Mucosal immunisation with Clostridium botulinum type C 16 S toxoid and its non-toxic component

Disruption of the epithelial barrier by botulinum haemagglutinin (HA) proteins – differences in cell tropism and the mechanism of action between HA proteins of types A or B, and HA proteins of type C

Orally ingested botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) causes food-borne botulism, but BoNT must pass through the gut lining and enter the bloodstream. We have previously found that type B haemagglutinin (HA) proteins in the toxin complex play an important role in the intestinal absorption of BoNT by disrupting the paracellular barrier of the intestinal epithelium, and therefore facilitating the transepithelial delivery of BoNT. Here, we show that type A HA proteins in the toxin complex have a similar disruptive activity and a greater potency than type B HA proteins in the human intestinal epithelial cell lines Caco-2 and T84 and in the canine kidney epithelial cell line MDCK I. In contrast, type C HA proteins in the toxin complex (up to 300 nM) have no detectable effect on the paracellular barrier in these human cell lines, but do show a barrier-disrupting activity and potent cytotoxicity in MDCK I. These findings may indicate that type A and B HA proteins contribute to the development of food-borne botulism, at least in humans, by facilitating the intestinal transepithelial delivery of BoNTs, and that the relative inability of type C HA proteins to disrupt the paracellular barrier of the human intestinal epithelium is one of the reasons for the relative absence of food-borne human botulism caused by type C BoNT.

Receptor-mediated transcytosis of botulinum neurotoxin A through intestinal cell monolayers

Botulism is mainly acquired by the oral route, and botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) escapes the gastrointestinal tract by crossing the digestive epithelial barrier prior to gaining access to the nerve endings. Here, we show that biologically active BoNT/A crosses intestinal cell monolayers via a receptor-mediated transcytosis, including a transport inhibition at 4 degrees C and a passage at 37 degrees C in a saturable manner within 30-60 min. BoNT/A passage rate was about 10-fold more efficient through the intestinal crypt cell line m-IC(cl2), than through the carcinoma Caco-2 or T84 cells, and was not increased when BoNT/A was associated with the non-toxic proteins (botulinum complex). Like for neuronal cells, BoNT/A binding to intestinal cells was mediated by the half C-terminal domain as tested by fluorescence-activated cytometry and by transcytosis competition assay. A 'double receptor model' has been proposed in which BoNT/A interacts with gangliosides of GD(1b) and GT(1b) series as well as SV2 protein. Gangliosides of GD(1b) and GT(1b) series and recombinant intravesicular SV2-C domain partially impaired BoNT/A transcytosis, suggesting a putative role of gangliosides and SV2 or a related protein in BoNT/A transcytosis through Caco-2 and m-IC(cl2) cells.

Mucosal vaccine development for botulinum intoxication

Botulism has classically been considered to be a food- and water-borne disease. However, it was recently classified by the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (National Institute of Health) and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as a Category A agent. Thus, the botulinum exotoxin, a neurotoxin, could be easily disseminated by bioterrorists through the air-borne route with a high morbidity and mortality rate. In this regard, a high priority should be given to the development of a safe and effective mucosal vaccine to protect against botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) since it is well known that the mucosal immune system is the first line of defense against major pathogens. Further, mucosal immunization has been shown to induce both mucosal and systemic immunity to pathogens. By contrast, the current injection-type vaccine only provides protective immunity in the systemic compartment. Clearly, the development of a safe and effective mucosal vaccine against this toxin should be a high priority. In this regard, it has been shown that both nasal and oral immunization approaches have been taken in order to protect from BoNT intoxication. In this article, we will discuss the importance of the development of a mucosal vaccine against botulinum and introduce current aspects of BoNT mucosal vaccines, which show that they effectively prevent mucosal BoNT intoxication.

Quantitative analysis of levels of serum immunoglobulin G against botulinum neurotoxin type D and association with protection in natural outbreaks of cattle botulism

The recent outbreaks of cattle botulism in vaccinated Israeli dairy cattle prompted us to determine vaccine efficacy and reasons for vaccine failure. Analysis of clinical signs, feeding practice, vaccination history, and epidemic curves enabled us to define a study population in two outbreaks, where high doses of Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin type D (BoNT/D) were evenly consumed by the affected animal groups. Attack rates among unvaccinated 6- to 24-month-old heifers were 96% (55/57) and 85% (53/62). The attack rates in vaccinated parity 1, 2, and >or=3 cows were 40.4% (21/52), 14.3% (4/28), and 5.6% (3/54), respectively. Vaccine efficacies for these cow groups were 52.5%, 83.2%, and 93.4%, respectively. In younger, unvaccinated 2- to 6-month-old calves, presumably protected by maternal antibodies, the attack rate was 24% (17/71). These differences correlated with significant differences in levels of specific anti-BoNT/D antibody in serum by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The ELISA performance for predicting protection was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic analysis and was found to be highly significant, with an area under the curve of 0.941 (standard error, 0.034; 95% confidence interval, 0.875 to 1.008; P < 0.000). No animals with serum ELISA unit levels above 0.33 were affected in these exposed groups. At this cutoff level, the specificity of the ELISA was 100%, sensitivity was 67%, and accuracy was 92%. We concluded that botulinum toxoids can confer adequate protection against natural exposure to lethal doses of BoNT/D; however, the vaccination protocols should be optimized. Our in-house ELISA system will enable us to optimize vaccination protocols in the animal population.

Production of vaccines against leading biowarfare toxins can utilize DNA scientific technology

There are a significant number of different natural toxins that are potential biological warfare agents against which a vaccine is needed. DNA science has been a key to the development of potential vaccines against the top threat toxin and should contribute such effects for other toxin's vaccines. Several different DNA technological scientific techniques have been used to accomplish the general goals of (1) cloning of the toxin or large toxin fragments, (2) altering the specific gene sequence to obtain high level expression of vaccine candidate production in alternate species (3) placement of the vaccine gene in very different presentation types of species.

Vaccines for the prevention of diseases caused by potential bioweapons

The development of vaccines and implementation of vaccination programs are among the most important medical contributions to humanity. To date, vaccination has reduced morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases more than any other specific medical intervention. The intentional use of bioweapons against civilians (bioterrorism), recently highlighted by events around the world, has fueled interest in the development of vaccines for potential microbial agents of bioterror. This review discusses the microbial agents that are considered to pose the greatest risk to the public, the diseases associated with them, and the vaccines that are available for their prevention. The paucity of such vaccines and uncertainty regarding mechanisms of vaccine efficacy and the microbial antigens that elicit protection underscore the need for continued study of host-microbe interaction and the immune response to potential agents of bioterror for the development of new vaccines and immune-based therapies to combat their potential to harm the public.