1
|
Arunkumar R, Zhou SO, Day JP, Bakare S, Pitton S, Zhang Y, Hsing CY, O’Boyle S, Pascual-Gil J, Clark B, Chandler RJ, Leitão AB, Jiggins FM. Natural selection has driven the recurrent loss of an immunity gene that protects Drosophila against a major natural parasite. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023; 120:e2211019120. [PMID: 37552757 PMCID: PMC10438844 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2211019120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Polymorphisms in immunity genes can have large effects on susceptibility to infection. To understand the origins of this variation, we have investigated the genetic basis of resistance to the parasitoid wasp Leptopilina boulardi in Drosophila melanogaster. We found that increased expression of the gene lectin-24A after infection by parasitic wasps was associated with a faster cellular immune response and greatly increased rates of killing the parasite. lectin-24A encodes a protein that is strongly up-regulated in the fat body after infection and localizes to the surface of the parasite egg. In certain susceptible lines, a deletion upstream of the lectin-24A has largely abolished expression. Other mutations predicted to abolish the function of this gene have arisen recurrently in this gene, with multiple loss-of-expression alleles and premature stop codons segregating in natural populations. The frequency of these alleles varies greatly geographically, and in some southern African populations, natural selection has driven them near to fixation. We conclude that natural selection has favored the repeated loss of an important component of the immune system, suggesting that in some populations, a pleiotropic cost to lectin-24A expression outweighs the benefits of resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramesh Arunkumar
- Department of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EH, United Kingdom
| | - Shuyu Olivia Zhou
- Department of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EH, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan P. Day
- Department of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EH, United Kingdom
| | - Sherifat Bakare
- Department of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EH, United Kingdom
- Department of Biochemical Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Surrey, 388 Stag Hill, Guildford,GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
| | - Simone Pitton
- Department of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EH, United Kingdom
- Biosciences Department, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 26, Milano, MI20133, Italy
| | - Yexin Zhang
- Department of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EH, United Kingdom
| | - Chi-Yun Hsing
- Department of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EH, United Kingdom
| | - Sinead O’Boyle
- Department of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EH, United Kingdom
- School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, DublinD04 V1W8, Ireland
| | - Juan Pascual-Gil
- Department of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EH, United Kingdom
- Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C. Francisco Tomás y Valiente 7, 28049Madrid, Spain
| | - Belinda Clark
- Department of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EH, United Kingdom
| | - Rachael J. Chandler
- Department of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EH, United Kingdom
- Department of Biochemical Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Surrey, 388 Stag Hill, Guildford,GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandre B. Leitão
- Department of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EH, United Kingdom
| | - Francis M. Jiggins
- Department of Genetics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mangan R, Bussière LF, Polanczyk RA, Tinsley MC. Increasing ecological heterogeneity can constrain biopesticide resistance evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 2023:S0169-5347(23)00016-2. [PMID: 36906434 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2023.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
Microbial biopesticides containing living parasites are valuable emerging crop protection technologies against insect pests, but they are vulnerable to resistance evolution. Fortunately, the fitness of alleles that provide resistance, including to parasites used in biopesticides, frequently depends on parasite identity and environmental conditions. This context-specificity suggests a sustainable approach to biopesticide resistance management through landscape diversification. To mitigate resistance risks, we advocate increasing the range of biopesticides available to farmers, whilst simultaneously encouraging other aspects of landscape-wide crop heterogeneity that can generate variable selection on resistance alleles. This approach requires agricultural stakeholders to prioritize diversity as well as efficiency, both within agricultural landscapes and the biocontrol marketplace.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosie Mangan
- Biological and Environmental Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.
| | - Luc F Bussière
- Biological and Environmental Sciences and Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, The University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ricardo Antônio Polanczyk
- Júlio de Mesquita Filho State University of São Paulo, Faculty of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences of Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
| | - Matthew C Tinsley
- Biological and Environmental Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Impact of Temperature on the Immune Interaction between a Parasitoid Wasp and Drosophila Host Species. INSECTS 2021; 12:insects12070647. [PMID: 34357307 PMCID: PMC8303993 DOI: 10.3390/insects12070647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 07/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Temperature is particularly important for ectotherms, including endoparasitoid wasps that develop inside another ectotherm host. In this study, we tested the impact of three temperatures (20 °C, 25 °C and 30 °C) on the host-parasitoid immune interaction using two Drosophila host species (Drosophila melanogaster and D. yakuba) and two parasitoid lines of Leptopilina boulardi. Drosophila's immune defense against parasitoids consists of the formation of a melanized capsule surrounding the parasitoid egg. To counteract this response, Leptopilina parasitoids rely on the injection of venom during oviposition. Here, we tested the effect of temperature on parasitic success and host encapsulation capacity in response to a parasitoid egg or other foreign body. Increased temperature either promoted or did not affect the parasitic success, depending on the parasitoid-host pairs considered. The mechanisms behind the higher success seemed to vary depending on whether the temperature primarily affected the host immune response or also affected the parasitoid counter-immune response. Next, we tested the effect of parasitoid rearing temperature on its success and venom composition. Venom composition varied strongly with temperature for both parasitoid lines, partially consistent with a change in their parasitic success. Overall, temperature may have a significant impact on the host-parasitoid immune interaction.
Collapse
|
4
|
Leitão AB, Arunkumar R, Day JP, Geldman EM, Morin-Poulard I, Crozatier M, Jiggins FM. Constitutive activation of cellular immunity underlies the evolution of resistance to infection in Drosophila. eLife 2020; 9:59095. [PMID: 33357377 PMCID: PMC7785293 DOI: 10.7554/elife.59095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Organisms rely on inducible and constitutive immune defences to combat infection. Constitutive immunity enables a rapid response to infection but may carry a cost for uninfected individuals, leading to the prediction that it will be favoured when infection rates are high. When we exposed populations of Drosophila melanogaster to intense parasitism by the parasitoid wasp Leptopilina boulardi, they evolved resistance by developing a more reactive cellular immune response. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, we found that immune-inducible genes had become constitutively upregulated. This was the result of resistant larvae differentiating precursors of specialized immune cells called lamellocytes that were previously only produced after infection. Therefore, populations evolved resistance by genetically hard-wiring the first steps of an induced immune response to become constitutive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre B Leitão
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ramesh Arunkumar
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan P Day
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Emma M Geldman
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ismaël Morin-Poulard
- Centre de Biologie du Développement, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Michèle Crozatier
- Centre de Biologie du Développement, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Francis M Jiggins
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wan B, Poirié M, Gatti JL. Parasitoid wasp venom vesicles (venosomes) enter Drosophila melanogaster lamellocytes through a flotillin/lipid raft-dependent endocytic pathway. Virulence 2020; 11:1512-1521. [PMID: 33135553 PMCID: PMC7605353 DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1838116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Venosomes are extracellular vesicles found in the venom of Leptopilina endoparasitoids wasps, which transport and target virulence factors to impair the parasitoid egg encapsulation by the lamellocytes of their Drosophila melanogaster host larva. Using the co-immunolocalization of fluorescent L. boulardi venosomes and one of the putative-transported virulence factors, LbGAP, with known markers of cellular endocytosis, we show that venosomes endocytosis by lamellocytes is not a process dependent on clathrin or macropinocytosis and internalization seems to bypass the early endosomal compartment Rab5. After internalization, LbGAP colocalizes strongly with flotillin-1 and the GPI-anchored protein Atilla/L1 (a lamellocyte surface marker) suggesting that entry occurs via a flotillin/lipid raft-dependent pathway. Once internalized, venosomes reach all intracellular compartments, including late and recycling endosomes, lysosomes, and the endoplasmic reticulum network. Venosomes therefore enter their target cells by a specific mechanism and the virulence factors are widely distributed in the lamellocytes' compartments to impair their functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Wan
- Université Côte d’Azur, INRAE, CNRS, ISA, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cavigliasso F, Mathé-Hubert H, Kremmer L, Rebuf C, Gatti JL, Malausa T, Colinet D, Poirié M. Rapid and Differential Evolution of the Venom Composition of a Parasitoid Wasp Depending on the Host Strain. Toxins (Basel) 2019; 11:E629. [PMID: 31671900 PMCID: PMC6891688 DOI: 10.3390/toxins11110629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 10/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Parasitoid wasps rely primarily on venom to suppress the immune response and regulate the physiology of their host. Intraspecific variability of venom protein composition has been documented in some species, but its evolutionary potential is poorly understood. We performed an experimental evolution initiated with the crosses of two lines of Leptopilinaboulardi of different venom composition to generate variability and create new combinations of venom factors. The offspring were maintained for 10 generations on two strains of Drosophila melanogaster differing in resistance/susceptibility to the parental parasitoid lines. The venom composition of individuals was characterized by a semi-automatic analysis of 1D SDS-PAGE electrophoresis protein profiles whose accuracy was checked by Western blot analysis of well-characterized venom proteins. Results made evident a rapid and differential evolution of the venom composition on both hosts and showed that the proteins beneficial on one host can be costly on the other. Overall, we demonstrated the capacity of rapid evolution of the venom composition in parasitoid wasps, important regulators of arthropod populations, suggesting a potential for adaptation to new hosts. Our approach also proved relevant in identifying, among the diversity of venom proteins, those possibly involved in parasitism success and whose role deserves to be deepened.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanny Cavigliasso
- Université Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, 06 903 Sophia Antipolis, France.
| | - Hugo Mathé-Hubert
- Université Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, 06 903 Sophia Antipolis, France.
| | - Laurent Kremmer
- Université Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, 06 903 Sophia Antipolis, France.
| | - Christian Rebuf
- Université Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, 06 903 Sophia Antipolis, France.
| | - Jean-Luc Gatti
- Université Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, 06 903 Sophia Antipolis, France.
| | - Thibaut Malausa
- Université Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, 06 903 Sophia Antipolis, France.
| | - Dominique Colinet
- Université Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, 06 903 Sophia Antipolis, France.
| | - Marylène Poirié
- Université Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, 06 903 Sophia Antipolis, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
|
8
|
Martinez AJ, Doremus MR, Kraft LJ, Kim KL, Oliver KM. Multi‐modal defences in aphids offer redundant protection and increased costs likely impeding a protective mutualism. J Anim Ecol 2017; 87:464-477. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2017] [Accepted: 03/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J. Martinez
- Department of Entomology University of Georgia Athens GA USA
- Department of Evolutionary Ecology Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Germany
| | | | - Laura J. Kraft
- Department of Entomology University of Georgia Athens GA USA
| | - Kyungsun L. Kim
- Department of Entomology University of Georgia Athens GA USA
| | - Kerry M. Oliver
- Department of Entomology University of Georgia Athens GA USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cogni R, Cao C, Day JP, Bridson C, Jiggins FM. The genetic architecture of resistance to virus infection in Drosophila. Mol Ecol 2016; 25:5228-5241. [PMID: 27460507 PMCID: PMC5082504 DOI: 10.1111/mec.13769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2015] [Revised: 07/03/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Variation in susceptibility to infection has a substantial genetic component in natural populations, and it has been argued that selection by pathogens may result in it having a simpler genetic architecture than many other quantitative traits. This is important as models of host-pathogen co-evolution typically assume resistance is controlled by a small number of genes. Using the Drosophila melanogaster multiparent advanced intercross, we investigated the genetic architecture of resistance to two naturally occurring viruses, the sigma virus and DCV (Drosophila C virus). We found extensive genetic variation in resistance to both viruses. For DCV resistance, this variation is largely caused by two major-effect loci. Sigma virus resistance involves more genes - we mapped five loci, and together these explained less than half the genetic variance. Nonetheless, several of these had a large effect on resistance. Models of co-evolution typically assume strong epistatic interactions between polymorphisms controlling resistance, but we were only able to detect one locus that altered the effect of the main effect loci we had mapped. Most of the loci we mapped were probably at an intermediate frequency in natural populations. Overall, our results are consistent with major-effect genes commonly affecting susceptibility to infectious diseases, with DCV resistance being a near-Mendelian trait.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Cogni
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK.
- Department of Ecology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-900, Brazil.
| | - Chuan Cao
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK
| | - Jonathan P Day
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK
| | - Calum Bridson
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK
| | - Francis M Jiggins
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Martinez AJ, Kim KL, Harmon JP, Oliver KM. Specificity of Multi-Modal Aphid Defenses against Two Rival Parasitoids. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0154670. [PMID: 27135743 PMCID: PMC4852904 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2015] [Accepted: 04/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Insects are often attacked by multiple natural enemies, imposing dynamic selective pressures for the development and maintenance of enemy-specific resistance. Pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) have emerged as models for the study of variation in resistance against natural enemies, including parasitoid wasps. Internal defenses against their most common parasitoid wasp, Aphidius ervi, are sourced through two known mechanisms– 1) endogenously encoded resistance or 2) infection with the heritable bacterial symbiont, Hamiltonella defensa. Levels of resistance can range from nearly 0–100% against A. ervi but varies based on aphid genotype and the strain of toxin-encoding bacteriophage (called APSE) carried by Hamiltonella. Previously, other parasitoid wasps were found to commonly attack this host, but North American introductions of A. ervi have apparently displaced all other parasitoids except Praon pequodorum, a related aphidiine braconid wasp, which is still found attacking this host in natural populations. To explain P. pequodorum’s persistence, multiple studies have compared direct competition between both wasps, but have not examined specificity of host defenses as an indirectly mediating factor. Using an array of experimental aphid lines, we first examined whether aphid defenses varied in effectiveness toward either wasp species. Expectedly, both types of aphid defenses were effective against A. ervi, but unexpectedly, were completely ineffective against P. pequodorum. Further examination showed that P. pequodorum wasps suffered no consistent fitness costs from developing in even highly ‘resistant’ aphids. Comparison of both wasps’ egg-larval development revealed that P. pequodorum’s eggs have thicker chorions and hatch two days later than A. ervi’s, likely explaining their differing abilities to overcome aphid defenses. Overall, our results indicate that aphids resistant to A. ervi may serve as reservoirs for P. pequodorum, hence contributing to its persistence in field populations. We find that specificity of host defenses and defensive symbiont infections, may have important roles in influencing enemy compositions by indirectly mediating the interactions and abundance of rival natural enemies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J. Martinez
- Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Kyungsun L. Kim
- Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Jason P. Harmon
- Department of Entomology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, United States of America
| | - Kerry M. Oliver
- Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Juneja P, Ariani CV, Ho YS, Akorli J, Palmer WJ, Pain A, Jiggins FM. Exome and transcriptome sequencing of Aedes aegypti identifies a locus that confers resistance to Brugia malayi and alters the immune response. PLoS Pathog 2015; 11:e1004765. [PMID: 25815506 PMCID: PMC4376896 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2014] [Accepted: 02/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Many mosquito species are naturally polymorphic for their abilities to transmit parasites, a feature which is of great interest for controlling vector-borne disease. Aedes aegypti, the primary vector of dengue and yellow fever and a laboratory model for studying lymphatic filariasis, is genetically variable for its capacity to harbor the filarial nematode Brugia malayi. The genome of Ae. aegypti is large and repetitive, making genome resequencing difficult and expensive. We designed exome captures to target protein-coding regions of the genome, and used association mapping in a wild Kenyan population to identify a single, dominant, sex-linked locus underlying resistance. This falls in a region of the genome where a resistance locus was previously mapped in a line established in 1936, suggesting that this polymorphism has been maintained in the wild for the at least 80 years. We then crossed resistant and susceptible mosquitoes to place both alleles of the gene into a common genetic background, and used RNA-seq to measure the effect of this locus on gene expression. We found evidence for Toll, IMD, and JAK-STAT pathway activity in response to early stages of B. malayi infection when the parasites are beginning to die in the resistant genotype. We also found that resistant mosquitoes express anti-microbial peptides at the time of parasite-killing, and that this expression is suppressed in susceptible mosquitoes. Together, we have found that a single resistance locus leads to a higher immune response in resistant mosquitoes, and we identify genes in this region that may be responsible for this trait.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Punita Juneja
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Cristina V. Ariani
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Yung Shwen Ho
- Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE) Division, King Abdullah University of Science & Technology, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Jewelna Akorli
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Parasitology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, Accra, Ghana
| | - William J. Palmer
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Arnab Pain
- Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE) Division, King Abdullah University of Science & Technology, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Francis M. Jiggins
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jalvingh KM, Chang PL, Nuzhdin SV, Wertheim B. Genomic changes under rapid evolution: selection for parasitoid resistance. Proc Biol Sci 2014; 281:20132303. [PMID: 24500162 PMCID: PMC3924063 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2013] [Accepted: 01/14/2014] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, we characterize changes in the genome during a swift evolutionary adaptation, by combining experimental selection with high-throughput sequencing. We imposed strong experimental selection on an ecologically relevant trait, parasitoid resistance in Drosophila melanogaster against Asobara tabida. Replicated selection lines rapidly evolved towards enhanced immunity. Larval survival after parasitization increased twofold after just five generations of selection. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that the fast and strong selection response in innate immunity produced multiple, highly localized genomic changes. We identified narrow genomic regions carrying a significant signature of selection, which were present across all chromosomes and covered in total less than 5% of the whole D. melanogaster genome. We identified segregating sites with highly significant changes in frequency between control and selection lines that fell within these narrow 'selected regions'. These segregating sites were associated with 42 genes that constitute possible targets of selection. A region on chromosome 2R was highly enriched in significant segregating sites and may be of major effect on parasitoid defence. The high genetic variability and small linkage blocks in our base population are likely responsible for allowing this complex trait to evolve without causing widespread erosive effects in the genome, even under such a fast and strong selective regime.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten M. Jalvingh
- Evolutionary Genetics Group, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Theoretical Biology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter L. Chang
- Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Sergey V. Nuzhdin
- Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Bregje Wertheim
- Evolutionary Genetics Group, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gene expression differences underlying genotype-by-genotype specificity in a host-parasite system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:3496-501. [PMID: 24550506 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1318628111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
In many systems, host-parasite evolutionary dynamics have led to the emergence and maintenance of diverse parasite and host genotypes within the same population. Genotypes vary in key attributes: Parasite genotypes vary in ability to infect, host genotypes vary in susceptibility, and infection outcome is frequently the result of both parties' genotypic identities. These host-parasite genotype-by-genotype (GH × GP) interactions influence evolutionary and ecological dynamics in important ways. Interactions can be produced through genetic variation; however, here, we assess the role of variable gene expression as an additional source of GH × GP interactions. The bumblebee Bombus terrestris and its trypanosome gut parasite Crithidia bombi are a model system for host-parasite matching. Full-transcriptome sequencing of the bumblebee host revealed that different parasite genotypes indeed induce fundamentally different host expression responses and host genotypes vary in their responses to the infecting parasite genotype. It appears that broadly and successfully infecting parasite genotypes lead to reduced host immune gene expression relative to unexposed bees but induce the expression of genes responsible for controlling gene expression. Contrastingly, a poorly infecting parasite genotype induced the expression of immunologically important genes, including antimicrobial peptides. A targeted expression assay confirmed the transcriptome results and also revealed strong host genotype effects. In all, the expression of a number of genes depends on the host genotype and the parasite genotype and the interaction between both host and parasite genotypes. These results suggest that alongside sequence variation in coding immunological genes, variation that controls immune gene expression can also produce patterns of host-parasite specificity.
Collapse
|
14
|
Magwire MM, Fabian DK, Schweyen H, Cao C, Longdon B, Bayer F, Jiggins FM. Genome-wide association studies reveal a simple genetic basis of resistance to naturally coevolving viruses in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet 2012; 8:e1003057. [PMID: 23166512 PMCID: PMC3499358 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2012] [Accepted: 09/14/2012] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Variation in susceptibility to infectious disease often has a substantial genetic component in animal and plant populations. We have used genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in Drosophila melanogaster to identify the genetic basis of variation in susceptibility to viral infection. We found that there is substantially more genetic variation in susceptibility to two viruses that naturally infect D. melanogaster (DCV and DMelSV) than to two viruses isolated from other insects (FHV and DAffSV). Furthermore, this increased variation is caused by a small number of common polymorphisms that have a major effect on resistance and can individually explain up to 47% of the heritability in disease susceptibility. For two of these polymorphisms, it has previously been shown that they have been driven to a high frequency by natural selection. An advantage of GWAS in Drosophila is that the results can be confirmed experimentally. We verified that a gene called pastrel--which was previously not known to have an antiviral function--is associated with DCV-resistance by knocking down its expression by RNAi. Our data suggest that selection for resistance to infectious disease can increase genetic variation by increasing the frequency of major-effect alleles, and this has resulted in a simple genetic basis to variation in virus resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Francis M. Jiggins
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kacsoh BZ, Schlenke TA. High hemocyte load is associated with increased resistance against parasitoids in Drosophila suzukii, a relative of D. melanogaster. PLoS One 2012; 7:e34721. [PMID: 22529929 PMCID: PMC3328493 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2011] [Accepted: 03/08/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Among the most common parasites of Drosophila in nature are parasitoid wasps, which lay their eggs in fly larvae and pupae. D. melanogaster larvae can mount a cellular immune response against wasp eggs, but female wasps inject venom along with their eggs to block this immune response. Genetic variation in flies for immune resistance against wasps and genetic variation in wasps for virulence against flies largely determines the outcome of any fly-wasp interaction. Interestingly, up to 90% of the variation in fly resistance against wasp parasitism has been linked to a very simple mechanism: flies with increased constitutive blood cell (hemocyte) production are more resistant. However, this relationship has not been tested for Drosophila hosts outside of the melanogaster subgroup, nor has it been tested across a diversity of parasitoid wasp species and strains. We compared hemocyte levels in two fly species from different subgroups, D. melanogaster and D. suzukii, and found that D. suzukii constitutively produces up to five times more hemocytes than D. melanogaster. Using a panel of 24 parasitoid wasp strains representing fifteen species, four families, and multiple virulence strategies, we found that D. suzukii was significantly more resistant to wasp parasitism than D. melanogaster. Thus, our data suggest that the relationship between hemocyte production and wasp resistance is general. However, at least one sympatric wasp species was a highly successful infector of D. suzukii, suggesting specialists can overcome the general resistance afforded to hosts by excessive hemocyte production. Given that D. suzukii is an emerging agricultural pest, identification of the few parasitoid wasps that successfully infect D. suzukii may have value for biocontrol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balint Z. Kacsoh
- Biology Department, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Todd A. Schlenke
- Biology Department, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
SummaryThe purpose of this study was to prepare intracellular pathogen resistance 1 (Ipr1) transgenic donor cells for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). Based on our current understanding of Ipr1, a macrophage special expression vector pSP–EGFP–Ipr1was constructed. Bovine fetal fibroblasts were transfected with pSP-EGFP-Ipr1. The green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing cells were selected and transferred into enucleated bovine oocytes. Then, the rates of oocyte cleavage and blastocyst formation of transgenic cells and non-transgenic cells were observed, respectively. The results showed that reconstructed embryos derived from transgenic cells could successfully develop into blastocysts, most of which were GFP-positive. This study may provide cloned embryos for the production of anti-tuberculosis transgenic animals.
Collapse
|
17
|
WERTHEIM BREGJE, KRAAIJEVELD ALEXR, HOPKINS MEIRIONG, WALTHER BOER MARK, GODFRAY HCHARLESJ. Functional genomics of the evolution of increased resistance to parasitism in Drosophila. Mol Ecol 2010; 20:932-49. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04911.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
18
|
Dubuffet A, Colinet D, Anselme C, Dupas S, Carton Y, Poirié M. Variation of Leptopilina boulardi success in Drosophila hosts: what is inside the black box? ADVANCES IN PARASITOLOGY 2009; 70:147-88. [PMID: 19773070 DOI: 10.1016/s0065-308x(09)70006-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Interactions between Drosophila hosts and parasitoid wasps are among the few examples in which occurrence of intraspecific variation of parasite success has been studied in natural populations. Such variations can originate from three categories of factors: environmental, host and parasitoid factors. Under controlled laboratory conditions, it is possible to focus on the two last categories, and, using specific reference lines, to analyze their respective importance. Parasitoid and host contributions to variations in parasite success have largely been studied in terms of evolutionary and mechanistic aspects in two Drosophila parasitoids, Asobara tabida and, in more details, in Leptopilina boulardi. This chapter focuses on the physiological and molecular aspects of L. boulardi interactions with two Drosophila host species, while most of the evolutionary hypotheses and models are presented in Chapter 11 of Dupas et al.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Dubuffet
- Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kraaijeveld AR, Godfray HCJ. Evolution of host resistance and parasitoid counter-resistance. ADVANCES IN PARASITOLOGY 2009; 70:257-80. [PMID: 19773074 DOI: 10.1016/s0065-308x(09)70010-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
By their nature, parasitoids will exert a selection pressure on their hosts to evolve a mechanism through which to resist parasitoid attack. In turn, such a resistance mechanism will lead to parasitoids evolving counter-resistance. In this chapter, we present an overview of the research on the (co)evolutionary interaction between Drosophila and their parasitoids, with the main focus on the cellular immune response of D. melanogaster, and the counter-resistance mechanism of one of its main parasitoids, Asobara tabida. A key aspect of this interaction is the existence of genetic variation: in the field, host resistance and parasitoid counter-resistance vary, both between and within populations. Host resistance and parasitoid counter-resistance are costly, and both these costs turn out to be density dependent. These tradeoffs can explain the existence of genetic variation. We briefly touch upon behavioral aspects of the interaction and the parasites and pathogens that the parasitoids themselves suffer from. We end this chapter by considering the data coming from gene chip experiments: early indications suggest that the genes involved in the actual immune response against parasitoids are mostly different from the genes involved in the evolution of resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex R Kraaijeveld
- University of Southampton, School of Biological Sciences, Southampton SO16 7PX, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fleury F, Gibert P, Ris N, Allemand R. Ecology and life history evolution of frugivorous Drosophila parasitoids. ADVANCES IN PARASITOLOGY 2009; 70:3-44. [PMID: 19773065 DOI: 10.1016/s0065-308x(09)70001-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Parasitoids and their hosts are linked by intimate and harmful interactions that make them well suited to analyze fundamental ecological and evolutionary processes with regard to life histories evolution of parasitic association. Drosophila aspects of what parasitoid Hymenoptera have become model organisms to study aspects that cannot be investigated with other associations. These include the genetic bases of fitness traits variations, physiology and genetics of resistance/virulence, and coevolutionary dynamics leading to local adaptation. Recent research on evolutionary ecology of Drosophila parasitoids were performed mainly on species that thrive in fermenting fruits (genera Leptopilina and Asobara). Here, we review information and add original data regarding community ecology of these parasitoids, including species distribution, pattern of abundance and diversity, host range and the nature and intensity of species interactions. Biology and the evolution of life histories in response to habitat heterogeneity and possible local adaptations leading to specialization of these wasps are reported with special emphasis on species living in southern Europe. We expose the diversity and intensity of selective constraints acting on parasitoid life history traits, which vary geographically and highlight the importance of considering both biotic and abiotic factors with their interactions to understand ecological and evolutionary dynamics of host-parasitoid associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédéric Fleury
- Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Eslin P, Prévost G, Havard S, Doury G. Immune resistance of Drosophila hosts against Asobara parasitoids: cellular aspects. ADVANCES IN PARASITOLOGY 2009; 70:189-215. [PMID: 19773071 DOI: 10.1016/s0065-308x(09)70007-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The immunity of Drosophila relies on a variety of defenses cooperating to fight parasites and pathogens. The encapsulation reaction is the main hemocytic response neutralizing large parasites like endophagous parasitoids. The diversity of the mechanisms of immunoevasion evolved by Asobara parasitoids, together with the wide spectrum of Drosophila host species they can parasitize, make them ideal models to study and unravel the physiological and cellular aspects of host immunity. This chapter summarizes what could be learnt on the cellular features of the encapsulation process in various Drosophila spp., and also on the major role played by Drosophila hosts hemocytes subpopulations, both in a quantitative and qualitative manner, regarding the issue of the immune Asobara-Drosophila interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrice Eslin
- Laboratoire de Biologie des Entomophages, EA 3900 BioPI, Université de Picardie-Jules Verne, 80039 Amiens cedex, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vorburger C, Sandrock C, Gouskov A, Castañeda LE, Ferrari J. Genotypic variation and the role of defensive endosymbionts in an all-parthenogenetic host-parasitoid interaction. Evolution 2009; 63:1439-50. [PMID: 19228189 DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00660.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Models of host-parasite coevolution predict pronounced genetic dynamics if resistance and infectivity are genotype-specific or associated with costs, and if selection is fueled by sufficient genetic variation. We addressed these assumptions in the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae, and its parasitoid Lysiphlebus fabarum. Parasitoid genotypes differed in infectivity and host clones exhibited huge variation for susceptibility. This variation occurred at two levels. Clones harboring Hamiltonella defensa, a bacterial endosymbiont known to protect pea aphids against parasitoids, enjoyed greatly reduced susceptibility, yet clones without H. defensa also exhibited significant variation. Although there was no evidence for genotype-specificity in the H. defensa-free clones' interaction with parasitoids, we found such evidence in clones containing the bacterium. This suggests that parasitoid genotypes differ in their ability to overcome H. defensa, resulting in an apparent host x parasitoid genotype interaction that may in fact be due to an underlying symbiont x parasitoid genotype interaction. Aphid susceptibility to parasitoids correlated negatively with fecundity and rate of increase, due to H. defensa-bearing clones being more fecund on average. Hence, possessing symbionts may also be favorable in the absence of parasitoids, which raises the question why H. defensa does not go to fixation and highlights the need to develop new models to understand the dynamics of endosymbiont-mediated coevolution.
Collapse
|
23
|
Bangham J, Knott SA, Kim KW, Young RS, Jiggins FM. Genetic variation affecting host-parasite interactions: major-effect quantitative trait loci affect the transmission of sigma virus in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Ecol 2008; 17:3800-7. [PMID: 18665899 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03873.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
In natural populations, genetic variation affects resistance to disease. Whether that genetic variation comprises lots of small-effect polymorphisms or a small number of large-effect polymorphisms has implications for adaptation, selection and how genetic variation is maintained in populations. Furthermore, how much genetic variation there is, and the genes that underlie this variation, affects models of co-evolution between parasites and their hosts. We are studying the genetic variation that affects the resistance of Drosophila melanogaster to its natural pathogen--the vertically transmitted sigma virus. We have carried out three separate quantitative trait locus mapping analyses to map gene variants on the second chromosome that cause variation in the rate at which males transmit the infection to their offspring. All three crosses identified a locus in a similar chromosomal location that causes a large drop in the rate at which the virus is transmitted. We also found evidence for an additional smaller-effect quantitative trait locus elsewhere on the chromosome. Our data, together with previous experiments on the sigma virus and parasitoid wasps, indicate that the resistance of D. melanogaster to co-evolved pathogens is controlled by a limited number of major-effect polymorphisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Bangham
- School of Biological Sciences, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, The University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, The King's Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tripet F, Aboagye-Antwi F, Hurd H. Ecological immunology of mosquito-malaria interactions. Trends Parasitol 2008; 24:219-27. [PMID: 18424235 PMCID: PMC2474669 DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2008.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2007] [Revised: 02/02/2008] [Accepted: 02/05/2008] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
More than a century after the discovery of the complex life cycle of its causative agent, malaria remains a major health problem. Understanding mosquito–malaria interactions could lead to breakthroughs in malaria control. Novel strategies, such as the design of transgenic mosquitoes refractory to Plasmodium, or design of human vaccines emulating mosquito resistance to the parasite, require extensive knowledge of processes involved in immune responses and of microevolutionary mechanisms that create and maintain variation in immune responses in wild vector populations. The recent realization of how intimately and specifically mosquitoes and Plasmodium co-evolve in Nature is driving vector molecular biologists and evolutionary ecologists to move closer to the natural setting under the common umbrella of ‘Ecological immunology’.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédéric Tripet
- Centre for Applied Entomology and Parasitology, Huxley Building, Keele University, Newcastle, Staffordshire, UK ST5 5BG.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Human 14-3-3 gamma protein results in abnormal cell proliferation in the developing eye of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Div 2008; 3:2. [PMID: 18194556 PMCID: PMC2246125 DOI: 10.1186/1747-1028-3-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2007] [Accepted: 01/14/2008] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background 14-3-3 proteins are a family of adaptor proteins that participate in a wide variety of cellular processes. Recent evidence indicates that the expression levels of these proteins are elevated in some human tumors providing circumstantial evidence for their involvement in human cancers. However, the mechanism through which these proteins act in tumorigenesis is uncertain. Results To determine whether elevated levels of 14-3-3 proteins may perturb cell growth we overexpressed human 14-3-3 gamma (h14-3-3 gamma) in Drosophila larvae using the heat shock promoter or the GMR-Gal4 driver and then examined the effect that this had on cell proliferation in the eye imaginal discs of third instar larvae. We found that induction of h14-3-3 gamma resulted in the abnormal appearance of replicating cells in the differentiating proneural photoreceptor cells of eye imaginal discs where h14-3-3 gamma was driven by the heat shock promoter. Similarly, we found that driving h14-3-3 gamma expression specifically in developing eye discs with the GMR-Gal4 driver resulted in increased numbers of replicative cells following the morphogenetic furrow. Interestingly, we found that the effects of overexpressing h1433 gamma on eye development were increased in a genetic background where String (cdc25) function was compromised. Conclusion Taken together our results indicate that h14-3-3 gamma can promote abnormal cell proliferation and may act through Cdc25. This has important implications for 14-3-3 gamma as an oncogene as it suggests that elevated levels of 14-3-3 may confer a growth advantage to cells that overexpress it.
Collapse
|
26
|
Schlenke TA, Morales J, Govind S, Clark AG. Contrasting infection strategies in generalist and specialist wasp parasitoids of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Pathog 2008; 3:1486-501. [PMID: 17967061 PMCID: PMC2042021 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2006] [Accepted: 09/14/2007] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Although host–parasitoid interactions are becoming well characterized at the organismal and cellular levels, much remains to be understood of the molecular bases for the host immune response and the parasitoids' ability to defeat this immune response. Leptopilina boulardi and L. heterotoma, two closely related, highly infectious natural parasitoids of Drosophila melanogaster, appear to use very different infection strategies at the cellular level. Here, we further characterize cellular level differences in the infection characteristics of these two wasp species using newly derived, virulent inbred strains, and then use whole genome microarrays to compare the transcriptional response of Drosophila to each. While flies attacked by the melanogaster group specialist L. boulardi (strain Lb17) up-regulate numerous genes encoding proteolytic enzymes, components of the Toll and JAK/STAT pathways, and the melanization cascade as part of a combined cellular and humoral innate immune response, flies attacked by the generalist L. heterotoma (strain Lh14) do not appear to initiate an immune transcriptional response at the time points post-infection we assayed, perhaps due to the rapid venom-mediated lysis of host hemocytes (blood cells). Thus, the specialist parasitoid appears to invoke a full-blown immune response in the host, but suppresses and/or evades downstream components of this response. Given that activation of the host immune response likely depletes the energetic resources of the host, the specialist's infection strategy seems relatively disadvantageous. However, we uncover the mechanism for one potentially important fitness tradeoff of the generalist's highly immune suppressive infection strategy. The fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster has become a model system for the study of innate immunity, and parasitic wasps are one of the most obvious natural pathogens of Drosophila, making this a great system for studying interactions between the host immune system and pathogen virulence proteins. We have focused on two closely related wasp species, Leptopilina boulardi and L. heterotoma, that successfully parasitize D. melanogaster hosts in nature. Both wasps inject venom loaded with virus-like particles into their hosts to prevent host-mediated melanotic encapsulation and killing of their eggs. However, there are substantial differences in the effects of the venom from these two wasp species. L. heterotoma venom causes lysis of host hemocytes (blood cells) and prevents the host from mounting any substantial immune transcriptional response, while L. boulardi venom has a relatively weak and localized effect on host hemocyte survival and does not prevent immune response activation. Thus, these wasps allow us to compare the benefits and drawbacks of relatively immune suppressive versus relatively immune evasive parasite infection strategies in a natural system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd A Schlenke
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kohler LJ, Carton Y, Mastore M, Nappi AJ. Parasite suppression of the oxidations of eumelanin precursors in Drosophila melanogaster. ARCHIVES OF INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY 2007; 66:64-75. [PMID: 17879234 DOI: 10.1002/arch.20199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
In insects, eukaryotic endoparasites encounter a series of innate immune effector responses mediated in large part by circulating blood cells (hemocytes) that rapidly form multilayer capsules around foreign organisms. Critical components of the encapsulation response are chemical and enzyme-catalyzed oxidations involving phenolic and catecholic substrates that lead to synthesis of eumelanin. These responses are initiated immediately upon infection and are very site-specific, provoking no undesirable systemic responses in the host. In this study, we were interested to learn if the principal oxidation pathways leading to the synthesis of eumelanin in larvae of Drosophila melanogaster were targets for inhibition by immune suppressive factors (ISF) derived from a virulent strain of the endoparasitic wasp Leptopilina boulardi. Comparative in vitro assays monitored by sensitive electrochemical detection methods showed that ISF derived from female reproductive tissues significantly diminished the oxidations of the two diphenol eumelanin precursors, dopamine and 5,6-dihydroxyindole (DHI). The oxidations of the monophenol tyrosine, and two other related diphenols, dopa and 5,6-dihydroxyindole-2-carboxylic acid (DHICA), were not significantly inhibited by ISF. The data suggest that melanogenesis represents at least one of the host responses suppressed by L. boulardi ISF, and that the oxidation pathways selectively targeted for inhibition are those synthesizing decarboxylated pigment precursors derived from DHI. These observations, together with previous reports of adverse effects of ISF on the ability of hemocytes to adhere to foreign surfaces, suggest a multifaceted approach by the parasitoid to circumvent the innate immune response of D. melanogaster.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara J Kohler
- Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Dubuffet A, Dupas S, Frey F, Drezen JM, Poirié M, Carton Y. Genetic interactions between the parasitoid wasp Leptopilina boulardi and its Drosophila hosts. Heredity (Edinb) 2006; 98:21-7. [PMID: 17035953 DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Coevolutionary arms races between hosts and parasites would not occur without genetic variation for traits involved in the outcome of parasitism. Genetic variations in resistance and virulence have only rarely been described in pairwise host-parasitoid interactions and have never been analysed in multi-species interactions, in contrast to well-characterized plant-pathogen interactions. This paper reports genetic variation in resistance of Drosophila yakuba to the parasitoid wasp Leptopilina boulardi. The genetic basis and geographic distribution of resistance is analysed. On the basis of these and previous findings, we demonstrate that there are different resistance patterns to the parasitoid species L. boulardi in D. melanogaster and D. yakuba, as well as different specificity levels in the parasitoid species, suggesting complex ecological interactions in the field. This first description of resistance-virulence genetic interactions between a parasitoid and its two host species provides empirical data showing that multi-species interactions may greatly influence coevolutionary processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Dubuffet
- IRBI, Université François-Rabelais, Parc Grandmont, Tours, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wertheim B, Kraaijeveld AR, Schuster E, Blanc E, Hopkins M, Pletcher SD, Strand MR, Partridge L, Godfray HCJ. Genome-wide gene expression in response to parasitoid attack in Drosophila. Genome Biol 2005; 6:R94. [PMID: 16277749 PMCID: PMC1297650 DOI: 10.1186/gb-2005-6-11-r94] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2005] [Revised: 09/20/2005] [Accepted: 09/30/2005] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parasitoids are insect parasites whose larvae develop in the bodies of other insects. The main immune defense against parasitoids is encapsulation of the foreign body by blood cells, which subsequently often melanize. The capsule sequesters and kills the parasite. The molecular processes involved are still poorly understood, especially compared with insect humoral immunity. RESULTS We explored the transcriptional response to parasitoid attack in Drosophila larvae at nine time points following parasitism, hybridizing five biologic replicates per time point to whole-genome microarrays for both parasitized and control larvae. We found significantly different expression profiles for 159 probe sets (representing genes), and we classified them into 16 clusters based on patterns of co-expression. A series of functional annotations were nonrandomly associated with different clusters, including several involving immunity and related functions. We also identified nonrandom associations of transcription factor binding sites for three main regulators of innate immune responses (GATA/srp-like, NF-kappaB/Rel-like and Stat), as well as a novel putative binding site for an unknown transcription factor. The appearance or absence of candidate genes previously associated with insect immunity in our differentially expressed gene set was surveyed. CONCLUSION Most genes that exhibited altered expression following parasitoid attack differed from those induced during antimicrobial immune responses, and had not previously been associated with defense. Applying bioinformatic techniques contributed toward a description of the encapsulation response as an integrated system, identifying putative regulators of co-expressed and functionally related genes. Genome-wide studies such as ours are a powerful first approach to investigating novel genes involved in invertebrate immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bregje Wertheim
- Centre for Evolutionary Genomics, Department of Biology, University College London, Darwin Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
- NERC Centre for Population Biology, Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK
| | - Alex R Kraaijeveld
- NERC Centre for Population Biology, Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK
| | - Eugene Schuster
- European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK
| | - Eric Blanc
- European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK
| | - Meirion Hopkins
- NERC Centre for Population Biology, Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK
| | - Scott D Pletcher
- Centre for Evolutionary Genomics, Department of Biology, University College London, Darwin Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
- Huffington Center on Aging and Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael R Strand
- Department of Entomology, 420 Biological Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2603, USA
| | - Linda Partridge
- Centre for Evolutionary Genomics, Department of Biology, University College London, Darwin Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - H Charles J Godfray
- NERC Centre for Population Biology, Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nappi AJ, Frey F, Carton Y. Drosophila serpin 27A is a likely target for immune suppression of the blood cell-mediated melanotic encapsulation response. JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY 2005; 51:197-205. [PMID: 15749104 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2004.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2004] [Revised: 10/06/2004] [Accepted: 10/07/2004] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Avirulent strains of the endoparasitoid Leptopilina boulardi succumb to a blood cell-mediated melanotic encapsulation response in host larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Virulent wasp strains effectively abrogate the cellular response with substances introduced into the host that specifically target and effectively suppress one or more immune signaling pathways, including elements that control phenoloxidase-mediated melanotic encapsulation. The present study implicates involvement of the Drosophila Toll pathway in cellular innate immunity by regulating the serine protease inhibitor Serpin 27A (Spn27A), which normally functions as a negative regulator of phenoloxidase. The introduction of Spn27A into normally highly immune competent D. melanogaster larvae significantly reduced their ability to form melanotic capsules around eggs of L. boulardi. This study confirms the role of Spn27A in the melanization cascade and establishes that this pathway and associated blood cell responses can be activated by parasitization. The activation of phenoloxidase and the site-specific localization of the ensuing melanotic response are such critical components of the blood cell response that Spn27A and the signaling elements mediating its activity are likely to represent prime targets for immune suppression by L. boulardi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Nappi
- Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1556 Linden Drive, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Evolutionary ecology seeks to understand the selective reasons for the design features of the immune defense, especially with respect to parasitism. The molecular processes thereby set limitations, such as the failure to recognize an antigen, response specificity, the cost of defense, and the risk of autoimmunity. Sex, resource availability, and interference by parasites also affect a response. In turn, the defense repertoire consists of different kinds of immune responses--constitutive or induced, general or specific--and involves memory and lasting protection. Because the situation often defies intuition, mathematical analysis is typically required to identify the costs and benefits of variation in design, but such studies are few. In all, insect immune defense is much more similar to that of vertebrates than previously thought. In addition, the field is now rapidly becoming revolutionized by molecular data and methods that allow unprecedented access to study evolution in action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Schmid-Hempel
- Ecology and Evolution, ETH Zürich, ETH-Zentrum NW, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Carton Y, Nappi AJ, Poirie M. Genetics of anti-parasite resistance in invertebrates. DEVELOPMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE IMMUNOLOGY 2005; 29:9-32. [PMID: 15325520 DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2004.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2004] [Revised: 04/21/2004] [Accepted: 05/12/2004] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
This review summarizes and compares available data on genetic and molecular aspects of resistance in four well-described invertebrate host-parasite systems: snail-schistosome, mosquito-malaria, mosquito-filarial worm, and Drosophila-wasp associations. It underlies that the major components of the immune reaction, such as hemocyte proliferation and/or activation, and production of cytotoxic radicals are common to invertebrate hosts. Identifying genes responsible for naturally occurring resistance will then be helpful to understand the mechanisms of invertebrate immune defenses and to determine how virulence factors are used by parasites to overcome host resistance. Based on these four well-studied models, invertebrate resistance appears as generally determined by one major locus or a few loci, displaying at least partial dominance. Interestingly, specificity of resistance is highly variable and would involve processes other than simple recognition mechanisms. Finally, resistance was shown to be generally costly but is nevertheless observed at high frequencies in many natural populations, suggesting a high potential for host parasite coevolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Carton
- Laboratoire Populations, Génétique et Evolution, CNRS, 91198 Gif, Yvette, France.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nappi AJ, Vass E, Malagoli D, Carton Y. The effects of parasite-derived immune-suppressive factors on the cellular innate immune and autoimmune responses of Drosophila melanogaster. J Parasitol 2004; 90:1139-49. [PMID: 15562616 DOI: 10.1645/ge-266r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune-suppressive factors (ISFs) introduced into larvae of Drosophila melanogaster during infection by virulent endoparasitic wasps effectively block the innate immune response mediated by blood cells (hemocytes) but have little influence on the autoimmune response made by a tumor strain in which the blood cells manifest a similar response but instead target and destroy endogenous tissues. Quantitative hemocyte analyses indicate that ISFs interfere with the immune effector responses downstream of nonself recognition, hemocyte activation and differentiation, because these responses were manifested by tumor hosts, in which the parasitoids developed. The data suggest that once activated to encapsulate aberrant tissues, the target specificity of the autoimmune-activated hemocytes, and the genetic program underlying tumor formation, cannot be blocked by parasitoid-derived ISFs, which effectively inhibit identical hemocyte-mediated responses during parasitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Nappi
- Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zheng L, Wang S, Romans P, Zhao H, Luna C, Benedict MQ. Quantitative trait loci in Anopheles gambiae controlling the encapsulation response against Plasmodium cynomolgi Ceylon. BMC Genet 2003; 4:16. [PMID: 14577840 PMCID: PMC280672 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-4-16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2003] [Accepted: 10/24/2003] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anopheles gambiae females are the world's most successful vectors of human malaria. However, a fraction of these mosquitoes is refractory to Plasmodium development. L3-5, a laboratory selected refractory strain, encapsulates transforming ookinetes/early oocysts of a wide variety of Plasmodium species. Previous studies on these mosquitoes showed that one major (Pen1) and two minor (Pen2, Pen3) autosomal dominant quantitative trait loci (QTLs) control the melanotic encapsulation response against P. cynomolgi B, a simian malaria originating in Malaysia. Results We have investigated the response of L3-5 to infection with P. cynomolgi Ceylon, a different but related parasite species, in crosses with the susceptible strain 4Arr. Refractoriness to this parasite is incompletely recessive. Infection and genotyping of F2 intercross females at genome-spanning microsatellite loci revealed that 3 autosomal QTLs control encapsulation of this species. Two loci map to the regions containing Pen2 and Pen3. The novel QTL maps to chromosome 3R, probably to polytene division 32 or 33. Thus the relative contribution of any QTL to oocyst encapsulation varies with the species of parasite. Further, different QTLs were most readily identified in different F2 families. This, like the F1 data, suggests that L3-5 is not genetically homogeneous and that somewhat different pathways may be used to achieve an encapsulation response. Conclusion We have shown here that different QTLs are involved in responses against different Plasmodium parasites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liangbiao Zheng
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Shuang Wang
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Patricia Romans
- Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3G5
| | - Hongyu Zhao
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Coralia Luna
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Mark Q Benedict
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop F22, Chamblee, GA 30334, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Ecological immunology is a rapidly expanding field that examines the causes and consequences of variation in immune function in the context of evolution and of ecology. Millions of invertebrate species rely solely on innate immunity, compared with only 45,000 vertebrate species that rely additionally on an acquired immune system. Despite this difference in diversity, most studies of ecological immunology focus on vertebrates. Here we review recent progress derived largely from the mechanistic analysis of invertebrate innate immunity. Using this empirical base, we pose general questions in areas that are of central importance for the development of ecological immunology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Rolff
- Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN, Sheffield, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dupas S, Carton Y, Poiriè M. Genetic dimension of the coevolution of virulence-resistance in Drosophila -- parasitoid wasp relationships. Heredity (Edinb) 2003; 90:84-9. [PMID: 12522430 DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Variations observed in parasite virulence and host resistance may be the outcome of coevolutionary processes. Recent theoretical developments have led to a 'geographic mosaic theory' of coevolution according to which there are some localities where reciprocal selection occurs (hot spots) and others where it is strongly reduced (cold spots). Studies of host-parasitoid systems back this up, revealing a geographical variation of traits subjected to antagonistic selection governed by variations in the strength of the ecological interactions. A more detailed analysis of the genetic basis of these geographic variations in a model system -- the interaction between Drosophila melanogaster and its specific parasitoid Leptopilina boulardi -- suggests that cold spots and hot spots are also driven by the amount of genetic variation available for the trait considered. Our approach, based on isolating reference strains, has been found to predict the result of sympatric interactions and it will be helpful in identifying the selective forces responsible for the coevolution. In this model, host resistance to a standardised reference strain is a weak predictor of the outcome of interactions in the field, and the main parameter accounting for the geographic variations is the number of host species available, with less parasitoid virulence towards D. melanogaster being found in areas displaying a more diversified host community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Dupas
- Laboratoire Populations, Génétique et Evolution, CNRS 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Li S, Falabella P, Giannantonio S, Fanti P, Battaglia D, Digilio MC, Völkl W, Sloggett JJ, Weisser W, Pennacchio F. Pea aphid clonal resistance to the endophagous parasitoid Aphidius ervi. JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY 2002; 48:971-980. [PMID: 12770044 DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1910(02)00176-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The physiological mechanism of resistance to the endophagous braconid Aphidius ervi Haliday (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) by a pink clone (PC) of Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Homoptera, Aphididae) has been investigated. Comparative data on parasitoid development and associated host biochemical changes in the resistant PC aphids and in a susceptible green clone (GC) of A. pisum are reported. When the PC aphids were attacked as early 4th instars, the developing parasitoid larvae showed a strongly reduced increase in size, compared to those synchronously developing in GC aphids, and were unable to produce a regular mummy. In contrast, parasitism of 2nd instar PC aphids, allowed completion of parasitoid development, but adults had a prolonged developmental time, due to a longer duration of parasitoid's final (3rd) instar. In all cases, teratocytes, cells deriving from the A. ervi serosal membrane, and the proteins abundantly synthesised by them, were never found in the haemolymph of parasitised PC aphids. Host castration, as demonstrated by total protein incorporation into reproductive tissues, was total in the majority of early (2nd instar) parasitised host aphids, while it was limited when later instars (4th) of PC aphids were parasitised. This is partly due to the absence of the cytolytic activity of teratocytes on host embryos, which, through their persistence, may compete for nutritional resources with the developing parasitoid larvae. In parasitised PC aphids, this competitive effect is further aggravated for the parasitoid by the absence of the regulated amino acid titre increase in the host haemolymph, which is regularly observed in GC aphids. Failure of teratocyte development in the PC clone of the pea aphid is, then, the major functional constraint accounting for the reduction/inhibition of A. ervi larval growth. The reported results allow to assess in vivo the role of teratocytes in the host physiological redirection and nutritional exploitation by the parasitoid, and to integrate and validate the proposed physiological model of host-parasitoid interactions in the system A. pisum-A.ervi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Li
- Dipartimento di Biologia, Difesa e Biotecnologie Agro-Forestali-Università della Basilicata, Macchia Romana - 85100, Potenza, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
|
39
|
Green DM, Kraaijeveld AR, Godfray HC. Evolutionary interactions between Drosophila melanogaster and its parasitoid Asobara tabida. Heredity (Edinb) 2000; 85 Pt 5:450-8. [PMID: 11122423 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00788.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Drosophila melanogaster is attacked by parasitoids that develop internally in the larva. They can defend themselves by a cellular immune response (host resistance), although this can be disabled by parasitoid countermeasures (parasitoid virulence). D. melanogaster and its parasitoids are an excellent system in which to study coevolution experimentally. We designed an experiment to compare changes in resistance and virulence in replicate populations of flies and parasitoids maintained together for approximately 10 fly (five parasitoid) generations. The experiment had three treatments each with three replicates: (A) no parasitoids (B) outbred parasitoids (C) partially inbred parasitoids. Host resistance increased in treatments B and C but there was no difference between these treatments. Parasitoid virulence appeared not to change during the experiment. Host larvae in treatments B and C fed at lower rates than those in A, evidence of a trade-off between resistance and larval competitive ability. We found no evidence for local adaptation, as hosts from the different replicates of treatment C performed no differently against parasitoids from the same and other replicates. Also, we found no evidence for the evolution of behavioural traits in the host that could lead to lower probabilities of being attacked. Comparing the evolution of host resistance in these seminatural settings with that in artificial selection experiments provides insight into how the conflicting selection pressures on host resistance interact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M Green
- NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|