Phase I Trial Evaluating the Safety of Preoperative Gemcitabine/nab-Paclitaxel With Concurrent Radiation Therapy for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Preoperative nutritional status is a useful predictor of the feasibility of postoperative treatment in octogenarian-plus pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

The suitability of radical surgery for very elderly pancreatic cancer (PC) patients remains controversial due to concerns about postoperative functional reserve. Inflammatory-nutritional status may help identify elderly patients at risk of compromised postoperative treatment tolerance.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 121 patients over eighty who were diagnosed with PC in 2010-2019, 40 of whom underwent radical surgery. Surgical outcomes were compared with those of 205 younger patients (under 80 years-old) who underwent radical surgery. K-means cluster analysis was conducted with four inflammatory-nutritional indices (NLR, PLR, PNI, and mGPS) to define, and the indices using ordinal logistic analysis were evaluated in each cluster to create a formula named 'nutritional index (NTI)', which was then used to redefine the clusters. The predictive ability of the NTI was validated in other octogenarians who underwent pancreatectomy for PC between 2020 and 2023.

RESULTS

Patients older than eighty exhibited comparable overall survival to younger patients (median survival time, 30.7/37.1 months, p = 0.20). However, octogenarian-plus patients had lower rates of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) initiation (45/80 %) and treatment upon recurrence (52/84 %), resulting in shorter survival after recurrence (7.4/11.1 months, p = 0.06). Inflammatory-nutritional status was significantly associated with overall survival, with poor nutritional status being linked to lower rates of AC initiation and/or treatment upon recurrence. NTI effectively predicted AC feasibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical surgery for octogenarian-plus PC patients meeting the current criteria was safe, but lower rates of postoperative treatment initiation may lead to poorer outcomes after recurrence. Inflammatory-nutritional status assessment could enhance surgical eligibility in octogenarian-plus PC patients.

Preoperative treatment response prediction for pancreatic cancer by multiple microRNAs in plasma exosomes: Optimization using machine learning and network analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are involved in chemosensitivity through their biological activities in various malignancies, including pancreatic cancer (PC). However, single-miRNA models offer limited predictability of treatment response. We investigated whether a multiple-miRNA prediction model optimized via machine learning could improve treatment response prediction.

METHODS

A total of 20 and 66 patients who underwent curative resection for PC after gemcitabine-based preoperative treatment were included in the discovery and validation cohorts, respectively. Patients were classified according to their response to preoperative treatment. In the discovery cohort, miRNA microarray and machine learning were used to identify candidate miRNAs (in peripheral plasma exosomes obtained before treatment) associated with treatment response. In the validation cohort, miRNA expression was analyzed using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction to validate its ability to predict treatment response.

RESULTS

In the discovery cohort, six and three miRNAs were associated with good and poor responders, respectively. The combination of these miRNAs significantly improved predictive accuracy compared with using each single miRNA, with area under the curve (AUC) values increasing from 0.485 to 0.672 to 0.909 for good responders and from 0.475 to 0.606 to 0.788 for poor responders. In the validation cohort, improved predictive performance of the miRNA combination over single-miRNA prediction models was confirmed, with AUC values increasing from 0.461 to 0.669 to 0.777 for good responders and from 0.501 to 0.556 to 0.685 for poor responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral blood miRNA profiles using an optimized combination of miRNAs may provide a more advanced prediction model for preoperative treatment response in PC.

The Oncological Stress Test of Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Systematic Review in Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Therapy Compared to Upfront Resection Approach for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, increasingly diagnosed in the United States, has a disheartening initial resection rate of 15%. Neoadjuvant therapy, particularly FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based regimens, is gaining favor for its potential to improve resectability rates and achieving microscopically negative margins (R0) in borderline resectable cases, marked by intricate arterial or venous involvement. Despite surgery being the sole curative approach, actual benefit of neoadjuvant therapy remains debatable. This study scrutinizes current literature on oncological outcomes post-resection of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. A MEDLINE/PubMed search was conducted to systematically compare oncological outcomes of patients treated with either neoadjuvant therapy with intent of curative resection or an "upfront resection" approach. A total of 1293 studies were initially screened and 30 were included (n = 1714) in this analysis. All studies included data on outcomes of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma being treated with neoadjuvant therapy (n = 1387) or a resection-first approach (n = 356). Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy underwent resection 52% of the time, achieving negative margins of 43% (n = 601). Approximately 77% of patients who received an upfront resection underwent a successful resection, with 39% achieving negative margins. Neoadjuvant therapy remains marginally efficacious in treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, as patients undergo an operation and successful resection less often when treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Rates of curative resection are comparable, despite neoadjuvant therapy being a primary recommendation in borderline resectable cases and employed more often than upfront resection. Upfront resection may offer improved resection rates by intention-to-treat, which can provide more patients with paths to curative resection.

A striking elevation of CA19-9 after preoperative therapy negates prognostic benefit from radical surgery in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Identifying patients who can be spared nonbeneficial surgery is crucial, as pancreatic cancer surgery is highly invasive, with substantial negative effects on quality of life. The study objective was to investigate a useful indicator of patients who do not gain prognostic benefit from radical surgery after neoadjuvant therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

METHOD

We compared factors among 609 patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy during 2005-2019. Patients were divided into a poor-prognosis group (no surgery or postresection recurrence within a year) and a good-prognosis group (no recurrence or recurrence >1 year after resection).

RESULTS

Patients who experience a recurrence within a year of resection (poor-prognosis group) did no better than patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and progressed but never made it to surgery. The value of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy was the most significant indicator to predict the poor prognosis group and the elevation of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (>200 U/mL) identified only poor prognosis group with high specificity of 96.6%. The overall survival of patients with more than 200 of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy was significantly very poor and their 2-year survival rate was only 41.4%.

CONCLUSION

A striking elevation of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is a good indicator of poor prognosis. Patients with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 >200 U/mL after neoadjuvant therapy should not undergo radical surgery.

miR-6855-5p Enhances Radioresistance and Promotes Migration of Pancreatic Cancer by Inducing Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition via Suppressing FOXA1: Potential of Plasma Exosomal miR-6855-5p as an Indicator of Radiosensitivity in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Whether radiation should be added to neoadjuvant treatment remains controversial, and liquid biopsy has not been reported to predict radioresistance in pancreatic cancer (PC). We aimed to identify microRNAs (miRNAs) governing radioresistance in PC by utilizing peripheral plasma exosome samples and to verify their usefulness as biomarkers.

METHODS

miRNA microarray analysis was conducted using pretreatment peripheral plasma exosomes from 10 patients with PC receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in the discovery cohort. Patients were categorized into two groups (good and poor responders) based on treatment responses, and candidate miRNAs exhibiting differential expression between the two groups were identified. The radiosensitivity of PC cells was examined after miR-6855-5p overexpression. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and TargetScan were used to explore the mechanisms of radioresistance. We investigated the correlation between miR-6855-5p expression levels in the pretreatment peripheral plasma exosomes of 28 patients in the validation cohort and the response to NACRT.

RESULTS

miR-6855-5p expression was higher in poor responders than in good responders. miR-6855-5p induces radioresistance in PC cells. NGS showed that epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was involved in miR-6855-5p-related radioresistance. Forkhead box protein A1 (FOXA1) was identified as a direct target of miR-6855-5p using NGS and TargetScan. Clinical examination of samples from the validation cohort revealed a tendency for patients with higher expression of miR-6855-5p in peripheral plasma exosomes to exhibit increased radioresistance (r = -0.5964).

CONCLUSIONS

miR-6855-5p regulates the radioresistance of PC by inducing EMT via suppressing FOXA1, and miR-6855-5p in peripheral plasma exosomes may be a biomarker for radioresistance of PC.

Prognostic impact of aberrant right hepatic artery involvement in patients with pancreatic cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of aberrant right hepatic artery (A-RHA) involvement in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

This study enrolled 474 patients who underwent upfront pancreatectomy or neoadjuvant treatment for resectable (R) or borderline resectable (BR) PC from four institutions. The patients were divided into three groups: A-RHA involvement group (n = 12), patients who had sole A-RHA involvement without major arterial involvement; BR-A group (n = 104), patients who had major arterial involvement; R/BR-PV group (n = 358), others.

RESULTS

All patients in the A-RHA involvement group underwent margin-negative resection. The median overall survival of the entire cohort in the A-RHA involvement, R/BR-PV, and BR-A groups was 41.2, 33.5, and 25.2 months, respectively. Although survival in the R/BR-PV group was significantly more favorable than that in the BR-A group (p = 0.0003), no significant difference was observed between the A-RHA involvement group and the R/BR-PV (p = 0.7332) and BR-A (p = 0.1485) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of patients with PC and sole A-RHA involvement was comparable to that of patients with R/BR-PV.

Prognostic Significance of Biologic Factors in Patients with a Modest Radiologic Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancers: Impact of the Combination Index of Sialyl-Lewis Antigen-Related Tumor Markers

BACKGROUND

Appropriate re-evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is important for optimal treatment selection. Nonetheless, determining the operative eligibility of patients with a modest radiologic response remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of biologic factors for patients showing a modest radiologic response to NAT and investigate the tumor markers (TMs), CA19-9 alone, DUPAN-II alone, and their combination, to create an index that combines these sialyl-Lewis antigen-related TMs associated with treatment outcomes.

METHODS

This study enrolled patients deemed to have a "stable disease" by RECIST classification with slight progression (tumor size increase rate, ≤20%) as their radiologic response after NAT. A sialyl-Lewis-related index (sLe index), calculated by adding one fourth of the serum DUPAN-II value to the CA19-9 value, was created. The prognostic significances of CA19-9, DUPAN-II, and the sLe index were assessed in relation to postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

An sLe index lower than the cutoff value (45.25) was significantly associated with favorable disease-free survival. Moreover, the post-NAT sLe index had a higher area under the curve value for recurrence within 24 months than the post-NAT levels of CA19-9 or DUPAN-II alone. Multivariable analysis showed that a post-NAT sLe index higher than 45.25 was the single independent predictive factor for recurrence within 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional evaluation of biologic factors can potentially enhance patient selection, particularly for patients showing a limited radiologic response to NAT. The authors' index is a simple indicator for the biologic evaluation of multiple combined sialyl-Lewis antigen-related TMs and may offer a better predictive significance.

Triple modal treatment comprising with proton beam radiation, hyperthermia, and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I/II study protocol (TT-LAP trial)

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), accounting for about 30% of PDAC patients, is difficult to cure by radical resection or systemic chemotherapy alone. A multidisciplinary strategy is required and our TT-LAP trial aims to evaluate whether triple-modal treatment with proton beam therapy (PBT), hyperthermia, and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is a safe and synergistically effective treatment for patients with locally advanced PDAC.

METHODS

This trial is an interventional, open-label, non-randomized, single-center, single-arm phase I/II clinical trial organized and sponsored by the University of Tsukuba. Eligible patients who are diagnosed with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, including both borderline resectable (BR) and unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) patients, and selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria will receive triple-modal treatment consisting of chemotherapy, hyperthermia, and proton beam radiation. Treatment induction will include 2 cycles of chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel), proton beam therapy, and 6 total sessions of hyperthermia therapy. The initial 5 patients will move to phase II after adverse events are verified by a monitoring committee and safety is ensured. The primary endpoint is 2-year survival rate while secondary endpoints include adverse event rate, treatment completion rate, response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, resection rate, pathologic response rate, and R0 (no pathologic cancer remnants) rate. The target sample size is set at 30 cases.

DISCUSSION

The TT-LAP trial is the first to evaluate the safety and effectiveness (phases1/2) of triple-modal treatment comprised of proton beam therapy, hyperthermia, and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol was approved by the Tsukuba University Clinical Research Review Board (reference number TCRB22-007). Results will be analyzed after study recruitment and follow-up are completed. Results will be presented at international meetings of interest in pancreatic cancer plus gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic surgeries and published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031220160. Registered 24 th June 2022, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs031220160 .

FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine-based Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Multi-institutional, Patient-Level, Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer often presents as locally advanced (LAPC) or borderline resectable (BRPC). Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is recommended as initial treatment. It is currently unclear what chemotherapy should be preferred for patients with BRPC or LAPC.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and multi-institutional meta-analysis of patient-level data regarding the use of initial systemic therapy for BRPC and LAPC. Outcomes were reported separately for tumor entity and by chemotherapy regimen including FOLFIRINOX (FIO) or gemcitabine-based.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies comprising 2930 patients were analyzed for overall survival (OS) calculated from the beginning of systemic treatment. OS for patients with BRPC was 22.0 months with FIO, 16.9 months with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (Gem/nab), 21.6 months with gemcitabine/cisplatin or oxaliplatin or docetaxel or capecitabine (GemX), and 10 months with gemcitabine monotherapy (Gem-mono) (p < 0.0001). In patients with LAPC, OS also was higher with FIO (17.1 months) compared with Gem/nab (12.5 months), GemX (12.3 months), and Gem-mono (9.4 months; p < 0.0001). This difference was driven by the patients who did not undergo surgery, where FIO was superior to other regimens. The resection rates for patients with BRPC were 0.55 for gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and 0.53 with FIO. In patients with LAPC, resection rates were 0.19 with Gemcitabine and 0.28 with FIO. In resected patients, OS for patients with BRPC was 32.9 months with FIO and not different compared to Gem/nab, (28.6 months, p = 0.285), GemX (38.8 months, p = 0.1), or Gem-mono (23.1 months, p = 0.083). A similar trend was observed in resected patients converted from LAPC.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with BRPC or LAPC, primary treatment with FOLFIRINOX compared with Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy appears to provide a survival benefit for patients that are ultimately unresectable. For patients that undergo surgical resection, outcomes are similar between GEM+ and FOLFIRINOX when delivered in the neoadjuvant setting.

A Prospective Study of Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel in Patients with Borderline-resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Objectives Neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical resection improves the borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) prognosis; however, the optimal therapeutic regimen remains unclear. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) showed a high anti-tumor effect in primary lesions in a prospective study for metastatic disease. However, evidence concerning its feasibility is still lacking in patients with BRPC. We therefore evaluated the tolerability of neoadjuvant GnP (NAC-GnP) for BRPC. Methods This single-center prospective study evaluated 10 patients with BRPC who were treated with two cycles of NAC-GnP. The primary endpoint was feasibility for NAC-GnP. Treatment feasibility was defined as a successful outcome in at least eight patients. Results Ten patients who had BRPC in contact with the celiac artery (n=5), superior mesenteric artery (n=3), or hepatic artery (n=2) were enrolled. The median age was 75 (range, 40-82) years old. Grade 3 anorexia and grade 2 pneumonia occurred in one patient each, so treatment was feasible in eight patients. The median primary tumor reduction and response rates were 33% (range, 0-68%) and 60%, respectively. Six of eight patients who had abnormal CA19-9 levels at the time of enrolment showed a decrease in CA19-9 levels, with a median decrease of 72%. Five patients underwent radical resection, including R0 resection in four. Postoperative grade IIIa Clavien-Dindo complications occurred in one patient (upper gastrointestinal bleeding and pancreatic fistula). Conclusion Two-cycle NAC-GnP is a feasible treatment for patients with BRPC. Further studies on NAC-GnP in patients with BRPC are warranted.

MR-Guided Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel Chemotherapy in Inoperable Pancreatic Cancer: A TITE-CRM Phase I Trial

PURPOSE

Ablative radiation therapy for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR/LA-PDAC) may limit concurrent chemotherapy dosing and usually is only safely deliverable to tumors distant from gastrointestinal organs. Magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy may safely permit radiation and chemotherapy dose escalation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a single-arm phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of ablative hypofractionated radiation with full-dose gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in patients with BR/LA-PDAC. Patients were treated with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (1000/125 mg/m2) x 1c then concurrent gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel and radiation. Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel and radiation doses were escalated per time-to-event continual reassessment method from 40 to 45 Gy 25 fxs with chemotherapy (600-800/75 mg/m2) to 60 to 67.5 Gy/15 fractions and concurrent gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (1000/100 mg/m2). The primary endpoint was maximum tolerated dose of radiation as defined by 60-day dose limiting toxicity (DLT). DLT was treatment-related G5, G4 hematologic, or G3 gastrointestinal requiring hospitalization >3 days. Secondary endpoints included resection rates, local progression free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Thirty patients enrolled (March 2015-February 2019), with 26 evaluable patients (2 progressed before radiation, 1 was determined ineligible for radiation during planning, 1 withdrew consent). One DLT was observed. The DLT rate was 14.1% (3.3%-24.9%) with a maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (1000/100 mg/m2) and 67.5 Gy/15 fractions. At a median follow-up of 40.6 months for living patients the median OS was 14.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.9-28.2 months). The median OS for patients with Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group 0 and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 <90 were 34.1 (95% CI, 13.6-54.1) and 43.0 (95% CI, 8.0-not reached) months, respectively. Two-year LPFS and DMFS were 85% (95% CI, 63%-94%) and 57% (95% CI, 34%-73%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Full-dose gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel with ablative magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy dosing is safe in patients with BR/LA-PDAC, with promising LPFS and DMFS.

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Where Do We Go?

The incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been on the rise in recent years; however, its clinical diagnosis and treatment remain challenging. Although surgical resection remains the only chance for long-term patient survival, the likelihood of initial resectability is no higher than 20%. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in PDAC aims to transform the proportion of inoperable PDACs into operable cases and reduce the likelihood of recurrence to improve overall survival. Ongoing phase 3 clinical trial aims to validate the role of NAT in PDAC therapy, including prolongation of survival, increased R0 resection, and a higher proportion of negative lymph nodes. Controversies surrounding the role of NAT in PDAC treatment include applicability to different stages of PDAC, chemotherapy regimens, radiation, duration of treatment, and assessment of effect. This review aims to summarize the current progress and controversies of NAT in PDAC.

Phase I Trial of nab-Paclitaxel Administered Concurrently With Radiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Inoperable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Nab-paclitaxel has radiosensitizing antitumor efficacy in pancreatic cancer. We aimed to establish maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of nab-paclitaxel with radiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

In a phase I dose escalation trial patients received weekly nab-paclitaxel for 6 weeks with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). 3 + 3 design was used with nab-paclitaxel doses: 25 mg/m 2 (cohort 1), 50 mg/m 2 (cohort 2), 75 mg/m 2 (cohort 3), and 100 mg/m 2 (cohort 4). Primary endpoint was MTD. Secondary objectives were progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were recruited. Median age was 69 years (range, 40-86). Grade 1/2 toxicities were nausea (93%), vomiting (54%), diarrhea (57%), and fatigue (69%). There were no dose limiting toxicities (DLT) in cohorts 1 to 3. In cohort 4, DLTs of febrile neutropenia and enterocolitis were observed in patient 1. Subsequent DLT of febrile neutropenia and enterocolitis occurred in patient 5 in the expanded cohort. Following chemoradiotherapy median progression-free survival was 4.7 months (95% confidence interval, 2.5-27.5) and median overall survival was 10.8 months (95% confidence interval, 6.37-25.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Nab-paclitaxel and EBRT was well-tolerated at doses below 100 mg/m 2 . The MTD and recommended phase II study dose for nab-paclitaxel with EBRT is 75 mg/m 2 in this disease.

The Survival Benefit of Chemoradiotherapy following Induction Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Simple Summary

An optimal therapeutic strategy for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (UR-LAPC) has not been established. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of patients with UR-LAPC who underwent gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) as first-line chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) compared to chemotherapy alone (CTx) at our department in a Japanese cancer referral center between February 2015 and July 2018. CRT resulted in significantly better PFS and OS than CTx. In the multivariate analyses, CRT following induction chemotherapy was identified as an independent prognostic factor for OS. In summary, patients with UR-LAPC experienced favorable treatment outcomes after receiving GnP as the first-line chemotherapy, especially when receiving additional CRT after tailored courses of induction chemotherapy. Thus, this treatment strategy represents a promising treatment option for selected patients with UR-LAPC.

Abstract

An optimal therapeutic strategy for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (UR-LAPC) has not been established. This study investigated the therapeutic efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) following induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) (CRT group) compared with systemic chemotherapy alone (CTx group) in patients with UR-LAPC. This was a retrospective study of 63 consecutive patients with UR-LAPC treated at our department in a Japanese cancer referral center between February 2015 and July 2018. We excluded patients who underwent other regimens and those enrolled in another prospective study. The CRT group (n = 25) exhibited significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than the CTx group (n = 20, PFS 17.9 vs. 7.6 months, p = 0.044; OS 29.2 vs. 17.4 months, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analyses, CRT following induction chemotherapy was identified as an independent prognostic factor for OS. Seven (15.6%) patients underwent conversion surgery, all of whom were in the CRT group. The R0 resection rate was 85.7% (6/7). In summary, patients with UR-LAPC experienced favorable treatment outcomes after receiving GnP as the first-line chemotherapy, especially when receiving additional CRT. Thus, this treatment strategy represents a promising treatment option for selected patients with UR-LAPC.

Phase I Study of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Using Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Patients Who Have Localized Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma With Contact or Invasion to Major Arteries

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of preoperative chemoradiotherapy using gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and to determine the recommended dose (RD) of nab-paclitaxel for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

The participants had localized PDAC with contact or invasion to major arteries. They received GnP on days 1, 15, 29, and 43. The dose of gemcitabine was fixed at 600 mg/m2, whereas that of nab-paclitaxel was at 3 dose levels in accordance with a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme. Three-dimensional radiotherapy was administered concurrently to a total dose of 50.4 Gy per 28 fractions.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 15 patients. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 4 (26.7%), leukopenia in 1 (6.7%), biliary infection in 2 (13.3%), appetite loss and nausea in 1 (6.7%), and anaphylaxis in 1 (6.7%). The RD was determined as level 2 (gemcitabine, 600 mg/m2; nab-paclitaxel, 100 mg/m2). Three patients underwent pancreatectomy after additional chemotherapy and achieved R0 resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The RD of nab-paclitaxel in our chemoradiotherapy protocol using GnP was 100 mg/m2 with gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to a total dose of 50.4 Gy per 28 fractions for patients with localized PDAC.

Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel in Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Due to the availability of effective combination chemotherapies such as gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GNP) or FOLFIRINOX, neoadjuvant treatment of borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) has been increasingly investigated in recent years. However, due to toxicity, FOLFIRINOX is only available for selected patients and data on GNP are scarce. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis, which is to our knowledge the first addressing this question, is to evaluate the value of GNP in patients with BRPC and LAPC. We provide a comprehensive overview on data of 21 studies, comprising 950 patients treated with neoadjuvant GNP. The pooled overall and R0 resection rates were 36% and 26%, respectively. Resection rates were higher in BRPC (49%) compared to LAPC (16%). With acceptable toxicity and a median overall survival rate ranging from 12 to 30 months, neoadjuvant GNP has considerable value in this setting, with more prospective trials being warranted.

Abstract

Therapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GNP) is the most commonly used palliative chemotherapy, but its advantage in the neoadjuvant setting remains unclear. Accordingly, our aim is to evaluate the impact of first-line neoadjuvant therapy with GNP in patients with borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). A systematic search for published studies until August 2020 was performed. The primary endpoint included resection and R0 resection rates in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints were response rate, survival and toxicity. Among 21 studies, 950 patients who received neoadjuvant GNP were evaluated. Treatment with GNP resulted in surgical resection and R0 resection rates as follows: 49% (95% CI 30–68%) and 36% (95% CI 17–58%) for BRPC and 16% (95% CI 7–26%) and 11% (95% CI 5–19%) for LAPC, respectively. The objective response rates and the median overall survival (mOS) ranged from 0 to 67% and 12 to 30 months, respectively. Neutropenia (range 5–77%) and neuropathy (range 0–22%) were the most commonly reported grade 3 to 4 adverse events. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with GNP can be performed safely and with valuable effects in patients with BRPC and LAPC. The utility of GNP in comparison to FOLFIRINOX in the neoadjuvant setting requires further investigation in prospective randomized trials.

Advances and challenges of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer has been becoming the second cause of cancer death in the western world, and its disease burden has increased. Neoadjuvant therapy is one of the current research hotspots in the field of pancreatic cancer, aiming to improve the surgical rate and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Based on the latest evidence, this review discussed neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer from the following three aspects: patient selection, protocols selection of neoadjuvant therapy, and treatment response evaluation and resectability prediction. A big controversy existed on the indications of neoadjuvant treatment, but it was agreed that any patient who is likely to achieve R0 resection due to neoadjuvant therapy should be the targeted population. A variety of chemotherapy regimens were tried for neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer, and FOLFIRINOX and Nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine are two preferred regimens at present. It was challenging to evaluate treatment response and predict resectability after neoadjuvant therapy, although imaging by CT is widely used. Based on new findings of the remarkable performance of several chemotherapy regimens with or without radiotherapy, the neoadjuvant indications of pancreatic cancer have extended in recent years. However, it is still a challenge to assess the neoadjuvant treatment response and determine the timing of surgery.

The clinical impact of splenic artery ligation on the occurrence of digestive varices after pancreaticoduodenectomy with combined portal vein resection: a retrospective study in two institutes

PURPOSE

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) concomitant with portal vein resection (PVR) often develops into digestive varices with an occurrence rate of 30-50%, and the variceal bleeding is sometimes untreatable and results in fatality. Against this issue, splenic artery (SpA) ligation during PD-PVR is emerging as an easy and effective prophylactic surgical option. The aim of this study was to investigate the significance of SpA ligation in the development of digestive varices in patients undergoing PD-PVR.

METHOD

We retrospectively investigated 97 patients with PDAC who received PD-PVR in two hospitals. Vascular reconstruction of the splenic vein (SpV) was not performed in either hospital. We assessed the occurrence rate of digestive varices in these patients in association with the performance of SpA ligation.

RESULTS

The occurrence rate of digestive varices was 23%. SpA ligation was the only significant decreasing factor for the development of digestive varices (odds ratio 0.3, p = 0.035). Although SpV resection was not a significant risk factor for the development of digestive varices in all patients, SpV resection was a significant risk factor for the development of digestive varices in patients without SpA ligation, as demonstrated in previous reports. SpA ligation did not increase surgical complications or impair pancreatic function.

CONCLUSION

PD-PVR surgery was accompanied by a 23% incidence of digestive varices, and SpA ligation significantly decreased the development of digestive varices without causing clinically significant complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

No. 18196 (Osaka International Cancer Institute) and no. 19006 (National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital).

Clinical implications of the serum CA19-9 level in "biological borderline resectability" and "biological downstaging" in the setting of preoperative chemoradiation therapy for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Biological factors are emphasized in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC), and CA19-9 is an important factor for biological borderline resectability (b-BR). The aim of this study was to investigate the cut-off value of CA19-9 for biological borderline resectability and "biological downstaging" in chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

A total of 407 patients with anatomically resectable PC (a-R) and BRPC (a-BR) received preoperative gemcitabine-based CRT. The b-BR was determined, according to the CA19-9 value prior to preoperative CRT (pre-CA19-9), as the subgroup of a-R cases in which the survival was comparable with that in a-BR cases. "Biological downstaging" was determined based on prognostic analyses regarding the CA19-9 value after preoperative CRT (post-CA19-9) in association with the survival of R cases (a-R cases without the b-BR factor).

RESULTS

The 5-year survival of a-R patients with pre-CA19-9 > 120 U/mL was comparable with that of a-BR patients (44% vs 34%, p = 0.082). The survival of b-BR patients with post-CRT CA19-9 ≤ 37 U/mL (normalized) was comparably favorable with that of R patients (56% vs 65%, p = 0.369). The incidence of distant recurrence was higher in b-BR patients without post-CA19-9 normalization than in those with post-CA19-9 normalization (70% vs 50%, p = 0.003), while the incidence of local recurrence was comparable between these two groups (12% vs 13%, p = 0.986).

CONCLUSIONS

Biological BRPC was determined to be an anatomically resectable disease with pre-CA19-9 > 120 U/mL, and post-CA19-9 normalization indicated "biological downstaging" in b-BR in the preoperative CRT strategy.

Neoadjuvant Treatment in Pancreatic Cancer

Thanks to the development of modern chemotherapeutic regimens, survival after surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has improved and pancreatologists worldwide agree that the treatment of PDAC demands a multidisciplinary approach. Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) plays a major role in the treatment of PDAC since only about 20% of patients are considered resectable at the time of diagnosis. Moreover, increasing data demonstrating the benefits of NAT for borderline resectable/locally advanced PDAC are driving a shift from up-front surgery to NAT in the multidisciplinary treatment of even resectable PDAC. Our understanding of the role of NAT in PDAC has evolved from tumor shrinkage to controlling potential micrometastases and selecting patients who may benefit from radical resection. The present review gives an overview on the current literature of NAT concepts for BR/LA PDAC and resectable PDAC.

Nanotechnology in Radiation Oncology

Nanotechnology has made remarkable contributions to clinical oncology. Nanotherapeutics and diagnostic tools have distinctive characteristics which allow them superior abilities to deliver therapeutics and imaging agents for radiation oncology. Compared to solid biopsies and imaging, the analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) offers a more rapid, real-time, and less invasive method to monitor the dynamic molecular profiles of tumors. The potential of CTCs to be translated as a novel cancer biomarker has been demonstrated in numerous clinical studies. This review will discuss clinical applications of nanomaterials in radiation oncology and the implication of CTCs in cancer detection and monitoring.

Pathological complete response (pCR) with or without the residual intraductal carcinoma component following preoperative treatment for pancreatic cancer: Revisiting the definition of "pCR" from the prognostic standpoint

BACKGROUND AND AIM

There are no previous reports describing the prognostic significance of the residual intraductal carcinoma component (carcinoma in situ [CIS]) following preoperative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic significance of a minimal residual CIS in cases with complete absence of an invasive component after preoperative treatment for PDAC.

METHODS

Eighty-one of 594 PDAC patients with preoperative treatment and subsequent surgery in our institute showed remarkable remission in the invasive component, which included 48 patients with the minimal residual invasive component (Min-inv group) and 33 with absence of an invasive component (No-inv group). We assessed the survival of these patients in association with the presence or absence of an invasive component and intraductal CIS.

RESULTS

Five-year overall survival in the No-inv group patients was significantly better than that of the Min-inv group patients (82%/66%, P = .041). Among the 33 patients in the No-inv group, residual CIS was observed in 16 patients (CIS-positive group), and the remaining 17 patients had no residual CIS (CIS-negative group). There was no significant difference in survival between patients in the CIS-positive and CIS-negative groups (92%/78%, P = .31).

CONCLUSIONS

Residual CIS in the absence of an invasive component after preoperative treatment does not yield a prognostic impact after receiving perioperative treatment for PDAC. It might be reasonable to define pathological complete response (pCR) from the prognostic standpoint as follows: pCR is the complete absence of an invasive carcinoma component regardless of residual CIS.