Potential of Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Characterization of Breast Lesions: Intraindividual Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Breast Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Current Applications, Insights from Screening, and Future Directions

Breast diffusion weighted MR imaging (DWI) is increasingly used, because it is fast and easy to be added in clinical protocol without contrast agent and provides information of cellularity or tissue microstructure. This review article explores the principles of breast DWI, the standardization of acquisition techniques, and its current clinical applications. We emphasize its role in differentiating benign from malignant lesions, reducing unnecessary biopsies, and discuss the evidence supporting DWI as a potential standalone screening tool. Prognostic indicators derived from DWI parameters and its utility in monitoring treatment responses are discussed. Finally, we look to the future, discussing emerging techniques. This review provides a comprehensive overview of breast DWI's current status and future potential.

Diagnostic performance of DCE-MRI radiomics in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Radiomics offers a novel strategy for the differential diagnosis, prognosis evaluation, and prediction of treatment responses in breast cancer. Studies have explored radiomic signatures from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) and sentinel lymph node metastasis (SLNM), but the diagnostic accuracy varies widely. To evaluate this performance, we conducted a meta-analysis performing a comprehensive literature search across databases including PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science (WOS), Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM) until March 31, 2024. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. Twenty-four eligible studies encompassing 5588 breast cancer patients were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis yielded a pooled sensitivity of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.84), specificity of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.81-0.87), PLR of 5.24 (95%CI: 4.32-6.34), NLR of 0.23 (95%CI: 0.19-0.27), DOR of 23.16 (95%CI: 17.20-31.19), and AUC of 0.90 (95%CI: 0.87-0.92), indicating good diagnostic performance. Significant heterogeneity was observed in analyses of sensitivity (I2 = 74.64%) and specificity (I2 = 83.18%). Spearman's correlation coefficient suggested no significant threshold effect (P = 0.538). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses identified several potential heterogeneity sources, including data source, integration of clinical factors and peritumor features, MRI equipment, magnetic field strength, lesion segmentation, and modeling methods. In conclusion, DCE-MRI radiomic models exhibit good diagnostic performance in predicting ALNM and SLNM in breast cancer. This non-invasive and effective tool holds potential for the preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.

Effect of Phase Encoding Direction on Image Quality in Single-Shot EPI Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Breast

BACKGROUND

In breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), distortion and physiologic artifacts affect clinical interpretation. Image quality can be optimized by addressing the effect of phase encoding (PE) direction on these artifacts.

PURPOSE

To compare distortion artifacts in breast DWI acquired with different PE directions and polarities, and to discuss their clinical implications.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

Eleven healthy volunteers (median age: 47 years old; range: 22-74 years old) and a breast phantom.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Single-shot echo planar DWI and three-dimensional fast gradient echo sequences at 3 T.

ASSESSMENT

All DWI data were acquired with left-right, right-left, posterior-anterior, and anterior-posterior PE directions. In phantom data, displacement magnitude was evaluated by comparing the location of landmarks in anatomical and DWI images. Three breast radiologists (5, 17, and 23 years of experience) assessed the presence or absence of physiologic artifacts in volunteers' DWI datasets and indicated their PE-direction preference.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Analysis of variance with post-hoc tests were used to assess differences in displacement magnitude across DWI datasets and observers. A binomial test and a chi-squared test were used to evaluate if each in vivo DWI dataset had an equal probability (25%) of being preferred by radiologists. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated using Gwet's AC1 agreement coefficient. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In the phantom study, median displacement was the significantly largest in posterior-anterior data. While the displacement in the anterior-posterior and left-right data were equivalent (P = 0.545). In the in vivo data, there were no physiological artifacts observed in any dataset, regardless of PE direction. In the reader study, there was a significant preference for the posterior-anterior datasets which were selected 94% of the time. There was good agreement between readers (0.936).

DATA CONCLUSION

This study showed the impact of PE direction on distortion artifacts in breast DWI. In healthy volunteers, the posterior-to-anterior PE direction was preferred by readers.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Deep Learning k-Space-to-Image Reconstruction Facilitates High Spatial Resolution and Scan Time Reduction in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Breast MRI

BACKGROUND

For time-consuming diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the breast, deep learning-based imaging acceleration appears particularly promising.

PURPOSE

To investigate a combined k-space-to-image reconstruction approach for scan time reduction and improved spatial resolution in breast DWI.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

133 women (age 49.7 ± 12.1 years) underwent multiparametric breast MRI.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3.0T/T2 turbo spin echo, T1 3D gradient echo, DWI (800 and 1600 sec/mm2).

ASSESSMENT

DWI data were retrospectively processed using deep learning-based k-space-to-image reconstruction (DL-DWI) and an additional super-resolution algorithm (SRDL-DWI). In addition to signal-to-noise ratio and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) comparisons among standard, DL- and SRDL-DWI, a range of quantitative similarity (e.g., structural similarity index [SSIM]) and error metrics (e.g., normalized root mean square error [NRMSE], symmetric mean absolute percent error [SMAPE], log accuracy error [LOGAC]) was calculated to analyze structural variations. Subjective image evaluation was performed independently by three radiologists on a seven-point rating scale.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Friedman's rank-based analysis of variance with Bonferroni-corrected pairwise post-hoc tests. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Both DL- and SRDL-DWI allowed for a 39% reduction in simulated scan time over standard DWI (5 vs. 3 minutes). The highest image quality ratings were assigned to SRDL-DWI with good interreader agreement (ICC 0.834; 95% confidence interval 0.818-0.848). Irrespective of b-value, both standard and DL-DWI produced superior SNR compared to SRDL-DWI. ADC values were slightly higher in SRDL-DWI (+0.5%) and DL-DWI (+3.4%) than in standard DWI. Structural similarity was excellent between DL-/SRDL-DWI and standard DWI for either b value (SSIM ≥ 0.86). Calculation of error metrics (NRMSE ≤ 0.05, SMAPE ≤ 0.02, and LOGAC ≤ 0.04) supported the assumption of low voxel-wise error.

DATA CONCLUSION

Deep learning-based k-space-to-image reconstruction reduces simulated scan time of breast DWI by 39% without influencing structural similarity. Additionally, super-resolution interpolation allows for substantial improvement of subjective image quality.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

A Machine Learning-Based Unenhanced Radiomics Approach to Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions Using T2-Weighted and Diffusion-Weighted MRI

BACKGROUND

Breast MRI has been recommended as supplemental screening tool to mammography and breast ultrasound of breast cancer by international guidelines, but its long examination time and use of contrast material remains concerning.

PURPOSE

To develop an unenhanced radiomics model with using non-gadolinium based sequences for detecting breast cancer based on T2-weighted (T2W) and diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective analysis followed by retrospective and prospective cohorts study.

POPULATION

1760 patients: Of these, 1293 for model construction (n = 775 for training and 518 for validation). The remaining patients for model testing in internal retrospective (n = 167), internal prospective (n = 188), and external retrospective (n = 112) cohorts.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3.0T MR scanners from two institution. T2WI, DWI, and first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequence.

ASSESSMENT

AUCs in distinguishing breast cancer were compared between combined model with gadolinium agent sequence and unenhanced model. Subsequently, the AUCs in testing cohorts of unenhanced model was compared with two radiologists' diagnosis for this research. Finally, patient subgroup analysis in testing cohorts was performed based on clinical subgroups and different types of malignancies.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, chi-square test, weighted kappa test, and DeLong's test.

RESULTS

The unenhanced radiomics model performed best under Gaussian process (GP) classifiers (AUC: training, 0.893; validation, 0.848) compared to support vector machine (SVM) and logistic, showing favorable prediction in testing cohorts (AUCs, 0.818-0.840). The AUCs for the unenhanced radiomics model were not statistically different in five cohorts from those of the combined radiomics model (P, 0.317-0.816), as well as the two radiologists (P, 0.181-0.918). The unenhanced radiomics model was least successful in identifying ductal carcinoma in situ, whereas did not show statistical significance in other subgroups.

DATA CONCLUSION

An unenhanced radiomics model based on T2WI and DWI has comparable diagnostic accuracy to the combined model using the gadolinium agent.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Enhancing the Kaiser score for lesion characterization in unenhanced breast MRI

PURPOSE

To adapt the methodology of the Kaiser score, a clinical decision rule for lesion characterization in breast MRI, for unenhanced protocols.

METHOD

In this retrospective IRB-approved cross-sectional study, we included 93 consecutive patients who underwent breast MRI between 2021 and 2023 for further work-up of BI-RADS 0, 3-5 in conventional imaging or for staging purposes (BI-RADS 6). All patients underwent biopsy for histologic verification or were followed for a minimum of 12 months. MRI scans were conducted using 1.5 T or 3 T scanners using dedicated breast coils and a protocol in line with international recommendations including DWI and ADC. Lesion characterization relied solely on T2w and DWI/ADC-derived features (such as lesion type, margins, shape, internal signal, surrounding tissue findings, ADC value). Statistical analysis was done using decision tree analysis aiming to distinguish benign (histology/follow-up) from malignant outcomes.

RESULTS

We analyzed a total of 161 lesions (81 of them non-mass) with a malignancy rate of 40%. Lesion margins (spiculated, irregular, or circumscribed) were identified as the most important criterion within the decision tree, followed by the ADC value as second most important criterion. The resulting score demonstrated a strong diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.840, providing both rule-in and rule-out criteria. In an independent test set of 65 lesions the diagnostic performance was verified by two readers (AUC 0.77 and 0.87, kappa: 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a clinical decision rule for unenhanced breast MRI including lesion margins and ADC value as the most important criteria, achieving high diagnostic accuracy.

Performance of Diffusion-weighted Imaging-based Noncontrast MRI Protocols for Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is increasingly recognized as a powerful diagnostic tool and tested alternative to contrast-enhanced (CE) breast MRI. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis that assesses the diagnostic performance of DWI-based noncontrast MRI protocols (ncDWI) for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Materials and Methods A systematic literature search in PubMed for articles published from January 1985 to September 2023 was performed. Studies were excluded if they investigated malignant lesions or selected patients and/or lesions only, used DWI as an adjunct technique to CE MRI, or were technical studies. Statistical analysis included pooling of diagnostic accuracy and investigating between-study heterogeneity. Additional subgroup comparisons of ncDWI to CE MRI and standard mammography were performed. Results A total of 28 studies were included, with 4406 lesions (1676 malignant, 2730 benign) in 3787 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ncDWI were 86.5% (95% CI: 81.4, 90.4) and 83.5% (95% CI: 76.9, 88.6), and both measures presented with high between-study heterogeneity (I 2 = 81.6% and 91.6%, respectively; P < .001). CE MRI (18 studies) had higher sensitivity than ncDWI (95.1% [95% CI: 92.9, 96.7] vs 88.9% [95% CI: 82.4, 93.1], P = .004) at similar specificity (82.2% [95% CI: 75.0, 87.7] vs 82.0% [95% CI: 74.8, 87.5], P = .97). Compared with ncDWI, mammography (five studies) showed no evidence of a statistical difference for sensitivity (80.3% [95% CI: 56.3, 93.3] vs 56.7%; [95% CI: 41.9, 70.4], respectively; P = .09) or specificity (89.9% [95% CI: 85.5, 93.1] vs 90% [95% CI: 61.3, 98.1], respectively; P = .62), but ncDWI had a higher area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (0.93 [95% CI: 0.91, 0.95] vs 0.78 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.81], P < .001). Conclusion A direct comparison with CE MRI showed a modestly lower sensitivity at similar specificity for ncDWI, and higher diagnostic performance indexes for ncDWI than standard mammography. Heterogeneity was high, thus these results must be interpreted with caution. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kataoka and Iima in this issue.

Adding quantitative T1rho-weighted imaging to conventional MRI improves specificity and sensitivity for differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the feasibility of T1rho-weighted imaging in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions and to explore the additional value of T1rho to conventional MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively enrolled consecutive women with breast lesions who underwent preoperative T1rho-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) between November 2021 and July 2023. The T1rho, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and semi-quantitative parameters from DCE-MRI were obtained and compared between benign and malignant groups. The diagnostic performance was analyzed and compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the Delong Test.

RESULTS

This study included 113 patients (74 malignant and 39 benign lesions). The mean T1rho value in the benign group (92.61 ± 22.10 ms) was significantly higher than that in the malignant group (72.18 ± 16.37 ms) (P < 0.001). The ADC value and time to peak (TTP) value in the malignant group (1.13 ± 0.45 and 269.06 ± 106.01, respectively) were lower than those in the benign group (1.57 ± 0.45 and 388.30 ± 81.13, respectively) (all P < 0.001). T1rho combined with ADC and TTP showed good diagnostic performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.896, a sensitivity of 81.0%, and a specificity of 87.1%. The specificity and sensitivity of the combination of T1rho, ADC, and TTP were significantly higher than those of the combination of ADC and TTP (87.1% vs. 84.6%, P < 0.005; 81.0% vs. 77.0%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

T1rho-weighted imaging was a feasible MRI sequence for differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions. The combination of T1rho, ADC and TTP could achieve a favorable diagnostic performance with improved specificity and sensitivity, T1rho could serve as a supplementary approach to conventional MRI.

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Skin Pathologies of the Breast-A Feasibility Study

Several breast pathologies can affect the skin, and clinical pathways might differ significantly depending on the underlying diagnosis. This study investigates the feasibility of using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to differentiate skin pathologies in breast MRIs. This retrospective study included 88 female patients who underwent diagnostic breast MRI (1.5 or 3T), including DWI. Skin areas were manually segmented, and the apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were compared between different pathologies: inflammatory breast cancer (IBC; n = 5), benign skin inflammation (BSI; n = 11), Paget's disease (PD; n = 3), and skin-involved breast cancer (SIBC; n = 11). Fifty-eight women had healthy skin (H; n = 58). The SIBC group had a significantly lower mean ADC than the BSI and IBC groups. These differences persisted for the first-order features of the ADC (mean, median, maximum, and minimum) only between the SIBC and BSI groups. The mean ADC did not differ significantly between the BSI and IBC groups. Quantitative DWI assessments demonstrated differences between various skin-affecting pathologies, but did not distinguish clearly between all of them. More extensive studies are needed to assess the utility of quantitative DWI in supplementing the diagnostic assessment of skin pathologies in breast imaging.

Breast lesion morphology assessment with high and standard b values in diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 Tesla

INTRODUCTION

With increasing spatial resolution, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) may be suitable for morphologic lesion characterization in breast MRI - an area that has traditionally been occupied by dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCE). This investigation compared DWI with b values of 800 and 1600 s/mm2 to DCE for lesion morphology assessment in high-resolution breast MRI at 3 Tesla.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Multiparametric breast MRI was performed in 91 patients with 93 histopathologically proven lesions (31 benign, 62 malignant). Two radiologists independently evaluated three datasets per patient (DWIb800; DWIb1600; DCE) and assessed lesion visibility and BIRADS morphology criteria. Diagnostic accuracy was compared among readers and datasets using Cochran's Q test and pairwise post-hoc McNemar tests. Bland-Altman analyses were conducted for lesion size comparisons.

RESULTS

Discrimination of carcinomas was superior compared to benign findings in both DWIb800 and DWIb1600 (p < 0.001) with no b value-dependent difference. Similarly, assessability of mass lesions was better than of non-mass lesions, irrespective of b value (p < 0.001). Intra-reader reliability for the analysis of morphologic BIRADS criteria among DCE and DWI datasets was at least moderate (Fleiss κ≥0.557), while at least substantial inter-reader agreement was ascertained over all assessed categories (κ≥0.776). In pairwise Bland-Altman analyses, the measurement bias between DCE and DWIb800 was 0.7 mm, whereas the difference between DCE and DWIb1600 was 2.8 mm. DWIb1600 allowed for higher specificity than DCE (p = 0.007/0.062).

CONCLUSIONS

DWI can be employed for reliable morphologic lesion characterization in high-resolution breast MRI. High b values increase diagnostic specificity, while lesion size assessment is more precise with standard 800 s/mm2 images.

Radiomic Nomogram for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Breast Cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The detection of axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in patients with breast cancer is a crucial determinant in the decision-making process for axillary surgery and potential therapies. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a radiomics nomogram that integrates radiomics features from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) with clinical factors to predict ALNM in patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 177 patients with breast cancer were randomly divided into a training set (n = 123) and a validation set (n = 54) using a 7:3 ratio. From the DCE-MRI images, 2818 radiomics features were extracted from the primary tumor and axillary lymph node (ALN). Subsequently, optimal features were selected through the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm to construct the Radscore. Clinical factors were identified using univariate logistic regression analysis and included in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Using the Radscore and clinical factors, a radiomics nomogram was developed using the Support Vector Machine method. The predicting efficacy of our model was visually appraised utilizing a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve, while its clinical application and predictive accuracy were assessed through decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curves, respectively.

RESULTS

The results revealed Ki67, multifocality, and MRI-reported ALN status as independent risk factors for ALNM. The radiomics nomogram demonstrated good calibration and discrimination with areas under the ROC curve of 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.97) in the training set and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.72-0.90) in the validation set. DCA revealed the clinical usefulness of the radiomics nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The DCE-MRI-based radiomics nomogram is a reliable tool for assessing ALNM in patients with breast cancer.

The role of gadolinium-based contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging structured reporting and data systems (RADS)

Among the 28 reporting and data systems (RADS) available in the literature, we identified 15 RADS that can be used in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Performing examinations without using gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) has benefits, but GBCA administration is often required to achieve an early and accurate diagnosis. The aim of the present review is to summarize the current role of GBCA in MRI RADS. This overview suggests that GBCA are today required in most of the current RADS and are expected to be used in most MRIs performed in patients with cancer. Dynamic contrast enhancement is required for correct scores calculation in PI-RADS and VI-RADS, although scientific evidence may lead in the future to avoid the GBCA administration in these two RADS. In Bone-RADS, contrast enhancement can be required to classify an aggressive lesion. In RADS scoring on whole body-MRI datasets (MET-RADS-P, MY-RADS and ONCO-RADS), in NS-RADS and in Node-RADS, GBCA administration is optional thanks to the intrinsic high contrast resolution of MRI. Future studies are needed to evaluate the impact of the high T1 relaxivity GBCA on the assignment of RADS scores.

Update on DWI for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring

DWI is a noncontrast MRI technique that measures the diffusion of water molecules within biologic tissue. DWI is increasingly incorporated into routine breast MRI examinations. Currently, the main applications of DWI are breast cancer detection and characterization, prognostication, and prediction of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, DWI is promising as a noncontrast MRI alternative for breast cancer screening. Problems with suboptimal resolution and image quality have restricted the mainstream use of DWI for breast imaging, but these shortcomings are being addressed through several technologic advancements. In this review, we present an up-to-date assessment of the use of DWI for breast cancer imaging, including a summary of the clinical literature and recommendations for future use.

Unenhanced Breast MRI With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection: Effects of Training on Performance and Agreement of Subspecialty Radiologists

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether reader training improves the performance and agreement of radiologists in interpreting unenhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A study of 96 breasts (35 cancers, 24 benign, and 37 negative) in 48 asymptomatic women was performed between June 2019 and October 2020. High-resolution DWI with b-values of 0, 800, and 1200 sec/mm² was performed using a 3.0-T system. Sixteen breast radiologists independently reviewed the DWI, apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and T1-weighted MRI scans and recorded the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category for each breast. After a 2-h training session and a 5-month washout period, they re-evaluated the BI-RADS categories. A BI-RADS category of 4 (lesions with at least two suspicious criteria) or 5 (more than two suspicious criteria) was considered positive. The per-breast diagnostic performance of each reader was compared between the first and second reviews. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated using a multi-rater κ analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Before training, the mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the 16 readers were 70.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59.4-79.9), 90.8% (95% CI: 85.6-94.2), and 83.5% (95% CI: 78.6-87.4), respectively. After training, significant improvements in specificity (95.2%; 95% CI: 90.8-97.5; P = 0.001) and accuracy (85.9%; 95% CI: 80.9-89.8; P = 0.01) were observed, but no difference in sensitivity (69.8%; 95% CI: 58.1-79.4; P = 0.58) was observed. Regarding inter-reader agreement, the κ values were 0.57 (95% CI: 0.52-0.63) before training and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.74) after training, with a difference of 0.11 (95% CI: 0.02-0.18; P = 0.01). The ICC was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69-0.74) before training and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76-0.80) after training (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Brief reader training improved the performance and agreement of interpretations by breast radiologists using unenhanced MRI with DWI.

Inter-reader agreement of breast magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer diagnosis: a multi-reader retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) are nowadays used in breast imaging but studies about their inter-reader agreement are lacking. Therefore, we compared the inter-reader agreement of CEM and MRI in breast cancer diagnosis in the same patients.

METHODS

Breast MRI and CEM exams performed in a single center (09/2020-09/2021) for an IRB-approved study were retrospectively and independently evaluated by four radiologists of two different centers with different levels of experience who were blinded to the clinical and other imaging data. The reference standard was the histological diagnosis or at least 1-year negative imaging follow-up. Inter-reader agreement was examined using Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa (κ) statistics and compared with the Wald test.

RESULTS

Of the 750 patients, 395 met inclusion criteria (44.5 ± 14 years old), with 752 breasts available for CEM and MRI. Overall agreement was moderate (κ = 0.60) for MRI and substantial (κ = 0.74) for CEM. For expert readers, the agreement was substantial (κ = 0.77) for MRI and almost perfect (κ = 0.82) for CEM; for non-expert readers was fair (κ = 0.39); and for MRI and moderate (κ = 0.57) for CEM. Pairwise agreement between expert readers and non-expert readers was moderate (κ = 0.50) for breast MRI and substantial (κ = 0.74) for CEM and it showed a statistically superior agreement of the expert over the non-expert readers only for MRI (p = 0.011) and not for CEM (p = 0.062).

CONCLUSIONS

The agreement of CEM was superior to that of MRI (p = 0.012), including for both expert (p = 0.031) and non-expert readers (p = 0.005).

Breast DWI Analyzed Before and After Gadolinium Contrast Administration-An Intrapatient Analysis on 1.5 T and 3.0 T

OBJECTIVES

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is gaining popularity as an addition to standard dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. Although adding diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to the standard protocol design would require increased scanning-time, implementation during the contrast-enhanced phase could offer a multiparametric MRI protocol without any additional scanning time. However, gadolinium within a region of interest (ROI) might affect assessments of DWI. This study aims to determine if acquiring DWI postcontrast, incorporated in an abbreviated MRI protocol, would statistically significantly affect lesion classification. In addition, the effect of postcontrast DWI on breast parenchyma was studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Screening or preoperative MRIs (1.5 T/3 T) were included for this study. Diffusion-weighted imaging was acquired with single-shot spin echo-echo planar imaging before and at approximately 2 minutes after gadoterate meglumine injection. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) based on 2-dimensional ROIs of fibroglandular tissue, as well as benign and malignant lesions at 1.5 T/3.0 T, were compared with a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Diffusivity levels were compared between precontrast and postcontrast DWI with weighted κ. An overall P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

No significant changes were observed in ADC mean after contrast administration in 21 patients with 37 ROI of healthy fibroglandular tissue and in the 93 patients with 93 (malignant and benign) lesions. This effect remained after stratification on B 0 . In 18% of all lesions, a diffusion level shift was observed, with an overall weighted κ of 0.75.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports incorporating DWI at 2 minutes postcontrast when ADC is calculated based on b150-b800 with 15 mL 0.5 M gadoterate meglumine in an abbreviated multiparametric MRI protocol without requiring extra scan time.

Diffusion-weighted Breast MRI at 3 Tesla: Improved Lesion Visibility and Image Quality with a Combination of Water-excitation and Spectral Fat Saturation

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

In breast MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), fat suppression is essential for eliminating the dominant lipid signal. This investigation evaluates a combined water-excitation-spectral-fatsat method (WEXfs) versus standard spectral attenuated inversion recovery (SPAIR) in high-resolution 3-Tesla breast MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multiparametric breast MRI with 2 echo-planar DWI sequences was performed in 83 patients (50.1 ± 12.6 years) employing either WEXfs or SPAIR for fat signal suppression. Three radiologists assessed overall DWI quality and delineability of 88 focal lesions (28 malignant, 60 benign) on images with b values of 800 and 1600 s/mm2, as well as apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. For each fat suppression method and b value, the longest lesion diameter was determined in addition to measuring the signal intensity in DWI and ADC value in standardized regions of interest.

RESULTS

Regardless of b values, image quality (all p < 0.001) and lesion delineability (all p ≤ 0.003) with WEXfs-DWI were deemed superior compared to SPAIR-DWI in benign and malignant lesions. Irrespective of lesion characterization, WEXfs-DWI provided superior signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise and signal-intensity ratios with 1600 s/mm2 (all p ≤ 0.05). The lesion size difference between contrast-enhanced T1 subtraction images and DWI was smaller for WEXfs compared to SPAIR fat suppression (all p ≤ 0.007). The mean ADC value in malignant lesions was lower for WEXfs-DWI (p < 0.001), while no significant ADC difference was ascertained between both techniques in benign lesions (p = 0.947).

CONCLUSION

WEXfs-DWI provides better subjective and objective image quality than standard SPAIR-DWI, resulting in a more accurate estimation of benign and malignant lesion size.

Comparison of Fused Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Using Unenhanced MRI and Abbreviated Post-Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Breast Cancer

Background and Objectives: To determine the percentage of breast cancers detectable by fused diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and abbreviated post-contrast-enhanced MRI. Materials and Methods: Between October 2016 and October 2017, 194 consecutive women (mean age, 54.2 years; age range, 28-82 years) with newly diagnosed unilateral breast cancer, who underwent preoperative 3.0 T breast MRI with DWI, were evaluated. Both fused DWI and abbreviated MRI were independently reviewed by two radiologists for the detection of index cancer (which showed the most suspicious findings in both breasts), location, lesion conspicuity, lesion type, and lesion size. Moreover, the relationship between cancer detection and histopathological results of surgical specimens was evaluated. Results: Index cancer detection rates were comparable between fused DWI and abbreviated MRI (radiologist 1: 174/194 [89.7%] vs. 184/194 [94.8%], respectively, p = 0.057; radiologist 2: 174/194 [89.7%] vs. 183/194 [94.3%], respectively, p = 0.092). In both radiologists, abbreviated MRI showed a significantly higher lesion conspicuity than fused DWI (radiologist 1: 9.37 ± 2.24 vs. 8.78 ± 3.03, respectively, p < 0.001; radiologist 2: 9.16 ± 2.32 vs. 8.39 ± 2.93, respectively, p < 0.001). The κ value for the interobserver agreement of index cancer detection was 0.67 on fused DWI and 0.85 on abbreviated MRI. For lesion conspicuity, the intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.72 on fused DWI and 0.82 on abbreviated MRI. Among the histopathological factors, tumor invasiveness was associated with cancer detection on both fused DWI (p = 0.011) and abbreviated MRI (p = 0.004, radiologist 1), lymphovascular invasion on abbreviated MRI (p = 0.032, radiologist 1), and necrosis on fused DWI (p = 0.031, radiologist 2). Conclusions: Index cancer detection was comparable between fused DWI and abbreviated MRI, although abbreviated MRI showed a significantly better lesion conspicuity.

An Unenhanced Breast MRI Protocol Based on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: A Retrospective Single-Center Study on High-Risk Population for Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the use of contrast-free magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an innovative screening method for detecting breast cancer in high-risk asymptomatic women. Specifically, the researchers evaluated the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in this population.

METHODS

MR images from asymptomatic women, carriers of a germline mutation in either the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene, collected in a single center from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. A radiologist with experience in breast imaging (R1) and a radiology resident (R2) independently evaluated DWI/ADC maps and, in case of doubts, T2-WI. The standard of reference was the pathological diagnosis through biopsy or surgery, or ≥1 year of clinical and radiological follow-up. Diagnostic performances were calculated for both readers with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa (κ) statistics.

RESULTS

Out of 313 women, 145 women were included (49.5 ± 12 years), totaling 344 breast MRIs with DWI/ADC maps. The per-exam cancer prevalence was 11/344 (3.2%). The sensitivity was 8/11 (73%; 95% CI: 46-99%) for R1 and 7/11 (64%; 95% CI: 35-92%) for R2. The specificity was 301/333 (90%; 95% CI: 87-94%) for both readers. The diagnostic accuracy was 90% for both readers. R1 recalled 40/344 exams (11.6%) and R2 recalled 39/344 exams (11.3%). Inter-reader reproducibility between readers was in moderate agreement (κ = 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

In female carriers of a BRCA1/2 mutation, breast DWI supplemented with T2-WI allowed breast cancer detection with high sensitivity and specificity by a radiologist with extensive experience in breast imaging, which is comparable to other screening tests. The findings suggest that DWI and T2-WI have the potential to serve as a stand-alone method for unenhanced breast MRI screening in a selected population, opening up new perspectives for prospective trials.

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Preoperative Evaluation of Patients With Breast Cancer: Protocol of a Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Detection of multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast cancers in patients affects surgical management. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) can identify additional foci that were initially undetected by conventional imaging. However, its use is limited owing to low specificity and high false-positive rate. Multiparametric MRI (DCE-MRI + diffusion-weighted [DW] MRI) can increase the specificity. We aimed to describe the protocols of our prospective, multicenter, observational cohort studies designed to compare the diagnostic performance of DCE-MRI and multiparametric MRI for the diagnosis of multifocal, multicentric cancer and contralateral breast cancer in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

METHODS

Two studies comparing the performance of DCE-MRI and multiparametric MRI for the diagnosis of multifocal, multicentric cancer (NCT04656639) and contralateral breast cancer (NCT05307757) will be conducted. For trial NCT04656639, 580 females with invasive breast cancer candidates for breast conservation surgery whose DCE-MRI showed additional suspicious lesions (breast imaging reporting and data system [BI-RADS] category ≥ 4) on DCE-MRI in the ipsilateral breast will be enrolled. For trial NCT05307757, 1098 females with invasive breast cancer whose DCE-MRI showed contralateral lesions (BI-RADS category ≥ 3 or higher on DCE-MRI) will be enrolled. Participants will undergo 3.0-T DCE-MRI and DW-MRI. The diagnostic performance of DCE-MRI and multiparametric MRI will be compared. The receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and characteristics of the detected cancers will be analyzed. The primary outcome is the difference in the receiver operating characteristic curve between DCE-MRI and multiparametric MRI interpretation. Enrollment completion is expected in 2024, and study results are expected to be presented in 2026.

DISCUSSION

This prospective, multicenter study will compare the performance of DCE-MRI versus multiparametric MRI for the preoperative evaluation of multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast cancer and is currently in the patient enrollment phase.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04656639, NCT05307757. Registered on April 1 2022.

The road to breast cancer screening with diffusion MRI

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer in women with a huge medical, social and economic impact. Mammography (MMG) has been the gold standard method until now because it is relatively inexpensive and widely available. However, MMG suffers from certain limitations, such as exposure to X-rays and difficulty of interpretation in dense breasts. Among other imaging methods, MRI has clearly the highest sensitivity and specificity, and breast MRI is the gold standard for the investigation and management of suspicious lesions revealed by MMG. Despite this performance, MRI, which does not rely on X-rays, is not used for screening except for a well-defined category of women at risk, because of its high cost and limited availability. In addition, the standard approach to breast MRI relies on Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE) MRI with the injection of Gadolinium based contrast agents (GBCA), which have their own contraindications and can lead to deposit of gadolinium in tissues, including the brain, when examinations are repeated. On the other hand, diffusion MRI of breast, which provides information on tissue microstructure and tumor perfusion without the use of contrast agents, has been shown to offer higher specificity than DCE MRI with similar sensitivity, superior to MMG. Diffusion MRI thus appears to be a promising alternative approach to breast cancer screening, with the primary goal of eliminating with a very high probability the existence of a life-threatening lesion. To achieve this goal, it is first necessary to standardize the protocols for acquisition and analysis of diffusion MRI data, which have been found to vary largely in the literature. Second, the accessibility and cost-effectiveness of MRI examinations must be significantly improved, which may become possible with the development of dedicated low-field MRI units for breast cancer screening. In this article, we will first review the principles and current status of diffusion MRI, comparing its clinical performance with MMG and DCE MRI. We will then look at how breast diffusion MRI could be implemented and standardized to optimize accuracy of results. Finally, we will discuss how a dedicated, low-cost prototype of breast MRI system could be implemented and introduced to the healthcare market.

Assessment of breast lesions by the Kaiser score for differential diagnosis on MRI: the added value of ADC and machine learning modeling

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of Kaiser score (KS) adjusted with the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (KS+) and machine learning (ML) modeling.

METHODS

A dataset of 402 malignant and 257 benign lesions was identified. Two radiologists assigned the KS. If a lesion with KS > 4 had ADC > 1.4 × 10^-3 mm²/s, the KS was reduced by 4 to become KS+. In order to consider the full spectrum of ADC as a continuous variable, the KS and ADC values were used to train diagnostic models using 5 ML algorithms. The performance was evaluated using the ROC analysis, compared by the DeLong test. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy achieved using the threshold of KS > 4, KS+ > 4, and ADC ≤ 1.4 × 10^-3 mm²/s were obtained and compared by the McNemar test.

RESULTS

The ROC curves of KS, KS+, and all ML models had comparable AUC in the range of 0.883-0.921, significantly higher than that of ADC (0.837, p < 0.0001). The KS had sensitivity = 97.3% and specificity = 59.1%; and the KS+ had sensitivity = 95.5% with significantly improved specificity to 68.5% (p < 0.0001). However, when setting at the same sensitivity of 97.3%, KS+ could not improve specificity. In ML analysis, the logistic regression model had the best performance. At sensitivity = 97.3% and specificity = 65.3%, i.e., compared to KS, 16 false-positives may be avoided without affecting true cancer diagnosis (p = 0.0015).

CONCLUSION

Using dichotomized ADC to modify KS to KS+ can improve specificity, but at the price of lowered sensitivity. Machine learning algorithms may be applied to consider the ADC as a continuous variable to build more accurate diagnostic models.

KEY POINTS

• When using ADC to modify the Kaiser score to KS+, the diagnostic specificity according to the results of two independent readers was improved by 9.4-9.7%, at the price of slightly degraded sensitivity by 1.5-1.8%, and overall had improved accuracy by 2.6-2.9%. • When the KS and the continuous ADC values were combined to train models by machine learning algorithms, the diagnostic specificity achieved by the logistic regression model could be significantly improved from 59.1 to 65.3% (p = 0.0015), while maintaining at the high sensitivity of KS = 97.3%, and thus, the results demonstrated the potential of ML modeling to further evaluate the contribution of ADC. • When setting the sensitivity at the same levels, the modified KS+ and the original KS have comparable specificity; therefore, KS+ with consideration of ADC may not offer much practical help, and the original KS without ADC remains as an excellent robust diagnostic method.

Can DWI provide additional value to Kaiser score in evaluation of breast lesions

OBJECTIVES

To explore added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as an adjunct to Kaiser score (KS) for differentiation of benign from malignant lesions on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Two hundred forty-six patients with 273 lesions (155 malignancies) were included in this retrospective study from January 2015 to December 2019. All lesions were proved by pathology. Two radiologists blind to pathological results evaluated lesions according to KS. Lesions with score > 4 were considered malignant. Four thresholds of ADC values -1.3 × 10^-3mm²/s, 1.4 × 10^-3mm²/s, 1.53 × 10^-3mm²/s, and 1.6 × 10^-3mm²/s were used to distinguish benign from malignant lesions. For combined diagnosis, a lesion with KS > 4 and ADC values below the preset cutoffs was considered as malignant; otherwise, it was benign. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were compared between KS, DWI, and combined diagnosis.

RESULTS

The AUC of KS was significantly higher than that of DWI alone (0.941 vs 0.901, p = 0.04). The sensitivity of KS (96.8%) and DWI (97.4 - 99.4%) was comparable (p > 0.05) while the specificity of KS (83.9%) was significantly higher than that of DWI (19.5-56.8%) (p < 0.05). Adding DWI as an adjunct to KS resulted in a 0-2.5% increase of specificity and a 0.1-1.3% decrease of sensitivity; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

KS showed higher diagnostic performance than DWI alone for discrimination of breast benign and malignant lesions. DWI showed no additional value to KS for characterizing breast lesions.

KEY POINTS

• KS showed higher diagnostic performance than DWI alone for differentiation of benign from breast malignant lesions. • DWI alone showed a high sensitivity but a low specificity for characterizing breast lesions. • Diagnostic performance did not improve using DWI as an adjunct to KS.

Diffusion Breast MRI: Current Standard and Emerging Techniques

The role of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) as a biomarker has been the subject of active investigation in the field of breast radiology. By quantifying the random motion of water within a voxel of tissue, DWI provides indirect metrics that reveal cellularity and architectural features. Studies show that data obtained from DWI may provide information related to the characterization, prognosis, and treatment response of breast cancer. The incorporation of DWI in breast imaging demonstrates its potential to serve as a non-invasive tool to help guide diagnosis and treatment. In this review, current technical literature of diffusion-weighted breast imaging will be discussed, in addition to clinical applications, advanced techniques, and emerging use in the field of radiomics.

Radiomic and Artificial Intelligence Analysis with Textural Metrics Extracted by Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Dynamic Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Breast Malignant Lesions

Purpose:The purpose of this study was to discriminate between benign and malignant breast lesions through several classifiers using, as predictors, radiomic metrics extracted from CEM and DCE-MRI images. In order to optimize the analysis, balancing and feature selection procedures were performed. Methods: Fifty-four patients with 79 histo-pathologically proven breast lesions (48 malignant lesions and 31 benign lesions) underwent both CEM and DCE-MRI. The lesions were retrospectively analyzed with radiomic and artificial intelligence approaches. Forty-eight textural metrics were extracted, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed: non-parametric statistical test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and machine learning classifiers. Results: Considering the single metrics extracted from CEM, the best predictors were KURTOSIS (area under ROC curve (AUC) = 0.71) and SKEWNESS (AUC = 0.71) calculated on late MLO view. Considering the features calculated from DCE-MRI, the best predictors were RANGE (AUC = 0.72), ENERGY (AUC = 0.72), ENTROPY (AUC = 0.70) and GLN (gray-level nonuniformity) of the gray-level run-length matrix (AUC = 0.72). Considering the analysis with classifiers and an unbalanced dataset, no significant results were obtained. After the balancing and feature selection procedures, higher values of accuracy, specificity and AUC were reached. The best performance was obtained considering 18 robust features among all metrics derived from CEM and DCE-MRI, using a linear discriminant analysis (accuracy of 0.84 and AUC = 0.88). Conclusions: Classifiers, adjusted with adaptive synthetic sampling and feature selection, allowed for increased diagnostic performance of CEM and DCE-MRI in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions.

Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast invasive lobular carcinoma: comparison with invasive carcinoma of no special type using a histogram analysis

BACKGROUND

To investigate the imaging findings and visibility of breast invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and compare quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics of ILC and invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) using a histogram analysis.

METHODS

We performed an observational retrospective study of 629 consecutive women with pathologically proven ILC and invasive ductal carcinoma of NST, who underwent 3-T MRI including DWI, between January 2017 and August 2020.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 71 women were allocated to each group. On DWI, 9 (12.7%) lesions of ILC and 4 (5.6%) invasive carcinomas of the NST were not visualized. For the tumor visibility on DWI, tumor size, tumor ADC value, and background diffusion grade were significantly associated with the visibility score in both groups (all P<0.05), whereas the mean background ADC value was not significant (P>0.05). The mean ADC (1.226×10^-3 vs. 1.052×10^-3 mm²/s, P<0.001), median ADC (1.222×10^-3 vs. 1.051×10^-3 mm²/s, P=0.002), maximum ADC (1.758×10^-3 vs. 1.504×10^-3 mm²/s, P<0.001), minimum ADC (0.717×10^-3 vs. 0.649×10^-3 mm²/s, P=0.003), 90th percentile ADC (1.506×10^-3 vs. 1.292×10^-3 mm²/s, P<0.001) and 10th percentile ADC (0.956×10^-3 vs. 0.818×10^-3 mm²/s, P=0.008) were higher in ILC than in invasive carcinoma of NST. Additionally, the ADC difference value of the ILC was higher than that of invasive carcinoma of NST (1.04×10^-3 vs. 0.855×10^-3 mm²/s, P=0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

On DWI, the visibility of ILC was lower compared to invasive carcinoma of NST. ILC showed higher quantitative ADC values and higher ADC difference values.

Synthesizing the First Phase of Dynamic Sequences of Breast MRI for Enhanced Lesion Identification

Objective

To develop a deep learning model for synthesizing the first phases of dynamic (FP-Dyn) sequences to supplement the lack of information in unenhanced breast MRI examinations.

Methods

In total, 97 patients with breast MRI images were collected as the training set (n = 45), the validation set (n = 31), and the test set (n = 21), respectively. An enhance border lifelike synthesize (EDLS) model was developed in the training set and used to synthesize the FP-Dyn images from the T1WI images in the validation set. The peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity (SSIM), mean square error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) of the synthesized images were measured. Moreover, three radiologists subjectively assessed image quality, respectively. The diagnostic value of the synthesized FP-Dyn sequences was further evaluated in the test set.

Results

The image synthesis performance in the EDLS model was superior to that in conventional models from the results of PSNR, SSIM, MSE, and MAE. Subjective results displayed a remarkable visual consistency between the synthesized and original FP-Dyn images. Moreover, by using a combination of synthesized FP-Dyn sequence and an unenhanced protocol, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI were 100%, 72.73%, 76.92%, and 100%, respectively, which had a similar diagnostic value to full MRI protocols.

Conclusions

The EDLS model could synthesize the realistic FP-Dyn sequence to supplement the lack of enhanced images. Compared with full MRI examinations, it thus provides a new approach for reducing examination time and cost, and avoids the use of contrast agents without influencing diagnostic accuracy.

Can DWI-MRI be an alternative to DCE-MRI in the diagnosis of troublesome breast lesions?

Background

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has always been a problem solver in troublesome breast lesions. Despite its many advantages, the encountered low specificity results in unnecessary biopsies. Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) is a well-established technique that helps in characterizing breast lesions according to their water diffusivity. So this work aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of DW-MRI in troublesome breast lesions and see if it can replace DCE-MRI study.

Results

In our prospective study, we included 86 patients with mammography and/or ultrasound-detected 90 probably benign or probably malignant (BIRADS 3 or 4) breast lesions. Among the studied cases, 49/90 lesions were benign, and 41/90 were malignant. Combined analysis of morphological and kinetic findings in DCE-MRI had achieved the highest sensitivity of 95.1%. DW-MRI alone was less sensitive (73.2%) yet more specific (83.7%) than DCE-MRI (77.6%). Diagnostic accuracy of DCE-MRI was higher (85.6%) as compared to DW-MRI which was (78.9%).

Conclusion

DCE-MRI is the cornerstone in the workup of troublesome breast lesions. DW-MRI should not be used as supplementary tool unless contrast administration is contraindicated. Combining both DCE-MRI and DW-MRI is the ultimate technique for better lesion evaluation.

Evaluation of suspicious breast lesions with diffusion kurtosis MR imaging and connection with prognostic factors

PURPOSE

To investigate the additional value of DKI in discriminating suspicious breast lesions on DCE-MRI, as compared with conventional DWI; and to explore connection between DKI-parameters and prognostic factors of breast cancers.

METHODS

The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and written informed consent was waived. Totally, 300 women (mean age, 43.2 ± 10.4 years) with suspicious breast lesions on DCE-MRI were enrolled from November 2014 to September 2019. With pathology as reference, performance of ADC, K_app and D_app in discriminating suspicious breast lesions were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with area under ROC curve (AUC). The specificities of parameters were compared by Chi-square test. The ADC, K_app and D_app of breast cancers with different receptor status were compared using Student's t or Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

There were 344 suspicious breast lesions (220 malignant, 124 benign) in 300 women. No significant differences were found for AUCs of ADC and DKI-parameters in discriminating suspicious breast lesions (0.882 vs. 0.888, p = 0.480). The specificities were significantly higher with ADC and D_app than that with DCE-MRI (p = 0.003 and 0.005). The ADC, K_app and D_app were correlated with HER2 expression and lymph node status, and ADC and K_app differed between ER-positive and negative tumors (all p < 0.05). Except K_app, DKI/DWI-parameters showed relation with Ki-67 expression. None of the DKI/DWI-parameters showed relation with lesion grade (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The more complicated and time-consuming DKI is not superior to conventional DWI in differentiating suspicious breast lesions and reflecting prognostic information of breast cancer.

Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, Unenhanced MRI, and Their Combination in the Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer: A Multi-reader Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (UMRI) in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively included 59 patients with 74 pathology-proven cancers who underwent DBT and preoperative 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging between January 2016 and February 2017. Four residents with 2-3 years of experience, blinded to pathology, independently reviewed DBT and UMRI (diffusion-weighted and unenhanced T1-weighted sequences), using the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) and a 0-5 Likert score, respectively. We calculated per-lesion sensitivity and positive predictive value of DBT, UMRI, and combined DBT+UMRI, as well as the agreement between DBT and UMRI vs. pathology in assessing cancer size (Bland-Altman analysis). Logistic regression was performed to assess clinical features predictive of missing cancer.

RESULTS

Of 74 lesions, 84% were invasive ductal carcinoma, 27% of which with an in situ component; 31% of cancers were ≤10 mm large. Sensitivity of UMRI (74-85%) was equal or higher than that of DBT (68-82%), with similar positive predictive value (93-97% vs. 98-100%, respectively). DBT+UMRI increased the sensitivity up to 88%. UMRI showed closer limits of agreement with pathological size than DBT. Missing cancer was independently predicted by size ≤10 mm on DBT, UMRI, and DBT+UMRI (odds ratio 18.7, 5.1, and 13.3, respectively), and by increased breast density on DBT alone (odds ratio 3.50).

CONCLUSION

UMRI was equal or better than DBT in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Combined imaging achieved up to 88% per-lesion sensitivity, suggesting potential use in clinical practice.

Diffusion weighted imaging for evaluation of breast lesions: Comparison between high b-value single-shot and routine readout-segmented sequences at 3 T

PURPOSE

In this study, we compare readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI) Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) to a work-in-progress single-shot EPI with modified Inversion Recovery Background Suppression (ss-EPI-mIRBS) sequence at 3 T using a b-value of 2000 s/mm² on image quality, lesion visibility and evaluation time.

METHOD

From September 2017 to December 2018, 23 women (one case used for training) with known breast cancer were included in this study, after providing signed informed consent. Women were scanned with the conventional rs-EPI sequence and the work-in-progress ss-EPI-mIRBS during the same examination. Four breast radiologists (4-13 years of experience) independently scored both series for overall image quality (1: extremely poor to 9: excellent). All lesions (47 in total, 36 malignant, and 11 benign and high-risk) were evaluated for visibility (1: not visible, 2: visible if location is given, 3: visible) and probability of malignancy (BI-RADS 1 to 5). ADC values were determined by measuring signal intensity in the lesions using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) images for reference. Evaluation times for all assessments were automatically recorded. Results were analyzed using the visual grading characteristics (VGC) and the resulting area under the curve (AUC_VGC) method. Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS, with McNemar tests, and paired t-tests used for comparison.

RESULTS

No significant differences were detected between the two sequences in image quality (AUC_VGC: 0.398, p = 0.087) and lesion visibility (AUC_VGC: 0.534, p = 0.336) scores. Lesion characteristics (e.g benign and high-risk, versus malignant; small (≤10 mm) vs. larger (>10 mm)) did not result in different image quality or lesion visibility between sequences. Sensitivity (rs-EPI: 72.2% vs. ss-EPImIRBS: 78.5%, p = 0.108) and specificity (70.5% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.210, respectively) were comparable. In both sequences the mean ADC value was higher for benign and high-risk lesions than for malignant lesions (ss-EPI-mIRBS: p = 0.022 and rs-EPI: p = 0.055). On average, ss-EPI-mIRBS resulted in decreased overall reading time by 7.7 s/case (p = 0.067); a reduction of 17%. For malignant lesions, average reading time was significantly shorter using ss-EPI-mIRBS compared to rs-EPI (64.0 s/lesion vs. 75.9 s/lesion, respectively, p = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Based on this study, the ss-EPI sequence using a b-value of 2000 s/mm² enables for a mIRBS acquisition with quality and lesion conspicuity that is comparable to conventional rs-EPI, but with a decreased reading time.

Distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion weighted imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

We sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast tumors by performing a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched the electronic databases PubMed and Embase from January 2000 to April 2020 for studies in English. Studies were included if they reported the sensitivity and specificity for identifying benign and malignant breast lesions using DWI or IVIM. Studies were reviewed according to QUADAS-2. The data inhomogeneity and publication bias were also assessed. In order to explore the influence of different field strengths and different b values on diagnostic efficiency, we conducted subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

We analyzed 79 studies, which included a total of 6294 patients with 4091 malignant lesions and 2793 benign lesions. Overall, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of ADC for detecting malignant breast tumors were 0.87 (0.86-0.88) and 0.80 (0.78-0.81), respectively. The PLR was 5.09 (4.16-6.24); the NLR was 0.15 (0.13-0.18); and the DOR was 38.95 (28.87-52.54). The AUC value was 0.9297. The highest performing parameter for IVIM was tissue diffusivity (D), and the pooled sensitivity and specificity was 0.85 (0.82-0.88) and 0.87(0.83-0.90), respectively; the PLR was 5.65 (3.91-8.18); the NLR was 0.17 (0.12-0.26); and the DOR was 38.44 (23.57-62.69). The AUC value was 0.9265. Most of parameters demonstrated considerable statistically significant heterogeneity (P < 0.05, I²>50 %) except the pooled DOR, PLR of D and the pooled DOR and NLR of D*.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis indicated that DWI and IVIM had high sensitivity and specificity in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions; and compared with DWI, IVIM could not further increase the diagnostic performance. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy.

Preoperative Staging in Breast Cancer: Intraindividual Comparison of Unenhanced MRI Combined With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI

Objectives

To evaluate the accuracy in lesion detection and size assessment of Unenhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging combined with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (UE-MRI+DBT) and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI), in women with known breast cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 84 patients with histological diagnosis of breast cancer, who underwent MRI on a 3T scanner and DBT over 2018-2019, in our Institution. Two radiologists, with 15 and 7 years of experience in breast imaging respectively, reviewed DCE-MRI and UE-MRI (including DWI and T2-w) + DBT images in separate reading sections, unaware of the final histological examination. DCE-MRI and UE-MRI+DBT sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV) and accuracy were calculated, using histology as the gold standard. Spearman correlation and regression analyses were performed to evaluate lesion size agreement between DCE-MRI vs Histology, UE-MRI+DBT vs Histology, and DCE-MRI vs UE-MRI+DBT. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated using Cohen’s κ coefficient. McNemar test was used to identify differences in terms of detection rate between the two methodological approaches. Spearman’s correlation analysis was also performed to evaluate the correlation between ADC values and histological features.

Results

109 lesions were confirmed on histological examination. DCE-MRI showed high sensitivity (100% Reader 1, 98% Reader 2), good PPV (89% Reader 1, 90% Reader 2) and accuracy (90% for both readers). UE-MRI+DBT showed 97% sensitivity, 91% PPV and 92% accuracy, for both readers. Lesion size Spearman coefficient were 0.94 (Reader 1) and 0.91 (Reader 2) for DCE-MRI vs Histology; 0.91 (Reader 1) and 0.90 (Reader 2) for UE-MRI+DBT vs Histology (p-value <0.001). DCE-MRI vs UE-MRI+DBT regression coefficient was 0.96 for Reader 1 and 0.94 for Reader 2. Inter-reader agreement was 0.79 for DCE-MRI and 0.94 for UE-MRI+DBT. McNemar test did not show a statistically significant difference between DCE-MRI and UE-MRI+DBT (McNemar test p-value >0.05). Spearman analyses showed an inverse correlation between ADC values and histological grade (p-value <0.001).

Conclusions

DCE-MRI was the most sensitive imaging technique in breast cancer preoperative staging. However, UE-MRI+DBT demonstrated good sensitivity and accuracy in lesion detection and tumor size assessment. Thus, UE-MRI could be a valid alternative when patients have already performed DBT.

A Multicentric Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping and the Kaiser Score in the Assessment of Breast Lesions

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicentric study, individual patient data from 3 different centers were analyzed. Consecutive patients receiving standardized multiparametric breast magnetic resonance imaging for standard nonscreening indications were included. At each center, 2 experienced radiologists with more than 5 years of experience retrospectively interpreted the examinations in consensus and applied the KS to every histologically verified lesion. The corresponding mean ADC of each lesion was measured using a Wielema type 4 region of interest. According to established methods, the KS and ADC were combined, yielding the KS+ score. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) and compared between the KS, ADC, and KS+ (DeLong test). Likewise, the potential to help avoid unnecessary biopsies was compared between the KS, ADC, and KS+ based on established high sensitivity thresholds (McNemar test).

RESULTS

A total of 450 lesions in 414 patients (mean age, 51.5 years; interquartile range, 42-60.8 years) were included, with 219 lesions being malignant (48.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 44%-53.4%). The performance of the KS (AUROC, 0.915; CI, 0.886-0.939) was significantly better than that of the ADC (AUROC, 0.848; CI, 0.811-0.880; P < 0.001). The largest difference between these parameters was observed when assessing subcentimeter lesions (AUROC, 0.909 for KS; CI, 0.849-0.950 vs 0.811 for ADC; CI, 0.737-0.871; P = 0.02).The use of the KS+ (AUROC, 0.918; CI, 0.889-0.942) improved the performance slightly, but without any significant difference relative to a single KS or ADC reading (P = 0.64).When applying high sensitivity thresholds for avoiding unnecessary biopsies, the KS and ADC achieved equal sensitivity (97.7% for both; cutoff values, >4 for KS and ≤1.4 × 10-3 mm2/s for ADC). However, the rate of potentially avoidable biopsies was higher when using the KS (specificity: 65.4% for KS vs 32.9% for ADC; P < 0.0001). The KS was superior to the KS+ in avoiding unnecessary biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the KS and ADC may be used to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions. However, KS proved superior in this task including, most of all, when assessing small lesions less than 1 cm. Using the KS may avoid twice as many unnecessary biopsies, and the combination of both the KS and ADS does not improve diagnostic performance.

Noncontrast-Enhanced MR-Based Conductivity Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection and Lesion Differentiation

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in noncontrast-enhanced MRI due to safety concerns for gadolinium contrast agents.

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical feasibility of MR-based conductivity imaging for breast cancer detection and lesion differentiation.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

SUBJECTS

One hundred and ten women, with 112 known cancers and 17 benign lesions (biopsy-proven), scheduled for preoperative MRI.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Non-fat-suppressed T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence (T2WI), dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) at 3T.

ASSESSMENT

Cancer detectability on each imaging modality was qualitatively evaluated on a per-breast basis: the conductivity maps derived from T2WI were independently reviewed by three radiologists (R1-R3). T2WI, DWI, and pre-operative digital mammography were independently reviewed by three other radiologists (R4-R6). Conductivity and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements (mean, minimum, and maximum) were performed for 112 cancers and 17 benign lesions independently by two radiologists (R1 and R2). Tumor size was measured from surgical specimens.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Cancer detection rates were compared using generalized estimating equations. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with cancer detectability. Discriminating ability of conductivity and ADC was evaluated by using the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Conductivity imaging showed lower cancer detection rates (20%-32%) compared to T2WI (62%-71%), DWI (85%-90%), and mammography (79%-88%) (all P < 0.05). Fatty breast on MRI (odds ratio = 11.8, P < 0.05) and invasive tumor size (odds ratio = 1.7, P < 0.05) were associated with cancer detectability of conductivity imaging. The maximum conductivity showed comparable ability to the mean ADC in discriminating between cancers and benign lesions (AUC = 0.67 [95% CI: 0.59, 0.75] vs. 0.84 [0.76, 0.90], P = 0.06 (R1); 0.65 [0.56, 0.73] vs. 0.82 [0.74, 0.88], P = 0.07 (R2)).

DATA CONCLUSION

Although conductivity imaging showed suboptimal performance in breast cancer detection, the quantitative measurement of conductivity showed the potential for lesion differentiation.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Inter-Reader Agreement of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection: A Multi-Reader Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

In order to evaluate the use of un-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting breast cancer, we evaluated the accuracy and the agreement of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) through the inter-reader reproducibility between expert and non-expert readers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive breast MRI performed in a single centre were retrospectively evaluated by four radiologists with different levels of experience. The per-breast standard of reference was the histological diagnosis from needle biopsy or surgical excision, or at least one-year negative follow-up on imaging. The agreement across readers (by inter-reader reproducibility) was examined for each breast examined using Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa (κ) statistics. The Wald test was used to test the difference in inter-reader agreement between expert and non-expert readers.

RESULTS

Of 1131 examinations, according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 382 women were included (49.5 ± 12 years old), 40 of them with unilateral mastectomy, totaling 724 breasts. Overall inter-reader reproducibility was substantial (κ = 0.74) for expert readers and poor (κ = 0.37) for non- expert readers. Pairwise agreement between expert readers and non-expert readers was moderate (κ = 0.60) and showed a statistically superior agreement of the expert readers over the non-expert readers (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

DWI showed substantial inter-reader reproducibility among expert-level readers. Pairwise comparison showed superior agreement of the expert readers over the non-expert readers, with the expert readers having higher inter-reader reproducibility than the non-expert readers. These findings open new perspectives for prospective studies investigating the actual role of DWI as a stand-alone method for un-enhanced breast MRI.

Diffusion-weighted Imaging Allows for Downgrading MR BI-RADS 4 Lesions in Contrast-enhanced MRI of the Breast to Avoid Unnecessary Biopsy

PURPOSE

Diffusion-weighted imaging with the calculation of an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) has been proposed as a quantitative biomarker on contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) of the breast. There is a need to approve a generalizable ADC cutoff. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a predefined ADC cutoff allows downgrading of BI-RADS 4 lesions on CE-MRI, avoiding unnecessary biopsies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This was a retrospective, multicentric, cross-sectional study. Data from five centers were pooled on the individual lesion level. Eligible patients had a BI-RADS 4 rating on CE-MRI. For each center, two breast radiologists evaluated the images. Data on lesion morphology (mass, non-mass), size, and ADC were collected. Histology was the standard of reference. A previously suggested ADC cutoff (≥1.5 × 10-3 mm2/second) was applied. A negative likelihood ratio of 0.1 or lower was considered as a rule-out criterion for breast cancer. Diagnostic performance indices were calculated by ROC analysis.

RESULTS

There were 657 female patients (mean age, 42; SD, 14.1) with 696 BI-RADS 4 lesions included. Disease prevalence was 59.5% (414/696). The area under the ROC curve was 0.784. Applying the investigated ADC cutoff, sensitivity was 96.6% (400/414). The potential reduction of unnecessary biopsies was 32.6% (92/282).

CONCLUSIONS

An ADC cutoff of ≥1.5 × 10-3 mm2/second allows downgrading of lesions classified as BI-RADS 4 on breast CE-MRI. One-third of unnecessary biopsies could thus be avoided.

Detection of Contralateral Breast Cancer Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Comparison with Combined Mammography and Whole-Breast Ultrasound

Objective

To compare the screening performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI and combined mammography and ultrasound (US) in detecting clinically occult contralateral breast cancer in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Materials and Methods

Between January 2017 and July 2018, 1148 women (mean age ± standard deviation, 53.2 ± 10.8 years) with unilateral breast cancer and no clinical abnormalities in the contralateral breast underwent 3T MRI, digital mammography, and radiologist-performed whole-breast US. In this retrospective study, three radiologists independently and blindly reviewed all DW MR images (b = 1000 s/mm² and apparent diffusion coefficient map) of the contralateral breast and assigned a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category. For combined mammography and US evaluation, prospectively assessed results were used. Using histopathology or 1-year follow-up as the reference standard, cancer detection rate and the patient percentage with cancers detected among all women recommended for tissue diagnosis (positive predictive value; PPV₂) were compared.

Results

Of the 30 cases of clinically occult contralateral cancers (13 invasive and 17 ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]), DW MRI detected 23 (76.7%) cases (11 invasive and 12 DCIS), whereas combined mammography and US detected 12 (40.0%, five invasive and seven DCIS) cases. All cancers detected by combined mammography and US, except two DCIS cases, were detected by DW MRI. The cancer detection rate of DW MRI (2.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3%, 3.0%) was higher than that of combined mammography and US (1.0%; 95% CI: 0.5%, 1.8%; p = 0.009). DW MRI showed higher PPV₂ (42.1%; 95% CI: 26.3%, 59.2%) than combined mammography and US (18.5%; 95% CI: 9.9%, 30.0%; p = 0.001).

Conclusion

In women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, DW MRI detected significantly more contralateral breast cancers with fewer biopsy recommendations than combined mammography and US.

Detection and Classification of Breast Lesions With Readout-Segmented Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in a Large Chinese Cohort

Objectives: To evaluate the performance of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging DWI (rs-EPI DWI) in detecting and characterizing breast cancers in a large Chinese cohort with comparison to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Methods: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study with waived written informed consent. A total of 520 women (mean age, 43.1- ± 10.5-years) were included from July 2013 to October 2019. First, the ability of rs-EPI DWI in detecting breast lesions identified by DCE-MRI was evaluated. The lesion conspicuity of rs-EPI-DWI and DCE-MRI was compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. With pathology as a reference, the performance of rs-EPI DWI and DCE-MRI in distinguishing breast cancers was evaluated and compared using the Chi-square test. Results: Of 520 women, 327/520 (62.9%) patients had 423 lesions confirmed by pathology with 203 benign and 220 malignant lesions. The rs-EPI DWI can detect 90.8% (659/726) (reader 1) and 90.6% (663/732) (reader 2) of lesions identified by DCE-MRI. The lesion visibility was superior for DCE-MRI than rs-EPI-DWI (all p < 0.05). With pathology as a reference, the sensitivities and specificities of rs-EPI DWI in diagnosing breast cancers were 95.9% (211/220) and 85.7% (174/203) for reader 1 and 97.7% (215/220) and 86.2% (175/203) for reader 2. No significant differences were found for the performance of DCE-MRI and rs-EPI DWI in discriminating breast cancers (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: Although with an inferior lesion visibility, rs-EPI DWI can detect about 90% of breast lesions identified by DCE-MRI and has comparable diagnostic capacity to that of DCE-MRI in identifying breast cancer.

Comparison of simultaneous multi-slice single-shot DWI to readout-segmented DWI for evaluation of breast lesions at 3T MRI

PURPOSE

To compare diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast performed with a conventional readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI) sequence to when using a prototype simultaneous multi-slice single-shot EPI (SMS-ss-EPI) acquisition.

METHOD

From September 2017 to December 2018, 26 women with histologically proven breast cancer were scanned with the conventional rs-EPI and the SMS-ss-EPI at 3 T during the same imaging examination. Four breast radiologists (4-13 years of experience) independently scored both acquired series of 25 women (one case was used for training) for overall image quality (1: extremely poor to 9: excellent) and artifacts (1: very disturbing to 5: not present). All lesions (n = 52; 40 malignant, 12 benign) were also evaluated for visibility (1: not visible, 2: visible if location is given, 3: visible). In addition, lesion characteristics were rated, and a BI-RADS score was given. Results were analyzed using visual grading characteristics and the resulting area under the curve (AUC_VGC), weighted kappa, McNemar test, and dependent-samples t-test when appropriate.

RESULTS

Overall, radiologists significantly preferred the image quality in rs-EPI over that of SMS-ss-EPI (AUC_VGC: 0.698, P = 0.002). Infolding and ghosting, and distortion artifacts were significantly less apparent in the rs-EPI (AUC_VGC: 0.660, P = 0.022 and AUC_VGC: 0.700 P = 0.002, respectively). Lesions were, however, significantly better visible on the SMS-ss-EPI images (AUC_VGC: 0.427, P = 0.016). Malignant lesions had significantly higher visibility with SMS-ss-EPI (P = 0.035). Sensitivity and specificity were comparable between both sequences (P = 0.760 and P = 0.549, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the perceived lower image quality and the increased presence of artifacts in the SMS-ss-EPI sequence, malignant lesions are better visualized using this sequence.

Multishot Diffusion-Weighted MRI of the Breast With Multiplexed Sensitivity Encoding (MUSE) and Shot Locally Low-Rank (Shot-LLR) Reconstructions

BACKGROUND

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has shown promise to screen for breast cancer without a contrast injection, but image distortion and low spatial resolution limit standard single-shot DWI. Multishot DWI methods address these limitations but introduce shot-to-shot phase variations requiring correction during reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To investigate the performance of two multishot DWI reconstruction methods, multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE) and shot locally low-rank (shot-LLR), compared to single-shot DWI in the breast.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

A total of 45 women who consented to have multishot DWI added to a clinically indicated breast MRI.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES

Single-shot DWI reconstructed by parallel imaging, multishot DWI with four or eight shots reconstructed by MUSE and shot-LLR, 3D T2 -weighted imaging, and contrast-enhanced MRI at 3T.

ASSESSMENT

Three blinded observers scored images for 1) general image quality (perceived signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], ghosting, distortion), 2) lesion features (discernment and morphology), and 3) perceived resolution. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the lesion was also measured and compared between methods.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Image quality features and perceived resolution were assessed with a mixed-effects logistic regression. Agreement among observers was estimated with a Krippendorf's alpha using linear weighting. Lesion feature ratings were visualized using histograms, and correlation coefficients of lesion ADC between different methods were calculated.

RESULTS

MUSE and shot-LLR images were rated to have significantly better perceived resolution (P < 0.001), higher SNR (P < 0.005), and a lower level of distortion (P < 0.05) with respect to single-shot DWI. Shot-LLR showed reduced ghosting artifacts with respect to both MUSE (P < 0.001) and single-shot DWI (P < 0.001). Eight-shot DWI had improved perceived SNR and perceived resolution with respect to four-shot DWI (P < 0.005).

DATA CONCLUSION

Multishot DWI enables increased resolution and improved image quality with respect to single-shot DWI in the breast. Shot-LLR reconstructs multishot DWI with minimal ghosting artifacts. The improvement of multishot DWI in image quality increases with an increased number of shots.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Image quality and diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted breast magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of acquired and computed images

PURPOSE

To compare the image quality of acquired diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and computed DWI and evaluate the lesion detectability and likelihood of malignancy in these datasets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was approved by our institutional review board. A total of 29 women (mean age, 43.5 years) underwent DWI between August 2018 and April 2019 for 32 breast cancers and 16 benign breast lesions. Three radiologists independently reviewed the acquired DWI with b-values of 1000 and 2000 s/mm2 (A-b1000 and A-b2000) and the computed DWI with a b-value of 2000 s/mm2 (C-b2000). Image quality was scored and compared between the three DWI datasets. Lesion detectability was recorded, and the lesion's likelihood for malignancy was scored using a five-point scale.

RESULTS

The A-b1000 images were superior to the A-b2000 and C-b2000 images in chest distinction, fat suppression, and overall image quality. The A-b2000 and C-b2000 images showed comparable scores for all image quality parameters. C-b2000 showed the highest values for lesion detection among all readers, although there was no statistical difference in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy between the DWI datasets. The malignancy scores of the DWI images were not significantly different among the three readers.

CONCLUSIONS

A-b1000 DWI is suitable for breast lesion evaluations, considering its better image quality and comparable diagnostic values compared to that of A-b2000 and C-b2000 images. The additional use of computed high b-value DWI may have the potential to increase the detectability of breast masses.

Qualitative characterization of breast tumors with diffusion-weighted imaging has comparable accuracy to quantitative analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the applicability and accuracy of a new qualitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) assessment method in the characterization of breast tumors compared to quantitative ADC measurement and dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After review board approval, MRIs of 216 consecutive women with final diagnoses (131 malignant, 85 benign) were retrospectively analyzed. Two radiologists independently scored DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) according to malignancy probability. Qualitative assessments were performed by combined analysis of tumor morphology and diffusion signal. Quantitative data was obtained from apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements. Lastly, descriptive DWI features were evaluated and recorded. Cohen's kappa, receiver operating characteristic and multivariate analyzes were applied.

RESULTS

Of malignant tumors, 97% were visible on DWI. Qualitative and quantitative DWI assessments provided comparable sensitivities of 89-94% and 88-92% and specificities of 51-61% and 59-67%, respectively. There was no statistical difference between the accuracies of qualitative and quantitative DWI (p ≥ 0.105). Best diagnostic values were obtained with DCE-MRI (sensitivity, 99-100%; specificity, 69-71%). Inter-reader agreement was moderate (kappa = 0.597) for qualitative DWI and substantial (kappa = 0.689) for DCE-MRI (p < 0.001). Agreement between qualitative DWI and DCE-MRI scores was moderate (kappa = 0.536 and 0.442). Visual diffusion signal, mass margin and shape were the most predictive features of malignancy on multivariate analysis of qualitative assessment.

CONCLUSION

Qualitative characterization of breast tumors on DWI has comparable accuracy to quantitative ADC analysis. This method might be used to make DWI more widely available with eliminating the need to a predetermined ADC threshold in tumor characterization. However, lower accuracy and inter-reader agreement of it compared to DCE-MRI should be considered.

Radiomic Signatures Derived from Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Assessment of Breast Cancer Receptor Status and Molecular Subtypes

Purpose

To compare annotation segmentation approaches and to assess the value of radiomics analysis applied to diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for evaluation of breast cancer receptor status and molecular subtyping.

Procedures

In this IRB-approved HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, 91 patients with treatment-naïve breast malignancies proven by image-guided breast biopsy, (luminal A, n = 49; luminal B, n = 8; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]-enriched, n = 11; triple negative [TN], n = 23) underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast at 3 T with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, T2-weighted and DW imaging. Lesions were manually segmented on high b-value DW images and segmentation ROIS were propagated to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. In addition in a subgroup (n = 79) where lesions were discernable on ADC maps alone, these were also directly segmented there. To derive radiomics signatures, the following features were extracted and analyzed: first-order histogram (HIS), co-occurrence matrix (COM), run-length matrix (RLM), absolute gradient, autoregressive model (ARM), discrete Haar wavelet transform (WAV), and lesion geometry. Fisher, probability of error and average correlation, and mutual information coefficients were used for feature selection. Linear discriminant analysis followed by k-nearest neighbor classification with leave-one-out cross-validation was applied for pairwise differentiation of receptor status and molecular subtyping. Histopathologic results were considered the gold standard.

Results

For lesion that were segmented on DWI and segmentation ROIs were propagated to ADC maps the following classification accuracies > 90% were obtained: luminal B vs. HER2-enriched, 94.7 % (based on COM features); luminal B vs. others, 92.3 % (COM, HIS); and HER2-enriched vs. others, 90.1 % (RLM, COM). For lesions that were segmented directly on ADC maps, better results were achieved yielding the following classification accuracies: luminal B vs. HER2-enriched, 100 % (COM, WAV); luminal A vs. luminal B, 91.5 % (COM, WAV); and luminal B vs. others, 91.1 % (WAV, ARM, COM).

Conclusions

Radiomic signatures from DWI with ADC mapping allows evaluation of breast cancer receptor status and molecular subtyping with high diagnostic accuracy. Better classification accuracies were obtained when breast tumor segmentations could be performed on ADC maps.

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Cancer Screening in High-Risk Women: Design and Imaging Protocol of a Prospective Multicenter Study in Korea

Purpose

Interest in unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening for breast cancer is growing due to concerns about gadolinium deposition in the brain and the high cost of contrast-enhanced MRI. The purpose of this report is to describe the protocol of the Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Trial (DWIST), which is a prospective, multicenter, intraindividual comparative cohort study designed to compare the performance of mammography, ultrasonography, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, and diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI screening in women at high risk of developing breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 890 women with BRCA mutation or family history of breast cancer and lifetime risk ≥ 20% are enrolled. The participants undergo 2 annual breast screenings with digital mammography, ultrasonography, DCE MRI, and DW MRI at 3.0 T. Images are independently interpreted by trained radiologists. The reference standard is a combination of pathology and 12-month follow-up. Each image modality and their combination will be compared in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, rate of invasive cancer detection, abnormal interpretation rate, and characteristics of detected cancers. The first participant was enrolled in April 2019. At the time of manuscript submission, 5 academic medical centers in South Korea are actively enrolling eligible women and a total of 235 women have undergone the first round of screening. Completion of enrollment is expected in 2022 and the results of the study are expected to be published in 2026.

Discussion

DWIST is the first prospective multicenter study to compare the performance of DW MRI and conventional imaging modalities for breast cancer screening in high-risk women. DWIST is currently in the patient enrollment phase.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03835897

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging as a Stand-Alone Breast Imaging Modality

확산강조영상은 유방암의 진단과 스크리닝에 있어 독립적 검사 방법으로서의 기대되는 결과를 보여주는 빠른 비조영증강 검사 방법이다. 현재까지의 연구 결과 유방암 진단에 있어 독립적 검사 방법으로서 확산강조영상의 민감도는 역동적 조영증강 검사보다는 낮으나 유방촬영술보다는 높으며, 이로써 유방암 스크리닝에 대한 유용한 대안이 될 수 있을 것으로 보인다. 확산강조영상의 표준화된 영상 획득과 판독을 통해 영상 화질이 개선될 수 있고, 판독 결과의 다양성도 감소할 것으로 기대된다. 또한, 최신 기법과 후처리 기법을 사용한 고해상도 확산강조영상을 시행함으로써 1 cm 미만의 작은 암의 발견율을 증가시킬 수 있고, 가음성 및 가양성 결과를 감소시킬 것으로 보인다. 현재 한국에서 진행 중인 고위험군 여성에서의 확산강조영상 스크리닝에 대한 다기관 연구 결과가 나온다면 독립적 검사로서의 확산강조영상의 사용을 촉진시킬 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.