Routine Use of Adjunctive p16 Immunohistochemistry Improves Diagnostic Agreement of Cervical Biopsy Interpretation: Results From the CERTAIN Study

Anal and Perianal Preneoplastic Lesions

Anal cancer, mainly squamous cell carcinoma, is rare but increasing in prevalence, as is its precursor lesion, anal squamous dysplasia. They are both strongly associated with human papillomavirus infection. The 2-tiered Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology classification, low-grade SIL and high-grade SIL, is preferred to the 3-tiered anal intraepithelial neoplasia classification because of better interobserver agreement and clearer management implications. Immunohistochemistry with p16 is helpful to corroborate the diagnosis of squamous dysplasia. Similarly, immunohistochemistry is helpful to differentiate primary Paget disease from secondary Paget disease, which is usually due to anal squamous mucosal/epidermal involvement by primary rectal adenocarcinoma.

A comparative analysis of clinicopathological features of HPV-associated and HPV-independent cervical carcinomas based on P16 INK4a immunohistochemistry: A one-year retrospective study

The recent WHO classification of female genital tracts recommends cervical carcinomas to be further subtyped as HPV-associated and HPV-independent and accepted p16 immunoreactivity as a surrogate biomarker for HPV testing. This paper presents the clinicopathological spectrum of cervical carcinomas in correlation with p16 immunoreactivity.

Aims and Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the immunoreactivity of p16 in cervical carcinoma, subtype them into HPV-associated and HPV-independent based on p16 immunoreactivity, and correlate them with clinicopathological features.

Design

A hospital-based retrospective study of one-year duration was done after ethics approval. A total of 124 cases were identified, and various parameters like the presence of mitosis, lymphovascular invasion, tumor budding, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, the pattern of stromal invasion, and the pattern of necrosis were recorded and graded. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) with p16 marker was done in 40 cases, and immunoreactivity was correlated with clinical and histopathological parameters.

Statistical Analysis

Multivariate analysis was done with Fisher's exact test, and a P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

P16 was positive in 36 out of 40 cases which included 35 cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (keratinizing-14 out of 35 SCC, 11 positive out of these 14, non-keratinizing-21 out of 35 SCC, 20 positive, out of these 21), two cases of adenocarcinoma (both positive), two cases of adenosquamous carcinoma (both positive), and one case of small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (positive). p16 negative in four cases (10%) (keratinizing type-3, non-keratinizing-1). P value was significant for HPV-independent carcinoma and keratinizing SCC morphology. The P value was not significant when p16 positivity with other parameters.

Conclusion

HPV-associated were 90%, HPV-independent were 10%.

Pagetoid Squamous Intraepithelial Neoplasia of the Vulva as a Mimicker of Vulvar Extramammary Paget Disease: Two Cases with Basal Layer Sparing

Human papillomavirus-associated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia [HSIL] or VIN of usual type) is a lesion characterized by atypia extending from the basal layer to the upper epidermis. There are only rare reports of vulvar intraepithelial morphology exhibiting a pagetoid pattern of intraepithelial dissemination. We herein report two cases of vulvar HSIL in which a pagetoid pattern of spread and a largely uninvolved basal layer represented a diagnostic pitfall for extramammary Paget disease. Nuclear atypia reminiscent of HSIL in addition to expression of p16, KRT5/6, and p40 were however in favor of pagetoid HSIL. Although there is morphological and immunohistochemical overlap between these two entities, an accurate diagnosis is important, since an erroneous diagnosis of vulvar extramammary Paget disease may lead to an extensive workup comprising radiological imaging, colonoscopy, and cystoscopy.

The changing nature of HPV associated with high grade cervical lesions in vaccinated populations, a retrospective study of over 1700 cases in Scotland

BACKGROUND

Understanding the pattern and dominance of HPV types in high grade cervical disease within increasingly vaccinated populations will help inform the development of appropriate screening and management protocols.

METHODS

Over 1700 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) diagnosed between 2011 and 2017 in women younger than 25 were genotyped for HPV. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between HPV 16/18 positivity with biopsy-collection year, birth year, deprivation and vaccination status. Regression analysis was repeated for cross-protective types (31, 33 and 45). Type specific detail of non-vaccine types by vaccination status was presented descriptively.

RESULTS

Detection of HPV 16/18 or 16/18/31/33 and 45 was lower in CIN2 associated with full vaccination vs no vaccination (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.5 & 0.4; 95% CI 0.3-0.6 respectively) Similar observations were made for CIN3. The relative contribution of non-established high-risk types including those considered low risk was greater among vaccinated women with CIN2+ vs unvaccinated women with CIN2+.

CONCLUSIONS

The change in HPV distribution in CIN2+ in vaccinated populations is a further marker of vaccine impact. Additionally, the progression rate of CIN2+ in vaccinated populations may be lower given the shift in type distribution. The definition of high grade disease in vaccinated populations may warrant reassessment.

Human Papillomavirus Epidemiology and Prevention: Is There Still a Gender Gap?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is sexually transmitted, one of the three most common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in both males and females, and the most common viral STI. A crucial public health strategy to protect people against HPV is vaccination, which has shown its effectiveness in preventing HPV-related diseases. Presently, three types of vaccines are available (bivalent, quadrivalent, and nonvalent), and they all target the two most oncogenic virus genotypes (HPV 16 and 18). In recent years, the need to implement vaccination programmes that include all genders has been discussed in order to achieve herd immunity against HPV. To date, only a few countries have included young males in their vaccination programmes. Thus, our objective with this review is to provide an overview of the epidemiology of HPV and HPV prevention strategies and report the latest findings from the scientific literature.

Distribution of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is closely associated with HPV status and uterine position

Although cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions are considered to be not randomly distributed across the cervix, but predominantly in the anterior wall, the clinicopathological etiology remains unknown. Herein, we aimed to elucidate the relationship between quantitatively measured area of CIN2/3 and cervical cancer associated factors by retrospective cohort study. We analyzed 235 consecutive therapeutic conization specimens dissected as a single intact section to determine CIN2/3 area and its correlation with both clinical risk factors including human papillomavirus (HPV) status (single or multiple infection) and uterine position defined by transvaginal ultrasound. Cervical wall was classified into three groups: anterior: (11, 12, 1, and 2 o'clock), posterior (5, 6, 7, and 8 o'clock) and lateral (3, 4, 9, and 10 o'clock). Multiple regression revealed that younger age and HPV16 status were significantly correlated with CIN2/3 area (p = 0.0224 and p = 0.0075, respectively). The Jonckheere-Terpstra test showed a significant trend: CIN2/3 area was highest in the single HPV16 group, followed by the multiple HPV16 group and the non-HPV16 group (p < 0.0001). CIN2/3 area in the anterior wall was statistically significantly larger than the posterior and lateral wall (p = 0.0059 and p = 0.0107, respectively). CIN2/3 area in the anterior wall was significantly greater with anteversion-anteflexion than retroversion-retroflexion (p = 0.0485), whereas CIN2/3 area in the posterior wall was significantly larger with retroversion-retroflexion than anteversion-anteflexion (p = 0.0394). In conclusion, the topographical distribution of CIN2/3 area is closely associated with patient age, high-risk HPV status, especially single HPV16 infection and uterine position.

Provider- and Facility-Level Variation in Precancerous Cervical Biopsy Diagnoses

OBJECTIVES

Reproducibility of cervical biopsy diagnoses is low and may vary based on where the diagnostic test is performed and by whom. Our objective was to measure multilevel variation in diagnoses across colposcopists, pathologists, and laboratory facilities.

METHODS

We cross-sectionally examined variation in cervical biopsy diagnoses within the 5 sites of the Population-Based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR I) consortium within levels defined by colposcopists, pathologists, and laboratory facilities. Patients aged 18 to 65 years with a colposcopy with biopsy performed were included, with diagnoses categorized as normal, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1), grade 2 (CIN2), and grade 3 (CIN3). Using Markov Chain Monte-Carlo methods, we fit mixed-effects logistic regression models for biopsy diagnoses and presented median odds ratios (MORs), which reflect the variability within each level. Median odds ratios can be interpreted as the average increased odds a patient would have for a given outcome (e.g., CIN2 or CIN3 vs normal or CIN1) when switching to a provider with higher odds of diagnosing that outcome. The MOR is always 1 or greater, and a value of 1 indicates no variation in outcome for that level, with higher values indicating greater variation.

RESULTS

A total of 130,110 patients were included who received care across 82 laboratory facilities, 2,620 colposcopists, and 489 pathologists. Substantial variation in biopsy diagnoses was found at each level, with the most occurring between laboratory facilities, followed by pathologists and colposcopists. Substantial variation in biopsy diagnoses of CIN2 or CIN3 (vs normal or CIN1) was present between laboratory facilities (MOR: 1.26; 95% credible interval = 1.19-1.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Improving consistency in cervical biopsy diagnoses is needed to reduce underdiagnosis, overdiagnosis, and unnecessary treatment resulting from variation in cervical biopsy diagnoses.

Reclassification of atypical immature metaplasia of the uterine cervix by combination of nuclear features on hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections without auxiliary immunohistochemistry

Reclassification of endocervical atypical immature metaplasia (AIM) into reactive changes and neoplastic lesion is often challenging. We aimed to accurately reclassify AIM on hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained sections without auxiliary immunohistochemistry (IHC). A total of 133 AIM diagnosed by punch biopsy were reclassified by IHC for p16 and Ki-67 into high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (NILM/LSIL) as a reference. Nuclear features significantly associated with HSIL on HE-stained sections were extracted by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Propensity score (PS) of HSIL was calculated in each case and cut-off was determined by receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. As a result, AIM was reclassified into 104 NILM/LSIL and 29 HSIL by IHC. Compared with reference diagnosis, accuracy of pathologists' subjective diagnosis was 54.9% (kappa coefficient, 0.208). Three nuclear features on HE-stained sections, ie, nuclear enlargement with anisokaryosis, nuclear hyperchromasia, and mitosis, were significantly associated with HSIL. The ROC curve analyses revealed that PS and number of nuclear features were significant predictors of HSIL. Diagnostic accuracy of PS-based diagnosis was 76.7% (kappa, 0.447). When AIM with 2 or more of the 3 nuclear features was diagnosed with HSIL, diagnostic accuracy was 77.4% (kappa, 0.448). Nuclear feature-based diagnosis significantly improved diagnostic accuracy on HE-stained sections compared with subjective diagnosis and may be useful when IHC is not available. However, a considerable proportion of AIM would still remain misdiagnosed and IHC for p16 and Ki-67 should be mandatory for accurate reclassification.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Human Papillomavirus Test-and-Treat as Compared to Cytology-Based Screening for Prevention of Cervical Cancer Among Women With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol A5282

BACKGROUND

Cytology-based cervical cancer screening followed by confirmation and treatment of biopsy-proven high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (bHSIL) is difficult to implement in resource-constrained settings. We hypothesized that high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing followed by immediate cryotherapy of women with hrHPV (HPV screen-and-treat) may improve outcomes.

METHODS

Randomized, open-label, phase 2, multinational clinical trial enrolling women with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) age 18 or older with cervical hrHPV and having no cervical lesions or lesions appropriate for cryotherapy. Women were randomized to immediate cryotherapy (Arm A) or cytology-based screening (Arm B). For Arm A, cervical biopsies were obtained followed by cervical cryotherapy, and in Arm B, women with abnormal cytology underwent colposcopy followed by loop electroexcision procedure (LEEP) if bHSIL was detected. Women were followed through 30 months. The primary outcome was time to bHSIL detected from Month 6 through study completion.

RESULTS

In total, 288 women (145 in Arm A, 143 in Arm B) were randomized: median age 35 years, 84% on antiretroviral therapy, median CD4 501 cells/mm3. In Arm A, 39 (27%) of women had bHSIL at entry, and in Arm B, 88 (62%) had abnormal cytology, 22 (15%) were diagnosed with bHSIL, 12 (8%) underwent LEEP. In follow-up, 30 (21%) and 31 (22%) developed bHSIL; time to bHSIL was similar between arms (P=.94). The prevalence of hrHPV at Month 6 was similar between arms (61% and 70%, P=.13).

CONCLUSIONS

HPV test-and-treat was not associated with improved bHSIL outcomes as compared to cytology-based screening. More effective treatment options are required to improve outcomes from screen-and-treat programs.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT01315363.

Adjunctive use of p16 immunohistochemistry for optimizing management of CIN lesions in a high-risk human papillomavirus-positive population

INTRODUCTION

Immunostaining with p16^INK4a (p16), a tumor-suppressor surrogate protein biomarker for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) oncogenic activity, may complement standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histology review, and provide more objective criteria to support the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) diagnosis. With this study we assessed the impact of p16 immunohistochemistry on CIN grading in an hrHPV-based screening setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this post-hoc analysis, 326 histology follow-up samples from a group of hrHPV-positive women were stained with p16 immunohistochemistry. All H&E samples were centrally revised. The pathologists reported their level of confidence in classifying the CIN lesion.

RESULTS

Combining H&E and p16 staining resulted in a change of diagnosis in 27.3% (n = 89) of cases compared with the revised H&E samples, with a decrease of 34.5% (n = 18) in CIN1 and 22.7% (n = 15) in CIN2 classifications, and an increase of 18.3% (n = 19) in no CIN and 20.7% (n = 19) in CIN3 diagnoses. The level of confidence in CIN grading by the pathologist increased with adjunctive use of p16 immunohistochemistry to standard H&E.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that adjunctive use of p16 immunohistochemistry to H&E morphology reduces the number of CIN1 and CIN2 classifications with a proportional increase in no CIN and CIN3 diagnoses, compared with standard H&E-based CIN diagnosis alone. The pathologists felt more confident in classifying the material with H&E and p16 immunohistochemistry than by using H&E alone, particularly during assessment of small biopsies. Adjunctive use of p16 immunohistochemistry to standard H&E assessment of CIN would be valuable for the diagnostic accuracy, thereby optimizing CIN management and possibly decreasing overtreatment.

p16 Immunoreactivity Correlates With Morphologic Diagnosis of HPV-associated Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Study of 1000 Biopsies

p16 is the most useful diagnostic marker for human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated anogenital lesions. In the cervix, the pattern of p16 immunoreactivity generally correlates with lesion severity. p16 expression in anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) is far less studied. Whether such correlation holds true has to be determined. We correlated the degree and pattern of p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) results with morphologic diagnoses of 1000 anal squamous and transitional zone biopsy specimens. Using the Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology criteria, p16 IHC results were classified as block staining, partial staining, or negative. Among 150 samples without morphologic evidence of AIN, p16 was negative in 85% and partial staining in 15%. AIN 1 (n=400) revealed diverse results: 28% negative, 35% partial, and 37% block staining. Among AIN 2 (n=298), 89% were block, 9% partial staining, and 2% negative. AIN 3 (n=152) revealed block (95%) or partial staining (5%). For the detection of AIN 2/3, p16 block staining yielded 91% sensitivity, 73% specificity, 80% positive predictive value, 91% negative predictive value, and a Youden Index of 0.64. Combining block staining and partial staining slightly increased sensitivity (99%) and negative predictive value (98%), but significantly decreased specificity (43%), positive predictive value (59%) and Youden Index (0.42, P<0.001). As with the cervix, p16 immunoreactivity correlates with morphologic diagnoses of AIN. Block staining offers the optimal diagnostic value for AIN 2/3. Caution is required since AIN 1 frequently exhibits block staining; the prognostic value of p16 warrants further investigation.

Interobserver Agreement in the Diagnosis of Anal Dysplasia: Comparison Between Gastrointestinal and Gynaecologic Pathologists and Utility of Consensus Conferences

INTRODUCTION

Management of anal dysplasia relies on the accurate diagnosis of anal biopsy specimens. As institutions move toward subspecialty signout (SSSO), decisions must be made regarding whether to assign anal biopsies to the gastrointestinal (GI) or gynaecologic (GYN) pathology service.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 200 archival tissue biopsies of anal mucosa and circulated them among three GI pathologists and three GYN pathologists. Each pathologist separately scored each biopsy as normal, atypical, LSIL, or HSIL. Every case that was called HSIL by at least one pathologist was stained with p16 immunostain and a "gold standard" interpretation of whether a case represented HSIL was made.

RESULTS

The GI pathologists agreed on 97 (49%) cases prior to consensus; the GYN pathologists agreed on 33 (17%). The sensitivities of the 3 GI pathologists in detecting HSIL against the "gold standard" were 47%, 100%, and 21%, and for the GYN pathologists the sensitivities were 74%, 89%, and 84%; the sensitivities of both the GI and GYN consensus diagnoses were 74% each. The specificities of the 3 GI pathologists in detecting HSIL were 99%, 90%, and 100%, and for the GYN pathologists the specificities were 99%, 92%, and 91%; the specificities of both the GI and GYN consensus diagnoses were 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

A mild to moderate degree of interobserver variability exists in the diagnosis of anal dysplasia among pathologists. Our study does indicate the utility of some form of consensus conference, as overall agreement among GI pathologists and among GYN pathologists improved following in-person consensus.

Anogenital High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Comorbid With Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus and Lichen Planus

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to describe the clinicopathologic features of vulvovaginal or anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) comorbid with lichen sclerosus and/or lichen planus (LS/LP).

METHODS

The local pathology database identified 37 consecutive cases from 2007 to 2019 of vulvar, vaginal, or anal HSIL among women who had a histopathologic diagnosis of vulvar LS/LP. Cases had p16 and p53 immunoperoxidase stains. Clinical data included age, relative location of HSIL and LS/LP, immune-modifying conditions, tobacco use, treatment type, and follow-up. Histopathologic data included HSIL morphology categorized as warty-basaloid or keratinizing, p16 and p53 patterns within HSIL, and features of LS/LP.

RESULTS

The mean age was 69 years with a median follow-up up 42 months. Lichen sclerosus, alone or in combination with LP, was the comorbid dermatosis in 89%. Lichen sclerosus/lichen planus was overlapping or adjacent to HSIL in two-thirds of cases and located separately in the remainder. Rates of tobacco use and immunologic dysfunction were each 40%. In cases of co-located LS and HSIL, sclerosis was absent under the neoplasia in 57%. Twenty-four percent of HSIL cases showed keratinizing morphology; block-positive p16 and suprabasilar-dominant p53 helped distinguish HSIL from human papillomavirus-independent neoplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathologic identification of comorbid HSIL and LS/LP may be challenging because of keratinizing morphology and loss of diagnostic features of LS. Clinicopathologic correlation and use of p16 and p53 are essential to achieve an accurate diagnosis and enact disease-specific management plans.

A Randomized Comparison of Different Vaginal Self-sampling Devices and Urine for Human Papillomavirus Testing-Predictors 5.1

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening is rapidly replacing cytology as the cervical screening modality of choice. In addition to being more sensitive than cytology, it can be done on self-collected vaginal or urine samples. This study will compare the high-risk HPV positivity rates and sensitivity of self-collected vaginal samples using four different collection devices and a urine sample.

METHODS

A total of 620 women referred for colposcopy were invited to provide an initial stream urine sample collected with the Colli-Pee device and take two vaginal self-samples, using either a dry flocked swab (DF) and a wet dacron swab (WD), or a HerSwab (HS) and Qvintip (QT) device. HPV testing was performed by the BD Onclarity HPV Assay.

RESULTS

A total of 600 vaginal sample pairs were suitable for analysis, and 505 were accompanied by a urine sample. Similar positivity rates and sensitivities for CIN2+ and CIN3+ were seen for DF, WD, and urine, but lower values were seen for QT and HS. No clear user preferences were seen between devices, but women found urine easiest to collect, and were more confident they had taken the sample correctly. The lowest confidence in collection was reported for HS.

CONCLUSIONS

Urine, a DF swab, and WD swab all performed well and were well received by the women, whereas the Qvintip and HerSwab devices were less satisfactory.

IMPACT

This is the first study to compare five self-sampling methods in the same women taken at the same time. It supports wider use of urine or vaginal self-sampling for cervical screening.

The CERTAIN Study Results: Adjunctive p16 Immunohistochemistry Use in Cervical Biopsies According to LAST Criteria

The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST) Project recommends the use of p16 immunohistochemistry as an adjunct to morphologic assessment of cervical biopsies according to a specific set of criteria. We analyzed the effect of adjunctive p16 according to LAST criteria in a US-based diagnostic utility study involving 70 surgical pathologists providing a total of 38,500 reads on cervical biopsies. Compared with the results obtained using hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides only, including p16-stained slides per LAST criteria increased sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing histologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions across all cases by 8.1% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 6.5-9.7; P<0.0001) and 3.5% (95% CI, 2.8-4.2; P<0.0001), respectively, using expert consensus diagnoses on hematoxylin and eosin+p16 as reference. Within the subset of cases classified by the pathologists as fulfilling the LAST criteria, adding p16 significantly increased both sensitivity (+11.8%; 95% CI, 9.5-14.0; P<0.0001) and specificity (+9.7%; 95% CI, 7.8-11.5; P<0.0001). However, a comparable improvement in sensitivity (+11.0%; 95% CI, 7.8-14.1; P<0.0001) was found when p16 was used in cases for which p16 staining was not ordered per LAST by the pathologists, whereas specificity decreased by -0.8% (95% CI, -1.1 to -0.5; P<0.0001). The study demonstrates a clinically and statistically significant increase in sensitivity and specificity for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion when p16 is used according to LAST criteria. Expanding the use of p16 into non-LAST cases would lead to a comparable improvement in sensitivity within this subgroup of biopsies, at the cost of a minimal, but statistically significant difference in specificity.

Clinical Challenges in Managing Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2: A Report From a Cross-sectional Survey

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the study were to determine the management strategies offered to women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN 2) and the attitude of colposcopists toward its histological diagnosis and to identify the criteria used to select women for conservative management.

METHODS

Colposcopists working in Spain were invited to participate in an online questionnaire via the Spanish Gynecology and Colposcopy Societies. The survey included 42 questions covering the 3 objectives of the study. One hundred eighty-two colposcopists representing all autonomous regions in Spain responded. The response rate was 26.2%, considering the total number of members.

RESULTS

Most colposcopists offer conservative management in selected cases (153/182). The preferred follow-up interval is 6 months (65%), followed by 3-4 months (30%). Observation was considered no longer appropriate after 24 months (29.5%) and 12 months (26.3%), and 24.3% expressed that it depended on women's plan to conceive. During conservative management, 93.9% always perform a cytology, 62.7% human papillomavirus testing, 96.8% colposcopy, 47.9% cervical biopsy, and 28.1% endocervical curettage. Forty-five percent consider that CIN 2 merely represents a misclassified CIN 1 or CIN 3, whereas 46.2% think that CIN 2 lesions are unlikely to regress. Most respondents considered that age older than 40 years (81.3%), human papillomavirus 16 infection (62.1%), HIV infection (76.8%), positive p16 immunostaining (60.2%), a large lesion occupying more than 50% of the cervix (87%), endocervical involvement (91.6%), and previous treatment for CIN 2-3 (77%) are contraindications for conservative management.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of CIN 2 remains challenging for colposcopists, and a lack of consensus still exists in clinical practice. A better understanding of the natural history of CIN 2 and its clinical outcomes is still necessary to guide clinicians in its management.

Diagnostic Criteria for Differentiated Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Vulvar Aberrant Maturation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to describe the features required for diagnosis of differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) and vulvar aberrant maturation (VAM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The International Society of the Study of Vulvovaginal Diseases tasked the difficult pathologic diagnoses committee to develop consensus recommendations for clinicopathologic diagnosis of vulvar lichen planus, lichen sclerosus, and dVIN. The dVIN subgroup reviewed the literature and formulated diagnostic criteria that were reviewed by the committee and then approved by the International Society of the Study of Vulvovaginal Diseases membership.

RESULTS

Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia is the immediate precursor of human papillomavirus (HPV)-independent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma and shows a spectrum of clinical and microscopic appearances, some overlapping with HPV-related neoplasia. The histopathologic definition of dVIN is basal atypia combined with negative or nonblock-positive p16 and basal overexpressed, aberrant negative, or wild-type p53. The most common pattern of dVIN is keratinizing with acanthosis, aberrant rete ridge pattern, and premature maturation. The morphologic spectrum of keratinizing dVIN includes hypertrophic, atrophic, acantholytic, and subtle forms. A few dVIN cases are nonkeratinizing, with basaloid cells replacing more than 60% of epithelium. Vulvar aberrant maturation is an umbrella term for lesions with aberrant maturation that arise out of lichenoid dermatitis and lack the basal atypia required for dVIN.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of women at risk for dVIN and VAM requires a collaborative approach by clinicians and pathologists experienced in vulvar disorders. Close surveillance of women with lichen sclerosus and use of these recommendations may assist in prevention of HPV-independent squamous cell carcinoma through detection and treatment of dVIN and VAM.

The value of HPV E6/E7 mRNA quantitative analysis in distinguishing high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions from low-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions

A quantitative assay for HPV E6/E7 mRNA may be a valuable tool for cervical cancer screening. The purpose of this study is to compare the expression levels of HPV E6/E7 mRNA in high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and to determine a new method that can be used to distinguish cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Routine cytology, HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA, histology, and p16 immunohistochemistry were performed in tissues from 142 patients with cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Significant differences were observed between the E6/E7 mRNA copy number values between the LSIL and HSIL cases (Mann-Whitney U-test, P < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value (≥9,222.00 copies/mL) was determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve to predict diagnostic performance. Out of the 161 samples tested in this study, four cases were classified cytologically as HSIL but had normal histology. The E6/E7 copy numbers in these cases were all higher than 9,222 copies/mL. Therefore, a quantitative assay for HPV E6/E7 mRNA may be a valuable tool that can be used to distinguish HSIL and LSIL, especially for those with HSIL, for which samples are not obtained by biopsy, or when HSIL is difficult to distinguish by morphology and p16 immunohistochemistry.

A Pooled Analysis to Compare the Clinical Characteristics of Human Papillomavirus-positive and -Negative Cervical Precancers

Given that high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is the necessary cause of virtually all cervical cancer, the clinical meaning of HPV-negative cervical precancer is unknown. We, therefore, conducted a literature search in Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar to identify English-language studies in which (i) HPV-negative and -positive, histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe diagnoses (CIN2+) were detected and (ii) summarized statistics or deidentified individual data were available to summarize proportions of biomarkers indicating risk of cancer. Nineteen studies including 3,089 (91.0%) HPV-positive and 307 (9.0%) HPV-negative CIN2+ were analyzed. HPV-positive CIN2+ (vs. HPV-negative CIN2+) was more likely to test positive for biomarkers linked to cancer risk: a study diagnosis of CIN3+ (vs. CIN2; 18 studies; 0.56 vs. 0.24; P < 0.001) preceding high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology (15 studies; 0.54 vs. 0.10; P < 0.001); and high-grade colposcopic impression (13 studies; 0.30 vs. 0.18; P = 0.03). HPV-negative CIN2+ was more likely to test positive for low-risk HPV genotypes than HPV-positive CIN2+ (P < 0.001). HPV-negative CIN2+ appears to have lower cancer risk than HPV-positive CIN2+. Clinical studies of human high-risk HPV testing for screening to prevent cervical cancer may refer samples of HPV test-negative women for disease ascertainment to correct verification bias in the estimates of clinical performance. However, verification bias adjustment of the clinical performance of HPV testing may overcorrect/underestimate its clinical performance to detect truly precancerous abnormalities.

The detection of DNA methylation of tumour suppressor genes in cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: A prospective cytological-histological correlation study of 70 cases

BACKGROUND

DNA methylation has been suggested as one of the epigenetic changes promoting carcinogenesis. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the methylation status of CADM 1, MAL and hsa-miR-124 genes in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples with a histological correlation.

METHODS

Seventy histologically confirmed cases of HSIL paired with prior screening LBC diagnosis of HSIL within a 3-month interval were selected. Histologically, the lesions were reviewed and assessed including: (a) number of blocks harbouring dysplastic squamous epithelium; (b) number of blocks containing glandular extension of dysplastic epithelium; and (c) the depth of glandular extension (which was assessed semi-quantitatively as graded 1-3). Human papillomavirus (HPV) subtyping was performed from residual LBC materials using the LINEAR ARRAY HPV Genotyping Test and in-house polymerase chain reaction targeting the HPV E1 gene. The detection of methylation silencing of tumour suppressor genes CADM1, MAL and hsa-miR-124 was performed by multiplex methylation-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

A positive methylation status was detected in 41 cases (58.6%). The number of blocks with HSIL varied from one to 13. Glandular extension was seen in 44 cases with the number of blocks involved ranging from one to 10. The depth of HSIL glandular extension varied.

CONCLUSION

The DNA methylation test allows HSIL lesions to be divided into two distinct groups of methylated HSIL in significantly older patients and unmethylated HSIL in younger patients. This study was not able to prove that methylation status in cervical HSIL correlates with the size of the lesion (measured by the number of blocks involved) or with HSIL propensity for endocervical glandular extension, nor with HPV type or multi-infection.

Relationships of p16 Immunohistochemistry and Other Biomarkers With Diagnoses of Cervical Abnormalities: Implications for LAST Terminology

CONTEXT.—

Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST) standardization recommended p16INK4a immunohistochemistry (p16 IHC) for biopsies diagnosed morphologically as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 (CIN2) to classify them as low-grade or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs).

OBJECTIVE.—

To describe the relationships of p16 IHC and other biomarkers associated with cervical cancer risk with biopsy diagnoses.

DESIGN.—

A statewide, stratified sample of cervical biopsies diagnosed by community pathologists (CPs), including 1512 CIN2, underwent a consensus, expert pathologist panel (EP) review (without p16 IHC results), p16 IHC interpretation by a third pathology group, and human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping, results of which were grouped hierarchically according to cancer risk. Antecedent cytologic interpretations were also available.

RESULTS.—

Biopsies were more likely to test p16 IHC positive with increasing severity of CP diagnoses, overall (Ptrend ≤ .001) and within each HPV risk group (Ptrend ≤ .001 except for low-risk HPV [Ptrend < .010]). All abnormal grades of CP-diagnosed biopsies were more likely to test p16 IHC positive with a higher HPV risk group (Ptrend < .001), and testing p16 IHC positive was associated with higher HPV risk group than testing p16 IHC negative for each grade of CP-diagnosed biopsies (P < .001). p16 IHC-positive, CP-diagnosed CIN2 biopsies were less likely than CP-diagnosed CIN3 biopsies to test HPV16 positive, have an antecedent HSIL+ cytology, or to be diagnosed as CIN3+ by the EP (P < .001 for all). p16 IHC-positive, CP-diagnosed CIN1 biopsies had lower HPV risk groups than p16 IHC-negative, CP-diagnosed CIN2 biopsies (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS.—

p16 IHC-positive, CP-diagnosed CIN2 appears to be lower cancer risk than CP-diagnosed CIN3. LAST classification of "HSIL" diagnosis, which includes p16 IHC-positive CIN2, should annotate the morphologic diagnosis (CIN2 or CIN3) to inform all management decisions, which is especially important for young (<30 years) women diagnosed with CIN2 for whom surveillance rather than treatment is recommended.

Moving forward-the 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors and beyond: implications and suggestions for laboratories

The 2019 ASCCP Risk Based Management Consensus Guidelines for prevention of cervical cancer promote clinical management recommendations aligned with our increased understanding of HPV biology and cervical carcinogenesis. They employ HPV-based testing as the basis for risk estimation, allow for personalized risk-based management by incorporating knowledge of current results with prior results, and streamline incorporation of new test methods as they are validated. They continue to support the principles of "equal management for equal risk" and "balancing harms and benefits" adopted in the 2012 version of the guidelines. These updated guidelines will be able to adjust for decreasing CIN3+ risks as more patients who received HPV vaccination reach screening age. Pathology organizations were closely involved in the development of these guidelines. Herein the pathologists who served as representatives to the 2019 ASCCP guidelines steering committee and workgroups, summarize the changes that are relevant to laboratories, pathologists, and cytotechnologists. Prior relevant screening and reporting recommendations that have not been widely and/or inconsistently adopted by laboratories are also discussed and considerations for modification of laboratory practices offered.

p16 Positive Histologically Bland Squamous Metaplasia of the Cervix: What does It Signify?

With increasing use of p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in diagnosis of premalignant lesions of cervix, we occasionally encounter p16 positivity in squamous metaplasia that lacks morphologic characteristics of "atypical squamous metaplasia" or of squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL). Our study aims to investigate if transcriptionally active human papilloma virus (HPV) can be identified in such foci and if they have any relationship with squamo-columnar junction (SCJ) cells. Twenty-two cases of cervical specimens with at least a focus of p16 positive bland squamous metaplasia, were selected. HPV E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization followed by IHC for CK7 (SCJ biomarker), Ki67, and HPV16 E2, were performed. Follow-up information was obtained. Four cases were excluded due to insufficient tissue. Of the final 18 cases, HPV E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization was positive in all. Nine cases showed positivity in >50% cells and the epithelial thickness involved was ≥lower two-thirds in 13 cases. Of the further evaluable 15 cases, CK7 was positive in 14, Ki67 was positive in 10, and HPV16 E2 was negative in all. Concomitant high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion was identified in 10 cases. On follow-up (duration: 1 to 19 mo), 6 patients showed histologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Our study demonstrates that p16 positivity in squamous metaplasia of cervix is associated with the presence of transcriptionally active high-risk HPV even when there are no clear morphologic features of dysplasia. Our results suggest that these lesions are early SILs or SILs that are not yet morphologically evident, most of which arise from SCJ and should be closely followed.

Comparison of Human Papillomavirus Genotypes in Penile Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Associated Lesions: LCM-PCR Study of 87 Lesions in 8 Patients

Penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PeIN) is currently classified in human papillomavirus (HPV)- and non-HPV-related subtypes with variable HPV genotypes. PeINs are frequently associated with other intraepithelial lesions in the same specimen. The aim of this study was to detect and compare HPV genotypes in PeINs and associated lesions using high-precision laser capture microdissection-polymerase chain reaction and p16^INK4a immunostaining. We evaluated resected penile specimens from 8 patients and identified 33 PeINs and 54 associated lesions. The most common subtype was warty PeIN, followed by warty-basaloid and basaloid PeIN. Associated lesions were classical condylomas (17 cases), atypical classical condylomas (2 cases), flat condylomas (9 cases), atypical flat condylomas (6 cases), flat lesions with mild atypia (12 cases), and squamous hyperplasia (8 cases). After a comparison, identical HPV genotypes were found in PeIN and associated lesions in the majority of the patients (7 of 8 patients). HPV16 was the most common genotype present in both PeIN and corresponding associated lesion (50% of the patients). Nonspecific flat lesions with mild atypia, classical condylomas, and atypical condylomas were the type of associated lesions most commonly related to HPV16. Other high-risk HPV genotypes present in PeIN and associated nonspecific flat lesion with mild atypia were HPV35 and HPV39. In this study of HPV in the microenvironment of penile precancerous lesions, we identified identical high-risk HPV genotypes in PeIN and classical, flat, or atypical condylomas and, specially, in nonspecific flat lesions with mild atypia. It is possible that some of these lesions represent hitherto unrecognized precancerous lesions.