αPD-(L)1 group (mOS: 14.5 vs. 10.5 months, P=0.02; mPFS: 10.4 vs. 6.4 months, P=0.02; mIPFS: 11.4 vs. 6.5 months, P<0.001). The overall incidence of AEs was comparable between the two groups, but the HAIC+αPD-(L)1 group had a lower incidence of grade 3-4 AEs related to anemia, leukopenia, weight loss, and fatigue.

Conclusions

HAIC+αPD-(L)1 had acceptable toxic effects and might improve outcomes compared to SYS+αPD-(L)1 as a first-line treatment for patients with uICC.

Enhanced efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined locoregional therapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A single - center retrospective study

Background

Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents significant treatment challenges. While locoregional therapies (LT) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) offer some benefits, prognosis remains poor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have shown promise in other oncological settings, suggesting potential benefits in HCC treatment regimens.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed 232 patients diagnosed with unresectable HCC at West China Hospital from January 2019 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into two treatment groups: LT+TKI and LT+TKI+ICI. All patients underwent standardized locoregional treatments and first-line TKIs, with the latter group also receiving ICIs. The primary endpoints measured were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Survival analysis utilized Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression models.

Results

The LT+TKI+ICI group demonstrated significantly improved survival outcomes compared to the LT+TKI group. Median OS was 28 ± 3.9 months in the LT+TKI+ICI group versus 21 ± 3.0 months in the LT+TKI group, with corresponding 6-, 12-, and 24-month OS rates of 96.8%, 79.3%, and 59.4% versus 85.8%, 71.5%, and 44.1%, respectively (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.449-0.913; P = 0.014). Median PFS also favored the LT+TKI+ICI group (11 ± 1.1 months vs. 7 ± 0.76 months; HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.452-0.805; P<0.001). Multivariable analysis identified LT+TKI, vascular invasion, and metastasis as independent risk factors for poorer survival outcomes.

Conclusions

Adding ICI to LT and TKI significantly extends both OS and PFS in patients with unresectable HCC. These findings suggest that integrating ICI into treatment protocols could be beneficial in managing unresectable HCC, particularly for patients with vascular invasion.

Anticipation for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is an advanced targeted therapeutic approach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type of primary liver cancer. HAIC has demonstrated significant potential in managing advanced HCC, particularly in regions with high prevalence rates. Despite its promise, several challenges and areas for future research remain. Clinical studies have substantiated the efficacy of HAIC in enhancing survival outcomes for patients with advanced hepatic carcinoma. Notably, combination therapies involving immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as lenvatinib and programmed death-1 inhibitors, have shown substantial improvements in median overall survival and progression-free survival compared to systemic chemotherapy. These combination therapies have also exhibited superior response rates and disease control, with manageable and often less severe adverse events relative to systemic treatments. This article is based on the review by Zhou et al and aims to discuss the current status and future directions in the treatment of HCC, emphasizing the role of HAIC and its integration with novel therapeutic agents.

Key prognostic factors in transarterial chemoembolization combined with sorafenib treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a prevalent malignancy worldwide, with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) worsening its prognosis and complicating management. The combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and the targeted agent sorafenib has been proposed to improve treatment outcomes. This study investigates the prognostic factors influencing the effectiveness of this combined treatment in HCC patients with PVTT.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 299 patients diagnosed with HCC and PVTT who underwent TACE and sorafenib treatment between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into good-prognosis (n = 197) and poor-prognosis (n = 102) groups based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) assessed four weeks post-treatment. Prognostic factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses to identify significant determinants affecting therapeutic outcomes.

RESULTS

Key prognostic factors included tumor number, differentiation, size, PVTT extent, Child-Pugh class, ECOG performance status, hospitalization duration, and AFP levels. Patients with a single tumor had better outcomes (OR 0.358, P = 0.002), whereas poor differentiation (OR 4.561, P = 0.005) and larger tumor size (OR 0.347, P < 0.001) were associated with worse prognosis. A higher Child-Pugh class (OR 0.563, P = 0.035) and better ECOG performance (OR 2.710, P = 0.025) improved prognosis, while prolonged hospitalization and elevated AFP levels were linked to poorer outcomes. ASA classification and HCC morphology did not significantly impact prognosis.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of HCC with PVTT treated with TACE and sorafenib is significantly influenced by tumor characteristics, liver function, and overall patient health. Identifying these factors can aid in refining personalized treatment strategies to improve survival outcomes.

Enhanced antitumor activity of combined hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with Lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Background

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is increasingly recognized as a primary treatment option for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), providing a focused treatment for localized tumors. The combination of lenvatinib, a multikinase inhibitor, with PD-1 inhibitors has demonstrated significant survival benefits in HCC. This meta-analysis aims to assess whether the integration of HAIC with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors (referred to as the HAIC-L-P group) leads to better treatment effectiveness and security compared to lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors alone (L-P group) in uHCC.

Methods

An exhaustive search of the literature was conducted, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science, from the start of each database until September 2024, to ensure a thorough and up-to-date compilation of relevant studies. Extract data on outcome measures such as overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). Subsequently, meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 to quantitatively evaluate the aggregated effect of the HAIC-L-P regimen versus the L-P regimen alone.

Results

In our systematic meta-analysis of eight retrospective cohort studies, the HAIC-L-P regimen demonstrated markedly enhanced OS, with an HR of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.45-0.64; p < 0.00001), and enhanced 1-year and 2-year OS rates. Superior PFS was also observed in the HAIC-L-P group, with an HR of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.55-0.75; p < 0.0001), and higher 1-year and 2-year PFS rates. Response rates were markedly higher in the HAIC-L-P group, with an ORR risk ratio of 2.15 (95% CI: 1.84-2.50; p < 0.00001) and a DCR risk ratio of 1.28 (95% CI: 1.20-1.43; p < 0.0001). The AEs classified as grade 3 or above were elevated in the HAIC-L-P group, with notable risk ratios for vomiting, elevated AST, elevated ALT, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and hyperbilirubinemia. No life-threatening AEs were reported.

Conclusion

The HAIC-L-P regimen correlated with enhanced tumor responses and prolonged survival, alongside manageable adverse effects, indicating its potential as a viable therapeutic strategy for individuals afflicted with uHCC.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024594109.

Arginine-Loaded Nano-Calcium-Phosphate-Stabilized Lipiodol Pickering Emulsions Potentiates Transarterial Embolization-Immunotherapy

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) continues to stand as a primary option for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the increased tumor hypoxia and acidification will lead to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) featuring exhausted T cells, limiting the effectiveness of subsequent therapies following TACE. Herein, a stable water-in-oil lipiodol Pickering emulsion by employing calcium phosphate nanoparticles (CaP NPs) as stabilizers is developed and used to encapsulate L-arginine (L-Arg), which is known for its ability to modulate T-cell metabolism. The obtained L-Arg-loaded CaP-stabilized lipiodol Pickering emulsion (L-Arg@CaPL) with great emulsion stability can not only neutralize the tumor acidity via reaction of CaP NPs with protons but also enable the release of L-Arg, thereby synergistically promoting the reinvigoration of exhausted CD8+ T cells and effectively reversing tumor immunosuppression. As a result, TACE therapy with L-Arg@CaPL shows greatly improved therapeutic responses as demonstrated in an orthotopic liver tumor model in rats. This study highlights an effective yet simple nanoparticle-stabilized Pickering emulsion strategy to promote TACE therapy via modulation of the immunosuppressive TME, presenting great potential for clinical translation.

Transarterial Chemoembolization With or Without Systemic Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Comparative Study

INTRODUCTION

Standard treatments provide limited benefits for patients with intermediate- or advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This retrospective observational study aimed to assess the potential improvements in outcomes associated with systemic therapies in patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for initially unresectable HCC.

METHODS

Between February 2019 and March 2023, we reviewed patients diagnosed with intermediate-to-advanced HCC who were treated with either TACE or TACE combined with antiangiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (combination therapy) as their initial treatment. To address potential confounding biases, patients were further stratified into surgical and non-surgical cohorts, and separate analyses were conducted. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), with safety profiles also evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 279 patients with initially unresectable intermediate or advanced HCC, 156 successfully underwent curative-intent liver resection after preoperative treatments (TACE group, n = 69; combination group, n = 87), while 123 patients continued with non-surgical treatments (TACE group, n = 31; combination group, n = 92). After propensity score matching, 26 matched patient pairs were generated within the non-surgical cohort. The combination group exhibited significantly improved PFS in non-surgical patients compared with the TACE group (9.4 vs. 7.2 months, p = 0.043). Cox proportional hazards analysis further confirmed that combination therapy was associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio = 0.476, 95% confidence interval: 0.257-0.883, p = 0.019). For surgical patients exceeding the up-to-seven criteria, the combination group demonstrated superior median PFS (18.0 vs. 14.6 months, p = 0.03) and OS (not reached vs. 50.1 months, p = 0.049) compared with the TACE group. Adverse events were manageable, with no treatment-related fatalities reported.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with TACE demonstrated enhanced survival benefits for patients with intermediate to advanced HCC, particularly in surgical patients with higher tumor burdens.

Lenvatinib and tislelizumab versus atezolizumab and bevacizumab in combination with TAE-HAIC for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Systemic and locoregional combination therapy has demonstrated promising outcomes for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); However, the best combination option remains unknown. This study compared the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and tislelizumab versus atezolizumab and bevacizumab in combination with transarterial embolization (TAE) plus hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for unresectable HCC with high tumor burden.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study enrolled treatment-naive patients with unresectable HCC treated with TAE-HAIC plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab (THLP group) or TAE-HAIC plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab (THTA group). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and adverse events (AEs). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce bias.

RESULTS

Of the 240 patients enrolled, 153 and 51 patients were assigned to the THLP and THTA groups, respectively after PSM (3:1). The THLP group showed a longer median OS (22 months vs. 18.2 months; P = 0.412), whereas the median PFS was longer in the THTA group (8.1 months vs. 7 months; P = 0.723), with statistically insignificant intergroup differences. No statistical differences were observed in objective response rate (RECIST 1.1: 33.9 vs. 31.4%; mRECIST: 77.1% vs. 74.5%; P = 0.635), disease control rate (RECIST 1.1: 88.9% vs. 92.2; mRECIST: 92.2% vs. 94.1%; P = 0.716), and in grade 3/4 AEs. Gastrointestinal hemorrhage rate was significantly higher in the THTA group (9.1% vs. 1.6%; P = 0.007). All AEs were controllable and no treatment-related grade 5 AEs occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

TAE-HAIC plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab or TAE-HAIC plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab showed similar outcomes for unresectable HCC with high tumor burden, and manageable safety. The results need further validation.

PD(L)1 Inhibitors Plus Lenvatinib Vs Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Combined With HAIC for Unresectable HCC: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Purpose

To compare the clinical outcomes of different systemic therapies, specifically PD(L)1 inhibitors plus Lenvatinib versus Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab, when combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) based on the FOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin) as first line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Patients and Methods

This real-world retrospective study enrolled 294 patients with unresectable HCC. All patients received HAIC in combination with either PD(L)1 inhibitors plus Lenvatinib (PLEN-HAIC) or Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab (AT-HAIC). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance patient characteristics. The overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared.

Results

After PSM, 80 and 130 patients received AT-HAIC and PLEN-HAIC, respectively. No significant differences were found in ORR between the AT-HAIC and PLEN-HAIC groups (50.0% vs 40.0% per RECIST, p = 0.202; 60.0% vs 57.7% per mRECIST, p = 0.853). Both groups showed similar disease control rates. Median PFS was 14.3 months for PLEN-HAIC versus 8.8 months for AT-HAIC (p = 0.018). Median OS was significantly better in the PLEN-HAIC group (p = 0.045, both not reached). Subgroup analysis revealed that Lenvatinib showed a better OS compared to Bevacizumab when combined with HAIC and PDL1 inhibitors (p = 0.023).

Conclusion

PLEN-HAIC offers significant survival benefits over AT-HAIC in advanced HCC. Given its remarkable efficacy, PLEN-HAIC could be a promising first-line option for unresectable HCC.

Deep learning-based CT radiomics predicts prognosis of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TACE-HAIC combined with PD-1 inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a computed tomography (CT)-based deep learning radiomics model to predict treatment response and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with PD-1 inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 172 patients with uHCC who underwent combination therapy of TACE-HAIC with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors. Among them, 122 were from the Interventional Department of the Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, with 92 randomly assigned to the training cohort and 30 cases randomly assigned to the testing cohort. The remaining 50 cases were from the Interventional Department of the Affiliated Fourth Hospital of Harbin Medical University and were used for external validation. All patients underwent liver enhanced CT examination before treatment. Residual convolutional neural network (ResNet) technology was used to extract image features. A predictive model for treatment response of combination therapy and PFS was established based on image features and clinical features. Model effectiveness was evaluated using metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), concordance index (C-index), accuracy, precision, and F1-score.

RESULTS

All patients had a median follow-up of 25.2 months (95% CI 24.4-26.0), with a median PFS of 14.0 months (95% CI 8.5-19.4) and a median overall survival (OS) of 26.2 months (95% CI 15.9-36.4) achieved. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was 41.0% and 55.7%, respectively. In the treatment response prediction model, the AUC for the training cohort reached 0.96, with an accuracy of 89.5%, precision of 85.6%, and F1-score of 0.896; the AUC for the testing cohort was 0.87, with an accuracy of 80.4%, precision of 74.5%, and F1-score of 0.802. The AUC of the external validation cohort was 0.85, with accuracy of 79.1%, precision of 73.6%, and f1-score of 0.784. In the PFS prediction model, the predicted AUC for 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months-PFS in the training cohort were 0.874, 0.809, 0.801, respectively. The AUC of testing cohort were 0.762, 0.804, 0.792. The AUC of external validation cohort were 0.764, 0.796, 0.773. The C-index of the combination model, radiomics model, and clinical model were 0.75, 0.591, and 0.655, respectively. The calibration curve demonstrated that the combination model was significantly superior to both the radiomics and clinical models.

CONCLUSIONS

The study provides a CT-based radiomics model that can predict PFS for patients with uHCC treated with TACE-HAIC combined with PD-1 and TKIs.

Prediction of Pathologic Response in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Downstaging with Locoregional and Systemic Combination Therapy

Background

The combination of locoregional and systemic therapy may achieve remarkable tumor response for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Objective

We aimed to investigate the correlation between radiologic and pathologic responses following combination therapy, evaluate their prognostic values, and to establish a non-invasive prediction system for pathologic response.

Methods

This single-center retrospective study included 112 consecutive patients with HCC who underwent locoregional and systemic combination therapy followed by liver resection or transplantation. Radiologic response was assessed with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST). Pathologic necrosis percentage was assessed to determine major pathologic response (MPR, ≥90% tumor necrosis) and pathologic complete response (100% tumor necrosis). Performance of the response criteria in predicting pathologic response was assessed with the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

Among all radiologic and pathologic response criteria, MPR was the only independent predictor of post-resection recurrence-free survival (RFS) (adjusted hazard ratio 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.72, p=0.004). In addition, mRECIST showed stronger correlation with pathologic response than RECIST 1.1 (spearman r values: 0.76 vs 0.42, p<0.001). A prediction system for MPR was developed that included a combination of mRECIST response (ie, >70% decrease of viable target lesions) with either >90% decrease in AFP (for AFP-positive group, n=75) or >80% decrease in PIVKA-II (for AFP-negative group, n=37), which yielded a respective AUC of 0.905 and 0.887. Furthermore, the system-defined dual-positive responders showed improved median RFS (not reached) than non-responders (7.1 months for AFP-positive group [p=0.043] and 13.3 months for AFP-negative group [p=0.099]).

Conclusion

mRECIST was more indicative of pathologic response after combination therapy than RECIST 1.1. Integration of mRECIST with AFP or PIVKA-II responses allowed for accurate prediction of MPR and could support decision-making on subsequent curative-intent treatment.

Multicenter, retrospective GUIDANCE001 study comparing transarterial chemoembolization with or without tyrosine kinase and immune checkpoint inhibitors as conversion therapy to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Survival benefit in intermediate or advanced, but not early, stages

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Various conversion therapy options have become available to patients with unresectable HCC, but which conversion therapy is optimal for which type of patient is controversial. This study compared the efficacy and safety of TACE alone or combined with immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Data were retrospectively compared for patients with initially unresectable HCC who underwent conversion therapy consisting of TACE alone (n=459) or combined with immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n=343). Compared to the group that received TACE alone, the group that received triple conversion therapy showed significantly higher rates of overall survival (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.35-0.53). In addition, triple therapy was associated with significantly longer median progression-free survival (15.9 vs. 8.0 mo, p <0.001). These results were confirmed in matched subsets of patients from each group. However, subgroup analysis confirmed the results only for patients with HCC in intermediate or advanced stages, not in an early stage. Those who received triple conversion therapy had a significantly higher rate of hepatectomy after conversion therapy (36.4 vs. 23.5%, p <0.001). Among those who underwent hepatectomy after conversion therapy, triple therapy was associated with a significantly higher rate of complete tumor response (32.1 vs. 11.1%, p <0.001). However, it was also associated with a significantly higher frequency of serious adverse events (35.6 vs. 27.0%, p =0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining TACE with immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibitors was associated with significantly better survival and conversion efficacy than TACE alone among patients with intermediate or advanced unresectable HCC.

Efficiency and safety of HAIC combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden: a multicenter propensity score matching analysis

Purpose

The present work focused on assessing whether hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab was safe and effective on advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) showing high tumor burden.

Methods

In the present multicenter retrospective study, treatment-naive advanced HCC patients (BCLC stage C) showing high tumor burden (maximum diameter of intrahepatic lesion beyond 7 cm) treated with lenvatinib and tislelizumab with or without HAIC were reviewed for eligibility from June 2020 to June 2023. Baseline differences between groups were mitigated by propensity score matching (PSM). Our primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); and secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, respectively.

Results

After eligibility reviewed, total 162 patients treated with lenvatinib and tislelizumab were enrolled: 63 patients with HAIC (HTP group), and the remaining 99 patients without HAIC (TP group). After PSM 1:1, 47 cases were evenly divided into each group. Of them, HTP group showed significant prolonged median OS compared with TP group (16.6 versus 21.0 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-0.98; p = 0.039), and median PFS of HTP group was also prolonged (8.9 versus 11.6 months; HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.34-0.87; p = 0.010). Higher DCR and ORR could be observed in HTP relative to TP groups (ORR: 53.2% versus 17.0%, p < 0.001; DCR: 87.2% versus 61.7%, p = 0.004). The severe AEs (grade 3/4) and all grades were comparable between the groups, while all of these AEs could be controlled, and AEs of grade 5 were not reported.

Conclusion

HAIC combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab is the candidate treatment for advanced HCC patients because of its improved prognosis and acceptable safety.

Prognosis predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy following conversion therapy

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy is the optimal treatment for less than 20 % patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A combination of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and systemic therapy-based conversion therapy provides a chance of resection for those with unresectable HCC. Yet, the prognosis for those successfully conversion resection is still unknown. The study is to determine the factors predicted prognosis of patients after conversion hepatic resection.

METHODS

A total of 343 HCC patients underwent hepatectomy following conversion therapy from August 2018 to April 2023. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to screen for independent factors affecting patients' prognosis.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-seven (45.8 %) patients developed recurrence or metastasis at a median time of 16.7 months (95 % CI 12.4-21.0 months) from hepatectomy. Univariate and multivariate analysis identified tumor number, alpha fetoprotein (AFP) response, tumor response, and successful downstaging were independent recurrent-free survival related predictors. Albumin bilirubin (ALBI) score and AFP response were independent death related predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical parameters reflecting the depth of conversion therapy response, were promising in predicting prognosis for HCC patients after conversion hepatic resection.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy-based conversion hepatectomy in responders versus nonresponders with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has shown satisfactory therapeutic efficacy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is regarded as an important conversion treatment. However, limited information is available regarding the optimal timing of HAIC-based conversion hepatectomy. This study aims to determine the optimal timing for HAIC-based conversion surgery in patients with HCC.

METHODS

Data from a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent HAIC-based conversion hepatectomy were reviewed. Oncological outcomes, surgical information, and risk factors were comparatively analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 424 patients with HCC who underwent HAIC-based conversion hepatectomy were included and were divided into responder ( n =312) and nonresponder ( n =112) groups. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of both the whole responder cohort and patients who achieved a response after 4-6 cycles of HAIC were significantly better than those of the nonresponder cohort. Higher OS and RFS were observed in responders than in nonresponders with advanced-stage HCC. Patients in the responder group had a shorter occlusion duration and less intraoperative blood loss than those in the nonresponder group. There were no significant differences in other surgical information or postoperative complications between the two groups. Tumor response, differentiation, postoperative alpha-fetoprotein level, postoperative protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II level, age, microvascular invasion, pre-HAIC neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and preoperative systemic inflammatory response index were independent risk factors for poor long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion surgery should be considered when tumor response is achieved. Our findings may be useful in guiding surgeons and patients in decision-making regarding HAIC-based conversion hepatectomy.

The heterogeneity of cellular metabolism in the tumour microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumour thrombus

Given the growing interest in the metabolic heterogeneity of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT). This study comprehensively analysed the metabolic heterogeneity of HCC, PVTT, and normal liver samples using multi-omics combinations. A single-cell RNA sequencing dataset encompassing six major cell types was obtained for integrated analysis. The optimal subtypes were identified using cluster stratification and validated using spatial transcriptomics and fluorescent multiplex immunohistochemistry. Then, a combined index based meta-cluster was calculated to verify its prognostic significance using multi-omics data from public cohorts. Our study first depicted the metabolic heterogeneity landscape of non-malignant cells in HCC and PVTT at multiomics levels. The optimal subtypes interpret the metabolic characteristics of PVTT formation and development. The combined index provided effective predictions of prognosis and immunotherapy responses. Patients with a higher combined index had a relatively poor prognosis (p <0.001). We also found metabolism of polyamines was a key metabolic pathway involved in conversion of metabolic heterogeneity in HCC and PVTT, and identified ODC1 was significantly higher expressed in PVTT compared to normal tissue (p =0.03). Our findings revealed both consistency and heterogeneity in the metabolism of non-malignant cells in HCC and PVTT. The risk stratification based on cancer-associated fibroblasts and myeloid cells conduce to predict prognosis and guide treatment. This offers new directions for understanding disease development and immunotherapy responses.

Efficacy and safety of transhepatic arterial chemoembolization with drug-loaded microspheres in unresectable primary liver cancer

BACKGROUND

Transhepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE), as a local treatment, has been widely used in the treatment of unresectable liver cancer. The introduction of drug carrier microspheres has brought new hope for the therapeutic effect of TACE. Microspheres can realize the slow release and directional delivery of drugs, reduce systemic toxicity and improve local curative effect.

AIM

To compare the effectiveness of traditional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization against microsphere-assisted transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma that is incurable.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases for clinical trials of drug-luting beads TACE (DEB-TACE) vs conventional TACE (cTACE) for the treatment of unresectable liver cancer. We screened references based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and then selected valid data for meta-analysis using RevMan 53 software. The complete response (CR) rate, partial response (PR) rate, postoperative stable disease (SD) rate, and 6-month and 12-month survival rates were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 12 articles were included, including 1177 patients, 519 of whom received DEB-TACE and 658 of whom received cTACE. The CR rate in the DEB-TACE group was much greater than that in the cTACE group [relative risk (RR) = 1.42, 95%CI: 1.18-1.72, P = 0.0002]. The 12-month survival rate significantly increased (RR = 1.09; 95%CI: 1.01- 1.17, P = 0.03); the PR rate (RR = 1.13; 95%CI: 0.97-1.30, P = 0.12); the SD rate (RR = 0.82; 95%CI: 0.64-1.05, P = 0.12); and the 6-month survival rate (RR = 1.05; 95%CI: 1.00-1.10, P = 0.07). There was no significant difference (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with those of iodized oil TACE, the drug-loaded microspheres tended to have therapeutic advantages.

Development and verification of a nomogram for predicting portal vein tumor thrombosis in hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To develop a nomogram to predict the risk of portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with HCC at Hunan Provincial People's Hospital between January 2010 and January 2022 were enrolled. Data on demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and laboratory tests were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for PVTT, which were then incorporated into a predictive nomogram. The nomogram's discriminative ability was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve. Clinical utility was assessed through decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Being male (OR 1.991, 95% CI 1.314-3.017, P = 0.001), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging (stage C: OR 8.043, 95% CI 4.334-14.926, P<0.001; stage D: OR 7.977, 95% CI 3.532-18.017, P<0.001), tumor size >5 cm (OR 1.792, 95% CI 1.116-2.876, P = 0.016), and D-dimer (OR 1.126, 95% CI 1.083-1.171, P<0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for PVTT. The nomogram formula is: Logit = -2.8961 + 0.6586 (male) + BCLC staging (-0.1922 for B, 1.9251 for C, or 1.7938 for D) + 0.5418 (tumor size >5 cm) + 0.1051 DDi. The nomogram achieved an AUC of 0.798 (95% CI 0.774-0.822) in the training set and 0.822 (95% CI 0.782-0.862) in the validation set. Sensitivities were 86.6% and 90.7%, while specificies were 68.2% and 71.8% in the training and validation sets, respectively, demonstrating strong discrimination and predictive accuracy. DCA indicated a favorable risk threshold probability.

CONCLUSION

A nomogram incorporating male sex, BCLC staging, tumor size, and D-dimer demonstrated good predictive performance for PVTT. This tool may aid in the early comprehensive assessment of PVTT risk in HCC patients.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with Tislelizumab and Lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective single-arm study

PURPOSE

We aimed to explore the curative effects of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with Tislelizumab and Lenvatinib on unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From September 2021 to September 2023, 42 patients with unresectable HCC who were treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were enrolled in this retrospective single-arm study. They received HAIC combined with Tislelizumab and lenvatinib. Baseline characteristics, laboratory indicators before and after treatment, and imaging findings were collected from medical records. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety indicators.

RESULTS

A total of 199 HAIC treatments were performed, with a median of 5.5 times (3.75-6.0 times). Based on the mRECIST and RECIST1.1 criterion, the ORR was 71.4% and 57.1%, the DCR was 92.9% and 92.9%. Up to the follow-up date of October 1, 2024, the median PFS was 14.0 months (95% CI, 11.6-16.4 months), and the median OS was 26.0 months.The incidence of any grade of adverse events was 97.6%. The most commonly reported treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events included thrombocytopenia (28.6%), elevated total bilirubin (19%), and abdominal pain (16.7%). There was no treatment-related death.

CONCLUSION

For unresectable HCC, HAIC combined with tirelizumab and lenvatinib has good anti-tumor efficacy and acceptable adverse reactions.

Mechanisms of vascular co-option as a potential therapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers, which has an insidious onset, and most of the patients have already lost the chance of radical surgery at the time of the first diagnosis, so systematic antitumor therapy has become the key to the treatment of intermediate and advanced HCC. The emergence of drug resistance to antitumor drugs is one of the most important reasons for the poor efficacy, which affects the prognosis of HCC patients, and how to improve the therapeutic efficacy for HCC is still the main focus of the present research. Although the research on antitumor drugs based on neovascularization has been deepening both domestically and abroad, less research has been done on the vascular co-option mode, which shares blood vessels of normal tissues to meet the metabolic needs of the tumor itself, and its impact on the progression of HCC and antitumor therapy has not been extensively studied. In this paper, we provide an overview of the impact of vascular co-option on multiple treatment modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma and related mechanisms, with a view to laying a theoretical foundation for improving drug resistance in HCC.

Prognostic Prediction and Risk Stratification of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Dual-Center Study

PURPOSE

The combination of transarterial chemoembolization, molecular targeted therapy, and immunotherapy (triple therapy) has shown promising outcomes in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to build a prognostic model to identify patients who could benefit from triple therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study encompassed 242 patients with HCC who underwent triple therapy from two centers (Training cohort: 158 patients from the Center 1; External validation cohort: 84 patients from the Center 2). Independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were identified through Cox regression analyses, and prognostic models based on Cox proportional hazards models were developed. Prognosis was assessed using Kaplan - Meier curves.

RESULTS

In the training cohort, independent predictors of PFS included vascular invasion and the C-reactive protein and alpha-fetoprotein in immunotherapy (CRAFITY) score. Independent predictors of OS were the CRAFITY score, extrahepatic metastasis, and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Prognostic prediction models were constructed based on these variables. The prognostic model for OS demonstrated a C-index of 0.715 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.662-0.768) in the training cohort and 0.701 (95% CI, 0.628-0.774) in the validation cohort. Patients were divided into low- and high-risk categories using the predictive model (P<0.001). These findings were corroborated by the external validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

The developed prognostic model serves as a reliable and convenient tool to predict outcomes in patients with unresectable HCC undergoing triple therapy. It aids clinicians in making informed treatment decisions.

Development and validation of a model for predicting who can benefit from multiple TACE in HCC patients

This study was to develop and validate a model for predicting who can benefit from multiple transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.228 and 98 patients were included in the development and validation sets, respectively. The primary clinical endpoint was benefiting from consecutive multiple TACE treatments. Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the independent risk factors for the clinical endpoint. The independent risk factors were then used to construct the predictive model. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and clinical decision curves were used to evaluate the predictive ability of the model.Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that complete envelope, hepatic lopes, tumor number, and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were independent risk factors for benefiting from multiple TACE in HCC patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model constructed by using independent risk factors in the development and validation sets was 0.843 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.784-0.902) and 0.828 (95%CI: 0.739-0.916), respectively. The calibration curves and clinical decision curves showed that the model had good predictive ability.The model established in this study has a good predictive effect on HCC patients who can benefit from multiple TACE.

Prognosis of Neoadjuvant HAIC and Lenvatinib Followed by Surgery versus Direct Resection for Resectable or Borderline Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Study

Purpose

This research aims to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with Lenvatinib (Len) to direct liver resection (LR) in patients with resectable or borderline resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

This retrospective study included 154 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated at the a large-scale hepatocellular carcinoma Research Center between March 2019 and June 2023. Patients were assigned to one of two groups: 63 received neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with Lenvatinib followed by liver resection (HAIC+Len→LR), while 91 received direct liver resection (LR). The primary outcomes assessed were median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median duration of response (mDOR), and adverse events (AEs).

Results

Patients in the HAIC+Len→LR group demonstrated significantly longer median overall survival (mOS) (40.1 months vs 35.9 months, P=0.001) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) (32.8 months vs 23.8 months, P=0.0023) compared to the LR group. Preoperative complete response (CR) to HAIC was associated with better median duration of response (mDOR) and mOS compared to partial response (PR) (not reached vs 28.9 months, P=0.006; 40.0 vs 29.1 months, P=0.037). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in OS or PFS between the HAIC+Len→LR and LR groups in early Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages. However, in late BCLC stages, the HAIC+Len→LR group exhibited significantly improved OS and PFS (HR 0.471, P=0.016; HR 0.551, P=0.022). Treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion

For patients with resectable or marginally resectable HCC in the intermediate to advanced stages of BCLC, surgery after neoadjuvant HAIC+Len may offer improved long-term prognosis.

Atezolizumab and bevacizumab plus transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for patients with high tumor burden unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

Though atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) offer promise for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treatment, the response rate remains suboptimal. Our previous studies highlighted the potential of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) when combined with FOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in HCC treatment. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A+B plus TACE-HAIC for high tumor burden uHCC (HTB-uHCC).

METHODS

This three-center retrospective study involved 82 HTB-uHCC patients administered with TACE-HAIC followed by A+B. We characterized HTB-uHCC patients as those surpassing the up-to-11 criteria, exhibiting VP 3-4, or presenting extrahepatic metastases. The primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes encompassed the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Employing the mRECIST criteria, the ORR was 62.2 %, wherein 18 (22.0 %) patients achieved complete response, 33 (40.2 %) demonstrated partial response, 21 (25.6 %) maintained stable disease, and 10 (12.2 %) exhibited disease progression. Impressively, 11 (13.4 %) patients were converted to resectable HCC and underwent curative hepatectomy. The median PFS was 10.1 months (95 % CI, 8.4 to NA), and the median OS was still pending. At the one-year mark, the OS and PFS rates were 92.8 % (95 % CI, 86.1 to 100.0) and 42.9 % (95 % CI, 31.3 to 58.7), respectively. 79 (96.3 %) experienced TRAEs, and 39 (47.6 %) had grade 3-4 TRAEs, though no treatment-related death was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings underscore the potential of the A+B and TACE-HAIC combined treatment for HTB-uHCC patients, marking it as a viable therapeutic option, given its potent efficacy and tolerable safety profile.

Liver transplantation following two conversions in a patient with huge hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein invasion: A case report

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection and liver transplantation (LT) are the most effective curative options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, few patients with huge HCC (> 10 cm in diameter), especially those with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), can receive these treatments. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) can be used as a conversion therapy for them because it has the dual benefit of shrinking tumors and increasing residual hepatic volume. However, in patients with huge HCC, high lung absorbed dose often prevents them from receiving SIRT.

CASE SUMMARY

A 35-year-old man was admitted because of emaciation and pain in the hepatic region for about 1 month. The computed tomography scan showed a 20.2 cm × 19.8 cm tumor located in the right lobe-left medial lobes with right portal vein and right hepatic vein invasion. After the pathological type of HCC was confirmed by biopsy, two conversions were presented. The first one was drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and lenvatinib and sintilimab, converted to SIRT, and the second one was sequential SIRT with continued systemic treatment. The tumor size significantly decreased from 20.2 cm × 19.8 cm to 16.2 cm × 13.8 cm, then sequentially to 7.8 cm × 6.8 cm. In the meantime, the ratio of spared volume to total liver volume increased gradually from 34.4% to 55.7%, then to 62.9%. Furthermore, there was visualization of the portal vein, indicating regression of the tumor thrombus. Finally, owing to the new tumor in the left lateral lobe, the patient underwent LT instead of resection without major complications.

CONCLUSION

Patients with inoperable huge HCC with PVTT could be converted to SIRT first and accept surgery sequentially.

[Efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization followed by hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with TKI and PD-1 inhibitors as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) followed by hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with TKI drugs and PD-1 inhibitors as the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 70 patients with advanced HCC treated in the Department of Oncology of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine between July, 2020 and June, 2023. 23 of the patients received TACE combined with HAIC and TKI (TACE+HAIC+ TKI group) and 47 received TACE combined with HAIC, PD-1 inhibitors and TKI (TACE+HAIC+PD-1+TKI group). The clinical characteristics, laboratory test results, efficacy, outcomes and adverse events of the patients were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The TACE+HAIC+TKI and TACE+HAIC+PD-1+TKI groups had significantly different objective remission rates (ORR; 60.87% vs 36.17%, P=0.031), comparable disease control rates (95.65% vs 93.62%, P=0.068), and different median progression-free survival (PFS) time (10.2 vs 11.8 months, P=0.003) and median overall survival (OS) time (15.7 vs 19.5 months, P=0.035). After propensity score matching (PSM), the median PFS and OS time of the two groups was 10.1 vs 14.5 months (P= 0.024) and 14.2 vs 21.2 months (P=0.221), respectively. The 1-year PFS rates of the 2 groups were 24.0% vs 52.2%, and the 1-, 2-and 3-year OS rates were 72.3% vs 93.1%, 23.9% vs 63.8%, and 23.9% vs 36.5%, respectively. The incidence of proteinuria was significantly higher in TACE+HAIC+PD-1+TKI group than in TACE+HAIC+TKI group (21.28% vs 0, P=0.025), but the incidences of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were all similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The first-line treatment with TACE+HAIC+PD-1+TKI is safe and effective for advanced HCC and can significantly prolong the survival of the patients.

Immune-Targeted Therapy with or without Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis (PVTT): A Multicenter Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

In the present study, we aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of immune-targeted therapy (IT) with or without transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective study that included 265 HCC patients with PVTT (IT + TACE: 82, IT: 183). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as tumor responses and adverse events, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients in the IT + TACE group experienced significantly longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) periods, compared with those in the IT group (OS 19.0 vs. 13.0 months, p < 0.001; PFS 12.0 vs. 7.3 months, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed IT + TACE as an independent predictor for improved OS and PFS. Subgroup analysis demonstrated the benefits of IT + TACE in patients with rich PVTT blood supply. Preoperative imaging and DSA offered predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

TACE combined with IT provides a safe and effective treatment option for advanced-HCC patients with PVTT, particularly those with abundant PVTT blood supply.

Da-Chai-Hu-Tang Formula inhibits the progression and metastasis in HepG2 cells through modulation of the PI3K/AKT/STAT3-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Da-Chai-Hu-Tang (DCHT), a Chinese traditional herbal compound, has been utilized for the treatment of Hepatic diseases in China for over 1800 years. The DCHT formula contains eight herbals: Bupleurum chinense DC. (chaihu), Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi (huangqin), Paeonia lactiflora Pall. (baishao), Pinellia ternata (Thunb.) Makino (banxia), Rheum officinale Baill. (dahuang), Citrus × aurantium L. (zhishi), Zingiber officinale Roscoe (shengjiang), Ziziphus jujuba Mill. (dazao). Clinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of DCHT in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its ability to enhance the immunity of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. A total of 20 Chinese articles have been published on the use of DCHT in treating HCC.

AIM OF THE STUDY

The study aimed to validate the effect of DCHT in HCC cells and to identify related targets (TP53, AKT1, BCL2, STAT3) in treating HCC by DCHT in vitro experiments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell proliferation and migration were investigated in vitro. Flow cytometry analysis was used to evaluate the cell cycle and apoptosis. Apoptotic bodies in HepG2 cells were observed using a confocal microscope. Biochemical detection was employed to analyze LDH release, MDA levels, and SOD levels. Bioinformatics analysis was used to predict core targets between DCHT and HCC, as well as potential signaling pathways. The protein levels of metastasis-associated, apoptosis, and PI3K, AKT, p-AKT, and STAT3 were further determined through Western blotting.

RESULTS

Following treatment with DCHT, the inhibition of viability, migration, and G2/M arrest was observed in HepG2 cells. Flow cytometry analysis and Morphological apoptosis studies provided evidence that DCHT could induce apoptosis in HepG2 cells. Biochemical detection revealed that DCHT could increase LDH release and the level of MDA, and inhibit the viability of the SOD. Bioinformatics analysis identified key targets such as TP53, AKT1, BCL2, STAT3. The PI3K/AKT/STAT3 signaling pathway emerged as a critical pathway in the KEGG enrichment analysis. Western blotting results indicated that DCHT could enhance the expression of E-cadherin, p53, and Bax, while reducing the content of N-cadherin, Bcl-2, PI3K, p-AKT, AKT1, and STAT3.

CONCLUSIONS

The results proved that DCHT could inhibit the progression and metastasis of HCC by regulating the expression of E-cadherin, N-cadherin, p53, Bax, Bcl-2, PI3K, p-AKT, AKT, and STAT3 through the PI3K/AKT/STAT3 signaling pathway.

Survival Benefit of Lenvatinib Plus PD-1 Inhibitor with or Without HAIC in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Oligometastasis: a Multicenter Cohort Study

Purpose

The outcome between Lenvatinib plus programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor and Lenvatinib in HCC beyond oligometastasis was unclear. In this multicenter, we compared the prognosis of Lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor with Lenvatinib in HCC beyond oligometastasis.

Patients and Methods

A total of 296 patients from six institutions were included. The patients were divided into two groups: (a) concurrent Lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor treatment (Len+PD-1 group) and (b) Lenvatinib monotherapy (Len group). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), the second endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and efficacy.

Results

The median OS was 20.1 ± 1.2 (17.7-22.5) months and 15.7 ± 1.5 (12.8-18.6) months in the Len+PD-1 and Len groups, respectively. The 12-, 24-, and 36-month OS rates were 79.1%, 39.4%, and 10.7% in the Len+PD-1 group, and 76.3%, 29.7%, and 0% in the Len group, respectively. The OS and PFS rates of the Len+PD-1 group were significantly longer compared with the Len group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence index [CI], 0.49-0.94; P = 0.021) and (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.87; P = 0.003). A subgroup analysis revealed that OS (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.90; P = 0.016) was improved between the Len+PD-1 and Len groups with hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) treatment, whereas OS (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.68-1.80; P = 0.689) was similar between the Len and Len+PD-1 groups without HAIC.

Conclusion

Lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor significantly improves the survival of HCC beyond oligometastasis. For patients with HAIC, there was obviously significance between Len and Len+PD-1 groups.

Comparison of drug-eluting bead with conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has shown efficacy for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). However, whether DEB-TACE is superior to conventional TACE (cTACE) remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE versus cTACE in treating HCC with PVTT.

METHODS

The study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Southeast China. HCC patients with PVTT were randomized at a 1:1 ratio into the DEB-TACE or cTACE groups. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). An independent review committee assessed the radiologic response according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). AEs were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Systemic therapies were not restricted.

RESULTS

Between September 2018 and July 2020, 163 patients were randomized to undergo DEB-TACE ( n =82) or cTACE ( n =81). Nine patients were excluded, and 154 patients were included in the final analysis; the median age was 55 years (range, 24-78 years), and 140 (90.9%) were male. The median PFS in the DEB-TACE group was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.0-10.0) versus 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.0-5.0) in the cTACE group (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.95; P =0.027). The DEB-TACE group showed a higher response rate [51 (66.2%) vs. 36 (46.8%); P =0.0015] and a longer median OS [12.0 months (95% CI, 9.0-16.0) vs. 8.0 months (95% CI, 7.0-11.0), P =0.039] than the cTACE group. Multivariate analysis showed that the treatment group, ALBI score, distant metastasis and additional TKIs were the four independent prognostic factors correlated with PFS. In addition, the treatment group, PVTT group and combination with surgery were independently associated with OS. AEs were similar in the two groups, and postembolization syndrome was the most frequent AE.

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE is superior to cTACE in treating HCC patients with PVTT, demonstrating improved PFS and OS with an acceptable safety profile, and may thus emerge as a promising treatment strategy for HCC patients with PVTT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800018035.

Real-world efficacy and safety of TACE-HAIC combined with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors in initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Local treatment may function synergistically with immunotherapy and targeted agents. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with initially uHCC who received combined treatment of TACE-HAIC combined with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors from July 2020 to February 2023. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs). Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and conversion surgery rate (CSR), whereas the secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

After screening, a total of 62 patients were selected for this study. The overall median OS was 18.2 (95% CI 16.24-20.16) months and median PFS was 9.2 (95% CI 7.24-11.16) months. Based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria and RECIST v1.1 criteria, ORR was 67.7% (42/62), and the DCR was 90.3% (56/62), the CSR was 27.4% (17/62). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were transaminitis (56.4%, 35/62), nausea and vomiting (43.5%, 27/62), thrombocytopenia (37.1%, 23/62), abdominal pain (33.9%, 21/62), and fever (33.9%, 21/62).

CONCLUSIONS

TKIs combined with PD-1 inhibitors plus TACE-HAIC therapy represents an effective and tolerable treatment option in patients with uHCC. Patients undergoing surgery after combination therapy may have survival benefits.

Clinical Therapy: HAIC Combined with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 Inhibitors versus HAIC Alone for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

The majority of new diagnoses of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still pertain to unresectable cases. Currently, the combination therapy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors has become the mainstream treatment. According to multiple clinical guidelines, it is strongly advised to consider local therapy as the primary treatment choice for uHCC. This research was conducted to examine the safety and effectiveness of combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors for the treatment of uHCC.

Methods

Between 2015 and 2020, 208 HCC patients received HAIC alone or HAIC in combination with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors. The overall survival(OS), and progression-free survival(PFS) and the best treatment response were compared between the two treatment groups. Propensity score matching (PSM)was used to minimize confounding bias.

Results

Among the enrolled patients, 116 patients (55.8%) received combination therapy, while 92 patients (44.2%) received HAIC alone. The baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. After PSM, 82 pairs of well-matched liver cancer patients were selected; the overall response rate in the combination group trended better than that in the HAIC alone group. The hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and PFS of the combination approach compared to the HAIC-alone approach were 0.47 (95% CI, 0.322-0.687; p<0.001) and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.397-0.848; p=0.005), respectively.

Conclusion

For uHCC patients, combination therapy can provide better OS and PFS compared to HAIC alone.

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with camrelizumab plus rivoceranib for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a multicenter propensity score-matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) signifies late-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with high-risk progression and poor prognosis. As a standard treatment, sorafenib monotherapy has limited the efficacy in managing HCC with PVTT. Currently, both hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and the combination of camrelizumab and rivoceranib have shown favorable survival benefits for advanced HCC, surpassing the standard sorafenib treatment. In this study, we investigate the safety and efficacy of HAIC combined with camrelizumab and rivoceranib in treating HCC patients with PVTT.

METHODS

From January 2020 to December 2021, HCC patients with PVTT, who received either a triple regime of HAIC combined with camrelizumab and rivoceranib or a dual regime of camrelizumab and rivoceranib as their first-line treatment, were reviewed for eligibility at four hospital centers in China. To balance any intergroup differences, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the dual and triple combination treatment regimens based on survival prognosis and tumor response and evaluate the safety based on the occurrence of adverse reactions.

RESULT

In this study, a total of 411 patients who received either the triple treatment regime (HAIC combined with camrelizumab plus rivoceranib, referred to as the HAICCR group, n = 292) or the dual treatment regime (camrelizumab combined with rivoceranib, referred to as the CR group, n = 119) between January 2020 and December 2021 were included. The results showed that the HAICCR group exhibited significantly better overall survival (mOS: 19.60 months vs. 11.50 months, p < 0.0001) and progression-free survival (mPFS: 10.0 months vs. 5.6 months, p < 0.0001) compared to the CR group in the overall cohort. Moreover, the HAICCR group also had a significantly higher ORR (objective response rate, 55.5% vs. 42.0%, p = 0.013) and DCR (disease control rate, 89.0% vs. 79.0%) compared to the CR group. After PSM, a final matched cohort of 83 pairs was obtained, and the survival benefits were consistent in this cohort as well (mOS: 18.70 months vs. 11.0 months, p < 0.0001; mPFS: 10.0 months vs. 5.6 months, p < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference in the ORR between the triple and dual combination regimes. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that CTP (Child-Turcotte-Pugh) stage, ALBI (albumin-bilirubin index) grade, tumor number, and treatment regime were significant risk factors affecting overall survival, while AFP (α-fetoprotein) level, tumor number, metastasis, and treatment regime were significant risk factors affecting progression-free survival. As for safety, hypertension and hand-foot syndrome were the two most common adverse reactions in both groups, with no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse reactions between the two groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the context of advanced HCC patients with PVTT, the combination regime of HAIC and camrelizumab plus rivoceranib demonstrates more excellent capacity for prolonging survival and offers a well-tolerated safety compared to the CR dual therapy approach. This triple regime represents a therapeutic modality of broad prospects and vast potential for HCC patients with PVTT.

Efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus HAIC monotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter propensity score matching analysis

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of the combined approach involving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patients and methods

In this multicenter retrospective study conducted from January 2020 to December 2023, we reviewed advanced HCC patients who were treated either with HAIC alone or with a combination of HAIC and TKIs. To address initial disparities between the two groups, we employed propensity score matching (PSM). Tumor response evaluation was performed following RECIST 1.1 criteria. We compared survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR), between the two treatment groups. Safety assessments were conducted for all patients.

Results

Following the eligibility review, 138 patients underwent combined treatment with HAIC and TKIs (HT group), while 198 patients received HAIC monotherapy (HA group) and met the inclusion criteria for enrollment in this study. After PSM, 107 patients were assigned to each group. The HT group exhibited a longer median OS (18.0 versus 8.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.52, p < 0.001) compared to the HA group. Median PFS was also longer in the HT group, although without statistical significance (6.0 versus 4.7 months; HR, 0.85, p = 0.265). The HT group demonstrated a higher ORR (41.1% versus 25.2%; p = 0.020). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the incidence of all adverse events (AEs) or grade 3/4 AEs (any grade: 81.2% for HT versus 78.8% for HA, p = 0.68; grade 3/4: 18.1% for HT versus 13.6% for HA, p = 0.29). Importantly, all AEs were manageable and acceptable. Notably, no grade 5 AEs occurred in either group.

Conclusion

Combination therapy involving HAIC and TKIs effectively prolonged survival in advanced HCC patients. It represented a preferable alternative to HAIC monotherapy, with manageable safety.

Research Progress in Predicting Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumour Thrombus in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is a condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The presence of Portal Vein Tumour Thrombus (PVTT) typically signifies advanced disease stages and poor prognosis. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL), has emerged as a promising tool for extracting quantitative data from medical images. AI is increasingly integrated into the imaging omics workflow and has become integral to various medical disciplines. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the mechanisms underlying the formation and progression of PVTT, as well as its impact on clinical management and prognosis. Additionally, it outlines the advancements in AI for predicting the diagnosis of HCC and the development of PVTT. The limitations of existing studies are critically evaluated, and potential future research directions in the realm of imaging for the diagnostic prediction of HCC and PVTT are discussed, with the ultimate goal of enhancing survival outcomes for PVTT patients.

Effectiveness and safety of vascular intervention plus lenvatinib versus vascular intervention alone for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombus: a retrospective comparative study

Background

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of vascular intervention combined with lenvatinib versus vascular intervention alone in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), and to identify prognostic factors associated with the treatment outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 92 patients with advanced HCC and PVTT who were treated between February 2016 and February 2023. Among them, 56 patients underwent vascular intervention alone (transarterial chemoembolization, TACE), while 36 patients received vascular intervention (TACE or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy [HAIC]) combined with lenvatinib. The primary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). Survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and confounders were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Prognostic factors were determined through the Cox regression model.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 20.07 months (interquartile range: 6.41-25.36). The combination therapy group had a significantly longer median PFS (11.00 vs. 5.00 months, P<0.05) and OS (12.91 vs. 6.83 months, P<0.05) in comparison to the monotherapy group, and these findings remained consistent after IPTW matching. Moreover, the combination therapy group showed a higher ORR (55.56% vs. 26.79%, P<0.05) based on mRECIST criteria. Cox multivariate analysis identified extrahepatic metastasis and maximum tumor diameter as risk factors for PFS, while age, tumor number, and maximum tumor diameter influenced OS. Combined treatment emerged as a protective factor for OS. In the combination therapy group, hypertension was the most frequent adverse event, with grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurring rarely.

Conclusion

The combination of vascular intervention with lenvatinib has demonstrated improved PFS and OS in advanced HCC patients with PVTT, and its safety profile appears to be acceptable. Adoption of this combined treatment strategy at an earlier stage may enhance patient outcomes.

A Novel Coacervate Embolic Agent for Tumor Chemoembolization

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has proven effective in blocking tumor-supplied arteries and delivering localized chemotherapeutic treatment to combat tumors. However, traditional embolic TACE agents exhibit certain limitations, including insufficient chemotherapeutic drug-loading and sustained-release capabilities, non-biodegradability, susceptibility to aggregation, and unstable mechanical properties. This study introduces a novel approach to address these shortcomings by utilizing a complex coacervate as a liquid embolic agent for tumor chemoembolization. By mixing oppositely charged quaternized chitosan (QCS) and gum arabic (GA), a QCS/GA polymer complex coacervate with shear-thinning property is obtained. Furthermore, the incorporation of the contrast agent Iohexol (I) and the chemotherapeutic doxorubicin (DOX) into the coacervate leads to the development of an X-ray-opaque QCS/GA/I/DOX coacervate embolic agent capable of carrying drugs. This innovative formulation effectively embolizes the renal arteries without recanalization. More importantly, the QCS/GA/I/DOX coacervate can successfully embolize the supplying arteries of the VX2 tumors in rabbit ear and liver. Coacervates can locally release DOX to enhance its therapeutic effects, resulting in excellent antitumor efficacy. This coacervate embolic agent exhibits substantial potential for tumor chemoembolization due to its shear-thinning performance, excellent drug-loading and sustained-release capabilities, good biocompatibility, thrombogenicity, biodegradability, safe and effective embolic performance, and user-friendly application.

PD-L1 inhibitor versus PD-1 inhibitor plus bevacizumab with transvascular intervention in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Both atezolizumab (a PD-L1 inhibitor) plus bevacizumab (A+B) and sintilimab (a PD-1 inhibitor) plus bevacizumab (S+B) are recommended as the first-line regimen for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in China. Different efficacy between the two regimens combined with transvascular intervention for unresectable HCC (uHCC) remain unknown. We retrospectively analyzed uHCC patients treated in three centers by simultaneous combination of A+B or S+B with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and FOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were compared. Totally 188 patients were included, with 92 and 96 administered A+B+TACE-HAIC (ABTH) and S+B+TACE-HAIC (SBTH), respectively. ORRs (62.0 vs. 70.8%, respectively; P = 0.257) and disease control rates (88.0 vs. 93.8%, P = 0.267) were similar between groups by the mRECIST criteria. ABTH showed no survival advantage over SBTH, with median PFS times of 11.7 months and 13.0 months, respectively (HR = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.52-1.26, P = 0.35) and similar OS times (HR = 1.19, 95% CI, 0.32-4.39, P = 0.8). No significant differences were observed in grade 3-4 TRAEs between groups. Either PD-L1 or PD-1 inhibitor plus bevacizumab combined with TACE-HAIC have similarly excellent therapeutic efficacy with manageable adverse events, representing promising treatment options for uHCC.

Clinical efficacy of Gamma Knife® combined with transarterial chemoembolization and immunotherapy in the treatment of primary liver cancer

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of Gamma Knife® combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and immunotherapy in the treatment of primary liver cancer.

AIM

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of Gamma Knife® combined with TACE and immune-targeted therapy in the treatment of primary liver cancer.

METHODS

Clinical data from 51 patients with primary liver cancer admitted to our hospital between May 2018 and October 2022 were retrospectively collected. All patients underwent Gamma Knife® treatment combined with TACE and immunotherapy. The clinical efficacy, changes in liver function, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with different treatment responses were evaluated, and adverse reactions were recorded.

RESULTS

The last follow-up for this study was conducted on October 31, 2023. Clinical evaluation of the 51 patients with primary liver cancer revealed a partial response (PR) in 27 patients, accounting for 52.94% (27/51); stable disease (SD) in 16 patients, accounting for 31.37% (16/51); and progressive disease (PD) in 8 patients, accounting for 15.69% (8/51). The objective response rate was 52.94%, and the disease control rate was 84.31%. Alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and alpha-fetoprotein isoform levels decreased after treatment compared with pretreatment (all P = 0.000). The median OS was 26 months [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 19.946-32.054] in the PR group and 19 months (95%CI: 14.156-23.125) in the SD + PD group, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.015). The median PFS was 20 months (95%CI: 18.441-34.559) in the PR group and 12 months (95%CI: 8.745-13.425) in the SD + PD group, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.002). Common adverse reactions during treatment included nausea and vomiting (39.22%), thrombocytopenia (27.45%), and leukopenia (25.49%), with no treatment-related deaths reported.

CONCLUSION

Gamma Knife® combined with TACE and immune-targeted therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of primary liver cancer and has a good effect on improving the clinical benefit rate and liver function of patients.

Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Plus Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Versus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Plus Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with First- or Lower-Order Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (TACE-TKI-ICI) versus TKIs plus ICIs (TKI-ICI) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with first- or lower-order portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in HCC patients with first- or lower-order PVTT receiving TKIs (Lenvatinib or sorafenib) plus ICIs (camrelizumab, sintilimab, or atezolizumab) with or without TACE from four institutions between January 2019 and January 2022. Propensity score-based method was performed to minimize bias by confounding factors. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

After inverse probability of treatment weighting, two balanced pseudopopulations were created: 106 patients in the TACE-TKI-ICI group and 109 patients in the TKI-ICI group. The objective response rate was higher in the TACE-TKI-ICI group (50.9% vs. 28.4%, P < 0.001). The median PFS and OS were significantly longer in the TACE-TKI-ICI group than in the TKI-ICI group (PFS: 9.1 vs. 5.0 months, P = 0.005; OS: 19.1 vs. 12.7 months, P = 0.002). In Cox regression, TACE-TKI-ICI treatment was an independent predictor of favorable OS. Treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs were comparable between the two groups (22.6% vs. 17.9%, P = 0.437).

CONCLUSION

TACE-TKI-ICI therapy contributed to better tumor control, PFS and OS than TKI-ICI therapy in unresectable HCC patients with first- or lower-order PVTT.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with PD-1 inhibitors plus lenvatinib as a preoperative conversion therapy for nonmetastatic advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a single center experience

Background

The preoperative conversion therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still being explored. This study reported the potential of combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and lenvatinib as preoperative conversion therapy for nonmetastatic advanced HCC.

Methods

This retrospective study gathered data on patients with nonmetastatic advanced HCC who received this combination therapy. We used drug-eluting bead (DEB) instead of conventional iodized oil in TACE. The clinical data, conversion rate, adverse events (AEs) and short-term survival were summarized. A stratified analysis based on whether or not the patient received surgery was conducted.

Results

A total of 28 patients were included in the analysis. No grade 4 AEs were observed. The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 64.3%. Ten (35.7%) patients eventually received R0 resection after 2 cycles of combination therapy. Patients succeeding to resection (surgery group) had significantly higher ORR (90.0% vs. 50.0%, P=0.048). The proportion of patients with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) >1,000 µg/L was significantly lower in surgery group (10.0% vs. 66.7%, P=0.006). After combination therapy, more patients in surgery group experienced significant reduction of >90% in AFP levels (75.0% vs. 23.1%, P=0.03), as well as standardized uptake value (SUV) of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) both in primary tumors and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) (60.0% vs. 5.6%, P=0.003; 57.1% vs. 8.3%, P=0.04). Of note, 85.7% of PVTT exhibited major pathological response (MPR) in pathological examination although only 28.6% achieved downstage in preoperative imaging examination. MPR was more commonly observed in PVTT than in main tumors (85.7% vs. 20.0%). In non-surgery group, the median overall survival (OS) was 7 months with a 1-year survival rate of 27.8%, while in surgery group, the median OS was not reached and 1-year survival rate was 60.0%.

Conclusions

The combination of TACE-HAIC, PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib showed its benefit as a preoperative conversion therapy for nonmetastatic advanced HCC. In addition to imaging evaluation, significant reduction of 18F-FDG uptake and AFP can be used as predictors of successful conversion, especially for PVTT.

Interventional therapy combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors as initial treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Interventional therapy, in conjunction with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has shown promising outcomes for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). With the advent of immunotherapy, the combined use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has attracted great attention due to their potential effectiveness in advanced HCC. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a triple therapy regimen (Interventional therapy, TKIs and ICIs, IT-TKI-ICI) with a dual therapy regimen (Interventional therapy and TKIs, IT-TKI) in the treatment of HCC and PVTT (HCC-PVTT).

METHODS

A comprehensive search was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases. Primary outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included tumor response rate, adverse event incidence as well as downstaging surgery rate. Statistical analysis was conducted using Revman 5.4 software.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis finally included 6 cohort studies. The triple therapy group demonstrated significantly prolonged OS and PFS compared to the dual therapy group. Meanwhile, the former exhibited significantly higher rates of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and better downstaging effects with a higher salvage surgery rate without significantly increasing adverse events.

CONCLUSION

In comparison to dual therapy, the triple therapy with interventional therapy, TKIs, and ICIs demonstrates superior efficacy and equivalent safety for HCC-PVTT.