A systematic review and meta-analysis of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients taking prehospital antiplatelet therapy: Is there a role for platelet transfusions?

Early Cold-stored Platelet Transfusion following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of cold storage compared with room temperature (RT) platelet transfusion in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

BACKGROUND

Data demonstrating the safety and efficacy of cold-stored platelet (CSP) transfusion are lacking after TBI.

METHODS

A phase 2, randomized, open-label clinical trial was performed at a single U.S. trauma center. Traumatic brain-injured patients with positive brain imaging and a need for platelet transfusion received up to 2 apheresis units of CSPs stored out to 14 days versus standard care RT platelet transfusion. The primary outcome was feasibility and the principal clinical outcome for efficacy and safety was the 6-month Glasgow Coma Scale-extended score.

RESULTS

The 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-extended score distributions were not different across cold stored and RT platelet arms (odds ratio: 1.58, 95% CI: 0.71 to 3.54, P = 0.27). A lower rate of neurosurgical craniotomy/craniectomy was found for those receiving CSPs (difference: -14.4%, 95% CI: -26.5% to -2.3%, P = 0.03). Adverse event rates did not differ across groups. The storage age of the cold-stored product was not associated with outcome differences.

CONCLUSIONS

In brain-injured patients requiring platelet transfusion, early CSP transfusion is feasible and did not result in improved 6-month Glasgow Coma Scale-extended scores. Early CSP transfusion was associated with a lower rate of neurosurgical operative intervention without an increase in adverse events. The storage age of the CSP product was not associated with outcome differences. Future phase 3 clinical trials are required to determine clinical outcome differences and safety attributable to CSP transfusion after TBI.

Predictive value of platelet function assays in traumatic brain injury patients on antiplatelet therapy

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients on antiplatelet therapy face higher mortality because of impaired platelet function, which may be treated by platelet transfusion. The value of testing platelet function in this cohort remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between platelet function assays and outcomes in TBI patients on antiplatelet therapy receiving platelet transfusions. We hypothesized that the magnitude of change in platelet assay performance following a transfusion would predict meaningful clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A cohort of patients, aged 18 to 89 years, with a history of preinjury antiplatelet therapy or who required platelet transfusion, and who were deemed at risk for neurosurgical intervention, was selected from a prospective randomized controlled trial of platelet transfusion for TBI. Pre- and posttransfusion blood samples were drawn. Platelet hemostatic function assays (PHFAs) included thromboelastography with platelet mapping (TEG-PM) and VerifyNow. Logistic regression models assessed the association of temporal assay results with 30-day all-cause mortality, need for craniotomy, and initial and follow-up Rotterdam scores.

RESULTS

Data from 94 TBI patients (43% female) with a median age of 76 years were analyzed. The 30-day mortality rate was 14%. VerifyNow aspirin assay was able to capture increases in platelet function following a platelet transfusion in patients on aspirin (significant positive Δ = 65 aspirin response units, p < 0.001). Thromboelastography with platelet mapping parameters detected improved platelet function following transfusion, although the absolute value of changes was minimal. Thromboelastography with platelet mapping parameters predicted important clinical outcomes on logistic regression, although no significant associations with clinical outcomes were identified by the change in PHFA after transfusion or after adjusting for multiple comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Higher absolute pre- and posttransfusion values of TEG-PM were associated with decreased mortality, decreased need for neurosurgical intervention, and decreased risk of progression of hemorrhage in TBI patients taking antiplatelet agents, although neither the change in TEG-PM after transfusion nor any other PHFA value predicted outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level II.

Major Bleeding in the Emergency Department: A Practical Guide for Optimal Management

Major bleeding is a life-threatening condition with high morbidity and mortality. Trauma, gastrointestinal bleeding, haemoptysis, intracranial haemorrhage or other causes of bleeding represent major concerns in the Emergency Department (ED), especially when complicated by haemodynamic instability. Severity and source of bleeding, comorbidities, and prior use of anticoagulants are pivotal factors affecting both the clinical status and the patients' differential response to haemorrhage. Thus, risk stratification is fundamental in the initial assessment of patients with bleeding. Aggressive resuscitation is the principal step for achieving haemodynamic stabilization of the patient, which will further allow appropriate interventions to be made for the definite control of bleeding. Overall management of major bleeding in the ED should follow a holistic individualized approach which includes haemodynamic stabilization, repletion of volume and blood loss, and reversal of coagulopathy and identification of the source of bleeding. The aim of the present practical guide is to provide an update on recent epidemiological data about the most common etiologies of bleeding and summarize the latest evidence regarding the bundles of care for the management of patients with major bleeding of traumatic or non-traumatic etiology in the ED.

Antiplatelet Reversal Is Not Associated With Decreased Progression of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Near-Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Clustered Analysis From Two Trauma Centers

INTRODUCTION

Antiplatelet agents (AAs) may increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). It is unclear whether reversal of antiplatelet effects (REV = desmopressin acetate [DDAVP] + Platelets) decreases ICH progression. The goal of the study was to determine whether REV was associated with decreased progression of ICH on repeat brain computed tomography (CT) scan.

METHODS

This is a clustered study (November 2019 to March 2022) at two regionally distinct trauma centers (TCs) with differing standards of practice in patients with ICH, one reversal with DDAVP + Platelets (REV+) and the other no reversal with DDAVP + Platelets (REV-). Using electronic and manual chart review, data were collected on inpatients aged ≥ 18 y on preinjury AAs with CT proven ICH (abbreviated injury scale head ≥ 2) and no other abbreviated injury scale > 2 injuries, who had at least one repeat CT scan within 120 h of admission. ICH progression on repeat brain CT scan, mortality, and resource utilization were compared via univariate analysis (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients were enrolled: 72 REV+ at the first TC and 42 REV- at the second TC. REV+ group had fewer White patients and a lower proportion on preinjury aspirin but were otherwise similar. ICH progression rate was 24/72 (33.3%) for REV+ and 11/42 (26.2%) for REV- (P = 0.43). Isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage was the most common lesion, followed by isolated subdural hemorrhage. No patients required cranial surgery. All-cause mortality (expired + hospice) was 5/72 (6.9%) and 1/42 (2.4%), respectively (P = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of patients on preinjury AAs, REV was not associated with decreased ICH progression, lower mortality, or less resource utilization. These findings should be confirmed in a larger, prospective study.

Cerebral contusions - Pathomechanism, predictive factors for progression and historical and current management

Introduction

Cerebral contusions (CCs) are common traumatic brain injuries known for their propensity to progress. Understanding their mechanical pathogenesis and predictive factors for progression is crucial for optimal management.

Research question

To provide an overview of current knowledge on CCs, including pathomechanisms, predictive factors of contusion progression, and management strategies.

Material and methods

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus and ISI web of knowledge focused on articles in English with the words "cerebral contusion" together with the words "traumatic brain injury", "pathomechanism", "progression of contusion", "predictive factors" and "management" alone or in combination.

Results

The management of CCs has evolved alongside the advances in neurointensive care, yet there is no consensus. Evidence on the effectiveness of early surgery, importantly, for the group which has the potential to expand, is limited. Some predictive factors for contusion progression have been identified, including age, injury mechanism, coagulopathy and initial contusion volume which could help to guide decision-making.

Discussion and conclusion

While various theories exist on pathomechanisms and several predictive factors for progression have been proposed, consensus on optimal management remains elusive. Individualized care guided by the predictive factors is essential. Challenges posed by antithrombotic medications highlight the need for early intervention strategies.Decompressive craniectomy could serve as a potential tool in severe traumatic brain injury management including contusions. Conducting large cohort studies to refine predictive models and harmonizing management approaches would help to improve outcomes of patients with CCs.

Age, admission platelet count, and mortality in severe isolated traumatic brain injury: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

We asked whether patients >50 years of age with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) present with lower platelet counts and whether lower platelet counts are independently associated with mortality.

METHODS

We combined trauma registry and laboratory data on a retrospective cohort of all patients ≥18 years of age admitted to our Level 1 US regional trauma center 2015-2021 with severe (Head Abbreviated Injury Score [AIS] ≥3), isolated (all other AIS <3) TBI who had a first platelet count within 1 h of arrival. Age and platelet count were assessed continuously and as groups (age 18-50 vs. >50, platelet normals, and at conventional transfusion thresholds). Outcomes such as mean admission platelet counts and in-hospital mortality were assessed categorically and with logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 44,056 patients, 1298 (3%, median age: 52 [IQR 33,68], 76.1% male) met all inclusion criteria with no differences between younger and older age groups for (ISS; 18 [14,26] vs. 17 [14,26], p = .22), New ISS (NISS; 29 [19,50] vs. 28 [17,50], p = .36), or AIS-Head (4 [3,5] vs. 4 [3,5]; p = .87). Patients aged >50 had lower admission platelet counts (219,000 ± 93,000 vs. 242,000 ± 76,000/μL; p < .001) and greater in-hospital mortality (24.5% vs. 15.6%, p < .001) than those 18-50. In multivariable regression, firearms injuries (OR9.08), increasing age (OR1.004), NISS (OR1.007), and AIS-Head (OR1.05), and decreasing admission platelet counts (OR0.998) were independently associated with mortality (p < .001-.041). Platelet transfusion in the first 4 h of care was more frequent among older patients (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients with TBI had lower admission platelet counts, which were independently associated with greater mortality.

Management of patients suffering from mild traumatic brain injury 2023

OBJECTIVE

To develop a multidisciplinary French reference that addresses initial pre- and in-hospital management of a mild traumatic brain injury patient.

DESIGN

A panel of 22 experts was formed on request from the French Society of Emergency Medicine (SFMU) and the French Society of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (SFAR). A policy of declaration and monitoring of links of interest was applied and respected throughout the process of producing the guidelines. Similarly, no funding was received from any company marketing a health product (drug or medical device). The expert panel had to respect and follow the Grade® (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology to evaluate the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. Given the impossibility of obtaining a high level of evidence for most of the recommendations, it was decided to adopt a "Recommendations for Professional Practice" (RPP) format, rather than a Formalized Expert Recommendation (FER) format, and to formulate the recommendations using the terminology of the SFMU and SFAR Guidelines.

METHODS

Three fields were defined: 1) pre-hospital assessment, 2) emergency room management, and 3) emergency room discharge modalities. The group assessed 11 questions related to mild traumatic brain injury. Each question was formulated using a PICO (Patients Intervention Comparison Outcome) format.

RESULTS

The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE® method resulted in the formulation of 14 recommendations. After two rounds of rating, strong agreement was obtained for all recommendations. For one question, no recommendation could be made.

CONCLUSION

There was strong agreement among the experts on important, transdisciplinary recommendations, the purpose of which is to improve management practices for patients with mild head injury.

Perioperative Management of Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Therapy

Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Drug ManagementManagement of patients on an anticoagulant or antiplatelet drug who require surgery or an invasive procedure is a common clinical problem. Douketis and Spyropoulos provide an evidence-based but practical approach to managing anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs in the perioperative setting.

The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition

BACKGROUND

Severe trauma represents a major global public health burden and the management of post-traumatic bleeding continues to challenge healthcare systems around the world. Post-traumatic bleeding and associated traumatic coagulopathy remain leading causes of potentially preventable multiorgan failure and death if not diagnosed and managed in an appropriate and timely manner. This sixth edition of the European guideline on the management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following traumatic injury aims to advise clinicians who care for the bleeding trauma patient during the initial diagnostic and therapeutic phases of patient management.

METHODS

The pan-European, multidisciplinary Task Force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma included representatives from six European professional societies and convened to assess and update the previous version of this guideline using a structured, evidence-based consensus approach. Structured literature searches covered the period since the last edition of the guideline, but considered evidence cited previously. The format of this edition has been adjusted to reflect the trend towards concise guideline documents that cite only the highest-quality studies and most relevant literature rather than attempting to provide a comprehensive literature review to accompany each recommendation.

RESULTS

This guideline comprises 39 clinical practice recommendations that follow an approximate temporal path for management of the bleeding trauma patient, with recommendations grouped behind key decision points. While approximately one-third of patients who have experienced severe trauma arrive in hospital in a coagulopathic state, a systematic diagnostic and therapeutic approach has been shown to reduce the number of preventable deaths attributable to traumatic injury.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary approach and adherence to evidence-based guidelines are pillars of best practice in the management of severely injured trauma patients. Further improvement in outcomes will be achieved by optimising and standardising trauma care in line with the available evidence across Europe and beyond.

Platelet Transfusion for Trauma Resuscitation

Purpose of Review

To review the role of platelet transfusion in resuscitation for trauma, including normal platelet function and alterations in behavior following trauma, blood product transfusion ratios and the impact of platelet transfusion on platelet function, platelet function assays, risks of platelet transfusion and considerations for platelet storage, and potential adjunct therapies and synthetic platelets.

Recent Findings

Platelets are a critical component of clot formation and breakdown following injury, and in addition to these hemostatic properties, have a complex role in vascular homeostasis, inflammation, and immune function. Evidence supports that platelets are activated following trauma with several upregulated functions, but under conditions of severe injury and shock are found to be impaired in their hemostatic behaviors. Platelets should be transfused in balanced ratios with red blood cells and plasma during initial trauma resuscitation as this portends improved outcomes including survival. Multiple coagulation assays can be used for goal-directed resuscitation for traumatic hemorrhage; however, these assays each have drawbacks in terms of their ability to measure platelet function. While resuscitation with balanced transfusion ratios is supported by the literature, platelet transfusion carries its own risks such as bacterial infection and lung injury. Platelet supply is also limited, with resource-intensive storage requirements, making exploration of longer-term storage options and novel platelet-based therapeutics attractive. Future focus on a deeper understanding of the biology of platelets following trauma, and on optimization of novel platelet-based therapeutics to maintain hemostatic effects while improving availability should be pursued.

Summary

While platelet function is altered following trauma, platelets should be transfused in balanced ratios during initial resuscitation. Severe injury and shock can impair platelet function, which can persist for several days following the initial trauma. Assays to guide resuscitation following the initial period as well as storage techniques to extend platelet shelf life are important areas of investigation.

Application of a TEG-Platelet Mapping Algorithm to Guide Reversal of Antiplatelet Agents in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury: An Observational Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Traumatic intracranial hemorrhages expand in one third of cases, and antiplatelet medications may exacerbate hematoma expansion. However, the reversal of an antiplatelet effect with platelet transfusion has been associated with harm. We sought to determine whether a thromboelastography platelet mapping (TEG-PM)-guided algorithm could limit platelet transfusion in patients with hemorrhagic traumatic brain injury (TBI) prescribed antiplatelet medications without a resultant clinically significant increase in hemorrhage volume, late hemostatic treatments, or delayed operative intervention.

METHODS

A total of 175 consecutive patients with TBI were admitted to our university-affiliated, level I trauma center between March 2016 and December 2019: 54 preintervention patients (control) and 121 patients with TEG-PM (study). After exclusion for anticoagulant administration, availability of neuroimaging and emergent neurosurgery, 62 study patients and 37 control patients remained. Intervention consisted of administration of desmopressin (DDAVP) for nonsurgical patients with significant inhibition at the arachidonic acid or adenosine diphosphate receptor sites. For surgical patients with significant inhibition, dual therapy with DDAVP and platelet transfusion was employed. Study patients were compared with a group of historical controls, which were identified from a prospectively maintained registry and typically treated with empiric platelet transfusion.

RESULTS

Median age was 75 years (interquartile range 85-67) and 77 years (interquartile range 81-65) in the TEG-PM and control patient groups, respectively. Admission hemorrhage volumes were similar (10.7 cm³ [20.1] in patients with TEG-PM vs. 14.1 cm³ [19.7] in controls; p = 0.41). There were no significant differences in admission Glasgow Coma Scale, mechanism of trauma, or baseline comorbidities. A total of 57% of controls versus 10% of patients with TEG-PM (p < 0.001) were transfused platelets; 52% of intervention patients and 0% controls were treated with DDAVP. Expansion hemorrhage volumes were not significantly different (14.0 cm³ [20.2] patients with TEG-PM versus 13.6 cm³ [23.7] controls; p = 0.93). There was no significant difference in rates of clinical deterioration, delayed neurosurgical intervention, or late platelet transfusion between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with hemorrhagic TBI prescribed preinjury antiplatelet therapy, our study suggests that the use of a TEG-PM algorithm may reduce platelet transfusions without a concurrent increase in clinically significant hematoma expansion. Further study is required to prove a causative relationship.

Controversies and evidence gaps in the early management of severe traumatic brain injury: back to the ABCs

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) accounts for around 30% of all trauma-related deaths. Over the past 40 years, TBI has remained a major cause of mortality after trauma. The primary injury caused by the injurious mechanical force leads to irreversible damage to brain tissue. The potentially preventable secondary injury can be accentuated by addressing systemic insults. Early recognition and prompt intervention are integral to achieve better outcomes. Consequently, surgeons still need to be aware of the basic yet integral emergency management strategies for severe TBI (sTBI). In this narrative review, we outlined some of the controversies in the early care of sTBI that have not been settled by the publication of the Brain Trauma Foundation’s 4th edition guidelines in 2017. The topics covered included the following: mode of prehospital transport, maintaining airway patency while securing the cervical spine, achieving adequate ventilation, and optimizing circulatory physiology. We discuss fluid resuscitation and blood product transfusion as components of improving circulatory mechanics and oxygen delivery to injured brain tissue. An outline of evidence-based antiplatelet and anticoagulant reversal strategies is discussed in the review. In addition, the current evidence as well as the evidence gaps for using tranexamic acid in sTBI are briefly reviewed. A brief note on the controversial emergency surgical interventions for sTBI is included. Clinicians should be aware of the latest evidence for sTBI. Periods between different editions of guidelines can have an abundance of new literature that can influence patient care. The recent advances included in this review should be considered both for formulating future guidelines for the management of sTBI and for designing future clinical studies in domains with clinical equipoise.

Rapid detection of platelet inhibition and dysfunction in traumatic brain injury: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Rapid platelet function testing is frequently used to determine platelet function in patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH). Accuracy and clinical significance of decreased platelet response detected by these tests is not well understood. We sought to determine whether VerifyNow and whole blood aggregometry (WBA) can detect poor platelet response and to elucidate its clinical significance for tICH patients.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with isolated tICH between 2018 and 2020. Demographics, medical history, injury characteristics, and patient outcomes were recorded. Platelet function was determined by VerifyNow and WBA testing at the time of arrival to the trauma bay and 6 hours later.

RESULTS

A total of 221 patients were enrolled, including 111 patients on no antiplatelet medication, 78 on aspirin, 6 on clopidogrel, and 26 on aspirin and clopidogrel. In the trauma bay, 29.7% and 67.7% of patients on no antiplatelet medication had poor platelet response on VerifyNow and WBA, respectively. Among patients on aspirin, 72.2% and 82.2% had platelet dysfunction on VerifyNow and WBA. Among patients on clopidogrel, 67.9% and 88.9% had platelet dysfunction on VerifyNow and WBA. Patients with nonresponsive platelets had similar in-hospital mortality (3 [3.0%] vs. 6 [6.3%], p = 0.324), tICH progression (26 [27.1%] vs. 24 [26.1%], p = 0.877), intensive care unit admission rates (34 [34.3%] vs. 38 [40.0%), p = 0.415), and length of stay (3 [interquartile range, 2-8] vs. 3.2 [interquartile range, 2-7], p = 0.818) to those with responsive platelets. Platelet transfusion did not improve platelet response or patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Rapid platelet function testing detects a highly prevalent poor platelet response among patients with tICH, irrespective of antiplatelet medication use. VerifyNow correlated fairly with whole blood aggregometry among patients with tICH and platelet responsiveness detectable by these tests did not correlate with clinical outcomes. In addition, our results suggest that platelet transfusion may not improve clinical outcomes in patients with tICH.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic tests, level II.

Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multicenter Trial: Comparison of pre-injury antithrombotic use and reversal strategies among severe traumatic brain injury patients

BACKGROUND

Trauma teams are often faced with patients on antithrombotic (AT) drugs, which is challenging when bleeding occurs. We sought to compare the effects of different AT medications on head injury severity and hypothesized that AT reversal would not improve mortality in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients.

METHODS

An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma-sponsored prospective, multicentered, observational study of 15 trauma centers was performed. Patient demographics, injury burden, comorbidities, AT agents, and reversal attempts were collected. Outcomes of interest were head injury severity and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Analysis was performed on 2,793 patients. The majority of patients were on aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA], 46.1%). Patients on a platelet chemoreceptor blocker (P2Y12) had the highest mean Injury Severity Score (9.1 ± 8.1). Patients taking P2Y12 inhibitors ± ASA, and ASA-warfarin had the highest head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) mean (1.2 ± 1.6). On risk-adjusted analysis, warfarin-ASA was associated with a higher head AIS (odds ratio [OR], 2.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-4.42) after controlling for Injury Severity Score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, initial Glasgow Coma Scale score, and initial systolic blood pressure. Among patients with severe TBI (head AIS score, ≥3) on antiplatelet therapy, reversal with desmopressin (DDAVP) and/or platelet transfusion did not improve survival (82.9% reversal vs. 90.4% none, p = 0.30). In severe TBI patients taking Xa inhibitors who received prothrombin complex concentrate, survival was not improved (84.6% reversal vs. 84.6% none, p = 0.68). With risk adjustment as described previously, mortality was not improved with reversal attempts (antiplatelet agents: OR 0.83; 85% CI, 0.12-5.9 [p = 0.85]; Xa inhibitors: OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.12-4.64; p = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

Reversal attempts appear to confer no mortality benefit in severe TBI patients on antiplatelet agents or Xa inhibitors. Combination therapy was associated with severity of head injury among patients taking preinjury AT therapy, with ASA-warfarin possessing the greatest risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic, level II.

Platelet Transfusion: An Update on Indications and Guidelines

Platelets are commonly transfused either therapeutically or prophylactically to maintain hemostasis. Most platelet transfusions are used to manage patients with hematologic malignancies. Although platelet transfusion guidelines have been published, platelet transfusion practices are still heterogeneous. Platelet transfusion guidelines partly lack recommendations or differ in the platelet threshold recommendations in some clinical situations. This article reviews platelet transfusions focusing on transfusion guidelines and platelet thresholds in different clinical settings.

Choice of Whole Blood versus Lactated Ringer's Resuscitation Modifies the Relationship between Blood Pressure Target and Functional Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury plus Hemorrhagic Shock in Mice

Civilian traumatic brain injury (TBI) guidelines recommend resuscitation of patients with hypotensive TBI with crystalloids. Increasing evidence, however, suggests that whole blood (WB) resuscitation may improve physiological and survival outcomes at lower resuscitation volumes, and potentially at a lower mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), than crystalloid after TBI and hemorrhagic shock (HS). The objective of this study was to assess whether WB resuscitation with two different MAP targets improved behavioral and histological outcomes compared with lactated Ringer's (LR) in a mouse model of TBI+HS. Anesthetized mice (n = 40) underwent controlled cortical impact (CCI) followed by HS (MAP = 25-27 mm Hg; 25 min) and were randomized to five groups for a 90 min resuscitation: LR with MAP target of 70 mm Hg (LR70), LR60, WB70, WB60, and monitored sham. Mice received a 20 mL/kg bolus of LR or autologous WB followed by LR boluses (10 mL/kg) every 5 min for MAP below target. Shed blood was reinfused after 90 min. Morris Water Maze testing was performed on days 14-20 post-injury. Mice were euthanized (21 d) to assess contusion and total brain volumes. Latency to find the hidden platform was greater versus sham for LR60 (p < 0.002) and WB70 (p < 0.007) but not LR70 or WB60. The WB resuscitation did not reduce contusion volume or brain tissue loss. The WB targeting a MAP of 60 mm Hg did not compromise function versus a 70 mm Hg target after CCI+HS, but further reduced fluid requirements (p < 0.03). Using LR, higher achieved MAP was associated with better behavioral performance (rho = -0.67, p = 0.028). Use of WB may allow lower MAP targets without compromising functional outcome, which could facilitate pre-hospital TBI resuscitation.

Platelet Reactivity Testing for Aspirin Patients Who Sustain Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Patients who take aspirin and sustain traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH) are often transfused platelets in an effort to prevent bleeding progression. The efficacy of platelet transfusion is questionable, however, and some medical societies recommend that platelet reactivity testing (PRT) should guide transfusion decisions. The study hypothesis was that utilization of PRT to guide platelet transfusion for tICH patients suspected of taking aspirin would safely identify patients who did not require platelet transfusion.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with blunt tICH who received PRT for known or suspected aspirin use between June 2014 and December 2017 at a level I trauma center. Chart abstraction was conducted to determine home aspirin status, and PRT values were used to classify patients as therapeutic or nontherapeutic on aspirin. Differences were assessed with Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests.

RESULTS

157 patients met study inclusion criteria, and 118 (75%) patients had documented prior aspirin use. PRT results were available approximately 1.7 h (IQR: 0.9, 3.2) after arrival. Upon initial PRT, 70% of patients were considered inhibited and 88% of those patients had aspirin documented as a home medication. Conversely, 18% of patients with home aspirin use had normal platelet reactivity. Clinically significant worsening of the tICH did not significantly differ when comparing those who received platelet transfusion with those who did not (8% versus 7%, P = 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Platelet reactivity testing can detect platelet inhibition related to aspirin and should guide transfusion decisions for head injured patients in the initial hours after trauma.

What's new in trauma 2020

Throughout the past 2020, the pandemic COVID-19 has caused a big global shock, meanwhile it brought a great impact on the public health network. Trauma emergency system faced a giant challenge and how to manage trauma under the pandemic of COVID-19 was widely discussed. However, the trauma treatment of special population (geriatric patients and patients taking anticoagulant drugs) has received inadequate attention. Due to the high mortality following severe traumatic hemorrhage, hemostasis and trauma-induced coagulopathy are the important concerns in trauma treatment. Sepsis is another topic should not be ignored when we talking about trauma. COVID-19 itself is a special kind of sepsis, and it may even be called as serious systemic infection syndrome. Sepsis has been become a serious problem waiting to be solved urgently no matter in the fields of trauma, or in intensive care and infection, etc. This article reviewed the research progress in areas including trauma emergency care, trauma bleeding and coagulation, geriatric trauma and basic research of trauma within 2020.