Measurement properties of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in populations with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review

First-episode vs recurrent nonspecific neck pain: clinical characteristics, recovery, and the impact of pain severity on well-being and functionality

Objective

This study (1) compared clinical characteristics between patients with first-episode and recurrent nonspecific neck pain (NSNP), and (2) examined differences in daily activities and psychological well-being between patients with minimal pain (1-2 numeric pain rating scale) and moderate to severe pain (≥3 numeric pain rating scale) at 6 weeks postpresentation.

Methods

The study was conducted across 30 primary physiotherapy practices and included patients experiencing a new NSNP episode lasting ≤12 weeks. For the first research objective, baseline data collection encompasses neck pain symptoms, prior conditions, and work-related, general, psychological, and behavioral factors. In addition, pain intensity was measured at 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups. For the second objective, pain intensity, psychological factors, and disability were assessed.

Results

No clinically meaningful differences were observed in clinical characteristics or recovery rates between patients with first-episode and recurrent NSNP. However, meaningful differences were found in disability, patient concerns, and self-efficacy between minimal and moderate to severe pain groups at 6 weeks. Patients with higher pain intensity had higher disability scores (1.33-point [SD 0.84-1.81]) difference on a 0 to 7 scale, lower self-efficacy (-1.25-point [SD -1.84 to -0.65]) difference on a 0 to 12 scale, and greater concerns (1.87-point [SD 1.21-2.52] difference on a 0 to 10 scale).

Conclusion

No clinically meaningful differences in clinical characteristics or pain recovery rates exist between first-episode and recurrent NSNP. However, significant and clinically meaningful differences exist in the impact of pain severity on daily activities, patient concerns, and self-efficacy.

Do Psychological Factors Explain the Persistence of Symptoms in Individuals With Rotator Cuff-related Shoulder Pain? A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether psychosocial factors, such as resilience, perceived stress, catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, pain self-efficacy, and social support, explain the persistence of pain and disability in individuals with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP) following an education program.

METHODS

One hundred forty-three individuals with persistent RCRSP were included in this prospective cohort study. At baseline, participants completed self-reported questionnaires related to pain, disability, and psychosocial constructs, including resilience, stress, catastrophizing, anxiety and depressive symptoms, pain self-efficacy, and social support. Thereafter, participants took part in an educational program aimed at promoting self-management of RCRSP that included 2 meetings with a physiotherapist. After 12 and 24 weeks, participants filled out pain and disability questionnaires and, based on their scores, were classified as having persistent shoulder pain or as recovered.

RESULTS

A univariable modified Poisson regression showed that higher perceived stress (RR adjusted : 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.04), catastrophizing (RR adjusted : 1.01; 95% CI: 1.01-1.02), symptoms of depression (RR adjusted : 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.06) and anxiety (RR adjusted : 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.06), along with lower resilience (RR adjusted : 0.90; 95% CI: 0.81-1.00), were associated with ongoing RCRSP at 12 weeks. In addition, reduced pain self-efficacy was associated with persistent pain at both 12 weeks (RR adjusted : 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97-0.99) and 24 weeks (RR adjusted : 0.99; 95% CI: 0.98-1.00). Multivariable regression indicated that only pain self-efficacy served as a protective factor against persistent RCRSP (RR adjusted : 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97-0.99).

DISCUSSION

This study sheds light on the impact of psychosocial factors on persistent RCRSP, underscoring the importance of positive beliefs in pain management. Importantly, pain self-efficacy emerges as a key factor in recovery.

The efficacy of an interdisciplinary pain management program for complex regional pain syndrome compared to low back pain and chronic widespread pain: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Little research has assessed the efficacy of interdisciplinary pain management programs (IPMPs) for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), whereas evidence shows that IPMPs are effective for low back pain (LBP) and chronic widespread pain (CWP). This study aimed to determine whether outcomes following an IPMP differ for people with CRPS compared to LBP and CWP. In addition, we determined whether it is possible to predict IPMP outcomes using baseline characteristics.

METHODS

People with CRPS (N = 66) who had completed a 3-week IPMP were compared with age- and gender- matched controls with LBP (N = 66) and CWP (N = 66). Measures of pain intensity, pain interference and psychological factors were extracted for pre- and post-program, and at 1, 6, and 12 months. Latent class analysis identified recovery trajectories for pain intensity and pain interference, and χ2 analyses assessed differences between diagnostic groups in recovery trajectories. Machine learning models were implemented to predict recovery trajectories from baseline scores.

RESULTS

Two recovery trajectories for each dependent variable (pain interference and for pain intensity) were identified: Good responders and poorer responders. Following IPMPs, 37% of people belonged to a good responder recovery trajectory for pain interference, and 11% belonged to a good responder recovery trajectory for pain intensity. Recovery trajectories were similar across the three diagnostic groups (CRPS, LBP, CWP) for pain interference (χ2 = 1.8, P = .4) and intensity (χ = 0.2, P = .9). Modeling to predict outcomes correctly classified 69% of cases for pain interference and 88% of cases for pain intensity recovery trajectories using baseline scores.

CONCLUSION

People with CRPS, LBP, and CWP experience similar benefits following an IPMP. This supports the use of IPMPs for people with CRPS.

What do patients with lumbar spinal stenosis think is physical therapy's best card? A survey of perceived message strength

OBJECTIVES

Rising surgical rates for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and underutilization of physical therapist services for this condition may increase patient risks and healthcare costs. Patient beliefs may also contribute to this problem. Therefore, our objective was to determine which messages about physical therapy were perceived as strongest by patients with LSS and whether those messages were influenced by patient factors.

METHODS

The study used a cross-sectional survey design, and participants were patients of outpatient physical therapy clinics with imaging or clinical evidence of LSS. Participants completed an electronic survey containing different messages about physical therapist services for LSS. Messages were designed using the health belief model. Perceived message strength was scored using the perceived argument strength scale (PASS). Pain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy were measured to determine whether they influenced participant perceptions. Occurrence of magnetic resonance imaging and surgical consultations were also measured.

RESULTS

Of 189 potential participants, 101 were included in the study. The message perceived as strongest emphasized physical therapists as listeners who would customize a plan (PASS 36.1 [5.0]) Similar scores were seen for messages that emphasized benefits of education and self-management and de-emphasized severity. The message that emphasized research findings was rated the least strong. Participants who had high levels of pain catastrophizing were more likely to have had imaging and perceived arguments as less strong.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Results of the current study suggested patients with LSS preferred a message that emphasized physical therapists as listeners who would customize a plan. The message about research outcomes was perceived as the least strong. Therefore, awareness campaigns intended to influence the beliefs or behavior of patients with LSS should emphasize the individualized nature of physical therapy more than research evidence.

Does Discussing Patient-reported Outcome Measures Increase Pain Self-efficacy at an Orthopaedic Visit? A Prospective, Sequential, Comparative Series

BACKGROUND

Pain self-efficacy, or the ability to carry out desired activities in the presence of pain, can affect a patient's ability to function before and after orthopaedic surgery. Previous studies suggest that shared decision-making practices such as discussing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can activate patients and improve their pain self-efficacy. However, the ability of PROMs to influence pain self-efficacy in patients who have undergone orthopaedic surgery has yet to be investigated.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is immediately discussing the results of a PROM associated with an increase pain self-efficacy in new patients presenting to the orthopaedic surgery clinic? (2) Is there a correlation between patient resilience or patient involvement in decision-making in changes in pain self-efficacy?

METHODS

This was a prospective, sequential, comparative series completed between February to October 2023 at a single large tertiary referral center at a multispecialty orthopaedic clinic. Orthopaedic subspecialties included total joint arthroplasty, spine, hand, sports, and trauma. The first 64 patients underwent standard care, and the following 64 had a conversation with their orthopaedic surgeon about their PROMs during the initial intake visit. We collected scores from the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function form (PF-SF10a) and data on demographic characteristics before the visit. The PSEQ is a validated PROM used to measure pain self-efficacy, while the BRS measures the ability of patients to recover from stress, and the PROMIS PF-SF10a is used to assess overall physical function. PROMs have been utilized frequently for their ability to report the real-time physical and psychological well-being of patients. In the standard care group, the PROMIS PF-SF10a score was not discussed with the patient. In the PROMs group, the physician discussed the PROMIS PF-SF10a score using a script that gave context to the patient's score. Additional conversation about the patient's score was permitted but not required for all patients. Scores from the Observing Patient Involvement in Decision Making (OPTION-5) instrument were recorded during the visit as a measure of patient involvement in clinical decision-making. After the visit, both groups completed the PSEQ. The primary outcome was change in the PSEQ. Change in pain self-efficacy was recorded as greater or less than the minimum clinically important difference, previously defined at 8.5 points for the PSEQ [ 10 ]. The secondary outcomes were correlation between PSEQ change and the BRS or OPTION-5.

RESULTS

Between the PROMs and standard care groups, there was no difference in the change in PSEQ scores from before the visit to after (mean ± SD change in control 4 ± 10 versus change in PROMs group 3 ± 7, mean difference 1 [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.0 to 4.0]; p = 0.29). Fifty-six percent (36 of 64) of patients in the standard care group demonstrated an increase in pain self-efficacy (of whom 22% [14 of 64] had clinically important improvements), and 59% (38 of 64) of patients in the PROMs group demonstrated an increase in pain self-efficacy (of whom 19% [12 of 64] had clinically important improvements). In the control group, there was no correlation between the change in PSEQ score and resiliency (BRS score r = -0.13 [95% CI -0.36 to 0.12]; p = 0.30) or patient involvement in decision-making (OPTION-5 r = 0.003 [95% CI -0.24 to 0.25]; p = 0.98). Similarly, in the PROMs group, there was no correlation between the change in PSEQ score and resiliency (BRS score r = -0.10 [95% CI -0.33 to 0.16]; p = 0.45) or patient involvement in decision-making (OPTION-5 r = -0.02 [95% CI -0.26 to 0.23]; p = 0.88).

CONCLUSION

Discussing PROMs results (PROMIS PF-SF10a) at the point of care did not increase pain self-efficacy during one visit. Therefore, surgeons do not need to discuss pain self-efficacy PROM scores in order to influence patient pain self-efficacy. While PROMs remain valuable tools for assessing patient outcomes, further work may assess whether the collection of PROMs itself may increase pain self-efficacy or whether longitudinal discussion of PROMs with patients changes pain self-efficacy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

A Brief Hypnosis Intervention Improves Single-Limb Dynamic Balance in People with Chronic Ankle Instability: A Crossover Experimental Pilot Study

Ankle sprains are one of the more common musculoskeletal injuries in active populations and can develop into chronic ankle instability (CAI), a condition with uncertain etiology and symptoms that include poor dynamic balance, the ability to maintain balance during movement. The components of CAI are psychophysiological and biomechanical, indicating mind-body connections that can influence the development and persistence of this condition. Preliminary evidence suggests that self-hypnosis, a mind-body therapy, can restore physical performance in conditions like CAI. Twenty-four participants with CAI participated in this experimental pilot study, with a crossover design, to investigate the relationship between self-reported measures of ankle instability and other psychological factors with performance-based measures of dynamic balance and heart rate variability (HRV). Participants also received an 8-minute, self-hypnosis session to determine its influence on balance performance. Perceived ankle instability and dynamic balance were not associated with enhancement-based (interoceptive awareness, self-efficacy) or limit-based (kinesiophobia, anxiety) psychological factors. Perceived anxiety was not associated with HRV. Hypnosis was modestly effective in improving direction-specific (lateral) dynamic balance.

The role of early orthotic intervention in the management of post-traumatic elbow contractures: Study protocol for phase II double-blinded randomised controlled trial

Background

Restoration of full elbow extension following trauma is difficult and influenced by the injury profile, surgeon preference, patient and environmental factors. The literature suggests that orthotic interventions are effective in improving contractures when movement plateaus despite normal therapeutic interventions. It is not known if extension orthotic intervention is more superior to standard treatment regardless of when it is commenced. The literature lacks patient-reported considerations to contracture management using elbow orthoses.

Methods and analysis

This protocol describes a Phase II double blinded randomised controlled feasibility trial (RCT) and mixed methods study, aimed to examine outcome with extension in an orthotic intervention group (OG) versus control (CG). All participants will undergo six weekly therapy sessions, which include a standardised therapeutic program. OG participants will be provided with an additional extension orthosis and the outcome is assessed according to the change in elbow extension motion after 6 weeks of intervention. Data will be collected via questionnaires, logbooks, feedback forms, and semi-structured interviews at baseline and final assessments for descriptive statistical analysis. Under the guidance of a statistician, all quantitative data will be evaluated using the appropriate parametric or non-parametric analyses to evaluate for systematic differences between groups. Preliminary extension gains are used to determine the final sample size required to achieve adequate power for a full-scaled RCT. Interview data on OG participants will be qualitatively analysed using the "five-factorial dimensions of adherence" framework to identify key differences in the influencers between adherent or non-adherent groups.

Trial registration number

ANZCTR ACTRN12619001402134p.

Self-Efficacy and Self-Management in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: Strategies and Challenges Among Brazilian Physiotherapists

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the knowledge and strategies used by Brazilian physical therapists in assessing and promoting self-efficacy and self-management in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.

METHODS

A nationwide cross-sectional online survey was conducted with licenced physical therapists recruited through professional networks and social media. The questionnaire, developed based on the CHERRIES checklist, assessed participants' knowledge, clinical strategies, and perceived barriers related to self-efficacy and self-management interventions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 348 responses were analysed. While 97.7% of respondents acknowledged self-efficacy as a key factor in treatment adherence, only 43.6% frequently applied strategies to enhance it in clinical practice, as per Bandura's theory. The most commonly cited interventions were self-management education and exercises (81.2%). However, limited professional training and low patient adherence emerged as major barriers. Logistic regression analysis revealed that therapists who engaged more frequently with literature on the subject were 3.48 times more likely (95% CI: 1.6-7.4) to implement self-efficacy strategies in practice compared with those who engaged less frequently.

CONCLUSION

Despite acknowledging the importance of self-efficacy, Brazilian physical therapists face challenges in applying structured strategies in practice. Enhancing education and integrating behavioural approaches into curricula may facilitate the implementation of evidence based self-efficacy interventions.

The PainSMART project: Protocol for a research program on effectiveness, mechanisms of effect and patient-practitioner experiences of the PainSMART-strategy as an adjunct to usual primary care physiotherapy management for musculoskeletal pain

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal pain (MSKP) disorders entail a significant burden for individuals and healthcare systems. The PainSMART-strategy has been developed aiming to reduce divergences between patients and healthcare practitioners in their understanding of MSKP by providing a shared basis for communication and to facilitate patients' self-management of MSKP. The objective of the PainSMART-project is to evaluate the effects of the PainSMART-strategy as an adjunct to usual physiotherapy management compared to usual physiotherapy management alone.

METHODS

The PainSMART-project is a research program with a collective suite of studies utilising mixed methods, centred around a randomised controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06187428). Subjects: Adults (18 years or older) seeking primary care for MSKP who are triaged and booked for an initial physiotherapy consultation at five primary care physiotherapy departments within the Swedish public healthcare regions of Östergötland and Jönköping. A total of 490 subjects will be randomised to receive one of two possible interventions.

INTERVENTIONS

Both groups will receive usual physiotherapy management for benign MSKP. The intervention group will also receive the PainSMART-strategy consisting of an educational film, reflection and reinforcement of the film's key messages prior to the initial physiotherapy consultation and a patient-practitioner discussion based on the film.

OUTCOME

The primary outcome is 1) between group mean change over time from baseline to 24 hours post initial physiotherapy consultation and baseline to 3 months regarding self-reported average pain intensity and pain self-efficacy. Secondary outcomes include similar measurements for MSKP illness perception, reassurance of benign nature, pain coping, physical activity, analgesic medication use, sick leave, healthcare use and direct healthcare costs. Physiotherapist and patient reported experience measures and qualitative evaluation of the effects of the PainSMART-strategy on communication at the initial physiotherapy consultation will also be explored.

DISCUSSION

This study will investigate potential added effects of PainSMART-strategy upon usual primary care physiotherapy for MSKP.

Knowledge translation and exercise for degenerative meniscal pathology and early osteoarthritis (KNEE-DEeP): Protocol for a single arm feasibility study

Background

The Knowledge Translation and Exercise for Degenerative Meniscal Pathology and Early Knee Osteoarthritis (KNEE-DEeP) intervention was designed to promote greater uptake of evidence-based non-surgical treatments for knee pain attributed to degenerative meniscal pathology and early knee osteoarthritis (OA) in primary care, by tackling barriers at a service, clinician and patient level. Evidence indicates that patients frequently do not access first-line treatments, namely exercise and patient education, prior to specialist referral. The KNEE-DEeP intervention supports general practitioners (GPs) and physiotherapists to enhance their skills and confidence in managing patients with this type of knee pain through professional development workshops. In turn, patients will receive an 'enhanced consultation' from their GP and be referred to an early 'best practice' physiotherapy session. Physiotherapists will work with patients to develop a collaborative action plan focussing on self-management and exercise.

Methods

This protocol outlines a single arm non-randomised feasibility study with a mixed method process evaluation. The study intends to recruit 15 GPs, five physiotherapists and 36 patients from general practices in the South-West of Ireland. Eligible patients, will be aged between 35 years and 69 years inclusive, and attend their GP with an episode of non-traumatic knee pain attributed to a degenerative meniscal tear (DMT) or early OA. Physiotherapists and GPs will be trained in intervention delivery. Within two weeks of receiving an 'enhanced consultation' from their participating GP, patients will attend the one-hour 'best practice' physiotherapy session. Patient data will be collected via online questionnaires at baseline, 12 weeks and 6 months. Qualitative interviews to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention will be conducted with a purposive sample of GPs, physiotherapists and their enrolled patients.

Ethics and Dissemination

Approved by Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Cork Teaching Hospitals. Results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at international conferences.

Registration

clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT06576557).

Social Media-Based Pain Neuroscience Education for Temporomandibular Joint Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

To examine the feasibility of a social networking site-based self-management intervention involving pain neuroscience education (PNE) for temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) among young adults and its initial efficacy in exploratory outcomes, including pain and somatization.

DESIGN

Pilot randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Korean-speaking adults aged 20-29 with temporomandibular joint pain having smartphone Internet access. The one-week intervention included two animated videos on pain neuroscience and self-management instructions addressing poor habits limiting jaw movement and exercises to alleviate TMD symptoms. The control group received self-management guidance only. Besides pain, the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis II assessed oral health and psychological aspects. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 Scale and Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) Part A measured anxiety and central sensitization, respectively. Besides feasibility benchmarks, a t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to examine the initial efficacy of PNE plus self-management on self-management alone.

RESULTS

Sixty-six participants were included in the study, with 33 participants in each group. Most participants expressed satisfaction with both interventions, with retention rates exceeding 87%. Differences in pain somatization were reported (t = 2.03, p = .046) in the intervention group compared to the control group. Differences in pain (t = 1.80, p = .077) and depression (t = 1.88, p = .061) did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

The feasibility of the PNE and self-management education was favorable. PNE, when combined with self-management, significantly reduced pain somatization compared with self-management alone.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

A social networking site-assisted self-management intervention for TMD can help nurses provide education in primary care settings and communities.

The effectiveness of peer support interventions for community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

ABSTRACT

This systematic review and meta-analysis critically examined the evidence for peer support interventions to reduce pain and improve health outcomes in community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain (PROSPERO CRD42022356850). A systematic search (inception-January 2023) of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken to identify relevant randomised controlled trials, with risk of bias and GRADE assessments performed on included studies. Meta-analyses used a generic, inverse-variance, random-effects model, calculating mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). Of 16,445 records identified, 29 records reporting on 24 studies (n = 6202 participants) were included. All evidence had unclear/high risk of bias and low-very low certainty. Peer support interventions resulted in small improvements in pain (medium-term: MD -3.48, 95% CI -6.61, -0.35; long-term: MD -1.97, 95% CI -3.53, -0.42), self-efficacy (medium-term: SMD 0.26, 95% CI 0.16, 0.36; long-term: SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.07, 0.36), and function (long-term: SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.19, -0.00) relative to usual care and greater self-efficacy (medium-term: SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.20, 0.51) relative to waitlist control. Peer support interventions resulted in similar improvement as active (health professional led) interventions bar long-term self-efficacy (MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.77, -0.05), which favoured active interventions. No point estimates reached minimal clinically important difference thresholds. Pooled health service utilisation outcomes showed unclear estimates. Self-management, quality of life, and social support outcomes had mixed evidence. Despite low-very low evidence certainty, peer support interventions demonstrated small improvements over usual care and waitlist controls for some clinical outcomes, suggesting that peer support may be useful as an adjunct to other treatments for musculoskeletal pain.

Non-inferiority of hybrid outpatient telerehabilitation for patients with back pain: 3-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

International studies identified comparable or better effects for telerehabilitation compared with face-to-face rehabilitation or no rehabilitation in people with back pain. In German rehabilitation centers, a standardized back school for patients with back pain is provided usually face-to-face as part of a multimodal rehabilitation program.

AIM

To examine the non-inferiority of a three-week, digitally assisted, multimodal rehabilitation that applies a digital version of a standardized back school (intervention group [IG]) against the same rehabilitation program applying the back school face-to-face (control group [CG]).

DESIGN

Our study was a non-blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial. Recruitment was conducted from 2022 to 2023. We analyzed outcomes at the end of rehabilitation and 3 months later.

SETTING

Implementation of the study and enrollment of participants was conducted in 8 German outpatient rehabilitation centers.

POPULATION

Rehabilitants aged 18-65 years with back pain were included.

METHODS

284 patients with back pain were randomized into the IG or CG using computer-generated block randomization. We excluded 14 patients as they withdrew their consent and requested removal of their data. We finally included 270 patients (IG: N.=127, CG: N.=143). The primary outcome was self-reported pain self-efficacy (10-60 points). Secondary outcomes were, amongst others, current health status and pain.

RESULTS

Our primary adjusted intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated that hybrid digitally assisted rehabilitation was non-inferior to face-to-face rehabilitation at the end of rehabilitation (b=-0.55; 95% CI=-2.75 to ∞) and at the 3-month follow-up (b=0.24; 95% CI=-2.86 to ∞). These results were in line with a non-adjusted intention-to-treat analysis, an adjusted complete case analysis, and an adjusted per-protocol analysis. Secondary outcomes were tested for superiority. Our primary adjusted intention-to-treat analysis found no significant group differences in the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that hybrid digitally assisted rehabilitation in patients with back pain is a sound alternative to face-to-face rehabilitation in an outpatient rehabilitation setting.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

Hybrid digitally assisted rehabilitation can improve flexibility and access to rehabilitation. Further studies should examine which components and which time frame of rehabilitation can be digitized without any loss of effectiveness.

Exploring the relationship between pain intensity, self-management of pain and pain self-efficacy on post-operative pain on day 5 after cesarean section: A cross-sectional study in Mie prefecture in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Pain self-management among women who begin child-rearing after a cesarean section (CS) has not been ascertained. This study aimed to explore the relationship among pain intensity, self-management, and self-efficacy on post-operative day (POD) 5 after CS in postpartum women.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted on POD5 after CS. Participants were recruited through convenience sampling in Mie Prefecture, Japan, from August 2023 to April 2024. Pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS), both during activity and at rest, with higher scores indicating greater pain. Pain self-efficacy was assessed using the Japanese version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-J), and pain self-management was investigated. SPSS version 29.0 was used for data analysis, and p<0.05 was set as the significance level.

RESULTS

Data from 124 participants (valid response rate: 73.8%) were analyzed. The median (IQR) of the NRS was 4.5 (3-6) during activity and 2.0 (1-4) at rest. There were significant differences according to method of oral analgesia during activity (p<0.049) and at rest (p<0.015). Multiple regression analysis revealed that NRS scores at maximum pain after CS significantly influenced pain on POD5. However, the number of oral analgesics and PSEQ-J scores were not influenced (during activity: R2=0.21, p<0.001, at rest: R2=0.12, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pain intensity during activity on POD5 was moderate and required pain-management. Acute post-operative pain-management was related to pain intensity on POD5, suggesting the importance of early post-operative pain control. Future studies are needed to examine the association between pain self-efficacy and other psychological factors.

Which Scale to Assess Pain Self-efficacy Shows Better Measurement Properties in Chronic Low Back Pain? A Head-To-Head Comparison Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the quality of the measurement properties of Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)-10, PSEQ-4, PSEQ-2, Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale (CPSS) long-form, and CPSS short-form (CPSS-SF) in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies (measurement properties).

SETTING

Outpatient rehabilitation.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants (N=245) with nonspecific CLBP (18-60y, 63% women) were enrolled in this study.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain self-efficacy questionnaires were administered on 3 occasions: baseline assessment, 1 week after the first assessment (reliability), and after an 8-week exercise program (responsiveness). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach α were used to assess reliability and internal consistency, respectively. Pearson correlation and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess construct validity. The area under the curve and hypothesis testing were used to assess responsiveness.

RESULTS

No difference was observed for all the questionnaires regarding internal consistency (Cronbach α>.7), criterion validity (r>.88), and reliability (ICC>.7). The scales confirmed >75% of the hypotheses for the construct validity, except for CPSS-SF. PSEQ-2 did not meet the criterion for structural validity. PSEQ-10 met all the criteria for good measurement properties according to Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

It was not possible to calculate structural validity for PSEQ-2, CPSS-SF did not meet the criterion for suitable hypothesis testing for construct validity, and all the questionnaires did not show suitable measurement error, except for the PSEQ-10. Hence, the PSEQ-10 was the unique scale that met all the criteria for good measurement properties for assessing pain self-efficacy in CLBP.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Translation, and Validation of Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in Hindi Language in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

STUDY DESIGN

Translation and psychometric testing.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) into Hindi (PSEQ-H), the local language of India, and assess its psychometric properties.

BACKGROUND

The PSEQ is a commonly used outcome measure in patients with pain and related psychosocial aspects too. The PSEQ invites participants to consider their pain while assessing their self-efficacy views. Because about half of India's population understands Hindi, there is a need to translate the PSEQ into Hindi for patient convenience and better comprehension, as well as for research purposes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PSEQ has been translated and culturally adapted into Hindi. A total of 120 patients with chronic neck pain were recruited. The PSEQ-H's content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness were all assessed. To determine test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated. Cronbach alpha was used to determine internal consistency. Criterion validity was assessed using the neck disability index, NRS, and anxiety and depression measures. The area under the curve and the change cut-point were determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

The PSEQ-H exhibited strong test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.90) and good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.88). Factor analysis confirmed a one-factor structure for the PSEQ-H. Furthermore, the PSEQ-H demonstrated a moderate correlation with the neck disability index, numerical pain rating scale, anxiety, and depression scales. A change detection threshold of 8.3 was established.

CONCLUSIONS

The PSEQ-H is a reliable and valid measure for use in research and clinical purposes in the Indian population with chronic neck pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Patient acceptance of care of a novel care pathway for those at risk of poor outcomes from musculoskeletal pain: A mixed methods study

OBJECTIVE

Investigate people's acceptance of specialist musculoskeletal care within a new care pathway for common musculoskeletal conditions (low back pain, neck pain/whiplash, knee osteoarthritis).

DESIGN

Convergent parallel mixed methods design referencing the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. The study included a subset of participants (n = 29) at-risk of poor outcomes from the intervention arm of the PAthway of CarE for common musculoskeletal conditions (PACE-MSK) trial. In the PACE-MSK arm, participants received specialist physiotherapist care as an adjunct to the care provided by their primary healthcare professional(s). One-to-one semi-structured interviews were conducted around 3-months after commencing in the trial. Quantitative data were collected at baseline and 3-month follow-up (health-related quality of life, pain self-efficacy, global perceived change, satisfaction).

RESULTS

Five themes were identified (Expectations and beliefs shaped patient experience; Clinical expertise and competence influence acceptance; Person-centred care; Mechanisms facilitating beneficial responses to care; Gaps in care pathway implementation). There were positive individual changes in physical quality of life for 17/29 (59%) participants, mental health quality of life for 12/29 (41%), pain self-efficacy for 8/29 (28%) and global perceived change for 19/29 (66%). Management met expectations with the majority reporting high levels of satisfaction. Integrating the qualitative and quantitative data with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability, there were complementary meta-inferences in the constructs of 'ethicality', 'intervention coherence', 'self-efficacy' and 'affective attitude'. Divergence was identified in 'perceived effectiveness'.

DISCUSSION

In general, there was positive acceptance of the care pathway by participants. Specialist physiotherapists' care was perceived as a positive addition to usual care.

Exercise-based telerehabilitation for the management of chronic pain in people with severe haemophilia: a mixed-methods feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain is reported by between 30 and 71% of people with haemophilia (PWH). Exercise is shown to be effective for pain management in other arthritides, but it remains unclear if such an approach is effective or acceptable to PWH. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a telerehabilitation exercise intervention for PWH living with chronic pain.

METHODS

This was a multisite, non-randomised, pre-post feasibility design, with a nested qualitative study. People with severe haemophilia > 18 years, living with chronic pain, were recruited. The intervention comprised 12 low-impact/moderate intensity, individualised exercise sessions and 3 knowledge-sharing and discussion sessions. Primary objectives assessed according to predefined progression criteria were as follows: (a) recruitment rate (5 participants enrolled per site over 8 weeks), (b) adherence (≥ 75% participants would adhere to ≥ 75% of sessions), (c) follow-up rate (≥ 75% completion of self-reported measures), (d) fidelity (intervention delivered as described in protocol) and (e) safety (≤ 30% participants would report adverse events). Acceptability was evaluated from thematic analysis of post-intervention participant interviews. Preliminary evaluation of self-reported pain, function and quality of life (QoL) was a secondary objective. Results were reported using descriptive statistics integrated with qualitative findings.

RESULTS

Ten PWH were recruited and completed the intervention. Nine agreed to be interviewed post intervention. Attendance at individual sessions was 84.5% compared to 52.1% for the group sessions. Outcome measures were successfully completed for 100% at baseline, 70% at intervention end and 60% at 3-month follow-up. No serious adverse events were recorded. Group median values in outcome measures (pain, function, QoL) showed minimal change post intervention. Participant interviews highlighted high levels of enjoyment, confidence in continuing exercises independently and positive views of virtual delivery and condition-specific exercise.

CONCLUSIONS

Recruitment rate and safety met the predefined progression criteria. Fidelity partially met the progression criteria, but the follow-up rate for self-reported measures did not. The study was acceptable to both participants and physiotherapists. Further intervention development is needed to review approaches to outcome measure collection and refine the usefulness of the knowledge-sharing sessions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was prospectively registered on 9 July 2021: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN 17454597.

Differences in Pain Experience Among Different Racial and Ethnic Groups

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the role of pain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy as possible mediators of race-based differences in pain intensity and to evaluate the possible moderating role of race on the relationship between pain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy with pain outcomes among persons with chronic spinal pain receiving physical therapy.

METHODS

This study was a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized trial. Participants were persons with chronic spinal pain in outpatient physical therapy clinics who consented to complete assessments at baseline and after 2 weeks and 12 weeks. Assessments included pain intensity, physical function, pain catastrophizing, and self-efficacy. Baseline comparisons between Black and non-Hispanic White participants were made. Mediation analyses used a regression-based framework to examine whether baseline pain catastrophizing and self-efficacy mediated the association between race and pain intensity. Moderation analyses used multiple linear regression to evaluate the role of race in the relationship of baseline pain catastrophizing and self-efficacy with 12-week pain intensity outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 274 participants were included (51 [18.6%] Black and 223 [81.4%] non-Hispanic White; mean age = 51.6 years [standard deviation = 14.9]; 180 [65.7%] female). At baseline, Black participants had higher pain intensity scores (mean difference = 0.80; 95% CI =1.5 to 0.12). Both pain catastrophizing and self-efficacy mediated the relationship between race and baseline pain intensity. Race moderated the relationships between baseline pain catastrophizing and self-efficacy and 12-week pain intensity scores.

CONCLUSION

Pain catastrophizing and self-efficacy had differential impacts on pain intensity based on race for both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses among persons receiving physical therapy for chronic spinal pain.

IMPACT

Improved understanding of the differences in pain experience based on factors such as race, ethnicity, cultural background, and experience with the health care system may help reduce disparities in pain management.

Improving Pain Self-Efficacy in Orthopedic Surgery Patients Through Video-Based Education: A Quality Improvement Project

BACKGROUND

Effective pain management following discharge is critical for postoperative recovery, with pain self-efficacy serving as a crucial component in this process. Patient education plays a key role in enhancing self-efficacy. Among various educational modalities, a growing body of evidence supports the efficacy of video-based methods.

LOCAL PROBLEM

A lack of evidence-based pain education programs for patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery was identified at an urban academic hospital on the East Coast of the United States. This quality improvement project aimed to develop and assess a video-based pain education program, focusing on pain self-efficacy and self-reported preparedness among adult patients prescribed opioids for postsurgical pain.

METHODS

This project adopted a pretest-posttest design, utilizing the knowledge-to-action framework. Data collection spanned 3 months. Among the 69 patients screened for eligibility, 13 participants were included in the analysis. The primary intervention consisted of a 15-minute educational video covering essential pain management aspects. Following the intervention, pain self-efficacy and self-reported preparedness were evaluated using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and a five-point Likert scale, respectively.

RESULTS

Median (IQR) scores on the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire increased significantly from 20 (16) to 32 (14) (p < .01). Mean (SD) scores for patients' self-reported preparedness also increased from 21.92 (6.53) to 31.85 (2.41) (p < .01). All participants reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the educational intervention.

CONCLUSION

Video-based education is a time-efficient and cost-effective approach. Healthcare providers can consider integrating video education to enhance pain self-efficacy in the postoperative phase, thus enhancing postsurgical pain outcomes and overall recovery experience.

Influence of unilateral versus bilateral patellofemoral pain on physical activity, pain self-efficacy, and disability

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) affects physical and psychosocial health; however, it is unclear if unilateral and bilateral PFP induce similar levels of impairments.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare physical activity (PA), pain self-efficacy, and disability between individuals with unilateral and bilateral PFP, and to compare these groups against pain-free controls.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional case-control.

METHOD

Sixty-two individuals with PFP (25 unilateral and 37 bilateral) and 20 pain-free controls completed the PA assessment using an accelerometer by daily steps, light PA, and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA). We also calculated variability in each PA variable. Pain self-efficacy and disability were measured using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Anterior Knee Pain Scale, respectively.

RESULTS

Individuals with bilateral PFP took fewer daily steps compared to pain-free controls (9568.1 ± 3827.0 vs. 12,285.8 ± 2821.2 steps/day; P = 0.018, Cohen d = 0.79), whereas individuals with unilateral PFP did not (11,099.2 ± 3547.1 steps/day; P = 0.503, Cohen d = 0.37). Individuals with bilateral PFP showed greater variability in MVPA compared to individuals with unilateral PFP (42.9 ± 23.1 vs. 29.0 ± 15.9; P = 0.011, Cohen d = 0.91) and pain-free controls (42.9 ± 23.1 vs. 17.6 ± 6.1; P < 0.001, Cohen d = 1.21). Individuals with unilateral and bilateral PFP similarly exhibited less time spent in MVPA, greater variability in daily steps, lower pain self-efficacy, and greater disability compared to pain-free controls (P < 0.001, Cohen d = 1.14-3.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Versus pain-free controls, individuals with bilateral PFP displayed greater variability in MVPA than individuals with unilateral PFP. However, it is important to note that unilateral PFP influenced time spent in MVPA, variability in daily steps, pain self-efficacy, and disability at similar levels to bilateral PFP.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of app-delivered self-management support (selfBACK) in addition to usual care for people with low back pain in Denmark

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the cost-effectiveness of individually tailored self-management support, delivered via the artificial intelligence-based selfBACK app, as an add-on to usual care for people with low back pain (LBP).

DESIGN

Secondary health-economic analysis of the selfBACK randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a 9-month follow-up conducted from a Danish national healthcare perspective (primary scenario) and a societal perspective limited to long-term productivity in the form of long-term absenteeism (secondary scenario).

SETTING

Primary care and an outpatient spine clinic in Denmark.

PARTICIPANTS

A subset of Danish participants in the selfBACK RCT, including 297 adults with LBP randomised to the intervention (n=148) or the control group (n=149).

INTERVENTIONS

App-delivered evidence-based, individually tailored self-management support as an add-on to usual care compared with usual care alone among people with LBP.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs of healthcare usage and productivity loss, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) based on the EuroQol-5L Dimension Questionnaire, meaningful changes in LBP-related disability measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), costs (healthcare and productivity loss measured in Euro) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

The incremental costs were higher for the selfBACK intervention (mean difference €230 (95% CI -136 to 595)), where ICERs showed an increase in costs of €7336 per QALY gained in the intervention group, and €1302 and €1634 for an additional person with minimal important change on the PSEQ and RMDQ score, respectively. At a cost-effectiveness threshold value of €23250, the selfBACK intervention has a 98% probability of being cost-effective. Analysis of productivity loss was very sensitive, which creates uncertainty about the results from a societal perspective limited to long-term productivity.

CONCLUSIONS

From a healthcare perspective, the selfBACK intervention is likely to represent a cost-effective treatment for people with LBP. However, including productivity loss introduces uncertainty to the results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03798288.

Virtual Reality for Subacute Pain After Orthopedic Traumatic Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES

Acute orthopedic traumatic musculoskeletal injuries are prevalent, costly, and often lead to persistent pain and functional limitations. Psychological risk factors (eg, pain catastrophizing and anxiety) exacerbate these outcomes but are often overlooked in acute orthopedic care. Addressing gaps in current treatment approaches, this mixed-methods pilot study explored the use of a therapeutic virtual reality (VR; RelieVRx ), integrating principles of mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral therapy, for pain self-management at home following orthopedic injury.

METHODS

We enrolled 10 adults with acute orthopedic injuries and elevated pain catastrophizing or pain anxiety from Level 1 Trauma Clinics within the Mass General Brigham health care system. Participants completed daily RelieVRx sessions at home for 8 weeks, which included pain education, relaxation, mindfulness, games, and dynamic breathing biofeedback. Primary outcomes were a priori feasibility, appropriateness, acceptability, satisfaction, and safety. Secondary outcomes were pre-post measures of pain, physical function, sleep, depression, and hypothesized mechanisms (pain self-efficacy, mindfulness, and coping).

RESULTS

The VR and study procedures met or exceeded all benchmarks. We observed preliminary improvements in pain, physical functioning, sleep, depression, and mechanisms. Qualitative exit interviews confirmed high satisfaction with RelieVRx and yielded recommendations for promoting VR-based trials with orthopedic patients.

DISCUSSION

The results support a larger randomized clinical trial of RelieVRx versus a sham placebo control to replicate the findings and explore mechanisms. There is potential for self-guided VR to promote evidence-based pain management strategies and address the critical mental health care gap for patients following acute orthopedic injuries.

Development and internal validation of a multivariable prognostic model to predict chronic pain after a new episode of non-specific idiopathic, non-traumatic neck pain in physiotherapy primary care practice

OBJECTIVE

To develop and internally validate a prognostic model to predict chronic pain after a new episode of acute or subacute non-specific idiopathic, non-traumatic neck pain in patients presenting to physiotherapy primary care, emphasising modifiable biomedical, psychological and social factors.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study with a 6-month follow-up between January 2020 and March 2023.

SETTING

30 physiotherapy primary care practices.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with a new presentation of non-specific idiopathic, non-traumatic neck pain, with a duration lasting no longer than 12 weeks from onset.

BASELINE MEASURES

Candidate prognostic variables collected from participants included age and sex, neck pain symptoms, work-related factors, general factors, psychological and behavioural factors and the remaining factors: therapeutic relation and healthcare provider attitude.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain intensity at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) after inclusion. An NPRS score of ≥3 at each time point was used to define chronic neck pain.

RESULTS

62 (10%) of the 603 participants developed chronic neck pain. The prognostic factors in the final model were sex, pain intensity, reported pain in different body regions, headache since and before the neck pain, posture during work, employment status, illness beliefs about pain identity and recovery, treatment beliefs, distress and self-efficacy. The model demonstrated an optimism-corrected area under the curve of 0.83 and a corrected R2 of 0.24. Calibration was deemed acceptable to good, as indicated by the calibration curve. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded a p-value of 0.7167, indicating a good model fit.

CONCLUSION

This model has the potential to obtain a valid prognosis for developing chronic pain after a new episode of acute and subacute non-specific idiopathic, non-traumatic neck pain. It includes mostly potentially modifiable factors for physiotherapy practice. External validation of this model is recommended.

Perceived benefits and limitations of a psychoeducation program for patients with fibromyalgia: an interpretative phenomenological analysis

Objective

To analyze the perceived benefits and limitations of a pain psychoeducation program as a non-pharmacological treatment for patients with fibromyalgia.

Methods

An interpretative phenomenological analysis was applied to analyze the subjective experiences of 11 patients with fibromyalgia who participated in a pain psychoeducation program. This program includes educational sessions that address pain understanding, coping strategies, and relaxation techniques. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed, and analyzed using ATLAS.ti software.

Results

Patients reported significant improvements in cognitive-functional capacity and socio-emotional ability, including better disease understanding and management, emotional stability, and interpersonal relationships. Despite these benefits, they identified limitations in program individualization and insufficient coverage of certain topics, such as sexual health and legal aspects of disability. Enhanced self-management skills were evident, with observed shifts in disease perception and coping strategies.

Conclusion

The psychoeducation program was viewed positively, influencing functional, cognitive, and emotional enhancements. Nonetheless, the need for increased program personalization and expanded socio-economic support was noted. Future research should focus on the long-term impacts of psychoeducation and the feasibility of tailored interventions.

Exploring the Association Between Physical Fitness (High Intensity and Low Intensity) and the Incidence of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Temporomandibular joint disorders affect the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), masticatory muscles, and associated structures. Symptoms include TMJ pain, limited jaw movement, muscle tenderness, and referred pain. Physical activity can alleviate musculoskeletal pain. This study explored the link between physical fitness (high and low intensity) and temporomandibular disorder (TMD) incidence.

METHODOLOGY

Sixty patients were divided into three groups in this comparative study. Group I underwent 30 minutes of high-intensity aerobic training. Group II had 30 minutes of low-intensity yoga sessions weekly. Group III received health education. TMD was diagnosed using the Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI). Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ).

RESULTS

Of the participants, 38.1% were males and 61.9% were females. TMD severity was mild (25.0%), moderate (55.0%), and severe (20.0%). High-intensity training groups had higher TMD symptom severity than low-intensity groups (p = 0.001). VAS scores increased in group I and decreased in group II (significant). PSEQ scores decreased in group I and increased significantly in group II. Group III showed no significant differences in PSEQ scores.

CONCLUSION

High-intensity training resulted in moderate TMD symptoms. Low-intensity training was beneficial for TMD pain. The study recommends combining low-intensity physical workouts with medications to alleviate TMD.

Pain Self-Efficacy Can Improve During a Visit With an Orthopedic Surgeon

BACKGROUND

Greater pain self-efficacy (PSE) is associated with reduced pain, fewer limitations, and increased quality of life after treatment for orthopedic conditions. The aims of this study were to (1) assess if PSE improves during a visit with an orthopedic surgeon and (2) identify modifiable visit factors that are associated with an increase in PSE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study of orthopedic clinic visits at a multispecialty clinic from February to May 2022. New patients who presented to one of six orthopedic surgeons were approached for the study. Patients who provided consent completed a pre-visit questionnaire including the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) and demographic questions. A trained research member recorded the five-item Observing Patient Involvement in Decision Making Instrument (OPTION-5) score, number of questions asked, and visit duration. Immediately after the visit, patients completed a post-visit questionnaire consisting of the PSEQ and Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS).

RESULTS

Of 132 patients enrolled, 61 (46%) had improved PSE after the orthopedic visit, with 38 (29%) having improvement above a clinically significant threshold. There were no significant differences between patients with increased PSE and those without increased PSE when comparing the PICS, OPTION-5, questions asked, or visit duration.

CONCLUSION

Almost half of the patients had improvement in PSE during an orthopedic visit. The causal pathway to how to improve PSE and the durability of the improved PSE have implications in strategies to improve patient outcomes in orthopedic surgery, such as communication methods and shared decision-making. Future research can focus on studying different interventions that facilitate improving PSE. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(4):e197-e203.].

Effect of an interdisciplinary inpatient program for patients with complex regional pain syndrome in reducing disease activity-a single-center prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of inpatient treatment in reducing disease activity in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) who have exhausted outpatient options. Furthermore, the study sought to identify patient-related outcome variables that predict a reduction in disease activity.

METHODS

The primary outcome was disease severity (CRPS Severity Score, range 0-16 points). Secondary outcomes included depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and the ability to participate in social roles and activities, all of which were assessed using the PROMIS-29. Furthermore, pain catastrophizing, neuropathic pain, quality of life, pain self-efficacy, medication intake, and the patient's global impression of change were examined in accordance with current international agreed recommendations, assessed at discharge, 3-month, and 6-month post-discharge. Mixed-effects models were conducted to identify baseline variables associated with CRPS severity.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients completed the program (mean age 49.28 [SD 11.23] years, 92% females, mean symptom duration 8.5 [SD 6.5] months). Results showed a significant reduction between baseline and discharge of disease activity (CSS -2.36, P < .0001), pain (PROMIS-29 pain -0.88, P = .005), and emotional function (PROMIS-29 depression -5.05, P < .001; fatigue -4.63, P = .002). Moderate evidence for a reduction between baseline and discharge could be observed for pain interference (+2.27, P = .05), social participation (PROMIS-29 + 1.93, P = .05), anxiety (PROMIS-29 -3.32, P = .02) and physical function (PROMIS-29 + 1.3, P = .03). On discharge, 92% of patients (23 of 25) reported improvement in their overall condition. In the follow-up period, medication intake could be reduced after 3 (MQS -8.22, P = .002) and 6 months (MQS -8.69, P = .001), and there was further improvement in social participation after 3 months (PROMIS-29 + 1.72, 0.03) and sleep after 6 months (PROMIS-29 + 2.38, 0.008). In the mixed models, it was demonstrated that patients experiencing less pain at baseline also exhibited lower disease activity.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study confirm that inpatient interdisciplinary treatment of CRPS patients improves disease activity, pain, physical function, emotional function, and social participation. Most improvements were maintained for up to 6 months after discharge. The majority of patients reported that their overall condition had improved during the study period.

Exploring equity of care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples within the state-wide Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy Screening Clinic and Multi-disciplinary Service in Queensland Health

Objective This study aimed to explore equity of care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples compared to non-Indigenous Australians within a Queensland-wide musculoskeletal service. Method The service database was analysed between July 2018 and April 2022 across 18 Queensland Health facilities. Representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples within the service's patient population was first explored. Second, service and patient-related characteristics and outcomes between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients and non-Indigenous patients undergoing an episode of care in the service were compared using analysis of variance and chi-squared tests. Results A greater proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (4.34%) were represented within the service's patient population than in the general population (3.61%) state-wide. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients presented with a generally higher severity of clinical presentation across measures at initial consult. Very similar proportions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (63.2%) and non-Indigenous (64.3%) patients reported clinically meaningful treatment benefits. While a higher proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients (69.7%) were discharged from the service without requiring specialist review compared to non-Indigenous patients (65.6%), Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients had higher rates of discharge due to non-attendance (20.8%) when compared to non-Indigenous (10.6%) patients (P <0.01). Conclusions Disparity in care retention for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients compared to non-Indigenous patients was observed within the musculoskeletal service. Consultation with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities is needed to address access barriers once in the service to guide service improvement.

Effectiveness of in-group versus individually administered pain neuroscience education on clinical and psychosocial outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain: randomized controlled study protocol

Objective

(1) This trial will compare the clinical and psychosocial effectiveness of in-group and individually pain neuroscience education (PNE) in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). In addition, (2) the influence of social determinants of health on post-treatment results will be analyzed.

Methods

A three-arm randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Sixty-nine participants with CLBP will be recruited in a 1:1:1 ratio. Participants, assessor, and statistician will be blinded to group assignment. The PNE intervention will be adapted to the context of the participants. An experimental group (n = 33) will receive PNE in an in-group modality, the other experimental group (n = 33) will receive PNE in an individually modality and the control group (n = 33) will continue with usual care. Additionally, participants will be encouraged to stay active by walking for 20-30 min 3-5 times per week and will be taught an exercise to improve transversus abdominis activation (bracing or abdominal following). The outcome measures will be fear avoidance and beliefs, pressure pain threshold, pain self-efficacy, catastrophizing, pain intensity, and treatment expectation. Outcome measures will be collected at one-week before intervention, immediately post-intervention, and four-weeks post-intervention.

Conclusion

The innovative approach of PNE oriented to fear beliefs proposed in this study could broaden the application strategies of this educational therapeutic modality. Impact. Contextualized PNE delivered by physical therapist could be essential to achieve a good cost-effectiveness ratio of this intervention to improve the clinical condition of people with CLBP.

Self-Efficacy in Nepali Adults With Musculoskeletal Pain: Measurement Properties of Hard-Copy and Online Versions of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire

The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is commonly used in pain self-efficacy research. Yet its Nepali translation is unavailable, limiting the ability to conduct cross-cultural research on the role of self-efficacy in musculoskeletal pain and its management. This study aimed to 1) translate and culturally adapt the 10-item (PSEQ-10) and 2-item (PSEQ-2) versions of the PSEQ into Nepali, 2) evaluate their measurement properties in Nepali adults with musculoskeletal pain, and 3) evaluate whether the type of administration (ie, hard-copy vs online) affected their measurement properties. The measurement properties of different administrations of the Nepali PSEQ-10 and PSEQ-2 were evaluated in 180 Nepali adults (120 hard-copy and 60 online administrations) with musculoskeletal pain. We conducted confirmatory factor analyses and estimated the measures' internal consistencies, test-retest reliabilities, and smallest detectable changes using standard error of measurement. We planned to conclude that the measures were valid if ≥ 75% of the validity hypotheses were supported. The results supported unidimensionality for the Nepali PSEQ-10. The Nepali PSEQ-2 and PSEQ-10 evidenced excellent internal consistencies (Cronbach alphas = .90-.95) and good to excellent test-retest reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficient = .61-.85) for both administrations. Construct validity (r's ≥ .20) and concurrent validity (r's ≥ .83) were supported, as hypothesized. Both hard-copy and online administrations of the Nepali PSEQ-2 and PSEQ-10 are similar, reliable, and valid ways to assess self-efficacy in Nepali adults with musculoskeletal pain. The findings should facilitate telehealth and cross-cultural research on pain self-efficacy in Nepal. PERSPECTIVE: This is the first Nepali adaptation of a self-efficacy scale with testing of measurement properties for hard-copy and online administrations. It will facilitate the assessment of pain self-efficacy in clinical practice and research and facilitate a deeper cross-cultural understanding of the role of self-efficacy in musculoskeletal pain.

Baseline measures for women with mesh complications accessing a pain service (as part of the London Complex Mesh Centre)

Introduction

Pelvic mesh was first used for stress urinary incontinence in 1998 following which its usage rapidly expanded to include treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Numerous complications relating to mesh insertion soon became apparent, culminating in the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety: First Do No Harm Report published by Baroness Cumberlege in 2020. Following this report, the UCLH London Complex Mesh Centre funded by NHS England, was one of a small number of specialist centres set up for mesh-injured women. The Pelvic Pain service of the Pain Management Centre at UCLH provides a service for patients attending the London Complex Mesh Centre. The aim of our study was to distinguish the differing needs of mesh-injured women from those with chronic pelvic pain by comparing patient-reported outcome measures between these two cohorts.

Methods

Distribution of data was calculated using the D'Agostino-Pearson normality test. Mann-Whitney tests were used to ascertain statistical difference between the two cohorts. Ethnicity was compared between groups using Fisher's exact test. Quantile regression models were used to assess whether differences in medians between groups remained after adjustment for age and ethnicity. Statistical significance was set at p < .05.

Results

Patients with mesh were significantly older than those with chronic pelvic pain and were more likely to be of white ethnicity. After adjustment for age and ethnicity, analysis revealed that bladder interference, sex interference and DAPOS A were significantly higher amongst mesh-injured women, whereas GP and hospital admissions were significantly lower.

Discussion

Our data shows the importance of mesh-injured women having access to pain management services with pathways of care integrated within women's and mental health services. It is essential that these programmes include support to discuss ways of returning to sexual relationships and have models to address anxiety such as graded exposure and psychological input.

Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in patients with subacute and chronic low back pain

OBJECTIVE

The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the level of pain self-efficacy in patients with low back pain (LBP). Although the PSEQ has been translated into Danish, its measurement properties remain unknown in patients with subacute and chronic LBP in Danish outpatient clinics. The aim of this study was to investigate the construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and measurement error of the Danish version of the PSEQ in a group of Danish patients with subacute and chronic LBP in a hospital outpatient setting.

METHODS

Patients with LBP referred to two Danish outpatient clinics were recruited for this study. Two days after the consultation, the participants were emailed a link to a survey that included the following outcome measures: the PSEQ, the Oswestry Disability Index, the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. Five days after completion of the survey, a new survey that included the PSEQ was sent to the participants.

RESULTS

In total, 109 participants were included for the analysis of construct validity and internal consistency, with 94 participants included for the analysis of test-retest reliability and measurement error. Construct validity was found to be high and internal consistency was acceptable, with Cronbach's alpha = 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.91-0.93). Test-retest reliability was found to be good, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2.1) of 0.89 (95% CI = 0.82-0.92). The standard error of measurement was calculated to be 4.52 and the smallest detectable change was 12.5 points.

CONCLUSIONS

The Danish version of the PSEQ showed acceptable measurement properties in terms of construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability in a group of patients with subacute and chronic LBP. However, further studies are needed to investigate other aspects of the measurement properties.

The Swedish version of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire short form, PSEQ-2SV: Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation in a population of patients with musculoskeletal disorders

OBJECTIVES

Measuring pain self-efficacy is suggested as relevant in patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in a primary care setting. However, there is no pain self-efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ) available in Swedish. The aim of this study was to translate and culturally adapt PSEQ-2 to Swedish and evaluate reliability and validity in a population of patients with MSDs.

METHODS

A translation and cultural adaptation together with psychometric evaluation of reliability and validity were performed according to guidelines with three groups of participants with MSDs. First, a convenient sample of 25 individuals were interviewed in the translation process. Next, 61 participants completed the test-retest survey via social media or QR codes in waiting rooms in rehabilitation clinics. Finally, to evaluate construct validity questionnaires were obtained from 132 participants with MSDs in an ongoing randomized controlled trial.

RESULTS

The Swedish version of PSEQ-2 showed adequate face and content validity. The results of 0.805 on Cohen's weighted kappa indicate that the reliability of PSEQ-2SV in a group of adults with MSDs is on the border between substantial and almost perfect. The point estimate regarding relative rank variance, measuring the individual variation within the group, and relative concentration, the systematic change in how the assessments are concentrated on the scale's categories, shows minor systematic differences and some random differences not neglectable. The construct validity of pre-defined hypotheses was met to some degree.

CONCLUSION

The PSEQ-2SV has been accurately linguistically translated and tested for reliability and validity, in a population of MSDs, and is deemed to be able to be used in the clinic and in research. As there were some concerns regarding measurement error and systematic bias, more research could be of value.

Identical movement control exercises with and without synchronized breathing for chronic non-specific low back pain:A randomized pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Exercise is a first-line treatment for chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP). Exercise combined with specific breathing techniques have the potential to improve multifactorial outcomes. No previous studies, however, have compared outcomes between identical exercises with or without a specific breathing protocol in a uniform clinical study setting.

OBJECTIVES

1) To investigate the feasibility of combining synchronized breathing with movement control exercises and evaluate eligibility criteria, randomization procedures, and dropout rates. 2) To study the preliminary efficacy of the interventions on multifactorial outcome measures.

METHODS

Thirty subjects with CNSLBP were randomized into two groups. Both groups had four contact clinic visits where they received personalized home movement control exercises to practice over two months. The experimental group included a movement control exercise intervention combined with synchronized breathing techniques. Trial registration number: NCT05268822.

RESULTS

Feasibility was demonstrated by meeting the recruitment goal of 30 subjects within the pre-specified timeframe with enrolment rate of 24.8% (30/121). Synchronized breathing techniques were successfully adhered by participants. Home exercise adherence was nearly identical between the groups without any adverse events. Preliminary efficacy findings on pain intensity, disability, and self-efficacy in the experimental group exceeded the minimal clinically important difference. No such findings were observed in any outcome measures within the control group. Overall, multifactorial differences were consistent because nine out of eleven outcome measures showed greater improvements for the experimental group.

CONCLUSION

The synchronized breathing with movement control exercises protocol was feasible and may be more beneficial for improving multifactorial outcomes compared to identical exercises alone. Results suggested progression to a full-scale trial.

Pain Catastrophizing as a Mediator Between Pain Self-Efficacy and Disease Severity in Patients with Fibromyalgia

BACKGROUND

Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterized by chronic widespread pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, cognitive impairment, and mood disturbance. Both pain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy have been found to be mediators of pain treatment effectiveness. However, whether pain catastrophizing mediates the association between pain self-efficacy and FM severity remains unclear.

AIM

To examine whether pain catastrophizing mediates the association between pain self-efficacy and disease severity in patients with FM.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included the baseline data of 105 people with FM from a randomized controlled trial. Hierarchical linear regression analysis was performed to examine the predictive ability of pain catastrophizing for FM severity. Furthermore, we examined the mediating effect of pain catastrophizing on the association between pain self-efficacy and FM severity.

RESULTS

Pain self-efficacy was negatively associated with pain catastrophizing (β = -.4043, p < .001). FM severity was positively associated with pain catastrophizing (β = .8290, p < .001) and negatively associated with pain self-efficacy (β = -.3486, p = .014). Pain self-efficacy had a direct effect on FM severity (β = -.6837, p < .001) and an indirect effect on FM severity through the effect of pain catastrophizing (β = -.3352, 95% CI bootstrapping -.5008 to -.1858).

CONCLUSION

Pain catastrophizing independently predicts FM severity and mediates the association between pain self-efficacy and FM severity. Pain catastrophizing should be monitored through interventions aimed at improving pain self-efficacy to reduce symptom burden in patients with FM.

Psychometric Properties of Patient-reported Outcome Measures to Assess Resilience in Individuals with Musculoskeletal Pain or Rheumatic Conditions: A COSMIN-based Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess resilience in individuals with musculoskeletal and rheumatic conditions.

METHODS

Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) were searched. Studies assessing any measurement property in the target populations were included. Two reviewers independently screened all studies and assessed the risk of bias using the COSMIN checklist. Thereafter, each measurement property of each PROM was classified as sufficient, insufficient, or inconsistent based on the COSMIN criteria for good measurement properties.

RESULTS

Four families of PROMs [Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS); Resilience Scale (RS-18); Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10 and CD-RISC-2); and Pain Resilience Scale (PRS-14 and PRS-12)] were identified from the 9 included studies. Even if no PROM showed sufficient evidence for all measurement properties, the PRS and CD-RISC had the most properties evaluated and showed the best measurement properties, although responsiveness still needs to be assessed for both PROMs. Both PROMs showed good levels of reliability (intraclass coefficient correlation 0.61 to 0.8) and good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥0.70). Minimal detectable change values were 24.5% for PRS and between 4.7% and 29.8% for CD-RISC.

DISCUSSION

Although BRCS, RS-18, CD-RISC, and PRS have been used to evaluate resilience in individuals with musculoskeletal and rheumatic conditions, the current evidence only supports the use of PRS and CD-RISC in this population. Further methodological studies are therefore needed and should prioritize the assessment of reliability and responsiveness.

Shoulder pain: Is the outcome of manual therapy, acupuncture and electrotherapy different for people with high compared to low pain self-efficacy? An analysis of effect moderation

Background

High baseline pain self-efficacy (PSE) predicts a better outcome for people attending physiotherapy for musculoskeletal shoulder pain. A potential contributing factor is that PSE moderates the relationship between some treatment modalities and outcome. Our aim was to investigate whether there is a difference in outcome between participants with high compared to low PSE receiving manual therapy, acupuncture, and electrotherapy.

Methods

Participants were stratified into high or low baseline (i) PSE, (ii) shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), and (iii) did or did not receive the treatment. Whether the effect of treatment differs for people with high compared to low PSE was assessed using the 95% confidence interval of the difference of difference (DoD) at a 5% significance level (p < 0.05).

Results

Six-month SPADI scores were consistently lower (less pain and disability) for those who did not receive passive treatments compared to those who did (statistically significant less pain and disability in 7 of 24 models). However, DoD was statistically insignificant.

Conclusion

PSE did not moderate the relationship between treatment and outcome. However, participants who received passive treatment experienced equal or more pain and disability at 6 months compared to those who did not. Results are subject to confounding by indication but do indicate the need for further appropriately designed research.

Level of Evidence

Level of evidence II-b.

Clinical Observation, Management and Function Of low back pain Relief Therapies (COMFORT): A cluster randomised controlled trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Low back pain (LBP) is commonly treated with opioid analgesics despite evidence that these medicines provide minimal or no benefit for LBP and have an established profile of harms. International guidelines discourage or urge caution with the use of opioids for back pain; however, doctors and patients lack practical strategies to help them implement the guidelines. This trial will evaluate a multifaceted intervention to support general practitioners (GPs) and their patients with LBP implement the recommendations in the latest opioid prescribing guidelines.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a cluster randomised controlled trial that will evaluate the effect of educational outreach visits to GPs promoting opioid stewardship alongside non-pharmacological interventions including heat wrap and patient education about the possible harms and benefits of opioids, on GP prescribing of opioids medicines dispensed. At least 40 general practices will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention or control (no outreach visits; GP provides usual care). A total of 410 patient-participants (205 in each arm) who have been prescribed an opioid for LBP will be enrolled via participating general practices. Follow-up of patient-participants will occur over a 1-year period. The primary outcome will be the cumulative dose of opioid dispensed that was prescribed by study GPs over 1 year from the enrolment visit (in morphine milligram equivalent dose). Secondary outcomes include prescription of opioid medicines, benzodiazepines, gabapentinoids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs by study GPs or any GP, health services utilisation and patient-reported outcomes such as pain, quality of life and adverse events. Analysis will be by intention to treat, with a health economics analysis also planned.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial received ethics approval from The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2022/511). The results will be disseminated via publications in journals, media and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12622001505796.

Economic analysis of patient-related effects of an interdisciplinary pain self-management program

ABSTRACT

Active Day Patient Treatment (ADAPT) is a well-established 3 week intensive cognitive-behavioural, interdisciplinary pain management program for patients with disabling chronic pain. The aim of this analysis was to conduct an economic analysis of patient-related effects of ADAPT using hospital administrative data, specifically, to compare the costs and health outcomes for patients 1 month after participating in the program, with the preprogram period when they were receiving standard care. This retrospective cohort study included 230 patients who completed ADAPT (including follow-ups) between 2014 and 17 at the Pain Management and Research Centre at the Royal North Shore Hospital in Sydney, Australia. Data on pain-related healthcare utilization and costs before and after the program were assessed. Primary outcome measures were labour force participation for patients' average weekly earnings and cost per clinically meaningful change in Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Severity, and BPI interference scores (n = 224). We estimated patients, on average, earned $59 more each week at 1 month follow-up compared with baseline. The cost per clinically meaningful change in pain severity and interference score based on the BPI severity and BPI interference were AU$9452.32 (95% CI: $7031.76-$12,930.40) and AU$3446.62 (95% CI: $2851.67-$4126.46), respectively. The cost per point improvement and per clinically meaningful change in the Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire were $483 (95% CI: $411.289-$568.606) and $3381.02, respectively. Our analysis showed a better health outcome, reduced healthcare services' cost, and reduced number of medications taken 1 month after participating in ADAPT.

Associations between Preoperative Patient Socioeconomic Status and Pain-Related Outcomes with Pain and Function in Patients Undergoing Rotator Cuff Repairs

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing rotator cuff repairs commonly experience postoperative pain and functional limitations. Various socioeconomic and pain-related factors have been recognized as influential in the prognosis of such patients. This study aims to investigate the associations between postoperative pain and functionality and preoperative pain-related outcomes and socioeconomic status in patients undergoing rotator cuff repairs.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study examines the relationship between the outcomes of rotator cuff repairs and participants' socioeconomic status and pain-related measures. Socioeconomic status was assessed through indicators such as educational level, monthly household income, and occupation. Pain-related outcomes included measures of kinesiophobia and pain self-efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients (68 male, 37 female) were included in the analysis. The findings revealed no significant association between postoperative pain or functionality and the patients' socioeconomic status (p > 0.05). However, postoperative pain levels demonstrated a significant association with preoperative kinesiophobia (p < 0.05) and pain self-efficacy (p < 0.013). In contrast, functionality did not exhibit a significant association with these measures (p < 0.072 and 0.217, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative pain-related outcomes play a role in postoperative pain levels among patients undergoing rotator cuff repairs. However, they do not appear to be related to functionality. Additionally, socioeconomic status does not significantly impact either pain or functionality.

Psychometric properties of the translated Spanish version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire

Introduction

Some patients with rotator cuff injuries do not report significant changes in pain-related outcomes. Pain self-efficacy, which is commonly assessed using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, may contribute toward this outcome. However, a Spanish adaptation of this questionnaire is currently lacking. Therefore, this study's purpose was developing the Spanish version of this questionnaire, and assess its psychometric properties.

Methods

The Spanish version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire was translated and culturally adapted, and a sample of 107 patients with rotator cuff injuries completed the questionnaire to examine its convergent validity (analyzing its correlation with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia), its test-retest reliability, for which a subset of 40 participants completed again the questionnaire, and its internal consistency.

Results

Translation was conducted without any problems, and 107 participants completed the study. Mean scores for the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire were 45.2 points (standard deviation, 11.4). The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire showed a moderate negative correlation with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (Pearson's correlation index r = -0.48) supporting its convergent validity. High test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.90) and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α value of 0.92) were also found.

Discussion

The Spanish version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire presents high validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency to assess pain self-efficacy in patients suffering rotator cuff injuries in Spanish-speaking settings.

Protocol of identical exercise programs with and without specific breathing techniques for the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain: randomized feasibility trial with two-month follow-up

BACKGROUND

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a leading cause of disability globally. Exercise therapies are one of the commonly prescribed treatment options for CLBP. The specific exercise therapies for CLBP most commonly target movement dysfunction, but seldom brain-based pain modulation. Exercise therapies with specific breathing techniques (SBTs) have been shown to influence and enhance brain-based structural and functional pain modulation.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility of the SBTs protocol, eligibility criteria, randomization, and dropout rates. To quantify the changes in patient outcome measures and choose the most relevant measure for larger-scale study. To quantify self-adherence levels to home exercise and monitor and record possible pain medication and other treatment modality usage, and adverse events during exercise.

DESIGN

A parallel randomised analyst-blinded feasibility trial with two-month follow-up.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Feasibility related to aims and objectives. Multiple pain- and health-related patient-reported outcome measures of pain intensity, disability, central sensitization, anxiety, kinesiophobia, catastrophising, self-efficacy, sleep quality, quality of life, and health and well-being status. Exercise adherence, pain medication and other treatment modality usage, and possible adverse events related to exercises will be monitored and recorded.

METHODS

Thirty participants will be randomized to movement control exercise with SBTs (15 subjects in experimental group) or movement control exercise without SBTs (15 subjects in control group) in private chiropractic practice setting with two-month follow-up. Trial registration number; NCT05268822.

DISCUSSION

The clinical difference in effectiveness between practically identical exercise programs in uniform study settings with or without SBTs has not been studied before. This study aims to inform feasibility and help determine whether progression to a full-scale trial is worthwhile.

Non-inferiority of a hybrid outpatient rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial (HIRE, DRKS00028770)

Background

Physiotherapeutic telerehabilitation in various musculoskeletal and internal diseases, including back pain, might be comparable to face-to-face rehabilitation or better than non-rehabilitation. In Germany, a standardized back school for patients with chronic back pain is provided in outpatient rehabilitation centers. The effectiveness of this standardized back school was shown in a randomized controlled trial in face-to-face rehabilitation. This study examines non-inferiority of a hybrid rehabilitation applying a digital version of the standardized back school against a rehabilitation applying the face-to-face back school.

Methods/design

We recruit 320 patients in eight German outpatient rehabilitation centers. Patients are randomized equally to the intervention and control groups. Patients aged 18 to 65 years with back pain are included. Patients lacking a suitable private electronic device and German language skills are excluded. Both groups receive the standardized back school as part of the 3-week rehabilitation program. The control group receives the back school conventionally in face-to-face meetings within the outpatient rehabilitation center. The intervention group receives the back school online using a private electronic device. Besides the back school, the patients participate in rehabilitation programs according to the German rehabilitation guideline for patients with chronic back pain. Hence, the term "hybrid" rehabilitation for the intervention group is used. The back school consists of seven modules. We assess data at four time points: start of rehabilitation, end of rehabilitation, 3 months after the end of rehabilitation and, 12 months after the end of rehabilitation. The primary outcome is pain self-efficacy. Secondary outcomes are, amongst others, motivational self-efficacy, cognitive and behavioral pain management, and disorder and treatment knowledge. Guided interviews with patients, physicians, physiotherapists and other health experts supplement our study with qualitative data.

Discussion/aim

Our randomized controlled trial aims to demonstrate non-inferiority of the online back school, compared to conventional implementation of the back school.

Trial registration

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028770, April 05, 2022).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44247-023-00013-4.

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire - Hebrew version

PURPOSE

This study aims to translate, culturally adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Hebrew Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ).

METHODS

The study was designed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) recommendations for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. The PSEQ was initially translated into Hebrew and cross-culturally adapted. The Hebrew version of the PSEQ (PSEQ-H) was administered to participants suffering from chronic musculoskeletal pain, along with other self-report measures of pain (NPRS, FABQ, HADS, PCS, and SF-12). Eight hypotheses on expected correlations of the PSEQ-H with other instruments were formulated a priori to assess construct validity. Structural validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. Floor and ceiling effects, test-retest, and internal consistency reliability were also assessed.

RESULTS

The translation process retained the unidimensional model of the PSEQ. The PSEQ-H demonstrates excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.97) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.88), and no significant floor and ceiling effects were observed. Construct validity was found satisfactory as 75% (six) of the analyses between the PSEQ-H and the other self-reported measures met the hypotheses. Factor analysis confirmed the single-factor structure of the questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

The PSEQ-H version was found to have excellent reliability, good construct, and structural validity, and can be used with heterogeneous chronic musculoskeletal pain populations. Future studies should test the PSEQ-H's responsiveness and psychometric properties with specific pain populations.

What factors predict outcome from an inpatient multidisciplinary chronic pain service? A prospective cohort study

Objective To identify baseline factors associated with outcomes from an inpatient multidisciplinary pain management program (PMP) located in a bicultural area of Aotearoa New Zealand. Methods A prospective cohort study was undertaken involving 164 people with chronic pain who attended the PMP. Demographic, clinical, and psychosocial measures were obtained at baseline, whereas clinical and psychosocial outcome measures were also obtained at program discharge and 3-month follow up (N  = 100). Multivariate analyses were used to determine baseline demographic variables that were associated with outcomes at discharge and follow up. Results Being male and working full-time were associated with poorer outcomes in select measures at discharge. At the 3-month follow up, Māori ethnicity, working full-time, being retired or unemployed, or having chronic widespread pain were associated with poorer outcomes for some measures, whereas those with rheumatoid arthritis had greater self-efficacy. Conclusions Sex, ethnicity, employment status, and patient condition impact clinical outcomes from the program and in the time from discharge to follow up. Program content and/or delivery should be altered to promote more equitable outcomes for all patients in the long term.

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a Canadian French adaptation of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ)

PURPOSE

The objectives of this study were to translate the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) into Canadian French (PSEQ-F) and to evaluate its validity, reliability and responsiveness in a French-Canadian sample of patients with persistent rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP).

METHODS

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original English version of the PSEQ into Canadian French were performed according to standard procedures. Thereafter, 78 adults with RCRSP completed the PSEQ-F on three occasions: baseline, 2 days later to evaluate the reliability and 6 weeks later to evaluate responsiveness.

RESULTS

Cross-cultural adaptation was performed without problems with content or language. The PSEQ-F was found to be reliable (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.96; Minimal Detectable Change = 3 points [5%]), valid (moderate correlations with an abbreviated version of Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [QuickDASH] and Brief Pain Inventory [BPI] Questionnaires) and responsive (Standardized Response Mean = 0.96; Effect Size = 0.81; Minimal Clinically Important Difference = 6 points [10%]).

CONCLUSION

The PSEQ-F is a reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire that can be used to assess pain self-efficacy in French-speaking individuals with RCRSP. Further studies should use a self-efficacy-specific Global Rating of Change scale to estimate its responsiveness more thoroughly.Implications for rehabilitationHigher levels of pain self-efficacy have been associated with increased odds of symptom resolution in those with persistent rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP).The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) has been identified as the most frequently used tool by clinicians to assess pain self-efficacy in patients at risk of developing persistent musculoskeletal pain.The Canadian French version of the PSEQ (PSEQ-F) is a reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire that can be used to assess pain self-efficacy in French-speaking individuals with RCRSP.

Childhood Adversity among Adults with Chronic Pain: Prevalence and Association with Pain-Related Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been linked to the development and impact of chronic pain in adulthood. The goal of this study was to investigate the prevalence of ACEs in a treatment-seeking sample of adults with chronic pain and the relationship between number and type(s) of ACEs and pain-related outcomes.

METHODS

Adults (N=1794) presenting for treatment at a multidisciplinary pain management center completed self-report measures of childhood adversity, pain, functioning, emotional distress, and adjustment to pain.

RESULTS

Participants endorsing ≥4 ACEs had significantly worse pain-related outcomes and lower quality of life compared to individuals reporting fewer ACEs. Having ≥3 ACEs was associated with higher anxiety and depression levels. Experiences of childhood neglect negatively affected mental health-related outcomes independent of number of ACEs. Significant sex differences were found in the number and type of ACEs reported, but not in the relationship between ACEs and outcome variables.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that the number and type of self-reported ACE(s) are associated with pain-related variables and psychosocial functioning in adults with chronic pain. Results highlight the importance of assessment of ACEs and trauma-informed care with patients with chronic pain.