1
|
Gogola-Mruk J, Pietrus M, Piechowicz M, Milian-Ciesielska K, Głód P, Wolnicka-Glubisz A, Szpor J, Ptak A. Low androgen/progesterone or high oestrogen/androgen receptors ratio in serous ovarian cancer predicts longer survival. Reprod Biol 2024; 24:100917. [PMID: 38970978 DOI: 10.1016/j.repbio.2024.100917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
The treatment of ovarian cancer (OC) remains one of the greatest challenges in gynaecological oncology. The presence of classic steroid receptors in OC makes hormone therapy an attractive option; however, the response of OC to hormone therapy is modest. Here, we compared the expression patterns of progesterone (PGR), androgen (AR) and oestrogen alpha (ERα) receptors between serous OC cell lines and non-cancer ovarian cells. These data were analysed in relation to steroid receptor expression profiles from patient tumour samples and survival outcomes using a bioinformatics approach. The results showed that ERα, PGR and AR were co-expressed in OC cell lines, and patient samples from high-grade and low-grade OC co-expressed at least two steroid receptors. High AR expression was negatively correlated, whereas ERα and PGR expression was positively correlated with patient survival. AR showed the opposite expression pattern to that of ERα and PGR in type 1 (SKOV-3) and 2 (OVCAR-3) OC cell lines compared with non-cancer (HOSEpiC) ovarian cells, with AR downregulated in type 1 and upregulated in type 2 OC. A low AR/PGR ratio and a high ESR1/AR ratio were associated with favourable survival outcomes in OC compared with other receptor ratios. Although the results must be interpreted with caution because of the small number of primary tumour samples analysed, they nevertheless suggest that the evaluation of ERα, AR and PGR by immunohistochemistry should be performed in patient biological material to plan future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justyna Gogola-Mruk
- Laboratory of Physiology and Toxicology of Reproduction, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Jagiellonian University, Krakow 30-387, Poland
| | - Miłosz Pietrus
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków 31-501, Poland
| | - Maryla Piechowicz
- Department of Biophysics and Cancer Biology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow 30-387, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Milian-Ciesielska
- Department of Pathomorphology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow 31-531, Poland
| | - Paulina Głód
- Laboratory of Physiology and Toxicology of Reproduction, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Jagiellonian University, Krakow 30-387, Poland; Doctoral School of Exact and Natural Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Kracow 30-348, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Wolnicka-Glubisz
- Department of Biophysics and Cancer Biology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow 30-387, Poland
| | - Joanna Szpor
- Department of Pathomorphology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow 31-531, Poland
| | - Anna Ptak
- Laboratory of Physiology and Toxicology of Reproduction, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Jagiellonian University, Krakow 30-387, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nagase S, Saeki H, Ura A, Terao Y, Matsumoto T, Yao T. Mixed Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell Carcinoma, and Endometrioid Carcinoma Arising from an Endometriotic Cyst. Int J Surg Pathol 2024; 32:1140-1148. [PMID: 37994045 DOI: 10.1177/10668969231213390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma is a rare neoplasm of the uterine corpus and ovary. Unlike prototypical mesonephric adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix, which is considered of Wolffian origin, recent evidence suggests that mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma is a Mullerian tumor associated with endometriosis. We report here on a 48-year-old woman with a mixed carcinoma of the ovary that consisted of mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, and endometrioid carcinoma, arising from an endometriotic cyst. The mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma consisted of cuboidal cells with vesicular nuclei presenting with a tubular, ductal, papillary, and solid architecture forming nodules. Each component showed distinct immunophenotypes that were consistent with their morphology. The mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma showed diffuse positive staining for paired box 8 and GATA binding protein 3, and negative staining for estrogen and progesterone receptors. A p53 stain exhibited wild-type immunoreactivity. A complete loss of AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (ARID1A) expression was suggestive of an ARID1A mutation. Manual macrodissection and Sanger sequencing revealed identical KRAS and PIK3CA mutations in all three components. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma combined with a clear cell carcinoma and endometrioid carcinoma, which supports the hypothesis that mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma is an endometriosis-associated neoplasm. The report also highlights a potential pitfall in diagnosing mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma combined with clear cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunsuke Nagase
- Department of Human Pathology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Harumi Saeki
- Department of Human Pathology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ayako Ura
- Department of Human Pathology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Terao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiharu Matsumoto
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Juntendo Nerima Hospital Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Yao
- Department of Human Pathology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moss E, Taylor A, Andreou A, Ang C, Arora R, Attygalle A, Banerjee S, Bowen R, Buckley L, Burbos N, Coleridge S, Edmondson R, El-Bahrawy M, Fotopoulou C, Frost J, Ganesan R, George A, Hanna L, Kaur B, Manchanda R, Maxwell H, Michael A, Miles T, Newton C, Nicum S, Ratnavelu N, Ryan N, Sundar S, Vroobel K, Walther A, Wong J, Morrison J. British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) ovarian, tubal and primary peritoneal cancer guidelines: Recommendations for practice update 2024. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 300:69-123. [PMID: 39002401 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Moss
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | | | - Adrian Andreou
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Christine Ang
- Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead, UK
| | - Rupali Arora
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College London NHS Trust, 60 Whitfield Street, London W1T 4E, UK
| | | | | | - Rebecca Bowen
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Lynn Buckley
- Beverley Counselling & Psychotherapy, 114 Holme Church Lane, Beverley, East Yorkshire HU17 0PY, UK
| | - Nikos Burbos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK
| | | | - Richard Edmondson
- Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester and University of Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Mona El-Bahrawy
- Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK
| | | | - Jonathan Frost
- Gynaecological Oncology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath, Bath BA1 3NG, UK; University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Raji Ganesan
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK
| | | | - Louise Hanna
- Department of Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Whitchurch, Cardiff CF14 2TL, UK
| | - Baljeet Kaur
- North West London Pathology (NWLP), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London and Barts Health NHS Trust, UK
| | - Hillary Maxwell
- Dorset County Hospital, Williams Avenue, Dorchester, Dorset DT1 2JY, UK
| | - Agnieszka Michael
- Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX and University of Surrey, School of Biosciences, GU2 7WG, UK
| | - Tracey Miles
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Claire Newton
- Gynaecology Oncology Department, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 3NU, UK
| | - Shibani Nicum
- Department of Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | | | - Neil Ryan
- The Centre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair (IRR), 4-5 Little France Drive, Edinburgh BioQuarter City, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK
| | - Sudha Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham and Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK
| | - Katherine Vroobel
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Marsden Foundation NHS Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Axel Walther
- Bristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Jason Wong
- Department of Histopathology, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich Hospital, Heath Road, Ipswich IP4 5PD, UK
| | - Jo Morrison
- University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, GRACE Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton TA1 5DA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fawzy MS, Ibrahiem AT, Osman DM, Almars AI, Alshammari MS, Almazyad LT, Almatrafi NDA, Almazyad RT, Toraih EA. Angio-Long Noncoding RNA MALAT1 (rs3200401) and MIAT (rs1061540) Gene Variants in Ovarian Cancer. EPIGENOMES 2024; 8:5. [PMID: 38390896 PMCID: PMC10885055 DOI: 10.3390/epigenomes8010005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The genotyping of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA)-related single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) could be associated with cancer risk and/or progression. This study aimed to analyze the angiogenesis-related lncRNAs MALAT1 (rs3200401) and MIAT (rs1061540) variants in patients with ovarian cancer (OC) using "Real-Time allelic discrimination polymerase chain reaction" in 182 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of benign, borderline, and primary malignant ovarian tissues. Differences in the genotype frequencies between low-grade ovarian epithelial tumors (benign/borderline) and malignant tumors and between high-grade malignant epithelial tumors and malignant epithelial tumors other than high-grade serous carcinomas were compared. Odds ratios (ORs)/95% confidence intervals were calculated as measures of the association strength. Additionally, associations of the genotypes with the available pathological data were analyzed. The heterozygosity of MALAT1 rs3200401 was the most common genotype (47.8%), followed by C/C (36.3%). Comparing the study groups, no significant differences were observed regarding this variant. In contrast, the malignant epithelial tumors had a higher frequency of the MIAT rs1061540 C/C genotype compared to the low-grade epithelial tumor cohorts (56.7% vs. 37.6, p = 0.031). The same genotype was significantly higher in high-grade serous carcinoma than its counterparts (69.4% vs. 43.8%, p = 0.038). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the age at diagnosis was significantly associated with the risk of OC development. In contrast, the MIAT T/T genotype was associated with a low risk of malignant epithelial tumors under the homozygote comparison model (OR = 0.37 (0.16-0.83), p = 0.017). Also, MIAT T allele carriers were less likely to develop high-grade serous carcinoma under heterozygote (CT vs. CC; OR = 0.33 (0.12-0.88), p = 0.027) and homozygote (TT vs. CC; OR = 0.26 (0.07-0.90), p = 0.034) comparison models. In conclusion, our data provide novel evidence for a potential association between the lncRNA MIAT rs1061540 and the malignant condition of ovarian cancer, suggesting the involvement of such lncRNAs in OC development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manal S Fawzy
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Northern Border University, Arar 73213, Saudi Arabia
- Unit of Medical Research and Postgraduate Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Northern Border University, Arar 73213, Saudi Arabia
| | - Afaf T Ibrahiem
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Northern Border University, Arar 73213, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dalia Mohammad Osman
- Department of Medical Laboratories Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Northern Border University, Arar 73213, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amany I Almars
- Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
- Hematology Research Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | | | - Renad Tariq Almazyad
- Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Northern Border University, Arar 73213, Saudi Arabia
| | - Eman A Toraih
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parkash V, Aisagbonhi O, Riddle N, Siddon A, Panse G, Fadare O. Recent Advances in the Classification of Gynecological Tract Tumors: Updates From the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization "Blue Book". Arch Pathol Lab Med 2023; 147:1204-1216. [PMID: 36596270 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0166-ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— The World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Female Genital Tract Tumors, 5th edition, published in September 2020, comes 6 years after the 4th edition, and reflects the monumental leaps made in knowledge about the biology of gynecological tumors. Major changes include revised criteria for the assignment of the site of origin of ovarian and fallopian tube tumors, a revision in the classification of squamous and glandular lesions of the lower genital tract based on human papillomavirus association, and an entire chapter devoted to genetic tumor syndromes. This article highlights the changes in the 5th edition relative to the 4th edition, with a focus on areas of value to routine clinical practice. OBJECTIVE.— To provide a comprehensive update on the World Health Organization classification of gynecological tumors, highlighting in particular updated diagnostic criteria and terminology. DATA SOURCES.— The 4th and 5th editions of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. CONCLUSIONS.— The World Health Organization has made several changes in the 5th edition of the update on female genital tumors. Awareness of the changes is needed for pathologists' translation into contemporary practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinita Parkash
- From the Department of Pathology (Parkash, Siddon, Panse), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Omonigho Aisagbonhi
- Department of Pathology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California (Aisagbonhi, Fadare)
| | - Nicole Riddle
- The Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Ruffolo, Hooper, and Associates, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida (Riddle, Siddon)
| | - Alexa Siddon
- From the Department of Pathology (Parkash, Siddon, Panse), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Laboratory Medicine (Siddon), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- The Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Ruffolo, Hooper, and Associates, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida (Riddle, Siddon)
| | - Gauri Panse
- From the Department of Pathology (Parkash, Siddon, Panse), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- The Department of Dermatology (Panse), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Oluwole Fadare
- Department of Pathology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California (Aisagbonhi, Fadare)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Talia KL, McCluggage WG. The diverse morphology and immunophenotype of ovarian endometrioid carcinomas. Pathology 2023; 55:269-286. [PMID: 36759286 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2023.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Endometrioid carcinoma (EC) accounts for approximately 10-12% of ovarian epithelial malignancies but compared to its relative frequency, results in a disproportionate number of diagnostically difficult cases with potential for misdiagnosis. In this review the protean and diverse morphologies of ovarian EC are discussed, including 'metaplastic' changes, EC with spindle cell differentiation/corded and hyalinised features and EC with sex cord-like formations. The propensity for 'transdifferentiation' in ovarian ECs is also discussed, one example being the association with a somatically derived yolk sac tumour. Although immunohistochemistry may be extremely useful in diagnosing EC and in distinguishing between EC and other ovarian epithelial malignancies, metastatic neoplasms and sex cord-stromal tumours, this review also discusses the propensity for ovarian EC to exhibit an aberrant immunophenotype which may compound diagnostic uncertainty. The genomic characteristics of these tumours and the recent 'incorporation' of seromucinous carcinoma into the EC category are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen L Talia
- Royal Children's Hospital, Royal Women's Hospital and Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gilks CB, Selinger CI, Davidson B, Köbel M, Ledermann JA, Lim D, Malpica A, Mikami Y, Singh N, Srinivasan R, Vang R, Lax SF, McCluggage WG. Data Set for the Reporting of Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:S119-S142. [PMID: 36305537 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The move toward consistent and comprehensive surgical pathology reports for cancer resection specimens has been a key development in supporting evidence-based patient management and consistent cancer staging. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) previously developed a data set for reporting of the ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal carcinomas which was published in 2015. In this paper, we provide an update on this data set, as a second edition, that reflects changes in the 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Female Genital Tumours as well as some other minor modifications. The data set has been developed by a panel of internationally recognized expert pathologists and a clinician and consists of "core" and "noncore" elements to be included in surgical pathology reports, with detailed commentary to guide users, including references. This data set replaces the widely used first edition, and will facilitate consistent and accurate case reporting, data collection for quality assurance and research, and allow for comparison of epidemiological and pathologic parameters between different populations.
Collapse
|
8
|
McCluggage WG. Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma of the Female Genital Tract: From Morphologic Observations to a Well-characterized Carcinoma With Aggressive Clinical Behavior. Adv Anat Pathol 2022; 29:208-216. [PMID: 35384888 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) was introduced as a new tumor type in the endometrium and the ovary in the 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification. This is a rare recently described (2016) and clinically aggressive carcinoma with a propensity for distant spread, especially to the lungs. MLA has a characteristic morphology and immunophenotype (hormone receptor negative; TTF1 and/or GATA3 positive). These neoplasms are commonly associated with KRAS and PIK3CA mutations and in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) molecular classification of endometrial carcinomas fall into the copy number low/no specific molecular profile category. Although they show significant morphological, immunophenotypic and molecular overlap with cervical mesonephric adenocarcinomas, there are other parameters which suggest a Mullerian origin and, as such, the term MLA seems apt. MLA can be added to the list of endometriosis-associated ovarian neoplasms. In this paper, I outline the series of events which lead to the first description of MLA and review the subsequent literature on this tumor type which has expanded on the morphologic features and immunophenotype, discovered the molecular underpinnings and elucidated the clinical behavior. The discovery of MLA represents an example of "new" entities still to this day being discovered through careful morphologic observations and referral of cases for specialist opinion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wu L, Shi S, Sun H, Zhang H. Tumor Size Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Stage I Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study of 1,000 Patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:862944. [PMID: 35651798 PMCID: PMC9149085 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.862944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value and stratification cutoff point for tumor size in stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC). Methods This was a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (version: SEER 8.3.9). Patients diagnosed with stage I OCCC from 1988 to 2018 were included for further analysis. X-Tile software was used to identify the potential cutoff point for tumor size. Stratification analysis, propensity score matching, and inverse probability weighting analysis were used to balance the potential confounding factors. Results A total of 1,000 stage I OCCC patients were included. Of these 1,000 patients, median follow-up was 106 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89-112 months). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size, age at diagnosis, and stage IC were significantly associated with stage I OCCC patients. Eight centimeters is a promising cutoff point that can divide stage I OCCC patients into a good or a poor prognosis group. After controlling potential confounding factors with propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting, we demonstrated that stage I OCCC patients with tumor size ≤ 8 cm enjoyed a significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS, 89.8% vs. 81%, p < 0.0001). Tumor size ≤ 8 cm was an independent prognostic factor of stage I OCCC patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.5608, 95% CI: 0.4126-0.7622, p = 0.0002). Conclusions Tumor size is an independent prognostic factor for stage I OCCC, and 8 cm is a promising cutoff point for tumor size for risk stratification. However, using tumor size in the stratification management of stage I OCCC patients warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hong Sun
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Haiyan Zhang
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kang EY, Millstein J, Popovic G, Meagher NS, Bolithon A, Talhouk A, Chiu DS, Anglesio MS, Leung B, Tang K, Lambie N, Pavanello M, Da-Anoy A, Lambrechts D, Loverix L, Olbrecht S, Bisinotto C, Garcia-Donas J, Ruiz-Llorente S, Yagüe-Fernandez M, Edwards RP, Elishaev E, Olawaiye A, Taylor S, Ataseven B, du Bois A, Harter P, Lester J, Høgdall CK, Armasu SM, Huang Y, Vierkant RA, Wang C, Winham SJ, Heublein S, Kommoss FKF, Cramer DW, Sasamoto N, van-Wagensveld L, Lycke M, Mateoiu C, Joseph J, Pike MC, Odunsi K, Tseng CC, Pearce CL, Bilic S, Conrads TP, Hartmann A, Hein A, Jones ME, Leung Y, Beckmann MW, Ruebner M, Schoemaker MJ, Terry KL, El-Bahrawy MA, Coulson P, Etter JL, LaVigne-Mager K, Andress J, Grube M, Fischer A, Neudeck N, Robertson G, Farrell R, Barlow E, Quinn C, Hettiaratchi A, Casablanca Y, Erber R, Stewart CJR, Tan A, Yu Y, Boros J, Brand AH, Harnett PR, Kennedy CJ, Nevins N, Morgan T, Fasching PA, Vergote I, Swerdlow AJ, Candido Dos Reis FJ, Maxwell GL, Neuhausen SL, Barquin-Garcia A, Modugno F, Moysich KB, Crowe PJ, Hirasawa A, Heitz F, Karlan BY, Goode EL, Sinn P, Horlings HM, Høgdall E, Sundfeldt K, Kommoss S, Staebler A, et alKang EY, Millstein J, Popovic G, Meagher NS, Bolithon A, Talhouk A, Chiu DS, Anglesio MS, Leung B, Tang K, Lambie N, Pavanello M, Da-Anoy A, Lambrechts D, Loverix L, Olbrecht S, Bisinotto C, Garcia-Donas J, Ruiz-Llorente S, Yagüe-Fernandez M, Edwards RP, Elishaev E, Olawaiye A, Taylor S, Ataseven B, du Bois A, Harter P, Lester J, Høgdall CK, Armasu SM, Huang Y, Vierkant RA, Wang C, Winham SJ, Heublein S, Kommoss FKF, Cramer DW, Sasamoto N, van-Wagensveld L, Lycke M, Mateoiu C, Joseph J, Pike MC, Odunsi K, Tseng CC, Pearce CL, Bilic S, Conrads TP, Hartmann A, Hein A, Jones ME, Leung Y, Beckmann MW, Ruebner M, Schoemaker MJ, Terry KL, El-Bahrawy MA, Coulson P, Etter JL, LaVigne-Mager K, Andress J, Grube M, Fischer A, Neudeck N, Robertson G, Farrell R, Barlow E, Quinn C, Hettiaratchi A, Casablanca Y, Erber R, Stewart CJR, Tan A, Yu Y, Boros J, Brand AH, Harnett PR, Kennedy CJ, Nevins N, Morgan T, Fasching PA, Vergote I, Swerdlow AJ, Candido Dos Reis FJ, Maxwell GL, Neuhausen SL, Barquin-Garcia A, Modugno F, Moysich KB, Crowe PJ, Hirasawa A, Heitz F, Karlan BY, Goode EL, Sinn P, Horlings HM, Høgdall E, Sundfeldt K, Kommoss S, Staebler A, Wu AH, Cohen PA, DeFazio A, Lee CH, Steed H, Le ND, Gayther SA, Lawrenson K, Pharoah PDP, Konecny G, Cook LS, Ramus SJ, Kelemen LE, Köbel M. MCM3 is a novel proliferation marker associated with longer survival for patients with tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. Virchows Arch 2022; 480:855-871. [PMID: 34782936 PMCID: PMC9035053 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-021-03232-0] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) are highly proliferative neoplasms that generally respond well to platinum/taxane chemotherapy. We recently identified minichromosome maintenance complex component 3 (MCM3), which is involved in the initiation of DNA replication and proliferation, as a favorable prognostic marker in HGSC. Our objective was to further validate whether MCM3 mRNA expression and possibly MCM3 protein levels are associated with survival in patients with HGSC. MCM3 mRNA expression was measured using NanoString expression profiling on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue (N = 2355 HGSC) and MCM3 protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (N = 522 HGSC) and compared with Ki-67. Kaplan-Meier curves and the Cox proportional hazards model were used to estimate associations with survival. Among chemotherapy-naïve HGSC, higher MCM3 mRNA expression (one standard deviation increase in the score) was associated with longer overall survival (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.92, p < 0.0001, N = 1840) in multivariable analysis. MCM3 mRNA expression was highest in the HGSC C5.PRO molecular subtype, although no interaction was observed between MCM3, survival and molecular subtypes. MCM3 and Ki-67 protein levels were significantly lower after exposure to neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy-naïve tumors: 37.0% versus 46.4% and 22.9% versus 34.2%, respectively. Among chemotherapy-naïve HGSC, high MCM3 protein levels were also associated with significantly longer disease-specific survival (HR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.36-0.74, p = 0.0003, N = 392) compared to cases with low MCM3 protein levels in multivariable analysis. MCM3 immunohistochemistry is a promising surrogate marker of proliferation in HGSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Joshua Millstein
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gordana Popovic
- Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, Stats Central, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicola S Meagher
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Adelyn Bolithon
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Aline Talhouk
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Derek S Chiu
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michael S Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Histopathology/ISH Core Facility, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Betty Leung
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Katrina Tang
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Neil Lambie
- NSW Health Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Marina Pavanello
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Australia
| | - Annalyn Da-Anoy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liselore Loverix
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Siel Olbrecht
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christiani Bisinotto
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Jesus Garcia-Donas
- HM Sanchinarro Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sergio Ruiz-Llorente
- HM Sanchinarro Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Monica Yagüe-Fernandez
- HM Sanchinarro Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Robert P Edwards
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alexander Olawaiye
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sarah Taylor
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte (KEM), Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte (KEM), Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Dr. Horst-Schmidt Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte (KEM), Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Dr. Horst-Schmidt Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Jenny Lester
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Claus K Høgdall
- Department of Gynaecology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sebastian M Armasu
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Yajue Huang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Robert A Vierkant
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sabine Heublein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix K F Kommoss
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel W Cramer
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Naoko Sasamoto
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lilian van-Wagensveld
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maria Lycke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Constantina Mateoiu
- Department of Pathology and Cytology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Janine Joseph
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Malcolm C Pike
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kunle Odunsi
- Department of Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Chiu-Chen Tseng
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Celeste L Pearce
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sanela Bilic
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Australia
| | - Thomas P Conrads
- Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael E Jones
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Yee Leung
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Australia
- Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Minouk J Schoemaker
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Kathryn L Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mona A El-Bahrawy
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Penny Coulson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - John L Etter
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | | | - Juergen Andress
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marcel Grube
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anna Fischer
- Institute of Pathology, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nina Neudeck
- Institute of Pathology, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Greg Robertson
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St George Private Hospital, Kogarah, Australia
| | | | - Ellen Barlow
- Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, Australia
| | - Carmel Quinn
- Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, Stats Central, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Translational Cancer Research Network, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- UNSW Biorepository, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anusha Hettiaratchi
- UNSW Biorepository, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Yovanni Casablanca
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, USAF, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Colin J R Stewart
- School for Women's and Infants' Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Adeline Tan
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Western Women's Pathology, Western Diagnostic Pathology, Wembley, Australia
| | - Yu Yu
- School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Jessica Boros
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alison H Brand
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul R Harnett
- The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Sydney-West Cancer Network, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nikilyn Nevins
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Terry Morgan
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Francisco J Candido Dos Reis
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - G Larry Maxwell
- Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Francesmary Modugno
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Philip J Crowe
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Akira Hirasawa
- Department of Clinical Genomic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte (KEM), Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Dr. Horst-Schmidt Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery, Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Peter Sinn
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Estrid Høgdall
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Molecular Unit, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul A Cohen
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Bendat Family Comprehensive Cancer Centre, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia
| | - Anna DeFazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Sydney-West Cancer Network, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Helen Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kate Lawrenson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gottfried Konecny
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Linda S Cook
- School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Bureau of Population Health Data Analytics & Informatics, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wiedemeyer K, Wang L, Kang EY, Liu S, Ou Y, Kelemen LE, Feil L, Anglesio MS, Glaze S, Ghatage P, Nelson GS, Köbel M. Prognostic and Theranostic Biomarkers in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:168-179. [PMID: 33770057 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to test whether prognostic biomarkers can achieve a clinically relevant stratification of patients with stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) and to survey the expression of 10 selected actionable targets (theranostic biomarkers) in stage II to IV cases. From the population-based Alberta Ovarian Tumor Type study, 160 samples of OCCC were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and/or silver-enhanced in situ hybridization for the status of 5 prognostic (p53, p16, IGF2BP3, CCNE1, FOLR1) and 10 theranostic biomarkers (ALK, BRAF V600E, ERBB2, ER, MET, MMR, PR, ROS1, NTRK1-3, VEGFR2). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. Cases with abnormal p53 or combined p16/IFG2BP3 abnormal expression identified a small subset of patients (6/54 cases) with stage I OCCC with an aggressive course (5-yr ovarian cancer-specific survival of 33.3%, compared with 91.5% in the other stage I cases). Among theranostic targets, ERBB2 amplification was present in 11/158 (7%) of OCCC, while MET was ubiquitously expressed in OCCC similar to a variety of normal control tissues. ER/PR showed a low prevalence of expression. No abnormal expression was detected for any of the other targets. We propose a combination of 3 biomarkers (p53, p16, IGF2BP3) to predict prognosis and the potential need for adjuvant therapy for patients with stage I OCCC. This finding requires replication in larger cohorts. In addition, OCCC could be tested for ERBB2 amplification for inclusion in gynecological basket trials targeting this alteration.
Collapse
|
12
|
The Evolution of Ovarian Carcinoma Subclassification. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020416. [PMID: 35053578 PMCID: PMC8774015 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Historically, cancers presenting with their main tumor mass in the ovary have been classified as ovarian carcinomas (a concise term for epithelial ovarian cancer) and treated with a one-size-fits-all approach. Over the last two decades, a growing molecular understanding established that ovarian carcinomas consist of several distinct histologic types, which practically represent different diseases. Further research is now delineating several molecular subtypes within each histotype. This histotype/molecular subtype subclassification provides a framework of grouping tumors based on molecular similarities for research, clinical trial inclusion and future patient management. Abstract The phenotypically informed histotype classification remains the mainstay of ovarian carcinoma subclassification. Histotypes of ovarian epithelial neoplasms have evolved with each edition of the WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumours. The current fifth edition (2020) lists five principal histotypes: high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC), mucinous carcinoma (MC), endometrioid carcinoma (EC) and clear cell carcinoma (CCC). Since histotypes arise from different cells of origin, cell lineage-specific diagnostic immunohistochemical markers and histotype-specific oncogenic alterations can confirm the morphological diagnosis. A four-marker immunohistochemical panel (WT1/p53/napsin A/PR) can distinguish the five principal histotypes with high accuracy, and additional immunohistochemical markers can be used depending on the diagnostic considerations. Histotypes are further stratified into molecular subtypes and assessed with predictive biomarker tests. HGSCs have recently been subclassified based on mechanisms of chromosomal instability, mRNA expression profiles or individual candidate biomarkers. ECs are composed of the same molecular subtypes (POLE-mutated/mismatch repair-deficient/no specific molecular profile/p53-abnormal) with the same prognostic stratification as their endometrial counterparts. Although methylation analyses and gene expression and sequencing showed at least two clusters, the molecular subtypes of CCCs remain largely elusive to date. Mutational and immunohistochemical data on LGSC have suggested five molecular subtypes with prognostic differences. While our understanding of the molecular composition of ovarian carcinomas has significantly advanced and continues to evolve, the need for treatment options suitable for these alterations is becoming more obvious. Further preclinical studies using histotype-defined and molecular subtype-characterized model systems are needed to expand the therapeutic spectrum for women diagnosed with ovarian carcinomas.
Collapse
|
13
|
McCluggage WG, Singh N, Gilks CB. Key changes to the world health organisation (who) classification of female genital tumours introduced in the 5 TH edition (2020). Histopathology 2022; 80:762-778. [PMID: 34996131 DOI: 10.1111/his.14609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
An updated World Health Organisation (WHO) Classification of Female Genital Tumours was published in Autumn 2020. We discuss the major new additions and changes from the prior 2014 Classification with discussion of the reasons underlying these. A feature of the new Classification is the greater emphasis on key molecular events with integration of morphological and-molecular features. Most of the major changes from the prior Classification pertain to uterine (corpus and cervix) and vulval tumours but changes in all organs are covered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rodriguez M, Kang EY, Farrington K, Cook LS, Le ND, Karnezis AN, Lee CH, Nelson GS, Terzic T, Lee S, Köbel M. Accurate Distinction of Ovarian Clear Cell From Endometrioid Carcinoma Requires Integration of Phenotype, Immunohistochemical Predictions, and Genotype: Implications for Lynch Syndrome Screening. Am J Surg Pathol 2021; 45:1452-1463. [PMID: 34534137 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) and ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) are both associated with endometriosis but differ in histologic phenotype, biomarker profile, and survival. Our objectives were to refine immunohistochemical (IHC) panels that help distinguish the histotypes and reassess the prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) in immunohistochemically confirmed OCCC. We selected 8 candidate IHC markers to develop first-line and second-line panels in a training set of 344 OCCC/OEC cases. Interobserver reproducibility of histotype diagnosis was assessed in an independent testing cohort of 100 OCC/OEC initially without and subsequently with IHC. The prevalence of MMRd was evaluated using the testing cohort and an expansion set of 844 ovarian carcinomas. The 2 prototypical combinations (OCCC: Napsin A+/HNF1B diffusely+/PR-; OEC: Napsin A-/HNF1B nondiffuse/PR+) occurred in 75% of cases and were 100% specific. A second-line panel (ELAPOR1, AMACR, CDX2) predicted the remaining cases with 83% accuracy. Integration of IHC improved interobserver reproducibility (κ=0.778 vs. 0.882, P<0.0001). The prevalence of MMRd was highest in OEC (11.5%, 44/383), lower in OCCC (1.7%, 5/297), and high-grade serous carcinomas (0.7%, 5/699), and absent in mucinous (0/126) and low-grade serous carcinomas (0/50). All 5 MMRd OCCC were probable Lynch syndrome cases with prototypical IHC profile but ambiguous morphologic features: 3/5 with microcystic architecture and 2/5 with intratumoral stromal inflammation. Integration of first-line and second-line IHC panels increases diagnostic precision and enhances prognostication and triaging for predisposing/predictive molecular biomarker testing. Our data support universal Lynch syndrome screening in all patients with OEC when the diagnosis of other histotypes has been vigorously excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Linda S Cook
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Preventative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency
| | - Anthony N Karnezis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gregg S Nelson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | | | - Sandra Lee
- Department of Pathology, University of Calgary
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Phillips-Chavez C, Coward J, Watson M, Schloss J. A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Cohort Trial Assessing the Prevalence of MTHFR Polymorphisms and the Influence of Diet on Platinum Resistance in Ovarian Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5215. [PMID: 34680361 PMCID: PMC8533864 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13205215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer has the lowest survival rate in gynaecologic malignancies with a 5-year survival rate of 43%. Platinum resistance is one of the main drivers of ovarian cancer mortality, of which aberrant methylation has been cited as a significant contributor. Understanding the essential role of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase enzyme (MTHFR) on DNA synthesis and repair, and how nutrient status can vastly affect its performance, led to the investigation of MTHFR status and dietary influence on platinum response in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. Twenty-five adult female patients who completed first-line platinum-based chemotherapy for primary ovarian cancer were selected from Icon Cancer Centres in Australia. Participants were grouped based on platinum response. A full medical and family history, food frequency questionnaire and single blood test were completed, testing for MTHFR polymorphisms, serum folate, serum and active B12 and homocysteine levels. Nineteen of twenty-five participants had an MTHFR polymorphism. Of those, 20% were compound heterozygous, 12% were heterozygous C677T (CT), 4% homozygous C677T, 12% homozygous A1298C and 28% were heterozygous A1298C (AC). Statistically significant associations were found between dietary zinc (p = 0.0086; 0.0030; 0.0189) and B12 intakes in CT genotypes (p = 0.0157; 0.0030; 0.0068) indicating that zinc or vitamin B12 intakes below RDI were associated with this genotype. There were strong associations of vitamin B6 intakes in AC genotypes (p = 0.0597; 0.0547; 0.0610), and dietary folate in compound heterozygotes with sensitive and partially sensitive disease (p = 0.0627; 0.0510). There were also significant associations between serum folate (p = 0.0478) and dietary B12 (p = 0.0350) intakes above RDI and platinum sensitivity in wild-types as well as strong associations with homocysteine levels (p = 0.0886) and zinc intake (p = 0.0514). Associations with dietary B12 (p = 0.0514) and zinc intakes (p = 0.0731) were also strong in resistant wild types. Results indicate that dietary zinc, B12 and B6 intakes may be associated with platinum sensitivity dependent on MTHFR genotype. These results require further research to clarify the dosages necessary to elicit a response; however, they provide a novel foundation for acknowledging the role of diet on treatment response in EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Phillips-Chavez
- Icon Cancer Centre, Queensland, Australia;
- Endeavour College of Natural Health, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia;
| | - Jermaine Coward
- Icon Cancer Centre, Queensland, Australia;
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Michael Watson
- Endeavour College of Natural Health, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia;
- Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Janet Schloss
- NCNM, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas (MLA) are rare neoplasms arising in the uterine corpus and ovary which have been added to the recent 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Female Genital Tumors. They have similar morphology and immunophenotype and exhibit molecular aberrations similar to cervical mesonephric adenocarcinomas. It is debated as to whether they are of mesonephric or Mullerian origin. We describe the clinical, pathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of 5 cases of extrauterine mesonephric-like proliferations (4 ovary, 1 extraovarian), all with novel and hitherto unreported features. These include an origin of MLA in extraovarian endometriosis, an association of ovarian MLA with high-grade serous carcinoma, mixed germ cell tumor and mature teratoma, and a borderline ovarian endometrioid tumor exhibiting mesonephric differentiation. Four of the cases exhibited a KRAS variant and 3 also a PIK3CA variant. In reporting these cases, we expand on the published tumor types associated with MLA and report for the first time a borderline tumor exhibiting mesonephric differentiation. We show the value of molecular testing in helping to confirm a mesonephric-like lesion and in determining the relationship between the different neoplastic components. We provide further evidence for a Mullerian origin, rather than a true mesonephric origin, in some of these cases. We also speculate that in the 2 cases associated with germ cell neoplasms, the MLA arose out of the germ cell tumor.
Collapse
|
17
|
Mayr D, Schmoeckel E, Höhn AK, Hiller GGR, Horn LC. [Current WHO classification of the female genitals : Many new things, but also some old]. DER PATHOLOGE 2021; 42:259-269. [PMID: 33822250 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-021-00933-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The new WHO classification of tumors of the female genitalia entails some changes, especially those of prognostic and therapeutic relevance: there is a return to the term borderline tumor. Implants are again subdivided into noninvasive implants of the epithelial or desmoplastic type as before. Invasive extraovarian implants are classified as low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC). Former seromucinous carcinomas are now classified as endometrioid carcinomas (seromucinous subtype). New entities of ovarian carcinomas are mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma, undifferentiated and dedifferentiated carcinoma, and mixed carcinoma. The classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms is analogous to that of pulmonary and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms, regardless of their location. Endometrioid endometrial carcinoma can be classified into four molecular subtypes, which have significant prognostic significance. New subtypes include mucinous carcinoma of the intestinal type and mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma. Stromasarcomas of the endometrium are further subclassified based on specific molecular alterations. Adenocarcinomas (ACs) and squamous cell carcinomas (PECs) of the lower female genital tract are distinguished from HPV-associated and HPV-independent carcinomas. Block-like staining for p16 is the accepted surrogate immunohistochemical marker. Grading has not been reported for PEC. For HPV-associated AC of the cervix uteri, prognostic assessment is based on the pattern of invasion (so-called Silva pattern). Serous carcinomas in the cervix uteri are endometrial carcinomas with cervical infiltration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doris Mayr
- Pathologisches Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Thalkirchner Straße 36, 80337, München, Deutschland.
| | - Elisa Schmoeckel
- Pathologisches Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Thalkirchner Straße 36, 80337, München, Deutschland
| | - Anne Kathrin Höhn
- Arbeitsgruppe Mamma‑, Gynäko- & Perinatalpathologie, Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Grit Gesine Ruth Hiller
- Arbeitsgruppe Mamma‑, Gynäko- & Perinatalpathologie, Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Lars-Christian Horn
- Arbeitsgruppe Mamma‑, Gynäko- & Perinatalpathologie, Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sitagliptin Modulates the Response of Ovarian Cancer Cells to Chemotherapeutic Agents. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21238976. [PMID: 33256016 PMCID: PMC7731375 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21238976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The strong association between diabetes mellitus type 2 and cancer is observed. The incidence of both diseases is increasing globally due to the interaction between them. Recent studies suggest that there is also an association between cancer incidence and anti-diabetic medications. An inhibitor of dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP-4), sitagliptin, is used in diabetes treatment. We examined the influence of sitagliptin alone or in combination with a cytostatic drug (paclitaxel) on the development of epithelial ovarian cancer cells and the process of metastasis. We examined migration, invasiveness, apoptosis, and metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors’ (TIMPs) production in two human ovarian cancer cell lines. Sitagliptin induced apoptosis by caspase 3/7 activation in paclitaxel-treated SKOV-3 and OVCAR-3 cells. Sitagliptin maintained paclitaxel influence on ERK and Akt signaling pathways. Sitagliptin additionally reduced migration and invasiveness of SKOV-3 cells. There were distinct differences of metalloproteinases production in sitagliptin-stimulated ovarian cancer cells in both cell lines, despite their identical histological classification. Only the SKOV-3 cell line expressed MMPs and TIMPs. SKOV-3 cells co-treated with sitagliptin and paclitaxel decreased concentrations of MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-10, TIMP-1, TIMP-2. The obtained data showed that sitagliptin used with paclitaxel may be considered as a possibility of pharmacological modulation of intracellular transmission pathways to improve the response to chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ovarian Combined Low-grade Serous and Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma: Further Evidence for A Mullerian Origin of Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2020; 39:84-92. [PMID: 30575604 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas are rare neoplasms occurring in the uterine corpus and ovary which bear a close morphologic resemblance to cervical mesonephric adenocarcinomas. They also have a similar immunophenotype and harbor similar molecular abnormalities to mesonephric adenocarcinomas and it is debated whether they are truly of mesonephric origin or represent Mullerian neoplasms closely mimicking mesonephric adenocarcinomas. We report an unusual case with bilateral ovarian serous borderline tumors and extraovarian low-grade serous carcinoma (invasive implants). In one ovary, there was a component of mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma. The immunophenotypes of the serous and the mesonephric-like components were distinct and as expected for the individual tumor types (serous component diffusely positive with WT1 and estrogen receptor and negative with GATA3, TTF1 and CD10; mesonephric-like component WT1 and estrogen receptor negative and GATA3, TTF1, and CD10 positive; both components diffusely positive with PAX8 and exhibiting "wild-type" p53 immunoreactivity). In all components (bilateral serous borderline tumors, low-grade serous carcinoma and mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma), an identical KRAS mutation was detected (NM_004985.4): c.35G>A, p.(G12D) proving a clonal association between the serous and mesonephric-like components and excluding a collision neoplasm. This represents the second reported case of a combined ovarian low-grade serous tumor and mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma; in the previously reported case, an identical NRAS mutation was present in both components. These 2 cases provide evidence that ovarian mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas have, at least in some cases, a Mullerian origin and differentiate along mesonephric lines. We present additional evidence for this by reviewing associated findings in published and unpublished ovarian mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas; 8 of 11 of these neoplasms contained other Mullerian lesions in the same ovary, mainly endometriosis and adenomas/adenofibromas.
Collapse
|
20
|
Hatano Y, Tamada M, Matsuo M, Hara A. Molecular Trajectory of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations. Front Oncol 2020; 10:361. [PMID: 32269964 PMCID: PMC7109296 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Every cancer carries genomic mutations. Although almost all these mutations arise after fertilization, a minimal count of cancer predisposition mutations are already present at the time of genesis of germ cells. Of the cancer predisposition genes identified to date, BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been determined to be associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Such cancer predisposition genes have recently been attracting attention owing to the emergence of molecular genetics, thus, affecting the strategy of cancer prevention, diagnostics, and therapeutics. In this review, we summarize the molecular significance of these two BRCA genes. First, we provide a brief history of BRCA1 and BRCA2, including their identification as cancer predisposition genes and recognition as members in the Fanconi anemia pathway. Next, we describe the molecular function and interaction of BRCA proteins, and thereafter, describe the patterns of BRCA dysfunction. Subsequently, we present emerging evidence on mutational signatures to determine the effects of BRCA disorders on the mutational process in cancer cells. Currently, BRCA genes serve as principal targets for clinical molecular oncology, be they germline or sporadic mutations. Moreover, comprehensive cancer genome analyses enable us to not only recognize the current status of the known cancer driver gene mutations but also divulge the past mutational processes and predict the future biological behavior of cancer through the molecular trajectory of genomic alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuichiro Hatano
- Department of Tumor Pathology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
This review is an appraisal of the current state of knowledge of 2 enigmatic histotypes of ovarian carcinoma: endometrioid and clear cell carcinoma. Both show an association endometriosis and the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch) syndrome, and both typically present at an early stage. Pathologic and immunohistochemical features that distinguish these tumors from high-grade serous carcinomas, each other, and other potential mimics are discussed, as are staging, grading, and molecular pathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oluwole Fadare
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
| | - Vinita Parkash
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, 20 York Street, EP2-607, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Casey L, Singh N. Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: Assessing Pathology for Site of Origin, Staging and Post-neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Changes. Surg Pathol Clin 2019; 12:515-528. [PMID: 31097113 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2019.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
High-grade serous (HGSC) stands apart from the other ovarian cancer histotypes in being the most frequent, in occurring as part of a genetic predisposition in a significant proportion of cases, and in having the poorest clinical outcomes. Although the pathologic diagnosis of HGSC is now made with high accuracy, there remain areas of disagreement regarding viewpoints on tissue site of origin and designation of primary site, with impact on staging in low-stage cases, as well as difficulties in reproducible and clinically relevant reporting of HGSC in specimens taken after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These areas are discussed in the current article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Casey
- Department of Pathology, Queen's Hospital, Rom Valley Way, Romford RM7 0AG, UK
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, 2nd Floor, 80 Newark Street, London E1 2ES, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ovarian Carcinoma Histotype: Strengths and Limitations of Integrating Morphology With Immunohistochemical Predictions. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2019; 38:353-362. [PMID: 29901523 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian carcinoma histotypes are critical for research and patient management and currently assigned by a combination of histomorphology +/- ancillary immunohistochemistry (IHC). We aimed to validate the previously described IHC algorithm (Calculator of Ovarian carcinoma Subtype/histotype Probability version 3, COSPv3) in an independent population-based cohort, and to identify problem areas for IHC predictions. Histotype was abstracted from cancer registries for eligible ovarian carcinoma cases diagnosed from 2002 to 2011 in Alberta and British Columbia, Canada. Slides were reviewed according to World Health Organization 2014 criteria, tissue microarrays were stained with and scored for the 8 COSPv3 IHC markers, and COSPv3 histotype predictions were calculated. Discordant cases for review and COSPv3 prediction were arbitrated by integrating morphology with IHC results. The integrated histotype (N=880) was then used to identify areas of inferior COSPv3 performance. Review histotype and integrated histotype demonstrated 93% agreement suggesting that IHC information revises expert review in up to 7% of cases. There was also 93% agreement between COSPv3 prediction and integrated histotype. COSPv3 errors predominated in 4 areas: endometrioid carcinoma (EC) versus clear cell (N=23), EC versus low-grade serous (N=15), EC versus high-grade serous (N=11), and high-grade versus low-grade serous (N=6). Most problems were related to Napsin A-negative clear cell, WT1-positive EC, and p53 IHC wild-type high-grade serous carcinomas. Although 93% of COSPv3 prediction accuracy was validated, some histotyping required integration of morphology with ancillary test results. Awareness of these limitations will avoid overreliance on IHC and misclassification of histotypes for research and clinical management.
Collapse
|
24
|
Lin Y, Yu J, Wu J, Wang S, Zhang T. Abnormal level of CUL4B-mediated histone H2A ubiquitination causes disruptive HOX gene expression. Epigenetics Chromatin 2019; 12:22. [PMID: 30992047 PMCID: PMC6466687 DOI: 10.1186/s13072-019-0268-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neural tube defects (NTDs) are common birth defects involving the central nervous system. Recent studies on the etiology of human NTDs have raised the possibility that epigenetic regulation could be involved in determining susceptibility to them. Results Here, we show that the H2AK119ub1 E3 ligase CUL4B is required for the activation of retinoic acid (RA)-inducible developmentally critical homeobox (HOX) genes in NT2/D1 embryonal carcinoma cells. RA treatment led to attenuation of H2AK119ub1 due to decrease in CUL4B, further affecting HOX gene regulation. Furthermore, we found that CUL4B interacted directly with RORγ and negatively regulated its transcriptional activity. Interestingly, knockdown of RORγ decreased the expression of HOX genes along with increased H2AK119ub1 occupancy levels, at HOX gene sites in N2/D1 cells. In addition, upregulation of HOX genes was observed along with lower levels of CUL4B-mediated H2AK119ub1 in both mouse and human anencephaly NTD cases. Notably, the expression of HOXA10 genes was negatively correlated with CUL4B levels in human anencephaly NTD cases. Conclusions Our results indicate that abnormal HOX gene expression induced by aberrant CUL4B-mediated H2AK119ub1 levels may be a risk factor for NTDs, and highlight the need for further analysis of genome-wide epigenetic modifications in NTDs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13072-019-0268-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Lin
- Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Child Development and Nutriomics, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, 100020, China.,Graduate Schools of Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Juan Yu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, China
| | - Jianxin Wu
- Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Child Development and Nutriomics, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, 100020, China.,Graduate Schools of Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Shan Wang
- Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Child Development and Nutriomics, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, 100020, China. .,Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Ting Zhang
- Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Child Development and Nutriomics, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, 100020, China. .,Graduate Schools of Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Takenaka M, Köbel M, Garsed DW, Fereday S, Pandey A, Etemadmoghadam D, Hendley J, Kawabata A, Noguchi D, Yanaihara N, Takahashi H, Kiyokawa T, Ikegami M, Takano H, Isonishi S, Ochiai K, Traficante N, Gadipally S, Semple T, Vassiliadis D, Amarasinghe K, Li J, Mir Arnau G, Okamoto A, Friedlander M, Bowtell DDL. Survival Following Chemotherapy in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma Is Not Associated with Pathological Misclassification of Tumor Histotype. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:3962-3973. [PMID: 30967419 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-3691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2018] [Revised: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although ovarian clear cell carcinomas (OCCC) are commonly resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy, good clinical outcomes are observed in a subset of patients. The explanation for this is unknown but may be due to misclassification of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) as OCCC or mixed histology. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN To discover potential biomarkers of survival benefit following platinum-based chemotherapy, we ascertained a cohort of 68 Japanese and Australian patients in whom progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) could be assessed. We performed IHC reclassification of tumors, and targeted sequencing and immunohistochemistry of known driver genes. Exome sequencing was performed in 10 patients who had either unusually long survival (N = 5) or had a very short time to progression (N = 5). RESULTS The majority of mixed OCCC (N = 6, 85.7%) and a small proportion of pure OCCC (N = 3, 4.9%) were reclassified as likely HGSOC. However, the PFS and OS of patients with misclassified samples were similar to that of patients with pathologically validated OCCC. Absent HNF1B expression was significantly correlated with longer PFS and OS (P = 0.0194 and 0.0395, respectively). Mutations in ARID1A, PIK3CA, PPP2R1A, and TP53 were frequent, but did not explain length of PFS and OS. An exploratory exome analysis of patients with favorable and unfavorable outcomes did not identify novel outcome-associated driver mutations. CONCLUSIONS Survival benefit following chemotherapy in OCCC was not associated with pathological misclassification of tumor histotype. HNF1B loss may help identify the subset of patients with OCCC with a more favorable outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masataka Takenaka
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Foothill Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Dale W Garsed
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ahwan Pandey
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dariush Etemadmoghadam
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joy Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ayako Kawabata
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daito Noguchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nozomu Yanaihara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Takahashi
- Department of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takako Kiyokawa
- Department of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Ikegami
- Department of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirokuni Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Seiji Isonishi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ochiai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Timothy Semple
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Jason Li
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Aikou Okamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Michael Friedlander
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - David D L Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
High-grade Endometrial Carcinomas: Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Features, Diagnostic Challenges and Recommendations. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2019; 38 Suppl 1:S40-S63. [PMID: 30550483 PMCID: PMC6296248 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
This review of challenging diagnostic issues concerning high-grade endometrial carcinomas is derived from the authors' review of the literature followed by discussions at the Endometrial Cancer Workshop sponsored by the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists in 2016. Recommendations presented are evidence-based, insofar as this is possible, given that the levels of evidence are weak or moderate due to small sample sizes and nonuniform diagnostic criteria used in many studies. High-grade endometrioid carcinomas include FIGO grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas, serous carcinomas, clear cell carcinomas, undifferentiated carcinomas, and carcinosarcomas. FIGO grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma is diagnosed when an endometrioid carcinoma exhibits >50% solid architecture (excluding squamous areas), or when an architecturally FIGO grade 2 endometrioid carcinoma exhibits marked cytologic atypia, provided that a glandular variant of serous carcinoma has been excluded. The most useful immunohistochemical studies to make the distinction between these 2 histotypes are p53, p16, DNA mismatch repair proteins, PTEN, and ARID1A. Endometrial clear cell carcinomas must display prototypical architectural and cytologic features for diagnosis. Immunohistochemical stains, including, Napsin A and p504s can be used as ancillary diagnostic tools; p53 expression is aberrant in a minority of clear cell carcinomas. Of note, clear cells are found in all types of high-grade endometrial carcinomas, leading to a tendency to overdiagnose clear cell carcinoma. Undifferentiated carcinoma (which when associated with a component of low-grade endometrioid carcinoma is termed "dedifferentiated carcinoma") is composed of sheets of monotonous, typically dyscohesive cells, which can have a rhabdoid appearance; they often exhibit limited expression of cytokeratins and epithelial membrane antigen, are usually negative for PAX8 and hormone receptors, lack membranous e-cadherin and commonly demonstrate loss of expression of DNA mismatch repair proteins and SWI-SNF chromatin remodeling proteins. Carcinosarcomas must show unequivocal morphologic evidence of malignant epithelial and mesenchymal differentiation.
Collapse
|
27
|
High-grade Endometrioid Carcinoma of the Ovary: A Clinicopathologic Study of 30 Cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2019; 42:534-544. [PMID: 29309296 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Although infrequently encountered, the diagnosis of ovarian high-grade endometrioid carcinoma remains a diagnostic challenge with potential consequences for targeted therapies and genetic counselling. We studied the clinical, morphologic, and immunohistochemical features of ovarian high-grade endometrioid carcinomas and their diagnostic reproducibility compared with tuboovarian high-grade serous carcinomas. Thirty cases confirmed as International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas were identified from 182 ovarian endometrioid carcinomas diagnosed in Alberta, Canada, between 1978 and 2010, from the population-based Alberta Ovarian Tumor Types cohort. Cases of lower grade endometrioid and high-grade serous carcinoma served for comparison. Ten immunohistochemical markers were assessed on tissue microarrays. Clinical data were abstracted and survival analyses performed using Cox regression. Interobserver reproducibility for histologic type was assessed using 1 representative hematoxylin and eosin-stained slide from 25 randomly selected grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas and 25 high-grade serous carcinomas. Histotype was independently assigned by 5 pathologists initially blinded to immunohistochemical WT1/p53 status, with subsequent reassessment unblinded to WT1/p53 status. Patients diagnosed with grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma had a significantly longer survival compared with high-grade serous carcinoma in univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR]=0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.16-0.67, P=0.0012) but not after adjusting for age, stage, treatment center, and residual tumor (HR=1.01, 95% CI=0.43-2.16, P=0.98). Grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma cases (N=30) were identical to grade 2 endometrioid carcinoma cases (N=23) with respect to survival in univariate analysis (HR=1.07, 95% CI=0.39-3.21, P=0.89) and immunohistochemical profile. Using histomorphology alone, interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of grade 3 endometrioid or high-grade serous carcinoma was 69%, which significantly increased (P<0.0001) to 96% agreement with the knowledge of WT1/p53 status. Our data support the diagnostic value of WT1/p53 status in differentiating between grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma and high-grade serous carcinoma. However, grade 3 and grade 2 endometrioid carcinomas showed no differences in immunophenotype or clinical parameters, suggesting that they could be combined into a single group.
Collapse
|
28
|
Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Le Frère-Belda MA, Leary A. [Biopathology of ovarian carcinomas early and advanced-stages: Article drafted from the French guidelines in oncology entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY under the aegis of CNGOF and endorsed by INCa]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 47:155-167. [PMID: 30686728 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Ovarian carcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of lesions with specific therapeutic management for each histological subtype. Thus, the correct histological diagnosis is mandatory. MATERIAL AND METHODS References were searched by PubMed from January 2000 to January 2018 and original articles in French and English literature were selected. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS In case of ovarian mass suspicious for cancer, a frozen section analysis may be proposed, if it could impact the surgical management. A positive histological diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma (type and grade) has to be rendered on histological (and not cytological) material before any chemotherapy with multiples and large sized biopsies. In case of needle biopsy, at least three fragments with needles>16G are needed. Histological biopsies need to be formalin-fixed (4% formaldehyde) less than 1h after resection and at least 6hours fixation is mandatory for small size biopsies. Tissue transfer to pathological labs up to 48hours under vacuum and at +4°C (in case of large surgical specimens) may be an alternative. Gross examination should include the description of all specimens and their integrity, the site of the tumor and the dimension of all specimens and nodules. Multiples sampling is needed, including the capsule, the solid areas, at least 1 to 2 blocks per cm of tumor for mucinous lesions, the Fallopian tube in toto, at least 3 blocks on grossly normal omentum and one block on the largest omental nodule. WHO classification should be used to classify the carcinoma (type and grade), with the use of a panel of immunohistochemical markers. High-grade ovarian carcinomas (serous and endometrioid) should be tested for BRCA mutation and in case of a detectable tumor mutation, the patient should be referred to an oncogenetic consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Devouassoux-Shisheboran
- Institut multisite de biopathologie des hôpitaux de Lyon : site Sud, centre de biologie et pathologie Sud, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite cedex, France.
| | - M-A Le Frère-Belda
- Service de pathologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - A Leary
- Inserm U981, service d'oncologie médicale, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Peres LC, Cushing-Haugen KL, Anglesio M, Wicklund K, Bentley R, Berchuck A, Kelemen LE, Nazeran TM, Gilks CB, Harris HR, Huntsman DG, Schildkraut JM, Rossing MA, Köbel M, Doherty JA. Histotype classification of ovarian carcinoma: A comparison of approaches. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 151:53-60. [PMID: 30121132 PMCID: PMC6292681 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Revised: 08/07/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Major changes in the classification of ovarian carcinoma histotypes occurred over the last two decades, resulting in the current 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria that recognize five principal histotypes: high-grade serous, low-grade serous, endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous carcinoma. We assessed the impact of these guidelines and use of immunohistochemical (IHC) markers on classification of ovarian carcinomas in existing population-based studies. METHODS We evaluated histotype classification for 2361 ovarian carcinomas diagnosed between 1999 and 2009 from two case-control studies using three approaches: 1. pre-2014 WHO ("historic") histotype; 2. Standardized review of pathology slides using the 2014 WHO criteria alone; and 3. An integrated IHC assessment along with the 2014 WHO criteria. We used Kappa statistics to assess agreement between approaches, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate mortality. RESULTS Compared to the standardized pathologic review histotype, agreement across approaches was high (kappa = 0.892 for historic, and 0.849 for IHC integrated histotype), but the IHC integrated histotype identified more low-grade serous carcinomas and a subset of endometrioid carcinomas that were assigned as high-grade serous (n = 25). No substantial differences in histotype-specific mortality were observed across approaches. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that histotype assignment is fairly consistent regardless of classification approach, but that progressive improvements in classification accuracy for some less common histotypes are achieved with pathologic review using the 2014 WHO criteria and with IHC integration. We additionally recommend a classification scheme to fit historic data into the 2014 WHO categories to answer histotype-specific research questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren C Peres
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, 560 Ray C. Hunt Dr., P.O. Box 800765, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
| | - Kara L Cushing-Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1110 Fairview Avenue N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Michael Anglesio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, 2660 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3Z6, Canada
| | - Kristine Wicklund
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1110 Fairview Avenue N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Rex Bentley
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Rd., Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, 25171 Morris Bldg., Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President St., MSC955, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Tayyebeh M Nazeran
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2B5, Canada
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2B5, Canada
| | - Holly R Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1110 Fairview Avenue N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2B5, Canada
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, 560 Ray C. Hunt Dr., P.O. Box 800765, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Mary Anne Rossing
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1110 Fairview Avenue N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary Laboratory Services, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Endometriosis-associated cancers include clear cell and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. A history of endometriosis has long been considered to be a risk factor for later development of these malignancies; however, recent molecular genetic evidence has provided unequivocal evidence that these lesions are in fact the precursors for endometriosis-associated cancers. Herein, we will explore the relationship between endometriosis and ovarian carcinomas, similarities between the premalignant lesions and their cancerous counterparts, and the potential role of mutations and the ovarian microenvironment that may contribute to malignant transformation.
Collapse
|
31
|
Pathology of Ovarian Cancer: Recent Insights Unveiling Opportunities in Prevention. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2018; 60:686-696. [PMID: 28990983 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian carcinomas were formerly referred to as "surface epithelial carcinomas," reflecting the belief that they all arise from the ovarian surface epithelium. It is now appreciated that most ovarian carcinomas originate from either fallopian tube or endometriotic epithelium, and how we approach prevention will thus differ between histotypes. The 5 histotypes of ovarian carcinoma (high-grade serous, clear cell, endometrioid, mucinous, and low-grade serous, in descending order of frequency) can be reproducibly diagnosed, and are distinct disease entities, differing with respect to genetic risk factors, molecular events during oncogenesis, patterns of spread, and response to chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
32
|
Wei L, Xin C, Wang W, Hao C. Microarray analysis of obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome for key gene screening, key pathway identification and drug prediction. Gene 2018; 661:85-94. [PMID: 29601948 DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.03.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2017] [Revised: 03/13/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to screen key genes and pathways involved in obese polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and predict drugs for treatment of obese PCOS via bioinformatics approaches. METHODS Microarray dataset GSE10946 were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, including 7 cumulus cell samples from obese PCOS patients and 6 lean control samples. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between obese PCOS and controls were obtained using Bayesian test after data preprocessing, followed by functional enrichment analyses for DEGs. Besides, protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and sub-network analyses were performed. Furthermore, drug prediction was carried out based on the DEGs. RESULTS A total of 793 DEGs were identified in PCOS compared with control, including 352 up-regulated and 441 down-regulated DEGs. Specifically, upregulated RNA polymerase I subunit B (POLR1B), DNA polymerase epsilon 3, accessory subunit (POLE3), and DNA polymerase delta 3, accessory subunit (POLD3) were enriched in pathway of pyrimidine metabolism associated with obesity and PCOS, and 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2C (HTR2C) was enriched calcium signaling pathway. Additionally, 10 significant potential drugs, such as spironolactone targeting androgen receptor (AR), trimipramine targeting adrenoceptor beta 2 (ADRB2), and L-ornithine targeting ornithine decarboxylase antizyme 3 (OAZ3), were obtained. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, POLR1B, POLE3, POLD3, and HTR2C might play important roles in obese PCOS via involvement of pyrimidine metabolism and calcium signaling pathway. Moreover, AR, ADRB2, and OAZ3 might be targets of spironolactone, trimipramine, and L-ornithine in the treatment of obese PCOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Wei
- Department of Reproductive Medical, The Affiliated Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong 264000, PR China; Department of Reproductive Medical, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong 272011, PR China
| | - Chunlei Xin
- Department of Hematology, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong 272011, PR China
| | - Wenjuan Wang
- Department of Reproductive Medical, The Affiliated Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong 264000, PR China
| | - Cuifang Hao
- Department of Reproductive Medical, The Affiliated Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong 264000, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Functional characterisation of a novel ovarian cancer cell line, NUOC-1. Oncotarget 2018; 8:26832-26844. [PMID: 28460465 PMCID: PMC5432300 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2016] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cell lines provide a powerful model to study cancer and here we describe a new spontaneously immortalised epithelial ovarian cancer cell line (NUOC-1) derived from the ascites collected at a time of primary debulking surgery for a mixed endometrioid / clear cell / High Grade Serous (HGS) histology. Results This spontaneously immortalised cell line was found to maintain morphology and epithelial markers throughout long-term culture. NUOC-1 cells grow as an adherent monolayer with a doubling time of 58 hours. The cells are TP53 wildtype, positive for PTEN, HER2 and HER3 expression but negative for oestrogen, progesterone and androgen receptor expression. NUOC-1 cells are competent in homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining, but base excision repair defective. Karyotype analysis demonstrated a complex tetraploid karyotype. SNP array analysis of parent and derived subpopulations (NUOC-1-A1 and NUOC-1-A2) cells demonstrated heterogeneous cell populations with numerous copy number alterations and a pro-amplification phenotype. The characteristics of this new cell line lends it to be an excellent model for investigation of a number of the identified targets. Materials and Methods The cell line has been characterised for growth, drug sensitivity, expression of common ovarian markers and mutations, clonogenic potential and ability to form xenografts in SCID mice. Copy number changes and clonal evolution were assessed by SNP arrays.
Collapse
|
34
|
Byrne T, Nelson L, Beirne JP, Sharpe D, Quinn JE, McCluggage WG, Robson T, Furlong F. BRCA1 and MAD2 Are Coexpressed and Are Prognostic Indicators in Tubo-ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 28:472-478. [PMID: 29465507 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between BRCA1 and mitotic arrest deficiency protein 2 (MAD2) protein expression, as determined by immunohistochemistry, and clinical outcomes in epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). METHODS A tissue microarray consisting of 94 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded EOC with fully matched clinicopathological data were immunohistochemically stained with anti-BRCA1 and anti-MAD2 antibodies. The cores were scored in a semiquantitative manner evaluating nuclear staining intensity and extent. Coexpression of BRCA1 and MAD2 was evaluated, and patient survival analyses were undertaken. RESULTS Coexpression of BRCA1 and MAD2 was assessed in 94 EOC samples, and survival analysis was performed on 65 high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs). There was a significant positive correlation between BRCA1 and MAD2 expression in this patient cohort (P < 0.0001). Both low BRCA1 and low MAD2 are independently associated with overall survival because of HGSC. Low coexpression of BRCA1 and MAD2 was also significantly associated with overall survival and was driven by BRCA1 expression. CONCLUSION BRCA1 and MAD2 expressions are strongly correlated in EOC, but BRCA1 expression remains the stronger prognostic factor in HGSC.
Collapse
|
35
|
Goebel EA, Vidal A, Matias-Guiu X, Blake Gilks C. The evolution of endometrial carcinoma classification through application of immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics: past, present and future. Virchows Arch 2017; 472:885-896. [DOI: 10.1007/s00428-017-2279-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2017] [Revised: 11/28/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
36
|
Abstract
There are 5 major histotypes of ovarian carcinomas. Diagnostic typing criteria have evolved over time, and past cohorts may be misclassified by current standards. Our objective was to reclassify the recently assembled Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource and the Alberta Ovarian Tumor Type cohorts using immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarkers and to develop an IHC algorithm for ovarian carcinoma histotyping. A total of 1626 ovarian carcinoma samples from the Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource and the Alberta Ovarian Tumor Type were subjected to a reclassification by comparing the original with the predicted histotype. Histotype prediction was derived from a nominal logistic regression modeling using a previously reclassified cohort (N=784) with the binary input of 8 IHC markers. Cases with discordant original or predicted histotypes were subjected to arbitration. After reclassification, 1762 cases from all cohorts were subjected to prediction models (χ Automatic Interaction Detection, recursive partitioning, and nominal logistic regression) with a variable IHC marker input. The histologic type was confirmed in 1521/1626 (93.5%) cases of the Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource and the Alberta Ovarian Tumor Type cohorts. The highest misclassification occurred in the endometrioid type, where most of the changes involved reclassification from endometrioid to high-grade serous carcinoma, which was additionally supported by mutational data and outcome. Using the reclassified histotype as the endpoint, a 4-marker prediction model correctly classified 88%, a 6-marker 91%, and an 8-marker 93% of the 1762 cases. This study provides statistically validated, inexpensive IHC algorithms, which have versatile applications in research, clinical practice, and clinical trials.
Collapse
|
37
|
Kawahara N, Ogawa K, Nagayasu M, Kimura M, Sasaki Y, Kobayashi H. Candidate synthetic lethality partners to PARP inhibitors in the treatment of ovarian clear cell cancer. Biomed Rep 2017; 7:391-399. [PMID: 29109859 DOI: 10.3892/br.2017.990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2017] [Accepted: 09/14/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) are new types of personalized treatment of relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. Ovarian clear cell cancer (CCC), a subset of ovarian cancer, often appears as low-stage disease with a higher incidence among Japanese. Advanced CCC is highly aggressive with poor patient outcome. The aim of the present study was to determine the potential synthetic lethality gene pairs for PARP inhibitions in patients with CCC through virtual and biological screenings as well as clinical studies. We conducted a literature review for putative PARP sensitivity genes that are associated with the CCC pathophysiology. Previous studies identified a variety of putative target genes from several pathways associated with DNA damage repair, chromatin remodeling complex, PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling, Notch signaling, cell cycle checkpoint signaling, BRCA-associated complex and Fanconi's anemia susceptibility genes that could be used as biomarkers or therapeutic targets for PARP inhibition. BRCA1/2, ATM, ATR, BARD1, CCNE1, CHEK1, CKS1B, DNMT1, ERBB2, FGFR2, MRE11A, MYC, NOTCH1 and PTEN were considered as candidate genes for synthetic lethality gene partners for PARP interactions. When considering the biological background underlying PARP inhibition, we hypothesized that PARP inhibitors would be a novel synthetic lethal therapeutic approach for CCC tumors harboring homologous recombination deficiency and activating oncogene mutations. The results showed that the majority of CCC tumors appear to have indicators of DNA repair dysfunction similar to those in BRCA-mutation carriers, suggesting the possible utility of PARP inhibitors in a subset of CCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Kawahara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan
| | - Kenji Ogawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan
| | - Mika Nagayasu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan
| | - Mai Kimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Sasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kobayashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Singh N, McCluggage WG, Gilks CB. High-grade serous carcinoma of tubo-ovarian origin: recent developments. Histopathology 2017; 71:339-356. [PMID: 28477361 DOI: 10.1111/his.13248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Extra-uterine high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) accounts for most of the morbidity and mortality associated with ovarian carcinoma, and is one of the leading causes of cancer death in women. Until recently our understanding of HGSC was very limited compared to other common cancers, and it has only been during the last 15 years that we have learned how to diagnose this ovarian carcinoma histotype accurately. Since then, however, there has been rapid progress, with identification of a precursor lesion in the fallopian tube, development of prevention strategies for both those with inherited susceptibility (hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome) and without the syndrome, and elucidation of the molecular events important in oncogenesis. This molecular understanding has led to new treatment strategies for HGSC, with the promise of more to come in the near future. In this review we focus on these recent changes, including diagnostic criteria/differential diagnosis, primary site assignment, precursor lesions and the molecular pathology of HGSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveena Singh
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
|
40
|
Kumar V, Jagadish N, Suri A. Role of A-Kinase anchor protein (AKAP4) in growth and survival of ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget 2017; 8:53124-53136. [PMID: 28881798 PMCID: PMC5581097 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 05/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer represents one of the most common malignancies among women with very high mortality rate worldwide. A-kinase anchor protein 4 (AKAP4), a unique cancer testis (CT) antigen has been shown to be associated with various malignant properties of cancer cells. However, its involvement in various molecular pathways in ovarian cancer remains unknown. In present investigation, employing gene silencing approach, we examined the role of AKAP4 in cell cycle, apoptosis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Further, we also investigated the effect of ablation of AKAP4 on tumor growth in SCID mice ovarian cancer xenograft mouse model. Our results showed that ablation of AKAP4 resulted in increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, DNA damage, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells. AKAP4 knockdown lead to degradation of protien kinase A (PKA) which was rescued by proteosome inhibitor MG-132. ROS quencher N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) treatment rescued cell cycle arrest and resumed cell division. Subsequently, increased expression of pro-apoptotic molecules and decreased expression of pro-survival/anti-apoptotic factors was observed. As a result of AKAP4 depletion, DNA damage response proteins p-γH2AX, p-ATM and p21 were upregulated. Also, knockdown of CREB resulted in similar findings. Further, PKA inhibitor (H89) and oxidative stress resulted in similar phenotype of ovarian cancer cells as observed in AKAP4 ablated cells. Collectively, for the first time our data showed the involvement of AKAP4 in PKA degradation and perturbed signaling through PKA-CREB axis in AKAP4 ablated ovarian cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikash Kumar
- Cancer Microarray, Genes and Proteins Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, 110067, New Delhi, India
| | - Nirmala Jagadish
- Cancer Microarray, Genes and Proteins Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, 110067, New Delhi, India
| | - Anil Suri
- Cancer Microarray, Genes and Proteins Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, 110067, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Singh N, Gilks CB. The changing landscape of gynaecological cancer diagnosis: implications for histopathological practice in the 21st century. Histopathology 2017; 70:56-69. [PMID: 27960241 DOI: 10.1111/his.13080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
The era of molecular medicine has led to dramatically improved understanding of the genetic events that give rise to different types of cancers. In the case of gynaecological malignancies, this has resulted in distinct shifts in how these tumours are diagnosed in routine surgical pathology practice, with an increased emphasis on accurate subtype diagnosis. This has happened across all sites in the gynaecological tract and for most cell types, but in ways that are site-specific and may appear to be subtle, as in most instances the diagnostic terminology has not changed. For example, the diagnosis of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary is still in use, but the diagnostic criteria and clinical implications are different in 2017 from what they were in 2000. As a result, there can be a failure to appreciate how important these changes are and the resulting necessity of incorporating them into our daily practice. In this review we will describe changes in diagnostic surgical pathology occasioned by improved understanding of molecular events during pathogenesis, for cancers of ovary/tube, endometrium, cervix and vulva, and highlight how current practice differs from that of only a few years ago.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveena Singh
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sanderson PA, Critchley HO, Williams AR, Arends MJ, Saunders PT. New concepts for an old problem: the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia. Hum Reprod Update 2017; 23:232-254. [PMID: 27920066 PMCID: PMC5850217 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmw042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2016] [Revised: 10/24/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial hyperplasia (EH) is a uterine pathology representing a spectrum of morphological endometrial alterations. It is predominantly characterized by an increase in the endometrial gland-to-stroma ratio when compared to normal proliferative endometrium. The clinical significance of EH lies in the associated risk of progression to endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) and 'atypical' forms of EH are regarded as premalignant lesions. Traditional histopathological classification systems for EH exhibit wide and varying degrees of diagnostic reproducibility and, as a consequence, standardized patient management can be challenging. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE EC is the most common gynaecological malignancy in developed countries. The incidence of EC is rising, with alarming increases described in the 40-44-year-old age group. This review appraises the current EH classification systems used to stratify women at risk of malignant progression to EC. In addition, we summarize the evidence base regarding the use of immunohistochemical biomarkers for EH and discuss an emerging role for genomic analysis. SEARCH METHODS PubMed, Medline and the Cochrane Database were searched for original peer-reviewed primary and review articles, from January 2000 to January 2016. The following search terms were used: 'endometrial hyperplasia', 'endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia', 'atypical hyperplasia', 'complex atypical hyperplasia', 'biomarker', 'immunohistochemistry', 'progression', 'genomic', 'classification' and 'stratification'. OUTCOMES Recent changes to EH classification reflect our current understanding of the genesis of endometrioid ECs. The concept of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) as a mutationally activated, monoclonal pre-malignancy represents a fundamental shift from the previously held notion that unopposed oestrogenic stimulation causes ever-increasing hyperplastic proliferation, with accumulating cytological atypia that imperceptibly leads to the development of endometrioid EC. Our review highlights several key biomarker candidates that have been described as both diagnostic tools for EH and markers of progression to EC. We propose that, moving forwards, a 'panel' approach of combinations of the immunohistochemical biomarkers described in this review may be more informative since no single candidate can currently fill the entire role. WIDER IMPLICATIONS EC has historically been considered a predominantly postmenopausal disease. Owing in part to the current unprecedented rates of obesity, we are starting to see signs of a shift towards a rising incidence of EC amongst pre- and peri-menopausal woman. This creates unique challenges both diagnostically and therapeutically. Furthering our understanding of the premalignant stages of EC development will allow us to pursue earlier diagnosis and facilitate appropriate stratification of women at risk of developing EC, permitting timely and appropriate therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A. Sanderson
- MRC Centre for Inflammation Research, The University of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, EdinburghEH16 4TJ, UK
| | - Hilary O.D. Critchley
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, EdinburghEH16 4TJ, UK
| | - Alistair R.W. Williams
- Division of Pathology, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, EdinburghEH16 4SA, UK
| | - Mark J. Arends
- Division of Pathology, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, EdinburghEH4 2XR, UK
- Centre for Comparative Pathology, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, MidlothianEH25 9RG, UK
| | - Philippa T.K. Saunders
- MRC Centre for Inflammation Research, The University of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, EdinburghEH16 4TJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rambau P, Kelemen LE, Steed H, Quan ML, Ghatage P, Köbel M. Association of Hormone Receptor Expression with Survival in Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinoma: Biological Validation and Clinical Implications. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18:ijms18030515. [PMID: 28264438 PMCID: PMC5372531 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18030515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2017] [Revised: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 02/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper aims to validate whether hormone receptor expression is associated with longer survival among women diagnosed with ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC), and whether it identifies patients with stage IC/II tumors with excellent outcome that could be spared from toxic chemotherapy. Expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) was assessed on 182 EC samples represented on tissue microarrays using the Alberta Ovarian Tumor Type (AOVT) cohort. Statistical analyses were performed to test for associations with ovarian cancer specific survival. ER or PR expression was present in 87.3% and 86.7% of cases, respectively, with co-expression present in 83.0%. Expression of each of the hormonal receptors was significantly higher in low-grade tumors and tumors with squamous differentiation. Expression of ER (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.08–0.42, p = 0.0002) and of PR (HR = 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.10–0.53, p = 0.0011) were significantly associated with longer ovarian cancer specific survival adjusted for age, grade, treatment center, stage, and residual disease. However, the five-year ovarian cancer specific survival among women with ER positive stage IC/II EC was 89.0% (standard error 3.3%) and for PR positive tumors 89.9% (standard error 3.2%), robustly below the 95% threshold where adjuvant therapy could be avoided. We validated the association of hormone receptor expression with ovarian cancer specific survival independent of standard predictors in an independent sample set of EC. The high ER/PR co-expression frequency and the survival difference support further testing of the efficacy of hormonal therapy in hormone receptor-positive ovarian EC. The clinical utility to identify a group of women diagnosed with EC at stage IC/II that could be spared from adjuvant therapy is limited.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Biomarkers, Tumor
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/diagnosis
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/mortality
- Female
- Gene Expression
- Humans
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Grading
- Neoplasm Staging
- Prognosis
- Receptors, Estrogen/genetics
- Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
- Receptors, Progesterone/genetics
- Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism
- Retrospective Studies
- Risk Factors
- Treatment Outcome
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Rambau
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
- Department of Pathology, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O. Box 1464, Mwanza, Tanzania.
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
| | - Helen Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada.
| | - May Lynn Quan
- Division of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kommoss S, Gilks CB, du Bois A, Kommoss F. Ovarian carcinoma diagnosis: the clinical impact of 15 years of change. Br J Cancer 2016; 115:993-999. [PMID: 27632374 PMCID: PMC5061905 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2016] [Revised: 07/26/2016] [Accepted: 08/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Until recently ovarian carcinoma was considered to be a single disease, and treatment decisions were based solely on grade and pre- and postoperative tumour burden. New insights into molecular features, treatment response, and patient demographics led the scientific community to conclude that ovarian carcinoma histotypes are different disease entities. METHODS In 2002, the pathology specimens from patients in a clinical trial were reviewed by an experienced gynaecopathologist (pathologist A) for translational research purposes. All cases were typed according to what were then current criteria. The identical cohort was now reassessed by the same expert pathologist and independently reviewed by another gynaecopathologist (pathologist B) applying WHO 2014 diagnostic criteria. Survival analyses were done based on the original as well as the new diagnoses, and historical biomarker study results were recalculated. RESULTS Upon re-review, pathologist A rendered the same histotype diagnosis in only 54% of cases. In contrast, pathologists A and B independently rendered the same diagnosis in 98% of cases. Histotype was of prognostic significance when 2014 diagnoses were used, but was not prognostic using the original (2002) histotype diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates a marked shift in ovarian carcinoma histotype diagnosis over the past 15 years. The new criteria are associated with a very high degree of interobserver reproducibility, allowing for treatment decisions based on histotype. Finally, biomarkers of putative prognostic significance were revealed to be primarily histotype-specific markers, confirming the critical importance of obtaining up-to-date diagnoses rather than accepting archival histotype data in clinical research.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/diagnosis
- Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/genetics
- Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/mortality
- Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/pathology
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/diagnosis
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/genetics
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/mortality
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/pathology
- Biomarkers, Tumor
- Carcinoma/classification
- Carcinoma/diagnosis
- Carcinoma/genetics
- Carcinoma/mortality
- Carcinoma/pathology
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/diagnosis
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/genetics
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/mortality
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/pathology
- Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
- Female
- Genes, Retinoblastoma
- Genes, p16
- Humans
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate
- Multicenter Studies as Topic
- Observer Variation
- Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics
- Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality
- Prognosis
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Reproducibility of Results
- Retrospective Studies
- Translational Research, Biomedical
- World Health Organization
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, 910 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 4E3
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), Henricistraße 92, 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Friedrich Kommoss
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, 910 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 4E3
- Institute of Pathology, Referral Centre for Gynecopathology, A2/2, 68159 Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kurman RJ, Shih IM. The Dualistic Model of Ovarian Carcinogenesis: Revisited, Revised, and Expanded. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2016; 186:733-47. [PMID: 27012190 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 697] [Impact Index Per Article: 77.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2015] [Revised: 10/07/2015] [Accepted: 11/02/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Since our proposal of a dualistic model of epithelial ovarian carcinogenesis more than a decade ago, a large number of molecular and histopathologic studies were published that have provided important insights into the origin and molecular pathogenesis of this disease. This has required that the original model be revised and expanded to incorporate these findings. The new model divides type I tumors into three groups: i) endometriosis-related tumors that include endometrioid, clear cell, and seromucinous carcinomas; ii) low-grade serous carcinomas; and iii) mucinous carcinomas and malignant Brenner tumors. As in the previous model, type II tumors are composed, for the most part, of high-grade serous carcinomas that can be further subdivided into morphologic and molecular subtypes. Type I tumors develop from benign extraovarian lesions that implant on the ovary and which can subsequently undergo malignant transformation, whereas many type II carcinomas develop from intraepithelial carcinomas in the fallopian tube and, as a result, disseminate as carcinomas that involve the ovary and extraovarian sites, which probably accounts for their clinically aggressive behavior. The new molecular genetic data, especially those derived from next-generation sequencing, further underline the heterogeneity of ovarian cancer and identify actionable mutations. The dualistic model highlights these differences between type I and type II tumors which, it can be argued, describe entirely different groups of diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Kurman
- Departments of Pathology, Gynecology and Obstetrics and Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Departments of Pathology, Gynecology and Obstetrics and Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome and Lynch syndrome (LS) are associated with increased risk of developing ovarian carcinoma. Patients with HBOC have a lifetime risk of up to 50% of developing high-grade serous carcinoma of tube or ovary; patients with LS have a 10% lifetime risk of developing endometrioid or clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Testing all patients with tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma for mutations associated with HBOC syndrome, and all patients presenting with endometrioid or clear cell carcinoma of the ovary for mutations associated with LS can identify patients with undiagnosed underlying hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quentin B Nakonechny
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Room 1200, 1st Floor JPPN, 855 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Room 1200, 1st Floor JPPN, 855 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kurman RJ, Shih IM. The Dualistic Model of Ovarian Carcinogenesis: Revisited, Revised, and Expanded. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2016. [PMID: 27012190 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.11.011] [] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Since our proposal of a dualistic model of epithelial ovarian carcinogenesis more than a decade ago, a large number of molecular and histopathologic studies were published that have provided important insights into the origin and molecular pathogenesis of this disease. This has required that the original model be revised and expanded to incorporate these findings. The new model divides type I tumors into three groups: i) endometriosis-related tumors that include endometrioid, clear cell, and seromucinous carcinomas; ii) low-grade serous carcinomas; and iii) mucinous carcinomas and malignant Brenner tumors. As in the previous model, type II tumors are composed, for the most part, of high-grade serous carcinomas that can be further subdivided into morphologic and molecular subtypes. Type I tumors develop from benign extraovarian lesions that implant on the ovary and which can subsequently undergo malignant transformation, whereas many type II carcinomas develop from intraepithelial carcinomas in the fallopian tube and, as a result, disseminate as carcinomas that involve the ovary and extraovarian sites, which probably accounts for their clinically aggressive behavior. The new molecular genetic data, especially those derived from next-generation sequencing, further underline the heterogeneity of ovarian cancer and identify actionable mutations. The dualistic model highlights these differences between type I and type II tumors which, it can be argued, describe entirely different groups of diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Kurman
- Departments of Pathology, Gynecology and Obstetrics and Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Departments of Pathology, Gynecology and Obstetrics and Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kurman RJ, Shih IM. The Dualistic Model of Ovarian Carcinogenesis: Revisited, Revised, and Expanded. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2016. [PMID: 27012190 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.11.011]+[] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Since our proposal of a dualistic model of epithelial ovarian carcinogenesis more than a decade ago, a large number of molecular and histopathologic studies were published that have provided important insights into the origin and molecular pathogenesis of this disease. This has required that the original model be revised and expanded to incorporate these findings. The new model divides type I tumors into three groups: i) endometriosis-related tumors that include endometrioid, clear cell, and seromucinous carcinomas; ii) low-grade serous carcinomas; and iii) mucinous carcinomas and malignant Brenner tumors. As in the previous model, type II tumors are composed, for the most part, of high-grade serous carcinomas that can be further subdivided into morphologic and molecular subtypes. Type I tumors develop from benign extraovarian lesions that implant on the ovary and which can subsequently undergo malignant transformation, whereas many type II carcinomas develop from intraepithelial carcinomas in the fallopian tube and, as a result, disseminate as carcinomas that involve the ovary and extraovarian sites, which probably accounts for their clinically aggressive behavior. The new molecular genetic data, especially those derived from next-generation sequencing, further underline the heterogeneity of ovarian cancer and identify actionable mutations. The dualistic model highlights these differences between type I and type II tumors which, it can be argued, describe entirely different groups of diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Kurman
- Departments of Pathology, Gynecology and Obstetrics and Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Departments of Pathology, Gynecology and Obstetrics and Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rambau PF, Duggan MA, Ghatage P, Warfa K, Steed H, Perrier R, Kelemen LE, Köbel M. Significant frequency of MSH2/MSH6 abnormality in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma supports histotype-specific Lynch syndrome screening in ovarian carcinomas. Histopathology 2016; 69:288-97. [PMID: 26799366 DOI: 10.1111/his.12934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2015] [Accepted: 01/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Lynch syndrome screening in ovarian carcinoma is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) protein in a retrospective cohort enriched for non-high-grade serous carcinomas and its association with outcome within histological types. METHODS AND RESULTS Tissue microarrays representing 612 ovarian carcinomas were tested for mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6) by immunohistochemistry. dMMR was detected in 13.8% of endometrioid and 2.4% of clear cell carcinomas, but not in other histological types. Within endometrioid carcinomas, 11 of 25 dMMR cases showed abnormal MLH1/PMS2, 10 cases showed abnormal MSH2/MSH6, and four cases showed only abnormal MSH6, indicating that at least 7.7% of endometrioid carcinomas have dMMR probably related to Lynch syndrome. The four dMMR clear cell carcinomas showed abnormal MSH2/MSH6 in three cases and only abnormal MSH6 in one case, all probably related to Lynch syndrome. Within endometrioid carcinomas, dMMR was significantly associated with age <50 years, synchronous endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, a higher CA125 level at diagnosis, higher FIGO grade, absence of ARID1A, and at least 20 CD8-positive intraepithelial lymphocytes per high-power field, but was not associated with cancer-specific death. Age <50 years, higher CA125 levels at diagnosis and at least 20 CD8-positive intraepithelial lymphocytes per high-power field remained significant after adjustment for multiple testing, but their sensitivity for identifying dMMR remained insufficient. CONCLUSION Our data support the policy of histotype-specific Lynch syndrome screening in ovarian carcinoma confined to endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter F Rambau
- Department of Pathology, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences-Bugando, Mwanza, Tanzania.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary Laboratory Services/Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Máire A Duggan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary Laboratory Services/Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Khadija Warfa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Helen Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Renee Perrier
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Charleston, SC, USA.,Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary Laboratory Services/Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Anglesio MS, Wang YK, Maassen M, Horlings HM, Bashashati A, Senz J, Mackenzie R, Grewal DS, Li-Chang H, Karnezis AN, Sheffield BS, McConechy MK, Kommoss F, Taran FA, Staebler A, Shah SP, Wallwiener D, Brucker S, Gilks CB, Kommoss S, Huntsman DG. Synchronous Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas: Evidence of Clonality. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 108:djv428. [PMID: 26832771 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2015] [Accepted: 12/14/2015] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Many women with ovarian endometrioid carcinoma present with concurrent endometrial carcinoma. Organ-confined and low-grade synchronous endometrial and ovarian tumors (SEOs) clinically behave as independent primary tumors rather than a single advanced-stage carcinoma. We used 18 SEOs to investigate the ancestral relationship between the endometrial and ovarian components. Based on both targeted and exome sequencing, 17 of 18 patient cases of simultaneous cancer of the endometrium and ovary from our series showed evidence of a clonal relationship, ie, primary tumor and metastasis. Eleven patient cases fulfilled clinicopathological criteria that would lead to classification as independent endometrial and ovarian primary carcinomas, including being of FIGO stage T1a/1A, with organ-restricted growth and without surface involvement; 10 of 11 of these cases showed evidence of clonality. Our observations suggest that the disseminating cells amongst SEOs are restricted to physically accessible and microenvironment-compatible sites yet remain indolent, without the capacity for further dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Yi Kan Wang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Madlen Maassen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Ali Bashashati
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Janine Senz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Robertson Mackenzie
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Diljot S Grewal
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Hector Li-Chang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Anthony N Karnezis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Brandon S Sheffield
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Melissa K McConechy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Friedrich Kommoss
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Florin A Taran
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Annette Staebler
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Sohrab P Shah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Sara Brucker
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG)
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, (MSA, HMH, JS, HLC, ANK, BSS, MKM, CBG, SK, DGH) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (MSA, DGH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada (YKW, AB, RM, DSG, SPS); Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (MM, FAT, DW, SB, SK); Division of Anatomic Pathology, Synlab MVZ, Institute of Pathology, Mannheim, Germany (FK); Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany (AS); Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada (CBG).
| |
Collapse
|