1
|
Abusuliman M, Jafri SM, Summers BB, Beduschi T, Boike J, Farmer DG, Horslen S, Lyer K, Langnas AN, Mangus RS, Matsumoto CS, Mavis AM, Mazariegos GV, Nagai S, O'Leary J, Schiano TD, Sudan DL, Abusuliman A, Sulejmani N, Segovia MC. Trends in the Perioperative Practices for Immunological Assessment and Immunosuppression Strategies for Patients Undergoing Intestinal Transplantation at American Transplant Centers. Transplant Proc 2025; 57:380-389. [PMID: 39890513 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/20/2025] [Indexed: 02/03/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intestinal transplantation (IT) is a complex procedure that requires nuanced immunosuppressive strategies to optimize patient outcomes. Despite advancements, significant variability remains in immunosuppressive protocols across transplant centers due to a lack of consensus on the optimal approaches for induction, maintenance, and clinical testing. This variability complicates standardization and identification of best practices for IT recipients. METHODS A descriptive survey study was conducted to characterize immunosuppressive and testing strategies in IT at major transplant centers in the United States. Ten centers known to have performed over 10 ITs since 2015 were selected from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. A 22-question survey was distributed to surgical directors, collecting data on pre-, peri-, and post-transplant immunological testing, desensitization strategies, immunosuppressive regimens, and management of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and acute cellular rejection (ACR). RESULTS Nine centers (90%) responded. All centers conducted pretransplant human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and donor-specific antibody (DSA) testing, with varying frequencies and methodologies. Desensitization was reported by 44% of centers for isolated IT and by 22% for multivisceral transplants. Induction therapy predominantly involved antithymocyte globulin (89%) and rituximab (44%). Tacrolimus was universally used for maintenance, with varying trough level targets across centers. Post-transplant DSA testing was performed by all centers, and protocol-driven endoscopic bowel biopsies were routine at 67% of centers. AMR was diagnosed at 89% of centers, with plasmapheresis and IVIG being the most common treatments. Variability was noted in desensitization practices and AMR management. CONCLUSION This survey highlights considerable consistency in pre- and post-transplant testing and immunosuppressive regimens for IT recipients, while significant variability exists in desensitization strategies and AMR management. Further research is needed to standardize these practices to improve patient outcomes across transplant centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bryant B Summers
- Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Thiago Beduschi
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Justin Boike
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Douglas G Farmer
- Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles Health, Los Angeles, California
| | - Simon Horslen
- Department of Hepatology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kishore Lyer
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Alan N Langnas
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Richard S Mangus
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Cal S Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Alisha M Mavis
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Shunji Nagai
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Jacqueline O'Leary
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Thomas D Schiano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York
| | - Debra L Sudan
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jang E, Youn J. Contribution of long-lived plasma cells to antibody-mediated allograft rejection. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION AND RESEARCH 2024; 38:341-353. [PMID: 39690904 PMCID: PMC11732765 DOI: 10.4285/ctr.24.0047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2024] [Revised: 11/15/2024] [Accepted: 11/15/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
Persistent alloantigens derived from allograft tissues can be recognized by the host's alloreactive immune system. This process enables cognate B cells to differentiate into plasma cells, which secrete donor-specific antibodies that are key drivers of antibody-mediated allograft rejection. A subset of these plasma cells can survive for extended periods in a suitable survival niche and mature into long-lived plasma cells (LLPCs), which are a cellular component of humoral memory. The current understanding of LLPCs is limited due to their scarcity, heterogeneity, and absence of unique markers. However, accumulating evidence indicates that LLPCs, unlike conventional short-lived plasma cells, can respond to extrinsic signals from their survival niches and can resist cell death associated with intracellular stress through cell-intrinsic mechanisms. Notably, they are refractory to traditional immunosuppressants and B cell depletion therapies. This resistance, coupled with their longevity, may explain why current treatments targeting antibody-mediated rejection are often ineffective. This review offers insights into the biology of LLPCs and discusses ongoing therapeutic trials that target LLPCs in the context of antibody-mediated allograft rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunkyeong Jang
- Laboratory of Autoimmunology, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeehee Youn
- Laboratory of Autoimmunology, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Del Bello A, Vionnet J, Congy-Jolivet N, Kamar N. Simultaneous combined transplantation: Intricacies in immunosuppression management. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2024; 38:100871. [PMID: 39096886 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2024.100871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/05/2024]
Abstract
Simultaneous combined transplantation (SCT), i.e. the transplantation of two solid organs within the same procedure, can be required when the patients develop more than one end-stage organ failure. The development of SCT over the last 20 years could only be possible thanks to progress in the surgical techniques and in the perioperative management of patients in an ageing population. Performing such major transplant surgeries from the same donor, in a short amount of time, and in critical pathophysiological conditions, is often considered to be counterbalanced by the immune benefits expected from these interventions. However, SCT includes a wide array of different transplant combinations, with each time a different immunological constellation. Recent research offers new insights into the immune mechanisms involved in these different settings. Progress in the understanding of these immunological intricacies help to address the optimal induction and maintenance immunosuppressive treatment strategies. In this review, we summarize the different immunological benefits according to the type of SCT performed. We also incorporate the main outcomes according to the immunological risk at transplantation, and the deleterious impact of preformed or de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in the different types of SCT. Finally, we propose comprehensive and evidence-based induction and maintenance immunosuppression strategies guided by the type of SCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Del Bello
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France; Department of Vascular Biology, Institute of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases (I2MC), France.
| | - Julien Vionnet
- Transplantation Center and Service of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Congy-Jolivet
- Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France; Laboratory of Immunology, Biology Department, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; INSERM UMR 1037, DynAct team, CRCT, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France; INSERM UMR 1037, DynAct team, CRCT, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France; Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), INSERM UMR1043-CNRS 5282, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
In this review, the authors outlined concepts and strategies to achieve immune tolerance through inducing hematopoietic chimerism after solid organ transplantation and introduced challenges and opportunities in harnessing two-way alloresponses to improve outcomes after intestinal transplantation (ITx). Next, the authors discussed the dynamics and phenotypes of peripheral blood and intestinal graft T-cell subset chimerism and their association with outcomes. The authors also summarized studies on other types of immune cells after ITx and their potential participation in chimerism-mediated tolerance. The authors further discussed strategies and future directions to promote chimerism-associated tolerance after ITx to overcome rejection and minimize immunosuppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Crosby
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Katherine D Long
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Jianing Fu
- Department of Medicine, Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang J, Zhan H, Song Z, Liu S. Immune reactions following intestinal transplantation: Mechanisms and prevention. Asian J Surg 2024; 47:3819-3826. [PMID: 38431471 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.02.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
For patients with intestinal failure, small bowel transplantation remains one of the most effective treatments despite continuous advancements in parenteral nutrition techniques. Long-term use of parenteral nutrition can result in serious complications that lead to metabolic dysfunction and organ failure. However, the small intestine is a highly immunogenic organ with a large amount of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue and histocompatibility antigens; therefore, the small intestine is highly susceptible to severe immune rejection. This article discusses the mechanisms underlying immune rejection after small bowel transplantation and presents various options for prevention and treatment. Our findings offer new insights into the development of small bowel transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junhao Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Hanxiang Zhan
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Zifang Song
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
| | - Shanglong Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McArdle R, Cope R, Chaudhry A, Sharkey L, Peacock S. Exploring the immunological relevance of pre-transplant donor-specific antibody in intestinal transplantation, with special consideration to the liver. Int J Immunogenet 2024; 51:217-227. [PMID: 38637869 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
Despite recent advances that have improved outcomes following intestinal transplantation (ITx), achieving long-term patient survival and rejection-free survival is still challenging. Understanding the relevance of pre-transplant human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibody (DSA) in ITx and the immunomodulatory potential of the liver within the allograft is crucial to providing an accurate assessment of pre-transplant immunological risk, which could influence and improve post-transplant outcomes further. This was the primary objective of this retrospective study of 95 adult ITx transplants which took place at Cambridge University Hospitals (United Kingdom) between 2007 and 2019. Two novel programs were developed and validated to identify DSA (tested by Luminex single antigen beads) in this dataset. Data analysis utilised Kaplan-Meier survival methods, and statistical analysis was performed using log-rank tests and adjusted Cox models. Fifty-four (57%) ITx cases contained a liver, and 36 (38%) were sensitised to HLA. Pre-transplant DSA > 500 mean fluorescent intensity appeared to negatively affect post-ITx patient survival and rejection outcomes. Additionally, liver-inclusive allografts seemed to show particular resistance to HLA class I DSA. Our data hints towards consistency with other ITx studies where deleterious effects of DSA have been demonstrated, and where liver inclusion is protective from HLA class I DSA. This is in line with current national guidelines for immunological risk. Our publicly available research programs could support future large or multicentre studies where statistically relevant data might be gained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhea McArdle
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Medical Education, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Transplant Laboratory, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester, UK
| | - Rebecca Cope
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Medical Education, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Afzal Chaudhry
- Department of Nephrology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lisa Sharkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sarah Peacock
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fu J, Hsiao T, Waffarn E, Meng W, Long KD, Frangaj K, Jones R, Gorur A, Shtewe A, Li M, Muntnich CB, Rogers K, Jiao W, Velasco M, Matsumoto R, Kubota M, Wells S, Danzl N, Ravella S, Iuga A, Vasilescu ER, Griesemer A, Weiner J, Farber DL, Luning Prak ET, Martinez M, Kato T, Hershberg U, Sykes M. Dynamic establishment and maintenance of the human intestinal B cell population and repertoire following transplantation in a pediatric-dominated cohort. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1375486. [PMID: 39007142 PMCID: PMC11239347 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1375486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction It is unknown how intestinal B cell populations and B cell receptor (BCR) repertoires are established and maintained over time in humans. Following intestinal transplantation (ITx), surveillance ileal mucosal biopsies provide a unique opportunity to map the dynamic establishment of recipient gut lymphocyte populations in immunosuppressed conditions. Methods Using polychromatic flow cytometry that includes HLA allele group-specific antibodies distinguishing donor from recipient cells along with high throughput BCR sequencing, we tracked the establishment of recipient B cell populations and BCR repertoire in the allograft mucosa of ITx recipients. Results We confirm the early presence of naïve donor B cells in the circulation (donor age range: 1-14 years, median: 3 years) and, for the first time, document the establishment of recipient B cell populations, including B resident memory cells, in the intestinal allograft mucosa (recipient age range at the time of transplant: 1-44 years, median: 3 years). Recipient B cell repopulation of the allograft was most rapid in infant (<1 year old)-derived allografts and, unlike T cell repopulation, did not correlate with rejection rates. While recipient memory B cell populations were increased in graft mucosa compared to circulation, naïve recipient B cells remained detectable in the graft mucosa for years. Comparisons of peripheral and intra-mucosal B cell repertoires in the absence of rejection (recipient age range at the time of transplant: 1-9 years, median: 2 years) revealed increased BCR mutation rates and clonal expansion in graft mucosa compared to circulating B cells, but these parameters did not increase markedly after the first year post-transplant. Furthermore, clonal mixing between the allograft mucosa and the circulation was significantly greater in ITx recipients, even years after transplantation, than in deceased adult donors. In available pan-scope biopsies from pediatric recipients, we observed higher percentages of naïve recipient B cells in colon allograft compared to small bowel allograft and increased BCR overlap between native colon vs colon allograft compared to that between native colon vs ileum allograft in most cases, suggesting differential clonal distribution in large intestine vs small intestine. Discussion Collectively, our data demonstrate intestinal mucosal B cell repertoire establishment from a circulating pool, a process that continues for years without evidence of stabilization of the mucosal B cell repertoire in pediatric ITx patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianing Fu
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Thomas Hsiao
- Department of Human Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Elizabeth Waffarn
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Wenzhao Meng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Katherine D. Long
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kristjana Frangaj
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rebecca Jones
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Alaka Gorur
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Areen Shtewe
- Department of Human Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Muyang Li
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Constanza Bay Muntnich
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kortney Rogers
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Wenyu Jiao
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Monica Velasco
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rei Matsumoto
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Masaru Kubota
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Steven Wells
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Nichole Danzl
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Shilpa Ravella
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Alina Iuga
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Adam Griesemer
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Joshua Weiner
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Donna L. Farber
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Eline T. Luning Prak
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Mercedes Martinez
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Tomoaki Kato
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Uri Hershberg
- Department of Human Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Megan Sykes
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Paulo Guzman J, Maklad M, Osman M, Elsherif A, Fujiki M. Updates in induction immunosuppression regimens for intestinal transplantation. Hum Immunol 2024; 85:110800. [PMID: 38599892 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2024.110800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
Intestinal allografts are the most immunologically complex and carry the highest risk of rejection among solid organ transplantation, necessitating complex immunosuppressive management. We evaluated the latest information regarding induction immunosuppression, with an emphasis on established, novel, and emergent therapies. We also reviewed classic and novel induction immunosuppression strategies for highly sensitized recipients. Comparable progress has been made in intestinal transplantation clinical outcomes since the implementation of induction strategies. This review shows a clear diversity of induction protocols can be observed across different centers. The field of intestinal transplantation is still in its early stages, which is further complicated by the limited number of institutions capable of intestinal transplantation and their geographical variation, which further hinders the development of adequately powered studies in comparison to other organs. As the implementation of institution-specific induction protocols becomes more refined and results are disseminated, future research efforts should be directed towards the development of efficacious induction strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johann Paulo Guzman
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mohamed Maklad
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mohammed Osman
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ayat Elsherif
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Masato Fujiki
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Xu Q, Zeevi A, Ganoza A, Cruz RJ, Mazariegos GV. Current approaches for risk assessment of intestinal transplant patients: A view from the histocompatibility laboratory. Hum Immunol 2024; 85:110768. [PMID: 38433035 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2024.110768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Despite its recent decline in volumes, intestinal transplantation remains an important option for patients with irreversible intestinal failures. The long-term outcome of an intestinal transplant has stagnated. The major cause of graft loss is rejection, resulting from mismatches in human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and the presence of antibodies to mismatched donor-specific HLA antigens (DSA). Literature has reported that DSAs, either preformed before transplantation or developed de novo after transplantation, are harmful to intestinal grafts, especially for those without combined liver grafts. A comprehensive assessment of DSA by the histocompatibility laboratory is critical for successful intestinal transplantation and its long-term survival. This paper briefly reviews the history and current status of different methods for detecting DSA and their clinical applications in intestinal transplantation. The focus is on applying different antibody assays to manage immunologically challenging intestinal transplant patients before and after transplantation. A clinical case is presented to illustrate the complexity of HLA tests and the necessity of multiple assays. The review of risk assessment by the histocompatibility laboratory also highlights the need for close interaction between the laboratory and the intestinal transplant program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingyong Xu
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
| | - Adriana Zeevi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | | | - Ruy J Cruz
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, USA; Gastrointestinal Rehabilitation and Transplant Center, Starzl Transplantation Institute, USA
| | - George V Mazariegos
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, USA; Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abele D, Gäbel M, Oltean M, Varkey J, Mölne J, Ekwall N, Borg H, Jacobsson H, Holgersson J, Herlenius G. Including the liver in the visceral allograft: Impact on donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and long-term outcomes. Hum Immunol 2024; 85:110767. [PMID: 38418315 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2024.110767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
Humoral immunity emerges as a risk factor for graft failure after visceral transplantation (VTx) and development of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) has been linked with poor outcomes. In most cases, a simultaneous liver transplant can be safely performed in sensitized patients with DSA and appears protective against lymphocytotoxic antibodies. We investigated the incidence of acute (AR) and chronic rejection (CR) in 32 VTx without any B cell-depleting pre-treatment (6 isolated intestinal transplants (IT) and 26 liver-containing, multivisceral transplants (MVT) and assessed the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) pre- and post-transplantation. Twenty-one patients (65 %) developed AR, 15 (57 %) of the MVT and 6 (100 %) of the IT (p = 0.05). CR occurred in 4 IT (60 %, p < 0.001). At one month, de novo DSA were present in 71 % of VTx (66 % MVT vs 100 % IT, p = 0.09). At the last available follow-up, 69 % of the MVT and 50 % of the IT patients were DSA-free. De novo DSA seemed more persistent (7/19, 37 %) than pre-Tx DSA (1/6, 17 %; p = n.s.), de novo DSA were more frequently specific for HLA class II than class I, 16/19 (84 %) vs. 7/19 (37 %; p = 0.003), and HLA-DQ was their most frequent target HLA. DQ mismatches appeared to be a risk factor for developing de novo DSA. In conclusion, liver-containing visceral allografts have superior short- and long-term outcomes compared with liver-free allografts. De novo DSA develop early and frequently after VTx performed without B cell-depleting induction therapy, but the exact role of DSA in the pathogenesis of rejection remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dace Abele
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Markus Gäbel
- The Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mihai Oltean
- The Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Jonas Varkey
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Internal Medicine & Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Johan Mölne
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Nils Ekwall
- Department of Pediatric Medicine, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburgl, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Helena Borg
- Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburgl, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Hanna Jacobsson
- Biobank West, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jan Holgersson
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Gustaf Herlenius
- The Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abreu P, Manzi J, Vianna R. Innovative surgical techniques in the intestine and multivisceral transplant. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2024; 29:88-96. [PMID: 37902277 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This timely review delves into the evolution of multivisceral transplantation (MVT) over the past six decades underscoring how advancements in surgical techniques and immunosuppression have driven transformation, to provide insight into the historical development of MVT, shedding light on its journey from experimentation to a valuable clinical approach. RECENT FINDINGS The review presents contemporary enhancements in surgical methods within the context of intestinal transplantation. The versatility of MVT is emphasized, accommodating diverse organ combinations and techniques. Both isolated intestinal transplantation (IIT) and MVT have seen expanded indications, driven by improved parenteral nutrition, transplantation outcomes, and surgical innovations. Surgical techniques are tailored based on graft type, with various approaches for isolated transplantation. Preservation strategies and ostomy techniques are also covered, along with graft assessment advancements involving donor-specific antibodies. SUMMARY This review's findings underscore the remarkable evolution of MVT from experimental origins to a comprehensive clinical practice. The progress in surgical techniques and immunosuppression has broadened the spectrum of patients who can benefit from intestinal transplant, including both IIT and MVT. The expansion of indications offers hope to patients with complex gastrointestinal disorders. The detection of donor-specific antibodies in graft assessment advances diagnostic accuracy, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillipe Abreu
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami Transplant Institute, Florida, USA
| | - Joao Manzi
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami Transplant Institute, Florida, USA
- University of Sao Paulo Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Vianna
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami Transplant Institute, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Klein K, Keck M, Langewisch E, Merani S, Hitchman K, Leick M. Evaluation of serial monitoring of donor-specific antibodies in pediatric and adult intestinal/multivisceral transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14638. [PMID: 37942670 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study purpose was to add to limited literature assessing anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) appearance, clearance, specificity, and impact in intestinal/multivisceral (MV) transplant as well as the value of serial monitoring following an institutional protocol shift implementing serial monitoring. METHODS This single-center retrospective review included intestinal/MV recipients transplanted 1/1/15-9/31/17 with completed DSA testing. Patients were divided into groups based on DSA presence post-transplant. The primary outcome was biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). Secondary outcomes included graft loss and death. Descriptive analysis of DSA was completed. RESULTS Of the 35 intestinal/MV recipients (60% pediatric) with DSA testing, 24 patients had post-transplant DSA. Fifteen patients in the DSA(+) group had T-cell-mediated BPAR versus five in the DSA(-) group (63% vs 45%, p = .47). Days to BPAR were 25 [IQR 19-165] (DSA(+) group) versus 232 [IQR 25.5-632.5] (DSA(-) group) (p = .066). There were no differences between groups for graft loss or death. One hundred and five DSA were identified in the DSA(+) group with 63% being class II, and 54% cleared during follow-up. DSA were directed against 50 different HLA alleles, with the most common being directed against HLA- DQ (35%). Time to first DSA and to clearance did not differ between class I and II. CONCLUSION Findings confirm previous data that suggest post-transplant DSA in this population may lead to increased BPAR or shorter time to BPAR, although not statistically significant. Most DSA were identified within the first month after transplant, and ahead of rejection identification on biopsy. DSA therefore may have utility as an early rejection biomarker and use may be considered in place of early protocol biopsies, particularly in pediatric patients. We identified novel findings of DSA directed against a large breadth of HLA in intestinal/MV patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey Klein
- University Health Transplant Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA
- The University of Texas at Austin, College of Pharmacy, Pharmacotherapy Division, Austin TX, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Megan Keck
- Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Eric Langewisch
- Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Shaheed Merani
- Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Kelley Hitchman
- University Health Transplant Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Mary Leick
- Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fu J, Hsiao T, Waffarn E, Meng W, Long KD, Frangaj K, Jones R, Gorur A, Shtewe A, Li M, Muntnich CB, Rogers K, Jiao W, Velasco M, Matsumoto R, Kubota M, Wells S, Danzl N, Ravella S, Iuga A, Vasilescu ER, Griesemer A, Weiner J, Farber DL, Luning Prak ET, Martinez M, Kato T, Hershberg U, Sykes M. Dynamic establishment and maintenance of the human intestinal B cell population and repertoire following transplantation. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.11.15.23298517. [PMID: 38014202 PMCID: PMC10680888 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.15.23298517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
It is unknown how intestinal B cell populations and B cell receptor (BCR) repertoires are established and maintained over time in humans. Following intestinal transplantation (ITx), surveillance ileal mucosal biopsies provide a unique opportunity to map the dynamic establishment of gut lymphocyte populations. Using polychromatic flow cytometry that includes HLA allele group-specific mAbs distinguishing donor from recipient cells along with high throughput BCR sequencing, we tracked the establishment of recipient B cell populations and BCR repertoire in the allograft mucosa of ITx recipients. We confirm the early presence of naïve donor B cells in the circulation and, for the first time, document the establishment of recipient B cell populations, including B resident memory cells, in the intestinal allograft mucosa. Recipient B cell repopulation of the allograft was most rapid in infant (<1 year old)-derived allografts and, unlike T cell repopulation, did not correlate with rejection rates. While recipient memory B cell populations were increased in graft mucosa compared to circulation, naïve recipient B cells remained detectable in the graft mucosa for years. Comparisons of peripheral and intra-mucosal B cell repertoires in the absence of rejection revealed increased BCR mutation rates and clonal expansion in graft mucosa compared to circulating B cells, but these parameters did not increase markedly after the first year post-transplant. Furthermore, clonal mixing between the allograft mucosa and the circulation was significantly greater in ITx recipients, even years after transplantation, than in healthy control adults. Collectively, our data demonstrate intestinal mucosal B cell repertoire establishment from a circulating pool, a process that continues for years without evidence of establishment of a stable mucosal B cell repertoire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianing Fu
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Hsiao
- Department of Human Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Elizabeth Waffarn
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wenzhao Meng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katherine D Long
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristjana Frangaj
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rebecca Jones
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alaka Gorur
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Areen Shtewe
- Department of Human Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Muyang Li
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Constanza Bay Muntnich
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kortney Rogers
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wenyu Jiao
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monica Velasco
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rei Matsumoto
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Masaru Kubota
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven Wells
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nichole Danzl
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shilpa Ravella
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alina Iuga
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Adam Griesemer
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joshua Weiner
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Donna L Farber
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eline T Luning Prak
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Tomoaki Kato
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Uri Hershberg
- Department of Human Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Megan Sykes
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Battle R, Pritchard D, Peacock S, Hastie C, Worthington J, Jordan S, McCaughlan JA, Barnardo M, Cope R, Collins C, Diaz-Burlinson N, Rosser C, Foster L, Kallon D, Shaw O, Briggs D, Turner D, Anand A, Akbarzad-Yousefi A, Sage D. BSHI and BTS UK guideline on the detection of alloantibodies in solid organ (and islet) transplantation. Int J Immunogenet 2023; 50 Suppl 2:3-63. [PMID: 37919251 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
Solid organ transplantation represents the best (and in many cases only) treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The effectiveness and functioning life of these transplants has improved each decade due to surgical and clinical advances, and accurate histocompatibility assessment. Patient exposure to alloantigen from another individual is a common occurrence and takes place through pregnancies, blood transfusions or previous transplantation. Such exposure to alloantigen's can lead to the formation of circulating alloreactive antibodies which can be deleterious to solid organ transplant outcome. The purpose of these guidelines is to update to the previous BSHI/BTS guidelines 2016 on the relevance, assessment, and management of alloantibodies within solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Battle
- Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Sarah Peacock
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Sue Jordan
- National Blood Service Tooting, London, UK
| | | | - Martin Barnardo
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rebecca Cope
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - Luke Foster
- Birmingham Blood Donor Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Olivia Shaw
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - David Turner
- Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Arthi Anand
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vianna R, Gaynor JJ, Selvaggi G, Farag A, Garcia J, Tekin A, Tabbara MM, Ciancio G. Liver Inclusion Appears to Be Protective Against Graft Loss-Due-to Chronic But Not Acute Rejection Following Intestinal Transplantation. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11568. [PMID: 37779512 PMCID: PMC10538304 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
In intestinal transplantation, while other centers have shown that liver-including allografts have significantly more favorable graft survival and graft loss-due-to chronic rejection (CHR) rates, our center has consistently shown that modified multivisceral (MMV) and full multivisceral (MV) allografts have significantly more favorable acute cellular rejection (ACR) and severe ACR rates compared with isolated intestine (I) and liver-intestine (LI) allografts. In the attempt to resolve this apparent discrepancy, we performed stepwise Cox multivariable analyses of the hazard rates of developing graft loss-due-to acute rejection (AR) vs. CHR among 350 consecutive intestinal transplants at our center with long-term follow-up (median: 13.5 years post-transplant). Observed percentages developing graft loss-due-to AR and CHR were 14.3% (50/350) and 6.6% (23/350), respectively. Only one baseline variable was selected into the Cox model indicating a significantly lower hazard rate of developing graft loss-due-to AR: Transplant Type MMV or MV (p < 0.000001). Conversely, two baseline variables were selected into the Cox model indicating a significantly lower hazard rate of developing graft loss-due-to CHR: Received Donor Liver (LI or MV) (p = 0.002) and Received Induction (p = 0.007). In summary, while MMV/MV transplants (who receive extensive native lymphoid tissue removal) offered protection against graft loss-due-to AR, liver-containing grafts appeared to offer protection against graft loss-due-to CHR, supporting the results of other studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Vianna
- Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Jeffrey J. Gaynor
- Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Gennaro Selvaggi
- Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Ahmed Farag
- Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
- Department of Surgery, Zagazig University School of Medicine, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Jennifer Garcia
- Department of Pediatrics, Miami Transplant Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Akin Tekin
- Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Marina M. Tabbara
- Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Gaetano Ciancio
- Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zorzetti N, Marino IR, Sorrenti S, Navarra GG, D'Andrea V, Lauro A. Small bowel transplant - novel indications and recent progress. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 17:677-690. [PMID: 37264646 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2221433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advances in the management of intestinal failure have led to a reduction in the number of intestinal transplants. The number of bowel transplants has been mainly stable even though a slight increase has been observed in the last 5 years. AREAS COVERED Standard indication includes patients with a reasonable life expectancy. Recent progress can be deduced by the increased number of intestine transplants in adults: this is due to the continuous improvement of 1-year graft survival worldwide (without differences in 3- and 5-year) associated with better abdominal wall closure techniques. This review aims to provide an update on new indications and changes in trends of pediatric and adult intestine transplantation. This analysis, which stretches through the past 5 years, is based on a collection of related manuscripts from PubMed. EXPERT COMMENTARY Intestinal transplants should be solely intended for a group of individuals for whom indications for transplantation are clear and both medical and surgical rehabilitations have failed. Nevertheless, many protocols developed over the years have not yet solved the key question represented by the over-immunosuppression. Novel indications and recent progress in the bowel transplant field, minimal yet consistent, represent a pathway to be followed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noemi Zorzetti
- General Surgery, Ospedale Civile "A. Costa", Alto Reno Terme, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Salvatore Sorrenti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Vito D'Andrea
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Augusto Lauro
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gaynor JJ, Tabbara MM, Ciancio G, Selvaggi G, Garcia J, Tekin A, Vianna R. The Importance Of Avoiding Time-Dependent Bias When Testing The Prognostic Value Of An Intervening Event - Two Acute Cellular Rejection Examples In Intestinal Transplantation. Am J Transplant 2023:S1600-6135(23)00308-8. [PMID: 36871628 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
In testing the prognostic value of the occurrence of an intervening event (clinical event that occurs post-transplant), 3 proper statistical methodologies for testing its prognostic value exist (time dependent covariate, landmark, and semi-Markov modelling methods). However, time-dependent bias has appeared in many clinical reports, whereby the intervening event is statistically treated as a baseline variable (as if it occurred at transplant). Using a single-center cohort of 445 intestinal transplant cases to test the prognostic value of 1st acute cellular rejection (ACR) and severe (grade of) ACR on the hazard rate of developing graft loss, we demonstrate how the inclusion of such time-dependent bias can lead to severe underestimation of the true hazard ratio (HR). The (statistically more powerful) time dependent covariate method in Cox's multivariable model yielded significantly unfavorable effects of 1st ACR (P<.0001; HR=2.492) and severe ACR (P<.0001; HR=4.531). In contrast, when using the time-dependent biased approach, multivariable analysis yielded an incorrect conclusion for the prognostic value of 1st ACR (P=.31, HR=0.877, 35.2% of 2.492) and a much smaller estimated effect of severe ACR (P=.0008; HR=1.589; 35.1% of 4.531). In conclusion, this study demonstrates the importance of avoiding time-dependent bias when testing the prognostic value of an intervening event.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Gaynor
- Miami Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Miami, FL.
| | - Marina M Tabbara
- Miami Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Miami, FL
| | - Gaetano Ciancio
- Miami Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Miami, FL
| | - Gennaro Selvaggi
- Miami Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Miami, FL
| | - Jennifer Garcia
- Miami Transplant Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Miami, FL
| | - Akin Tekin
- Miami Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Miami, FL
| | - Rodrigo Vianna
- Miami Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bharadwaj P, Shrestha S, Pongracz T, Concetta C, Sharma S, Le Moine A, de Haan N, Murakami N, Riella LV, Holovska V, Wuhrer M, Marchant A, Ackerman ME. Afucosylation of HLA-specific IgG1 as a potential predictor of antibody pathogenicity in kidney transplantation. Cell Rep Med 2022; 3:100818. [PMID: 36384101 PMCID: PMC9729883 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the leading cause of graft failure. While donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are associated with a higher risk of AMR, not all patients with DSAs develop rejection, suggesting that the characteristics of alloantibodies determining their pathogenicity remain undefined. Using human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-specific antibodies as a model, we apply systems serology tools to investigate qualitative features of immunoglobulin G (IgG) alloantibodies including Fc-glycosylation patterns and FcγR-binding properties. Levels of afucosylated anti-A2 antibodies are elevated in seropositive patients, especially those with AMR, suggesting potential cytotoxicity via FcγRIII-mediated mechanisms. Afucosylation of both glycoengineered monoclonal and naturally glycovariant polyclonal serum IgG specific to HLA-A2 drives potentiated binding to, slower dissociation from, and enhanced signaling through FcγRIII, a receptor widely expressed on innate effector cells, and greater cytotoxicity against HLA-A2+ cells mediated by natural killer (NK) cells. Collectively, these results suggest that afucosylated DSA may be a biomarker of AMR and contribute to pathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pranay Bharadwaj
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
| | - Sweta Shrestha
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
| | - Tamas Pongracz
- Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Catalano Concetta
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, Belgium; Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Shilpee Sharma
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - Alain Le Moine
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Noortje de Haan
- Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Naoka Murakami
- Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leonardo V Riella
- Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vanda Holovska
- HLA Laboratory, Laboratoire Hospitalier Universitaire de Bruxelles (LHUB), Hôpital Erasme ULB, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Manfred Wuhrer
- Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Arnaud Marchant
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - Margaret E Ackerman
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA; Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Charmetant X, Chen CC, Hamada S, Goncalves D, Saison C, Rabeyrin M, Rabant M, Duong van Huyen JP, Koenig A, Mathias V, Barba T, Lacaille F, le Pavec J, Brugière O, Taupin JL, Chalabreysse L, Mornex JF, Couzi L, Graff-Dubois S, Jeger-Madiot R, Tran-Dinh A, Mordant P, Paidassi H, Defrance T, Morelon E, Badet L, Nicoletti A, Dubois V, Thaunat O. Inverted direct allorecognition triggers early donor-specific antibody responses after transplantation. Sci Transl Med 2022; 14:eabg1046. [PMID: 36130013 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abg1046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The generation of antibodies against donor-specific major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens, a type of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), after transplantation requires that recipient's allospecific B cells receive help from T cells. The current dogma holds that this help is exclusively provided by the recipient's CD4+ T cells that recognize complexes of recipient's MHC II molecules and peptides derived from donor-specific MHC alloantigens, a process called indirect allorecognition. Here, we demonstrated that, after allogeneic heart transplantation, CD3ε knockout recipient mice lacking T cells generate a rapid, transient wave of switched alloantibodies, predominantly directed against MHC I molecules. This is due to the presence of donor CD4+ T cells within the graft that recognize intact recipient's MHC II molecules expressed by B cell receptor-activated allospecific B cells. Indirect evidence suggests that this inverted direct pathway is also operant in patients after transplantation. Resident memory donor CD4+ T cells were observed in perfusion liquids of human renal and lung grafts and acquired B cell helper functions upon in vitro stimulation. Furthermore, T follicular helper cells, specialized in helping B cells, were abundant in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue of lung and intestinal grafts. In the latter, more graft-derived passenger T cells correlated with the detection of donor T cells in recipient's circulation; this, in turn, was associated with an early transient anti-MHC I DSA response and worse transplantation outcomes. We conclude that this inverted direct allorecognition is a possible explanation for the early transient anti-MHC DSA responses frequently observed after lung or intestinal transplantations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Charmetant
- CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université de Lyon, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, 69007 Lyon, France
| | - Chien-Chia Chen
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan
| | - Sarah Hamada
- French National Blood Service (EFS), HLA Laboratory, 69150 Décines, France
| | - David Goncalves
- CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université de Lyon, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, 69007 Lyon, France
| | - Carole Saison
- French National Blood Service (EFS), HLA Laboratory, 69150 Décines, France
| | - Maud Rabeyrin
- Department of Pathology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est, 69500 Bron, France
| | - Marion Rabant
- Pathology Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Necker, 75015 Paris, France
| | | | - Alice Koenig
- CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université de Lyon, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, 69007 Lyon, France
- Lyon-Est Medical Faculty, Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), 69008 Lyon, France
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - Virginie Mathias
- French National Blood Service (EFS), HLA Laboratory, 69150 Décines, France
| | - Thomas Barba
- CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université de Lyon, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, 69007 Lyon, France
| | - Florence Lacaille
- Pediatric Gastroenterology-Hepatology-Nutrition Unit, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants malades, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Jérôme le Pavec
- Department of Pulmonology and Lung Transplantation, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France
| | - Olivier Brugière
- Pulmonology Department, Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre and Lung Transplantation Department, Foch Hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Laboratory of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Hôpital Saint-Louis APHP, 75010 Paris, France
- INSERM U976 Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis, Université Paris Diderot, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Lara Chalabreysse
- Department of Pathology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est, 69500 Bron, France
| | - Jean-François Mornex
- Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, INRAE, IVPC, UMR754, 69000 Lyon, France
- Department of Pneumology, GHE, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69000 Lyon, France
| | - Lionel Couzi
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation, Dialysis, Apheresis, Pellegrin Hospital, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Stéphanie Graff-Dubois
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (i3), 75013 Paris, France
| | - Raphaël Jeger-Madiot
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (i3), 75013 Paris, France
| | - Alexy Tran-Dinh
- Université de Paris, LVTS, INSERM U1148, 75018 Paris, France
| | - Pierre Mordant
- Department of Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, 75018 Paris, France
| | - Helena Paidassi
- CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université de Lyon, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, 69007 Lyon, France
| | - Thierry Defrance
- CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université de Lyon, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, 69007 Lyon, France
| | - Emmanuel Morelon
- CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université de Lyon, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, 69007 Lyon, France
- Lyon-Est Medical Faculty, Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), 69008 Lyon, France
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - Lionel Badet
- Lyon-Est Medical Faculty, Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), 69008 Lyon, France
- Department of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69003 Lyon, France
| | | | - Valérie Dubois
- French National Blood Service (EFS), HLA Laboratory, 69150 Décines, France
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université de Lyon, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, 69007 Lyon, France
- Lyon-Est Medical Faculty, Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), 69008 Lyon, France
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69003 Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Raghu VK, Vetterly CG, Horslen SP. Immunosuppression Regimens for Intestinal Transplantation in Children. Paediatr Drugs 2022; 24:365-376. [PMID: 35604536 DOI: 10.1007/s40272-022-00512-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric intestinal transplant serves as the only definitive treatment for children with irreversible intestinal failure. Successful intestinal transplant hinges upon appropriate management of immunosuppression. The indications for intestinal transplant have changed over time. Immunosuppression regimens can be divided into induction and maintenance phases along with treatment of acute rejection. Intestinal transplant induction now often includes antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab in addition to corticosteroids. Maintenance regimens continue to be dominated by tacrolimus, with additional agents used to either decrease goal tacrolimus levels to limit toxicity or as an adjunct in sensitized patients. Careful monitoring can help to limit serious complications, such as rejection, infection, and malignancy. Future work will aim to decrease variation in practice and identify methods to determine optimal immunosuppression for a particular patient. Furthermore, there is a need for non-invasive monitoring of the intestinal graft and functional assessments of immunosuppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram Kalathur Raghu
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine and UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Carol G Vetterly
- Department of Pharmacy, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Simon Peter Horslen
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine and UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Advancements in donor management, organ preservation and operative techniques, as well as immunosuppressive therapies, have provided children with intestinal failure and its complications a chance not only for enteral autonomy but also long-term survival through intestinal transplantation (ITx). First described in the 1960's, experience has grown in managing these complex patients both pre- and post-transplant. The goals of this review are to provide a brief history of intestinal transplantation and intestinal rehabilitation in pediatric patients, followed by focused discussions of the indications for ITx, induction and maintenance immunosuppression therapies, common post-operative complications, and outcomes/quality of life post-transplant.
Collapse
|
22
|
Lasa-Lázaro M, Ramos-Boluda E, Mancebo E, Castro-Panete MJ, González-Sacristán R, Serradilla J, Andrés-Moreno AM, Hernández-Oliveros F, Paz-Artal E, Talayero P. Antibody-removal therapies for de novo DSA in pediatric intestinal recipients: Why, when, and how? A single-center experience. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:1074577. [PMID: 36819192 PMCID: PMC9932897 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.1074577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) impact negatively on the outcome of intestinal grafts. Although the use of antibody-removal therapies (ART) is becoming more frequent in the last few years, issues regarding their timing and effectiveness remain under discussion. METHODS In the present study, we report our experience with eight ART procedures (based on plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab) in eight pediatric intestinal and multivisceral transplants with de novo DSA (dnDSA). RESULTS ART were performed when dnDSA appeared in two contexts: (1) concomitant with rejection (acute or chronic) or (2) without rejection or any other clinical symptom. Complete DSA removal was observed in seven out of eight patients, showing an effectiveness of 88%. In the group treated for dnDSA without clinical symptoms, the success rate was 100%, with complete DSA removal and without rejection afterward. A shorter time between DSA detection and ART performance appeared as a significant factor for the success of the therapy (p = 0.0002). DSA against HLA-A and DQ alleles were the most resistant to ART, whereas anti-DR DSA were the most sensitive. In addition, the 8-year allograft survival rate in recipients undergoing ART was similar to that in those without DSA, being significantly lower in non-treated DSA-positive recipients (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION The results confirm the effectiveness of ART in terms of DSA removal and allograft survival and encourage its early use even in the absence of clinical symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Lasa-Lázaro
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther Ramos-Boluda
- Unit of Intestinal Rehabilitation and Transplant, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther Mancebo
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - María José Castro-Panete
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Javier Serradilla
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.,IdiPaz Research Institute, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ane Miren Andrés-Moreno
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.,IdiPaz Research Institute, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco Hernández-Oliveros
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.,IdiPaz Research Institute, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Estela Paz-Artal
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.,School of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.,CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paloma Talayero
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Moon JI, Ko HM, Iyer KR. Enhanced virtual crossmatch in intestinal transplantation: association with outcomes and application in practice. KOREAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION 2021; 35:230-237. [PMID: 35769851 PMCID: PMC9235456 DOI: 10.4285/kjt.21.0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jang Il Moon
- Recanati Miller Transplantation Institute and Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Huaibin M Ko
- Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kishore R Iyer
- Recanati Miller Transplantation Institute and Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Immunosuppression in liver and intestinal transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2021; 54-55:101767. [PMID: 34874848 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2021.101767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Immunosuppression handling plays a key role in the early and long-term results of transplantation. The development of multiple immunosuppressive drugs led to numerous clincial trials searching to reach the ideal regimen. Due to heterogeneity of the studied patient cohorts and flaws in many, even randomized controlled, study designs, the answer still stands out. Nowadays triple-drug immunosuppression containing a calcineurin inhibitor (preferentially tacrolimus), an antimetabolite (using mycophenolate moffettil or Azathioprine) and short-term steroids with or without induction therapy (using anti-IL2 receptor blocker or anti-lymphocytic serum) is the preferred option in both liver and intestinal transplantation. This chapter aims, based on a critical review of the definitions of rejection, corticoresistant rejection and standard immunosuppression to give some reflections on how to reach an optimal immunosuppressive status and to conduct trials allowing to draw solid conclusions. Endpoints of future trials should not anymore focus on biopsy proven, acute and chronic, rejection but also on graft and patient survival. Correlation between early- and long-term biologic, immunologic and histopathologic findings will be fundamental to reach in much more patients the status of operational tolerance.
Collapse
|
25
|
Spaggiari M, Lichvar A, Tzvetanov I, Carroll R, Gaitonde S, Setty S, Cocco PD, Alvarez JAA, Benedetti E. Temporary Deceased Donor Splenic Transplant Prior to Intestinal Transplantation: A New Strategy for Desensitization? Transplant Proc 2021; 53:2602-2608. [PMID: 34503818 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Intestinal transplantation is a therapeutic treatment option for patients with irreversible intestinal failure. The presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) has been associated with increased antibody-mediated rejection and allograft loss for recipients of all the solid organ transplants. This case report describes the posttransplant course in the first year of a patient who received a T-cell and B-cell flow cross-match (FXM) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity cross-match positive intestinal transplant in the presence of several class I and class II DSAs who underwent a "temporary desensitization" using the donor spleen. The temporary donor splenic transplant removed several class I and II DSAs as demonstrated by the negative subsequent T-cell FXM, the decreased mean channel shift of the positive B-cell FXM with a significant decrease in DSA mean florescence intensity post temporary splenic transplant. The patient experienced an isolated incidence of acute rejection, which responded to therapy. He had no infectious or cancerous sequelae from the immunosuppression modalities. He was able to discontinue total parenteral nutrition and gained weight after the procedure. Long-term effects are not able to be determined from this approach; hence, further research is warranted to better evaluate the real efficacy of this strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Spaggiari
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
| | - Alicia Lichvar
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ivo Tzvetanov
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Robert Carroll
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sujata Gaitonde
- Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Suman Setty
- Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Pierpaolo Di Cocco
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jorge A Almario Alvarez
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Enrico Benedetti
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Whang EC, Rossetti M, Guerra MR, Cheng E, Marcus EA, McDiarmid SV, Venick RS, Farmer DG, Reed EF, Wozniak LJ. Differential cytokine and chemokine expression during rejection and infection following intestinal transplantation. Transpl Immunol 2021; 69:101447. [PMID: 34400246 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2021.101447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Rejection and infectious enteritis in intestinal transplant (ITx) patients present with virtually identical symptoms. Currently, the gold standard for differentiating between these two conditions is endoscopy, which is invasive and costly. Our primary aim was to identify differences in peripheral blood cytokines during episodes of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and infectious enteritis in patients with intestinal transplants. METHODS This was a prospective, cross-sectional study involving ITx patients transplanted between 2000 and 2016. We studied 63 blood samples collected from 29 ITx patients during periods of normal (n = 24) and abnormal (n = 17) allograft function. PBMCs from whole blood samples were cultured under unstimulated or stimulated conditions with phytohemagglutinin (PHA). The supernatant from these cultures were collected to measure cytokine and chemokine levels using a 38-plex luminex panel. RESULTS Our study found that cytokines and chemokines are differentially expressed in normal, ACR, and infectious enteritis samples under unstimulated conditions based on heatmap analysis. Although each cohort displayed distinctive signatures, only MDC (p = 0.037) was found to be significantly different between ACR and infectious enteritis. Upon stimulation of PBMCs, patients with ACR demonstrated increased immune reactivity compared to infectious enteritis; though this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive study comparing cytokine expression during acute rejection and infectious enteritis in intestinal transplant recipients. Our results suggest that cytokines have the potential to be used as clinical markers for risk stratification and/or diagnosis of ACR and infectious enteritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E C Whang
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States.
| | - M Rossetti
- Immunogenetics Center, UCLA, United States
| | - M R Guerra
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States
| | - E Cheng
- Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States
| | - E A Marcus
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States; VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, United States
| | - S V McDiarmid
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States; Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States
| | - R S Venick
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States; Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States
| | - D G Farmer
- Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States
| | - E F Reed
- Immunogenetics Center, UCLA, United States
| | - L J Wozniak
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Vo HD, Radio SJ, Reyes-Santiago EM, Mauch TJ. Post-transplant hepatic fibrosis in pediatric liver-small bowel transplant recipients: A single-center, retrospective, observational study. Pediatr Transplant 2021; 25:e13965. [PMID: 33378567 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the prevalence of hepatic graft fibrosis in combined LSBT children. We aimed to determine the prevalence of and identify potential predictors for hepatic graft fibrosis in LSBT children and to compare them with those in LT children. METHODS We retrospectively included children younger than 19 years who had received a primary LT/LSBT between 2000 and 2018 and had a liver biopsy performed at least 6 months post-transplant. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine predictors associated with significant hepatic graft fibrosis (≥F2) in LSBT vs LT children. RESULTS Ninety-six children (47 LSBT, 54 females) were included. The median post-transplant follow-up (years) was 12.8 in LT vs 10.5 in LSBT patients (P = .06). Hepatic graft fibrosis was found in 81.6% of LT vs 70.2% of LSBT children (P = .19), after a median time of 2.5 years and 2.6 years, respectively. On multivariate analyses, having post-transplant biliary complications was found to be associated with significant graft fibrosis in LT children, whereas AST/ALT ratio was found to predict significant hepatic graft fibrosis in LSBT children. The use of parenteral nutrition after transplant was not associated with significant hepatic graft fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of hepatic graft fibrosis in LSBT children did not significantly differ from that in LT children, but the predictors may differ. Future studies should investigate the role of post-transplant autoimmune antibodies and donor-specific antibodies in the development and progression of hepatic graft fibrosis in LSBT children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanh D Vo
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Stanley J Radio
- Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Emille M Reyes-Santiago
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Teri J Mauch
- Pediatric Nephrology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Smullin CP, Venick RS, Marcus EA, Naini BV, Farmer DG. REG3α is a novel biomarker that potentially correlates with acute allograft rejection after intestinal transplantation. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14378. [PMID: 34060679 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Monitoring of intestinal allograft function remains a challenge. While frequent endoscopies and biopsies are the gold standard, no single biomarker exists to screen for intestinal transplant rejection. The novel REG3α, an antimicrobial peptide secreted by intestinal enterocytes and Paneth cells, has been associated with inflammatory bowel disease as well as intestinal graft versus host disease. Our aim was to identify and describe a role of REG3α in monitoring or predicting acute allograft rejection after intestinal transplantation (ITx). Since 2019, we have incorporated REG3α into the standard monitoring of patients after ITx. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained IRB-approved database and present, herein, the results of 2 adults with irreversible intestinal failure who underwent isolated ITx under this monitoring protocol. Increases in REG3α corresponded with acute allograft rejection in both cases and preceded acute allograft rejection by 1 week in one of the cases. We describe REG3α as a non-invasive marker of acute allograft rejection after adult isolated ITx which not only corresponded with acute allograft rejection but also preceded histopathological changes by 1 week.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert S Venick
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Marcus
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bita V Naini
- Department of Pathology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Douglas G Farmer
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Schmitz R, Fitch ZW, Schroder PM, Choi AY, Jackson AM, Knechtle SJ, Kwun J. B cells in transplant tolerance and rejection: friends or foes? Transpl Int 2021; 33:30-40. [PMID: 31705678 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Our understanding of the role of B cells in organ transplantation remains incomplete and continues to grow. The majority of research has focused on the detrimental role of antibodies that drive the development of pathogenesis of the transplanted organ. However, it has been shown that not all donor-specific antibodies are harmful and in some circumstances can even promote tolerance through the mechanism of accommodation. Furthermore, B cells can have effects on transplanted organs through their interaction with T cells, namely antigen presentation, cytokine production, and costimulation. More recently, the role and importance of Bregs was introduced to the field of transplantation. Due to this functional and ontogenetic heterogeneity, targeting B cells in transplantation may bring undesired immunologic side effects including increased rejection. Therefore, the selective control of B cells that contribute to the humoral response against donor antigens will continue to be an important and challenging area of research and potentially lead to improved long-term transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Schmitz
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Zachary W Fitch
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paul M Schroder
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ashley Y Choi
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Annette M Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chan AP, Guerra MAR, Rossetti M, Hickey MJ, Venick RS, Marcus EA, McDiarmid SV, Farmer DG, Reed EF, Wozniak LJ. Non-HLA AT1R antibodies are highly prevalent after pediatric intestinal transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2021; 25:e13987. [PMID: 33590644 PMCID: PMC8058288 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The role of angiotensin II type-1 receptor (AT1R) antibodies in intestinal transplantation (ITx) is unclear. The aims were 1) to identify the prevalence of AT1R antibodies in pediatric ITx, compared to pediatric intestinal failure (IF), and 2) to determine whether AT1R antibodies were associated with graft dysfunction. 46 serum samples from 25 ITx patients (3 isolated ITx, 22 liver-inclusive ITx) were collected during routine visits >6 months apart and during episodes of graft dysfunction as a result of infectious enteritis or rejection. For comparison, samples were collected from 7 IF control patients. AT1R antibodies were considered positive for levels >17 U/mL. The median (range) AT1R antibody level for ITx patients was 40.0 U/mL (7.2-40.0), compared to 7.0 U/mL (5.7-40.0) for IF patients (p = .02). There was a trend toward higher prevalence of AT1R antibodies in ITx compared with IF patients (68% versus 29%, p = .09). Among ITx patients, the prevalence of AT1R antibodies was not different between periods of active graft dysfunction and normal health (83% versus 67%, p = .31). For 16 patients with >2 samples, AT1R antibodies remained positive in 67% cases, developed in 14% cases, disappeared in 10% cases, and remained negative in 10% cases. The changes in AT1R antibodies did not correlate with de/sensitizing events. This is the first study of AT1R antibodies in pediatric ITx. AT1R antibodies are highly prevalent after ITx and may be triggered by immune activation associated with the transplant. However, their pathogenicity and clinical utility remain in question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvin P Chan
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital and David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marjorie-Anne R Guerra
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital and David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Maura Rossetti
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michelle J Hickey
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Robert S Venick
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital and David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Marcus
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital and David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Suzanne V McDiarmid
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital and David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Douglas G Farmer
- Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elaine F Reed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Laura J Wozniak
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital and David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In this article, data from the intestinal transplant registry, recent publications and reviews in the field will be used to describe mortality, morbidity, complications, nutritional and psychosocial outcomes in intestinal transplant recipients with a focus on those furthest out from transplant. RECENT FINDINGS Registry data show static long-term survival data (41% 10-year survival in the most recent analysis), but experienced centres report improvements with survival between 60 and 70% at 10 years. Chronic rejection remains a problem for long-term graft survival, but understanding of humoral immunity is increasing. Nutritional outcomes are good with most recipients achieving enteral autonomy with an unrestricted diet. Health-related quality of life data generally shows improvement in the years after transplant, educational attainment is good, but some patients have ongoing psychosocial problems. SUMMARY Most patients do well in the long-term after transplant. Survival outcomes have improved in experienced centres, and nutrition and quality of life outcomes are good. Recognition of psychosocial outcomes is increasing. Nevertheless, challenges remain in areas such as infectious complications, renal function, chronic rejection, social support and mental health.
Collapse
|
32
|
Donor-specific antibody and sensitized patients in intestinal transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2021; 26:245-249. [PMID: 33528224 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW It has been well established that antibody to donor HLA pretransplant and the development of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies posttransplant contribute to inferior graft survival outcomes. This article serves to review the current status of the management of pretransplant sensitized intestinal transplant candidate as well as to review posttransplant care of patients that harbor antidonor HLA antibodies. RECENT FINDINGS The intestinal transplant candidate oftentimes presents for transplant listing with high levels of anti-HLA antibodies that necessitate a careful preoperative strategy to avoid a donor-recipient pair that would result in a positive crossmatch. In the end, donor intestine offer acceptance is based on a balance between recipient clinical needs and allowable immunologic risk tolerance. The use of virtual crossmatching (VXM) enables the transplant center to effectively gauge the immunologic risk of each potential donor-recipient pair far in advance of allocating resources toward pursuing a donor organ. In those candidates with high levels of preformed donor anti-HLA antibodies, desensitization with a novel technique of donor splenic perfusion has been described as well as a single-center experience with a conventional desensitizing protocol. Posttransplant, with the use of a denovo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) monitoring and treatment protocol, the well known deleterious effects of dnDSA can potentially be ameliorated, thus improving outcome. Efforts to establish a formal histologic criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in the intestinal graft continues to evolve with recent findings describing the relationship between DSA and histopathologic findings. SUMMARY Techniques such as the use of VXM, novel desensitization methods and protocols, monitoring and eradicating dnDSA, along with establishing new criteria for ABMR have all contributed to improving the outcomes in transplanting the immunologically challenging intestine.
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The current review aims to describe in detail the most common practices utilized to monitor graft function in intestinal transplant (ITx) recipients. In addition, to discussing the role of endoscopy and stool studies it will examine the use of other potential biomarkers which have been utilized. Data will be discussed from contemporary publications in the field, the Intestinal Transplant Registry as well as detailed data from a large, ITx single-center. RECENT FINDINGS Significant improvements have been made in early outcomes following ITx, yet long-term survival remains challenged by infection and rejection, both of which can present with diarrhea. While endoscopy and stool studies are the gold-standard for graft monitoring, calprotectin, citrulline, measurements of immunoreactivity and donor-specific antibodies have been investigated in the field and are herein reviewed. SUMMARY Despite a number of tests which are currently available for monitoring ITx recipients, a strong need exists for improved noninvasive, timely and accurate biomarkers to help improve ITx graft and patient survival.
Collapse
|
34
|
Varkey J. Graft assessment for acute rejection after intestinal transplantation: current status and future perspective. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:13-19. [PMID: 33202155 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1847318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Intestinal transplantation has since its inception evolved as a lifesaving treatment option for patients with irreversible intestinal failure who can no longer be sustained on parenteral nutrition. Improvement in short-term survival after transplantation has also justified the expansion of treatment indications. Unfortunately, success is somewhat limited by a plateau observed in long-term survival. The reason for this sub-optimal long-term result experienced in this cohort may in part be attributed to the intestinal graft with the lymphoid content it carries inflicting the host with multiple complications where acute cellular rejection is one of the most common causes for graft loss. Graft monitoring is for this reason of paramount importance and detection of rejection at an early stage essential to enable early instigation of treatment and successful reversal of the pathology. Due to the challenges in diagnosing acute rejection with a noninvasive marker we are still limited to a surveillance protocol using endoscopy and biopsies for the diagnosis of rejection. The purpose of our paper is to review the adequacy of different methods in monitoring the graft for acute rejection using biomarkers, endoscopy and imaging. In conclusion, the evidence base continues to support the use of histology for the diagnosis of acute rejection. The role of biomarkers are still debatable, although markers such as calprotectin might be beneficial in excluding an ongoing process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Varkey
- Department of Internal Medicine & Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Sahlgrenska Intestinal Failure and Transplant Centre, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Factors Associated With 5- and 10-Year Survival After Intestinal Transplantation in Infants and Children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2020; 71:617-623. [PMID: 33093368 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Intestinal transplantation is an option for permanent intestinal failure with parenteral nutrition intolerance. We sought to determine long-term intestinal graft survival in pediatric patients at our center and to identify factors influencing survival. METHODS Retrospective chart review of 86 patients transplanted between 2003 and 2013, targeting potential explanatory variables related to demographics, perioperative factors, and postoperative complications. RESULTS Intestinal graft survival was 71% and 65% after 5 and 10 years, respectively. Five-year graft survival was attained in 79% of patients with a history of anatomic intestinal failure compared with 45% with functional intestinal failure (P = 0.0055). Compared with nonsurvival, 5-year graft survival was also associated with reduced incidences of graft-versus-host disease (2% vs 16%, P = 0.0237), post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (3% vs 24%, P = 0.0067), and de novo donor-specific antibodies (19% vs 57%, P = 0.0451) plus a lower donor-recipient weight ratio (median 0.727 vs 0.923, P = 0.0316). Factors not associated with 5-year intestinal graft survival included graft rejection of any severity and inclusion of a liver graft. Factors associated with graft survival at 10 years were similar to those at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS In our experience, outcomes in pediatric intestinal transplantation have improved substantially for anatomic but not functional intestinal failure. Graft survival depends on avoidance of severe infectious and immunological complications including GVHD, whereas inclusion of a liver graft provides no obvious survival benefit. Reduced success with functional intestinal failure may reflect inherently increased susceptibility to complications in this group.
Collapse
|
36
|
|
37
|
Courbage S, Canioni D, Talbotec C, Lambe C, Chardot C, Rabant M, Galmiche L, Corcos O, Goulet O, Joly F, Lacaille F. Beyond 10 years, with or without an intestinal graft: Present and future? Am J Transplant 2020; 20:2802-2812. [PMID: 32277553 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Long-term outcomes in children undergoing intestinal transplantation remain unclear. Seventy-one children underwent intestinal transplantation in our center from 1989 to 2007. We report on 10-year posttransplant outcomes with (group 1, n = 26) and without (group 2, n = 9) a functional graft. Ten-year patient and graft survival rates were 53% and 36%, respectively. Most patients were studying or working, one third having psychiatric disorders. All patients in group 1 were weaned off parenteral nutrition with mostly normal physical growth and subnormal energy absorption. Graft histology from 15 late biopsies showed minimal abnormality. However, micronutrient deficiencies and fat malabsorption were frequent; biliary complications occurred in 4 patients among the 17 who underwent liver transplantation; median renal clearance was 87 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Four patients in group 1 experienced late acute rejection. Among the 9 patients in group 2, 4 died after 10 years and 2 developed significant liver fibrosis. Liver transplantation and the use of a 3-drug regimen including sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil were associated with improved graft survival. Therefore, intestinal transplantation may enable a satisfactory digestive function in the long term. The prognosis of graft removal without retransplantation is better than expected. Regular monitoring of micronutrients, early psychological assessment, and use of sirolimus are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Courbage
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Danielle Canioni
- Department of Pathology, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Talbotec
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Lambe
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Chardot
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Marion Rabant
- Department of Pathology, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Louise Galmiche
- Department of Pathology, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Corcos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nutrition Support and Intestinal Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris, Clichy, France
| | - Olivier Goulet
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Francisca Joly
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nutrition Support and Intestinal Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris, Clichy, France
| | - Florence Lacaille
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Amin A, Farmer DG. Current outcomes after pediatric and adult intestinal transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2020; 24:193-198. [PMID: 30676400 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In this article, we will review the outcomes of patients with intestinal transplant (ITx) with a focus on factors affecting long-term graft and patient survival. RECENT FINDINGS The most recent International Intestinal Transplant Registry reports a 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival of 71%, 50%, and 41% respectively, for ITx grafts transplanted since 2000. Over the past decades, significant improvements have been achieved in short-term graft and patient outcomes for ITx recipients. The improvement in short-term outcomes may be related to the focused treatment of antihuman leukocyte antigen antibodies, the use of induction immunotherapy protocols, refinements in surgical techniques, establishment of dedicated ITx units, and improved postoperative management.However, long-term graft and patient outcomes for ITx recipients remain stagnant. Issues impairing long-term outcomes of ITx include the challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic rejection and antibody-mediated rejection, progressive decline in renal function, and long-term infectious and malignancy risks especially related to cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after ITx. SUMMARY Addressing and preventing early and late complications is the key to improving short-term and long-term outcomes after ITx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpit Amin
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wang J, Wang P, Wang S, Tan J. Donor-specific HLA Antibodies in Solid Organ Transplantation: Clinical Relevance and Debates. EXPLORATORY RESEARCH AND HYPOTHESIS IN MEDICINE 2019; 000:1-11. [DOI: 10.14218/erhm.2019.00012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
40
|
Wozniak LJ, Venick RS. Donor-specific antibodies following liver and intestinal transplantation: Clinical significance, pathogenesis and recommendations. Int Rev Immunol 2019; 38:106-117. [DOI: 10.1080/08830185.2019.1630404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J. Wozniak
- Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Robert S. Venick
- Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Intestinal re-transplantation: indications, techniques and outcomes. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2019; 23:224-228. [PMID: 29465439 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The field of intestinal transplantation has shown significant growth and has become the gold standard therapy for patients that suffer from the complications of total parenteral nutrition due to irreversible intestinal failure. In the early years of intestinal transplant, retransplantation was associated with extremely high morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent encouraging reports, showing significant improvement in outcomes after intestinal retransplantation. RECENT FINDINGS Recent studies at large volume centers have reported significant progress in patient and graft survival after intestinal retransplantation. Recent literature described the most common indications for retransplantation, surgical techniques, timing of graft enterectomy, immunologic monitoring, and complications. Improvement in outcomes due to advances in immunosuppression management and the importance of liver-containing grafts are also described. SUMMARY Improving early to midterm patient and graft survival has made consideration for intestinal retransplantation even more necessary. Current clinical evidence supports the benefit of intestinal retransplantation in well selected recipients. Initial immunosuppression protocols, technical modifications, proper timing of enterectomy, and improved infectious disease monitoring have contributed to improved outcomes.
Collapse
|
42
|
Donor-specific antibody management in intestine transplantation: hope for improving the long-term durability of the intestine allograft? Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2019; 24:212-218. [DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
43
|
Timofeeva OA. Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies as Biomarkers of Transplant Rejection. Clin Lab Med 2019; 39:45-60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2018.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
44
|
|
45
|
Talayero P, Ramos Boluda E, Gómez Massa E, Castro Panete MJ, Prieto Bozano G, Hernández Oliveros F, López Santamaría M, Calvo Pulido J, Paz-Artal E, Mancebo E. Donor-Specific Antibodies in Pediatric Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation: The Role of Liver and Human Leukocyte Antigen Mismatching. Liver Transpl 2018; 24:1726-1735. [PMID: 30112820 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Rejection is one of the most important drawbacks for graft and patient survival in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. However, there is no consensus on the diagnostic criteria for humoral rejection, and the literature about the role of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) on allograft outcome and the risk factors that contribute to their development is scant with contradictory results. The present study analyzes the role of DSA exclusively in a pediatric cohort of 43 transplants. Among our patients, 11.6% showed preformed DSA, but they did not correlate with more rejection or less allograft survival. Having previous transplants was the main sensitization factor with an odds ratio (OR) = 44.85 (P = 0.001). In total, 16.3% of recipients developed de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA), mostly directed against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II, polyspecific and complement fixing. Additionally, the presence of dnDSA had a deleterious effect on graft rejection (hazard ratio [HR] = 11.00; P = 0.01) and survival (HR = 66.52; P < 0.001) in an observational period of 5 years after transplantation. The inclusion of the liver emerged as the main protective factor against dnDSA development with an OR = 0.07 (P = 0.007). The analysis of HLA compatibility at the serological and epitope level with the computational tools HLAMatchmaker and PIRCHE revealed no association between HLA mismatching and dnDSA. In conclusion, this study performed in pediatric recipients shows the deleterious effect of dnDSA on intestinal transplantation supported by the complement-fixing activity observed. Additionally, the liver inclusion in the allografts showed to be a protective factor against dnDSA generation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paloma Talayero
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.,I+12 Research Institute, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther Ramos Boluda
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Intestinal Rehabilitation Unit, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Gómez Massa
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.,I+12 Research Institute, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Gerardo Prieto Bozano
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Intestinal Rehabilitation Unit, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco Hernández Oliveros
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.,EOC of ERN-Transplantchild, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Jorge Calvo Pulido
- General and Digestive Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.,School of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Estela Paz-Artal
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.,I+12 Research Institute, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.,School of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.,Section of Immunology, San Pablo CEU University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther Mancebo
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.,I+12 Research Institute, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.,School of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lacaille F. Intestinal Transplantation and Donor-Specific Antibodies: Another Brick in the Wall. Liver Transpl 2018; 24:1651-1652. [PMID: 30369014 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Lacaille
- Gastroenterology-Hepatology-Nutrition Unit, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Mallon DH, Kling C, Robb M, Ellinghaus E, Bradley JA, Taylor CJ, Kabelitz D, Kosmoliaptsis V. Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential. THE JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY 2018; 201:3780-3792. [PMID: 30429288 PMCID: PMC6287104 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
In transplantation, development of humoral alloimmunity against donor HLA is a major cause of organ transplant failure, but our ability to assess the immunological risk associated with a potential donor–recipient HLA combination is limited. We hypothesized that the capacity of donor HLA to induce a specific alloantibody response depends on their structural and physicochemical dissimilarity compared with recipient HLA. To test this hypothesis, we first developed a novel computational scoring system that enables quantitative assessment of surface electrostatic potential differences between donor and recipient HLA molecules at the tertiary structure level [three-dimensional electrostatic mismatch score (EMS-3D)]. We then examined humoral alloimmune responses in healthy females subjected to a standardized injection of donor lymphocytes from their male partner. This analysis showed a strong association between the EMS-3D of donor HLA and donor-specific alloantibody development; this relationship was strongest for HLA-DQ alloantigens. In the clinical transplantation setting, the immunogenic potential of HLA-DRB1 and -DQ mismatches expressed on donor kidneys, as assessed by their EMS-3D, was an independent predictor of development of donor-specific alloantibody after graft failure. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the translational potential of our approach to improve immunological risk assessment and to decrease the burden of humoral alloimmunity in organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dermot H Mallon
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.,National Institute for Health Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.,National Institute of Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Christiane Kling
- Institute for Immunology, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - Matthew Robb
- Statistics and Clinical Studies Unit, National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol BS34 7QH, United Kingdom
| | - Eva Ellinghaus
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, 24105 Kiel, Germany; and
| | - J Andrew Bradley
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.,National Institute for Health Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.,National Institute of Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Craig J Taylor
- National Institute of Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.,Tissue Typing Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Dieter Kabelitz
- Institute for Immunology, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom; .,National Institute for Health Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.,National Institute of Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Guerra MAR, Rossetti M, Zhang Z, Zhou X, Whang EC, Venick RS, Marcus EA, McDiarmid SV, Farmer DG, Reed EF, Wozniak LJ. Characterization of T cell immunophenotypes in intestinal transplantation: A pilot study. Transpl Immunol 2018; 51:50-57. [PMID: 30243797 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2018.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Revised: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Immunophenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells has been shown to be a useful, non-invasive method of predicting acute cellular rejection (ACR) following intestinal transplantation (ITx). Our objectives were to characterize differences in the T cell immunophenotype of ITx recipients in peripheral blood samples (1) collected late versus early after ITx and (1) associated with episodes of ACR and infectious enteritis. An IRB-approved, cross-sectional study of ITx recipients was performed. Peripheral blood samples were collected during normal visits and episodes of allograft dysfunction. A total of 38 patients were included in the analysis: 31 ITx recipients (87% liver-inclusive allografts) and 7 intestinal failure control patients. Of the ITx patients, 26 patients were pediatric patients (<21 years). A total of 70 samples were analyzed from ITx recipients, including 51 during normal visits and 19 during episodes of allograft dysfunction (median of 2 samples per patient; range of 1-6 samples per patient). In the late (n = 32) versus early post-ITx (n = 19) normal samples, there was a significantly higher percentage of central memory CD4 T cells (p = .001). In the ACR (n = 5) versus infectious enteritis (n = 14) samples, there was a higher percentage of CD8 T cells expressing HLA-DR (p = .002), CD57 (p < .001), and KLRG1 (p < .001) and a higher percentage of CD4 T cells expressing CD57 (p = .03). Additional studies are needed with larger cohorts to validate these changes in the T cell immunophenotype. Further elucidating T cell immunophenotypes in ITx will lead to a better understanding of immune mechanisms of allograft dysfunction, identification of potential biomarkers in ITx, and optimized selection of immunosuppressive therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjorie-Anne R Guerra
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States.
| | | | - Zhenyu Zhang
- Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA, United States
| | - Xinkai Zhou
- Medicine,Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States
| | - Emily C Whang
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States
| | - Robert S Venick
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States; Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States
| | - Elizabeth A Marcus
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States; VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, United States
| | - Suzanne V McDiarmid
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States; Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States
| | - Douglas G Farmer
- Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States
| | | | - Laura J Wozniak
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rabant M, Racapé M, Petit LM, Taupin JL, Aubert O, Bruneau J, Barbet P, Goulet O, Chardot C, Suberbielle C, Lacaille F, Canioni D, Duong Van Huyen JP. Antibody-mediated rejection in pediatric small bowel transplantation: Capillaritis is a major determinant of C4d positivity in intestinal transplant biopsies. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:2250-2260. [PMID: 29397036 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Revised: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 01/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The diagnostic criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) after small bowel transplantation (SBT) are not clearly defined, although the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) has been reported to be deleterious for graft survival. We aimed to determine the incidence and prognostic value of DSAs and C4d in pediatric SBT and to identify the histopathologic features associated with C4d positivity. We studied all intestinal biopsies (IBx) obtained in the first year posttransplantation (N = 345) in a prospective cohort of 23 children. DSAs and their capacity to fix C1q were identified by using Luminex technology. Eighteen patients (78%) had DSAs, and 9 had the capacity to fix C1q. Seventy-eight IBx (22.6%) were C4d positive. The independent determinants of C4d positivity were capillaritis grades 2 and 3 (odds ratio [OR] 4.02, P = .047 and OR 5.17, P = .003, respectively), mucosal erosion/ulceration (OR 2.8, P = .019), lamina propria inflammation grades 1 and 2/3 (OR 1.95, P = .043 and OR 3.1, P = .016, respectively), and chorion edema (OR 2.16, P = .028). Complement-fixing DSAs and repeated C4d-positive IBx were associated with poor outcome (P = .021 and P = .001, respectively). Our results support that capillaritis should be considered as a feature of ABMR in SBT and identify C1q-fixing DSAs and repeated C4d positivity as potential markers of poor outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Rabant
- Pathology Department, Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,INSERM U1151, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France.,Paris V Descartes University, Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Maud Racapé
- Paris Translational Research for Organ Transplant INSERM U 970, PARCC, HEGP, Paris, France
| | - Laetitia-Marie Petit
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Department, Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Jean Luc Taupin
- Immunology and histocompatibility laboratory, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Paris Translational Research for Organ Transplant INSERM U 970, PARCC, HEGP, Paris, France
| | - Julie Bruneau
- Pathology Department, Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Paris V Descartes University, Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Patrick Barbet
- Pathology Department, Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Paris V Descartes University, Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Goulet
- Paris V Descartes University, Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, Paris, France.,Pediatric Gastroenterology Department, Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Chardot
- Paris V Descartes University, Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, Paris, France.,Pediatric Surgery Department, Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Caroline Suberbielle
- Immunology and histocompatibility laboratory, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Florence Lacaille
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Department, Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Danielle Canioni
- Pathology Department, Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Paris V Descartes University, Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Paul Duong Van Huyen
- Pathology Department, Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Paris V Descartes University, Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, Paris, France.,Paris Translational Research for Organ Transplant INSERM U 970, PARCC, HEGP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Vandevoorde K, Ducreux S, Bosch A, Guillaud O, Hervieu V, Chambon-Augoyard C, Poinsot D, André P, Scoazec JY, Robinson P, Boillot O, Dubois V, Dumortier J. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Impact of Donor-Specific Alloantibodies After Adult Liver Transplantation. Liver Transpl 2018; 24:1091-1100. [PMID: 29665189 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Revised: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/31/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The incidence and impact of anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific alloantibodies (DSAs) developing after liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial and not extensively studied. The aim of the present study was to assess the incidence of DSAs, to identify risk factors for the development of DSAs, and to understand the impact of DSAs in a large population of adult LT recipients. This single-center retrospective study included all adult patients who underwent a first LT between 2000 and 2010 in our center. The study population mainly consisted of male patients, the mean age was 52.4 years, and the main indication was alcoholic cirrhosis (54.1%). From the 297 patients included in the cross-sectional study, 14 (4.7%) had preformed DSAs, and 59 (19.9%) presented de novo DSAs (12.2% at 1 year, 13.4% at 5 years, and 19.5% at 10 years). Multivariate analysis found that female donor sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-2.01; P = 0.01) and delay between LT and DSA screening (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.20; P = 0.03) were associated with occurrence of de novo DSAs. From the 190 patients included in the subgroup longitudinal analysis, exposure to tacrolimus (mean trough level during the periods 0-2 years and 0-3 years) was significantly lower for patients having DSAs at 5 years. Concerning histology, only acute rejection (P = 0.04) and portal fibrosis ≥2 (P = 0.02) were more frequent at 1 year for patients with DSAs. Patient survival and graft survival were not significantly different according to the presence or not of DSAs at 1 year. Among the 44 patients who had de novo or persistent preformed DSAs, the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection was made in 4 (9.1%) patients after 1, 47, 61, and 74 months following LT. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that DSAs are observed in a minority of LT adult patients, with limited overall impact on graft and patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katia Vandevoorde
- Unité de Transplantation Hépatique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Stéphanie Ducreux
- Etablissement Français du Sang, Laboratoire d'Histocompatibilité, Lyon, France
| | - Alexie Bosch
- Unité de Transplantation Hépatique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Guillaud
- Unité de Transplantation Hépatique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Valérie Hervieu
- Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | | | - Domitille Poinsot
- Unité de Transplantation Hépatique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Patrice André
- Laboratoire de Virologie, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Yves Scoazec
- Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Philip Robinson
- Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Boillot
- Unité de Transplantation Hépatique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Valérie Dubois
- Etablissement Français du Sang, Laboratoire d'Histocompatibilité, Lyon, France
| | - Jérôme Dumortier
- Unité de Transplantation Hépatique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|