The impact of frailty on posttraumatic outcomes in older trauma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Long-term functional recovery after rib fractures: The impact of frailty

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that patients with rib fractures experience long-term functional limitations. However, the specific predictors of these worse long-term functional limitations remain under-characterized.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study including patients ≥18 years with an injury severity score ≥9 and isolated chest injury. Patients included had ≥1 rib fracture and were admitted between July 2015 and May 2019 at one of three Level I trauma centers present in our region. We performed stepwise regression analysis to identify predictors of new functional limitations, i.e., limitations that patients developed postinjury in an activity of daily living. Patients were contacted between 5 and 12 months postinjury to inquire about functional limitations. We assessed frailty using the mFI-5 tool, and a score of 1 was considered moderate frailty, while >1 was considered severe frailty.

RESULTS

Among 279 included patients, 74 (26.5%) developed new functional limitations. The majority of patients had a displaced fracture [118 (42.3%)] and ≥3 rib fractures [237 (84.9%)]. A proportion of patients had superior rib fractures [105 (37.6%)], concomitant clavicular, scapular, or sternal fractures [64 (22.9%)], flail chest [37 (13.3%)], moderate frailty [106 (38.0%)], and severe frailty [57 (20.4%)]. Severe frailty and discharge to a skilled nursing facility, rehabilitation facility, or other location as opposed to home were predictors of new functional limitations.

CONCLUSION

In our population, frailty, not injury characteristics, predicted new long-term functional limitations in patients with rib fractures. Frail patients may benefit from additional inpatient and discharge resources for improved long-term outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Frailty is associated with poor outcomes in midlife trauma patients

BACKGROUND

The impact of frailty on outcomes in midlife trauma patients (50-64 ​y) remains understudied. We evaluated the impact of frailty on midlife trauma patients' outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using TQIP 2021 data. Demographics, injury and hospital information, comorbidities, complications, mortality, and discharge disposition were extracted. Frailty was scored using the modified frailty index-5. Multivariate analyses were performed. P ​< ​0.001 was considered significant.

RESULTS

In 2021, 5.1 ​% midlife trauma patients were frail. On multivariate analysis adjusting for demographics, insurance status, injury severity score, vitals on arrival, and mode of transportation, frailty was associated with increased risk of death (OR ​= ​2.27 [2.01-2.57]), longer hospital and ICU stay (MR ​= ​1.46 [1.43-1.49] and MR ​= ​1.30 [1.24-1.36]), and discharge requiring higher level of care (OR ​= ​2.11 [2.01-2.22]).

CONCLUSION

Our data support the need for preventative efforts regarding frailty in midlife adults.

Predictors of prolonged hospitalization among geriatric trauma patients using the modified 5-Item Frailty index in a Middle Eastern trauma center: an 11-year retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Using a validated tool, we explored the prevalence, risk factors, and predictors of longer hospitalization among hospitalized geriatric patients.

METHODS

Retrospective and comparative analyses of age groups (55-64 vs. ≥ 65 years), gender, survival status, and frailty index categories were performed. The Modified 5-Item Frailty Index was assessed, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to predict prolonged hospitalization (> 7 days).

RESULTS

There were 17,600 trauma hospitalizations with a mean age of 32 ± 15 years between 2010 and 2021; of them, 9.2% were geriatrics at ≥ 55-64 years (n = 935) and ≥ 65 years (n = 691). The female/male ratio was 17.5%/82.5%, and the mean injury severity score was 13 ± 9. The injury rate for age ≥ 65 was 24 per 10,000 compared to 10 per 10,000 in the younger group age (≥ 55-64). 35% of injuries occurred at home due to falls. Overall mortality was 8%, with a higher rate among males than females (9% vs. 4%). The deceased were three years older at the time of death compared to the survivors. Higher frailty grades were associated with home-related falls and head injuries. Patients 65 years or older were likely to have higher frailty scores, as indicated by higher percentages in the mFI-5. Among the older group, 25% were moderately frail, and 18% severely frail. In the younger group, 50% were frail. Higher frailty scores correlated with increased acute kidney injury, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and longer hospital stays. Severe frailty significantly predicted longer hospitalization (odds ratio 1.83, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

One out of eleven trauma admissions was aged > 55. Head injury and bleeding were the leading causes of mortality in the study cohort. There was a significant decrease in the trend of geriatric trauma over the years. The modified FI-5 performs well as a predictive tool of prolonged hospitalizaion in trauma patients with different age groups.

Growing problem: frailty in midlife adult trauma patients in the USA

BACKGROUND

Unintentional falls are the greatest cause of injury-related hospitalisation in adult patients. Frailty is an important contributor to fall risk and poor outcomes in both midlife and older adult trauma patients. Despite this, the incidence of frailty remains understudied among midlife adults, and the CDC fall screening guidelines are limited to older adults. Here, we assessed the incidence of frailty among midlife and older trauma patients in the USA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database in midlife (aged 50-64 years) and older adult (aged 65 years and older) trauma patients from 2012 to 2021. Frailty was assessed using the five-item Modified Frailty Index. The adjusted change of frailty incidence over the study period was evaluated via Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Frailty incidence in midlife trauma patients rose from 2.4% in 2012 to 5.1% in 2021. The adjusted annual incidence rate ratio (IRR) for midlife frailty was 1.08 (95% CI 1.08, 1.09). Among older adult patients, frailty incidence rose from 6.4% to 14.7%, with an adjusted annual frailty IRR of 1.10 (95% CI 1.10, 1.10).

CONCLUSION

Frailty is rising in both the midlife and older adult populations, indicating that these groups present increasing risk for unintentional falls and further morbidity and mortality. This underscores the necessity of fall screening in both midlife and older adult patients alongside further explorations into methods to delay the onset of frailty.

Efficacy of the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) in Predicting Mortality in Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Trauma has a profound impact on mortality as well as short- and long-term health outcomes. For trauma patients to receive medical care in a timely manner, early identification and risk assessment are essential. The Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS), which was created by combining age, the Injury Severity Score (ISS), and the requirement for packed red blood cell transfusion, has proven to be a valuable prognostic tool for elderly trauma patients, though its applicability to general trauma patients is still understudied.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data from the Trauma Registry System at a Level I trauma center in southern Taiwan, covering the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2021. This study included 40,068 trauma patients aged 20 years and older. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U tests, and multivariate analyses to identify independent risk factors for mortality. The predictive performance of the GTOS was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

The final study population included 40,068 patients, with 818 deaths and 39,250 survivors. Deceased patients had higher GTOS scores (mean 132.8 vs. 76.1, p < 0.001) and required more blood transfusions (mean 4.0 vs. 0.3 units, p < 0.001) compared to survivors. The optimal GTOS cut-off value for predicting mortality was 104.5, with a sensitivity of 82.6% and a specificity of 84.3% (AUC = 0.917). A high GTOS score was associated with increased mortality (9.6 vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001) compared with a low GTOS score, even after adjusting for confounding factors (adjusted mortality rate of 2.86, p < 0.001), and a longer hospital stay (14.0 vs. 7.7 days, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The GTOS is a valuable prognostic tool for predicting mortality in trauma patients, providing a simple and rapid assessment method. Its high predictive accuracy supports its use in broader trauma patient populations beyond the elderly. Further studies are recommended to refine and validate the GTOS in diverse trauma settings to enhance its clinical utility.

The impact of frailty on long-term functional outcomes in severely injured geriatric patients

BACKGROUND

The incidence of severe injury in the geriatric population is increasing. However, the impact of frailty on long-term outcomes after injury in this population remains understudied. Therefore, we aimed to understand the impact of frailty on long-term functional outcomes of severely injured geriatric patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study, including patients ≥65 years old with an Injury Severity Score ≥15, who were admitted between December 2015 and April 2022 at one of 3 level 1 trauma centers in our region. Patients were contacted between 6 and 12 months postinjury and administered a trauma quality of life survey, which assessed for the presence of new functional limitations in their activities of daily living. We defined frailty using the mFI-5 validated frailty tool: patients with a score ≥2 out of 5 were considered frail. The impact of frailty on long-term functional outcomes was assessed using 1:1 propensity matching adjusting for patient characteristics, injury characteristics, and hospital site.

RESULTS

We included 580 patients, of whom 146 (25.2%) were frail. In a propensity-matched sample of 125 pairs, frail patients reported significantly higher functional limitations than nonfrail patients (69.6% vs 47.2%; P < .001). This difference was most prominent in the following activities: climbing stairs, walking on flat surfaces, going to the bathroom, bathing, and cooking meals. In a subgroup analysis, frail patients with traumatic brain injuries experienced significantly higher long-term functional limitations.

CONCLUSION

Frail geriatric patients with severe injury are more likely to have new long-term functional outcomes and may benefit from screening and postdischarge monitoring and rehabilitation services.

Major trauma patients and their outcomes - A retrospective observational study of critical care trauma admissions to a trauma unit with special services

INTRODUCTION

International data describes a changing pattern to trauma over the last decade, with an increasingly comorbid population presenting challenges to trauma management and resources. In Ireland, resource provision and management of trauma is being transformed to deliver a trauma network, in line with international best practice. Our hospital plays a crucial role within this network and is designated a Trauma Unit with Specialist Services (TUSS) to distinguish it from standard trauma units.

METHODS

This study aims to describe the characteristics of patients and injuries and assess trends in mortality rates. It is a retrospective observational study of adult ICU trauma admissions from August 2010 to July 2021. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30-days, 90-days, and 1 year. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, disposition, and complications. Patients were categorised by age, injury severity score (ISS), and mechanism of injury.

RESULTS

In all, 709 patients were identified for final analysis. Annual admissions doubled since 2010/11, with a trough of 41 admissions, increasing to peak at 95 admissions in 2017/18. Blunt trauma accounted for 97.6% of cases. Falls <2 m (45.4%) and RTAs (29.2%) were the main mechanisms of injury. Polytrauma comprised 41.9% of admissions. Traumatic brain injury accounted for 30.2% of cases; 18.8% of these patients were transferred to a neurosurgical centre. The majority of patients, 58.1%, were severely injured (ISS ≥ 16). Patients ≥ 65 years of age accounted for 45.7% of admissions, with falls <2 m their primary mechanism of injury. The primary outcome of all-cause mortality reduced with an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 8.0% (95% CI: -8.37%, 24.36%), 12.9% (95% CI: -4.19%, 29.94%) and 8.2% (95% CI: -9.64%, 26.09%) for 30-day, 90-day and 1-year respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality for 30-days and 90-days post presentation to hospital (P-values of 0.018, 0.033 and 0.152 for 30-day, 90-day and 1-year respectively).

CONCLUSION

The burden of major trauma in our hospital is considerable and increasing over time. Substantial changes in demographics, injury mechanism and mortality were seen, with outcomes improving over time. This is consistent with international data where trauma systems have been adopted.

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures in the geriatric trauma population is associated with equivalent outcomes to a younger cohort: A propensity matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) improves outcomes in chest wall trauma. Geriatric patients are particularly vulnerable to poor outcomes; yet, this population is often excluded from SSRF studies. Further delineating patient outcomes by age is necessary to optimize care for the aging trauma population.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted examining outcomes among patients aged 40+ for whom an SSRF consult was placed between 2017 and 2022 at a level 1 trauma center. Patients were categorized into geriatric (65+) and adult (40-64), as well as 80 years and older (80+) and 79 and younger (40-79). Patient outcomes were assessed comparing non-operative and operative management of chest wall trauma. Propensity matched analysis was performed to evaluate mortality differences between adult and geriatric patients who did and did not undergo SSRF.

RESULTS

A total of 543 patients had an SSRF consult. Of these, 227 were 65+, and 73 were 80+. A total of 129 patients underwent SSRF (24 %). The percentage of patients undergoing SSRF did not vary between 40 and 64 and 65+ (23.7 % and 23.6 %, respectively, p = 0.97) or 40-79 and 80+ (24.0 vs 21.9, p = 0.69). Patients undergoing SSRF had higher chest injury burden and were more likely to require mechanical ventilation and ICU level care on admission. Overall, in-hospital mortality rate was 4.6 %. Among patients who underwent SSRF, mortality rate did not significantly differ between 65+ and 40-64 (7.8% vs 2.7 %, p = 0.18) or 80+ and 40-79 (6.3% vs 4.6 %, p = 0.77). This remained true in propensity matched analysis.

CONCLUSION

Geriatric and octogenarian patients with rib fractures underwent SSRF at similar rates and achieved equivalent outcomes to their younger counterparts. SSRF did not differentially affect mortality outcomes based on age group in propensity matched analysis. SSRF is safe for geriatric patients including octogenarians.

Beyond Mortality: Severely Frail Femur Fracture Patients Can Regain Independence after Surgery

Objectives: Little is known about the post-operative functional outcomes of severely frail femur fracture patients, with previous studies focusing on complications and mortality. This study investigated patient- or proxy-reported outcomes after femur fracture surgery in older adult patients with severe frailty. Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of older adult (>70 years) patients with severe frailty (defined by a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment-based Frailty Index (FI-CGA) ≥ 0.40), who underwent femur fracture surgery at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients or their proxy (i.e., close relative) reported mobility, psychosocial, and functional outcomes at least 1-year after surgery. Results: Thirty-seven predominantly female (76%) patients with a median age of 85 years (IQR 79-92), and a median FI-CGA of 0.48 (IQR 0.43-0.54) were included. Eleven patients (30%) regained pre-fracture levels of ambulation, with twenty-six patients (70%) able to walk with or without assistance. The majority of patients (76%) were able to have meaningful conversations. Of the patients, 54% of them experienced no to minimal pain, while 8% still experienced a lot of pain. Functional independence varied, as follows: five patients (14%) could bathe themselves; nine patients (25%) could dress themselves; fourteen patients (39%) could toilet independently; and seventeen patients (47%) transferred out of a (wheel)chair independently. Conclusions: Despite the high risk of mortality and perioperative complications, many of the most severely frail patients with surgically treated femur fractures regain the ability to ambulate and live with a moderate degree of independence. This information can help healthcare providers to better inform these patients and their families of the role of surgical treatment during goals of care discussions.

It is not all black and white: The effect of increasing severity of frailty on outcomes of geriatric trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Frailty is associated with poor outcomes in trauma patients. However, the spectrum of physiologic deficits, once a patient is identified as frail, is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the dynamic association between increasing frailty and outcomes among frail geriatric trauma patients.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of the American Association of Surgery for Trauma Frailty Multi-institutional Trial. Patients 65 years or older presenting to one of the 17 trauma centers over 3 years (2019-2022) were included. Frailty was assessed within 24 hours of presentation using the Trauma-Specific Frailty Index (TSFI) questionnaire. Patients were stratified by TSFI score into six groups: nonfrail (<0.12), Grade I (0.12-0.19), Grade II (0.20-0.29), Grade III (0.30-0.39), Grade IV (0.40-0.49), and Grade V (0.50-1). Our Outcomes included in-hospital and 3-month postdischarge mortality, major complications, readmissions, and fall recurrence. Multivariable regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

There were 1,321 patients identified. The mean (SD) age was 77 years (8.6 years) and 49% were males. Median [interquartile range] Injury Severity Score was 9 [5-13] and 69% presented after a low-level fall. Overall, 14% developed major complications and 5% died during the index admission. Among survivors, 1,116 patients had a complete follow-up, 16% were readmitted within 3 months, 6% had a fall recurrence, 7% had a complication, and 2% died within 3 months postdischarge. On multivariable regression, every 0.1 increase in the TSFI score was independently associated with higher odds of index-admission mortality and major complications, and 3 months postdischarge mortality, readmissions, major complications, and fall recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The frailty syndrome goes beyond a binary stratification of patients into nonfrail and frail and should be considered as a spectrum of increasing vulnerability to poor outcomes. Frailty scoring can be used in developing guidelines, patient management, prognostication, and care discussions with patients and their families.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Investigating the effects of frailty on six-month outcomes in older trauma patients admitted to UK major trauma centres: a multi-centre follow up study

BACKGROUND

Pre-injury frailty is associated with adverse in-hospital outcomes in older trauma patients, but the association with longer term survival and recovery is unclear. We aimed to investigate post discharge survival and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in older frail patients at six months after Major Trauma Centre (MTC) admission.

METHODS

This was a multi-centre study of patients aged ≥ 65 years admitted to five MTCs. Data were collected via questionnaire at hospital discharge and six months later. The primary outcome was patient-reported HRQoL at follow up using Euroqol EQ5D-5 L visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included health status according to EQ5D dimensions and care requirements at follow up. Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between predictor variables and EQ-5D-5 L VAS at follow up.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients died in the follow up period, of which two-third (64%) had been categorised as frail pre-injury, compared to 21 (16%) of the 133 survivors. There was no difference in self-reported HRQoL between frail and not-frail patients at discharge (Mean EQ-VAS: Frail 55.8 vs. Not-frail 64.1, p = 0.137) however at follow-up HRQoL had improved for the not-frail group but deteriorated for frail patients (Mean EQ-VAS: Frail: 50.0 vs. Not-frail: 65.8, p = 0.009). There was a two-fold increase in poor quality of life at six months (VAS ≤ 50) for frail patients (Frail: 65% vs. Not-frail: 30% p < 0.009). Frailty (β-13.741 [95% CI -25.377, 2.105], p = 0.02), increased age (β -1.064 [95% CI [-1.705, -0.423] p = 0.00) and non-home discharge (β -12.017 [95% CI [118.403, 207.203], p = 0.04) were associated with worse HRQoL at follow up. Requirements for professional carers increased five-fold in frail patients at follow-up (Frail: 25% vs. Not-frail: 4%, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is associated with increased mortality post trauma discharge and frail older trauma survivors had worse HRQoL and increased care needs at six months post-discharge. Pre-injury frailty is a predictor of poor longer-term HRQoL after trauma and recognition should enable early specialist pathways and discharge planning.

Outcomes of Geriatric Burn Patients Presenting to the Trauma Service: How Does Frailty Factor in?

INTRODUCTION

Frailty has been known to negatively affect the outcomes of geriatric trauma patients. However, there is a lack of data on the effect of frailty on the outcomes of geriatric trauma patients with concomitant burn injuries. The aim of our study was to compare the outcomes of frail versus nonfrail geriatric trauma patients with concomitant burn injuries.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2018). We included geriatric (≥65 y) trauma patients who sustained a concomitant burn injury with ≥10% Total Body Surface Area affected. Patients with body region-specific AIS ≥4 were excluded. Patients were stratified into Frail and Nonfrail, using 5-factor modified Frailty Index. Primary outcomes measured were mortality. Secondary outcomes measured were complications, and hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 574 patients were identified, of which 172(30%) were Frail. Mean age was 74 ± 7 y and median [interquartile range] ISS was 3[1-10]. Overall, the rate of mortality was 23% and median hospital LOS was 14[3-31]. After controlling for potential confounding factors, frailty was not identified as an independent predictor of mortality (adjusted odds ratio:1.059, P = 0.93) and complications (adjusted odds ratio:1.10, P = 0.73). However, frail patients had longer hospital (β: 5.01, P = 0.002) and ICU LOS (β: 2.12, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among geriatric trauma patients with concomitant burn injuries, frailty is associated with longer hospital and ICU LOS, and higher rates of thrombotic complications, but not higher mortality or overall complications. Future research should investigate the impact of early assessment of frailty as well as tailored interventions on outcomes in this population.

Decreased Glycocalyx Shedding on Presentation in Hemorrhaging Geriatric Trauma Patients

INTRODUCTION

Plasma levels of syndecan-1 (Sdc-1), a biomarker of endothelial glycocalyx (EG) damage, correlate with worse outcomes in trauma patients. However, EG injury is not well characterized in injured older adults (OA). The aims of this study were to characterize Sdc-1 shedding in OA trauma patients relative to younger adults (YA) and determine associations with putative regulators of EG sheddases.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of data from the Pragmatic, Randomized Optimal Platelet, and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) trial, stratifying bluntly injured subjects into OA and YA groups based on upper age quartile (57 y). Plasma Sdc-1 levels were compared in OA and YA at hospital arrival through postinjury day 3, and the independent association between age and Sdc-1 level at arrival was determined after adjusting for differences in gender, shock index (SI), and pre-existing comorbidities. In a follow-up analysis, case-control matching was used to create populations of OA and YA with equivalent SI and injury severity score. Levels of Sdc-1 were compared between these matched groups, and the relationships with candidate regulators of EG shedding were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 680 subjects in the Pragmatic, Randomized Optimal Platelet, and Plasma Ratios trial, 350 (51%) had blunt injuries, and 92 (26.3%) of these were OA. Plasma Sdc-1 levels at arrival, 2 h, and 6 h were significantly lower in OA compared to YA (all P < 0.05). After adjusting for sex, pre-existing morbidities and SI, age was associated with decreased Sdc-1 levels at arrival. In the matched analyses, Sdc-1, high-mobility group box 1 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 levels were lower in OA compared to YA. Both high-mobility group box-1 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 significantly correlated with arrival Sdc-1 and were inversely associated with age.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that increased age is independently associated with decreased Sdc-1 levels among patients with blunt injuries. Suppressed plasma levels of sheddases in relation to diminished Sdc-1 shedding suggest that mechanisms regulating EG cleavage may be impaired in injured older adults. These findings provide novel insight into the age-dependent impact of injury on the vascular endothelium, which could have important implications for the clinical management of older adults following trauma.

Associations Between Patient Characteristics and Unplanned or Delayed Discharges From Geriatric Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Chart Review

ABSTRACT

Returning home is considered an indicator of successful rehabilitation for community-dwelling older adults. However, the factors associated with unplanned discharge remain uncertain. This retrospective chart review included patients 65 yrs and older admitted to a geriatric rehabilitation unit from medical and surgical wards in an academic hospital. Patient characteristics and outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was unplanned discharge destination defined as anything other than return to patients' preexisting residence. The associations between patient variables and unplanned discharge destination were analyzed using Pearson χ 2 and univariate logistic regression. Of the 251 charts screened, 25 patients (10.0%) had an unplanned discharge destination, and 74 of the remaining 226 (32.7%) experienced a delayed discharge (beyond 20 days). Requiring assistance for activities of daily living (odds ratio [OR], 2.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-7.47), a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 4.04; 95% CI, 1.63-9.71), and lower serum albumin level (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.06-2.72) were associated with unplanned discharge. Variables commonly associated with worse outcomes such as age, cognitive scores, delirium, and number of comorbidities were not barriers to returning home and should therefore not be used on their own to limit access to geriatric rehabilitation.

Frailty and Adverse Outcomes After SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Elderly Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Cohort Study

Purpose

Frailty is an important geriatric syndrome associated with aging and adverse events, especially in patients with severe infection. To help guide prognosis for elderly patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) who experience acute infection, this study investigated whether baseline (pre-infection) frailty may be associated with adverse outcomes in elderly patients undergoing MHD who suffer SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection.

Patients and Methods

Patients (aged ≥60 y) receiving MHD had been assessed for overall frailty and the 5 frailty components based on the Fried Frailty Phenotype scale within 3 months prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Results

There were 59 and 98 patients in the frail and non-frail groups, respectively. Three months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, 21 (13.4%) and 45 (28.7%) patients had died or were in hospital. The multivariate COX proportional risk model suggested that the all-cause mortality rate in patients judged overall frail or with low activity was significantly higher compared with that of the non-frail (P = 0.049; 0.003). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that hospitalization 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with both overall frailty and low activity (OR 2.276, 95% CI: 1.034-5.010, P = 0.041; OR 2.809, 95% CI: 1.311-6.020, P = 0.008, respectively).

Conclusion

Overall frailty and specifically low activity were significantly associated with all-cause mortality and hospitalization in this elderly MHD population after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Early assessment of frailty and effective interventions are recommended to improve the prognosis of patients receiving MHD who are at higher risk of acute infection.

The modified 5-item frailty index determines the length of hospital stay and accompanies with mortality rate in patients with bone and implant-associated infections after trauma and orthopedic surgery

BACKGROUND

Bone and implant-associated infections are severe complications after trauma and orthopedic surgery. The modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5) is an easily applicable score to predict adverse outcome after surgery. The current literature regarding mFI-5 is focused on a period of 30-days postoperative.

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the impact of frailty in orthopedic trauma patients with bone and implant-associated infections. mFI-5 was calculated from a database, which prospectively collects data about factors potentially correlated with peri- and postoperative complications since 2014.

METHODS

In a level I trauma center a total of 345 patients with surgical site infections were enrolled in this study. Hereof, patients with fracture-related infections after osteosynthesis, periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee and post-operative osteomyelitis were included. Extensive medical baseline examination was performed in 2013/14, a three-year follow-up was organized as a telephone interview. The mFI-5 score was calculated based on the 5 factor-principle as established by Subramaniam. The nutritional status was assessed using the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002).

RESULTS

130 patients were included, whereof seven had died, resulting in 123 patients. A grouping of our patients was performed in mFI-5 = 0 (n = 46; 36,4%), mFI-5 = 1 (n = 41; 33,3%) or mFI-5 ≥ 2 (n = 36; 29,3%). Sex distribution showed 69,1% male and 30,9% female patients. Frailty did neither impact on the re-admission (p = 0,433) nor the reoperation (p = 0,327) rate in our cohort. The mortality risk nearly doubled (1,7 times) in frail patients, but did not reach significance. In hospital stay was prolonged due to frailty (12,1 ± 11,8; p = 0,004) compared to those with a mFI-5 = 0 (5,9 ± 5,1) or mFI-5 = 1 (6,9 ± 5,9). Frailty goes along with a risk of malnutrition and increases with age.

CONCLUSION

The modified 5-item frailty index is not a suitable screening tool for predicting revision rate, re-admission rate, and mortality in our orthopedic trauma patient population with bone and implant-associated infections. Nevertheless, frailty is associated with an increased risk of malnutrition and increases with age.

Geriatric Trauma and Frailty

Geriatric trauma is increasing in the United States. The care of patients with geriatric trauma is complex due to age-related changes and comorbidities. Patients with geriatric trauma have increased risk of poor outcomes compared with younger patients with trauma, and the highest risk groups are those who have frailty. These patients require special care considerations. Multidisciplinary care can improve outcomes in frail patients with geriatric trauma.

Provision of acute care pathways for older major trauma patients in the UK

BACKGROUND

The introduction of specific pathways of care for older trauma patients has been shown to decrease hospital length of stay and the overall rate of complications. The extent and scope of pathways and services for older major trauma patients in the UK is not currently known.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to map the current care pathways and provision of services for older people following major trauma in the UK.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of UK hospitals delivering care to major trauma patients (major trauma centres and trauma units). Data were collected on respondent and site characteristics, and local definitions of older trauma patients. To explore pathways for older people with major trauma, four clinical case examples were devised and respondents asked to complete responses that best illustrated the admission pathway for each.

RESULTS

Responses from 56 hospitals were included in the analysis, including from 25 (84%) of all major trauma centres (MTCs) in the UK. The majority of respondents defined 'old' by chronological age, most commonly patients 65 years and over. The specialty team with overall responsibility for the patient in trauma units was most likely to be acute medicine or acute surgery. Patients in MTCs were not always admitted under the care of the major trauma service. Assessment by a geriatrician within 72 hours of admission varied in both major trauma centres and trauma units and was associated with increased age.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey highlights variability in the admitting specialty team and subsequent management of older major trauma patients across hospitals in the UK. Variability appears to be related to patient condition as well as provision of local resources. Whilst lack of standardisation may be a result of local service configuration this has the potential to impact negatively on quality of care, multi-disciplinary working, and outcomes.

A comparison between the clinical frailty scale and the hospital frailty risk score to risk stratify older people with emergency care needs

BACKGROUND

Older adults living with frailty who require treatment in hospitals are increasingly seen in the Emergency Departments (EDs). One quick and simple frailty assessment tool-the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS)-has been embedded in many EDs in the United Kingdom (UK). However, it carries time/training and cost burden and has significant missing data. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) can be automated and has the potential to reduce costs and increase data availability, but has not been tested for predictive accuracy in the ED. The aim of this study is to assess the correlation between and the ability of the CFS at the ED and HFRS to predict hospital-related outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using data from Leicester Royal Infirmary hospital during the period from 01/10/2017 to 30/09/2019. We included individuals aged + 75 years as the HFRS has been only validated for this population. We assessed the correlation between the CFS and HFRS using Pearson's correlation coefficient for the continuous scores and weighted kappa scores for the categorised scores. We developed logistic regression models (unadjusted and adjusted) to estimate Odds Ratios (ORs) and Confidence Intervals (CIs), so we can assess the ability of the CFS and HFRS to predict 30-day mortality, Length of Stay (LOS) > 10 days, and 30-day readmission.

RESULTS

Twelve thousand two hundred thirty seven individuals met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 84.6 years (SD 5.9) and 7,074 (57.8%) were females. Between the CFS and HFRS, the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.36 and weighted kappa score was 0.15. When comparing the highest frailty categories to the lowest frailty category within each frailty score, the ORs for 30-day mortality, LOS > 10 days, and 30-day readmission using the CFS were 2.26, 1.36, and 1.64 and for the HFRS 2.16, 7.68, and 1.19.

CONCLUSION

The CFS collected at the ED and the HFRS had low/slight agreement. Both frailty scores were shown to be predictors of adverse outcomes. More research is needed to assess the use of historic HFRS in the ED.

Outcomes as experienced by older patients after hospitalisation: satisfaction, acceptance, frustration and hope-a grounded theory study

Background

outcomes of hospitalisation are often described in quantitative terms. It is unknown how older frail patients describe their own outcomes.

Objective

to discover how older frail persons describe their own hospitalisation outcomes and the meaning of these outcomes for their daily lives.

Design

Constructivist Grounded Theory approach.

Participants

frail older people discharged from hospital.

Methods

Open interviews in the participant’s home. Transcripts were coded inductively according to the Constructivist Grounded Theory approach.

Results

Twenty-four interviews were conducted involving 20 unique participants. Although for some participants hospitalisation was just a ripple, for others, it was a turning point. It could have positive or negative impacts on outcomes, including remaining alive, disease, fatigue/condition, complaints, daily functioning, social activities and intimate relationships, hobbies, living situation and mental well-being. Few participants were completely satisfied, but for many, a discrepancy between expectation and reality existed. Some participants could accept this, others remained hopeful and some were frustrated. Factors associated with these categories were research and treatment options, (un)clarity about the situation, setting the bar too high or pushing boundaries, confidence in physicians, character traits and social factors.

Conclusions

of the persons whose outcomes did not meet their expectations, some were frustrated, others hopeful and others accepted the situation. The following interventions can help patients to accept: clear communication about options and expectations before, during and after hospitalisation; giving room for emotions; help finding social support, encouragement to engage in pleasant activities and find meaning in small things. For some patients, psychological treatment may be needed.

Multiple Organ Dysfunction in Older Major Trauma Critical Care Patients: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study

The objective was to explore the characteristics and outcomes of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in older trauma patients.

Background

Severely injured older people present an increasing challenge for trauma systems. Recovery for those who require critical care may be complicated by MODS. In older trauma patients, MODS may not be predictable based on chronological age alone and factors associated with its development and resolution are unclear.

Methods

Consecutive adult patients (aged ≥16 years) admitted to 4 level 1 major trauma center critical care units were enrolled and reviewed daily until discharge or death. MODS was defined by a daily total sequential organ failure assessment score of >5.

Results

One thousand three hundred sixteen patients were enrolled over 18 months and one-third (434) were aged ≥65 years. Incidence of MODS was high for both age groups (<65 years: 64%, ≥65 years: 70%). There were few differences in severity, patterns, and duration of MODS between cohorts, except for older traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients who experienced a prolonged course of MODS recovery (TBI: 9 days vs no TBI: 5 days, P < 0.01). Frailty rather than chronological age had a strong association with MODS development (odds ratio [OR], 6.9; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 3.0-12.4; P < 0.001) and MODS mortality (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.31-3.38; P = 0.02). Critical care resource utilization was not increased in older patients, but MODS had a substantial impact on mortality (<65 years: 17%; ≥65 years: 28%). The majority of older patients who did not develop MODS survived and had favorable discharge outcomes (home discharge ≥65 years NoMODS: 50% vs MODS: 15%; P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Frailty rather than chronological age appears to drive MODS development, recovery, and outcome in older cohorts. Early identification of frailty after trauma may help to predict MODS and plan care in older trauma.

Timely goals of care documentation in patients with frailty in the COVID-19 era: a retrospective multi-site study

BACKGROUND

Older frail patients are more likely to have timely goals of care (GOC) documentation than non-frail patients.

AIMS

To investigate whether timely documentation of GOC within 72 h differed in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020), compared with the pre-COVID-19 era (2019) for older frail patients.

METHODS

Multi-site retrospective cohort study was conducted in two public hospitals where all consecutive frail adult patients aged ≥65 years were admitted under medical units for at least 24 h between 1 March 31 and October in 2019 and between 1 March and 31 October 2020 were included. The GOC was derived from electronic records. Frailty status was derived from hospital coding data using hospital frailty risk score (frail ≥5). The primary outcome was the documentation of GOC within 72 h of hospital admission. Secondary outcomes included hospital mortality, rapid response call, intensive care unit admission, prolonged hospital length of stay (≥10 days) and time to the documentation of GOC.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 2021 frail patients admitted in 2019 and 1849 admitted in 2020, aged 81.2 and 90.9 years respectively. The proportion of patients with timely GOC was lower in 2020, than 2019 (48.3% (893/1849) vs 54.9% (1109/2021); P = 0.021). After adjusting for confounding factors, patients in 2020 were less likely to receive timely GOC (odds ratio = 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.88). Overall time to GOC documentation was longer in 2020 (hazard ratio = 0.86; 95% CI 0.80-0.93).

CONCLUSION

Timely GOC documentation occurred less frequently in frail patients during the COVID-19 pandemic than in the pre-COVID-19 era.

Acute traumatic brain injury in frail patients: the next pandemic

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight recent findings on the evaluation and impact of frailty in the management of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

RECENT FINDINGS

Frailty is not a direct natural consequence of aging. Rather, it commonly results from the intersection of age-related decline with chronic diseases and conditions. It is associated with adverse outcomes such as institutionalization, falls, and worsening health status. Growing evidence suggests that frailty should be a key consideration both in care planning and in adverse outcome prevention. The prevalence of elderly patients with TBI is increasing, and low-energy trauma (i.e., ground or low-level falls, which are typical in frail patients) is the major cause. Establishing the real incidence of frailty in TBI requires further studies. Failure to detect frailty potentially exposes patients to interventions that may not benefit them, and may even harm them. Moreover, considering patients as 'nonfrail' purely on the basis of their age is unacceptable. The future challenge is to shift to a new clinical paradigm characterized by more appropriate, goal-directed care of frail patients.

SUMMARY

The current review highlights the crucial importance of frailty evaluation in TBI, also given the changing epidemiology of this condition. To ensure adequate assessment, prevention and management, both in and outside hospital, there is an urgent need for a valid screening tool and a specific frailty-based and comorbidity-based clinical approach.

Frailty and mortality associations in patients with COVID ‐19: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Background

Observational data during the pandemic have demonstrated mixed associations between frailty and mortality.

Aim

To examine associations between frailty and short‐term mortality in patients hospitalised with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19).

Methods

In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase and the COVID‐19 living systematic review from 1 December 2019 to 15 July 2021. Studies reporting mortality and frailty scores in hospitalised patients with COVID‐19 (age ≥18 years) were included. Data on patient demographics, short‐term mortality (in hospital or within 30 days), intensive care unit (ICU) admission and need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) were extracted. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle−Ottawa Scale.

Results

Twenty‐five studies reporting 34 628 patients were included. Overall, 26.2% (n = 9061) died. Patients who died were older (76.7 ± 9.6 vs 69.2 ± 13.4), more likely male (risk ratio (RR) = 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06–1.11) and had more comorbidities. Fifty‐eight percent of patients were frail. Adjusting for age, there was no difference in short‐term mortality between frail and non‐frail patients (RR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.84–1.28). The non‐frail patients were commonly admitted to ICU (27.2% (4256/15639) vs 29.1% (3567/12274); P = 0.011) and had a higher mortality risk (RR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.30–2.03) than frail patients. Among patients receiving IMV, there was no difference in mortality between frail and non‐frail (RR = 1.62; 95% CI 0.93–2.77).

Conclusion

This systematic review did not demonstrate an independent association between frailty status and short‐term mortality in patients with COVID‐19. Patients with frailty were less commonly admitted to ICU and non‐frail patients were more likely to receive IMV and had higher mortality risk. This finding may be related to allocation decisions for patients with frailty amidst the pandemic.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Frailty Admitted to ICU With Coronavirus Disease 2019: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Frailty is often used in clinical decision-making for patients with coronavirus disease 2019, yet studies have found a variable influence of frailty on outcomes in those admitted to the ICU. In this individual patient data meta-analysis, we evaluated the characteristics and outcomes across the range of frailty in patients admitted to ICU with coronavirus disease 2019.

Is Frailty Associated with Adverse Outcomes After Orthopaedic Surgery?: A Systematic Review and Assessment of Definitions

BACKGROUND

There is increasing evidence supporting the association between frailty and adverse outcomes after surgery. There is, however, no consensus on how frailty should be assessed and used to inform treatment. In this review, we aimed to synthesize the current literature on the use of frailty as a predictor of adverse outcomes following orthopaedic surgery by (1) identifying the frailty instruments used and (2) evaluating the strength of the association between frailty and adverse outcomes after orthopaedic surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify articles that reported on outcomes after orthopaedic surgery within frail populations. Only studies that defined frail patients using a frailty instrument were included. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Study demographic information, frailty instrument information (e.g., number of items, domains included), and clinical outcome measures (including mortality, readmissions, and length of stay) were collected and reported.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 630 articles. Of these, 177 articles underwent full-text review; 82 articles were ultimately included and analyzed. The modified frailty index (mFI) was the most commonly used frailty instrument (38% of the studies used the mFI-11 [11-item mFI], and 24% of the studies used the mFI-5 [5-item mFI]), although a large variety of instruments were used (24 different instruments identified). Total joint arthroplasty (22%), hip fracture management (17%), and adult spinal deformity management (15%) were the most frequently studied procedures. Complications (71%) and mortality (51%) were the most frequently reported outcomes; 17% of studies reported on a functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consensus on the best approach to defining frailty among orthopaedic surgery patients, although instruments based on the accumulation-of-deficits model (such as the mFI) were the most common. Frailty was highly associated with adverse outcomes, but the majority of the studies were retrospective and did not identify frailty prospectively in a prediction model. Although many outcomes were described (complications and mortality being the most common), there was a considerable amount of heterogeneity in measurement strategy and subsequent strength of association. Future investigations evaluating the association between frailty and orthopaedic surgical outcomes should focus on prospective study designs, long-term outcomes, and assessments of patient-reported outcomes and/or functional recovery scores.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Preoperatively identifying high-risk orthopaedic surgery patients through frailty instruments has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Frailty screenings can create opportunities for targeted intervention efforts and guide patient-provider decision-making.

Predicting 1 year mortality after traumatic injury using the Clinical Frailty Scale

BACKGROUND

Frailty is known to affect how people admitted with traumatic injuries recover during their inpatient stay and shortly after discharge. However, few studies have examined the effect of frailty on long-term mortality when adjusted for significant factors including age. We aimed to determine the effect of frailty on 1-year morality in older adults admitted with traumatic injuries.

METHODS

We undertook an observational study at the Severn Major Trauma Network's major trauma centre based in South West England. Patients ≥65 years old admitted between November 2018 and September 2019 with traumatic injuries were included. Isolated hip fractures and inpatient injuries were excluded. A geriatrician assessed all patients for frailty using the Clinical Frailty Scale. Follow-up occurred at 1 year. A multivariable Cox proportional baseline hazards model assessed the effect of frailty on time-to-mortality. The adjusted model included age, sex, multimorbidity, surgery, most injured site, injury severity, postinjury complications, and geriatrician review.

RESULTS

Five hundred and eighty-five patients were included. Median age was 81 years old (IQR 74-88), and median injury severity score was 13 (IQR 9-25). At 1 year 147 (25.1%) patients had died. Living with frailty was associated with mortality. The risk of dying increased with frailty severity. Compared to CFS 1-3: CFS 4 aHR = 1.73 (95% CI 0.89-3.36, p = 0.11); CFS 5 aHR = 3.82 (95% CI 2.11-6.93, p < 0.001); CFS 6 aHR = 4·05 (95% CI 2.21-7.45, p < 0.001); CFS 7-8 aHR = 6.57 (95% CI 3.43-12.59, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to demonstrate a consistent effect of frailty, at all levels of severity and independent of age, on older peoples' survival 1 year after traumatic injury. These data support performing an admission frailty assessment to aid long-term management decisions and provide opportunity to modify frailty to improve outcomes.

Association between Frailty and 90-Day Outcomes amongst the Chinese Population: A Hospital-Based Multicentre Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Frailty has gained increasing attention as it is by far the most prevalent geriatric condition amongst older patients which heavily impacts chronic health status. However, the relationship between frailty and adverse health outcomes in China is far from clear. This study explored the relation between frailty and a panel of adverse health outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a multicentre cohort study of older inpatients at 6 large hospitals in China, with two-stage cluster sampling, from October 2018 to April 2019. Frailty was measured according to the FRAIL scale and categorized into robust, pre-frail, and frail. A multivariable logistic regression model and multilevel multivariable negative binomial regression model were used to analyse the relationship between frailty and adverse outcomes. Outcomes were length of hospitalization, as well as falls, readmission, and mortality at 30 and 90 days after enrolment. All regression models were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, surgery, and hospital ward.

RESULTS

We included 9,996 inpatients (median age 72 years and 57.8% male). The overall mortality at 30 and 90 days was 1.23 and 1.88%, respectively. At 30 days, frailty was an independent predictor of falls (odds ratio [OR] 3.19; 95% CI 1.59-6.38), readmission (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.25-1.67), and mortality (OR 3.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.10-5.96), adjusted for age, sex, BMI, surgery, and hospital ward clustering effect. At 90 days, frailty had a strong predictive effect on falls (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.09-4.01), readmission (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.21-1.57), and mortality (OR 6.50; 95% CI 4.00-7.97), adjusted for age, sex, BMI, surgery, and hospital ward clustering effect. There seemed to be a dose-response association between frailty categories and fall or mortality, except for readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is closely related to falls, readmission, and mortality at 30 or 90 days. Early identification and intervention for frailty amongst older inpatients should be conducted to prevent adverse outcomes.

Frailty as a predictor of mortality among patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

A large number of studies have explored the association between frailty and mortality among COVID-19 patients, with inconsistent results. The aim of this meta-analysis was to synthesize the evidence on this issue.

Methods

Three databases, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, from inception to 20th January 2021 were searched for relevant literature. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess quality bias, and STATA was employed to pool the effect size by a random effects model. Additionally, potential publication bias and sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results

Fifteen studies were included, with a total of 23,944 COVID-19 patients, for quantitative analysis. Overall, the pooled prevalence of frailty was 51% (95% CI: 44–59%). Patients with frailty who were infected with COVID-19 had an increased risk of mortality compared to those without frailty, and the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) were 1.99 (95% CI: 1.66–2.38) and 2.48 (95% CI: 1.78–3.46), respectively. In addition, subgroup analysis based on population showed that the pooled ORs for hospitalized patients in eight studies and nursing home residents in two studies were 2.62 (95% CI: 1.68–4.07) and 2.09 (95% CI: 1.40–3.11), respectively. Subgroup analysis using the frailty assessment tool indicated that this association still existed when using the clinical frailty scale (CFS) (assessed in 6 studies, pooled OR = 2.88, 95% CI: 1.52–5.45; assessed in 5 studies, pooled HR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.66–2.38) and other frailty tools (assessed in 4 studies, pooled OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.81–2.16). In addition, these significant positive associations still existed in the subgroup analysis based on study design and geographic region.

Conclusion

Our study indicates that frailty is an independent predictor of mortality among patients with COVID-19. Thus, frailty could be a prognostic factor for clinicians to stratify high-risk groups and remind doctors and nurses to perform early screening and corresponding interventions urgently needed to reduce mortality rates in patients infected by SARS-CoV-2.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02138-5.

Early predictors of discharge to home among severely injured geriatric patients: A single-system retrospective cohort study

Background

Injured geriatric patients experience significant functional decline during their hospitalization, limiting their ability to be discharged home which is a valuable outcome among this vulnerable population. We therefore sought to evaluate the clinical characteristics of injured elderly patients managed within our trauma system and identify early predictors for discharge to home.

Methods

In this single-system retrospective cohort study, we evaluated significantly injured (Injury Severity Score ≥12) geriatric (age ≥65 y) patients admitted from Northern Alberta between 2011 and 2016. The primary outcome was discharge disposition to home. Data was analyzed with descriptive statistics, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression modelling. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

We identified 1548 patients with a median age of 77. Falls accounted for 47% of injuries with median injury severity score of 22; 47% of patients were discharged home with a median hospital length of stay of 8 days. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 19%. On multivariable regression, age, injury severity score, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and Glasgow Coma Score were independent predictors for discharge home, as well as hospital and intensive care unit length of stay.

Conclusion

Nearly half of severely injured geriatric trauma patients were discharged home. The identified predictors provide clues to disposition on admission that trauma providers may use to guide in-hospital care planning, disposition planning, and stimulate early goals of care discussions.