Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Pediatric Patients: Characteristics of Disease in EBV-seropositive Recipients

Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Pediatric Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients: A 7-Year Single-Center Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder is a consequential complication following solid-organ transplant, particularly associated with the Epstein-Barr virus. We studied a single center's cases of pediatric posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder for a 7-year period and focused on incidence rates, anatomic sites involved, and correlation with clinical outcomes. We explored clinical features and treatment outcomes in patients with pediatric posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, with emphasis on patient survival and associated clinical ramifications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of medical records from pediatric solid-organ transplant recipients (liver or kidney) at Baskent University Ankara Hospital Organ Transplantation Center between January 1, 2017, and January 1, 2024, approved by the Institutional Review Board (KA24/63). We identified cases based on pathology-confirmed persistent lymphadenopathy or tumorous lesions. Patient categorization distinguished between malignant and benign groups. Early posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder was defined within the initial year after transplant. Epstein?Barr virus association was determined through in situ hybridization, and patient characteristics were reviewed comprehensively.

RESULTS

In 7 years, 10 pediatric patients (9 liver transplants, 1 kidney transplant) were diagnosed with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, with an incidence of 8.7% for pediatric liver transplants. Mean age at diagnosis was 46.4 months, and mean time from transplant to diagnosis was 21.2 months. The most common complaints at diagnosis included fever, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, dyspnea, and diarrhea. Treatment modalities included rituximab, immunosuppression reduction, intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, and chemotherapy (NHL Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster 90 protocols). All patients achieved remission (mean follow-up, 22.9 mo).

CONCLUSIONS

Early diagnosis of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder is important, and rituximab with immunosuppression reduction is effective to achieve complete remission, particularly in early polymorphic cases. Despite challenges, all patients achieved remission, signaling improved outcomes in pediatric posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Active monitoring of Epstein?Barr virus infection may further reduce posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder complications in pediatric solid-organ transplant; hence, early diagnosis is crucial.

The IPTA Nashville Consensus Conference on Post-Transplant lymphoproliferative disorders after solid organ transplantation in children: III - Consensus guidelines for Epstein-Barr virus load and other biomarker monitoring

The International Pediatric Transplant Association convened an expert consensus conference to assess current evidence and develop recommendations for various aspects of care relating to post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders after solid organ transplantation in children. In this report from the Viral Load and Biomarker Monitoring Working Group, we reviewed the existing literature regarding the role of Epstein-Barr viral load and other biomarkers in peripheral blood for predicting the development of PTLD, for PTLD diagnosis, and for monitoring of response to treatment. Key recommendations from the group highlighted the strong recommendation for use of the term EBV DNAemia instead of "viremia" to describe EBV DNA levels in peripheral blood as well as concerns with comparison of EBV DNAemia measurement results performed at different institutions even when tests are calibrated using the WHO international standard. The working group concluded that either whole blood or plasma could be used as matrices for EBV DNA measurement; optimal specimen type may be clinical context dependent. Whole blood testing has some advantages for surveillance to inform pre-emptive interventions while plasma testing may be preferred in the setting of clinical symptoms and treatment monitoring. However, EBV DNAemia testing alone was not recommended for PTLD diagnosis. Quantitative EBV DNAemia surveillance to identify patients at risk for PTLD and to inform pre-emptive interventions in patients who are EBV seronegative pre-transplant was recommended. In contrast, with the exception of intestinal transplant recipients or those with recent primary EBV infection prior to SOT, surveillance was not recommended in pediatric SOT recipients EBV seropositive pre-transplant. Implications of viral load kinetic parameters including peak load and viral set point on pre-emptive PTLD prevention monitoring algorithms were discussed. Use of additional markers, including measurements of EBV specific cell mediated immunity was discussed but not recommended though the importance of obtaining additional data from prospective multicenter studies was highlighted as a key research priority.

Update on Epidemiology and Outcomes of Infection in Pediatric Organ Transplant Recipients

Pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at risk for infection following transplantation. Data from adult SOT recipients are often used to guide prevention and treatment of infections associated with organ transplantation in children. This article highlights key recent pediatric SOT-specific publications for an array of infectious complications of organ transplantation. Attention is given to areas of need for future study.

The value of 18 F-FDG PET/CT quantitative indexes in the diagnosis of nondestructive posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders after pediatric liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a serious complication after pediatric liver transplantation (pLT), which may lead to death. ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT is rarely considered in PTLD after pLT and lacks clear diagnostic guidelines, especially in the differential diagnosis of nondestructive PTLD. The aim of this study was to find a quantifiable ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT index to identify nondestructive PTLD after pLT.

METHODS

This retrospective study collected the data of patients who underwent pLT, postoperative lymph node biopsy, and ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT at Tianjin First Central Hospital from January 2014 to December 2021. Quantitative indexes were established using lymph node morphology and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax).

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this retrospective study. To distinguish between PTLD-negative cases and nondestructive PTLD cases, according to the receiver operating characteristic curve, (the shortest diameter of the lymph node at the biopsy site [SDL]/the longest diameter of the lymph node at the biopsy site [LDL])*(SUVmax at the biopsy site [SUVmaxBio]/SUVmax of the tonsils [SUVmaxTon]) had the maximum area under the curve (0.923; 95% confidence interval: 0.834-1.000), and the cutoff value was 0.264 according to the maximum value of Youden's index. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 93.6%, 94.7%, 97.8%, 85.7%, and 93.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

(SDL/LDL)*(SUVmaxBio/SUVmaxTon) has good sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values, and accuracy, and can be used as a good quantitative index for the diagnosis of nondestructive PTLD.

Association of antiviral prophylaxis and rituximab use with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs): A nationwide cohort study

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a serious complication of solid organ transplantation (SOT). Most PTLD cases are associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. The role of antiviral prophylaxis or rituximab therapy for prevention of PTLD in SOT recipients is controversial. In a nationwide cohort, we assessed the incidence, presentation, and outcome of histologically proven PTLD. We included 4765 patients with a follow-up duration of 23 807 person-years (py). Fifty-seven PTLD cases were identified; 39 (68%) were EBV positive (EBV+ PTLD). Incidence rates for EBV+ PTLD at 1, 2, and 3 years posttransplant were 3.51, 2.24, and 1.75/1000 py and 0.44, 0.25, and 0.29/1000 py for EBV- PTLD. We did not find an effect of antiviral prophylaxis on early and late EBV+ PTLD occurrence (early EBV+ PTLD: SHR 0.535 [95% CI 0.199-1.436], p = .264; late EBV+ PTLD: SHR 2.213, [95% CI 0.751-6.521], p = .150). However, none of the patients (0/191) who received a rituximab-containing induction treatment experienced PTLD, but 57 of 4574 patients without rituximab induction developed PTLD. In an adjusted restricted mean survival time model, PTLD-free survival was significantly longer (0.104 years [95% CI 0.077-0.131]) in patients receiving rituximab as induction treatment. This study provides novel data on the association of rituximab induction and reduced risk for PTLD.

Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder Following Kidney Transplantation: A Review

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is one of the most feared complications following kidney transplantation. Over a 10-year period, the risk of PTLD in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is 12-fold higher than in a matched nontransplanted population. Given the number of kidney transplants performed, KTRs who experience PTLD outnumber other organ transplant recipients who experience PTLD. Epstein-Barr virus infection is one of the most important risk factors for PTLD, even though 40% of PTLD cases in contemporary series are not Epstein-Barr virus-associated. The overall level of immunosuppression seems to be the most important driver of the increased occurrence of PTLD in solid organ transplant recipients. Reduction in immunosuppression is commonly accepted to prevent and treat PTLD. Although the cornerstone of PTLD treatment had been chemotherapy (typically cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristinr-prednisone), the availability of rituximab has changed the treatment landscape in the past 2 decades. The outcome of PTLD in KTRs has clearly improved as a result of the introduction of more uniform treatment protocols, improved supportive care, and increased awareness and use of positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography in staging and response monitoring. In this review, we will focus on the most recent data on epidemiology, presentation, risk factors, and management of PTLD in KTRs.

Diarrhea in the pediatric solid organ transplantation recipient: A multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and management

Diarrhea in the pediatric solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipient is a frequent complaint that is associated with significant morbidity and impaired quality of life. There are limited published data regarding the specific epidemiology, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of diarrhea after SOT in children. Pediatric SOT recipients have an increased risk of developing diarrhea because of a generalized immunosuppressed state, epidemiologic exposures, and polypharmacy. There is a need to standardize the diagnostic evaluation of diarrhea in children after SOT to facilitate an accurate diagnosis and timely treatment. Herein, we review the available published data and propose a systematic, stepwise approach to the evaluation of diarrhea in this high-risk population, focusing on timely diagnosis of both infectious and non-infectious causes, in order to provide focused management. Prospective studies are needed to better assess the true prevalence, risk factors for, etiologies, and complications of diarrhea in pediatric SOT patients that will guide optimal management. Development of effective vaccines and antiviral therapies for enteric viruses may also contribute to improved outcomes.