1
|
Wheeler CM, Torrez-Martinez NE, Torres-Chavolla E, Parvu V, Andrews JC, Du R, Robertson M, Joste NE, Cuzick J. Comparing the performance of 2 human papillomavirus assays for a new use indication: a real-world evidence-based evaluation in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230:243.e1-243.e11. [PMID: 37806613 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.09.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The US Food and Drug Administration supports innovations to facilitate new indications for high-risk human papillomavirus testing. This report describes the retrospective testing of stored specimens and analysis of existing data to efficiently and cost-effectively support a new indication for the Onclarity human papillomavirus assay (Becton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences - Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, Sparks, MD). The performance of this index test was compared with that of a predicate test, the cobas human papillomavirus assay (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Both human papillomavirus assays are based on real-time polymerase chain reaction platforms that detect the presence of 14 high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes. The predicate assay reports human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 as individual results and the other 12 human papillomavirus genotypes as 1 pooled result. The index assay reports 9 independent results (human papillomavirus types 16, 18, 31, 33/58, 35/39/68, 45, 51, 52, and 56/59/66). Both the index and predicate assays are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for cervical cancer screening, but at the time that this study was initiated, the index human papillomavirus assay was not approved for use with cervical specimens collected in PreservCyt (Hologic, Inc, San Diego, CA) liquid-based cytology media. OBJECTIVE The performance of the index human papillomavirus assay was compared with that of the predicate human papillomavirus assay for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 or greater and 3 or greater (≥CIN2 or ≥CIN3) using PreservCyt liquid-based cytology specimens collected from women aged 21 to 65 years. In addition, the ability of the index test's extended genotyping to stratify ≥CIN2 and ≥CIN3 risks, using these specimens, was evaluated. STUDY DESIGN The New Mexico HPV Pap Registry was used to select an age- and cytology-stratified random sample of 19,879 women undergoing opportunistic cervical screening and follow-up in routine clinical practice across New Mexico. A subset (n = 4820) of PreservCyt specimens was selected from 19,879 women for paired testing by the index and predicate human papillomavirus assays within age and cytology strata and included women with or without cervical biopsy follow-up. Point estimate differences and ratios were calculated for cervical disease detection and positivity rates, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals to determine statistical significance. The cumulative risk of ≥CIN2 or ≥CIN3, with up to 5-year follow-up, was estimated for the index assay using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS The 5-year cumulative ≥CIN3 detection rates were 5.6% for the index assay and 4.6% for the predicate assay (difference, 1.0%; 95% confidence interval, 0.5%-1.5%). The ≥CIN3 positivity rates within <1 year were 95.3% for the index assay and 94.5% for the predicate assay (ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.06). The ≥CIN3 cumulative positivity rates for the index and predicate assays were also similar at 5 years. Among cases of ≥CIN3, the positive agreement rates between the index and predicate assays for human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 were 100.0% (95% confidence interval, 95.0%-100.0%) and 90.9% (95% confidence interval, 62.3%-98.4%), respectively. Human papillomavirus type 16 carried the highest ≥CIN2 or ≥CIN3 risk, followed by human papillomavirus types 18/31/33/58/52/45 and human papillomavirus types 35/56/59/51/56/59/66. CONCLUSION The index and predicate human papillomavirus assays demonstrated equivalent performance, and extended human papillomavirus genotyping, using the index assay, provided effective ≥CIN2 and ≥CIN3 risk stratification, supporting a new indication for use of the index assay with PreservCyt.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cosette M Wheeler
- Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM; Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM.
| | - Norah E Torrez-Martinez
- Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Edith Torres-Chavolla
- Becton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences - Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, Sparks, MD
| | - Valentin Parvu
- Becton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences - Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, Sparks, MD
| | - Jeffrey C Andrews
- Becton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences - Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, Sparks, MD
| | - Ruofei Du
- Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Michael Robertson
- Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Nancy E Joste
- Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cuzick J, Adcock R, Kinney W, Castle PE, Robertson M, McDonald RM, Stoler MH, Du R, Wheeler CM. Impact of HPV testing in opportunistic cervical screening: Support for primary HPV screening in the United States. Int J Cancer 2023; 153:83-93. [PMID: 36946690 PMCID: PMC10639031 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical screening increases diagnosis of precancer and reduces the incidence of cervical cancer more than cytology alone. However, real-world evidence from diverse practice settings is lacking for the United States (U.S.) to support clinician adoption of primary HPV screening. Using a population-based registry, which captures all cervical cytology (with or without HPV testing) and all cervical biopsies, we conducted a real-world evidence study of screening in women aged 30 to 64 years across the entire state of New Mexico. Negative cytology was used to distinguish cotests from reflex HPV tests. A total of 264 198 cervical screening tests (with exclusions based on clinical history) were recorded as the first screening test between 2014 and 2017. Diagnoses of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 or 3 or greater (CIN2+, CIN3+) from 2014 to 2019 were the main outcomes. Of cytology-negative screens, 165 595 (67.1%) were cotests and 4.8% of these led to biopsy within 2 years vs 3.2% in the cytology-only group. Among cytology-negative, HPV tested women, 347 of 398 (87.2%) CIN2+ cases were diagnosed in HPV-positive women, as were 147 of 164 (89.6%) CIN3+ cases. Only 29/921 (3.2%) CIN3+ and 67/1964 (3.4%) CIN2+ cases were diagnosed in HPV-negative, cytology-positive women with biopsies. Under U.S. opportunistic screening, across a diversity of health care delivery practices, and in a population suffering multiple disparities, we show adding HPV testing to cytology substantially increased the yield of CIN2+ and CIN3+. CIN3+ was rarely diagnosed in HPV-negative women with abnormal cytology, supporting U.S. primary HPV-only screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Prevention, Diagnosis and Detection, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Rachael Adcock
- Centre for Prevention, Diagnosis and Detection, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Center for HPV Prevention, UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | | | - Philip E. Castle
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Michael Robertson
- Center for HPV Prevention, UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Ruth M. McDonald
- Center for HPV Prevention, UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Mark H. Stoler
- Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Ruofei Du
- Center for HPV Prevention, UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Center for HPV Prevention, UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Del Vecchio NJ, Beaber EF, Garcia MP, Wheeler CM, Kamineni A, Chao C, Chubak J, Corley DA, Owens CL, Winer RL, Pruitt SL, Raine-Bennett T, Feldman S, Silverberg M. Provider- and Facility-Level Variation in Precancerous Cervical Biopsy Diagnoses. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2023; 27:113-119. [PMID: 36728078 PMCID: PMC10038855 DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Reproducibility of cervical biopsy diagnoses is low and may vary based on where the diagnostic test is performed and by whom. Our objective was to measure multilevel variation in diagnoses across colposcopists, pathologists, and laboratory facilities. METHODS We cross-sectionally examined variation in cervical biopsy diagnoses within the 5 sites of the Population-Based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR I) consortium within levels defined by colposcopists, pathologists, and laboratory facilities. Patients aged 18 to 65 years with a colposcopy with biopsy performed were included, with diagnoses categorized as normal, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1), grade 2 (CIN2), and grade 3 (CIN3). Using Markov Chain Monte-Carlo methods, we fit mixed-effects logistic regression models for biopsy diagnoses and presented median odds ratios (MORs), which reflect the variability within each level. Median odds ratios can be interpreted as the average increased odds a patient would have for a given outcome (e.g., CIN2 or CIN3 vs normal or CIN1) when switching to a provider with higher odds of diagnosing that outcome. The MOR is always 1 or greater, and a value of 1 indicates no variation in outcome for that level, with higher values indicating greater variation. RESULTS A total of 130,110 patients were included who received care across 82 laboratory facilities, 2,620 colposcopists, and 489 pathologists. Substantial variation in biopsy diagnoses was found at each level, with the most occurring between laboratory facilities, followed by pathologists and colposcopists. Substantial variation in biopsy diagnoses of CIN2 or CIN3 (vs normal or CIN1) was present between laboratory facilities (MOR: 1.26; 95% credible interval = 1.19-1.36). CONCLUSIONS Improving consistency in cervical biopsy diagnoses is needed to reduce underdiagnosis, overdiagnosis, and unnecessary treatment resulting from variation in cervical biopsy diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elisabeth F. Beaber
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael P. Garcia
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Aruna Kamineni
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Chun Chao
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Jessica Chubak
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Douglas A. Corley
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | | | - Rachel L. Winer
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Sandi L. Pruitt
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; and Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Tina Raine-Bennett
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Sarah Feldman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Michael Silverberg
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adcock R, Nedjai B, Lorincz AT, Scibior‐Bentkowska D, Banwait R, Torrez‐Martinez N, Robertson M, Cuzick J, Wheeler CM. DNA methylation testing with S5 for triage of high-risk HPV positive women. Int J Cancer 2022; 151:993-1004. [PMID: 35477862 PMCID: PMC9543033 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Methylation of host and viral genes is promising for triage of women with high-risk human papillomavirus infections (hrHPV). Using a population-based sample of hrHPV positive women with cervical biopsies within 12 months after cervical screening, the clinical value of the S5 methylation classifier (S5), HPV genotyping and cytology were compared as potential triage tests, for outcomes of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 or greater (CIN3+), CIN2+ and CIN2, and the area under the curve (AUC) calculated. S5 scores increased with histopathology severity (Ptrend < .001). For CIN3+, the AUC was 0.780 suggesting S5 provides good discrimination between
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Adcock
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population HealthQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
- Center for HPV PreventionUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer CenterAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
| | - Belinda Nedjai
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population HealthQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Attila T. Lorincz
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population HealthQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Dorota Scibior‐Bentkowska
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population HealthQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Rawinder Banwait
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population HealthQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Norah Torrez‐Martinez
- Center for HPV PreventionUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer CenterAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
| | - Michael Robertson
- Center for HPV PreventionUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer CenterAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population HealthQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Center for HPV PreventionUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer CenterAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chao CR, Chubak J, Beaber EF, Kamineni A, Mao C, Silverberg MJ, Tiro JA, Skinner C, Garcia M, Corley DA, Winer RL, Raine‐Bennett T, Feldman S, Wheeler CM. Gaps in the screening process for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in four diverse US health care settings. Cancer Med 2022; 12:3705-3717. [PMID: 36106421 PMCID: PMC9939213 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Potential care gaps in the cervical cancer screening process among women diagnosed with cervical cancer in an era with increased human papillomavirus (HPV) testing have not been extensively evaluated. METHODS Women diagnosed with cervical cancer between ages 21 and 65 at four study sites between 2010 and 2014 were included. Screening histories were ascertained from 0.5 to 4 years prior to cervical cancer diagnosis. We identified potential care gaps in the screening history for each woman and classified them into one of three mutually exclusive types: lack of a screening test, screening test failure, and diagnostic/treatment care gap. Distributions of care gaps were tabulated by stage, histology, and study site. Multivariable nominal logistic regression was used to examine the associations between demographic and cancer characteristics and type of care gap. RESULTS Of 499 women evaluated, 46% lacked a screening test in the time window examined, 31% experienced a screening test failure, and 22% experienced a diagnostic/treatment care gap. More than half of the women with advanced cancer and squamous cell carcinoma lacked a screening test compared to 31% and 24% of women with localized cancer and adenocarcinoma, respectively. Women aged 21-29 at diagnosis were more likely to experience screening test failure and diagnostic/treatment care gap, while those aged 50-65 were more likely to lack a screening test, compared to women aged 30-39. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate a continuing need to develop interventions targeting unscreened and under-screened women and improve detection and diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in women undergoing cervical cancer screening and diagnostic follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun R. Chao
- Department of Research and EvaluationKaiser Permanente Southern CaliforniaPasadenaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Jessica Chubak
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research InstituteSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Elisabeth F. Beaber
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Public Health Sciences DivisionSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Aruna Kamineni
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research InstituteSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Connie Mao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | | | - Jasmin A. Tiro
- Department of Population and Data SciencesUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTexasUSA,Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterDallasTexasUSA
| | - Celette Skinner
- Department of Population and Data SciencesUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTexasUSA,Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterDallasTexasUSA
| | - Michael Garcia
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Public Health Sciences DivisionSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Douglas A. Corley
- Division of ResearchKaiser Permanente Northern CaliforniaOaklandCaliforniaUSA
| | - Rachel L. Winer
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of Washington School of Public HealthSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Tina Raine‐Bennett
- Division of ResearchKaiser Permanente Northern CaliforniaOaklandCaliforniaUSA,Medicines360San FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Sarah Feldman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Center for HPV PreventionUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer CenterAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brown DR, Castellsagué X, Ferris D, Garland SM, Huh W, Steben M, Wheeler CM, Saah A, Luxembourg A, Li S, Velicer C. Human papillomavirus seroprevalence and seroconversion following baseline detection of nine human papillomavirus types in young women. Tumour Virus Res 2022; 13:200236. [PMID: 35525430 PMCID: PMC9172167 DOI: 10.1016/j.tvr.2022.200236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Estimates of the humoral immune response to incident human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are limited. Methods In this post hoc analysis of 3875 women aged 16–23 years from a 4-valent HPV vaccine trial (NCT00092482), HPV seroprevalence on day 1 was measured with a 9-valent HPV (HPV 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58) competitive Luminex immunoassay and compared with cervical/external genital HPV detection by polymerase chain reaction. In the control group, among women who were HPV DNA‒negative on day 1, seroconversion following initial HPV detection was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results Type-specific HPV seropositivity among women with no day 1 cervical/external genital HPV detection was 0.6%–3.6%. Women with any 9-valent HPV (9vHPV) cervical/external genital detection (796/3875; 20.5%) had concordant seropositivity ranging from 13.4% (HPV 45) to 38.5% (HPV 6). Among women in the control group who were negative for all HPV types on day 1, seroconversion by month 30 after initial detection ranged from 29% (HPV 45) to 75% (HPV 16). Conclusions Humoral immune response to HPV is variable and dynamic, depending on type-specific exposure. This longitudinal analysis provides insight into the relationship between incident infection and seropositivity. ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT00092482 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00092482. Research on humoral immune responses to HPV infection are limited. HPV-related serologic responses were analyzed in women aged 16–23 years. Type-specific HPV seropositivity was low in women without initial HPV DNA detection. Concordant seropositivity in women with any 9vHPV DNA detection ranged from 13% to 40%. Seroconversion to the same genotype within 30 months of an infection was common.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darron R Brown
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Van Nuys Med Science Building, Suite 224, 635 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| | - Xavier Castellsagué
- Institut Catala D'Oncologia, IDIBELL, CIBERESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Granvia de L'Hospitalet 199-203, Barcelona, Catalonia, 08908, Spain
| | - Daron Ferris
- Clinica CerviCusco, Calle Los Saucos B-8-2, Larapa, Curco, Peru
| | - Suzanne M Garland
- Centre for Women's Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital, Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Women's Hospital, Locked Bag 300
- Corner Grattan Street and Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Warner Huh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama, 1700 6th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - Marc Steben
- Département de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, École de Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, 1851 East Sherbrooke Street, Montréal, Quebec, H2K 4L5, Canada
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1201 Camino de Salud NE, Albuquerque, NM, 87102, USA
| | - Alfred Saah
- Merck & Co., Inc., 126 E Lincoln Ave, Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA
| | | | - Se Li
- Merck & Co., Inc., 126 E Lincoln Ave, Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Banila C, Lorincz AT, Scibior-Bentkowska D, Clifford GM, Kumbi B, Beyene D, Wheeler CM, Cuschieri K, Cuzick J, Nedjai B. Clinical performance of methylation as a biomarker for cervical carcinoma in situ and cancer diagnosis: A worldwide study. Int J Cancer 2022; 150:290-302. [PMID: 34562270 PMCID: PMC8627461 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
The shift towards primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening has necessitated the search for a secondary triage test that provides sufficient sensitivity to detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer, but also brings an improved specificity to avoid unnecessary clinical work and colposcopy referrals. We evaluated the performance of the previously described DNA-methylation test (S5) in detecting CIN3 and cancers from diverse geographic settings in high-, medium- and low-income countries, using the cut-off of 0.80 and exploratory cut-offs of 2.62 and 3.70. Assays were performed using exfoliated cervical specimens (n = 808) and formalin-fixed biopsies (n = 166) from women diagnosed with cytology-negative results (n = 220), CIN3 (n = 204) and cancer stages I (n = 245), II (n = 249), III (n = 28) and IV (n = 22). Methylation increased proportionally with disease severity (Cuzick test for trend, P < .0001). S5 accurately separated women with negative-histology from CIN3 or cancer (P < .0001). At the 0.80 cut-off, 543/544 cancers were correctly identified as S5 positive (99.81%). At cut-off 3.70, S5 showed a sensitivity of 95.77% with improved specificity. The S5 odds ratios of women negative for cervical disease vs CIN3+ were significantly higher than for HPV16/18 genotyping at all cut-offs (all P < .0001). At S5 cut-off 0.80, 96.15% of consistently high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-negative cancers (tested with multiple hrHPV-genotyping assay) were positive by S5. These cancers may have been missed in current primary hrHPV-screening programmes. The S5 test can accurately detect CIN3 and malignancy irrespective of geographic context and setting. The test can be used as a screening and triage tool. Adjustment of the S5 cut-off can be performed considering the relative importance given to sensitivity vs specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiana Banila
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Attila T. Lorincz
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dorota Scibior-Bentkowska
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gary M. Clifford
- Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France
| | - Birhanu Kumbi
- College of Natural and Computational Sciences Department of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia
| | - Dereje Beyene
- College of Natural and Computational Sciences Department of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Centre for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Kate Cuschieri
- Scottish HPV Reference Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Belinda Nedjai
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Webster E, Seiger KW, Core SB, Collar AL, Knapp-Broas H, Graham J, Shrestha M, Afzaal S, Geisler WM, Wheeler CM, Chackerian B, Frietze KM, Lijek RS. Immunogenicity and Protective Capacity of a Virus-like Particle Vaccine against Chlamydia trachomatis Type 3 Secretion System Tip Protein, CT584. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10010111. [PMID: 35062772 PMCID: PMC8779370 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10010111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
An effective vaccine against Chlamydia trachomatis is urgently needed as infection rates continue to rise and C. trachomatis causes reproductive morbidity. An obligate intracellular pathogen, C. trachomatis employs a type 3 secretion system (T3SS) for host cell entry. The tip of the injectosome is composed of the protein CT584, which represents a potential target for neutralization with vaccine-induced antibody. Here, we investigate the immunogenicity and efficacy of a vaccine made of CT584 epitopes coupled to a bacteriophage virus-like particle (VLP), a novel platform for Chlamydia vaccines modeled on the success of HPV vaccines. Female mice were immunized intramuscularly, challenged transcervically with C. trachomatis, and assessed for systemic and local antibody responses and bacterial burden in the upper genital tract. Immunization resulted in a 3-log increase in epitope-specific IgG in serum and uterine homogenates and in the detection of epitope-specific IgG in uterine lavage at low levels. By contrast, sera from women infected with C. trachomatis and virgin controls had similarly low titers to CT584 epitopes, suggesting these epitopes are not systemically immunogenic during natural infection but can be rendered immunogenic by the VLP platform. C. trachomatis burden in the upper genital tract of mice varied after active immunization, yet passive protection was achieved when immune sera were pre-incubated with C. trachomatis prior to inoculation into the genital tract. These data demonstrate the potential for antibody against the T3SS to contribute to protection against C. trachomatis and the value of VLPs as a novel platform for C. trachomatis vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Everett Webster
- Department of Biological Sciences, Mount Holyoke College, 50 College St., South Hadley, MA 01075, USA; (E.W.); (K.W.S.); (H.K.-B.); (J.G.); (M.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Kyra W. Seiger
- Department of Biological Sciences, Mount Holyoke College, 50 College St., South Hadley, MA 01075, USA; (E.W.); (K.W.S.); (H.K.-B.); (J.G.); (M.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Susan B. Core
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, MSC 08-4660, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; (S.B.C.); (A.L.C.); (B.C.); (K.M.F.)
| | - Amanda L. Collar
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, MSC 08-4660, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; (S.B.C.); (A.L.C.); (B.C.); (K.M.F.)
| | - Hannah Knapp-Broas
- Department of Biological Sciences, Mount Holyoke College, 50 College St., South Hadley, MA 01075, USA; (E.W.); (K.W.S.); (H.K.-B.); (J.G.); (M.S.); (S.A.)
| | - June Graham
- Department of Biological Sciences, Mount Holyoke College, 50 College St., South Hadley, MA 01075, USA; (E.W.); (K.W.S.); (H.K.-B.); (J.G.); (M.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Muskan Shrestha
- Department of Biological Sciences, Mount Holyoke College, 50 College St., South Hadley, MA 01075, USA; (E.W.); (K.W.S.); (H.K.-B.); (J.G.); (M.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Sarah Afzaal
- Department of Biological Sciences, Mount Holyoke College, 50 College St., South Hadley, MA 01075, USA; (E.W.); (K.W.S.); (H.K.-B.); (J.G.); (M.S.); (S.A.)
| | - William M. Geisler
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 703 19th St. S, ZRB 242, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA;
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, MSC 08-4640, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA;
| | - Bryce Chackerian
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, MSC 08-4660, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; (S.B.C.); (A.L.C.); (B.C.); (K.M.F.)
| | - Kathryn M. Frietze
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, MSC 08-4660, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; (S.B.C.); (A.L.C.); (B.C.); (K.M.F.)
- Clinical and Translational Science Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences, MSC 08-4635, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| | - Rebeccah S. Lijek
- Department of Biological Sciences, Mount Holyoke College, 50 College St., South Hadley, MA 01075, USA; (E.W.); (K.W.S.); (H.K.-B.); (J.G.); (M.S.); (S.A.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(413)-538-2487
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Landy R, Mathews C, Robertson M, Wiggins CL, McDonald YJ, Goldberg DW, Scarinci IC, Cuzick J, Sasieni PD, Wheeler CM. Corrigendum to 'A state-wide population-based evaluation of cervical cancers arising during opportunistic screening in the United States' [Gynecologic Oncology 159 (2020) 344-353]. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:614. [PMID: 34602285 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Landy
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Christopher Mathews
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Robertson
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Charles L Wiggins
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Yolanda J McDonald
- Department of Human and Organizational Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Daniel W Goldberg
- Department of Geography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Isabel C Scarinci
- Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter D Sasieni
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hammer A, Gravitt PE, Adcock R, Patterson N, Cuzick J, Wheeler CM. Burden of Mycoplasma genitalium and Bacterial Coinfections in a Population-Based Sample in New Mexico. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48:e186-e189. [PMID: 33993157 PMCID: PMC8590705 DOI: 10.1097/olq.0000000000001472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT In this population-based US study, the overall prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium was 1.95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.62%-2.34%), declining from 6.12% (95% CI, 4.72%-7.92%) in women aged 21 to 24 years to 0.48% (95% CI, 0.25%-0.94%) in women aged 40 to 64 years. The prevalence of coinfections with Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis was low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Hammer
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Patti E. Gravitt
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Rachael Adcock
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Departments of Pathology
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, MSC02-1670 House of Prevention Epidemiology, Albuquerque, NM
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Perkins RB, Adcock R, Benard V, Cuzick J, Waxman A, Howe J, Melkonian S, Gonzales J, Wiggins C, Wheeler CM. Clinical follow-up practices after cervical cancer screening by co-testing: A population-based study of adherence to U.S. guideline recommendations. Prev Med 2021; 153:106770. [PMID: 34416221 PMCID: PMC8595756 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Failure to follow-up women after abnormal cervical screening could lead to cervical cancers, yet little is known about adherence to recommended follow-up after abnormal co-testing [cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing]. We documented clinical management following cervical screening by co-testing in a diverse population-based setting. A statewide surveillance program for cervical screening, diagnosis, and treatment was used to investigate all cytology, hrHPV and biopsy reports in the state of New Mexico from January 2015 through August 2019. Guideline-adherent follow-up after co-testing required 1) biopsy within 6 months for low-grade cytology if positive for hrHPV, for high-grade cytology irrespective of hrHPV, and for HPV 16/18 positive results irrespective of cytology and; 2) repeat co-testing within 18 months if cytology was negative and hrHPV test was positive (excluding types 16/18). Screening co-tests (2015-2017) for 164,522 women were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kaplan Meier curves, and pairwise comparisons between groups. Guideline adherence was highest when both cytology and hrHPV tests were abnormal, ranging from 61.7% to 80.3%. Guideline-adherent follow-up was lower for discordant results. Women with high-grade cytology were less likely to receive a timely biopsy when hrHPV-testing was negative (48.1%) versus positive (83.3%) (p < 0.001). Only 47.9% of women received biopsies following detection of HPV16/18 with normal cytology, and 30.8% received no follow-up within 18-months. Among women with hrHPV-positive normal cytology without evidence of HPV 16/18 infection, 51% received no follow-up within 18 months. Provider education and creation of robust recall systems may help ensure appropriate follow-up of abnormal screening results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca B Perkins
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rachael Adcock
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Vicki Benard
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Alan Waxman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Jean Howe
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northern Navajo Medical Center, Shiprock, NM, USA
| | - Stephanie Melkonian
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Janis Gonzales
- Division of Public Health, Family Health Bureau, New Mexico Department of Health, USA
| | - Charles Wiggins
- New Mexico Tumor Registry, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Center for HPV Prevention, New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA..
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Castle PE, Kinney WK, Chen L, Kim JJ, Jenison S, Rossi G, Kang H, Cuzick J, Wheeler CM. Adherence to National Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation from a Statewide Registry. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 114:djab173. [PMID: 34463763 PMCID: PMC9002271 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2012, national recommendations for cervical-cancer screening of women aged 30-64 years were quinquennial human papillomavirus and cytology co-testing or triennial cytology. Data from a state-wide surveillance program in New Mexico demonstrated 65.2% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]= 64.6%% to 65.7%) of women screened in 2019 had negative co-test within the last 3 years. Percentages of women screened in 2013, 2016, and 2019 with a prior negative co-test more than 5 and up to 7 years ago were 2.6% (95% CI = 2.2% to 2.9%), 2.1% (95% CI = 1.9% to 2.2%), and 6.5% (95% CI = 6.2% to 6.8%), respectively (2-sided P trend<.001). Percentages of women screened in 2013, 2016, and 2019 with a prior negative cytology more than 5 and up to 7 years ago were 3.8% (95% CI = 3.7% to 3.9%), 9.0% (95% CI = 8.7% to 9.3%), and 14.9% (95% CI = 14.4% to 15.4%), respectively (2-sided P trend<.001). Thus, in 2019, only 12.7% (95% CI = 12.4% to 13.1%) of the 30,215 women aged 30-64 years underwent co-testing and 27.7% (95% CI = 27.1% to 28.3%) of the 18,733 underwent cytology at the recommended interval. The observed under- and over-screening could result in increases in cervical-cancer incidence and harms and costs, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip E Castle
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
- National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | - Lu Chen
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biostatistics Shared Resource, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Jane J Kim
- Harvard T.H. Chan, School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven Jenison
- School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | | | - Huining Kang
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biostatistics Shared Resource, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hernández-López R, Hermosillo L, León-Maldonado L, Velázquez-Cruz R, Torres-Ibarra L, Lazcano-Ponce E, Lörincz A, Wheeler CM, Bosch FX, Cuzick J, Rivera-Paredez B, Nedjai B, Salmerón J. Performance of an affordable urine self-sampling method for human papillomavirus detection in Mexican women. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0254946. [PMID: 34288949 PMCID: PMC8294492 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Urine self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening is a non-invasive method that offers several logistical advantages and high acceptability, reducing barriers related to low screening coverage. This study developed and evaluated the performance of a low-cost urine self-sampling method for HPV-testing and explored the acceptability and feasibility of potential implementation of this alternative in routine screening. METHODS A series of sequential laboratory assays examined the impact of several pre-analytical conditions for obtaining DNA from urine and subsequent HPV detection. Initially, we assessed the effect of ethylaminediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as a DNA preservative examining several variables including EDTA concentration, specimen storage temperature, time between urine collection and DNA extraction, and first-morning micturition versus convenience sample collection. We further evaluated the agreement of HPV-testing between urine and clinician-collected cervical samples among 95 women. Finally, we explored the costs of self-sampling supplies as well as the acceptability and feasibility of urine self-sampling among women and healthcare workers. RESULTS Our results revealed higher DNA concentrations were obtained when using a 40mM EDTA solution, storing specimens at 25°C and extracting DNA within 72 hrs. of urine collection, regardless of using first-morning micturition or a convenience sampling. We observed good agreement (Kappa = 0.72) between urine and clinician-collected cervical samples for HPV detection. Furthermore, urine self-sampling was an affordable method (USD 1.10), well accepted among cervical cancer screening users, healthcare workers, and decision-makers. CONCLUSION These results suggest urine self-sampling is feasible and appropriate alternative for HPV-testing in HPV-based screening programs in lower-resource contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rubí Hernández-López
- Oficina de Análisis del Plan de Salud, Subgerencia Técnica del Plan de Salud, Gerencia de Administración del Plan de Salud, Banco de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Luis Hermosillo
- Facultad de Medicina, Centro de Investigación en Políticas, Población y Salud, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Leith León-Maldonado
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología-Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Rafael Velázquez-Cruz
- Laboratorio de Genómica del Metabolismo Óseo, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Leticia Torres-Ibarra
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Attila Lörincz
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Department of Pathology and Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - F. Xavier Bosch
- Unit of Infections and Cancer—Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)—IDIBELL, l’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Open University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Berenice Rivera-Paredez
- Facultad de Medicina, Centro de Investigación en Políticas, Población y Salud, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Belinda Nedjai
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jorge Salmerón
- Facultad de Medicina, Centro de Investigación en Políticas, Población y Salud, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cuzick J, Du R, Adcock R, Kinney W, Joste N, McDonald RM, English K, Torres SM, Saslow D, Wheeler CM. Uptake of co-testing with HPV and cytology for cervical screening: A population-based evaluation in the United States. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:555-559. [PMID: 34253387 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical screening has been shown to increase the yield of precancerous disease and reduce the incidence of cervical cancer more than cytology alone. Here we document the state-wide uptake of co-testing with HPV and cytology in women aged 30-64 years as recommended by national and international bodies. METHODS Registry-based study of all screening cytology and HPV tests in New Mexico from 2008 to 2019 among women aged 21-64 years, with a focus on cytology negative tests to distinguish co-testing from reflex HPV testing to triage equivocal or mildly abnormal cytology. RESULTS A total of 1,704,055 cervical screening tests from 681,440 women aged 21-64 years in the state of New Mexico were identified. The proportion of screening tests which were co-tests rose from 5.6% in 2008 to 84.3% in 2019 among women aged 30-64 years with a marked change from the near exclusive use of the Hybrid Capture II HPV test, (a signal amplified test method) to the use of target amplified HPV tests. The largest increases were seen between 2013 and 2015, reflecting the introduction and adoption of new clinical guidelines. Increases in co-testing were also seen in younger women. CONCLUSIONS Co-testing is now well established in women aged 30-64 years, but smaller increases have also been seen at younger ages, although this is not currently recommended. The impact of co-testing on cervical disease outcomes and number of colposcopies and biopsies in routine population settings remain important, especially in young women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Ruofei Du
- University of New Mexico (UNM) Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Molecular Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Rachael Adcock
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Nancy Joste
- UNM Health Sciences Center (HSC), Department of Pathology, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Ruth M McDonald
- UNM Health Sciences Center (HSC), Department of Pathology, Albuquerque, NM, USA; UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, Center for HPV Prevention, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Kevin English
- Albuquerque Area Southwest Tribal Epidemiology Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | | | | | - Cosette M Wheeler
- UNM Health Sciences Center (HSC), Department of Pathology, Albuquerque, NM, USA; UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, Center for HPV Prevention, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Landy R, Mathews C, Robertson M, Wiggins CL, McDonald YJ, Goldberg DW, Scarinci IC, Cuzick J, Sasieni PD, Wheeler CM. Erratum to 'A state-wide population-based evaluation of cervical cancers arising during opportunistic screening in the United States' [Gynecologic Oncology 159 (2020) 344-353]. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 161:913. [PMID: 33867145 PMCID: PMC8486679 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Landy
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Christopher Mathews
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Robertson
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Charles L Wiggins
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Yolanda J McDonald
- Department of Human and Organizational Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Daniel W Goldberg
- Department of Geography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Isabel C Scarinci
- Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter D Sasieni
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tota JE, Struyf F, Hildesheim A, Gonzalez P, Ryser M, Herrero R, Schussler J, Karkada N, Rodriguez AC, Folschweiller N, Porras C, Schiffman M, Schiller JT, Quint W, Kreimer AR, Lehtinen M, Wheeler CM, Sampson JN. Efficacy of AS04-Adjuvanted Vaccine Against Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Types 16 and 18 in Clearing Incident HPV Infections: Pooled Analysis of Data From the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial and the PATRICIA Study. J Infect Dis 2021; 223:1576-1581. [PMID: 32887990 PMCID: PMC8248553 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical trial data and real-world evidence suggest that the AS04-adjuvanted vaccine targeting human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 (AS04-HPV-16/18) vaccine provides nearly 90% protection against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or higher irrespective of type, among women vaccinated before sexual debut. This high efficacy is not fully explained by cross-protection. Although AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccination does not affect clearance of prevalent infections, it may accelerate clearance of newly acquired infections. We pooled data from 2 large-scale randomized controlled trials to evaluate efficacy of the AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine against clearance of nontargeted incident infections. Results of our analysis do not suggest an effect in expediting clearance of incident infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph E Tota
- Divison of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National
Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Allan Hildesheim
- Divison of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National
Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Paula Gonzalez
- Agencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas,
Fundación INCIENSA, Guanacaste, Costa
Rica
| | | | - Rolando Herrero
- Agencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas,
Fundación INCIENSA, Guanacaste, Costa
Rica
- Section of Early Detection and Prevention, International
Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - John Schussler
- Information Management Services, Rockville,
Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | - Carolina Porras
- Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación
INCIENSA, San José, Costa
Rica
| | - Mark Schiffman
- Divison of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National
Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - John T Schiller
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer
Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Wim Quint
- DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk,
the Netherlands
| | - Aimée R Kreimer
- Divison of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National
Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Matti Lehtinen
- University of Tampere, School of Public
Health, Tampere, Finland
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Department of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology,
University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico,
USA
| | - Joshua N Sampson
- Divison of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National
Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Torres-Ibarra L, Lorincz AT, Wheeler CM, Cuzick J, Hernández-López R, Spiegelman D, León-Maldonado L, Rivera-Paredez B, Méndez-Hernández P, Lazcano-Ponce E, Salmerón J. Adjunctive testing by cytology, p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology or HPV16/18 E6 oncoprotein for the management of HPV16/18 screen-positive women. Int J Cancer 2021; 148:2264-2273. [PMID: 33252834 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
High-risk human papillomavirus type 16/18 (HPV16/18) genotyping is unable to accurately discriminate nonprogressive infections from those that will progress to cervical cancer. Our study aimed to assesses if additional testing either with liquid-based cytology (LBC) or the putative progression markers p16/Ki-67 and HPV16/18 E6 oncoprotein (E6) can improve the efficiency of HPV16/18 genotyping for triaging high-risk HPV (hrHPV)-positive women through better cancer risk stratification. Women attending colposcopy after positive HPV16/18 genotyping results within the Forwarding Research for Improved Detection and Access for Cervical Cancer Screening and Triage (FRIDA) hrHPV-based screening study in Tlaxcala, Mexico, underwent further testing with LBC, p16/Ki-67 dual-stained (DS) cytology and E6. We calculated measures of test performance for detecting histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) and grade 3 or higher (CIN3+). A number of 475 (64.3%) of 739 HPV16/18-positive women had complete results for all tests. Triage positivity rates were 14.1%, 18.5% and 24.4%, for LBC, E6 and DS, respectively. Compared with LBC, DS had higher sensitivity (24.4% vs 60.0%) although lower specificity (87.0% vs 79.3%) for CIN3+ (P < .001), whereas E6 had a sensitivity of 37.8% and a specificity of 83.5%. No invasive cancer was missed by DS or E6, but 75% were in normal cytology. DS test was associated with nearly 75% reduction of colposcopy referrals compared with the direct referral of all HPV16/18-positive women, giving the least number of colposcopies (n = 4.3) per CIN3+ detected. We show that adjunctive testing of HPV16/18-positive women with DS may greatly reduce unnecessary colposcopy referrals within HPV-based screening employing HPV16/18 genotyping while retaining acceptable sensitivity for CIN2+ and CIN3+.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leticia Torres-Ibarra
- Center for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Attila T Lorincz
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Rubí Hernández-López
- Health Plan Analysis Office, Technical Deputy Management of Health Plan, Health Plan Administration Management, General Administration, Bank of Mexico, Mexico ty, Mexico
| | - Donna Spiegelman
- Center for Methods in Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Leith León-Maldonado
- CONACYT-Center for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Berenice Rivera-Paredez
- Faculty of Medine, Research Center on Policies, Population and Health, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Pablo Méndez-Hernández
- Departamento de Calidad y Educación en Salud, Secretaria de Salud Tlaxcala, Santa Ana Chiautempan, Tlaxcala, Mexico
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, Zacatelco, Tlaxcala, Mexico
| | - Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce
- School of Public Health of Mexico, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Jorge Salmerón
- Faculty of Medine, Research Center on Policies, Population and Health, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Landy R, Mathews C, Robertson M, Wiggins CL, McDonald YJ, Goldberg DW, Scarinci IC, Cuzick J, Sasieni PD, Wheeler CM. A state-wide population-based evaluation of cervical cancers arising during opportunistic screening in the United States. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:344-353. [PMID: 32977987 PMCID: PMC7594931 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite widespread cervical screening, an estimated 13,800 women will be diagnosed with cervical cancer in the United States in 2020. To inform improvements, the screening histories of women diagnosed with cervical cancer in New Mexico were assessed. METHODS Data were collected on all cervical screening, diagnostic tests and treatment procedures for all women diagnosed with cervical cancer aged 25-64 yrs. in New Mexico from 2006 to 2016. Women were categorized by their screening attendance in the 5-40 months (screening interval) and 1-4 months (peri-diagnostic interval) prior to cancer diagnosis. RESULTS Of the 504 women diagnosed between May 2009-December 2016, 64% were not screened or had only inadequate screening tests in the 5-40 months prior to diagnosis, and 90 of 182 screened women (49%) had only negative screens in this period. Only 32% (N = 162) of cervical cancers were screen-detected. Women with adenocarcinomas were more likely to have had a recent negative screen (41/57 = 722%) than women with squamous cancers (50/112 = 45%). Both older women (aged 45-64 years) and women with more advanced cancers were less likely to have been screened, and if screened, were more likely to have a false-negative outcome. Only 9% of cancers were diagnosed in women who did not attend biopsy or treatment after positive tests requiring clinical management. Screening currently prevents 35% of cancers, whereas full screening coverage could prevent 61% of cervical cancers. CONCLUSION Improved screening coverage has the largest potential for reducing cervical cancer incidence, though there is also a role for improved recall procedures and screening sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Landy
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Christopher Mathews
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Robertson
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Charles L Wiggins
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Yolanda J McDonald
- Department of Human and Organizational Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Daniel W Goldberg
- Department of Geography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Isabel C Scarinci
- Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter D Sasieni
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Barlow WE, Beaber EF, Geller BM, Kamineni A, Zheng Y, Haas JS, Chao CR, Rutter CM, Zauber AG, Sprague BL, Halm EA, Weaver DL, Chubak J, Doria-Rose VP, Kobrin S, Onega T, Quinn VP, Schapira MM, Tosteson ANA, Corley DA, Skinner CS, Schnall MD, Armstrong K, Wheeler CM, Silverberg MJ, Balasubramanian BA, Doubeni CA, McLerran D, Tiro JA. Evaluating Screening Participation, Follow-up, and Outcomes for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer in the PROSPR Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 112:238-246. [PMID: 31292633 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Revised: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer screening is a complex process encompassing risk assessment, the initial screening examination, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of cancer precursors or early cancers. Metrics that enable comparisons across different screening targets are needed. We present population-based screening metrics for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers for nine sites participating in the Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens consortium. METHODS We describe how selected metrics map to a trans-organ conceptual model of the screening process. For each cancer type, we calculated calendar year 2013 metrics for the screen-eligible target population (breast: ages 40-74 years; cervical: ages 21-64 years; colorectal: ages 50-75 years). Metrics for screening participation, timely diagnostic evaluation, and diagnosed cancers in the screened and total populations are presented for the total eligible population and stratified by age group and cancer type. RESULTS The overall screening-eligible populations in 2013 were 305 568 participants for breast, 3 160 128 for cervical, and 2 363 922 for colorectal cancer screening. Being up-to-date for testing was common for all three cancer types: breast (63.5%), cervical (84.6%), and colorectal (77.5%). The percentage of abnormal screens ranged from 10.7% for breast, 4.4% for cervical, and 4.5% for colorectal cancer screening. Abnormal breast screens were followed up diagnostically in almost all (96.8%) cases, and cervical and colorectal were similar (76.2% and 76.3%, respectively). Cancer rates per 1000 screens were 5.66, 0.17, and 1.46 for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Comprehensive assessment of metrics by the Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens consortium enabled systematic identification of screening process steps in need of improvement. We encourage widespread use of common metrics to allow interventions to be tested across cancer types and health-care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elisabeth F Beaber
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Berta M Geller
- Departments of Family Medicine, and the University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Aruna Kamineni
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Yingye Zheng
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jennifer S Haas
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber, Harvard Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Chun R Chao
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | | | - Ann G Zauber
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Brian L Sprague
- Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Ethan A Halm
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.,Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Donald L Weaver
- Department of Pathology and the UVM Cancer Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Jessica Chubak
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - V Paul Doria-Rose
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA.,Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Sarah Kobrin
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Tracy Onega
- Departments of Biomedical Data Science, Epidemiology, and the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH
| | | | - Marilyn M Schapira
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, and CMC VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Anna N A Tosteson
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice and Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH
| | - Douglas A Corley
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Celette Sugg Skinner
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Mitchell D Schnall
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Katrina Armstrong
- General Medicine Division, MA General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Science Center, Albuquerque, NM.,University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM
| | | | - Bijal A Balasubramanian
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX.,UTHealth School of Public Health, Dallas, TX
| | - Chyke A Doubeni
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Dale McLerran
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jasmin A Tiro
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Landy R, Sasieni PD, Mathews C, Wiggins CL, Robertson M, McDonald YJ, Goldberg DW, Scarinci IC, Cuzick J, Wheeler CM. Impact of screening on cervical cancer incidence: A population-based case-control study in the United States. Int J Cancer 2020; 147:887-896. [PMID: 31837006 PMCID: PMC7282928 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Revised: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Cervical cancer is widely preventable through screening, but little is known about the duration of protection offered by a negative screen in North America. A case-control study was conducted with records from population-based registries in New Mexico. Cases were women diagnosed with cervical cancer in 2006-2016, obtained from the Tumor Registry. Five controls per case from the New Mexico HPV Pap Registry were matched to cases by sex, age and place of residence. Dates and results of all cervical screening and diagnostic tests since 2006 were identified from the pap registry. We estimated the odds ratio of nonlocalized (Stage II+) and localized (Stage I) cervical cancer associated with attending screening in the 3 years prior to case-diagnosis compared to women not screened in 5 years. Of 876 cases, 527 were aged 25-64 years with ≥3 years of potential screening data. Only 38% of cases and 61% of controls attended screening in a 3-year period. Women screened in the 3 years prior to diagnosis had 83% lower risk of nonlocalized cancer (odds ratio [OR] = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.12-0.24) and 48% lower odds of localized cancer (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.38-0.72), compared to women not screened in the 5 years prior to diagnosis. Women remained at low risk of nonlocalized cancer for 3.5-5 years after a negative screen compared to women with no negative screens in the 5 years prior to diagnosis. Routine cervical screening is effective at preventing localized and nonlocalized cervical cancers; 3 yearly screening prevents 83% of nonlocalized cancers, with no additional benefit of more frequent screening. Increasing screening coverage remains essential to further reduce cervical cancer incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Landy
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive MedicineQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human ServicesBethesdaMD
| | - Peter D. Sasieni
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Christopher Mathews
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Charles L. Wiggins
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center and University of New Mexico Health Sciences CenterAlbuquerqueNM
| | - Michael Robertson
- The Center for HPV PreventionUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences CenterAlbuquerqueNM
| | - Yolanda J. McDonald
- Department of Human and Organizational DevelopmentVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleTN
| | | | - Isabel C. Scarinci
- Division of Preventive MedicineUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAL
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive MedicineQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Department of Pathology and Obstetrics & GynecologyUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences CenterAlbuquerqueNM
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tota JE, Struyf F, Sampson JN, Gonzalez P, Ryser M, Herrero R, Schussler J, Karkada N, Rodriguez AC, Folschweiller N, Porras C, Schiffman M, Schiller JT, Quint W, Kreimer AR, Wheeler CM, Hildesheim A. Efficacy of the AS04-Adjuvanted HPV16/18 Vaccine: Pooled Analysis of the Costa Rica Vaccine and PATRICIA Randomized Controlled Trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 112:818-828. [PMID: 31697384 PMCID: PMC7825474 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Revised: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The AS04-adjuvanted HPV16/18 (AS04-HPV16/18) vaccine provides excellent protection against targeted human papillomavirus (HPV) types and a variable degree of cross-protection against others, including types 6/11/31/33/45. High efficacy against any cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or greater (CIN3+; >90%) suggests that lower levels of protection may exist for a wide range of oncogenic HPV types, which is difficult to quantify in individual trials. Pooling individual-level data from two randomized controlled trials, we aimed to evaluate AS04-HPV16/18 vaccine efficacy against incident HPV infections and cervical abnormalities . METHODS Data were available from the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial (NCT00128661) and Papilloma Trial Against Cancer in Young Adults trial (NCT00122681), two large-scale, double-blind randomized controlled trials of the AS04-HPV16/18 vaccine. Primary analyses focused on disease-free women with no detectable cervicovaginal HPV at baseline. RESULTS A total of 12 550 women were included in our primary analyses (HPV arm = 6271, control arm = 6279). Incidence of 6-month persistent oncogenic and nononcogenic infections, excluding known and accepted protected types 6/11/16/18/31/33/45 (focusing on 34/35/39/40/42/43/44/51/52/53/54/56/58/59/66/68/73/70/74), was statistically significantly lower in the HPV arm than in the control arm (efficacy = 9.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.7% to 17.4%). Statistically significant efficacy (P < .05) was observed for individual oncogenic types 16/18/31/33/45/52 and nononcogenic types 6/11/53/74. Efficacy against cervical abnormalities (all types) increased with severity, ranging from 27.7% (95% CI = 21.7% to 33.3%) to 58.7% (95% CI = 34.1% to 74.7%) for cytologic outcomes (low-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia lesion or greater, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia lesion or greater, respectively) and 66.0% (95% CI = 54.4% to 74.9%) to 87.8% (95% CI = 71.1% to 95.7%) for histologic outcomes (CIN2+ and CIN3+, respectively). Comparing Costa Rica Vaccine Trial and Papilloma Trial Against Cancer in Young Adults results, there was no evidence of heterogeneity, except for type 51 (efficacy = -28.6% and 20.7%, respectively; two-sided P = .03). CONCLUSIONS The AS04-HPV16/18 vaccine provides some additional cross-protection beyond established protected types, which partially explains the high efficacy against CIN3+.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph E Tota
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | | | - Joshua N Sampson
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Paula Gonzalez
- GSK, Wavre, Belgium
- Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, Guanacaste, Costa Rica
| | | | - Rolando Herrero
- Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, Guanacaste, Costa Rica
- Section of Early Detection and Prevention, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Carolina Porras
- Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica
| | - Mark Schiffman
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - John T Schiller
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda
| | - Wim Quint
- DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands
| | - Aimée R Kreimer
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Department of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Allan Hildesheim
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Castle PE, Adcock R, Cuzick J, Wentzensen N, Torrez-Martinez NE, Torres SM, Stoler MH, Ronnett BM, Joste NE, Darragh TM, Gravitt PE, Schiffman M, Hunt WC, Kinney WK, Wheeler CM. Relationships of p16 Immunohistochemistry and Other Biomarkers With Diagnoses of Cervical Abnormalities: Implications for LAST Terminology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2020; 144:725-734. [PMID: 31718233 PMCID: PMC8575174 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0241-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST) standardization recommended p16INK4a immunohistochemistry (p16 IHC) for biopsies diagnosed morphologically as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 (CIN2) to classify them as low-grade or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs). OBJECTIVE.— To describe the relationships of p16 IHC and other biomarkers associated with cervical cancer risk with biopsy diagnoses. DESIGN.— A statewide, stratified sample of cervical biopsies diagnosed by community pathologists (CPs), including 1512 CIN2, underwent a consensus, expert pathologist panel (EP) review (without p16 IHC results), p16 IHC interpretation by a third pathology group, and human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping, results of which were grouped hierarchically according to cancer risk. Antecedent cytologic interpretations were also available. RESULTS.— Biopsies were more likely to test p16 IHC positive with increasing severity of CP diagnoses, overall (Ptrend ≤ .001) and within each HPV risk group (Ptrend ≤ .001 except for low-risk HPV [Ptrend < .010]). All abnormal grades of CP-diagnosed biopsies were more likely to test p16 IHC positive with a higher HPV risk group (Ptrend < .001), and testing p16 IHC positive was associated with higher HPV risk group than testing p16 IHC negative for each grade of CP-diagnosed biopsies (P < .001). p16 IHC-positive, CP-diagnosed CIN2 biopsies were less likely than CP-diagnosed CIN3 biopsies to test HPV16 positive, have an antecedent HSIL+ cytology, or to be diagnosed as CIN3+ by the EP (P < .001 for all). p16 IHC-positive, CP-diagnosed CIN1 biopsies had lower HPV risk groups than p16 IHC-negative, CP-diagnosed CIN2 biopsies (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS.— p16 IHC-positive, CP-diagnosed CIN2 appears to be lower cancer risk than CP-diagnosed CIN3. LAST classification of "HSIL" diagnosis, which includes p16 IHC-positive CIN2, should annotate the morphologic diagnosis (CIN2 or CIN3) to inform all management decisions, which is especially important for young (<30 years) women diagnosed with CIN2 for whom surveillance rather than treatment is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip E Castle
- From Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Dr Castle); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (Ms Adcock and Dr Cuzick); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland (Drs Wentzensen and Schiffman); the Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque (Ms Torrez-Martinez, Dr Torres, Dr Joste, Dr Gravitt, Mr Hunt, and Dr Wheeler); the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (Dr Stoler); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Ronnett); the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Darragh); and Sacramento, California (Dr Kinney)
| | - Rachael Adcock
- From Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Dr Castle); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (Ms Adcock and Dr Cuzick); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland (Drs Wentzensen and Schiffman); the Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque (Ms Torrez-Martinez, Dr Torres, Dr Joste, Dr Gravitt, Mr Hunt, and Dr Wheeler); the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (Dr Stoler); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Ronnett); the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Darragh); and Sacramento, California (Dr Kinney)
| | - Jack Cuzick
- From Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Dr Castle); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (Ms Adcock and Dr Cuzick); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland (Drs Wentzensen and Schiffman); the Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque (Ms Torrez-Martinez, Dr Torres, Dr Joste, Dr Gravitt, Mr Hunt, and Dr Wheeler); the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (Dr Stoler); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Ronnett); the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Darragh); and Sacramento, California (Dr Kinney)
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- From Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Dr Castle); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (Ms Adcock and Dr Cuzick); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland (Drs Wentzensen and Schiffman); the Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque (Ms Torrez-Martinez, Dr Torres, Dr Joste, Dr Gravitt, Mr Hunt, and Dr Wheeler); the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (Dr Stoler); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Ronnett); the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Darragh); and Sacramento, California (Dr Kinney)
| | - Norah E Torrez-Martinez
- From Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Dr Castle); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (Ms Adcock and Dr Cuzick); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland (Drs Wentzensen and Schiffman); the Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque (Ms Torrez-Martinez, Dr Torres, Dr Joste, Dr Gravitt, Mr Hunt, and Dr Wheeler); the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (Dr Stoler); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Ronnett); the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Darragh); and Sacramento, California (Dr Kinney)
| | - Salina M Torres
- From Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Dr Castle); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (Ms Adcock and Dr Cuzick); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland (Drs Wentzensen and Schiffman); the Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque (Ms Torrez-Martinez, Dr Torres, Dr Joste, Dr Gravitt, Mr Hunt, and Dr Wheeler); the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (Dr Stoler); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Ronnett); the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Darragh); and Sacramento, California (Dr Kinney)
| | - Mark H Stoler
- From Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Dr Castle); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (Ms Adcock and Dr Cuzick); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland (Drs Wentzensen and Schiffman); the Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque (Ms Torrez-Martinez, Dr Torres, Dr Joste, Dr Gravitt, Mr Hunt, and Dr Wheeler); the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (Dr Stoler); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Ronnett); the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Darragh); and Sacramento, California (Dr Kinney)
| | - Brigitte M Ronnett
- From Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Dr Castle); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (Ms Adcock and Dr Cuzick); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland (Drs Wentzensen and Schiffman); the Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque (Ms Torrez-Martinez, Dr Torres, Dr Joste, Dr Gravitt, Mr Hunt, and Dr Wheeler); the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (Dr Stoler); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Ronnett); the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Darragh); and Sacramento, California (Dr Kinney)
| | - Nancy E Joste
- From Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Dr Castle); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (Ms Adcock and Dr Cuzick); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland (Drs Wentzensen and Schiffman); the Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque (Ms Torrez-Martinez, Dr Torres, Dr Joste, Dr Gravitt, Mr Hunt, and Dr Wheeler); the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (Dr Stoler); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Ronnett); the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Darragh); and Sacramento, California (Dr Kinney)
| | - Teresa M Darragh
- From Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Dr Castle); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (Ms Adcock and Dr Cuzick); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland (Drs Wentzensen and Schiffman); the Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque (Ms Torrez-Martinez, Dr Torres, Dr Joste, Dr Gravitt, Mr Hunt, and Dr Wheeler); the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (Dr Stoler); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Ronnett); the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Darragh); and Sacramento, California (Dr Kinney)
| | - Patti E Gravitt
- From Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Dr Castle); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (Ms Adcock and Dr Cuzick); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland (Drs Wentzensen and Schiffman); the Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque (Ms Torrez-Martinez, Dr Torres, Dr Joste, Dr Gravitt, Mr Hunt, and Dr Wheeler); the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (Dr Stoler); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Ronnett); the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Darragh); and Sacramento, California (Dr Kinney)
| | - Mark Schiffman
- From Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Dr Castle); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (Ms Adcock and Dr Cuzick); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland (Drs Wentzensen and Schiffman); the Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque (Ms Torrez-Martinez, Dr Torres, Dr Joste, Dr Gravitt, Mr Hunt, and Dr Wheeler); the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (Dr Stoler); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Ronnett); the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Darragh); and Sacramento, California (Dr Kinney)
| | - William C Hunt
- From Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Dr Castle); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (Ms Adcock and Dr Cuzick); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland (Drs Wentzensen and Schiffman); the Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque (Ms Torrez-Martinez, Dr Torres, Dr Joste, Dr Gravitt, Mr Hunt, and Dr Wheeler); the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (Dr Stoler); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Ronnett); the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Darragh); and Sacramento, California (Dr Kinney)
| | - Walter K Kinney
- From Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Dr Castle); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (Ms Adcock and Dr Cuzick); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland (Drs Wentzensen and Schiffman); the Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque (Ms Torrez-Martinez, Dr Torres, Dr Joste, Dr Gravitt, Mr Hunt, and Dr Wheeler); the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (Dr Stoler); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Ronnett); the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Darragh); and Sacramento, California (Dr Kinney)
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- From Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Dr Castle); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (Ms Adcock and Dr Cuzick); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland (Drs Wentzensen and Schiffman); the Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque (Ms Torrez-Martinez, Dr Torres, Dr Joste, Dr Gravitt, Mr Hunt, and Dr Wheeler); the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (Dr Stoler); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Ronnett); the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Darragh); and Sacramento, California (Dr Kinney)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Torres-Ibarra L, Cuzick J, Lorincz AT, Spiegelman D, Lazcano-Ponce E, Franco EL, Moscicki AB, Mahmud SM, Wheeler CM, Rivera-Paredez B, Hernández-López R, León-Maldonado L, Salmerón J. Comparison of HPV-16 and HPV-18 Genotyping and Cytological Testing as Triage Testing Within Human Papillomavirus-Based Screening in Mexico. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1915781. [PMID: 31747033 PMCID: PMC6902808 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Triage tests enhance the efficiency cervical cancer screening based on human papillomavirus (HPV), but the best approach for maximizing programmatic effectiveness is still uncertain, particularly in a real-world scenario. OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical performance of 6 triage strategies based on liquid-based cytology (LBC) and HPV-16 and HPV-18 genotyping individually or in combination as sequential triage tests to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or higher among women with high-risk HPV. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This diagnostic study of routine cervical cancer screening was conducted at 100 primary health centers in Tlaxcala, Mexico. Women aged 30 to 64 years were recruited from August 1, 2013, to February 24, 2016, as part of the Forwarding Research for Improved Detection and Access for Cervical Cancer Screening and Triage study. Six triage scenarios for referral to colposcopy were examined: (1) LBC testing that found atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) or worse, (2) positive results in HPV-16 genotyping, (3) positive results in HPV-18 genotyping, (4) positive results in HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping, (5) positive results in HPV-16 genotyping or, if genotyping results were negative, reflex LBC testing that found ASC-US or worse, and (6) positive results in HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping or, if genotyping results were negative, reflex LBC testing that found ASC-US or worse. Data were analyzed from October 2017 to August 2018. EXPOSURES Liquid-based cytological testing with simultaneous HPV-16 and HPV-18 genotyping. Women whose HPV genotyping results were positive for HPV-16 or HPV-18 or whose LBC results found ASC-US or worse and a random set of negative and normal results were referred to colposcopy with histologic analysis used for disease confirmation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Clinical performance of each test strategy for detection of CIN grade 2 or higher. Secondary outcomes included resource utilization of each triage scenario, measured by the number of tests performed, the referral rate for colposcopy, and the numbers of colposcopies per CIN grade 2 or higher detected. RESULTS A total of 36 212 women (median [interquartile range] age, 40 [35-47] years) were screened, and 4051 women (11.2%) had high-risk HPV. Of these women, 1109 (24.6%) were found to have HPV-16, HPV-18, or ASC-US or worse. Further histologic testing detected CIN grade 2 or higher in 110 of 788 women (14.0%) who underwent follow-up colposcopy. Sensitivity and specificity for 3 main triage strategies were 42.9% and 74.0% for LBC; 58.3% and 54.4% for HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping; and 86.6% and 34.0% for HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping with reflex LBC. The referral rate to colposcopy was 29% for HPV-16/HPV-18 with reflex LBC, which was 2-fold higher than the referral rate of 12% for LBC. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Triage of women with high-risk HPV with HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping with reflex LBC was significantly associated with improvement in detection of CIN grade 2 or higher compared with LBC alone. The benefit of disease prevented may outweigh the cost of increasing requirements for colposcopy services in settings with limited adherence to follow-up after a positive screening result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leticia Torres-Ibarra
- Center for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Attila T. Lorincz
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Donna Spiegelman
- Center for Methods in Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce
- Center for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Eduardo L. Franco
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Salaheddin M. Mahmud
- Vaccine and Drug Evaluation Centre, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Center for HPV Prevention, New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
| | - Berenice Rivera-Paredez
- Research Center on Policies, Population, and Health, Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Rubí Hernández-López
- Center for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
- Research Center on Policies, Population, and Health, Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Leith León-Maldonado
- Center for Population Health Research, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Jorge Salmerón
- Research Center on Policies, Population, and Health, Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Adcock R, Cuzick J, Hunt WC, McDonald RM, Wheeler CM. Role of HPV Genotype, Multiple Infections, and Viral Load on the Risk of High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019; 28:1816-1824. [PMID: 31488417 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-0239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 06/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing provides a much more sensitive method of detection for high-grade lesions than cytology, but specificity is low. Here, we explore the extent to which full HPV genotyping, viral load, and multiplicity of types can be used to improve specificity. METHODS A population-based sample of 47,120 women undergoing cervical screening was tested for 13 high-risk HPV genotypes. Positive predictive values (PPV) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse (CIN2+; N = 3,449) and CIN3 or worse (CIN3+; N = 1,475) over 3 years of follow-up were estimated for HPV genotype and viral load. Weighted multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of CIN2+ or CIN3+ according to genotype, multiplicity of types, and viral load. RESULTS High-risk HPV was detected in 15.4% of women. A hierarchy of HPV genotypes based on sequentially maximizing PPVs for CIN3+ found HPV16>33>31 to be the most predictive, followed sequentially by HPV18>35>58>45>52>59>51>39>56>68. After adjusting for higher ranked genotypes, the inclusion of multiple HPV infections added little to risk prediction. High viral loads for HPV18, 35, 52, and 58 carried more risk than low viral loads for HPV16, 31, and 33. High viral load for HPV16 was significantly more associated with CIN3+ than low viral load. CONCLUSIONS HPV genotype and viral load, but not multiplicity of HPV infections, are important predictors of CIN2+ and CIN3+. IMPACT The ability to identify women at higher risk of CIN2+ and CIN3+ based on both HPV genotype and viral load could be important for individualizing triage plans, particularly as HPV becomes the primary screening test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Adcock
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - William C Hunt
- Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Ruth M McDonald
- Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kamineni A, Tiro JA, Beaber EF, Silverberg MJ, Wheeler CM, Chao CR, Chubak J, Skinner CS, Corley DA, Kim JJ, Balasubramanian BA, Paul Doria-Rose V. Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: Rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort. Int J Cancer 2018; 144:1460-1473. [PMID: 30353911 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Revised: 09/24/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Little is known about the effect of evolving risk-based cervical cancer screening and management guidelines on United States (US) clinical practice and patient outcomes. We describe the National Cancer Institute's Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR I) consortium, methods and baseline findings from its cervical sites: Kaiser Permanente Washington, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Parkland Health & Hospital System/University of Texas Southwestern (Parkland-UTSW) and New Mexico HPV Pap Registry housed by University of New Mexico (UNM-NMHPVPR). Across these diverse healthcare settings, we collected data on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccinations, screening tests/results, diagnostic and treatment procedures/results and cancer diagnoses on nearly 4.7 million women aged 18-89 years from 2010 to 2014. We calculated baseline (2012 for UNM-NMHPVPR; 2010 for other sites) frequencies for sociodemographics, cervical cancer risk factors and key screening process measures for each site's cohort. Healthcare delivery settings, cervical cancer screening strategy, race/ethnicity and insurance status varied among sites. The proportion of women receiving a Pap test during the baseline year was similar across sites (26.1-36.1%). Most high-risk HPV tests were performed either reflexively or as cotests, and utilization pattern varied by site. Prevalence of colposcopy or biopsy was higher at Parkland-UTSW (3.6%) than other sites (1.3-1.4%). Incident cervical cancer was rare. HPV vaccination among age-eligible women not already immunized was modest across sites (0.1-7.2%). Cervical PROSPR I makes available high-quality, multilevel, longitudinal screening process data from a large and diverse cohort of women to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of US cervical cancer screening delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aruna Kamineni
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Jasmin A Tiro
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.,Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Elisabeth F Beaber
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Cosette M Wheeler
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Chun R Chao
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Jessica Chubak
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Celette Sugg Skinner
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.,Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Douglas A Corley
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Jane J Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Bijal A Balasubramanian
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX.,UTHealth School of Public Health in Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - V Paul Doria-Rose
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Teixeira AA, Marchiò S, Dias-Neto E, Nunes DN, da Silva IT, Chackerian B, Barry M, Lauer RC, Giordano RJ, Sidman RL, Wheeler CM, Cavenee WK, Pasqualini R, Arap W. Going viral? Linking the etiology of human prostate cancer to the PCA3 long noncoding RNA and oncogenic viruses. EMBO Mol Med 2018; 9:1327-1330. [PMID: 28751581 PMCID: PMC5623838 DOI: 10.15252/emmm.201708072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The hypothesis is discussed that prostate cancer marker lncRNA PCA3 was introduced into the human genome by an oncogenic virus, and that viral infection‐related mechanisms might underlie its overexpression and prostate cancer initiation and/or progression.
![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre A Teixeira
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.,Division of Molecular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.,Department of Biochemistry, Chemistry Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Serena Marchiò
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.,Division of Molecular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.,Department of Oncology, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, TO, Italy.,Candiolo Cancer Institute-Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia (FPO), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | - Emmanuel Dias-Neto
- Laboratory of Medical Genomics, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.,Laboratory of Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Diana N Nunes
- Laboratory of Medical Genomics, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Israel T da Silva
- Laboratory of Computational Biology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Bryce Chackerian
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Marc Barry
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.,Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Richard C Lauer
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Ricardo J Giordano
- Department of Biochemistry, Chemistry Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Richard L Sidman
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Webster K Cavenee
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Renata Pasqualini
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.,Division of Molecular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Wadih Arap
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Castle PE, Wheeler CM, Campos NG, Sy S, Burger EA, Kim JJ. Inefficiencies of over-screening and under-screening for cervical cancer prevention in the U.S. Prev Med 2018; 111:177-179. [PMID: 29548787 PMCID: PMC5930058 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
There is limited information on the cost-inefficiencies of non-adherence to recommended cervical cancer screening or the potential value for improving non-adherence. We estimated the incremental value of adhering to recommended screening every three years with cytology, using a disease simulation model that integrated real-world screening practice data from New Mexico. The amount that can be spent to improve adherence was estimated by calculating the incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) under scenarios of Current Practice (assuming a population of mixed adherence) and Uniformly Non-Adherent populations with imperfect or perfect adherence to follow-up of screen-positive women. Getting unscreened women screened every three years by cytology was a better value than increasing screening in the under-screened or reducing screening in the over-screened. For example, INMBs were $3998 for screening previously unscreened women versus $136 for eliminating annual screening at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Strategies to reach unscreened women are potentially high-value investments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip E Castle
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Nicole G Campos
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen Sy
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jane J Kim
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Doubeni CA, Gabler NB, Wheeler CM, McCarthy AM, Castle PE, Halm EA, Schnall MD, Skinner CS, Tosteson ANA, Weaver DL, Vachani A, Mehta SJ, Rendle KA, Fedewa SA, Corley DA, Armstrong K. Timely follow-up of positive cancer screening results: A systematic review and recommendations from the PROSPR Consortium. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68:199-216. [PMID: 29603147 PMCID: PMC5980732 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Timely follow-up for positive cancer screening results remains suboptimal, and the evidence base to inform decisions on optimizing the timeliness of diagnostic testing is unclear. This systematic review evaluated published studies regarding time to follow-up after a positive screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancers. The quality of available evidence was very low or low across cancers, with potential attenuated or reversed associations from confounding by indication in most studies. Overall, evidence suggested that the risk for poorer cancer outcomes rises with longer wait times that vary within and across cancer types, which supports performing diagnostic testing as soon as feasible after the positive result, but evidence for specific time targets is limited. Within these limitations, we provide our opinion on cancer-specific recommendations for times to follow-up and how existing guidelines relate to the current evidence. Thresholds set should consider patient worry, potential for loss to follow-up with prolonged wait times, and available resources. Research is needed to better guide the timeliness of diagnostic follow-up, including considerations for patient preferences and existing barriers, while addressing methodological weaknesses. Research is also needed to identify effective interventions for reducing wait times for diagnostic testing, particularly in underserved or low-resource settings. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:199-216. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chyke A. Doubeni
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nicole B. Gabler
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Departments of Pathology, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Science Center, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Anne Marie McCarthy
- General Medicine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Philip E. Castle
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Ethan A. Halm
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Mitchell D. Schnall
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Section, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Celette S. Skinner
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Anna N. A. Tosteson
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice and Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH
| | - Donald L. Weaver
- Department of Pathology, UVM Cancer Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Anil Vachani
- Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Shivan J. Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine and Penn Center for Health Care Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Katharine A. Rendle
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Stacey A Fedewa
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society. Atlanta, GA
| | - Douglas A. Corley
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA, and San Francisco Medical, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Katrina Armstrong
- General Medicine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Arrossi S, Temin S, Garland S, Eckert LO, Bhatla N, Castellsagué X, Alkaff SE, Felder T, Hammouda D, Konno R, Lopes G, Mugisha E, Murillo R, Scarinci IC, Stanley M, Tsu V, Wheeler CM, Adewole IF, de Sanjosé S. Primary Prevention of Cervical Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Resource-Stratified Guideline. J Glob Oncol 2017; 3:611-634. [PMID: 29094100 PMCID: PMC5646902 DOI: 10.1200/jgo.2016.008151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide resource-stratified (four tiers), evidence-based recommendations on the primary prevention of cervical cancer globally. METHODS The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a multidisciplinary, multinational panel of oncology, obstetrics/gynecology, public health, cancer control, epidemiology/biostatistics, health economics, behavioral/implementation science, and patient advocacy experts. The Expert Panel reviewed existing guidelines and conducted a modified ADAPTE process and a formal consensus-based process with additional experts (consensus ratings group) for one round of formal ratings. RESULTS Existing sets of guidelines from five guideline developers were identified and reviewed; adapted recommendations formed the evidence base. Five systematic reviews, along with cost-effectiveness analyses, provided evidence to inform the formal consensus process, which resulted in agreement of ≥ 75%. RECOMMENDATIONS In all resource settings, two doses of human papillomavirus vaccine are recommended for girls age 9 to 14 years, with an interval of at least 6 months and possibly up to 12 to 15 months. Individuals with HIV positivity should receive three doses. Maximal and enhanced settings: if girls are age ≥ 15 years and received their first dose before age 15 years, they may complete the series; if no doses were received before age 15 years, three doses should be administered; in both scenarios, vaccination may be through age 26 years. Limited and basic settings: if sufficient resources remain after vaccinating girls age 9 to 14 years, girls who received one dose may receive additional doses between age 15 and 26 years. Maximal, enhanced, and limited settings: if ≥ 50% coverage in the priority female target population, sufficient resources, and cost effectiveness, boys may be vaccinated to prevent other noncervical human papillomavirus-related cancers and diseases. Basic settings: vaccinating boys is not recommended. It is the view of the American Society of Clinical Oncology that health care providers and health care system decision makers should be guided by the recommendations for the highest stratum of resources available. The guideline is intended to complement but not replace local guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvina Arrossi
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Sarah Temin
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Suzanne Garland
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Linda O'Neal Eckert
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Neerja Bhatla
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Xavier Castellsagué
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Sharifa Ezat Alkaff
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Tamika Felder
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Doudja Hammouda
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Ryo Konno
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Gilberto Lopes
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Emmanuel Mugisha
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Rául Murillo
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Isabel C Scarinci
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Margaret Stanley
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Vivien Tsu
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Isaac Folorunso Adewole
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Silvia de Sanjosé
- , Instituto Nacional del Cancer, Buenos Aires, Argentina; , American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; , University of Washington; , PATH, Seattle, WA; , All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and , Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; , Cervivor, Upper Marlboro, MD; , Institut National de Santé Publique, Algiers, Algeria; , Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; , Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; , PATH, Kampala, Uganda; , International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; , University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; , University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; , University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; and , Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cuzick J, Myers O, Lee JH, Shi Y, Gage JC, Hunt WC, Robertson M, Wheeler CM. Outcomes in Women With Cytology Showing Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance With vs Without Human Papillomavirus Testing. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3:1327-1334. [PMID: 28655061 PMCID: PMC5710525 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Little is known about the long-term yield of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and the influence on biopsy and treatment rates of human papillomavirus (HPV) triage of cytology showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (hereafter ASC-US cytology). OBJECTIVE To examine 5-year outcomes after ASC-US cytology with vs without HPV testing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this observational study, all cervical cytology and HPV testing reports from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2012, were obtained for women throughout New Mexico and linked to pathology reports. The dates of the analysis were May 4, 2015, to January 13, 2017. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Influence of HPV testing on disease yield, time to histologically confirmed disease, and biopsy or loop electrosurgical excision procedure rates. RESULTS A total of 457 317 women (mean [SD] age, 39.8 [12.5] years) with a screening test were recorded between 2008 and 2012, and 20 677 (4.5%) of the first cytology results per woman were reported as ASC-US. CIN grade 3 or more severe (CIN3+) lesions were detected in 2.49% of women with HPV testing vs 2.15% of women without HPV testing (P = .23). Time to CIN3+ detection was much shorter in those with HPV testing vs those without testing (median, 103 vs 393 days; P < .001). CIN grade 1 was detected in 11.6% of women with HPV testing vs 6.6% without testing (relative risk, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.56-2.00; P < .001). Loop electrosurgical excision procedure rates within 5 years were 20.0% higher in those who underwent HPV testing, resulting in more CIN2+ and CIN3+ detection. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Human papillomavirus testing led to faster and more complete diagnosis of cervical disease, but 55.8% more biopsies and 20.0% more loop electrosurgical excision procedures were performed. In those tested, virtually all high-grade disease occurred in the 43.1% of women who were HPV positive, allowing clinical resources to be focused on women who need them most. These data provide essential information for cervical screening guidelines and public health policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, England
| | - Orrin Myers
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque
| | - Ji-Hyun Lee
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque
| | - Yang Shi
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
| | - Julia C. Gage
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - William C. Hunt
- Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque
| | - Michael Robertson
- Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
McDonald YJ, Goldberg DW, Scarinci IC, Castle PE, Cuzick J, Robertson M, Wheeler CM. Health Service Accessibility and Risk in Cervical Cancer Prevention: Comparing Rural Versus Nonrural Residence in New Mexico. J Rural Health 2017; 33:382-392. [PMID: 27557124 PMCID: PMC5939944 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2016] [Revised: 06/14/2016] [Accepted: 06/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Multiple intrapersonal and structural barriers, including geography, may prevent women from engaging in cervical cancer preventive care such as screening, diagnostic colposcopy, and excisional precancer treatment procedures. Geographic accessibility, stratified by rural and nonrural areas, to necessary services across the cervical cancer continuum of preventive care is largely unknown. METHODS Health care facility data for New Mexico (2010-2012) was provided by the New Mexico Human Papillomavirus Pap Registry (NMHPVPR), the first population-based statewide cervical cancer screening registry in the United States. Travel distance and time between the population-weighted census tract centroid to the nearest facility providing screening, diagnostic, and excisional treatment services were examined using proximity analysis by rural and nonrural census tracts. Mann-Whitney test (P < .05) was used to determine if differences were significant and Cohen's r to measure effect. FINDINGS Across all cervical cancer preventive health care services and years, women who resided in rural areas had a significantly greater geographic accessibility burden when compared to nonrural areas (4.4 km vs 2.5 km and 4.9 minutes vs 3.0 minutes for screening; 9.9 km vs 4.2 km and 10.4 minutes vs 4.9 minutes for colposcopy; and 14.8 km vs 6.6 km and 14.4 minutes vs 7.4 minutes for precancer treatment services, all P < .001). CONCLUSION Improvements in cervical cancer prevention should address the potential benefits of providing the full spectrum of screening, diagnostic and precancer treatment services within individual facilities. Accessibility, assessments distinguishing rural and nonrural areas are essential when monitoring and recommending changes to service infrastructures (eg, mobile versus brick and mortar).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda J McDonald
- Department of Geography, College of Geosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Daniel W Goldberg
- Department of Geography, College of Geosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
- Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Dwight Look College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Isabel C Scarinci
- Division of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmigham, Alabama
| | - Philip E Castle
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Robertson
- Department of Pathology, House of Prevention Epidemiology (HOPE), University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Department of Pathology, House of Prevention Epidemiology (HOPE), University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Benard VB, Castle PE, Jenison SA, Hunt WC, Kim JJ, Cuzick J, Lee JH, Du R, Robertson M, Norville S, Wheeler CM. Population-Based Incidence Rates of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Era. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3:833-837. [PMID: 27685805 PMCID: PMC5765871 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE A substantial effect of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines on reducing HPV-related cervical disease is essential before modifying clinical practice guidelines in partially vaccinated populations. OBJECTIVE To determine the population-based cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) trends when adjusting for changes in cervical screening practices that overlapped with HPV vaccination implementation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The New Mexico HPV Pap Registry, which captures population-based estimates of both cervical screening prevalence and CIN, was used to compute CIN trends from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2014. Under New Mexico Administrative Code, the New Mexico HPV Pap Registry, a statewide public health surveillance program, receives mandatory reporting of all cervical screening (cytologic and HPV testing) and any cervical, vulvar, and vaginal histopathological findings for all women residing in New Mexico irrespective of outcome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Prespecified outcome measures included low-grade CIN (grade 1 [CIN1]) and high-grade CIN (grade 2 [CIN2] and grade 3 [CIN3]). RESULTS From 2007 to 2014, a total of 13 520 CIN1, 4296 CIN2, and 2823 CIN3 lesions were diagnosed among female individuals 15 to 29 years old. After adjustment for changes in cervical screening across the period, reductions in the CIN incidence per 100 000 women screened were significant for all grades of CIN among female individuals 15 to 19 years old, dropping from 3468.3 to 1590.6 for CIN1 (annual percentage change [APC], -9.0; 95% CI, -12.0 to -5.8; P < .001), from 896.4 to 414.9 for CIN2 (APC, -10.5; 95% CI, -18.8 to -1.2; P = .03), and from 240.2 to 0 for CIN3 (APC, -41.3; 95% CI, -65.7 to 0.3; P = .05). Reductions in the CIN2 incidence were also significant for women 20 to 24 years old, dropping from 1027.7 to 627.1 (APC, -6.3; 95% CI, -10.9 to -1.4; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Population-level decreases in CIN among cohorts partially vaccinated for HPV may be considered when clinical practice guidelines for cervical cancer screening are reassessed. Evidence is rapidly growing to suggest that further increases in raising the age to start screening are imminent, one step toward integrating screening and vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki B Benard
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Philip E Castle
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Steven A Jenison
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque
| | - William C Hunt
- House of Prevention Epidemiology (HOPE), Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque
| | - Jane J Kim
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, England
| | - Ji-Hyun Lee
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque
| | - Ruofei Du
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque
| | - Michael Robertson
- House of Prevention Epidemiology (HOPE), Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque
| | - Scott Norville
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- House of Prevention Epidemiology (HOPE), Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
McDonald YJ, Schwind M, Goldberg DW, Lampley A, Wheeler CM. An analysis of the process and results of manual geocode correction. Geospat Health 2017; 12:526. [PMID: 28555477 PMCID: PMC5978681 DOI: 10.4081/gh.2017.526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2016] [Revised: 02/21/2017] [Accepted: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Geocoding is the science and process of assigning geographical coordinates (i.e. latitude, longitude) to a postal address. The quality of the geocode can vary dramatically depending on several variables, including incorrect input address data, missing address components, and spelling mistakes. A dataset with a considerable number of geocoding inaccuracies can potentially result in an imprecise analysis and invalid conclusions. There has been little quantitative analysis of the amount of effort (i.e. time) to perform geocoding correction, and how such correction could improve geocode quality type. This study used a low-cost and easy to implement method to improve geocode quality type of an input database (i.e. addresses to be matched) through the processes of manual geocode intervention, and it assessed the amount of effort to manually correct inaccurate geocodes, reported the resulting match rate improvement between the original and the corrected geocodes, and documented the corresponding spatial shift by geocode quality type resulting from the corrections. Findings demonstrated that manual intervention of geocoding resulted in a 90% improvement of geocode quality type, took 42 hours to process, and the spatial shift ranged from 0.02 to 151,368 m. This study provides evidence to inform research teams considering the application of manual geocoding intervention that it is a low-cost and relatively easy process to execute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda J McDonald
- Department of Geography, College of Geosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tota JE, Struyf F, Merikukka M, Gonzalez P, Kreimer AR, Bi D, Castellsagué X, de Carvalho NS, Garland SM, Harper DM, Karkada N, Peters K, Pope WAJ, Porras C, Quint W, Rodriguez AC, Schiffman M, Schussler J, Skinner SR, Teixeira JC, Wheeler CM, Herrero R, Hildesheim A, Lehtinen M. Evaluation of Type Replacement Following HPV16/18 Vaccination: Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized Trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017; 109:2938662. [PMID: 28132019 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djw300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Revised: 10/25/2016] [Accepted: 11/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Current HPV vaccines do not protect against all oncogenic HPV types. Following vaccination, type replacement may occur, especially if different HPV types competitively interact during natural infection. Because of their common route of transmission, it is difficult to assess type interactions in observational studies. Our aim was to evaluate type replacement in the setting of HPV vaccine randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods Data were pooled from the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial (CVT; NCT00128661) and PATRICIA trial (NCT001226810)-two large-scale, double-blind RCTs of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine-to compare cumulative incidence of nonprotected HPV infections across trial arms after four years. Negative rate difference estimates (rate in control minus vaccine arm) were interpreted as evidence of replacement if the associated 95% confidence interval excluded zero. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results After applying relevant exclusion criteria, 21 596 women were included in our analysis (HPV arm = 10 750; control arm = 10 846). Incidence rates (per 1000 infection-years) were lower in the HPV arm than in the control arm for grouped nonprotected oncogenic types (rate difference = 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.9 to 2.3) and oncogenic/nononcogenic types (rate difference = 0.2, 95% CI = -0.3 to 0.7). Focusing on individual HPV types separately, no deleterious effect was observed. In contrast, a statistically significant protective effect (positive rate difference and 95% CI excluded zero) was observed against oncogenic HPV types 35, 52, 58, and 68/73, as well as nononcogenic types 6 and 70. Conclusion HPV type replacement does not occur among vaccinated individuals within four years and is unlikely to occur in vaccinated populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph E Tota
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Frank Struyf
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Marko Merikukka
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Paula Gonzalez
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Aimée R Kreimer
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Dan Bi
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Xavier Castellsagué
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Newton S de Carvalho
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Suzanne M Garland
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Diane M Harper
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Naveen Karkada
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Klaus Peters
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Willy A J Pope
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Carolina Porras
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Wim Quint
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Ana Cecilia Rodriguez
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Mark Schiffman
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - John Schussler
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - S Rachel Skinner
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Júlio Cesar Teixeira
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Rolando Herrero
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Allan Hildesheim
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | - Matti Lehtinen
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (JET, ARK, MS, AH); GSK Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium (FS, DB); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Oulu, Finland (MM); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (PG); Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)-IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain (XC); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Paraná, Infectious Diseases in Gynecology and Obstetrics Sector/Clinics Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (NSdC); Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (SMG); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville, Australia (SMG); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH (DMH); GSK Vaccines, Bangalore, India (NK); Berner Heerweg 157, Hamburg, Germany (KP); Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital KU Leuven Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (WAJP); Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica (CP, ACR, RH); DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, the Netherlands (WQ); Information Management Systems, Rockville, MD (JS); Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia (SRS); Department of Gynecology, Oncology Division-CAISM, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (JCT); University of Tampere, School of Public Health, Tampere, Finland (ML)
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Folschweiller N, Berlaimont V, Skinner SR, Wheeler CM, Karkada N, Struyf F, Ryser M. Letter to the Editor in response to O.M. Bautista, A. Luxembourg. Deconstructing the measure of vaccine efficacy against disease irrespective of HPV in HPV vaccine clinical trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials 47 (2016) 254-258. Contemp Clin Trials 2016; 54:106-107. [PMID: 28034686 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2016] [Accepted: 12/23/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - S Rachel Skinner
- Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney University and The Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Vaccine Trials Group, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Castellsagué X, Ault KA, Bosch FX, Brown D, Cuzick J, Ferris DG, Joura EA, Garland SM, Giuliano AR, Hernandez-Avila M, Huh W, Iversen OE, Kjaer SK, Luna J, Monsonego J, Muñoz N, Myers E, Paavonen J, Pitisuttihum P, Steben M, Wheeler CM, Perez G, Saah A, Luxembourg A, Sings HL, Velicer C. Human papillomavirus detection in cervical neoplasia attributed to 12 high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes by region. Papillomavirus Res 2016; 2:61-69. [PMID: 29074187 PMCID: PMC5886863 DOI: 10.1016/j.pvr.2016.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2015] [Revised: 03/02/2016] [Accepted: 03/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We estimated the proportion of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) cases attributed to 14 HPV types, including quadrivalent (qHPV) (6/11/16/18) and 9-valent (9vHPV) (6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58) vaccine types, by region METHODS: Women ages 15-26 and 24-45 years from 5 regions were enrolled in qHPV vaccine clinical trials. Among 10,706 women (placebo arms), 1539 CIN1, 945 CIN2/3, and 24 adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) cases were diagnosed by pathology panel consensus. RESULTS Predominant HPV types were 16/51/52/56 (anogenital infection), 16/39/51/52/56 (CIN1), and 16/31/52/58 (CIN2/3). In regions with largest sample sizes, minimal regional variation was observed in 9vHPV type prevalence in CIN1 (~50%) and CIN2/3 (81-85%). Types 31/33/45/52/58 accounted for 25-30% of CIN1 in Latin America and Europe, but 14-18% in North America and Asia. Types 31/33/45/52/58 accounted for 33-38% of CIN2/3 in Latin America (younger women), Europe, and Asia, but 17-18% of CIN2/3 in Latin America (older women) and North America. Non-vaccine HPV types 35/39/51/56/59 had similar or higher prevalence than qHPV types in CIN1 and were attributed to 2-11% of CIN2/3. CONCLUSIONS The 9vHPV vaccine could potentially prevent the majority of CIN1-3, irrespective of geographic region. Notwithstanding, non-vaccine types 35/39/51/56/59 may still be responsible for some CIN1, and to a lesser extent CIN2/3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Castellsagué
- Institut Catala d'Oncologia (ICO), IDIBELL, CIBERESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain.
| | - Kevin A Ault
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - F Xavier Bosch
- Institut Catala d'Oncologia (ICO), IDIBELL, CIBERESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Darron Brown
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis IN, USA
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daron G Ferris
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Georgia Regents University Cancer Center, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Elmar A Joura
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Suzanne M Garland
- Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women׳s Hospital, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Warner Huh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Ole-Erik Iversen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen/Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Susanne K Kjaer
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen Denmark and Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joaquin Luna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Colsanitas, Fundacion Universitaria Sanitas, Bogota, Colombia
| | | | - Nubia Muñoz
- National Institute of Cancer, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Evan Myers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jorma Paavonen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Marc Steben
- Direction des Risques Biologiques et de la Santé au travail, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Gonzalo Perez
- Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA; Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gage JC, Hunt WC, Schiffman M, Katki HA, Cheung LA, Myers O, Cuzick J, Wentzensen N, Kinney W, Castle PE, Wheeler CM. Similar Risk Patterns After Cervical Screening in Two Large U.S. Populations: Implications for Clinical Guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128:1248-1257. [PMID: 27824767 PMCID: PMC5247269 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000001721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the risks of histologic high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or worse after different cervical cancer screening test results between two of the largest U.S. clinical practice research data sets. METHODS The New Mexico Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Pap Registry is a statewide registry representing a diverse population experiencing varied clinical practice delivery. Kaiser Permanente Northern California is a large integrated health care delivery system practicing routine HPV cotesting since 2003. In this retrospective cohort study, a logistic-Weibull survival model was used to estimate and compare the cumulative 3- and 5-year risks of histologic CIN 3 or worse among women aged 21-64 years screened in 2007-2011 in the New Mexico HPV Pap Registry and 2003-2013 in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Results were stratified by age and baseline screening result: negative cytology, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) (with or without HPV triage), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. RESULTS There were 453,618 women in the New Mexico HPV Pap Registry and 1,307,528 women at Kaiser Permanente Northern California. The 5-year CIN 3 or worse risks were similar within screening results across populations: cytology negative (0.52% and 0.30%, respectively, P<.001), HPV-negative and ASC-US (0.72% and 0.49%, respectively, P=.5), ASC-US (3.4% and 3.4%, respectively, P=.8), HPV-positive and ASC-US (7.7% and 7.1%, respectively, P=.3), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (6.5% and 5.4%, respectively, P=.009), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (53.1% and 50.4%, respectively, P=.2). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse risks and 3-year risks had similar trends across populations. Age-stratified analyses showed more variability, especially among women aged younger than 30 years, but patterns of risk stratification were comparable. CONCLUSION Current U.S. cervical screening and management recommendations are based on comparative risks of histologic high-grade CIN after screening test results. The similar results from these two large cohorts from different real-life clinical practice settings support risk-based management thresholds across U.S. clinical populations and practice settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia C. Gage
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National
Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - William C. Hunt
- Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health
Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Mark Schiffman
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National
Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Hormuzd A. Katki
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National
Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Li A. Cheung
- Information Management Services Inc., Calverton, MD,
USA
| | - Orrin Myers
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico
Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of
Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London,
UK
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National
Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Walter Kinney
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Medical
Care Program, Oakland, CA, USA
| | | | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health
Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New
Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gravitt P, Patterson N, Stanislawski E, Colquitt E, Norville S, Cuzick J, Wheeler CM. Prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Infections and Coinfection in a Population-Based Sample of Women Attending Cervical Cancer Screening in New Mexico, United States of America. Open Forum Infect Dis 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofw172.1003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Elizabeth Colquitt
- Queen Mary's University, London, United Kingdom, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Scott Norville
- Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Queen Mary's University, London, United Kingdom, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rudolph SE, Lorincz A, Wheeler CM, Gravitt P, Lazcano-Ponce E, Torres-Ibarra L, León-Maldonado L, Ramírez P, Rivera B, Hernández R, Franco EL, Cuzick J, Méndez-Hernández P, Salmerón J. Population-based prevalence of cervical infection with human papillomavirus genotypes 16 and 18 and other high risk types in Tlaxcala, Mexico. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16:461. [PMID: 27585544 PMCID: PMC5008001 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1782-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2015] [Accepted: 08/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer remains an important cause of cancer mortality for Mexican women. HPV 16/18 typing may help to improve cervical cancer screening. Here we present the prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) including HPV16 and HPV18 from the FRIDA (Forwarding Research for Improved Detection and Access) population. METHODS Beginning in 2013, we recruited 30,829 women aged 30-64 in Tlaxcala, Mexico. Cervical samples were collected and tested for 14 hrHPV genotypes (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68). We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios with 95 % confidence intervals for hrHPV infections according to putative risk factors. RESULTS Prevalence of infection with any of the 14 hrHPV types was 11.0 %. The age-specific prevalence of all hrHPV formed a U-shaped curve with a higher prevalence for women aged 30-39 and 50-64 than women aged 40-49. Across all age groups, 2.0 % of women were positive for HPV16 and/or HPV18 (HPV16/18), respectively. HPV16/18 prevalence also showed a U-shaped curve with increased prevalence estimates for women aged both 30-39 and 60-64. Both prevalence curves had a significant quadratic age coefficient. Infections with hrHPV were positively associated with an increased number of lifetime sexual partners, a history of sexually transmitted disease, being unmarried, use of hormonal contraception, having a history of smoking and reported condom use in the multivariate model. CONCLUSIONS The FRIDA population has a bimodal distribution of both hrHPV and HPV16/18 positivity with higher prevalences at ages 30-39 and 60-64. These findings will help to evaluate triage algorithms based on HPV genotyping. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02510027 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha E. Rudolph
- UC Berkeley-UCSF Joint Medical Program, Berkeley, CA USA
- Unidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y en Servicios de Salud, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México
| | - Attila Lorincz
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM USA
| | - Patti Gravitt
- Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM USA
| | - Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Avenida Universidad 655, Colonia Sta. María Ahuacatitlán, 62100 Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico
| | - Leticia Torres-Ibarra
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Avenida Universidad 655, Colonia Sta. María Ahuacatitlán, 62100 Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico
| | - Leith León-Maldonado
- CONACYT, Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos México
| | - Paula Ramírez
- Unidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y en Servicios de Salud, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Avenida Universidad 655, Colonia Sta. María Ahuacatitlán, 62100 Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico
| | - Berenice Rivera
- Unidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y en Servicios de Salud, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Avenida Universidad 655, Colonia Sta. María Ahuacatitlán, 62100 Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico
| | - Rubí Hernández
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Avenida Universidad 655, Colonia Sta. María Ahuacatitlán, 62100 Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico
| | - Eduardo L. Franco
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Pablo Méndez-Hernández
- Departamento de Enseñanza, Capacitación e Investigación, Secretaría de Salud de Tlaxcala, Tlaxcala, Tlaxcala Mexico
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, Tlaxcala, Tlaxcala Mexico
| | - Jorge Salmerón
- Unidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y en Servicios de Salud, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Skinner SR, Wheeler CM, Romanowski B, Castellsagué X, Lazcano-Ponce E, Del Rosario-Raymundo MR, Vallejos C, Minkina G, Pereira Da Silva D, McNeil S, Prilepskaya V, Gogotadze I, Money D, Garland SM, Romanenko V, Harper DM, Levin MJ, Chatterjee A, Geeraerts B, Struyf F, Dubin G, Bozonnat MC, Rosillon D, Baril L. Progression of HPV infection to detectable cervical lesions or clearance in adult women: Analysis of the control arm of the VIVIANE study. Int J Cancer 2016; 138:2428-38. [PMID: 26685704 PMCID: PMC4787275 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2015] [Revised: 11/03/2015] [Accepted: 11/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The control arm of the phase III VIVIANE (Human PapillomaVIrus: Vaccine Immunogenicity ANd Efficacy; NCT00294047) study in women >25 years was studied to assess risk of progression from cervical HPV infection to detectable cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). The risk of detecting CIN associated with the same HPV type as the reference infection was analysed using Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox models. Infections were categorised depending upon persistence as 6‐month persistent infection (6MPI) or infection of any duration. The 4‐year interim analysis included 2,838 women, of whom 1,073 (37.8%) experienced 2,615 infections of any duration and 708 (24.9%) experienced 1,130 6MPIs. Infection with oncogenic HPV types significantly increased the risk of detecting CIN grade 2 or greater (CIN2+) versus non‐oncogenic types. For 6MPI, the highest risk was associated with HPV‐33 (hazard ratio [HR]: 31.9 [8.3–122.2, p < 0.0001]). The next highest risk was with HPV‐16 (21.1 [6.3–70.0], p < 0.0001). Similar findings were seen for infections of any duration. Significant risk was also observed for HPV‐18, HPV‐31, and HPV‐45. Concomitant HPV infection or CIN grade 1 or greater associated with a different oncogenic HPV type increased risk. Most women (79.3%) with an HPV infection at baseline cleared detectable infections of any duration, and 69.9% cleared a 6MPI. The risk of progression of HPV infection to CIN2+ in women >25 years in this study was similar to that in women 15–25 years in PATRICIA. What's New? Which HPV infections lead to cancer in women over 25 years? Most cervical cancer follows persistent oncogenic HPV infection, but most HPV infections clear naturally. Thus, to best predict patient outcomes, it's imperative to understand how HPV infections progress to CINs. This study confirmed that in women over 25 years, persistent infection with HPV‐33 or HPV‐16 meant the greatest chance of developing a CIN—the same as was found in women 15–25 years, in an earlier analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Rachel Skinner
- Vaccines Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA and Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Barbara Romanowski
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Xavier Castellsagué
- Unit of Infections and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), IDIBELL, CIBER-ESP, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Shelly McNeil
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, IWK Health Center and Capital Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Vera Prilepskaya
- Scientific Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | | | - Deborah Money
- University of British Columbia, The Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Suzanne M Garland
- Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville/Department of Microbiology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville/Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville/Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Diane M Harper
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA and University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KT, USA
| | - Myron J Levin
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Archana Chatterjee
- Department of Pediatrics, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine/Sanford Children's Specialty Clinic, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gage JC, Joste N, Ronnett BM, Stoler M, Hunt WC, Schiffman M, Wheeler CM. Corrigendum to "A comparison of cervical histopathology variability using whole slide digitized images versus glass slides: experience with a statewide registry" [HumAN PatholOGY 2013;44:2542-2548]. Hum Pathol 2016; 52:201. [PMID: 27141825 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Julia C Gage
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Nancy Joste
- Department of Pathology, Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA
| | - Brigitte M Ronnett
- Departments of Pathology and Gynecology & Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Mark Stoler
- Department of Pathology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | - William C Hunt
- Department of Pathology, Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA
| | - Mark Schiffman
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Department of Pathology, Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Salmerón J, Torres-Ibarra L, Bosch FX, Cuzick J, Lörincz A, Wheeler CM, Castle PE, Robles C, Lazcano-Ponce E. HPV vaccination impact on a cervical cancer screening program: methods of the FASTER-Tlalpan Study in Mexico. Salud Publica Mex 2016; 58:211-9. [PMID: 27557379 DOI: 10.21149/spm.v58i2.7790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To outline the design of a clinical trial to evaluate the impact of HPV vaccination as part of a hrHPV-based primary screening program to extend screening intervals. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 18,000 women aged 25-45 years, attending the regular cervical cancer-screening program in primary health care services in Tlalpan, Mexico City, will be invited to the study. Eligible participants will be assigned to one of three comparison groups: 1) HPV16/18 vaccine and hrHPV-based screening; 2) HPV6/11/16/18 vaccine and hrHPV-based screening; 3) Control group who will receive only hrHPV-based screening. Strict surveillance of hrHPV persistent infection and occurrence of precancerous lesions will be conducted to estimate safety profiles at different screening intervals; participants will undergo diagnosis confirmation and treatment as necessary. CONCLUSION The FASTER-Tlalpan Study will provide insights into new approaches of cervical cancer prevention programs. It will offer valuable information on potential benefits of combining HPV vaccination and hrHPV-based screening to safety extend screening intervals.
Collapse
|
43
|
Castro FA, Koshiol J, Quint W, Wheeler CM, Gillison ML, Vaughan LM, Kleter B, van Doorn LJ, Chaturvedi AK, Hildesheim A, Schiffman M, Wang SS, Zuna RE, Walker JL, Dunn ST, Wentzensen N. Detection of HPV DNA in paraffin-embedded cervical samples: a comparison of four genotyping methods. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15:544. [PMID: 26607224 PMCID: PMC4660657 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-1281-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2015] [Accepted: 11/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Identification of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in cervical tissue is important for understanding cervical carcinogenesis and for evaluating cervical cancer prevention approaches. However, HPV genotyping using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues is technically challenging. We evaluated the performance of four commonly used genotyping methods on FFPE cervical specimens conducted in different laboratories and compared to genotyping results from cytological samples. Methods We included 60 pairs of exfoliated-cell and FFPE specimens from women with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial lesions grade 2 or 3. Cytology specimens were genotyped using the Linear Array assay. Four expert laboratories processed tissue specimens using different preparation methods and then genotyped the resultant sample preparations using four different HPV genotyping methods: SPF10-PCR DEIA LiPA25 (version 1), Inno-LiPA, Linear Array and the Onclarity assay. Percentage agreement, kappa statistics and McNemar’s chi-square were calculated for each comparison of different methods and specimen types. Results Overall agreement with respect to carcinogenic HPV status for FFPE samples between different methods was: 81.7, 86.7 and 91.7 % for Onclarity versus Inno-LiPA, Linear Array and SPF-LiPA25, respectively; 81.7 and 85.0 % for Linear Array versus Inno-LiPA and SPF-LiPA25, respectively; and 86.7 % for SPF-LiPA25 versus Inno-LiPA. Type-specific agreement was >88.3 % for all pair-wise comparisons. Comparisons with cytology specimens resulted in overall agreements from 80 to 95 % depending on the method and type-specific agreement was >90 % for most comparisons. Conclusions Our data demonstrate that the four genotyping methods run by expert laboratories reliably detect HPV DNA in FFPE specimens with some variation in genotype-specific detection. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-1281-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe A Castro
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Jill Koshiol
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Wim Quint
- DDL, Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | - Maura L Gillison
- Viral Oncology Program, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Anil K Chaturvedi
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Allan Hildesheim
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Mark Schiffman
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Sophia S Wang
- Division of Cancer Etiology, Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute and the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
| | - Rosemary E Zuna
- Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
| | - Joan L Walker
- Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
| | - S Terence Dunn
- Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. .,Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, NCI Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive 7E114, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Gage JC, Hunt WC, Schiffman M, Katki HA, Cheung LC, Cuzick J, Myers O, Castle PE, Wheeler CM. Risk Stratification Using Human Papillomavirus Testing among Women with Equivocally Abnormal Cytology: Results from a State-Wide Surveillance Program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015; 25:36-42. [PMID: 26518316 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2015] [Accepted: 09/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical guidelines for cervical cancer screening have incorporated comparative risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or cancer (CIN3(+)) for various screening outcomes to determine management. Few cohorts are large enough to distinguish CIN3(+) risks among women with minor abnormalities versus negative cytology because of low incidence. The New Mexico Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Pap Registry offers a unique opportunity to evaluate cervical cancer screening in a diverse population across a broad-spectrum of health service delivery. METHODS Kaplan-Meier and logistic-Weibull survival models were used to estimate cumulative risks of CIN3(+) among women ages 21 to 64 who were screened in New Mexico between 2007 and 2011 with negative, equivocal or mildly abnormal cytology, that is, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US; with or without HPV triage), or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL). RESULTS We identified 452,045 women meeting the selection criteria. The 3-year CIN3(+) risks for women with negative, ASC-US, and LSIL cytology were 0.30%, 2.6%, and 5.2%, respectively. HPV triage of ASC-US stratified 3-year CIN3(+) risks were 0.72% for HPV-negative and 7.7% for HPV-positive. Risks tended to decline after age 30 for all screening results. CONCLUSIONS In this state-wide population-based cohort, cytology and HPV triage of ASC-US stratified women's CIN3(+) risk into similar patterns observed previously, suggesting the validity of screening guidelines for diverse populations in the United States. Absolute risk estimates should be compared across other large populations. IMPACT Strategies for HPV triage of ASC-US derived from clinical trials are upheld in large clinical practice settings and across diverse screening populations in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia C Gage
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - William C Hunt
- Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Mark Schiffman
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Hormuzd A Katki
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Li C Cheung
- Information Management Services Inc., Calverton, Maryland
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Orrin Myers
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | | | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kim JJ, Campos NG, Sy S, Burger EA, Cuzick J, Castle PE, Hunt WC, Waxman A, Wheeler CM. Inefficiencies and High-Value Improvements in U.S. Cervical Cancer Screening Practice: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163:589-97. [PMID: 26414147 PMCID: PMC5104349 DOI: 10.7326/m15-0420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies suggest that cervical cancer screening practice in the United States is inefficient. The cost and health implications of nonadherence in the screening process compared with recommended guidelines are uncertain. OBJECTIVE To estimate the benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of current cervical cancer screening practice and assess the value of screening improvements. DESIGN Model-based cost-effectiveness analysis. DATA SOURCES New Mexico HPV Pap Registry; medical literature. TARGET POPULATION Cohort of women eligible for routine screening. TIME HORIZON Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE Societal. INTERVENTION Current cervical cancer screening practice; improved adherence to guidelines-based screening interval, triage testing, diagnostic referrals, and precancer treatment referrals. OUTCOME MEASURES Reductions in lifetime cervical cancer risk, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), lifetime costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and incremental net monetary benefits (INMBs). RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS Current screening practice was associated with lower health benefit and was not cost-effective relative to guidelines-based strategies. Improvements in the screening process were associated with higher QALYs and small changes in costs. Perfect adherence to screening every 3 years with cytologic testing and adherence to colposcopy/biopsy referrals were associated with the highest INMBs ($759 and $741, respectively, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained); together, the INMB increased to $1645. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Current screening practice was inefficient in 100% of simulations. The rank ordering of screening improvements according to INMBs was stable over a range of screening inputs and willingness-to-pay thresholds. LIMITATION The effect of human papillomavirus vaccination was not considered. CONCLUSIONS The added health benefit of improving adherence to guidelines, especially the 3-year interval for cytologic screening and diagnostic follow-up, may justify additional investments in interventions to improve U.S. cervical cancer screening practice. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE U.S. National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane J. Kim
- From Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Global Coalition Against Cervical Cancer, Arlington, Virginia; University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Nicole G. Campos
- From Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Global Coalition Against Cervical Cancer, Arlington, Virginia; University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Stephen Sy
- From Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Global Coalition Against Cervical Cancer, Arlington, Virginia; University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Emily A. Burger
- From Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Global Coalition Against Cervical Cancer, Arlington, Virginia; University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Jack Cuzick
- From Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Global Coalition Against Cervical Cancer, Arlington, Virginia; University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Philip E. Castle
- From Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Global Coalition Against Cervical Cancer, Arlington, Virginia; University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - William C. Hunt
- From Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Global Coalition Against Cervical Cancer, Arlington, Virginia; University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Alan Waxman
- From Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Global Coalition Against Cervical Cancer, Arlington, Virginia; University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- From Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Global Coalition Against Cervical Cancer, Arlington, Virginia; University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Starling R, Nodulman JA, Kong AS, Wheeler CM, Buller DB, Woodall WG. Usability Testing of an HPV Information Website for Parents and Adolescents. Online J Commun Media Technol 2015; 5:184-203. [PMID: 26594313 PMCID: PMC4654461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Parents make the decisions regarding their children's health care. Unfortunately, many parents are misinformed about HPV and HPV vaccines. In order to help parents make an informed decision regarding HPV vaccination for their daughter, the GoHealthyGirls website was created for parents and their adolescent daughters. Usability testing was conducted with members of the target population to refine the website prior to conducting an efficacy trial. METHODS Parents with girls (n=9) between the ages of 11-13 and 11-13 year old adolescents (n=10) were recruited for usability testing. The testing consisted of completing twelve scenarios where participants were asked to find specific information on the GoHealthyGirls site. This was followed by a self-administered system usability scale-to determine ease of use and functionality of the website-and a user satisfaction survey. RESULTS Both adult and adolescent participants were able to easily find the requested information and reported an increased positive opinion of HPV vaccines after visiting the website. Both groups of participants reported favorable evaluations of using the website. CONCLUSION The GoHealthyGirls website has the potential to help parents of adolescent daughters make an informed decision about HPV vaccination. A large scale efficacy trial will determine its usefulness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randall Starling
- Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions University of New Mexico, 2650 Yale Blvd. SE MSC11-6280, Albuquerque, NM 87106, , ,
| | - Jessica A Nodulman
- Department of Communication Studies, Augustana College, 639 38 Street, Rock Island, IL 61201, ,
| | - Alberta S Kong
- Department of Pediatrics, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Dept. of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, MSC10 5590 1 UNM, Albuquerque, NM 87131, , ,
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Department of Pathology, MSC08 4640, Albuquerque, NM 87131, , ,
| | - David B Buller
- Klein Buendel, Inc., 1667 Cole Suite 225, Golden, CO 80401, 303-565-4340, 303-565-4320,
| | - W Gill Woodall
- Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, 2650 Yale Blvd. SE MSC11-6280, Albuquerque, NM 87106, , ,
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kreimer AR, Struyf F, Hildesheim A, David MP, Wheeler CM. Fewer than three doses of HPV vaccine - Authors' reply. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16:e424-e425. [PMID: 26370346 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00196-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2015] [Accepted: 07/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Aimée R Kreimer
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| | | | - Allan Hildesheim
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, MSC 02-1670 Bldg 191, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kreimer AR, Struyf F, Del Rosario-Raymundo MR, Hildesheim A, Skinner SR, Wacholder S, Garland SM, Herrero R, David MP, Wheeler CM, González P, Jiménez S, Lowy DR, Pinto LA, Porras C, Rodriguez AC, Safaeian M, Schiffman M, Schiller JT, Schussler J, Sherman ME, Bosch FX, Castellsague X, Chatterjee A, Chow SN, Descamps D, Diaz-Mitoma F, Dubin G, Germar MJ, Harper DM, Lewis DJM, Limson G, Naud P, Peters K, Poppe WAJ, Ramjattan B, Romanowski B, Salmeron J, Schwarz TF, Teixeira JC, Tjalma WAA. Efficacy of fewer than three doses of an HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine: combined analysis of data from the Costa Rica Vaccine and PATRICIA Trials. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16:775-86. [PMID: 26071347 PMCID: PMC4498478 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00047-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 220] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2015] [Revised: 04/17/2015] [Accepted: 04/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is some evidence to suggest that one or two doses of the HPV vaccine provides similar protection to the three-dose regimen. The main aim of the study was to ascertain HPV-16/18 vaccine efficacy in both full and naive cohorts and to explore protection conferred against non-vaccine HPV types, by number of doses received. METHODS Summary data from the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial (CVT; NCT00128661) and ~the PATRICIA trial (NCT001226810), two phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trials of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in young women, were combined in a post-hoc analysis (GlaxoSmithKline [GSK] e-track number 202142) to investigate the efficacy of fewer than three doses of the HPV-16/18 vaccine after 4 years of follow-up. Women were randomly assigned to receive three doses of the HPV-16/18 vaccine or to a control vaccine; yet, some received fewer doses. After exclusion of women with less than 12 months of follow-up or those who were HPV-16/18 DNA-positive at enrolment (for the HPV-16/18 endpoint), we calculated vaccine efficacy against one-time detection of incident HPV infections after three, two, and one dose(s). The primary study endpoint was one-time detection of first incident HPV-16/18 infections accumulated during the follow-up phase. FINDINGS We assessed vaccine efficacy against incident HPV-16/18 infection in the modified total vaccinated cohort (22 327 received three doses, 1185 two doses, 543 one dose). Vaccine efficacy against incident HPV-16/18 infections for three doses was 77·0% (95% CI 74·7-79·1), two doses was 76·0% (62·0-85·3), and one dose was 85·7% (70·7-93·7). Vaccine efficacy against incident HPV-31/33/45 infections for three doses was 59·7% (56·0-63·0), two doses was 37·7% (12·4-55·9), and one dose was 36·6% (-5·4 to 62·2). Vaccine efficacy against incident HPV-16/18 infection for two-dose women who received their second dose at 1 month was 75·3% (54·2-87·5) and 82·6% (42·3-96·1) for those who received the second dose at 6 months (CVT data only). Vaccine efficacy against HPV-31/33/45 for two-dose women who received their second dose at 6 months (68·1%, 27·0-87·0; CVT data only), but not those receiving it at one month (10·1%, -42·0 to 43·3), was similar to the three-dose group. INTERPRETATION 4 years after vaccination of women aged 15-25 years, one and two doses of the HPV-16/18 vaccine seem to protect against cervical HPV-16/18 infections, similar to the protection provided by the three-dose schedule. Two doses separated by 6 months additionally provided some cross-protection. These data argue for a direct assessment of one-dose efficacy of the HPV-16/18 vaccine. FUNDING US National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Office of Research on Women's Health, and Ministry of Health of Costa Rica (CVT); GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (PATRICIA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimée R Kreimer
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | | | | | - Allan Hildesheim
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - S Rachel Skinner
- Vaccine Trials Group, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, Australia; Sydney University Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sholom Wacholder
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Suzanne M Garland
- Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Department, Royal Women's Hospital and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rolando Herrero
- Proyecto Epidemiologico Guanacaste, San José, Costa Rica; Section of Early Detection and Prevention, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Pickard A, McDade SS, McFarland M, McCluggage WG, Wheeler CM, McCance DJ. HPV16 Down-Regulates the Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 2 to Promote Epithelial Invasion in Organotypic Cultures. PLoS Pathog 2015; 11:e1004988. [PMID: 26107517 PMCID: PMC4479471 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2014] [Accepted: 05/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer is a multi-stage disease caused by human papillomaviruses (HPV) infection of cervical epithelial cells, but the mechanisms regulating disease progression are not clearly defined. Using 3-dimensional organotypic cultures, we demonstrate that HPV16 E6 and E7 proteins alter the secretome of primary human keratinocytes resulting in local epithelial invasion. Mechanistically, absence of the IGF-binding protein 2 (IGFBP2) caused increases in IGFI/II signalling and through crosstalk with KGF/FGFR2b/AKT, cell invasion. Repression of IGFBP2 is mediated by histone deacetylation at the IGFBP2 promoter and was reversed by treatment with histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. Our in vitro findings were confirmed in 50 invasive cancers and 79 cervical intra-epithelial neoplastic lesions caused by HPV16 infection, where IGFBP2 levels were reduced with increasing disease severity. In summary, the loss of IGFBP2 is associated with progression of premalignant disease, and sensitises cells to pro-invasive IGF signalling, and together with stromal derived factors promotes epithelial invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Pickard
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- * E-mail: (AP); (DJM)
| | - Simon S. McDade
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Marie McFarland
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - W. Glenn McCluggage
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Dennis J. McCance
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
- * E-mail: (AP); (DJM)
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Nodulman JA, Starling R, Kong AS, Buller DB, Wheeler CM, Woodall WG. Investigating stakeholder attitudes and opinions on school-based human papillomavirus vaccination programs. J Sch Health 2015; 85:289-298. [PMID: 25846308 PMCID: PMC4576450 DOI: 10.1111/josh.12253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2013] [Revised: 08/22/2014] [Accepted: 12/25/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In several countries worldwide, school-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programs have been successful; however, little research has explored US stakeholders' acceptance toward school-based HPV vaccination programs. METHODS A total of 13 focus groups and 12 key informant interviews (N = 117; 85% females; 66% racial/ethnic minority) were conducted with 5 groups of stakeholders: parents of adolescent girls, parents of adolescent boys, adolescent girls, middle school nurses, and middle school administrators throughout the 5 public health regions of New Mexico. RESULTS All groups of stakeholders lacked knowledge on HPV and HPV vaccines. Stakeholders were interested in--but apprehensive about--the benefits of HPV vaccination. Despite previous literature showing the benefits of using middle schools as an HPV vaccination site, stakeholders did not deem middle schools as a viable site for vaccination. Nurses reported that using the school as an HPV vaccination site had not occurred to them; parents and adolescents stated they were uncertain about using this type of program. School administrators indicated that they lacked implementation authority. CONCLUSIONS Our study uncovered barriers to using middle schools as a site of HPV vaccination. Resources should be directed toward increased support and education for middle school nurses who function as opinion leaders relevant to the uptake of HPV vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A. Nodulman
- Assistant Professor, Department of Communication Studies, Augustana College, Old Main Office 212, 639 38th Street, Rock Island, IL 61201
| | - Randall Starling
- Senior Research Scientist II, Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, 2650 Yale Blvd., SE MSC11-6280, Albuquerque, NM87106
| | - Alberta S. Kong
- Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, MSC10 5590 1 UNM, Albuquerque, NM87131
| | - David B. Buller
- Senior Scientist, Klein Buendel, Inc., 1667 Cole Suite 225, Golden, CO 80401
| | - Cosette M. Wheeler
- Professor, Center for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico, Department of Pathology, MSC08 4640 Albuquerque, NM87131
| | - W. Gill Woodall
- Professor of Communication, Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, 2650 Yale Blvd. SE MSC11-6280, Albuquerque, NM87106
| |
Collapse
|