1
|
Phuong DJ, Pirtz MG, Ralston CQ, Cosgrove BD, Schimenti JC, Flesken-Nikitin A, Nikitin AY. Aggressive Serous Carcinomas of the Female Reproductive Tract: Cancer-Prone Cell States and Genetic Drivers. Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:604. [PMID: 40002199 PMCID: PMC11852459 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17040604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2025] [Revised: 02/06/2025] [Accepted: 02/08/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025] Open
Abstract
In 2025, gynecological cancers are projected to account for approximately 10% of cancer-related deaths in women. High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) and serous endometrial carcinoma (SEC) are the most lethal gynecological cancer subtypes. Both malignancies commonly have TP53 mutations, alterations of the RB1 pathway, and numerous secondary mutations. Both carcinoma types consist of poorly differentiated and highly heterogeneous cell populations at the time of detection. Latent development and rapid progression of HGSC and SEC impede the identification of definitive cells of origin and genetic drivers. Here, we review our current knowledge about cancer-prone cell states and genetic drivers. We also discuss how emerging transcriptomic and genetic tools applied to contemporary model systems may facilitate the identification of novel targets for timely detection and therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daryl J. Phuong
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; (D.J.P.); (M.G.P.); (C.Q.R.); (J.C.S.)
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Matalin G. Pirtz
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; (D.J.P.); (M.G.P.); (C.Q.R.); (J.C.S.)
- Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA;
| | - Coulter Q. Ralston
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; (D.J.P.); (M.G.P.); (C.Q.R.); (J.C.S.)
- Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA;
| | - Benjamin D. Cosgrove
- Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA;
| | - John C. Schimenti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; (D.J.P.); (M.G.P.); (C.Q.R.); (J.C.S.)
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Andrea Flesken-Nikitin
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; (D.J.P.); (M.G.P.); (C.Q.R.); (J.C.S.)
| | - Alexander Yu. Nikitin
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; (D.J.P.); (M.G.P.); (C.Q.R.); (J.C.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kather A, Arefian H, Schneider C, Hartmann M, Runnebaum IB. Ovarian cancer prevention through opportunistic salpingectomy during abdominal surgeries: A cost-effectiveness modeling study. PLoS Med 2025; 22:e1004514. [PMID: 39883621 PMCID: PMC11781718 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 12/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is indication that the fallopian tubes might be involved in ovarian cancer pathogenesis and their removal reduces cancer risk. Hence, bilateral salpingectomy during hysterectomy or sterilization, so called opportunistic salpingectomy (OS), is gaining wide acceptance as a preventive strategy. Recently, it was discussed whether implementation of OS at other gynecologic surgery, e.g., cesarean section, endometriosis excision or myomectomy and even at non-gynecologic abdominal surgery such as cholecystectomy or appendectomy for women with completed family could be feasible. This modeling analysis evaluated the clinical and economic potential of OS at gynecologic and abdominal surgeries. METHODS AND FINDINGS A state transition model representing all relevant health states (healthy, healthy with hysterectomy or tubal ligation, healthy with other gynecologic or non-gynecologic abdominal surgery, healthy with hysterectomy and salpingectomy, healthy with salpingectomy, healthy with hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy, ovarian cancer and death) was developed and informed with transition probabilities based on inpatient case numbers in Germany (2019). Outcomes for women aged 20-85 years were simulated over annual cycles with 1,200,000 million individuals. We compared four strategies: (I) OS at any suitable abdominal surgery, (II) OS only at any suitable gynecologic surgery, (III) OS only at hysterectomy or sterilization, and (IV) no implementation of OS. Primary outcome measures were prevented ovarian cancer cases and deaths as well as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Volume of eligible interventions in strategy I was 3.5 times greater than in strategy III (286,736 versus 82,319). With strategy IV as reference, ovarian cancer cases were reduced by 15.34% in strategy I, 9.78% in II, and 5.48% in III. Setting costs for OS to €216.19 (calculated from average OS duration and operating room minute costs), implementation of OS would lead to healthcare cost savings as indicated by an ICER of €-8,685.50 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for strategy I, €-8,270.55/QALY for II, and €-4,511.86/QALY for III. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated stable results over a wide range of input parameters with strategy I being the superior approach in the majority of simulations. However, the extent of cancer risk reduction after OS appeared as the critical factor for effectiveness. Preventable ovarian cancer cases dropped to 4.07% (I versus IV), 1.90% (II versus IV), and 0.37% (III versus IV) if risk reduction would be <27% (hazard ratio [HR] > 0.73). ICER of strategies I and II was lower than the 2× gross domestic product per capita (GDP/C) (€94,366/QALY, Germany 2022) within the range of all tested parameters, but strategy III exceeded this threshold in case-risk reduction was <35% (HR > 0.65). The study is limited to data from the inpatient sector and direct medical costs. CONCLUSIONS Based on our model, interdisciplinary implementation of OS in any suitable abdominal surgeries could contribute to prevention of ovarian cancer and reduction of healthcare costs. The broader implementation approach demonstrated substantially better clinical and economic effectiveness and higher robustness with parameter variation. Based on a lifetime cost saving of €20.89 per capita if OS was performed at any suitable abdominal surgery, the estimated total healthcare cost savings in Germany could be more than €10 million annually.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Kather
- Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
- Zentrum für Alternsforschung Jena—Aging Research Center Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Habib Arefian
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Claus Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Michael Hartmann
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Ingo B. Runnebaum
- Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
- Zentrum für Alternsforschung Jena—Aging Research Center Jena, Jena, Germany
- RU21 GmbH, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Takamatsu S, Hillman RT, Yoshihara K, Baba T, Shimada M, Yoshida H, Kajiyama H, Oda K, Mandai M, Okamoto A, Enomoto T, Matsumura N. Molecular classification of ovarian high-grade serous/endometrioid carcinomas through multi-omics analysis: JGOG3025-TR2 study. Br J Cancer 2024; 131:1340-1349. [PMID: 39215190 PMCID: PMC11473812 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02837-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Revised: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 08/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Considerable interobserver variability exists in diagnosis of ovarian high-grade endometrioid carcinoma (HGEC) and high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) due to histopathological similarities. While homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) correlates with drug sensitivity in HGSC, the molecular features of HGEC are unclear. METHODS Fresh-frozen samples from 15 ovarian HGECs and 274 ovarian HGSCs in the JGOG-TR2 cohort were submitted to targeted DNA sequencing, RNA sequencing, DNA methylation array, and SNP array. We additionally analyzed 555 ovarian HGSCs from TCGA-OV and 287 endometrial high-grade carcinomas from TCGA-UCEC. RESULTS Unsupervised clustering using copy number signatures identified four distinct tumor groups (C1, C2, C3 and C4). C1 (n = 41) showed CCNE1 amplification and poor survival. C2 (n = 160) and C3 (n = 59) showed high BRCA1/2 alteration frequency with low and moderate ploidy, respectively. C4 (n = 22) was characterized by favorable outcome, higher HGEC proportion, no BRCA1/2 alteration or CCNE1 amplification, and low levels of HRD score, ploidy, intra-tumoral heterogeneity, cell proliferation rate, and WT1 gene expression. Notably, C4 exhibited a normal endometrium-like DNA methylation profile, thus, defined as "HGEC-type" tumors, which were also identified in TCGA-OV and TCGA-UCEC. CONCLUSIONS Ovarian "HGEC-type" tumors present a non-HRD status, favorable prognosis, and endometrial differentiation, possibly constituting a subset of clinically diagnosed HGSCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiro Takamatsu
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - R Tyler Hillman
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kosuke Yoshihara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Muneaki Shimada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University Graduate School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kajiyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Katsutoshi Oda
- Division of Integrative Genomics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaki Mandai
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Aikou Okamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Noriomi Matsumura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Blackman A, Rees AC, Bowers RR, Jones CM, Vaena SG, Clark MA, Carter S, Villamor ED, Evans D, Emanuel AJ, Fullbright G, O’Malley MS, Carpenter RL, Long DT, Spruill LS, Romeo MJ, Orr BC, Helke KL, Delaney JR. MYC is Sufficient to Generate Mid-Life High-Grade Serous Ovarian and Uterine Serous Carcinomas in a p53-R270H Mouse Model. CANCER RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 2024; 4:2525-2538. [PMID: 39225558 PMCID: PMC11425777 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-24-0144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Revised: 07/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM) have fundamentally changed how ovarian cancer etiology, early detection, and treatment are understood. MYC, an oncogene, is amongst the most amplified genes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), but it has not previously been utilized to drive HGSOC GEMMs. We coupled Myc and dominant-negative mutant p53-R270H with a fallopian tube epithelium (FTE)-specific promoter Ovgp1 to generate a new GEMM of HGSOC. Female mice developed lethal cancer at an average of 14.5 months. Histopathologic examination of mice revealed HGSOC characteristics, including nuclear p53 and nuclear MYC in clusters of cells within the FTE and ovarian surface epithelium. Unexpectedly, nuclear p53 and MYC clustered cell expression was also identified in the uterine luminal epithelium, possibly from intraepithelial metastasis from the FTE. Extracted tumor cells exhibited strong loss of heterozygosity at the p53 locus, leaving the mutant allele. Copy-number alterations in these cancer cells were prevalent, disrupting a large fraction of genes. Transcriptome profiles most closely matched human HGSOC and serous endometrial cancer. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the Myc and Trp53-R270H transgenes were able to recapitulate many phenotypic hallmarks of HGSOC through the utilization of strictly human-mimetic genetic hallmarks of HGSOC. This new mouse model enables further exploration of ovarian cancer pathogenesis, particularly in the 50% of HGSOC which lack homology-directed repair mutations. Histologic and transcriptomic findings are consistent with the hypothesis that uterine serous cancer may originate from the FTE. SIGNIFICANCE Mouse models using transgenes which generate spontaneous cancers are essential tools to examine the etiology of human diseases. Here, the first Myc-driven spontaneous model is described as a valid HGSOC model. Surprisingly, aspects of uterine serous carcinoma were also observed in this model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Blackman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Amy C. Rees
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Robert R. Bowers
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Christian M. Jones
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Silvia G. Vaena
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Madison A. Clark
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Shelby Carter
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Evan D. Villamor
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Della Evans
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Anthony J. Emanuel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - George Fullbright
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Matthew S. O’Malley
- Department of Medical Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana.
| | - Richard L. Carpenter
- Department of Medical Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana.
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana.
| | - David T. Long
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Laura S. Spruill
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Martin J. Romeo
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Brian C. Orr
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Kristi L. Helke
- Department of Comparative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| | - Joe R. Delaney
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Blackman A, Rees AC, Bowers RR, Jones CM, Vaena SG, Clark MA, Carter S, Villamor ED, Evans D, Emanuel AJ, Fullbright G, Long DT, Spruill L, Romeo MJ, Helke KL, Delaney JR. MYC is sufficient to generate mid-life high-grade serous ovarian and uterine serous carcinomas in a p53-R270H mouse model. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.01.24.576924. [PMID: 38352443 PMCID: PMC10862747 DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.24.576924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM) have fundamentally changed how ovarian cancer etiology, early detection, and treatment is understood. However, previous GEMMs of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) have had to utilize genetics rarely or never found in human HGSOC to yield ovarian cancer within the lifespan of a mouse. MYC, an oncogene, is amongst the most amplified genes in HGSOC, but it has not previously been utilized to drive HGSOC GEMMs. We coupled Myc and dominant negative mutant p53-R270H with a fallopian tube epithelium-specific promoter Ovgp1 to generate a new GEMM of HGSOC. Female mice developed lethal cancer at an average of 15.1 months. Histopathological examination of mice revealed HGSOC characteristics including nuclear p53 and nuclear MYC in clusters of cells within the fallopian tube epithelium and ovarian surface epithelium. Unexpectedly, nuclear p53 and MYC clustered cell expression was also identified in the uterine luminal epithelium, possibly from intraepithelial metastasis from the fallopian tube epithelium (FTE). Extracted tumor cells exhibited strong loss of heterozygosity at the p53 locus, leaving the mutant allele. Copy number alterations in these cancer cells were prevalent, disrupting a large fraction of genes. Transcriptome profiles most closely matched human HGSOC and serous endometrial cancer. Taken together, these results demonstrate the Myc and Trp53-R270H transgene was able to recapitulate many phenotypic hallmarks of HGSOC through the utilization of strictly human-mimetic genetic hallmarks of HGSOC. This new mouse model enables further exploration of ovarian cancer pathogenesis, particularly in the 50% of HGSOC which lack homology directed repair mutations. Histological and transcriptomic findings are consistent with the hypothesis that uterine serous cancer may originate from the fallopian tube epithelium.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kilic F, Ersak B, Cakir C, Yuksel D, Kilic C, Korkmaz V, Tokgozoglu N, Toptas T, Boran N, Kimyon Comert G, Ureyen I, Tasci T, Moraloglu Tekin O, Ustun Y, Turan T. Assessment of the differences in oncologic outcomes between patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and uterine serous carcinoma. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2024; 50:86-94. [PMID: 37854000 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate whether the recurrence rates, recurrence patterns, and survival outcomes differed according to the primary site of the tumor in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) and uterine serous carcinoma (USC). METHODS The population of this multicenter retrospective study consisted of patients who had USC or HGSOC. Progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) estimates were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS The study cohort consisted of 247 patients with HGSOC and 34 with USC. Recurrence developed in 118 (51.1%) in the HGSOC group and 14 (42.4%) in the USC group (p = 0.352). The median time to recurrence was 23.5 (range, 4-144) and 17 (range, 4-43) months in the HGSOC and USC groups, respectively (p = 0.055). The 3-year PFS was 52% in the HGSOC group and 47% in the USC group (p = 0.450). Additionally, 3-year DSS was 92% and 82% in the HGSOC and USC groups, respectively (p = 0.060). CONCLUSIONS HGSOC and USC are aggressive tumors with high recurrence and mortality rates in advanced stages. These two carcinomas, which are similar in molecular features and clinical management, may also have similar recurrence patterns, disease failure, and survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatih Kilic
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burak Ersak
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Caner Cakir
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Dilek Yuksel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cigdem Kilic
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Vakkas Korkmaz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nedim Tokgozoglu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tayfun Toptas
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Nurettin Boran
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gunsu Kimyon Comert
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Isin Ureyen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Tolga Tasci
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ozlem Moraloglu Tekin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yaprak Ustun
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Taner Turan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sun B, Zhao N, Cheng Y, Wang J. A review of basic to clinical targeted therapy and immunotherapy in uterine serous cancer. Mol Biol Rep 2023; 50:6901-6912. [PMID: 37326746 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-023-08580-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Uterine serous carcinomas show more frequent mutations of TP53, FBXW7, PIK3CA, and PP2R1A. Furthermore, cyclin-dependent kinase, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B, and mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathways are involved in uterine serous carcinoma progression. However, most patients with uterine serous carcinoma develop chemoresistance to paclitaxel and carboplatin. Moreover, uterine serous carcinoma shows immunosuppressive microenvironment with lower frequency of microsatellite instability. However, some clinical trials of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/neu and WEE1 targeted therapies showed good effects in prolonging the survival in patients with uterine serous carcinoma. More effective targeted therapies and immunotherapies need to be developed in recurrent uterine serous carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bowen Sun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Na Zhao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Yuan Cheng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
| | - Jianliu Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Runnebaum IB, Kather A, Vorwergk J, Cruz JJ, Mothes AR, Beteta CR, Boer J, Keller M, Pölcher M, Mustea A, Sehouli J. Ovarian cancer prevention by opportunistic salpingectomy is a new de facto standard in Germany. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:6953-6966. [PMID: 36847838 PMCID: PMC10374707 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04578-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The most prevalent and aggressive subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC), high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), originates in many cases from the fallopian tubes. Because of poor prognosis and lack of effective screening for early detection, opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) for prevention of EOC is being implemented into clinical routine in several countries worldwide. Taking the opportunity of a gynecological surgery in women at average cancer risk, extramural fallopian tubes are completely resected preserving the ovaries with their infundibulopelvic blood supply. Until recently, only 13 of the 130 national partner societies of the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) have published a statement on OS. This study aimed to analyze the acceptance of OS in Germany. METHODS (1) Survey of German gynecologists in 2015 and 2022 by the Department of Gynecology of the Jena University Hospital in co-operation with the Department of Gynecology at Charité-University Medicine Berlin with support of NOGGO e. V. and AGO e. V. (2) Salpingectomy numbers in Germany for years 2005-2020 as retrieved from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (Destatis). RESULTS (1) Survey: Number of participants was 203 in 2015 and 166 in 2022, respectively. Nearly all respondents (2015: 92%, 2022: 98%) have already performed bilateral salpingectomy without oophorectomy in combination with benign hysterectomy with the intention to reduce the risk for malignant (2015: 96%, 2022: 97%) and benign (2015: 47%, 2022: 38%) disorders. Compared to 2015 (56.6%), considerably more survey participants performed OS in > 50% or in all cases in 2022 (89.0%). Recommendation of OS for all women with completed family planning at benign pelvic surgery was approved by 68% in 2015 and 74% in 2022. (2) Case number analysis: In 2020, four times more cases of salpingectomy were reported by German public hospitals compared to 2005 (n = 50,398 vs. n = 12,286). Of all inpatient hysterectomies in German hospitals in 2020, 45% were combined with salpingectomy, and more than 65% in women at the age of 35 to 49 years. CONCLUSION Mounting scientific plausibility regarding involvement of fallopian tubes in the pathogenesis of EOC led to change of clinical acceptance of OS in many countries including in Germany. Case number data and widespread expert judgment demonstrate that OS has become a routine procedure in Germany and a de facto standard for primary prevention of EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I B Runnebaum
- Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
| | - A Kather
- Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - J Vorwergk
- Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - J J Cruz
- Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics and Perinatal Medicine, Bonn University Hospital, Sigmund Freud Street 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - A R Mothes
- Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, St. Georg Hospital Eisenach, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Jena, Muehlhaeuser Str. 94, 99817, Eisenach, Germany
| | - C R Beteta
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - J Boer
- Nord-Ostdeutsche Gesellschaft für Gynaekologische Onkologie (NOGGO e.V.), Schwedenstraße 9, 13359, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Keller
- Nord-Ostdeutsche Gesellschaft für Gynaekologische Onkologie (NOGGO e.V.), Schwedenstraße 9, 13359, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Pölcher
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Rotkreuzklinikum München Frauenklinik, Taxisstraße 3, 80637, München, Germany
| | - A Mustea
- Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - J Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Nord-Ostdeutsche Gesellschaft für Gynaekologische Onkologie (NOGGO e.V.), Schwedenstraße 9, 13359, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gilks CB, Selinger CI, Davidson B, Köbel M, Ledermann JA, Lim D, Malpica A, Mikami Y, Singh N, Srinivasan R, Vang R, Lax SF, McCluggage WG. Data Set for the Reporting of Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:S119-S142. [PMID: 36305537 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The move toward consistent and comprehensive surgical pathology reports for cancer resection specimens has been a key development in supporting evidence-based patient management and consistent cancer staging. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) previously developed a data set for reporting of the ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal carcinomas which was published in 2015. In this paper, we provide an update on this data set, as a second edition, that reflects changes in the 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Female Genital Tumours as well as some other minor modifications. The data set has been developed by a panel of internationally recognized expert pathologists and a clinician and consists of "core" and "noncore" elements to be included in surgical pathology reports, with detailed commentary to guide users, including references. This data set replaces the widely used first edition, and will facilitate consistent and accurate case reporting, data collection for quality assurance and research, and allow for comparison of epidemiological and pathologic parameters between different populations.
Collapse
|
10
|
Minimal uterine serous carcinoma and endometrial polyp: a close clinicopathological relationship. Hum Pathol 2021; 118:1-8. [PMID: 34508766 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2021.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Frequently involving an endometrial polyp, minimal uterine serous carcinoma (MUSC) represents the earliest recognizable forms of endometrial serous carcinoma. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive morphological and clinical outcome assessment of MUSC involving endometrial polyp. A total of 77 fully staged MUSCs involving endometrial polyp were identified, including 53 MUSCs confined to polyp and 24 nonpolyp confined tumors. Extrauterine disease was found in 17% (9/53) of polyp-confined MUSCs compared to 41.7% (10/24) of nonpolyp confined tumors (p = 0.02). Lymphovascular invasion was observed in 3.8% (2/53) of polyp-confined cases compared to 25% (6/24) of nonpolyp confined cases (p = 0.047). Lymph node metastasis was observed in 11.3% (6/53) of polyp-confined cases, compared to 29.2% (7/24) of nonpolyp confined cases (p = 0.058). Positive pelvic washing cytology was seen in 18.9% (10/53) of polyp-confined versus 37.5% (9/24) of nonpolyp confined tumors (p = 0.078). Overall, 58 of 77 (75.3%) patients had low tumor stage (57 stage I cases and 1 stage II case) and only two patients (3.5%) had a recurrence. In contrast, 19 of 77 (24.7%) patients had advanced stage (stage III or IV) disease and 17 (89.5%) patients had recurrence (p < 0.0001). Only one of 57 low-stage patient (1.7%) versus 11 of 19 high-stage patients (57.8%) died of the tumor (p < 0.0001). Five of 53 (9.4%) patients with polyp-confined MUSC and 7 of 24 (29.2%) patients with nonpolyp confined MUSC died of the disease (p = 0.03). In conclusion, while a small percentage of MUSCs exist without the involvement of an endometrial polyp, a close topographic relationship between MUSC and the endometrial polyp is confirmed in this largest series, supporting the theory that most if not all MUSCs arise in an EMP. Patients with MUSC without extrauterine spread have an excellent prognosis. Compared to patients with MUSC confined to an endometrial polyp, patients with MUSC extending to the background endometrium have a significantly higher risk for high-stage disease at presentation.
Collapse
|
11
|
Yoshioka T, Suzuki Y, Imai Y, Ruiz-Yokota N, Yamanaka S, Furuya M, Miyagi E. Inspection for micrometastasis is essential for predicting the prognosis of serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma: Case report and literature review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021; 47:4484-4489. [PMID: 34494349 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma is the precursor of invasive uterine serous carcinoma. Here, we present two cases of serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma with omental micrometastasis and discuss their clinical significance. Two menopausal patients with abnormal endometrial biopsy findings underwent hysterectomy and comprehensive surgical staging (bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy). Although gross examination failed to detect tumors, the pathological diagnosis was serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma. Both patients had omental micrometastasis; they were diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IVB disease and received postoperative chemotherapy. One patient died of the carcinoma 9 months after the hysterectomy, and the other had a recurrence of carcinoma 17 months after the end of the initial therapy. The present cases and literature review highlight the importance of meticulous inspection for micrometastasis in the abdominal cavity, including the omentum and peritoneum, for predicting prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshiki Yoshioka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yukio Suzuki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yuichi Imai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Naho Ruiz-Yokota
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Shoji Yamanaka
- Department of Pathology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | | | - Etsuko Miyagi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Steenbeek MP, Bulten J, Snijders MPLM, Lombaers M, Hendriks J, van den Brand M, Kraayenbrink AA, Massuger LFAG, Sweegers S, de Hullu JA, Pijnenborg JMA, Küsters-Vandevelde HVN, Reijnen C. Fallopian tube abnormalities in uterine serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 158:339-346. [PMID: 32409160 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is presumed to arise from endometrial intra-epithelial carcinoma (EIC), whereas tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas have similar precursor lesions in the Fallopian tube, i.e. serous tubal intra-epithelial carcinoma (STIC). The presence of Fallopian tube abnormalities and their clonal relationship to the concurrent USC was investigated. METHODS In this multicenter study, all patients treated for USC between 1992 and 2017 were retrospectively identified. Histopathological diagnosis of USC, EIC and STIC was revised by an expert pathologist. Additionally, all Fallopian tube sections were immunohistochemically stained (p53 and Ki-67). Fallopian tube abnormalities were classified as either p53 signature, serous tubal intra-epithelial lesion (STIL) or STIC. The USCs and Fallopian tube abnormalities were analyzed by targeted next-generation sequencing. RESULTS In 168 included patients, Fallopian tube abnormalities were found in 27.4% (46/168): p53-signatures in 17.9% (30/168), STILs in 3.0% (5/168) and STICs in 6.5% (11/168). In subgroup analysis, STICs were found in 9.5% (11/115) of patients with at least one section of the fimbriated end embedded. Next-generation sequencing showed identical TP53-mutations in the STIC and corresponding USC. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the presence of Fallopian tube abnormalities was shown in a high percentage of patients with USC, representing either true precursor lesions or metastasized disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda P Steenbeek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marc P L M Snijders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marike Lombaers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanine Hendriks
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Arjan A Kraayenbrink
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sanne Sweegers
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Casper Reijnen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Trinh VQH, Pelletier MP, Echelard P, Warkus T, Sauthier P, Gougeon F, Mès-Masson AM, Provencher DM, Rahimi K. Distinct Histologic, Immunohistochemical and Clinical Features Associated With Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Carcinoma Involving Polyps. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2020; 39:128-135. [PMID: 30789501 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The origin of serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC) is debated, due to its premalignant and independently malignant nature. It often arises next to endometrial serous carcinoma (ESC), with a propensity for polypoid growth. We aimed to better characterize this discrepancy by analyzing the clinical, histologic, and immunohistochemical features of polypoid carcinoma associated with SEIC (P-SEIC), and compared them with usual endometrial serous carcinoma without SEIC (UESC). Consecutive patients with P-SEIC were recruited and compared with UESC controls from our institutional research center. Clinical, histologic, and immunohistochemical (IHC, ER, PR, P53, Napsin-A, WT1, P16) were analyzed. BRCA testing results and familial history were also extracted from clinical databases. Welch T test, Pearson χ, and Fisher exact test were performed in SPSS version 23. A total of 37 P-SEIC and 25 UESC were the basis of a case-control study. P-SEIC was associated with more bilateral ovarian involvement (P=0.026), yet showed lower rates of myometrial invasion (P=0.002). P-SEIC showed a statistically different IHC profile: p53+, p16+, ER+, PR+, and WT-1+, and high rates of Napsin-A, while UESC was p53+, p16+, WT-1-, Napsin-A-, with lower rates of ER and PR. We also identified 2 patients who received prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy for BRCA mutations and who subsequently developed P-SEIC with its unique IHC pattern. Our results suggest different underlying expression profiles and possibly diverging molecular signatures between both P-SEIC and UESC. If confirmed in further molecular studies, it could lead to a distinct molecular subclass.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Although endometrial carcinoma (EC) is generally considered to have a good prognosis, over 20% of women with EC die of their disease, with a projected increase in both incidence and mortality over the next few decades. The aim of accurate prognostication is to ensure that patients receive optimal treatment and are neither overtreated nor undertreated, thereby improving patient outcomes overall. Patients with EC can be categorized into prognostic risk groups based on clinicopathologic findings. Other than tumor type and grade, groupings and recommended management algorithms may take into account age, body mass index, stage, and presence of lymphovascular space invasion. The molecular classification of EC that has emerged from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) study provides additional, potentially superior, prognostic information to traditional histologic typing and grading. This classifier does not, however, replace clinicopathologic risk assessment based on parameters other than histotype and grade. It is envisaged that molecular and clinicopathologic prognostic grouping systems will work better together than either alone. Thus, while tumor typing and grading may be superseded by a classification based on underlying genomic abnormalities, accurate assessment of other pathologic parameters will continue to be key to patient management. These include those factors related to staging, such as depth of myometrial invasion, cervical, vaginal, serosal surface, adnexal and parametrial invasion, and those independent of stage such as lymphovascular space invasion. Other prognostic parameters will also be discussed. These recommendations were developed from the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists Endometrial Carcinoma project.
Collapse
|
15
|
Can morphometric analysis of the fallopian tube fimbria predict the presence of uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC)? PLoS One 2019; 14:e0211329. [PMID: 30818325 PMCID: PMC6394988 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine serous papillary carcinoma (UPSC) is an aggressive tumor, often diagnosed as a metastatic disease and characterized by a high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. UPSC represents a distinct subtype of endometrial cancer which is different in clinical and pathological behaviors from endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC) and resembles more to serous ovarian carcinoma. Since tumors of serous papillary of the ovary are hypothesized to stem from cells of the fallopian tube's fimbria, we hypothesized that UPSC may also origin in the fallopian tubes. In our previous study, using a novel method of computerized morphometry of the fimbrial epithelium we have found significant differences between fimbriae of healthy women and serous ovarian cancer patients. In this study we showed the presence of morphologic differences between twenty-four fimbriae from healthy women, and twenty six fimbriae from uterus cancer (13 from UPSC patients and 13 from EEC patients). All fimbriae reported by the pathologist as "normal" were subjected to a computerized histomorphometric analysis. Two-step method of computerized histomorphometry, i.e. Fast Fourier transformation (FFT) followed by a co-occurrence matrix analysis and an additional analysis of the nuclear symmetry of the tubal fimbrial epithelium were applied. Using these novel methods, we were able to show differences in the morphometric characteristics of the fimbriae in UPSC patients compared to EEC and healthy patients. It is yet to be determined the clinical significance of this observation.
Collapse
|
16
|
Stewart CJR, Crum CP, McCluggage WG, Park KJ, Rutgers JK, Oliva E, Malpica A, Parkash V, Matias-Guiu X, Ronnett BM. Guidelines to Aid in the Distinction of Endometrial and Endocervical Carcinomas, and the Distinction of Independent Primary Carcinomas of the Endometrium and Adnexa From Metastatic Spread Between These and Other Sites. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2019; 38 Suppl 1:S75-S92. [PMID: 30550485 PMCID: PMC6296834 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
In most cases of suspected endometrial neoplasia tumor origin can be correctly assigned according to a combination of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features, even when the latter are based upon the examination of relatively small biopsy samples. However there are well-recognized exceptions to this rule which continue to create diagnostic difficulty, and sometimes difficulties persist even after the detailed examination of resection specimens. Among the most common problems encountered in practice are the distinction of primary endometrial and primary endocervical adenocarcinomas, and the determination of tumor origin when there is synchronous, multifocal involvement of gynecologic tract sites, for example the endometrium and the ovary. However, accurate diagnosis in these cases is important because this has significant staging, management and prognostic implications. In this review we discuss the value and limitations of key morphologic, immunophenotypic and molecular findings in these diagnostic scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin J R Stewart
- Department of Histopathology, King Edward Memorial Hospital and School for Women's and Infants' Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia (C.J.R.S.) Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (C.P.C.) Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School (E.O.), Boston, Massachusetts Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK (W.G.M.) Department of Pathology, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (K.J.P.) Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (J.K.R.) Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (A.M.) Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (V.P.) Pathological Oncology Group and Pathology Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain (X.M.-G.) Departments of Pathology and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (B.M.R.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kim J, Park EY, Kim O, Schilder JM, Coffey DM, Cho CH, Bast RC. Cell Origins of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10:cancers10110433. [PMID: 30424539 PMCID: PMC6267333 DOI: 10.3390/cancers10110433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Revised: 11/03/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian cancer, also known as high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), is the most common and deadliest type of ovarian cancer. HGSC appears to arise from the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum. As most HGSC cases present with widespread peritoneal metastases, it is often not clear where HGSC truly originates. Traditionally, the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) was long believed to be the origin of HGSC. Since the late 1990s, the fallopian tube epithelium has emerged as a potential primary origin of HGSC. Particularly, serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), a noninvasive tumor lesion formed preferentially in the distal fallopian tube epithelium, was proposed as a precursor for HGSC. It was hypothesized that STIC lesions would progress, over time, to malignant and metastatic HGSC, arising from the fallopian tube or after implanting on the ovary or peritoneum. Many clinical studies and several mouse models support the fallopian tube STIC origin of HGSC. Current evidence indicates that STIC may serve as a precursor for HGSC in high-risk women carrying germline BRCA1 or 2 mutations. Yet not all STIC lesions appear to progress to clinical HGSCs, nor would all HGSCs arise from STIC lesions, even in high-risk women. Moreover, the clinical importance of STIC remains less clear in women in the general population, in which 85–90% of all HGSCs arise. Recently, increasing attention has been brought to the possibility that many potential precursor or premalignant lesions, though composed of microscopically—and genetically—cancerous cells, do not advance to malignant tumors or lethal malignancies. Hence, rigorous causal evidence would be crucial to establish that STIC is a bona fide premalignant lesion for metastatic HGSC. While not all STICs may transform into malignant tumors, these lesions are clearly associated with increased risk for HGSC. Identification of the molecular characteristics of STICs that predict their malignant potential and clinical behavior would bolster the clinical importance of STIC. Also, as STIC lesions alone cannot account for all HGSCs, other potential cellular origins of HGSC need to be investigated. The fallopian tube stroma in mice, for instance, has been shown to be capable of giving rise to metastatic HGSC, which faithfully recapitulates the clinical behavior and molecular aspect of human HGSC. Elucidating the precise cell(s) of origin of HGSC will be critical for improving the early detection and prevention of ovarian cancer, ultimately reducing ovarian cancer mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaeyeon Kim
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
- Indiana University Melvin & Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | - Eun Young Park
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | - Olga Kim
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | - Jeanne M Schilder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
- Indiana University Melvin & Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | - Donna M Coffey
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist and Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Chi-Heum Cho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Daegu 41931, Korea.
| | - Robert C Bast
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Soslow RA, Murali R. A guided tour of selected issues pertaining to metastatic carcinomas involving or originating from the gynecologic tract. Semin Diagn Pathol 2018; 35:95-107. [PMID: 29248205 PMCID: PMC5821534 DOI: 10.1053/j.semdp.2017.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Epithelial metastases originating from the gynecologic tract or secondarily involving it frequently display a different morphology when compared to the primary tumor. Furthermore, issues such as modes of metastasis, appropriate nomenclature and prognostic significance remain subjects of discussion and some skepticism. In this review, we will discuss: metastases to uterine adnexa; serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC); serous borderline tumors; metastases from the uterine corpus; and “synchronous” endometrial and ovarian tumors. Three additional themes that will run through the discussions are those that are peculiar, although not restricted to the gynecologic tract: metastasis from non-invasive primary tumors, metastases that look benign and metastases that are benign or clinically indolent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Soslow
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
| | - Rajmohan Murali
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Accurate staging of cancers is an important determinant of prognosis and guides optimal patient treatment. Although the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting recommends that endometrial cancers (including carcinosarcomas) are pathologically staged using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 system, in many areas TNM [American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) or Union for International Cancer Control (UICC)] staging is used or even mandated; these latter systems are based on FIGO 2009. In this review, areas of difficulty in the pathologic staging of endometrial carcinomas are covered with practical advice for the reporting pathologist. These include issues regarding the assessment of the depth of myometrial involvement (which may be rendered difficult due to a variety of factors), tumor involvement of adenomyosis, and assessment of cervical and uterine serosal involvement. Although not included in the FIGO staging system, the issue of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is covered as this is of prognostic importance and there are multiple problems in the pathologic assessment of this. One important point is that tumors should not be upstaged based on the presence of LVSI alone without tissue involvement; for example, the presence of LVSI in the outer half of the myometrium or in cervical or adnexal vessels in a carcinoma with myoinvasion confined to the inner half of the myometrium is still FIGO stage IA. The issue of simultaneously occurring tumors of the endometrium and adnexa is also covered with advice on how to distinguish between synchronous independent and metastatic neoplasms of both endometrioid and nonendometrioid types. Recent molecular evidence showing that simultaneously occurring endometrioid carcinomas of the endometrium and ovary are clonal and thus probably represent metastatic disease from the endometrium to the ovary rather than synchronous independent neoplasms, as is widely assumed, is discussed.
Collapse
|
20
|
Falconer H, Yin L, Altman D. Association between tubal ligation and endometrial cancer risk: A Swedish population-based cohort study. Int J Cancer 2018; 143:16-21. [DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2017] [Revised: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Henrik Falconer
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
- Department of Women's and Children's Health; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Karolinska University Hospital; Stockholm Sweden
| | - Li Yin
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
| | - Daniel Altman
- Department of Clinical Sciences; Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods; University of Milano-Bicocca; Milan Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bartosch C, Clarke B, Bosse T. Gynaecological neoplasms in common familial syndromes (Lynch and HBOC). Pathology 2017; 50:222-237. [PMID: 29287922 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2017.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2017] [Revised: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Recognising hereditary predisposition in a cancer patient has implications both for the patient and the patient's kindred. For the latter, cascade germline testing can reassure those not-at-risk family members while carriers can be enrolled in cancer screening and prevention programs that are medically effective and economically sustainable for health care systems. Furthermore, in many of these syndromes, ramifications of molecular phenotypes are increasing, and it is now emerging that, in addition, they convey prognostic and predictive information. Although cancer predisposition syndromes are rare, these molecular phenotypes also occur as somatic events in sporadic cancer settings. The information obtained from these molecular phenotypes, regardless of germline or somatic origin, is being incorporated into clinical management in view of their manifold significance. Thus, increasingly, bespoke management of cancer patients involves testing for both germline and somatic mutations in tumours. Lynch syndrome and BRCA-1 and BRCA-2-associated hereditary breast and ovarian cancer are hereditary cancer syndromes frequently involving the gynaecological tract but tumours associated with similar molecular alterations may also occur sporadically. Thus, the molecular phenotype of mismatch repair deficiency, microsatellite instability or hypermutator phenotype may be attributable to germline or somatic events. Similarly, homologous recombination deficiency or 'BRCAness' in ovarian cancers may be syndromic or sporadic. While hereditary syndromes are well recognised, the prognostic and predictive implications of these molecular phenotypes have only recently been elucidated and these aspects will finally ensure that molecular screening may become standard of care. Thus, nowadays pathologists are asked to designate the molecular phenotype of these cancers and then determine whether it is due to hereditary or sporadic causes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Bartosch
- Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Blaise Clarke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The most common type of ovarian cancer, high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), was originally thought to develop from the ovarian surface epithelium. However, recent data suggest that the cells that undergo neoplastic transformation and give rise to the majority of HGSOC are from the fallopian tube. This development has impacted both translational research and clinical practice, revealing new opportunities for early detection, prevention, and treatment of ovarian cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Genomic studies indicate that approximately 50% of HGSOC are characterized by mutations in genes involved in the homologous recombination pathway of DNA repair, especially BRCA1 and BRCA2. Clinical trials have demonstrated successful treatment of homologous recombination-defective cancers with poly-ribose polymerase inhibitors through synthetic lethality. Recently, amplification of CCNE1 was found to be another major factor in HGSOC tumorigenesis, accounting for approximately 20% of all cases. Interestingly, amplification of CCNE1 and mutation of homologous recombination repair genes are mutually exclusive in HGSOC. SUMMARY The fallopian tube secretory cell is the cell of origin for the majority of ovarian cancers. Although it remains unclear what triggers neoplastic transformation of these cells, certain tumors exhibit loss of BRCA function or amplification of CCNE1. These alterations represent unique therapeutic opportunities in ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
23
|
Clinical Significance of Positive Pelvic Washings in Uterine Papillary Serous Carcinoma Confined to an Endometrial Polyp. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2017; 35:249-55. [PMID: 26535985 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) represents 10% of endometrial carcinomas. Significant number of patients initially present with extrauterine disease. The role of adjuvant treatment in low stage, especially polyp-confined UPSC is controversial. This multi-institutional study evaluated the significance of positive pelvic washing (PW) and adjuvant treatment on disease recurrence in a setting of endometrial polyp-confined UPSC. Surgical pathology files from 3 institutions were searched for cases of endometrial polyp-confined UPSC. Following histologic review, cases were clinically staged as Stage I, without myoinvasion or lymphovascular invasion. Clinicopathologic characteristics, results of PW, and type of adjuvant therapy were recorded. Statistical analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method for survival and Fisher exact test were performed. Thirty-three patients were included in the study. All patients were diagnosed with polyp-confined UPSC. The size of the polyp ranged from 0.3 to 4.3 cm. PW was positive for tumor cells in 8/33 (24%) patients. Twenty-two patients (66.6%) received some type of adjuvant treatment. Six patients (18%) developed recurrent disease. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival in the patients receiving adjuvant treatment versus not (P=0.375). However, there was significant association (P=0.0013) between positive PW and disease recurrence. Data are conflicting whether positive PW affects prognosis in low-stage endometrial carcinomas. Our study showed that in UPSC, malignant cells can be present in PW without lymphovascular invasion or myoinvasion and may have negative prognostic implication. Our data also reflect the controversies in the role of adjuvant treatment in endometrium-confined UPSC.
Collapse
|
24
|
Incidental Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma and Non-Neoplastic Conditions of the Fallopian Tubes in Grossly Normal Adnexa: A Clinicopathologic Study of 388 Completely Embedded Cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2017; 35:423-9. [PMID: 26630221 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), the putative precursor of the majority of extrauterine high-grade serous carcinomas, has been reported in both high-risk women (those with a germline BRCA mutation, a personal history of breast carcinoma, and/or family history of breast or ovarian carcinoma) and average risk women from the general population. We reviewed grossly normal adnexal specimens from 388 consecutive, unselected women undergoing surgery, including those with germline BRCA mutation (37 patients), personal history of breast cancer or family history of breast/ovarian cancer (74 patients), endometrial cancer (175 patients), and a variety of other conditions (102 patients). Among 111 high-risk cases and 277 non-high-risk cases, 3 STICs were identified (0.8%), all in non-high-risk women (high risk vs. non-high risk: P=not significant). STIC was found in 2 women with nonserous endometrial carcinoma and 1 with complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Salpingoliths (mucosal calcifications), found in 9% of high-risk cases, and fimbrial adenofibromas in 9.9% of high-risk cases, were significantly more common in high-risk as compared with non-high-risk women (1.8% and 2.5%, respectively; P<0.007). Mucinous metaplasia was found in 3.1%, salpingitis isthmica nodosa in 3.4%, hemosiderin or pseudoxanthoma cells in 4.9%, and fibrous luminal nodules in 4.1%. None of these latter features differed significantly in the high-risk versus non-high-risk groups. These findings suggest a possible association between STIC and endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma, and clarify the frequency of non-neoplastic tubal findings in grossly normal fallopian tubes.
Collapse
|
25
|
Singh N, McCluggage WG, Gilks CB. High-grade serous carcinoma of tubo-ovarian origin: recent developments. Histopathology 2017; 71:339-356. [PMID: 28477361 DOI: 10.1111/his.13248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Extra-uterine high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) accounts for most of the morbidity and mortality associated with ovarian carcinoma, and is one of the leading causes of cancer death in women. Until recently our understanding of HGSC was very limited compared to other common cancers, and it has only been during the last 15 years that we have learned how to diagnose this ovarian carcinoma histotype accurately. Since then, however, there has been rapid progress, with identification of a precursor lesion in the fallopian tube, development of prevention strategies for both those with inherited susceptibility (hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome) and without the syndrome, and elucidation of the molecular events important in oncogenesis. This molecular understanding has led to new treatment strategies for HGSC, with the promise of more to come in the near future. In this review we focus on these recent changes, including diagnostic criteria/differential diagnosis, primary site assignment, precursor lesions and the molecular pathology of HGSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveena Singh
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Müllerian intra-abdominal carcinomatosis in hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome: implications for risk-reducing surgery. Fam Cancer 2017; 15:371-84. [PMID: 26875157 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9878-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
More than 40 years ago Lynch et al. described several multigenerational breast cancer family pedigrees which demonstrated autosomal dominant inheritance of a trait(s) that increased risks for both breast and ovarian cancers. Mutation carriers in at least 90 % of these hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome families have been linked to cancer-associated mutations in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. This review focuses on the contributions of Lynch, colleagues and collaborators and pertinent literature, toward defining the HBOC syndrome, the cancer risks that the inherited adverse mutations convey, the gynecologic tissues and organs from which the malignancy may arise to disseminate throughout the pelvic and abdominal organs and peritoneum and how this information can be used to reduce the risk and morbidities of intra-abdominal carcinomatosis in effected individuals.
Collapse
|
27
|
Meserve EEK, Brouwer J, Crum CP. Serous tubal intraepithelial neoplasia: the concept and its application. Mod Pathol 2017; 30:710-721. [PMID: 28106106 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2016] [Revised: 12/04/2016] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In recent years it has become clear that many extra-uterine (pelvic) high-grade serous carcinomas (serous carcinomas) are preceded by a precursor lesion in the distal fallopian tube. Precursors range from small self-limited 'p53 signatures' to expansile serous tubal intraepithelial neoplasms that include both serous tubal epithelial proliferations (or lesions) of uncertain significance and serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas. These precursors can be considered from three perspectives. The first is biologic underpinnings, which are multifactorial, and include the intersection of DNA damage with Tp53 mutations and disturbances in transcriptional regulation that increase with age. The second perspective is the morphologic discovery and classification of intraepithelial neoplasms that are intercepted early in their natural history, either incidentally or in risk-reduction surgeries for germline mutations. For the practicing pathologist, as well as the investigators, a distinction between a primary intraepithelial neoplasm and an intramucosal carcinoma must be made to avoid misinterpreting (or underestimating) the significance of these proliferations. The third perspective is the application of this information to intervention, devising strategies that will actually lower the ovarian cancer death rate by opportunistic salpingectomy, widespread comprehensive genetic screening and early detection. Central to this issue are the questions of (1) whether some STICs are metastatic, (2) whether lower-grade epithelial proliferations can invade prior to evolving into intraepithelial carcinoma, or (3) metastasize and become malignant elsewhere ('precursor escape'). An important caveat is the persistent and unsettling reality that many high-grade serous carcinomas are not associated with an obvious point of initiation in the fallopian tube. The pathologist sits squarely in the midst of all of these issues, and has a pivotal role in managing expectations for stemming the death rate from this lethal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily E K Meserve
- Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Jan Brouwer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Christopher P Crum
- Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Uterine Serous Carcinomas Frequently Metastasize to the Fallopian Tube and Can Mimic Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2017; 41:161-170. [DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000000757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
29
|
Shu CA, Pike MC, Jotwani AR, Friebel TM, Soslow RA, Levine DA, Nathanson KL, Konner JA, Arnold AG, Bogomolniy F, Dao F, Olvera N, Bancroft EK, Goldfrank DJ, Stadler ZK, Robson ME, Brown CL, Leitao MM, Abu-Rustum NR, Aghajanian CA, Blum JL, Neuhausen SL, Garber JE, Daly MB, Isaacs C, Eeles RA, Ganz PA, Barakat RR, Offit K, Domchek SM, Rebbeck TR, Kauff ND. Uterine Cancer After Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy Without Hysterectomy in Women With BRCA Mutations. JAMA Oncol 2016; 2:1434-1440. [PMID: 27367496 PMCID: PMC5594920 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The link between BRCA mutations and uterine cancer is unclear. Therefore, although risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is standard treatment among women with BRCA mutations (BRCA+ women), the role of concomitant hysterectomy is controversial. OBJECTIVE To determine the risk for uterine cancer and distribution of specific histologic subtypes in BRCA+ women after RRSO without hysterectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multicenter prospective cohort study included 1083 women with a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation identified from January 1, 1995, to December 31, 2011, at 9 academic medical centers in the United States and the United Kingdom who underwent RRSO without a prior or concomitant hysterectomy. Of these, 627 participants were BRCA1+; 453, BRCA2+; and 3, both. Participants were prospectively followed up for a median 5.1 (interquartile range [IQR], 3.0-8.4) years after ascertainment, BRCA testing, or RRSO (whichever occurred last). Follow up data available through October 14, 2014, were included in the analyses. Censoring occurred at uterine cancer diagnosis, hysterectomy, last follow-up, or death. New cancers were categorized by histologic subtype, and available tumors were analyzed for loss of the wild-type BRCA gene and/or protein expression. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Incidence of uterine corpus cancer in BRCA+ women who underwent RRSO without hysterectomy compared with rates expected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. RESULTS Among the 1083 women women who underwent RRSO without hysterectomy at a median age 45.6 (IQR: 40.9 - 52.5), 8 incident uterine cancers were observed (4.3 expected; observed to expected [O:E] ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.8-3.7; P = .09). No increased risk for endometrioid endometrial carcinoma or sarcoma was found after stratifying by subtype. Five serous and/or serous-like (serous/serous-like) endometrial carcinomas were observed (4 BRCA1+ and 1 BRCA2+) 7.2 to 12.9 years after RRSO (BRCA1: 0.18 expected [O:E ratio, 22.2; 95% CI, 6.1-56.9; P < .001]; BRCA2: 0.16 expected [O:E ratio, 6.4; 95% CI, 0.2-35.5; P = .15]). Tumor analyses confirmed loss of the wild-type BRCA1 gene and/or protein expression in all 3 available serous/serous-like BRCA1+ tumors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Although the overall risk for uterine cancer after RRSO was not increased, the risk for serous/serous-like endometrial carcinoma was increased in BRCA1+ women. This risk should be considered when discussing the advantages and risks of hysterectomy at the time of RRSO in BRCA1+ women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine A. Shu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Malcolm C. Pike
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anjali R. Jotwani
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Tara M. Friebel
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Robert A. Soslow
- Gynecologic Pathology Service, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Douglas A. Levine
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Katherine L. Nathanson
- Basser Center for BRCA and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jason A. Konner
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Angela G. Arnold
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Faina Bogomolniy
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Fanny Dao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Narciso Olvera
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Deborah J. Goldfrank
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Zsofia K. Stadler
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mark E. Robson
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Breast Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Carol L. Brown
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mario M. Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Carol A. Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joanne L. Blum
- Baylor-Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX
| | - Susan L. Neuhausen
- Population Sciences Department, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Judy E. Garber
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Mary B. Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Department of Oncology and Medicine, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Rosalind A. Eeles
- Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Patricia A. Ganz
- UCLA Schools of Public Health and Medicine, and the Center for Cancer Prevention and Control Research, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Richard R. Barakat
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Susan M. Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Timothy R. Rebbeck
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Noah D. Kauff
- Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Duke Cancer Institute/Duke University Health System, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Demacopulo B, Lema BE, Cabrini RL, Kreimann EL. Similar expression pattern of NHERF1 and EZRIN in papillary but not in solid areas of human serous ovarian carcinomas. Acta Histochem 2016; 118:797-805. [PMID: 27823775 DOI: 10.1016/j.acthis.2016.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2016] [Revised: 10/19/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
NHERF1 is an adaptor protein expressed in the apical membrane of polarized epithelia, which interacts with the EZRIN-Radixin-Moesin (ERM) family of proteins connecting signaling pathways to the cell cytoskeleton. NHERF1 and EZRIN cooperate in the maintenance of the apical microvilli in polarized epithelial cells. In several types of cancers, NHERF1 and EZRIN are displaced from the apical compartment to the cytoplasm and nuclei of cancer cells. At the present, the distribution of NHERF1 in ovarian tumors is not well known. In this study, NHERF1 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry in cyst adenofibromas, serous borderline tumors, and serous ovarian carcinomas. We observed a strong staining of NHERF1 and EZRIN at the membrane level of borderline tumors and areas of papillary structures in ovarian carcinomas. In tumors without papillary structures and compact structure, NHERF1 was exclusively expressed in the apical pole of the cells at the edges of the clefts of luminal spaces. In contrast, positive expression of EZRIN was found in the membrane of tumor cells within the solid tumor where NHERF1 was not expressed. In summary, this study shows, for the first time, the distribution of NHERF1 in ovarian cancer and reveals a different regulation of NHERF1 and EZRIN expression in ovarian tumors which represents the complexity of the molecular changes of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenda Demacopulo
- National Atomic Energy Commission of Argentina (CNEA), National Research Council of Argentina (CONICET), Department of Radiobiology, Av. General Paz 1499 (1650), San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Baltazar Eduardo Lema
- Private Diagnostic Pathology Laboratory, Anchorena 1510 Capital Federal (1425) C.A.B.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Rómulo Luis Cabrini
- National Atomic Energy Commission of Argentina (CNEA), National Research Council of Argentina (CONICET), Department of Radiobiology, Av. General Paz 1499 (1650), San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina; School of Dentistry, University of Buenos Aires (UBA), Department of Oral Pathology, Marcelo T. de Alvear 2142, (C1122AAH) C.A.B.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Erica Lorena Kreimann
- National Atomic Energy Commission of Argentina (CNEA), National Research Council of Argentina (CONICET), Department of Radiobiology, Av. General Paz 1499 (1650), San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Afrogheh AH, Meserve E, Sadow PM, Stephen AE, Nosé V, Berlin S, Faquin WC. Molecular Characterization of an Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma Metastatic to a Thyroid Hürthle Cell Adenoma Showing Cancerization of Follicles. Endocr Pathol 2016; 27:213-9. [PMID: 26687112 DOI: 10.1007/s12022-015-9412-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Tumor-to-tumor metastasis is rare. Herein, we present a unique case of endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma metastatic to a thyroid Hürthle cell adenoma 9 years after initial diagnosis. On histologic examination of the thyroid, the malignant endometrioid glands and single cells (donor tumor) were dispersed within the Hürthle cell adenoma (recipient tumor). In several sections of the adenoma with still preserved microfollicular architecture, malignant endometrial adenocarcinoma cells were admixed within oncocytic adenomatous epithelium (so-called "cancerization of the follicles"). This unusual phenomenon, to our knowledge, is a novel finding in the thyroid gland. Immunohistochemistry, subsequently elicited clinical history, and morphologic comparison of the tumor in the thyroid to the primary endometrial tumor confirmed the origin of the donor tumor cells. Molecular analysis of both the metastatic and primary endometrial tumors demonstrated PIK3CA and PTEN mutations in both tumors, as is characteristic of well-differentiated endometrioid tumors of the endometrium. Amplification of chromosome 1q was detected in both sites; however, only the metastatic tumor showed loss of chromosomes 2, 9, and 22. The morphologic differential diagnosis of metastatic endometrioid adenocarcinoma in the thyroid includes columnar cell variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (CCVPTC) arising in a preexisting adenoma, endocrine glandular atypia within an adenoma, and metastasis from other anatomic sites. Histomorphologic differences among these entities may be subtle; therefore, knowledge of and morphologic comparison with prior malignancies and immunohistochemistry can be helpful in rendering the correct diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir H Afrogheh
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Emily Meserve
- Department of Pathology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Peter M Sadow
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Antonia E Stephen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Vânia Nosé
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Suzanne Berlin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - William C Faquin
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
- Pathology Service, WRN219, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sherman ME, Drapkin RI, Horowitz NS, Crum CP, Friedman S, Kwon JS, Levine DA, Shih IM, Shoupe D, Swisher EM, Walker J, Trabert B, Greene MH, Samimi G, Temkin SM, Minasian LM. Rationale for Developing a Specimen Bank to Study the Pathogenesis of High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: A Review of the Evidence. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2016; 9:713-20. [PMID: 27221539 PMCID: PMC5010984 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-15-0384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2015] [Accepted: 05/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Women with clinically detected high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) generally present with advanced-stage disease, which portends a poor prognosis, despite extensive surgery and intensive chemotherapy. Historically, HGSCs were presumed to arise from the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE), but the inability to identify early-stage HGSCs and their putative precursors in the ovary dimmed prospects for advancing our knowledge of the pathogenesis of these tumors and translating these findings into effective prevention strategies. Over the last decade, increased BRCA1/2 mutation testing coupled with performance of risk-reducing surgeries has enabled studies that have provided strong evidence that many, but probably not all, HGSCs among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers appear to arise from the fallopian tubes, rather than from the ovaries. This shift in our understanding of the pathogenesis of HGSCs provides an important opportunity to achieve practice changing advances; however, the scarcity of clinically annotated tissues containing early lesions, particularly among women at average risk, poses challenges to progress. Accordingly, we review studies that have kindled our evolving understanding of the pathogenesis of HGSC and present the rationale for developing an epidemiologically annotated national specimen resource to support this research. Cancer Prev Res; 9(9); 713-20. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark E Sherman
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Ronny I Drapkin
- The Penn Ovarian Cancer Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Neil S Horowitz
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher P Crum
- Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sue Friedman
- Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered (FORCE), Tampa, Florida
| | - Janice S Kwon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Douglas A Levine
- Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Donna Shoupe
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Elizabeth M Swisher
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Joan Walker
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Peggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Britton Trabert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Mark H Greene
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Goli Samimi
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sarah M Temkin
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Maryland. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lori M Minasian
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Similar protein expression profiles of ovarian and endometrial high-grade serous carcinomas. Br J Cancer 2016; 114:554-61. [PMID: 26889980 PMCID: PMC4782211 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2015] [Revised: 12/09/2015] [Accepted: 01/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Ovarian and endometrial high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) have similar clinical and pathological characteristics; however, exhaustive protein expression profiling of these cancers has yet to be reported. Methods: We performed protein expression profiling on 14 cases of HGSCs (7 ovarian and 7 endometrial) and 18 endometrioid carcinomas (9 ovarian and 9 endometrial) using iTRAQ-based exhaustive and quantitative protein analysis. Results: We identified 828 tumour-expressed proteins and evaluated the statistical similarity of protein expression profiles between ovarian and endometrial HGSCs using unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis (P<0.01). Using 45 statistically highly expressed proteins in HGSCs, protein ontology analysis detected two enriched terms and proteins composing each term: IMP2 and MCM2. Immunohistochemical analyses confirmed the higher expression of IMP2 and MCM2 in ovarian and endometrial HGSCs as well as in tubal and peritoneal HGSCs than in endometrioid carcinomas (P<0.01). The knockdown of either IMP2 or MCM2 by siRNA interference significantly decreased the proliferation rate of ovarian HGSC cell line (P<0.01). Conclusions: We demonstrated the statistical similarity of the protein expression profiles of ovarian and endometrial HGSC beyond the organs. We suggest that increased IMP2 and MCM2 expression may underlie some of the rapid HGSC growth observed clinically.
Collapse
|
34
|
Endometrial involvement in pseudomyxoma peritonei secondary to low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm: report of 2 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2016; 34:232-8. [PMID: 25760906 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Pseudomyxoma peritonei is a clinical condition characterized by the presence of mucinous ascites, usually with variable amounts of neoplastic enteric-type mucinous epithelium, and most commonly secondary to spread from a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm. We report 2 cases of pseudomyxoma peritonei associated with low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms where there was colonization of the endometrium (both cases) and cervical mucosa (1 case) by low-grade atypical enteric-type mucinous epithelium (CK20 positive and CK7 negative). The patients had symptoms of mucoid vaginal discharge and endometrial biopsies in both (1 patient had multiple endometrial biopsies over a period of 11 mo) and were initially interpreted as representing mucinous metaplasia. Pseudomyxoma peritonei may rarely result in endometrial and cervical mucosal involvement, presumably secondary to transtubal spread.
Collapse
|
35
|
Soslow RA. Practical issues related to uterine pathology: staging, frozen section, artifacts, and Lynch syndrome. Mod Pathol 2016; 29 Suppl 1:S59-77. [PMID: 26715174 PMCID: PMC4821462 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2015] [Revised: 09/18/2015] [Accepted: 09/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
This review covers three areas in endometrial tumor pathology: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging, the use of frozen section, and Lynch syndrome. The section on FIGO staging will emphasize problems that practicing pathologists often confront, such as measuring the depth of myometrial invasion, assessing for the presence of cervical stromal invasion, detecting low-volume lymph node metastases, and recognizing synchronous endometrial and ovarian tumors and artifacts. The frozen section portion of this review will focus on the performance characteristics of intraoperative examination of the uterus to determine tumor grade and depth of myometrial invasion, including suggestions for alternative methods. The last portion of this review will provide an overview of Lynch syndrome and a discussion of the rationale and methods of screening for Lynch syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A. Soslow
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, Tel. 212-639-5905
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Practical issues in the diagnosis of serous carcinoma of the endometrium. Mod Pathol 2016; 29 Suppl 1:S45-58. [PMID: 26715173 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2015] [Revised: 10/13/2015] [Accepted: 11/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Serous carcinoma (SC) represents ~10% of endometrial carcinomas, but is responsible for almost 40% of cancer deaths. This article reviews the main pathological features, differential diagnosis, and the usefulness of molecular pathology and immunohistochemistry in its diagnosis. Most helpful features for the diagnosis include: irregularly shaped and sized papillae, slit-like spaces, cell stratification and budding, highly atypical cells, architectural and cytological discordance in pseudoglandular tumors, as well as lack of endometrioid features. SC shows typically a predominant papillary growth, which is also found in some subtypes of endometrioid carcinoma of the endometrium (EEC). Distinction is easy when attention is paid to the presence of diffuse marked nuclear pleomorphism, but also to the complex papillary architecture. SC may also show a solid or pseudoglandular patterns, and in these cases differential diagnosis may be difficult with EEC grade 3. Moreover, a high proportion of SC may exhibit clear cells, and, thus, may be confused with clear cell carcinoma. Finally, it is sometimes difficult to distinguish mixed SC-EEC, from SC that combines papillary and pseudoglandular growths. Although there is not a single immunohistochemical marker for distinguishing SC from its mimickers, some antibodies are useful (p53, p16, IMP2, and IMP3), particularly when used in combination. Diagnosis of SC may be even more problematic in small biopsies; a diagnosis of high-grade endometrial carcinoma, SC component can not be excluded, is acceptable as a managerial approach, so it could be taken into account at the time of final surgery.
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Permanent methods are the most commonly used contraceptive options worldwide. Even with the increase in popularity and accessibility of long-acting reversible methods, there remains high demand for permanent options, especially among women in developing countries. RECENT FINDINGS Traditional methods of permanent contraception, such as postpartum tubal ligation and interval surgical tubal occlusion or electrocautery by mini-laparotomy or laparoscopy are well tolerated and highly effective. Bilateral total salpingectomy for ovarian cancer risk reduction is currently being investigated. Hysteroscopic tubal occlusion reduces or eliminates the need for anesthesia, but requires surgical training and specialized equipment. Alternative permanent contraception methods are being explored including immediately effective hysteroscopic methods, and nonsurgical permanent contraception methods that have the potential to improve access and reduce cost. SUMMARY Permanent contraception methods are an important part of the contraceptive methods mix designed to meet the needs of women who have completed desired family size or wish never to become pregnant. Current surgical approaches to permanent contraception are well tolerated and highly effective. The development of a highly effective nonsurgical approach could simplify the provision of permanent contraception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Patil
- Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, (503) 418 4500
| | - Jeffrey T. Jensen
- Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, (503) 418 4500
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Characterization of precursor lesions in the endometrium and fallopian tube epithelium of early-stage uterine serous carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2015; 34:57-64. [PMID: 25473754 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
To determine if selected cases of uterine serous carcinoma (USC) arise from tubal rather than endometrial epithelium. Bilateral fallopian tubes from 38 women with pure USC were entirely submitted for histopathologic examination using the protocol Sectioning and Extensively Examining the FIMbria (SEE-FIM). Non-neoplastic endometrium was extensively sampled. Immunohistochemistry for p53 was performed on all paraffin blocks of fallopian tube and non-neoplastic endometrium. Endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (EIC) was present in 22 cases (58%). Endometrial p53 foci were identified in 3 patients. There were 11 cases (29%) with fallopian tube involvement; 9 of 11 had tubal wall invasion or lymphatic involvement without serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) and were, therefore, classified as metastatic from the endometrium. STIC was identified in 3 patients (8%). There were 3 cases with tubal p53 foci in non-neoplastic epithelium. EIC was present in 58% of patients, further supporting EIC as a precursor lesion to USC. STIC was present in 8%, suggesting that the fallopian tube may in fact represent the primary lesion in a minority of patients with USC. This finding may account for the early multifocal disease distribution observed in these patients.
Collapse
|
39
|
McCluggage WG, Judge MJ, Clarke BA, Davidson B, Gilks CB, Hollema H, Ledermann JA, Matias-Guiu X, Mikami Y, Stewart CJR, Vang R, Hirschowitz L. Data set for reporting of ovary, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal carcinoma: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Mod Pathol 2015; 28:1101-22. [PMID: 26089092 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.77] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2015] [Revised: 02/24/2015] [Accepted: 02/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
A comprehensive pathological report is essential for optimal patient management, cancer staging and prognostication. In many countries, proforma reports are used but these vary in their content. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) is an alliance formed by the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia, the Royal College of Pathologists of the United Kingdom, the College of American Pathologists, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer and the European Society of Pathology, with the aim of developing an evidence-based reporting data set for each cancer site. This will reduce the global burden of cancer data set development and reduplication of effort by different international institutions that commission, publish and maintain standardised cancer reporting data sets. The resultant standardisation of cancer reporting will benefit not only those countries directly involved in the collaboration but also others not in a position to develop their own data sets. We describe the development of a cancer data set by the ICCR expert panel for the reporting of primary ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma and present the 'required' and 'recommended' elements to be included in the report with an explanatory commentary. This data set encompasses the recent International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists staging system for these neoplasms and the updated World Health Organisation Classification of Tumours of the Female Reproductive Organs. The data set also addresses issues about site assignment of the primary tumour in high-grade serous carcinomas and proposes a scoring system for the assessment of tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The widespread implementation of this data set will facilitate consistent and accurate data collection, comparison of epidemiological and pathological parameters between different populations, facilitate research and hopefully will result in improved patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Meagan J Judge
- Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Blaise A Clarke
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ben Davidson
- 1] Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway [2] Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Harry Hollema
- Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Yoshiki Mikami
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Colin J R Stewart
- 1] Department of Histopathology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia [2] School for Women's and Infant's Health, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Russell Vang
- Department of Pathology (Division of Gynecologic Pathology), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lynn Hirschowitz
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Felix AS, Brinton LA, McMeekin DS, Creasman WT, Mutch D, Cohn DE, Walker JL, Moore RG, Downs LS, Soslow RA, Zaino R, Sherman ME. Relationships of Tubal Ligation to Endometrial Carcinoma Stage and Mortality in the NRG Oncology/ Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107:djv158. [PMID: 26089540 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2014] [Accepted: 05/12/2015] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stage is a critical determinant of treatment among endometrial carcinoma patients; understanding patterns of tumor spread may suggest approaches to improve staging. Specifically, the importance of exfoliation of endometrial carcinoma cells through the fallopian tubes into the peritoneum is ill defined. We assessed the hypothesis that tubal ligation (TL), which should impede transtubal passage of cells, is associated with lower endometrial carcinoma stage at presentation and, consequently, lower mortality. METHODS The NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 210 Trial included 4489 endometrial carcinoma patients who completed a risk factor questionnaire that included TL history. Pathology data were derived from clinical reports and central review. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between TL with stage and peritoneal metastasis, overall and by tumor subtype. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for TL and mortality. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Compared with stage I, TL was inversely associated with stage III (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.78) and stage IV carcinomas (OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.24) overall and among individual tumor subtypes. TL was inversely related to peritoneal metastasis overall (OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.68) and among serous carcinomas (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.68). In multivariable models unadjusted for stage, TL was associated with lower endometrial carcinoma-specific mortality (HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.91); however, adjustment for stage eliminated the survival advantage. Similar relationships with all-cause mortality were observed. CONCLUSIONS TL is associated with lower stage and mortality among women with aggressive endometrial carcinomas, suggesting transtubal spread is clinically important. Future studies should evaluate whether detection of intraluminal tumor cells is prognostically relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley S Felix
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES).
| | - Louise A Brinton
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - D Scott McMeekin
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - William T Creasman
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - David Mutch
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - David E Cohn
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - Joan L Walker
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - Richard G Moore
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - Levi S Downs
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - Robert A Soslow
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - Richard Zaino
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| | - Mark E Sherman
- : Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (ASF, LAB) and Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention (ASF), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK (SM, JLW); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (WTC); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (DM); Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH (DEC); Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI (RGM); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (LSD); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (RAS); Anatomic Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hersey Medical Center, Hershey, PA (RZ); Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (MES)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Endometrial Cancers in Mutation Carriers From Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer Syndrome Kindreds: Report From the Creighton University Hereditary Cancer Registry With Review of the Implications. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 25:650-6. [DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to categorize and report endometrial cancers in mutation carriers from hereditary breast ovarian cancer families.MethodsOur Hereditary Cancer Registry was searched for gynecologic and peritoneal cancers linked to mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Invasive cancers were registered in 101 mutation carriers with complete pathology reports. Efforts were made to secure diagnostic surgical pathology tissues for review. All records and available diagnostic slides were meticulously studied, and primary cancers were classified.FindingsEight malignancies were classified as primary endometrial cancers. Five of these were low- or intermediate-grade endometrioid carcinomas, and 3 were pure serous carcinomas or contained serous carcinoma elements mixed with high-grade endometrioid carcinoma. Breast cancers were diagnosed in 5 patients before and in 1 patient after endometrial carcinoma. Three endometrioid carcinomas were preceded by estrogen treatment, 2 for many years and the other for only 2 months, and 2 of the patients with serous carcinoma had been treated with tamoxifen.ConclusionsThe finding that 8 of gynecologic and peritoneal cancers in 101 mutation carriers were endometrial cancers with a smaller proportion of endometrioid carcinomas than reported in general populations is added to the current controversial literature on endometrial cancer, particularly regarding serous carcinomas, in hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome. Well-designed prospective programs for standardized surgical and pathologic handling, processing, and reporting are essential for working out the pathogenesis, true risks, and best management of this disease in carriers of deleterious BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations.
Collapse
|
42
|
Singh N, Gilks CB, Wilkinson N, McCluggage WG. Assessment of a new system for primary site assignment in high-grade serous carcinoma of the fallopian tube, ovary, and peritoneum. Histopathology 2015; 67:331-7. [DOI: 10.1111/his.12651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2014] [Accepted: 01/12/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Naveena Singh
- Department of Cellular Pathology; Barts Health NHS Trust; London UK
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology; Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia; Vancouver BC Canada
| | | | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology; Belfast Health and Social Care Trust; Belfast UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Incidental Nonuterine High-grade Serous Carcinomas Arise in the Fallopian Tube in Most Cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2015; 39:357-64. [DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000000353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
44
|
Primary sources of pelvic serous cancer in patients with endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2015; 28:118-27. [PMID: 24925054 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2014.76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2014] [Accepted: 03/27/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma is often associated with extrauterine disease. It is currently unclear where does the extrauterine disease come from. This study addressed this issue. A total of 135 samples from 21 serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma patients were studied. Cellular lineage relationships between intrauterine and extrauterine serous carcinomas were determined by TP53-mutation analysis and correlated to the clinicopathologic features. There were three conditions contributing the extrauterine disease: metastasis from serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (n=10) showed identical TP53 mutation between intrauterine lesions and extrauterine disease, cases of adnexal origin (n=5) had discordant TP53 mutations, and the mixed cellular origin cases (n=6) with both identical and discordant mutation status. Patients with extrauterine disease from serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma metastasis typically had small tumor masses (<2 cm) in extrauterine sites and without finding of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma, while extrauterine disease with adnexal or tubal origin commonly had larger tumor masses in extrauterine sites including ovary and omentum and serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma. The majority of extrauterine diseases associated with serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma are metastasized from the endometrium. Serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma is frequently associated with serous cancers of adnexal or tubal origin, indicating that endometrial and adnexal or tubal serous cancers may share similar etiologies. TP53-mutation analysis provides a strong linkage for cellular lineage analysis. Tumor size in extrauterine disease and presence of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma or not are useful clinicopathologic features to determine primary cancer site, which helps in clinical management.
Collapse
|
45
|
Sherman ME, Piedmonte M, Mai PL, Ioffe OB, Ronnett BM, Van Le L, Ivanov I, Bell MC, Blank SV, DiSilvestro P, Hamilton CA, Tewari KS, Wakeley K, Kauff ND, Yamada SD, Rodriguez G, Skates SJ, Alberts DS, Walker JL, Minasian L, Lu K, Greene MH. Pathologic findings at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: primary results from Gynecologic Oncology Group Trial GOG-0199. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:3275-83. [PMID: 25199754 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.54.1987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) lowers mortality from ovarian/tubal and breast cancers among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Uncertainties persist regarding potential benefits of RRSO among high-risk noncarriers, optimal surgical age, and anatomic origin of clinically occult cancers detected at surgery. To address these topics, we analyzed surgical treatment arm results from Gynecologic Oncology Group Protocol-0199 (GOG-0199), the National Ovarian Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS This analysis included asymptomatic high-risk women age ≥ 30 years who elected RRSO at enrollment. Women provided risk factor data and underwent preoperative cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) serum testing and transvaginal ultrasound (TVU). RRSO specimens were processed according to a standardized tissue processing protocol and underwent central pathology panel review. Research-based BRCA1/2 mutation testing was performed when a participant's mutation status was unknown at enrollment. Relationships between participant characteristics and diagnostic findings were assessed using univariable statistics and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Invasive or intraepithelial ovarian/tubal/peritoneal neoplasms were detected in 25 (2.6%) of 966 RRSOs (BRCA1 mutation carriers, 4.6%; BRCA2 carriers, 3.5%; and noncarriers, 0.5%; P < .001). In multivariable models, positive BRCA1/2 mutation status (P = .0056), postmenopausal status (P = .0023), and abnormal CA-125 levels and/or TVU examinations (P < .001) were associated with detection of clinically occult neoplasms at RRSO. For 387 women with negative BRCA1/2 mutation testing and normal CA-125 levels, findings at RRSO were benign. CONCLUSION Clinically occult cancer was detected among 2.6% of high-risk women undergoing RRSO. BRCA1/2 mutation, postmenopausal status, and abnormal preoperative CA-125 and/or TVU were associated with cancer detection at RRSO. These data can inform management decisions among women at high risk of ovarian/tubal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark E Sherman
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Marion Piedmonte
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Phuong L Mai
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Olga B Ioffe
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brigitte M Ronnett
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Linda Van Le
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Iouri Ivanov
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Maria C Bell
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Stephanie V Blank
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Paul DiSilvestro
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Chad A Hamilton
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Krishnansu S Tewari
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Katie Wakeley
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Noah D Kauff
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Diane Yamada
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gustavo Rodriguez
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Steven J Skates
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - David S Alberts
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joan L Walker
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lori Minasian
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Karen Lu
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mark H Greene
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
|
47
|
Mingels MJJM, Masadah R, Geels YP, Otte-Höller I, de Kievit IM, van der Laak JAWM, van Ham MAPC, Bulten J, Massuger LFAG. High prevalence of atypical hyperplasia in the endometrium of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 2014; 142:213-21. [PMID: 25015863 DOI: 10.1309/ajcptgjopxuw6rvo] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the present study is to determine the prevalence of endometrial premalignancies in women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS Endometrial and ovarian specimens of 186 patients with EOC were retrospectively selected using the nationwide pathology network and registry, and sections were comprehensively reviewed: 136 (73%) serous, 19 (10%) endometrioid, 15 (8%) mucinous, seven (4%) clear cell, and nine (5%) undifferentiated. Immunohistochemical phenotypes were compared for patients with serous EOC with concurrent endometrial pathology. RESULTS In 31%, endometrial (pre)malignancy was found: carcinoma in 3%, endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (EIC) in 4%, and atypical hyperplasia in 24%. Atypical hyperplasia was found in 47% of endometrioid EOCs but in 7% to 33% of other subtypes. Body mass index was higher concurrent to atypical hyperplasia (P=.001). Serous EOC and EIC immunophenotypes were comparable, whereas atypical hyperplasia was expressed differently. CONCLUSIONS Apart from synchronous endometrial carcinoma, endometrial premalignancies should be taken into account when determining optimal treatment for women diagnosed with EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rina Masadah
- Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
| | - Yvette P. Geels
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Irene Otte-Höller
- Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Ineke M. de Kievit
- Department of Pathology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Johan Bulten
- Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Koç N, Ayas S, Uygur L. The association of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma with gynecologic pathologies and its role in pelvic serous cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 134:486-91. [PMID: 25038287 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.07.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2014] [Revised: 07/08/2014] [Accepted: 07/13/2014] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Possible primary sites of pelvic serous cancers are, fallopian tubes, ovaries or peritoneum. Recent studies have revealed that a portion of these tumors originates from serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) at the distal end of fallopian tubes. In this study, the association of STIC with pelvic serous carcinomas and the pathologic parameters that indicate the tubes as the primary site were assessed. METHODS In total, 495 pairs of fallopian tubes obtained via total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy between 2011 and 2013 were examined according to SEE-FIM protocol. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were examined by pathologists. Suspicious areas were immunostained with p53 and Ki-67 to diagnose STIC precisely. RESULTS Of the 495 cases, 110 cases were malignant. Among 34 cases of non-uterine serous carcinomas, 13 were diagnosed with STIC. STIC was located at the fimbrial end of the fallopian tubes in 12 cases. No STIC was identified in the gynecologic malignancies other than non-uterine serous pelvic carcinomas and benign gynecologic pathologies. Comparison of the ovarian and tubal cancer cases with and without STIC did not reveal a factor that helps to define the primary site. STIC was an important factor associated in a higher portion of the cases with bilateral ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION The role of STIC in carcinogenesis continues to be discussed as it is unknown whether STIC is the precursor lesion or just associates with the malignancies. Discovering the accurate precursor lesions and tumor carcinogenesis is essential to prevent these malignancies and to develop early diagnostic methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nermin Koç
- Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Research and Training Hospital, Department of Pathology, Turkey
| | - Selçuk Ayas
- Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Research and Training Hospital, Department of Gyneoncology, Turkey
| | - Lütfiye Uygur
- Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Research and Training Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Mingels MJJM, van Ham MAPC, de Kievit IM, Snijders MPML, van Tilborg AAG, Bulten J, Massuger LFAG. Müllerian precursor lesions in serous ovarian cancer patients: using the SEE-Fim and SEE-End protocol. Mod Pathol 2014; 27:1002-13. [PMID: 24309326 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2013] [Revised: 10/02/2013] [Accepted: 10/03/2013] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Serous ovarian cancer is suggested to develop from epithelium embryologically derived from the Müllerian ducts. The aim of the current study is to thoroughly, analyze the epithelium derived from the Müllerian ducts (cervix, endometrium and fallopian tubes) in serous ovarian cancer patients. Sixty women diagnosed with serous ovarian carcinoma were included in this multicentre, observational study. Tissues were embedded completely for histological assessment, in accordance with the SEE-Fim and SEE-End protocol (Sectioning and Extensively Examining of the Fimbriated end; and-Endometrium), and prevalence of cervical, as well as endometrial and tubal pathology was analyzed. In 31 (52%) cases, a pathologic lesion was identified, and in 16 (27%) of these cases coexistence of pathologic lesions. In 1 case, severe dysplasia was found in the cervix, in 9 (15%) cases endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma, in 19 (32%) cases atypical hyperplasia, and in 23 (43%) cases serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma. Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma was seen significantly more often concurrent with endometrial atypical hyperplasia or endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma than with benign endometrium (64 vs 28%; P=0.01). To conclude, histological assessment of epithelium derived from Müllerian ducts of serous ovarian cancer patients resulted in the identification of endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma, serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and/or endometrial atypical hyperplasia in more than half of cases. Coexistence of these pathologic lesions was common, and might represent an effect of field carcinogenesis or tumor implantation of migrating cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjanka J J M Mingels
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike A P C van Ham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ineke M de Kievit
- Department of Pathology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marc P M L Snijders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Angela A G van Tilborg
- 1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands [2] Department of Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Singh N, Gilks CB, Wilkinson N, McCluggage WG. Assignment of primary site in high-grade serous tubal, ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma: a proposal. Histopathology 2014; 65:149-54. [PMID: 24660659 DOI: 10.1111/his.12419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The revised FIGO 2013 staging for carcinomas of the ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum has introduced a single system for tumours originating at these sites. The system requires pathologists to assign a primary site (ovary, tube or peritoneum), but does not provide guidance to aid this assignment. This is particularly problematic in cases of advanced-stage (stage II or greater) high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), where there is commonly involvement of two or more sites by tumour, and practice among pathologists in determining where a tumour has arisen varies widely. This has significant implications for recording of tumour incidence and mortality, data collection by cancer registries, and entry into clinical trials. We propose guidelines for assigning the primary site of HGSC based on careful macroscopic and histological assessment. The use of these guidelines, in conjunction with the new FIGO staging system, is intended to act as an impetus to promote debate and provide a uniform and consistent approach in assigning primary tumour site which will facilitate comparison of data between centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveena Singh
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|