Type 1 and 2 gastric carcinoid tumors: long-term follow-up of the efficacy of treatment with a slow-release somatostatin analogue

Gastric adenocarcinoma: A review of the TNM classification system and ways of spreading

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the world. The most common histologic subtype is adenocarcinoma. Gastric adenocarcinomas are staged using the American Joint Committee on Cancer's 8th TNM classification. The perigastric ligaments, mesentery, omentum, and potential spaces between the parietal and visceral peritoneal linings play are important structures for staging. The spread of disease is influenced by the location of the tumor within the stomach, as well as by the anatomy related to the ligaments and lymph vessels. CT is the imaging modality of choice for the preoperative clinical staging of gastric cancer, and it is essential for planning treatment. To be able to do an adequate imaging workup, radiologists need to know the different pathways through which gastric cancer can spread: lymphatic, subperitoneal, direct invasion, transperitoneal, hematogenous, and extramural venous invasion.

Successful endoscopic resection of an unusually enlarged and pedunculated type I gastric carcinoid tumour

Three distinct gastric carcinoid (GC) tumour types have been described based on differing biological behaviour and prognoses. Type I GC tumours account for the vast majority (70%-80%), are associated with chronic atrophic gastritis and have a low metastatic potential. Type II carcinoid tumours are the least common (5%-10%), are related to Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and occur in relation to multiple neoplasia type I. Sporadic type III tumours (15%-25%) are the most aggressive type, are unrelated to gastrin over secretion and carry the worst prognosis. In this case report, we present a patient with longstanding gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who presented with epigastric abdominal pain and tarry stools and was found to have a large gastric polyp on endoscopy. Despite current literature recommending surgical resection for larger GC tumours, endoscopic resection was successfully used to excise the tumour with pathology demonstrating complete resection with negative margins.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) and neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs)

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are relatively rare neoplasms with 6.4-times increasing age-adjusted annual incidence during the last four decades. NENs arise from neuroendocrine cells, which release hormones in response to neuronal stimuli and they are distributed into organs and tissues. The presentation and biological behaviour of the NENs are highly heterogeneous, depending on the organ. The increased incidence is mainly due to increased awareness and improved detection methods both in the majority of sporadic NENs (non-inherited), but also the inherited groups of neoplasms appearing in at least ten genetic syndromes. The most important one is multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1), caused by mutations in the tumour suppressor gene MEN1. MEN-1 has been associated with different tumour manifestations of NENs e.g. pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, thymus and pituitary. Pancreatic NENs tend to be less aggressive when arising in the setting of MEN-1 compared to sporadic pancreatic NENs. There have been very important improvements over the past years in both genotyping, genetic counselling and family screening, introduction and validation of various relevant biomarkers, as well as newer imaging modalities. Alongside this development, both medical, surgical and radionuclide treatments have also advanced and improved morbidity, quality of life and mortality in many of these patients. Despite this progress, there is still space for improving insight into the genetic and epigenetic factors in relation to the biological mechanisms determining NENs as part of MEN-1. This review gives a comprehensive update of current evidence for co-occurrence, diagnosis and treatment of MEN-1 and neuroendocrine neoplasms and highlight the important progress now finding its way to international guidelines in order to improve the global management of these patients.

Effects of tumor types on treatment strategy formulation and prognostic evaluation of gastric neuroendocrine tumors

Aim: The effects of different types of gastric neuroendocrine tumors (G-NETs) on treatment strategy formulation and prognostic evaluation still remain controversial due to their rarity. Methods: 187 patients diagnosed with G-NETs were subdivided into four types based on the pathophysiology, etiology and presentation. Results: Type I, II G-NETs >1.0 cm and type III, IV G-NETs >2.0 cm are proved with aggressive behavior (p < 0.05). Type III G-NETs with higher Ki-67 index and tumor stage showed more invasive potential than type I and II G-NETs (p < 0.05). Endoscopic resection is the primary treatment for type I, II G-NETs, while surgical combined with chemotherapy is associated with favorable outcomes for type IV G-NETs. Conclusion: The clinical classifications of G-NETs are of great significance for the choice of treatment and the evaluation of prognosis.

Debulking Surgery for Moderately Differentiated Neuroendocrine Gastric Carcinoma - A Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND/AIM

Gastroenteropancreatic neuro-endocrine carcinomas represent poorly differentiated neoplasms with a high capacity of spreading inducing the development of distant metastases. In such cases debulking surgery seems to offer a good chance for survival especially in well and moderately differentiated lesions. The aim of this study was to report the case of a 48-year-old patient submitted to surgery for moderately differentiated neuroendocrine gastric carcinoma with distant metastases.

CASE REPORT

The patient was initially investigated for hematemesis and weight loss and was diagnosed with a lesser curvature gastric tumor in association with liver and peritoneal metastases. Due to the extent of the disease, the patient was initially submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery with radical intent. At the time of surgery subtotal gastrectomy en bloc with total omentectomy, peritonectomy, cholecystectomy and atypical liver resection were performed. Moreover, the two ovaries presented large tumoral masses so total hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy was performed. The histopathological studies confirmed the presence of a moderately differentiated neuroendocrine gastric carcinoma with negative resection margins.

CONCLUSION

Multiple visceral resections might be needed in order to maximize the debulking effort in metastatic gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas.

Response and relapse rates after treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogs in multifocal or recurrent type-1 gastric carcinoids: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors represent a recurring disease and long-acting somatostatin analogs can inhibit both gastrin release and endocrine cell proliferation. The efficacy and timing of this treatment are still unclear. We performed a systematic review of the literature to clarify the role of somatostatin analog treatment in type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors.

METHODS

A computerized literature search was performed using relevant keywords to identify all the pertinent articles published in the last 15 years.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in this systematic review on somatostatin analogs in type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors. A complete response rate ranged from 25-100%. When only the six prospective studies were considered, no significant heterogeneity was observed, and the pooled cumulative complete response rate was 84.5% (confidence interval 73.8-92.8). Three studies evaluated the type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumor recurrence, with a cumulative relapse rate of 30.2% (confidence interval 13.1-50.6) after 34 months.

CONCLUSION

Somatostatin analogs, namely lanreotide and octreotide, have an excellent response rate, with a good safety profile in selected type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors, which cannot be safely managed by endoscopic follow-up or resection due to multiple or frequently recurring disease. After therapy discontinuation, the cumulative relapse rate observed after a median 34-month follow-up was relatively high (30.2%).

[Gastric neuroendocrine tumors]

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors are rare neoplasms. Currently, incidence of gastric neuroendocrine tumors (gNETs) is being significantly increased. There are 3 groups of gNETs: types I, II and III. Each type has important features regarding clinical picture, prognosis and treatment strategy. Type I is the most common (70-80%) and associated with chronic atrophic gastritis including autoimmune gastritis and Helicobacter associated atrophic gastritis. Type II (5-6%) is associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (MEN I - ZES). Both types are characterized by hypergastrinemia and small tumor dimension. These neoplasms are multiple and mostly benign. On the contrary, NETs type III (10-15%) is not associated with hypergastrinemia and represented by single large neoplasms. Tumors are malignant as a rule. Therefore, surgical resection and chemotherapy are preferred for these tumors. Endoscopic surgery followed by observation is acceptable for almost all NETS type I and II. At the same time, this approach is advisable only for small and highly differentiated neoplasms type III.

Management of gastric neuro-endocrine tumours in a large French national cohort (GTE)

INTRODUCTION

Gastric neuro-endocrine tumours are rare. European guidelines for the management of neuro-endocrine tumours have been published in 2012. The aim of our survey was to study the management of gastric neuro-endocrine tumours registered in the national cohort. A prospective national cohort registers the Neuro-endocrine tumours in France since January 2003 (GTE network). We reviewed all the individual medical reports of gastric neuro-endocrine tumours in order to collect data on treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety seven gastric neuro-endocrine tumours diagnosed between 1964 and 2013 in 20 centres were registered. For 181 cases data were considered complete for our survey. Eighty four tumours were type 1 (46.4%); five types 2 (2.8%); 52 types 3 (28.7%) and 40 types 4 (22.1%). Types 1 and 2 were first endoscopically managed in 93 and 60% of cases, respectively, whereas surgery was first done in 45 and 42%, respectively, of types 3 and 4. Systemic treatment, chemotherapy and/or somatostatin analogue, was first administered exclusively for types 3 and 4. Near 3% of types 1 and 40% of types 2 received at a time somatostatin analogue treatment. Five-year survival rates were 98.3, 100, 63.2 and 31.8% for types 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The great majority of gastric neuro-endocrine tumours registered in this national cohort are treated in accordance with the current guidelines. The survival rates we reported must be interpreted with caution, because this cohort registered preferentially selected patients eligible for treatment. The registration of all the gastric neuro-endocrine tumours, in particular type 1 considered as benign and type 4 not eligible for specific anti-cancer treatment must be encouraged.

Management of gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumors

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs) are rare neoplasms, like all NETs. However, the incidence of GI-NETS has been increasing in recent years. Gastric NETs (G-NETs) and duodenal NETs (D-NETs) are the common types of upper GI-NETs based on tumor location. G-NETs are classified into three distinct subgroups: type I, II, and III. Type I G-NETs, which are the most common subtype (70%-80% of all G-NETs), are associated with chronic atrophic gastritis, including autoimmune gastritis and Helicobacter pylori associated atrophic gastritis. Type II G-NETs (5%-6%) are associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (MEN1-ZES). Both type I and II G-NETs are related to hypergastrinemia, are small in size, occur in multiple numbers, and are generally benign. In contrast, type III G-NETs (10%-15%) are not associated with hypergastrinemia, are large-sized single tumors, and are usually malignant. Therefore, surgical resection and chemotherapy are generally necessary for type III G-NETs, while endoscopic resection and follow-up, which are acceptable for the treatment of most type I and II G-NETs, are only acceptable for small and well differentiated type III G-NETs. D-NETs include gastrinomas (50%-60%), somatostatin-producing tumors (15%), nonfunctional serotonin-containing tumors (20%), poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (< 3%), and gangliocytic paragangliomas (< 2%). Most D-NETs are located in the first or second part of the duodenum, with 20% occurring in the periampullary region. Therapy for D-NETs is based on tumor size, location, histological grade, stage, and tumor type. While endoscopic resection may be considered for small nonfunctional D-NETs (G1) located in the higher papilla region, surgical resection is necessary for most other D-NETs. However, there is no consensus regarding the ideal treatment of D-NETs.

Well-Differentiated Grade 2, Type 3 Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour with Bilateral Metastatic Ovarian Involvement: Report of an Unusual Case

Treatment of metastatic gastric neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) is challenging. In oligometastatic cases, surgical resection is recommended whenever possible. Somatostatin analogues have been used to decrease gastrin levels, and available evidence suggests that these drugs can also reduce recurrences. Here we present a highly unusual case involving a patient with a well-differentiated grade 2, type 3 gastric NET with exclusive metastatic bilateral ovarian involvement. To our knowledge, this is the first such case reported in the literature, as the cause of ovarian involvement is usually due to local invasion rather than metastasis. We believe this case is of interest not only due to the unusual presentation, but also because it makes us consider adjuvant treatment with somatostatin analogues in patients with low-grade tumours and a positive postoperative octreoscan.

Clinical management of patients with gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms associated with chronic atrophic gastritis: a retrospective, multicentre study

To provide data regarding clinical presentation, pathological features, management, and response to different treatments of patients with type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors in stages 0-2A. The study design consist of an Italian multicentre, retrospective analysis of patients with type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors managed with different therapeutic approaches: surgery, endoscopic surveillance, endoscopic resection, or somatostatin analog therapy. Among the 97 patients included, 3 underwent surgery, 45 (46.4%) radical endoscopic resection of the neoplastic lesions, 13 (13.4%) follow-up with upper endoscopy, and 36 (37.1%) somatostatin analog therapy. At the end of the follow-up, all patients were alive and there was no evidence of metastatic disease. Somatostatin analog therapy resulted in a complete response in 76.0% of the patients and stable disease in 24.0%. A prolonged period of therapy, the use of a full dose of somatostatin analogs and higher gastrin levels at diagnosis were related to a complete response to the therapy. The recurrence rate was 26.3% in patients treated with somatostatin analog therapy and 26.2% in patients treated with endoscopic resection, without a statistically significant difference in terms of disease-free survival. Regarding recurrence of the disease, no statistical difference was found according to type of therapy, number of neoplastic lesions, and 2010 WHO classification. The only risk factor for tumor recurrence was a short period of medical treatment. In conclusion, our study suggested that endoscopic surveillance, endoscopic resection and somatostatin analog therapy represent valid options in the management of patients with type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors in stages 0-2A.

Intermittent treatment of recurrent type-1 gastric carcinoids with somatostatin analogues in patients with chronic autoimmune atrophic gastritis

BACKGROUND

Optimal management and treatment of type-1 gastric carcinoids is under debate.

AIMS

This prospective study evaluates the outcome of patients with recurrent type-1 gastric carcinoids treated with somatostatin analogues.

METHODS

From 2000 to 2013, among a population of 107 chronic atrophic gastritis patients, 25 (20% males, median age 62 years) developed type-1 gastric carcinoids and underwent regular clinical and endoscopic follow-up (median 77 months, range 6-165) after the initial treatment. Those patients showing recurrent disease were treated with somatostatin analogues until carcinoid disappearance.

RESULTS

12/25 patients (33% males, median age 65 years) showed recurrent gastric carcinoids and were treated with somatostatin analogues for a median duration of 12 months. Median gastrin and chromogranin A levels, which were 802 pg/mL and 33 U/L, respectively, decreased to 299 pg/mL (p=0.002) and 15.6 U/L (p=0.001) at the end of the treatment. Gastric carcinoids disappeared after a median length of treatment of 12 months. After a median time of 19.5 months from somatostatin analogues discontinuation, 4/12 patients (25% males, median age 56 years) showed a further recurrence. A new cycle of treatment was performed successfully.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that type-1 gastric carcinoids are a recurring disease and somatostatin analogues, administered on 12-month cycles, represent an effective treatment.

Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia: Genetics and Clinical Management

Early diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) syndromes is critical for optimal clinical outcomes; before the MEN syndromes can be diagnosed, they must be suspected. Genetic testing for germline alterations in both the MEN type 1 (MEN1) gene and RET proto-oncogene is crucial to identifying those at risk in affected kindreds and directing timely surveillance and surgical therapy to those at greatest risk of potentially life-threatening neoplasia. Pancreatic, thymic, and bronchial neuroendocrine tumors are the leading cause of death in patients with MEN1 and should be aggressively considered by at least biannual computed tomography imaging.

Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of type 1 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms

The vast majority of gastrin-related gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (GI-NENs) develop in the context of chronic atrophic gastritis (type 1), a condition closely related to autoimmune thyroid diseases. These neoplasms are defined as gastric NENs type 1 (GNEN1) and have recently been shown to constitute the commonest GI-NENs in a prospective study. GNEN1s are usually multiple and follow a relative indolent course, raising questions regarding the extent that such patients should be investigated and the appropriate therapeutic interventions needed. Recently, a number of consensus statements and guidelines have been published from various societies dealing with the diagnosis and management of GI-NENs. Endocrinologists are among the many different medical specialties involved in GNEN1s diagnosis and management. However, despite recent advances, few randomized trials are available, and thus existing evidence remains relatively weak compared to other malignancies. The purpose of this review is to provide recent evidence along with currently employed modalities addressing the diagnosis, management, long-term follow-up and potential comorbidities of GNEN1s.

Guidance on the effective use of upper gastrointestinal histopathology

Given the ever-increasing demand for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, for diagnosis and surveillance, there is a need to consider when it is appropriate, and when it is not appropriate, to take an endoscopic biopsy for histological evaluation. In this article, we consider this in relation to each of the anatomical compartments encountered during oesophagogastroduodenoscopy, and in relation to the common clinical scenarios and endoscopic abnormalities encountered. There are clear indications to biopsy suspicious ulceration or mass lesions and for investigation of some inflammatory conditions, such as eosinophilic oesophagitis and coeliac disease. Increasing guidance is available on optimal biopsy sites and biopsy numbers to maximise yield from histology. Outside these areas, the endoscopist should consider whether biopsy of normal or abnormal appearing mucosa is likely to contribute to patient management, to ensure effective use of limited healthcare resources.

The efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection of type I gastric carcinoid tumors compared with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection

Background and Aims. Conventional endoscopic submucosal resection (EMR) of carcinoid tumors often involves the resection margin, which necessitates further intervention. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely accepted for removing carcinoid tumors. We aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of ESD with that of EMR for resection of type I gastric carcinoid tumors. Patients and Methods. The study enrolled 62 patients (37 males, 25 females; median age, 50 years; range, 40-68 years) who were treated with EMR or ESD at three hospitals; the study group had 87 type I gastric carcinoid tumors with an estimated size of ≤10 mm. The complete resection rate and the complications associated with these two procedures were analyzed. Results. The overall ESD complete resection rate was higher than that of the EMR rate (94.9% versus 83.3%, P value = 0.174). A statistically lower vertical margin involvement rate was achieved when ESD was performed compared to when EMR was performed (2.6% versus 16.7%, P value = 0.038). The complication rate was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions. ESD showed a higher complete resection rate, particularly for the vertical margin, with a similar complication rate. We mildly recommend ESD rather than EMR for removing type I gastric carcinoid tumors.

Systemic therapeutic options for carcinoid

"Carcinoids" are mostly slow-growing neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) with low proliferative activity. A wide range of therapeutic options with variable efficacy exist, including locoregional ablative strategies. Thereafter, some patients may not require medical therapy for years depending on the rate of progression or recurrence. However, the majority of patients require systemic treatment and therein lies the dilemma, since no antiproliferative agent is currently approved for carcinoids. Somatostatin analogs (SSAs), and to a lesser extent interferon-alpha, are standard therapy for carcinoids associated with the carcinoid syndrome. These drugs have some antiproliferative efficacy. SSAs rarely lead to tumor remission but may modestly prolong time to tumor progression. Chemotherapy is of limited value in carcinoids with low proliferation indices but may be useful in higher grade tumors. Peptide receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy may be of benefit and is mostly used after medical therapies fail. However, it is considered an investigational modality. More recently, targeted drugs such as mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and anti-angiogenics have been investigated. Objective remissions are rare. Their value remains to be rigorously elucidated. Increased efficacy requires a better understanding of the underlying tumor biology and identification of molecular pathological criteria to allow appropriate preselection of candidates for targeted therapies.

Gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumours

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are increasing in frequency and have a varied spectrum with regard to histology, clinicopathologic background, stage, and prognosis. They are usually discovered incidentally, are for the most part benign and are associated with hypergastrinaemia (secondary either to chronic atrophic gastritis or rarely Zollinger-Ellison syndrome; types 1 and 2, respectively) or more rarely sporadic type 3. Applications of recent staging and grading systems - namely using Ki-67 proliferative indices - (from ENETS and WHO 2010) can be particularly helpful in further categorising these tumours. The natural history of Type 1 gastric carcinoids is generally (>95%) favourable and simple surveillance is usually recommended for small (<1 cm) T1 tumours, with local (endoscopic or surgical) resection for larger lesions. Other potential therapies such as somatostatin analogues and gastrin receptor antagonists may offer newer therapeutic possibilities. Rarely, gastric NENs have a malignant course and this is usually confined to Type 2 and especially Type 3 tumours; the latter mimic the biological course of gastric adenocarcinoma and require radical oncological therapies. Most duodenal NENs, apart from gastrinomas (that are not dealt with here) are sporadic and non functional. They are also increasing in frequency probably due to incidental discovery at endoscopy or imaging for other reasons and this may account for their overall good prognosis. Peri-ampullary and ampullary NENs may have a more aggressive outcome and should be carefully appraised and treated (often with surgical resection).

Gastric neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

Gastric neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are increasingly recognised, and management decisions may be difficult due to an incomplete understanding of aetiology, natural history and optimum therapy. This article presents a current understanding based on recent advances in epidemiology, classification, molecular profiling, and treatment.

METHODS

Relevant medical literature was identified from searches of PubMed and references cited in appropriate articles identified. Selection of articles was based on peer review, journal and relevance.

RESULTS

Gastric NETs may be divided into three clinical prognostic groups: type I is associated with autoimmune atrophic gastritis and hypergastrinaemia, type II is associated with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, and type III lesions are gastrin-independent, have the greatest metastatic potential and poorest prognosis. There has been an increased frequency of gastric NETs reported. Management approaches have evolved in parallel with advances in endoscopic staging and surgery, as well as improved understanding of the biology and natural history of NETs.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric NETs present a spectrum of activity from indolent tumours to metastatic malignancy. Treatment decisions for patients must be individualised and are best managed by a multidisciplinary team approach. The current evidence base is limited to small series and efforts to treat patients within clinical networks of expertise are warranted.

Review of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of type I gastric carcinoid tumor

Gastric carcinoid tumors comprise 7% of all gastrointestinal carcinoids and have significantly increased in incidence over the past few decades. Seventy to 80% of gastric carcinoids are type I, which usually are clinically asymptomatic and found incidentally at endoscopic evaluation for abdominal pain or anemia. In this review, advances in understanding the pathophysiology of type I gastric carcinoid are highlighted. In addition, various current diagnostic and treatment options are discussed. Although type I carcinoids generally hold a benign course, rigorous investigation is needed to ensure accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment. This includes appropriate diagnostic procedures and imaging and accurate staging of tumor. Tumor size, depth of invasion, presence of metastasis, and the tumor's gastrin dependency dictate treatment options. Appropriate treatments can consist of endoscopic resection, antrectomy, medical management, or frequent follow-up. This article provides a systematic method of evaluating and treating type I gastric carcinoid.

Type I gastric carcinoids: a prospective study on endoscopic management and recurrence rate

BACKGROUND

Type I gastric carcinoids (TIGCs) are neuroendocrine neoplasms arising from enterochromaffin-like cells in atrophic body gastritis. Data regarding their evolution in prospective series are scarce, thus treatment and follow-up are not codified. Our aim was to evaluate clinical outcome and recurrence in TIGCs managed by endoscopic approach.

METHODS

33 patients (24 females; median age 65 years, range 23-81) were included and managed through endoscopic follow-up every 6-12 months, with lesion removal and multiple gastric biopsies. Baseline clinical and histological features were analyzed as risk factors by Cox regression.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, 7 tumors were intramucosal carcinoids and 26 were polyps (median diameter 5 mm, range 2-20), multiple in 17 patients. Associated severe atrophy was present in 21 cases (63.6%), while mild atrophy was found in 6 cases (18.2%). During a 46-month median follow-up, survival was 100% and no metastases occurred. One patient developed a less-differentiated carcinoid that was radically treated by surgery. 21 patients (63.6%) had recurrence after a median of 8 months, 14 of these (66.6%) had a second recurrence after a median of 8 months following the previous carcinoid removal. Median recurrence-free survival was 24 months. Neither clinical nor biochemical recurrence-predicting factors were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Although about 60% of TIGCs had recurrence after endoscopic resection, endoscopic management may be considered safe and effective.

Development of type I gastric carcinoid in patients with chronic atrophic gastritis

BACKGROUND

Long-term observational studies assessing the incidence of type I gastric carcinoid (typeIGC) in patients with chronic atrophic gastritis are few.

AIM

To evaluate the occurrence of typeIGC at diagnosis and during follow-up and to identify patient features associated with the presence of typeIGC in a cohort of chronic atrophic gastritis patients.

METHODS

Three hundred and sixty-seven chronic atrophic gastritis patients [245 women, age 54 (18-79) years] underwent regular follow-up by gastroscopy. The incidence of typeIGC was determined in chronic atrophic gastritis patients with at least 2 years of follow-up (n = 214). Baseline clinical and histological features were analysed as factors associated with the presence of typeIGC by univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Type I gastric carcinoid was diagnosed in nine (2.4%) patients at the moment when chronic atrophic gastritis was diagnosed. After 1463 person-years, six patients developed typeIGC with an annual incidence rate (person-year) of 0.4%. Patients with typeIGC had significantly higher levels of gastrin, chromogranin A and more frequently the presence of body polyps and ECL-dysplasia compared with chronic atrophic gastritis patients without typeIGC.

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort study shows that typeIGC is a rare complication in patients with chronic atrophic gastritis, and the presence of body polyps and ECL-dysplasia at gastroscopic/histologic evaluation is strongly associated with the presence of typeIGC.

New and emerging syndromes due to neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare, slow-growing neoplasms characterized by their ability to store and secrete different peptides and neuroamines. Some of these substances cause specific clinical syndromes whereas others are not associated with specific syndromes or symptom complexes. NETs usually have episodic expression that makes diagnosis difficult, erroneous, and often late. For these reasons a high index of suspicion is needed, and it is important to understand the pathophysiology of each tumor to decide which biochemical markers are more useful and when they should be used.

A clinical perspective on gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia

The incidence of gastric neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has increased exponentially based on widespread use of endoscopy and a greater pathological awareness of the condition. A key concern is the potential association with hypergastrinemia induced by proton pump inhibitor administration. Previous confusion regarding diagnosis and therapy has been diminished by a series of international consensus statements defining the biology and management strategies for the disease. Overall, gastric NETs are categorized as well-differentiated or poorly differentiated neoplasms. Well-differentiated gastric NETs are enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell tumors subclassified into three types based on their relationship to gastrin, a key regulator of ECL cell neoplastic transformation. The treatment of type 1 and type 2 tumors depends on the size and invasiveness of the tumor, whereas type 3 tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas warrant aggressive surgical resection. The disease-specific 5-year survival ranges from about 95% in type 1 gastric carcinoids to about 25% in poorly differentiated gastric NECs. Elucidation of the precise biology of a gastric NET is critical to diagnosis and delineation of a type-specific management strategy.

Hypervascular gastric masses: CT findings and clinical correlates

OBJECTIVE

This article focuses on masses that are hypervascular on IV contrast-enhanced CT.

CONCLUSION

The rising use of dual-phase IV contrast-enhanced CT will result in an increase in incidental detection of hypervascular gastric masses. Radiologists must be aware of the range of abnormalities that may appear as a hyperenhancing gastric mass because the differential diagnosis includes both benign and malignant lesions.

Plasma chromogranin A response to octreotide test: prognostic value for clinical outcome in endocrine digestive tumors

OBJECTIVES

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) expressing somatostatin receptors may be treated with somatostatin analogs (SSAs). Selection criteria are a positive Octreoscan or a >50% hormone level decrease after octreotide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection (octreotide test) (OT). Plasma chromogranin A (CgA) is the best general GEP-NET marker, but data on CgA response to OT are scanty. Thus, we evaluated whether plasma CgA response to OT could predict the clinical response to SSAs.

METHODS

At diagnosis, 38 GEP-NET patients received octreotide 200 microg s.c., with plasma CgA determination at 0, 3, and 6 h. Long-term SSA treatment was then given by monitoring symptomatic, biochemical, and objective responses, and survival.

RESULTS

Basal plasma CgA levels were significantly higher in patients with functioning than non-functioning tumors (median (range): 220 (18-2,230) vs. 46 (25-8,610) U/l, P=0.03) and in those with than without metastases (171 (18-8,610) vs. 43 (28-220) U/l, P=0.04). CgA levels significantly correlated with WHO classification, clinical TNM staging, and Ki-67 proliferative index. After OT, CgA levels decreased from 146 (18-8,610) to 61 (10-8,535) U/l (basal and nadir values), P<0.001. In patients responsive to OT, a successful objective response occurred in 21/31 patients (68%). Successful symptomatic response occurred in 13/18 patients (72%), biochemical response in 25/31 (81%), and objective response in 21/31 (68%). In the remaining seven unresponsive cases, with CgA decrement <30%, disease progressed to death in six (86%). Median survival from enrollment was 48 months (6-138) in responsive and 6 (6-30) in unresponsive patients (P=0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

In GEP-NETs, plasma CgA is a reliable marker, and a >30% decrease after OT has a relevant prognostic meaning allowing the identification of the subgroup of patients most likely to be responsive to chronic SSAs.

NANETS treatment guidelines: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach and pancreas

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the stomach and pancreas represent 2 major subtypes of gastrointestinal NETs. Historically, there has been little consensus on the classification and management of patients with these tumor subtypes. We provide an overview of well-differentiated NETs of the stomach and pancreas and describe consensus guidelines for the treatment of patients with these malignancies.

Treatment of type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors with somatostatin analogs

BACKGROUND AND AIM

There are limited data on response and long-term follow-up of octreotide therapy in type-I gastric neuroendocrine tumors. The objective of the present study was to assess the response of type-I gastric neuroendocrine tumors to octreotide-long acting, repeatable (LAR) therapy and evaluate long-term follow up of such patients after therapy.

METHODS

Three patients with documented type-I gastric neuroendocrine tumors from a tertiary gastroenterology centre were studied. Octreotide-LAR therapy 20 mg intramuscularly every 28 days was administered for one year. Serum gastrin and chromogranin levels, gastroscopies and biopsies from tumor nodules at 6 months and one year on therapy and every 6 months after completion of drug therapy were taken. Follow-up after completion of therapy extended for 3 years in two and 2.5 years in one patient.

RESULTS

During octreotide therapy there was normalization of serum gastrin levels and serum chromogranin levels. Tumors in all three patients had regressed at 6 months of treatment. Following cessation of therapy, there was progressive rise of serum gastrin to pre-treatment levels. Serum chromogranin levels remained within normal limits. Gastroscopic and histologic examination of gastric biopsies did not reveal recurrence of tumors in any patients. All patients tolerated therapy well and became asymptomatic soon after drug therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide-LAR therapy causes regression of type-I gastric neuroendocrine tumors. After completion of drug therapy there was no recurrence of tumors even with continued hypergastrinemia. Octreotide therapy should be considered as one of the treatment options in such patients.

Gastric carcinoids: between underestimation and overtreatment

Gastric carcinoids (GCs), which originate from gastric enterochromaffin-like (ECL) mucosal cells and account for 2.4% of all carcinoids, are found increasingly in the course of upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy. Current nosography includes those occurring in chronic conditions with hypergastrinemia, as the type 1 associated with chronic atrophic gastritis, and the type 2 associated with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, and type 3, which is unrelated to hypergastrinemia and is frequently malignant, with distant metastases. The optimal clinical approach to GCs remains to be elucidated, depending upon type, size and number of carcinoids. While there is agreement concerning the treatment of type 3 carcinoids, for types 1 and 2, current possibilities include simple surveillance, endoscopic polypectomy, surgical excision, associated or not with surgical antrectomy, or total gastrectomy. Moreover, the recent introduction of somatostatin analogues represents a therapeutic option of possibly outstanding relevance.