Comparison between mucinous cystic neoplasm and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the branch duct type of the pancreas with respect to expression of CD10 and cytokeratin 20

Expression of CD117, CK17, CK20, MUC4, villin and mismatch repair deficiency in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

Among pancreatic intraductal papillary neoplasms, gastric, intestinal, and pancreatobiliary intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm (IOPN), and intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) have been defined, differing regarding association with invasive carcinoma and prognosis. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) can help in the distinction of these neoplasms, but a proportion is unclassifiable using recommended markers. Hence, additional markers useful for the typing of pancreatic intraductal papillary neoplasms are needed. The reported frequencies of the different types of IPMNs in surgical series vary to some extent, and such data based on Danish patients are currently lacking. Besides, the role of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in these neoplasms has not been fully elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the frequency of different types of pancreatic intraductal papillary neoplasms in a Danish cohort. Furthermore, we aimed to examine the utility of CD117, CK17, CK20, MUC4, and villin as markers for their distinction, in addition to the recommended markers MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6 and CDX2, and to evaluate the frequency of MMR deficiency. We typed 40 consecutively resected pancreatic intraductal papillary neoplasms according to the WHO criteria from 2019. IHC for CD117, CDX2, CK17, CK20, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUC1 (H23), MUC1 (Ma695), MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC, MUC6, PMS2, and villin was performed and evaluated using a five-tiered semiquantitative scale. A subset of the tumours was examined with PCR for microsatellite instability (MSI). Most tumours were intestinal (40 %) and gastric (40 %) IPMNs, followed by pancreatobiliary (17 %) IPMNs and IOPN (3 %). All cases were MMR proficient. We found a higher expression of MUC4, CK20 and villin in intestinal compared to gastric IPMNs (p < 0.01, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). MUC4 was more strongly expressed in intestinal compared to pancreatobiliary IPMNs, while the opposite was found for CK17 (p < 0.05 and p < 0.05). IOPN showed strong CD117 expression (score 4), while all gastric IPMNs were negative and 50 % and 29 % of intestinal and pancreatobiliary IPMNs only showed weak expression (score 1). Our data suggest that CK20, MUC4 and villin may aid in the identification of intestinal IPMNs, while CK17 and CD117 may aid in the identification of pancreatobiliary IPMNs and IOPN, in some cases. However, additional studies evaluating these markers in pancreatic intraductal papillary neoplasms are needed.

CD10 is useful to identify gastrointestinal contamination in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology is an effective tool to diagnose pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). Standard morphological criteria are usually reliable. When contaminating gastrointestinal (GI) epithelial cells are prevalent among neoplastic cells, these can be highlighted by carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) staining. CD10 is a cell-surface metallopeptidase normally expressed by the GI epithelial apical border, whose expression is decreased or lost in PDA. We included CD10 in a panel, together with CEA, to discriminate the GI contaminant cells from PDA cells on cell blocks.

METHODS

Eight cases of EUS-FNA of PDA, featuring both contaminating GI cells and neoplastic cells, whose corresponding cell blocks were available for immunostaining, were selected. CD10 and CEA were stained on cell blocks by standard methods.

RESULTS

CD10 strongly labelled only the GI cells, with a well-defined apical membrane signal; conversely, GI cells did not show CEA staining; benign duodenal cells were faintly labelled in only one case. Malignant cells were positive for CEA and negative for CD10, with the exception of one case with labelled neoplastic cells with weak diffuse cytoplasmic positivity. CD10 apical membrane staining was a feature only seen in benign GI cells.

CONCLUSIONS

As a loss of CD10 is a consistent feature of PDA, this marker can be useful, together with CEA, to aid the cytopathologist to identify neoplastic cells in a background rich in GI contaminant cells.

Pancreatic mucinous cystic tumor in Turner syndrome: How a tumor bends to a genetic disease

INTRODUCTION

Mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) are uncommon tumors of the pancreatic corpus/tail occurring mostly in middle-aged women, with a variable clinico-biological behavior. On histology, MCNs concurrently show an epithelial mucosecreting component with ovarian-type stromal cells.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

This report describes the first case of a pancreatic MCN with no ovarian-type stroma in a patient with Turner syndrome (TS).

DISCUSSION

The mesenchymal component of MCN presumably results from the intra-pancreatic entrapment of ovarian stroma during embryogenesis. In our case, the absence of such stromal component may relate to the "dysgenetic" changes in the ovary involved in TS.

CONCLUSION

The present case of primary pancreatic MCN arising in a TS-patient triggers some original speculation on the morphogenesis of pancreatic MCN, also expanding the current clinico-pathological knowledge of this extremely rare entity.

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: an update

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is a cystic tumor of the pancreas. The etiology is unknown, but increasing evidence suggests the involvement of several tumorigenesis pathways, including an association with hereditary syndromes. IPMN occurs more commonly in men, with the mean age at diagnosis between 64 and 67 years old. At the time of diagnosis, it may be benign, with or without dysplasia, or frankly malignant with an invasive carcinoma. Tumors arising from the main pancreatic duct are termed main-duct IPMNs, those involving the branch ducts, branch-duct IPMNs. In general, small branch-duct IPMNs are benign, particularly in asymptomatic patients, and can be safely followed. In contrast, main-duct tumors should be surgically resected and examined carefully for an invasive component. In the absence of invasion, patient's survival is excellent, from 94 to 100%. For patients with an IPMN-associated invasive carcinoma, the prognosis overall is better than those with a de novo pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, with a 5-year survival of 40% to 60% in some series. However, no survival advantage can be demonstrated if the invasive component in an IPMN patient is that of the conventional tubular type (versus mucinous carcinoma). Several histomorphologic variants are recognized, although the clinical significance of this "subtyping" is not well defined.

[Precursor lesions of pancreatobiliary cancer]

Precursor lesions of pancreatobiliary cancer can be divided into cystic and flat lesions. Mucinous cystic neoplasm and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) comprise the cystic precursors in the pancreas, while intraductal papillary neoplasm (IPN) represents their counterpart in the bile duct system. There is an adenoma-carcinoma sequence in the cystic precursors arising from four different types of epithelia: pancreatobiliary, oncocytic, intestinal and gastric. These subtypes of IPMN/IPN are morphologically and immunohistochemically well characterised and show clinical and prognostic relevance: the gastric subtype is associated with the best prognosis, followed by the oncocytic and intestinal subtypes, while the pancreatobiliary subtype is characterized by adverse clinical behaviour. Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) and biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (BilIN) represent the flat precursors. PanIN are morphologically and biologically well defined. PanIN with lobulocentric atrophy has recently been described as a putative precursor of pancreatic cancer. Despite well defined morphological features in BilIN, the molecular alterations seen during early tumor progression in the biliary tract are poorly understood.

Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the liver: a clinicopathological study and comparison with intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct

Mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver has been a controversial entity, in particular, regarding differentiation from intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct. In this study, we compared the characteristics of hepatic mucinous cystic neoplasms with ovarian-like stroma (n=29) to those of cyst-forming intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct (n=12). Radiological or macroscopic appearance, histological grade of malignancy, and postoperative clinical course were recorded. Immunohistochemistry for biliary or gastrointestinal markers was performed to characterize cell phenotypes. The patients with hepatic mucinous cystic neoplasm were all female and ranged in age from 21 to 67 years, which was significantly younger than that in the patients with biliary intraductal papillary neoplasm. Eighteen mucinous cystic neoplasms (76%) were located in the left lobe, with 13 (54%) in segment IV. Mucinous cystic neoplasms were significantly larger than intraductal papillary neoplasms (median diameter: 110 vs 50 mm, P=0.008). In contrast to intraductal papillary neoplasms that were all histologically malignant, 26 mucinous cystic neoplasms (90%) were adenomas, 2 (7%) were borderline malignant, and 1 (3%) was a carcinoma in situ. Benign mucinous cystadenomas had the pure biliary immunophenotype, whereas gastrointestinal markers including cytokeratin 20 and mucin core proteins 2, 5AC, and 6 were more frequently expressed in borderline or malignant mucinous cystic neoplasms and biliary intraductal papillary neoplasms. There was no mortality in the patients with mucinous cystic neoplasm, whereas one patient with intraductal papillary neoplasm died of cancer. In conclusion, hepatic mucinous cystic neoplasms and biliary intraductal papillary neoplasms have different clinicopathological characteristics as evidenced by differences in the age and gender of patients, macroscopic appearance, immunophenotypes, and grades of malignancy.

CD44 expression is related to poor prognosis of hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

CONCLUSIONS

CD44 expression in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) is closely associated with poor prognosis for patients. CD44 may serve as a prognostic marker for hypopharyngeal SCCs.

OBJECTIVES

CD44, an adhesion molecule binding to extracellular matrix, is believed to participate in the progression of malignancies. To clarify the role of CD44 in the progression of hypopharyngeal SCCs, we examined CD44 expression in relation to clinical parameters in hypopharyngeal SCCs.

METHODS

Biopsy specimens of hypopharyngeal SCCs were collected from 40 untreated patients, and their CD44 expression was examined immunohistochemically. Hypopharyngeal SCCs were classified into two groups: CD44-low SCCs comprising < 50% CD44-positive tumor cells and CD44-high SCCs comprising ≥ 50% CD44-positive tumor cells. The relation between CD44 expression and various parameters (clinical T and N stages, distant metastasis, and pathological T and N stages) was analyzed by Fisher's exact test. The relation between CD44 expression and the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was also analyzed by log rank test.

RESULTS

The CD44 expression in hypopharyngeal SCCs was related to pathological N stage, but not to clinical T and N stages and pathological T stage, of the patients. Distant metastasis during the follow-up occurred more frequently in patients with CD44-high SCCs than those with CD44-low SCCs. The 5-year DFS was significantly lower in the former than in the latter.

Concomitant adenocarcinoma and colonic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in a patient with ulcerative colitis: a case report and molecular analysis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) complicated by colonic lymphoma is rare, although UC is often accompanied by adenocarcinoma of the colon. A concurrent existence of adenocarcinoma and lymphoma in a patient with UC is extremely rare, and has not yet been analyzed at the molecular level. We report a 64-year-old female patient with concomitant adenocarcinoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the colon of UC. The genetic changes in these two neoplasms were analyzed. The colon adenocarcinomas had a mutation in MSH6 gene, DNA methylation in CDKN2A gene, and increased microsatellite instability (MSI), although these genetic changes were not recognized in either DLBCL or non-neoplastic UC mucosa. The DLBCL was diagnosed as primary colonic lymphoma, and confirmed Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. The adenocarcinomas and the non-neoplastic UC mucosa were EBV-negative. Our case presented here clearly shows that the development of adenocarcinoma and lymphoma in the colon with UC was caused by individual mechanisms.

Preferential expression of MUC6 in oncocytic and pancreatobiliary types of intraductal papillary neoplasms highlights a pyloropancreatic pathway, distinct from the intestinal pathway, in pancreatic carcinogenesis

The expression of different MUC glycoproteins has helped define cellular lineage in variety of pancreatic neoplasms, and has helped identify distinct carcinogenic pathways such as the intestinal pathway characterized by diffuse/strong MUC2/CDX2 expression in intestinal-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and their associated colloid carcinomas (CCs). In this study, the expression profile of MUC6, a pyloric-type mucin, was investigated in both preinvasive and invasive pancreatic neoplasia. Florid papillary ("in-situ") components of 9 intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms (IOPNs), 24 IPMNs, and 7 mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs), were analyzed immunohistochemically for MUC6 expression, as were 15 PanINs, 112 usual invasive ductal adenocarcinomas (DAs), and 14 CCs. In PanINs, MUC6 expression was limited to the very early areas of PanIN-1A that typically have pyloric features. Expression was lost in later stages. Similarly, in IOPNs or IPMNs or MCNs, MUC6 expression was detectable in the cystic or flat areas that have pyloric-like histology. However, in the more advanced (papillary) components of these neoplasms, MUC6 expression was mostly limited to the "cuboidal-cell" but was not seen in the "columnar-cell" phenotype: there was diffuse or strong expression in 8/9 IOPN and, relatively weaker but consistent expression in all 6/6 pancreatobiliary-type IPMNs; whereas virtually no expression in villous or intestinal-type IPMNs. The 7/8 gastric or foveolar-type IPMNs were also negative; in the single case with positivity, the labeling was limited to high-grade dysplastic areas. Interestingly, the papillae in MCNs were also mostly negative. Among invasive carcinomas, 39/112 DAs and only 1/14 CC expressed MUC6. In DA, the expression did not correlate with survival (P=0.94), or any of the markers of aggressiveness: more than 2-cm tumor size (P=0.76), positive surgical margins (P=0.27), lymph node metastasis (P=0.82), or high grade (P=0.08).

IN CONCLUSION

(1) The expression of MUC6 in oncocytic and pancreatobiliary-type neoplasms but not in villous or intestinal-type neoplasms supports the presence of a pyloropancreatic pathway distinct from the MUC2/CDX2 expressing intestinal pathway in intraductal papillary neoplasia. (2) MUC6 expression is present in the earliest (nonpapillary) form of any type of preinvasive neoplasia regardless of whether it is PanIN or IOPN or IPMN or MCN suggesting that these entities may share some characteristics early on, but evolve along divergent pathways as they progress.

Comparison between colorectal low- and high-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma with MUC1 and MUC5AC

AIM: To explore useful prognostic factors for mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) in the colon and rectum.

METHODS: MAC was divided into low- and high-grade types based on the degree of structural differentiation; low-grade MAC arisen from well to moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma and papillary carcinoma, and high-grade MAC from poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and signet ring cell carcinoma. Immunohistochemically, the expression of 2 types of MUC1 (MUC1/DF and MUC1/CORE), MUC2, 2 types of MUC5AC (MUC5AC/CHL2 and HGM), MUC6, CDX2, and CD10 was examined in 16 cases of MAC consisting of 6 low- and 10 high-grade types.

RESULTS: MUC1/DF3 was expressed in 3 of 6 low-grade MAC (50%) and 10 of 10 high-grade MAC (100%). MUC1/CORE was expressed in 1 of 6 low-grade MAC (16.7%) and 7 of 10 high-grade MAC (70%). MUC2 was expressed in all MAC regardless of the grade. MUC5AC was expressed in 6 of 6 low-grade MAC (100%) and 4 of 10 high-grade MAC (40%). HGM was expressed in 5 of 6 low-grade MAC (83.3%) and 6 of 10 high-grade MAC (60%). Expression of MUC6 and CD10 was undetected in all MAC regardless of the grade. CDX2 was expressed in 5 of 6 low-grade MAC (83.3%) and 7 of 10 high-grade MAC (70%). Taken together, MUC1/DF3 was expressed significantly more frequently in high-grade MAC than in low-grade, and MUC5AC/CHL2 was expressed significantly more frequently in low-grade MAC than in high-grade.

CONCLUSION: It is proposed that MUC1/DF3 and MUC5AC/CHL2 immunostaining is useful to discriminate high-grade MAC from low-grade MAC.