Clinical perspective of acute humoral rejection after blood type-compatible liver transplantation

The role of healthcare professionals to improve organ donation and transplantation outcome: a national study

BACKGROUND

Improve the quality of donor coordination activities caused by an increased organ donation rate. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of organ donation coordinators' characteristics on rate of donation and family consent rate in Recognition Centers (RCs) and Organ Procurement Units (OPUs) in Iran by analyzing the organ procurement and transplantation data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on a questionnaire, this retrospective study evaluated the number of confirmed brain deaths, family consent rate, organ recoveries, rate of expired brain death cases before and after family consent in Iran.

RESULTS

According to results, the overall family consent rate in the entire country is equal to 60.63%. The work experience had a significant effect on the number of procured organs (P < 0.004), death rate after family consent (P < 0.04), and eligible donor death before family consent (P < 0.03). The type of unit (RCs or OPUs) had significant difference on death after family consent (P < 0.023), the death before family consent (P < 0.014), the sum of procured organ (P < 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The consent rate and donor management in the cases of brain death are unacceptable. The coordinators need training to increase their efficiency in terms of family approach and maintenance of brain death. Only by improving the level of family consent and increasing the coordinators' maintenance skills for brain death cases can the amount of organ donation in Iran be doubled to the current amount.

Acute liver failure secondary to acute antibody mediated rejection after compatible liver transplant: A case report

BACKGROUND

The liver has traditionally been regarded as resistant to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). AMR in liver transplants is a field in its infancy compared to kidney and lung transplants. In our case we present a patient with alpha-1-antitrypsin disease who underwent ABO compatible liver transplant complicated by acute liver failure (ALF) with evidence of antibody mediated rejection on allograft biopsy and elevated serum donor-specific antibodies (DSA). This case highlights the need for further investigations and heightened awareness for timely diagnosis.

CASE SUMMARY

A 56 year-old woman with alpha-1-antitrypsin disease underwent ABO compatible liver transplant from a deceased donor. The recipient MELD at the time of transplant was 28. The flow cytometric crossmatches were noted to be positive for T and B lymphocytes. The patient had an uneventful recovery postoperatively. Starting on postoperative day 5 the patient developed fevers, elevated liver function tests, distributive shock, renal failure, and hepatic encephalopathy. She went into ALF with evidence of antibody mediated rejection with portal inflammation, bile duct injury, endothelitis, and extensive centrizonal necrosis, and C4d staining on allograft biopsy and elevated DSA. Despite various interventions including plasmapheresis and immunomodulating therapy, she continued to deteriorate. She was relisted and successfully underwent liver retransplantation.

CONCLUSION

This very rare case highlights AMR as the cause of ALF following liver transplant requiring retransplantation.

Clinical Relevance of Isoagglutinin Rebound in Adult ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation

ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) can be performed successfully. However, anti-ABO isoagglutinin rebound may cause antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and graft loss. The risk threshold of isoagglutinin rebound is still not defined. 76 ABO-I LDLT recipients were divided into group A (n = 56) with low isoagglutinin titers (<1:256), and group B (n = 20) with high isoagglutinin titers (≥1:256), at initial assessment for liver transplantation. The last 12 patients in group B received a modified desensitization regimen by adding bortezomib to deplete plasma cells. Six (10.7%) patients in group A and 10 (50.0%) patients in group B had postoperative isoagglutinin rebound (p < 0.001). Three patients (5.54%) in group A and two patients (10%) in group B developed clinical AMR (p = 0.602). The cutoff value of postoperative isoagglutinin rebound to cause clinical AMR was ≥1:1024. Among the 12 patients in group B with bortezomib administration, isoagglutinin rebounded up to 1:128 only, and no clinical AMR occurred. In conclusion, the patients with high isoagglutinin titers had a higher rate of postoperative isoagglutinin rebound. Isoagglutinin rebound ≥1:1024 is risky for developing clinical AMR. Adding bortezomib into the desensitization regimen may mitigate isoagglutinin rebound, and avoid clinical AMR.

Antibody-mediated rejection of the liver allograft: An update and a clinico-pathological perspective

Antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation is an under-recognised cause of allograft injury. While definitions of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection have increased clinical awareness, timely identification and management of antibody-mediated rejection remain difficult because of complexities in diagnosis and histopathology, lack of treatment protocols, and unclear long-term outcomes. While recent cohort studies assessing the importance of donor-specific antibodies have aided in its diagnosis, literature on the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation remain limited to case reports and small series. Further increasing the awareness and timely recognition of antibody-mediated rejection post-liver transplantation is crucial in order to stimulate future research and the development of protocols for its diagnosis and treatment. This review will summarise recent advances in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation, as well as some of the histopathologic features (on liver biopsy tissue) of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients: A Case Series and Literature Review

Antibody-mediated rejection is a rare complication following liver transplantation and there is a lack of a comprehensive treatment strategy to provide detailed information about the dose and duration of antibody-mediated rejection treatment. This study describes eight adult liver transplantation recipients who developed antibody-mediated rejection between 2002 and 2021 in our center, as well as a review of the literature on the reported cases of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation recipients. Our center's medical records were reviewed retrospectively to extract the necessary data on patients' characteristics, management, and outcomes. Then, a comprehensive search using Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar databases was conducted without time limitation until June, 2021. Finally, a stepwise protocol was developed for managing acute, chronic, and recurrent antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation patients, based on our own experience, reported cases in the literature, and data from kidney transplantation. By review of the literature, 24 case studies containing 64 patients were identified and their management strategies and outcomes were evaluated. Although, various combinations of corticosteroids, plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and biological agents are used in the treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation, treatment strategies should be classified according to the type, severity, and the timing of its onset. Given the importance of early treatment, rituximab and/or bortezomib should be started as soon as possible if no improvement in liver enzymes/bilirubin is observed during the initial treatment strategy using corticosteroids, plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The efficacy of rituximab treatment for antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation: A retrospective Japanese nationwide study

AIM

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been consistently elucidated in liver transplantation (LT); however, the treatment for AMR, including rituximab, has not been indicated as a strongly recommended therapeutic protocol.

METHODS

This study was conducted as the Japanese multicenter retrospective study to accumulate data on the use of rituximab for AMR among patients undergoing LT between August 2001 and December 2016. Thirteen patients (five children and eight adults) were enrolled.

RESULTS

The types of AMR in the pediatric cases were chronic AMR in four cases and indeterminate AMR in one case. Among the pediatric cases, rituximab treatment only showed therapeutic efficacy in two patients with chronic AMR. Among the adult patients, five patients had chronic AMR, and three had acute AMR. Although two patients with chronic AMR died due to graft failure, liver function tests revealed improvement after rituximab treatment in the other patients. Two of the three patients with acute AMR died due to graft failure; rituximab treatment showed no therapeutic efficacy in these cases. Although bacterial infections occurred within 3 months after rituximab administration in three patients, rituximab treatment could be safely administered without any direct adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The indication of rituximab therapy as an additional treatment for mild acute AMR and chronic AMR may be feasible; however, a prospective randomized control study is needed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of rituximab treatment for AMR.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Late Acute Antibody-mediated Rejection in Pediatric Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

An early and accurate diagnosis of liver antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) followed by timely intervention is important for clinical management but remains challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of late acute AMR in pediatric liver transplantation recipients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 739 ABO-identical/compatible allograft liver biopsies from 199 pediatric transplantation recipients.

RESULTS

Based on Banff 2016 AMR criteria, 3 recipients fulfilled the criteria for definite for late acute AMR, 2 met the criteria for suspicious for AMR, and 2 were indeterminate for AMR. We further assessed the clinicopathologic characteristics of these 7 patients. All 7 patients had at least 1 biopsy with a histopathologic pattern compatible with acute AMR. Additionally, we observed accompanied moderately to markedly dilated portal/central veins and endothelialitis disproportionate to the degree of bile duct injury in all 7 patients; periportal/perivenular hepatocyte necrosis was seen in 6 of 7 patients; and arteritis was seen in 3 of 7 patients. In each case, microvascular C4d deposition was present in at least 1 biopsy. Posttransplant donor specific anti-HLA antibodies were detected in 5 patients. Two of 7 patients were retransplanted, and 2 died after developing refractory AMR. The remaining 5 patients were alive with stable graft function at a median follow-up of 4.1 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that acute AMR in pediatric liver grafts is rare, can develop late, and may be associated with graft loss or patient death. The recurrent histopathologic findings of moderately to markedly dilated portal/central veins and endothelialitis disproportionate to the degree of bile duct injury are features that appear unique to pediatric acute AMR of liver grafts.

De Novo Donor Specific Antibody and Long-Term Outcome After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The impact of de novo anti-HLA donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) which develop after long-term liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial and unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of de novo DSAs on the outcome in LT.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies published until Dec 31, 2019, that reported de novo DSA outcome data (≥1 year of follow-up) after liver transplant. A literature search in the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection databases was performed.

RESULTS

Of 5,325 studies identified, 15 fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The studies which reported 2016 liver transplant recipients with de novo DSAs showed an increased complication risk, i.e. graft loss and chronic rejection (OR 3.61; 95% CI 1.94-6.71, P < 0.001; I2 58.19%), and allograft rejection alone (OR 6.43; 95% CI: 3.17-13.04; P < 0.001; I2 49.77%); they were compared to patients without de novo DSAs. The association between de novo DSAs and overall outcome failure was consistent across all subgroups and sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that de novo DSAs had a significant deleterious impact on the liver transplant risk of rejection. The routine detection of de novo DSAs may be beneficial as noninvasive biomarker-guided risk stratification.

Online education about end-of-life care and the donation process after brain death and circulatory death. Can we influence perception and attitudes in critical care doctors? A prospective study

Impact of training on end-of-life care (EOLC) and the deceased donation process in critical care physicians' perceptions and attitudes was analysed. A survey on attitudes and perceptions of deceased donation as part of the EOLC process was delivered to 535 physicians working in critical care before and after completion of a online training programme (2015-17). After training, more participants agreed that nursing staff should be involved in the end-of-life decision process (P < 0.001) and that relatives should not be responsible for medical decisions (P < 0.001). Postcourse, more participants considered 'withdrawal/withholding' as similar actions (P < 0.001); deemed appropriate the use of pre-emptive sedation in all patients undergoing life support treatment adequacy (LSTA; P < 0.001); and were favourable to approaching family about donation upon LSTA agreement, as well as admitting them in the intensive care unit (P < 0.001) to allow the possibility of donation. Education increased the number of participants prone to initiate measures to preserve the organs for donation before the declaration of death in patients undergoing LSTA (P < 0.001). Training increased number of positive terms selected by participants to describe donation after brain and circulatory death. Training programmes may be useful to improve physicians' perception and attitude about including donation as part of the patient's EOLC.

Encouraging Split Liver Transplantation for Two Adult Recipients to Mitigate the High Incidence of Wait-list Mortality in The Setting of Extreme Shortage of Deceased Donors

Background: Organ demand for liver transplantation (LT) is constantly increasing. Split liver transplantation (SPLT) is an ideal option for increasing the number of available liver grafts for transplantation and ameliorating organ shortage to a certain degree. However, SPLT for two adult recipients is still not broadly applied. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of SPLT for adult recipients at a single center. All donor, recipient, and transplantation factors were thoroughly investigated to clarify factors affecting patient outcomes after LT. Results: One hundred consecutive adult SPLTs were performed during the study period. Early mortality and 1-year mortality occurred in 21 and 31 recipients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, graft weight (p = 0.036, odds ratio = 0.99, 95% confidence interval = 0.98-0.99) was the independent risk factor associated with early mortality; however, no factor was significantly related to 1-year mortality. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, a graft weight of 580 g was identified the cutoff for stratifying outcomes. Recipients transplanted with a graft weighing ≥580 g had significantly better outcome as compared with other recipients (p = 0.001). Moreover, SPLT remarkably provided a better survival benefit for recipients than those on the LT wait-list (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Given the considerable incidence of wait-list mortality, SPLT for two adult recipients should be encouraged whenever possible to increase the donor pool and benefit patients awaiting LT. Nonetheless, caution should be taken with a smaller graft weight owing to the risk of early graft loss.

"Left at right" liver transplantation with heterotopic implantation of left liver graft in the right subphrenic space: Reappraisal and technical concerns for decision making

Conventional orthotopic implantation of left liver grafts is technically demanding and requires consideration of limited space and vascular complications. The study proposed a modified approach termed "left at right" liver transplantation (LAR-LT), wherein left liver grafts were rotated and implanted in right subphrenic spaces. The selection of recipients for this approach is based on the measurement of the right subphrenic space width and left liver graft length, in which a rotated left liver graft could be comfortably placed in the right subphrenic space. A total of 36 recipients who had undergone LAR-LT between July 2006 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. None of recipients died of complications related to this approach immediately after operation. All grafts showed remarkable increment in liver volume and bi-directional regeneration to fit well within the right abdominal cavity. Meanwhile, the alignment of the biliary tree in LAR-LT is quite straight, making no difficulty in both anastomosis during operation and dealing with biliary stenosis afterward. As such, long-term outcome of LAR-LT is satisfactory. Keeping in mind certain technical concerns, a heterotopic LAR-LT might be safely applied as an alternative with an easier reconstruction procedure for select patients.

Prevalence and Impact of Reformed and De Novo Anti-HLA Donor-Specific Antibodies in Liver Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence and impact of pre-existing and de novo anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is still controversial. We investigated the prevalence of DSAs and their implication in the development of allograft dysfunction after OLT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 65 liver transplant patients were tested for anti-HLA antibodies, with single antigen bead technology, before, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation, and thereafter annually, along with other risk factors. Sixteen out of 65 patients (24.6%) had circulating pre-existing anti-HLA antibodies, and 4 of them (25%) had DSAs. All patients positive for anti-HLA antibodies (100%) presented allograft dysfunction. Fourteen out of 65 patients (21.5%) had circulating de novo DSAs, and 12 out of 14 (85.7%) presented allograft dysfunction. The investigated risk factors for allograft dysfunction were: recipient and donor age, time on the waiting list, cold ischemia time, cytomegalovirus infection, immunosuppression regimen, de novo DSAs, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), direct bilirubin and total bilirubin peak post-transplant, and alkaline phosphatase. The multivariate analysis showed that de novo DSAs and time on the waiting list were independent risk factors for allograft dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that de novo DSAs are an independent risk factor for allograft dysfunction, along with time on the waiting list.

Successful living donor liver retransplantation for graft failure within 7 days due to acute de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody-mediated rejection

Growing evidence suggests a relationship between antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and early graft failure due to a previously unknown etiology in liver transplantation (LTx). We herein report a 3-year-old boy who developed rapid graft failure due to de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA)-driven AMR a week after living donor LTx, requiring a second transplant on the 10th day after the first LTx. The pathology of the first graft showed massive necrosis in zone 3 along with positive C4d and inflammatory cell infiltrates in portal areas. The mean fluorescence intensity against human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR15, which was possessed by both the first and the second donor, peaked at 12 945 on the day before the second LTx. Antithymocyte globulin, plasma exchange along with i.v. immunoglobulin, rituximab, and the local infusion of prostaglandin E1, steroids, and Mesilate gabexate through a portal catheter were provided to save the second graft. To our knowledge, this is the first report to show a clear association between de novo DSA and acute AMR within 7 days of a LTx. Furthermore, we successfully rescued the recipient with a second graft despite possessing the same targeted HLA. The rapid decision to carry out retransplantation and specific strategies overcoming AMR were crucial to achieving success in this case of immunologically high-risk LTx.

Antibody-mediated rejection: what is the clinical relevance?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review outlines the diagnosis, clinical implications, and treatment strategies for acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

RECENT FINDINGS

A combination of clinical work-up, histopathology, C4d staining, and donor-specific antibody (DSA) should be used to diagnose AMR. The differential diagnosis for idiopathic fibrosis now includes chronic AMR. Characterization of pathogenic DSA continues to progress. De-novo and persistent DSA, particularly of the IgG3 subtype, are associated with inferior long-term outcomes.The liver allograft may confer long-term immunologic benefits to the kidney allograft after simultaneous liver-kidney transplant.The more widespread use of rituximab has improved outcomes in ABO-incompatible OLT.Although larger long-term studies of treatment options are needed, compliance with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression and transfusion minimization are agreed upon preventive strategies.

SUMMARY

AMR has evolved into an established pathology in OLT recipients. Acute AMR may lead to early graft loss whereas chronic AMR results in progressive fibrosis if unrecognized. DSAs, likely in the setting of predisposing environmental factors, appear to play a role in T cell-mediated rejection and long-term graft outcomes.

Acute antibody-mediated rejection in ABO-compatible pediatric liver transplant recipients: case series and review of the literature

Acute AMR is well reported following ABO-incompatible LTx. However, it remains uncommon in ABO-compatible LTx. It typically presents with graft dysfunction ≤2 weeks post-LTx and is often associated with graft loss. We report the clinical presentation, treatment regimen, and outcome of six pediatric LTx recipients diagnosed with early acute AMR based on (i) clinical signs of graft dysfunction, (ii) histopathology indicative of acute injury ± C4d staining, and (iii) presence of HLA DSA. All patients developed elevated ALT and GGT ≤ 45 days post-LTx. All showed HLA class I (n=4) and/or II (n=6) DSA (peak MFI 6153-11 910). Four had de novo DSA, and two had preformed DSA. Five were initially diagnosed with ACR refractory to steroid therapy. Four exhibited resolution of graft dysfunction with AMR therapy. Two had refractory AMR-one was re-transplanted; the other was treated with eculizumab and showed improvement in graft function but later died due to a tracheostomy complication. Our case series suggests that AMR following ABO-compatible LTx may be under-diagnosed. The presentation can be variable, and treatment should be individualized. Eculizumab may be an option for refractory AMR. Ultimately, future multicenter studies are needed to better define diagnostic criteria, characterize optimal treatment, and assess long-term outcomes following liver AMR.

Application of CD8+ Cells Count as a Guide of Immunosuppressive Regimen Introduction for Very Sick Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppression (IS) protocols should be individualized according to the individual recipient's immunity to minimize adverse effects. The aim of this study was to determine whether preoperative levels of CD8+ T lymphocytes could be used as a guide for the introduction of IS.

METHODS

Sixteen adult liver transplantations in our institute were retrospectively analyzed. The immunosuppressive agents were temporarily withheld for 8 patients with a lower (<10%) preoperative percentage of CD8+ cells after transplant (classified as group A). In this group, postoperative immunosuppressive agents had never been used until acute rejection was suspected. Another 8 patients receiving classic IS were classified as group B. We collected their demographic features and analyzed the clinical courses.

RESULTS

The postoperative IS-free period of group A was 5 to 120 days (median, 31 days). Our data showed an inverse correlation between CD8+ levels and the severity of liver disease. Although the IS-free protocol did not present a lower incidence of infection-related events, most of them were effectively treated with antibiotics. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall patient survival rates were not different between those with a short-term IS-free period and those with regular IS (87.5% vs 100%, 75% vs 100%, and 62.5% vs 87.5%; P = .468). No patient died of graft failure due to acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative immunosuppressive agents can be safely withheld for a period of time to preserve proper immune responses against infections in very sick recipients guided by using the CD8+ levels.

2016 Comprehensive Update of the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology: Introduction of Antibody-Mediated Rejection

The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology reviewed and discussed literature evidence regarding antibody-mediated liver allograft rejection at the 11th (Paris, France, June 5-10, 2011), 12th (Comandatuba, Brazil, August 19-23, 2013), and 13th (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, October 5-10, 2015) meetings of the Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology. Discussion continued online. The primary goal was to introduce guidelines and consensus criteria for the diagnosis of liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection and provide a comprehensive update of all Banff Schema recommendations. Included are new recommendations for complement component 4d tissue staining and interpretation, staging liver allograft fibrosis, and findings related to immunosuppression minimization. In an effort to create a single reference document, previous unchanged criteria are also included.

Clinical significance of donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies in liver transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) caused by donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA) is widely accepted to be a risk factor for decreased graft survival after kidney transplantation. This entity also plays a pathogenic role in other solid organ transplants as it appears to be an increasingly common cause of heart graft dysfunction and an emerging issue in lung transplantation. In contrast, the liver appears relatively resistant to DSA-mediated injury. This “immune-tolerance” liver property has been sustained by a low rate of liver graft loss in patients with preformed DSA and by the intrinsic liver characteristics that favor the absorption and elimination of DSA; however, alloantibody-mediated adverse consequences are increasingly being recognized, and several cases of acute AMR after ABO-compatible liver transplant (LT) have been reported. Furthermore, the availability of new solid-phase assays, allowing the detection of low titers of DSA and the refinement of objective diagnostic criteria for AMR in solid organ transplants and particularly in LT, have improved the recognition and management of this entity. A cost-effective strategy of DSA monitoring, avoidance of class II human leukocyte antigen mismatching, judicious immunosuppression attached to a higher level of clinical suspicion of AMR, particularly in cases unresponsive to conventional anti-rejection therapy, can allow a rational approach to this threat.

Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Across ABO-Incompatibility

The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of adult ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).ABO-incompatible LDLT is an aggressive treatment that crosses the blood-typing barrier for saving lives from liver diseases. Although graft and patient survival have been improved recently by various treatments, the results of adult ABO-incompatible LDLT require further evaluation.Two regimens were designed based on isoagglutinin IgG and IgM titers and the time course of immunological reactions at this institute. When isoagglutinin IgG and IgM titers were ≤64, liver transplantation was directly performed and rituximab (375 mg/m) was administrated on postoperative day 1 (regimen I). When isoagglutinin titers were >64, rituximab (375 mg/m) was administered preoperatively with or without plasmapheresis and boosted on postoperative day 1 (regimen II). Immunosuppression was achieved by administration of mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and steroids.Forty-six adult ABO-incompatible and 340 ABO-compatible LDLTs were performed from 2006 to 2013. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores for ABO-incompatible recipients ranged from 7 to 40, with a median of 14. The graft-to-recipient weight ratio ranged from 0.61% to 1.61% with a median of 0.91%. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 81.7%, 75.7%, and 71.0%, respectively, for ABO-incompatible LDLT recipients, compared to 81.0%, 75.2%, and 71.5% for ABO-C recipients (P = 0.912). The biliary complication rate was higher in ABO-incompatible LDLT recipients than in the ABO-compatible recipients (50.0% vs 29.7%, P = 0.009).In the rituximab era, the blood type barrier can be crossed to achieve adult ABO-incompatible LDLT with survival rates comparable to those of ABO-compatible LDLT, but with more biliary complications.

ABO-compatible liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) studies have lagged behind parallel efforts in kidney and heart because of a comparative inherent hepatic resistance to AMR. Three developments, however, have increased interest: first, solid phase antibody testing enabled more precise antibody characterization; second, increased expectations for long-term, morbidity-free survival; and third, immunosuppression minimization trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two overlapping liver allograft AMR phenotypic expressions are beginning to emerge: acute and chronic AMR. Acute AMR usually occurs within the several weeks after transplantation and characterized clinically by donor-specific antibodies (DSA) persistence, allograft dysfunction, thrombocytopenia, and hypocomplementemia. Acute AMR appears histopathologically similar to acute AMR in other organs: diffuse microvascular endothelial cell hypertrophy, C4d deposits, neutrophilic, eosinophilic, and macrophag-mediated microvasculitis/capillaritis, along with liver-specific ductular reaction, centrilobular hepatocyte swelling, and hepatocanalicular cholestasis often combined with T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). Chronic AMR is less well defined, but strongly linked to serum class II DSA and associated with late-onset acute TCMR, fibrosis, chronic rejection, and decreased survival. Unlike acute AMR, chronic AMR is a slowly evolving insult with a number of potential manifestations, but most commonly appears as low-grade lymphoplasmacytic portal and perivenular inflammation accompanied by unusual fibrosis patterns and variable microvascular C4d deposition; capillaritis can be more difficult to identify than in acute AMR.

SUMMARY

More precise DSA characterization, increasing expectations for long-term survival, and immunosuppression weaning precipitated a re-emergence of liver allograft AMR interest. Pathophysiological similarities exist between heart, kidney, and liver allografts, but liver-specific considerations may prove critical to our ultimate understanding of all solid organ AMR.

Clinical strategy for the reconstruction of middle hepatic vein tributaries in right liver living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Venous drainage of the right paramedian sector (segments V and VIII), which is mainly via the middle hepatic vein (MHV), remains the major concern when using a right liver graft in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We herein describe our approach to decision making in the reconstruction of MHV tributaries in LDLT using a right liver graft without the MHV trunk.

METHODS

A total of 77 consecutive right liver LDLTs were performed between January 2011 and December 2012. The MHV trunk was not taken with the graft, and all MHV tributaries were ligated during donor hepatectomy. The right liver graft was subsequently assessed on the back table for congestion in the right paramedian sector as an indicator for the need to reconstruct MHV tributaries.

RESULTS

Based on the algorithm, reconstruction of MHV tributaries was performed in 18 patients (23.4 %). Although a mild degree of congestion in the right paramedian sector was noted in a few liver grafts without venous reconstruction, this congestion was well tolerated by recipients and was not visible afterward. The recipients' outcomes were similar in groups with and without venous reconstruction, and the 1-year survival rates were 83.3 and 86.2 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A right liver graft without the MHV trunk can be successfully performed in LDLT with a satisfactory outcome. However, these experiences show that this approach might be safely applied as a strategy for determining the necessity of reconstruction of MHV tributaries in a right liver graft without the MHV trunk in LDLT.

Biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection in liver transplant recipients: A review

The gold standard for the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a liver biopsy. The quest for an alternative non-invasive biomarkers has been long and is ongoing. However, an efficient and useful biomarker has not been developed yet. In this manuscript, we review all possible candidate biomarkers that have been studied in recent years, starting with cytokines and ending with an overview of different newly discovered "omics". Promising paths are being explored but a valid non-invasive biomarker has not been discovered yet.

Bortezomib for acute antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is an uncommon, but challenging type of rejection after solid organ transplantation. We review three cases of AMR in ABO-compatible liver transplant recipients. These cases were characterized by severe acute rejection resistant to steroids and antithymocyte globulin, histologic evidence of plasma cell infiltrates, C4d positivity and high serum anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies. All three patients were treated with bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor effective in depleting plasma cells. After treatment, all patients had improved or normal liver function tests, resolution of C4d deposition and significant decline in their HLA donor-specific antibodies.

Proteasome inhibitors as immunosuppressants: biological rationale and clinical experience

Accumulating evidence supports the potential of proteasome inhibitors as immunosuppressants. Proteasome inhibitors interfere with antigen processing and presentation, as well as with the signaling cascades involved in immune cell function and survival. Both myeloma and healthy plasma cells appear to be highly susceptible to proteasome inhibitors due to impaired proteasomal activity in both cell types. As a consequence, these agents can be used to reduce antibody production and thus prevent antibody-induced tissue damage. Several clinical studies have explored the potential of bortezomib, a peptide boronate proteasome inhibitor, for treating immune disorders, such as antibody-mediated organ rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), with encouraging results. Here, we discuss the biological rationale for the use of proteasome inhibitors as immunosuppressive agents and review the clinical experience with bortezomib in immune-mediated diseases.

"Left at right" adult liver transplantation: the feasibility of heterotopic implantation of left liver graft

Left liver grafts have been widely utilized in adult liver transplantation (LT) and yielded acceptable results. However, the conventional orthotopic implantation of a left liver graft imposes the potential risk of perioperative vascular complications. We report herein an alternative modified technique for adult left liver LT and evaluate its feasibility in LT. In this study, 10 recipients had their left liver graft rotated 180°, and heterotopically implanted at the right subphrenic space, which we termed "left at right" liver transplantation (LAR-LT). The sequence of vascular and biliary reconstruction was performed as standard techniques, and no perioperative vascular complications related to LAR-LT were encountered. There were two mortalities in this series, one due to a small-for-size graft dysfunction and the other due to postoperative internal hemorrhage. Two recipients had biliary strictures that were successfully managed by percutaneous biliary dilatation and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing LAR-LT were also compared with patients undergoing conventional orthotopic left liver LT (n = 14). Although the results showed no significant difference between the two groups, according to our experience, the satisfactory outcome and easier technical reconstruction suggest that the LAR-LT modification could be a feasible alternative to left liver LT.

Bortezomib is effective to treat acute humoral rejection after liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Acute humoral rejection (AHR), a rare complication in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), responds poorly to conventional therapies. Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, has been shown to be effective in treating plasma cell-derived tumors and acute rejection episodes after renal transplantation. Herein, we have reported our clinical experience with bortezomib as a novel approach to treat AHR after OLT.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the 247 adult OLTs performed from January 2007 to April 2011. Patients with AHR who were treated with steroid pulses, rituximab (375 mg/m2), and plasmapheresis (PP) were assigned to group A. Group B subjects were prescribed steroid pulses, rituximab, PP, and bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2), after March 2009.

RESULTS

Among the 9 patients (3.6%) diagnosed with AHR, all subjects in group A (n=3) died within several days after AHR, whereas 4/6 (66.7%) group B patients were rescued and 3 (50%) survived at a mean follow-up 22.3 months (range, 18-26).

CONCLUSION

Proteasome inhibitor-based therapies provide a more effective strategy to treat AHR after OLT.