Interferon-Based Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection Reduces All-Cause Mortality in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease: An 8-Year Nationwide Cohort Study in Taiwan

Recent Information on Pan-Genotypic Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for HCV in Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is still common in patients with chronic kidney disease. It has been recently discovered that chronic HCV is a risk factor for increased incidence of CKD in the adult general population. According to a systematic review with a meta-analysis of clinical studies, pooling results of longitudinal studies (n = 2,299,134 unique patients) demonstrated an association between positive anti-HCV serologic status and increased incidence of CKD; the summary estimate for adjusted HR across the surveys was 1.54 (95% CI, 1.26; 1.87), (p < 0.0001). The introduction of direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) has caused a paradigm shift in the management of HCV infection; recent guidelines recommend pan-genotypic drugs (i.e., drugs effective on all HCV genotypes) as the first-choice therapy for HCV, and these promise to be effective and safe even in the context of chronic kidney disease.

AIM

The purpose of this narrative review is to show the most important data on pan-genotypic DAAs in advanced CKD (CKD stage 4/5).

METHODS

We recruited studies by electronic databases and grey literature. Numerous key-words ('Hepatitis C' AND 'Chronic kidney disease' AND 'Pan-genotypic agents', among others) were adopted.

RESULTS

The most important pan-genotypic combinations for HCV in advanced CKD are glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL). Two clinical trials (EXPEDITION-4 and EXPEDITION-5) and some 'real-world' studies (n = 6) reported that GLE/PIB combinations in CKD stage 4/5 gave SVR12 rates ranging between 86 and 99%. We retrieved clinical trials (n = 1) and 'real life' studies (n = 6) showing the performance of SOF/VEL; according to our pooled analysis, the summary estimate of SVR rate was 100% in studies adopting SOF/VEL antiviral combinations. The drop-out rate (due to AEs) in patients on SOF/VEL ranged between 0 and 4.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pan-genotypic combinations, such as GLE/PIB and SOF/VEL, appear effective and safe for HCV in advanced CKD, even if a limited number of studies with small sample sizes currently exist on this issue. Studies are under way to assess whether successful antiviral therapy with DAAs will translate into better survival in patients with advanced CKD.

Pan-genotypic direct-acting antivirals for patients with hepatitis C virus infection and chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major health problem with significant clinical and economic burdens in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4 or 5. Current guidelines recommend pan-genotypic direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) to be the first-line treatment of choice for HCV. This review summarizes the updated knowledge regarding the epidemiology, natural history, public health perspectives of HCV in patients with CKD stage 4 or 5, including those on maintenance dialysis, and the performance of pan-genotypic DAAs in these patients. The prevalence and incidence of HCV are much higher in patients with CKD stage 4 or 5 than in the general population. The prognosis is compromised if HCV patients are left untreated regardless of kidney transplantation (KT). Following treatment-induced HCV eradication, patient can improve the health-related outcomes by maintaining a long-term aviremic state. The sustained virologic response (SVR12) rates and safety profiles of pan-genotypic DAAs against HCV are excellent irrespective of KT. No dose adjustment of pan-genotypic DAAs is required across CKD stages. Assessing drug-drug interactions (DDIs) before HCV treatment is vital to secure on-treatment safety. The use of prophylactic or preemptive pan-genotypic DAAs in HCV-negative recipients who receive HCV-positive kidneys has shown promise in shortening KT waiting time, achieving excellent on-treatment efficacy and safety, and maintaining post-KT patient and graft survival. HCV elimination is highly feasible through multifaceted interventions, including mass screening, treatment scale-up, universal precautions, and post-SVR12 reinfection surveillance.

Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatic Fibrosis in Hemodialysis Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major health problem in hemodialysis patients, which leads to significant morbidity and mortality through progressive hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis. Percutaneous liver biopsy is the gold standard to stage hepatic fibrosis. However, it is an invasive procedure with postbiopsy complications. Because uremia may significantly increase the risk of fatal and nonfatal bleeding events, the use of noninvasive means to assess the severity of hepatic fibrosis is particularly appealing to hemodialysis patients. To date, researchers have evaluated the performance of various biochemical, serological, and radiological indices for hepatic fibrosis in hemodialysis patients with HCV infection. In this review, we will summarize the progress of noninvasive indices for assessing hepatic fibrosis and propose a pragmatic recommendation to diagnose the stage of hepatic fibrosis with a noninvasive index, in hemodialysis patients with HCV infection.

Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir with or without low-dose ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and severe renal impairment

OBJECTIVE

Data regarding the real-world effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) with or without low-dose ribavirin (RBV) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and severe renal impairment (RI) are limited. We evaluated the performance of SOF/VEL with or without low-dose RBV in HCV-infected patients with chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5.

DESIGN

191 patients with compensated (n=181) and decompensated (n=10) liver diseases receiving SOF/VEL (400/100 mg/day) alone and SOF/VEL with low-dose RBV (200 mg/day) for 12 weeks were retrospectively recruited at 15 academic centres in Taiwan. The effectiveness was determined by sustained virological response at off-treatment week 12 (SVR12) in evaluable (EP) and per-protocol populations (PP). The safety profiles were assessed.

RESULTS

The SVR12 rates by EP and PP analyses were 94.8% (95% CI 90.6% to 97.1%) and 100% (95% CI 97.9% to 100%). In patients with compensated liver disease, the SVR12 rates were 95.0% and 100% by EP and PP analyses. In patients with decompensated liver disease, the SVR12 rates were 90.0% and 100% by EP and PP analyses. Ten patients who failed to achieve SVR12 were attributed to non-virological failures. Among the 20 serious adverse events (AEs), none were judged related to SOF/VEL or RBV. The AEs occurring in ≥10% included fatigue (14.7%), headache (14.1%), nausea (12.6%), insomnia (12.0%) and pruritus (10.5%). None had ≥grade 3 total bilirubin or alanine aminotransferase elevations.

CONCLUSION

SOF/VEL with or without low-dose RBV is effective and well-tolerated in HCV-infected patients with severe RI.

Acute hepatitis C treatment in advanced renal failure using 8 weeks of pan-genotypic daclatasvir and reduced-dose sofosbuvir

BACKGROUND

Sofosbuvir is not recommended in persons with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min. We report the results of treatment with an off-label 8-week regimen of daclatasvir and half-dose sofosbuvir in patients with acute infection with hepatitis C virus ( HCV) and eGFR <30 mL/min.

METHODS

Clinic records were searched to identify treatment-naïve, noncirrhotic adults with acute hepatitis C (HCV viremia and a ≥10-fold elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase activity) and eGFR <30 mL/min, who had been treated with a sofosbuvir-based regimen. Treatment response was assessed using serum HCV RNA testing at 4 weeks of treatment, end of the 8-week treatment and 12 weeks after stopping treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 31 patients with acute hepatitis C, 27 [median age (range): 36 (18-74) years; 20 (74%) male] were started on treatment with 200 mg sofosbuvir and 60 mg daclatasvir daily for 8 weeks, irrespective of HCV genotype. All the 27 completed the planned 8-week treatment. One patient died 10 weeks after completing the treatment of an unrelated cause. All the 27 patients had undetectable HCV RNA after 4 weeks of and at the end of treatment. At 12 weeks after completion of treatment, only one tested HCV RNA positive and 25 were negative, with sustained virological response rate of 25/27 (92.6%) and 25/26 (96.2%) on intention-to-treat and per-protocol basis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Eight-week course of daclatasvir and half-dose sofosbuvir is effective for acute hepatitis C in patients with eGFR <30 mL/min and could be a useful alternative to costly, kidney-safe anti-HCV oral drugs in resource-constrained settings.

Glecaprevir-pibrentasvir for chronic hepatitis C: Comparing treatment effect in patients with and without end-stage renal disease in a real-world setting

INTRODUCTION

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is increasingly observed in patients with renal disease. With the introduction of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) as a pan-genotype therapy for HCV, treatment efficacy is expected to rise.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of GLE/PIB treatment in adults with HCV infection and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The primary end point was sustained virological response (SVR) observed 12 weeks after completed treatment.

RESULTS

We enrolled 235 patients, including 44 patients with ESRD. Median age was 60 years, and 48% were males. Twenty-two percent had cirrhosis. HCV genotypes 1 (43%) and 2 (41%) were the most common. The overall SVR rate was 96.6%. Patients with ESRD were older than those without (67.6 years vs 58.3 years, p < 0.001) and trended toward having a higher prevalence of cirrhosis (32% vs 19%, p = 0.071). A significant proportion of patients with ESRD complained of skin itching during treatment (61% vs 26%, p < 0.001), and the SVR rate were similar between these two groups (95.45% vs 96.86%, p = 0.644).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a higher rate of pruritus among patients with ESRD, GLE/PIB-based therapy achieved similarly high SVR rates among patients with and without ESRD.

Hepatitis c virus and chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with an increased incidence and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), as well as higher mortality in CKD and renal transplant patients. Direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have revolutionized the treatment of HCV, with viral eradication attained in 90-100% of treated patients. DAAs have an excellent safety and tolerability profile in CKD and renal transplant patients.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss the association of HCV with incidence and progression of CKD as well as its effect on outcomes and mortality. We also discuss the available treatment options in patients with CKD and renal transplant and in HCV-associated glomerular disease.

EXPERT OPINION

The availability of newly available direct acting anti-viral agents has revolutionized the treatment of HCV in persons with advanced CKD and undergoing dialysis. With these regimens, viral eradication can be attained in 90-100% of the treated patients. The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of these drugs in renal transplant patients have also made it possible to use HCV-infected grafts and successful virus eradication at a later stage.

Hepatitis C virus and mortality among patients on dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE

The role of hepatitis C virus (HCV) as an independent risk factor for death in dialysis population is unclear.

DESIGN

A systematic review of the published medical literature was performed to evaluate the impact of positive anti-HCV serologic status on all-cause and disease-specific mortality in patients on regular dialysis. The risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and liver disease-related mortality was regarded as the most reliable outcome end-point. Study-specific relative risks were weighted by the inverse of their variance to obtain fixed- and random-effects pooled estimates for mortality with HCV across the published studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-three observational studies (n = 574,081 patients on long-term dialysis) were identified. Pooling of study results demonstrated that HCV positive status was an independent and significant risk factor for death in patients on maintenance dialysis. The summary estimate for adjusted death risk (all-cause mortality) with HCV was 1.26 (95% CI: 1.18; 1.34) (P < 0.0001). Between-study heterogeneity was found (Q value 52.8, P = 0.001). The overall estimate for adjusted death risk (liver disease-related mortality) was 5.05 (95% CI: 2.53; 10.0) (P < 0.0001); heterogeneity statistics, Q value 8.2, P = 0.04. The overall estimate for adjusted death risk (cardiovascular mortality) was 1.18 (95% CI: 1.085; 1.29) (P < 0.0001) (no heterogeneity). Meta-regression showed that the effect of HCV on all-cause mortality was more evident in those studies provided with a greater size (P = 0.0001), a higher prevalence of diabetics (P = 0.0005) and HCV-infected individuals (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

An association between HCV positive serologic status and increased risk of either liver or cardiovascular disease-related mortality exists among dialysis patients.

Daclatasvir and reduced-dose sofosbuvir: An effective and pangenotypic treatment for hepatitis C in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min

AIM

Sofosbuvir is a key agent for HCV treatment. It is not recommended for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min. We report real-life experience of treating a cohort of CKD patients with eGFR <30 mL/min using daclatasvir and half-daily dose of sofosbuvir.

METHODS

Adults patients who (i) had eGFR<30 mL/min and detectable HCV RNA and (ii) were treated with interferon and ribavirin free, DAA based regimens were included. All patients were treated with daily doses of daclatasvir 60 mg and sofosbuvir 200 mg. The planned duration of treatment was 12 weeks, except for 24 weeks in those with either clinical evidence of cirrhosis or on immunosuppressive drugs. The end-points of the study were: (i) 12 weeks of follow-up after treatment completion, (ii) treatment discontinuation, or (iii) death or loss to follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-six (88%) among 41 included patients (median [range] age: 48 [19-75] years; 25 [61%] male; genotype 1/3/4 were 17/ 22/2; cirrhosis 5) completed the treatment, two discontinued and three died during treatment. On an intention-to-treat basis, HCV RNA were undetectable at 4 weeks of treatment, treatment completion and after 12 weeks of follow-up in 40/41 (97.6%), 37/41 (90.2%) and 37/41 (90.2%), respectively. None of the patients had a relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Daclatasvir and half-daily dose of sofosbuvir was effective against genotype 1 and 3 HCV infection in patients with eGFR <30 mL/min. This combination could be a pangenotypic treatment option for such patients.

Effect of Hepatitis C Treatment on Renal Function in Liver Transplant Patients

Background and Aims: Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) is uniformly recurrent after liver transplant (LT) and recurrence is associated with an increased risk of mortality. Immunosuppressive medications increase the risk of chronic kidney disease, and the presence of chronic kidney disease presents a challenge for HCV treatment in LT recipients. The aim of this study was to assess changes in glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) of LT recipients receiving HCV treatment. Methods: This is a retrospective study of LT patients who received HCV treatment between 2015 and 2016 (n = 60). The outcomes of interest were differences in serum creatinine levels and in GFR, measured at treatment initiation and at 24 weeks after treatment. The average age of the patients was 59 years-old, and 17% were cirrhotic and 67% were treatment-experienced. All patients received sofosbuvir/ledipasvir without ribavirin. Results: All patients achieved sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). At baseline, 55% of patients had GFR <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Among those patients, GFR did not change in 18%, 33% had improved GFR, and 48% had worsened GFR. Up to 45% of the patients had a GFR >60 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Among those patients, GFR did not change in 81%, and 19% had worsened GFR. In the entire cohort, 65% of patients had improved or stable GFR and 35% had worsened GFR. The average change in serum creatinine between baseline and 24 weeks was 0.10 (p = 0.18). Conclusions: This study showed improved or unchanged GFR in 65% and worsened GFR in 35% of LT recipients who achieved SVR12. Worsening of GFR was more frequently encountered in those with impaired renal function at baseline. Caution should be used when treating HCV in LT recipients, especially those with baseline status of renal impairment.

Comorbidities, concomitant medications and potential drug-drug interactions with interferon-free direct-acting antiviral agents in hepatitis C patients in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

While direct-acting antivirals have been approved for treating hepatitis C, the guidelines highlight the importance of considering potential drug-drug interactions between DAAs and concomitant medications.

AIM

To assess comorbidity prevalence, concomitant medication use and potential drug-drug interactions between DAAs and concomitant medications for hepatitis C patients in Taiwan.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study enrolled 822 patients from May to August 2016 in Taiwan. Patient demographics, comorbidities and concomitant medications were evaluated by physician surveys.

RESULTS

A total of 709 (86.3%) patients had ≥1 comorbidity; the most prevalent comorbidity categories were diseases of the digestive system (40.1%), circulatory system (38.7%) and endocrine/nutritional/metabolic diseases (35.2%). Elderly patients had more comorbidities. A total of 622 (75.7%) patients received ≥1 concomitant medication; the average number of concomitant medications was 3.2. The most common concomitant medication classes were cardiovascular (34.4%), gastrointestinal (25.7%) and central nervous system drugs (22.7%). Among patients without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis, contraindications were most prevalent with paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir plus dasabuvir, daclatasvir/asunaprevir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (13.3%, 6.0% and 5.4% respectively), and least prevalent with sofosbuvir, sofosbuvir/daclatasvir, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (0.8%, 1.3%, 1.4% and 2.1% respectively). Sofosbuvir-based regimens had no contraindications in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION

Our population represented an elderly demographic, with a high prevalence of comorbidities and widespread use of concomitant medications. The potential drug-drug interactions between these concomitant medications and DAA regimens differed, with the fewest potential interactions with sofosbuvir-based regimens.

Treating hepatitis C virus in dialysis patients: How, when, and why?

The identification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) occurred in 1989, and soon thereafter, it was recognized that there was a higher prevalence of anti-HCV seropositivity in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) when compared to the general population. Multiple extrahepatic manifestations have been associated with HCV infection in patients with ESRD; these include an increased prevalence and risk of cardiovascular complications, insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, and lymphoproliferative disorders. Infection with HCV has also been associated with an increased relative risk of mortality in the ESRD patient when contrasted to those patients without infection. The availability of second-generation direct-acting antiviral agents has revolutionized the treatment of HCV in both the general population as well as those patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and receiving dialysis. These new treatment protocols are very well tolerated with limited side effects and manageable drug-drug interactions while achieving remarkable sustained viral response rates. It is important that nephrologists become familiar with the differing strategies available for HCV-infected ESRD patients so that the appropriate decision of when and who to treat can be made for each patient.

Direct medical costs associated with the extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis C infection in Europe

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a systemic disease associated with both hepatic and extrahepatic manifestations. The burden associated with the hepatic manifestation of HCV infection has been well documented in Europe, although that of HCV extrahepatic manifestations remains unknown. In this study, we estimated the annual direct medical costs associated with HCV extrahepatic manifestations in five European countries. A previously validated economic model was used to estimate the annual direct medical cost associated with HCV extrahepatic manifestations. Global excess prevalence of extrahepatic manifestations in HCV patients relative to that in non-HCV patients was obtained from a recent meta-analysis. Per-patient per-year inpatient, outpatient and medication costs to treat each extrahepatic manifestation were from the literature, national databases or expert opinion if unavailable otherwise. All costs were adjusted to 2016 euros (€). The overall direct medical costs associated with HCV extrahepatic manifestations were calculated by multiplying the total per-patient per-year costs of each by the respective excess prevalence rates and then by the size of the HCV-infected population in each country. Treatment impact with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) was explored using HCV extrahepatic manifestations excess prevalence rates among cured patients compared to untreated HCV patients, as sourced from a meta-analysis. The total annual direct medical cost associated with HCV extrahepatic manifestations was estimated to be 2.17 billion euro (€), with a per-HCV-patient cost ranging from €899 to €1647 annually. DAA treatment was projected to result in cost savings of €316 million per year. We find that the annual economic burden of extrahepatic manifestations is significant and may be partly mitigated by treatment with DAAs.

Peginterferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in the era of direct-acting antivirals

BACKGROUND

The availability of novel direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) represents a new era of curative hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, with over 95% of patients infected with HCV genotype 1 achieving sustained virological response (SVR). Nevertheless, the majority of patients globally are unable to access these treatments because of cost and infrastructure constraints and, thus, remain untreated and uncured.

DATA SOURCE

Relevant articles of peginterferon (PegIFN)-based treatments in HCV and sofosbuvir-based treatments, simeprevir, daclatasvir/asunaprevir, ritonavir-boosted paritaprevir/ombitasvir/dasabuvir, and grazoprevir/elbasvir, were searched in PubMed database, including general population and special population.

RESULTS

PegIFN in combination with ribavirin remains an important and relevant option for some patients, achieving SVR rates of up to 79% in genotype 1 and 89% in genotype 2 or 3 infections, which increases for patients with favorable IL28B genotypes. Triple therapy of DAA plus PegIFN/ribavirin is effective in treating difficult-to-cure patients infected with HCV genotype 3 or with resistance-associated variants. Owing to its long history in HCV management, the efficacy, tolerability and long-term outcomes associated with PegIFN alfa-2a are well established and have been validated in large-scale studies and in clinical practice for many populations. Furthermore, emerging data show that IFN-induced SVR is associated with lower incidences of hepatocellular carcinoma compared with DAAs. On the contrary, novel DAAs have yet to be studied in special populations, and long-term outcomes, particularly tumor development and recurrence in patients with cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma, and reactivation of HBV in dually infected patients, are still unclear.

CONCLUSION

In this interferon-free era, PegIFN-based regimens remain a safe and effective option for selected HCV patients.

Safety and effectiveness of response-guided therapy using pegylated interferon and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in patients on maintenance dialysis

AIM

Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is difficult. Addition of ribavirin to pegylated-interferon (Peg-IFN) may help to improve the treatment response. Further, treatment duration could be shortened using a response-guided treatment (RGT) approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records of treatment-naïve adult patients with ESRD and chronic HCV infection who had been treated with Peg-IFN and low-dose ribavirin using a RGT approach. Rapid responders (undetectable HCV-RNA at 4 weeks) received treatment for 12 weeks, and slow responders (HCV-RNA detectable at 4 weeks, but undetectable or with >2.0 log10 reduction at week 12) for 24 (genotype 3; GT3) or 48 (genotype 1; GT1) weeks. In those without such reduction (null responders), treatment was discontinued.

RESULTS

Of 26 non-cirrhotic patients (GT1 15, GT3 11) treated, four (15%; GT1 3, GT3 1) were null responders. Twenty-two (85%) patients had either rapid (n = 14 (54%); GT1 10, GT3 4) or slow response (n = 8 (31%); GT1 2, GT3 6). Of them, 21 patients had undetectable RNA at the end of treatment; one could not complete the treatment and was lost thereafter. There were no deaths during treatment. Three patients relapsed and three others died in 6 months after stopping treatment. Overall, 15/26 (58%) patients attained SVR24. Fourteen patients underwent transplantation beginning one month after treatment completion, and all were relapse-free after 17 (14-24) months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

RGT using Peg-IFN and ribavirin was effective in ESRD patients on maintenance dialysis. Renal transplant was safely done within one month of completing such treatment.

Rheumatologic Manifestations of Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with a morbidity and mortality due to liver complications. HCV infection is also frequently associated with rheumatic disorders, such as arthralgia, myalgia, cryoglobulinemia vasculitis, and sicca syndrome, as well as the production of autoantibodies. The treatment of HCV infection with interferon alpha (IFN) has been contraindicated for a long time in many rheumatologic autoimmune/inflammatory disorders. New oral IFN-free combinations offer an opportunity for HCV-infected patients with extrahepatic manifestations, including rheumatologic autoimmune/inflammatory disorders, to be cured with a short treatment duration and a low risk of side effects.

Opportunities for treatment of the hepatitis C virus-infected patient with chronic kidney disease

The prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection amongst patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease exceeds that of the general population. In addition to predisposing to the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, infection with HCV has been associated with extra-hepatic complications including CKD, proteinuria, glomerulonephritis, cryoglobulinemia, increased cardiovascular risk, insulin resistance, and lymphoma. With these associated morbidities, infection with HCV is not unexpectedly accompanied by an increase in mortality in the general population as well as in patients with kidney disease. Advances in the understanding of the HCV genome have resulted in the development of direct-acting antiviral agents that can achieve much higher sustained virologic response rates than previous interferon-based protocols. The direct acting antivirals have either primarily hepatic or renal metabolism and excretion pathways. This information is particularly relevant when considering treatment in patients with reduced kidney function. In this context, some of these agents are not recommended for use in patients with a glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min per 1.73 m². There are now Food and Drug Administration approved direct acting antiviral agents for the treatment of patients with kidney disease and reduced function. These agents have been demonstrated to be effective with sustained viral response rates comparable to the general population with good safety profiles. A disease that was only recently considered to be very challenging to treat in patients with kidney dysfunction is now curable with these medications.

Hepatitis C virus infection and chronic kidney disease: Time for reappraisal

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with tremendous morbidity and mortality due to liver complications. HCV infection is also associated with many extrahepatic manifestations including cardiovascular diseases, glucose metabolism impairment, cryoglobulinemia vasculitis, B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Many studies have shown a strong association between HCV and CKD, by reporting (i) an increased prevalence of HCV infection in patients on haemodialysis, (ii) an increased incidence of CKD and proteinuria in HCV-infected patients, and (iii) the development of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis secondary to HCV-induced cryoglobulinemia vasculitis. HCV seropositivity is found to be associated with an increased relative risk for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the dialysis population. HCV seropositivity is linked to lower patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation. Such poor HCV-associated prognosis should have encouraged clinicians to treat HCV in CKD patients. However, due to frequent side effects and the poor efficacy of interferon-based treatments, very few HCV dialysis patients have received HCV medications until now. The emergence of new direct acting, interferon-free antiviral treatment, leading to HCV cure in most cases with a satisfactory safety profile, will shortly modify the management of HCV infection in CKD patients. In patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >30ml/min, the choice of DAA is not restricted. In those with a GFR <30 and >15ml/min, only paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir/dasabuvir or a grazoprevir plus elbasvir regimen are approved. In patients with end stage renal disease (GFR <15ml/min or dialysis), current data only allows for the use of a grazoprevir plus elbasvir combination. No doubt these data will be modified in the future with the advent of new studies including larger cohorts of HCV patients with renal impairment.