Crossing low-level donor-specific antibodies in heart transplantation

Molecular Signature of Antibody-Mediated Chronic Vasculopathy in Heart Allografts in a Novel Mouse Model

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) limits the long-term success of heart transplants. Generation of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) is associated with increased incidence of CAV clinically, but mechanisms underlying development of this pathology remain poorly understood. Major histocompatibility complex-mismatched A/J cardiac allografts in B6.CCR5-/- recipients have been reported to undergo acute rejection with little T-cell infiltration, but intense deposition of C4d in large vessels and capillaries of the graft accompanied by high titers of DSA. This model was modified to investigate mechanisms of antibody-mediated CAV by transplanting A/J hearts to B6.CCR5-/- CD8-/- mice that were treated with low doses of anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody to decrease T-cell-mediated graft injury and promote antibody-mediated injury. Although the mild inhibition of CD4 T cells extended allograft survival, the grafts developed CAV with intense C4d deposition and macrophage infiltration by 14 days after transplantation. Development of CAV correlated with recipient DSA titers. Transcriptomic analysis of microdissected allograft arteries identified the Notch ligand Dll4 as the most elevated transcript in CAV, associated with high versus low titers of DSA. More importantly, these analyses revealed a differential expression of transcripts in the CAV lesions compared with the matched apical tissue that lacks large arteries. In conclusion, these findings report a novel model of antibody-mediated CAV with the potential to facilitate further understanding of the molecular mechanisms promoting development of CAV.

Impact of carfilzomib-based desensitization on heart transplantation of sensitized candidates

BACKGROUND

Allosensitization in heart transplant candidates is associated with longer transplant wait times and post-transplant complications. We summarize our experience with desensitization using carfilzomib, an irreversible proteasome inhibitor that causes plasma cell apoptosis.

METHODS

One cycle of desensitization consisted of plasmapheresis and carfilzomib 20 mg/m² on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 with intravenous immune globulin 2 g/kg after carfilzomib on day 16. Patients underwent repeat cycles as indicated. We compare calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) for neat combined Class I and II IgG and C1q pre- and post-treatment using a cutoff for cPRA entry of ≥ 4000 and 500 MFI, respectively.

RESULTS

From June 2013 to October 2019, 9 patients underwent 20 cycles of carfilzomib-based desensitization. Each cycle resulted in an average cPRA decrease of 24% (95% CI: 6-42) for IgG and 36% (95% CI: 17-55) for C1q. From treatment start to finish, mean cPRA fell from 76% to 40% (p = 0.01) for IgG and 56% to 4% (p = 0.017) for C1q. Six of 9 patients have been transplanted with 5 of the transplanted hearts crossing preoperative donor-specific antibodies. During a median follow-up of 35.1 months, all transplanted patients have survived with only 1 occurrence of treated rejection. Side effects of desensitization included acute kidney injury (67%) and thrombocytopenia (33%) with all episodes self-resolving.

CONCLUSIONS

A carfilzomib-based desensitization strategy among heart transplant candidates reduces the level of HLA antibodies and complement binding, facilitates successful transplantation, and is associated with excellent outcomes at 3 years.

Heart Transplant Immunosuppression Strategies at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Heart transplant is the optimal treatment for selected patients with end-stage heart failure. Immunosuppression after heart transplantation has significantly reduced the incidence of rejection and improved patient outcomes with the routine use of calcineurin inhibitors. Antimetabolites and proliferation signal inhibitors add to the improvement in patient outcomes as well. The goal of induction therapy is to provide intense immunosuppression when the risk of allograft rejection is highest. Most maintenance immunosuppressive protocols employ a 3-drug regimen consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor, an antimetabolite agent and glucocorticoids. The management of rejection proceeds in a stepwise fashion based on the severity of rejection detected on biopsy and the patient's clinical presentation. This review will cover induction, maintenance, rejection therapy and some special considerations including sensitization, renal sparing protocol, and corticosteroid weaning. It will end in consideration of potential future directions in immunosuppressive strategies to promote patient and graft survival.

Crossing low/moderate-level donor-specific antibodies during heart transplantation

Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in patients prior to heart transplantation are associated with increased risk of rejection and can lead to longer waitlist times, but it is not known whether patients with low/moderate-level DSA at transplant have acceptable post-transplant outcomes. We performed a single-center, retrospective review to examine outcomes associated with crossing pre-existing low/moderate-level DSA. We assessed 864 patients awaiting heart transplantation between 2010 and 2018, identified 67 patients with low/moderate-level DSA and compared them to patients who were sensitized without DSA at the time of heart transplantation, as well as a control group of non-sensitized patients. Outcomes included 3-year survival, freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), freedom from non-fatal major adverse cardiac events (NF-MACE), and 1-year freedom from rejection. In the first-year post-transplant, there was decreased freedom from antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in the patients with pre-existing DSA compared with patients sensitized without DSA and non-sensitized patients. However, the DSA group experienced similar 3-year post-transplant survival, freedom from CAV, and freedom from NF-MACE compared with the other study groups. Our findings suggest that crossing low/moderate-level DSA does not lead to worse outcomes in heart transplantation and may offer a viable way to increase a sensitized patient's chance to obtain a suitable donor.

Antibody-medicated rejection after heart transplantation: diagnosis and clinical implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present article will review the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplant recipients and further explore the clinical implications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improved diagnostic techniques have led to increased recognition of antibody-mediated rejection and better understanding of the long-term consequences in heart transplant recipients. Endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of antibody-medicated ejection; however, several advances in molecular testing have emerged, including the use of gene expression profiling, messenger RNA, and microRNA. Routine surveillance of donor-specific antibodies identifies recipients at high risk for graft compromise. Additionally, new monoclonal antibody therapies have broadened our repertoire in the treatment of rejection.

SUMMARY

Advances in molecular testing for antibody-mediated rejection may improve the associated long-term complication, while minimizing risk to the patient.